Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
All,
Is (b) asking for a change to PF225 or an addition to the PF225 project utilizing OJS type forces? I
(6) it the way (b) at first and then reading farther down I think it is more about military
read
construction. Would(6) that still need a change or just a request? Unless of course we need to add this
to PF225 for mileage due to El Paso K-2b, etc.
(b)
(6)
(b)
(6)
The attached change request form needs to be completed for all requested scope modifications
associated with PF255. Please seek input from the Corps’ relative to the estimated cost and schedule
impacts. You can attach your “white paper” to the submittal as your justification and description of
change. Once we receive the completed request from you, we will submit to the PF225 Change Control
Board for review and recommendation. Loren Flossman will make the final go/no go decision.
Thanks
(b)
(6)
(b)
(6)
Tucson Sector is requesting to extend the PF 225 Nogales D5A project by an additional 4.056 miles to
the west to meet current operational requirements. Currently D5B (5.4) and D6 (2.2) extend the
Nogales Fence to the east by 7.6 miles. D5A currently only extends the fence out two additional miles
to the Westside of the Mariposa POE.
The additional 4.056 miles will extend far enough to the west to significantly enhance operational
control on Nogales’s western urban side.
Thanks
(b) (6)
Tucson Sector
Assistant Chief Patrol Agent
(b) (6)
Sir,
I recommend we support this request and push it forward as this will take the west side fence as far as
we can go for now, essentially finishing it there.
Thanks,
(b
)
Sir,
This is an updated TI request subsequent to the ACE General’s visit last week. TI (b) (6)
is on board and this has passed the local laugh test. We respectfully request consideration and
support.
V/R, (b)
(6)
(b) (6)
Patrol Agent in Charge
1500 W. La Quinta
Nogales, AZ 85621
((b) (6)
Sirs,
Can we please modify this paper to address the request for the additional 4 miles of fencing to the
west. We will address the landing mat fencing after we have all primary infrastructure in first. Naco is
having the same issue.
Also please route requests for new issues/ projects through Sector first. TCA will then route to OBP
and the ACE.
Thanks
(b) (6)
Tucson Sector
Assistant Chief Patrol Agent
(b) (6)
Please see attached. The landing mat is being breached at a rate not seen before. This is most
definitely attributable to the bollard fence adjacent to it.
(b) (6)
Field Operations Supervisor
Nogales Station Tactical Infrastructure
(b) (6)
PF225 Change Request
Change Request Number: (SBI to assign) Change Request Date:
Change Requested By
Name: Telephone Number:
3/18/2010
Cost Adjustment $
Notes
Approval Signature
_________________________________________ ___________________
Loren Flossman, PF225 SBI TI Project Manager Date
3/18/2010