Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
No. 07-1405
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond.
Henry E. Hudson, District
Judge. (3:07-cv-00010-HEH)
Submitted:
Decided:
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Douglas L. and Debora A. Miller appeal the district
courts order dismissing their 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint as
barred by the statute of limitations and for failure to exhaust
state
remedies.
Their
complaint
asserted
that
an
ordinance
On
We affirm.
The Millers first contend that they may challenge an
See National
Advert. Co. v. Raleigh, 947 F.2d 1158, 1161 (4th Cir. 1991).
The
We reject the
to
both
civil
litigation
in
the
state
and
federal
courts.
Welding, Inc. v. Bland County Srv. Auth., 541 S.E.2d 909, 912 (Va.
2001).
March 10, 2004, when the Millers petition for appeal was denied in
their most recent civil case.
timely
filed
within
unconstitutional actions.
- 4 -
two
years
of
the
latest
A
unlawful
continuing
acts,
violation.
not
violation
continual
is
ill
occasioned
effects
from
by
continual
an
original
If the statutory
Id. at
Id.
actions
and
(2)
whether
unfairness
results
from
Id. at
- 5 -
Once
the
alleged
harm,
even
though
the
city
took
later
enforcement action).
Accordingly, we affirm.
AFFIRMED