35 F.

3d 557

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of

unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
Circuit.
Ernest SNELL; Evelyn Snell, Plaintiffs Appellants,
v.
SOUTH CAROLINA PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY, a/k/a
Santee
Cooper; Lawrence M. White; Robert Petracca; G. Denton
Lindsay; John Doe Sanders; John Roe Gilbert; Horger,
Barnwell & Reid, Law Firm; Samuel T. Reid, Defendants
Appellees.
No. 93-2312.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Sept. 12, 1994.
Submitted July 5, 1994.
Decided September 12, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South
Carolina, at Orangeburg. Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA90-2911-5-8-BC)
Ernest Snell, Evelyn Snell, appellants Pro Se.
Julius Walker McKay, II, McKay, McKay, Henry & Foster, P.A.,
Columbia, South Carolina; David Clifford Eckstrom, Nexen, Pruet,
Jacobs & Pollard, Columbia, SC, for appellees.
Before HALL, WILKINS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

Appellants appeal from the district court's order granting summary judgment to
the Defendants in their civil action. Our review of the record and the district
court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses
that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of
the district court. Snell v. South Carolina Pub. Serv. Auth., No. CA-90-2911-58-BC (D.S.C. Sept. 3, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.