Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Ecological Engineering
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ecoleng
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 5 November 2015
Received in revised form 24 April 2016
Accepted 14 June 2016
Keywords:
Carbon sequestration
Fly ash dumps
Naturally vegetated site
CO2 ux
a b s t r a c t
The aim of the present study was to measure in-situ y ash (FA) CO2 ux from naturally vegetated
and non-vegetated sites of FA dumps for identifying potential plant species for carbon sequestration by
using an automated soil CO2 ux system. The FA CO2 ux was found to be higher in vegetated site than
non-vegetated site due to higher root density and respiration. The presence of organic carbon, microbial
activity and root biomass are important indicators for sequestration of atmospheric CO2 in naturally
vegetated site of FA dumps because of the fresh FA dumps are supposed to be initially free of organic
carbon. Furthermore, in the naturally vegetated site, the FA CO2 efux rates were least in Saccharum
spontaneum (lower by 84.29%) and Prosopis juliora (lower by 92.09%) association as compared to Typha
latifolia association. Thus, the eld results proved that S. spontaneum and P. juliora associations are
potentially suitable for sequestering atmospheric CO2 in the fresh FA deposited sites.
2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
The carbon sequestration and CO2 ux assessment was directed
by the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007, which was
based on assessment to quantify (1) the amount of carbon stored in
ecosystems, (2) the capacity of ecosystems to sequester carbon, and
(3) the rate of CO2 uxes in and out of the ecosystems (EISA, 2007).
A number of summits have been organized on the carbon sequestration and its management ranging from the Stockholm to Kyoto
protocol. Due to increasing demand and dependence on coalbased
thermal power stations for electricity, we are parallely increasing
the area and number of y ash (FA) deposits, which are serious
ecological concern. These FA dumps can be used as a potential sink
for carbon sequestration. Because, these dumps are supposed to be
initially free of organic carbon, and therefore organic carbon developed in the substrate resulted from the plant growth since the last
ash deposition. It is well known that vegetation and soil are major
sources for sequestering CO2 from the atmosphere.
Carbon sequestration means using plants to capture CO2 from
the atmosphere or to capture anthropogenic CO2 from the major
sources such as coal-based thermal power stations and then storing it as carbon for long-term in form of biomass (stems and roots)
of plants as well as in substrate. Soil CO2 ux is an important compo-
Corresponding author.
E-mail address: vimalcpandey@gmail.com (V.C. Pandey).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.06.010
0925-8574/ 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
199
Fig. 1. The measurement of FA CO2 ux of the dominant plant species [A] P. juliora L. and [B] S. spontaneum L. growing naturally on FA dumps.
200
CO2 production and transport inside the FA prole. CO2 efux rates
were measured as linear increment in CO2 concentration with time
and were computed using Soil ux Pro and LI-8100 le viewer software by conguring measurement length, dead band, purge time
and measurement delay as 120, 45, 45 and 45 s respectively for each
cycle of measurement. Flux measurements were made every 4 min
and a total of approx. 10 readings were logged to the LI-8100 every
hour. The air ow rate was set to maximum to ensure adequate
mixing of the air within the ux chamber.
-2 -1
s )
0.8
0.7
2.6
-2 -1
s )
Fifteen FA samples were collected from the rhizosphere of population of the dominant species (i.e. S. spontaneum, P. juliora and
T. latifolia) and pooled to reduce the spatial heterogeneity of the
FA, if any. After that three replicates from these pooled samples
were taken to examine the FA properties. All the samples were collected from sites (015 cm) within each species association (along
with control) and were transported to laboratory for further measurements. The samples were air dried and sieved with 2.0 mm
mesh to prepare homogenized samples. The pH and electrical conductivity (EC) of FA were measured as per Pandey et al. (2015b).
Total organic carbon (TOC) was estimated by di-chromate oxidation method (Walkley and Black, 1934). Available nitrogen and total
AT; C, FT; C, CO2; mol mol1 and AH; mmol mol1 ) were measured at each of the four sites within Arkha FA dump. All sensors
(except FT C) were positioned 1 m above surface. PAR measurements were made with (LI-COR, LI-191), Air temperature (AT; C)
with (LI-COR, LI-101) and FA temperature (FT; C) with (LI-COR,
LI-103). Ambient CO2 and ambient humidity (AH; mmol mol1 )
measurements were made with LI-COR, LI-840 CO2 /H2 0 gas analyzer. All the sensors were integrated to a single data logger
(LI-1400; LI-COR, Lincoln, NE, USA) and data were measured simultaneously for each parameter every 15 s and logged as per minute
average values.
2.4
2.2
0.6
2.0
0.5
1.8
1.6
0.4
1.4
Control Site
0.3
07:00
11:00
15:00
19:00
P. j uli flora
1.2
07:00
11:00
-2 -1
s )
4.4
4.2
4.0
3.8
3.6
3.4
3.2
3.0
S. sponta neum
2.8
07:00
11:00
Tim e (hou r)
19:00
Tim e (hour)
4.6
15:00
19:00
-2 -1
s )
Tim e (hour)
15:00
30
28
26
24
22
20
18
T. la tifoli a
16
07:00
11:00
15:00
Tim e (hour)
Fig. 2. Diurnal proles of FA CO2 efux in three different plant species association along with control site on FA dumps.
19:00
201
3.2. Temperature
The diurnal variation in ambient air temperature at FA dumps
is presented in Fig. 3. Average ambient air temperatures across all
sites ranged from 29.81 C to 31.46 C with maximum average temperature of 36.26 4.56 C in control site. There was lack of much
canopy cover across sites except for P. juliora association which
had small canopies leading to more or less equal heating of FA
surface (as there was very little light interception by the ora). Surface FA temperatures varied between 28.27 C32.86 C across sites
with a minimum of 18.86 C. Multiple linear regressions (2nd order)
plotted for CO2 efuxes versus temperature (ambient air) showed
no signicant correlations for control site. However T. latifolia, P.
juliora and S. spontaneum associations showed respective signicant correlations of R2 = 0.66, R2 = 0.60 and 0.64 against CO2 efuxes
(g. 4). S. spontaneum and P. juliora associations showed inverse
correlations with ambient air temperatures as compared to T. latifolia, which showed positive correlations with temperature (Pearson
two tailed correlation). The FA prole under P. juliora and S. spontaneum associations observed dry condition due to lack of moisture
and higher temperatures leading to inhibition of microbial respiration (Rastogi et al., 2002), and resulting in lower CO2 ux. FA
covered with T. latifolia association showed inverse correlations
with temperatures, favoring higher soil CO2 efuxes. T. latifolia
associations observed favorable moisture requirement leading to
higher soil CO2 efuxes being near to the reservoir area of FA
dumps. FA dumps at 25 cm below surface level are less affected
by incoming solar radiation, as radiations hitting the surface of
dump penetrate less depth, leading to little diurnal change among
all vegetation cover at deeper horizon.
3.3. Humidity (%)
T. latifolia species association showed maximum ambient RH
levels (about 78%) and a negative correlation with CO2 efuxes
due to more amount of FA moisture levels however multiple linear regression with CO2 efux rate showed highest regression
(R2 = 0.64) among all species associations (g. 4). In T. latifolia association, availability of more water vapor displaced and diffused
other gas molecules in presence of higher ambient air temperature leading to linear decrease in CO2 efux rates with increasing
RH (at more or less static temperature within FA dumps). Respective R2 values of 0.58 and 0.55 were obtained with S. spontaneum
and P. juliora associations (g. 4).
3.4. CO2 concentration
Diurnal variations in ambient CO2 concentration were between
386.86 and 398.63 molmol1 with maximum ambient CO2 conc.
during the early daytime hours which decreased progressively with
solar time as plants started Carbon xation cycle. As the vegetation
was sparse the difference between the maximum and minimum
ambient CO2 levels diurnally was not much as compared to thick
202
Fig. 4. Multiple linear regressions of FA CO2 efux against different parameters in three different plant species association.
Table 1
Physicochemical properties of different y ash dumpsites.
Parameters
pH
EC (S cm1 )
WHC (%)
TOC (%)
AP (g g1 )
AN (%)
TN (%)
MBC (g g1 )
8.90
150.0
68.15
0.00
7.36
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.10
6.5
1.25
0.00
0.25
0.00
0.00
0.00
S. spontaneum
7.80
101.4
65.85
1.11
23.13
0.02
0.02
222.02
0.19
8.18
2.45
0.08
0.94
0.01
0.00
2.50
P. juliora
8.35
186.7
66.65
0.55
5.34
0.02
0.04
134.87
T. latifolia
0.12
5.65
2.10
0.06
0.19
0.01
0.00
1.55
8.65
160.1
67.55
0.35
21.10
0.00
0.02
96.21
0.63
5.05
1.70
0.08
3.93
0.00
0.00
1.25
trolling CO2 efuxes. The high intensity PAR levels also indirectly
affected relative humidity levels (inverse correlation) by heating up
of ambient air (positive correlation) thus having a substantial role
in transport of CO2 through the FA prole. Optimal PAR levels also
aided in maximum leaf Photosynthetic rates among the different
species which lead to greater carboxylation efciency and translocation of photosynthates to roots thereby increasing both below
and above ground biomass accumulation by plants which was followed by subsequent increase in root respiration contributing to
the total CO2 efux rate.
3.6. Hydrogen ion activity (pH)
Table 2
Pearson correlation ratio between different measured FA CO2 ux parameters of different species in FA dumps.
Parameters
Efux Control
(CO2 mol
mol1 )
0.609b
TFlyashTemp.Control(15 cm)
0.432b
0.248a
Efux Prosopis
TChamber Prosopis
( C)
TFlyashTemp.
Prosopis (15 cm)
Efux Saccharum
(CO2 mol mol1 )
Tchamber Saccharum
( C)
TFlyashTemp.
Saccharum (15 cm)
Efux Typha
Prosopis
(CO2 mol
mol1 )
0.532b
Tchamber
Prosopis
(15cm)
Saccharum
( C)
0.670b
0.944b
0.204
0.314b
0.309b
0.653b
0.191
0.302b
0.651b
0.629b
0.783b
0.060
0.532b
0.714b
0.409b
0.634b
0.989b
0.000
0.490b
0.966b
0.685b
0.425b
0.109
0.989b
0.125
0.687b
0.578b
0.909b
0.480b
0.443b
0.474b
0.956b
0.949b
RH (%)
0.281b
PAR (mol m2 s1 )
0.094
0.875b
0.472b
0.205
0.832b
CO2ambient
TFlyashTemp. Efux
Saccharum
(CO2 mol
mol1 )
TFlyashTemp. Efux
Saccharum
Typha
(CO2 mol
(15 cm)
mol1 )
Tchamber
TyashTemp.Tair ( C)
Typha
( C)
Typha
(15 cm)
CO2ambient RH (%)
(mol
mol1 )
PAR
(mol
m2 s1 )
0.391b
0.559b
(15 cm)
Tair ( C)
TChamber Prosopis
( C)
0.054
0.375b
(CO2 molmol1 )
Tchamber Typha ( C)
TFlyashTemp. Typha
Efux
TChamberControl
( C)
TChamberControl
( C)
0.356b
0.134
0.218a
0.771b
0.062
0.057
0.018
0.629b
0.519b
0.405b
0.611b
0.076
0.237a
0.280b
0.020
0.679b
0.390b
0.935b
0.494b
0.164
0.028
0.969b
0.605b
0.558b
0.561b
0.496b
0.634b
0.294b
0.698b
0.559b
0.552b
0.856b
0.874b
0.694b
0.700b
0.694b
0.736b
0.942b
0.375b
0.529b
0.818b
0.308b
0.936b
0.188
0.524b
0.789b
0.280b
0.933b
0.483b
0.559b
0.513b
0.782b
0.222a
0.865b
0.420b
0.488b
0.514b
0.719b
0.154
0.911b
0.550b
0.117
0.206
0.209
0.965b
0.683b
0.459b
0.634b
0.100
0.935b
0.316b
0.143
(mol mol1 )
( C)
a
b
0.422b
0.889b
0.487b
0.715b
0.760b
0.563b
0.372b
0.728b
0.276b
0.543b
0.815b
0.895b
0.493b
0.868b
0.721b
0.974b
0.757b
203
204
Table 3
Biomass (tons/hectare) of the studied vegetation on y ash deposits.
Plant species
Above ground
dry biomass
Below ground
dry biomass
Total
biomass
S. spontaneum
P. juliora
T. latifolia
3.806 0.224
0.516 0.166
0.008 0.006
0.784 0.112
0.231 0.056
0.002 0.006
4.59
0.75
0.01
205
Raich, J.W., Schlesinger, W.H., 1992. The global CO2 ux in soil respiration and its
relationship to vegetation and climate. Tellus 44B, 8489.
Ram, L.C., Masto, R.E., 2014. Fly ash for soil amelioration: a review on the inuence
of ash blending with inorganic and organic amendments. Earth Sci. Rev. 128,
5274.
Rastogi, M., Singh, S., Pathak, H., 2002. Emission of carbon dioxide from soil. Curr.
Sci. 82 (5), 510517.
Roy, W.R., Berger, P.M., 2011. Geochemical controls of coal y ash leachate pH. Coal
Combust. Gasi. Prod. 3, 6366.
Ryan, M.G., Law, B.E., 2005. Interpreting, measuring, and modeling soil respiration.
Biogeochemistry 73, 327.
Sanci, R., Panarello, H.O., 2012. CO2 and CH4 ux measurements from landlls a
case study: gualeguaych municipal landll, entre Ros province, Argentina.
In: Liu, Guoxiang (Ed.), Greenhouse Gases Emission, Measurement and
Management. , pp. 953978, ISBN: 978-953-51-0323-3, InTech, Available
from: http://cdn.intechopen.com/pdfs-wm/32351.pdf.
Singh, D., Chhonkar, P.K., Dwivedi, B.S., 2007. Soil analysis. In: Manual on Soil, Plant
and Water Analysis. Westville Publishing House, Delhi, pp. 1175.
Sitaula, B.K., Bakken, L.R., Abrahamsen, G., 1995. N-fertilization and soil
acidication effects on N2O and CO2 emission from temperate pine forest soil.
Soil Biol. Biochem. 27 (11), 14011408.
VanVeen, J.A., Liljeroth, E., Lekkerkerk, J.A., 1991. C uxes in plantsoil systems at
elevated atmospheric CO2 levels. Ecol. Appl. 1, 175181.
Vance, E.D., Brookes, P.C., Jenkinson, D.S., 1987. An extraction method for
measuring soil microbial biomass C. Soil Biol. Biochem. 19, 703707.
Walkley, A., Black, I.A., 1934. An examination of the Degtjareff method for
determining organic carbon in soils: effect of variations in digestion conditions
and of inorganic soil constituents. Soil Sci. 63, 251263.