Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
7939/10
'
Human Rights Alert - NGO
" ,33407"
"joseph.zernik@hra-ngo.org :
077-3179186 :
02,
2016 - ) (
) (502/07 ""
02 ,2016 ,
) ( ) (502/07
:
.
.1 " , ,
, / /,
) . - (158/11
.2 " -
[1] . ,
, " " ,
1 2016-07-11 In RE: Roman Zadorov - Ukrainian citizen detained in Israel - complaint and
request for investigation by the UN HRC Working Group on Arbitrary Detention
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B8Aa2xQGbmk5YTcxZGJENnN1QmM
2016-07-14 Supplemental letter - Ms Olga Grishaev joins the complaint
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B8Aa2xQGbmk5UmpTN3A1aGdwX3c/view?usp=sharing
2016-07-11 In RE: Roman Zadorov - Ukrainian citizen detained in Israel
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B8Aa2xQGbmk5YTcxZGJENnN1QmM
Attachment 9.1 Joseph Zernik, PhD Biosketch
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B8Aa2xQGbmk5M1o2UHZHaWJmYU0
Attachment 9.2 Zernik, J., Integrity, or lack thereof, in electronic record systems of the
Israeli courts, HRA-NGO submission for the 2013 UPR by UN HRC.
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B8Aa2xQGbmk5aGI4dEtsbGExQWc
Attachment 9.3 Zernik, J., New Fraudulent IT Systems in the Israeli Courts: Unannounced
)Regime Change?, European Conference on E-Government (2015
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B8Aa2xQGbmk5QlRaTGNHTVR4UFU
1/13
02.2016,
2/13
.2016,02
, ,
.
.4 , , ,
, - ) .(1961 -
, / /
) . - (158/11
. " "
.5 2002 ,
, , ,
... " .
.
. / /
.1 )( ,2004 6 ,:
6 .
- - .
2
.2 " , ... "[ ] ,
,9-11 .
.3 4 ,2015 , )
] (10/2015 '[ '
, , " . , "
'
.
.4 , ,
" " .
.
.6 ,1984 )105( ,:
) .105(
, .
.7 , / / ,
.
.
.8
, , ) . -
(.
.
.9 "" , ".
.10 ' ] 7 ,[1-4
, " , .
http://www.csc.gov.il/DataBases/ArticlesAndPublications/documents/2003647.pdf
3/13
02.2016,
.1 , 27 ,2014 ,
,
, 3 2008 ,
) .( 1233/08 .
) " , " " , ( ,
.
,
3.2008 ,
.2 , 29 ,2014 ,
,
, 3 2008 ,
) .( 1233/08 ) " ,
" " , ( , ' . , ,
, " , - , , "" .
' ,"
" .
,
3.2008 ,
4/13
02.2016,
.3 ,
27 ,2015 , )
:( 7939/10 , ,
, " " ,
.
.4 ,
27 ,2015 , ):(7939/10
, ,
.
_____
.
.11 .
.12 ) 11 ,(5
" ".
" ," ) ,(5
/ /
. ," ," ,
, .
5/13
02.2016,
.5 ,
) :(4650/16 " " ,
" " . , " " ,
, , . ,
. .
. "
.13 ,
, ," 1977-
" , .
.14 ,
.
.
16 , ,2016
____________
' ,
SupremeCourtoftheStateofIsrael
6/13
02.2016,
ZadorovvStateofIsrael
7939/10
Requester:JosephZernik,PhD
HumanRightsAlertNGO
POBox33407,TelAviv
Email:joseph.zernik@hrango.org
Fax:0773179186
RequestforaDulySignedandCertifiedCopyoftheJune02,2016
MagistrateDecisioninInstantCourtFiledenyingrequesttoinspect
decisionrecordsinthepapercourtfile(originalrecords)inStateofIsraelv
RomanZadorov(502/07)intheNazarethDistrictCourtunderthereasoning
ofajumbleinthecourtfile
I,theRequesterofInspectionininstantcourtfile,filehereinrequestforaduly
signedandcertifiedcopyoftheJune02,2016MagistrateDecisioninInstant
CourtFiledenyingrequesttoinspectdecisionrecordsinthepapercourtfile
(originalrecords)inStateofIsraelvRomanZadorov(502/07)intheNazareth
DistrictCourtunderthereasoningofajumbleinthecourtfile:
A.Dulysignedandcertifiedcopyisrequestedforfilingwithinternational
authorities
1. Theabovereferenceddecisionrecordhasneverbeendulyservedonme,and
therefore,IrequesthereinthattheCourtprovidemeacopythatisdulysigned
bytheappropriatejudicialauthorityanddulycertifiedbyadulyappointed
ChiefClerkorMagistrateoftheSupremeCourt(seeExhibitA).
2. IhaverecentlyfiledacomplaintwiththeUNHumanRightsCouncil
WorkingGrouponArbitraryDetention.[3]Thecoreofthecomplaintisin
evidencethatRomanZadorovisheldunderarbitrarydetention,sincethereis
nodulymadeVerdictrecord,nodulymadeSentencingrecord,andnoduly
madeArrestDecreeinStateofIsraelvRomanZadorov(502/07)inthe
NazarethDistrictCourt.Additionally,thecomplaintprovidesevidencethatthe
courtsdenyaccesstoinspectauthenticcourtrecordsinStateofIsraelvRoman
Zadorov(520/07)andpublishedonlyrecordsthatarenotauthenticcourt
recordsimulatedcourtrecords.Moreover,thecomplaintdocumentsthat
regardlessofrepeatrequests,filedbothwiththeCourtitselfandwiththe
ChiefClerkoftheNazarethDistrictCourt,Ihaveneverreceivedanyduly
3 See footnote 1, above.
7/13
.2016,02
signedandcertifiedcopyofadecisionintheancillaryprocessofrequeststo
inspecttheelectroniccourtfileStateofIsraelvRomanZadorov(502/07)inthe
NazarethDistrictCourt.
3. Thesamematteraccesstoinspectauthenticcourtrecordsisalsothe
foundationoftheabovereferencedMagistratedecision.However,theprocess
regardingthedecisionandtheappealthatoriginatedinithadnotendedby
thetimeIfiledtheabovereferencedcomplaint.Therefore,Iintendtofilean
appendix,documentingtheendoftheprocess.
4. Therefore,Ihereinrequestthatthedulysignedandcertifiedcopy,whichis
preparedinresponsetoinstantrequest,besuchthatwouldbedeemed
admissiblebyinternationalauthorities,pursuanttotheHagueApostille
Convention(1961)dulysignedbytheappropriatejudicialauthorityand
dulycertifiedbyadulyappointedChiefClerk,orMagistrateoftheSupreme
Court.SeeExhibitA,regardingtheprohibitionofcertifyingdecisionrecords,
whicharenotsignedbytheappropriatejudicialauthority.
B.Disclaimersubjecttoeditingandphrasingchanges
5. AsiscustomaryinallSupremeCourtdecisionrecordssinceMarch2002,the
decisionrecord,referencedabove,ispublishedinITsystemoftheCourt,
bearingthedisclaimer,...subjecttoeditingandphrasingchanges.Thereis
nodoubtthatthismatterwouldbedeemeddubiousbyinternationalobservers.
C.CertificationbyadulyappointedChiefClerk
6. TheRegulationsoftheCourts(OfficeoftheClerk)2004,Regulation6a,says:
TheChiefClerksofthecourtsareauthorizedcertifythatacopyofa
courtrecordistruecopyoftheoriginalinthecourtfile.
7. TheStateServicepublicationBasicPrinciplesinEmploymentofSeniorStaff
intheStateService(2004),[4]pp911,outlinesthevariouswaysthatlawful
appointmentintheStateServiceisdocumented.
8. TheMarch4,2015,FreedomofInformationActresponse(10/2015)bythe
AdministrationofCourtsonarequestfordocumentationofIditMelul'sdue
appointmentasChiefClerkoftheSupremeCourt[ExhibitA],saysinpart,
Noappointmentrecordwasfound.Additionally,theresponsefailsto
provideanyothervaliddocumentationofMsIditMelulsdueappointmentas
ChiefClerkoftheSupremeCourt.
9. Therefore,insofarastherequestedcertificationissignedbyMsIditMelul,I
hereinrequestthatitbeaccompaniedbydocumentationofherdue
appointmentasChiefClerkoftheSupremeCourt.
4
http://www.csc.gov.il/DataBases/ArticlesAndPublications/documents/2003647.pdf
8/13
.2016,02
D.CertificationbytheSupremeCourtMagistrate
10. TheCourtsAct1984,Article105(a)says:
105(a)TheMagistrateoftheCourtoftheSupremeCourt,theDistrict
Court,andtheMagistrateCourtshallserveinanyauthoritythatwas
vestedintheChiefClerkoftherespectivecourt,andperformany
dutyassignedtotheChiefClerk.
11. Therefore,incasethereisnodulyappointedChiefClerkintheSupreme
Courttoday,thedecisionrecordsmaybedulycertifiedbytheMagistrateof
theSupremeCourt.
E.Invalidcertificationbyunauthorizedpersons
12. TheCourtisexplicitlyrequestedthatthecertificationnotbesignedbyan
unauthorizedperson,suchasMrDannyLevy,SeniorCoordinator.See
ExhibitA,regardingtheauthoritytosigncertificationofcourtrecords.
F.Certificationlanguage
13. Thecertificationlanguageshouldbethat,whichisexplicitlyprovidedinthe
abovereferencedRegulation,TrueCopyoftheOriginal.
14. TheCourtisexplicitlyrequestedtoavoidtheuseofstamp#7[Figures14],
whichemploysinvalid,pervertedcertificationlanguage,CopyingisTrueto
theOriginal.
Figure 1. Perverted, invalid certification, received by letter post-stamped May 27, 2014,
from the Supreme Court, in response on Tax-Authority whistle-blower Rafi Rotem first
letter to Presiding Justice Asher Grunis, asking for a duly signed and certified copy of the
March 3, 2008 Judgment record in his Petition Rotem v Samet et al (1233/08). The record
is unsigned by the judicial authorities. The certification employs perverted, meaningless
certification language (Copying is True to the Original, instead of True Copy of the
Original, as prescribed by law.), and is signed with an illegible scribble by a person,
whose name and authority fail to appear on the record. Supreme Court Presiding Justice
refused to explain why the Supreme Court provides only perverted, invalid certifications,
but no true, valid certification of the March 3, 2008 Judgment record.
9/13
.2016,02
Figure 2. Perverted, invalid certification, received by letter post-stamped May 29, 2014,
from the Supreme Court, in response on Tax-Authority whistle-blower Rafi Rotem second
letter to Presiding Justice Asher Grunis, asking for a duly signed and certified copy of the
March 3, 2008 Judgment record in his Petition Rotem v Samet et al (1233/08). The
certification employs perverted, meaningless certification language (Copying is True to
the Original, instead of True Copy of the Original, as prescribed by law), and is signed
by Ms Nava Khalaf. The stamp, which states her position, Senior Coordinator, Civil
Division, was hand-altered to read Senior Coordinator, High Court of Justice Division.
Response on Freedom of Information Act request documented that Ms Nava Khalaf holds
no lawful appointment for either position, and a Senior Coordinator is not lawfully
authorized to certify Supreme Court decision records. Supreme Court Presiding Justice
refused to explain why the Supreme Court provides only perverted, invalid certifications,
but no true, valid certification of the March 3, 2008 Judgment record.
Figure 3. Perverted, invalid certification, received in response on the first request for
certification of Supreme Court's April 27, 2015 decision record in Zadorov v State of Israel
(7939/10). The record is not signed by the judicial authorities, the language of the
certification is meaningless, and not the one prescribed by law (Copying is True to the
Original, instead of True Copy of the Original), and the signature on the certification is
by Mr Danny Levy, Senior Coordinator, Criminal Division, who is not authorized by law to
sign such certification.
10/13
.2016,02
Figure 4. Perverted, invalid certification, received in response on the first request for
certification of Supreme Court's April 27, 2015 decision record in Zadorov v State of Israel
(7939/10). The language of the certification is meaningless, and not the one prescribed
by law (Copying is True to the Original, instead of True Copy of the Original), and the
signature on the certification is by Mr Danny Levy, Senior Coordinator, Criminal Division,
who is not authorized by law to sign such certification.
______
G.Nameandauthorityofthecertifier
15. Thenameandauthorityofthecertifiershouldexplicitlyappearontheface
oftherecord.
16. TheCourtisexplicitlyrequestedthatthecertifieravoidtheuseofStamp#11
(Figure5),sincesuchstampfailstoexplicitlynametheChiefClerk.
17. TheCourtisexplicitlyrequestedtoavoidcertificationonbehalf(Figure5),
sincethereisnoprovisioninthelawfortheChiefClerkortheMagistrateof
theCourttodelegatethecertificationauthority.Furthermore,signatureon
behalfofaperson,whosenamefailstoappearontherecord,islikelytobe
deemeddoublyinvalidbyinternationalauthorities.
11/13
.2016,02
H.Alltheabovedetailsarenecessarysothatthedecisionrecordbedeemed
avalidandadmissiblerecordbyinternationalauthorities.
18. Suchdulysignedandcertifiedcopyofthedecisionrecord,referencedabove,
isrequestedinordertoenabletheissuanceofanApostille,incompliancewith
theRegulationsforExecutionoftheHagueApostilleConvention(1977)and
GuidelinesoftheMinistryofForeignAffairsregardingtheConvention,forits
filingoutsidetheStateofIsrael.
19. Therefore,Irequestthatthedulysignedandcertifiedcopyofthedecision
recordbemailedonpapertomyaddressprovidedabove.
Inaccordancewiththefundamentalsoflawandjustice,acompetentCourt
shouldprovidedulymadecopiesofitsowndecisions.
12/13
.2016,02
______________
JosephZernik,PhDRequesterofInspection
Today,August16,2016
13/13
02.2016,
Administration of Courts
August 21, 2014
To: Ms Idit Melul
Unit: Supreme Court
RE: End of probation period
--------------------------------We are honored to inform you that your probation period successfully ended on July 06,
2014.
in position 80007351 as Chief Clerk (Supreme Court).
Scope 100.00
Total cumulative scope: 100.00..
We wish you success in your job.
Truly,
[hand signature]
Meyrav Yamin Yohanan
Humna Resources
CC:
Employees Unit
Payroll Dept
Personal File
State of Israel
Administration of
Courts
Instruction Subject:
Implementing judicial
decisions, signed by the
judicial authorities, and
stamping True Copy of the
Original
Area: Offices of
the Clerks
No: 158/11
Author:
Operations and
Offices of the
Clerks Division
Update
Effective date:
December 15, 2014
1. General
1.1 As part of the work routines, the Office of the Clerk is required to implement and
authenticate with the stamp, True Copy of the Original, decisions and/or judgments
and/or protocols in the courts files.
1.2 Computerized implementation of a judicial decision, is possible only after the hearing
protocol was signed by the appropriate judicial authority.
Without signature of the judicial authority on decisions and/or judgments and/or
protocols, it is impossible to implement the decision.
1.3
1.4
2. Goal
Form clear rules in operations of the Offices of the Clerks, relative to implementation of
judicial decisions, and stamping True Copy of the Original for authentication of the
decision.
3.
4. Implementation and authentication with True Copy of the Original only on
signed decision, not in Net-HaMishpat
Once anonymous arrives at the Office of the Clerk, carrying a copy of a court decision,
and asks to obtain a True Copy of the Original stamp of the decision, staff of the
Office of the Clerk shall operate as follows:
4.1 Locate the physical court file
4.2 Locate the original record, signed by original signature of the judge.
4.3 Compare the original record and the photocopy.
4.4 If the photocopy is found to be identical to the original, stamp it True Copy of the
Original.
5. Certification True Copy of the Original for residents of remote locations
7.
Instant Instruction voids the following Work Instructions:
67/09 regarding the use of the stamp True Copy of the Original.
114/10 regarding stamping True Copy of the Original on a printed judgment.
Truly,
Mimi Amsili
Civil and Family Areas Director
Operations and Offices of the Clerks Div
ADMINISTRATION OF COURTS
:
"
NGO
"joseph.zernik@hra-ngo.org :
04290215 :
10/2015
) (
" ,
: " 1998 -
: 2.2.2015
5.1.2015
:
.1 '
. ,
.
.2 .
- 158/11
" ".
. ,
) " 1" ,
3 7 - .(... -
. .
. ,
, .
' ,22 , 02-6556919 ,02-6556935 95464'02-6556887 :
- E- mail: hof esh-hamida@court.gov.il "
ADMINISTRATION OF COURTS
.3 2 "" - " ,
, , , " . - ,
.
.4 , 45
.
.
:
" "
158/11
:
15/12/2014
.1
1.1
, " " , /
/ .
1.2
, "
.
/ / , .
1.3
...
1.4
...
.2
, " "
.
... .3
.4 " " -
, "
" , :
.5
4.1
4.2
, .
4.3
, .
4.4
, " ".
" "
5.1
5.2
,
5.1 ,
5.2.1 " ".
5.2.2
, ,
.
.6 " "
, :
" .
, " " ,
, .
... .7
:
67/09 " ".
114/10 " "