Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
No. 14-4229
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg.
Gina M. Groh,
District Judge. (3:13-cr-00033-GMG-JES-1)
Submitted:
November 6, 2014
Decided:
Nicholas
J.
Compton,
Assistant
Federal
Public
Defender,
Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellant. Jarod James Douglas,
Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia,
for Appellee.
PER CURIAM:
Timothy Rameek Williams pleaded guilty pursuant to a
plea agreement to one count of conspiracy to possess with intent
to distribute and to distribute twenty-eight grams or more of
cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B)
& 846 (2012).
Counsel has
Williams
We affirm.
the
sentence.
procedural
and
reasonableness
of
the
In determining procedural
the
by
3553(a)
the
parties,
factors,
and
2
analyzed
sufficiently
any
arguments
explained
the
sentence.
Id.
Regardless
of
whether
the
district
court
facts
of
the
case
before
it.
United
States
v.
Carter, 564 F.3d 325, 330 (4th Cir. 2009) (internal quotation
marks omitted).
of
any
variance
from
the
Guidelines
range.
United
States v. Morace, 594 F.3d 340, 345-46 (4th Cir. 2010) (internal
quotation marks omitted).
Because there was no objection to the district courts
direction that Williams sentence run consecutive to any state
sentence, rather than any anticipated state sentence, that may
be
imposed,
review
is
for
plain
error.
United
States
v.
To demonstrate
the error was plain; and (3) the error affected his substantial
rights.
if
the
exercise
our
meets
discretion
his
to
burden
in
correct
this
the
regard,
error
Even
we
only
will
if
it
judicial
omitted).
proceedings.
Id.
(internal
quotation
marks
(2012),
the
Supreme
Court
held
that
sentencing
courts
have
state
sentence.
Here,
the
amended
judgment
two
specific,
related
charges.
Thus,
the
courts
and
have
found
no
meritorious
issues
for
appeal.
We
This
materials
before
this
court
and
argument
would
not
aid
the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED