Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
No. 14-1878
Argued:
Decided:
Judge Duncan
Senior Judge
Immigration
Appeals
(BIAs)
order
affirming
the
evidence
in
the
record
indicated
that
Hernandez-
that
cancellation
1229b(b).
Hernandez-Zavala
of
removal
was
under
statutorily
INA
ineligible
240A(b),
for
U.S.C.
Zavalas petition.
I.
On March 8, 2012, Hernandez-Zavala, a native and citizen of
Mexico,
was
charged
with
several
misdemeanor
offenses
under
N.C.
Gen.
Stat.
14-33(c)(1).
This
offense
covers
general
woman
partner,
Hernandez-Zavala
with
whom
described
he
resides
the
Department
in
and
his
brief
shares
as
his
child.
Petitioners Br. at 4.
On
(DHS)
March
9,
served
2012,
Hernandez-Zavala
with
of
a
Homeland
Notice
to
Security
Appear.
he
entered
the
removability
8 U.S.C.
United
States,
under
DHS
INA
1182(a)(6)(A)(i).
charged
him
with
212(a)(6)(A)(i),
Hernandez-Zavala
conceded
February
4,
2013,
DHS
moved
to
pretermit
Hernandez-
this
provision,
[a]ny
alien
who
at
any
time
after
8 U.S.C. 1227(a)(2)(E)(i).
Id.
under
U.S.C.
1229b(b)(1)(C).
Hernandez-Zavala
application
for
cancellation
of
removal.
Next,
the
IJ
considered
whether
the
North
Carolina
IJ
considered
the
offense
of
conviction
as
well
as
the
thus
concluded
that
Hernandez-Zavala
was
The
statutorily
April
decision
to
8,
the
2013,
BIA,
Hernandez-Zavala
arguing
that
the
appealed
IJ
should
the
IJs
not
have
categorically
1227(a)(2)(E)(i).
disqualifying
offense
under
The BIA,
crime
ineligible
of
for
domestic
violence,
cancellation
of
rendering
removal.
him
statutorily
Hernandez-Zavala
II.
The question presented in this case is a purely legal one:
whether a conviction under a state law that does not have a
domestic
relationship
as
an
element
5
of
the
offense
can
constitute
crime
1227(a)(2)(E)(i).
of
domestic
violence
under
U.S.C.
this circuit.
On appeal from the BIA, this court reviews legal questions
de novo.
Where, as here, the BIA and the immigration judge both issue
decisions
in
case,
we
review
both
decisions
upon
appeal.
This
A.
Under 8 U.S.C. 1227(a)(2)(E)(i), a crime of domestic
violence has two requirements: it must be a crime of violence
as defined by 18 U.S.C. 16, and the crime must have been
committed by an individual who was in a domestic relationship
with the victim.
There is no dispute in this case that Hernandez-Zavalas
North
Carolina
assault
conviction
constitutes
crime
of
the
must be
an
domestic
element
relationship
of
the
requirement
underlying
offense
in
of
the
statute
conviction,
argues
that
the
categorical
approach
look
to
the
statutory
definition
of
the
North
Carolina
specific
approach,
evidence
of
the
the
court
conviction
may
to
also
consider
determine
if
underlying
a
domestic
B.
To determine which approach should apply, we first consider
the previous uses of, and the rationales behind, the categorical
approach
and
the
circumstance-specific
approach.
We
then
existed.
Accordingly,
we
find
that
Hernandez-
with
constitutes
whom
a
he
crime
was
in
of
domestic
domestic
relationship
violence,
indeed
rendering
him
It is
the
trigger
for
immigration
consequences.
Mellouli
v.
defining
the
crime.
generic
crime
of
federal
conviction
definition
categorically
of
fits
corresponding
Duenas-Alvarez,
omitted).
the
549
U.S.
183,
186
(2007))(quotation
marks
statute
shares
the
nature
of
the
federal
offense
that
Id.
Id.
equating
to
[the]
generic
[federal
(2005))(quotation
marks
omitted)(alterations
in
original).
approach
judicial
and
is
practical
administrative
designed
efficiency
by
to
promote[]
precluding
the
2.
When
the
federal
statute
does
not
describe
generic
engaged
on
specific
occasion,
the
circumstance-
federal
statute
approach,
courts
necessary
attendant
must
may
be
assessed
consider
other
circumstances
using
the
evidence
existed.
to
categorical
see
See,
if
the
e.g.,
id.
at 38, 42-43.
In Nijhawan v. Holder, the Supreme Court for the first time
applied
the
context.
circumstance-specific
approach
in
the
immigration
aggravated
includes
which
an
the
felony,
offense
loss
to
defined
that . . . involves
the
victim
8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(43)(M)(i).
that
definitions
referring
to
elsewhere
loss
or
fraud
victims
the
or
statute,
deceit
exceeds
in
$10,000.
requirement
generic
in
crime,
should
be
triggering
interpreted
the
as
categorical
specific
occasion,
triggering
approach.
the
circumstance-specific
circumstance-specific
phrasing
and
in
part
approach
in
because
to
part
because
apply
of
its
categorical
Id. at 39.
Id.
Further, at
the time the law was passed, only eight states had statutes that
would have had a relevant threshold if subparagraph (M)(i) were
interpreted under the categorical approach.
Concluding
that
Congress
would
Id. at 40.
not
have
designed
the
Court
held
that
the
the
specific
circumstances
monetary
threshold
was
not
an
offenders
The
limitation,
written
into
the
11
INA
itself.
Moncrieffe,
Congress
found
in
indicated
immigration
an
intent
to
have
proceedings.
the
Id.
relevant
The
Court
criminal
refer
to
applies.
statutes
generic
Id.
wholesale,
crimes,
to
which
in
which
the
case
it
categorical
must
approach
1968,
18
U.S.C.
922(g)(9).
This
term
is
defined
in
18
U.S.C.
921(a)(33)(A)(ii).
Although
Hayes
arose
in
the
12
concluded
that
the
relationship
The Court
need
not
be
Id. at 426.
had used the singular form of the word element in the text,
this suggest[ed] that Congress intended to describe only one
required element.
manner
in
Id. at 421.
which
relationship
the
with
offender
the
acts,
victim,
are
and
the
offenders
conceptually
distinct
element
immediately
precedes
the
use
The
of
force
Thus,
the
latter
predicate
as
offense,
it
well
it
as
the
likely
elements,
as
has
provisions.
Id. at 421-22.
done
former
would
in
an
have
element
used
other
the
of
the
plural
offense-defining
was
passed,
statutes
only
about
that
specifically
13
one-third
of
the
proscribed
States
had
domestic
violence.
states
Id. at 427.
that
did
have
laws
specifically
against
domestic
generally
applicable
assault
or
battery
laws.
Id.
Id.
C.
Because
of
the
statutory
structure,
the
Supreme
Courts
was
Moncrieffe,
relationship
just
a
133
as
the
monetary
limitation[]
S.
Ct.
component
at
threshold
written
1691,
here.
so
This
requirement
in
into
the
INA
itself,
too
is
the
domestic
provision
of
the
INA
violence
wholesale.
under
Id.
18
U.S.C.
16,
but
it
did
not
do
so
Further,
as
the
Court
has
8 U.S.C.
previously
14
found
in
immigration
proceedings.
Moncrieffe,
133
S.
Ct.
at 1691.
Second, we find the Supreme Courts interpretation of the
nearly
identical
statutory
text
in
Hayes
to
be
instructive.
appear
reference
18
U.S.C.
offense
in
in
that
the
16
has
1227(a)(2)(E)(i):
it
is
of
crime
of
crime
of
definition
(defining
as
an
element
the
incorporated
violence.
violence
use,
to
See
mean
attempted
by
use,
an
or
the INA than in the statute at issue in Hayes that the term
element applies only to the use of force requirement.
Finally,
the
practical
considerations
described
in
Hayes
domestic
underlying
relationship
offense.
component
Congress
to
passed
be
the
an
element
INAs
of
crime
the
of
Just as in Hayes,
be
an
element
of
the
underlying
offense
would
frustrate
Congress manifest purpose, given that the law would have been
a dead letter in some two-thirds of the States from the very
moment of its enactment.
The
practical
considerations
listed
by
this
court
in
In Prudencio,
that
the
monetary
threshold
criterion
at
issue
in
however,
involves
determination
that
could
by
an
proceedings.
adjudicator
Id.
Thus,
wholly
while
unfamiliar
the
with
those
circumstance-specific
very
real
evidentiary
concerns
in
Prudencio
case.
Id.
noncitizen
domestic
the
victim
of
the
relationship--involves
threshold
fact.
straightforward
adjudicator
conclusion.
will
This
and
have
the
conduct
offense
inspection
determination
objective,
to
prior
reducing
a
were
of
in
single
will
often
be
fears
that
the
minitrial
to
reach
Id. at 270.
We agree.
cite Tokatly following Hayes and Nijhawan, see, e.g., OlivasMotta v. Holder, 746 F.3d 907, 912 (9th Cir. 2013), we do not
find Tokatlys reasoning persuasive given the Supreme Courts
subsequent holdings.
Our conclusion today does not conflict with our previous
assessment
that
Nijhawan
does
not
permit[]
an
unrestricted
Congress.
relationship
which
Prudencio,
requirement
Congress
669
falls
modified
F.3d
within
the
at
483.
the
generic
The
narrow
domestic
category
in
crime . . . with
Id.
their
traditional
application,
including
courts
for
which
Section 1227(a)(2).
aliens
may
be
removed
under
III.
In conclusion, we affirm the BIAs decision because we find
that
Hernandez-Zavalas
conviction
for
assault
with
deadly
under
U.S.C.
1229b(b).
For
the
reasons
stated
above,
19