Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
No. 14-1801
JO
LYNN
KRAINA;
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
AMERICAN
PORT
HOLDINGS,
INCORPORATED,
a
Delaware
corporation;
PATRICK
NICHOLAS
DICARLO,
an
individual;
ARCELORMITTAL
WEIRTON
LLC,
a
corporation;
DANIEL
L.
DICKERSON, individually; ANDREW S. FELLOWS, individually;
JAMES C. BRECKINRIDGE, individually,
Defendants Appellees,
and
ALLIED INVESTMENT PARTNERS PJSC, a foreign corporation;
ARCELORMITTAL
WEIRTON
INCORPORATED;
STANLEY
BALLAS,
individually; CHANNEL POINT PARTNERS, a corporation; JAMES
MARTODAM, individually,
Defendants.
No. 14-1809
JO
LYNN
KRAINA;
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
AMERICAN
PORT
HOLDINGS,
INCORPORATED,
a
Delaware
corporation;
PATRICK
NICHOLAS
DICARLO,
an
individual;
ARCELORMITTAL
WEIRTON
LLC,
a
corporation;
DANIEL
L.
DICKERSON, individually; ANDREW S. FELLOWS, individually;
JAMES C. BRECKINRIDGE, individually,
Defendants Appellees,
and
ALLIED INVESTMENT PARTNERS PJSC, a foreign corporation;
ARCELORMITTAL
WEIRTON
INCORPORATED;
JAMES
MARTODAM,
individually; STANLEY BALLAS, individually; CHANNEL POINT
PARTNERS, a corporation,
Defendants.
No. 14-2249
JO
LYNN
KRAINA;
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
AMERICAN
PORT
HOLDINGS,
INCORPORATED,
a
Delaware
corporation;
PATRICK
NICHOLAS
DICARLO,
an
individual;
ARCELORMITTAL
WEIRTON
LLC,
a
corporation;
DANIEL
L.
DICKERSON, individually; ANDREW S. FELLOWS, individually;
JAMES C. BRECKINRIDGE, individually,
Defendants Appellees,
and
ALLIED INVESTMENT PARTNERS PJSC, a foreign corporation;
ARCELORMITTAL
WEIRTON
INCORPORATED;
JAMES
MARTODAM,
individually; STANLEY BALLAS, individually; CHANNEL POINT
PARTNERS, a corporation,
Defendants.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Wheeling.
Frederick P. Stamp,
Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:11-cv-00050-FPS-JES)
Submitted:
Decided:
Before MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit
Judge.
PER CURIAM:
American
Heartland
Port,
Inc.,
Jo
Lynn
Kraina,
Shelley
We have
Accordingly,
are
adequately
presented
in
the
materials
before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED