Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
No. 13-4688
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston.
Patrick Michael Duffy, Senior
District Judge. (2:10-cr-00277-PMD-4)
Submitted:
Decided:
Before DIAZ and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit
Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Calvin
Levar
Dixon
pleaded
guilty,
pursuant
to
of
marijuana,
distribution,
distribute
three
heroin,
as
well
counts
one
of
count
as
maintaining
possession
of
with
possession
with
place
for
intent
to
intent
to
v.
California,
He received a 264-month
U.S.
738
(1967),
finding
no
imposed
supplemental
reasonable
brief
raising
sentence.
Dixon
ineffective
assistance
filed
a
of
pro
se
counsel
Finding no error, we
affirm.
Prior to accepting a plea, a trial court must conduct
a
plea
colloquy
in
which
it
informs
the
defendant
of,
and
he
is
relinquishing
by
pleading
guilty.
Fed.
R.
Crim.
P.
11(b)(1); United States v. DeFusco, 949 F.2d 114, 116 (4th Cir.
1991).
Fed.
Because
F.3d 517, 525 (4th Cir. 2002); see Henderson v. United States,
133 S. Ct. 1121, 1126 (2013) (discussing plain error standard).
Our
review
of
the
record
indicates
that
the
district
court
we
conclude
that
Dixons
plea
was
knowing
and
See United
States v. Lambey, 974 F.2d 1389, 1394 (4th Cir. 1992) (en banc).
We review a sentence for reasonableness, applying an
abuse of discretion standard.
38,
first
46
(2007).
The
court
reviews
for
significant
then
considers
substantive
reasonableness.
Id.
at
51.
court
must
make
an
individualized
Id.
The
assessment
by
lengthy,
but
it
appellate review.
must
be
adequate
Id. at 330.
to
allow
meaningful
Substantive reasonableness is
the
range,
sentence
we
is
apply
within
the
properly-calculated
presumption
of
Guidelines
reasonableness.
United
imposing
Dixons
sentence,
the
district
court
accordance
with
Anders,
we
have
reviewed
the
We
This court
petition
the
Supreme
Court
of
the
United
States
for
further
review.
move
in
this
court
for
leave
to
withdraw
from
and
materials
legal
before
contentions
are
adequately
this
and
argument
court
presented
would
not
in
the
aid
the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED