Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
No. 10-2018
OF
AMERICA,
INCORPORATED,
California
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior
District Judge. (5:09-cv-00457-F)
Submitted:
Decided:
PER CURIAM:
Stephen and Tiffany Misel appeal the district courts
order
and
(Mazda)
judgment
12(b)(1))
Federal
motion
jurisdiction.
granting
Rule
to
of
Mazda
Motor
Civil
dismiss
of
America,
Inc.s
Procedure
12(b)(1)
(Rule
subject
matter
for
lack
of
The
of
$66,405.15.
Mazda
moved
to
dismiss
the
Misels
motion
to
dismiss
for
lack
of
subject
matter
jurisdiction
subject
12(b)(1)
motion
matter
to
jurisdiction
dismiss
is
on
in
the
The burden of
response
to
plaintiff,
the
Rule
party
asserting jurisdiction.
304 (4th Cir. 1995).
A
certain
plaintiff
breach
of
federal court.
however,
is
not
may
file
warranty
MMWA
obligations
suit
in
for
either
brought
in
damages
state
for
or
Such a suit,
United
States
district court
(A)
(B)
(C)
15 U.S.C. 2310(d)(3).
The Misels concede that their claims do not meet the
$50,000 requirement unless they receive treble damages pursuant
to North Carolina law.
not
computed
however,
is
on
the
claims.
basis
of
pendent
state
law
1058,
1071
(5th
Cir.
1984);
Collins
v.
dispense
with
oral
argument
because
the
facts
and
legal
AFFIRMED