Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
No. 06-4994
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior
District Judge. (3:06-cr-00079)
Submitted:
Decided:
PER CURIAM:
Francisco Andrade appeals the district courts judgment
entered pursuant to a jury verdict convicting Andrade of assault
with intent to commit murder, assault with a dangerous weapon,
assault
resulting
in
serious
bodily
injury,
and
assault
by
The
Federal
Petersburg).
Correctional
and
(hereinafter
FCC
Center
Chappelle
into
verbal
confrontation
over
Andrades laundry. Andrade then left the laundry room but returned
approximately five minutes later.
- 2 -
At Andrades
Chappelle then
turned to leave the cell but, according to his testimony, was hit
on the nose by Mejia who apparently had been behind him.
After
being struck, Chappelle felt his head being pulled down and was
punched, kicked and stabbed.
his throat as starting at his ear and just scratching him until it
hit his esophagus, where it bounced and split his throat wide open.
Chappelle described the stab wound to his chest as coming from
behind him, over his shoulder.
him.
Chappelle managed to escape and ran for help.
Chappelle
- 3 -
To
(1) admission of
the allegedly false testimony was error; (2) the error was plain;
and (3) the error affected his substantial rights.
Id.
Further,
even if these requirements are met, we must also conclude that the
error
seriously
affected
the
fairness,
integrity,
or
public
Id.
knowingly
used
perjured
testimony
in
securing
his
- 4 -
According to the
Andrade
stipulation.
refused
to
accept
the
agreement
and
its
plain error.
Additionally, Andrade cannot establish that the admission
of the challenged testimony affected his substantial rights because
he fails to show that the testimony affected the outcome of his
case.
- 5 -
209, 216 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 127 S. Ct. 197 (2006).
Where,
Substantial
United States v. Burgos, 94 F.3d 849, 862 (4th Cir. 1996) (en
banc).
witnesses.
454 F.3d 390, 394 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 127 S. Ct. 452 (2006).
We conclude that, viewing all the evidence in favor of
the prosecution, a rational trier of fact could have found beyond
a reasonable doubt that Andrade possessed the requisite intent to
commit murder during the assault.
chest to make certain his lung was not punctured by the stab wound
to his chest.
- 6 -
about Andrades intent from the mere fact that he chose to cut
Chappelles throat.
Accordingly, we affirm the district courts judgment. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 7 -