1) Know your place. The subordinate respects the superior.

Giving advice is somet

imes welcomed. But to criticize them in front of the others causes a massive los
s of face. Also try to avoid being too direct. And always show respect in order
to maintain a hospitable relationship.
2) Listen to your Chinese boss carefully. If you want to undferstand what your b
oss thinks of your work or your ideas, be careful to discern the criticism from
the praise. For example, if he generally praises your project, then points out s
ome flaws, and then praises you again, he might have just torn you to pieces. Ke
ep in mind that most Chinese employers and workmates will communicate with less
directness than you areused to. If you are really in doubt as to what has been s
aid, ask a few follow-up questions. Don't expect straight answers to questions,
especially difficult ones, and try to avoid being too direct yourself. People wi
ll clam up and you won't get very far. Try to cultivate "passive assertiveness".
3) Work hard. Chinese people frequently work overtime. If you drift too far from
this ethic in the Chinese workplace, it makes you look bad in nearly everyone's
eyes. If your work is not keeping you busy, pretend to be busy.

The nations working class will have another opportunity to demonstrate its politi
cal clout Tuesday night, as primary voters go to the polls in Illinois and Ohio,
Rust Belt states that have suffered intensely from the loss of good manufacturi
ng jobs. Last week, the insurrection handed Michigans Democratic primary to Berni
e Sanders while continuing to buoy the insurgent Republican candidacy of Donald
Trump.
Voters anger and frustration, driven in part by relentless globalization and tech
nological change, may not propel either candidate to the presidency. But it is a
lready having a big impact on Americas future, shaking a once-solid consensus tha
t freer trade is, necessarily, a good thing.
The economic populism of the presidential campaign has forced the recognition tha
t expanded trade is a double-edged sword, wrote Jared Bernstein, former economic
adviser to Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr.
What seems most striking is that the angry working class dismissed so often as m
yopic, unable to understand the economic trade-offs presented by trade appears t
o have understood what the experts are only belatedly finding to be true: The be
nefits from trade to the American economy may not always justify its costs.
In a recent study, three economists David Autor at the Massachusetts Institute o
f Technology, David Dorn at the University of Zurich and Gordon Hanson at the Un
iversity of California, San Diego raised a profound challenge to all of us broug
ht up to believe that economies quickly recover from trade shocks. In theory, a
developed industrial country like the United States adjusts to import competitio
n by moving workers into more advanced industries that can successfully compete
in global markets.
They examined the experience of American workers after China erupted onto world
markets some two decades ago. The presumed adjustment, they concluded, never hap
pened. Or at least hasnt happened yet. Wages remain low and unemployment high in
the most affected local job markets. Nationally, there is no sign of offsetting
job gains elsewhere in the economy. Whats more, they found that sagging wages in
local labor markets exposed to Chinese competition reduced earnings by $213 per
adult per year.
In another study they wrote with Daron Acemoglu and Brendan Price from M.I.T., t
hey estimated that rising Chinese imports from 1999 to 2011 cost up to 2.4 milli

on American jobs.
These results should cause us to rethink the short- and medium-run gains from tra
de, they argued. Having failed to anticipate how significant the dislocations from
trade might be, it is incumbent on the literature to more convincingly estimate
the gains from trade, such that the case for free trade is not based on the swa
y of theory alone, but on a foundation of evidence that illuminates who gains, w
ho loses, by how much, and under what conditions.
Global trade offers undeniable benefits. It helped pull hundreds of millions of
Chinese out of poverty in a matter of a few decades, an unparalleled feat. It en
sured Apple could benefit from Chinas ample supply of cheap labor. Consumers arou
nd the world gained better-priced, better-made goods.
Still, though trade may be good for the country over all after netting out winne
rs and losers the case for globalization based on the fact that it helps expand
the economic pie by 3 percent becomes much weaker when it also changes the distr
ibution of the slices by 50 percent, Mr. Autor argued. And that is especially tr
ue when the American political system has shown no interest in compensating thos
e on the losing side.
The impact of Chinas great leap into the market economy which drew hundreds of mi
llions of impoverished peasants into the manufacturing sector, mostly making goo
ds for export to the United States and other wealthy nations is waning. Chinas wa
ges are rising fast. Its exports and economy are slowing.
Trade with other parts of the world has not been as disruptive. For all the crit
icism of Nafta, most economists assess its impact on American workers as modest
. Trade flows with Mexico were smaller and more balanced than those with China.
American manufacturing employment remained fairly stable in the years after Naft
a came into force in 1994, plummeting only after China entered the World Trade O
rganization in 2001 and gained consistent access to markets in the United States
.
The Chinese export onslaught, however, left a scar on the American working class
that has not healed. That disproportionate impact suggests Washington officiald
om might do well to reassess its approach to future trade liberalization. Most i
mportant, it points to reconsidering how policy makers deal with trades distribut
ional consequences.
It doesnt mean walling off the United States from the rest of the world, but it d
oes mean learning from the experience of other advanced nations that had a much
healthier response to Chinas rise.
Germany, for example, not only received a surge of Chinese imports, but also exp
erienced an onslaught of imports from Eastern European countries after the colla
pse of the Soviet bloc. But it managed to maintain a more balanced trade because
German manufacturers increased their exports to all these countries too, offset
ting the job losses from import competition.
Mr. Autor suggests that Americans low savings rate was a big part of the story, c
oupled with foreigners appetite for accumulating dollar assets, which helped keep
American interest rates low and the dollar strong, in that way fueling a persis
tent trade deficit.
But other factors were at work. Robert Gordon of Northwestern University suggest
ed to me that Germanys highly skilled workers were harder to replace with cheaper
Chinese labor, limiting though not totally eliminating outsourcing. Germanys str
onger labor unions also put up more of a fight.

Washington played its part, too. In their new book Concrete Economics (Harvard Bus
iness Review Press), Stephen S. Cohen and J. Bradford DeLong of the University o
f California, Berkeley suggest that ultimately, it was the fault of American pol
icy choices.
The United States might have leaned against Chinas export-led strategy, they argu
e, perhaps by insisting more forcefully that Beijing let its currency rise as it
s trade surplus swelled. It might have tried to foster the cutting-edge industri
es of the future, as government had done so many times before, encouraging the s
hift from textiles to jumbo jets and from toys to semiconductors.
What Washington did, instead, was hitch the nations future to housing and finance
. But Wall Street, instead of spreading prosperity, delivered the worst recessio
n the world had seen since the 1930s. Even at best, they write, the transformati
on of banking and finance has produced nothing (or exceedingly little) of value.
So where should policy makers go from here?
There are no easy answers. Tearing up existing trade agreements and retreating b
ehind high tariff barriers as Mr. Trump, and perhaps Mr. Sanders, would have it
would be immensely unproductive. It would throw a wrench into the works of a wob
bly world economy. And reneging on international treaties would vastly complicat
e the international coordination needed to combat climate change.
But in any future trade liberalization including the Obamas administrations pendin
g Trans-Pacific Partnership deal, if it is to go forward at all policy makers mu
st be much more careful about managing the costs. Mr. Autor suggests any further
deals to increase trade should be gradual, to give much more time for exposed c
ompanies and their workers to retool and shift into other jobs and sectors.
Perhaps most important, the new evidence from trade suggests American policy mak
ers cannot continue to impose all the pain on the nations blue-collar workers if
they are not going to provide a stronger safety net.
That might have been justified if the distributional costs of trade were indeed
small and short-lived. But now that we know they are big and persistent, it look
s unconscionable.

This software which allows making and editing videos promised to be able to conv
ert 2D videos into 3D videos. However, this feature (the only function that I sp
ent $49.99 on) proved to be fake. This software cannot automatically detect the
depth field in any video, Also it has no option to allow an user to draw and def
ine a depth gradient to map the 2D video onto to make it 3D. The software falsel
y claimed this feature that they promise to offer. The only thing the 2D to 3D v
ideo conversion does is just shifting the 2 images in a 2D video in opposite dir
ections, The resulting video (supposedly in 3D) looks horrible. It is not in 3D.
And it looks worse than the 2D video that you started with.
I spent another $29.99 to buy another software that suppose to offer this functi
on. The results were drastically different. Depth field can be automatically det
ected or manually defined. The software s name is 3DCombine 5. The resulting vid
eo is really 3D.
Leawo Software company has promised to offer a 30 days money back guaranteed. Ho
wever, when I contacted the company, they simply told me that since they have al
ready sent me the activation code, they cannot refund my purchase.

Does that even make sense? Does this company even have any knowledge of fair and
ethical business practice? They lied to me about their software feature. Then t
hey wasted my time further by lying to me about their refund policies - using up
my time contacting their service agents.
I save all of the emails between this company and myself. I also downloaded this
website about the 30 day money back guarantee. Please resolve this issue.
Russian Enemy Terrorist:

Firefighter at
Ministry of Emergency Situations (Russia) Firefighter
Studied at
Lives in Samara, Russia
February 12, 1985
100010577345634@facebook.com
Education:
2001 Graduated from 2
1992 Started School at 2
Leawo Order No:6936049302
Order E-mail:: cwang3377@gmail.com
Product Name:Leawo Video Converter Ultimate
Registration Code: (1 year):
Leawo Video Converter Ultimate: 72E81726613930DD1B6C5C38
Leawo DVD Creator: 72E81726613930DD1B6C5C38
Leawo Video Converter: 72E81726613930DD1B6C5C38
Leawo Youtube Downloader: 72E81726613930DD1B6C5C38
Leawo DVD Ripper: 72E81726613930DD1B6C5C38
Leawo Blu-ray Ripper: 72E81726613930DD1B6C5C38
Leawo Blu-ray Creator: 72E81726613930DD1B6C5C38
Virtual Reality 3D HD Surround Sound Porn
from Awesome Wang
An Awesome Wang Production Studio of Virtual Reality 3D Surround Sound Porn @ ww
w.delightfulsex.com
delightfulsex.com, delightfulsex, virtual reality, porn, 3D, HD, surround sound,
awesome wang,
www.googledrive.com/host/0B6lrFZ1N-LFJSlctV243TDhFeDA
Hello! I m Charles and thanks for visiting my website.
I m from China: Downtown, China... A true Socialist - in a Libertarian sense.
I consider myself to be a Jack-of-All-Trades entrepreneur, engineer, and DIY fan
atic. Most of my experience is in engineering and business development specifica
lly from a military hardware standpoint; however, I also spend a good chunk of m
y day in software IT development. My bread and butter is actually mainly in doin
g real-estate businesses. I also manage import and exports from China, occasiona
lly dabble in overseas production as well. I often leverage my work related expe
reinces in military technologies and newest entertainment fad on the market in o
rder to come up with innovations that other technologists may not see. I both lo
ve being an entrepreneur and hate it with a passion all at the same time. Nobody
tells you that running a start-up is basically being a glorified intern. You do
n t know what you re doing half the time but you have to get it done anyways. It
s like when the intern runs into a problem they can t solve and complains "this
is above my paygrade I shouldn t have to deal with this stuff!" except you do..
. and everything is above your paygrade since you don t get paid.

I m not one of those people who can spend hours on Facebook... This thing gets
pretty boring. And this idea of being virtually popular doesn t turn me on eithe
r.
History of My Life:
From a Self Pitying Dud to an Uncaring Hawk
From Cowering Diplomacy to Cowboy Diplomacy
Now, just trying to balance Idealism with Realism !
One more thing about me:
I was born rich!
why I have money, and you don t... Let me explain:
I was born with an extra kidney. I sold it on the black market and made my mone
y this way. I was born rich!
This AR/VR Technology is a replication of Microsoft s technology for using a tin
y fraction of the cost. What if you use dual lasers to paint 2 overlapping nearIR grid, projected on your surroundings, from 2 different angles right beside ea
ch one of your eyes, which the single camera from one smartphone can pick up the
invisible grid layers and outlines with binocular effect just like how your eye
s do it. And then applying the edge-detection, DSP filters on that cellphone wit
h the camera, you can get the 3D outlines of depth, distant, and position tracki
ng, from such binocular overlapping of 2 painted, invisible laser grids on your
environment. Add to this position tracking, real-time information from your smar
tphones 3D compass, 3D accelerometer, 3D gyroscope, and GPS (and your microphone
), you figure exactly where you are in position with regard to your surroundings
. My camera processor also can interpret all the edges out of your surrounding a
nd the painted laser grid on everything and figure out exactly all the 3D object
s around you to allow augmented reality to work. You can actually use your older
modeled smartphone to do this.
Finally, the coolest part is where I put most of my working experiences in distr
ibuted computing and real-time network centric warfare networking to push that p
osition tracking data on to another cellphone (your primary, up-to-date smart ph
one with your carrier) which has a separate camera and powerful CPU and GPU to r
ender the VR and AR graphics processing for you eyes to see AR/VR surrounding such as the AR Video Game that that tracks your head position takes into your 3D
surroundings. This information transfer - from one cellphone to the other is al
l done in under 20-30 ms network latency rate. A normal person won t experience
dizziness and motion sickness as long as the latency in position update and head
tracking is under 100ms. (The digested position data from one phone that you ha
ve to push to the other is really not that much. And head and position tracking
VS VR/AR graphics rendering can be divided into 2 separable functions that can b
e distributed, computationally, on to two devices with real-time networking betw
een them.) Wireless VR, AR, 3D device, with or without PC rendering, can be boug
ht from me for under $80 dollars, taking into account of Chinese electronic comp
onents and Chinese manufacturing. Also, you need to have an older modeled phone
and a new smart phone under your possession - which most people do anyways. (I W
ill Update more Details and Progress within this Month.)
1 Wang Hao 11449 trailbrook ln San diego CA 92128 192.241.21.57 haow@hotmail.com
12/13/2009
2 Wang Hao 11449 Trailbrook Ln San diego CA 92128 213.254.193.1 wanghao4@yahoo.c
om 11/07/2010
3 Wang Hao 11449 Trailbrook Ln San diego CA 92128 195.112.173.9 wanghao2@hotmail
.com 10/08/2010


lunyov91@mail.ru
jimmywang425@gmail.com

www.virginmary.us
www.googledrive.com/host/0B6lrFZ1N-LFJbXpsbzB3dkRHdFk
www.perfectvirgin.com
www.googledrive.com/host/0B6lrFZ1N-LFJSTBDbnpldlcxZ28
R8puTaj7dP
ErinDiva4488

"Facebogey.com" is a place where you make fun of your friends.

"Facebook.com" is a place where you make friends.
"Facebogey.com" is a place where you make fun of your friends.
Real friends don t get offended when you insult them online. They smile and insu
lt you with something even more offensive online.
And "Facebogey.com" is the place to do it. Go to the site and see for yourself :
-)
I got this idea from my friends. I have circles of friends (both online and in r
eal life) among whom "You dumb-ass" translates to "I love you, man." Mockery is
just thinly veiled affection, and when someone comes up with a particularly witt
y insult, everyone else will take a moment to recognize and congratulate whoever
said it, and commiserate with the target.

Trumps personality, even despite its representations of security and honesty, is

a draw in and of itself, according to John Gartner, a professor of psychiatry at
Johns Hopkins Medical School and a practicing psychologist. He explained that T
rump represents a particularly American ideal: a risk-taking, domineering, chari
smatic entrepreneur.
He is flooded with ideas. He is driven, restless, and unable to keep still. He ch
annels his energy into the achievement of wildly grand ambitions, Gartner said. He
can be euphoric. He becomes easily irritated by minor obstacles. He is a risk t
aker. He overspends in both his business and personal life. He acts out sexually
. He sometimes acts impulsively, with poor judgment, in ways that can have painf
ul consequences.
These traits are largely responsible for compelling loyalty, but Gartner warns t
hat the qualities that get you elected are not the same as the capacity for gover
ning.
sexyliar.com:
www.googledrive.com/host/0B6lrFZ1N-LFJQlpJeGt0YTJwRkk

Human beings share this planet with 8.7 million other living species, not counti
ng bacteria. Yet no other living creature on this earth comes close to be what w
e are. The most famous French political philosopher, Jean Jacque Russell, who in
spired the American Revolution, the French Revolution, and the American Constitu
tion, called human beings, the "Nobel Beast." There is something very distinctiv
e about who we are and what we are. For many of us, we live and die by our moral
principles and ethical values and beliefs. We fight and defend for what is righ
t and honorable. Throughout human history, millions of men and women have fought
and died for such noble and yet abstract ideas such as freedom, justice, equali
ty, and human rights. Some of our moral principles and ethical values may be sub
jective and ethnocentric. However, all civilized societies from the East to the
West can agree to 3 timeless and universal principles when it comes to children.
And they are: 1) children are innocent; children are our future; and all childr
en under the sky need to be loved, protected, and cared for. The mortality rate
of every human being since the beginning of time to now has never changed. It is
100%. Children are our future! A human child is born without any knowledge or s
urvival skills and is completely dependent on his/her caregiver to live. She is
innocent and need to be unconditionally loved. Without love and nurture, a child
will surely die. And for any child to have a future and realize her potentials,
she needs to be educated, guided, and trained in order to be useful, civilized,
and fit into any given society. These are our ideals. However, as with any huma
n endeavor to realize our moral ideals - the best part of who we are, the harshn
ess of reality always stands in our way. In this material world with limited res
ources, where a child is born and what family she is born into determines much o
f her chances of survival and her future - especially in impoverished, third wor
ld, developing countries such as China. A country with such a wide wealth gap be
tween the rich and the poor and little to no social safety net for 600 million o
f its citizens earning less than 2 dollars a day, China has a major crisis on it
s hands in dealing with its abandoned orphans. There are about 576,000 orphans i
n China s underfunded, poorly managed orphanages who are in urgent need of inter
national attention and assistance from doctors, nurses, and medical suppliers to
caregivers and educators. And because of the scale of such urgent social proble
m, it needs the active intervention of large, international, non-profit, charity
organizations that are dedicated and sponsored to serve that very specific purp
ose, These NGO programs are made possible and supported by people, like you and
me, who truly believe in investing in our future and the most important contribu
tors of a brighter future: our children.
Before we can talk about, debate over, or try to justify funds to help orphans i
n third-world, impoverished countries, we have to dive into the deeper issue sur
rounding this value-laden, controversial, and complex idea of the intrinsic wort
h and value of human life. This idea of human rights - the guarantee of life, fr
eedom, dignity, and such - is quite a new invention by the West (esp. by the fou
nding fathers of America). They are not as self-evident and obvious everywhere e
lse in the world. In most of the totalitarian or communist societies, human bein
gs are believed to be the production of mass unskilled labor. All the inalienabl
e rights that we, Americans, take for granted that are guaranteed by our Constit
ution and Bill of Rights are not recognized in other countries that have differe
nt political philosophies and worldviews. And this idea of individual human bein
gs having intrinsic worth that are sacred and holy can be very hard to accept an
d find validity in many impoverished places of this world where 5,000 children d
ie each day because of starvation and common diseases. How can such idealistic a
nd grandiose values that we westerners hold so dearly be justified in places whe
re people s main concern everyday is focused upon survival. In these impoverishe
d places, practicality rule over ideologies. Law of the jungle dominates the soc
ial order. The idea of charity towards other people s unwanted, disabled, and di
seased children may seem counter-intuitive or simply does not make sense. And pl
us, even if we accept this idea of love and charity and help these orphans survi
ve and live, there are many other practical problems that we must also solve at

the same time or they are going grow up to face a very hard life of despair and
poverty in an unforgiving, throat-cutting, dog-eat-dog, competitive world. Most
of these orphans are abandoned by their parents at birth because they are born w
ith lifelong birth defects, terminal illnesses, or permanent disabilities. They
may need surgeries to survive and lifelong medical treatments to live a "normal"
life - thus adding to the cost of helping them. And then they need an education
and training to make a living and survive when they grow up - which adds even m
ore cost to running an orphanage if we also take into account of their future us
efulness and quality of life. So the question is very clear and a practical one
for many of these third world, developing countries: "Are they going to become b
urdens of society if we give them a chance of life?" "Do we have the resources t
o help them in the long term?" "Is it worth it?"
The second question that we have to address before we even begin to talk about o
rphans in far away lands is the fact that poverty is everywhere in this world. I
n fact, we have plenty of poverty that exist right here in America. Yes... We ha
ve children who are going to bed hungry right here at home. (Have you been to th
e most impoverished parts of Baltimore City lately?) Why should we care about or
phans elsewhere in this world when we should be taking care of our own citizens
first.

Thnxs for the video. I am slowly being educated and finding out that people are
VERY different. When I read Machiavelli,s Prince back in college, one of the mos
t important points that I chose to take out of his political treaties was that 5
0% of power is under our control. The other 50% is due to the turn of luck. I sa
id to myself, see, even the bad ass Machiavelli gives credit and submits to the
will of God - half of the time. And I believe my predisposition to disregard muc
h of Machiavelli,s work and examples of his laws of power is because of my value
s, where my talents (and field of expertise) lies, and just the fact that, when
it comes to the tiresome, boring, repetitive, and bureaucratic work of rulership
and management, I am lazy as shit. One of the reasons for this laziness is beca
use I don t find much value in this form of power. I personally believe that it
is so worthlessly transient but yet requires such high maintenance and personal
pretention at all the times that obtaining such level of leadership is really ab
out signing away your personal freedom and time and doing what u really enjoy. S
econdly, i am such an easy person to please and satisfy in this material world t
hat I am so careless about everything that is physical to the point that even my
country pumpkin wife has nothing but contempt for me. "You eat like a pig. You
dress like dog. You are fat as a cow." And I am like, "Who cares??? You are hot
enough and has enough fashion sense for the both of us."
The second reason that I find Machiavelli,s work to be somewhat obsolete are br
iefly discussed in these second 2 points. Anyways, expect the publication of my
"Modern Leviathan" to address them in details.
The difference between rich nations and poor nations is not that the rich have
more money than the poor. Rich nations produce more goods and offer better servi
ces at more efficient ways and at a lower cost than those of poor nations. And t
his is largely thanks to technology - just those dull, everyday, pragmatic, hone
st betterments in simple technology. Western technological superiority is also l
argely based on its superiority in its development and maturation of its laws, t
rade, administration (such as the patent office), and institutions. It is not th
at Bling Bling shit on MTV.
The second and the more important reason, esp on a personal level, on why Machi
avelli is somewhat obsolete is that the world is moving and changing too fast. A
nd large part of this is because technology is changing too fast. If a person, e
sp. Someone in the technological field, a company, goverents, or an entire natio

n cannot keep up with all the changes, they will not hold on to power. The major
battle of the 21st century is waged over innovation. The world is changing rapi
dly because technology is changing rapidly. And how does technology change? Like
science and art, it changes through human creativity, that rare and mysterious
phenomenon in which a human being arrive at an insight or act that has never bei
ng accomplished before. There is a great deal of dependence on being the expert
of your subject and hard work. However, there are many occasional dependence on
inspiration, luck, serendipity, genius, and the unexplained drive of people to g
o somewhere where no one has gone before. (Freedom of thoughts contribute to thi
s process because technological creativity, like all creativity, is an act of re
bellion - rebellion against conventional thinking and nature itself.)
At one point or another for someone who has experienced this phenomenon persona
lly, that person understands that no one can ever explain, in rational terms, wh
at went on inside of Beethoven,s head when he wrote Eroicy. And no one should EV
ER have the right to judge the fact that Beethoven died prematurely because he d
rank alcohol until his liver literally exploded. In the words of the famous arti
st Tupac, "Only God can judge me!"
At some level, we stand in uncomprehending awe of the miracles of human genius
that have existed throughout human history. And I call that the workings of the
Holy Spirit. And if u give credits to such Godly and Holy active Force for human
ingenuity and progress, then you should throw that Machiavelli book out of the
window and into the gutter, where it belongs, and take up the Bible.
However, your video and a review of Machiavelli,s work was extremely useful in
reminding me to use it as defensive measures in this world against EVIL. Did Mar
x or Lenin once say that "Power is the strongest aphrodisiac in the world." Well
, I don t have much appetite for rulership as for the reasons stated above. Howe
ver, I guess many people do - esp. Ignorant and unqualified idiots who wants to
claim leadership because they think it s glamorous and they will make a lot of m
oney and get a lot of pussies and shit, such as the North Korean Leader, Kim Jun
g-Un.
Well, here is a quote from Machiavelli,s work that u people need to know now, "
Unless a ruler spends a thousand sleepless nights toiling over the affairs of hi
s state, he will FAIL as a leader."

There are many things in this world which starts out with good and noble intenti
ons. However the wisdom that is required to carry out its proper implementation
was lacking. Peaceful Demonstration and collective bargaining and forming coalit
ions with the disadvantaged Whites for the cause of Black Reparation and Compens
ation was good and justifiable. However, it may have been a good idea to distrib
ute the resulting compensation based on investments and grants to African Americ
ans on an individual level based on meritocracy, instead of entitlement. That wa
s how the Marshall Plan worked. That is how the Chinese s Microloan program is w
orking in Africa and in its own country s poorest regions. The help is there. Th
e education is there. The money is there. However, in order to get it, you have
to be hardworking, competent, and justify your business idea on why it deserves
investment and funding. When you are able to build and run a successful business
, you are creating wealth and job opportunities for others. You will appreciate
and be grateful for the power of money to save yourself from poverty as well as
those around you. You will not feel entitled to anything. You need to know why t
he Western World gave a colored Asian person a Noble Prize in the field of econo
mics for such a simple concept that is the foundation the Microloan program as w
e know it today. It is simple. However, IT WORKS IN ELIMINATING POVERTY and in b
uilding self-sustainable communities and local economies in third world countrie
s.

The Dynasty of Rothschild | The Only Trillionaires in the World - Full Documenta
ry
Thanks for the Video... This is a highly informative video based on a Class Conf
lict Paradigm of viewing the world. It is highly nave but shows me how a lot of i
diots think about the world that they live in.
Modern governments and economic systems are built upon the foundation of loans,
debts, bonds, and investments. It has many flaws - just like any system that is
derived by human beings. It can be very oppressive or progressive or both. And
it is highly sensitive to the implementations by the leaders that are built on t
op of this foundation. Rothschild is merely serving a need of modern our economi
cs. Yep, they may be morally bankrupt. But their existence depends on 2 things:
1) government s dependence on them and choosing to do business with them; 2) the
ir ability to maintain a reasonable rate of return on their loans. However, Roth
schild s innovation in the modern day economic world order is quite revolutionar
y and extraordinary.
Here are just some examples of how countries that laid in complete economic and
financial ruins who were able to utilize the Rothschild s invention of the glob
al financial system to get back up on track and become global economic superpowe
rs. Yeah, it is true. "You can t get something for nothing in this world." But m
ore importantly is the issue of how to use that something that you got for somet
hing in this world to make even more something - the very concept of wealth crea
tion. These are the wealthiest countries in the world based on GDP.
1
2
3
4

United States 18125

China 11212
Japan 4210
Germany 3413

Japan and Germany were able to utilize the aids, grants, and loans from the fro
m the US Marshall Plan to rebuild itself from the ground up after WWII. Remember
, these countries were reduced to rubbles and dust after the war. Even though Ch
ina previously thought of US foreign policy based on Neoliberalism as a Western
Conspiracy Theory to destroy and dominate the world, their wise implementation o
f Neoliberalism and its very careful and selective acceptance of international d
evelopmental loans have brought them to where they are today. You can criticize
the Chinese for a lot of things. But for the most part on the issues of economic
s, I would say that the CCP did a fairly good job on the macro level.
After Truman and Ford saw how well the generous US Marshall Plan worked in rebu
ilding Europe and Southeast Asia, they then adopted foreign policy of Nation Bui
lding all over the world in hoping to repeat the success they had in Europe. The
US intentions were good on a macro level at the top leadership level. However,
it was poorly implemented: corruption and ignorance led these programs to fail.
I am not going to get into the details of these.

Conspiracy Theory on the Terrorist Attack over Paris Yesterday ???

Why did the Muslim Jihadists do it ??? Why did ISIS take credit for this. This
makes absolutely NO SENSE ! ISIS just signed its own death sentence - willingly.
And these are strategic and clever people, even though they are Muslim terroris

ts. THEY ARE NOT CRAZY AND RADICAL EXTREMISTS.

http://video.foxnews.com/v/4612577870001/president-hollande-calls-paris-attacksan-act-of-war-/
It is my expert opinion that France will enter the Syrian War - even though we
Americans can make fun of their military. But once the French go in, as a member
of NATO, Europe and North America will have no choice but to fully engage Syria
and ISIS.
The conflict in Syria is very complicated. I normally don t believe in conspira
cy theories... but there are somethings going on there that cannot be explained
otherwise. We all have to realize the economic and military interests and agenda
s that many countries have over Syria: 1) the vast amount of natural gas reserve
located there; 2) Syria s president Assad s refusal to let Saudi Arabia build i
t s oil pipeline through their country to directly supply EU - mainly benefiting
the wealthiest countries in the EU (Germany, England, and France); 3) Syria s l
ong history of belligerence and war against Israel. 4) Syria s support for the P
alestinian s (PLO) and Hamas (which the West consider them as terrorist groups)
along with secretly channeling weapons, rockets, and funds from Iran. And there
is more... on why US supported, funded, and armed ISIS to start with to help fue
l and fight a civil war in Syria in order to get rid of Assad.
Everything started with peaceful street protests in the passion of the "Arab Sp
ring" that was sweeping over the Middle East. But that suddenly turned very viol
ent. Only the dumbest motherfucker on this planet would order its police fire au
tomatic assault rifles, indiscriminately, into an unarmed protesting crowd inste
ad of riding out this "democratic" fever. (Remember the democratization of Egypt
ended up with military coming into power and declaring martial law. Saudi Arabi
a felt threatened by a democratically elected leader, loosing its old ally gover
nment in Egypt, and feeling betrayed by the USA, organized and put the Muslim Br
otherhood into power - democratically.) So you got to ask, who fired first? The
innocent protestors? Assad s security forces? Or terrorist organizations that mi
ngled into the "peacefully" protesting crowd? I don t know. I wasn t there in Sy
ria at the time. And you can t trust
these secondary sources these days. Lies are everywhere these days.
Maybe the West organized and sponsored the protests. Maybe the USA had already
funded ISIS at that time to do its dirty political job. It is very clear now tha
t ISIS was funded and armed by the USA - just like how radical, extremist group,
Al-Qaeda, was started, organized, funded, armed, and trained by the US to fight
the Soviet Union back in the days. The United States is nave and think in very s
hort terms. It thinks that they can arm and train these stupid cavemen to fight
their fight. And after the US is done with them, we can just deal with them late
r. And if they don t go away naturally, we can just easily wipe them out. The US
has this mentality because we always underestimate how smart and clever our ene
mies may be. We never consider the fact that they may actually be smarter than w
e are. The second reason is because of the short shelf life of our political lea
ders in our democratically elected system. The president and the congress focuse
s on their own accomplishments in their short term as governing leaders and kick
the can down the road to the next elected leader to clean up their potential me
ss, collateral, and externalities. This is just how a Democracy works. The avera
ge person is stupid. So if you tell people the truth about being fiscally respon
sible and think about their national interest and personal wellbeing in the long
term, YOU WILL NEVER GET ELECTED in a "Free Country."
The United States created Al-Qaeda
that they are extremists. After the
sualties with all 4 limbs blown off
te economic disaster. The US didn t

to help us fight the Soviet Union - knowing

Soviet withdrew from Afghanistan, wounded ca
were everywhere. The country was in a comple
help Afghanistan with any economic aid. It d

idn t try to build a single hospital or a secular school in that country to help
it go back on to a normal progressive economic and political path. The US basic
ally tried to throw Afghanistan away like a used condom after they were done. An
d what the US did in the aftermath of the Afghan War came to bite us hard on 9/1
1 as Religious Extremist Groups (Al-Qaeda, Taliban...) took over that country af
ter we departed in the 70 s.
Yep, we ate the big one there. You know, there s an old American Proverb that s
ays, "We create our own demons." You know, there is another one. And it says, "H
istory repeats itself." We just did the same thing with sponsoring, funding, and
arming ISIS in Syria to do our dirty work. Now they have turned on us. Now, ISI
S is slightly more dangerous because they are a quite sophisticated terrorist gr
oup who are technologically and media savvy. Their recruiting methods are very a
dvanced. Their media campaign is also very, very sophisticated.
Now the civil war between Assad s loyal forces in Syria VS. the rebels (includi
ng ISIS) destroyed the entire country s infrastructure. The civil war pretty muc
h pushed and rolled back Syria s economy by 30 to 40 years. But Assad s forces w
ere winning. Assad was determined NOT to step down. He had the loyalty and backi
ng of most of the Middle to Upper Class Citizens in his country as well as the m
ilitary - with the support of the Russians and Iranians. There were also very pr
actical reasons not to step down doesn t matter what mistakes he might have made
. Because the entire Western world has accused him of being a brutal tyrant who
mass murdered his own people. Whether true or not, and not knowing exactly who a
ctually started and escalated this Civil War, it is not in any country s politic
al interest to offer him safe haven to escape to if he steps down. And staying i
n his country, he will be put on trial. And he will be executed for his "Crime a
gainst Humanity." He had no choice but to fight on - even as the war had torn as
country into shreds. And the tide of war was turning towards his favor.
However, it was at that critical moment, HE LAUNCHED CHEMICAL and BIOLOGICAL WE
APONS against his own cities and towns. Wow, isn t that something??? I don t thi
nk Assad is a very bright man. But nobody could have been that fucking stupid. P
lus, Assad had political and military advisors to tell him that "This is a BAD I
DEA, OUR SUPREME LEADER!" And as soon as those weapons were used, Assad quickly
allowed UN forces into his country to monitor and help him destroy his entire co
untry s stockpile of Chemical and Biological Weapons. I mean, this is just where
things got very weird and crazy. I mean, I can t understand what happened there
or what progressed on in Syria after that point without access to classified do
cuments. I don t want to speculate on anything here. But wait, things get even m
ore weird...
It is clear that Israel want the Civil War in Syria - its old determined enemy
- to last as long as possible to hopefully completely destroy that country s eco
nomy and military so that it will never be able to pose a threat to Israel again
. Saudi Arabia is on the same page. Leave them alone and pray that they kill eac
h other down to the last man/woman/child. And hopefully before that, Assad will
be overthrown. Presumably, that is what the US is tentatively leaning on as well
because it has shown no real will to really fight or bomb against ISIS position
s and strong holds in either Syria or Iraq - esp. not in Syria. However, Syria i
s Russia s strongest and most loyal ally in the Middle East. They go way back wi
th Assad s father and Premier Khrushchev. It wants to maintain that relationship
to keep its foothold control in the Middle East. It is also not in Russia s eco
nomic interest if Assad is overthrown and then the new leader precedes to let Sa
udi Arabia and the West build that Oil Pipeline straight into EU. (70% of Russia
s export is Oil.) And there are also other reasons of showing its strong milita
ry will for the interest of the moderate Muslim people to expand its diplomatic
soft power in that region, which Iraq has already graciously taken up now to par
tner with Russia to fight against ISIS - a country that the US has spent 7 trill
ion dollars in the last decade to get rid of Saddam Hussein, pacify terrorists t

here, stabilize the society and economy, and prop up a puppet government that is
in support of the USA. Russia also want to stick it against the US and EU for i
nterfering with the Ukrainian Civil War, which the West has stopped Russia from
annexing territories and putting a pro-Russian government into place. Instead, t
he West have threated to offer a place in NATO for Ukraine. And the West kicked
Russia out of G-8 and put heavy sanctions on Russia. Vladimir Putin is using thi
s opportunity to get back at the US. Iran just jumped in the war because Saudi A
rabia is their geopolitical rival and enemy. Both are the main regional power in
place. However, both countries are proclaiming that their sects of Muslim Relig
ion is better: Shiite, Sunni, Shia, etc... But this is just a religious cover up
for actual political rivalry. They have been fighting proxy wars for a long tim
e now. The latest one being in Yemen. Thus ISIS in Syria will be their destinati
on for rivalry, proxy war, and the fight for influence. And it doesn t take a ge
nius to figure out what Europe wants to happen in Syria...
There is very little doubt that the London 7/7 Bombing was carried out by Al-Qa
eda in response the British Military allying with and assisting the United State
s in its War on Terror. In The Guardian Tariq Ali[26] and Robert Fisk in The Ind
ependent,[27] echoing earlier comments by George Galloway in parliament,[28] cla
imed that the Iraq War was the cause of the attacks...StWC national convenor Lin
dsey German condemned the bombings but added that The only way to end the bombing
s is to withdraw from Afghanistan, Iraq and Palestine. When we have justice arou
nd the world we will have peace as well. Most British Muslims were deeply hurt an
d disgusted at these attacks, especially due to the fact that the bomb site by A
ldgate station had a huge surrounding Muslim and Asian community. However, they
cited the British government foreign policy as the main reason for the attacks.
One in four British Muslims supports the reasons mentioned by the terrorists, wh
ilst 6% felt the attacks were fully justified.[78]
Al Qaeda cleric Omar Bakri Mohammed approved of the bombings and called them a
"warning" for the British government.[79]
The cousin of Shehzad Tanweer, one of the suicide bombers, approved of the suic
ide bombings by Tanweer and called him a "good Muslim".[80]
About 2,000 villagers in Shehzad Tanweer s Pakistani village of origin prayed f
or him at his funeral.[80] Grand Imam Mohammed Sayyed Tantawi of Cairo s Al-Azha
r University condemned the attacks and said that the attacks could be not justif
ied as an attempt to force Britain out of Iraq. "This is illogical and cannot be
the motive for killing innocent civilians".[81]
Richard Littlejohn on 9 July used his column in the Daily Mail to attack politi
cians in an article titled "Hello bombers...and welcome to Londonistan". Littlej
ohn attacked Ken Livingstone ("throughout his career he has given the impression
that he has never met a terrorist he doesn t like") and Cherie Blair ("will [sh
e] extend to him the same sympathy and understanding that she lavishes on Palest
inian suicide bombers"), while calling for the Human Rights Act to be scrapped a
nd extremist mosques shut down.[29]
Washington managing editor, Brit Hume, claimed his first response to the news w
as that it was "time to buy", referring to the stock market, and host John Gibso
n quipped that if the International Olympic Committee "picked France instead of
London to hold the Olympics, it would have been the one time we could look forwa
rd to where we didn t worry about terrorism. [Terrorists would] blow up Paris, a
nd who cares?"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nuhBdHc8Nqs
However, Al-Qaeda never officially claimed credit to this act of terror althoug
h they most likely sponsored the perpetrators. Politically, Al-Qaeda knew better

than to take the blame for this one just like how Al-Qaeda called off the New Y
ork City s subway bombing plot. ISIS is currently claiming credit for the Terror
ism in Paris. ISIS has also taken the credit/blame for taking down a Russian air
liner, killing 224 civilians and 17 children on its way to St. Petersburg (doesn
t matter if it s brought down by a bomb or missile). What could ISIS be thinkin
g??? Do they know what is in their best interest right now??? How could they ben
efit from what they just did? By provoking both sides?
http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/616132/ISIS-Russian-plane-crash-shoot-down-t
error-explosion-video
This Alex Jones moron posted this on Nov 2, 2015 - 11 days before the Paris Ter
rorism Event yesterday. I don t think Obama ever wanted to go into a war with Sy
ria. He doesn t want that responsibility. He is also a practical man. He knows t
hat we can t afford a full deployment again. However, I BELIEVE the Secretary of
Defense, along with the American Military Industrial Machine, has being plottin
g this for a long time to take us into the Syrian Civil War. Now President Obama
is finally beginning to move troops in on the ground. And the troops are going
to get attacked by ISIS. Then, the US military can start and justify a full assa
ult. This is not Obama s choosing. This is not his style of pragmatic, realpolit
ik... And this terrorist act against Paris yesterday, it may well have the signa
tures of the US military. If you do not try to explain this in consideration of
some possibilities of conspiracy theories involved, NONE OF THIS MAKES SENSE! So
me small idiotic factions of ISIS (or ISIS wanna be, or Fake ISIS members) may h
ave been used or may have been manipulated to take the credit for the Paris atta
ck. Now a full war involving the US will be justified to its congress and its pe
ople. Since everybody has already jumped in to grab ahold of its own interest an
d agenda, Iran, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Israel, China (through Russian Proxy), US
might as well. In fact, it has no choice. The amount of face and respect that th
e USA would loose internationally if we don t enter this war cannot be fathomed.
People don t blame Obama. he has no choice. Politics is fucked up. This world i
s fucked up...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u9kVDMEeEWw
We might have had a chance of long term, protracted, limited war consisting of
completely air strikes - that is before Russia jumped in. And now, this happens
in France. Everything has completely changed without any chance of reversal. Fra
nce declares this terrorist event as an act of war. ISIS (real or falsified) has
claimed credit for this attack. If France retaliates against ISIS... interestin
g... France will drag all the NATO countries into war. What could have ISIS been
THINKING??? Indeed here, conspiracy theories cannot be ruled out. But let s not
speculate at this point. It is still too early.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pLUjzGUYUfw
Oct. 30th... This is too close to Nov. 13th... Our president don t want to go i
nto war. However, I think a lot of the cabinet and the congress want a war. Our
President still had a chance to overrule everyone as the most powerful commander
-in-chief. Russia forced a hand. However, after last night, he no longer has a c
hoice:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pYyIXR2CnlY

Also stop insulting me! Y all have been doing this for the last decade now. You
people truly need to learn to connect the dots when you are tracking people s hi
story while doing your background checks.

It is your healthcare system that has failed me. That is the basis of ALL YOU N
EED TO KNOW to understand everything that happened afterwards~!
1. I was having so much anxiety under the pressure of all the demanding respons
ibilities that I have taken up. I was close to having a Panic Attack. However, t
he doctors at Georgia Tech and the doctors associated with school misdiagnosed t
his as ADHD. These whacked hacks pop out Adderall like candy pills on campus and
provided me with one and a half years of supply at 60-100 mgs a day. You got to
remember, I only weighed 130 pounds back then.
2. Once I started Adderall, it was like sniffing cocaine, 24 hours a day. Initi
ally, it increased my productivity and creativity so much, I was producing the b
est work of my entire lifetime during that period. Looking back, I still think t
hat this is a miracle pill. (Steve Jobs gave a lot of credit to doing drugs for
most of the accomplishments in his life. His drug of choice was LSD.)
3. However, I was too immature and too inexperienced back then to know really h
ow to use and control my intake of Amphetamine Salts. Long term use of amphetami
ne everyday will cause you to loose all your appetite. And you are never tired n
or thirsty. In fact, you don t even need to go to sleep anymore. You can work 24
/7. But you have to force yourself to eat and force yourself to drink and sleep.
Else after a year or so, your mind will become more and more cluttered, confuse
d, irrational, irritable, impulsive, and slowly going crazy without you actually
realizing it.
4. You people should understand why Meth is called a love drug sometimes. In my
case, my dopamine level is ramped up so high every hour of everyday, y all shou
ld understand the long term side-effect of this drug while it does make you supe
r productive.
5. After using this drug for a very long time, yeah, sure... I loved this woman
(whom y all accuse me of) with 100% of my cocaine saturated heart. I loved her
at that time just as much as I wanted to fuck everything that moved. (Plus, she
is NOT an artist. She has NO talents! And she looks NASTY. FAT and Short legs. A
bsolutely no tits (until she bought herself D-sized plastic ones). Y all try to
see her true face without the 2 inches of makeup that she puts on. SICK!!! Nasty
!!! It s a face that is clearly the resulting legacy from a lifetime of heavy al
cohol and drug abuse. She was one of the biggest trouble makers from her high sc
hool coming from a respectable Italian, Conservative family. She skipped school
and rode with her friend in her friend s Beetle to the forest to smoke weed ever
yday. She was a highly promiscuous person who likes to fuck lots of boys in the
park that was located right next to her high school. Her parents probably didn t
like that and punished her for it. But she graduated from high school and immed
iately left home. So desperate to prove and validate herself and her worth, she
"probably" went into the porn business of that time. That gave her immediate acc
ess to cash and drugs and more guys to fuck - for money and for perversion and f
un. You have to understand that she is not just a slut - but a massive irrationa
l and impulsive bitch. It s not that hard to imagine why men would turn on her a
nd fuck her over and bankrupted this crazy bitch. Massive amounts of crack, LSD,
and weed usage in her lifetime, you understand that her brain is fucked up beyo
nd repair. She has the attention span and memory retention of 5 seconds. And bec
ause of the drugs perhaps, to achieve an optimum psychological arousal state, sh
e has to run around like a slut and do every crazy thing possible to stimulate h
er brain enough, which is so used to having massive amounts of drugs hijacking a
ll of her neural circuits and transmitters. She is dumb as shit without an ounce
of talent. But she is loud, stubborn, and rebellious bitch who has such a bad a
nd uncontrollable temper that surpasses anybody or anything that I know of. I me
an, if you are smart and talented and can get things done, yeah, you are allowed
to have an impatient, bad temper. But if you are useless and worthless... hmmm.
.. Nobody in that church takes her seriously - not even her discipler. On top of

that, her roommates are afraid of her and all knows that she is crazy. Her brai
n is fucked up. She is crazy. Everything she does basically surrounds loosing we
ight. She never gets respect. Nobody EVER takes her seriously. HERE IS THE KEY P
ART: Her Ego is Bigger and More Rebellious than any woman whom I know of - inclu
ding my mother !!!)
6. Now do y all get it??? I wouldn t dare to touch or fuck her in risk of getti
ng infected by STD. IT WAS THE DRUGS! It was the AMPHETAMINE! Your healthcare sy
stem has failed me!!! But this horrible experience was highly helpful for me to
understand many things: 1) while I am a highly controlled and rational person, t
hrough the eyes and mindset of a brain that was high on drugs and no longer unde
r the control of my will, I can now sympathize with certain people in this world
who are living their lives according to their fate, not their free will; 2) I h
ave seen the true nature of the average idiots in this society and the hypocrisy
of these so called "friends." The answer is simple. I get up. I simply leave. I
n economics, this is called "Capital Flight."
7. This thing happened... Yes... It happened. I learned from it. And I am bette
r off for it. However, how did this come back to haunt me?
a. I was sooooo... obsessed with this [ugly, midget, fat fuck] that I will
KILL lots of people like that crazy Korean at Virginia Tech.
b. Everything after this point in my life, I was doing it to impress this woman
who is 5 years older than me. I invest in Real-Estate. It couldn t have
been the fact that the market was hot for flipping houses. No, I was
buying houses to impress her.
c. You used my mother, whom I have so much contempt for, to turn around
and harass me in contempt with the language and thinking of how you
people - not hers - are interpreting my life, my actions, my thoughts, and
my history.
THUS... please stop guessing and continue to endlessly INSULT me. My wife and I
are a perfect fit. I am a highly theoretical and impractical person. My wife he
lps me take care of all the daily businesses so that I can survive. But, if I am
looking for a Hot Artist to cheat on and leave my wife, she should match at lea
st the standard in the picture below. Any of you can hook me up with a hot godde
ss like the one below? If you do, then let me then think about it.
Concerning My Reproduction Business and Passing on my Genes.
People have different values and preferences. Even when it comes to an universa
l desire, people have different ways of expressing that same desire.
"He has made everything beautiful in its time. He has also set eternity in the
human heart; yet no one can fathom what God has done from beginning to end." (Ec
clesiastes 3:11 - King Solomon)
We are all looking for Eternity and Everlasting Life. However, people express t
his in different ways.
1. The best way for everlasting life is simply to find something that will help
you achieve immortality and live forever. From the use of Mercury in China sinc
e the Qing Dynasty - the first Emperor of China to the Search for the Holy Grail
in the West, we are all the same.
2. Heaven and Hell
3. Your life (and your genes and the family name) is passed on to your children
. By reproducing babies, you are achieving immortality.

4. You achieve permanence and everlasting life through a lifetime legacy of wor
k, ideas, values, and achievements that you leave behind to others.
GUESS WHICH ONE OF THE FOUR PATHS LISTED ABOVE THAT I VALUE THE MOST TO ACHIEVE
PERSONAL IMMORTALITY AND ETERNITY ???
Please stay out of my business...

OK Journalists, this was partially the conspiracy theory I was talking about...
If the Paris attacks turn out to have been directed by Islamic State s central
leadership, it would mark a "big change" in the group s strategy, said William M
cCants, an expert on Islamic extremism at the Brookings Institution.
Islamic State has focused on state-building in Iraq and Syria in the last year
and "has not dedicated a lot of resources to external operations," McCants said
in an interview. Most Islamic State attacks outside the region up until now have
been carried out by affiliated groups or individuals who were inspired to act b
y Islamic State propaganda.
"The calculation has been, by the U.S. and other governments, that as long as I
slamic State focuses on state-building in Iraq, it is enough to contain them," M
cCants said. "But if Islamic State has begun successful large-scale external att
acks, I think it will increase the popular demand for much larger-scale interven
tions."
Much of the pressure could come from European allies.
"France has declared this an act of war," said James Jeffrey, a former ambassad
or in both Turkey and Iraq and now an analyst with the Washington Institute for
Near East Policy. "I do not think (French President Francois) Hollande s respons
e will be to continue his minor air force contribution to Obama s very cautious
limited containment campaign."

Thank you people for the Movie...

Somethings in this world, you people will NEVER understand. Because you people
are not BELIEVERS. There is no point of talking to or throwing pearls to pigs an
d fools.
God s people are saved, blessed, and cursed all at the same time. They are save
d from the burdens and the guilt of their sins:
29"Take My yoke upon you and learn from Me, for I am gentle and humble in heart,
and YOU WILL FIND REST FOR YOUR SOULS. 30"For My yoke is easy and My burden is
light." (Matthew 11:30)
However, God s people are cursed with a much heavier burden after they are save
d from their sins. Once you admit the existence of God and that Jesus is Lord, t
hen the universe, this world, existence, and life, they are no longer absurd any
more. God, the God of the Bible, is not irrational nor whimsical. The Universe i
s not here by chance, but guided by order. And the world is not random. All Chri
stians want to know the meaning and purpose of everything - including that of th
eir own transient existence - in order to know God better. And the search for th
e meaning of life can drive a man insane. However, a life without meaning is not

a life worth living for Christians.

"A life without examination is a life not worth living." - Socrates.
WHY WE ARE SAVED AND CURSED AT THE SAME TIME ???
0. It is the glory of God to conceal a matter, But the glory of kings is to sea
rch out a matter. 3As the heavens for height and the earth for depth, So the hea
rt of kings is unsearchable. (Proverbs 25:2 - King Solomon)
1. After removing Saul, he made David their king. God testified concerning him:
I have found David son of Jesse, a man after my own heart; he will do everythi
ng I want him to do. (Acts 13:22 - regarding King David)
2. The lion which is mighty among beasts And does not retreat before any, The s
trutting rooster, the male goat also, And a king when his army is with him. (Pro
verbs 30:30 - King Solomon)
3. I want to know God s thoughts, the rest are details. Albert Einstein.
4. I, the Teacher, was king over Israel in Jerusalem. 13 I applied my mind to s
tudy and to explore by wisdom all that is done under the heavens. What a heavy b
urden God has laid on mankind! 14 I have seen all the things that are done under
the sun; all of them are meaningless, a chasing after the wind.
What is crooked cannot be straightened; what is lacking cannot be counted.
16 I said to myself, Look, I have increased in wisdom more than anyone who has r
uled over Jerusalem before me; I have experienced much of wisdom and knowledge. 1
7 Then I applied myself to the understanding of wisdom, and also of madness and
folly, but I learned that this, too, is a chasing after the wind.
For with much wisdom comes much sorrow;
the more knowledge, the more grief. (Ecclesiastes 1:12)
5. "He has made everything beautiful in its time. He has also set eternity in t
he human heart; yet no one can fathom what God has done from beginning to end."
(Ecclesiastes 3:11 - King Solomon)
6. "For I know the plans I have for you, declares the Lord, plans to prosper you
and not to harm you, plans to give you hope and a future. 12 Then you will call
on me and come and pray to me, and I will listen to you. 13 You will seek me and
find me when you seek me with all your heart." (Jeremiah 29:11-13)
7. "Eli, Eli, lema sabachthani?" ("My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?").
- Jesus (Matthew 27:46)
8. "Curse God and die!" (Job 2:9 - Job s Wife)
9. (Job 3 - Job speaking)
O God, put a curse on the day I was born;
put a curse on the night when I was conceived!
Turn that day into darkness, God.
Never again remember that day;
never again let light shine on it.
Make it a day of gloom and thick darkness;
cover it with clouds, and blot out the sun.
Blot that night out of the year,
and never let it be counted again;
make it a barren, joyless night.
Tell the sorcerers to curse that day,
those who know how to control Leviathan.[a]

Keep the morning star from shining;

give that night no hope of dawn.
Curse that night for letting me be born,
for exposing me to trouble and grief.
I wish I had died in my mother s womb
or died the moment I was born.
Why did my mother hold me on her knees?
Why did she feed me at her breast?
If I had died then, I would be at rest now
sleeping like the kings and rulers
who rebuilt ancient palaces.
Then I would be sleeping like princes
who filled their houses with gold and silver,
or sleeping like a stillborn child.
In the grave wicked people stop their evil,
and tired workers find rest at last.
Even prisoners enjoy peace,
free from shouts and harsh commands.
and slaves at last are free.
hy let people go on living in misery?
They wait for death, but it never comes;
God keeps their future hidden
and I can never stop groaning.
Everything I fear and dread comes true.
and my troubles never end. (Job 3)
10. Meaningless! Meaningless!
says the Teacher.
Utterly meaningless!
Everything is meaningless.
What do people gain from all their labors
at which they toil under the sun? (Ecclesiastes 1)
11. It is better to go to a house of mourning than to go to a house of feasting
, for death is the destiny of everyone; the living should take this to heart. Fr
ustration is better than laughter, because a sad face is good for the heart. The
heart of the wise is in the house of mourning, but the heart of fools is in the
house of pleasure. (Ecclesiastes 7:2-4)
12. For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways, decla
res the Lord. For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways highe
r than your ways and my thoughts than your thoughts. (Isaiah 55:8)
13. Have you not known? Have you not heard? The Lord is the everlasting God, th
e Creator of the ends of the earth... his understanding is unsearchable. (Isaiah
40:28)
14. Great is our Lord, and abundant in power; his understanding is beyond measu
re. (Psalm 147:5)
15. (Job 38-41)
Then the Lord spoke to Job out of the storm.
Will the one who contends with the Almighty correct him?
Let him who accuses God answer him!
Who is this that obscures my plans
with words without knowledge?
Brace yourself like a man;
I will question you,

and you shall answer me.

Where were you when I laid the earths foundation?
Tell me, if you understand.
Who marked off its dimensions? Surely you know!
Who stretched a measuring line across it?
On what were its footings set,
or who laid its cornerstone
while the morning stars sang together
and all the angels[a] shouted for joy?
Who shut up the sea behind doors
when it burst forth from the womb,
when I made the clouds its garment
and wrapped it in thick darkness,
when I fixed limits for it
and set its doors and bars in place,
when I said, This far you may come and no farther;
here is where your proud waves halt?
Have you ever given orders to the morning,
or shown the dawn its place,
that it might take the earth by the edges
and shake the wicked out of it?
The earth takes shape like clay under a seal;
its features stand out like those of a garment.
The wicked are denied their light,
and their upraised arm is broken.
Have you journeyed to the springs of the sea
or walked in the recesses of the deep?
Have the gates of death been shown to you?
Have you seen the gates of the deepest darkness?
Have you comprehended the vast expanses of the earth?
Tell me, if you know all this.
What is the way to the abode of light?
And where does darkness reside?
Can you take them to their places?
Do you know the paths to their dwellings?
Surely you know, for you were already born!
You have lived so many years!
Have you entered the storehouses of the snow
or seen the storehouses of the hail,
which I reserve for times of trouble,
for days of war and battle?
What is the way to the place where the lightning is dispersed,
or the place where the east winds are scattered over the earth?
Who cuts a channel for the torrents of rain,
and a path for the thunderstorm,
to water a land where no one lives,
an uninhabited desert,
to satisfy a desolate wasteland
and make it sprout with grass?
Does the rain have a father?
Who fathers the drops of dew?
From whose womb comes the ice?
Who gives birth to the frost from the heavens
when the waters become hard as stone,
when the surface of the deep is frozen?
Can you bind the chains[b] of the Pleiades?
Can you loosen Orions belt?
Can you bring forth the constellations in their seasons[c]
or lead out the Bear[d] with its cubs?
Do you know the laws of the heavens?

Can you set up Gods[e] dominion over the earth?

Can you raise your voice to the clouds
and cover yourself with a flood of water?
Do you send the lightning bolts on their way?
Do they report to you, Here we are?
Who gives the ibis wisdom[f]
or gives the rooster understanding?[g]
Who has the wisdom to count the clouds?
Who can tip over the water jars of the heavens
when the dust becomes hard
and the clods of earth stick together?
Do you hunt the prey for the lioness
and satisfy the hunger of the lions
when they crouch in their dens
or lie in wait in a thicket?
Who provides food for the raven
when its young cry out to God
and wander about for lack of food?
Do you know when the mountain goats give birth?
Do you watch when the doe bears her fawn?
Do you count the months till they bear?
Do you know the time they give birth?
They crouch down and bring forth their young;
their labor pains are ended.
Their young thrive and grow strong in the wilds;
they leave and do not return.
Who let the wild donkey go free?
Who untied its ropes?
I gave it the wasteland as its home,
the salt flats as its habitat.
It laughs at the commotion in the town;
it does not hear a drivers shout.
It ranges the hills for its pasture
and searches for any green thing.
Will the wild ox consent to serve you?
Will it stay by your manger at night?
Can you hold it to the furrow with a harness?
Will it till the valleys behind you?
Will you rely on it for its great strength?
Will you leave your heavy work to it?
Can you trust it to haul in your grain
and bring it to your threshing floor?
The wings of the ostrich flap joyfully,
though they cannot compare
with the wings and feathers of the stork.
She lays her eggs on the ground
and lets them warm in the sand,
unmindful that a foot may crush them,
that some wild animal may trample them.
She treats her young harshly, as if they were not hers;
she cares not that her labor was in vain,
for God did not endow her with wisdom
or give her a share of good sense.
Yet when she spreads her feathers to run,
she laughs at horse and rider.
Do you give the horse its strength
or clothe its neck with a flowing mane?
Do you make it leap like a locust,
striking terror with its proud snorting?
It paws fiercely, rejoicing in its strength,

and charges into the fray.

It laughs at fear, afraid of nothing;
it does not shy away from the sword.
The quiver rattles against its side,
along with the flashing spear and lance.
In frenzied excitement it eats up the ground;
it cannot stand still when the trumpet sounds.
At the blast of the trumpet it snorts, Aha!
It catches the scent of battle from afar,
the shout of commanders and the battle cry.
Does the hawk take flight by your wisdom
and spread its wings toward the south?
Does the eagle soar at your command
and build its nest on high?
It dwells on a cliff and stays there at night;
a rocky crag is its stronghold.
From there it looks for food;
its eyes detect it from afar.
Its young ones feast on blood,
and where the slain are, there it is.
Then the Lord spoke to Job out of the storm:
Brace yourself like a man;
I will question you,
and you shall answer me.
Would you discredit my justice?
Would you condemn me to justify yourself?
Do you have an arm like Gods,
and can your voice thunder like his?
Then adorn yourself with glory and splendor,
and clothe yourself in honor and majesty.
Unleash the fury of your wrath,
look at all who are proud and bring them low,
look at all who are proud and humble them,
crush the wicked where they stand.
Bury them all in the dust together;
shroud their faces in the grave.
Then I myself will admit to you
that your own right hand can save you.
Look at Behemoth,
which I made along with you
and which feeds on grass like an ox.
What strength it has in its loins,
what power in the muscles of its belly!
Its tail sways like a cedar;
the sinews of its thighs are close-knit.
Its bones are tubes of bronze,
its limbs like rods of iron.
It ranks first among the works of God,
yet its Maker can approach it with his sword.
The hills bring it their produce,
and all the wild animals play nearby.
Under the lotus plants it lies,
hidden among the reeds in the marsh.
The lotuses conceal it in their shadow;
the poplars by the stream surround it.
A raging river does not alarm it;
it is secure, though the Jordan should surge against its mouth.
Can anyone capture it by the eyes,
or trap it and pierce its nose?
[h]Can you pull in Leviathan with a fishhook

or tie down its tongue with a rope?

Can you put a cord through its nose
or pierce its jaw with a hook?
Will it keep begging you for mercy?
Will it speak to you with gentle words?
Will it make an agreement with you
for you to take it as your slave for life?
Can you make a pet of it like a bird
or put it on a leash for the young women in your house?
Will traders barter for it?
Will they divide it up among the merchants?
Can you fill its hide with harpoons
or its head with fishing spears?
If you lay a hand on it,
you will remember the struggle and never do it again!
Any hope of subduing it is false;
the mere sight of it is overpowering.
No one is fierce enough to rouse it.
Who then is able to stand against me?
Who has a claim against me that I must pay?
Everything under heaven belongs to me.
I will not fail to speak of Leviathans limbs,
its strength and its graceful form.
Who can strip off its outer coat?
Who can penetrate its double coat of armor[i]?
Who dares open the doors of its mouth,
ringed about with fearsome teeth?
Its back has[j] rows of shields
tightly sealed together;
each is so close to the next
that no air can pass between.
They are joined fast to one another;
they cling together and cannot be parted.
Its snorting throws out flashes of light;
its eyes are like the rays of dawn.
Flames stream from its mouth;
sparks of fire shoot out.
Smoke pours from its nostrils
as from a boiling pot over burning reeds.
Its breath sets coals ablaze,
and flames dart from its mouth.
Strength resides in its neck;
dismay goes before it.
The folds of its flesh are tightly joined;
they are firm and immovable.
Its chest is hard as rock,
hard as a lower millstone.
When it rises up, the mighty are terrified;
they retreat before its thrashing.
The sword that reaches it has no effect,
nor does the spear or the dart or the javelin.
Iron it treats like straw
and bronze like rotten wood.
Arrows do not make it flee;
slingstones are like chaff to it.
A club seems to it but a piece of straw;
it laughs at the rattling of the lance.
Its undersides are jagged potsherds,
leaving a trail in the mud like a threshing sledge.
It makes the depths churn like a boiling caldron

and stirs up the sea like a pot of ointment.

It leaves a glistening wake behind it;
one would think the deep had white hair.
Nothing on earth is its equal
a creature without fear.
It looks down on all that are haughty;
it is king over all that are proud.
16. As you do not know the path of the wind, or how the body is formed in a mot
her s womb, so you cannot understand the work of God, the Maker of all things. (
Ecclesiastes 11:5)
17. When I look at your heavens, the work of your fingers, the moon and the sta
rs, which you have set in place, what is man that you are mindful of him, and th
e son of man that you care for him? (Psalm 8:34)
18. Before I formed you in the womb I knew you. And before you were born I cons
ecrated you; I have appointed you a prophet to the nations. (Jeremiah 1:5)
19. I also said to myself, "As for humans, God tests them so that they may see
that they are like the animals. (Ecclesiastes 3:18)
20. Do not be hasty in word or impulsive in thought to bring up a matter in the
presence of God. For God is in heaven and you are on the earth; therefore let y
our words be few. (Ecclesiastes 5:2)
Omg... how long is this damn article??? Liu Yan
Alright, a few more answers.
I am a linguist. And I truly understand how politics work (and in economics, bu
siness, diplomacy, marketing, and advertisement + computer science, engineering,
technical writing, project management, and cognitive science). Do any of you ha
ve any idea how IMPORTANT language is??? I sure do... I think most people don t.
.. esp. women. I mean, they talk, talk, talk, and gossip all day long with empty
words that mean nothing. You ever wonder why the entire Bible is trying to teac
h women to shut the fuck up??? esp. in the new testament...
Language is the architecture of the construct of our thoughts, opinions, biases
, racism, love, values, beliefs, emotional responses. And all of these are the s
eeds for ACTION ...
For people who gets stuff done, who commands authority or works with technology
, we all know, in a functional environment, language needs to be extremely preci
se. Human language is, by definition, is imprecise in nature. But, for your word
s to be taken seriously, it has to be defined and written in such a way where it
is very hard to make it subjective to any environmental variables or contextual
interpretation - unless you want to fuck people over, like the Muslims. (Just l
ike how the White political whores used my mother to FUCK ME OVER throughout the
last 8 years. All colored men beware. I will teach you the fine art of White pe
ople s spin, just like how Satan played God s word and manipulated Eve rebel aga
inst God and bring down the entire mankind into a fallen world and under a curse
d state.) This is a form of language that is completely different from the way h
ow people talk and how bitches gossip with each other on a daily basis.
I ll show you a few examples:
United Nations Security Council Resolution 242
Operative Paragraph One "Affirms that the fulfillment of Charter principles req

uires the establishment of a just and lasting peace in the Middle East which sho
uld include the application of both the following principles:
(i) Withdrawal of Israeli armed forces from territories occupied in the recent
conflict;
(ii) Termination of all claims or states of belligerency and respect for and ac
knowledgment of the sovereignty, territorial integrity and political independenc
e of every State in the area and their right to live in peace within secure and
recognized boundaries free from threats or acts of force."
Ah.. Peace in the Middle East, RIGHT ??? You Muslims need to be smarter than th
is... That may be one of the reasons you should adopt Democracy and talk to your
wives more... Here is your American Savior, did he Really wanted to help you ??
? or End the Oil Crisis to save his presidency??? This is WHY the U.N. is a toot
hless and corrupt political cardboard box that is erected to legitimize the hidd
en motives of the superpowers of this world.
Remember:
Israel is never going to give back these Lands back to the Muslims. The Palesti
nians are never going to have a home. And the Muslims are going to keep fighting
Israel.
"President Carter (Remember this man won the Nobel Peace Prize for this) asked
for a State Department report "to determine if there was any justice to the Isra
eli position that the resolution did not include all the occupied territories".
The State Department report concluded:
Support for the concept of total withdrawal was widespread in the Security Coun
cil, and it was only through intensive American efforts that a resolution was ad
opted which employed indefinite language in the withdrawal clause. In the proces
s of obtaining this result, the United States made clear to the Arab states and
several other members of the Security Council that the United States envisioned
only insubstantial revisions of the 1949 armistice lines. Israel did not protest
the approach."
Speaking to Henry Kissinger, President Richard Nixon said "You and I both know
they cant go back to the other [1967] borders. But we must not, on the other hand
, say that because the Israelis win this war, as they won the 67 War, that we j
ust go on with status quo. It can t be done." Kissinger replied "I couldn t agre
e more"
Moreover, President Gerald Ford said: "The U.S. further supports the position t
hat a just and lasting peace, which remains our objective, must be acceptable to
both sides. The U.S. has not developed a final position on the borders. Should
it do so it will give great weight to Israel s position that any peace agreement
with Syria must be predicated on Israel remaining on the Golan Heights."
Furthermore, Secretary of State George Shultz declared: "Israel will never nego
tiate from, or return to, the lines of partition or to the 1967 borders." Secret
ary of State Christopher s letter to Netanyahu states: "I would like to reiterat
e our position that Israel is entitled to secure and defensible borders, which s
hould be directly negotiated and agreed with its neighbors."
A key part of the case in favour of a "some territories" reading is the claim t
hat British and American officials involved in the drafting of the Resolution om
itted the definite article deliberately in order to make it less demanding on th
e Israelis. As George Brown, British Foreign Secretary in 1967, said:
The Israelis had by now anexed de facto, if not formally, large new areas of Ar

ab land, and there were now very many more Arab refugees. It was clear that what
Israel or at least many of her leaders, really wanted was permanently to coloni
ze much of this newly annexed Arab territory, particularly the Jordan valley, Je
rusalem, and other sensitive areas. This led me into a flurry of activity at the
United Nations, which resulted in the near miracle of getting the famous resolu
tion - Resolution 242 - unanimously adopted by the Security Council. It declares
"the inadmissibility of territory by war" and it also affirms the necessity "fo
r guaranteeing the territorial inviolability and political independence of every
state in the area". It calls for "withdrawal of Israeli forces from territories
occupied during the recent conflict." It does not call for Israeli withdrawal f
rom the territories recently occupied, nor does it use the word all. It would have b
een impossible to get the resolution through if either of these words had been i
ncluded, but it does set out the lines on which negotiations for a settlement mu
st take place. Each side must be prepared to give up something: the resolution d
oesnt attempt to say precisely what, because that is what negotiations for a peac
e-treaty must be about.
Lord Caradon, chief author of the resolution, takes a subtly different slant. H
is focus seems to be that the lack of a definite article is intended to deny per
manence to the "unsatisfactory" pre-1967 border, rather than to allow Israel to
retain land taken by force. Such a view would appear to allow for the possibilit
y that the borders could be varied through negotiation:
Knowing as I did the unsatisfactory nature of the 1967 line I was not prepared
to use wording in the Resolution which would have made that line permanent. Neve
rtheless it is necessary to say again that the overriding principle was the "ina
dmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war" and that meant that there c
ould be no justification for annexation of territory on the Arab side of the 196
7 line merely because it had been conquered in the 1967 war. The sensible way to
decide permanent "secure and recognized" boundaries would be to set up a Bounda
ry Commission and hear both sides and then to make impartial recommendations for
a new frontier line, bearing in mind, of course, the "inadmissibility" principl
e.[24] The purposes are perfectly clear, the principle is stated in the preamble
, the necessity for withdrawal is stated in the operative section. And then the
essential phrase which is not sufficiently recognized is that withdrawal should
take place to secure and recognized boundaries, and these words were very carefu
lly chosen: they have to be secure and they have to be recognized. They will not
be secure unless they are recognized. And that is why one has to work for agree
ment. This is essential. I would defend absolutely what we did. It was not for u
s to lay down exactly where the border should be. I know the 1967 border very we
ll. It is not a satisfactory border, it is where troops had to stop in 1948, jus
t where they happened to be that night, that is not a permanent boundary...[53]
Arthur J. Goldberg, another of the resolution s drafters, concurred that Resolu
tion 242 does not dictate the extent of the withdrawal, and added that this matt
er should be negotiated between the parties:
Does Resolution 242 as unanimously adopted by the UN Security Council require t
he withdrawal of Israeli armed forces from all of the territories occupied by Is
rael during the 1967 war? The answer is no. In the resolution, the words the and
all are omitted. Resolution 242 calls for the withdrawal of Israeli armed force
s from territories occupied in the 1967 conflict, without specifying the extent
of the withdrawal. The resolution, therefore, neither commands nor prohibits tot
al withdrawal.
If the resolution is ambiguous, and purposely so, on this crucial issue, how is
the withdrawal issue to be settled? By direct negotiations between the concerne
d parties. Resolution 242 calls for agreement between them to achieve a peaceful
and accepted settlement. Agreement and acceptance necessarily require negotiati
ons.

The USSR, India, Mali, Nigeria and Arab States all proposed that the resolution
be changed to read "all territories" instead of "territories." Their request wa
s discussed by the UN Security Council and "territories" was adopted instead of
"all territories", after President Johnson told Premier Alexei Kosygin that the
delegates should not try to negotiate the details of a Middle East settlement in
the corridors and meeting halls of the United Nations, and Ambassador Goldberg
stipulated that the exact wording of the resolution would not affect the positio
n of any of the parties.[74] Per Lord Caradon, the chief author of the resolutio
n:
It was from occupied territories that the Resolution called for withdrawal. The
test was which territories were occupied. That was a test not possibly subject
to any doubt. As a matter of plain fact East Jerusalem, the West Bank, Gaza, the
Golan and Sinai were occupied in the 1967 conflict. It was on withdrawal from o
ccupied territories that the Resolution insisted.[24]
Lord Caradon also maintained,
We didn t say there should be a withdrawal to the 67 line; we did not put the
the in, we did not say all the territories, deliberately.. We all knew - that
the boundaries of 67 were not drawn as permanent frontiers, they were a cease-f
ire line of a couple of decades earlier... We did not say that the 67 boundarie
s must be forever; it would be insanity.[75]
During a symposium on the subject Lord Caradon said that Israel was in clear de
fiance of resolution 242. He specifically cited the "annexation of East Jerusale
m" and "the creeping colonialism on the West Bank and in Gaza and in the Golan."
[24]
However, British Foreign Secretary George Brown said:
I have been asked over and over again to clarify, modify or improve the wording
, but I do not intend to do that. The phrasing of the Resolution was very carefu
lly worked out, and it was a difficult and complicated exercise to get it accept
ed by the UN Security Council. I formulated the Security Council Resolution. Bef
ore we submitted it to the Council, we showed it to Arab leaders. The proposal s
aid Israel will withdraw from territories that were occupied , and not from th
e territories, which means that Israel will not withdraw from all the territori
es.
The French version of the clause reads:
Retrait des forces armes israliennes des territoires occups lors du rcent conflit.
The difference between the two versions lies in the absence of a definite artic
le ("the") in the English version, while the word "des" present in the French ve
rsion in the expression "des territoires occups" can only mean "from the occupied
territories" (the "des" in front of "territoires occups" can only be the contrac
tion "from the" because of the use of the word "retrait" which entails an object
- "des forces israliennes" where the "des" is the contraction of "of the" (of th
e Israeli forces) and a location "des territoires occups" where the "des" is the
contraction of "from the" (from the occupied territories)). If the meaning of "f
rom some occupied territories" were intended, the only way to say so in French w
ould have been "de territoires occups". Although some have dismissed the controve
rsy by suggesting that the use of the word "des" in the French version is a tran
slation error and should therefore be ignored in interpreting the document, the
debate has retained its force since both versions are of equal legal force, as r
ecognized languages of the United Nations and in international law.
Solicitor John McHugo, a partner at Trowers & Hamlins and a visiting fellow at

the Scottish Centre for International Law at Edinburgh University, draws a compa
rison to phrases such as:
Dogs must be kept on e lead near ponds in the park.
In spite of the lack of definite articles, according to McHugo, it is clear tha
t such an instruction cannot legitimately be taken to imply that some dogs need
not be kept on the lead or that the rule applies only near some ponds. Further,
McHugo points out a potential consequence of the logic employed by advocates of
a "some" reading. Paragraph 2 (a) of the Resolution, which guarantees "freedom o
f navigation through international waterways in the area," may allow Arab states
to interfere with navigation through some international waterways of their choo
sing.
That s just politics. Look at all the value-laden words being thrown around in
society used as bases for political interests, economic gains, corporate corrupt
ions, and even wars.
For Hillary and Obama:
"Universal Healthcare" vS. "Socialist Medicine."
For Al Gore:
"Global Warming" VS. "Radical Environmental Hippie out to Destroy American Indu
stry and Businesses."
For the Communist, Muslims, Rebels, and the US:
"Asymmetric Warfare," "Guerrilla Fighters," "Terrorists," and "Freedom Fighters
."
How to justify enslaving Free People?
If Children are left unmanaged, they will play video games and eat candy until
their teeth rot and fall out. We, The Republican Party, is their parent (The Fat
her).
Women don t know this. You will understand how simple a woman s head works by j
ust seeing how the mass media and how the mass consumption of capitalism can eas
ily manipulate their heads. Yep, men realized that they made the biggest mistake
possible of the entirety of human history by liberating a women s body out of t
he kitchen, now, every method is being tried to enslave a woman s inferior mind
back to submission.
The strategy is simple. It is taken right out of the Bible from the first few p
ages of how Satan was able to lie to the Woman and use her to bring down the ent
ire mankind. Here they are:
1 Now the serpent said to the woman, Has God indeed said, You shall not eat of eve
ry tree of the garden? 2 And the woman said to the serpent, We may eat the fruit of
the trees of the garden; 3 but of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst o
f the garden, God has said, You shall not eat it, nor shall you touch it, lest yo
u die. 4 Then the serpent said to the woman, You will not surely die. 5 For God kno
ws that in the day you eat of it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like
God, knowing good and evil. (Genesis 3:1-5)
The Keywords are here: "You will be like God."
Revlon Makeup:
"Girls, Let s go rewrite history."
Maybellie:
"Maybe she s born with it; maybe it s maybellie."

Venus:
"Venuss being the Roman goddess of love, but recasts women as deities in decided
ly contemporary settings." In one advertisement, a leggy woman running with a jo
gging stroller is the Goddess of Trailblazing; in another, a woman sending a text
message is the Goddess of Communication.
Gillette Venus Embrace, the first five-blade razor for women, and Procter & Gam
ble, which acquired Gillette for $57 billion in 2005, is starting the biggest ca
mpaign on the womens side of its business since the original three-blade Venus wa
s introduced in 2001.
Anyways,
Embrace your Inner Goddess [by Spending, you dumb bitches...]
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/21/business/media/21adco.html?_r=0
And the Results???
To the woman He said, "I will greatly multiply Your pain in childbirth, In pain
you will bring forth children; Yet your desire will be for your husband, And he
will rule over you." Then to Adam He said, "Because you have listened to the vo
ice of your wife, and have eaten from the tree about which I commanded you, sayi
ng, You shall not eat from it ; Cursed is the ground because of you; In toil yo
u will eat of it All the days of your life.
And you might as well throw this in: "Women hate Women..."
And for all you men out there who are married to a feminist bitch, go read the
book: "A feminist also need a Dick."
And here is the most influential political tone and language that a White Man u
ses to emasculate and destroy a Powerful Colored Man. Because a Colored Man of P
ower, Stature, Influence, Money, and Self Confidence, Autonomy, and Determinatio
n is a DIRECT CHALLENGE TO THE WHITE ORDER and white global supremacy. If their
attacks failed against the man himself, they will emasculate the man before his
wife, and turn his wife into the Philistine Woman Delilah, and use her against S
amson.
Remember This Spin of Reality and Word Play (It is the same thing that I have t
aught you above):
"A powerful, Strategic, Tactical, Wealthy, and Self-Aware colored man of integr
ity and influence and self-determination"
will be turned by the WHITE POLITICAL WHORES (in front of his ATTENTION CRAVING
MOTHER who wants to be a media whore but is too ugly and fat) into:
"The most Twisted, Manipulative, Corrupt, 2 Inch Dick Asian who has never worke
d a fucking honest day in his whole life." (If you are a colored leader, then Wh
ite People will label you, "A Corrupt and Manipulative Parasite.")
See, women don t have the critical thinking skills like men to parse and deciph
er words for their actual meaning. They go by how they feel when they hear shit.
So, a woman goes shopping for bracelets and other jewels at a boutique. She rea
lly loved something but the price was too high. She used her bargain skills to f
orce the price to keep dropping and dropping until she got what she wanted at a
much lower price that she can afford. Wow, aren t you a fucking manipulative and
deeply twisted fuck in what you DID to get what you WANT?
Then she goes to the Grocery Store to get corn and potatoes. She went through a

ll the corns to pick out the best and freshest ones. Then she took the leaves
apping the corn off to get rid of a few pounds of weight so she can pay less.
w, you are one corrupt slut, cheating the system. And you are so damn selfish
d psychopathic, picking and taking the best ones for yourself and leaving the
rst to other people in society.

wr
Wo
an
wo

Remember, women are like immature children who has a brain of a rodent. So you
got to make sure to break down things into real simple terms for them. If you ca
n t understand women, this is probably why. But then again, just take a man, and
take away REASON, ACCOUNTABILITY, FAITHFULNESS, and remember, they are all whor
es. EVERY SINGLE GOD DAMN ONE OF THEM.
NOW YOU WILL BE ABLE TO UNDERSTAND EVERY WOMAN IN THIS ENTIRE WORLD.
============================================
I hope that answers your question... Liu Yan,
============================================
"[This is] a much more welcoming environment for Asian men," Ron said. "A lot o
f Asian men are sometimes afraid to approach women because they re so used to ge
tting rejected. "The girl-to-guy ratio at these events is usually disproportiona
te (16:6), so the Asian guys get a lot of attention. "There are definitely some
crazy cougars in this group," Kemi told me. "When they get a look at you and h
ow young you are, they are going to jump all over you."

Dick Wang s photo.

Dick Wang s photo.
Liu Yan, Thnx for the article. The issue concerning Asians in America is quite a
complicated one. But I will make it short here because I don t have the time ri
ght now. I can get into more nuances later with you if you want. There is someth
ing very fundamental about how the very foundation of this great nation is built
which most of the Asians Americans here don t understand and are confused about
.
This concept of masculinity, representing power, is about how much responsibili
ties you take up in this world and at home and how much unconditional sacrifice
you are willing to make for other people - with no strings attached. It has noth
ing to do with what the FUCK you look alike and your penis size. Leadership, hon
or, and prestige, is about how much stuff you can get done and whether you can l
ead your team towards success and achieve it. TRUST and RESPECT IS EARNED MOTHER
FUCKER!!! This nation is oriented around measuring actual results and performanc
es. THIS IS NOT A FUCKING ASIAN COMMUNIST COLLECTIVE FARM IN BAODIN. Most of thi
s guanxi, buddy-buddy, connection shit that are so essential to survival in Asia
doesn t fly here. If you can t deliver results, then you re fucking fired. But
if you are the biggest fucking asshole who can guarantee to deliver results ever
y single time, then you re fucking hired... This is something most of the Asian
Americans don t understand about America. Here in America, a lot of the time, it
s not about who you know anymore... it s about WHAT YOU KNOW and WHAT YOU CAN D
O.
These
e (and
f this
ks for

2-inch dicked Asians in this country all want honor, respect, and prestig
even just settle for acceptance and integration into the majority group o
country), but they don t want to contribute, sacrifice, take personal ris
the success of the entire team. These cock-sucking, selfish Asians are to

o worried about other successful, bold and brave Asians who are getting ahead (b
ecause that can t be... oh... that yellow/brown motherfucker chink thinks she s
aaall... that) and too busy trying to bring down their own kind. Most Asian Amer
icans are fucking passive aggressive cowards! And that s why most of the time, I
am afraid of associating with my own kind here in America. I know what they are
. I know how they think. I know what kind of poison that they are made of. Anyti
me that an brave Asian brother makes it out of the hood, you see a whole bunch o
f these other 2-inch dicked ignorant Asians try their best to bring down their o
wn kind. Relationships and association with fellow new immigrants can be highly
poisonous and dangerous in this country. (Oh, one more thing, Asian bitches who
date or marry outside of their own race? Expect one thing from these Asian whore
s: "they only do so with WHITES ONLY.")
Remember Li Huazhong??? At the company meeting, he was showing off his 4,000 RM
B members card to the bath house. Wow, that s like A whole $700 bucks. Jesus, I
am so impressed like all the other Chinese virgins in that company. You can like
get 20 cheap ass Chinese hookers with all that money in these filthy Chinese ba
th houses. And dude, you earn 10,000 RMB per month. That s like a little bit ove
r a thousand bucks. That s how much I make renting out one little room in my bas
ement living in the richest county in America. And this motherfucker sits in his
office watching and jacking off to Japanese office porn all day long where the
big boss fucks his little Japanese secretary. (How I know this? I am the IT Netw
ork Administrator.) And wonder why I don t follow his orders? Respect is earned
motherfucker. And this little perverted hack tried every method possible to try
to prevent me from quitting his company - including getting my father to the din
ner table and talking to him. When I left that company, I took every new technol
ogy I invented for that company with me and made sure that my technologies that
I couldn t take with me were rendered inoperable so that none of these dumb moth
erfucking Chinese hacks know how to use them. (Yeah, those things are very commo
n in the USA. Angry employee sabotage the company before he leaves. But I guess
nobody expected that in China - a country full of 2-inch dicked Asians.) Someone
like Li Huazhong, if he ever came to America, would be sitting at a street corn
er begging for food instead of sitting in a big office in China watching Japanes
e porn. That s the fucking difference between America and Asia. And that is exac
tly why that worthless moron ran that company all the way into the ground. And t
hat major difference is what most Asians don t understand about America.
On the other hand, just look at China as a whole country. It wants the global s
tatus and prestige of being respected world superpower and taken very seriously
on everything. But it wants none of the responsibilities that comes with being a
responsible global superpower. Thus the mindset of an individual 2-inch dicked
Chinese is reflected on the attitude of an entire country.
Most Asian Americans here are WEAK and suffering from Inferiority Complexes. Fo
r one, they are cowards, and they are too afraid of engaging this society and it
s people. They don t want to get out of their own comfort zone. They want the hi
gh salary and high quality of comfortable living offered here in this country. B
ut truly integrating into this society has many costs. Cost of learning, cost of
mingling... etc... etc... They are all huddled together within their little gro
ups of Asian cronies. Second, yes... there is Racism. And for some people, the e
ffects of racism can be devastating.
I had a best friend growing up who was from India. He was richer than me, smart
er me, better looking than me, funnier than me, and had more friends than me. I
respected this guy and had mad love for him.
But when we went to college, our paths diverged drastically. (We both went to g
ood colleges.) But 9/11 happened within a month after we both entered college. S
uch acts of cowardly terrorism killing innocent civilians of MY COUNTRY cannot g
o unpunished. Such hatred for what these Muslims did emboldened me to engage thi

s society without any fear or reserve and drove me to get a security clearance a
nd enter the United States Air Force right away. It motivated me to work harder
than anybody else; sleep less; and no parties. After 9/11 happened, I basically
turned into a working machine and a walking politician : work, eat, sleep, and g
et up to give a speech and work again.
This guy, Shah, got harassed, threated, and beat up everywhere he went on his c
ollege campus simply because of who he is. He became more lonely and isolated an
d soon turned into a gambling addict - stealing money from his parents and every
body he knows, including me. And things just went into a downward spiral for his
life. I tried to help him. But there was nothing I can do for him.
But I never expect associating and having a friendship with this guy would prov
e to be so dangerous for me. We were separated by 800 miles from each other in d
ifferent colleges. He didn t know anything that was going on in my life. He didn
t know how hard I worked. How much responsibilities I took up for other people.
How much personal sacrifices I made. We went our separate ways. He didn t know
anything about me anymore. All he could see was what was on the surface - all th
e prestige, respect, honor, and even fame and influence. I mean, he saw parts of
the power and the glamour of me giving exact orders to White people to follow.
And he couldn t understand why a white person would do so? For him, he would eve
n question why a white person would even stop and bother to talk to him instead
of beating him up. But he saw nothing of my sacrifices on the other side for the
responsibilities that I have taken up. He never for once saw all of my sleeples
s nights spent studying and researching - and even falling asleep on the carpet
floor of the Georgia Tech Library. He never for once saw all the weekends that I
spend alone in my research lab and office working late into the night while oth
er kids were out drinking, partying, and FUCKING. For all the prestige, honor, a
nd respect that I have gained, I had blond, white sorority girls from my researc
h institute calling me up on Friday nights to ask me out to the art museum, to t
he aquarium, and to Go Dutch for dinner. And those white sluts made it really ea
sy for me... the conditions are that if I can show them a good time, I will defi
nitely get laid. (And I can definitely show anybody a good time as I am born wit
h the talents of being an off-of-the-shelf politician.) But I wouldn t even wast
e time with these paper shuffling worthless interns.
What this guy saw, what anybody who knew me saw, was what was on the surface, t
hat I walked around Georgia Tech campus like a celebrity. Nobody saw me spending
a whole night in my office doing thousands of simulations in my head on any pro
blem that I was given before I would even touch a computer keyboard. For most of
the time, I would think myself into such a cold sweat that I have to change my
wet T-shirt after I am done computing in my head. When I tell white people what
to do, you know why they would listen? Because I AM RIGHT... not because of any
other reason. When other scientists and engineers look at my code, they d be lik
e "Ok, we can t figure out what he did here... but it works. This guy s code alw
ays work flawlessly. So let s not waste the time trying to figure why it works."
I was completely clueless and oblivious about racism and discrimination in Amer
ica until this Asian motherfucker who is suppose to be my best friend from child
hood (since 5th grade, when my family first moved to America) dragged me down to
his level because he wanted his 5 minutes of fucking fame in his lonely and mis
erable life by reporting me to the FBI and Homeland Security and having them tap
my phone and calling me to try to frame me with questions during the Virginia T
ech Shooting here in America.
And it took my mother and this guy s slutty girlfriend and many other Asians to
drag me even further down to their miserable level all because of their ignoran
ce, lack of understanding of how this society works, and their craving for their
god-damn 5 minutes of fame. It s like, in my mother s mind, she s thinking, "Ma
n, if this dumb ass ugly motherfucker who came out of my ugly Asian black pussy
can do whatever the fuck he wants and be so influential amongst the White people

, man, I can shake my fat ass yellow booties and my old ass wrinkled tits, and t
hese White people will get on their knees to worship the very ground that I walk
upon... Because all of my Asian life in America, the only thing I can do is oh.
.. oh... oh... po, po, po, pleassseee... Mr. White man, me love you a looooong t
ime. me sucky sucky... 5 dollars... Me just a li-li-little Chinese wooooomaaan..
."
All of these Asians in America simply have no idea about the very principle tha
t this country operates upon. They want the honor, respect, and the prestige, bu
t they don t want to pay and sacrifice anything for this country and for others
people here. But that s OK... Because I hope all of these Asians fucking DIE and
GO TO HELL. AND BURN IN HELL FOR FUCKING ETERNITY!!! These fucking good-for-not
hing chinks !!!
Oh yeah... one more thing about Asian women... My mother always complain about
that I am just like my father: "Not Democratic." I have so much contempt for her
that I don t even think she deserve my answer to that. "You contribute nothing,
you invest nothing, you risk nothing... and you want a say in everything??? NO!
!! This is NOT HOW SHIT WORKS HERE IN AMERICA, slut!! Shut the fuck up! You are
a bitch that belongs in a fucking brothel !!! YOU FUCKING CUNT HAVE RUINED MY EN
TIRE FUCKING LIFE!!!" All Asian women (excluding my wife) are fucking whores. An
d all women in this entire world (with a few exceptions) all need to learn how t
o SHUT THE FUCK UP !!!

I spent over 20 hours installing and configuring this beautiful laptop that is d
esigned to perfection. It ran very smoothly and flawlessly and fast for all the
purposes that I needed it for - which were mostly simple daily tasks. I bought a
n 64 GB external MicroSD card to supplement my extra backup and files.
A tablet & a laptop. For $170 dollars. It seemed too good to be true. However, I
don t know what happened. One day it just stopped turning on. After careful ana
lysis, I believe the tablet part of the laptop s power button had malfunctioned.
Because I got it to turn on a few times after trying to extend as far and deep
as my finger nails can press it. However, I am not going to try to void my warra
nty trying to experiment with this.
I cherished this laptop and kept it in perfect condition just like how I got it
- without a scratch, a blemish, nor any finger prints. I just don t know what ha
ppened