Evaluation: Process

Names:
3
Cooperation

Planning

Use of resources

Communication

We worked together as
a team and could easily
achieve our goals.
We were always on
schedule. We did plan
out everything
perfectly.
We managed to gather
enough information by
using more than 3
different resources.
Our communication
was at its best. We
even kept
communicating outside
the classroom.

City: .
2
1
0

There was sometimes a

hesitation, but it
eventually worked out
in the end.
Some parts of the
assignment were more
difficult than we
imagined and thus
slowed us down.
We managed to gather
enough information by
using 2 to 3 different
resources.
There was enough
communication during
the sessions in the
classroom so we knew
what to do at home.

The other student

wasnt motivated
enough to cooperate at
his fullest.
Not everything went
according to our plan.
We managed to
achieve our goal just in
time.
We managed to gather
enough information by
using 1 to 2 different
resources.
The communication
was just enough to do a
division of tasks.

I was doing most of the

work on my own.
We had to leave out
important parts of the
presentation because
of the lack of
organisation.
We only used the
resource (tripadvisor)
to finish the task.
The communication
didnt go smoothly and
thus resulting in
unprepared

TOTAAL:

Comments:

Evaluation: Presentation
Names:
3

City: .
2
1
0

Information

Information was wellchosen and relevant to

the city.

Most of the information

was relevant.

Coherence

The message was easy

to follow.

There were some

difficult moments.

Timing

50-50

60-40

Images

Images were wellchosen and invited to

visit.

Images showed which

sights you can see in
the city.

The information
presented on the
PowerPoint consisted of
keywords AND was
legible on the
background.
No more than 5
vocabulary mistakes
were made OR 2
grammar ones.

The information
presented on the
PowerPoint consisted of
keywords OR was
legible on the
background.
No more than 5
vocabulary mistakes
were made AND 2
grammar ones.

PowerPoint

Mistakes

Some of the
information was not
important to the
message.
Sentences had a loose
connection with each
other.
70-30

Information was not

relevant.

Little thought was

given to the images,
but it showed the
actual sights.
Entire texts were
shown on slides OR was
not legible on the
chosen background.

Images had nothing to

do with the sights/ no
images.

More than 5 vocabulary

mistakes OR more than
2 grammar mistakes.

Sentences had no
apparent link.
80-20

Entire texts were shown

on slides AND was not
legible on the chosen
background..
More than 5 vocabulary
mistakes were made
AND more than 2
grammar ones.

TOTAAL:

Comments:

Evaluation: Brochure
Names:
3

City: .
2
1
0

Information

Information was wellchosen and relevant to

the city.

Most of the information

was relevant.

Coherence

The message was easy

to follow.

There were some

difficult moments.

Images were wellchosen and invited to

visit.

Images showed which

sights you can see in
the city.

50-50

60-40

No more than 5
vocabulary mistakes
were made OR 2
grammar ones.
Layout is appealing and
original.

No more than 5
vocabulary mistakes
were made AND 2
grammar ones.
Good use of the layout
template.

Images

Work division
Mistakes

Layout usage (bonus)

Some of the
information was not
important to the
message.
Sentences had a loose
connection with each
other.
Little thought was
given to the images,
but it showed the
actual sights.
70-30
More than 5 vocabulary
mistakes OR more than
2 grammar mistakes.
Layout template was
mostly followed, lacks
some minor elements.

Information was not

relevant.
Sentences had no
apparent link.
Images had nothing to
do with the sights/ no
images.
80-20
More than 5 vocabulary
mistakes were made
AND more than 2
grammar ones.
Layout template was
ignored and has little to
invite tourism to the
city.

TOTAAL:

Comments: