Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
ITEC 7236
Key Assessment
Stage 2
Section 1: Students
The data discussed in this report was collected from a math assessment administered to
21 fourth grade students ranging in age from nine to eleven years old. Six boys and fifteen girls
completed this assessment and their scores are displayed in the test data located in the appendix.
The group of test participants is comprised of 10 Caucasian, 8 African-American, 1 Asian, and 2
Mixed-Race students. A variety of ability levels are represented in the student group ranging
from below average to above average. Based upon recent STAR reports, seven of the students
are reading below grade level; however, four of the students receive instruction in a gifted
classroom once per week. The students which make up the data set attend an elementary school
located in Southeast Georgia which is a part of the First District Regional Educational Service
Agency. Out of nine elementary schools in the district, the school ranked second according to
the College and Career Ready Performance Index issued by the Georgia Department of
Education during the previous school year.
Section 2: Course
The data depicted in the appendix of this report was collected from a fourth grade math
assessment designed to assess student understanding of content covered during the first two
semesters of the school year. At the beginning of the third quarter, the assessment was given to
all fourth grade students in the school utilizing an online-based assessment system. Each
question required the students to fill-in a blank by using the number pad on the keyboard. Upon
completion, the assessments were scored and a report was sent to each students teacher. A
variety of math standards were assessed which are identified in the chart located in the appendix.
A description of these standards can be found by clicking the link below.
Fourth Grade Math Standards
Mean
Median
Mode
Standard Deviation
Spearman-Brown Reliability
52.91
54
64
18.37
0.83
Fifteen items on the assessment had an average score below 70%, and these items make
up 60% of the assessment. I think it would be advantageous for all students to receive additional
instruction in these areas. The following assessment items/standards fall in this category: finding
the missing number in expanded notation, counting (more or less), two-digit division with
regrouping, multiplying fractions and whole numbers, improper fractions as mixed numbers
without a number line, mixed numbers as improper fractions, multiplication/division of fractions
(fraction of a number), multiplication/division of fractions (times as many as), two-digit by twodigit multiplication, four-digit division, prime factorization, measures of capacity, measurement
conversion (U.S. customary), bilateral symmetry, classifying triangles visually, and identifying
parallel and perpendicular lines in figures (see test data in the appendix as another point of
reference for these areas of weakness).
Spearman-Brown Reliability
The Spearman-Brown reliability score (0.83) indicates that the assessment has moderate
reliability. An odd-even split-halves procedure was utilized to determine the reliability of this
assessment. However, some of the standards were not equally represented on each half. For
example, standard 4.OA.4 was only assessed in question 25 and it was answered incorrectly by
all students. In order to improve reliability, I think it would be beneficial to increase the number
of assessment items and then check to ensure that each split half contains parallel content
samples (Nitko and Brookhart, 2014, p.75). In addition, the assessment could be administered
on another occasion and results from both administrations could be compared to increase
reliability. The image below shows the Spearman-Brown reliability calculation.
individual performances. The areas of weakness listed below are assessment items that were
answered incorrectly. These areas will be used to form intervention groups. Students will
receive enrichment opportunities for the remaining standards assessed, which are not identified
as areas of weakness in the table below.
Student #
1
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
All content areas assessed were answered incorrectly re-teaching of each standard
is required
Appendix
Test Data