Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
VOLUME
41 . NUMBER
4 -JANUARY-FEBRUARY
1997
ELSEVIER
MAJOR REVIEW
Chemical Injuries of the Eye: Current
Pathophysiology
and Therapy
MICHAEL
D. WAGONER,
Concepts
in
MD
Ante-rior Segment/External
Disease Division,
King Khakd Eye Specialist Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia;
Cornea Service, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Injirmary,
Boston, MA, USA; and Department
of Ophthalmology,
Harvard
Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
Chemical injuries of the eye may produce extensive damage to the ocular surface epithelium, cornea, and anterior segment, resulting in permanent
unilateral or bilateral visual impairment. Pathophysiological
events which may influence the final visual prognosis and which are amenable to therapeutic
modulation
include 1) ocular surface injury, repair, and differentiation,
2)
cornea1 stromal matrix injury, repair and/or ulceration,
and 3) cornea1 and stromal inflammation.
Immediately
following
chemical injury, it is important
to estimate and clinically grade the severity
of limbal stem cell injury (by assessing the degree of limbal, conjunctival,
and scleral ischemia and
necrosis) and intraocular
penetration
of the noxious agent (by assessing clarity of the cornea1 stroma
and anterior segment abnormalities).
Immediate
therapy is directed toward prompt irrigation
and
removal of any remaining
reservoir of chemical contact with the eye. Initial medical therapy is
directed toward promoting
re-epithelialization
and transdifferentiation
of the ocular surface, augmenting cornea1 repair by supporting
keratocyte collagen production
and minimizing
ulceration
related to collagenase activity, and controlling
inflammation.
Early surgical therapy, if indicated, is
directed toward removal of necrotic cornea1 epithelium
and conjunctiva,
prompt re-establishment
of an adequate limbal vascular+, and re-establishment
of limbal stem cell populations
early in the
clinical course, if sufficient evidence exists of complete limbal stem cell loss. Re-establishment
of
limbal stem cells by limbal autograft or allograft transplantation,
or by transfer in conjunction
with
large diameter penetrating
keratoplasty, may facilitate development
of an intact, phenotypically
correct cornea1 epithelium.
Limbal stem cell transplantation
may prevent the development
of fibrovascular pannus or sterile cornea1 cornea1 ulceration,
simplify visual rehabilitation,
and improve the
visual prognosis. Advances in ocular surface transplantation
techniques which allow late attempts at
visual rehabilitation
of a scarred and vascularized cornea include limbal stem cell transplantation
for incomplete
transdifferentiation
and persistent cornea1 epithelial dysfunction, and conjunctival
and/or mucosal membrane
transplantation
for ocular surface mechanical
dysfunction. Rehabilitation of the ocular surface may be followed, if necessary, by standard penetrating
keratoplasty if all
aspects of ocular surface rehabilitation
are complete, or by large diameter penetrating
keratoplasty
if successful limbal stem cell transplantation
cannot be achieved but other ocular surface rehabilitation is complete. (SW-V Ophthalmol
41:275-313,
1997. 0 1997 by Elsevier Science Inc. All rights
reserved.)
Abstract.
words.
acid alkali
chemical injury
conjunctival
cornea1 limbus
cornea1 stroma
inflammation
limbal
membrane
transplantation
ocular surface
penetrating
Key
Chemical
injuries
of the eye may produce
extensive damage
to the ocular surface epithelium,
cornea,
and anterior
segment,
resulting
in permanent
unilateral
or bilateral
visual
impair-
0 1997 by Elsevier
All rights resend.
Science
Inc.
merit
transplantation
cornea1 epithelium
autograft
limbal allograft
mucous
keratoplasty
tenoplasty
l
37,172.173.0~.21.~,~~9,~~~-~9~l,3~7,.1~3
In addition
to causing
ocular
surface
injury,
alkalies readily
penetrate
into the eye, damaging
the cornea1
stroma
and endothelium,
as well as
0039.6257/97/$17.00
PI1 S0039-6257(96)00007-O
276
Surv Ophthalmol41
(4) January-February
1997
other anterior
segment structures
such as the
iris, lens, and ciliary body. Most acidic substances
tend to remain confined
to the ocular surface,
where they may threaten
vision by producing
profound
disturbances
of the ocular surface.
Strong acids, such as hydrofluoric
acid, may
readily penetrate
as quickly as alkalies, producing the same spectrum
of ocular injury.32.35
Extensive laboratory
and clinical studies of the
basic repair and ulcerative processes of the chemically-injured
eye have elucidated
some of the
pathophysiological
processes that determine
the
ultimate outcome of these injuries, and have facilitated the development
of medical and surgical
strategies to maximize the potential for successful
management.
I. Etiology
The frequency and distribution
of chemical injuries of the eye have been addressed comprehenMost
victims
are
sively. 11,52.208,216,217,257.336,348,350
216,217.257,336,350
and in most large series expoyoung,
sure occurs in industrial
accidents,216,217s?57,350at
home, 216*217,257,350
and in association with criminal
assaults.11,z57,336 Because of their more frequent
presence
in household
cleaning agents and in
many building materials, alkali injuries occur more
frequently than acid injuries.257
Morgan257 reviewed 221 chemical injuries in 180
patients presenting to the Croydon Eye Unit, United Kingdom (which serves a largely residental area
of population
300,000) between January
1, 1985
and February 28, 1986. One hundred thirty six patients (75.6%) were male, while 44 (24.4%) were
female. Most patients were between 16 and 25 years
of age. Alkali injuries were nearly twice as common
as acid injuries. Most injuries (161 [89.4%]) were
accidental, while 19 (10.6%) resulted from chemical assault. Among the accidental cases, 63% occurred at work, 33% at home, and 3% at school.
Only 14 (7.7%) patients required hospital admission. Eight of these were due to accidents and six
were due to assaults with ammonia. Only one patient suffered severe, permanent
visual loss.
In a subsequent large series by Kuckelkorn2i6
of
all patients seen at the eye center serving Aachen,
Germany,
between
September
1990 and August
1991, there were 236 chemically injured eyes in I71
patients. Of these, 121 (70%) were adult males, 39
(23%) were adult females, and 11 (7%) were children. Most patients were between the ages of 16
and 45 years. Industrial
accidents accounted for
104 injuries (61%), 64 (37%) were due to household accidents, and 3 (2%) were of unknown
origin. Fortunately, 208 (88%) injuries were classified
as mild, with a favorable outcome, confirming
Mor-
WAGONER
gan~~ previous observation
that most chemical
injuries are mild.
A large series by Kuckelkorn217 which examined
the epidemiology
and outcome of 42 patients with
severe chemical injuries which required admission
to the RWTH Aachen, Germany, between 1985 and
1992 confirmed the poor prognosis in severe cases.
In this series, only six (14.5%) patients achieved
adequate visual rehabilitation.
Most of the patients
were between 20 and 40 years old. Most (73.8%)
of the accidents were industrial, while the remainder occurred
at home. The industrial
accidents
were almost equally divided among construction
and labor industry, chemical plants, and machine
factories.
At home, most of the injuries were
caused by lime and drain cleaners.
The most important agents causing chemical injuries of the eye are summarized
in Table l.?4q,403
A. ALKALI
The most common causesof acid injury are sulfuric (H,SO,) , sulfurous (H,SO,) , hydrofluoric
(HF) , acetic (CH,COOH) , chromic, and hydrochloric (HCI) acids.24gThe most serious ocular
acid injuries are due to hydrofluoric acid.24g-250Due
to its low molecular weight and small size, fluoride
penetrates readily into and through the cornea1
stroma, producing severe cornea1 and anterior segment injury.24g-20
Sulfuric acid is the most common cause of acid
injury.249 Sulfuric acid reacts with water in the pre-
CHEMICAL
INJURIES
277
OF THE EYE
TABLE
Compound
Class
Ammonia
Alkali
Common
Causes of Chemical
Common
Source/uses
1. Fertilizers
2. Refrigerants
3. Cleaning agents
tion)
1. Drain cleaners
1. Caustic potash
[NH,1
Lye [NaOH]
Potassium hydroxide
1
Comments
1. Combines with water to form NH,OH
2. Very rapid penetration
(7%
[CAO-U,I
Acid
1. Sparklers
1. Produces combined
1. Plaster
2. Mortar
3. Cement
4. Whitewash
1. Industrial cleaners
Sulfuric acid
W$Q,l
2. Battery acid
Sulfurous
acid
W,SO,I
Hydrofluoric
acid
WI
Acetic acid
[CH,COOH]
Chromic
acid
[CrAl
Hydrochloric
acid
t HCLI
* Reproduced
by Permission,
1. Penetrates easily
2. Produces severe injury
II.
fumes
solu-
[KOHI
Magnesium hydroxide
bk@W,I
Lime
Injury*
Pathophysiology
Depending
on the degree
of penetration,
there
may be damage
to the cornea1
and conjunctival
epithelium,
basement
membrane,
stroma1 keratocytes,
stromal
nerve endings,
endothelium, lens epithelium,
and vascular
endothelium
of the conjunctiva,
episclera,
iris and ciliary
into the anterior
body. 5.135,215,217.244,24.5,289Penetra~on
chamber
may be seen almost immediately
after ammonia injury and within
3-5 minutes
after sodium
278
Surv Ophthalmol
41 (4) January-February
19987
hydroxide
injury. 133z7gIf the external pH is restored to normal, the aqueous pH levels return to
normal within 30 minutes to three hours, depending upon the amount of penetration.27g Damage to
the ciliary body epithelium results in decreased secretion of ascorbate and a reduction in its anterior
chamber concentration,
potentially compromising
subsequent
cornea1 keratocyte
collagen synthesis
Irreversible
intram
and stromal repair. 23%293309,311312
ocular damage with hypotony and phthisis bulbi
may follow prolonged aqueous pH levels of 11.5 or
greater.27gs2g3
With the exception of hydrofluoric
acid and, to
a lesser extent, sulfurous
acid, acids penetrate
much less readily into the corneal stroma than alkalies.132*135The hydrogen (H+) ion causes damage
due to pH alteration, while the anion produces
protein precipitation
and denaturation
in the corneal epithelium and superficial stroma.1061t is this
coagulation
of proteins which produces the characteristic ground glass appearance of the epithelium, functions as a barrier to further penetration,
and limits further intraocular
injury.lo6 Often the
stroma has a surprisingly
clear appearance after debridement
of the necrotic epithelium.lm
If penetration
occurs into the stroma, alterations
in tissue similar to those seen in alkali injury may
occur. These changes include precipitation
of extracellular glycosaminoglycans
and cornea1 opacification,106,134z342hydration
and shortening
of collagen fibrils with a transient elevation in intraocular pressure due to trabecular
meshwork
distortion,56~277,278,367
anterior
chamber pH alterations,
anterior segment damage, and lowered aqueous
ascorbate levels.233,30g
Kuckelkorn215
assessed the clinical course of 90
severely chemically-injured
eyes in 66 patients to
determine the actual incidence of short- and longterm complications
related to intraocular
penetration. In the early phase, 23 (25.6%) eyes developed
secondary cataract and 14 (15.6%) eyes had secondary glaucoma. Subsequently,
an additional 41
(45.6%) eyes developed secondary cataract and 20
(22.2%) eyes developed secondary glaucoma.
In addition to complications
related to corneal
and intraocular
injury, many short- and long-term
complications may occur related to damage to proximal and distal bulbar conjunctiva, tarsal conjunct&
and ant&or
orbid ~ssues.214~~20~325~329.330~341,375
Net-e
sis of bulbar conjunctival tissue is associated with infiltration of leukocytes, which is a source of continued ocular surface inflammation,
and associated release of increased levels of N-acetylglucosaminidase
and Cathepsin-D
into the preocular
tear film.325
There may be retention of contaminating
particles
from the trauma itself and these may contribute to
WAGONER
Schematicdepiction of the ocular surface, demonstrating the continuity of the conjunctival (blue), limbal (red), and cornea1 (green) epithelium, and the interactive relationship (arrows) between the cornea1epithelium and stromal keratocytes.
Fig. 1.
continued inflammation.541 In a study of chemicallyinjured conjunct&a with scanning electron microscopy and energy-dispersive X-ray analysis, Schirne? confirmed traumatic contamination with calcium in Ca(OH), and CaO burns, aswell as silicone
in a peroxidase plus silicone spray burn. There is a
loss of vascularization at the limbus due to ischemic
necrosis of the conjunct&a, and this reduces the
availability of vascularly-derived collagenase inhibitors (see below) 16,68,142
which may contribute partially
to subsequent corneal ulceration and perforation.375
Late sequelae of severe conjunctival injury include
disorders of ocular surface wetting due to mucous
membrane abnormalities, cicatricization of the conjunctiva with sytnblepharon formation, and enn-opion. 220,267,349
Irrespective of the substance responsible for
chemical injuries, the principles guiding evaluation and management require an understanding of
the complex interactions between regenerating ocular surface epithelium, stromal matrix repair and
degradation, and inflammatory infiltration of the
cornea. In this review, chemical injuries will be
considered generically, unless otherwise noted.
A. EPITHELIAL INJURY, REPAIR, AND
DIFFERENTIATION
CHEMICAL
INJURIES
OF THE
279
EYE
of the functional relationships between these two adjacent cell populations. This functional unity is especially relevant to the pathophysiology and therapy
of chemical injury of the eye.
The cornea1 epithelium is composed of 5-6 cell
layers of stratified squamous epithelium which has
no goblet cells and is nonkeratinized under normal circumstances.3g2It is a rapidly renewing tissue
which loses its surface cells into the tear film, with
a turnover period of 46 days.1*6,1471t
plays an important optical role in maintaining the smoothness
of the optical surface and a physiological role in
excluding microorganisms from the cornea1 stroma, maintaining the deturgence of the cornea1
stroma, and regulating the metabolic activity of
stromal keratocytes.so-84~254~370
At the cornea1 limbus, the stratified squamous
epithelium thickens to approximately 10 cell layers.2g~124~139~400~401
Recent evidence has shown that
the basal epithelial cells of the limbal zone are of
paramount importance in the maintenance of ocular surface epithelium, both in normal health and
following ocular surface injury.287~385,3sg
The conjunctival epithelium consists of two or
more layers of stratified columnar epithelium with
numerous goblet cells. It is well established that
the conjunctival epithelium is capable of repopulating the cornea1 epithelial surface following traumatic injury.7s,104-106.47
The conjunctival portion
has many other important functions which may be
compromised following severe chemical injury.
These include facilitation of smooth movement of
the eyelid over the cornea, maintenance of normal
lid-globe apposition, production of mucous essential for tear film stability, and provision of the limbal vascular supply.
2. Limbal
Stem
Cell Hypothesis
and
post-traumaticlO4,10~.195,2~
replace-
Fig. 2. Schematic depiction of the cornea1basalepithelial cells. Basalepithelial cells which are stem cells (approximately 30%2*6)migrate centripetally along the basal
epithelial layer and then anteriorly toward the surface.
(Reprinted from Wagoner MD, Kenyon KR, Shore JS408
with permissionof Churchill Livingstone.)
and
blood-forming
228.231,252.859.319.321,3.59
of location,
o~gan~.423..50.145,159.2OY.Z26
Stem<ell
populations,
irrespective
~~~~4~50~145~22~228~231.238,239,31~321.389
They
are
characterisI)
present
in
280
WAGONER
Stem
Cell/Ocular
Surface
cornea1 epiInjury
104-106.168.346
CHEMICAL
INJURlES
281
OF THE EYE
chemical injury the resurfacing of cornea with conjunctival epithelium is associated with delayed re-epithelialization,113J62 superficial and deep stromal neovascularization,38g persistence of goblet cells within
the cornea1 epithelium,3X and recurrent
epithelial
erosions due to abnormal basement membrane epihelid
adheSion.55~113~162~166,205~247~3355.364
Tr~sdifferentiation of a cornea1 epithelial phenotype is adversely
affected by local deficiency of vitamin A and the presence of corneal neovascularization.171~3gW3g5Altbough
the amount of post-injury cornea1 neovascularization
may be marginally influenced by topical progestational steroids,141 final vascularization seems to be determined by the severity of limbal stem cell injury: 784.394If limbal stem cell loss is complete, severe
superficial pannus invariably occurs (often in ass*
ciation with stromal vascularization)
resulting in
complete conjunctival phenotypic characteristics
or
conjunctivalization
of the new ocular
surface 117,389.394
Because of poor transdifferentiation
and conjunctivalization
of the ocular surface following
complete
limbal stem cell loss, Kenyon
and
Tseng199.36
proposed that limbal stem cells are the
most qualified cells to restore functional
competence after extensive ocular surface and limbal
stem cell injury. Tsai385 compared the efficiency of
limbal transplantation
to that of bulbar conjunctival transplantation
for cornea1 surface reconstruction in rabbit eyes in which the cornea1 and limbal
epithelia had been removed by a combination
of
chemical debridement
plus surgical scraping. Limbal transplantation
resulted in a smooth, lustrous
surface without cornea1 neovascularization.
Bulbar
conjunctival
transplantation
resulted in vascularized corneas with irregular
epithelium.
Huang@
used a battery of monoclonal
antibodies to cellspecific markers, including ocular mucin, to demonstrate evidence of restoration
of cornea1 phenotype after limbal transplantation,
but not after
bulbar conjunctival
transplantation.
B. CORNEAL STROMAL
MATRIX
REPAIR, AND ULCERATION
INJURY,
~~~~~~~ff~~~~~~~~~~1~~7~113,l5~~1~~.l70,2~~2,335,383,389,394,4~f~
1. Collagen
Collagen constitutes approximately 80% of the
organic constituents of the cornea1 stroma.L.274Fibrillar collagens (predominantly type I) provide
the major tensile strength of the cornea.51,274The
orderly arrangement of cornea1 stromal fibrillar
collagen (types I, III, V) insures uniform distribution of tensile strength radially in all directions,
minimizes light scattering, and contributes to corn&
transparency.?~.""-"4.'~1.~'7.*9~)~~74
Type
VII
co&-
Surv Ophthalmol41
(4) January-February
1997
WAGONER
with
migration
usually
beginning
on the
endothelial side.O In mild injuries, such as corneal lacerations, type I collagen may be detected
at the edge of the wounded area as early as one
day after injury. 177,1go-1g3
In moderately severe
chemical injuries, complete repopulation may be
delayed, taking as long as 7-14 days.l*OJgOInsevere
injuries with complete keratocyte destruction, repopulation may be completely absent, although
some evidence suggests that monocyte transformation to functionally competent fibroblastic cells
may occur. 24gWhile corticosteroids are of considerable value in reducing inflammation and tissue
destruction following chemical injury, they inter-
rate-limiting
step in ribosomal
collagen
synthesis.lm
Systemic ascorbate deficiency results in unstable triple-helical structure of extracellular fibrillar collagen334and the clinical syndrome of scurvy, Deficiency of anterior chamber ascorbate following experimental chemical injury results in morphological abnormalities in collagen-synthesizing fibroblastsm,334
and cornea1 ulceration or perforation.Ws~309
2. Collagenase
Collagenase is the enzyme responsible for cleavage of the collagen molecule at a site three quarters from
the amino
terminus.*5~30~40~*48~412 It is now
CHEMICAL,
INJURIES
283
OF THE EYE
called
matrix
metalloproteinases
(MMP)
are responsible
for the initial
rate-limiting
cleavage of
collagen
molecules.
81,82,84,85 Three
well-characterized corneal-MMP
are type I collagenase,
strome?6,167.174,242
These
three
enlysin, and gelatinase.
zymes share many common
features, including
significant
amino acid homology,261
optimal
activity at
neutral
pH, 82.148,p61requirement
for zinc as a cofactor and calcium
ions for stability,30~5~21 secretion
as an inactive zymogen
or proenzyme,14s,261
and activation
by enzymatic
or organomercurial
cleavage
of a small amino peptide.g0,148
Type I collagenase,
also known
as MMP-1,
is usually
not detectable
in the normal
cornea.1pg~176~180~182Its presence
has been demonstrated
in cornea1 repair following
mechanical
injury,21 in
keratoconus76.89,268,324
and in actively ulcerating
corneas.
tance
15~17~21,40~41~4~3~129.178,306,353,355,356
of MMP-1
activity
in conjunction
The
imporwith
cor-
284
Surv Ophthalmol41
WAGONER
CHEMICAL
INJURIES
OF THE EYE
285
286
Surv Ophthalmo141
(4) January-February
1997
WAGONER
Fig. 6. (A) Grade II chemical injury: schematic. There is injury to cornea1 epithelium
and partial limbal stem cell
loss. (B) Type II healing pattern: schematic. Re-epithelialization
from areas of normal limbal stem cells proceeds
normally, while re-epithelialization
in areas of limbal stem cell loss is initially from conjunctival epithelium.
Transient
subepithelial
vascularization
may accompany the conjunctival
epithelium.
Interactions
between epithelium,
inflammatory cells, and keratocytes are usually appropriate
for proper repair. (C) Grade II chemical injury: clinical appearance. In the quadrant with epithelial
defect there is obvious limbal &hernia
and probable loss of limbal stem cells
(in contrast to the appearance in 5C). (D) Type II healing pattern: clinical appearance. Following re-epithelialization
there is persistent epitheliopathy,
subepithelial
vascularization.
and stromal haze.
B. ACUTEPHA!SE
Grade I injuries usually heal without incident
during the acute phase. Grade II injuries have early re-epithelialization and slow recovery of stromal
clarity. Grade III and IV injuries have little or no
re-epithelialization, with early keratocyte proliferation, first wave inflammatory cell infiltration, little
or no collagenase production, and no cornea1 neovascularization.
C.EARLYREPAIRPHASE
During
the
early
repair
phase,
epithelial
mi-
with respect to the serious consequences of complete limbal stem cell loss. Because Grade IV injuries involve extensive damage and necrosis to
the proximal conjunctival epithelium (as well as
distal bulbar conjunctival epithelium, in some
cases) with associated limbal ischemic necrosis
(Fig. 8C), there is usually little change in the
clinical appearance during this phase, especially
if early debridement
of necrotic
tissue and advancement
of conjunctiva
or Tenons tissue (see
Keratocyte proliferation,
along with resultant
collagen and collagenase production, and the second wave of inflammatory cell infiltration,
becomes very important in this stage for Grade II and
III injuries which have not been managed with aggressive anti-inflammatory therapy. It is even more
which
important
leads
the physician
to become
complacent
in Grade
IV injuries
if debridement
of
CHEMICAL
INJURIES
287
OF THE EYE
necrotic conjunctival
tissue has not removed an additional source of leukocyte accumulation
and enzymatic release. 325The combination
of additional
inflammation,
loss of limbal blood supply, and lack
of vascularly-derived
collagenase inhibitors may result in evidence of anterior segment necrosis and
sterile cornea1 ulceration,
even at this early stage
in Grade IV injuries.375
Normal epithelial recovery occurs in the quadrants with intact limbal stem cells. Because progeny
of the limbal stem cells usually do not cross the
visual axis, there may be delayed re-epithelialization from the quadrant(s)
of limbal stem cell loss.
Experimental
studies78 suggest that transient amplifying cells from limbal stem cells may migrate
circumferentially
into the area of limbal stem cell
loss and then migrate centripetally.
Pending completion of this process, epithelialization
may occur
from conjunctival
epithelium
with transient neovascularization.
Type II healing patterns (Fig. 6B-D), which correspond to Grade II limbal stem cell injuries, complete re-epithelialization in the quadrants where
the limbal stem cells are preserved, but may still
have a sectoral epithelial defect in the quadrant
with complete limbal stem cell loss at the beginning of the late repair phase. While the healing
pattern will not be complete at this stage, there can
be a reasonable expectation that the subsequent
course will be one of delayed re-epithelialization
and superficial vascular pannus due to the initial
reliance on conjunctival epithelium. Because the
injury has been sufficient to damage some of the
well-protected limbal basal epithelial cells, there is
a much greater likelihood of associated goblet cell
dysfunction than with Grade I injury. There may
be persistent ocular surface wetting abnormalities,
which may persist for weeks or months after reepithelialization is complete. Persistent epitheliopathy may result in subnormal vision for several
months.
2. Grades
1. Grade II
III/IV
Because complete limbal stem cell loss has occurred, epithelial recovery is rate-limited by the total
reliance on the slow migration of conjunctival epithelium onto the cornea. Clinical suspicion of a COIZjirwzd
total limbal stem cell loss should develop by
the end of the early repair phase if there is no epithelialiiation inside the limbus.
D.
LATE
REPAIR
PHASE
At the beginning of the early repair phase corneal inflammation, collagen synthesis, collagenase
synthesis, and collagenase activation are peaking.
Based on the epithelial healing which has occurred
by this stage, it is possible to classify the injury into
a conjirmed healing pattern. This classification can
accurately predict the functional outcome in the
absence of aggressive intervention and form the
basis of recommendations for surgical intervention.
1. Type I: Normal Epithelial Recovery
Type I healing patterns (Fig. 5B-D), which correspond to Grade I limbal stem cell injuries, result
in complete re-epithelialization by the beginning
of the late repair phase. The cornea1 epithelium
will be clinically and phenotypically normal. Gob
let cell injury is unusual in Grade I injury, but, if
present, it may result in abnormal mucus secretion
with transient ocular surface wetting abnormalities
and mild cornea1 epitheliopathy.
Type III healing patterns (Fig. 7B-D) , which correspond to Grade III injuries, have little or no reepithelialization during the first three weeks after
injury, although the limbal conjunctival appearance may be relatively normal and the cornea may
be deceptively clear. The anticipated healing pattern can be predicted at this stage based upon the
clinical status of the cornea1 epithelium, but the
actual completion of the pathophysiologic process
which will result in the final clinical appearance
and outcome may not be complete for several
months in surgically-neglected cases(Fig. 7D). The
only unsettled issue at this point is whether conjunctivallyderived
epithelium will provide enough
fibrovascular
pannus for the cornea1 surface
(conjunctivalization)
and vascularly-derived collagenase inhibitors to prevent sterile cornea1 ulceration and perforation. In addition to progressive and complete fibrovascular pannus of the corneal surface , the ocular surface abnormalities may
be exacerbated by late progressive symblepharon
formation, cicatricial entropion, trichiasis, and additional cornea1 scarring. In such cases, the best
outcome that can be anticipated with complete
limbal stem cell loss is one of fibrovascular pannus
with slow conjunctival ingrowth and cornea1 stroma1 neovascularization (Fig. 7D). While this may
result in a tectonically stable eye, it may pose significant problems for subsequent late rehabilitation.
288
Surv Ophthalmol41
(4) January-February
1997
WAGONER
Fig. 7. (A) Grade III chemical injury: schematic. There is loss of all corneal epithelial
and limbal stem cells, but
preservation
of the proximal conjunctival
epithelium.
(B) Type III healing pattern: schematic. All re-epithelialization
must come from conjunctival epithelium,
which is usually considerably delayed. Interactions between the conjunctival
epithelium,
inflammatory
cells, and keratocytes may or may not result in appropriate
corneal repair. (C) Grade III
chemical injury: clinical appearance. There is complete corneal and proximal conjunctival
epithelial defect, with loss
of corneal stromal clarity. (D) Type III healing pattern: clinical appearance.There is complete coverageof the cornea
with conjunctivaliied
epithelium
and superficial and deep stromal vascularization.
(C and D reprinted
from Wagoner MD, Kenyon KR, Shore JSs with permission of Churchill
Livingstone.)
will
result
in the final
clinical
appear-
of anterior
segment
necrosis,
retre
cornea1 membranes, peripheral anterior synechiae, cataract, glaucoma, hypotony, and phthisis
bulbi may develop.2*5 Under no circumstances can
a satisfactory result be anticipated in the absence
of aggressive
surgical
intervention,
and
withhold-
three-step
apis applicable
eye.1g6p4o6
Man-
CHEMICALINJURIESOFTHEEYE
agement of the extreme chemical injury must attempt to 1) promote ocular surface epithelial recovery with proper cornea1 phenotypic transdifferentiation, 2) augment corneal repair by supporting
keratocyte
collagen production
and minimize ulceration related to collagenase activity, and 3) control inflammation.
k PROMOTE
TRANSD-TION
RON/
1. Tear Substitutes
Most chemical injuries occur in young, healthy
individuals with the ability to produce copious teating, so tear substitution is not needed. In rare
cases,where chemical injury occurs in the setting
of preexisting keratoconjunctivitis sicca, preservative-free tear substitutes may be useful. Temporary
or permanent punctal occlusion may facilitate the
function of tear substitutes. Tear substitutes are of
greater value following re-epithelialization, where
they ameliorate persistent epitheliopathy, reduce
the risk of recurrent erosion, and accelerate visual
rehabilitation.
2. Bandage Soft Contact Lens
by
inducing
hyperplasia.7*,130~163,~~~~~39.~51.3~7
290
Surv Ophthalmol41
5. Retinoic
WAGONER
TABLE 2
Acid
Hyaluronate
(Healon)
SDS-page* HPLC
Assay 48
Assay 48
1
1
3
13
33
100
10,000
7
8
180
122
27,000
1. Ascorbate
Pfister
md
o&,e~97,233,300,305,307-309,312.315
have
Tetracycline
be efficacious
27.48.125-12A.175.236.283
ty
experimental
independent
cornea1
ulceration
in
3. Collagenase
Inhibitors
CHEMICAL
INJURIES
OF THE
291
EYE
INFLAMMATION
1. Corticosteroids
Corticosteroids have traditionally been the mainstay of therapy for the reduction of tissue injury
related to acute or chronic inflammatory conditions, including those of the eye.1g7s232
Corticosteroids reduce inflammatory cell infiltration and stabilize polymorphonuclear
leukocyte cytoplasmic
and lysosomal membranes9 Unfortunately, there
has been an unfounded reluctance on the part of
many clinicians to use corticosteroids in the severely inflamed, acutely chemically-injured
eye.
This may be due to unfavorable experiences that
often result from the injudicious use of corticosteroids in this setting. This error is compounded by
the extrapolation that such poor outcomes automatically exclude this potentially beneficial family
of substances from the management of severe
chemical injuries.
It is well recognized among clinicians that there
is little risk of sterile ulceration in the first week
after severe chemical injury whether or not corticosteroids are used. This finding is confirmed in
experimental models, where there is no adverse
effect on outcome when corticosteroids are used
in the first 10 days. Corticosteroids interfere with
stromal wound repair by impairing both keratocyte
migration into the area of injury and collagen synthesis.0~0,114~17,~1~
The deleterious side effects of
corticosteroids do not become apparent until corneal repair processes begin, since a balance between collagen synthesis and proteolytic debridement must be maintained to avoid cornea1 thinning and perforation .looDuring this phase, which
usually peaks after lo-14 days, suppression of keratocyte collagen production by corticosteroids may
offset the advantages of their effect on inflammatory cell suppression and collagenase inhibition 42,210.317
resulting in a net shift of cornea1 repairtoward ulceration.
The key to successful use of corticosteroids is to
maximize their anti-inflammatory effect during the
first 7-10 days when the risk-benefit ratio is favor-
able. Later the therapy can be modified by tapering the corticosteroids while monitoring for evidence of cornea1 thinning or by substituting progestational steroids or substituting non-steroidal
anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) .
2. Progestational
Steroids
Progestational steroids have less anti-inflammatory potency than corticosteroids, but have only a
minimal effect on stromal repair and collagen synthesis.317They are effective in reducing cornea1 ulceration in experimental chemical injuries.141,224,27
They may be substituted for corticosteroids at lo14 days when suppression of inflammation is needed but interference with cornea1 stromal repair is
undesirable. Topical, subconjunctival, or systemic
medroxyprogesterone
(Provera) has potent anticollagenolytic activity in experimental animal models 141.270
The ability of medroxyprogesterone to inhibit neovascularization141 may be helpful in promoting ocular surface epithelial transdifferentiation in the early stagesafter chemical injury3g1 and
for visual rehabilitation in the late stages.
3. Non-steroidal
Anti-inflammatory
Drugs
WSm)
NSAID, such as diclofenac sodium, ketorolac tromethamine, and experimental lipogenase and leukotriene inhibitors, are effective inhibitors of PMN
leukocytes. 363They reduce inflammation at least as
effectively as corticosteroids following routine cataract surgery54.s~g2,371
and in experimental lens-induced uveitis.54
Early experimental trials on the efficacy of
NSAID in reducing ocular inflammation after
chemical injuries have been promising. Struck
reported that leukotriene antagonist S 872419, a
specific antagonist of peptide leukotrienes, reduced clinical evidence of inflammation following
experimental alkali injuries in rabbit eyes by inhib
iting lipoxygenase-mediated reactions. He also reported37 that BN 52 021, a specific antagonist of
PAF receptors led to a visible anti-inflammatory effect of the chemically burned anterior segment of
rabbit eyes by reducing the anticipated increase in
PGF2 alpha. Preliminary clinical trials379suggest a
possible additive effect of topical indomethacin, an
inhibitor of cyclooxygenase, to dexamethasone in
the early treatment of moderate and severe chemical injuries.
The effect of NSAID on stromal wound repair
and collagen synthesis, collagenolytic activity, and
inhibition of neovascularization has not been adequately addressed, * It is hoped that NSAID will
prove to be an effective substitute or an additive
for corticosteroids in the first week and for pro-
SUIV Ophthalmol41
(4) January-February
1997
WAGONER
Fig 8. (A) Grade IV chemical injury: schematic. There is loss of all corneal epithelial, limbal stem cells, and proximal
conjunctival epithelium. (B) Type IV healing pattern: schematic. Little or no re-epitbelialization is expected from the
distal conjunctival epithelium. Interactions between inflammatory cells and keratocytes, in the absence of modulation
by migrating epithelium result in excessive collagenolysis instead of appropriate repair. (C) Grade IV chemical injury:
clinical appearance. Complete corneal epithelium defect with limbal ischemia remains unchanged four months after
original injury. (D) Type IV healing pattern: clinical appearance. Sterile cornea1 ulceration with perforation and iris
prolapse in the inferior cornea. A mature cataract is also present. (C and D reprinted by permission from Mandel
ER, Wagoner MD: Atlas af Cornea1 Disease. Philadelphia, WB Saunders,1989,p 72.)
4. Citrate
V. Surgical Therapy
A. PROMOTE
TRANSD-TION
REFaP-TION/
Fig. 9. Technique
of limbal stem cell transplantation.
(early intervention).
(A-D) Technique
of donor eye preparation. Superior and inferior limbal grafts are delineated with focal applications
of cautery approximately
2 mm posterior
to the limbus. The initial incision is made superficially within clear cornea using a disposable scarifier. The bulbar
conjunctival portion of the graft is undermined
and thinly dissected free from its limbal attachment. (E/F) Technique
of recipient eye preparation.
The limbal grafts are transferred
to their corresponding
sites in tbe recipient eye and
are secured with interrupted
sutures, 10-O nylon at the corneal edge and 8-O vicryl at the conjunctival
margin.
Superficial keratectomy is not required.
(A-F reprinted
from Kenyon KR and Tseng SCG1wwith permission from the
authors and JB Lippincott.)
face transplantation
techniques
that are useful inelude
conjunctival/Tenons
advancement
(tenoplasty)
for immediate
t-e-establishment
of hmbal
vascularity
and a proximate
source of epithelium
for the denuded
corneal
surface,330 limbal
stem
cell transplantation
for early or late re-establishment of limbal stem cell populations
in the hope
of producing
a phenotypically
normal
corneal
ep
ithelial
surface,199,*v408
and conjunctivaP
or mucous membrane
transplantation220~267~34g
for the late
294
Surv Ophthalmol41
WAGONER
juries in an effort to prevent a Type III or IV healing pattern and the need for more complicated
late rehabilitation.
1. Conjunctival/Tenons
advancement
The technique, as described by Kenyon and
(Tenoplasty)
Tseng lgg (Fig. 9), involves harvesting two crescents
In Grade IV injuries, the most immediate conof peripheral cornea1 limbal epithelium with a corcern is the development of anterior segment neresponding section of conjunctiva from the limbus
crosis due to loss of the limbal vascular blood supof the patients uninjured or less injured contraply, as well as the certainty of failure to re-epithelateral eye (autograft) or from a close relative (allialize. There is extensive evidence to suggest that
lograft). When performed early in the clinical
prompt reestablishment of the limbal vascularity
course, the graft can be transferred to the recipimay greatly reduce the subsequent development of
ent eye without preparatory superficial keratectothe disastrous Type IV healing pattern.21g~326~330~375
my. In such cases, successful transplantation deThe use of conjunctival/Tenons
advancement,
pends upon having controlled ocular inflammaor tenoplasty, is based upon the principle of using
tion with appropriate medical therapy, and insurvital connective tissue within the orbit to re-estaing that the graft is properly
attached to
blish limbal vascularity and to facilitate re-epithewell-vascularized conjunctiva. In Grade IV injuries
lialization.375 As described by Teping and Reim,375 prior extension of an appropriate vascular supply
all necrotic conjunctival and episcleral tissue is exto the limbal region by tenoplasty, either before or
cised, followed by blunt separation of Tenons tisat the same time as limbal stem cell transplantation
sue from the equatorial region of the globe and
is mandatory to insure graft survival.
from the extraocular muscles. The Tenon sheet
In the past, the evolution of a Type III healing
must be prepared with a smooth surface to allow
pattern (fibrovascular pannus) following a Grade
conjunctival epithelium to slide on this layer. The
III injury was allowed to proceed without intervention with the intention of attempting rehabilitation
Tenons flap, with its carefully preserved vascular
supply, is then advanced to the limbus and sutured
after six months with superficial keratectomy, contightly to the sclera.
junctival or limbal stem cell transplantation, and
possibly penetrating keratoplasty. This healing patReim330reported 24 severely chemically-burned
eyes in 21 patients in which conjunctival tissue was
tern can be anticipated after a Grade III injury or
not available for advancement and for which Tenafter a Grade IV injury in which successful tenoon flaps alone were employed. In all cases,sterile
plasty has been performed early in the course. It
cornea1 ulceration was either prevented or arrestis now known that the use of limbal stem cell transplantation asearly as three weeks after injury offers
ed. Although this technique has been almost unithe theoretical potential of a phenotypically norformly successful in preventing anterior segment
mal ocular surface by upgrading the healing patnecrosis and/or sterile cornea1 ulceration, it has
tern to that normally associated with a Grade II
been lesssuccessful in insuring adequate or approinjury. Such therapy may produce a satisfactory
priately differentiated
cornea1 epithelial recovclinical outcome (Fig. lOA-D), without the comery. 21g,326,330,375
This technique may be very effective
plication of fibrovascular pannus (Fig. iD) and
in insuring initial stablization of a Grade IV injury,
complicated rehabilitation.1gg~3g6~408
providing the eye with the possibility of a Type III
In the past, Type IV healing patterns were treatrather than a Type IV healing pattern. This teched with either tissue adhesive or with keratoplasty
nique may have prevented the sterile cornea1 ulas the need arose (see below). As discussed above,
ceration which occurred in the case depicted in
early tenoplasty offers the opportunity to reduce
Fig. SC and D.
the risk of sterile ulceration and perforation asso2. Limbal
Stem Cell Transplantation
ciated with Grade IV injuries. Still, the best outcome that can be anticipated is an upgrade to a
Limbal stem cell transplantation was proposed
Type III healing pattern with delayed re-epithelialby Kenyon and Tsenglgg as a modification of the
ization and eventual development of fibrovascular
original conjunctival transplantation technique of
pannus of the ocular surface. In these cases,there
Thoft.381,388Limbal stem cell transplantation, but
are also theoretical advantages to attempting early
not transplantation of conjunctival bulbar epithelimbal stem cell transplantation in an effort to
lium, restores the normal cornea1 epithelial phereestablish a phenotypically normal cornea1 surnotype after chemical injury. Limbal stem cell
face. Unfortunately, the severe spectrum of antetransplantation is the only currently available techrior segment injury often precludes a satisfactory
nique to reestablish a normal cornea1 phenotype
outcome.
earlv in the clinical course for Grade III or IV in-
CHEhfKAL
INJURIES
OF THE
EYE
While limbal stem cell transplantation has proven extremely useful in the management of unilateral chemical injury, it has not been extensively
applied to the management of the bilateral chemical injury due to the lack of an alternative source
of limbal stem cells. Recent innovations which may
prove useful in such cases are limbal allograft
transplantation or the use of cultured limbal stem
cells.
Weise and colleagues410first reported the use of
limbal allografts on 12 primates. In 12 allograft
limbal transplants, there was successful transfer
and re-epithelialization in all 12 eyes. The transplanted tissue showed marked injection, hemorrhage, and chemosis, which subsided after 28-150
days. The donor tissue survived in all 12 cases,despite immune reactions. Pfister described two cases
in humans in which limbal allograft transplantation was obtained from donor globes.287The first
patient had an asymmetric injury with a type III
healing pattern in one eye at 11 months and a visual acuity of counting fingers at one foot. The
other eye had 20/20 acuity, but due to extensive
limbal epithelial injury, it was not considered to be
a suitable donor site. Five months after limbal allograft transplantation, successful penetrating keratoplasty was performed and it was still clear 15
months later. The second patient had a bilateral
severe chemical injury, in which one eye had been
lost following multiple failed penetrating keratoplasties and a keratoprosthesis. The other eye had
two failed penetrating keratoplasties. Five months
following limbal allograft transplantation
(with
transient, steroid-responsive immune reaction), a
penetrating keratoplasty was performed. It was still
clear with 20/80 visual acuity 18 months later.*s
Although these anecdotal casesseem promising,
there are concerns of eventual rejection of the limbal allograft stem cells followed by subsequent replacement of the cornea1 epithelial cells with a
conjunctival epithelium and incomplete transdifferentation. Williams4Ls recently investigated the
survival of non-related, donor-derived epithelial
cells after limbal stem cell allotransplantation in a
patient with bilateral limbal stem cell failure, using
short tandem-repeated DNA polymorphisms to distinguish between donor and recipient cells. He
demonstrated that cells of the donor genotype
were not detected in the central cornea until 12
weeks postoperatively, indicating that repopulation
of cornea1 surface with transplanted cells from the
donor is slow. In addition, only recipient-type cells,
and not donor cells, were detected in the central
cornea by the 20th week, despite systemic immunosuppression of the recipient with azathioprine
and cyclosporine. This single case of rejection of
Transplantation
296
Surv Ophthalmol41
(4) January-February
1997
WAGONER
tation
in the bilaterally
chemically-injured
and not uncommon in neglected or poorly treated
eye.378,381The
first attempt to restore ocular surface
Grade III injuries. Traditional treatment such as
epithelial function with limbal stem cell transplanthe application of cyanoacrylate glue for impendtation used allogenic corneal donor limbal epitheing or small perforations
and tectonic keratoplasty
for perforations > 1 mm offer a means of preservlium taken on thin crescents of stroma. Unfortuing the integrity of the globe. They do not, hownately, keratoepithelioplasty is technically difficult
and has failed to produce convincing results.377~sg7 ever, rectify the ocular surface deficiency or the
aberrant stromal repair mechanisms responsible
Interestingly, large diameter penetrating kerafor the corneal ulceration (in Grade III and IV intoplasty (see below),21s,323may solve the technical
juries) or the complications of an avascular limbal
problems of transfer of limbal stem cell allografts
zone (in Grade IV injuries). Even if adequate tecfrom donor
tissue and, at the same time, provide
tonic support
is achieved,
there is inevitably
proa more favorable substrate for migration and visual
gressive vascularization
and scarring,
loss of visual
recovery than either keratoepithelioplasty or limacuity, and a worsened prognosis for subsequent
bal stem cell allograft transplantation alone. Still,
penetrating keratoplasty.
limbal stem cells transferred by this method, while
Although tenoplasty214~21g~326*330~375
and limbal
initially successful, may have problems with evenstem
cell
transplantation
have
been
discussed
tual stem cell rejection.21s~323~418
B. SUPPORT REPAIR AND MDNJMIZE
ULCERATION
Progression
to cornea1 thinning
and perforation
is quite common
after Grade IV chemical
injuries
CHEhflCAL
INJURIES
OF THE EYE
Fig. II.
Technique
of limbal stem cell transplantation
(late intervention,
donor eye preparation).
(A) Using Castroviejo calipers and disposable cautery, the area to be resected is marked approximately
2 mm posterior to the limbus.
(B) After conjunctival
resection, abnormal corneal epithelium
and fibrovascular pannus are stripped by blunt dissection using cellulose sponges and tissue forceps and/or
superficially
dissected with Martinez
spatula or disposable
scarifier. (C/D) Additional
surface polishing smoothes the stromal surface and improves clarity. Donor limbal autografts are obtained in the same manner shown in Fig. 9 A/B and sutured in place as shown in Fig. 9 C/D. (A-D
reprinted from Kenyon KR and Tseng SCG* with permission from the authors and JB Lippincott.)
298
Surv Ophthalmol41
(4) January-February
1997
1. Tenoplasty
Tenoplasty has already been discussed for its role
in reestablishment of the limbal vascular blood
supply.21g~926~350~375
The access of vascularly derived
collagenase inhibitors may be of clinical significance in the prevention of collagenolytic-related
ulceration of the cornea1 stroma prior to the re-establishment of an intact epithelium.
WAGONER
problems of the cornea. This suggests that preventing rejection of limbal stem cell allografts is
much more difficult than preventing endothelial
cell rejection, even with the use of systemic immunosuppression.
4. Tissue
Adhesive
Tissue adhesives are an effective tool for management of impending or actual perforation related to sterile ulceration of the cornea1 stroma fol2. Limbal
Stem Cell Transplantation
lowing chemical injury. g3Jg8,406
While the use of tisIrrespective of its source, an intact epithelium
sue adhesive was originally described in conjunceffectively arrests further sterile cornea1 ulceration with the application of a glued-on hard
tion1g6,405
by producing cytokines which inhibit corcontact lens, this has not been adopted in common
neal fibroblast collagenase production1sG184s70and
clinical practice. lg8 The application of tissue adby excluding PMN-leukocytes from the cornea1
hesive is best reserved for impending perforations
stroma.rgs Thus, successful limbal stem cell transor actual perforations of 1 mm or less. Using the
plantation early in the clinical course is not only a
slit-lamp or operating microscope, cyanoacrylate
means of encouraging re-epithelialization and esglue can be applied easily to the area of ulceration
tablishing an appropriate cornea1 epithelial pheor perforation, after which a durable bandage soft
notype, but the reestablishment of an intact epicontact lens is usually applied to provide comfort
thelium is also an effective means of supporting
and reduce the chances of dislodgement of the
repair and minimizing ulceration.1sO-1a4,196,370,405 glue. g3,406
The adhesive can be left in place until it
loosens spontaneously as re-epithelialization oc3. Large Diameter
Therapeutic
Penetrating
curs. It can be removed with jewelers forceps after
Keratoplasty
six to eight weeks when the inflammation has subKuckelkorn218 and Redbrake
have reported
sided and neovascularization of the area has eliminated the risk of recurrent ulceration.406
encouraging results with the use of large (11-12
mm) diameter penetrating keratoplasty in the
In addition to providing immediate tectonic
management of both acute and chronic severe
support, tissue adhesive arrests further ulceration
chemical injury. By transferring not only cornea1
by excluding PMN leukocytes from the site and
inducing fibrovascular scarring.lg8 Unfortunately,
tissue for tectonic support, but also limbal stem
this fibrovascular scar results in poor visual acuity
cells of the donor globe, this procedure, used in
conjunction with tenoplasty (when indicated), adand worsens the prognosis for penetrating keradresses not only the issuesof tectonic support and
toplasty. If possible, it is best to take precautions
visual rehabilitation, but the problems of ocular
to prevent or reduce the likelihood of requiring
tissue adhesive. Repair with tissue adhesive, howsurface epithelial abnormalities and vascular defiever, remains vastly preferable to emergency tecciency as well. This addresses the major problems
which usually lead to failure of conventional tectonic keratoplasty, where the potential complications of recurrent ulceration and perforation,
tonic keratoplasty (see below).
graft opacification, and immunological stimulaKuckelkorn218 successfully managed six eyes with
tion make subsequent rehabilitation even more
sterile cornea1 ulceration with large diameter pen&fficult.93,194*196
etrating keratoplasty, arresting ulceration and
maintaining an intact epithelium during a period
5. Tectonic
Keratoplasty
of follow-up exceeding one year, although two
grafts did experience rejection 2-3 months postTectonic keratoplasty may be required in the uroperatively. Redbrake
reported the treatment of
gent setting of acute perforation not amenable to
tissue adhesive.1v32s35*36
Unlike tissue adhesive,
nine severely chemically-injured eyes in seven patients with cornea1 ulceration and perforation with
which tends to arrest further ulceration, tectonic
keratoplasty may be the preferred approach for ac12 large diameter penetrating keratoplasty (three
tual perforation, especially if the defect is greater
repeated for graft failure). All nine eyes were prethan 1 mm in diameter. This technique is used to
served tectonically, but only two of 12 grafts rebuy time in caseswhere the perforation is relamained clear throughout the entire period of foltively small and can be addressed with a small teclow-up, despite the fact that only four endothelial
tonic keratoplasty, until vascularization of the graft
graft rejection episodes were documented. Among
bed arrests further cornea1 ulceration. Until this
the 10 failures, eight were attributed to epithelial
CHEMICAL
INJURIES
occurs, it is occasionally necessary to use tissue adhesive for leaks at the graft-host junction
or progressive thinning and impending perforation
within the graft itself.
As with tissue adhesive, it is best to take every
preventative
measure to minimize the necessity of
tectonic keratoplasty,
including prompt use of conjunctival advancement
or tenoplasty in Grade IV
injuries. If a tectonic keratoplasty
does become
necessary, there is some merit to consideration
of
large diameter grafts to provide tectonic stability
while transferring
an adequate (albeit, potentially
short-lived)
limbal stem cell population.218.32s.48
C. LATE
299
OF THE EYE
REHAJ3ILITATION
300
Surv Ophthalmol41
(4) January-February
1997
WAGONER
Fig. 13. Severe alkali injury, late sequelae. (A) Extensive symblepharon
between the right lower lid and temporal
bulbar conjunctiva and cornea. Corneal epithelium
is intact and relatively clear due to preservation
of superior and
nasal limbal stem cells. (B) Similar findings are present laterally in the left eye.
CHEMICALINJURIESOFIHEEYE
Fig. 15.
Keratoprosthesis may be useful for bilateral, severe chemical injury where the prognosis is hopeless for penetrating keratoplasty due to irreparable
damage to the ocular surface or repeated immunological rejection (Fig. 15). Although the success
rate has been variable in the past,51,76,211,322
improved keratoprosthesis design and postoperative
management may offer an improved prognosis in
the future.
SW-V Ophthalmol
302
41 (4) January-February
1997
WAGONER
2. Debridement
C. EARLY
REPAIR
1. Grade
3. Paracentesis
12.49.
289
B. ACUTE
1. Grade
PHASE
Adequate therapy consists of topical corticosteroids to reduce inflammation, appropriate glaucoma medications for elevation of intraocular pressure, prophylactic antibiotics while awaiting re-epithelialization, and cycloplegics as needed for comfort.
2. Grades
II/III
For chemical injuries of this severity, initial therapy which addresses all of the pathophysiological
abnormalities includes:
1. topical corticosteroids every four hours to four
times a day;
2. sodium ascorbate 10% topically every two
hours;
3. sodium citrate 10% topically every two hours;
4. tetracycline ointment four times a day;
5. sodium ascorbate two grams orally, four times a
day;
6. doxycycline 100 mg orally, twice a day;
7. P-blocker of choice twice a day as needed;
8. diamox sequels 500 mg orally, twice a day;
3. Grade
IV
Grade IV injury requires all the therapies recommended for Grades II/III, plus tenoplasty.
PHASE
II
If re-epithelialization
progresses, but fails to
reach completion during this phase, adjustments
to the initial therapy may include tapering of topical corticosteroids, topical/systemic sodium ascorbate, topical sodium citrate, and topical/systemic
tetracycline.
3. Grades
III/IV
LATE
REPAIR
PHASE
1. Type1
III/IV
CHEMICAL
INJURIES
303
OF THE EYE
keratoplasty
(1 l-12 mm) may be performed
if limbal stem cell transplantation
is not possible (especially applicable in bilateral cases).
Pending completion
of re-epithelialization
following limbal stem cell transplantation,
it is necessary to continue the following
medical therapy:
Medoxyprogesterone
1% or NSAID;
topical/systemic sodium ascorbate;
topical sodium citrate;
topical/systemic
tetracycline.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
VII.
Conclusion
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
References
I. Abel R Jr. Binder PS, Polack FM, Kaufman
HE: The results
of penetrating
keratoplasty
after chemical
burns. Trans Am
Acad Ophthalmol
Otolaryngol
79:OP 584-95,
1975
2. Alldredge
OC. Krachmer
JH: Clinical
types of cornea!
transplant rejection;
their manifestations,
frequency,
preoperative
correlates.
and treatment.
Arch Ophthalmol
99:
599-604,
1981
3. Allam B, lnsler MS: The use of fibronectin
in the healing
of persistent
epithelia!
defects in the rabbit cornea. .J Ocul
Ther Surg 4:89-92.
1985
4. Allen TD, Potten CS: Fine-structural
identification
and organization
of the epidermal
proliferative
unit. J Cell Sci
15:29!-319.
1974
5. Awan KJ: Delayed cataract formation
after alkali burn, Can
I Ophthalmol
10:423-426,
1975
6. Balien
PH: Mucous
membrane
grafts in chemical
(lye)
burns. Am J Ophthalmol55:302-312,
1963
7. Barlati S, Marchina
E, Quaranta
CA, et al: Analysis of fibronectin,
plasminogen
activators
and plasminogen
in tear
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
fluid as markers
of cornea! damage
and repair. Exp Eye
Res 51:1-g,
1990
Barnes MJ: Function
of ascorbic
acid in collagen
metabolism. Ann NY Acad Sci 258:2&l-277,
1975
Basu PK, Avaria M, Jankie R: Effect of hydrocortisone
on
the mobilisation
of leucocytes
in cornea1
wounds.
Br J
Ophthalmol
65: 694-698,
1981
Beams R, Linabery
L, Grayson
M: Effect of topical corticosteroids
on cornea! wound strength.
Am .J Ophthalmol
66:1131-1133,!968
Beare JD: Eye injuries
from assault with chemicals.
Br J
Ophthalmol
74:51+518.
1990
Bennett
TO, Peyman
GA, Rutgard
J: lntracameral
phosphate buffer in alkali burns. Can J Ophthalmol
13:93-95,
1978
Berman
MB: Regulation
of cornea! fibroblast
MMP-1
collagenase secretion
by plasmin.
Cornea
12420-432,
1993
Berman
MB: The pathogenesis
of cornea1 epithelial
defects. Acta Ophthal
67(Suppl
!92):55-64,
1989
Berman
MB: Collagenase
and cornea! ulceration,
in Wooley DE, Evanson
JE (eds): Collagenase
in Normal
and
Pathological
Connective
Tissues. New York, John Wiley,
1982, pp 141-174
Berman
MB, Barber JC, Talamo RC, Langley
GE: Cornea!
ulceration
and the serum antiproteases.
I. alpha-l-antitrypsin. Invest Ophthalmol
Vis Sci 12:759-770,
1973
Berman
MB, Dohlman
CH, Davison
PF, et al: Characterization
of collagenolytic
activity in the ulcerating
cornea.
Exp Eye Res 11:225-227,197l
Berman
MB, Hayashi K, Young E. et al: Urokinase-like
plasminogen
activator,
cornea1 epithelial
migration,
and defect
formation.
Invest Ophthalmol
Vis Sci SO(Suppl):Z.
1989
Berman
MB, Kenyon
KR, Hayashi
K, LHernault
N: The
pathogenesis
of epithelial
defects and stromal
ulceration,
in Cavanagh
HD (ed): The Cornea:
TrdnsdCtiOnS
of the
World Congress
on the Cornea
Ill. New York, Raven Press,
1988, pp 35-43
Berman
MB, Leary R, Gage J: Evidence
for a role of the
plasminogen
activator-plasmin
system in cornea!
ulcerddon. Invest Ophthalmol
Vis Sci 19:1204-1221,
1980
Berman
MB, Manabe
R: Cornea! collagenase:
evidence for
zinc metalloenzyme.
Ann Ophthalmol
5:1193-1209,
1973
Berman
MB, Manseau
E, Law M, et al: Ulceration
is correlated
with degradation
of fibrin and fibronectin
at the
cornea1 surface. Invest Ophthalmol
Vis Sci 24:1358-1366.
1983
Bickenbach
JR, McCutecheon
J, MacKenzie
JC: Rate of loss
of tritiated
thymidine
label in basal cells in mouse epithelial tissues. Cell Tissue Kinet 19:325-333,
1986
Birk DE, Fitch JM, Babiarz JP, Linsenmayer
TF: Collagen
type I and type V are present in the same fibril in the avian
cornea! stroma. J Cell Biol 106:999-1008.
1988
Brazzell RK, Stern ME, Aquavella.p,
et al: Human
recombinant
epidermal
growth
factor in experimental
cornea!
wound
healing.
Invest
Ophthalmol
Vis Sci 32:336-340,
199 1
Brinckerhoff
CE, Fini ME: Molecular
cloning
of collagenase and activator/stromelysin:
Members
of a coordinately
regulated
gene family of metalloproteinases
is important
in the modulation
of connective
tissue metdbo!ism,
in Olsen B, Nimmi ME (eds): Collagen.
Vol 4. Boca Raton, CRC
Press, 1989, pp 65-84
Brion M. Lambs L, Berthon
G: Metal ion-tetracycline
interactions
in biological
fluids: Part 5. Formation
of zinc
complexes
with tetracycline
and some of its derivatives
and
assessment of their biological
significance.
Agents Actions
17:229-242
, 1985
Bron AJ: Vortex patterns
of the cornea! epirhelium.
Tram
Ophthalmol
Sot UK 93:455-472,!973
Bron AJ, Goldberg
MF: Clinical features of human limbus.
in Trevor-Roper
PD (ed): The Cornea
in Health and Disease: VIth Congress
of the European
Society of Ophthalmology. London.
Grune
and Stratton,
1981, pp 15-20
Brown D. Chwa M, ESCObdr
M. Kennrv
MC: CharacteriLa-
304
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
43.
44.
45.
46
47.
48.
49.
50.
51.
52.
53.
54.
55.
56.
Surv Ophthalmol
41 (4) January-February
1997
WAGONER
57. Chin JR, Murphy
G, Werb Z: Stromelysin,
a connectivetissue degrading
metalloendopeptidase
secreted by rabbit
synovial
fibroblasts
in parallel
with collagenase.
J Biol
Chem 260:12367-12376,1985
58. Chung JH: Healing of rabbit cornea1 alkali wounds in vitro.
Cornea
9:36-40,
1990
59. Chung JH, Fagerholm
P: Stromal reaction
and repair after
cornea1 alkali wound
in the rabbit: a quantitative
microradiographic
study. Exp Eye Res 45:227-237,
1987
60. Cintron
C, Hassinger
LC, Kublin
CL, et al: Biochemical
and ultrastructural
changes
in collagen
during
cornea1
wound healing. J Ultrastruct
Res 65:13-22,
1978
61. Cintron
C, Hong BS: Heterogeneity
of collagens
in rabbit
cornea:
type IV collagen.
Invest Ophthalmol
Vis Sci 29:
760-766,1988
62. Cintron
C, Hong BS, Covington
HI, Kublin
CL: Quantitative analysis of collagen
from normal developing
corneas
and cornea1 scars. Curr Eye Res 1:1-8, 1981
63. Cintron
C, Hong BS, Covington
HI, Macarak
EJ: Heterogeneity of collagens
in rabbit cornea: type III collagen.
Invest Ophthalmol
Vis Sci 29:767-775,
1988
64. Cionni
RJ, Katakami
C, Lavrich JB, Kao Wwy:
Collagen
metabolism
following
cornea1 laceration
in rabbits. Curr
Eye Res 5:549-558,1986
65. Collier IE, Smith J, Kronberger
A, et al: The structure
of
the human
skin fibroblast
collagenase
gene. J Biol Chem
263:10711-10713,1988
66. Collier IE, Wilhelm
SM, Eisen AZ, et al: H-rus oncogenetransformed
human
bronchial
epithelial
cells (TBE-1)
secrete a single metalloprotease
capable of degrading
basement membrane
collagen.
J Biol Chem
263:6579-6587,
1988
67. Colvin RB, Phan TM, Boruchoff
SA: Fibronectin
therapy
of persistent
cornea1 epithelial
defects. Invest Ophthalmol
Vis Sci 26(Suppl):92,
1985
68. Cooper
TW, Eisen AZ, Stricklin
GP, Welgus HG: Platelet
derived
collagenase
inhibitor:
characterization
and subcellular localization.
Proc Nat1 Acad Sci USA 82:2779-2783,
1985
69. Cotsarellis
G, Cheng SZ, Dong G, et al: Existence
of slowcycling
limbal epithelial
basal cells that can be preferentially stimulated
to proliferate:
implications
on epithelial
stem cells. J Cell Biol 103:49-62,
1986
70. Cotsarellis
G, Dong G, Sun IT, Lavker
RW: Differential
response
of limbal and cornea1 epithelia
to phorbol
myristate acetate (TPA). Inv Ophthalmol
Vis Sci 28(Suppl):l,
1987
71. Cybulsky
MI, Chan MKW, Movat HZ: Neutrophil
emigration quantitation,
kinetics and role of mediators,
in Poste
G, Crooke
ST (eds): Cellular
and Molecular
Aspects of
Inflammation.
New York, Plenum
Press, 1988, pp 41-56
72. Daniele
S, Frati L, Fiore C, et al: The effect of epidermal
growth factor (EGF) on the cornea1 epithelium
in humans.
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol
210:159-165,
1979
73. Danjo S, Friend J, Thoft RA: Conjunctival
epithelium
in
healing
of cornea1 epithelial
wounds.
Invest Ophthalmol
Vis Sci 28:1445-1459,
1987
74. Darlak K Miller RB, Stack MS, et al: Thiol-based
inhibitors
of mammalian
collagenase.
J Biol Chem 2655199-5205,
1990
75. Davanger
M, Evensen A: Role of the pericorneal
papillary
structure
in renewal
of cornea1 epithelium.
Nature
229:
560-561,
1971
76. Dohlman
CH, Schneider
HA, Doane MG: Prosthokerdtoolastv. Am 1 Oohthalmol
77:694-700,
1974
77. Donshik
PC, Berman
MB, Dohlman
CH, et al: Effect of
topical corticosteroids
on ulceration
in alkali-burned
corneas. Arch Ophthalmol
96:2117-2120,
1978
78. Dua HS, ForresterJV:
The corneoscleral
limbus in human
epithelial
wound
healing. Am J Ophthalmol
110:646-656,
1990
79. Ebato B, Friend J, Thoft RA: Comparison
of central and
peripheral
human cornea1 epithelium
in tissue culture. Invest Ophtbalmol
Vis Sci 281450-1456,
1987
CHEMICAL
INJURIES
OF THE EYE
305
101. Frati L, Cenci G, Sharaglia
G, et al: Levels of epidermal
growth
factor in mice tissues measured
by a specific radioreceptor
assay. Life Sci 18:905-912,
1976
102. Frati L, Daniele
S, Delogu A, Covelli I: Selective binding
of epidermal
growth
factor and its specific effects on the
epithelial
cells in the cornea. Exp Eye Res 14: 135-141,1972
103. Fredj-Reygrobellet
D, Plouet J, Delayre
T, et al: Effects of
aFGF and bFGF on wound healing in rabbit corneas. Curr
Eye Res 6:1205-1209,1987
104. Friedenwald
JS: Growth
pressure
and metaplasia
of conjunctival
and cornea1
epithelium.
Dot Ophthalmol
5-6:
184-192,
1951
105. Friedenwald
JS, Buschke
W: Some factors concerned
in
the mitotic
and wound-healing
activities of the cornea1 epithelium.
Trans Am Ophthalmol
Sot 42:371-383,
1944
106. Friedenwald
JS, Hughes WF, Hermann
H: Acid burns of
the eye. Arch Ophthalmol
35:98-108,
1946
107. Friend J, Thoft RA: Functional
competence
of regenerating ocular surface epithelium.
Invest Ophthalmol
Vis Sci
17:134-139,
1978
108. Fujikawa
LS, Foster CS, Harrist
TJ, et al: Fibronectin
in
healing
rabbit
cornea1 wounds.
Lab Invest 45:1120-129,
198
109. Fujisawa K, Katakami
C, Yamamoto
M: Effect of epidermal
growth
factor on epithelial
cells and keratocytes
during
wound healing of alkali-burned
cornea. Invest Ophthalmol
Vis Sci 31 (Suppl):225,
1990
110. Fujisawa K Katakami
C, Yamamoto
M: Keratocyte
activity
during
wound
healing
of alkali-burned
cornea.
Nippon
Ganka Gakkai
Zasshi 95:59-66,
1991
111. Gabler WL, Creamer
HR: Suppression
of human
neutrophi1 functions
by tetracyclines.
J Periodont
Res 26:52-58,
1991
112. Garbisa S, Ballin M, Daga-Giordini
D, et al: Transient
expression of type IV collagenolytic
metalloproteinase
by human mononuclear
phagocytes.
J Biol Chem
261:23692375,1986
113. Gartaganis
SP, Margaritis
LH, Koliopoulous
JX: The corneal epithelium
basement
membrane
complexes
after alkali burns: an ultrastructural
study. Ann Ophthalmol
19:
263-268,1987
114. Gasset AR, Lorenzetti
DW, Ellison
EM, Kaufman
HE:
Quantitative
corticosteroid
effect on cornea1 wound
healing. Arch Ophthalmol
81:589-591,
1969
115. Geanon J, Tripathi
B, Tripathi
R: The localization
of tissue
plasminogen
activator
by a monoclonal
antibody
in human
and monkey
eyes. Invest Ophthalmol
Vis Sci 28(Suppl):
108, 1987
116. Geanon
J, Tripathi
B, Tripathi
R, Barlow
G: Tissue plasminogen
activator
in avascular
tissues of the eye: a quantitative study of its activity in the cornea, lens, and aqueous
and vitreous
humors
of dog, calf, and monkey.
Exp Eye
Res 44:55-63,
1987
117. Geggel HS, Thoft RA, Friend J: Histology
of human
conjunctival
transplantation.
Cornea
3:11-15,
1984
118. Gipson
IK, Spurr-Michaud
S, Tisdale
AS: Hemidesmosomes and anchoring
fibril collagen
appear synchronously
during development
and wound healing. De Biol 126:253262, 1988
119. Gipson
IK, Spurr-Michaud
S, Tisdale A, Keogh M: Reassembly of the anchoring
structures
of the cornea1 epithelium during wound repair in the rabbit. Invest Ophthalmol
Vis Sci 30:423-434,
1989
120. Girard
MT, Matsubara
M, Fini ME: Transforming
growth
factor-beta
and interleukin-I
modulate
metalloproteinase
expression
by cornea1 stromal cells. Invest Ophthalmol
Vis
Sci 32:2441-2454,
1991
121. Girard
MT, Matsubara
M, Kublin
C, et al: Stromal
fibroblasts synthesize
collagenase
and stromelysin
during
longterm tissue remodeling.
J Cell Sci 104:1001-1011,
1993
122. Gnadinger
MC, Itoi M, Slansky HH, Dohlman
CH: The
role of collagenase
in the alkali-burned
cornea.
Am J
Ophthalmol
68:478-483,
1969
123. Goldberg
GL, Marmer
BL, Grant GA, Eisen AZ: Human
306
124.
125.
126.
127
128
129
130.
131.
132.
133.
134.
135.
136.
137.
138.
139.
140.
141.
142.
143.
144.
145.
Surv Ophthalmo141
(4) January-February
1997
72 kilodalton
type IV collagenase
forms a complex
with a
tissue inhibitor
of metalloproteinases
designated
TIMP-2.
Proc Nat1 Acad Sci USA 86:8207-8211,1986
Goldberg
MF, Bron AJ: Limbal palisades of Vogt. Trans Am
Ophthalmol
Sot 80:155-171,
1982
Golub LM, Lee HM, Lehrer
G, et al: Minocycline
reduces
gingival collagenolytic
activity during diabetes: preliminary
observations
and a proposed
new mechanism
of action. J
Periodont
Res 18:51&526,
1983
Golub LM, McNamara
TF, DAngelo
G, Greenwald
RA: A
non antibacterial
chemically-moduified
tetracycline
inhibits
mammalian
collagenase
activity. J Dent Res 66:1310-1314,
1987
Golub LM. Ramamurthy
N, McNamara
TF, et al: Tetracyclines inhibit
tissue collagenase
activity: a new mechanism
in the treatment
of periodontal
disease, J Periodont
Res
19:651-655,
1984
Golub LM, Wolff M, Lee HM, et al: Further
evidence
that
tetracyclines
inhibit
collagenase
activity
in human
crevicular fluid and from other mammalian
sources. J Periodont Res 20:12-23,
1985
Gordon
JM, Bauer EA. Eisen AZ: Collagenase
in the human cornea: immunologic
localization.
Arch Ophthalmol
98:341-345,198O
Gospodarowicz
D, Mescher
AL, Brown K, Birdwell
C: The
role of fibroblast
growth
factor and epidermal
growth factor in the proliferative
response
of cornea1 and lens epithelium.
Exp Eye Res 25:631-649.
1977
Granelli-Piperno
A, Vassalli JD, Reich E: Secretion
of plasminogen
activator
by human
polymorphonuclear
leukocytes. J Exp Med 146:169%1706,1977
Grant
WM: Toxicology
of the Eye. Drugs,
Chemicals,
Plants, Venoms.
Springfield,
Charles
C. Thomas,
ed 2,
1974, pp 5-22
Grant WM: Experimental
investigation
of paracentesis
in
the treatment
of ocular ammonia
burns. Arch Ophthalmol
44:399-404,
1950
Grant WM: Ocular
injury due to sulfur dioxide:
II. Experimental study and comparison
with ocular effects of freezing. Arch Ophthalmol
38:762-774,
1947
Grant WM, Kern HL: Action
of alkalies on the cornea1
stroma. Arch Ophthalmol
54:931-934,
1955
Gray RD. Miller RB, Spatola AF: Inhibition
of mammalian
collagenase
by thiol-containing
peptides.
J Cell Biochem
32:71-77,
1986
Gray RD, Saneii HH, Spatola AF: Metal binding
peptide
inhibitors
of vertebrate
collagenase.
Biochem
Biophys Res
Commun
101:1251-1258,1981
Greenwald
RA, Golub LM, Lavietes B, et al: Tetracyclines
inhibit
human synovial
collagenase
in vivo and in vitro. J
Rheumatol
14:28-32,
1987
Greiner
JV, Covington
HI, ABdnsmith
MR: The human
limbus.
A scanning
electron
microscopic
study. Arch
Ophthalmol97:1159-1165,1979
Gross J: An essay on biological
degradation
of collagen, in
Hay ED (ed): Cell Biology of the Extracellular
Matrix.
New
York, Plenum,
1982, pp 217-258
Gross J, Azizkhan
RG, Biswas C. et al: Inhibition
of tumor
growth,
vascularization,
and collagenolysis
in the rabbit
cornea by medroxyprogesterone.
Proc Nat1 Acad Sci USA
78:117&1180,
I981
Gundersen
T: Conjunctival
flaps in the treatment
of corneal disease with reference
to a new technique
of apphcation. Arch Ophthalmol
60:880-888,
1958
Haddox
JL, Pfister RR, Sommers
CL A visual assay for
quantitating
neutrophil
chemotaxis
in a collagen
gel matrix. A novel chemotactic
chamber.
,J Immunol
Methods
141:41-52,
1991
Haddox
IL. Pfister RR, Yuille-Barr
D: The efficacy of top
ical citrate after alkali injury is dependent
on the period
of time it is administered.
Invest Ophthalmol
Vis Sci 30:
1062-1068.
1989
Hall PA, Watt FM: Stem cells: the generation
and maintenance of cellular
activity. Development
106:619-633,
1989
_I
WAGONER
146. Hanna
C, Bicknell
DS, OBrien
JE: Cell turnover
in the
adult human eye. Arch Ophthalmol
65:695-698,196l
147. Hanna
C, OBrien
JE: Cell production
and migration
in
the epithelial
layer of the cornea.
Arch Ophthalmol
64:
536539,
1960
148. Harris ED Jr, Welgus HG, Krane SM: Regulation
of mammalian collagenases.
Co11 Relat Res 4493-512,
1984
149. Harris
LH, Cohn
K, Galin
MA: Alkali
injury
from
fireworks.
Ann Ophthalmol
3:849-851,
1971
150. Harris TM, Berry ER, Pakurar
AS, Sheppard
LB: Biochemical transformation
of bulbar conjunctiva
into cornea1 epithelium:
an electrophoretic
analysis. Exp Eye Res 41:597606, 1985
151. Hay ED: Development
of the vertebrate
cornea, in Bourne
GH, Danielli
JF (eds): International
Review of Cytology.
New York, Academic
Press, 1980, pp 263-322
152. Hayashi K, Berman
M, Smith D, et al: Pathogenesis
of corneal epithelial
defects: role of plasminogen
activator.
Curr
Eye Res 10:381-398,199l
153. Hayashi
K Sueishi K: Fibrinolytic
activity and species of
plasminogen
activator
in human
tears. Exp Eye Res 46:
131-137,1988
154. Hembry
RM, Ehrlich
HP: Immunolocalization
of collagenase and tissue inhibitor
of metalloproteinases
(TIMP)
in
hypertrophic
scar tissue. Br J Dermatol
115:409-420,
1986
155. Henriquez
AS, Pihlaja
DJ, Dohlman
CH: Surface
ultrastructure
in alkali-burned
rabbit corneas. Am J Ophthalmol 81:324-331,
1976
156. Herman
WK, Doughman
DJ, Lindstrom
RL: Conjunctival
autograft
transplantation
for unilateral
ocular surface diseases. Ophthalmology
90:1121-1126,
1983
157. Herr RD, White GL Jr, Bernhisel
K, et al: Clinical comparison of ocular irrigation
fluids following
chemical
injury.
Am J Emerg Med 9:228-231,199l
158. Hersh
PS, Rice BA, Baer JC, et al: Topical
nonsteroidal
agents and cornea1 wound healing. Arch OphthalmollO8:
577-583,
1990
159. Hesterberg
TW, Maness SC, Iglehart
JD, et al: Subpopulations of human
bronchial
epithelial
cells in culture
respond heterogeneously
to 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13.
acetate
(TPA)
and other modulators
of differentiation.
Carcinogenesis
8:1511-1515,
1987
160. Hibbs MS, Hasty KA, Seyer JM, et al: Biochemical
and immunological
characterization
of the secreted forms of human neutrophil
gelatinase.
J Biol Chem 260:2493-2500,
1985
161. Hibbs MS, Hoidal JR, Kang AH: Expression
of a metalloproteinase
that degrades
native type V collagen
and denatured
collagens
by cultured
human
alveolar
macrophages. J Clin Invest 80:1644-1650,
1987
162. Hirst LW, Fogle JA, Kenyon
KR, Stark WJ: Cornea1 epitheha1 regeneration
and adhesion
following
acid burns in the
rhesus monkey.
Invest Ophthalmol
Vis Sci 23:764-773,
1982
163. Ho PC, Davis WH, Elliott JH, Cohen S: Kinetics of cornea1
epithelial
regeneration
and epidermal
growth
factor. Invest Ophthalmol
Vis Sci 13:804-809,
1974
164. Ho PC, Elliott JH: Kinetics of cornea1 epithelial
regeneration. II. Epithelial
growth
factor and topical
corticosteroids. Invest Ophthalmol
Vis Sci 14:63O-633,
1975
165. Hook CW, Brown SI, Iwanij W, Nakanishi
I: Characterization and inhibition
of cornea1 collagenase.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 10:496-503,
1971
166. Hook
RM, Hook
CW, Brown
SI: Fibroblast
collagenase:
partial
purification
and characterization.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 12:771-776,
1973
167. Hoyhtya
M, Turpeenniemi-Hujanen
T, Stetler-Stevenson
W, et al: Monoclonal
antibodies
to type IV collagenase
recognize a protein
with limited
sequence homology
to interstitial collagenase
and stromelysin.
FEBS Lett 233:109-113,
1988
168. Huang AJW, Tseng XX: Cornea1 epithelial
wound healing
in the absence of limbal epithelium.
Invest Ophthalmol
Vis
Sci 32:96-105,
1991
CHEMICAL
169.
170.
171.
172.
173.
174.
175.
176.
177.
178.
179.
180.
181.
182.
183.
184.
185.
186.
187.
188.
189.
190.
191.
192.
INJURIES
307
OF THE EYE
193.
194.
195.
196.
197.
198.
199.
200.
201.
202.
203.
204.
205.
206.
207.
208.
209.
210.
211.
212.
213.
214.
nuclear
leukocytes
inhibit
proliferation
of epithelial
cells
in rabbit cornea.)
Nippon
Ganka
Gakkai
Zasshi 92:798805, 1988
Katakami
C, Sahori A, Kazusa R, et al: Keratocyte
activity
during
wound
healing
following
epikeratophakia
in rab
bits. Invest Ophthalmol
Vis Sci 32:1837-1845,
1991
Kaufman
HE: Surgical approaches
to cornea1 wound healing. Acta Ophthalmol
202(Suppl):84-87,
1992
Kaye DB: Epithelial
response
in penetrating
keratoplasty.
Am J Ophthalmol89:381-387,
1980
Kenyon
KR: Decision
making
in the therapy
of external
eye disease: noninfected
cornea1
ulcers. Ophthalmology
89:44-51,
1982
Kenyon
KR: Inflammatory
mechanisms
in cornea1 ulceration. Trans Am Ophthalmol
Sot 83:610-663,
1985
Kenyon
KR, Berman
M, Rose J, Gage J: Prevention
of stroma1 ulceration
in the alkali-burned
rabbit cornea by gluedon contact lens. Evidence
for the role of polymorphonuclear leukocytes
in collagen
degradation.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 18:570-587,
1979
Kenyon
KR, Tseng SCG: Limbal autograft
transplantation
for ocular surface disorders.
Ophthalmology
96:709-722.
1989
Kenyon
KR, Wagoner
MD: Advances
in the therapy
of recurrent
erosion and persistent
epithehdl
defects of the corneal epithelium.
Focal Points: Clinical
Modules
for Ophthalmologists.
Am Acad Ophthalmol,
San Francisco,
1991.
Vol. 99
Kenyon KR, Wagoner
MD, Hettinger
ME: Conjunctival
autograft
transplantation
for advanced
and recurrent
pterygium. Ophthalmology
92:1461-1470.
1985
Kinoshita
S, Friend J, Kiorpes TC, Thoft RA: Keratin-like
proteins
in cornea1 and conjunctival
epithelium
are different. Invest Ophthalmol
Vis Sci 24:577-581,
1983
Kinoshita
S, Friend J, Thoft RA: Biphasic cell proliferation
in transdifferentiation
of conjunctival
to cornea1 epitheliurn in rabbits.
Invest Ophthalmol
Vis Sci 24:1008-1014,
1983
Kinoshita
S, Friend J, Thoft RA: Sex chromatin
of donor
cornea1 epithelium
in rabbits. Inv Ophthalmol
Vis Sci 21:
434441,
1981
Kinoshita
S, Kiorpes TC, Friend J. Thoft RA: Limbal epithelium
in ocular surface wound healing.
Inv Ophthalmol
Vis Sci 23:73-80,
1982
Kinoshita
S, Manaba
S: Chemical
burns, in Brightbill
FS
(ed): Cornea1 Surgery.
St. Louis. CV Mosby. 1986, pp 370379
Kinoshita
S, Ohashi Y, Ohji M, Manabe
R: Long-term
results of keratoepithelioplasty
in Moorens
ulcer. Ophthalmology
98:438-445,
1991
Klein R, Lobes LA Jr: Ocular alkali burns in a large urban
area. Ann Ophthalmol
8:1185-1189,
1976
Klein-Szanto
AJP, Slaga TJ: Numerical
variations
of dark
cells in normal
and chemically
induced
hyperplastic
epidermis
with age of animal and efficiency
of tumor
promoter. Cancer Res 41:44374440,
1981
Koob TF, Jeffrey JJ, Eisen ZZ: Regulation
of human
skin
collagenase
activity by hydrocortisone
and dexamethasone
in organ culture. Biochem
Biophys Res Commun
61:10831088, 1974
Kozarsky
AM, Knight SH, Waring GO: Clinical results with
a ceramic
keratoprosthesis
placed
through
the eyelid.
Ophthalmology
94:904-911,
1987
Kramer
SG: Late numerical
grading
of alkali burns to determine
keratopkdsty
prognosis.
Trans Am Ophthalmol
SOC
81:97-106,
1983
Kruse
FE, Tseng
SCG: Retinoic
acid regulates
clonal
growth
and differentiation
of cultured
limbal and peripheral cornea1
epithelium.
Invest Ophthalmol
Vis Sci 35:
2405-2420.
1994
Kuckelkorn
R, Becker J, Reim M: Tarsoconjunctival
advancement-a
surgical
procedure
in cicatricial
entropion
with
marginal
tars-us deformation.
Klin Monatsbl
Auienheilkd
202: 102-109.
1993
308
215.
216.
217.
218
219.
220.
221.
222.
223.
224.
225.
226.
227.
228.
229.
230.
231.
232.
233.
234.
235.
236.
237.
238.
Surv Ophthalmol41
(4) January-February
1997
Kuckelkorn
R, Kottek
A, Reim M: Intraocular
complications after severe chemical
burns-incidence
and surgical
treatment.
Klin Monatsbl
Augenheilkd
205:8&92,
1994
Kuckelkorn
R, Luft I, Kottek AA, et al: Chemical
and thermal eye burns in the residential
area of RWTH Aachen.
Analysis of accidents
in 1 year using a new automated
documentation
of findings.
Klin Monatsbl
Augenheilkd
203:
3442,1993
Kuckelkorn
R, Makropoulos
W, Kotteck
A, Reim M: Retrespective
study of severe alkali burns of the eyes. Klin
Monatsbl
Augenheilkd
203:397402,
1993
Kuckelkorn
R, Redbrake
C, Schrage NF, Reim M: Keratoplasty with 11-12 mm diameter
for management
of severely
chemically-burned
eyes. Ophthalmologe
90:683-687,
1993
Kuckelkorn
R, Schrage N, Reim M: Treatment
of severe
eye burns by tenoplasty
(letter).
Lancet 345:657-658,
1995
Kuckelkorn
R, Wenzel M, Lamprecht
J, et al: Autologous
transplantation
of nasal mucosa after severe chemical
and
thermal
eye burns. Klin Monatsbl
Augenheilkd
204:155161, 1994
Kuwabara
T, Perkins
DG, Cogan DG: Sliding
of the epithelium
in experimental
cornea1 wounds. Inv Ophthalmol
15:414,
1976
Kuter I, Johnson-Wint
B, Beupre N, Gross J: Collagenase
secretion
accompanying
changes in cell shape occurs only
in the presence
of a biologically
active cytokine.
J Cell Sci
92473485,
1989
Lande MA, Birk DE, Nagpal
ML, Rader RL: Phagocytic
properties
of human
keratocyte
cultures.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 20:481-489,
1981
Lass JH, Campbell
RC, Rose J, et al: Medroxyprogesterone
on cornea1 ulceration:
its effects after alkali burns on rabbits. Arch Ophthalmol
99:673-676,
1981
Lauhio
A, Sorsa T, Lindy 0, et al: The anticollagenolytic
potential
of lymecycline
in the long-term
treatment
of reactive arthritis.
Arthritis
Rheum 35:195-198,
1992
Lavker
RM, Dong G, Cotsarellis
G, Sun TT: Limbal basal
epithelial
cells display characteristics
consistent
with stem
cells from various stratifying
epithelia.
Invest Ophthalmol
Vis Sci 29(Suppl):191,
1988
Lavker
RM, Sun TT: Epidermal
stem cells. J Invest Dermatol 81 (Suppl 1):121s-127s,
1983
Lavker RM, Sun ?T: Heterogeneity
in epidermal
basal keratinocytes.
Morphological
functional
correlations.
Science
215:1239-1241,
1982
Lazarus
GS, Brown RS, Daniels JR, et al: Human
granulocyte collagenase.
Science 159:1483-1485,
1968
Lazarus
GS, Daniels JR, Brown RS, et al: Degradation
of
collagen
by a human
granulocyte
collagenolytic
system. J
Clin Invest 47:2622-2629,1968
Leblond
CP: The life history of cells in renewing
systems.
Am J Anat 160:114158,
1981
Leibowitz
HM: Management
of inflammation
in the cornea and conjunctiva.
Ophthalmology
87:753-758,
1980
Levinson
RA, Paterson
CA, Pfister RR: Ascorbic
acid prevents cornea1 ulceration
and perforation
following
experimental alkali burns. InvestOphthalmol
Vis Sci 15:98&993,
1976
Lewallen
S: A randomized
trial of conjunctival
autografting
for pterygium
in the tropics.
Ophthalmology
96:16121614, 1989
Lindberg
K, Brown ME, Chaves HV, et al: In vitro propagation of human
ocular surface epithelial
cells for transplantation.
Invest Ophthalmol
Vis Sci 34:2672-2679,
1993
Lindy 0, Sorsa T, Saari H, et al: Doxycycline
inhibits
the
serpinase
activity
of human
neutrophil
collagenase
(abstract). The International
Congress
on Inflammation.
Biennial Forum
for Basic and Clinical
Research.
Rome; OCtober 6-l 1, 1991
Macartney
A, Tschesche
H: Latent and active human polymorphonuclear
leukocyte
collagenases.
J Biochem
130:7178, 1983
MacKenzie
IC: Relationship
between
mitosis and ordered
WAGONER
239.
240.
241.
242.
243.
244.
245.
246.
247.
248.
249.
250.
251.
252.
253.
254.
255.
256.
257.
258.
259.
260.
261.
262.
structure
of the stratum corneum
in mouse epidermis.
Nature 226:653-655,
1970
MacKenzie
IC: Ordered
structure
of the stratum corneum
of mammalian
skin. Nature
222:881-882,
1969
Maguire
MG, Stark WJ, Gottsch JD, et al: Risk factors for
corneal graft failure and rejection
in the collaborative
corneal transplantation
studies.
The Collaborative
Cornea1
Transplantation
Studies Research
Group.
Ophthalmology
101:153&1547,1994
Matrisian
LM, Hogan BL: Growth
factor-regulated
proteases and extracellular
matrix
remodeling
during mammalian development.
Curr Top Dev Biol 24:219-259,
1990
Matsubara
M, Girard
MT, Kublin
CL, Cintron
C, Fini ME:
Differential
roles for two gelatinolytic
enzymes of the matrix metalloproteinase
family in the remodelling
cornea.
Dev Biol 147:425439,
1991
Matsubara
M, Zieske JD, Fini ME: Mechanism
of basement
membrane
dissolution
preceding
cornea1 ulceration.
Invest Ophthalmol
Vis Sci 32:3221-3237,
1991
Matsuda
H, Smelser GK: Endothelial
cells in alkali-burned
corneas: ultrastructural
alterations.
Arch Ophthalmol
89:
402409,1973
Matsuda
H, Smelser GK: Epithelium
and stroma in alkaliburned
corneas. Arch Ophthalmol89:396401,1973
Matsuda
M, Ubels JL, Edelhauser
HF: A larger cornea1 ep
ithelial wound
closes at a faster rate. Invest Ophthalmol
Vis Sci 26:897-900,1985
Maumenee
AE: Repair in cornea. Adv Biol Skin 5:208-215,
1964
McCulley
JP: Ocular hydrofluoric
acid burns: animal model, mechanism
of injury and therapy.
Trans Am Ophthalmol Sot 88:649-684,199O
McCulley
JP: Chemical
injuries,
in Smolin G and Thoft RA
(eds): The Cornea:
Scientific
Foundation
and Clinical
Practice..
Boston,
Little,
Brown
and Co, 1987, ed 2. pp
527-542
McCulley
JP, Pettit M, Lauber
S: Treatment
of experimental ocular hydrofluoric
acid burns. Invest Ophthalmol
Vis
Sci 19(Suppl):228,
1980
McCulley
JP, Slansky
HH, Pavan-Langston
D, Dohlman
CH: Collagenolytic
activity in experimental
herpes simplex
keratitis.
Arch Ophthalmol
84516-519,
1970
Milstone
LM, LaVigne JF: Heterogeneity
of basal keratinocytes: non-random
distribution
of thymidine-labeled
basal
cells in confluent
cultures
is not a technical
artifact. J Invest Dermatol
84:504-507,
1985
Mishima
H, Yasumoto
K, Nishida T, Otari T: Fibronectin
enhances
the phagocytic
activity of cultured
rabbit keratocytes. Invest Ophthalmol
Vis Sci 28:1521-1526,
1987
Mishima
S, Hedbys
BO: The permeability
of the cornea1
epithelium
and endothelium
to water. Exp Eye Res 6:1032, 1967
Mondino
BJ, Brown
SI: Ocular
cicatricial
pemphigoid.
Ophthalmology
88:95-100,
1981
Mondino
BJ, Brown SI, Lempert
S, Jenkins MS: The acute
manifestations
of ocular cicatricial
pemphigoid:
diagnosis
and treatment.
Ophthalmology
86:543-552,1979
Morgan
SJ: Chemical
burns of the eye: causes and management.
Br J Ophthalmol
71:854-857,
1987
Morioka
S, Lazarus J, Baird L, Jensen P: Migrating
keratinocytes express urokinase-type
plasminogen
activator. J Invest Dermatol
88:418-423,
1987
Morris RJ, Fischer SM, Slaga TJ: Evidence
that the centrally
and peripherally
located
cells in the murine
epidermal
proliferative
unit are two distinct
cell populations.
J Invest
Dermatol
84:277-281,
1985
Moses RA, Parkison
G, Schuchardt
R: A standard
large
wound
of the cornea1
epithelium
in the rabbit.
Inv
Ophthalmol
Vis Sci 18:103-106,
1979
Muller
D, Quantine
B, Gensel MC, et al: The collagenase
gene family in humans consists of at least four members.
Biochem J 253:187-192,
1988
Murphy
G: The regulation
of connective
tissue metalloproteinases
by natural
inhibitors,
in Ackerman
NR, Bon-
CHEMICAL
263.
264.
265.
266.
267.
268.
269.
270.
271.
272.
273.
274.
275.
276.
277.
278.
279.
280.
281.
282.
283.
INJuRlES
309
OF THE EYE
284.
285.
286.
287.
288.
289.
290.
291.
292.
293.
294.
295.
296.
297.
298.
299.
300.
301.
302.
303.
304.
310
305.
306.
307.
308.
309.
310.
311.
312.
313.
314.
315.
316.
317.
318.
319.
320.
321.
322.
323.
324.
325.
326.
327.
328.
Surv Ophthalmol
41 (4) January-February
1997
WAGONER
329.
330.
331.
332.
333.
334.
335.
336.
337.
338.
339.
340.
341.
342.
343.
344.
345.
346.
347.
348.
349.
350.
351.
352.
353.
354.
growth
factor in severe experimental
alkali burns. Ophthalmic
Res 20:327-331,
1988
Reim M, Kuckelkorn
R: Chemical
injuries and thermal
injuries
of the orbital
region:
Bull Sot Belge Ophthalmol
245:21-28,
1992
Reim M, Overkamping
B, Kuckelkorn
R: 2 years experience with Tenon-plasty.
Ophthalmologe
89:524-30,
1992
Reim M, Teping
C: Surgical
procedures
in the treatment
of most severe eye burns. Revival of the articifial
epitheliurn. Acta Ophthalmol
Suppl 192:47-54,1989
Roat MI, Thoft RA: Ocular
surface epithelial
transplantation. Int Ophthalmol
Clin 28:169-174,
1988
Roper-Hall
MJ: Thermal
and chemical
burns.
Trans
Ophthalmol
Sot UK 85:631-653,
1965
Ross R, Benditt
EP: Wound
healing
and collagen
formation. II. Fine structure
in experimental
scurvy. J Cell Biol
12:533-551,
1962
Saika S, Kobata S, Hashizume
N, et al: Epithelial
basement
membrane
in alkali-burned
corneas
in rats. Immunohistochemical
study. Cornea
12:383-390,
1993
Saini JB, Sharma
A: Ocular
chemical
burns: clinical and
demographic
profile.
Burns 19:67-69,
1993
Sakai J, Hung J, Zhu G, et al: Collagen
metabolism
during
healing
of lacerated
rabbit corneas.
Exp Eye Res 52:237244, 1991
Saksela 0, Rifkin
DB: Cell-associated
plasminogen
activation: regulation
and physiological
functions.
Ann Rev Cell
Biol 4:93-126,
1988
Savage CJ, Cohen
S: Proliferation
of cornea1 epithelium
induced
by epidermal
growth
factor. Exp Eye Res 15:361366, 1973
Schermer
A, Galvin S, Sun TT: Differentiation-related
expression
of a major 64K cornea1 keratin
in viva and in
culture suggests limbal location
of cornea1 epithelial
stem
cells. J Cell Biol 103:49-62,
1986
Schirner
G, Schrage NF, Salla S, Reim M, Burchard
WG:
Conjunctival
tissue examination
in severe eye burns:
a
study with scanning
electron
microscopy
and energ-dispersive X-ray analysis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol
233:251-256,
1995
Schultz G, Henkind
P, Gross EM: Acid burns of the eye.
Am J Ophthalmol
66:654-657,
1968
Schultz
GS, Davis JB, Eiferman
RA: Growth
factors and
cornea1 epithelium.
Cornea
7:96-101,
1988
Schultz GS, Strelow S, Stern GA, et al: Treatment
of alkaliinjured
rabbit corneas with a synthetic
inhibitor
of matrix
metalloproteinases.
Invest Ophthalmol
Vis Sci 33:33253331,1992
Seedor JA, Perry HD, McNamara
TE, et al: Systemic tetracycline
treatment
of alkali-induced
cornea1 ulceration
in
rabbits. Arch Ophthalmol
105:268-271,
1987
Shapiro
MS, Friend J, Thoft RA: Cornea1
re-epithelialization from the conjunctiva.
Invest Ophthalmol
Vis Sci 21:
135-142,
1981
Sharma A, Coles WH: Kinetics of cornea1 epithelial
maintenance and graft loss. Invest Ophthalmol
Vis Sci 30:19621971,1989
Shingleton
BJ: Eye injuries.
N Engl J Med 325:408-413,
1991
Shore JW, Foster CS, Westfall CT, Rubin PAD: Results of
buccal mucosal
grafting
for patients
with medically
controlled
ocular cicatricial
pemphigoid.
Ophthalmology
99:
383-395,
1990
Singer
A, Sagi A, BenMeir
P. Rosenberg
L: Chemical
burns: our ten year experience.
Burns 18:250-252,1992
Singh GA, Foster CS: Epidermal
growth
factor in alkaliburned
cornea1 epithelial
wound
healing.
Am J Ophthalmol 103:802-807,
1987
Slansky HH, Berman
MB, Dohlman
CH, Rose J: Cysteine
and acetylcysteine
in the prevention
of cornea1 ulcerations.
Ann Ophthalmol
2:488-491,
1970
Slansky HH, Dohlman
CH: Collagenase
and the cornea.
Surv Ophthalmol
14:402-416,
1970
Slansky HH, Dohlman
CH, Berman MB: Prevention
of cor-
CHEMICAL
355.
356.
357.
358.
359.
360.
361.
362.
363.
364.
365.
366.
367.
368.
369.
370.
371.
372.
373.
374.
375.
376.
INJURIES
311
OF THE EYE
377.
378.
379.
380.
381.
382.
383.
384.
385.
386.
387.
388.
389.
390.
391.
392.
393.
394.
395.
396.
397.
398.
399.
400.
401.
402.
312
403.
404.
405.
406.
407.
408.
409.
410.
411.
412.
413.
414.
415.
416.
Surv Ophthalmol41
(4) January-February
1997
in their collagenase
response
to epithelial
cytokines
and
interleukin-1.
Invest Ophthalmol
Vis Sci 28(Suppl):222,
1987
Wagoner
MD, Kenyon KR: Chemical
injuries
of the eye, in
Albert
DM, Jakobiec
FA (eds): Principles
and Practice of
Ophthalmology:
Clinical
Practice. Philadelphia,
WB Saunders, 1994, Vol. 1, pp 234-245
Wagoner
MD, Kenyon
KR: Chemical
injuries,
in Shingleton BJ, Hersh PS, and Kenyon
KR(eds):
Ocular
Trauma.
Mosby, St. Louis, 1991, pp 63-68
Wagoner
MD, Kenyon
KR: Conjunctival
transplantation
for pterygium
and other ocular surface disorders,
in Bruner WR, Stark WJ, and Maumenee
AE (eds): A Manual
of
Cornea1
Surgery.
New York, Churchill
Livingstone,
1987,
pp 119-128
Wagoner
MD, Kenyon
KR: Noninfected
cornea1 ulceration. Focal Points: dlinical
Modules
for Ophthalmologists.
Am Acad of Onhthalmol,
San Fransisco,
1985, Vol. 3:7
Wagoner
MD, Kenyon
KR, Gipson IK, et al: Polymorphonuclear
neutrophils
delay cornea1 epithelial
wound
healing in vitro. Invest Ophthalmol
Vis Sci 25:1217-1220,1984
Wagoner
MD, Kenyon
KR, Shore JS: Ocular surface transplantation,
in Barrie J and Kirkness
C (eds): Recent Advances in Ophthalmology.
New York, Churchill
Livingstone, 1995, pp 59-90
Wang HM, Berman
MB, Law M: Latent
and active plasminogen
activator
in cornea1 ulceration.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 26:51 l-524, 1985
Weise RA, Mannis
MJ, Vastine DW, et al: Conjunctival
transplantation.
Autologous
and homologous
grafts. Arch
Ophthalmol
103:173&1740,1985
Weissmann
G, Spilberg I, Krakauer
K: Arthritis
induced
in
rabbits
by lysates of granulocyte
lysosomes.
Arthritis
Rheum
12:103-116,1969
Welgus HG, Jeffrey JJ, Eisen AZ: The collagen
substrate
specificity
of human
skin fibroblast
collagenase.
J Biol
Chem 256:9511-9515,198l
Wentworth
JS, Paterson
CA, Gray RD: Effect of a metalloproteinase
inhibitor
on established
cornea1 ulcers after alkali burn. Invest Ophthalmol
Vis Sci 33:2174-2179,
1992
Wentworth
JS, Paterson
CA, Wells JT, et al: Collagen
shields exacerbate
ulceration
of alkali-burned
rabbit corneas. Arch Ophthalmol
111:389-392,1993
Werb Z, Aggeler J: Proteases induce secretion
of collagenase and plasminogen
activator
by fibroblasts.
Proc Nat1
Acad Sci USA 75:1839-1843,1978
West-Mays JA, Strissel KJ, Sadow PM, Fini ME: Competence
WAGONER
417.
418.
419.
420.
422.
423.
424.
425.
426.
427.
428.
for collagenase
gene expression
by tissue fibroblasts
requires activation
of an interleukin
1 alpha autocrine
loop.
Proc Nat1 Acad Sci USA 92:6768-6772,1995
Wilhelm
SM, Collier
IE, Marmer
BL, et al: SV40-transformed
human
lung fibroblasts
secrete a 92-kDa type IV
collagenase
which is identical
to that secreted by normal
human macrophages.
J Biol Chem 26417213-17221,
1989
Williams
KA, Brereton
HM, Aggarwal
R, et al: Use of DNA
polymorphisms
and polymerase
chain reaction
to examine
the survival
of human
limbal
stem cell autograft.
Am J
Ophthalmol
120:342-350,1995
Williams
RN, Paterson
CA: Polymorphonuclear
accumulation in aqueous humor
and iris-ciliary
body during intraocular inflammation.
Invest Ophthalmol
Vis Sci 25:105108, 1984
Williams RN, Paterson CA, Eakins KE, et al: Quantification
of ocular inflammation:
evaluation
of polymorphonuclear
leukocyte
infiltration
by measuring
myeloperoxidase
activity. Curr Eye Res 2:465-470,
1983
Wright
DG, Gallin JI: A functional
differentiation
of human neutrophil
granule:
generation
of C5a by a specific
(secondary)
granule
product
and inactivation
of C5a by
azurophil
(primary)
granule
products.
J Immunol
119:
1068-1076,
1977
Wright DG, Gallin JI: Modulation
of the anti-inflammatory
response
by products
released from human
polymorphonuclear
leukocytes
during
phagocytosis.
Generation
and
inactivation
of the chemotactic
factor C5a. Inflammation
1:23-39,
1975
Wright P: The chemically
injured
eye. Trans Ophthalmol
Sot UK 102:85-87,1982
Yamabayashi
S, Furuya
T, Gohd T, et al: Newly designed
continuous
cornea1 irrigation
system for chemical
burns.
Ophthalmologica
201:174-179,
1990
Yang JS: Biphasic
effects of hydrocortisone
on the stem
cells and transient
amplifying
cells of rabbit cornea1 epithelium.
Invest Ophthalmol
Vis Sci 34(Suppl):1012,
1993
Zhu G, Ishizaki M, Haseba T, et al: Expression
of K12 keratin in alkali-burned
rabbit corneas. Curr Eye Res 11:875887, 1992
Zieske JD, Bukusoglu
G, Yankauckas
MA: Characterization
of a potential
marker
of cornea1 epithelial
stem cells. Invest Ophthalmol
Vis Sci 33:143-152,
1992
Zieske JD, Bukusoglu
G, Yankauckas
MA, Wasson ME,
Keutmann
HT: Alpha-enolase
is restricted
to basal cells of
stratified
squamous
epithelium.
Dev Biol 151:18-26,
1992
CHEMICAL
INJURIES
313
OF THE EYE
Outliie
I. Etiology
A. Alkali
B. Acid
II. Pathophysiology
A. Epithelial
injury, repair, and differentiation
1. The ocular surface
2. Limbal stem cell hypothesis
3. Limbal stem cell/ocular
surface injury
B. Cornea1 stromal matrix injury, repair, and
ulceration
1. Collagen
2. Collagenase
C. Inflammation
III. Clinical course and evaluation
A. Immediate
B. Acute phase
C. Early repair phase
1. Grade II
2. Grades III/IV
D. Late repair phase
1. Type I: Normal epithelial recovery
2. Type II: Delayed differentiation
3. Type III: Fibrovascular pannus
4. Type nT: Sterile cornea1 ulceration
IV. Medical therapy
A. Promote re-epithelialization/transdifferentiation
1. Tear substitutes
2. Bandage soft contact lens
3. Fibronectin
4. Epidermal
growth factor
5. Retinoic acid
6. Sodium hyalouronate
B. Support repair and minimize ulceration
1. Ascorbate
2. Tetracycline
3. Collagenase inhibitors
C. Control inflammation
1. Corticosteroids
2. Progestational
steroids
3. Non-steroidal
anti-inflammatory
drugs
4. Citrate
V. Surgical therapy
A. Promote re-epithelialization/transdifferentiation
1. Conjunctival/Tenons
advancement
(tenoplasty)
2. Limbal stem cell transplantation
3. Conjunctival
transplantation
4. Keratoepithelioplasty
B. Support repair and minimize ulceration
1. Tenoplasty
2. Limbal stem cell transplantation
3. Large diamater therapeutic
penetrating keratoplasty
4. Tissue adhesive
5. Tectonic keratoplasty
C. Late rehabilitation
1. Limbal stem cell transplantation
2. Conjunctival
transplantation
3. Mucosal membrane grafts
4. Penetrating
keratoplasty
5. Keratoprosthesis
VI. Specific therapy
A. Immediate phase
1. Irrigation
2. Debridement
3. Paracentesis
B. Acute phase
1. Grade I
2. Grades II/III
3. Grade IV
C. Early repair phase
1. Grade I
2. Grade II
3. Grade III/IV
D. Late repair phase
1. TypeI
2. Type II
3. Types III/IV
VII. Conclusion
Reprint
Address: Michael
D. Wagoner,
MD, c/o Medical
Library, Ring Khaled Eye Specialist
Hospital,
PO Box 7191, Riyadh 11462, Kingdom
of Saudi Arabia.