Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Digby1
Department of Mathematics
and General Research,
Konlnklljke Shell Exploration
and Production Laboratory,
Volmerlaan 6,
Rl)swl|k (ZH),
The Netherlands
Introduction
In the present paper, we consider the calculation of the effective
elastic moduli of porous, granular rocks. The rock will always be
elastically isotropic and homogeneous over lengths large compared
with the radii of the individual particles of which the rock is composed.
Many earlier papers treating this problem (for example, Deresiewicz
[2] and Duffy and Mindlin [3]) concentrate on regular packings of
identical solid spherical particles. The results obtained in such special
cases are very useful. All predict effective elastic moduli whose values
are directly proportional to the cube root of the confining pressure,
no matter what kind of regular packing model is selected. One limitation of this model is, of course, that the material will not be elastically isotropic. Another is that values of the effective elastic moduli
have so far only been predicted for a few descrete values of the porosity.
Brandt [1], in his elegant treatment of the porous, granular rock
proposed an alternative model. A random packing of spherical particles of different radii was used. He was able to calculate explicitly
the effective bulk modulus of an elastically isotropic, homogeneous
porous rock as a function of the confining pressure, porosity, and
liquid saturation. Values of the effective shear modulus, and the
pressure and shear wave speeds were then derived, assuming that the
effective Poisson's ratio for the rock was known.
In the present paper, we shall calculate explicitly both the effective
bulk and the effective shear modulus of a porous granular rock
modeled by a random packing of identical solid spherical particles.
We shall also consider the effect of the initial bonding of the particles
on the calculated values of the effective bulk and effective shear
1
From present to September, 1981: Lobelialaan 48, 2555 PJ, The Hague,
The Netherlands: After October, 1981: Department of Rock Mechanics, University of Lulea, S-951 87 Lulea, Sweden.
Contributed by the Applied Mechanics Division for publication in the
moduli. In all of the earlier papers just described, the particles (grains)
composing the rock were not actually bonded together initially.
Rather, the particles were forced to come into contact over small areas
by subjecting a specimen of the modeled rock to large confining
pressures.
We shall deal with the more general case in which the granular rock
is modeled by a random packing of bonded spheres of different radii
in a later paper. This exercise will enable the effects of porosity and
liquid saturation to be included in the calculations.
2
M o d e l of t h e R o c k
We consider a random packing of identical solid spherical particles
of radius R. Each particle (grain) is elastically isotropic and homogeneous with shear modulus, Poisson's ratio, and density, fi, v, and
p, respectively. A bar over any of these quantities denotes the corre-
undergoes zero rotation, that is, no couple stresses act in the medium.
We then have
Spij = K&tjbehk + 2Ji{5eij - \ bijbehk)
Fig. 2 0x^2X3 is a right-handed set of axes embedded in the rock; C is a
contact point on the surface with center 0'; Cx',x' 2 x' 3 Is a right-handed set
of axes on the surface of the sphere with CV 3 normal to the surface
(1)
As usual, b,j is the Kronecker delta symbol and, unless stated otherwise, summation is performed over repeated subscripts.
Our problem is to calculate explicitly the effective bulk and the
effective shear moduli K and jiZ in equation (2). A similar problem has
been solved by Duffy and Mindlin [3] for a special type of regular
packing. However, rigorous application of their methods, for rocks
modeled by random packings of spheres, would be a hopelessly
complex task. We must therefore construct an approximate
method.
We suppose first that the increment of displacement of a contact
point on the surface of any sphere in the medium, relative to its center,
b(ujc Uj), 0 = 1, 2,3) can be uniquely determined from the uniform
applied strain field beij, that is,
b(ujc - uj) = Ra3kbejh
We suppose the medium is initially subjected to a uniform hydrostatic pressure P pkk/3- euk is the corresponding uniform strain
field. We now superimpose on this uniform field, small, arbitrary
applied stresses bpij (i,j = 1, 2, 3). Let ben D e the corresponding strain
field, bpij and Se;y are supposed uniform over lengths large compared
with R. We suppose that under the given applied stresses, each grain
(3)
In Section 6, we consider the number of spheres in the medium intersected by an arbitrary plane. Variations in contact forces, bN'a (i
= 1,2,3) are related to the arbitrary variations in the applied stresses
bpij by deriving a force equilibrium equation for all spheres cut by the
plane. This problem is considered in Section 7. It will be seen that the
values of the effective elastic moduli (given in equations (33) and (34)
later) can be explicitly calculated, if the relative displacements of the
centers of neighboring, bonded spheres can be related to the contact
forces. This problem is considered in the following section.
4 Calculation Procedure
(2)
= (p -
for
p^ 6
for
c>p>b
for
p^c
b) /2Ri
c' )/2R
(4)
(5)
It can then be assumed that when purely normal forces acting through
the centers of the spheres are applied, there are no singularities in the
2fli
=8
-'I'
dt
{p2
_ t 2)1/2
" p'Pzz(p')dp'
( p / 2 _ t 2)1/2
(7)
P'Pzz(p')dp'
(p -^)1
2{l v)
(p'2 - J 2 ) 1 ' 2
- XTpT^^X
= irp.\8
(p 2 - c' 2 )
if
2R
(p ~ b)%
2fl x
= 7rp- 8-
if
2al d
Pzz(p)
b^p^c^a
(8)
0 < p =S b
if
5
b
- +
a
Ri
7TP dp
fi8
p.bt
aiX-v)
sm
Ri(l-v)
(9)
Jp'a
by*
2
flxd-j/jT
a)
1/2
fibt
- sin
\atj
nat 11
(l-c)\R
R i ( l - v) 2
mt
fl^l
tL-
- v) \
a ( l - v)
sm
\\
\atj
1W
:2\i/2
flJV
-L i
(b\\
(10)
[atj
if
if b/a>t
c/a>t>
b/a >
>0
We can show from equations (5)and (9) that the condition that the
normal stress pzz (p) has no singularity as p -* o - 0 (and in fact
vanishes at p = a) is that F(l) vanishes. We then obtain,
5
b
- +
a
Ri
(13)
and
Y=
4/uaS
( 1 - v)
a 2 /1
3Bi(l - *) I
2/io 2 b
Aid-;/) -
(14)
. ^ '
From equations (11) and (12) (or (13) and (14)) together, we find by
differentiation that
dY_
Ap.a
(15)
db ' U - i O
for either a> c> b> 0 or c^ a> b > 0.
Suppose that a small tangential force dT is now superimposed on
the normal force Y. Suppose the centers of the spheres undergo a
relative tangential displacement 2 ds. Mindlin's results [4], show
that
dT
8/xb
ds
(2 - v)
(16)
(17)
4(i
a8
(a2 3fi
b2)3'2
(18)
The use of the limiting forms for Y and 5 (equations (17) and (18)) in
the following sections of this paper will simplify the subsequent
analysis considerably. Equations (17) and (18) reduce to those of the
classical Hertz theory when we put b equal to zero. Equations
(15)-(18) derived in the foregoing now enable us to relate relative
displacements of the centers of neighboring bonded spheres, to small,
arbitrary variations in the contact forces:
by n
a2)
(12)
&2U/2
(1-K)
p.5
a>c>b>0
and
r-i_
where
aQ-v)
(11)
^2
8 = a(a2 -
t'-.
if
a^c>b>0
B i ( l - v)
pat
if
c ^ p ^a
if
= wp.8
F{t)--
C 1
For the case c > a > b > 0 one obtains the following corresponding
results:
\ C
\l/2
(Cont.)
(6)
Outside the contact region (p > a) all stresses pzz(p), p,,z(p) vanish.
Inside the contact region (p^a) the shear stress ppz (p) again vanishes
since we have two identical spheres pushed together by purely normal
forces acting along the line joining their centers. The normal stress
Pzz (p) has a resultant equal to Y.
(b) Solution of thaBoundary-Value Problem. The adhesion
and contact surfaces of the adhering spheres in Fig. 3 join smoothly
for all Y > 0. We can therefore assume that the normal stress pzz (p)
is continuous for all values of p, 0 ^ p < co. We can therefore follow
the procedure given in Sneddon's book [5]. One obtains the following
expression for the normal displacement of the contact surface uz (p,
0),(0pa)
o/i
cfli
(p2 ~ c'2)
,
u = o
;
Mi
(ID
A&Par =
ctlr8N'3l
, all contacts
spheres
+ a2r5N>32 - a3rSN'aa
(25)
for r = 1, 2, 3. We can also write (from equations (1) and (3)), for r
1, 2, 3:
8{urc' - ur0') =
Rarpaakbepk
(26)
After some algebra, it can then be shown, from the results of Section
5 (equations (15) and (16)) and equations (25) and (26), that, for r =
1, 2, 3,
Adp3r = Z
8fiM0)
contacts ( 2 v)
a,')p5erp -
aar(aSpaa<j)8ep
4jian(6)
v)
0 contacts VI
,KnbRn(8)
3A(l-)
4TTR2
sin 5 Odd
(19)
4A(1 - a)
bivR2
Similarly, we have
for
5e3r
1,2
(28)
2(1 - v)
^ KfibRn(6) shy* 6 , ,
Aop33 = Y.
:
(3de33 - 5ekk)
o
2(2 - v) 2
KixaRn(d) sin
- |<5e33(4 3 sin 2 6) + Se^k sin 2
+E
4(1 - v)
(29)
(20)
a)hR
E n(0) sin I A(l o
Equation (20) can in any case be derived independently of the arguments just given. In later calculations we shall suppose that the K
contact points on the surface of a given sphere are distributed over
the surface with uniform probability, or at any rate approximately.
There are then K/4iv contacts per unit solid angle distributed over
the surface of the sphere. Considering now the portion of the given
sphere cut by Si (as previously defined) we then easily derive the
following results (for r = 1,2,3) which are also needed in later sections
of this paper,
E
3r = 4 &3rK sin 2 6
(21)
contacts
E
3323r =
contacts
n tacts
6)
and
JO
sin4 6
^KnaRn(6)
+ L
sin2 B,
-8e3r(2
(2-)
(27)
where 6 and n(6) have been defined in Section 6. We note that only
the components of the unit normals to the surfaces of the spheres
intersected by the plane S i arise in the equilibrium equation (27). It
should also be noted that the coefficients of the terms a3p and
3r(3P'3q) for p, q, r = 1, 2, 3 are constant over the surface of any
sphere. Using equations (21)-(24) derived in Section 5, one obtains
from equation (27)
ASp3
aar(a3paaq)8epq
a3p2a3r-
<53rif sin 2 0 , n
(2
S i n 2 0)
(22)
b3rKsin*0
,
for
p-1,2
(23)
X=L
.2(1 -P)
sin2 6\a(4-Z
^ K^Rnid)
2M = E
(2 - v).
sin2 6)
36 sin 2 i
1 ^ + " ^ -
2A
(30)
2(1 - v)
(31)
(32)
Equations (31) and (32) appear to be inconsistent. However, we assume that the material we are considering is isotropic. The coefficients
of the terms n(6) sin 2 6 and n(8) sin 4 6 in equations (30)-(32) are then
independent of 6. We can then show, with the help of equations (19)
and (20), that equations (31) and (32) are identical. In fact, one finally
obtains
-
K{1 - a)
57rfl
(24)
2A
and
lb
L
313233 = 0
contacts
KnRn(0) sin 4
2b
[(1 -v)
(2 - v)
(33)
and
2/1
u i t ( l - a)
2a
5wR
(1 - v)
+-
66
(2 - v)\
(34)
We can derive a further result from equation (25) with the help of our
results given in Section 5. Under a purely hydrostatic increment of
stress, 8P, we have,
A8P=
a338N'.
(35)
spheres e x a c t s
0.432
CO
a
LU 0.384 _
UJ
Q_
CO
I
ex
3CO
2=
0.240
CD
0.192
0.000
NORMALISED PRESSURE
Fig. 5 Normalized wave speeds plotted as functions of the normalized pressure for some fixed values of the normalized adhesion
radius B = b/R
A-KRHP
KbN'-
KbY
(l-)
where Y is defined in Section 4. We therefore have, if up to the pres
sure P, the loading was purely hydrostatic,
4irR2P
(37)
KY
(l-)
This result agrees exactly with equation (16) in Brandt's paper [1],
for the special case of a "dry" packing of spheres, when, in Brandt's
paper we put C^( = 1 and K = 8.84. It can also be shown, in this case,
that the effective density of the medium is given by
p =* p(l - a) 1 + 3 H
(38)
to order b/R, where b has been defined in Section 4 and p is the grain
density.
From equations (17), (18), and (37) one obtains the following
equation for the normalized contact radius, a/R,
(36)
(39)
RJ
Equations (39) and (40), together with equations (33) and (34), enable
us to determine explicitly the effective bulk and effective shear
modulus of the granular rock we are considering as a function of the
confining pressure P and the adhesion radius b of the adhering particles. One can also derive the corresponding numerical values of the
elastic wave speeds (using also equation (38))as is done in the next
section. Walton [6], however, has shown that this procedure is only
strictly valid for seismic waves of sufficiently low frequency a>, namely,
those for which pw2R2/(\ + 2/t) < pw2R2/n 1.
Results
pressure Pin, for some fixed values of the normalized adhesion radius
B = b/R, The values selected for the grain Poisson's ratio v, and the
grain shear modulus n were 0.2 and 38 GPa, respectively. Values of
P/n range from 0 to 18.10 X 10~4. The values of a and K are the same
as those used in Brandt's paper [1]; namely, 0.392 and 8.84, respectively.
References
1 Brandt, H.," A Study of the Speed of Sound in Porous Granular Media,"
ASME JOURNAL OF APPLIED MECHANICS, Vol 22,1955, pp. 479-486.
-Readers Of_
The Journal Of Applied Mechanics
Will Be Interested In:
A M D V o l . 27 - Finite Elasticity
Ed. R . S . Rivlin
1977
Bk. No. 100116
152 p p .
$20.00
Members $10.00
Members $15.00
A M D V o l . 31 - Mechanics Applied T o
The Transport Of Bulk Materials
Ed. S. C. Cowin
1979
Bk. No. G00146
140 pp. $20.00
Members $10.00
Members $15.00
Members $9.00
Members $20.00
Members $20.00
Descriptions of other ASME volumes of interest appear on pages 742, 756, 790, 829, 840, 865, 870, 875, and 922.