WHITE PAPER

Equations and Example Benchmark Calculations within

the aspenONE Engineering Safety Analysis Environment
V8.8: Two-phase Orifice Sizing, Vapor Noise and Reaction Forces
Craig Powers, Principal Software Developer, Aspen Technology, Inc.

Introduction
Introduced in Aspen HYSYS V8.3, the Safety Analysis Environment provides a tool for adding pressure relief devices
and calculating relief loads inside Aspen HYSYS. Leveraging this tool within the rigorous Aspen HYSYS simulator, and in
combination with Aspen Flare System Analyzer, provides an integrated solution for pressure relief analysis (PRA) work.
This white paper contains hand calculations for two-phase orifice sizing and vapor noise and reaction forces inside the
Safety Analysis Environment, helping you to validate the calculations of this tool within Aspen HYSYS.

Leung Omega Method

There are two forms of the Leung Omega Method that are implemented in the Safety Analysis Environment. One form
is for cases that are saturated or two-phase at relief conditions, upstream of the relief valve. The other form is for cases
that are subcooled liquid upstream of the relief valve, with flashing occurring across the valve that produces a twophase stream at the valve outlet.

Non-Subcooled Omega Method

Equations
The governing equations for the application of the Omega Method are obtained from Appendix C of API Standard 520
Part I.1 It is a two-point method, meaning that physical properties are required at two thermodynamic state points. For
the non-subcooled method, the first state point is relief conditions. The second state point is obtained by an isentropic
flash to 90% of the relief pressure. Aspen HYSYS uses an isenthalpic flash to 90% of the relief pressure in place of an
isentropic flash. With this information, the required orifice area may be obtained using the following equations below.

Eq. 1

= 9

!
!
1 = 9
1
!
!

In the equation above, is the Omega parameter, v0 and v9 are specific volumes at upstream and 90% conditions,
respectively, and 0 and 9 are density at upstream and 90% conditions, respectively.

Eq. 2

Eq. 3

! =

!
1 + 1.0446 0.0093431 !!.!"#"$
!

!!.!"#$%!!.!"#$%& !" !

! = ! !

In the equation above, c is the critical pressure ratio, Pc is the pressure corresponding to critical flow
at the nozzle throat in the relief valve in absolute units, Pa is the total back pressure at the outlet of
the valve in absolute units, and P0 is the upstream relief pressure in absolute units.

If c exceeds a, then the flow through the relief valve is critical, and the following equation should be
used to calculate the maximum mass flux, where G is the maximum mass flux through the valve in
lb/s-ft or kg/s-m, P0 is in psia or Pa, v0 is in ft/lb or m/kg, and 0 is in lb/ft or kg/m. C1 = 68.09
in U.S. customary units, or 1.0 in SI units.

Equations and Example Benchmark Calculations within the

aspenONE Engineering Safety Analysis Environment

2015 Aspen Technology Inc. 11-8231-1215

Eq. 4

= ! !

!
! !
= !

!

If c does not exceed a, then the flow through the relief valve is subcritical, and the following
equation should be used to calculate the maximum mass flux, where units are as in (Eq. 4).

Eq. 5

= !

! !

1 +1
!

2 ln ! + 1

1 !

Once the maximum mass flux has been obtained, the required effective discharge area may be
calculated by using Equation 6, where A is the required effective discharge area in mm, w is the
required relief load in kg/h, Kd is the discharge coefficient of the valve, Kb is the backpressure
correction factor (applicable to balanced bellows valves only), Kc is the combination capacity factor,
and Kv is the viscosity correction factor. C2 = 0.04 for U.S. customary units, 277.8 for SI units.

Eq. 6

!

! ! ! !

When an orifice area has been selected, Equation 6 may be rearranged to find the rated capacity of
the valve, shown in Equation 7:

Eq. 7

!"# = ! ! ! ! 277.8

Example with Critical Flow

The example is based on the following conditions:
Composition

15% propane, 25% n-butane, 30% n-pentane,

30% n-heptane using the Aspen HYSYS PR
package for physical properties

Relief conditions

8.03 barg / 101.2 C

Required relief load 63,000 kg/h

63,000 kg/h

Based on the relief pressure of 8.03 barg, the 90% intermediate flash pressure is at 7.227 barg.
Setting up a stream in Aspen HYSYS at the relief conditions and running it through an isenthalpic
flash will yield the following properties:
0 = 112.0 kg/m
9 = 90.73 kg/m

Equations and Example Benchmark Calculations within the

aspenONE Engineering Safety
Analysis Environment

2015 Aspen Technology Inc. 11-8231-1215

The Omega parameter may be calculated using (Eq. 1):

112.0
1 = 2.110
90.73

= 9

The critical pressure ratio and backpressure ratio may be calculated using (Eq. 2) and (Eq. 3):

! =

! = 0.6989

1.01325
= 0.1120
8.03 + 1.01325

Figure 1: Two-phase critical flow case calculated in Aspen HYSYS

Because c is larger than a, flow across the relief valve is choked; therefore, the maximum mass flux
is calculated using (Eq. 4).

= 0.6989

112 9.043 100,000 /

= 4,844 kg/s-m
2.110

Assuming that all capacity coefficients are 1.0, aside from the discharge coefficient which is 0.85 in
accordance with guidance from API, the required area is calculated using (Eq. 6):

277.8 63,000
= 4,250 mm
0.85 4,844

Equations and Example Benchmark Calculations within the

aspenONE Engineering Safety Analysis Environment

2015 Aspen Technology Inc. 11-8231-1215

For a selected Q orifice with an effective area of 7129 mm, the rated capacity is calculated using
(Eq. 7):

!"# =

0.85 4,844 7,129

= 105,700 kg/h
277.8

The results calculated above are compared to results obtained in Aspen HYSYS in Table 1.
Variable

Units

Example Calculation

Aspen HYSYS

kg/h

63,000

63,000

Relief Pressure (P0)

barg

8.03

8.03

Mass Density at 90% (9)

Required Relief Load (w)

90% Pressure (P9)

Mass Density at Relief (0)

7.227

barg
kg/m

112.0

112.0

kg/m

90.73

88.34

Omega Parameter ()

Critical Flow Ratio (c)

2.110
0.6989

Flow Type

Maximum Mass Flux (G)

Required Area (A)

Rated Capacity (wmax)

Critical
kg/s-m
mm

kg/h
Blue = Calculation input

Critical

4,844
4,250

4,448

105,700

101,000

Gray = Calculated value

Table 1: Comparison of example calculation and Aspen HYSYS calculation for critical two-phase flow

Example with Subcritical Flow

The example is based on the following conditions:

Composition

15% propane, 25% n-butane, 30% n-pentane,

30% n-heptane using the Aspen HYSYS PR
package for physical properties

Relief conditions

154 kPag / 85 C

Required relief load

20,000 kg/h

Back pressure

60 kPa superimposed

Based on the relief pressure of 1.54 barg, the 90% intermediate flash pressure is at 1.28 barg. Setting
up a stream in Aspen HYSYS at the relief conditions and running it through an isenthalpic flash will
yield the following properties:
0 = 8.264 kg/m
9 = 7.335 kg/m

Equations and Example Benchmark Calculations within the

aspenONE Engineering Safety Analysis Environment

2015 Aspen Technology Inc. 11-8231-1215

The Omega parameter may be calculated using (Eq. 1):

8.264
1 = 1.140
7.335

= 9

The critical pressure ratio and backpressure ratio may be calculated using (Eq. 2) and (Eq. 3):

! =

! = 0.6234

1.01325 + 0.6
= 0.6318
1.54 + 1.01325

Figure 2: Two-phase subcritical flow case calculated in Aspen HYSYS

Because c is smaller than a, flow across the relief valve is unchoked, and the maximum mass flux is
calculated using (Eq. 5), yielding a maximum mass flux G = 830 kg/m-s.

Assuming that all capacity coefficients are 1.0, aside from the discharge coefficient which is 0.85 in
accordance with guidance from API, the required area is calculated using (Eq. 6):

277.8 20,000
= 7,870 mm
0.85 830

For a selected R orifice with an effective area of 10322.5 mm, the rated capacity is calculated using

(Eq. 7):

!"# =

0.85 830 10322.5

= 26,230 kg/h
277.8

The results calculated above are compared to results obtained in Aspen HYSYS in Table 2.

Equations and Example Benchmark Calculations within the

aspenONE Engineering Safety Analysis Environment

2015 Aspen Technology Inc. 11-8231-1215

Variable

Units

Example Calculation

Aspen HYSYS

Required Relief Load (w)

kg/h

20,000

20,000

Relief Pressure (P0)

barg

1.54

1.54

Mass Density at 90% (9)

kg/m3

90% Pressure (P9)

Mass Density at Relief (0)

1.28

barg
kg/m

Omega Parameter ()

Critical Flow Ratio (c)

8.264

8.264

7.335

7.337

1.140
0.6234

Flow Type

Subcritical

Maximum Mass Flux (G)

Required Area (A)

Rated Capacity (wmax)

kg/s-m
mm

kg/h
Blue = Calculation input

Subcritical

830
7,870

7,710

26,230

26,780

Gray = Calculated value

Table 2: Comparison of example calculation and Aspen HYSYS calculation for subcritical two-phase flow

Subcooled Omega Method

Equations
As with the non-subcooled Omega Method, the subcooled Omega Method is a two-point method.
The first point remains the same with the conditions at the PRV inlet. For the second point, the relief
stream is flashed isentropically to 90% of its saturation pressure corresponding to the PRV inlet
temperature T0. As with the non-subcooled method, flow may be critical or subcritical; however,
the subcooled Omega Method also requires a determination as to whether the relief conditions
correspond to high or low subcooling; that is, whether the fluid will begin to flash in the inlet line,
or whether it will flash at the valve throat.
The omega parameter is calculated using a similar equation to (Eq. 1), where 0 is the liquid density
at the PRV inlet in kg/m.

Eq. 8

! = 9

"
1
!

High or low subcooling is determined via the transition saturation pressure ratio, which is
calculated below in Equation 9 and 10, where st is the transition saturation pressure ratio, s is
the saturation pressure ratio, Ps is the saturation pressure in absolute units, and P0 is the upstream
pressure in absolute units.

Eq. 9

Eq. 10

!" =

! =

2!

1 + 2!

!

!

Equations and Example Benchmark Calculations within the

aspenONE Engineering Safety Analysis Environment

2015 Aspen Technology Inc. 11-8231-1215

If st exceeds s, then relief is considered to lie in the high subcooling region, and flow will
necessarily be critical unless the total back pressure exceeds the saturation pressure (but in this
case, the fluid is liquid across the valve, and the API liquid sizing will be sufficient to calculate the
orifice size). Otherwise, relief is considered to lie in the low subcooling region, and a check must be
made to determine if the flow across the PRV is critical or subcritical. The critical pressure ratio may
be estimated as shown below in Equation 11.

Eq. 11

! !

2!
2! 1

1 2! 1

!
2!

The back pressure ratio a is calculated using (Eq. 3) as with the non-subcooled method.
For low subcooling, the maximum mass flux is calculated using Equation 12 below.

Eq. 12

= !

!
! "
2 1 ! + 2 ! ! ln ! 1 !
!

1 +1

For critical flow, =c; for subcritical flow, =a. Pressure is in psia or Paa. C1 = 68.09 for U.S.
customary units, 1.0 for SI units.
For high subcooling, the maximum mass flux is calculated using Equation 13 below.

Eq. 13

= ! 2 " ! !

The pressure is measured in psia or Paa.

Given a required relief load in lb/h or kg/h, the required area and rated capacity may be calculated
using (Eq. 6) and (Eq. 7).

Example with Low Subcooling, Critical Flow

The example is based on the following conditions:

Composition

15% propane, 30% isobutane, 30% n-butane,

25% isopentane using the Aspen HYSYS PRSV
package for physical properties

Relief conditions

242 psig, 205 F

Required relief load

92,590 lb/h

Setting up a stream in Aspen HYSYS at the relief conditions and flashing appropriately, yields the
following properties:
0 = 29.23 lb/ft
Ps = 241.4 psia
P9 = 217.3 psia
9 = 17.53 lb/ft

Equations and Example Benchmark Calculations within the

aspenONE Engineering Safety Analysis Environment

2015 Aspen Technology Inc. 11-8231-1215

The omega parameter is calculated using (Eq. 8):

! = 9

29.23
1 = 6.011
17.53

Figure 3: Low subcooled critical flow case calculated in Aspen HYSYS

The transition saturation pressure ratio is calculated using (Eq. 9):

!" =

2 6.011
= 0.923
1 + 2 6.011

The saturation pressure ratio is 0.956. Because this is greater than the transition ratio, this case
involves low subcooling, and the critical pressure ratio is calculated using (Eq. 11):

! 0.923

2 6.011
2 6.011 1

1
2 6.011 1
0.923
2 6.011

= 0.8633

The back pressure ratio of 0.0573 is much lower than the critical pressure ratio, so the flow is critical.
The maximum mass flux is calculated using (Eq. 12) with =c. The result shows that G = 2,150
lb/s-ft.
Assuming that all capacity coefficients are 1.0, aside from the discharge coefficient which is 0.65 in
accordance with guidance from API, the required area is calculated using (Eq. 6):

0.04 92,590
= 2.651 in
0.65 2,150

Equations and Example Benchmark Calculations within the

aspenONE Engineering Safety Analysis Environment

2015 Aspen Technology Inc. 11-8231-1215

For a selected L orifice with an effective area of 2.853 in, the rated capacity is calculated using

(Eq. 7):

!"# =

0.65 2,150 2.853

= 99,640 lb/h
0.04

The results calculated above are compared to results obtained in Aspen HYSYS in Table 3.
Variable

Units

Example Calculation

Aspen HYSYS

Required Relief Load (w)

lb/h

92,590

92,590

Relief Pressure (P0)

psig

242

242.0

226.7 psig

241.4 psia

psig

202.6

Mass Density at Relief (0)

lb/ft3

29.23

lb/ft

17.53

Saturation Pressure (Ps)

90% Pressure (P9)

Mass Density at 90% (9)

Omega Parameter ()

6.011

Transition Subcool Ratio (st)

Critical Flow Ratio (c)

0.923
0.8633

Flow Type

Maximum Mass Flux (G)

Required Area (A)

Rated Capacity (wmax)

17.51

Low Subcool, Critical

lb/s-ft
in

lb/h
Blue = Calculation input

Critical

2,150
2.651

2.663

99,640

99,180

Gray = Calculated value

Table 3: Comparison of example calculation and Aspen HYSYS calculation for low subcooled critical flow

Example with Low Subcooling, Subcritical Flow

The example is based on the following conditions:
Composition

15% propane, 30% isobutane, 30% n-butane,

25% isopentane using the Aspen HYSYS PRSV
package for physical properties

Relief conditions

44 psig, 87.5 F

Required relief load

92,590 lb/h

Back pressure

40 psi superimposed

Setting up a stream in Aspen HYSYS at the relief conditions and flashing appropriately yields the
following properties:
0 = 35.17 lb/ft
Ps = 57.13 psia
P9 = 51.4 psia
9 = 13.72 lb/ft

Equations and Example Benchmark Calculations within the

10 aspenONE Engineering Safety Analysis Environment

2015 Aspen Technology Inc. 11-8231-1215

Figure 4: Low subcooled subcritical flow case calculated in Aspen HYSYS

The omega parameter is calculated

using (Eq. 8):

! = 9

35.17
1 = 14.07
13.72

The transition saturation pressure ratio is calculated using (Eq. 9):

!! =

2 14.07
= 0.9657
1 + 2 14.07

The saturation pressure ratio is 0.9733. Because this is greater than the transition ratio, this case
involves low subcooling. The critical pressure ratio is calculated using (Eq. 11):

! 0.9733

2 14.07
2 14.07 1

1
2 14.07 1
0.9733
2 14.07

= 0.9130

The back pressure ratio of 0.9319 is higher than the critical pressure ratio, so the flow is subcritical.
The maximum mass flux is calculated using (Eq. 12) with =a=0.9319. The result is that G = 765.4
lb/s-ft.
Assuming that all capacity coefficients are 1.0, aside from the discharge coefficient which is 0.65 in
accordance with guidance from API, the required area is calculated using (Eq. 6):

11

0.04 92,590
= 7.444 in
0.65 765.4

Equations and Example Benchmark Calculations within the

aspenONE Engineering Safety Analysis Environment

2015 Aspen Technology Inc. 11-8231-1215

For a selected Q orifice with an effective area of 11.05 in, the rated capacity is calculated using

(Eq. 7):

!"# =

0.65 765.4 11.05

= 137,400 lb/h
0.04

The results calculated above are compared to results obtained in Aspen HYSYS in Table 4.
Variable

Units

Example Calculation

Aspen HYSYS

Required Relief Load (w)

lb/h

92,590

92,590

Relief Pressure (P0)

psig

44

44.00

42.43 psig

57.13 psia

psig

36.7

Mass Density at Relief (0)

lb/ft3

35.17

lb/ft3

13.72

Saturation Pressure (Ps)

90% Pressure (P9)

Mass Density at 90% (9)

Omega Parameter ()

14.07

Transition Subcool Ratio (st)

Critical Flow Ratio (c)

0.9657
0.9130

Flow Type

Maximum Mass Flux (G)

Required Area (A)

Rated Capacity (wmax)

13.75

Low Subcool, Critical

lb/s-ft
in

lb/h
Blue = Calculation input

Critical

765.4
7.444

7.450

137,400

137,300

Gray = Calculated value

Table 4: Comparison of example calculation and Aspen HYSYS calculation for low subcooled, subcritical
flow

Example with High Subcooling

The example is based on the following conditions:

Composition

15% propane, 30% isobutane, 30% n-butane,

25% isopentane using the Aspen HYSYS PRSV
package for physical properties

Relief conditions

242 psig, 188.3 F

Required relief load

92,590 lb/h

Setting up a stream in Aspen HYSYS at the relief conditions and flashing appropriately, yields the
following properties:
0 = 30.34 lb/ft
Ps = 203.1 psia
P9 = 182.8 psia
9 = 17.40 lb/ft

Equations and Example Benchmark Calculations within the

12 aspenONE Engineering Safety Analysis Environment

2015 Aspen Technology Inc. 11-8231-1215

Figure 5: High subcooled critical flow case calculated in Aspen HYSYS

The omega parameter is calculated using (Eq. 8):

! = 9

30.34
1 = 6.693
17.4

The transition saturation pressure ratio is calculated using (Eq. 9):

!" =

2 6.693
= 0.9305
1 + 2 6.693

The saturation pressure ratio is 0.7912. Because this is less than the transition ratio, this case
involves high subcooling. The critical pressure ratio is equal to the saturation pressure ratio. The
maximum mass flux is calculated using (Eq. 13):

= 68.09 2 30.34 256.7 203.1 = 3,883 lb/s-ft

Assuming that all capacity coefficients are 1.0, aside from the discharge coefficient which is 0.65 in
accordance with guidance from API, the required area is calculated using (Eq. 6):

0.04 92,590
= 1.467 in
0.65 3,883

For a selected K orifice with an effective area of 1.838 in, the rated capacity is calculated using

(Eq. 7):

!"# =

0.65 3,883 1.838

= 116,000 lb/h
0.04

The results calculated above are compared to results obtained in Aspen HYSYS in Table 5.

Equations and Example Benchmark Calculations within the

13 aspenONE Engineering Safety Analysis Environment

2015 Aspen Technology Inc. 11-8231-1215

Variable

Units

Example Calculation

Aspen HYSYS

Required Relief Load (w)

lb/h

92,590

92,590

Relief Pressure (P0)

psig

242

242.0

188.4 psig

203.1 psia

psig

168.1

Mass Density at Relief (0)

lb/ft3

30.34

lb/ft3

17.40

Saturation Pressure (Ps)

90% Pressure (P9)

Mass Density at 90% (9)

Omega Parameter ()

6.693

Transition Subcool Ratio (st)

0.9305

Flow Type

Maximum Mass Flux (G)

Required Area (A)

Rated Capacity (wmax)

17.38

High Subcool, Critical

lb/s-ft
in

lb/h
Blue = Calculation input

Critical

3,883
1.467

1.473

116,000

115,600

Gray = Calculated value

Table 5: Comparison of example calculation and Aspen HYSYS calculation for high subcooled, critical flow

Direct Integration Method

The direct integration method involves evaluating thermodynamic properties of the relieving stream
at a number of state points and then numerically integrating the nozzle equation to determine the
maximum mass flux. This equation is the theoretical basis for every orifice method, so the direct
integration method is applicable to any type of flow, single or multi-phase.

Equations
The nozzle equation is shown below, where G is the mass flux in lb/ft-s or kg/m-s, v is the specific
volume in ft/lb or m/kg, and dp is the differential pressure increment in lbf/ft or Pa.

Eq. 14

! =

2!
!

This is approximated as shown below, where v is the average specific volume over the pressure
increment p.

Eq. 15

2!
!

The sum is performed from the relief pressure until either a maximum value of G is reached or the
back pressure Pa is reached. If the maximum in G occurs above Pa, then the flow is choked.

Equations and Example Benchmark Calculations within the

14 aspenONE Engineering Safety Analysis Environment

2015 Aspen Technology Inc. 11-8231-1215

Example
The example is based on the following conditions:

Composition

25% n-octane, 35% n-decane, 30% n-C11, 10%

nitrogen using the Aspen HYSYS SRK package
for physical properties

Relief conditions

176 psig, 122 F

Required relief load

138,900 lb/h

A property table may be used to obtain the mass density along an isentropic path for numerical
integration, as shown below.
Pressure
psia

Mass Density
lb/ft3

Specific Volume
ft3/lb

gcv P
ft/s

Mass Flux
lb/ft2-s

190.7

23.21

0.0431

0.0

0.0

180.7

22.48

0.0445

2028

1432

170.7

21.71

0.0461

2098

1972

160.7

20.90

0.0478

2175

2347

150.7

20.06

0.0499

2263

2625

140.7

19.18

0.0521

2363

2835

130.7

18.25

0.0548

2477

2988

120.7

17.28

0.0579

2610

3092

110.7

16.25

0.0615

2766

3150

100.7

15.17

0.0659

2952

3164

90.7

14.04

0.0712

3177

3133

Note that the mass flux reaches a maximum at a pressure of 100.7 psia, indicating that flow is
choked and the relief mass flux is 3164 lb/ft-s.

Equations and Example Benchmark Calculations within the

15 aspenONE Engineering Safety Analysis Environment

2015 Aspen Technology Inc. 11-8231-1215

Figure 6: Direct integration case calculated in Aspen HYSYS

Assuming that all capacity coefficients are 1.0, aside from the discharge coefficient which is 0.85
in accordance with guidance from API for two-phase flow at relief conditions, the required area is
calculated using (Eq. 6):

0.04 138,900
= 2.066 in
0.85 3,164

For a selected L orifice with an effective area of 2.853 in, the rated capacity is calculated using
(Eq. 7):

!"# =

0.85 3,164 2.853

= 191,800 lb/h
0.04

The results calculated above are compared to results obtained in Aspen HYSYS in Table 6.

Variable

Units

Example Calculation

Aspen HYSYS

Required Relief Load (w)

lb/h

138,900

138,900

psig

176

176.0

122

122.0

3,164

3,114

Relief Pressure (P0)

Relief Temperature (T0)

Rated Capacity (wmax)

lb/h

Maximum Mass Flux (G)

Required Area (A)

lb/s-ft
in

Blue = Calculation input

2.066

2.099

191,800

188,800

Gray = Calculated value

Table 6: Comparison of example calculation and Aspen HYSYS calculation for direct integration

Equations and Example Benchmark Calculations within the

16 aspenONE Engineering Safety Analysis Environment

2015 Aspen Technology Inc. 11-8231-1215

Noise
Equations
The equations for computing noise level for atmospheric relief valves are given in section 5.8.10.3
of API Standard 521.2 The noise level at 30 m from the point of discharge is calculated using the
following equation below, where w is the mass flow through the valve in kg/h, c is the speed of
sound in the gas at the valve in m/s, and L is the sound level in decibels.

Eq. 16

!" = + 10 log!"

1
!
7200

The speed of sound may be computed as shown below, where k is the ideal specific heat ratio in the
gas, T is the temperature
in K, and M is the molecular weight of the gas.

Eq. 17

= 91.2

The value of L in (Eq. 16) is read from a figure in the text. It may be approximated using two semilog
curve fits shown below, where X is the pressure ratio across the pressure relief valve.

Eq. 18

39.461 ln + 12.648 2.866

2.1716 ln + 51.914 > 2.866

Example
The example is based on the following conditions:
Composition

100% air using the Aspen HYSYS PR package

for physical properties

Relief conditions

330 kPaa, 311 K

Required relief load

52,560 kg/h

Setting up a stream in Aspen HYSYS at the relief conditions will yield the following properties:
M = 28.95
k = 1.404

Equations and Example Benchmark Calculations within the

17 aspenONE Engineering Safety Analysis Environment

2015 Aspen Technology Inc. 11-8231-1215

Figure 7: Noise example calculated

in Aspen HYSYS

The speed of sound may be calculated

using (Eq. 17) as:

= 91.2

1.404 311
= 354.2 m/s
28.95

Based on a pressure ratio of 330101.325=3.26, the contribution due to pressure ratio may be
estimated by (Eq.
18) to be 54.5 dB. Then, the total noise level is calculated using (Eq. 16):

!" = 54.5 + 10 log!"

1
52,560 354.2
7200

= 114.1 dB

The results calculated above are compared to results obtained in Aspen HYSYS in Table 7.

Variable

Units

Example Calculation

Aspen HYSYS

Required Relief Load (w)

kg/h

52,560

52,560

330 kPaa

2.287 barg

311 K

37.85 C

114.1

114.1

Relief Pressure (P0)

Relief Temperature (T0)

Sound Level (L30)

dB
Blue = Calculation input

Gray = Calculated value

Table 7: Comparison of example calculation and Aspen HYSYS calculation for noise
Figure 8: Reaction force example
calculated in Aspen HYSYS

Equations and Example Benchmark Calculations within the

18 aspenONE Engineering Safety Analysis Environment

2015 Aspen Technology Inc. 11-8231-1215

Reaction Forces
Equations
The equations for computing reaction forces on the outlet piping of atmospheric relief valves are
given in section 4.4.1 of API Recommended Practice 520 Part II.3 The reaction force due to vapor
discharge is calculated using the following equation below, where F is the reaction force in N, w is the
required relief load in kg/h, k is the ideal specific heat ratio of the gas, T is the discharge temperature
in K, M is the molecular weight of the gas, A is the area of the pipe at the point of discharge in mm,
and p3 is the static pressure at the outlet in barg (that is, 0 for flow that is unchoked at the outlet, or
the choke pressure for flow that is choked at the outlet).

Eq. 19

27.9

+ 0.1 !
+ 1

Example
The example is based on the following conditions:
Composition

30% propane, 70% n-butane using the Aspen

HYSYS SRK package for physical properties

Relief conditions

4.4 barg, 92.15 C

Required relief load

36,970 kg/h

Fluid properties at relief may be observed to be:

M = 53.92
k = 1.081
P* = 0.8201 bara

The reaction force may be calculated using (Eq. 19), as shown below. Because the choke pressure is
less than atmospheric pressure, the second term may be neglected.

1
37,150
27.9

1.081 92.15 + 273.15

= 2,498 N
2.081 53.92

The results calculated above are compared to results obtained in Aspen HYSYS in Table 8.

Variable

Units

Example Calculation

Aspen HYSYS

Required Relief Load (w)

kg/h

37,150

37,150

92.15

92.15

2,498

2,497

Relief Temperature (T)

Reaction Force (F)

Blue = Calculation input

Gray = Calculated value

Table 8: Comparison of example calculation and Aspen HYSYS calculation for reaction force

Equations and Example Benchmark Calculations within the

19 aspenONE Engineering Safety Analysis Environment

2015 Aspen Technology Inc. 11-8231-1215

Conclusion
Safety is of the highest priority to every process, and ensuring accurate, validated calculations is a
key component of this work. To view additional validation papers, access tutorial documents and
videos, and learn more information about the tools AspenTech provides to address process safety
work, please visit the safety page on our company website, today!

References
1.

American Petroleum Institute, API Standard 520 Part I 9th Ed.: Sizing, Selection, and Installation
of Pressure-relieving Devices, Washington, DC: API Publishing Services, 2014.

2. American Petroleum Institute, API Standard 521 6th Ed.: Pressure-relieving and Depressuring
Systems, Washington, DC: API Publishing Services, 2014.
3. American Petroleum Institute, API Recommended Practice 520 Part II 5th Ed., Reaffirmed,
Washington: API Publishing Services, 2011.

Equations and Example Benchmark Calculations within the

20 aspenONE Engineering Safety Analysis Environment

2015 Aspen Technology Inc. 11-8231-1215

AspenTech is a leading supplier of software that optimizes process manufacturingfor energy, chemicals, engineering and
construction, and other industries that manufacture and produce products from a chemical process. With integrated aspenONE
solutions, process manufacturers can implement best practices for optimizing their engineering, manufacturing, and supply chain
operations. As a result, AspenTech customers are better able to increase capacity, improve margins, reduce costs, and become
more energy efficient. To see how the worlds leading process manufacturers rely on AspenTech to achieve their operational
excellence goals, visit www.aspentech.com.
Worldwide Headquarters
Aspen Technology, Inc.
20 Crosby Drive | Bedford, MA 01730 | United States
phone: +1-781-221-6400 | fax: +1-781-221-6410 | info@aspentech.com
Regional Headquarters
Houston, TX | United States
phone: +1-281-584-1000
So Paulo | Brazil
phone: +55-11-3443-6261
Reading | United Kingdom
phone: +44-(0)-1189-226400
Singapore | Republic of Singapore
phone: +65-6395-3900
Manama | Bahrain
phone: +973-13606-400
For a complete list of offices, please visit www.aspentech.com/locations

Equations and Example Benchmark Calculations within the

21 aspenONE Engineering Safety Analysis Environment

2015 Aspen Technology Inc. 11-7852-0915