Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
PERIODONTOLOGY 2000
ISSN 0906-6713
54
Distraction osteogenesis
55
The intraosseous ACE distractor (ACE Surgical Supply, Brockton, MA) is made of titanium alloy and has
three main components during active distraction
(Fig. 1). The distractor body engages the bony transport segment with external threads that are of the
same pattern as that of a conventional 3.75 mm oral
implant. The distractor body comes in both a 5 mm
56
Distraction osteogenesis
57
three missing teeth up to a maximum of three distractors. Following 2 months of consolidation, implants were placed at the time of distractor removal
and allowed to heal for 7 months prior to nal
restoration (Fig. 10a,b).
As with most distraction systems, it is imperative
that the guidance components and a suitable
58
Distraction osteogenesis
temporary be utilized to insure proper transport segment positioning. Base plug instability may arise
during placement of the ACE distractor, especially
if an insufcient amount of bone remains apical to
the base plug. Due to the dense inferior cortex of
the mandible, planned vertical distraction can be
achieved even with complete disattachment of the
base plug. Currently, the preassembled device contains both the base plug and the distractor body, so
instability is not likely to occur. Radiographic conrmation at the completion of surgery and during
distraction is advised to conrm proper positioning
of the distractor components.
59
Fig. 11. The LEAD system showing the threaded rod, stabilizing base plate and threaded transport plate.
Fig. 12. The LEAD system xated in place after the completion of the horizontal and vertical osteotomies.
60
The extraosseous Track distractors (KLS Martin, Jacksonville, FL) are made of titanium with microplates
that have been welded onto the sliding mechanism of
the actual distraction screw (Fig. 15). Multiple sizes
are available depending on the regenerative needs.
For full arches the Track 1.5 is indicated and for very
small segments the Track 1.0 microdistractor may be
utilized. For most partially edentulous distraction
patients the Track Plus distractor is indicated,
because it has the most rigidity due to the apical
extension and it is still of manageable size.
Distraction osteogenesis
Fig. 15. The KLS distractors: (a) Track 1.5, (b) Track Plus
and (c) Track 1.0.
61
Fig. 16. Initial radiographic appearance showing extensive evidence of bone loss on teeth 12, 11 and 21.
Fig. 17. The KLS Martin Track Plus fully xated with
completed vertical and horizontal osteotomies prior to
suturing.
62
Distraction osteogenesis
63
64
Either with a single distractor or multiple distractors, undesirable movement of the transport bone
segment may occur, often due to lingual ap or muscle tension. A guidance axial distraction screw may
be utilized to maintain the desired direction of movement or to correct malalignment with the ACE distractor. Temporary or orthodontic hardware may be
used with the KLS or LEAD distractors if segment
guidance is an issue. Making the lingual aspect of
the vertical cuts slightly convergent will also resist
undesirable segment movement, especially when larger transport segments are used that involve more
arch curvature.
When both vertical osteotomies are properly completed and the distraction rate is kept to 1 mm per day
or less, the transport segment should advance without
signicant resistance. If premature consolidation
occurs prior to completion of distraction, it is likely
due to incomplete osteotomy or mineralization at the
vertical osteotomy sites. In these cases, the transport
segment can be freed under local anesthesia by applying a nger pressure on the bone segment. Alternatively, the transport segment premature consolidation
can be re-osteotomized using a small-size interdental
osteotome through a small incision. Keeping the vertical osteotomies slightly divergent to the crestal
aspect will prevent segment binding and minimize
premature consolidation.
Typically, there is no detectable transport segment
mobility at the end of the consolidation period. In
some cases, however, delayed consolidation may
occur, potentially leading to the development of a
nonunion. If signicant transport segment mobility
exists at the proposed time of distractor removal, the
device may be left in place to allow further consolidation. Sufcient stabilization of the transport segment is an important aspect in prevention of
nonunion during distraction. During active distraction and during the consolidation phase, segment
mobility must be controlled. In cases with an immature regeneration, nger pressure can be applied to
the transport segment at the time of distractor
removal to resist rotational forces, thereby stabilizing
the segment. In addition, immediate placement of
oral implants at this point will also support further
stabilization of the newly regenerated bone. Finally,
if a partial or complete nonunion exists at the nal
uncovering of the implants, debridement must be
performed followed by bone grafting and plate stabilization.
While any of these complications are possible, the
publications to date indicate these complications
occur at a very low rate (4, 5, 12, 13, 20, 22). For
Distraction osteogenesis
distraction cases involving sites that have had multiple prior surgeries the incidence of complications is
higher (5), suggesting that distraction should be the
rst line of treatment rather than a last resort after
other techniques have failed. Considering there is no
established ideal bone augmentation approach for
the treatment of vertical defects, the minimal incidence of complications gives further support to the
technique of distraction osteogenesis for treatment
of vertical defects.
11.
12.
13.
14.
Conclusions
15.
16.
References
19.
20.
17.
18.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
65
66
32. Snyder CC, Swanson HM, Browne EZ. Mandibular lengthening by gradual distraction: preliminary report. Plast Reconstr Surg 1972: 51: 506508.
33. Stucki-McCormick SU, Moses JJ, Robinson F, Laster Z,
Mommaerts MY, Jensen OT. Alveolar distraction devices.
In: Jensen OT, editor. Alveolar distraction osteogenesis. Chicago: Quintessence Books, 2002.
34. Urbani G, Lombardo G, Santi E, Consolo U. Distraction
osteogenesis to achieve mandibular vertical bone regeneration: a case report. Int J Periodontics Dent 1999: 19: 321331.