Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
A 69-year-old man with a history of coronary artery disease, hypertension, and stage 3 chronic kidney disease presented to
the emergency department with acute onset of chest pain, dyspnea, and dizziness. The patient was hypotensive (68/36 mm Hg)
with clinical evidence of pulmonary edema. Electrocardiogram revealed an acute anterior wall myocardial infarction. The patient
underwent emergent cardiac catheterization during which an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) was placed for management of
cardiogenic shock. Two coronary artery stents were placed and 380 mL of low-osmolar contrast were administered. Blood
pressure improved over the next 24 hours and the IABP was removed. Urine output declined to less than 400 mL/day and the
serum creatinine concentration increased from a baseline of 1.5 mg/dL to 6.8 mg/dL over 4 days. Serum potassium concentration increased to 6.8 mEq/L. The patient became anorexic with nausea and vomiting. Uremic symptoms and metabolic abnormalities developed, and acute hemodialysis was initiated.
cute renal failure (ARF) frequently complicates the course of hospitalized patients. The
incidence of hospital-acquired ARF is between
4.9% and 7%.1,2 ARF occurs commonly in the
intensive care unit, with an incidence up to 20% in this
setting.3 In contrast, the incidence of communityacquired ARF is 0.9%.4 Despite technical advances in
the management of ARF over the past 50 years, mortality rates remain unchanged at 50%.5 Hospital-based
clinicians should be familiar with the diagnosis and
management of this renal disorder.
www.turner-white.com
gories according to clinical outcome (Table 1).7 Although serum creatinine concentration is commonly
used to assess renal function and to estimate ARF severity,
a precise correlation between changes in creatinine concentration and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) does not
exist. The non-steady state conditions that prevail in ARF
make estimation of GFR using standard formulas inaccurate, often overestimating true GFR.8
ARF is also classified based on urine output: anuric
(< 100 mL/d), oliguric (100399 mL/d), and nonoliguric (> 400 mL/d). Anuria usually reflects either complete urinary tract obstruction or a vascular catastrophe
complicated by cortical necrosis.
ETIOLOGY
The causes of ARF traditionally have been divided
into 3 major categories based on pathophysiology: prerenal, intrinsic renal, and postrenal (Table 2). Prerenal
etiologies are the most common, accounting for 30% to
60% of all cases of ARF.4 Prerenal azotemia results from
either an absolute or relative decrease in blood volume
51
Ya r l a g a d d a & P e r a z e l l a : R e s i d e n t G r a n d R o u n d s : p p . 5 1 5 8
Glomerular
Filtration Rate
Urine Output
Criteria
Risk
Injury
Failure
Loss
End stage
DIAGNOSIS
A comprehensive history with detailed review of the
hospital medical record, physical examination, and basic
laboratory tests correctly identifies hospital-acquired
ARF. Diagnosis requires knowledge of the natural history of various causes of ARF and a systematic approach to
evaluating renal insufficiency by excluding and correcting both prerenal and postrenal causes.
History
In the hospital, patients develop excessive fluid losses from diarrhea, ostomy losses, or high urine output.
These losses are compounded by limited fluid intake
prior to the recognition of ARF. Obstruction, especially
from urinary retention, is common and reduces urine
output. The presence of urine output does not exclude partial urinary tract obstruction as a cause of
ARF. Bone pain in an elderly patient might suggest
multiple myeloma as a cause of ARF.
Review of the hospital record for recent intake/output data, trends in body weights, episodes of hypotension (especially requiring vasopressors), evidence of
sepsis, use of radiocontrast for procedures, and administration of any number of nephrotoxic medications is
critical. Invasive vascular procedures, including both
percutaneous and open operative interventions, should
be assessed for their temporal relationship to ARF. The
operative report of any surgical procedure should be
scrutinized to identify hypotension, blood loss, and administration of potential nephrotoxins.
Physical Examination
Evaluation of intravascular volume status in hospitalized patients is important to assess for prerenal ARF. The
examination should include measurement of blood pressure and heart rate, including orthostatic readings, and
www.turner-white.com
Ya r l a g a d d a & P e r a z e l l a : R e s i d e n t G r a n d R o u n d s : p p . 5 1 5 8
assessment for pulsus paradoxus. Other required evaluations include assessment of mucosal hydration and skin
turgor and assessment for the presence of edema (pretibial in ambulatory patients, sacral in bedridden patients),
jugular venous distension, lung crackles, and an S3 cardiac gallop. Equally important are signs of coexistent comorbidities, such as congestive heart failure, cirrhosis,
nephrosis, and vascular disease. The presence of a diffuse
rash, livedo reticularis with skin mottling, or palpable
purpura suggest renal and vascular injury. Suprapubic
fullness indicates a postrenal cause of ARF. Limb ischemia suggests the possibility of underlying rhabdomyolysis.
Laboratory Testing
Blood tests. Measurement of serum blood urea
nitrogen (BUN) and creatinine concentration, electrolytes, calcium, and phosphate is an integral part of the
diagnosis of hospital-acquired ARF and management
of its associated complications. The trends in BUN and
serum creatinine concentrations help define the severity and course of ARF. Metabolic disturbances such as
hyperkalemia and hyperphosphatemia accompanied by
an elevated creatine kinase level suggest rhabdomyolysis. Hypercalcemia can point to a malignant condition
such as multiple myeloma; similarly, hyperuricemia indicates tumor lysis syndrome. Abnormal transaminase
levels suggest congestive heart failure or liver disease;
elevated bilirubin levels may represent hemolysis or
hepatic disease.
Anemia in the presence of schistocytes and thrombocytopenia should raise suspicion for a thrombotic
microangiopathy (hemolytic uremic syndrome, thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura, antiphospholipid
antibody syndrome), endocarditis, and disseminated
intravascular coagulation. Eosinophilia may be seen
with acute interstitial nephritis (AIN) and atheroembolic renal disease. Finding a monoclonal protein in
the serum suggests multiple myeloma. Positive blood
cultures can point to an endovascular infection with an
associated acute immune complexassociated glomerulonephritis. The utility of serologic tests such as hepatitis serology and measurement of antinuclear antibody, complement, and antineutrophil cytoplasmic
antibody levels depend upon clinical suspicion.
Urine studies. Routine urinalysis consists of dipstick
testing, which provides information about urine concentration and detects protein, ketones, glucose, leukocyte esterase, bilirubin, and blood. In the absence of
red blood cells (RBC), heme-positive urine suggests
the presence of heme protein from either myoglobin
(rhabdomyolysis) or hemoglobin (hemolysis).
Microscopic examination of the spun urine sedi-
www.turner-white.com
ment is essential in the evaluation of ARF. The sediment should be closely inspected for cellular elements,
casts, and crystals. RBCs indicate bleeding along the
urogenital tract if the cells are monomorphic (normal
appearing) or glomerular injury if the cells are dysmorphic. Renal tubular epithelial (RTE) cells suggest tubular injury, while white blood cells (WBC) suggest infection or renal inflammation. RTE cell casts and granular
casts typically represent renal tubular injury (Figure 1).
RBC casts confirm glomerular injury, while WBC casts
suggest either intrarenal infection or AIN. Uric acid
crystals in the urine of a patient with ARF suggest the
possibility of tumor lysis syndrome. Urine crystals associated with medications (acyclovir, indinavir, sulfadiazine)
point to drug-associated crystal nephropathy.
Urine chemistries can also provide useful information to classify the cause of ARF (Table 3). These tests
must be interpreted in conjunction with clinical assessment of the patient and other serum and urine test
results.
Diagnostic Imaging
Renal ultrasound is both sensitive (90%) and specific
(90%) in diagnosing urinary tract obstruction. Hydronephrosis, which reflects dilatation of the renal pelvis and
ureters, is readily seen on ultrasound (Figure 2). Ultrasound also provides information about renal size and
echogenicity and cortical thickness. The absence of
hydronephrosis does not always exclude obstruction,
especially in the setting of acute obstruction (< 72 h),
53
Ya r l a g a d d a & P e r a z e l l a : R e s i d e n t G r a n d R o u n d s : p p . 5 1 5 8
retroperitoneal fibrosis, or severe hypovolemia. Computed tomography scan without radiocontrast is also useful in the diagnosis of urinary obstruction (Figure 2). Its
advantage over ultrasound is enhanced sensitivity in visualizing the various etiologies of obstruction, such as
stones, retroperitoneal disease, and malignancy.
Renal Biopsy
Renal biopsy is rarely required in the work-up of
ARF. When a primary renal disease other than ischemic or toxic ATN is suspected, renal biopsy may
establish the diagnosis. Common indications include
unexplained ARF, suspicion of acute glomerulonephritis or lupus nephritis, protracted renal dysfunction in
patients suspected for AIN, and ARF that fails to improve after 6 to 8 weeks (due to potentially irreversible
causes such as cholesterol emboli [Figure 3] and cortical necrosis). In a prospective study of patients with
ARF, renal histology altered management in 75% of
cases.10 Because the risks associated with renal biopsy
are low (< 1%), this diagnostic procedure should be
used in the appropriate setting to evaluate ARF.11
MANAGEMENT
The initial care of patients with ARF should focus
on reversing the underlying cause (prerenal and postrenal) and correcting fluid, electrolyte, and acid-base
imbalances (Table 4). Every effort should be made to
prevent further kidney injury and to provide supportive care (including dialysis), until recovery occurs.
Fluids
An important goal of patient management is maintaining euvolemia. Careful physical examination and,
when appropriate, invasive monitoring is vital to this
process. Achieving appropriate fluid balance involves
2 conflicting goals: providing sufficient volume to ensure
adequate renal perfusion and avoiding volume overload
with resulting pulmonary congestion. Attention to all
sources of fluid intake and output, including surgical
drains, nasogastric suction, diarrhea, and insensible losses is required. There is no substitute for daily weights.
Rapid restoration of intravascular volume may reverse prerenal azotemia and prevent ischemic damage.
Crystalloid solutions are often the best fluid choice. In
situations of increased vascular permeability, colloid
solutions may provide enhanced restoration of intravascular volume. Albumin therapy should be restricted to
situations where synthetic colloids cannot be used.12 Of
the synthetic colloids, hydroxyethyl starch (HES) solutions with low in vivo molecular weight (HES, 200/0.5)
demonstrate the best risk/benefit ratio,13 but these
should be avoided in patients with underlying kidney
disease due to enhanced risk of ARF.
Vasoactive Agents
If hypotension persists despite adequate fluid replacement, vasopressors are indicated. However, intrarenal vasoconstriction develops with these drugs and
may negate the hemodynamic benefit of increased
blood pressure. Norepinephrine reduces renal blood
flow in normal humans but improves renal blood flow
and augments urine output and GFR in patients with
septic shock.14 Vasopressin also increases urine output
and GFR in patients with septic shock.15 Inotropic
agents such as dobutamine increase cardiac output
and augment renal blood flow in patients with systolic
dysfunction and ARF.
Low-dose dopamine (0.50.2 g/kg body weight) is
commonly used to increase urine output in oliguric patients. Several studies have demonstrated that dopamine
does not promote renal recovery or reduce mortality1618 and is associated with tachyarrhythmias, pulmonary shunting, and gut or digital necrosis.19 Dopamine should not be employed in the treatment of ARF.
Diuretics
Diuretics are often required to treat ARF when volume overload develops. Loop diuretics (furosemide,
ethacrynic acid, torsemide) diminish active transport
and energy requirements in the thick ascending limb.
Although a favorable diuretic response occurs with these
www.turner-white.com
Ya r l a g a d d a & P e r a z e l l a : R e s i d e n t G r a n d R o u n d s : p p . 5 1 5 8
Urine
Sediment
BUN/ Cr
Ratio
Urine
Dipstick
Urine Na,
mmol/L
FE Na, %
FE Urea, %
Prerenal
> 500
Bland or
hyaline casts
> 20
No proteinuria
< 20
<1
< 35
Intrinsic
< 450
RBCs, WBCs,
cellular casts
< 20
++ Proteinuria
> 40
>1
> 50
Postrenal
< 450
Bland, RBCs,
crystals
< 20
No proteinuria
> 40
>1
BUN = blood urea nitrogen; Cr = creatinine; FE = fractional excretion; RBCs = red blood cells; WBCs = white blood cells.
Figure 2. (A) Dilated renal calyces on ultrasound scan indicative of hydrenephrosis. This ultrasound finding is highly specific for
renal obstruction. (B) Dilated renal calyces on computed tomography scan indicative of hydronephrosis. This finding is also highly specific for renal obstruction. (Images courtesy of Mark A. Perazella, MD.)
www.turner-white.com
largely by (1) reduced renal excretion of acid and several organic and inorganic anions and (2) excessive acid
production via catabolism. Correction of metabolic acidosis enhances response to vasopressors, improves cardiac contractility, ameliorates bone injury due to acid
buffering, and reduces catabolism. Bicarbonate containing intravenous fluids correct acidosis, but proper use is required to limit excess volume repletion and
minimize symptoms of hypocalcemia. Depending on
the serum sodium concentration, sodium bicarbonate
(50150 mEq) can be added to a liter of either 5% dextrose in water or 0.45% normal saline to make an isotonic solution. Oral bicarbonate or bicarbonate precursors (citrate) are preferable in patients able to take pills
or a liquid preparation. The goal is to correct the serum bicarbonate to approximately 22 mEq/L, depending on respiratory status and arterial pH.
55
Ya r l a g a d d a & P e r a z e l l a : R e s i d e n t G r a n d R o u n d s : p p . 5 1 5 8
www.turner-white.com
Ya r l a g a d d a & P e r a z e l l a : R e s i d e n t G r a n d R o u n d s : p p . 5 1 5 8
PROGNOSIS
Given its diverse causes, the long-term effects of
ARF are unknown. Progressive kidney dysfunction is
commonly observed after severe ARF.24 Irreversible
ARF occurs in 5% of cases and approaches 16% in the
elderly.25 When ARF is severe enough to necessitate
RRT, hospital mortality exceeds 50%.26
4.
5.
6.
CONCLUSION
Hospitalized patients may develop ARF from various
etiologies, although ATN is the most common cause.
Rapid diagnosis utilizing history, chart review, physical
examination, and laboratory data enhances the chances
for renal recovery. Appropriate management of ARF
and its complications is required to improve patient outcome. ARF that requires RRT is associated with inHP
creased mortality.
7.
8.
REFERENCES
1. Hou SH, Bushinsky DA, Wish JB, et al. Hospital-acquired
renal insufficiency: a prospective study. Am J Med 1983;
74:2438.
2. Nash K, Hafeez A, Hou S. Hospital-acquired renal insufficiency. Am J Kidney Dis 2002;39:9306.
3. Schrier RW, Wang W, Poole B, Mitra A. Acute renal fail-
www.turner-white.com
9.
10.
57
Ya r l a g a d d a & P e r a z e l l a : R e s i d e n t G r a n d R o u n d s : p p . 5 1 5 8
Copyright 2006 by Turner White Communications Inc., Wayne, PA. All rights reserved.
www.turner-white.com