Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
When he refers to Ambivalence, he is talking about the relation characterized by the mixture of the rejection
and interest between the colonial force and colonized subject. We are going to talk about the term
Ambivalence, which implies talking about Homi Bhabha at the same time.
In Bhabhas theory, ambivalence disrupts the crucial authority of colonial domination because it bothers the
simple relationship between colonizers and colonized. There exists an unbalance between wanting the
colonized to adopt the colonizers customs, beliefs, etc. and being able to impose them. Moreover, mimicry is
never very far from mockery.
Moving on to the hybridity, this concept is strongly related with the term Ambivalence. The impossibility of
both parts achieving their individual interests leads to the colonized adaptation of a part of what the colonizer
tries to impose.
As said, ambivalence is the bi-lateral relation of the colonized and the colonizer, and a good example of this
would be when in 1792 the British Empire sent an elite member of the East India Company so as to impose
the Christian religion upon India. Here we see that the Empire wanted to have India, but not as it was, because
if the Indian population didnt assimilate their customs, beliefs and ideals, it would be difficult to govern them
as they wanted to. The colonized force, in change, wanted to be independent while taking advantage of all the
advances the Empire could give them. Here we see that both forces want some aspect of the other, but while
rejecting all other aspects. Ambivalence is exactly this type of relation. In the end, a hybridization took place
where the Christianization process failed, but the Indians did adopt certain Christian doctrines and values.
To conclude, in all process of colonialization, necessarily there needs to take place an ambivalent relation
where mimicry and hybridization define the resulting culture after the colonialization, and this process has its
cause in the interest that each force has to improve themselves but while the colonized evade their
enslavement and the colonizer tries to force their culture and ideologies.
*They crushed the attempt of Mahatma Gandhi and the Indian National Congress to force them to 'quit India'
in 1942.
*Britain had promised to give India full independence once the war was over.
*By the time that the last viceroy, Lord Louis Mountbatten, arrived in India, Congress and its leader
Jawaharlal Nehru had begun to accept that unless they agreed to partition, they risked a descent into chaos and
communal war before power could be transferred from British into Indian hands.
*Britain was now overshadowed by the United States and Soviet Union, its domestic economy had been
seriously weakened and the Labour government had embarked on a huge and expensive programme of social
reform.
*Kenya, Uganda and Tanganyika. All became independent between 1961 and 1963.
*In the 21st century, old imperial links still survive, particularly those based on language and law, which may
assume growing importance in a globalized world.
Even the Commonwealth, bruised and battered in the 1960s and 1970s, has retained a surprising utility as a
dense global network of informal connections, valued by its numerous small states.
So, thats an overview of the main features of the concept but which were its real repercussions? The stimulus
was the nationalist feeling that grew in colonized people. One of the most important cases of anti-colonialism
was India, because of its influence on other countries that became independent after it. Mahatma Gandhi and
the Indian National Congress tried to liberate the nation from the arms of the first great power, but they
crushed the attempt. However, Britain lost gradually its power due to its participation in the Second World
War and it was impossible to maintain the control over India. Therefore, the colonized country threatened
Britain it would be a war if they didnt transferred the power to Indian hands in a peaceful way.
Kenya, Uganda and Tanganyika became independent between 1961 and 1963. The British Empire continued
its incredible reduction. Lets take a look at this gift that shows us the evidence.
However, Britain still maintains the contact with past colonies through informal connections thanks to the
organization known as Commonwealth, although this time nations participate in it freely.
Also to describe the strategy by which the dominant imperial power incorpore, as its own, the territory
or culture surveys and invades.
In fact, post-colonial theory gives importance on the ways in which the dominated or colonized culture can
use the tools of the discourse to make resistence against the political o cultural control.
Writers (examples)
Raja Rao (Indian)- writed in English
Chinua Achebe (Nigerian)- writed in English
James Baldwin (African American)- language that bear the burden of their experience
Ngogi wa Thiongo (Kenya)- writes in Gikuyu
The most potent appropriations are the domains of language and textuality (and its discursive forms). For
example, an Indian writer like Raja Rao or a Nigerian one such as Chinua Achebe write in English in order to
reach the widest possible audience (and not because they considered their mother tongue inappropriate).
Nevertheless, Chinua Achebe (and others) needed to transform English to, as he says, quoting James Baldwin
(an African American writer), make it bear the burden of their experience. This has become one of the most
famous declarations of the power of appropriation in post-colonial discourse.
However, there were writers like Ngugi wa Thiongo (from Kenya) that renounced the language of the
colonizer to write their works in mother tongue (in his case, Gikuyu). He argues that the introduced English
only reaches the educated elite, so that wider audience is just outside the country. His decision of
renouncing English maybe has succeeded because of his reputation as a writer in English.
The colonizing centre is home to science, order and modernity, while the colonized periphery harbors
superstition, chaos, and backwarness, there live the savage colonized who had some opposite concepts.
Following this logic, the colonizing center must control these negative aspects of the periphery in order to
protect them from itself.
Based in geographical and spatial concepts, the dichtonomy might seem to carry the supposed impartiality of
topography, that is why cartography experts constructed maps to represent not the fixity of territories but the
fixity of power.
The colonized subject who travels to the colonizing centre for education or work, matter how long main
remain in the centre, he must eventually return to the periphery.
colonialism to refer to the new forces of global control operating by the elite class was coined by the Ghanaian
as Independence.
Decolonisation of British India:
The campaigns of civil diisobedience led by Gandhi in India during the interwar years had exasperated Great
Britain. India, a poor country but one with a large population, intended to play a role on the world stage by
making itself the primary advocate of neutralist anti-colonialism. However, at the end of the Second World
War the British Government did not have the means to face a new colonial war. It eventually decided to grant
independence to the Indian subcontinent in August 1947, but the period was marked by violent clashes
between the Hindu and Muslim communities.
While Gandhi and Nehru, the main leaders of the Congress Party, advocated Indian unity, the Muslim League,
directed by Ali Jinnah, called for the creation of an independent Muslim state. The violence between the two
sides escalated and degenerated into a civil war. In February 1947, the British decided to evacuate the country,
and on 15 August 1947 it was partitioned into two independent states: India, with a Hindu majority, and
Pakistan, with a Muslim majority. The Republic of India was proclaimed in January 1950, once the
constitution had been drawn up, but it remained a member of the British Commonwealth.
In 1948, two other British possessions, Burma and Ceylon, were granted independence, but Malaya had to
wait until 1957 before it achieved the same status.
of feminist theory and those of post-colonialism discussing similarities between writing the body in
feminism and writing place in post colonialism, similarities between the strategies of bisexuality and
cultural syncreticity.
Moreover, in the 1980, many feminist, like Mohanty, critics that feminism, was therefore charged with failing
to account for or deal adequately with the experiences of third world women. In this respect , the issues
concerning gender face similar problems to those concerned with class.
To end, we could emphasize Sander (connections between race and gender as a consequence of imperial
expansion) which shows how the representations of the African in nineteenth- century European art, medicine
and literature, reinforced the construction of the sexualized female body.
The presence of male or female, black servents was regularly included in paintings, plays and operas as a sign
of illicit sexual activity.
By the nineteenth century, the sexuality of the black, both male and female, becomes an icon for deviant
sexuality in general. Furthermore, the relationship between the sexuality white woman enters a new dimension
when contemporary scientific discourse concerning the nature of black female sexuality is examined.
As critics like whitlock have argued, they were perceived reductively not as sexual but as reproductive
subjects, as literal wombs of empire whose function was limited to the population of the new colonies with
white settlers.
Military power. It has the most powerful army, with capacity to act anywhere in the planet.
Cultural. The United States has created a whole industry (cinema, music, fast food or clothes).
Countries as France, the UK, Italy, the Soviet Union and later Nazi Germany tried to spread their influence or
conquer territory but none achieved the status of a global hegemonic power. Only the US and Japan expanded
their influences, the US to Latin America and Japan to East Asia, both after the Second World War.
culture, behaviour, manners and values by the colonized contains both mockery and a certain 'menace', 'so that
mimicry is at once resemblance and menace' (86).
Mimicry reveals the limitation in the authority of colonial discourse, almost as though colonial
authority inevitably embodies the seeds of its own destruction. The line of decent of the 'mimic man' that
emerges in Macaulay's writing, claims Bhabha, can be traced through the work of Kipling, Foster, Orwell and
Naipaul, and is the effect of a flawed colonial mimesis, in which to be Anglicized is ,emphatically, not to be
English.
Mimicry can be both ambivalent and multi-layered. In his novel, The Mimic Men, V.S. Naipaul opens
with a very subtle description of the complexity of mimicry when he describes his landlord.
The narrator not only copies the habits of the landlord, but mimics the guilt of a post-war Europe
concerning the Jews, a guilt that is embedded also in a cultural familiarity with the implications of the name
'Shylock' (The Jew who demanded repayment of a pound of flesh in Shakespeare's Merchant of Venice).
During his reign as President, he was known for his pacifism and his dedication to peasants. Leopold Sedar
Senghor was very interested in arts and literature, African and European, and for that reason he created the
first festival of Black arts.
During that festival he invited artists from all Africa and the Caribbean and he also invited European artists.
This is just an example of how in Senegal it is important to respect others for what they are and not mistreat
them for their difference.