Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Department of Biology, Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Vena pot 111, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
Institute for Adriatic Crops and Karst Reclamation, Put Duilova 11, 21000 Split, Croatia
Joef Stefan Institute, Jamova 39, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
H I G H L I G H T S
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 27 June 2014
Received in revised form 17 October 2014
Accepted 17 October 2014
Available online 5 November 2014
Editor: Charlotte Poschenrieder
Keywords:
Grapevine
Production vineyards
Mineral composition
Agricultural practice
a b s t r a c t
The spatial variability of the mineral composition of grapevines in production vineyards along the east Adriatic
coast was determined and compared between conventional and sustainable vineyard management. Cluster analysis
shows a high level of spatial variability even within the individual locations. Factor analysis reveals three factors with
strong loading for the macronutrients K and P and the micronutrient Mn, which explain 67% of the total variance in
the mineral composition. Here, 26% to 34% of the variance of these three elements can be explained by abiotic and
biotic soil parameters, with soil concentrations of K, Fe and Cu, organic matter content, and vesicular colonisation
showing the strongest effects on the mineral composition of the grapevines. In addition, analysis of the mineral composition data shows signicant differences between differently managed vineyards, with increased bioaccumulation
of P and K in sustainable vineyards, while Zn bioaccumulation was increased in conventional vineyards. Our data
conrm the importance of soil and vineyard management in the concept of terroir, and demonstrate the effects of
sustainable management practices on the mineral nutrition of grapevines that result from modied nutrient availability related to changes in the abiotic and biotic characteristics of the soil.
2014 Published by Elsevier B.V.
1. Introduction
In viticulture, the concept of terroir relates the sensory attributes of
wines to the environmental conditions of the grapes, and it therefore
represents an important descriptor of the connection between wines
and their origins. It encompasses both the natural factors of soil, climate
and topography, and the human role in vineyard management (Van
Leeuven and Seguin, 2006).
The soil is one of the most important factors of the terroir, which
makes it of special interest for the evaluation of the environmental
effects on the mineral composition of grapevines (Van Leeuven and
Seguin, 2006). This mineral composition reects the environment in
which the grapevines are cultivated (Bertoldi et al., 2011; Chopin
et al., 2008; Marengo and Aceto, 2003; Pessanha et al., 2010). As a
Corresponding author. Tel.: +386 1 3203418; fax: +386 1 2573390.
E-mail address: matevz.likar@bf.uni-lj.si (M. Likar).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.10.057
0048-9697/ 2014 Published by Elsevier B.V.
practices, as these support higher AM fungi spore abundance and diversity (Oehl et al., 2004).
In the ongoing effort to develop techniques for wine monitoring,
geochemical ngerprints would greatly improve the traceability of
wines to their origins, particularly as the mineral compositions of grapevines and their products are governed by the soil characteristics and the
cultural practices. As such, evaluation of the mineral composition of
grapevines from conventionally managed vineyards and vineyards
with organic practices under different environmental conditions should
greatly improve the monitoring system.
The main aim of the present study was to assess the inuence of the
soil on the mineral composition of grapevine leaves on the east Adriatic
coast and to evaluate the effects of conventional and sustainable agricultural practices on grapevine mineral composition. For this, grapevines of
the cultivar Mali Plavac (a red wine variety) were sampled in vineyards
along a 250-km-long transect, with the evaluation of: (i) the spatial
variability in the mineral composition of the grapevines in production
vineyards in the east Adriatic Karst region; and (ii) the effects of environment and vineyard management on the mineral composition of
the grapevines. Multivariate statistical techniques were applied to
evaluate the spatial variations in the mineral compositions of the grapevines. Furthermore, the effects of vineyard management practices
(i.e., conventional vs. sustainable) on the grapevine mineral compositions were tested, following the hypothesis that differences in cultivation
practices will inuence the mineral compositions of the grapevines
either directly (due to changes in soil characteristics) or indirectly (as
a result of improved microbiota diversity in organically managed
vineyards).
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Sampling locations
Eight production vineyards from four distinct localities (two
vineyards per wine region) in the Karst region of the east Adriatic area
were selected for sampling. The vineyards are located along a transect
of 250 km that stretches from north to south. The altitudes of the
vineyards range from 50 m to 350 m a.s.l. The climates of all of these
localities are of the Mediterranean type, with most of the annual precipitation in autumn and winter (8001300 mm), and with droughts very
often during the late spring and summer periods.
The bedrock is composed mainly of limestone or dolomite, and it is
covered with stony carbonate soils. The soil texture ranged from clay
loam (Ivan Dolac), to silty clay (Milna) and silt loam (Peljesac). At
Zadar conventionally managed vineyard was located on loam soil, whereas soil in sustainable vineyard had sandy loam texture (Table 1). The soils
have a pH of 7.9 to 8.2, with the exception of the Zadar location, where
725
the vineyard soil has a pH of 6.0 to 6.1. Organic matter content of the
soil ranged around 1.53%, but reached above 5% at the locations of
Ivan Dolac (both vineyards) and Peljesac (sustainable vineyard).
The grapevine coverage of the vineyards is 5% to 10%, with total plant
cover reaching 587% (according to averages of Braun-Blanquet classes).
2.2. Sample collection and analysis
Root samples of ve randomly chosen grapevines and their rhizosphere soil were collected to a depth of 20 cm to 30 cm at each of the
vineyards, in the Summer of 2010. The element compositions of the
grapevines were assessed according to the European criteria for assessment of grapevine elements, which are based on whole-leaf analysis, in
contrast to the American criteria where only the leaf petiole is analysed
(oga et al., 2008).
The soil samples were air dried, sieved to 2 mm, and ground to a ne
powder in an agate mortar. Total organic matter was measured by wet
combustion, according to Kandeler (1995). The plant-available phosphorous was extracted using 0.5 M NaHCO3, and determined photometrically
according to Olsen and Sommers (1982). The soil pH was measured in
soil:water (1:2, v/v) extracts, using deionised water. The soil mineral
composition was measured by energy dispersive X-ray uorescence
spectrometry in soil pellets pressed from 0.5 g powdered soil material,
which were prepared using a pellet die and a hydraulic press. For uorescence excitation, a [109]-Cd annular radioisotope source was used
(300 MBq, 22.1 keV; Isotope Products Laboratories, USA). An X-ray spectrometer was used that was based on a Si (Li) detector (EG and G ORTEC,
USA), with a 25-mm-thick Be window. The energy resolution of the
spectrometer at count rates below 1000 c/s was 175 eV at 5.9 keV.
X-ray uorescence measurements were performed in air, and each
sample was irradiated for 3000 s. The analysis of the X-ray spectra
was performed using AXIL programme (Van Espen and Jansen, 1993),
as included in the QAES software package (Vekemans et al., 1994;
Kump et al., 2007). Quality assurance for the element analysis was performed using standard reference materials: NIST SRM 1573a (tomato
leaves, homogenised powder); CRM 129 (hay powder); and OU-10
(geological sample of longmyndian greywacke, GeoPT24).
The mineral compositions of the leaves were determined by total
reection X-ray spectrometry. For TXRF about 0.1 g of the powdered
material was digested in 3 mL HNO3 in Teon vessels, using the CEM
microwave sample digestion system (MarsX Press). The cooled digests
were diluted to 10 mL with Milli-Q water, and spiked with standard solution of Ga as an internal standard to a nal concentration of 10 g/L
(Golob et al., 2005; Kump et al., 1996; Vogel-Miku et al., 2006). Two
aliquots of 10 L of the resulting sample solutions were deposited
onto quartz sample carrier plates and dried in a dessicator overnight.
For excitation, a focused X-ray beam from a ne-focus X-ray tube
Table 1
Soil physico-chemical characteristics for selected vineyards from four locations under different agricultural practice (conventional, sustainable), with altitude and plant cover (according to
Braun-Blanquet 1964).
Ivan Dolac
Milna
Peljesac
Zadar
Conventional
Sustainable
Conventional
Sustainable
Conventional
Sustainable
Conventional
Sustainable
13.3 3.09
18.4 1.96
69.5 9.08
1090 140
41.3 0.85
103 25
170 28
5.76 0.33
8.02 0.06
Clay loam
45
5
3.77 1.67
21.5 1.39
42.4 10.1
1173 121
43.9 1.85
111 19
124 6
4.09 0.48
8.15 0.05
Clay loam
60
5
1.94 0.2
17.0 2.03
121 10.1
872 179
37.8 1.82
89 9
117 33
1.62 0.18
8.18 0.07
Silty clay
100
87
1.77 0.42
17.1 1.64
15.0 17.1
657 48
35.9 2.27
87 16
132 17
2.03 0.25
8.05 0.08
Silty clay
100
87
4.58 0.62
8.28 2.10
160 15.1
569 71
13.3 2.68
73 27
480 119
2.81 0.17
8.05 0.14
Silt loam
90
5
0.28 0.11
9.00 2.47
123 41.2
511 31
20.5 5.78
63 20
83 28
9.39 2.54
7.87 0.05
Silt loam
100
5
5.77 0.62
12.8 2.66
105 12.5
487 54
18.8 3.36
51 11
131 7
1.44 0.21
6.00 0.16
Loam
300
5
0.37 0.08
10.2 2.44
44.1 1.62
379 41
22.8 3.19
41 9
51 2
1.73 0.21
6.10 0.08
Sandy loam
300
5
726
different size classes of soil particles (for raw data see Radi et al.,
2014) and mineral concentrations in grapevine leaves were used.
2.7. Nonparametric multidimensional scaling and perMANOVA analysis
The compositional dissimilarity was estimated using the BrayCurtis
dissimilarity matrix of the mineral compositions between the samples,
and pair-wise dissimilarities between the samples were analysed
using a non-metric multidimensional scaling plot. Nonparametric
multidimensional scaling was performed with the metaMDS function
of the R Vegan package (Oksanen et al., 2010). To explore the relative
importance of the measured environmental factors for the mineral
compositions of the grapevine leaves, unconstrained ordination was
performed, with the subsequent tting of the environmental variables.
The function envt from the Vegan library (Oksanen et al., 2010) was
used to identify the variables that were signicantly correlated with
the mineral compositions of the grapevine leaves. The signicance of
the correlations was assessed by comparing the R2 t to R2 values generated via 1000 random permutations of the environmental variables.
The BrayCurtis dissimilarity matrices obtained from the mineral
datasets were analysed in a hierarchical experimental design (with the
location of the vineyard or the agricultural practice as the grouping factor), using permutational multivariate analysis of variance (perMANOVA,
see Anderson, 2001). The analysis of variance was performed with the
adonis function of the R Vegan package 2.0-10 (Oksanen et al., 2010),
using 999 permutations. The possibility of signicant effects arising due
to differences in multivariate dispersion rather than compositional
change was excluded on the basis of the beta diversity measurements
within and between groups (using the betadisper function from the
Vegan package).
3. Results
The data for soil physico-chemical analyses, the grapevine leaf
element analyses, and the colonisation estimations are presented in
Table 1 and Online resources 12.
3.1. Spatial variability of mineral composition
Hierarchical clustering was performed for the similarity of the
vineyards based on the mineral compositions of the grapevine leaves.
The cluster analysis of vineyards provided a dendrogram (Fig. 1) in
which only the vineyards from Ivan Dolac were grouped together. The
vineyard pairs (conventional and sustainable) from all of the other locations were in separate groups. With two exceptions (Ivan Dolac conventional, Zadar sustainable), the locations of the conventional vineyards
showed above average z-scores, and those for the sustainable vineyards
were below average. The highest dissimilarity to average values (extreme
z values; Fig. 1, intensive colours) was observed with the z-scores obtained for the Zadar and Peljesac sustainable vineyards, and the Milna
conventional vineyards.
The cluster analysis of the minerals measured in the grapevine
leaves formed two larger clusters, with the rst cluster containing the
macronutrients K and P and the micronutrients Fe and Mn. The second
cluster was composed of micronutrient Zn and macronutrient Ca.
PCA was applied to the normalised grapevine mineral data from the
leaves, to compare the compositional patterns between the vineyard
samples and to identify potential factors that inuenced each of these.
As the scree plot did not have a clear drop-off (data not shown), we
experimented with a range of factor counts near the optimal coordinate
index (as calculated by nScree in the nFactors R-project library), with
three factors nalised, which corresponded to the number of PCs with
eigenvalues N1.0. A varimax rotation (raw) of the PCs to three different
variance factors (VFs) explained about 67% of the total variance
(Table 2). According to Liu et al. (2003), the factor loadings were classied
as strong, moderate, and weak, as those corresponding to absolute
727
Fig. 1. Heat map of the median elemental abundances (quantied as moderated z-scores) of the clusters generated using complete linkage hierarchical clustering based on Euclidean
distances for the mineral compositions of the grapevine leaves. The dendrogram represents the relationships between vineyards (rows) and minerals (columns), with the colour in the
intersections representing the magnitude of abundance: green and yellow if median for elements is b0; dark orange and red if median for elements is N0.
Table 2
Rotated factor loadings of variables from the leaf mineral composition dataset of grapevines on the rst three rotated PCs.
Variable
P
K
Ca
Fe
Mn
Zn
Eigenvalue
% total variance
Cumulative variance (%)
VF1
VF2
VF3
1.00
0.33
0.41
0.52
0.99
1.55
26
26
0.90
0.52
0.38
0.42
1.25
21
47
Communality
0.99
0.93
0.46
0.41
0.99
0.20
1.20
20
67
Bold values represent strong loadings. Loadings below 0.30 are not included.
728
Table 3
Results of the multiple regressions for leaf P, K and Mn.
Leaf accumulated element
P
Constant
P
OM
pH
K
Ca
Fe
Cu
Zn
AC
VC
MSC
Mn
VIF
Estimate
SE
Estimate
SE
Estimate
SE
1.63E+06
1.66E+03
1.80E+04
1.53E+05
1.62E+01
5.57E01
3.00E+00
3.34E+02
2.79E+03
4.40E+03
3.17E+03
1.82E+04
5.67E+05
7.85E+03
1.27E+04
1.09E+05
1.89E+01
1.10E+00
9.90E+00
4.08E+02
2.13E+03
3.41E+03
4.34E+03
3.01E+04
2.876
0.211
1.418
1.408
0.855
0.505
0.303
0.818
1.311
1.288
0.730
0.605
0.008
0.834
0.169
0.172
0.401
0.618
0.764
0.422
0.202
0.210
0.472
0.551
1.52E+07
2.71E+03
5.22E+04
1.08E+06
3.40E+02
1.30E+01
1.27E+02
7.85E+03
9.92E+03
2.92E+04
8.30E+03
2.87E+05
6.05E+06
8.38E+04
1.35E+05
1.16E+06
2.02E+02
1.18E+01
1.06E+02
4.36E+03
2.27E+04
3.64E+04
4.63E+04
3.21E+05
2.505
0.032
0.386
0.931
1.686
1.100
1.201
1.803
0.437
0.803
0.179
0.895
0.019
0.975
0.703
0.361
0.105
0.282
0.242
0.084
0.666
0.430
0.859
0.380
8.07E+05
1.26E+03
5.91E+03
1.06E+05
1.68E+01
8.66E01
1.12E+01
1.73E+02
2.64E+02
1.17E+03
1.93E+03
7.03E+03
2.04E+05
2.82E+03
4.55E+03
3.90E+04
6.78E+00
3.96E01
3.55E+00
1.47E+02
7.63E+02
1.22E+03
1.56E+03
1.08E+04
3.965
0.447
1.299
2.723
2.474
2.186
3.162
1.179
0.345
0.952
1.238
0.652
b0.001
0.659
0.206
0.012
0.021
0.039
0.004
0.250
0.733
0.350
0.228
0.521
1.871
2.209
11.556
10.738
5.487
15.001
3.310
4.504
1.600
2.369
2.521
VF2
VF3
VF4
VF5
0.56
0.88
0.86
0.86
0.77
0.82
0.40
0.93
0.79
0.81
0.89
0.68
3.53
29
29
0.68
1.75
15
44
1.61
13
57
1.35
11
69
Communality
0.53
0.94
0.84
0.96
0.69
0.74
0.91
0.99
0.69
0.83
0.59
0.58
1.05
9
78
Bold values represent strong loadings. Loadings below 0.30 are not included.
729
Table 5
Results of multiple regressions for leaf P, K and Mn based on factor analysis.
Leaf accumulated element
P
Constant
VF1
VF2
VF3
VF4
VF5
Mn
VIF
Estimate
SE
Estimate
SE
Estimate
SE
588.72
49.47
36.89
93.89
59.53
20.43
27.16
28.28
28.8
28.72
30.8
30.15
21.679
1.75
1.281
3.269
1.933
0.677
b2.00E16
0.090
0.210
0.003
0.063
0.503
7263.9
872.9
799.8
172.6
134.7
390.9
284.6
296.3
301.8
300.9
322.8
316
25.526
2.946
2.65
0.574
0.417
1.237
b2.00E16
0.006
0.013
0.571
0.679
0.226
109.147
19.310
15.612
12.096
52.265
0.560
11.084
11.542
11.754
11.722
12.572
12.308
9.847
1.673
1.328
1.032
4.157
0.046
6.54E11
0.105
0.194
0.310
b0.001
0.964
1.005
1.003
1.014
1.011
1.002
Table 6
Bioaccumulation factors for the elements accumulated in grapevine leaves calculated as the ratios between leaf concentrations and soil concentrations.
Location
Management
Ivan Dolac
Conventional
Sustainable
Conventional
Sustainable
Conventional
Sustainable
Conventional
Sustainable
44.3
254
262
274
160
4575
117
2595
Milna
Peljesac
Zadar
6.01
106
43.9
77.8
24.7
1880
23.6
593
0.33
0.25
0.43
0.47
0.72
1.13
0.51
0.95
Ca
0.03
0.03
0.06
0.05
0.04
0.21
0.11
0.10
0.32
0.62
0.26
0.13
0.14
0.12
4.32
4.21
Mn
0.02
0.14
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.02
1.32
0.34
0.05
0.05
0.26
0.21
0.13
0.04
0.31
0.55
Fe
0.004
0.004
0.04
0.04
0.003
0.004
0.15
0.12
0.003
0.002
0.003
0.002
0.007
0.004
0.005
0.009
Zn
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.14
0.16
0.64
0.21
1.12
0.27
1.75
0.56
0.02
0.01
0.39
0.03
0.23
0.05
0.31
0.02
730
Table 7
Results of the perMANOVA analysis and beta-diversity tests for the mineral compositions
of the grapevine leaves, using general location, management practice, and their interaction
as the source of diversity.
Factor
Location
Management practice
Location management practice
perMANOVA
2
Beta-diversity test
5.512
14.034
5.358
0.221
0.188
0.215
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.161
0.135
0.643
(Likar et al., 2013; present study) indicates the need for a more sustainable approach in vineyard soil management, which should be directed towards supporting the complex intimate relationship between soil biotic
and abiotic properties, in order to achieve optimised grapevine functioning. Furthermore with promotion of healthy AM fungal communities in
agricultural ecosystems, increased concentration of benecial elements
in crop plants (Lehmann et al., 2014) (and/or its bioavailability to
humans) could be achieved in a sustainable way.
In conclusion, our data demonstrate the high impact of the location
characteristics on the mineral composition of the grapevine leaves, with
K, P and Mn explaining two-thirds of the variance between samples. All
of these three elements are important grapevine nutrients and they can
be decient in calcareous soils. Furthermore, not only abiotic, but also
biotic soil factors like AM fungi colonisation, have strong impact on the
mineral composition of the grapevines. In addition to the soil characteristics, the management practices are conrmed as important factors for the
terroir, as these inuenced the bioaccumulation of specic macronutrients and micronutrients.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Peter Kump and Andreja Redek for the help with
the X-ray uorescence analyses. This study was supported by the
Slovenian Research Agency (ARRS) through the Plant Biology Programme group (P1-0212), and Unity through the Knowledge Fund,
Croatia (UKF, grant no 53). Dr Chris Berrie is acknowledged for English
revision of the manuscript.
Fig. 2. Non-metric multidimensional scaling plots of grapevine leaf mineral compositions according to the individual vineyards (a) and with overlaid soil variables (b). Abbreviations in the
middle of the centroids represent the locations of the vineyards: ID, Ivan Dolac (triangles); M, Milna (upside-down triangles); P, Peljesac (squares); Z, Zadar (circles) and agricultural practice used: C, conventional vineyard (lled symbols); E, sustainable vineyard (empty symbols). (b) The vectors point in the direction of the most rapid change of the parameter with the
length scaled according to the strength of the correlation (only vectors with signicance p b 0.1 are shown). OM, organic matter; V%, vesicular colonisation.
References
Amors JA, Garcia FJ, Sanchez CJ, Prez de los Reyes C, Garca R, Jimenez R. Trace element
distribution in red soils under semiarid Mediterranean environment. Int J Geosci
2011;2:8497.
Anderson MJ. A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral
Ecol 2001;26:3246.
Bavaresco L, Giachino E, Pezzutto S. Grapevine rootstock effects on lime-induced chlorosis,
nutrient uptake and sourcesink relationships. J Plant Nutr 2003;26:145165.
Bertoldi D, Larcher R, Bertamini M, Otto S, Concheri G, Nicolini G. Accumulation and
distribution pattern of macro and microelements and trace elements in Vitis vinifera
L. cv. Chardonnay berries. J Agric Food Chem 2011;59:722436.
Biricolti S, Ferrini F, Rinaldelli E, Tamantini I, Vignozzi N. VAM fungi and soil lime content
inuence rootstock growth and nutrient content. Am J Enol Vitic 1997;48:939.
Brateevec K, Sivilotti P, Vodopivec BM. Soil and foliar fertilization affects mineral contents in Vitis vinifera L. cv. Rebula leaves. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 2013;13:65063.
Braun-Blanquet J. Panzensoziologie: Grundzge der Vegetationskunde (Phytosociology:
Fundamentals of Vegetation Science). Berlin: Springer; 1964.
Bray JR, Curtis JT. An ordination of the upland forest communities of southern Wisconsin.
Ecol Monogr 1957;27:32549.
Cheng X, Baumgartner K. Effects of mycorrhizal roots and extraradical hyphae on 15N uptake from vineyard cover crop litter and the soil microbial community. Soil Biol
Biochem 2006;38:266575.
Chopin EIB, Marin B, Mkoungafoko R, Rigaux A, Hopgood MJ, Delannoy E, et al. Factors affecting distribution and mobility of trace elements (Cu, Pb, Zn) in a perennial grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) in the Champagne region of France. Environ Pollut 2008;156:
10928.
oga L, Slunjski S, usti M, Gunjaa J, osi T. Phosphorous dynamics in grapevine on
acid and calcareous soils. Alps-Adria Scientic Workshop, Stara Lesna, Slovakia; 2008.
oga L, Slunjski S, Herak usti M, Horvat T, Petek M, Gunjaa J. Effect of soil pH reaction
on manganese content and dynamics in grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.). Acta Horticult
2010;868:2038.
Daz I, Barrn V, del Campillo MC, Torrent J. Testing the ability of vivianite to prevent iron
deciency in pot-grown grapevine. Sci Hortic 2010;123:4648.
Eissenstat DM. Costs and benets of constructing roots of small diameter. J Plant Nutr
1992;15:76382.
Geering HR, Hodgson JF, Solans C. Micronutrient cation complexes in soil solution. Soil Sci
Soc Am J 1969;38:815.
Golob T, Doberek U, Kump P, Neemer M. Determination of trace and minor elements in
Slovenian honey by total reection X-ray uorescence spectroscopy. Food Chem
2005;91:593600.
Goslee SC, Urban DL. The ecodist package for dissimilarity based analysis of ecological
data. J Stat Softw 2007;22:119.
Gruber B, Kosegarten H. Depressed growth of non-chlorotic vine grown in calcareous soil is
an iron deciency symptom prior to leaf chlorosis. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 2001;165:1117.
Havlin JL, Kissel DE, Maddux LD, Claassen MM, Long JH. Crop rotation and tillage effects
on soil organic carbon and nitrogen. Soil Sci Soc Am J 1990;54:44852.
Havlin JL, Beaton JD, Tisdale SL, Nelson WL. Soil fertility and fertilizers. London: Prentice-Hall
International Ltd; 1999.
Heintze SG. Studies on soil manganese. J Soil Sci 1957;8:287300.
Helena B, Pardo R, Vega M, Barrado E, Fernandez J, Fernandez L. Temporal evolution of
groundwater composition in an alluvial aquifer (Pisuerga River, Spain) by principal
component analysis. Water Res 2000;34:80716.
Hodge A, Campbell CD, Fitter AH. An arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus accelerates decomposition and acquires nitrogen directly from organic material. Nature 2001;413:2979.
Humphries J, Stangoulis J, Graham R. Manganese. In: Barker A, Pilbeam D, editors. Handbook of plant nutrition. New York: Taylor and Francis; 2007. p. 35166.
Jackson RS. Wine science. Principles and applications. London: Elsevier; 2008.
Kandeler E. Organic matter by wet combustion. In: Schinner F, hlinger R, Kandeler E,
Margesin R, editors. Methods in soil biology. Berlin: Springer; 1995. p. 3978.
Karagiannidis N, Nikolaou N. Arbuscular mycorrhizal root infection as an important factor
of grapevine nutrition status. Multivariate analysis application for evaluation and
characterization of the leaf and soil parameters. Agrochimica 1999;43:15165.
Kump P, Neemer M, Smodi B, Jaimovi R. Multielement analysis of rubber samples by
X-ray uorescence. Appl Spectrosc 1996;50:13737.
Kump P, Neemer M, Vogel-Miku K, Rupnik Z, Ponikvar D, Pelicon P. Improvement of the
XRF quantication and enhancement of the combined applications by EDXRF and
Micro PIXE. First research co-ordination meeting under coordinated research project
on Unication of nuclear spectrometries: integrated techniques as a new tool for
materials research. Vienna: IAEA; 2007. p. 915.
Lehmann A, Veresoglou S, Leifheit EF, Rillig MC. Arbuscular mycorrhizal inuence on zinc
nutrition in crop plants a meta-analysis. Soil Biol Biochem 2014;69:12331.
Likar M, Hanevi K, Radi T, Regvar M. Distribution and diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal
fungi in grapevines from production vineyards along the eastern Adriatic coast. Mycorrhiza 2013;23:20919.
Linderman RG, Davis EA. Comparative response of selected grapevine rootstocks and cultivars to inoculation with different mycorrhizal fungi. Am J Enol Vitic 2001;52:811.
731
Liu C-W, Lin K-H, Kuo Y-M. Application of factor analysis in the assessment of groundwater
quality in a blackfoot disease area in Taiwan. Sci Total Environ 2003;313:7789.
Mackie KA, Mller T, Zikeli S, Kandeler E. Long-term copper application in an organic
vineyard modies spatial distribution of soil micro-organisms. Soil Biol Biochem
2013;65:24553.
Mdder P, Edenhofer S, Boller T, Wiemken A, Niggli U. Arbuscular mycorrhizae in a longterm eld trial comparing low-input (organic, biological) and high-input (conventional)
farming systems in a crop rotation. Biol Fertil Soils 2000;31:1506.
Marengo E, Aceto M. Statistical investigation of the differences in the distribution of
metals in Nebbiolo-based wines. Food Chem 2003;81:62130.
Marschner H. Mineral nutrition of higher plants. London: Academic Press; 1995.
McBride MB. Electron spin resonance investigation of Mn2+ complexation in natural and
synthetic organics. Soil Sci Soc Am J 1982;46:113743.
McGonigle TP, Miller MH, Evans DG, Fairchild GL, Swan JA. A new method which gives
and objective measure of colonization of roots by vesiculararbuscular mycorrhizal
fungi. New Phytol 1990;115:495501.
Menge JA, Raski DJ, Lider LA, Johnson ELV, Jones NO, Kissler JJ, et al. Interaction between
mycorrhizal fungi, soil fumigation and growth of grapes in California. Am J Enol Vitic
1983;34:11721.
Mengel K. Potassium. In: Barker AV, Pilbeam DJ, editors. Handbook of plant nutrition. Boca
Ranton: CRC Press; 2007. p. 91120.
Neter J, Wasserman W, Kutner MH. Applied Linear Regression Models. Homewood, IL:
Irwin; 1989.
Oehl F, Sieverding E, Mder P, Dubois D, Ineichen K, Boller T, et al. Impact of long-term
conventional and organic farming on the diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi.
Oecologia 2004;138:57483.
Oehl F, Sieverding E, Ineichen K, Ris E-A, Boller T, Wiemken A. Community structure of
arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi at different depths in extensively and intensively
managed agroecosystems. New Phytol 2005;165:27383.
Oksanen JF, Blanchet G, Kindt R, Legendre P, O'Hara RB, Simpson GL, et al. Vegan: community ecology package. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan, 2010. [R package
version 1.17-4].
Olsen SR, Sommers LE. Phosphorus. In: Page AL, Miller RH, Keeney DR, editors.
Methods of soil analysis, part 2. Am Soc AgronMadison, Wisconsin: Soil Sci Soc AM;
1982. p. 40330.
Pessanha S, Carvalho ML, Becker M, Von Bohlen A. Quantitative determination on heavy
metals in different stages of wine production by total reection X-ray uorescence
and energy dispersive X-ray uorescence: comparison on two vineyards. Food
Chem 2010;112:2634.
Phillips JM, Hayman DS. Improved procedure of clearing roots and staining parasitic and
vesiculararbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for rapid assessment of infection. Trans Br
Mycol Soc 1970;55:15961.
Pohl P. What do metals tell us about wine? Trends Anal Chem 2007;26:9419.
Radi T, Hanevi K, Likar M, Protega I, Jug-Dujakovi M, Bogdanovi I. Neighbouring
weeds inuence the formation of arbuscular mycorrhiza in grapevine. Symbiosis
2012;56:11120.
Radi T, Likar M, Hanevi K, Bogdanovi I, Paskovi I. Occurrence of root endophytic fungi
in organic versus conventional vineyards on the Croatian coast. Agric Ecosyst Environ
2014;192:11521.
Rogiers S, Greer D, Hateld J, Orchards B, Keller M. Mineral sinks within ripening grape
berries (Vitis vinifera L.). Vitis 2006;45:11523.
Sanchez CA. Phosphorus. In: Barker AV, Pilbeam DJ, editors. Handbook of plant nutrition.
Boca Ranton: CRC Press; 2007. p. 5190.
Schreiner RP. Mycorrhizas and mineral acquisition in grapevines. In: Christensen LP,
Smart DR, editors. Proceedings of the Soil Environment and Vine Mineral Nutrition
Symposium; 2005. p. 4960.
Steenwerth K, Belina KM. Cover crops enhance soil organic matter, carbon dynamics and microbiological function in a vineyard agroecosystem. Appl Soil Ecol 2008;40:35969.
Storey JB. Zinc. In: Barker AV, Pilbeam DJ, editors. Handbook of plant nutrition. Boca
Ranton: CRC Press; 2007. p. 91120.
Van Espen PJM, Jansen KHA. Spectrum evaluation. In: Van Grieken RE, Markowicz AA, editors. Handbook of X-ray spectrometry. New York: M. Decker Inc.; 1993. p. 181293.
Van Leeuven C, Seguin G. The concept of terroir in viticulture. J Wine Res 2006;17:110.
Vega M, Pardo R, Barrado E, Deban L. Assessment of seasonal and polluting effects on the
quality of river water by exploratory data analysis. Water Res 1998;32:358192.
Vekemans B, Janssens K, van Espen P, Adams F. Quantitative X-ray Analysis System
(QXAS). Vienna, Austria: Distributed by the International Atomic Energy Agency;
1994.
Vogel-Miku K, Pongrac P, Kump P, Neemer M, Regvar M. Colonisation of a Zn, Cd and Pb
hyperaccumulator Thlaspi praecox Wulfen with indigenous arbuscular mycorrhizal
fungal mixture induces changes in heavy metal and nutrient uptake. Environ Pollut
2006;139:36271.
White RE. Understanding vineyard soils. Oxford Press; 2009.
Wooldridge J, Louw PJE, Conradie WJ. Effects of rootstock on grapevine performance, petiole and must composition, and overall wine score of Vitis vinifera cv. Chardonnay and
Pinot Noir. 31. S Afr J Enol Viticult; 2010. p. 458.