Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
By Bruce S. McEwen
Abstract
The brain is the central organ of stress and adaptation. Brain circuits are
remodeled by stress so as to change the ability to self-regulate anxiety and mood
and to perform working and episodic memory, as well as executive function and
decisionmaking. The brain regulates the body via the neuroendocrine,
autonomic, immune, and metabolic systems, and the mediators of these systems
and those within the brain and other organs activate epigenetic programs that
alter expression of genetic information so as to change cellular and organ
function. While the initial active response to stressors promotes adaptation
("allostasis"), there can be cumulative change (e.g., body fat, hypertension) from
chronic stress and a resulting unhealthy lifestyle ("allostatic load"), which may
lead to disease, e.g. diabetes, cardiovascular disease ("allostatic overload").
Besides early life experiences, the most potent of stressors are those arising from
the social and physical environment, and these can affect both brain and body.
Gradients of socioeconomic status generally reflect the cumulative burden of
coping with limited resources, toxic environments, and negative life events, as
the quality of early experiences, the most potent of stressors that influence adult
life are those arising from the family, neighborhood, workplace, and exposure to
local, national, and international events in the media that can affect both brain
and body health and progression toward a variety of diseases. Social ordering in
human society is associated with gradients of disease, with an increasing
frequency of mortality and morbidity along a gradient of decreasing income and
education (socioeconomic status, SES).a Although the causes of these gradients
of health are very complex, they likely reflect, with increasing frequency going
down the SES ladder, the cumulative burden of coping with limited resources,
toxic and otherwise stressful living environments, and negative life events, as
well as differences in health-related behaviors (aka "lifestyle") that result in
chronic activation of physiological systems involved in adaptation leading to
allostatic overload.2
Thus, the behavioral and social sciences have increasingly important roles in the
evolution of our knowledge about brain-body interactions over the life course in
the area known now as "social neuroscience." Because of the multiple levels of
interaction from the physical and social environment down to individual health
behaviors and the impact of all of these upon the physiology of the body and
internal workings of the brain, interventions must occur at multiple levels. This
topic will be discussed in relation to our increasing knowledge of the potential
for brain plasticity as influenced by "top down," that is, integrative, behavioral,
and societal interventions facilitated by activities like exercise that increase the
potential for plasticity. This is particularly important in discussions about
understanding the origins of diseases and improving health and health care in
view of the "lifecourse health development" perspective that is now superseding
the "biopsychosocial" and "germs, genes, and biomedical" models of the past.3
Indeed, what happens at each stage of development, with particular potency
early in life, has influences upon the trajectory that brain and body development
take as the life course unfolds.
Determinants of Physical and Mental Health
There are many aspects of life experiences that influence physical and mental
health, and the brain is central to all of them (Figure 1).4 Social stressors include
trauma and abuse, major life events, and the daily experiences of work, family,
neighborhood, and ongoing events in one's city, State, nation, and world. The
brain processes all of this and determines the behavioral and physiological
responses. Behavioral responses include quality and quantity of sleep and healthdamaging behaviors, such as eating too much, smoking and substance abuse,
including alcohol, as well as health promoting behaviors, such as regular physical
activity and social integration and social support. Physiological responses that are
Source: McEwen BS. Protective and damaging effects of stress mediators. NEJM
1998;338(3):171-9. Used with permission.
The brain regulates neuroendocrine, autonomic, immune, and metabolic systems
and the mediators of these systems interact in a non-linear manner.10 The
concepts of allostasis and allostatic load/overload concern the protective, as well
as potentially damaging, effects of the mediators of stress and adaptation, and
they reflect a life course perspective that recognizes the power of the social
environment and the health behaviors adopted by individuals. These concepts
also include genetic contributions, and they recognize the central role of the
brain and the importance of reciprocal brain-body interactions.4,11
The distinction between AL and overload is based on the severity of the outcome
allostatic load refers to cumulative change in biomarkers, whereas allostatic
overload signifies cumulative change that has pathophysiological consequences.2
In the natural world, bears putting on fat for the winter develop an AL in terms
of body fat that they burn off during hibernation; a bear in a zoo, overfed and
physically inactive, can develop an allostatic overload that involves diabetes and
cardiovascular disease. Migrating salmon present another example of AL in the
natural world; they die after spawning due, in part, to a massive over-secretion
of glucocorticoids.2
Measuring allostasis and allostatic load/overload requires biomarkers that tap
into multiple interactive systems and look at the brain, as well as systemic
physiology.1214 These biomarkers tap into measures of the multiple interacting
mediators that affect many body systems concurrently, including measures of
blood pressure, metabolic parameters (glucose, insulin, lipid profiles, and waist
circumference), markers of inflammation (interleukin-6, C-reactive protein, and
fibrinogen), heart rate variability, sympathetic nervous system activity (12-hour
urinary norepinephrine and epinephrine), and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal
axis activity (diurnal salivary free cortisol).14 Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA)
and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) have been used as positive markers of
health. Choice of markers is limited by their cost and accessibility in studies
involving large numbers of subjects. Telomeres and telomerase have been added
as another endpoint of cumulative effect.15,16
Biomarkers for allostasis and allostatic load/overload fall into different classes:
primary, secondary, tertiary.17 Primary mediators include cortisol, sympathetic
and parasympathetic activity, pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines, metabolic
hormones, and neurotransmitters and neuromodulators in the nervous system.
Secondary mediators are those that reflect the cumulative actions of the primary
mediators in a tissue/organ-specific manner, often reflecting the actions of more
than one primary mediator, such as those described above: e.g. those that reflect
abnormal metabolism and risk for cardiovascular disease, such as waste-hip ratio,
blood pressure, glycosylated hemoglobin, cholesterol/high-density lipoprotein
(HDL) ratio, and HDL cholesterol, as well as telomere length and telomerase
activity.
In the realm of neuroimaging, secondary outcomes include functional activation
of a set of brain regions that appear to define subtypes of anxiety disorder18 and
hypo- or hyperactivation of the insula region of the brain that defines
outcomes compared to less reactive alleles, even though those same alleles can
enhance adverse outcomes in a stressful early life environment.63-65 Regarding
adverse outcomes and "good and bad environments," allostatic processes are
adjusted via epigenetic influences to optimize the individual's adaptation to, and
resulting fitness for, a particular environment, whether more or less threatening
or nurturing.66 Yet, there are "trade-offs" in terms of physical and mental health
that, on the one hand, may increase the likelihood of passing on one's genes by
improving coping with adversity and enhancing mental health and overall
reproductive success, but on the other hand, may impair later health, e.g., by
eating of "comfort foods" (for example Jackson, et al).67 Moreover, when an
individual faces a new challenge, there is the question of resilience in terms of
the ability to show experience-related adaptation, for example, when an
individual from a safe environment is placed into a dangerous one or vice versa.
This brings up the question of plasticity, particularly in brain architecture that is
so fundamental to brain and body health, and there is both old and new
evidence that glucocorticoids, often thought of in a negative sense in relation to
stress effects, play an important role in the ability of the brain to adapt to new
challenges and possibly also to remediate deficits associated with stress over the
life course.
Role of Glucocorticoids and Other Mediators in Brain Plasticity
The discovery of receptors for glucocorticoids in the hippocampus has led to
many investigations in animal models and translation to the human brain using
modern imaging methods that show the degree to which the brain, on the one
hand, may be damaged by excessive glucocorticoids, but on the other hand, the
beneficial role that they play in adaptive plasticity together with other
mediators.30 Glucocorticoids thus provide insights into brain plasticity, as well as
the more negative side related to AL and overload.
The most striking findings from animal models have identified structural
plasticity in the hippocampus, consisting of ongoing neurogenesis in the dentate
gyrus68 and remodeling of dendrites and synapses in the major neurons of
Ammon's horn.17 The mediators of this plasticity include excitatory amino acids69
and glucocorticoids, along with a growing list of other mediators, such as
oxytocin, corticotrophin releasing factor, brain derived neurotrophic factor
(BDNF), lipocalin-2, and tissue plasminogen activator (tPA).30,33 Moreover,
glucocorticoid actions involve both genomic and non-genomic mechanisms that
implicate mineralocorticoid, as well as glucocorticoid, receptors and their
translocation to mitochondria, as well as to cell nuclei, and an as-yet unidentified
G-protein coupled membrane receptor related to endocannabinoid
production.7072
allow people to make choices that improve their chances for a healthy life.12 This
point was made by the Acheson report of the British Government in 1998,116
which recognized that no public policy of virtually any kind should be enacted
without considering the implications for the health of all citizens. Thus, basic
education, housing, taxation, setting of a minimum wage, and addressing
occupational health and safety and environmental pollution regulations are all
likely to affect health via a myriad of mechanisms. At the same time, providing
higher quality food and making it affordable and accessible in poor, as well as in
affluent neighborhoods will be necessary for people to eat better, providing they
also learn what types of food to eat.117 Likewise, making neighborhoods safer
and more congenial and supportive can improve opportunities for positive social
interactions and increased recreational physical activity.118,119 However,
government policies are not the only way to reduce allostatic load. for example,
businesses that encourage healthy lifestyle practices among their employees are
likely to gain reduced health insurance costs and possibly a more loyal
workforce.120-122
Conclusion
Biomedical science has progressed from the concept of identifying and treating
single causes of disease, as in the germ theory, to the recognition of multiple risk
factors, as in the biopsychosocial model, and now to "lifecourse health
development" that recognizes multiple contributing factors from genes and
experiences over the life course that epigenetically alter trajectories of health
and disease.3 At the same time, the behavioral and social sciences are
recognizing that "biology is not destiny," and that social and behavioral
influences continually affect the body through the brain. Together with
recognition of the central role of the brain and behavior (Figure 1), the emerging
science of "epigenetics" recognizes the continuing role of the physical and social
environments, and of behavior, in getting "under the skin" to shape expression
of inherited characteristics in a continuous and evolving manner over an
individual's lifespan. The complexities and degrees of freedom made possible by
the many ways that "epigenetics" affects expression of the genetic blueprint
make it essential that the social and behavioral sciences work closely with the
biological sciences to achieve better understanding of brain and body function
for the good of our own species and all living creatures on this earth.
Author's Affiliation
Bruce S. McEwen, PhD, is the Alfred E. Mirsky Professor of Neuroscience and runs
the Harold and Margaret Milliken Hatch Laboratory of Neuroendocrinology at
Rockefeller University.
33. McEwen BS. Stress, sex, and neural adaptation to a changing environment:
mechanisms of neuronal remodeling. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2010;
1204(Suppl):E38-59.
34. Juster RP, Bizik G, Picard M, et al. A transdisciplinary perspective of chronic
stress in relation to psychopathology throughout life span development.
Dev Psychopathol 2011; 23:725-76.
35. Lupien SJ, McEwen BS, Gunnar MR, et al. Effects of stress throughout the
lifespan on the brain, behaviour and cognition. Nature Rev Neurosci 2009;
10:434-45.
36. Felitti VJ, Anda RF, Nordenberg D, et al. Relationship of childhood abuse
and household dysfunction to many of the leading causes of death in
adults. The adverse childhood experiences (ACE) study. Am J Prev Med
1998; 14:245-58.
37. Levine S, Haltmeyer G, Kara G, et al. Physiological and behavioral effects of
infantile stimulation. Physiol Behav 1967; 2:55-59.
38. Meaney MJ, Szyf M. Environmental programming of stress responses
through DNA methylation: life at the interface between a dynamic
environment and a fixed genome. Dialogues Clin Neurosci 2005; 7:103-23
39. Akers KG, Yang Z, DelVecchio DP, et al. Social competitiveness and
plasticity of neuroendocrine function in old age: influence of neonatal
novelty exposure and maternal care reliability. PLoS ONE 2008; 3(7):e2840.
40. Tang AC, Akers KG, Reeb BC, et al. Programming social, cognitive, and
neuroendocrine development by early exposure to novelty. Proc Natl Acad
Sci USA 2006; 103:15716-21.
41. Parker KJ, Buckmaster CL, Sundlass K, et al. Maternal mediation, stress
inoculation, and the development of neuroendocrine stress resistance in
primates. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006; 103:3000-5.
42. Isgor C, Kabbaj M, Akil H, et al. Delayed effects of chronic variable stress
during peripubertal-juvenile period on hippocampal morphology and on
cognitive and stress axis functions in rats. Hippocampus 2004; 14:636-48.
43. Moriceau S, Sullivan R. Maternal presence serves as a switch between
learning fear and attraction in infancy. Nature Neurosci 2006; 8:1004-6.
44. Coplan JD, Smith ELP, Altemus M, et al. Variable foraging demand rearing:
sustained elevations in cisternal cerebrospinal fluid corticotropin-releasing
factor concentrations in adult primates. Biol Psychiat 2001; 50:200-4.
45. Kaufman D, Smith ELP, Gohil BC, et al. Early appearance of the metabolic
syndrome in socially reared bonnet macaques. J Clin Endocrin Metab 2005;
90:404- 8.
46. Danese A, McEwen BS. Adverse childhood experiences, allostasis, allostatic
load, and age-related disease. Physiol Behav 2012; 106:29-39.
47. Danese A, Moffitt TE, Harrington H, et al. Adverse childhood experiences
48.
49.
50.
51.
52.
53.
54.
55.
56.
57.
58.
59.
60.
61.
and adult risk factors for age- related disease: depression, inflammation,
and clustering of metabolic risk markers. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2009;
163:1135-43.
Miller GE, Chen E. Harsh family climate in early life presages the emergence
of a proinflammatory phenotype in adolescence. Psychol Sci 2010; 21:84856.
Evans GW, Gonnella C, Marcynyszyn LA, et al. The role of chaos in poverty
and children's socioemotional adjustment. Psychol Sci 2005; 16:560-5.
Anda RF, Butchart A, Felitti VJ, et al. Building a framework for global
surveillance of the public health implications of adverse childhood
experiences. Am J Prev Med 2010; 39:93-8.
McEwen BS, Tucker P. Critical biological pathways for chronic psychosocial
stress and research opportunities to advance the consideration of stress in
chemical risk assessment. Am J Public Health 2011; 101(Suppl 1):S131-9.
Farah MJ, Shera DM, Savage JH, et al. Childhood poverty: specific
associations with neurocognitive development. Brain Res 2006; 1110: 6674.
Hart B, Risley, TR. 1995. Meaningful differences in the everyday experience
of young American children. Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing Company;
1995. 304 p.
Hanson JL, Chandra A, Wolfe BL, et al. Association between income and
the hippocampus. PLoS One 2011; 6:e18712.
Hanson JL, Hair N, Shen DG, et al. Family poverty affects the rate of human
infant brain growth. PLoS One 2013; 8:e80954.
Kim P, Evans GW, Angstadt M, et al. Effects of childhood poverty and
chronic stress on emotion regulatory brain function in adulthood. Proc Natl
Acad Sci USA 2013; 110:18442-7.
Hanson JL, Adluru N, Chung MK, et al. Early neglect is associated with
alterations in white matter integrity and cognitive functioning. Child Dev
2013; 84:1566- 78.
Gianaros PJ, Horenstein JA, Cohen S, et al. Perigenual anterior cingulate
morphology covaries with perceived social standing. Soc Cogn Affect
Neurosci 2007; 2:161-73.
Gianaros PJ, Horenstein JA, Hariri AR, et al. Potential neural embedding of
parental social standing. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 2008; 3:91-6.
Adler NE, Boyce TW, Chesney MA, et al. Socioeconomic inequalities in
health. JAMA 1993; 269:3140-5.
Lupien SJ, Parent S, Evans AC, et al. Larger amygdala but no change in
hippocampal volume in 10-year-old children exposed to maternal
depressive symptomatology since birth. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011;
108:14324-9.
78.
79.
80.
81.
82.
83.
84.
85.
86.
87.
88.
89.
90.
91.
92.
93.
94.
95.
96.
97.
98.
99.
100.
101.
102.
103.
104.
105.
106.
107.
a.
http://www.macses.ucsf.edu/
b.
Bruce S. McEwen, PhD, is the Alfred E. Mirsky Professor of Neuroscience and heads the
Harold and Margaret Milliken Hatch Laboratory of Neuroendocrinology at Rockefeller
University. As a neuroscientist and neuroendocrinologist, he studies environmentallyregulated, variable gene expression in the brain. His laboratory discovered adrenal
steroid receptors in the hippocampus in 1968. He is a member of the National Academy
of Sciences, the Institute of Medicine, the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, and
the National Council on the Developing Child. Dr. McEwen served as President of the
Society for Neuroscience in 1997-98.