Vincent Cataldi Richard C.

Hoagland: methane hydrate frequency - dissociation

www.facebook.com
www.facebook.com
May 30 at 9:52pm · Comment · Unlike · Share
You and Kathleen Marcelli like this.

Vincent Cataldi
Deepwater Horizon - Draft 1.A

http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=391702826491
May 30 at 9:52pm ·
Delete

Greg Ahrens
Vincent, that ultrasound idea sounds good. Bust up those pesky methane hydrate "ice cubes" just like kidney stones!
May 30 at 10:47pm ·
Delete

Vincent Cataldi
Greg:

That is the method to make them explosively unstable;

I think this is what Roo found HAARP doing; why the 'deep' pressures are surging wildly; belching to clear the vertical rise of the wells in the Gulf, and North Sea; if so, a cascade potential threatens -
especially if energized by 'ultrasound'.
Monday at 12:36am ·
Delete

Roo Reindeer
Your discussion of what amounts to "inter-related non-linear' uncertainties and phase changes is very important. Particularly with people throwing the idea of nukes around. I see from this map here that
the gulf is one area where considerable sources of MH have been located.
http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2008/05/could-methane-t/
you will notice two locations in the gulf, pert near the DH drilling site! How convienient.

There are numerous articles relating to runaway release of methane from warming MH deposits. It really doesn't matter to what cause you attribute global warming. The release of methane will make it
way worse. Although probably not this bad:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Permian-Triassic_extinction_event

Destabilzation of these deposits could be far worse then just the current oil mess. But that raises a new paranoid possibility that the release of that methane may be a goal of this "event".

As far as anything involving HARRP (see disclaimer below) and methane release I hadn't considered that. Stupid me! It might be possible to do that without anyone even really noticing since unlike
earthquakes and volcanoes, it could be a slow subtle heating that would raise no flags until it popped off.

Disclaimer: The "HARRP" I have been writing about has no relationship to the well known "HAARP" organization. Superficial resemblence to HAARP or any other organization living or dead, real or
imaginary is purely coincidental. Like a lot of other things.
Monday at 1:11am ·
Delete

Greg Ahrens
OOPS. I was thinking of breaking up the methane hydrates that were clogging the first containment dome attempt.
But clearly this whole business of extracting volatile fluids and gases from that depth below the ocean surface is crazy.
I thought the CBS 60 Minutes piece said the Deepwater Horizon experiment was the deepest offshore well ever ...See More
Monday at 1:40am ·
Delete

Storm Thor
its good you guys have this all figured out ...
Monday at 1:40am ·
Delete
Vincent Cataldi
Greg: I understood exactly what you were thinking - a logical first thought; I am very pleased you engaged seriously to help with what I see potentially as an important issue for team-work to consider.

Roo: I've been waiting for you :)

I began my 'flash' education explicitly for the reason you state; I saw people "Giving Up" with statements like 'How could it be any worse'?, and 'Russia is laughing at us'; ...See More
Monday at 3:34am ·
Delete

Vincent Cataldi
Vincent Cataldi -> Richard C. Hoagland: Deepwater Horizon - Draft 1.A

http://www.facebook.com/posted.php?id=213984790088&share_id=124936820863159&comments=1#s124936820863159
Monday at 4:02am ·
Delete

Aaron Bathols
Vince....I appluad your tireless, informative research.
Monday at 4:04am ·
Delete

Vincent Cataldi
Insightful Insanity - realized :)
Monday at 4:06am ·
Delete

Vincent Cataldi

All the Seismograms around the planet went crazy - UPDATED

http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=391178956491
Monday at 4:52am ·
Delete

Vincent Cataldi

All the Seismograms around the planet went crazy - GRAPHS

http://www.facebook.com/album.php?aid=15351&id=100000360291470&l=82839344a3
Monday at 6:12am ·
Delete

Roo Reindeer
Vincent:Those seismograms are showing the results of a magnitude 6 in the Phillipines.

http://www.iris.edu/seismon/last30.html

Most of them are the normal response of a large quake. The time delays for the arrival at each station look resonable with regard to distance from the center. I don't know yet if any of the preceding
traces show a precursor or not. I'm looking at them now.

If you look at the post I put further up the page you will see how the precursor data can "disappear". This actually is an innocent artifact of the plotting process, but can be very annoying. I was looking
at some Norway station annomilies with a period of 18.5 to 20 hours..hmmm..when I first noticed it.
Monday at 12:33pm ·
Delete
Vincent Cataldi
Roo:

Thanks; I saved each page individually, and did not also save the image; i hoped that posting one of my many folders of graphs thumbnails - unknown time and date - may prompt you to help me get
what we need to post :)

I do suspect I saved the Ionosphere data for the events properly, so I did not yet post those - but if you can or wish to pass this along too - please.

If I knew where you hid your doorbell; I would have quietly asked more directly with private diplomacy.
Monday at 1:49pm ·
Delete

Roo Reindeer
Vincent: I couldn't see anything obvious this time.
The only oddball stuff is:
ADK Aliutians, Alaska, which is near the you now what transmitter went off just at the start of the Philippine quake, to the minute. it's still off 9.5 hours later.

KONO Norway had strange slow pulses going back to yesterday. I was looking at them beacause they had a group rate of 18-20 hours. But they continue now after the Philippine quake as well.

SDV Venezuela looks like somebody really doen't like poor Hugo!
But none of that shows up on the rest of the Carabean sites. Looks like selective targeting ;-)

Nothing on the Ion stuff either but I don't think that will show up till the 12th or so.

Looks like a natural one, they do happen sometimes :(

ADK going offline at 1016 looks interesting though.
Monday at 2:28pm ·
Delete

Roo Reindeer
Vincent: Glad you brought up Yellowstone. and other super volcanoes. There are other major hotspots that tie into that as well. They seem to be distributed near a great circle path that can be used to
define a "new" equator and an axis of rotation offset from the normal polar axis. I have determined that this axis would have a north pole located atapprox 39 deg lat, and 110-120 long. Not exact but
close.
The really interesting thing is that the Hawaiin hotspot basically remains near the same 19.5 latitude. If you subject the lat-lon coordinate grid of a sphere to an arbitrary rotation you will find that only
ONE point retains it's old latitude co-ordinate in the new co-ordinate system, this is the point that you would be rotating the grid system around.(two points retain their old latitude, 0 deg, if you rotate it
around a point located on the equator, but that is a special case).
This axis causes so many geophysical features to line up on lines of latitude and longitude in the new system in a natural way that I am inclined to think it may represent a natural Axis of Convection for
mantel currents in the earth. The core and mantel may rotate about this offset axis. The Hawaiin hotspot remains at the tetrahedrally important latitude of 19.5 in both systems. The fact that it links them
together may have hyperdimensional consequences.

If the two axies were to be aligned it's possible that the flow of energy from higher dimensions postulated in RCH's Hyperdimensional Physics model could vastly increase. This alignment of "real" and
"hyperdimensional" axes of rotation could be the key to the idea of exploding planets, and the reason the sun puts out it's energy. It's axes seem to almost line up. The normal axis of sunspots (hotspots,
that trace it's inner convective dynamics) lies closer to the physical rotation axis. Our rotational and convective axis seem to be misaligned by roughly 39 deg. Interesting coincidence again :-) Perhaps in
the case of a super-nova you have perfect alignment...whoopee.

If a slow drift of this internal axis, whether at random or somehow linked to rotation around the galaxy or whatever (rotation,rotation,rotation again; the key to higher dimensional flow, masonic 500 etc
;-) were to bring them closer to alignment it could explain a lot of geophysical activity.
Assume for the moment that the present 39 degree offset has been there for a long time and is "safe". Ie our temperature remains near 300 kelvin. Further assume that a near true alignment would light
up the earth like the sun, at least 4000 kelvin even at the surface. If the absolute temperature were proportional to the tangent of the angle of the latitude of the Convective Pole a change of 5 deg would
change the average temperature by 20%, that's roughly 60 kelvin. Our average temp would be 85 C instead of 25. 185 F !!
To change the temp by 20 F, and goodbye icecaps at the very least, would require only about a 10 kelvin increase in absolute temperature that's 3%. The angle would only have to change to 39.8
deg....only 0.8 frickking degrees of offset from the present.
This is only about 55 miles of travel on the surface.
In the process of this core axis shifting a natural consequence would be much more geological activity due to stress induced by torque on the crust which continues to rotate about the "normal" axis. So
you get a double whammy, overal rise in temperatures and much more geophysical activity of a destructive nature.

Last but not least, due to the non linearity of trigonometric functions, if the axial offset is depedent on some sort of galactic positioning, it is possible that the rate of shifting could increase radically in a
sort time span. And it would not take much of a shift to make a big change to begin with.

Most polar shift theories assume you have to shift the whole axis of the earth 30 deg or more (~2000 miles) to have any kind of climatic affect. Questions of how to do this without MAJOR destruction,
way past the "end of civilization" level get ignored. There are also questions of conservation of angular momentum etc that tend to get dismissed with handwaving. But if a very small shift in the axis of
rotation of the core only is required, with the effects being multiplied by hyperdimensional energy coupling, those objections to "pole shifting" drop away. It just depends whose pole you are shifting.
That reminds me of a lap dancer I once knew who....oops wrong forum. I digress. Time to shut up.
Monday at 4:33pm ·
Delete

Vincent Cataldi
[PDF] Methane Hydrates in CSEM Surveys - Analysis of a Recent Data Example

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&ct=res&cd=1&ved=0CBIQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.emgs.com%2Fcontent.ap%3FthisId%3D417&ei=ISwETKLfFI7SNcTu-
Ts&usg=AFQjCNH0FUaTbRV4iAjaEAK3xS--PIvxhw&sig2=WF_qIamWHQzzkaeNJqSxSA
Monday at 4:40pm ·
Delete

Roo Reindeer
Damn it. Asleep at the switch again on the last 6.4 in India, you can't take your eye off of the earth for a minute these days. Back to the plots.
Monday at 7:56pm ·
Delete

Roo Reindeer
Wouldn't ya know it this one occured at 1951 GMT close to lat 11 lon 93. Poor tetrahedral victims. ....why do these numbers keep dropping in like this?
Monday at 8:02pm ·
Delete

Vincent Cataldi
Roo : if this is not known to you, I suggest you try it: no windows install - tiny - visual too sweet to describe - set mag and date limits - spin the globe - watch the sequence as they run around the ring of
fire; look through the globe, draw angles to the center, get depths. I love it !!

Download Earthquake 3D EQuake3D.exe

EARTHQUAKE 3D 2.2
6 posts - 4 authors - Last post: May 12, 2003
Earthquake3D ( Equake3D.exe) is a simple executable program. ... executable Equake3D.exe. It looks like the first screenshot and is not just ...
www.pcreview.co.uk/forums/thread-1965704.php
............................................................
RE seismographs and ionosphere data: I am looking for the images from the 10:10 event on the 25th; am I hunting for the proper images - or better stated what one or more dates and times should I
search for please? - I did try to save but got empty html shells - so I am on the hunt !
Tuesday at 3:58am ·
Delete

Vincent Cataldi
All the Seismograms around the planet went crazy - UPDATED 06-01-10

http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=391178956491
Tuesday at 4:14am ·
Delete

Vincent Cataldi

Roo:

Chief: you too please, comment if you can; else I must assume an official: "No Comment"

I pull my final question 'out of context' from the end of this post and paste it immediately below to attract more visibility;
to seek more comments too.

Do you (anyone) have reason to tell me this is highly unlikely?

.............................................................
I suspect this Concept IS related to what you discovered - yet only you are truly qualified to tell us if I am wrong with certainty; so I did research, compiling data so you could most easily give us all
another assessment - an opinion I and others respect greatly.

My question: can (should) we view the highly fractured Gulf of Mexico Impact Zone (Chicxulub Impact Crater ??), now ringed with (oil/gas producing) bore holes (vents), as a virtual "Caldera" ringed
by virtual volcanoes; covered by an "explosive" cap of stratified rock embedded with temperamental MH - the virtual caldera cap over the virtual lava dome - and if no - why not ?

One can envision for use the MH 'locked' precariously in the rock strata, from the ocean floor down to the crude oil/gas reservoir, as a blasting cap; a primer cascading to envelope the entire fractured
circumference of, highly pressurized - explosively saturated - crude (lava) vault; which if 'energized properly' (naturally or otherwise) could flash-over as a grease fire of enormous scale ?
.............................................................
http://www.facebook.com/notes/vincent-cataldi/methane-hydrate-frequency-dissociation/391923496491?ref=mf
Tuesday at 1:35pm ·
Delete
Roo Reindeer
Vincent I LIKE that cute little global indcator. Globes always give you a better idea of the connectivity of things then flat maps. It takes a monumental effort to visualize great circle routes on a map.
They are grossly distorted sinusoids on a mercator. I have been marking some of the quakes on google earth, which is good for deeper analysis, butI like the quick and easy data on this new one.

With regard to the data plots. I don't think it is legal to simply post the images from the realtime server. You can post a link but I don't think you can download the image then post a link to your
downloaded copy....I think. I don't know the law but I believe the images are copy righted. The data, though, I think is public domain. If you plot it on your "own" graph and simply credit the source,
you can post it.

The program that allows downloading and replotting of the raw seismo data is "JWeed".

http://www.iris.edu/manuals/jweed.htm

click software/DMS software/downloads to get to the download page.

I am still learning how to get the data from that program's downloads into manageable form. It is a case of information overload. it downloads dozens of plots from each station. I got 918 in all on my
first attempt and each plot consisted of as many as a dozen traces. 10,000 traces can be hard to deal with ;-D. I need to be more selective then the defaults allow.

The data can be saved in ASCII format for replotting in Excel or whatever. This will also make possible side by side comparisons and overlaps of data traces which is necessary to show correlations.
The final plott can then be uploaded and if the data source is identified anyone can get the raw data to verify the graphs themselves.

The Ion image data is likewise copy righted. But they also have ASCII data in their archives down below the image data. I believe that is also legal to post if it is replotted along with attribution. Again,
that allows comparison plots as well, all on one graph.

Although i will keep looking I have not seen anything really funny on the seismos since those two incidents. No precursers. Most of the data seems normal, a couple of mysterious data drops and weird
plots but nothing that correlates. But if the quakes turn out to be related to the ION storms, and perhaps to the "How About Ripping & Rapeing the Planet" project, the Mid June window should prove
oppurtune to watch the data. Richard said (I think) the 14th would be an interesting HD time window. Hopefully I should have the data from the May 25/26 events in a useable form by then for a quick
comparison.

By the doorbell do you mean my homepage?

I was wondering if that was acessible with my current privacy settings. I originally had everthing restricted when I signed on here due to my naturally paranoid, antisocial and misanthropic nature ;-D
If I want to let people see what is posted there do I just set it to "everybody". Does that mean everybody can post there as well? I have no idea how FB really works. I have just been treating it like an old
fashioned BBS. I guess I have to get out of the 20th century, even if there are only 2 years left to this one.
Tuesday at 1:57pm ·
Delete

Vincent Cataldi
Roo:

mouse can control speed and tilt of the globe; hold the mouse button over the Earth, and drag to adjust; I often tilt to view an upper or lower view for a better view of the poles.

Also: select the slide bar for number of days; now slowly spin the mouse wheal to incrementally slide through a time line; same with the magnitudes- very fine control this way....See More
Tuesday at 2:03pm ·
Delete

Vincent Cataldi
Roo:

RE: "By the doorbell do you mean my homepage?"

All your posts here are publicly viewable, and I archive into my "Notes" also, for public to find - and all my cross linking makes the search engines so happy....See More
Tuesday at 2:13pm ·
Delete

Vincent Cataldi
Roo:

In your system for modeling :

1.) does a polaral reversal also flow out of the data?
and if yes, ...See More
Tuesday at 4:43pm ·
Delete

Roo Reindeer
I'll try playing with the privacy settings. Hell I got nothing on the page anyway. :-)

As far as my modeling the Hyperdimensional stuff that's all qualitative speculation at the moment, with a bit of "hype' thrown in. I would like to get around to quantifying some of it but right now it just
consists on some plausable physical ideas mostly based ...See More
Tuesday at 11:33pm ·
Delete
Roo Reindeer
As I said in the other posts this axis may change as the earth moves through the galaxy, as it's normal axis of rotation precesses, etc. It may also move on it's own in response to Hyperdimentional
alignments or precess due to normal Newtonian torques. it could move for any number of possible theoretical reasons both mainstream or alternative.

What I postulate happens when it does move however involves the channeling of energy from higher dimensions in a tetrahedral based geomety familiar to Hyperdimensional Physics fans. Due to the
tetrahedral geometry of the hyperspacial connection the two different axies of rotation are pinned together at the tetrahedral vertex they share in common as they wobble about this common point. I will
try and eventually put up some graphics to show this.
But for know imagine the earth has a tetrahedron in it's interior that is lined up with the normal polar axis. As the earth rotates the tetrhedron rotates with it. Now imagine another axis going thru the
earth offset with respect to the normal axis. Imagine that this axis also has a tetrahedron associated with it. Make one more assumption, that one of the three vertices at the 19.5 point on each of the
offset tetrahedrons remains in contact with its counterpart. In our case that point would correspond with the Hawaiin hotspot.

As these two axes rotate, at different rates, the two 19.5 points remain together. One axis will gyrate about the other. If you can visualise this you will see two spheres partially mergeing with one
another as they overlap and seperate again. If the axes were to move with respect to each other until their poles lined up then the two spheres would merge, continuallly. Any offset produces a periodic
phase in and phase out of the overlapping volumes.

The degree of overlap at any moment determines the rate of energy flow. At the locked point some energy always flows. Hawaii, Mons Olympica, the Red Spot. But the rate of flow overall into the
rotating body depends on the time average of the degree of overlap. That varies with the rate of rotation of the two axes and their relative angle. If they line up the two tetrahedrons cease to wobble with
respect to one another. The overlap is 100% and continuous, all three of the tetrahedral vertices at the 19.5 point are congruent and maximum energy transfer flow can take place. You no longer have
Hawaii, Mons Olymica and the Red Spot. You have a potential sun. Boom goes Tom van Flanderns planet, sizzle goes Venus, bigtime fart for the Earth at the KT.

Of couse we are not talking 'real tetrahedrons' in any material sense but a mathematical representation of underlying physics of a 4 space geometry. The actual coupling points would be connections
between HyperTetrahedrons. In our 3d space the tetrahedron we know and love is the shadow cast by a HyperTet. Just as a cube is the shadow cast by a hyper cube and the square is a shadow cast by a
cube into flatlands 2D world.

Consequently an actual visualisation of the overlap between these objects is not possible. But the degree of overlap is quantifiable. This determines the rate of energy flow.
Other factors such as material, angular momentum, electomagnetic properties etc would probably have an affect on the actual flow in any given real life situation. but these factors would be modulated
by the degree of Hyperspacial overlap determined by the offset of the axes of rotation.

With a planet sized object you can't do too much about the axial offset. I hope...if it is possible to mess with it we are in terminally deep shit..well there is HARRP (Not HAARP :-). however this
hyperspacial overlap can be controlled with small rotating objects by .....stay tuned.
Yesterday at 12:21am ·
Delete

Vincent Cataldi
Vincent Cataldi Roo: I missed the polar shift angle - we posted concurrently. Your mind :)

Chief: You too please !

Comment if you can; else I must assume an official: EM HD MH "No Comment"

[EnterpriseMission - HyperDimensional Physics - Methane Hydrate]

I pull my final question 'out of context' from the end of this post and paste it immediately below to attract more visibility; to seek more comments too.
Do you (anyone) have reason to tell me this is highly unlikely?
.............................................................

I suspect this Concept IS related to what you discovered - yet only you are truly qualified to tell us if I am wrong with certainty; so I did research, compiling data so you could most easily give us all
another assessment - an opinion I and others respect greatly.
My question: can (should) we view the highly fractured Gulf of Mexico Impact Zone (Chicxulub Impact Crater ??), now ringed with (oil/gas producing) bore holes (vents), as a virtual "Caldera" ringed
by virtual volcanoes; covered by an "explosive" cap of stratified rock embedded with temperamental MH - the virtual caldera cap over the virtual lava dome - and if no - why not ?
One can envision for use the MH 'locked' precariously in the rock strata, from the ocean floor down to the crude oil/gas reservoir, as a blasting cap; a primer cascading to envelope the entire fractured
circumference of, highly pressurized - explosively saturated - crude (lava) vault; which if 'energized properly' (naturally or otherwise) could flash-over as a grease fire of enormous scale ?
.............................................................

http://www.facebook.com/notes/vincent-cataldi/methane-hydrate-frequency-dissociation/391923496491?ref=mf

http://www.facebook.com/posted.php?id=213984790088&share_id=121508717889272&comments=1#s121508717889272
Vincent Cataldi -> Richard C. Hoagland: methane hydrate frequency - dissociation
www.facebook.com
Yesterday at 1:57pm · Comment · Like · Share

Roo Reindeer Question:.....should we worry about the Chicxulub/ Gulf area as a sort of caldera......(not a direct quote) ?

Short answer: YES! YES! YES!

Long answer :-D

Here's why. The cool part is I thought of none of this until you asked about the gulf/Chicxulub, talk about synchronocity!

When you posted your note on super volcanoes and mentioned Yellowstone I went into a long winded diatribe on my own research in the possibility of a Axis of Convection around which the earths
core and mantel rotate. The north pole of this axis seems to be near 39 N 120 E.
I won't repeat the Hyperdimentional aspects of that here, anyone interested can read my original that you reposted. It's the one that starts:

" Vincent I'm glad you mentioned Yellowstone...."

At the time I had not read your speculation on Chicxulub and the surrounding area. At the present time Chicxulub is near 19.5 north. This is interesting in itself from a tetrahedral standpoint.

The Chicxulub event has been attributed to an impact at 65MYA, said impact being caused according to some by a fragment of Tom van Flanderns Exploding Planet which also wiped the butt of Mars
according to the Enterprise Mission Tidal Model. If the same Hyperdimentional energy coupling which caused the planet around which Mars was orbiting to explode had also caused the earths core to
heat up at the approximate same time the Chicxulub event may have been the ultimate super volcano, not an impact. The natural place for this energy release would have been latitude 19.5!
As I mentioned in my Convective Axis post, Hawaii, the worlds major hotspot at the present ends up at near it's present 19.5 latitude in the alternate longietude/latitude coordinate system based on 39N
and 120E. This is the only point on earth that stays on the same line of latitude in both the normal and convective axis based coordinate systems.

Just now I went back to check my map based on a pole located at 39N 120 W. Where says I will Chicxulub end up with regard to my new longe/lat grid? With this coordinate system the 19.5 SOUTH
latitude line cuts right through the center of the Gulf of Mexico I could not have done this on purpose with any better fit.

This shows, at least to my biased mind..yes..yes I love coincidences :-D, that the Gulf/Chicxulub area is a VERY IMPORTANT TETRAHEDRAL POINT. It, like Hawaii is at an important tetrahedral
point in both coordinate systems. If my idea about hyperdimentional Coupling being modulated by the offset between the normal (3D ) polar axis and the convective(hyperdimentional) core axis has
anything to it then a closer alignment 65MYA could have caused the blowout.

And here's the real trip. If the coupling is dependent on the tangent of the angle of the latitude of the convective axis pole with respect to the normal pole you can get maximum energy transfer at either
latitude +/- 90. Minimum if the axis is offset so that the convective pole is on our present equator. But the hotspots will change place with respect to the convective grid as the convective pole moves.
With a reversed orientation the hotspot would be at 19.5 S in the convective grid.

Did the earths convective axis do a flip 65MYA causeing a major energy release at the spot corresponding to latitude 19.5 south in the convective axis coordinate system (still 19.5 north in the normal
grid ie nothing changes on the surface of the earth) before continuing passed the danger point to it's present position leaving our current hotspot (Hawaii) at 19.5 N in both grid systems ? Did this occur
fast enough to avoid a long dwell at the angle that would have caused the Earth to go the way of Mar's parent? Remember I said that the Convective Axis can shift fast. It does not require any movement
of the earth's crust. Only the rotation of the convective flow has to flip, molten core or mantel current can change orientation with much less stress then the crust.

Is there any evidence of this convective axis flip? Well Venus is rotating opposite to the earth, it's "upside down". Venus also appears to have undergone a complete "resurfaceing". It's present surface
seems to be way younger then the surface of Earth or Mars. Some studies place it at about 65MYA (others 400MYA, nobody really knows ,but it is young).

I say (ex cathedra of course) that 65MYA the Hyperdimentional Alignments caused the axis of convection of the Earth, Venus, Mars parent and other solar system objects to move and as they did they
got close to a line up with their normal polar axes, which remained, and continue to remain fixed. This occured as the current "North" pole of the axis of convection, whose position is modulated by
hyperdimentional factors moved from latitude -39 (where it was then) northward to latitude 90 (the danger zone) then back down the other side to latitude +39 (where it is today). In other words a 180
flip. This would have caused the rotational orientation of the convection currents to flip. It would now be opposite to what it was then .

In the case of Mars parent the convective pole took longer to pass the danger point of extreme energy release caused by it's close position to the normal pole. or it just got closer to a perfect (supernova)
alignment. it blew up. Venus also got so hot the energy release melted it's entire crust. With a total meltdown the entire body of the planet assumed the same rotational direction as the core, the new crust
took on the same rotational direction of the core convection as it cooled. It rotates backwards in relation to it's prior direction.

The Earth got off easy, just the KT extinction.

As the pole of the axis of convection (+39deg) may now be moving north, the Gulf/Chicxulub area might turn out to be a KT hotspot AGAIN.

Which brings us back to the question...do the PTB and their cronies at BP and elsewhere know this...or am I a nut.
.......stay tuned :-D
9 hours ago ·

Vincent Cataldi You Deliver Always what I hope for :

many fold over :)