) (

.
-

2007

) (

.
-

: ) ( STAD
) ( Jigsaw
.

. ) (349

 ) (160 ) (189 .
:


.

.
"" STAD
.
" "Jigsaw
.


.

.

:

.


.






)
.( 2004

.

.

 .




)
.( 2001
:





(Alshaye, 2002).


:
-1

-2


-3


:
-1
.
-2
.
-3 ) (

.
-4


.
:

 : ) ( STAD
).( Jigsaw



.

) (2001


) .( 1998


.
: :
) (2000

.




)
Ahuja. 1994 1999 .( 2001
) (2001 "
/


) ".
.(7
)(1995
:
-1 :


.


.
-2 :

:

 .
.




.
-3 :



.
-4 :





.
-5 :

.



)
.(2002

. ) (2003




.


.
: :

.
) (2004 :
) -(Learning Together )Group
-(Investigation ( Jigsaw)- ). (STAD

:
(1 ) Student Teams Achievement
( Division Robert slavin .1980
5-4 ,

, ,

).(Achievement Division
(2 ) :( Jigsaw
Arnson etal .1978


.
: :



)
.(2004
)Alshaye (2002

) Tompkins (1998


.

) (2004

.


. :

 -1 .
-2
.
-3 .
-4 .
-5 .
-6 .
-7 .
-8 .
-9 .
-10 ).(2004



( (STAD )
(Jigsaw

).(2001

) .( 2000



) .( 2000



) .( 1999
) (2000
86





.




.
:



)
.( 2004





Hnze ;Berger ,2007; Moore, 2005;Barrett, 2005; Hancock,).
(2004



) .( 2004


)2003 Obeidat,. 2005; 2004
.( .Summers,. 2005



.



) 1999
.( 1996

) 1995 .( 2003

)

- 1998.( 2001

:
)(1

8484 9376
17860

15
14
29

) (1 ) (17860
) (29
. ) (9376 ) (8484 .

.
.
) ( .
3 - -
) :
.(STAD- Jigsaw - ) (349
) (160 ) (189.
:



.
24 4
.
: ) (pretest



.
. )(9
. )
( 4 (2)
( 3 )


.
.
.
51
) (Spearman's rho
) (0.79 .
:

:

 ) (Spearman's rho . )with planned comparison (One-WayANOVA

.

) (T - test
.
:


) (STAD
) .(Jigsaw
:
: . ) :(STAD . ) :(Jigsaw .
. ) (2
.
)(2
ANOVA .

ANOVA

0.895
157 ,2
0.111

0.264
186 ,2
1.341

.
P-value

:

:
.
) Wilson (1992



.
)
(Metacognitive ) Alshaye (2002 Wilson
.
Alshaye
Kwlplus SQ3R

 .

.

.
) Roger (1997

Jigsaw
. Amanza
) (1997 D.R.T.A
) (STAD

) (STAD
.D.R.T.A

.
& ) Bouzeineddine Ghaith (2003
)(Jigsaw

.
) (Jigsaw

.


.
) (1999

((STAD ) (Jigsaw


.

.
STAD .Jigsaw
) (2001


) (STAD .

).(STAD

10

 . ) (1994



.
) Priebe (1997

.

.
.



.




)
- Almanza, 1997 - 1999 .(2001
) 1994
.(Priede,1997
:


)One way
(ANOVA with planned comparison
)
(STAD ) .(Jigsaw ) (3
.
)(3
ANOVA

ANOVA

6.81

9.05

54.58

350 ,1

P-value

*0.000

* )(0.05

11

 ) (9.05 )
(6.81 .


).(Wilson 1992- Alshaye 2002-Roger 1997- Amanza 1997
) Wilson (1992
.
) Alshaye (2002
.
) Roger (1997 ) Amanza (1997

.


:


.


) .(2001
:



) (STAD
) (Jigsaw ) .(t-test
) (4 .
)(4
t-test .

STAD

8.36 9.64

4.021-

114

Jigsaw

10.0
8.02
3

2.806

115

t-test

* ).(0.05

P-Vlaue

0.00
*0
0.00
*6

).(STAD
)
.(9.64
) .(Jigsaw

12

 )
.(10.03


. &
) Bouzeineddine Ghaith (2003 Jigsaw
)( )(


.
Jigsaw
.
) (1999
) (STAD
) (Jigsaw )(


STAD )
(1999


.
STAD
Jigsaw ) -Roger 1997- Amanza 1997.(2001
:
(1
.
(2


.
(3
.
(4

.

13


:
(1 ) (2001
) ( Hypermedia
.
17 .
(2 ) .(2002


) (8 ) .( 1
(3 .(1999) .
.
).(13
(4 : ) .(2004

. ) (4 )
.( 1
(5 ) (2004 .
.
(6 ) .(2001

.
.
(7 ) .(1999

.
.
(8 ) (2001
.
.
(9 ) .(2003
) (
. 66
.17

14

 (10 .(2001) .

.
.
(11 ) ,(1995
.
: .
.
(12 ) .(2000

. . .
) (15 ).(57
(13 ) .(1998 :
) . : ( :
.
(14 .(2003) .

.
.
(15 ) (2001

.
.39
(16 ) .(2003

. . ).(86
(17 ) (1999
. .
(18 ) .(2002

.
. . .15
.3
(19 ) (2000
. ) (3 ) (2 81
.178

15

 (20 .(2000) .


.
(21 ) (2002



.
.
(22 ) .(1994
. .
.
(23 ) .(1998
.
.
).(53
(24 ) .(2003
.
. . ).(86
(25 ) .(1996
. :
.

:
26) Ahuja, A. (1994). The Effects of a cooperative learning instructional
strategy on the academic achievement, attitudes to ward science Class
and process skills, of Middle school Doctoral dissertation, Ohio state
university, UMT.
27)Almanza, T. (1997). The Effects of the D.R.T.A and Cooperative
Learning Strategies On Reading Comprehension. Kean College of New
Jersey. ERIC, ED 405565.
28) Alshaye, S. (2002). The Effectiveness of Metacognitive Strategies on
Reading Comprehension and Comprehension Strategies on Reading
Comprehension and Comprehension Strategies of Eleventh Grade
Students in Kuwait high schools. College of Education, Ohio University.

16

29) Barrett, T. (2005). Effects of cooperative learning on the performance

of Sixth- Grade Physical Education Students. Journal of Teaching in
Physical Education. Vol (24). PP.38-102.
Bouzeineddine, A., & Ghaith, G. (2003). Relationship Between (30
Reading Attitudes, Achievement, and Learners of Their Jigsaw. Reading
.Psychology; Vol (24). Issue 2
31) Geok; Ivy. Kim; Christine. Sharan; Shlomo (2007). Group
Investigation Effects on Achievement, Motivation, and Perceptions of
Students in Singapore. Journal of Educational Research; Vol.100 Issue 3
P 142-154, 13 P.
32) Hancock, D. ( 2004). Cooperative learning and peer Orientation
Effects on Motivation and Achievement. The Journal of Educational
Research. Vol (97). NO (3).
33) Hnze, Martin ;Berger, Roland (2007). Cooperative learning,
motivational effects, and student characteristics: An experimental study
comparing cooperative learning and direct instruction in 12th grade
physics classes. Learning & Instruction; Feb2007, Vol. 17 Issue 1, p2941, 13p.
Jagan, S. (1992). Cooperative learning (San Juan Capistrano, CA: (34
.Kagan cooperative learning)
Moore,J. (2005). Undergraduate Mathematics achievement in (35
the emerging ethnics eng inners Programmer. International Journal of
.mathematical Education in science and Technology. Tol.36. Issue 5
Obeidat,. M. (2005) Field Student Teachers' Attitudes Toward (36
Certain Pedagogic Dimensions Related to Cooperative Learning in the
.Hashemite University. The Educational Journal. No. 79- Vol. 19
37) Priebe, R(1997). The Effect of cooperative learning in a secondsemester University Computer Science Course, Paper Presented at the
Annual Meeting of National Association for Research in Science
Teaching ( Chicago,IL ) ERIC, ED406189.
Summers, J. (2005). Evaluating Collaborative learning and (38
.Community. The Journal of Experimental Education, Vol (73). NO (3)
Tom Pkins, G. (1998). Language arts: Content and teaching (39
.strategies. Upper Saddle: Merrill Tiver, NJ

17

Wilgus, B. (2002). The Relationship of peer collaboration on Third (40

Grade student Math Performance. Master degree. Johansson Bible
.college
41) Wilson, S. (1992). The Effects of Cooperative Learning On Reading
Comprehension. Diss, abst Int. Vol. (52). No (9).

18