1

HigitPa SusunodnaBlog

BumuongBlog Magsignin

LawStudent'sCoffeeTable
Let'stalkanythingandeverythingabouttheLaw.

TungkolsaAkin

Linggo,Abril26,2015

KarlodeGuzman

ASSOCIATIONOFSMALLLANDOWNERSV.
SECRETARYOFDAR,G.R.No.78742(175SCRA
343),July14,1989
CONSTITUTIONALLAWII
FUNDAMENTALPOWERSOFTHESTATE
POLICEPOWER

Subaybayan

Tingnanangaking
kumpletongprofile
PageDescription

Whatcanbefoundhere?
>CaseDigests
>SomeLegalNotes
>EverythingrelatedtoLaw
ArchivesaBlog

G.R.No.78742July14,1989

2015(12)
April(12)

ASSOCIATION OF SMALL LANDOWNERS IN THE PHILIPPINES,

INC., JUANITO D. GOMEZ, GERARDO B. ALARCIO, FELIPE
A. GUICO, JR., BERNARDO M. ALMONTE, CANUTO RAMIR B.
CABRITO, ISIDRO T. GUICO, FELISA I. LLAMIDO, FAUSTO
J. SALVA, REYNALDO G. ESTRADA, FELISA C. BAUTISTA,
ESMENIA J. CABE, TEODORO B. MADRIAGA, AUREA J.
PRESTOSA, EMERENCIANA J. ISLA, FELICISIMA C.
ARRESTO, CONSUELO M. MORALES, BENJAMIN R.
SEGISMUNDO, CIRILA A. JOSE & NAPOLEON S.
FERRER,petitioners,
vs.
HONORABLESECRETARYOFAGRARIANREFORM,respondent.
G.R.No.79310July14,1989
ARSENIOAL.ACUNA,NEWTONJISON,VICTORINOFERRARIS,
DENNIS JEREZA, HERMINIGILDO GUSTILO, PAULINO D.
TOLENTINO and PLANTERS' COMMITTEE, INC., Victorias
Mill
District,
Victorias,
Negros
Occidental,petitioners,
vs.
JOKER ARROYO, PHILIP E. JUICO and PRESIDENTIAL
AGRARIANREFORMCOUNCIL,respondents.
G.R.No.79744July14,1989
INOCENTESPABICO,petitioner,
vs.
HON.PHILIPE.JUICO,SECRETARYOFTHEDEPARTMENTOF
AGRARIAN REFORM, HON. JOKER ARROYO, EXECUTIVE
SECRETARY OF THE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT, and

ASSOCIATIONOFSMALL
LANDOWNERSV.
SECRETARYOFDA...
LET'SDIGEST(AGUIDEON
HOWTODIGESTACASE)
SARMIENTOV.MISON,G.R.No.
79974December17,1...
DECASTROV.JBC,G.R.No.
191342April2,2010(C...
BIRAOGOV.PHILIPPINE
TRUTHCOMMISSION2010,
G.R....
IRENEOROQUEV.DIRECTOR
OFLANDS,G.RNo.L25373...
LEAGUEOFCITIESv.COMELEC
G.R.No.176951August...
JMMPROMOTIONAND
MANAGEMENT,INC.v.CA
260SCRA...
LUTZv.ARANETA98PHIL.145
December22,1955(CA...
LOZANOv.MARTINEZG.RNo.
L63419.December18,1...
YNOTv.INTERMEDIATE
APPELLATECOURTG.R.No.
7445...
WHITELIGHTCORPORATIONv.
CITYOFMANILAJanuary...

Messrs. SALVADOR TALENTO, JAIME ABOGADO, CONRADO

AVANCENAandROBERTOTAAY,respondents.
G.R.No.79777July14,1989
NICOLAS
S.
MANAAY
and
AGUSTIN
HERMANO,
JR.,petitioners,
vs.
HON. PHILIP ELLA JUICO, as Secretary of Agrarian
Reform,
and
LAND
BANK
OF
THE
PHILIPPINES,respondents.

CRUZ,J.:
FACTS:
These are consolidated cases involving common legal questions
including serious challenges to the constitutionality of R.A.
No. 6657 also known as the "Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Law
of1988"
InG.R.No.79777,thepetitionersarequestioningtheP.DNo.
27 and E.O Nos. 228 and 229 on the grounds inter alia of
separation of powers, due process, equal protection and the
constitutional limitation that no private property shall be
takenforpublicusewithoutjustcompensation.
InG.R.No.79310,thepetitionersinthiscaseclaimthatthe
powertoprovideforaComprehensiveAgrarianReformProgramas
decreedbytheConstitutionbelongstotheCongressandnotto
the President, the also allege that Proclamation No. 131 and
E.O No. 229 should be annulled for violation of the
constitutionalprovisionsonjustcompensation,dueprocessand
equal protection. They contended that the taking must be
simultaneous with payment of just compensation which such
paymentisnotcontemplatedinSection5oftheE.ONo.229.
InG.R.No.79744,thepetitionerarguesthatE.ONos.228and
229 were invalidly issued by the President and that the said
executive orders violate the constitutional provision that no
private property shall be taken without due process or just
compensationwhichwasdeniedtothepetitioners.
In G.R. No 78742 the petitioners claim that they cannot eject
their tenants and so are unable to enjoy their right
of retention because the Department of Agrarian Reform has so
far not issued the implementing rules of the decree. They
therefore ask the Honorable Court for a writ of mandamus to
compeltherespondentstoissuethesaidrules.

ISSUE:
Whetherornotthelawsbeingchallengedisavalidexerciseof
PolicepowerorPowerofEminentDomain.

RULING:
PolicePowerthroughthePowerofEminentDomain,thoughthere
are traditional distinction between the police power and the

powerofeminentdomain,propertycondemnedunderpolicepower
is noxious or intended for noxious purpose, the compensation
forthetakingofsuchpropertyisnotsubjecttocompensation,
unlike the taking of the property in Eminent Domain or the
power of expropriation which requires the payment of just
compensationtotheownerofthepropertyexpropriated.

SEEFULLTEXTINTHISLINK:
FullTextfromLawphil

IpinaskilniKarlodeGuzmansa11:49PM
+1 Irekumenda ito sa Google

Walangkomento:
MagpostngisangKomento
Ilagayangiyongkomento...

Magkomentobilang:

Ipublish

Unknown(Google)

Magsignout

Inotifyako

IPreview

Home

MgaLumangPost

Magsubscribesa:IpostangMgaKomento(Atom)

Simplenatemplate.Mgalarawanngtemplateniluoman.PinaganangBlogger.