Title25. Health Services
Part I. Department of State Health Services
Chapter 1. Miscellaneous Provisions
Subchapter K. Definition, Treatment, end Disposition of Special Waste from Health Care~
Related Facilities
‘Amendments §§1.132 - 1.137
Proposed Preamble
‘The Executive Commissioner of the Health and Human Services Commis
Department of Siate Health Services (department), proposes amendments to §§1.132 - 1.137,
concerning the definition, treatment, and disposition of special waste from health care-related
facilites.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
‘The rule amendments provide language and offer clarification to enhance the understanding of
the rules, as well as to update outdated references, terminology, and AispOsitigh methods. Texas
‘Government Code, §2001.039 requires a review of rules, including an assessment of whether the
reasons fo initially adopting the rules continue to exist. Chapter 1, Subchapter K of Tile 25 of
the Texas Administrative Code was originally adopted in 1989, and amendments were made in
1991 and 1994. Additionally, the department has reviewed §§1.131 - 1.137 end has determined
‘thatthe reasons for adopting the rules continues o exist because the rules on this subject are
needed, However, there are no changes being proposed to §1.131 in tis rulemaking.
‘SCOPE OF THE PROPOSED RULES
“The seope ofthe proposed rules encompasses the following provisions of the rules in Subchapter
K of Chapter 1, Miscellaneous Provisions, relating to special waste from heaith care-related
facilites:
§1.132. Definitions
§1.133. Scope, Covering Exemptions and Minimum Parametric Standards for Waste Treatment
‘Teehnologies Previously approved by the Texas Department of Health
§1.134. Application,
51.135, Performance Standards for Commercally-Avsilable Alternate Treatment Technologies
for Special Waste from Health Care-Related Facilites
§1.136, Approved Methods of Treatment and Disposition.
§1.137, Enforcement,
SECTION-BY-SECTION SUMMARY
Proposed Preamble - 1Amendments to §1-152, Definitions, are proposed to update references to the deparment; define
the terms sremation, executive commissioner, and fetal tissue; remove the definition fr the term
‘cremated ‘emains; update references to Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ);
correcta mathematical unt for “logis” and necessitates the renumbering of subsections
Amendments to §1.133, Scope, Covering Exemptions and Minimum Parametri Standards for
‘Waste Treatment Technologies Previously Approved by the Texas Department of Health, are
proposed 0 update references to the department and a legal reference.
Amendments to §1.134, Application, are proposed to update references to facilites providing
‘mental health and intellectual disability services; and add freestanding emergency medical care
facilites tothe list of health care-related facilities to whieh this rule applies.
Amendments to §1.125, Performance Standarde for Commercially-Available AlRerate
‘Treatment Technologies for Special Waste from Health Care-Related Facilities, are proposed to
update references to the department and correcta mathematical unt to “Iogio”
Amendments to §1.136, Approved Methods of Treatment and Disposition, are proposed to
‘update references to the department; update terminology regarding the Texas Administrative
Code; upeate references to TCEQ and its rules; clarifying disposition methods for fetal tissue;
clarifying disposition methods for fetal tissue and other tissues that are products of spontaneous
or induced human abortion; and clarifying that disposition methods for anatomical remains are
established in 25 TAC §4794
‘Amendments to §1.137, Enforcement, ae proposed to reflect the Executive Commissioner's role
in rulemaking; remove home and community support services agencies from the list ofthe
departments regulatory programs; and add end-stage renal disease facilities and freestanding
emergency medical centers tothe lst ofthe department's regulatory programs.
FISCALNOTE
has determined that for each year of the first five years
‘that the sections will be in effect, there will not be fiscal implications to state or local
governments as a result of enforeing and administering the sections as proposed,
SMALL AND MICRO-BUSINESS IMPACT ANALYSIS AND ECONOMIC COSTS TO
PERSONS
Proposed Preuuble-2‘the proposed rules will result in increased total costs for healthcare facilities required to comply
withthe rules, Different costs may arise based on a healthcare facility's decisions regarding the
tse of burial, eremation or other forms of interment of fetal remains. ‘The proposed rues allow
the disposttion of remains together, thereby reducing costs to an amount estimated to be
‘commensurate with current methods used for disposition. The department notes that in
‘comments previously submitted, private partes, have offered to bury fetal remains without
charge. Other partes may also offer discounted or free services associated with the disposition
of fetal tisue. For these reasons, the department estimates no fiscal impact,
‘The purpose of specifying disposition standards for specific types of tissue relates to the
protection ofthe health and safety of the public pursuant to Texas and Health Safety Code,
(Chapter 8:, All healthcare facilities handling that type of tissue, whether a small or micro-
‘business or a larger organization, face the same risks associated with handling this specific type
of tissue and asa result, are required tobe held to the same standard for disposition. The rules
and amendments tothe rules, authorize alternative methods among which facilites, including
‘small and miero-businesses can choose for disposition, thereby including regulatory flexibility
within therule. The department considered separate compliance and different standards for
small and micro-businesses such as alternative disposition methods or exemption from the