Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Learning (Ii) - 2016.04.08 PDF
Learning (Ii) - 2016.04.08 PDF
BEHAVIOURISM
CLASICAL (PAULOV
&WATSON)
SOCIO-COGNITIVE
(BANDURA)
OPERANT(THORDIKE
& SKINNER)
COGNITIVISIM
CONSTRUCTIVISIM
INDIVIDUAL (PIAGET
& BRUNER)
INFORMATION
PROCESSING
SOCIAL (VIGOTSKY)
Observational Learning
ALBERT BANDURAS COGNITIVE-SOCIAL THEORY
LEARNING BY OBSERVATION =
LEARNING IS WHAT HAPPENS WHEN A
PERSON OBSERVES AND IMITATES
ANOTHER PERSONS BEHAVIOUR
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eqNaLerMNOE
BEHAVIOUR
PERSONAL
PSYCHOLOGICAL
PROCESS
ENVIROMENT
Power & Prestige
Competence
Similarity
coping
Self-recoding
Self-instruction
LEARNING THEORIES
BEHAVIOURISM
CLASICAL (PAULOV
&WATSON)
SOCIAL (BANDURA)
OPERANT(THORDIKE
& SKINNER)
COGNITIVISIM
CONSTRUCTIVISIM
INDIVIDUAL (PIAGET
& BRUNER)
INFORMATION
PROCESSING
SOCIAL (VIGOTSKY)
COGNITIVE APPROACH TO
LEARNING
COGNITIVISM
-Study of the thinking process
- Student as an active agent of instructional process ( from the sensory information,
he/she constructs and interpres the information through internal structures and processes
he/she plans, executes and manages the answers).
-Focuses its interest on mental processes that underlie human activity
-it emphasises knowledge rather than answers
- Information processing
- Multi store Theories of Memory
- Theory of processing levels
- Theory of Gagn
- Constructivism
- Roots :
Gestalt Psychology
Vigotsky
Piaget
- Bruner: Learning by Discovery
- Ausubel: Theory of meaningful learning
Carmen Ferrndiz
LEARNING THEORIES
BEHAVIOURISM
CLASICAL (PAULOV
&WATSON)
SOCIAL (BANDURA)
OPERANT(THORDIKE
& SKINNER)
CONSTRUCTIVISIM
INDIVIDUAL
Gestalt
Piaget
Bruner
COGNITIVISIM
Ausubel
INFORMATION
PROCESSING
SOCIAL (VIGOTSKY)
Watson
Behaviourism
Wundt
Gestalt
Wertheimer
Kohler
Laws of Gestalt
Law of Pragananz
Law of closure
Law of similarity
Law of proximity
Law of symmetry
Law of contiguity
Law of common direction
Principle of simplicity
Principle of figure-ground
articulation
Human being is an active being that adapt to his enviroment through process of equilibration
Equilibration is the act of self-regulation of cognition in which individuals try to understand environmental challenges
physically or mentally and maintain a balance between assimilation and accommodation. According to Piaget, the
selfregulating process of equilibration is the motivation to learn. For example, if a student encounters a challenge that he
cannot understand or solve immediately, then cognitive conflict arises and
disequilibrium appears.
Assimilation
assimilating a new relationship directly
into the present schema by extending
it to subsume the new relationship
'..simple growth...'
Accommodation
creating a new schema (or changing the
structure of the original schema to
create a different schema) by
accommodation
Developmental stages
factors that contribute to changes in cognitive development of a child:
maturation,
physical experiences,
social experiences,
equilibration.
Estructura - Esquema
Principles
Motivation
nnate instincts
eed to develop self competences
eciprocity
Aprj + accesible
Subjects Structure
What is it?
Learning by doing
Learning to think
The final concept or product is
not given to the student
Students reach the concept by
induction process
Symbolic
Phase
enactive
Manipulacin fisica
______
accin
Organization and
sequence of contents
Reinforcement
Iconic
Reflexin : representaci _______
Organizacin perceptual e
inmaginacinn
Learning by discovering
Teacher role
Make student questioning
Teacher as mediator: helps and direct
the procedure.
Gives feedback
Helps facing new challenges and
problems
Disadvantages
UncertaintyVentajas
regarding the
final outcome
Needs careful pacification
and high structure it is
Difficult
DISADVANTAGES
Not very effective compared to expository teaching
unnatural role of the teacher (hidden information)
Acquisition of misconceptions
Need for planning and structuring careful
Inadequate when a large group, with slow learners
Requires the use of many materials
Me lo contaron y lo olvid
lo v y lo entend,
lo descubr y lo aprend.
NIVEL 2
NIVEL 3
NIVEL 4
fuente de la pregunta
Dado
Dado
Dado
Abierto
Dado
Dado
Abierto
Abierto
Dado
Abierto
Abierto
Abierto
resultados
Implicacin del alumno en el el alumno se "engancha" en
scientific questioning
cuestin cientfica
ciertos datos
responder preguntas
recoge
formula explicaciones
formular explicaciones
investigar explicaciones
desde la evidencia
evidencias (pruebas)
se le dan posibles
se le dirige a areas y
de forma independiente
conexiones
fuentes de conocimiento
cientfico
explicaciones
conocimiento cientfico
procedimientos para la
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
Qu
caballo
ha llegado
primero?
x
x
x
x
x
x
Por
qu?
Cul
tenia
ms
posibilidades
de
llegar
x
x
x
x
x
x
primero?
x
x dexprobabilidad
x
x
x
estudio
Reglas
de
x
x combinatorias
x
x
x nmeros
x
CONDITIONS OF MEANINGFUL
LEARNING
1. Good attitude through learning
2. Contents must be potentially meaningful
(logic and psychologically)
* Nature of contents: logic structure
* Cognitive structure (previous
knowledge that are relevant
Variables: Availability, discriminability
stability and clarity of cognitive
structure
1. Subordinate learning
2. Supraordinate learning
3. Coordinate Learning
Teaching: previous
organizers
Tomado de XXXX
Organizadores Previos
Tomado de http://pronacapzorritosprimaria.blogspot.com.es/2008/07/otros-recursos.html
LEARNING THEORIES
BEHAVIOURISM
CLASICAL (PAULOV
&WATSON)
SOCIAL (BANDURA)
OPERANT(THORDIKE
& SKINNER)
COGNITIVISIM
CONSTRUCTIVISIM
INDIVIDUAL (PIAGET
& BRUNER)
INFORMATION
PROCESSING
SOCIAL (VIGOTSKY)
VIGOSTKY
Cognitive develoment as a result of interaction
PREMISES
TUTORING AND
RECIPROCAL TEACHING
COMUNITIES OF
LEARNERS
PROBLEM BASED
LEARNING
CLASSROOM
DISCUSSIONS
INFORMAL LEARNING
EXPERIENCES
Jigsaw
Rote
vs.
Meaningful learning
Class Exercise
1- Review the information about Bruners and Ausubels learning
theories
2- Imagine two schools:
School 1 will be guided by Bruners principles: Describe how
this school is organized, the teaching methodology, etc.
School 2 will be guided by Ausubels principles: Describe how
this school is organized, the teaching methodology, etc.
3- Compare both schools: How are these schools similar? How are
they different?