Scribd Logo
Fazer o upload

Bem-vindo(a) ao Scribd!

  • 09-28-2016 ECF 1358 USA V SHAWNA COX - 9th Cir - Order of Dismissal of Appeal by USCA-9th Circuit As To Shawna Cox

    Enviado por

    Jack Ryan
    151 visualizações2 páginas
    09/28/2016 1358 Order of Dismissal of Appeal by USCA-9th Circuit as to Shawna Cox regarding Notice of Appeal - Interlocutory 1088 USCA # 16-30193. The motion of appellant's standby counsel in the district court, Tiffany A. Harris, to withdraw as counsel of record in this appeal is granted. The Clerk shall enter on the docket appellant, 1031 South Monument Road, Kanab, Utah 84741, as appearing pro se. We conclude that we lack jurisdiction over this appeal because the district court's August 15, 2016 order is not appealable as a final judgment or an order that comes within the collateral order doctrine. See 28 U.S.C. § 1291; Midland Asphalt Corp. v. United States, 489 U.S. 794, 798 (1989) (stating that finality requirement generally "prohibits appellate review until after conviction and imposition of sentence"). All other pending motions are denied as moot. DISMISSED. (jtj) (Entered: 09/28/2016)

    Título original

    09-28-2016 ECF 1358 USA v SHAWNA COX - 9th Cir - Order of Dismissal of Appeal by USCA-9th Circuit as to Shawna Cox

    Direitos autorais

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Formatos disponíveis

    PDF, TXT ou leia online no Scribd

    Você considera este documento útil?

    Este conteúdo é inapropriado?

    Denunciar este documento
    09/28/2016 1358 Order of Dismissal of Appeal by USCA-9th Circuit as to Shawna Cox regarding Notice of Appeal - Interlocutory 1088 USCA # 16-30193. The motion of appellant's standby counsel in the district court, Tiffany A. Harris, to withdraw as counsel of record in this appeal is granted. The Clerk shall enter on the docket appellant, 1031 South Monument Road, Kanab, Utah 84741, as appearing pro se. We conclude that we lack jurisdiction over this appeal because the district court's August 15, 2016 order is not appealable as a final judgment or an order that comes within the collateral order doctrine. See 28 U.S.C. § 1291; Midland Asphalt Corp. v. United States, 489 U.S. 794, 798 (1989) (stating that finality requirement generally "prohibits appellate review until after conviction and imposition of sentence"). All other pending motions are denied as moot. DISMISSED. (jtj) (Entered: 09/28/2016)

    Direitos autorais:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Baixe no formato PDF, TXT ou leia online no Scribd
    Sinalizar o conteúdo como inadequado
    151 visualizações2 páginas

    09-28-2016 ECF 1358 USA V SHAWNA COX - 9th Cir - Order of Dismissal of Appeal by USCA-9th Circuit As To Shawna Cox

    Enviado por

    Jack Ryan
    09/28/2016 1358 Order of Dismissal of Appeal by USCA-9th Circuit as to Shawna Cox regarding Notice of Appeal - Interlocutory 1088 USCA # 16-30193. The motion of appellant's standby counsel in the district court, Tiffany A. Harris, to withdraw as counsel of record in this appeal is granted. The Clerk shall enter on the docket appellant, 1031 South Monument Road, Kanab, Utah 84741, as appearing pro se. We conclude that we lack jurisdiction over this appeal because the district court's August 15, 2016 order is not appealable as a final judgment or an order that comes within the collateral order doctrine. See 28 U.S.C. § 1291; Midland Asphalt Corp. v. United States, 489 U.S. 794, 798 (1989) (stating that finality requirement generally "prohibits appellate review until after conviction and imposition of sentence"). All other pending motions are denied as moot. DISMISSED. (jtj) (Entered: 09/28/2016)

    Direitos autorais:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Baixe no formato PDF, TXT ou leia online no Scribd
    Sinalizar o conteúdo como inadequado
    de 2

    Case 3:16-cr-00051-BR

    Document 1358

    Filed 09/28/16

    Page 1 of 2

    FILED
    SEP 27 2016

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    v.

    No.

    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK


    U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

    16-30193

    D.C. No. 3:16-cr-00051-BR-7


    District of Oregon,
    Portland

    SHAWNA COX,
    ORDER
    Defendant-Appellant.

    Before: WARDLAW, CALLAHAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.


    The motion of appellants standby counsel in the district court, Tiffany A.
    Harris, to withdraw as counsel of record in this appeal is granted. The Clerk shall
    enter on the docket appellant, 1031 South Monument Road, Kanab, Utah 84741, as
    appearing pro se.
    We conclude that we lack jurisdiction over this appeal because the district
    courts August 15, 2016 order is not appealable as a final judgment or an order that
    comes within the collateral order doctrine. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; Midland Asphalt
    Corp. v. United States, 489 U.S. 794, 798 (1989) (stating that finality requirement
    generally prohibits appellate review until after conviction and imposition of
    sentence).
    AC/MOATT

    Case 3:16-cr-00051-BR

    Document 1358

    Filed 09/28/16

    All other pending motions are denied as moot.


    DISMISSED.

    AC/MOATT

    Page 2 of 2

    Você também pode gostar