Gi Rep Mahisiakhal Final

2015
DESIGNERS FORUM
GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT
NAME OF THE PROJECT: GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION FOR INSITU
REDEVELOPMENT OF MAHISIAKHAL SLUM, BHUBANESWAR UNDER RAJIV
AWAS YOJANA.
LOCATION: Borehole No. 12 to 19, Mahisiakhal, Khurda, Odisha.
CLIENT: BHUBANESWAR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Sample Ref. No: IDAX/QC/SOIL/582
Report Ref. No: IDAX/REP/2015070002/EXP-GI/2015-16/1227
TESTING AGENCY:
IDAX CONSULTING & RESEARCH GROUP
Plot No. - 5016, Duplex-E, Brundaban Enclave, VSS Nagar,
Bhubaneswar-751007, Odisha (INDIA).
Tel: +91-674-3199991, 2360019, Fax: +91-674-2360019
E-mail: info@idaxconsulting.com
Web: www.idaxconsulting.com
Date of Test: 19.07.2015 to 05.08.2015

Date of Submission of Report: 12.08.2015
PREFACE
IDAX CONSULTING & RESEARCH GROUP is pleased to submit the geotechnical
investigation
report
for
Eight
Bore
Holes
at
Mahisiakhal
for
Insitu
Redevelopment of Mahisiakhal slum, Bhubaneswar under Rajiv Awas Yojana

Project of Designers Forum at Mahisiakhal of Khurda District, Odisha. The
objective of this investigation is to ascertain the characteristics of sub-soil to present
necessary information for sub-surface. It was endeavored to study in detail the subsurface conditions at the project site.
The general soil profiles and the geological stratification have been determined.
The field and laboratory works have been conducted as per relevant IS Codes.
This is to certify that the samples are collected from the proposed site for the Eight
Bore Holes at Mahisiakhal for Insitu Redevelopment of Mahisiakhal slum,
Bhubaneswar under Rajiv Awas Yojana Project of Designers Forum at Mahisiakhal
of Khurda District, Odisha by IDAX CONSULTING & RESEARCH GROUP, VSS
NAGAR, BHUBANESWAR-751007. The laboratory tests have been performed
under the supervision of qualified personal, as per the Indian standards and this
report is prepared on the basis of these tests results and experts experience.
For IDAX CONSULTING & RESEARCH GROUP.
Engineer Civil (Soil)

Er. Niharika kar
B. Tech- Civil
Project Code: 2015070002-GI
(Head - Civil)
Er. Deepak Kumar Mallick
B. Tech (Hons.) Civil (IIT Kharagpur)
Page 1 of 63
CONTENTS
Sl. No.
PARTICULARS
PAGES
01.
INTRODUCTION
03
02.
SCOPE OF WORK
03 - 04
03.
DETAILS OF FIELD WORK
05
04.
LABORATORY TESTS
06 - 07
05.
DETERMINATION OF ALLOWABLE BEARING CAPACITY
08
06.
ANALYSIS OF SUB-SOIL INVESTIGATION
08 - 09
07.
FOUNDATION & RECOMMENDATION
08
08.
LIMITATION
09
09.
CLOSURE
09
BORE LOG & LAB TEST RESULTS OF BORE HOLE

ABP CALCULATIONS
RECORD OF BORING
Page 2 of 63
1. INTRODUCTION
Intending to provide a safe, sound and economical foundation system for the Sub - Soil
Exploration work for Eight Bore Holes at Mahisiakhal for Insitu Redevelopment of
Mahisiakhal slum, Bhubaneswar under Rajiv Awas Yojana Project of Designers

Forum at Mahisiakhal of Khurda District, Odisha and the work for conducting
detailed soil investigation work has been awarded by Designers Forum, to M/s IDAX
Consulting & Research Group, VSS Nagar, Bhubaneswar-751007.
i.
Objectives of Sub-soil Exploration
The objective of this Geo-technical investigation is to optimize the Foundation system for
proposed Project within the safe bearing capacity of the soil and allowable settlement, it
consists of the following
Determination of type, size and depth of foundation- system by analyzing the soil
properties
To suggest a conclusive recommendation for the type of foundation System to be adopted
which would be economically viable and structurally safe for the proposed structures of the
projects.
ii.
Limitations of Investigation
The scope of Geo-technical exploration is confined within limitations of the framework of

agreement drawn between DESIGNERS FORUM and M/s IDAX Consulting & research
Group, Bhubaneswar-751007. All the field and laboratory experiments have been carried out
as per the Technical specification of the client and the relevant Indian Standard Code of
practice. However the directions issued by the authority in this respect has been given due
emphasis during the sub soil exploration work.
2. SCOPE OF WORK
The scope of work comprises of conducting detail soil investigation, laboratory testing,
conducting and estimation of safe bearing capacity for the above proposed work on drilled
borehole as shown by the Engineer-in charge.
i.
Nature of Investigation Work
The all investigation consists of the following:

Visual reconnaissance of the site.
Field Work-Drilling of bore hole up to the required depth.
Page 3 of 63
Laboratory experiments, determination of soil parameters.

Analysis of field and Laboratory data
Arriving at the conclusive decision on foundation system to be adopted in the present
case using Our Engineering judgment, based on the current practice. The detailed
Geo-technical investigation work that was carried out consists of two parts.
ii.
Field Investigation:
The field investigation consists of the following methods
Location of One number of bore hole with due consultation with the authority.
Boring / drilling up to 10.0 m depth below N.G.L or refusal.
Conducting standard penetration test (SPT) & Collection of undisturbed sample
(UDS) at the locations prefixed by the Engineer-in-charge.
Observation of the depth of water table in the Borehole.
Study of site condition and surroundings with regards to the need of the Project.
Taking observation of surrounding structure to observe any deficiency in safety.
Transportation of all soil samples to laboratory for analysis with proper care.
iii.
Laboratory Tests:
The Laboratory tests for the sample collected are given below
Determination of Grain size analysis
Determination of soil moisture content
Determination of liquid limit
Determination of plastic limit
Determination of specific gravity
Determination of Allowable Bearing Pressure of Rock.
Page 4 of 63
3. DETAILS OF FIELD WORK

i.
Selection of Borehole:
Eight Bore-holes were selected by the Engineer in charge in order to obtain comprehensive
sub-soil data for this site with a provision of borings up to 10.0m depth as required as per IS:
1892 - 1979. For detailed laboratory investigation SPT is conducted @ 1.50 m intervals or at
change of soil Strata in different Boreholes and S.P.T soil samples were collected for
laboratory analysis. Disturbed representative, soil samples from all the Boreholes were
collected at 1.5 m. interval for different tests.
ii.
Boring:
It is the main part of sub soil investigation work as the soil samples were collected for
different tests at different levels. The sub-soil exploration work at the proposed site was
carried out manually / mechanically using 150 mm diameter shell and auger manual
equipment in soft strata and power operated Mechanical boring in hard strata using diamond
cutter , as per IS : 1892 1979 .
iii.
Standard Penetration Tests:
Standard penetration test plays a major role in sub soil investigation termination of safe
bearing capacity of soil in non cohesive type soil, particularly in non-cohesive granular sandy
soil and where the UDS could not be collected either due to high liquidity or non cohesive
nature of soil .The SPT tests were conducted as per IS: 2131-1981 respectively, in different
levels of the bore holes in a continuous manner using spilt-spoon samplers at locations
decided by Engineer-in-charge. The SPT sampler was lower inside the borehole after drilling
the required level and is driven by a 63.50 kg Rammer with a free fall of 750 mm. driving 450
mm in One stages 150 mm each and the number of blows for each 150mm penetration for
2nd & 3rd 150 mm drive recorded as N. Refusal was considered for N>100. The details of
location of test and SPT value [N] are presented in bore log data annexed separately.
iv.
Ground Water Table:
During exploration work of the borehole, 24hours observation it is found that the water table
is at 2.20m depth in BH-12, 1.80m depth in BH-13, 3.0m depth in BH-14 , 2.80m depth in
BH-15 ,2.0m depth in BH-16, 2.10m depth in BH-17, 2.0m depth in BH-18, 1.80m depth in
BH-19 within the Boring depth from the existing ground level depending on the location of
boring. The water table may be fluctuating due to change of season.
Page 5 of 63
4. LABORATORY TESTS
The laboratory-tests were conducted on selected representative disturbed / undisturbed soil
samples collected from different Borehole drilled at the proposed site. The tests include
Grain size analysis, Natural moisture content, D.F.S, Specific Gravity and Liquid limit, Plastic
limit, Plasticity index, Shear test, and Particles size distribution tests on representative soil
sample were also carried out. All the tests conducted confirming to the requirements of I.S
specification. The results of all these tests have been annexed separately.
i.
Grain Size Analysis:
The grain size analysis of different soil samples were done as per the requirement of IS:
2720 (Pt-IV) 1985 method of test for soil, Grain size analysis. The details of the test results
are shown test result sheet separately. The results of grain size analysis are used to classify
the soil in various depths of boreholes. The results of all these tests have been annexed
separately.
ii.
Natural Moisture Content:
The natural moisture content was determined from different undisturbed samples of different
Boreholes at different depths, as per IS: 2720(Pt-II)-1973: Method of test for soil,
determination of Water content. It is used for determining specific gravity, optimum moisture
content, S.B.C, settlement of foundation system. The results of all these tests have been
annexed separately.
iii.
Determination of Specific Gravity:
The specific gravity of the UDS / DS samples have been determined at different levels as
per IS: 2720 (Pt-III) - 1980. It is used for determining void ratio, porosity, saturated density,
S.B.C, settlement of foundation system. The results of all these tests have been annexed
separately.
iv.
Determination of Void Ratio:
The void-ratio of the UDS / DS samples has been determined at different levels and the
results are shown separately. It is used for determining specific gravity, optimum moisture
content, S.B.C, settlement of foundation system. The results of all these tests have been
annexed separately.
v.
Determination of Liquid Limit / Plastic Limit:
The liquid and plastic limits of soils were other index properties of soil have also been
determined as per the relevant as per IS: 2720(Pt-v)-1985 Code of practice. The liquid and
plastic limits of soil samples have been determined in the laboratory and it is used for
Page 6 of 63
determining S.B.C, settlement of foundation system etc. The results of all these tests have
been annexed separately.
5. DETERMINATION OF SAFE BEARING CAPACITY (SBC)

Depth in mtrs.
Net Safe Bearing

Capacity in T/m2.
Gross Safe Bearing

Capacity in T/m2.
1.5
17.42
18.92
3.0
25.16
28.16
1.5
15.46
16.96
3.0
25.16
28.16
1.5
13.45
15.08
3.0
25.16
28.16
1.5
21.17
22.65
3.0
75.36
78.36
1.5
9.69
11.30
3.0
25.16
28.16
BH-17
1.5
40.32
41.82
BH-18
1.5
13.13
14.63
1.5
15.46
16.96
3.0
25.16
28.16
Borehole
BH-12
BH 13
BH 14
BH 15
BH 16
BH-19
6. DETERMINATION OF ALLOWABLE BEARING PRESSURE (ABP)

The allowable bearing pressure has been calculated as per IS: 2131& IS: 8009 (part-1) at
different depth from the existing ground level. The details of the calculation are annexed
separately.
Page 7 of 63
Allowable Bearing Pressure in T/m2
Borehole
Depth in mtrs.
25mm
Settlement
40mm
Settlement
75mm
Settlement
1.50
19.32
30.91
57.95
3.00
19.95
31.92
59.84
BH 12
Borehole
Depth in mtrs.
25mm
Settlement
40mm
Settlement
75mm
Settlement
1.50
17.30
27.68
51.90
3.00
22.55
36.08
67.65
BH 13
Borehole
Depth in mtrs.
25mm
Settlement
40mm
Settlement
75mm
Settlement
3.00
22.12
35.38
66.35
4.50
25.80
41.29
77.41
6.00
22.80
36.48
68.39
7.50
23.70
37.92
71.10
9.00
31.58
50.53
94.75
10.0
31.33
50.12
93.98
BH 14
Page 8 of 63
Borehole
Depth in mtrs.
25mm
Settlement
40mm
Settlement
75mm
Settlement
3.00
26.89
43.02
80.66
4.50
31.90
51.05
95.71
6.00
23.29
37.26
69.87
7.50
21.19
33.90
63.57
9.00
23.41
37.45
70.22
10.0
28.83
46.12
86.48
BH 15
Borehole
BH 16
Depth in mtrs.
3.00
25mm
Settlement
40mm
Settlement
75mm
Settlement
20.38
32.61
61.14
Borehole
BH 17
Depth in mtrs.
1.50
25mm
Settlement
40mm
Settlement
75mm
Settlement
27.19
43.50
81.57
Page 9 of 63
Borehole
Depth in mtrs.
1.50
BH 18
25mm
Settlement
40mm
Settlement
75mm
Settlement
22.47
35.96
67.42
Borehole
Depth in mtrs.
25mm
Settlement
40mm
Settlement
75mm
Settlement
1.50
16.88
27.01
50.63
3.00
19.95
31.92
59.84
BH 19
7. ANALYSIS OF THE SUB-SOIL INVESTIGATION

LOCATION: Mahisiakhal, Khurda
Borehole No. - 12 was explored up to a depth of 10.0m the sub soil strata of the Borehole
is summarized as follows.
LAYER- 1
The layer starts form 0.0m to 3.0m consists of Poorly graded clayey sand. The soil sample in
this layer was tested and results are summarized. The average weight was Gravel- 29%,
Sand- 46%, and Silt & Clay- 25%. The engineering classification of the soil is SC as per IS:
1498-1970.
LAYER-2
The layer starts form 4.50m to 10.0m consists of Broken boulder pieces not suitable for test.
Page 10 of 63
LAYER- 1
The layer at 0.0m consists of Poorly graded clayey sand. The soil sample in this layer was
tested and results are summarized. The average weight was Gravel- 32%, Sand- 42%, and
Silt & Clay- 26%. The engineering classification of the soil is SC as per IS: 1498-1970.
LAYER- 2
The layer starts form 1.50m to 3.0m consists of Poorly graded sand. The soil sample in this
layer was tested and results are summarized. The average weight was Gravel-20%, Sand76%, and Silt & Clay- 04%. The engineering classification of the soil is SP as per IS: 14981970.
LAYER-3
LAYER- 1
The layer starts form 0.0m to 1.50m & 6.0m to 9.0m consists of Poorly graded clayey gravel.
The soil sample in this layer was tested and results are summarized. The average weight
was Gravel- 45%, Sand- 31%, and Silt & Clay- 24%. The engineering classification of the
soil is GC as per IS: 1498-1970.
LAYER- 2
The layer starts form 3.0m to 4.50m & 10.0m consists of Poorly graded clayey sand. The soil
sample in this layer was tested and results are summarized. The average weight was
Gravel- 04%, Sand- 63%, and Silt & Clay- 33%. The engineering classification of the soil is
SC as per IS: 1498-1970.
LAYER- 1
The layer starts form at 0.0m & 4.50m consists of Poorly graded clayey gravel. The soil
sample in this layer was tested and results are summarized. The average weight was
Gravel- 43%, Sand- 37%, and Silt & Clay- 20%. The engineering classification of the soil is
GC as per IS: 1498-1970.
LAYER- 2
The layer starts form 1.50m to 3.0m & 6.0m to 10.50m consists of Poorly graded clayey
sand. The soil sample in this layer was tested and results are summarized. The average
weight was Gravel- 12%, Sand- 56%, and Silt & Clay- 32%. The engineering classification of
the soil is SC as per IS: 1498-1970.
Page 11 of 63
LAYER- 1
The layer starts form 0.0m to 1.50m consists of Poorly graded clayey sand. The soil sample
in this layer was tested and results are summarized. The average weight was Gravel- 31%,
1498-1970.
LAYER- 2
The layer at 3.0m consists of Poorly graded sand. The soil sample in this layer was tested
and results are summarized. The average weight was Gravel- 24%, Sand- 70%, and Silt &
Clay- 06%. The engineering classification of the soil is SP as per IS: 1498-1970.
LAYER-3
LAYER- 1
The layer starts form 0.0m to 1.50m consists of Poorly graded clayey gravel. The soil sample
Sand- 29%, and Silt & Clay- 31%. The engineering classification of the soil is GC as per IS:
1498-1970.
LAYER-2
Borehole No. - 18was explored up to a depth of 10.0m the sub soil strata of the Borehole
LAYER- 1
The layer starts form 0.0m to 1.50m consists of Poorly graded clayey sand. The soil sample
1498-1970.
LAYER-2
LAYER- 1
The layer starts form 0.0m to 3.0m consists of Poorly graded clayey sand. The soil sample in
this layer was tested and results are summarized. The average weight was Gravel- 29%,
1498-1970.
Page 12 of 63
LAYER-2
8. FOUNDATION & RECOMMENDATION

Based on our field and laboratory investigation, the following recommendations are made:
i.
The stratum encountered in different boreholes at different depths is presented in

respective soil profile sheets.
ii.
The water table if encountered in the boreholes is also indicated in the soil profile
sheets.
iii.
The depth of foundation shall be decided based on bearing capacity and uplift
resistance required.
iv.
As per site condition which, visual observations of soil samples at site, field bore log
record, local geology of the area, type of sample received, laboratory classification of
soil samples and based on the experience of our Geotechnical Expert, it is
recommended to provide open foundation.
v.
The recommended safe bearing capacity for the footing is computed based on
footing size as specified for suggested foundations are given below. It is feasible to
provide open foundations. Open foundations can be placed at a depth of 3.0m below
the existing ground level. However for heavily loaded structures the foundation depth
can be increased as per the design load.
vi.
The SBC at 1.50m depth is 18T/m2 & 3.0m depth is 34T/m2 is recommended for the
foundation design based on the calculations and the experience.
9. LIMITATION
The soil investigation has been carried out at the location chosen by the client.
Recommendations made in the report are hence valid only for these tests locations.
However if there is any change in subsoil conditions and properties at places beyond chosen
test locations, the soil consultants be contacted for further guidance.
10. CLOSURE
We appreciate the opportunity given to us to submit this draft report. This presented report is
based on observations and tests on samples collected from the boreholes as decided by the
client. In case any difference is noticed in the field subsoil strata and reported subsoil strata
during excavation please contact us before proceeding with further construction.
Page 13 of 63
NB:
The above test reports are based on the sample received by our laboratory.
The test results relates only to the items tested.
The report shall not be reproduced except in full without the approval of the testing
laboratory.
For IDAX CONSULTING & RESEARCH GROUP.
Engineer Civil (Soil)

Er. Niharika kar
B. Tech- Civil
(Head - Civil)
Er. Deepak Kumar Mallick
B. Tech (Hons.) Civil (IIT Kharagpur)
Page 14 of 63
BORE LOG AND LAB TEST RESULTS OF BOREHOLES
Page 15 of 63
Borehole No. - 12
Type of Soil
Soil
Profile
Depth
in mtrs.
N
SPT Value "N" Depth Plot
Type of
Sample
N1 - N2 - N3
0
0.00
Poorly graded
clayey sand
Core
Recovery
(%)
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
0.0
1.0
SC
30
12-13-17
SPT Sample
15-17-20
SPT Sample
2.0
WL:
2.80m
3.0
37
4.0
5.0
6.0
Broken Boulder
Pieces Not
Suitable For
Test
LATERITE
7.0
8.0
9.0
10.0
Page 16 of 63
R.Q.D
(%)
Borehole No. -13
Type of Soil
Soil
Profile
Depth
in mtrs.
N
Type of
Sample
N1 - N2 - N3
0
0.00
Poorly graded
clayey sand
Core
Recovery
(%)
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
0.0
SC
1.0
32
Poorly graded
sand
2.0
SP
3.0
14-15-17
SPT Sample
17-20-23
SPT Sample
WL:
1.80m
43
4.0
5.0
6.0
Broken Boulder
Pieces Not
Suitable For
Test
7.0
8.0
9.0
10.0
Page 17 of 63
R.Q.D
(%)
Borehole No. - 14
Type of Soil
Soil
Profile
Depth
in mtrs.
Type of
Sample
N1 - N2 - N3
0
0.00
Poorly graded
clayey gravel
Core
Recovery
(%)
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
0.0
GC
1.0
2.0
Poorly graded
clayey sand
SC
3.0
42
13-17-25
SPT Sample
20-22-24
SPT Sample
15-18-22
SPT Sample
18-22-23
SPT Sample
28-32-34
SPT Sample
30-28-36
SPT Sample
WL:
3.0m
4.0
46
5.0
6.0
Poorly graded
clayey gravel
40
GC
7.0
45
8.0
9.0
Poorly graded
clayey sand
66
SC
10.0
64
Page 18 of 63
R.Q.D
(%)
Borehole No. - 15
Type of Soil
Soil
Profile
Depth
in mtrs.
Type of
Sample
N1 - N2 - N3
0
0.00
Poorly graded
clayey gravel
Core
Recovery
(%)
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
0.0
GC
1.0
Poorly graded
clayey sand
SC
2.0
53
WL:
2.80m
3.0
Poorly graded
clayey gravel
20-28-25
SPT Sample
30-35-24
SPT Sample
15-19-22
SPT Sample
16-19-20
SPT Sample
18-22-24
SPT Sample
17-26-32
SPT Sample
GC
4.0
59
5.0
6.0
41
7.0
Poorly graded
clayey sand
SC
39
8.0
9.0
10.0
46
58
Page 19 of 63
R.Q.D
(%)
Borehole No.-16
Type of Soil
Soil
Profile
Depth
in mtrs.
Type of
Sample
N1 - N2 - N3
0
0.00
Poorly graded
clayey sand
Poorly graded
sand
SC
Core
Recovery
(%)
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
0.0
1.0
2.0
SP
WL:
2.0m
3.0
45
13-17-21
SPT Sample
4.0
5.0
6.0
Broken Boulder
Pieces Not
Suitable For
Test
7.0
8.0
9.0
10.0
Page 20 of 63
R.Q.D
(%)
Borehole No. - 17
Type of Soil
Soil
Profile
Depth
in mtrs.
Type of
Sample
N1 - N2 - N3
0
0.00
Poorly graded
clayey sand
Core
Recovery
(%)
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
0.0
GC
1.0
48
19-23-25
SPT Sample
2.0
WL:
2.10m
3.0
4.0
5.0
Broken Boulder
Pieces Not
Suitable For
Test
LATERITE
6.0
7.0
8.0
9.0
10.0
Page 21 of 63
R.Q.D
(%)
Borehole No. - 18
Type of Soil
Soil
Profile
Depth
in mtrs.
Type of
Sample
N1 - N2 - N3
0
0.00
Poorly graded
clayey sand
SC
Core
Recovery
(%)
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
0.0
1.0
15-19-21
30
SPT Sample
2.0
WL:
2.00m
3.0
4.0
5.0
Broken Boulder
Pieces Not
Suitable For
Test
LATERITE
6.0
7.0
8.0
9.0
10.0
Page 22 of 63
R.Q.D
(%)
Borehole No. - 19
Type of Soil
Soil
Profile
Depth
in mtrs.
Type of
Sample
N1 - N2 - N3
0
0.00
Poorly graded
clayey sand
SC
Core
Recovery
(%)
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
0.0
1.0
31
2.0
3.0
13-14-17
SPT Sample
16-18-19
SPT Sample
WL:
1.80m
37
4.0
5.0
6.0
Broken Boulder
Pieces Not
Suitable For
Test
LATERITE
7.0
8.0
9.0
10.0
Page 23 of 63
R.Q.D
(%)
Page 24 of 63
BHNo.-12
SPT
BARREL
4.5-10.0
SPT
1.5
3.0
DS
0.0
Co-ordinate : N201548, E 8551621
S a m p lin g D e p th (m )
LOCATION: Block No.- 12, MAHISIAKHAL
L O C A T IO N N o .
T y p e o f s a m p le
37
30
S P T V a lu e ( N )
26.81
32.06
29.17
G ra v e l in %
(2 0 m m - 4 .7 5 m m )
17.50
16.45
19.03
16.02
15.48
17.31
25.20
28.19
22.57
20
20
20
31
33
31
18
19
18
Atterbergs Limits
RL: 44.5m
13
14
13
SC
SC
SC
CLIENT: DESIGNERS FORUM
Broken Boulder Pieces Not Suitable For Test
14.47
7.82
11.92
TABLE - 1
SUMMARY SHEET RESULT OF SOIL SAMPLE
Grain size analysis
C o a r s e S a n d in %
(4 .7 5 m m - 2 m m )
M e d iu m S a n d in %
(2 m m - .4 2 5 m m )
F in e S a n d in %
(.4 2 5 m m .0 7 5 m m )
S ilty & C la y in %
(.0 7 5 m m P a s s in g )
D .F .S . In %
L iq u id L im it ( % )
P la s tic L im it ( % )
P la s tic ity In d e x (% )
C la s s ific a tio n o f S o il
11.92
12.67
8.31
N a tu r a l M o is tu re
c o n te n t( % )
2.65
2.63
2.65
S p e c ific g ra v ity
Page 25 of 63
BH No.-13
SPT
BARREL
4.5-10.0
SPT
1.5
3.0
DS
0.0
43
32
Co-ordinate : N2015018 , E 08550811
S P T V a lu e (N )
21.69
18.51
35.84
G ra v e l in %
(2 0 m m 4 .7 5 m m )
12.78
15.35
10.07
52.30
55.73
14.02
5.02
3.91
26.84
10
18
18
30
Np
Np
19
Atterbergs Limits
RL: 44.2m
Np
Np
11
SP
SP
SC
4.23
6.51
11.38
8.21
6.50
13.23
Grain size analysis
TABLE - 1
C o a rs e S a n d in
%
(4 .7 5 m m 2m m )
M e d iu m S a n d in
%
(2 m m - .4 2 5 m m )
F in e S a n d in %
(.4 2 5 m m .0 7 5 m m )
(.0 7 5 m m P a s s in g )
D .F .S . In %
L iq u id L im it
(% )
P la s tic L im it
(% )
P la s tic ity
In d e x (% )
N a tu ra l M o is tu re
c o n te n t(% )
2.59
2.58
2.62
LO C ATIO N N o.
BH No.-14
SPT
4.5
SPT
SPT
9.0
10.0
SPT
SPT
3.0
7.5
UDS
1.5
SPT
DS
Sam pling D epth (m )
6.0
Type of sam ple
0.0
SPT Value (N )
64
66
45
40
46
42
G ravel in %
(20m m - 4.75m m )
3.84
42.19
37.30
46.72
0.00
0.00
37.66
62.61
C oarse S and in %
(4.75m m - 2m m )
7.63
9.03
8.23
6.66
5.02
1.78
9.49
6.20
15.97
8.33
25.32
28.36 26.41 33.76
11.24 11.61 25.93
15.72 10.09 28.66
12.97
50.69 15.33 28.96
44.16 16.77 37.29
15.99 10.52 26.34
7.21
M edium Sand in %
(2m m - .425m m )
Fine Sand in %
(.425m m .075m m )
Silty & C lay in %
(.075m m Passing)
8.01
D .F.S . In %
10
20
20
20
20
20
20
10
Liquid Lim it (% )
29
29
30
29
33
33
31
28
18
18
18
18
21
21
20
18
Plastic Lim it (% )
Atterbergs Limits
11
11
12
11
12
12
11
10
C lassification of Soil
SC
GC
GC
GC
SC
SC
GC
GC
Density test
9.82
13.21
12.25
13.99
12.14
12.90
16.21
1.972 1.722 14.51
Bulk density in
gm /cc.
Grain size analysis
Plasticity Index (% )
RL: 37m
D ry density in
gm /cc.
Co-ordinate : N 2015015 , E 08550479
N atural M oisture
content(% )
2.70
2.73
2.75
2.74
2.65
2.63
2.72
2.75
Shear Parameters
Specific gravity
DS
Type of Test
0.26
13
C ohesion ( C )
Kg/cm 2
Angle of internal
friction() in
D egree
TABLE - 1
Void R atio (e o)
0.58
Page 26 of 63
LO C ATIO N N o.
BH No.-15
SPT
4.5
SPT
SPT
9.0
10.0
SPT
SPT
3.0
7.5
UDS
1.5
SPT
DS
Sam pling D epth (m )
6.0
Type of sam ple
0.0
SPT Value (N )
58
46
30
41
59
53
G ravel in %
(20m m - 4.75m m )
C oarse S and in %
(4.75m m - 2m m )
6.77
9.01
45.93 19.25 20.99
25.10 17.41 37.54
21.01
8.63
9.01
7.88
22.33 15.25 43.55
22.48 13.11 18.31
26.00 15.74 41.47
21.81 10.10 22.94 13.79 31.36
10.24
13.22
8.91
42.20 10.23 17.70 10.53 19.34
7.06
10.94
8.69
M edium Sand in %
(2m m - .425m m )
Fine Sand in %
(.425m m .075m m )
Silty & C lay in %
(.075m m Passing)
44.19 11.65 14.46
D .F.S . In %
15
20
20
20
15
10
20
20
Liquid Lim it (% )
31
34
34
35
31
30
32
30
19
20
19
20
19
20
18
17
Plastic Lim it (% )
Atterbergs Limits
12
14
15
15
12
10
14
13
C lassification of Soil
SC
SC
SC
SC
GC
SC
SC
GC
Density test
14.62
15.70
16.28
14.06
15.46
17.24
14.64
1.871 1.595 17.31
Bulk density in
gm /cc.
Grain size analysis
Plasticity Index (% )
RL: 35m
D ry density in
gm /cc.
Co-ordinate : N 0379524 , E 2239631
N atural M oisture
content(% )
2.72
2.64
2.70
2.71
2.73
2.75
2.60
2.65
Shear Parameters
Specific gravity
DS
Type of Test
0.36
18
C ohesion ( C )
Kg/cm 2
Angle of internal
friction() in
D egree
TABLE - 1
Void R atio (e o)
0.63
Page 27 of 63
Page 28 of 63
BHNo.-16
SPT
BARREL
4.5-10.0
UDS
1.5
3.0
DS
0.0
Co-ordinate : N2015038, E 08550808
S a m p lin g D e p th ( m )
38
LOCATION: Block No.-16, MAHISIAKHAL
S P T V a lu e (N )
24.02 16.91 45.50

7.63
9.53
5.94
32.43
31.56 15.19 17.31 10.08 25.86
29.56 12.38 16.10
10
10
Np
19
19
Np
11
10
SP
SC
SC
1.943
1.73
Densitytest
RL: 35.6m
4.91
12.3
10.51
2.64
2.63
2.60
DS
0.23
9
Shear Parameters
18
30
29
Atterbergs Limits
TABLE- 1
SUMMARYSHEET RESULT OF SOIL SAMPLE
Grain size analysis
G ra v e l in %
(2 0 m m 4 .7 5 m m )
C o a rs e S a n d in
%
(4 .7 5 m m M e d iu m S a n d in
%
(2 m m - .4 2 5 m m )
F in e S a n d in %
(.4 2 5 m m .0 7 5 m m )
(.0 7 5 m m P a s s in g )
D .F .S . In %
L iq u id L im it
(% )
P la s tic L im it
(% )
P la s tic ity
In d e x ( % )
B u lk d e n s ity in
g m /c c .
D r y d e n s ity in
g m /c c .
N a tu r a l M o is tu re
c o n te n t( % )
S p e c ific g r a v ity
Type of Test
C o h e s io n ( C
) K g /c m 2
A n g le o f
in te r n a l
fr ic tio n ( ) in
0.52
V o id R a tio (e o )
Page 29 of 63
BHNO-17
DS
BARREL
1.5
3.0-10.0
DS
0.0
Co-ordinate: N2015084, E08550836
48
LOCATION: BlockNo.- 17, MAHISIAKHAL
39.08
41.50
G r a v e l in %
(2 0 m m - 4 .7 5 m m )
7.01
11.82
11.54
8.03
32.03
29.11
20
20
31
32
19
20
Atterbergs Limits
RL: 42.8m
12
12
GC
GC
CLIENT: DESIGNERSFORUM
BrokenBoulder Pieces Not SuitableFor Test
10.34
9.54
TABLE- 1
SUMMARYSHEET RESULTOFSOILSAMPLE
Grainsizeanalysis
(4 .7 5 m m - 2 m m )
( 2 m m - .4 2 5 m m )
F in e S a n d in %
( .4 2 5 m m .0 7 5 m m )
( .0 7 5 m m P a s s in g )
D .F .S . In %
P la s t ic L im it ( % )
P la s t ic it y In d e x ( % )
C la s s if ic a tio n o f S o il
15.96
12.61
N a tu r a l M o is t u r e
c o n te n t( % )
2.67
2.65
S p e c ific g r a v it y
Page 30 of 63
BHNo.-18
SPT
BARREL
1.5
3.0-10.0
DS
0.0
Co-ordinate: N2015033, E08550836
40
LOCATION: BlockNo.- 18, MAHISIAKHAL
28.04
31.02
G r a v e l in %
( 2 0 m m - 4 .7 5 m m )
14.30
17.54
17.26
14.41
23.78
25.50
20
20
33
32
19
18
AtterbergsLimits
RL: 43.9m
14
14
SC
SC
CLIENT: DESIGNERSFORUM
BrokenBoulder PiecesNot SuitableFor Test
16.62
11.53
TABLE- 1
SUMMARYSHEET RESULTOFSOILSAMPLE
Grainsizeanalysis
( 4 .7 5 m m - 2 m m )
( 2 m m - .4 2 5 m m )
F in e S a n d in %
( .4 2 5 m m .0 7 5 m m )
( .0 7 5 m m P a s s in g )
D .F .S . In %
P la s tic L im it ( % )
P la s tic ity In d e x ( % )
13.51
9.56
N a tu r a l M o is tu r e
c o n te n t( % )
2.65
2.66
S p e c ific g r a v ity
Page 31 of 63
BHNo.-19
SPT
BARREL
4.5-10.0
DS
1.5
3.0
DS
0.0
Co-ordinate : N2015039 , E 0855892
37
31
S P T V a lu e (N )
25.11
29.05
32.51
G ra v e l in %
(2 0 m m - 4 .7 5 m m )
9.74
11.68
13.27
16.48
17.53
14.31
28.91
24.77
20.59
10
10
10
31
31
29
20
20
20
Atterbergs Limits
RL: 43.5m
11
11
SC
SC
SC
19.76
16.97
19.32
TABLE - 1
Grain size analysis
C o a rs e S a n d in %
(4 .7 5 m m - 2 m m )
(2 m m - .4 2 5 m m )
F in e S a n d in %
(.4 2 5 m m .0 7 5 m m )
(.0 7 5 m m P a s s in g )
D .F .S . In %
L iq u id L im it (% )
P la s tic L im it (% )
P la s tic ity In d e x (% )
13.26
11.09
9.53
N a tu ra l M o is tu re
c o n te n t(% )
2.66
2.65
2.67
ALLOWABLE BEARING PRESSURE (ABP) AND SAFE

BEARING CAPACITY (SBC)
Page 32 of 63
CALCULATION OF ALLOWABLE BEARING PRESSURE (ABP) FOR

SETTLEMENT CRITERIA
Project Name: GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION FOR DESIGNERS FORUM
MAHISIAKHAL
Location:
Project Code:
Bore Hole No.:
Water Table:
12
References
Calculations
Input Data
Width / Diameter of Footing (Assumed)
Length of Footing (Assumed)
B
L
mtr.
mtr.
SQUARE
3.00
=
mtr.
= Elastic/Immediate (For Sandy & Granular Strata)
= Flexible Foundation
Type of Soil Strata

Type of Foundation
Cr
Correction Factor for Rigidity
Shape of the Foundation

Influence Zone below foundation level
2.20
mtr.
= Worst Condition Scenario (Submerged)
=
Corrected SPT value due

to over burden pressure
(N')
Corrected SPT value as

per Dilatancy (N")
Corresponding settlement in mm for

2
1kg/cm as per IS: 8009 (Part-I) Fig-9
(Si)
Correction Factor for Water Table as per

IS:8009 (Part-I) Cw
Fox Correction for Depth as per IS:8009

(Part-I), Fig-12 Cd
Final Corrected Settlement in mm

S=SixCdxCr/Cw
1.50
3.00
30
37
2
2
30.00
37.00
22.50
26.00
11.20
9.49
0.68
0.50
0.78
0.66
12.94
12.53
Correction of
SPT values
(IS:2131-1981)
mm settlement in
2
T/m .
Width of Footing in M.
(Assumed)
mtr.
Field SPT Value (N)
SPT Conducted at Depth in mtr.
Depth to be ignored in Depth Factor

Computation
for loose soils, poorly
compacted backfill, scour, etc.
=
YES
75
ABP for
Cd
mm settlement in
2
T/m .
Fox's Depth Factor to be Considered ?
40
Fig-12
ABP for
Water Table Factor to be Considered ?
mm settlement in
2
T/m .
Water Table depth below GL

Fig-9
N Value >3
1.0
25
Fig-11
ABP for
IS:8009 (Part-I)
2015070002
2.20 mtrs
19.32
19.95
30.91
31.92
57.95
59.84
Page 33 of 63

SETTLEMENT CRITERIA
MAHISIAKHAL
Location:
Project Code:
Bore Hole No.:
Water Table:
13
References
Input Data
mtr.
mtr.

Type of Soil Strata
Type of Foundation
1.0
=
Cr

YES
Factor
poorly

2
(Si)

IS:8009 (Part-I) Cw

(Part-I), Fig-12 Cd

S=SixCdxCr/Cw
2
2
32.00
43.00
23.50
29.00
10.65
8.40
0.58
0.50
0.78
0.66
14.45
11.09
mm settlement in
2
T/m .

per Dilatancy (N")
32
43
75

(N')
1.50
3.00
Correction of
SPT values
(IS:2131-1981)
ABP for
(Assumed)
mtr.
Field SPT Value (N)
N Value >3
Depth to be ignored in Depth

Computation
for loose soils,
Cd
mm settlement in
2
T/m .
mtr.
40
Fig-12
1.80
ABP for
mm settlement in
2
T/m .
Fig-9
SQUARE
3.00
mtr.
25
Fig-11
Calculations
ABP for
IS:8009 (Part-I)
2015070002
1.80 mtrs
17.30
22.55
27.68
36.08
51.90
67.65
Page 34 of 63

SETTLEMENT CRITERIA
Location:
MAHISIAKHAL
Project Code:
Bore Hole No.:
Water Table:
14
References
Calculations
Input Data
mtr.
mtr.

Type of Soil Strata

Type of Foundation
Cr
SQUARE
3.00
mtr.
1.0
3.00
Fig-9
Fig-12
YES
Factor
poorly

1kg/cm 2 as per IS: 8009 (Part-I) Fig-9
(Si)

IS:8009 (Part-I) Cw

(Part-I), Fig-12 Cd

S=SixCdxCr/Cw
ABP for
ABP for
ABP for
42.00
28.50
8.56
0.50
0.66
11.30
22.12
35.38
66.35
46
46.00
30.50
7.94
0.50
0.61
9.69
25.80
41.29
77.41
6.00
40
37.20
26.10
9.45
0.50
0.58
10.97
22.80
36.48
68.39
7.50
45
38.25
26.60
9.25
0.50
0.57
10.55
23.70
37.92
71.10
9.00
10.00
66
64
2
2
52.80
51.20
33.90
33.10
7.07
7.26
0.50
0.50
0.56
0.55
7.92
7.98
31.58
31.33
50.53
50.12
94.75
93.98
40
Page 35 of 63
mm settlement in
T/m2.

per Dilatancy (N")
42
4.50
mm settlement in
T/m2.

(N')
3.00
Correction of
SPT values
(IS:2131-1981)
mm settlement in
T/m2.
(Assumed)
mtr.
Field SPT Value (N)
N Value >3

Computation
for
loose
soils,
Cd
mtr.
25
Fig-11
75
IS:8009 (Part-I)
2015070002
3.00 mtrs

SETTLEMENT CRITERIA
Location:
MAHISIAKHAL
Project Code:
15
Bore Hole No.:

References
Calculations
Input Data
mtr.
mtr.

Type of Soil Strata

Type of Foundation
Cr
SQUARE
3.00
mtr.
1.0
2.80
Fig-9
Fig-12
YES

1kg/cm 2 as per IS: 8009 (Part-I) Fig-9
(Si)

IS:8009 (Part-I) Cw
53.00
34.00
7.04
0.50
4.50
59
59.00
37.00
6.42
0.50
6.00
41
38.13
26.60
9.25
0.50
7.50
39
33.15
24.10
10.35
9.00
10.00
46
58
2
2
36.80
46.40
25.90
30.70
9.54
7.88
26.89
43.02
80.66
0.61
7.84
31.90
51.05
95.71
0.58
10.73
23.29
37.26
69.87
0.50
0.57
11.80
21.19
33.90
63.57
0.50
0.50
0.56
0.55
10.68
8.67
23.41
28.83
37.45
46.12
70.22
86.48
40
25
Page 36 of 63
mm settlement in
2
T/m .
9.30
mm settlement in
T/m 2.
0.66
mm settlement in
T/m 2.
ABP for

per Dilatancy (N")
ABP for

(N')
53
ABP for
(Assumed)
3.00
Correction of
SPT values
(IS:2131-1981)
mtr.

S=SixCdxCr/Cw
Field SPT Value (N)
N Value >3
Cd
Factor
poorly

Computation
for
loose
soils,
mtr.

(Part-I), Fig-12 Cd
Fig-11
75
IS:8009 (Part-I)
2015070002
2.80 mtrs
Water Table:

SETTLEMENT CRITERIA
Location:
MAHISIAKHAL
Project Code:
Bore Hole No.:
Water Table:
16
References
Calculations
Input Data
mtr.
mtr.

SQUARE
3.00
mtr.
=
Type of Soil Strata

Type of Foundation
Cr
1.0
2.00
mtr.
YES
Factor
poorly

per Dilatancy (N")

2
(Si)

IS:8009 (Part-I) Cw

(Part-I), Fig-12 Cd

S=SixCdxCr/Cw
38.00
26.50
9.29
0.50
0.66
12.27
mm settlement in
2
T/m .

(N')
38
75
(Assumed)
3.00
Correction of
SPT values
(IS:2131-1981)
ABP for
Field SPT Value (N)
mtr.

Computation
for
loose soils,
Cd
mm settlement in
2
T/m .
40
Fig-12
ABP for
mm settlement in
2
T/m .
Fig-9
N Value >3
25
Fig-11
ABP for
IS:8009 (Part-I)
2015070002
2.00 mtrs
20.38
32.61
61.14
Page 37 of 63

SETTLEMENT CRITERIA
Location:
Project Code:
MAHISIAKHAL
Bore Hole No.:
Water Table:
17
References
Calculations
Input Data
mtr.
mtr.

SQUARE
3.00
=
mtr.
Type of Soil Strata

Type of Foundation
Cr
1.0
2.10
Fig-9
Fig-12
YES
Factor
poorly
0.65
0.78
9.19
mm settlement in
2
T/m .

S=SixCdxCr/Cw
7.66
ABP for

(Part-I), Fig-12 Cd
31.50
mm settlement in
2
T/m .

IS:8009 (Part-I) Cw
48.00
40

2
(Si)
ABP for

per Dilatancy (N")
48
mm settlement in
2
T/m .

(N')
1.50
Correction of
SPT values
(IS:2131-1981)
25
(Assumed)
mtr.
Field SPT Value (N)
N Value >3

Computation
for loose soils,
Cd
mtr.
ABP for
Fig-11
75
IS:8009 (Part-I)
2015070002
2.10 mtrs
27.19
43.50
81.57
Page 38 of 63

SETTLEMENT CRITERIA
Location:
Project Code:
MAHISIAKHAL
Bore Hole No.:
Water Table:
18
References
Calculations
Input Data
mtr.
mtr.

SQUARE
3.00
=
mtr.
Type of Soil Strata

Type of Foundation
Cr
1.0
2.00
Fig-9
Fig-12
YES
Factor
poorly
0.63
0.78
11.12
mm settlement in
2
T/m .

S=SixCdxCr/Cw
8.91
ABP for

(Part-I), Fig-12 Cd
27.50
mm settlement in
2
T/m .

IS:8009 (Part-I) Cw
40.00
40

2
(Si)
ABP for

per Dilatancy (N")
40
mm settlement in
2
T/m .

(N')
1.50
Correction of
SPT values
(IS:2131-1981)
25
(Assumed)
mtr.
Field SPT Value (N)
N Value >3

Computation
for loose soils,
Cd
mtr.
ABP for
Fig-11
75
IS:8009 (Part-I)
2015070002
2.00 mtrs
22.47
35.96
67.42
Page 39 of 63

SETTLEMENT CRITERIA
Location:
MAHISIAKHAL
Project Code:
Bore Hole No.:
Water Table:
19
References
Calculations
Input Data
mtr.
mtr.

SQUARE
3.00
=
mtr.
Type of Soil Strata

Type of Foundation
Cr
1.80
Fig-9
Fig-12
YES
Factor
poorly
0.58
0.50
0.78
0.66
14.81
12.53
ABP for

S=SixCdxCr/Cw
10.92
9.49
mm settlement in
2
T/m .

(Part-I), Fig-12 Cd
23.00
26.00
40

IS:8009 (Part-I) Cw
31.00
37.00
ABP for

2
(Si)
2
2
mm settlement in
2
T/m .

per Dilatancy (N")
31
37
25

(N')
1.50
3.00
Correction of
SPT values
(IS:2131-1981)
ABP for
(Assumed)
mtr.
Field SPT Value (N)
N Value >3

Computation
for
loose
soils,
Cd
mtr.
mm settlement in
2
T/m .
Fig-11
1.0
=
75
IS:8009 (Part-I)
2015070002
1.80 mtrs
16.88
19.95
27.01
31.92
50.63
59.84
Page 40 of 63
CALCULATION OF SAFE BEARING CAPACITY (SBC) Based on SPT "N" Value

Location:
MAHISIAKHAL
Borehole No.:
12
Project Code:
1.50 mtrs
Depth of Sample:
References
2015070002 - GI
2.20 mtrs
Water Table:
Calculations
Input Data
N
Df
30
Depth of Foundation
1.50
Corrected SPT value after over burden pressure
N'
30.000
Corrected SPT value after Dilatancy
N"
22.500
Angle of internal friction based on SPT "N" Value
33
Degrees
tan ( 0.67 tan )

Submersible density (Assumed)
'
s
24
Degrees
1.000
mtr.
mtr.
Field SPT Value

IS:2131, Fig-1
IS:6403, Fig-1
-1

IS:6403, Fig-1
mtr.
gm/cc
Type of Footing
= Continuous Strip Footing
Condition of Soil
= Medium
Overburden Pressure
q = (Df x s) / 1000
IS:6403, Table -1
Kg/cm
B =( B x s) / 1000
Nc
Nq
39.728 27.340
Shape Factors
Sc =
dc
dq
'
N'c
N'q
N'
24
19.542
9.808
9.782
S =
1.0
W'
= 0.5
Inclination Factors
= 1+0.2 x (Df/B) x tan(45+/2)

= d
1.276
1.138
ic
In case of general shear failure Net Ultimate Bearing Capacity

=
0.000
iq
C = 0
q(Nq -1) Sqdqiq
0.5 BNSdiW'
4.496
2.150
6.646 Kg/cm2
+ 0.5 BN'SdiW'
0.557
=
+
2.061 Kg/cm2
In case of Local shear failure Net Ultimate Bearing Capacity

q'd = 2/3 x CN'cScdcic
=
Medium
Water Table Effect
For Continuous Strip Footing

Sq =
1.0
1.0
qd = CNcScdcic
Loose
Kg/cm
37.778
Depth Factors
Dense
0.200
Bearing Capacity Factors

33
IS:6403, Table -2
0.150
0.000
+ q(N'q -1)Sqdqiq
1.504
+
Qs = Qnu / FS + OB
Soil Bearing Capacity (SBC)=

Qs=
1.892 Kg/cm2
1.742 Kg/cm2
SBC =
18.92 Tons/m
=
2
Factor of Safety (FS) = 2.5
18.92 Tons/m 2
Qns = Qnu / FS = Qs - OB
Net Safe Bearing Capacity (NSBC)=

Qns=
4.354 Kg/cm2
Qnu =
After Interpolating, Net Ultimate Bearing Capacity
17.42 Tons/m 2
NSBC =
17.42 Tons/m
Page 41 of 63

Location:
MAHISIAKHAL
Borehole No.:
12
Project Code:
3.00 mtrs
Depth of Sample:
References
2015070002 - GI
2.20 mtrs
Water Table:
Calculations
Input Data
Field SPT Value
IS:2131, Fig-1
IS:6403, Fig-1
Depth of Foundation
3.00
N'
37.000
N"
26.000
35
Degrees
tan ( 0.67 tan )

'
s
25
Degrees
1.000
-1
mtr.
gm/cc
mtr.
mtr.
= Medium
Type of Footing
IS:6403, Fig-1
37
N
Df
Condition of Soil
Overburden Pressure
q = (Df x s) / 1000
IS:6403, Table -1
Kg/cm
B =( B x s) / 1000
Nc
Nq
46.120 33.300
Shape Factors
Sc =
'
48.030
25
dc
dq
S =
N'q
N'
1.0
W'
= 0.5
Inclination Factors
= 1+0.2 x (Df/B) x tan(45+/2)

= d
1.576
1.288
ic
iq
C = 0
CNcScdcic
q(Nq -1) Sqdqiq
0.5 BNSdiW'
0.000
12.481
3.093
15.574 Kg/cm2
+ 0.5 BN'SdiW'
0.701
=
+
4.434 Kg/cm2

=
Medium
Water Table Effect

Sq =
1.0
1.0
N'c

qd =
Loose
Kg/cm
20.720 10.660 10.880
Depth Factors
Dense
0.200

35
IS:6403, Table -2
0.300
0.000
+ q(N'q -1)Sqdqiq
3.733
+
Qnu =

Qs = Qnu / FS + OB

Qs=
2.816 Kg/cm2
2.516 Kg/cm2
SBC =
28.16 Tons/m
=
2
28.16 Tons/m 2

Qns=
6.291 Kg/cm2
25.16 Tons/m 2
NSBC =
25.16 Tons/m
Page 42 of 63

MAHISIAKHAL
Location:
Borehole No.:
13
Depth of Sample:
References
2015070002 - GI
Project Code:
1.50 mtrs
Water Table:
1.80 mtrs
Calculations
Input Data
N
Df
32
Depth of Foundation
1.50
N'
32.000
N"
23.500
34
Degrees
tan ( 0.67 tan )

'
s
24
Degrees
1.000
mtr.
mtr.
Field SPT Value

IS:2131, Fig-1
IS:6403, Fig-1
-1
IS:6403, Fig-1
mtr.
gm/cc
Type of Footing
Condition of Soil
= Medium
Overburden Pressure
q = (Df x s) / 1000
IS:6403, Table -1
Kg/cm
B =( B x s) / 1000
Nc
Nq
42.924 30.320
Shape Factors
Sc =
dc
dq
'
N'c
N'q
N'
24
19.542
9.808
9.782
S =
1.0
W'
= 0.5
Inclination Factors
= 1+0.2 x (Df/B) x tan(45+/2)

= d
1.282
1.141
ic

=
0.000
iq
C = 0
q(Nq -1) Sqdqiq
0.5 BNSdiW'
5.018
2.447
7.465 Kg/cm 2
+ 0.5 BN'SdiW'
0.558
=
+
2.065 Kg/cm 2

=
Medium
Water Table Effect

Sq =
1.0
1.0
qd = CNcScdcic
Loose
Kg/cm
42.900
Depth Factors
Dense
0.200

34
IS:6403, Table -2
0.150
0.000
+ q(N'q -1)Sqdqiq
1.507
+
Qnu =

Qs = Qnu / FS + OB

Q s=
1.696 Kg/cm 2
1.546 Kg/cm 2
SBC =
16.96 Tons/m
=
2
16.96 Tons/m2

Qns=
3.865 Kg/cm 2
15.46 Tons/m2
NSBC =
15.46 Tons/m
Page 43 of 63

Location:
MAHISIAKHAL
Borehole No.:
13
Depth of Sample:
Project Code:
3.00 mtrs
References
2015070002 - GI
Water Table:
1.80 mtrs
Calculations
Input Data
N
Df
43
Depth of Foundation
3.00
N'
43.000
N"
29.000
35
Degrees
tan ( 0.67 tan )

'
s
25
Degrees
1.000
mtr.
mtr.
Field SPT Value

IS:2131, Fig-1
IS:6403, Fig-1
-1
IS:6403, Fig-1
mtr.
gm/cc
Type of Footing
Condition of Soil
= Medium
Overburden Pressure
q = (Df x s) / 1000
IS:6403, Table -1
Kg/cm
B =( B x s) / 1000
Nc
Nq
46.120 33.300
Shape Factors
Sc =
'
48.030
25
dc
dq
N'c
S =
1.0
N'q
W'
N'
= 0.5
Inclination Factors
= 1+0.2 x (Df/B) x tan(45+/2)

= d
1.576
1.288
ic

=
0.000
iq
C = 0
q(Nq -1) Sqdqiq
0.5 BNSdiW'
12.481
3.093
15.574 Kg/cm2
+ 0.5 BN'SdiW'
0.701
=
+
4.434 Kg/cm2

=
Medium
Water Table Effect

Sq =
1.0
1.0
qd = CNcScdcic
Loose
Kg/cm
20.720 10.660 10.880
Depth Factors
Dense
0.200

35
IS:6403, Table -2
0.300
0.000
+ q(N'q -1)Sqdqiq
3.733
+
Qs = Qnu / FS + OB

Qs=
2.816 Kg/cm2
2.516 Kg/cm
SBC =
28.16 Tons/m2
28.16 Tons/m 2

Qns=
6.291 Kg/cm2
Qnu =
25.16 Tons/m 2
NSBC =
25.16 Tons/m2
Page 44 of 63
CALCULATION OF SAFE BEARING CAPACITY (SBC) Based on C,

Project Name:
Location:
Borehole No.:
GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION FOR DESIGNERS FORUM

MAHISIAKHAL
Project Code:
14
Depth of Sample:
1.50 mtrs
References
Value
2015070002 - GI
Water Table:
3.00 mtrs
Calculations
Input Data
Cohesion
0.26
Angle of internal friction
-1
Dry Density
'
tan ( 0.67 tan )

Bulk Density
Kg/cm
13
9
=
1.972
gm/cc
1.722
gm/cc
Submersible Density
Depth of Foundation Df
1.50
mtr.
Degrees
Degrees
Saturated Density
Field Moisture Content

Gs
Specific Gravity
sat
2.089
gm/cc
1.089
gm/cc
Void Ratio
14.51 %
=
=
2.72
0.58
mtr.
Type of Footing
mtr.
Condition of Soil
= Medium
Overburden Pressure
q = (Df x s) / 1000
IS:6403, Table -1
IS:6403, Table -2
0.163
Kg/cm
B =( B x s) / 1000
Nc
Nq
'
N'c
N'q
N'
13
9.928
3.352
2.078
7.978
2.290
1.066
Shape Factors
dc
dq
1.0
W'
= 0.5
Inclination Factors
= 1+0.2 x (Df/B) x tan(45+/2)

= d
1.189
1.094
ic
iq

qd =
=
CNcScdcic
3.069
q(Nq -1) Sqdqiq
0.5 BNSdiW'
0.420
0.124
3.613 Kg/cm 2

=
Medium
Water Table Effect

Sq =
S =
1.0
1.0
Depth Factors
Loose
Kg/cm
Sc =
Dense
0.218
1.644
+ q(N'q -1)Sqdqiq
0.231
+
+ 0.5 BN'SdiW'
0.063
=
+

Qs = Qnu / FS + OB

Qs=
1.508 Kg/cm2

Qns=
SBC =
1.345 Kg/cm2
15.08 Tons/m2
Qnu =
1.938 Kg/cm 2
3.362 Kg/cm 2
15.08 Tons/m2
13.45 Tons/m2
NSBC =
13.45 Tons/m2
Page 45 of 63

Location:
MAHISIAKHAL
Borehole No.:
14
Depth of Sample:
Project Code:
3.00 mtrs
References
2015070002 - GI
Water Table:
3.00 mtrs
Calculations
Input Data
=
42
Depth of Foundation
N
Df
3.00
N'
42.000
N"
28.500
35
Degrees
tan ( 0.67 tan )

'
s
25
Degrees
1.000
Field SPT Value

IS:2131, Fig-1
IS:6403, Fig-1
-1
gm/cc
mtr.
2
mtr.
= Medium
Type of Footing
IS:6403, Fig-1
mtr.
Condition of Soil
Overburden Pressure
q = (Df x s) / 1000
IS:6403, Table -1
Kg/cm
B =( B x s) / 1000
Nc
Nq
46.120 33.300
Shape Factors
Sc =
'
48.030
25
dc
dq
N'c
S =
1.0
N'q
W'
N'
= 0.5
Inclination Factors
= 1+0.2 x (Df/B) x tan(45+/2)

= d
1.576
1.288
ic

=
0.000
iq
C = 0
q(Nq -1) Sqdqiq
0.5 BNSdiW'
12.481
3.093
15.574 Kg/cm2
+ 0.5 BN'SdiW'
0.701
=
+
4.434 Kg/cm2

=
Medium
Water Table Effect

Sq =
1.0
1.0
qd = CNcScdcic
Loose
Kg/cm
20.720 10.660 10.880
Depth Factors
Dense
0.200

35
IS:6403, Table -2
0.300
0.000
+ q(N'q -1)Sqdqiq
3.733
+
Qnu =

Qs = Qnu / FS + OB

Qs=
2.816 Kg/cm
Qns=
2.516 Kg/cm
SBC =
28.16 Tons/m
=
2

2

2
28.16 Tons/m
6.291 Kg/cm2
25.16 Tons/m2
NSBC =
25.16 Tons/m
Page 46 of 63

Project Name:
Location:
Borehole No.:

Project Code:
MAHISIAKHAL
15
Depth of Sample:
1.50 mtrs
References
Value
2015070002 - GI
Water Table:
2.80 mtrs
Calculations
Input Data
Cohesion
0.36
-1
Dry Density
'
tan ( 0.67 tan )

Bulk Density
Kg/cm
18
12
=
1.871
gm/cc
1.595
gm/cc
Submersible Density
1.50
mtr.
Degrees
Degrees
Saturated Density

Gs
Specific Gravity
sat
1.982
gm/cc
0.982
gm/cc
Void Ratio
17.31 %
=
=
2.60
0.63
mtr.
mtr.
= Medium
Type of Footing
Condition of Soil
Overburden Pressure
q = (Df x s) / 1000
IS:6403, Table -1
IS:6403, Table -2
0.147
Kg/cm
B =( B x s) / 1000
Nc
Nq
'
N'c
N'q
N'
18
13.290
5.416
4.294
12
9.402
3.058
1.792
Shape Factors
dc
dq
1.0
W'
= 0.5
Inclination Factors
= 1+0.2 x (Df/B) x tan(45+/2)

= d
1.206
1.103
ic
iq

qd =
=
CNcScdcic
q(Nq -1) Sqdqiq
0.5 BNSdiW'
5.770
0.717
0.233
6.720 Kg/cm2

=
Medium
Water Table Effect

Sq =
S =
1.0
1.0
Depth Factors
Loose
Kg/cm
Sc =
Dense
0.196
2.721
+ q(N'q -1)Sqdqiq
0.334
+
+ 0.5 BN'SdiW'
0.097
=
+

Qs = Qnu / FS + OB

Qs=
2.265 Kg/cm2

Qns=
SBC =
2.117 Kg/cm2
22.65 Tons/m2
Qnu =
3.152 Kg/cm2
5.293 Kg/cm2
22.65 Tons/m2
21.17 Tons/m2
NSBC =
21.17 Tons/m2
Page 47 of 63

Location:
MAHISIAKHAL
Borehole No.:
15
Depth of Sample:
Project Code:
3.00 mtrs
References
2015070002 - GI
Water Table:
2.80 mtrs
Calculations
Input Data
N
Df
53
Depth of Foundation
3.00
N'
53.000
N"
34.000
36
Degrees
tan ( 0.67 tan )

'
s
26
Degrees
1.000
mtr.
mtr.
Field SPT Value

IS:2131, Fig-1
IS:6403, Fig-1
-1

IS:6403, Fig-1
mtr.
gm/cc
Type of Footing
Condition of Soil
= Dense
Overburden Pressure
q = (Df x s) / 1000
IS:6403, Table -1
Kg/cm
B =( B x s) / 1000
Nc
36
Nq
51.958 39.480
Shape Factors
Sc =
'
60.306
26
dc
dq
S =
N'q
N'
22.628 12.208 13.184
1.0
W'
1.589
1.294
ic

=
= 0.5
0.000
iq
C = 0
q(Nq -1) Sqdqiq
0.5 BNSdiW'
14.938
3.902
18.840 Kg/cm2
+ 0.5 BN'SdiW'
0.000
=
+
0.000 Kg/cm2

=
Medium
Inclination Factors
= 1+0.2 x (Df/B) x tan(45+/2)

= d
qd = CNcScdcic
Loose
Kg/cm
Water Table Effect

Sq =
1.0
1.0
N'c
Depth Factors
Dense
0.200
IS:6403, Table -2
0.300
0.000
+ q(N'q -1)Sqdqiq
0.000
+
Qs = Qnu / FS + OB

Qs=
7.836 Kg/cm2
7.536 Kg/cm2
SBC =
78.36 Tons/m
=
2
78.36 Tons/m 2

Qns=
18.840 Kg/cm2
Qnu =
Net Ultimate Bearing Capacity
75.36 Tons/m 2
NSBC =
75.36 Tons/m
Page 48 of 63

Project Name:
Location:
Borehole No..:

MAHISIAKHAL
Project Code:
16
Depth of Sample:
1.50 mtrs
References
Value
2015070002 - GI
Water Table:
2.00 mtrs
Calculations
Input Data
Cohesion
0.23
-1
mtr.
Degrees
Gs
Specific Gravity
gm/cc
sat
2.072
gm/cc
1.072
gm/cc
Submersible Density
1.50
Degrees
gm/cc
1.730
Saturated Density
=
1.943
=
d
Dry Density
'
tan ( 0.67 tan )

Bulk Density
Kg/cm
9
Void Ratio
12.30 %
=
=
2.63
0.52
mtr.
mtr.
Type of Footing
Condition of Soil
= Dense
Overburden Pressure
q = (Df x s) / 1000
IS:6403, Table -1
IS:6403, Table -2
0.161
Kg/cm
B =( B x s) / 1000
Nc
Nq
'
N'c
N'q
N'
7.978
2.290
1.066
6.862
1.750
0.604
Shape Factors
dc
dq
1.0
W'
= 0.5
Inclination Factors
= 1+0.2 x (Df/B) x tan(45+/2)

= d
1.176
ic
iq

qd =
=
CNcScdcic
q(Nq -1) Sqdqiq
0.5 BNSdiW'
2.158
0.207
0.057
2.422 Kg/cm2

=
Medium
Water Table Effect

Sq =
S =
1.0
1.0
Depth Factors
Loose
Kg/cm
Sc =
Dense
0.214
0.000
+ q(N'q -1)Sqdqiq
0.000
+
+ 0.5 BN'SdiW'
0.000
=
+
Qnu =

Qs = Qnu / FS + OB

Qs=
1.130 Kg/cm2
SBC =
0.969 Kg/cm2
2.422 Kg/cm2
11.30 Tons/m2

Qns=
0.000 Kg/cm2
9.69 Tons/m2
=
2
11.30 Tons/m
NSBC =
9.69 Tons/m
Page 49 of 63

Location:
MAHISIAKHAL
Borehole No.:
16
Project Code:
3.00 mtrs
Depth of Sample:
References
2015070002 - GI
2.00 mtrs
Water Table:
Calculations
Input Data
=
38
Depth of Foundation
N
Df
3.00
N'
38.000
N"
26.500
35
Degrees
tan ( 0.67 tan )

'
s
25
Degrees
1.000
Field SPT Value

IS:2131, Fig-1
IS:6403, Fig-1
-1
gm/cc
mtr.
mtr.
= Medium
Type of Footing
IS:6403, Fig-1
mtr.
Condition of Soil
Overburden Pressure
q = (Df x s) / 1000
IS:6403, Table -1
Kg/cm
B =( B x s) / 1000
Nc
Nq
46.120 33.300
Shape Factors
Sc =
'
48.030
25
dc
dq
N'c
S =
1.0
N'q
W'
N'
= 0.5
Inclination Factors
= 1+0.2 x (Df/B) x tan(45+/2)

= d
1.576
1.288
ic

=
0.000
iq
C = 0
q(Nq -1) Sqdqiq
0.5 BNSdiW'
12.481
3.093
15.574 Kg/cm 2
+ 0.5 BN'SdiW'
0.701
=
+
4.434 Kg/cm 2

=
Medium
Water Table Effect

Sq =
1.0
1.0
qd = CNcScdcic
Loose
Kg/cm
20.720 10.660 10.880
Depth Factors
Dense
0.200

35
IS:6403, Table -2
0.300
0.000
+ q(N'q -1)Sqdqiq
3.733
+
Qs = Qnu / FS + OB

Qs =
2.816 Kg/cm2
2.516 Kg/cm2
SBC =
28.16 Tons/m
=
2
28.16 Tons/m2

Qns=
6.291 Kg/cm 2
Qnu =
25.16 Tons/m2
NSBC =
25.16 Tons/m
Page 50 of 63

Location:
MAHISIAKHAL
Borehole No.:
17
Depth of Sample:
Project Code:
1.50 mtrs
References
2015070002 - GI
Water Table:
2.10 mtrs
Calculations
Input Data
N
Df
48
Depth of Foundation
1.50
N'
48.000
N"
31.500
36
Degrees
tan ( 0.67 tan )

'
s
26
Degrees
1.000
Field SPT Value

IS:2131, Fig-1
IS:6403, Fig-1
-1
gm/cc
mtr.
mtr.
= Dense
Type of Footing
IS:6403, Fig-1
mtr.
Condition of Soil
Overburden Pressure
q = (Df x s) / 1000
IS:6403, Table -1
Kg/cm
B =( B x s) / 1000
Nc
36
Nq
51.958 39.480
Shape Factors
Sc =
'
60.306
26
dc
dq
S =
N'q
N'
22.628 12.208 13.184
1.0
W'
1.294
1.147
ic

=
= 0.5
0.000
iq
C = 0
q(Nq -1) Sqdqiq
0.5 BNSdiW'
6.620
3.459
10.079 Kg/cm2
+ 0.5 BN'SdiW'
0.000
=
+
0.000 Kg/cm2

=
Medium
Inclination Factors
= 1+0.2 x (Df/B) x tan(45+/2)

= d
qd = CNcScdcic
Loose
Kg/cm
Water Table Effect

Sq =
1.0
1.0
N'c
Depth Factors
Dense
0.200
IS:6403, Table -2
0.150
0.000
+ q(N'q -1)Sqdqiq
0.000
+
Qnu =

Qs = Qnu / FS + OB

Qs=
4.182 Kg/cm2
Qns=
4.032 Kg/cm
SBC =
41.82 Tons/m2
41.82 Tons/m2

2
10.079 Kg/cm2
40.32 Tons/m2
NSBC =
40.32 Tons/m2
Page 51 of 63

MAHISIAKHAL
Location:
Borehole No.:
18
1.50 mtrs
Depth of Sample:
References
2015070002 - GI
Project Code:
2.00 mtrs
Water Table:
Calculations
Input Data
=
40
Depth of Foundation
N
Df
1.50
N'
40.000
N"
27.500
35
Degrees
tan ( 0.67 tan )

'
s
25
Degrees
1.000
mtr.
mtr.
Field SPT Value

IS:2131, Fig-1
IS:6403, Fig-1
-1
gm/cc

= Medium
Type of Footing
IS:6403, Fig-1
mtr.
Condition of Soil
Overburden Pressure
q = (Df x s) / 1000
IS:6403, Table -1
Kg/cm
B =( B x s) / 1000
Nc
35
Nq
46.120 33.300
Shape Factors
Sc =
'
48.030
25
dc
dq
S =
N'q
N'
20.720 10.660 10.880
1.0
W'
1.288
1.144
ic

=
= 0.5
0.000
iq
C = 0
q(Nq -1) Sqdqiq
0.5 BNSdiW'
5.543
2.747
8.290 Kg/cm2
+ 0.5 BN'SdiW'
0.622
=
+
2.280 Kg/cm2

=
Medium
Inclination Factors
= 1+0.2 x (Df/B) x tan(45+/2)

= d
qd = CNcScdcic
Loose
Kg/cm
Water Table Effect

Sq =
1.0
1.0
N'c
Depth Factors
Dense
0.200
IS:6403, Table -2
0.150
0.000
+ q(N'q -1)Sqdqiq
1.658
+
Qs = Qnu / FS + OB

Qs=
1.463 Kg/cm2
Qns=
1.313 Kg/cm
SBC =
14.63 Tons/m
=
2
14.63 Tons/m 2

2
3.282 Kg/cm2
Qnu =
13.13 Tons/m 2
NSBC =
13.13 Tons/m
Page 52 of 63

Location:
MAHISIAKHAL
Borehole No.:
19
Depth of Sample:
Project Code:
1.50 mtrs
References
2015070002 - GI
Water Table:
1.80 mtrs
Calculations
Input Data
Field SPT Value
N
Df
Depth of Foundation
IS:2131, Fig-1
IS:6403, Fig-1
31
1.50
N'
31.000
N"
23.000
mtr.
34
Degrees
tan ( 0.67 tan )

'
s
24
Degrees
1.000
mtr.
mtr.

-1
gm/cc

= Medium
Type of Footing
IS:6403, Fig-1
Condition of Soil
Overburden Pressure
q = (Df x s) / 1000
IS:6403, Table -1
Kg/cm
B =( B x s) / 1000
Nc
34
Nq
42.924 30.320
Shape Factors
Sc =
dc
dq
'
N'c
N'q
N'
42.900
24
19.542
9.808
9.782
S =
1.0
W'
= 0.5
Inclination Factors
= 1+0.2 x (Df/B) x tan(45+/2)

= d
1.282
1.141
ic

=
0.000
iq
C = 0
q(Nq -1) Sqdqiq
0.5 BNSdiW'
5.018
2.447
7.465 Kg/cm2
2.065 Kg/cm2

=
Medium
Water Table Effect

Sq =
1.0
1.0
qd = CNcScdcic
Loose
Kg/cm
Depth Factors
Dense
0.200
IS:6403, Table -2
0.150
0.000
+ 0.5 BN'SdiW'
+ q(N'q -1)Sqdqiq
1.507
0.558
Qnu =

Qs = Qnu / FS + OB

Qs=
1.696 Kg/cm2
1.546 Kg/cm2
SBC =
16.96 Tons/m
=
2
16.96 Tons/m2

Qns=
3.865 Kg/cm2
15.46 Tons/m 2
NSBC =
15.46 Tons/m
Page 53 of 63

Location:
MAHISIAKHAL
Borehole No.:
19
Depth of Sample:
Project Code:
3.00 mtrs
References
2015070002 - GI
Water Table:
1.80 mtrs
Calculations
Input Data
=
37
Depth of Foundation
N
Df
3.00
N'
37.000
N"
26.000
35
Degrees
tan ( 0.67 tan )

'
s
25
Degrees
1.000
mtr.
mtr.
Field SPT Value

IS:2131, Fig-1
IS:6403, Fig-1
-1
gm/cc

= Medium
Type of Footing
IS:6403, Fig-1
mtr.
Condition of Soil
Overburden Pressure
q = (Df x s) / 1000
IS:6403, Table -1
Kg/cm
B =( B x s) / 1000
Nc
Nq
46.120 33.300
Shape Factors
Sc =
'
48.030
25
dc
dq
S =
N'q
N'
1.0
W'
= 0.5
Inclination Factors
= 1+0.2 x (Df/B) x tan(45+/2)

= d
1.576
1.288
ic
iq
C = 0
CNcScdcic
q(Nq -1) Sqdqiq
0.5 BNSdiW'
0.000
12.481
3.093
15.574 Kg/cm2
+ 0.5 BN'SdiW'
0.701
=
+
4.434 Kg/cm2

=
Medium
Water Table Effect

Sq =
1.0
1.0
N'c

qd =
Loose
Kg/cm
20.720 10.660 10.880
Depth Factors
Dense
0.200

35
IS:6403, Table -2
0.300
0.000
+ q(N'q -1)Sqdqiq
3.733
+
Qnu =

Qs = Qnu / FS + OB

Qs=
2.816 Kg/cm
2.516 Kg/cm2
SBC =
28.16 Tons/m
=
2

2

Qns=
28.16 Tons/m
6.291 Kg/cm2
25.16 Tons/m2
NSBC =
25.16 Tons/m
Page 54 of 63
RECORD OF BORING FROM FIELD
Page 55 of 63
Page 56 of 63
Page 57 of 63
Page 58 of 63
Page 59 of 63
Page 60 of 63
Page 61 of 63
Page 62 of 63
Page 63 of 63

Gi Rep Mahisiakhal Final

Enviado por

Dados do documento

Direitos autorais

Formatos disponíveis

Compartilhar este documento

Compartilhar ou incorporar documento

Opções de compartilhamento

Você considera este documento útil?

Este conteúdo é inapropriado?

Direitos autorais:

Formatos disponíveis

Gi Rep Mahisiakhal Final

Enviado por

Direitos autorais:

Formatos disponíveis

2015

CLIENT: BHUBANESWAR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Date of Test: 19.07.2015 to 05.08.2015

IDAX CONSULTING & RESEARCH GROUP

Redevelopment of Mahisiakhal slum, Bhubaneswar under Rajiv Awas Yojana

For IDAX CONSULTING & RESEARCH GROUP.

Engineer Civil (Soil)

Project Code: 2015070002-GI

IDAX CONSULTING & RESEARCH GROUP

DETAILS OF FIELD WORK

DETERMINATION OF ALLOWABLE BEARING CAPACITY

ANALYSIS OF SUB-SOIL INVESTIGATION

FOUNDATION & RECOMMENDATION

BORE LOG & LAB TEST RESULTS OF BORE HOLE

Project Code: 2015070002-GI

IDAX CONSULTING & RESEARCH GROUP

Mahisiakhal slum, Bhubaneswar under Rajiv Awas Yojana Project of Designers

Objectives of Sub-soil Exploration

The scope of Geo-technical exploration is confined within limitations of the framework of

Nature of Investigation Work

The all investigation consists of the following:

Project Code: 2015070002-GI

IDAX CONSULTING & RESEARCH GROUP

Laboratory experiments, determination of soil parameters.

Project Code: 2015070002-GI

IDAX CONSULTING & RESEARCH GROUP

3. DETAILS OF FIELD WORK

Standard Penetration Tests:

Ground Water Table:

Project Code: 2015070002-GI

IDAX CONSULTING & RESEARCH GROUP

Grain Size Analysis:

Natural Moisture Content:

Determination of Specific Gravity:

Determination of Void Ratio:

Determination of Liquid Limit / Plastic Limit:

Project Code: 2015070002-GI

IDAX CONSULTING & RESEARCH GROUP

5. DETERMINATION OF SAFE BEARING CAPACITY (SBC)

Net Safe Bearing

Gross Safe Bearing

6. DETERMINATION OF ALLOWABLE BEARING PRESSURE (ABP)

Project Code: 2015070002-GI

IDAX CONSULTING & RESEARCH GROUP

Allowable Bearing Pressure in T/m2

Allowable Bearing Pressure in T/m2

Allowable Bearing Pressure in T/m2

Project Code: 2015070002-GI

IDAX CONSULTING & RESEARCH GROUP

Allowable Bearing Pressure in T/m2

Allowable Bearing Pressure in T/m2

Allowable Bearing Pressure in T/m2

Project Code: 2015070002-GI

IDAX CONSULTING & RESEARCH GROUP

Allowable Bearing Pressure in T/m2

Allowable Bearing Pressure in T/m2

7. ANALYSIS OF THE SUB-SOIL INVESTIGATION

Project Code: 2015070002-GI

IDAX CONSULTING & RESEARCH GROUP

Project Code: 2015070002-GI

IDAX CONSULTING & RESEARCH GROUP

Project Code: 2015070002-GI

IDAX CONSULTING & RESEARCH GROUP

8. FOUNDATION & RECOMMENDATION