Você está na página 1de 20

Flare and vent disposal systems

A flare or vent disposal system collects and discharges gas from atmospheric or pressurized
process components to the atmosphere to safe locations for final release during normal
operations and abnormal conditions (emergency relief). In vent systems, the gas exiting the
system is dispersed in the atmosphere. Flare systems generally have a pilot or ignition device that
ignites the gas exiting the system because the discharge may be either continuous or intermittent.
Gas-disposal systems for tanks operating near atmospheric pressure are often called atmospheric
vents or flares, and gas-disposal systems for pressure vessels are called pressure vents or flares.
A flare or vent system from a pressurized source may include a control valve, collection piping,
flashback protection, and a gas outlet. A scrubbing vessel should be provided to remove liquid


1 Possible components

2 Hazard assessments

3 Knockout drums

4 Flashback protection
o 4.1 Seal drums
o 4.2 Molecular seals
o 4.3 Fluidic seals
o 4.4 Flame arrestors

5 Flare Stacks
o 5.1 Elevated-flare-stack designs

5.1.1 Self supported stacks

5.1.2 Guy wire supported stacks

5.1.3 Derrick supported stacks

o 5.2 Offshore flare support structures

5.2.1 Flare booms

5.2.2 Derrick supported flares

5.2.3 Bridge supported flares

5.2.4 Remote flares

o 5.3 Flare stack design criteria

5.3.1 Flare tip diameter and exit gas velocity

5.3.2 Pressure drop considerations

5.3.3 Flare stack height

5.3.4 Gas dispersion limitations

5.3.5 Flame distortion caused by lateral wind

5.3.6 Radiation considerations

o 5.4 Purge gas

o 5.5 Burn pits
o 5.6 Vent design

5.6.1 Radiation

5.6.2 Velocity

5.6.3 Dispersion

6 Nomenclature

7 References

8 Noteworthy papers in OnePetro

9 External links

10 See also

Possible components
A flare or vent system from an atmospheric source may include:

Pressure-vacuum valve

Collection piping

Flashback protection

Gas outlet

Hazard assessments
The actual configuration of the flare or vent system depends on the hazards assessment for the
specific installation.
RP 520, Part 1, Sec. 8,[1] and RP 521, Secs. 4 and 5,[2] cover disposal and depressuring system
design. RP 521, Appendix C, provides sample calculations for sizing a flare stack. RP 521,
Appendix D[2], shows:

Flare-stack seal drum

Quench drum

Typical flare installation.

Knockout drums
RP 521, paragraph 5.4.2, provides detailed guidance for the design of knockout drums (also
called relief drums or flare or vent scrubbers).[2] All flare, vent, and relief systems must include a
liquid knockout drum. The knockout drum removes any liquid droplets that carry over with the
gas relief sent to the flare. Most flares require that the particle size be reduced to a minimum of
less than 300 m. RP 14J suggests sizing for liquid droplets between 400 and 500 m.[3] Most
knockout drums are horizontal with a slenderness ratio (length-to-diameter ratio) between 2 and

4. A horizontal knockout drum must have a diameter large enough to keep the vapor velocity low
enough to allow entrained liquids to settle or drop out.
Knockout drums operated at atmospheric pressure should be sized to handle the greatest liquid
volume expected at the maximum rates of liquid buildup and pump out. RP 521 suggests 20 to
30 minutes of liquid holdup.[2] This is not practical in upstream operations. In onshore operations,
it is recommended to take 20% of the maximum potential liquid stream and provide a 10-minute
liquid holdup. For offshore operations, it is recommended to provide normal separation-retention
times (1 to 3 minutes on the basis of API gravity) and an emergency dump design to handle the
maximum liquid flow with no valves. An emergency sump (disposal) pile is recommended to
dispose of the liquid, and a seal in the pile is recommended to contain the backpressure in the
Knockout drums normally are operated at atmospheric pressure. To maintain an explosion, the
MAWP of the knockout drum usually is set at 50 psig. Stoichiometric hydrocarbon/air explosions
produce peak pressures seven to eight times the normal pressure.

Flashback protection
Flashback protection (the possibility that the flame will travel upstream into the system) should
be considered for all disposal systems because flashback can result in pressure buildup in
upstream piping and vessels. Flashback is more critical where there are tanks or pressure vessels
with a MAWP less than 125 psig and in flare systems. RP 520 discusses flashback protection for
pressure vents and flares,[1] and STD 2000 discusses atmospheric vents and flares.[4] RP 14C
recommends that vents from atmospheric vessels contain a flame arrestor.[5] Because the flame
arrestor can plug, a secondary pressure/vacuum valve without a flame arrestor should be
considered for redundancy. The secondary system should be set at a pressure high enough and
vacuum low enough so that it will not operate unless the flame arrestor on the primary system is
Pressure vents with vessels rated 125 psig and above normally do not need flashback protection.
In natural-gas streams, the possibility of vent ignition followed by flash backpressures above 125
psig is minimal. When low-pressure vessels are connected to pressure vents, molecular or fluidic
seals and purge gas often are used to prevent flashback. If relief valves are tied into the vent, the
surge of flow when a relief valve opens could destroy a flame arrestor and lead to a hazardous
condition. Also, there is a potential for flame arresters to become plugged. A means of flame
snuffing should be considered for vent systems.
Flares have the added consideration of a flame always being present, even when there is a very
low flow rate. They are typically equipped with molecular or fluidic seals and a small amount of
purge gas to protect against flashback.

Seal drums
Knockout drums are sized with the gas-capacity equations referred to in the design of two- and
three-phase separators in Oil and gas separators. Liquid seal drums are vessels that are used to

separate the relief gases and the flare/header stack by a layer of liquid. Water (or water/glycol
mixture) is normally the sealing fluid. The flare gas (or purge gas) is forced to bubble through a
layer of water before it reaches the flare stack. This prevents air or gas from flowing backward
beyond the water seal. Seal drums serve as a final knockout drum to separate liquid from the
relief gases.
In a deep seal drum, the depth of the sealing fluid is designed to be equal to the staging pressure
of the staged flare system. The sealing-fluid depth in most staging seal drums is typically in the
range of 2 to 5 psig, which is equivalent to 5 to 12.5 ft of water column. In a shallow seal drum
(conventional flashback prevention), the water seals have only a 6- to 10-in. water-column depth.
It is important to design the deep seal drum with a proper gas velocity at the staging point to
ensure that all the sealing fluid is displaced quickly at the staging pressure (an effect similar to a
fast-acting valve actuator). It is also common to design the deep seal drum with a concentric
overflow chamber to collect the displaced sealing fluid. The overflow chamber can be designed
to flow back automatically into the sealing chamber once the gas velocity decreases below the
rate required for closing off the second stage.
The depth of the liquid seal drum must be considered in calculating the relief-header
backpressure. This depth is set by the flare supplier, but it usually can be altered somewhat, with
the suppliers concurrence, to suit plant conditions. Typical seal depths are 2 ft for elevated flares
and 6 in. for ground flares. The height of the liquid seal can be determined by

(Eq. 1)
where h = height of liquid seal, p = maximum allowable header backpressure, and = sealingliquid density.
The vessel-free area for gas flow above the liquid level should be a minimum of 3 ft or three
times the inlet pipe cross-sectional area to prevent surges of gas flow to the flare and to provide
space for disengagement.
RP 521 states that surging in seal drums can be minimized with the use of V-notches on the end
of the dip leg. 6 If the water sloshes in the seal drum, it will cause pulsations in the gas flow to
the flare, resulting in noise and light disturbances. Thus, most facilities prefer either a
displacement seal or a perforated antislosh baffle. Fig. 1 shows seal-drum configurations.

Fig. 1Seal-drum configuration with (a) displacement seal and (b) perforated
antislosh baffle.

Molecular seals
Molecular seals cause flow reversal. They normally are located below the flare tip and serve to
prevent air entry into the stack. Molecular seals depend on the density difference between air and
hydrocarbon gas. Light gas is trapped at the top of the U-tube. A continuous stream of purge gas
is required for proper functioning of the gas seal, but the amount of purge gas is much less than
would be required without the seal. The main advantages over liquid seals are that they do not
slosh and they produce much less oily water. Gas seal must be drained, and the drain loop must
be sealed. Because a gas seal with an elevated flare is required to keep air out of the flare stack,
the liquid seal usually is omitted from an elevated-only flare system. If a vapor-recovery
compressor is used, a liquid seal is used to provide a minimum header backpressure.

Fluidic seals
Fluidic seals are an alternative to gas seals. Fluidic seals use an open wall-less venturi, which
permits flow out of the flare in one direction with very little resistance but strongly resists
counterflow of air back into the stack. The venturi is a series of baffles, like open-ended cones in
appearance, mounted with the flare tip. The main advantages of fluidic seals are that they are
smaller, less expensive, and weigh less, and thus have less structural load on the flare stack, than
molecular seals. However, fluidic seals require more purge gas than molecular seals.

Flame arrestors
Flame arrestors are used primarily on atmospheric vents and are not recommended on
pressurized systems. Because of the acceleration of the flame, the flame arrestor must be
installed approximately 10 pipe diameters from the exit, which prevents the flame from blowing
through the arrestor. The length of the tube and surface area provided keep the metal cool. The
major drawbacks of flame arrestors are that they are easily plugged, can become coated with
liquid, and may not be strong enough for pressure-relief systems.

Flare Stacks
RP 521, Sec. 5.4.3, covers the design of elevated flares.[2] RP 521, Appendix C, provides
examples of full design of a flare stack.[2] Most flares are designed to operate on an elevated flare
stack or on angled booms on offshore platforms.

Elevated-flare-stack designs
Fig. 2 shows an example of an elevated-flare-stack design.

Fig. 2Elevated flare stack configurations: (a) self-supported, (b) guyed supported,
and (c) derrick supported.
Self supported stacks
This is the simplest and most economical design for applications requiring short-stack heights
(up to 100 ft overall height); however, as the flare height and/or wind loading increases, the
diameter and wall thickness required become very large and expensive.
Guy wire supported stacks
This is the most economical design in the 100- to 350-ft height range. The design can be a singlediameter riser or a cantilevered design. Normally, sets of 3 wires are anchored 120 degrees apart
at various elevations (1 to 6).
Derrick supported stacks
This is the most feasible design for stack heights above 350 ft. They use a single-diameter riser
supported by a bolted framework of supports. Derrick supports can be fabricated from pipe (most
common), angle iron, solid rods, or a combination of these materials. They sometimes are chosen
over guy-wire-supported stacks when a limited footprint is desired.

Offshore flare support structures

Because offshore production platforms process very large quantities of high-pressure gas, the
relief systems and, therefore, the flare systems, must be designed to handle extremely large
quantities of gas quickly. By nature, flares normally have to be located very close to production
equipment and platform personnel or located on remote platforms. Maximum emergency-flare
design is based on emergency shut in of the production manifold and quick depressurization of
the system. Maximum continuous-flare design is based on loss of produced-gas transport, single
compression shutdown, gas-turbine shutdown, etc. Typical flare mountings on an offshore
platform are angled boom mounting (most common), vertical towers, or remote flare platforms.
Fig. 3 shows typical offshore flare-support structures.

Fig. 3Typical offshore flare-support structures: (a) angle flare boom and (b)
vertical tower.
Selection of the flare structure depends on such factors as:

Water depth

The distance between the flare and the production platform

Relief gas quantity


Allowable loading on the flare structure

Location of personnel

Location of drilling derrick

Locations of adjacent platforms

Whether the flaring is intermittent or continuous

Flare booms
Flare booms extend from the edge of the platform at an angle of 15 to 45 and are usually 100 to
200 ft long. Sometimes two booms oriented 180 from each other are used to take advantage of
prevailing winds. Fig. 4 shows a diagram of an offshore flare boom.

Fig. 4Offshore flare boom.

Derrick supported flares
Derrick-supported flares (see Fig. 5) are the most common flare towers used offshore. They
provide the minimum footprint (four-legged design) and dead load, which are critical design
parameters for offshore flares and normally are used when space is limited and relief quantities
moderate. Disadvantages of derrick-supported flares include possible crude-oil spill onto the
platform, interference with helicopter landing, and higher radiation intensities.

Fig. 5Derrick-supported flare.

Bridge supported flares

In the bridge-supported flare (see Fig. 6), the production platform is connected to a separate
platform that is devoted to the flare structure. Bridges can be as much as 600 ft long, and bridge
supports usually are spaced approximately every 350 ft.

Fig. 6Bridge-supported flare.

Remote flares
Remote flares (see Fig. 7) are located on a separate platform connected to the main platform by a
subsea relief line. The main disadvantage of remote flares is that any liquid carryover or subsea
condensation will be trapped in pockets in the connecting line.

Fig. 7Remote flare with subsea relief line.

Flare stack design criteria

Important design criteria that determine the size and cost of flare stacks include flare-tip diameter
and exit gas velocity, pressure-drop considerations, flare-stack height, gas dispersion limitations,
flame distortion caused by lateral wind, and radiation considerations.
Flare tip diameter and exit gas velocity

The flare-tip diameter should provide a large enough exit velocity so that the flame lifts off the
flare tip but not so large as to blowout the flare. The flare diameter and gas velocity normally are
determined by the flare supplier. They are sized on the basis of gas velocity, although pressure
drop should be checked.
Flare-Tip Diameter. Low-pressure flare tips are sized for 0.5 Mach for a peak, short-term,
infrequent flow (emergency release) and 0.2 Mach for normal conditions, where Mach equals the
ratio of vapor velocity to sonic velocity in that vapor at the same temperature and pressure and is
dimensionless. These API 521 recommendations are conservative.[2] Some suppliers are
designing "utility-type" tips for rates up to 0.8 Mach for emergency releases. For high-pressure
flare tips, most manufacturers offer "sonic" flares that are very stable and clean burning;
however, they do introduce a higher backpressure into the flare system. Smokeless flares should
be sized for the conditions under which they are to operate smokelessly.
Velocity Determination. The sonic velocity of a gas can be calculated with

(Eq. 2)
Gas velocity can be determined from

(Eq. 3)
and the critical flow pressure at the end of the relief system can be calculated with

(Eq. 4)


pipe inside diameter, in.;

ratio of specific heats, CP/CV;
critical pressure at flare tip, always 14.7, psia;
gas-flow rate, MMscf/D;
specific gravity, ratio;
temperature, R;
gas velocity, ft/s;
sonic velocity, ft/s;

= gas compressibility at standard conditions, where air = 1, psi 1 .

Pressure drop considerations

Pressure drops as large as 2 psi have been used satisfactorily. If the tip velocity is too small, it
can cause heat and corrosion damage. Furthermore, the burning of the gases becomes quite slow
and the flame is influenced greatly by the wind. The low-pressure area on the downwind side of
the stack may cause the burning gases to be drawn down along the stack for 10 ft or more. Under
these conditions, corrosive materials in the stack gases may attack the stack metal at an
accelerated rate, even though the top 8 to 10 ft of the flare is usually made of corrosion-resistant
For conventional (open-pipe) flares, an estimate of the total flare pressure drop is 1.5 velocity
heads, which is based on nominal flare-tip diameter. The pressure drop is determined by

(Eq. 5)
where g = acceleration due to gravity, 32.3 ft/s2; V = gas velocity, ft/s; PW = pressure drop at the
tip, inches of water; and g = density of gas, lbm/ft3. Fig. 8 shows a "quick-look" nomograph to
determine the flare-tip diameter.

Fig. 8Nomograph to determine flare-tip diameter.

Flare stack height
The height is generally based on the radiant-heat intensity generated by the flame. The stack
should be located so that radiation releases from both emergency and long-term releases are
acceptable and so that hydrocarbon and H2S dispersion is adequate if the flame is extinguished.
The stack also should be structurally sound and withstand wind, earthquake, and other
miscellaneous loadings. RP 521, Appendix C, provides guidance on sizing a flare stack.[2]
The Hajek and Ludwig equation (see RP 521) may be used to determine the minimum distance
from a flare to an object whose exposure to thermal radiation must be limited.

(Eq. 6)


minimum distance from the midpoint of the flame to the object being considered, ft;
fraction of heat radiated;
allowable radiation level, BTU/hr-ft2;
heat release (lower heating value), BTU/hr; and
fraction of heat intensity transmitted, defined by Eq. 7.

Table 1 shows component emissivity, and Table 2 shows allowable radiation levels. Humidity
reduces the emissivity values in Table 1 by a factor of , which is defined by

(Eq. 7)

= relative humidity, fraction;

= distance from flare center, ft;
= fraction of heat transmitted, in range of 0.7 to 0.9.

Table 1

Table 2
Gas dispersion limitations
In some cases, it may be desirable to check the stack height on the basis of atmospheric
dispersion of pollutants. Where this is required, the authorities with jurisdiction normally will
have a preferred calculation method.
Flame distortion caused by lateral wind
Another factor to be considered is the effect of wind tilting the flame, which varies the distance
from the center of the flame. The center of the flame is considered to be the origin of the total
radiant-heat release with respect to the plant location under consideration. API RP 521[2] gives a
generalized curve for approximating the effect of wind.
Radiation considerations
There are many parameters that affect the amount of radiation given off by a flare including the
type of flare tip, whether sonic or subsonic (HP or LP) or assisted or nonassisted; emissivity of
flame produced or flame length produced; amount of gas flow; heating value of gas; exit velocity
of flare gas; orientation of flare tip; wind velocity; and humidity level in air.
Several design methods are used for radiation calculations. The most common methods are the
API simple method and the Bruztowski and Sommers method. Both methods are listed in RP
521, Appendix C.[2] These methods are reasonably accurate for simple low-pressure pipe flares
(utility flare) but do not accurately model high-efficiency sonic-flare tips, which produce short,
stiff flames. The fourth edition of RP 521 suggests that manufacturers proprietary calculations
should be used for high-efficiency sonic-flare tips.[2]

Purge gas
Purge gas is injected into the relief header at the upstream end and at the major branches to
maintain a hydrocarbon-rich atmosphere in each branch, into the off-plot relief system, and into
the flare stack. The gas volume typically is enough to maintain the following velocities: ft/s for
density seals, 0.4 ft/s for fluidic seals, and 0.4 to 3 ft/s for open-ended flares. RP 521 states that
the oxygen concentration must not be greater than 6% at 25 ft inside the tip.[2] When there is
enough PSV leakage or process venting to maintain the desired backpressure, no purge gas is

Burn pits
Burn pits can handle volatile liquids. They must be large enough to contain the maximum
emergency flame length and must have a drain valve and pump (if required) to dispose of
trapped water. The flare should be pointed down, and the pilot should be reliable. Because of the
uncertainty regarding the effects of wind on the center of the flame, it is recommended that the
greater of either 50 ft or 25% be added to the calculated required distance behind the tip. Burn

pits should be at least 200 ft from property lines. A fence or some other positive means for
keeping animals and personnel away from a potential radiation of 1,200 BTU/hr-ft2 should be

Vent design
The size of a vent stack must consider radiation, velocity, and dispersion.
The vent should be located so that radiation levels from ignition are acceptable.
The vent must have sufficient velocity to mix air with gas to maintain the mixed concentration
below the flammable limit within the jet-dominated portion of the release. The vent should be
sized for an exit velocity of at least 500 ft/s (100 ft/s minimum). Studies indicate that gases with
velocities of 500 ft/s or more have sufficient energy in the jet to cause turbulent mixing with air
and will disburse gas in accordance with the following equation.

(Eq. 8)

= weight flow rate of the vapor/air mixture at distance Y from the end of the tailpipe;
= weight flow rate of the relief-device discharge, in the same units as W ;
= distance along the tailpipe axis at which W is calculated;
= tailpipe diameter, in the same units as Y.

Eq. 8 indicates that the distance Y from the exit point at which typical hydrocarbon relief streams
are diluted to their lower flammable limit occurs approximately 120 diameters from the end of
the discharge pipe. As long as a jet is formed, there is no fear of large clouds of flammable gases
existing below the level of the stack. The distance to the lean flammability concentration limits
can be determined from API RP 521[2] and API RP 14C.[5] The horizontal limit is approximately
30 times the tailpipe diameter.
Industry practice is to locate vent stacks 50 ft horizontally from any structure running to a higher
elevation than the discharge point. The stacks must vent at least 10 ft above any equipment or
structure within 25 to 50 ft above a potential ignition source. Because the flame can be ignited,
the height of the stack must be designed or the pit located so that the radiation levels do not
violate emergency conditions.

The vent must be located so that dispersion is adequate to avoid potential ignition sources. The
dispersion calculation of low-velocity vents is much more difficult and should be modeled by
experts familiar with the latest computer programs. Location of these vents is very critical if the
gas contains H2S because even low concentrations at levels accessible by personnel could be
hazardous. The location of low-velocity vents should be checked for radiation in the event of
accidental ignition.


= specific heats at constant pressure and temperature, dimensionless

= nominal tip diameter, L, in.
= pipe inside diameter, L, in.
= minimum distance from the midpoint of the flame to the object being considered, L, ft
= tailpipe diameter, L, in the same units as Y
= fraction of heat radiated
= acceleration due to gravity, 32.3 ft/sec2
= height of liquid seal, L, ft
= ratio of specific heats, CP/CV
= allowable radiation level, BTU/hr-ft2
= flame length, L, ft
= maximum allowable header backpressure, m/Lt2, psi
= critical pressure at flare tip, m/Lt2, psia
= heat release (lower heating value), BTU/hr
= gas-flow rate, MMscf/D
= relative humidity, fraction
= distance from flare center
= specific gravity, fraction
= temperature, T, F
= temperature, T, R
= lateral-wind velocity, L
= exit gas velocity from stack, L
= gas velocity, L/t, ft/sec
= sonic velocity, L/t, ft/sec
= weight flow rate of the vapor/air mixture at distance Y from the end of the tailpipe, mL/t
= gas-flow rate, lbm/hr
= weight flow rate of the relief device discharge in the same units as W, mL/t
= horizontal distance from flare tip to flame center, L
= vertical distance from flare tip to flame center, L
= distance along the tailpipe axis at which W is calculated, L
= gas compressibility at standard conditions, Lt2/m, psi1
= pressure drop at the tip in inches of water
= horizontal flame distortion caused by lateral wind, L, ft

= vertical flame distortion caused by lateral wind, L, ft

= sealing-liquid density, lbm/ft3
= density of gas, lbm/ft3
= fraction of heat intensity transmitted


The dynamic (velocity) seal is a simple innovation which

ensures significant cost savings over time. The reverse conical baffle design reduces flow area in
the flare tip while simultaneously increasing purge gas velocity. In combination with the
dynamic seal, a constant flow of purge gas will maintain a seal in flare system, ensuring that air
infiltration does not occur. A vortex effect is created as the exiting purge gas inspirates intruding
air. This intruding air is drawn out of the boundary layer and into the exiting purge gas flow
column, thus purging the flare tip. This technology is a standard on various flares.
Download the Brochure

Whenever a process requires that entrained droplets be

removed from a vapor stream, a knockout drum should be integrated into the system.
Condensation can occur when hot process gases cool considerably in the flare gas header and
riser, and some gases also go to dew point at ambient temperatures and pressures and can
therefore generate liquids. These droplets must be removed in order to avoid the phenomenon
known as flaming rain, which occurs when liquid droplets are blown out the top of a flare stack
along with ignited process gases. These vessels can be either horizontal or vertical.
Download the Brochure

Mach-1 Sonic Flares are used in both onshore and offshore

applications to dispose of high pressure waste gas streams with high smokeless capacities. By
efficiently inducing high volumes of ambient air for more complete, smokeless combustion at
sonic velocities, this advanced flaring technology allows for reduced levels of radiation, and can
be placed at lower, less visible elevations, allowing for a more cost-effective flaring solution.
Mach-1 sonic flare technology can be applied in multi-point orientations which accomodate
flame length

The Peacock Burner was developed to flare liquid

hydrocarbons without liquid fallout or soot formation (smoke). These burners provide
excellent service for well testing operations and have been used in applications in the Gulf of

Mexico and Arabian Gulf. When only oil is flared, a high pressure air or gas source is required
to provide mechanical atomization which ensures the mixture is a fine mist as it exits the
burner nozzle. This particular burner nozzle is designed to accept separate high pressure oil
and air/gas streams. for maximum efficiency.

Triton sonic flare technology allows for safe, efficient, and

smokeless flaring at elevated oil and gas production rates by injecting sea water into the
flame envelope. High pressure sea water injection reduces flare emissions, helps minimize
overall radiation levels from the flame, abates combustion noise, and preserves flame
characteristics during wind events. The Triton sonic flare is best-suited for offshore
applications involving high pressure gas streams comprised of relatively heavy

The VariMach sonic flare tip features spring-actuated variable sonic nozzles allow the exit
area to vary with pressure, ensuring constant sonic velocity of waste gas. This industry
proven technology guarantees sufficient inspiration of air to ensure 100% smokeless
combustion and infinite turndown. Radiation levels are also minimized throughout the entire
range of flow, yielding shorter stack heights and reducing material costs. Additionally, the
VariMach has the lowest purge rate of any flare technology on the market, minimizing utility
costs while maintaining flashback protection.