High School Tournament 2016-17: Case Prompt Zoe Johnson is a sophomore at Thomas Jefferson High School, a public high school in Mountainview, Olympus. She has no record of misconduct and makes average grades. Due to a recent school shooting in nearby Cullensburg that left two students hospitalized, the administration of Thomas Jefferson High School has increased the presence of its on-campus security. Zoe Johnson was identified as a potential risk to campus safety after a fellow student told a teacher about a series of threatening and violent posts Zoe made on Facebook. In these posts, Zoe expressed the desire to inflict bodily harm on specific teachers and pupils. Principal Joe Conway contacted the police officer currently stationed on campus to investigate the threat. Officer Ted Nigel then called Zoe into the principals office and had her turn in her phone. The officer looked through the text messages on Zoes phone for evidence of a plot against the school. While he did not find any evidence of a credible threat to the school, he found some messages between Zoe and another student where they discussed the details of a drug deal on school property. The school administration decided to search Zoes locker, with Officer Nigel present. They found a bag of marijuana and a glass pipe in her purse inside her locker. Pursuant to the schools Zero-Tolerance Policy, the administration met with Zoe and her parents, and Zoe was suspended from school. The police then charged Zoe with possession of a controlled substance and intent to distribute. She is now protesting the charges placed against her by the officer that oversaw the search of her possessions. The prosecutor intends to bring in the evidence found of drug usage and distribution, and this is the cornerstone of the case against Zoe. However, she contends that this evidence was obtained illegally in violation of her 4th Amendment protections against unwarranted searches and seizures, and therefore should not be held against her in court. In 500 words or fewer, evaluate the students claim using constitutional reasoning. Applicants are free to compare the strengths and weaknesses of the claim from a neutral standpoint or advocate for one side of the issue as they see fit. No preference or penalty will be given based on the position you choose. In writing the essay, applicants may refer to the quotes and the case from which they are cited in the Appendix, but should do not additional outside research.
Duke Moot Court 2017
Tournament Essay Application Appendix 4th Amendment of the United States Constitution The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to beseized." New Jersey v. TLO (1985) Schoolchildren have legitimate expectations of privacy. They may find it necessary to carry with them a variety of legitimate, noncontraband items, and there is no reason to conclude that they have necessarily waived all rights to privacy in such items by bringing them onto school grounds. But striking the balance between schoolchildren's legitimate expectations of privacy and the school's equally legitimate need to maintain an environment in which learning can take place requires some easing of the restrictions to which searches by public authorities are ordinarily subject. Thus, school officials need not obtain a warrant before searching a student who is under their authority. School Information Name: ___________________________________________________________ Address: _________________________________________________________ City: _______________________________ State: ________________________ Zip Code: ___________________________ Phone Number: ________________ st 1 Students Information Name: ___________________________________________________________ Email: ___________________________________________________________ Phone Number: ____________________________________________________ 2nd Students Information Name: ___________________________________________________________ Email: ___________________________________________________________ Phone Number: ____________________________________________________ Advisers Information Name: ___________________________________________________________ Email: ___________________________________________________________ Phone Number: ____________________________________________________ Honor Statement: I certify that the essay submitted is the work of the student team members listed above. I agree to abide by the rules and regulations of the Duke Moot Court Tournament and furthermore understand that failure to comply may result in disqualification. Student 1__________________________________ Date_________________________ Student 2__________________________________ Date_________________________ Advisor___________________________________ Date_________________________
Duke Moot Court 2017
Tournament Essay Application Rules and Regulations Requirements 1. Each team of two students must enter only one essay. 2. The essay must be 500 words or fewer, excluding citations. 3. Citations must follow MLA format. 4. Use Times New Roman, 12-point, double-spaced text. Submission Instructions 1. Please include the completed cover sheet (i.e., the previous page) and the essay submission together in one PDF file titled DMCTourneyApp_SchoolName_LastName1_LastName2, with LastName1 and LastName2 referring to the first and second students last names, respectively. 2. Please email the final submission to dukemootcourt@gmail.com with the subject line DMCTourneyApp_SchoolName_LastName1_LastName2. This is very important, as submissions are accepted over a period of one month, and if your subject line does not match this format, we may miss your application when we gather the submissions for evaluation. 3. Homeschooled applicants should indicate Homeschool as their school name. 4. If you are unable to email your submission, please send in a physical copy to: Jeffrey Ho Box 97446 Room J106 104 Union Drive Durham, NC 27708 Important Dates and Addresses 1. The cover sheet and essay must be received by 11:59 PM November 13th , 2016. We strongly encourage students to submit their essays by email. 2. All contestants will be notified of their status and the tournament case prompt by December 4th , 2016 at the latest. 3. Final payments are due by January 15th , 2017. The fee is $75 per team, and an additional fee of $50 per team will be charged for late payment submissions. 4. Qualifying teams will be invited to the Duke Moot Court Tournament on February 25th 26th , 2017. Contact Information Please note the following important contacts: President: Jeffrey Ho, jeffrey.ho@duke.edu, (general questions) Tournament Chair: Michael Brunetti, michael.brunetti@duke.edu, (tournament logistics) Case Law Committee Chair: Cassandra Williams, cassandra.williams@duke.edu (essay prompt questions) Best of luck, and we look forward to reading your submissions soon!