Comparison of Electric Field Levels Obtained Experimentally and by Simulation at Different Points in Entire Vehicles PDF

See
discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at:

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/268444764
Comparison of Electric Field Levels

Obtained Experimentally and by
Simulation at Different Points in Entire
Vehicles
Conference Paper September 2008
DOI: 10.13140/2.1.2142.3681
CITATIONS
READS
24
2 authors:
Marco KLINGLER
Benhassine Salah
Groupe PSA
PSA PEUGEOT CITREN
111 PUBLICATIONS 88 CITATIONS
18 PUBLICATIONS 68 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
SEE PROFILE
Available from: Marco KLINGLER

Retrieved on: 19 September 2016
Comparison of Electric Field Levels

Obtained Experimentally and by
Simulation at Different Points in
Entire Vehicles
Marco KLINGLER, Salah BENHASSINE
PSA Peugeot Citon
Vlizy-Villacoublay, FRANCE
marco.klingler@mpsa.com
EMC Europe 2008, September 4-8, Hamburg, Germany
Introduction
z
How well does simulation match with reality ?

z Compare simulation results and measurements for quasi-identical
configurations
How important are the differences between simulation results and

measurements ?
z Compare with measurement uncertainties :
z obtained by laboratory round-robin measurements
z introduced by the imperfectness of the test sites
z due to repeatability precision
Explain the reason of such dispersion in simulation and

measurement results
Overview
z
Comparing simulation and measurement results for

z
Different field incidences (front, back, left, right)
Different polarizations (horizontal, vertical)
Different equipment locations (engine, passenger compartment,

trunk)
3 vehicles (2006, 2007, 2008)
Comparison of measurement results

z
In 3 different laboratories
With different antenna sets and test setups
Explain the differences introduced by the test or simulation

setups
Conclusions
Vehicle n1
Right Horizontal
Right Vertical
Back Horizontal
Back Vertical
Front Horizontal
Front Vertical
EQ1
z
z
z
z
z
z
Sedan
5 doors
Full roof
Athermic windscreen
Left-hand drive
Diesel engine
z
z
z
z
Comparison over 1 MHz - 1 GHz

Different step sizes in frequency
Different frequencies between simulation and measurements
Simulation : average field over 9 points of the equipment position (center and 8 corners)
Left Horizontal
Left Vertical
Vehicle n1 Equipment EQ1

Horizontal polarization
20
20
Back
0
-10
10 dB / div
E / Ecal (dB)
10
10 dB / div
E / Ecal (dB)
Front
10
-10
-20
-20
-30
-30
(No measurements at all)

Simulation
Measurement
Simulation
-40
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
100
200
300
Frequency (MHz)
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
800
900
1000
Frequency (MHz)
20
20
Left
Right
-10
(No measurements above)
10 dB / div
10
E / Ecal (dB)
10
10 dB / div
E / Ecal (dB)
AR-H
-40
-10
-20
-20
-30
-30
Simulation
Simulation
Measurement
Measurement
-40
-40
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
Frequency (MHz)
900
1000
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
Frequency (MHz)

Vertical polarization
20
20
Back
0
-10
10 dB / div
E / Ecal (dB)
10
10 dB / div
E / Ecal (dB)
Front
10
-10
-20
-20
-30
-30
Simulation
Measurement
Simulation
-40
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
100
200
300
Frequency (MHz)
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
800
900
1000
Frequency (MHz)
20
20
Left
Right
-10
10 dB / div
10
E / Ecal (dB)
10
10 dB / div
E / Ecal (dB)
Measurement
-40
-10
-20
-20
-30
-30
Simulation
Measurement
Simulation
-40
Measurement
-40
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
Frequency (MHz)
900
1000
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
Frequency (MHz)
Vehicle n2
EQ4
EQ2
Front Horizontal
Front Vertical
EQ1
z
z
z
z
z
z
Sedan
5 doors
Sun roof
Non-athermic windscreen
Left-hand drive
Regular fuel engine (measurements), Diesel engine (simulation)
z
z
z
z
Comparison over 1 MHz - 1 GHz

Different step sizes in frequency
Different frequencies between simulation and measurements

20
Front - Horizontal
10
10 dB / div
E / Ecal (dB)
-10
-20
-30
EQ1
Simulation
Measurement
-40
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
800
900
1000
Frequency (MHz)
20
Front - Vertical
10
10 dB / div
E / Ecal (dB)
-10
-20
-30
Simulation
Measurement
-40
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
Frequency (MHz)

20
Front - Horizontal
10
10 dB / div
EQ2
E / Ecal (dB)
-10
-20
-30
Simulation
Measurement
-40
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
800
900
1000
Frequency (MHz)
20
Front - Vertical
10
10 dB / div
E / Ecal (dB)
-10
-20
-30
Simulation
Measurement
-40
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
Frequency (MHz)

20
Front - Horizontal
10
10 dB / div
EQ4
E / Ecal (dB)
-10
-20
-30
Simulation
Measurement
-40
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
800
900
1000
Frequency (MHz)
20
Front - Vertical
10
10 dB / div
E / Ecal (dB)
-10
-20
-30
Simulation
Measurement
-40
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
Frequency (MHz)
10
Vehicle n3
EQ2
EQ3
Front Vertical
EQ1
z
z
z
z
z
z
Sedan
5 doors
Full roof
Athermic windscreen
Left-hand drive
Diesel engine
Comparison over 1 MHz - 600 MHz

Linear steps in frequency (1 MHz)
Same frequencies between simulation and measurements
z
z
z
Left Vertical
11

20
Front - Vertical
10
10 dB / div
E / Ecal (dB)
-10
-20
-30
EQ1
Simulation
Measurement
-40
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
500
600
Frequency (MHz)
20
Left - Vertical
10
10 dB / div
E / Ecal (dB)
-10
-20
-30
Simulation
Measurement
-40
0
100
200
300
400
Frequency (MHz)
12

20
Front - Vertical
10
10 dB / div
EQ2
E / Ecal (dB)
-10
-20
-30
Simulation
Measurement
-40
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
Frequency (MHz)
13

20
Front - Vertical
10
10 dB / div
EQ3
E / Ecal (dB)
-10
-20
-30
Simulation
Measurement
-40
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
500
600
Frequency (MHz)
20
Left - Vertical
10
10 dB / div
E / Ecal (dB)
-10
-20
-30
Simulation
Measurement
-40
0
100
200
300
400
Frequency (MHz)
14
Simulations vs. measurements similarities

Macroscopic synthesis
Vehicles
n1
Equipment positions
EQ1
EQ1
Polarizations
Incidences
n2
V
L
H
L
n3
EQ2
V
EQ4
V
EQ1
EQ3
EQ2
Lower band
Upper band
Resonances
H Horizontal
V Vertical
B Back
L
Resonances in simulations have been found in measurements

Resonances in simulations have NOT been found in measurements
Front
Left
R Right
0 - 5 dB
5 - 10 dB
10 - 15 dB
Above 20 dB
Not measured
15
Impact of the probes position

20
Front - Vertical
10
10 dB / div
E / Ecal (dB)
Position 1
-10
-20
-30
Position 1
Position 2
-40
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
500
600
Frequency (MHz)
20
Left - Vertical
Position 2
10
10 dB / div
E / Ecal (dB)
-10
-20
-30
Position 1
Position 2
-40
0
2 cm
100
200
300
400
Frequency (MHz)
16
Experimental results in 3 different labs

100kHz
Lab A
Lab B
Lab C
20MHz 30MHz
Stripline A
Stripline B
Stripline C
100MHz
Single log-periodic A
Biconic
Single log-periodic C
200MHz
1GHz
Quad log-periodic A
Double ridge
Quad log-periodic C
17
Different antennas used in different

laboratories
Lower band
Middle band
Upper band
18
Experimental results in the 3 different labs

20
10
h1
E / Ecal (dB)
h2
10 dB / div
-10
-20
-30
Lab A
200 mm
Lab B
Lab C
-40
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
800
900
1000
Frequency (MHz)
20
0
10 dB / div
E / Ecal (dB)
10
-10
-20
-30
Lab A
Lab B
Lab C
-40
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
Frequency (MHz)
19
Simulation results of 4-probe calibration

2
Ref 1.2 m
Dipole
h1 = 1.6 m
Ref 1 m
1.6
Ref 0.8 m
Ref 0.5 m
1.4
1.2 m
1m
0.8 m
0.5 m
h2
E / Ecal (linear)
Direct
1.8
1.2
1
0.8
0.6
Reflected
0.4
D = 2.5 m
0.2
0
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
800
900
1000
Frequency (MHz)
2
Ref 1.2 m
1.8
Ref 1 m
1.6
Ref 0.8 m
Ref 0.5 m
E / Ecal (linear)
1.4
1.2
1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
Frequency (MHz)
20
Simulation vs. measurements results

20
20
Ref = 1 m
10
E / Ecal (dB)
E / Ecal (dB)
Ref = 1.2 m
10
-10
Lab A
-20
-10
Lab A
-20
Lab B
Lab B
Lab C
Lab C
-30
-30
Simulation
Simulation
-40
-40
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
100
200
300
500
600
700
800
900
1000
700
800
900
1000
20
20
Ref = 0.8 m
Ref = 0.5 m
10
10
E / Ecal (dB)
E / Ecal (dB)
400
Frequency (MHz)
Frequency (MHz)
-10
Lab A
-20
-10
Lab A
-20
Lab B
Lab B
Lab C
Lab C
-30
-30
Simulation
Simulation
-40
-40
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
Frequency (MHz)
900
1000
100
200
300
400
500
600
Frequency (MHz)
21
Simulation vs. measurements results

20
20
Ref = 1 m
10
E / Ecal (dB)
E / Ecal (dB)
Ref = 1.2 m
10
-10
Lab A
-20
-10
Lab A
-20
Lab B
Lab B
Lab C
-30
Lab C
-30
Simulation
-40
Simulation
-40
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
100
200
300
Frequency (MHz)
500
600
700
800
900
1000
700
800
900
1000
Frequency (MHz)
20
20
Ref = 0.8 m
Ref = 0.5 m
10
10
E / Ecal (dB)
E / Ecal (dB)
400
-10
Lab A
-20
-10
Lab A
-20
Lab B
Lab B
Lab C
-30
Lab C
-30
Simulation
-40
Simulation
-40
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
Frequency (MHz)
900
1000
100
200
300
400
500
600
Frequency (MHz)
22
Parameters influencing the electric field levels

z
z
z
z
z
Type of antenna
Reference point of the antenna
Distance D
Height
h1
Center of phase
Direct
h1
h2
Reflected
D
23
Conclusions
z
Similarity of simulation and measurement results

z Same trends in low and high frequencies
z No predominant worst test / simulation conditions (orientation, polarization,
equipment position, )
z Globally simulation values are systematically above measurements
z Resonances are emphasized in simulation results
z Several resonances in the lower frequency band are not found in the measurements
If it wasnt for some unfound resonances and some differences of level in the
upper band, simulation results can be considered as representative as another
laboratory result
Major differences are introduced by

z Absence of losses in the dielectrics, especially at high frequencies
z Differences between position of the seats and the steering column (which isnt the
case for the engine compartment)
z Difficulties in setting the parameters of the athermic windscreen
z Non representative connections of the steering column, the doors, the hood, or the
trunk to the chassis
24

Comparison of Electric Field Levels Obtained Experimentally and by Simulation at Different Points in Entire Vehicles PDF

Enviado por

Dados do documento

Título original

Direitos autorais

Formatos disponíveis

Compartilhar este documento

Compartilhar ou incorporar documento

Opções de compartilhamento

Você considera este documento útil?

Este conteúdo é inapropriado?

Direitos autorais:

Formatos disponíveis

Comparison of Electric Field Levels Obtained Experimentally and by Simulation at Different Points in Entire Vehicles PDF

Enviado por

Direitos autorais:

Formatos disponíveis

See

discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at:

Comparison of Electric Field Levels

PSA PEUGEOT CITREN

111 PUBLICATIONS 88 CITATIONS

Available from: Marco KLINGLER

Comparison of Electric Field Levels

EMC Europe 2008, September 4-8, Hamburg, Germany

How well does simulation match with reality ?

How important are the differences between simulation results and

Explain the reason of such dispersion in simulation and

EMC Europe 2008, September 4-8, Hamburg, Germany

Comparing simulation and measurement results for

Different field incidences (front, back, left, right)

Different polarizations (horizontal, vertical)

Different equipment locations (engine, passenger compartment,

3 vehicles (2006, 2007, 2008)

Comparison of measurement results

With different antenna sets and test setups

Explain the differences introduced by the test or simulation

EMC Europe 2008, September 4-8, Hamburg, Germany

Comparison over 1 MHz - 1 GHz

EMC Europe 2008, September 4-8, Hamburg, Germany

Vehicle n1 Equipment EQ1

(No measurements at all)

(No measurements above)

EMC Europe 2008, September 4-8, Hamburg, Germany

Vehicle n1 Equipment EQ1

EMC Europe 2008, September 4-8, Hamburg, Germany

Comparison over 1 MHz - 1 GHz

EMC Europe 2008, September 4-8, Hamburg, Germany

Vehicle n2 Equipment EQ1

EMC Europe 2008, September 4-8, Hamburg, Germany

Vehicle n2 Equipment EQ2

EMC Europe 2008, September 4-8, Hamburg, Germany

Vehicle n2 Equipment EQ4

EMC Europe 2008, September 4-8, Hamburg, Germany

Comparison over 1 MHz - 600 MHz

EMC Europe 2008, September 4-8, Hamburg, Germany

Vehicle n3 Equipment EQ1

EMC Europe 2008, September 4-8, Hamburg, Germany

Vehicle n3 Equipment EQ2

EMC Europe 2008, September 4-8, Hamburg, Germany

Vehicle n3 Equipment EQ3

EMC Europe 2008, September 4-8, Hamburg, Germany

Simulations vs. measurements similarities

Resonances in simulations have been found in measurements

EMC Europe 2008, September 4-8, Hamburg, Germany

Impact of the probes position

Experimental results in 3 different labs

EMC Europe 2008, September 4-8, Hamburg, Germany

Different antennas used in different

EMC Europe 2008, September 4-8, Hamburg, Germany

Experimental results in the 3 different labs

EMC Europe 2008, September 4-8, Hamburg, Germany

Simulation results of 4-probe calibration

EMC Europe 2008, September 4-8, Hamburg, Germany

Simulation vs. measurements results

EMC Europe 2008, September 4-8, Hamburg, Germany

Simulation vs. measurements results

EMC Europe 2008, September 4-8, Hamburg, Germany

Parameters influencing the electric field levels

EMC Europe 2008, September 4-8, Hamburg, Germany