Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Abstract:
The purpose of this article is to give light to an historical and sociological nature of
analysis based on an instrumental research, putting in evidence inaccuracies and frailties
which make incongruous (incoherent ; contradictory) common arguments which relies
on three texts of different magnitude (scale) published of the ongoing decade; one in an
academic magazine (data) and two in a weekly publication sold in newsstands (Carta
Capital e (Bravo) that deconstruct Monteiro Lobato, taking it of the pantheon from the
big national name and reducing him to rabble as well as despicable eugenicist/racist.
The article also draws attention to some quality differences that exist in taking part of
the work, the contribution, as well as some author's thought to a systematic subject of
study. Also, the approach on such issues with in a rush related to conjectures motives,
realizing what is defined as a reading in haste.