Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
10.09.2016
To,
1. State of Haryana through its Additional Chief
Secretary,
Department
of
Development
Panchayat,
Government
of
Haryana,
and
Civil
Secretariat, Chandigarh.
2. Union of India through its Cabinet secretary,
Govt. of India,
New Delhi
Petitioner.
Versus
heard
Honble
by
the
Punjab
Honble
and
Motion
Haryana
Bench
High
of
the
Court
on
Advocate
1973
SUPREME
COURT
1461
(V
60
But
this
does
not
place
every
of
the
Constitution
can
be
and
structure
of
the
Republican
and
Democratic
forms
of Government.
3.
Secular
character
of
the
Constitution;
4. Separation of powers between the
legislature,
the
executive
and
the
Judiciary;
5. Federal character of the Constitution.
1993
The
Constitution
(Seventy
third
name
called)of
self-
Haryana
Panchayati
enacted,
wherein
Raj
Act,
provision
1994
of
was
direct
has
been
8(2)(a),
which
is
made
vide
Section
unconstitutional
and
V/s
SUPREME
State
COURT
of
1461
Kerala
(V
(AIR
60
1973
333)
democracy
and
basic
structure
of
the
Indian
Constitution.
Hence, this Civil Writ Petition.
Place: Chandigarh
Dated:15.10.2016.
(RAVI SHARMA)
(Enrl. No. P/792/1991)
Advocate
Counsel for the Petitioner
Department
Panchayat,
Government
of
of
Development
Haryana,
and
Civil
Secretariat, Chandigarh.
2. Union
of
India
through
its
Secretary,
Respondents
Place: Chandigarh
Dated: 15.10.2016
(RAVI SHARMA)
(Enrl. No. P/792/1991)
Advocate
Counsel for the Petitioner
Civil
writ
226/227
petition
of
the
under
Articles
Constitution
of
unconstitutional
law
laid
down
and
against
the
Honble
by
Supreme
Court
in
celebrated
judgment
reported
as
Keshwananda
Bharti
v/s
State
of
Kerala,
other
subsequent
judgments
and
at
all
levels
in
Articles
226
and
227
of
the
Constitution of India.
2. That
voter
the
of
petitioner
Gram
is
Panchayat
a
of
duly
registered
village
Siwan,
Tehsil:
Beri,
District
Jhajjar.
He
has
social
and
petitioner
animal
is
National
one
March
welfare
activist.
The
the
Conveners
of
Mission
initiated
by
of
sole
motto
of
Reform
to
Perform
and
of
the
constitution
of
India
which
develop
the
scientific
temper,
Trust
and
mission
is
to
create
capacity
building
among
the
modifications
in
then
existing
system,
country
than
Britain,
both
area
and
area of
the Britain
State
of
present
Uttar
Rajasthan
Maharashtra
Pradesh
and
and
population
State
and
further
1/3
without
half
of
of
present
taking
the
Hind
Parliament
Swaraj
in
1909
regarding
into
then
British
consideration,
the
Then
the
from
your
Government
statement
of
England
deduce
is
not
justified.
The
Your
deduction
is
is
such
that,
without
outside
work
under
public
pressure.
This
is
its
quality.
Editor: You are mistaken. Let us examine it a
little
more
closely.
The
best
men
are
therefore
we
should
assume
that
they
the
members
selfish.
Each
interest.
It
is
What
motive.
tomorrow.
single
It
thinks
for
hypocritical
of
his
fear
that
is
is
done
today
is
not
instance
predicted
are
in
its
work.
guiding
be
to
finality
When
little
the
may
possible
which
own
the
and
undone
recall
can
a
be
greatest
world".
Members
vote
for
their
party
occupying
today
Parliament
is
much
simply
higher
costly
platform.
toy
of
the
me.
Some
great
English
thinkers
have
recently
said
that
true
right. If
literature
this
on
subject,
you
will
the
have
Under
the
Prime
Minister,
its
welfare
of
Parliament.
His
energy
is
made
Parliament
do
things
merely
for
most
of
the
members
of
Constituent
of
political
system
because
of
its
10
inherent
weaknesses
in
members,
but
the
political
still
system
was
addition
British
adopted
due
to
other
model
of
to
the
to
influence
their
co-members
and
direct
democracy
is
antiminorities,
for
Ambedkar
Parliamentary
was
not
system
in
of
favour
of
the
for
the
of
the
visualized
that
Government
country.
5. That
perhaps
Constituent
the
Honble
Assembly
had
not
members
the
U.S.
has
such
hostilities
at
their
both
the
aforesaid
countries
have
constitutional
reforms/improvements.
The
is
also
true
that
individual
cant
be
the
It is the constitution
constitutionalism
which
can
improve/
11
the
Honble
Keshvananda
Supreme
Bharti
Vs
Court
State
of
of
India
Kerala
in
(AIR
every
provision
of
the
not
have
Constitution.
been
This
is
put
in
the
true.
But
this
the
Constitution
provided
in
foundation
the
and
can
be
result
amended
the
structure
basic
of
the
may
be
said
to
consist
of
the
following features;
Secular
character
of
the
between
the
Constitution;
4.
Separation
legislature,
of
the
powers
executive
and
the
Judiciary;
5.
Federal
character
of
the
Constitution.
303. The above structure is built on
the basic foundation i.e. the dignity
12
features
only
are
from
easily
the
discernible
preamble
but
the
further held
are
an
democracy
inherent
and
part
multiparty
of
the
basic
Law
declared
by
Supreme
Court
to
be
of
State
take
shall
Village
Panchayat.-The
steps
to
organize
powers
and
authority
as
may
be
13
by
the
Parliament
in
April
1993.
The
matters
pertaining
to
these
that
the
said
Directive
was
not
followed
two-tier
system,
the
others
of
243(d)
powers
of
provides as under:-
the
to
such
institutions.
Constitution
of
India
14
called)of self-government
That
the
respondent
no
enacted
Haryana
Establishment
and
Constitution
of
Gram
(2)
shall
be
filled
in
by
persons
far
as
possible,
Panchayat area.
be
the
same
throughout
the
15
12.
the
constitutionalism
is
like
termite
to
the
which
helps
in
establishing
the
especially
people
even
whereas
residing
in
the
common
the
village
and
simple
side
have
we
have
not
learnt
the
meaning
of
the
we are thrusting
the
Honble
Supreme
Court
of
India
has
been
16
is
secondary
Constitution
is
thing
of
but
paramount
the
violation
concern.
With
of
the
14.
That
the
impugned
provisions
of
Haryana
in
numerous
Judgments
and
further
the
encourage
the
constitutionalism
for
the
The
petitioner
has
served
the
advance
Whether
the
8(2)(a)
of
Raj
1994
are
of
the
Act
ultravire
provisions
the
Haryana
of
Section
Panchayati
unconstitutional,
Constitution
of
the
Honble
Supreme
court
of
deserve
to
India?
ii) Whether
the
respondents
17
That
the
petitioner
has
not
filed
any
either in this
is,
writ
therefore,
respectfully
prayed
that:a)
quashing
in
the
the
nature
of
provisions
certiorari
of
Section
judgment reported as
and
further
mandamus
take
writ
directing
effective
Conveniencism
in
the
the
nature
of
respondents
to
steps
and
to
curb
encourage
18
c)
d)
Exemption
copies
from
of
filing
the
certified
Annexures
may
kindly
advance
notice
upon
be
granted;
e)
Service
of
the
Costs
of
the
petition
may
kindly
be
Place: Chandigarh
Dated 15.10.2016
Petitioner
Through
(Ravi Sharma & Sunil Bhardwaj)
(Enrl. No. P/792/1991)
Advocate
Counsel for the petitioner.
VERIFICATION:Verified that the contents of paras 1 to
& 14 and 16 to 17 are true and correct to my
knowledge and that of para 15 is based on the
legal advice of ld. counsel and believed to be
true and correct. Nothing has been kept concealed
therein and stated false therein.
Place: Chandigarh
Dated 15.10.2016
Petitioner
19
Petitioner.
Versus
I,
--Respondents.
That
the
deponent
being
petitioner
is
which
has
been
drafted
as
per
the
Deponent
(Naresh Kadian)
that the contents of para no. 1
affidavit are true and correct
and belief. No part of it is
has been concealed.
Deponent
20
Petitioner
Versus
Respondents
INDEX
SR.
PARTICULARS
DATED
PAGES
NO.
1.
Court
fee
List
of
dates 15.10.2016
1-2
and events
2.
Civil
Writ 15.10.2016
3-17
Petition
3
Affidavit
4.
Power
Attorney
15.10.2016
18
of 15.10.2016
19
Total
Note:-
3.
Relevant Statute/Rules:
a)
Constitution of India.
b)
NIL
Place: Chandigarh
Dated:15.10.2016.
Advocate
Counsel for the petitioner
21
Petitioner
Versus
Respondents
Court Fee
Place: Chandigarh
Dated:15.10.2016.
Advocate
Counsel for the petitioner