Você está na página 1de 4

CHEMICAL REACTION ENGINEERING II (BKF3472)

REPORT EVALUATION FORM

GROUP NUMBER

PROJECT TITLE

NAME OF EVALUATOR:
GROUP MEMBERS
S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6

NAME

Use the following criteria and rubrics as the basis for evaluating Chemical Reaction Eng. II report on a scale of 1 (low) to 5 (high).

Chapter
Task

Score Ranking
Item Assessed

Unacceptable
(0)

Acceptable
(1)

Fair
(3)

Good
(5)

Total
Score

Introduction - product
application and production
technologies

Not clearly and vaguely


justified & discussed

Partly justified &


discussed.

Clearly and adequately


justified/discussed

Clearly and convincingly


justified / discussed

X1

Literature Review - Process


flow diagram, process
description, reaction kinetics

Not clearly explained and


described & justified
processes, parameters &
equipment involved

Explained and partly


described & justified
processes, parameters &
equipment involved

Clearly explained and


adequately described &
justified processes,
parameter & equipment
involved

Clearly explained and


convincingly described &
justified processes,
parameters & equipment
involved

X1

Mass & Energy Balance

No mass and energy


balance calculation
included

Incomplete mass balance


and energy balance

Complete mass and energy


balance calculation
without critical analysis

Complete mass and energy


balance calculation with
critical analysis

X2

Economic analysis - 1st stage


decision making

No economic analysis
evaluation

The economic analysis was


used to optimize the
reactor design including
the conversion. Graph is
not included.

The economic analysis was


used to optimize the
reactor design including
the conversion. Graph is
included but graph format
is not correct and no
optimum point

The economic analysis was


used to optimize the
reactor design including
the conversion. Graph is
included and graph format
is correct and shows the
optimum. Justify the
analysis

X1.5

Development of reaction
mechanism and derivation of
rate law

No reaction mechanism
and rate law derivation

Only reaction mechanism


or rate law is derived but
slightly incorrect. No
support with literature. Do
not compare and explained
the derivation steps.

Reaction mechanism is
developed. Rate law is
derived and no support
with literature. Do not
compare and explained the
derivation steps.

Reaction mechanism is
well explained. Rate law is
derived and support with
literature. Compare and
explained clearly the
derivation steps.

X1.5

Reactor Design

No reactor design. No
assumption stated.

Reactor design is
completed without
considering the pressure
drop. Assumption stated.

Reactor design is
completed considering
only the pressure drop and
heat transfer. Assumption
is clearly stated.

Reactor design is
completed considering the
pressure drop and heat
transfer. Assumption is
clearly stated. Support
clearly with literature.

X2

Reactor specification

No reactor specification

Incomplete reactor
specification of the reactor
material, catalyst weight
and shape, reactor
diameter, reactor height
and other related
specification. Drawing is

Indicate reactor
specification that include
incomplete parameter of
the reactor material,
catalyst weight and shape,
reactor diameter, reactor
height and other related

Clearly indicate reactor


specification including the
reactor material, catalyst
weight and shape, reactor
diameter, reactor height
and other related
specification. Drawing is

X1

Other

not enclosed.

specification. Drawing is
not enclosed.

enclosed.

Diffusion control determination

No reaction mechanism
and rate law derivation

Only reaction mechanism


or rate law is derived but
slightly incorrect. No
support with literature.

Reaction mechanism is
developed. Rate law is
derived and no support
with literature. Do not
explain the derivation
steps.

Reaction mechanism is
well explained. Rate law is
derived and support with
literature. Explain clearly
the derivation steps.

X2

Reactor Design
(new reactor design if diffusion
control, if not controlled by
diffusion, mark from task two is
referred)

No reactor design. No
assumption stated.

Reactor design is
completed considering
only the pressure drop.
Assumption stated.

Reactor design is
completed considering
only the pressure drop and
heat transfer. Assumption
is clearly stated.

Reactor design is
completed considering the
pressure drop and heat
transfer. Assumption is
clearly stated. Support
clearly with literature.

X2

Reactor specification
(new reactor design if diffusion
control, if not controlled by
diffusion, mark from task two is
referred)

No reactor specification

Indicate less than three (3)


reactor specification of
either reactor material,
catalyst weight, diameter
and shape, reactor
diameter, reactor height or
other related specification.
Drawing is not enclosed.

Indicate reactor
specification that include
incomplete parameter of
the reactor material,
catalyst weight, diameter
and shape, reactor
diameter, reactor height
and other related
specification. Drawing is
not enclosed.

Clearly indicate reactor


specification including the
reactor material, catalyst
weight, diameter and
shape, reactor diameter,
reactor height and other
related specification.
Drawing is enclosed.

X1

Economic analysis
2nd state of economic analysis
for reactor design at various
conversion

No economic potential
evaluation

The economic potential


was used to optimize the
reactor design including
the conversion. Graph is
not included.

The economic potential


was used to optimize the
reactor design including
the conversion. Graph is
included but graph format
is not correct and no
optimum point

The economic potential


was used to optimize the
reactor design including
the conversion. Graph is
included and graph format
is correct and shows the
optimum. Justify the
analysis

X1.5

Grammar and Spelling

Numerous spelling and/or


grammar errors.
Transitions confusing and
unclear.

Still many spelling and/or


grammar errors. Few or
weak transitions, often
wanders and jumps around.

Occasional
grammar/spelling errors.
May have a few unclear
transitions.

Occasional
grammar/spelling mistakes.
Spell checked and proofed
throughout. Good sentence
and paragraph structure

X1

and transitions.
Organization and format

Not well organized.


Contents show lack of
knowledge. Some citations
in text are not available in
list of references.

Contents show enough of


knowledge but still a few
concept and ideas are
loosely connected. A few
citations in text are not
available in list of
references.

All needed sections


present. Well organized.
Contents show enough
knowledge of subject. All
citations in text are
available in list of
references.

All needed sections


present. Well organized
and easily followed.
Contents show full
knowledge of subject. All
citations in text are
available in list of
references.

X1.5

Timeliness

Handed in more than one


week late

Up to one week late

Up to three days late

Handed in on time

X1

Total (100)

Comment