Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Goals: We aimed to simultaneously evaluate the association between metabolic syndrome and Helicobacter pylori (HP) infection
diagnosed histologically and serologically in a large number of
healthy Korean adults.
Background: Serological positivity for HP does not necessarily indicate current infection. No study to date has compared the association between metabolic syndrome and HP infection diagnosed
by histologic and serological status.
Study: HP status was ascertained histologically and serologically in
healthy Korean adults who underwent comprehensive health
screening in a private health screening center in Korea. Metabolic
syndrome was dened according to the International Diabetes
Federation denition. Multivariate logistic analyses were performed, after adjusting for potential confounders, including age,
sex, smoking, alcohol consumption, and income level.
Results: A total of 5889 subjects were included in the analysis. The
metabolic syndrome was more strongly associated with histologic
positivity for HP [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 1.26; 95% condence interval (CI), 1.08-1.48] than serologic positivity (aOR =
1.12, 95% CI, 0.95-1.32), after adjusting for age, sex, smoking
status, alcohol consumption, and economic status.
Conclusions: The stronger association between metabolic syndrome
and histologic positivity than serological positivity suggests that the
eects of HP infection on the pathogenesis of cardiometabolic
outcomes may be reversible. Further prospective studies are
needed.
Key Words: Helicobacter pylori, metabolic syndrome, serology,
histology
840 | www.jcge.com
J Clin Gastroenterol
J Clin Gastroenterol
METHODS
Study Subjects
From October 2004 to April 2010, 70,226 subjects
visited the Seoul National University Hospital Healthcare
System Gangnam Center for routine health check-ups.
As screening esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and serological tests for HP are included in the basic screening
program, most of the subjects underwent EGD, unless they
had undergone previous EGD for other reasons or preferred
an upper gastrointestinal series. The study was approved by
the institutional review board of Seoul National University
Hospital. Individual patient consents were not obtained, as
this study was an analysis of data that was collected as part of
routine clinical practice. Patient anonymity was secured.
Of the 70,226 subjects, 20,501 subjects were excluded
as they had been diagnosed with diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, or hypertension (n = 12,137), had history of established myocardial infarction/angina, stroke, chronic
kidney disease, malignancy (including gastric cancer) or use
of steroids (n = 2184), or lacked detailed history of diabetes
mellitus, dyslipidemia, or hypertension (n = 6180). Of the
remaining 49,725 individuals, 44,600 (89.7%) underwent
screening EGD with biopsies taken from 7702 (17.2%) for
suspicious gastric mucosal lesions. We excluded individuals
with gastric or duodenal ulcers or submucosal tumors, as
conrmed by EGD (n = 933), individuals with pathology
other than chronic gastritis (eg, adenocarcinoma, MALToma)
(n = 175), those with inadequate biopsy specimens (n = 2),
and those who were not tested serologically for HP (n = 703).
Thus, 5889 subjects were included in the analyses (Fig. 1).
Data Collection
Helicobacter Status
The diagnosis of HP infection was based on (1) the
detection of HP-specic antibody in serum; and (2) detection
of HP by histologic analysis. Anti-HP immunoglobulin G
(IgG) antibody titers were measured using enzyme-linked
immunosorbent assay kit (ELISA, Radim diagnostics, Rome,
Italy), and antibody titers of Z30 U/mL were considered
positive, according to the manufacturers instruction. ELISA
was validated in the Korean population with high sensitivity
and specicity.33
Subjects underwent EGDs, performed by well-trained
gastroenterologists, after an overnight fast. Biopsy samples
were taken from any suspicious regions of the stomach and
sent to the pathology laboratory, where they were stained
with hematoxylin and eosin and examined by experienced
pathologists who were blinded to all clinical information.
Although rapid urease tests were occasionally performed at
the request of the patient, these results were not considered
in our analysis.
r
Statistical Analysis
Continuous variables were expressed as means and SD
and compared using Student t tests and analysis of covariance. Categorical variables were compared by the
www.jcge.com |
841
J Clin Gastroenterol
Shin et al
RESULTS
Subject Characteristics
Of the 5889 included subjects, 3297 (56.0%) were male
and 2592 (44.0%) were female; their mean age was
48.0 10.7 years. We found that 3591 (61.0%) were HPpositive by serology, whereas 3082 (52%) were HP-positive
by histology. A total of 15.5% reported a history of HP
eradication, 11.6% were not sure, and 66.3% were not
treated for HP eradication (Table 1).
DISCUSSION
TABLE 1. Characteristics of Study Subjects (n = 5889)
Characteristics
Age (mean SD)
< 40
40-49
50-59
Z60
Sex, female
Smoking
Nonsmoker
Past smoker
Current smoker
Missing
Alcohol consumption
None
Low to moderate (14 drinks/wk)
Heavy (Z14 drinks/wk)
Missing
Self-reported history of helicobacter eradication
No
Not sure
Yes
Missing
Helicobacter status
Serology, positive
Histology, positive
842 | www.jcge.com
N (%)
48.0 10.7
1341 (22.8)
1873 (31.8)
1846 (31.3)
829 (14.1)
2592 (44.0)
2820
1368
1361
340
(47.9)
(23.2)
(23.1)
(5.8)
2106
2154
1250
379
(35.8)
(36.5)
(21.2)
(6.4)
3907
684
911
387
(66.3)
(11.6)
(15.5)
(6.6)
3591 (61.0)
3082 (52.3)
Histologic Status
Serological
Status
Histology
( )
All patients
Serology ( )
2099 (91.3)
Serology (+)
708 (19.7)
By self-reported HP eradication
No
Serology ( ) 1329 (91.6)
Serology (+) 381 (15.5)
Not sure
Serology ( ) 236 (89.7)
Serology (+) 98 (23.3)
Yes
Serology ( ) 417 (92.7)
Serology (+) 178 (38.6)
Histology
(+)
Concordance
Agreement
84.6
0.69
122 (8.4)
2075 (84.5)
87.1
0.73
27 (10.3)
323 (76.7)
81.7
0.63
33 (6.33)
283 (61.4)
76.8
0.53
199 (8.7)
2883 (80.3)
history
J Clin Gastroenterol
TABLE 3. Associations of Helicobacter pylori Infection and Metabolic Syndrome by Serological and Histologic Status
Positive, n (%)
By serological status
Central obesity
High triglyceride
Low HDL
High blood pressure
Impaired fasting glucose
Metabolic syndrome (by
Metabolic syndrome (by
By histologic status
Central obesity
High triglyceride
Low HDL
High blood pressure
Impaired fasting glucose
Metabolic syndrome (by
Metabolic syndrome (by
Unadjusted
Model 1
Model 2
Model 3
IDF)
NCEP)
1245
779
720
1063
1087
538
678
(34.7)
(21.7)
(20.1)
(29.6)
(30.3)
(15.0)
(18.9)
1.23
1.20
1.05
1.33
1.23
1.29
1.30
(1.10-1.38)
(1.05-1.37)
(0.92-1.20)
(1.18-1.50)
(1.10-1.39)
(1.10-1.50)
(1.13-1.50)
1.15
1.04
1.07
1.15
1.04
1.14
1.14
(1.02-1.28)
(0.91-1.20)
(0.94-1.23)
(1.01-1.30)
(0.92-1.18)
(0.97-1.33)
(0.99-1.32)
1.14
1.06
1.08
1.14
1.05
1.13
1.13
(1.01-1.29)
(0.91-1.23)
(0.93-1.24)
(1.00-1.31)
(0.92-1.20)
(0.95-1.34)
(0.97-1.33)
IDF)
NCEP)
1076
674
630
918
920
471
594
(34.9)
(21.9)
(20.4)
(29.8)
(29.9)
(15.3)
(19.3)
1.21
1.19
1.10
1.28
1.14
1.29
1.31
(1.08-1.35)
(1.04-1.37)
(0.97-1.25)
(1.14-1.44)
(1.02-1.27)
(1.11-1.50)
(1.15-1.50)
1.18
1.05
1.14
1.21
1.04
1.20
1.22
(1.06-1.32)
(0.92-1.19)
(1.00-1.30)
(1.07-1.36)
(0.93-1.18)
(1.03-1.40)
(1.06-1.40)
1.22 (1.09-1.39)
1.09 (0.95-1.26)
1.21 (1.05-1.39)
1.20 (1.06-1.37)
1.06 (0.93-1.20)
1.25 (1.06-1.47)
1.28 (1.11-1.49)
(0.96-1.25)
(0.90-1.22)
(0.91-1.23)
(0.98-1.30)
(0.91-1.20)
(0.93-1.33)
(0.95-1.32)
1.20 (1.06-1.36)
1.07 (0.92-1.24)
1.17 (1.02-1.36)
1.19 (1.04-1.36)
1.04 (0.91-1.19)
1.23 (1.04-1.46)
1.26 (1.08-1.48)
TABLE 4. Comparison of Cardiometabolic and Inflammatory Parameters by Serological and Histologic Status
By Serological Status
Crude Mean (Unadjusted)
HP( ) HP(+)
Body mass index
Weight (kg)
Waist circumference(cm)
Systolic BP (mm Hg)
Diastolic BP (mm Hg)
Total cholesterol (mg/dL)
Triglyceride (mg/dL)
HDL cholesterol (mg/dL)
LDL cholesterol (mg/dL)
FPG (mg/dL)
Leukocyte count (/mm3)
Neutrophil count (/mm3)
23.2
63.1
83.7
115.2
73.7
194
111.4
55.8
119.6
94.7
5.64
3.18
23.8
65.3
85.2
117.3
76.0
197.9
116.8
54.0
124.6
96.2
5.92
3.35
P
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
0.009
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
By Histologic Status
Adjusted Mean
HP( ) HP(+)
23.4
64.2
84.3
116.0
74.6
194.8
114.9
54.9
121.1
95.6
5.71
3.21
23.6
64.9
84.8
116.9
75.8
197.0
114.9
54.1
123.3
95.9
5.89
3.34
P
0.004
0.009
0.063
0.032
< 0.001
0.030
0.996
0.028
0.07
0.53
< 0.001
0.002
23.8
65.5
85.2
117.2
76.1
197.8
118.0
53.9
124.0
96.1
5.95
3.37
P
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
0.006
0.014
< 0.001
< 0.001
Adjusted Mean
P
HP( ) HP(+)
23.4
64.2
84.2
116.0
74.6
195.0
113.3
54.9
121.7
95.6
5.71
3.22
23.7
65.1
84.9
117.0
76.0
197.2
116.3
53.9
123.0
95.9
5.92
3.35
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
0.018
< 0.001
0.022
0.158
0.005
0.281
0.489
< 0.001
0.001
www.jcge.com |
843
Shin et al
J Clin Gastroenterol
counts, suggesting the involvement of inammation. Lowgrade chronic inammation was recently proposed to be a
critical factor underlying the metabolic syndrome,39 with
proinammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor-a
and interluekin-6 playing a key role in the common
pathogenesis of HP infection and metabolic syndrome.40
Although the nonsignicant dierences in fasting TG and
FPG were not expected, they may be due to insulin resistance in healthy subjects with HP infection may not be severe enough to cause a signicant increase in TG and FPG
or that these parameters are less sensitive measures of insulin resistance than postprandial TG41 or postprandial
glucose.42 Our nding, that LDL-C did not increase, may
be because of atherogenic lipidemia in metabolic syndrome
involving an increase in smaller and denser LDL-C particles, rather than absolute amount of LDL-C.38 However,
previous studies have suggested that LDL-C is increased in
HP-infected individuals.10
Consistent with previous studies,10,15 the association
between metabolic syndrome and HP infection in our study
was only mild to moderate, suggesting that it accounted for
only a minor portion of total risk. However, the positive
change of cardiometabolic proles after HP eradication19
suggested that adverse cardiometabolic eect of HP infection is at least partially reversible. Although unlikely to
be a strong risk factor, the high prevalence of HP and the
limited eect of current prevention approaches suggest that
this association merits further investigation.
Our study had several limitations. First, because of the
cross-sectional design of this study, our results do not
necessarily imply causation. However, as HP infection
usually occurs during childhood, it is more likely that HP
preceded the development of metabolic syndrome.15 Second, as a retrospective analysis of clinical data, there is a
potential risk of selection bias because many subjects were
excluded as they had neither undergone EGD nor biopsied.
Prospective study that collects both histologic and serological data for the study purpose would be necessary.
Third, histologic diagnosis of HP infection might not be
optimal, as this was performed primarily in a clinical context, rather than for research per se. Multiple biopsies of
normal stomach mucosa (antrum19,37,43 and/or corpus19,43)
and several staining techniques (eg, hematoxylin and
eosin,37 Warthin-Starry silver,37 Giemsa,19,44 McMullen,44
and immunostaining44) have been utilized in studies evaluating several diagnostic methods. However, HP is more
likely to be detected in lesions than in normal mucosa,43
and careful examination almost always detects the microorganism, regardless of the staining technique.44 Thus, any
bias from a failure of histologic identication is not likely to
be considerable, and if present, should not aect our conclusions. Fourth, we did not include dietary habits and
physical activity as covariates15,16 in our analysis, as these
variables were not uniformly available. Although several
studies have suggested a link between HP infection and
diet, the relationship is far from established showing conicting results.45 Moreover, level of physical activity is
likely not associated with HP status, suggesting that omitting these variables would not inuence our conclusions.
In conclusion, our ndings provide further evidence of
a small to moderate association between metabolic syndrome and HP infection, which cannot be fully accounted
for by other risk factors. The stronger association between
metabolic syndrome and histologic positivity than serological positivity suggests that the eects of HP infection on
844 | www.jcge.com
J Clin Gastroenterol
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
43.
44.
45.
www.jcge.com |
845