000001 FOUNDATION MODELING Programs M-STRUDL and COM624P can be used in an iterative approach to model a structure-soil problem through the use of footing support springs. The approach is to determine the approximate force magnitudes for the controlling loading and then use these forces to develop a better representation of the structure-soil problem. This example shows a method to model the non-linearity of the substructure-soil interaction. The following steps would be typical for foundation modeling design: 1. Run the M-STRUDL model using the fixed condition. 2. Develop the pile top load-deflection curve and initial translational spring constant for pile-supported footings using COM624P Rotational spring constants for pile- supported footings are calculated using force-deformation relationships, and translational and rotational spring constants for spread footings are calculated using the procedure found in the Office Practice Manual. 3. Develop a full M-STRUDL model using the calculated spring constants. Using the model, run the controlling load case (typically seismic loading will be the controliing case) . 4. Calculate the ultimate translational and rotational capacities using the same COM624P run, statics, or the procedure found in the Office Practice Manual, as appropriate. The force-deflection relations for each spring are required to compare with the equivalent spring, and to determine that the system capacity has not been exceeded. 5 Compare the results from the M-STRUDL run with the ultimate capacities. Recalculate the spring constants (if necessary) based upon this comparison, and rerun M-STRUDL using these revised spring constants. 6. Repeat the above step as necessary to achieve better convergence. Results which change no more than 15% per cycle are normally sufficiently close and further cycling is usually not required.5-0" x B'-0" crossteam ZL T ee : Medium gravelly sand ‘SPT * 30 odium grovelly sane CREEK BRIDGE SPT = 30 Swf clay SPT = 16 eee Medium gravelly sond SPT = 30003 M-STRUDL MODELBRIDGE ENGINEERING SECTION OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION vOd Bridge Mane: creek Beige calculations by: Peter R. Pagter Dates June 3, 1995 artage Now: 1 Bent 2 Determine translational spring coefficient: Bed cece fos \ 1. 2 . Se. eee gee ete 2 7 ay aw = 2.02 >= Kex = 220B | BOSD ASHI MOAGNA _ 99 699 Kee @-w @- 035) Determine rotational spring coefficient: (2. ED soo Es @) (my 1.0 a = 1.05 D , 2. . ose. R a6oy a scr’ofs —_—@) 750) 06.0" H.05) OD rx = 27,800,000 £t-k/radian 3-H) @ a = 0.35)creek Bridge tent 3:Setonte Deaign Brant aBENT 3 SINGLE PILE TRANSLATION SPRING COEFFICIENT [COM624P) creck Bridge Sent 3;Seienic Design example v06 PILE DEFLECTION, BENDING NOMENT, SHEAR & SOIL RESISTANCE INPUT INFORMATION THE LOADING 18 STATIC PILE GEOMETRY AND PROPERTIES PILE LENGTH = 720.09 mm MODULUS OF ELASTICITY OF PILE = 2908405 KIP/INe+2 2 secrroN(s) x DIAMETER MOMENT OF AREA, INERTIA cy m meee nero 12.750 2796403 14602 720.00 32.750 2798603 aaeero2 720.00 SOILS INFORMATION X-COORDINATE AT THE GROUND SURFACE = © -84.00 IN SLOPE ANGLE AT THE GROUND SUREACE 00 baa 2 LAYER(S) OF Sort LAYER 1 THE LAYER 15 A SAND X AT THE Top OF THE LAYER = -84.00 1m X AT THE BOTTOM OF THE LAYER = 60.00 IN VARIATION OF SOIL MODULUS, k = 6008402 LBS/IN++3 LAYER 2 THE LAYER I6 A STIFF CLAY BELOW THE WATER TABLE X AT THE TOP OF THE LAYER = 60.00 IN XAT THE BOTTom OF THE LAYER © = ——@40.00 IN VARIATION OF SOIL MODULUS, K =~ -SO0E¢03 LBS/IN*+3 DISTRIBUTION OF AFFECTIVE UNIT WEIGHT MITH DEPTH 5 POLNTS X,IN WEIGHT, LBs/INe+3 490 308-01 60.00 308-01 60.00 258-01 720.00 255-01 04.00 1258-01 DISTRIBUTION OF STRENGTH PARAMETERS WITH DEPTH 5 POINTS xm LBs /1¥ PHI, DEGREES 350, ~8400 00z+a0 34/000 sees 0.00 oocz+00, 34,000 seeet 60.00 1doEeo2 | 00 7008-02 720.00 1408402, 000 7008-02 904.00 1408402 000 -7008-02FINITE DIFFERENCE PARAMETERS NUMBER OF PILE INCREMENTS TOLERANCE O' DETERMINATION OF DEFLECTIONS YOXIMOM NUMBER OF ITERATIONS ALLOWED FOR PILE ANALYSIS = MAXIMOM ALLOWABLE DEFLECTION INPUT coDt ourer Keye Kec KPYOP me creek Bridge Bent LATERAL BOUNDARY LOAD CONDITION cere) Ba <348E602 — .000E+00 1528E602 —,000E+00 6325+02 -a00+00 693402 0008400 7248402 \000E+00 738E+02 .000E+00 1742E+02 10008400 T45E402 ,0008+00 748E+02 ,0008+00 T51E+02 ,000E+00 feismic Design Example oureuT SUMMARY axTAL, LORD uae} 1.498602 2.498402 2-49B+02 2.49E+02 2.49E+02 1.49402 1.498402 1.49E+02 1.498402, 1.a9E+02 INFORMATION vr a S00E+00 100B+02 asoB+o1 200B+01 2508-01 "3008602 3508-02 4008401 4508401 SO0E+01 TABLE st. (xy 0948-02 s1s7e-01, 234-01 2938-01 3438-01 3878-01 14268-01, 4628-01 4978-02 $328-01 MAX, Moment (an-Kr) 9408403 165E+04 (257e+04 2798404 2928404 300E+08 3128406 SL7E04 2008-03 IN 1oB+o3 1 ax STRESS (ups/me+2) 2298405 3908405 S16E+05 601E+0s 6518405 6818405 6998605 m13E+05 7208408 738405 -3103 LATERAL LOAD (K) LATERAL LOAD-DEFLECTION CURVE [BOTTOM OF FOOTING, 16 PILES, NO GROUP REDUCTION] He sien es oe —+—Series1 oe ie DEFLECTION (INCH)BRIDGE ENGINEERING SECTION OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Bridge Name: creak Bridge ulations by: Peter R. Fagter Date: sune 1, 1995 Bent 3 Determine Translational Spring Constant: Pile Contribution 1400. ve] | | 1200 ——— | 09 Bridge No. 1 a } 1100 = 1000-1 © s00 | $= }3™ | § coo | 3 s04 =1/| sr x zo} /f woo-|} 050" ge eee ee 0 05 10 15 20 25 30 55 40 45 59 | DEFLECTION (inch | | Lateral load = (34.8 k/pile) (16 piles) = 857 k Soil Contribution Effective pressure = ((0.125 kef) (4.5')- (0,082 kef) (4.5°) 0.237 ks Force = [(Kp) (BE£. Unit Pressure) (Footing side area) (13.7) (0.237 ks#) (26°) (5") 70% Assume that this fully effective at 1" deflection P-5 curve for the footing passive resistance Therefore, the follows:BRIDGE ENGINEERING SECTION OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION clo Bridge Name: creck Bridge calculations by: eter R. Pagter Date: gune 2, 1995 53 LATERAL CAPACITY (Kd our 1.00 DEFLECTION (INCH i | = Be Kou | i: | ie BENT 3 | ° 0 05 19 15 20 25 30 38 40 45 50 Eko Lae eed Note that the contribution from the footing passive resistance is small for this example Total Translational Spring Constan! km see ain (Bs 14, 620 k/feBRIDGE ENGINEERING SECTION oLL OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION v Bridge Naze: Creek Bridge calculations by: Peter R. Pagter Date: June 1, 1995 Bridge Now: Determine Rotational Spring Constant: Apne = 14.6 in? Bye = 29,000 ksi Larescrve = (0-50) (60°) = 30° a 2) no EA 10) 29000KS) O46 sy ying L or) P, = (2/3) (Pr) 470 k/pile ™ (470 k/pite) (2") (4 piles) (2 rows) + (1410 k/pile) (6) (4 piles) (2 rows) 75,200 ft-k Kx = 4,836,000 ft-k/radianTITLE CREEK BRIDGE - BRIDGE 1 TITLE PETER R. PAGTER JUNE 1995 TYPE PLANE FRAME REPORT DEVICE C:\DATA\SEISMIC\OUT UNITS FEET KIPS RADIANS $ $ SEISMIC ANALYSIS $ ITERATION #1 o to $ JOINT COORDINATES 1 0.00 35.00 SUPPORT 2 25.00 35.00 3 50.00 35.00 4 75.00 35.00 5 100.00 35.00 6 125.00 35.00 7 150.00 35.00 8 175.00 35.00 9 200.00 35.00 10 225.00 35.00 11 250.00 35.00 12 275.00 35.00 13 300.00 35.00 14 325.00 35.00 15 350.00 35.00 16 375.00 35.00 17 400.00 35.00 SUPPORT 18 125.00 30.00 19 125.00 25.00 20 © 125.00 15.00 SUPPORT 21 275.00 30.00 22 275.00 15.00 23 275.00 0.00 SUPPORT $ JOINT RELEASE 1 FORCE X MOMENT Z $ROLLER SUPPORT @ BENT 1 17 FORCE X MOMENT Z $ROLLER SUPPORT @ BENT 4 20 KFX 99600 MZ 27800000 23 KFX 14200 MZ 4536000 $ MEMBER INCIDENCES 1 1 wordnnewn woarnneen Hoovaueun10 11 12 13 14 15 16 a7 18 19 20 21 22 $ MATERIAL PROPERTY 10 22 12 13 14 15 1s 6 18 19 22 21 22 BEAM E 550600 coL BE 519200 s MEMBER PROPERTIES Al aX 40.83 $SUPERSTRUCTURE B2 aX a3 aX $ 28.27 28.27 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 au 22 23 DEN 0.212 DEN 0.150 IZ 229.1 IZ IZ 63. 63 6 6 $CROSSBEAM SCOLUMN COLUMN SCROSSBEAM $COLUMN: S$COLUMN cr cr 1 17 18 DYNAMIC ANALYSIS REACTIONS MODES 10 $ $ Az0.24 LOAD EQL RSA X 9.27 RESSOILZ s UNITS INCH OUTPUT DECIMAL 10 Sel. 2 G=32.2 LIST JOINT DISPLACEMENTS ALL $ UNITS FEET OUTPUT DECIMAL 1 LIST MEMBER FORCES 19 22 $ FINISH 0.000006 0.000006 TO 16 20 19 21 22 G13 1 10 16 17 TO 22 $CROSSBEAM $COLUMNvid | M-STRUDL BY CAST / REV. V2.90 SER : 722d TIME : 5/31/1995 16:16:45 | | LICENSEE : Oregon DOT #11, OR | TITLE: PETER R. PAGTER PAGE 1 | ‘“** LOAD INDEX: 1 LOAD TAG EOL +** * X= RSA, PACTOR = 9.27 PREQ. VS. ACCEL. CURVE RESULTANT JOINT DISPLACEMENTS - JOINT /-+-+ GLOBAL DISPLACEMENTS ---/-- ROTATION --/ No. X DIRECTION Y DIRECTION DIRECTION. 0.6235262750 0.0000000004 00024831517 0.6230702754 0.6944699778 —0.0019795820 0.6217031809 1,1088846474 0,0007181373 0.6194277017 1.0873247748 9 .0008808909 0.6262483445 0.6585935637 90019567845 0.6121713988 0.0046747348 9. 0023402468 0.6195249526 0.6734315296 00021393360, 0.6260033914 1.1851300658 0.0014137657 0.6318899693 1.3734220526 0. 0006630122 10 0.6362695096 1.1561265602 0.0014576608 11 0,8400303946 0.6248045906 0.0021041875 12 0.6428608617 0.0082642747 0.0019584668 13 0.6472224497 0.6093660656 0.0019284083 14 0.6506242820 1.0533559732 0.0009263057 15 0.6530591333 1.0986647689 0.0006418695, 26 0.6545220371 0.6951293228 0.001 9665484 17 0.6550100043 0.0000000004 00024926233 18 0.4797910718 0.0035063630 0.9026122091 19 0.3276689570 0.0023377419 00025810238 20 0.1252716772 0.0000800008 00004274597 21 0.6213876807 9.0070848538 —0.0014592232 22 0.4402199339 00035435641 0.0014330906 23 0.2355366178 0.0000000005 + 0.0007366430| M-STRUDL BY CAST / REV. V2.90 SER: 722d TIME : 5/31/1998 16:16: | LTC ENS =; Cregon DOT #11, OR \ | TITLE: PETER R. PAGTER pace 2 | ‘e+ LOAD INDEX 1. WoaD TAG : BOL *** * X= RSA, FACTOR = 9.27 FREQ. VS. ACCEL. CURVE O.3:4.4 0.3:4-8 0.3:5.4 0.4:6.0 0.5:7.2 0.6:7-5 0.6:7.8 0.6:8.2 0.7:8.9 0.8:9.4 0.8:9.8 0.9:10.5 y.t:12.0 2.3:12.9 3.4:24.2, 1.7:15.7 2.3:19.3 100.0:19.3 RESULTANT MEMBER FORCES - MEMBER SECTION JOINT /--~ LOCAL ¥ --/-- LOCAL 2 --/ NO. Tag. NO. FORCE SHEAR FORCE MOMENT 19 A319 285.9 1038.0 3418.6 20 205.9 1038.0 3183.4 22 na 22 289.0 274.9 1635.7 23 289.0 274.9 3341.4BRIDGE ENGINEERING SECTION A OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION io Bridge Name: creek Bridge calculations by: Peter R. Pagter Date: June 1, 1995 Bridge No. 1 Bent 2 Determine Ultimate Translational Force Capacity: No = 30 G+ 750 ksf = 0.35 Dead load support reaction = 2390 k Force capacity = [(xp) (Bff. unit preseure) (Ftg. side axes) + (F) (Support Reaction! (63.7) ( (0.125 kee) (6")) (6") (28°) + (0.5) (2390 KI] 1624 k — 1038 K @ 0.125" hoor re AW DEFLECTION (INCH) *. The translation spring is too stiff. Recalculate the translational spring constant as follows: 70k) (2in / EY = Bros Gain (FOL 93,500 k/tt i 0128") Determine Ultimate Moment Capacity: Qux* 18 ksf (from the Foundations Unit) P= 2390 kBRIDGE ENGINEERING SECTION ul? OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Bridge Name: Creek pridge calculations by: Pet Date: dune 1, 1995 Bridge Now: 1 5 P 2° Baar _ 39007 @ ~ @ 8) wake: = 14! - 2.377 = 11.63" M = Pe (2390 k) (11.63") 27,793 £t-k [= pres rr-n © 43210" maoins | Barony tes Tone Sei eaninns | E 1 a | : So OF ee | wowen soxt04 29.8x10 ROTATION (RADIANS) The rotational spring is adequate.BRIDGE ENGINEERING SECTION OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION u1s Bridge Name: Creek Bridge calculations by: Peter R. Pagter Date: June 1, 199 Bridge Wow: 2 Bent 3 Determine Ultimate Translational Foree Capacity: a ‘The translation spring is adequate. Determine Ultimate Moment Capacity: Gltimate pile capacity = 405 k/pile (from Foundations Unit) Utimate moment capacity = (405 k/pile} (4 piles) (6’} (2 rows) + (405 k/pile) (4 piles) (2) (2 rows) 25,900 ft-k [3541 FT-k @ 7.4r107 RaDians £25300; E1940 © 13000) woven