Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Chabangborn, A., Brandefelt, J. & Wohlfarth, B. 2014 (January): Asian monsoon climate during the Last Glacial
Maximum: palaeo-datamodel comparisons. Boreas, Vol. 43, pp. 220242. 10.1111/bor.12032. ISSN 0300-9483.
The Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) (2319 ka BP) in the Asian monsoon region is generally described as cool and
dry, due to a strong winter monsoon. More recently, however, palaeo-data and climate model simulations have
argued for a more variable LGM Asian monsoon climate with distinct regional differences. We compiled,
evaluated, and partly re-assessed proxy records for the Asian monsoon region in terms of wet/dry climatic
conditions based on precipitation and effective moisture, and of sea surface temperatures. The comparison of the
palaeo-data set to LGM simulations by the Climate Community System Model version 3 (CCSM3) shows fairly
good agreement: a dry LGM climate in the western and northern part due to a strengthened winter monsoon
and/or strengthened westerly winds and wetter conditions in equatorial areas, due to a stronger summer monsoon.
Datamodel discrepancies are seen in some areas and are ascribed to the fairly coarse resolution of CCSM3 and/or
to uncertainties in the reconstructions. Differences are also observed between the reconstructed and simulated
northern boundaries of the Intertropical Convergence Zone (ITCZ). The reconstructions estimate a more southern position over southern India and the Bay of Bengal, whereas CCSM3 simulates a more northern position. In
Indochina, the opposite is the case. The palaeo-data indicate that climatic conditions changed around 2019 ka
BP, with some regions receiving higher precipitation and some experiencing drier conditions, which would imply
a distinct shift in summer monsoon intensity. This shift was probably triggered by the late LGM sea-level rise,
which led to changes in atmosphereocean interactions in the Indian Ocean. The overall good correspondence
between reconstructions and CCSM3 suggests that CCSM3 simulates LGM climate conditions over subtropical
and tropical areas fairly well. The few high-resolution qualitative and quantitative palaeo-records available for the
large Asian monsoon region make reconstructions however still uncertain.
Akkaneewut Chabangborn (akkaneewut.c@geo.su.se) and Barbara Wohlfarth, Department of Geological Sciences,
Stockholm University, SE-106 91, Stockholm, Sweden; Jenny Brandefelt, The Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste
Management Company, SE-111 64, Stockholm, Sweden; received 4th January 2013, accepted 31st May 2013.
BOREAS
221
East Asian monsoon intensity has recently been challenged (Clemens et al. 2010; Dayem et al. 2010; Pausata
et al. 2011; Maher & Thompson 2012).
Here, we compile published palaeoenvironmental
proxies for the Asian monsoon region and evaluate
these in terms of qualitative precipitation and effective
moisture to assess LGM summer monsoon variability
on spatial and temporal scales. We compare these data
sets to quantitative precipitation and effective moisture
simulated by the Community Climate System Model
version 3 (CCSM3), which has shown good correspondence to reconstructed LGM climate at high latitudes (Kjellstrm et al. 2009), and test whether
CCSM3 is also able to faithfully simulate LGM
monsoon precipitation over the Asian subtropics and
tropics.
Palaeo-proxies
The palaeo-proxy data sets selected for this study
include published terrestrial and marine records (here
referred to as palaeo-data compilation) and the
MARGO (2009) sea surface temperature (SST) synthesis (here referred to as MARGO09) (Table 1). We constrained our study area to the Asian monsoon region
between 15S and 40N, and 40E and 160E (Fig. 1).
Following Wang et al. (2003, 2005), the area was separated into the IOM and EAM subregions along longitude 105E. The IOM subregion covers the area from
the Indian Ocean in the south to the Tibetan Plateau in
the north, and the EAM subregion covers large parts of
China and the western Pacific Ocean (Fig. 1).
The LGM landsea configuration in the Asian
monsoon region was distinctly different from the
present day, owing to the marked sea-level lowstand.
The LGM palaeogeography did not influence the IOM
subregion as much as the EAM subregion, where a
smaller South China Sea and exposure of the East
China Sea shelf increased the landsea thermal
contrast. Sumatra, Java, and Borneo were connected to
the Indochina peninsula and formed the so-called
Sundaland, and northern Australia was linked to New
Guinea, forming Sahulland (Fig. 1). As the areal extent
of the exposed land was almost double that of today
(De Deckker et al. 2002) and resulted in distinct environmental changes (Bird et al. 2005), the continental
shelves of Sundaland and Sahulland (SSS) were treated
as a third subregion (Fig. 1).
Selection criteria
Marine and terrestrial records (Table 1) were selected
here according to the following criteria: (i) for evaluation of the spatial variability of LGM climatic conditions, the records should contain at least one 14C, U/Th,
and/or TL date between 23 and 19 ka BP; (ii) records
with age estimate errors of >1000 years, and 14C dates
222
BOREAS
Table 1. Palaeo-records and palaeo-proxies used for the compilation. The age assignments are based on MARGO project members (2009)
(=M) data set and published 14C, TL and U/Th dates. The number of dates between 2517 ka BP for each sequence is given in parentheses.
Site Site name
no.
Archive
Marine
Proxy
Age
References
assignment
SHI9034
9.10
111.01
3330
SHI9016
8.46
128.24
1805
3
4
5
Kosipe valley
8.45
Situ Bayongbong swamp 7.18
Bandung basin
7.00
147.20
107.28
108.00
1965
1300
665
6
7
8
BAR94-42
SHI9014
SHI9006
6.75
5.77
4.33
102.42
126.97
117.60
2542
3163
1999
Marine
Marine
Marine
9
10
11
12
Sentarum lake
di Atas lake
Pea Sim-sim swamp
Pee Bullok swamp
0.73
1.07
2.29
2.28
112.10
100.77
98.89
98.98
3550
1535
1450
1400
Terrestrial
Terrestrial
Terrestrial
Terrestrial
13
K-12
2.69
127.74
3510
Marine
14
15
16
17
2.69
3.06
3.53
4.00
127.74
102.64
141.87
114.00
3510
2030
2282
1000
18
19
20
21
22
K-12
Tasek Bera basin
KH92-1-5cBX
Cave in Gunung Buda
National Park
SO18302
SO18300
GIK17964-2
GIK17961-2
MD97-2142
Planktonic
M
foraminifera
14
C (1)
Marine
Pollen
Terrestrial Hardwood remain 14C (1)
Marine
Alkenone
M
U/Th (9)
Terrestrial 18O
4.15
4.35
6.16
8.51
12.69
108.57
108.65
112.21
112.33
119.47
83
91
1556
1795
1557
Marine
Marine
Marine
Marine
Marine
23
24
GIK17954-2
31-KL
14.80
18.75
111.53
115.87
1520
3360
Marine
Marine
25
GIK17938-2
19.79
117.54
2840
Marine
26
MD97-2148
19.80
117.54
2830
Marine
27
28
29
30
31
32
GIK17940-2
Core 17940
Tianyang basin
Huguang lake
Toushe Basin
DGKS9603
20.12
20.12
20.78
21.15
23.82
28.15
117.38
117.38
110.03
110.28
120.88
127.27
1727
1727
120
23
650
1100
Marine
Marine
Terrestrial
Terrestrial
Terrestrial
Marine
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
DGKS9603
Jintanwan Cave
Hulu Cave
Songjia Cave
Weinan section
Beizhuangcun section
Pyonggeodong
archaeological site
Biwa lake
A paddy field in Iwaya,
Fukui prefecture
Mikata Lake
CH84-04
KH-79-3_L3
KT94-15_PC-9
MD85-674
SK-157-14
28.15
29.48
32.30
32.41
34.40
34.33
35.17
127.27
109.53
119.17
107.41
109.50
109.48
128.06
1100
460
100
680
6001100
6001100
100300
Marine
Terrestrial
Terrestrial
Terrestrial
Terrestrial
Terrestrial
Terrestrial
35.25
35.52
136.05
135.88
85
20
35.56
36.46
37.06
39.57
3.19
5.18
135.89
142.14
134.72
139.41
50.44
75.91
0
2630
935
807
4875
3306
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
Planktonic
foraminifera
Marine
Planktonic
foraminifera
Terrestrial Pollen
Terrestrial Pollen
Terrestrial Pollen
Pollen
Pollen
Planktonic
foraminifera
Pollen
Pollen
Pollen
Pollen
14
Hope (2009)
Stuijts et al. (1988)
van der Kaars & Dam
(1997)
van der Kaars et al. (2010)
van der Kaars et al. (2000)
Ding et al. (2002)
C (1)
C (1)
14
C (1)
14
14
C (2)
C (1)
M
14
14
C (1)
C (2)
14
C (5)
14
C (4)
14
14
C (1)
C (1)
M
M
M
M
M
M
C (2)
14
C (2)
14
C (2)
14
C (3)
M
14
C (2)
U/Th (3)
U/Th (3)
U/Th (2)
14
C (1)
14
C (2)
14
C (3)
Xu et al. (2010)
Cosford et al. (2010)
Wang et al. (2001)
Zhou et al. (2008)
Sun et al. (1997)
Wang & Sun (1994)
Chung et al. (2006)
Terrestrial Pollen
Terrestrial Pollen
14
Terrestrial
Marine
Marine
Marine
Marine
Marine
14
Pollen
Pollen
Alkenone
Alkenone
Planktonic
foraminifera
Alkenone
Planktonic
foraminifera
Planktonic
foraminifera
Planktonic
foraminifera
Alkenone
Pollen
Pollen
Pollen
Pollen
Planktonic
foraminifera
Pollen
18O
18O
18O
Pollen
Pollen
Pollen
Pollen
Alkenone
Alkenone
Alkenone
Alkenone
18O
14
14
C (2)
C (1)
14
C (2)
M
M
M
M
14
C (1)
BOREAS
223
Table 1. Continued
Site Site name
no.
48
Horton plains
6.81
80.83
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
MD77-191
MD77-169
MD77-194
TY93905/P
Nilgiri hills
MD77-195
RC12-344
Moomi cave,
TY93929/P
MD77-176
MD76-135
GeoB3005-1
MD76-131
MD76-131(C)
7.30
10.13
10.28
10.70
11.25
11.30
12.46
12.50
13.70
14.31
14.44
14.97
15.32
15.53
76.43
95.03
75.14
51.93
76.67
74.32
96.04
54.00
53.25
93.08
50.52
54.37
72.34
72.57
1254
2360
1222
1500
2200
1200
2140
1000
2490
1375
1895
2316
1230
1230
63
64
65
GeoB3007-1
MD77-181
117723_Site
16.17
17.24
18.05
59.76
90.29
57.61
1920
2271
816
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
MD77-180
MD77-202
SO93-126KL
MD77-203
SO90-137KA
SO90-93KL
Bharatpur Bird
Sanctuary wetland
Phulara palaeolake
Kathmandu basin
Shudu lake,
Ren Co
Tham Rod
archaeological site
18.28
19.13
19.97
20.42
23.12
23.59
27.12
89.51
60.41
90.03
59.34
66.48
64.22
77.52
1986
2427
1250
2442
573
1802
174
29.33
27.67
27.90
30.73
19.57
80.13
85.22
99.95
96.68
98.89
15001700
1303
3630
4450
6001170
73
74
75
76
77
Archive
Proxy
Age
References
assignment
14
Alkenone
Alkenone
Alkenone
Alkenone
13C
Alkenone
18O
18O
Alkenone
Alkenone
Alkenone
Alkenone
Alkenone
Planktonic
foraminifera
Marine
Alkenone
Marine
Alkenone
Marine
Planktonic
foraminifera
Marine
Alkenone
Marine
Alkenone
Marine
Alkenone
Marine
Alkenone
Marine
18O
Marine
Alkenone
Terrestrial Pollen
M
M
M
M
14
C (1)
M
14
C (3)
U/Th (8)
M
M
M
M
M
M
Premathilake (2006)
Premathilake & Risberg
(2003)
Sonzogni et al. (1998)
Sonzogni et al. (1998)
Sonzogni et al. (1998)
Sonzogni et al. (1998)
Rajagopalan et al. (1997)
Sonzogni et al. (1998)
Rashid et al. (2007)
Shakun et al. (2007)
Sonzogni et al. (1998)
Sonzogni et al. (1998)
Sonzogni et al. (1998)
Budziak et al. (2000)
Sonzogni et al. (1998)
Cayre et al. (1999)
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
14
C (4)
M
14
C (1)
Terrestrial
Terrestrial
Terrestrial
Terrestrial
Terrestrial
14
Marine
Marine
Marine
Marine
Terrestrial
Marine
Marine
Terrestrial
Marine
Marine
Marine
Marine
Marine
Marine
Pollen
Pollen
Pollen
Pollen
Fauna remains
C (2)
C (2)
C (3)
14
C (4)
14
C (3)
TL (1)
14
Palaeo-proxy assessment
The MARGO09 data set could directly be compared to
the CCSM3 output, whereas other palaeo-proxies had
to be assessed in terms of qualitative precipitation and
effective moisture (precipitation minus evaporation,
P-E), i.e. wet or dry climatic conditions. Qualitative
precipitation and P-E were categorized for each type of
terrestrial proxy and were then compared to quantitative model output from CCSM3 (Fig. 2). Variations of
LGM summer monsoon intensity were identified by
changes in qualitative precipitation and P-E, and were
interpolated to millennium-scale resolution for the
individual study sites.
Terrestrial proxies. For pollen assemblages from terrestrial archives (24 sites) and marine sequences (five
sites) (Fig. 1), we assigned each pollen taxon with >5%
abundance to plant functional types (PFTs) that had
been established for China (Yu et al. 2000a), Japan
224
BOREAS
Fig. 1. Location of the compiled palaeo-data sets and MARGO (2009) sea surface temperature sites used in this study. The Asian monsoon
region is separated into three subregions: the Indian Ocean Monsoon, the East Asian Monsoon, and the Sundaland and Sahulland Shelves.
The LGM palaeo-shoreline (thick black contour line) and land topography (green, yellow, and red contour lines) are based on the TerrainBase
5-min global bathymetry/topography data set (National Geophysical Data Center 1995). See Table 1 for details on the sites.
BOREAS
225
cipitation (3) and high mean 18O values low precipitation (1) (Table 3). For investigation of summer
monsoon variability over time, we averaged 18O values
for each speleothem using a five-point running mean
between 25 and 17 ka BP. Average values for each site
were then compared to the LGM mean 18O value for
individual speleothem sites to assess shifts in relatively
wet or dry climatic conditions.
Climatic conditions derived from other terrestrial proxies, i.e. 13C of bulk sediment, hardwood and
faunal remains, and archaeological evidence, were used
as supporting information and follow the interpretations of the respective authors.
Marine proxies. For planktonic foraminifera (Globigerinoides ruber) 18O values we assumed that sealevel was stable (Clark & Mix 2002; Clark et al. 2009)
and that major salinity changes did not occur during
the LGM (Schulz et al. 1998; Clark & Mix 2002)
(Fig. 2).
The SST difference between the LGM and the
present-day was calculated using the MARGO09
alkenone and the World Ocean Atlas (WOA) 1998
(Conkright et al. 1998) data sets (Table 5). This difference was then used to calculate the LGM P-E for
selected marine 18O records (four sites) (Table 6)
(Tiwari et al. 2006) at locations, which were not significantly affected by the LGM sea-level lowstand. Calculation of P-E was based on the assumption of a 0.25
increase in 18O with a SST decrease of 1C (Erez & Luz
1983). Moreover, we assume a constantly averaged
global ocean effect of 1.1 higher than present during
the LGM sea-level lowstand (Adkins et al. 2002;
Ravelo & Hillaire-Marcel 2007). P-E calculated for
four sites and based on the LGM 18O mean values of
planktonic foraminifera (G. ruber; Table 6) is used as
an approximation of mean LGM precipitation and
allows for an easier qualitative comparison between
marine sites. We assigned the calculated P-Es to two
qualitative categories: high P-E and high precipitation
(3); low P-E and low precipitation (1) (Table 3) using
the same procedure as for the mean 18O speleothem
values.
226
BOREAS
Table 2. Assignment of LGM pollen assemblages to biomes using plant functional types (PFTs). See text for further explanations.
Site
no.
Biome
References
Nothofagus, Poaceae
Tropical deciduous
broadleaf forest and
woodland
Hope (2009)
Tropical deciduous
broadleaf forest and
woodland
Tropical deciduous
broadleaf forest and
woodland
Tropical deciduous
broadleaf forest and
woodland
10
11
Maloney (1980)
12
Maloney &
McCormac (1996)
14
Barmawidjaja et al.
(1993)
18
Tropical deciduous
broadleaf forest and
woodland
19
Tropical deciduous
broadleaf forest, woodland,
and steppe
28
Pinus, Artemisia
Yu et al. (2000a)
29
Yu et al. (2000a)
30
Yu et al. (2000a)
31
Broadleaf evergreen/warm
mixed forest
Yu et al. (2000a)
33
Xu et al. (2010)
Yu et al. (2000a)
37
Artemisia, Compositae
Steppe
Yu et al. (2000a)
BOREAS
227
Table 2. Continued
Site
no.
Biome
References
38
Takahara et al.
(2000)
39
Steppe
Yu et al. (2000a)
40
Yu et al. (2000a)
41
Takahara et al.
(2000)
42
Yasuda (1982)
Takahara et al.
(2000)
48
Chenopodiaceae
Steppe
Premathilake (2006)
73
74
75
76
Chenopodiaceae, Artemisia
Steppe
Table 3. Assignment of qualitative precipitation minus evaporation (effective moisture; P-E) for biome and planktonic foraminifera, and
precipitation for speleothem mean 18O values. Biomes were roughly approximated to P-E by comparison to a relationship between biome and
mean annual temperature and precipitation suggested by Mader (2010). Mean 18O values obtained from planktonic foraminifera (Globigerina
ruber) were converted to P-E, whereas those of speleothem were directly used to represent LGM qualitative precipitation. These assignments
were used to attribute qualitative P-E to the biomes in Fig. 4B, i.e. 1 = dry; 2 = medium; 3 = wet. The grey box represents medium precipitation, which was not considered in the qualitative precipitation assessments for the speleothem mean 18O values and planktonic foraminifera
P-E assessments in order to avoid any overestimation.
Palaeo-proxy
assessment
3
2
1
Effective moisture
Qualitative precipitation
speleothem 18O values
Biome
P-E
<1.4
<7.70
>0.3
>0.58
Site name
References
17
34
35
36
56
24.317.8
24.117.7
24.218.8
19.817.5
24.217.3
7.700.05
6.200.22
6.290.33
9.260.14
0.580.17
Site #
1
2
8
13
16
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
32
43
44
45
46
52
57
59
60
63
65
67
69
71
49
51
54
61
62
50
58
64
66
68
Bay of Bengal
Subregion
Sunda and
Sahul
Shelves
East Asian
Monsoon
Indian Ocean
Monsoon
Indian Ocean
Monsoon
MD77-169
MD77-176
MD77-181
MD77-180
SO93-126KL
MD77-191
MD77-194
MD77-195
MD76-131
MD76-131(C)
MD85-674
TY93905/P
TY93929/P
MD76-135
GeoB3005-1
GeoB3007-1
117723_Site
MD77-202
MD77-203
SO90-93KL
MD97-2142
GIK17954-2
31-KL
GIK17938-2
MD97-2148
GIK17940-2
DGKS9603
CH84-04
KH-79-3_L3
KT94-15_PC-9
SHI9034
SHI9016
SHI9006
K-12
KH92-1-5cBX
GIK17964-2
GIK17961-2
Site name
Alkenone
Alkenone
Alkenone
Alkenone
Alkenone
Alkenone
Alkenone
Alkenone
Alkenone
Planktonic foraminifera
Alkenone
Alkenone
Alkenone
Alkenone
Alkenone
Alkenone
Planktonic foraminifera
Alkenone
Alkenone
Alkenone
Planktonic foraminifera
Alkenone
Planktonic foraminifera
Planktonic foraminifera
Planktonic foraminifera
Alkenone
Planktonic foraminifera
Alkenone
Alkenone
Alkenone
Planktonic foraminifera
Planktonic foraminifera
Planktonic foraminifera
Planktonic foraminifera
Alkenone
Alkenone
Alkenone
Proxies
25.880.23
25.500.27
25.670.28
25.710.26
25.540.27
26.060.20
25.990.18
25.810.19
25.100.23
25.000.23
24.480.19
22.820.24
22.580.26
21.470.28
22.120.25
22.770.26
21.940.30
22.620.29
22.160.30
22.150.33
26.240.16
24.420.19
24.740.19
24.750.18
24.750.18
24.560.19
22.100.24
16.190.45
4.530.44
NA
26.120.27
26.980.18
27.030.15
26.900.19
26.790.16
25.420.18
25.270.18
SSTCCSM3
(C)
25.901.50
26.901.50
26.101.50
26.301.50
26.401.50
25.801.50
25.701.50
25.801.50
25.201.50
28.510.85
25.601.50
26.001.50
24.401.50
24.601.50
24.701.50
25.101.50
25.870.85
23.001.50
22.501.50
23.601.50
26.811.26
22.401.50
24.711.26
25.181.26
25.311.26
22.401.50
25.381.26
14.701.50
17.501.50
17.801.50
25.600.85
27.720.85
27.981.26
26.560.85
27.601.50
24.801.50
25.001.50
SSTMARGO09
(C)
28.34
28.27
27.97
28.06
27.82
28.22
28.35
28.45
28.25
28.25
27.12
26.03
26.40
26.61
26.37
26.73
25.95
26.39
25.75
26.58
28.49
27.32
26.68
26.54
26.53
26.38
23.94
18.50
16.86
14.15
27.78
28.26
28.74
28.45
29.18
28.36
28.30
SSTWOA98
(C)
1.68
4.92
1.97
1.36
1.22
3.98
1.44
3.80
0.64
3.65
1.52
0.03
2.00
2.01
1.67
1.63
0.08
3.39
3.25
2.98
2.42
2.65
2.65
3.05
0.26
2.44
1.37
1.87
1.76
1.42
2.25
2.90
1.94
1.79
1.78
1.82
1.84
2.31
12.33
NA
2.64
3.21
3.82
5.14
4.25
3.96
4.01
3.77
3.59
4.43
2.16
2.36
2.64
3.15
3.25
2.46
2.77
2.30
2.35
2.28
1.12
3.18
1.82
3.13
2.58
2.33
3.93
0.38
0.34
1.45
0.26
0.29
0.01
0.10
3.51
0.02
1.40
0.43
0.59
0.86
0.57
2.02
0.03
0.43
0.56
2.16
3.28
1.49
12.97
NA
2.17
0.54
0.76
1.89
1.58
3.56
3.30
1.66
1.28
1.71
1.55
2.39
2.94
3.03
0.51
0.74
0.95
0.34
0.81
0.62
0.27
SSTMARGO09-WOA98
(C)
SSTCCSM3-WOA98
(C)
SSTMARGO09-CCSM3
(C)
Table 5. Annual mean sea surface temperatures (SSTs) simulated by CCSM3 and reconstructed by MARGO (2009). These are compared to the World Ocean Atlas data set (WOA97) (Conkright
et al. 1998). See Fig. 1 for the location of the sites, and Fig. 5 for datamodel comparisons.
228
Akkaneewut Chabangborn et al.
BOREAS
BOREAS
229
Table 6. LGM mean P-E derived from planktonic foraminifera (G. ruber) 18O (Tiwari et al. 2006).
Site #
Site name
SSTLGM-Present1 (C)
P-E2
References
6
47
55
70
BAR94-42
SK-157-14
RC12-344
SO90-137KA
1.00
0.960.43
1.190.17
0.090.09
2.17
2.42
2.44
2.98
1.56
1.46
1.67
0.27
Difference between reconstructed LGM SSTs inferred from alkenones (MARGO 2009) and present-day SSTs from the World Ocean Atlas
data set (Conkright et al. 1998) from sites in the vicinity.
2
P-E is based on the assumption that 18O increases by 0.25 with a SST decrease of 1C (Erez & Luz 1983) and a constantly averaged
global ocean effect of 1.1 higher than present during the sea-level lowstand of the LGM (Adkins et al. 2002; Ravelo & Hillaire-Marcel
2007).
230
BOREAS
Fig. 3. CCSM3 simulated climate parameters for the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) compared to the Recent Past (RP). The land-sea
topography is based on the LGM shoreline in the TerrainBase 5-min global bathymetry/topography data set (National Geophysical Data
Center 1995). A. LGM mean annual air temperature (C). B. Difference between LGM and RP mean annual temperatures (C). C. LGM mean
annual sea surface temperatures (SSTs; C). D. Difference between LGM and RP SSTs (C). E. LGM mean annual precipitation (mm a1). F.
Difference between mean LGM and RP precipitation (mm a1). G. LGM mean annual effective moisture (P-E).
BOREAS
precipitation simulated by CCSM3. P-E shows dry conditions along the west coast of the Arabian Sea and wet
conditions near the equator (Fig. 3G). There are distinct differences in continental regions, where CCSM3
simulates low precipitation, but medium to high P-E.
This indicates very low evaporation over these areas
during the LGM.
To compare quantitative model output to qualitative
precipitation reconstructed from palaeo-data, we
assumed here that precipitation amounts of <1000,
10002000, and >2000 mm a1 correspond to low, medium, and high precipitation, respectively. Furthermore,
simulated P-E of <0, 0 to 800, and >1200 mm a1 were
assumed to correspond to low, medium, and high P-E,
respectively, as estimated from the proxy data.
Palaeo-dataclimate model
output comparison
Indian Ocean monsoon subregion
18O values measured on speleothems from the western
Arabian Sea (#56, Shakun et al. 2007) (Table 4) have
been interpreted as representing arid LGM conditions.
In addition, the low P-E calculated for marine site #70
(von Rad et al. 1999) from the continental margin off the
Indus Delta suggests low precipitation (Table 3). Arid
LGM conditions agree well with CCSM3 simulations of
low precipitation (<500 mm a1) (Fig. 4A) and low P-E
(<400 mm a1) (Fig. 4B) over the western part of the
IOM domain. High P-E reconstructed off southern
India (#47, Ahmad et al. 2008) and in the Bay of Bengal
(#55, Rashid et al. 2007) is of a similar value as P-E at
site #6 (van der Kaars et al. 2010) in Sundaland, where
substantial LGM precipitation has been inferred from
multiproxy analyses (Table 6). The CCSM3 simulation
also compares well to the palaeo-data assessment here
and suggests high P-E (1000>1200 mm a1) over the
southern and eastern IOM domain (Fig. 4B).
Datamodel discrepancies are visible for Sri Lanka,
southern India, northwestern Thailand, and the northern part of the IOM subregion (Fig. 4A, B). Chenopodiaceae are the only pollen taxa present in LGM
sediments from Sri Lanka (#48, Premathilake &
Risberg 2003; Premathilake 2006) and were originally
interpreted as representing a dry (xerophytic) forest
(Premathilake 2006). Here, we assigned these assemblages to a steppe biome because the majority of
Chenopodiaceae pollen are drought-tolerant species
(Kotlia et al. 2010; Kramer et al. 2010) (Table 2), and
infer dry LGM conditions (Table 3). The dominance of
dry-tolerant C4 plants in sediments from the Nilgiri
Hills (#53, Rajagopalan et al. 1997) provides additional support for a dry LGM climate. In contrast
to the palaeo-proxy assessment of dry conditions,
CCSM3 simulates intermediate P-E (0200 mm a1)
(Fig. 4B) and precipitation (1500 mm a1).
231
232
BOREAS
Fig. 4. Palaeo-dataCCSM3 comparison for the LGM. Quantitative precipitation and P-E (mm a1) modelled by CCSM3 is compared to
qualitative precipitation (A) and P-E (B) inferred from the palaeo-data compilation. The land-sea topography is based on the LGM shoreline
in the TerrainBase 5-min global bathymetry/topography data set (National Geophysical Data Center 1995). For easier comparisons between
palaeo-data and model results, the simulated quantitative precipitation and P-E were categorized as low (<1000 mm a1), medium (1000
2000 mm a1), and high (>2000 mm a1), and low (<0 mm a1), medium (0800 mm a1), and high (>800 mm a1), respectively. See Table 3 for
details on the qualitative assessment of the palaeo-proxies.
BOREAS
233
234
BOREAS
Fig. 5. LGM sea surface temperature (SST; C) in the Asian monsoon region reconstructed by planktonic foraminifera and alkenones
(MARGO 2009) compared with CCSM3 simulated SSTs. The land-sea topography is based on the LGM shoreline in the TerrainBase 5-min
global bathymetry/topography data set (National Geophysical Data Center 1995). The filled circles and squares represent MARGO (2009)
SSTs and the underlying colours are CCSM3 simulated SSTs.
Fig. 6. Qualitative precipitation change inferred from biomes and 18O of speleothems in the Asian monsoon region between 25 and 17 ka BP.
Thick lines represent the calibrated age points and thin lines are interpolations between these. The black and grey colours represent relatively
wet and dry climatic conditions, respectively. See Table 1 for details on the sites and Fig. 1 for locations of the sites.
BOREAS
235
Fig. 7. Simulated and reconstructed northern boundary of the Intertropical Convergence Zone (ITCZ) during the LGM in the Asian monsoon
region compared to its present-day January and July position (Stager et al. 2011). The land-sea topography is based on the LGM shoreline in
the TerrainBase 5-min global bathymetry/topography data set (National Geophysical Data Center 1995). Present-day northern boundary of
the ITCZ in January and July (yellow line); CCSM3 simulated ITCZ (orange line); reconstructed position of the ITCZ at 2320 ka BP (blue
dashed line); northward shift of the ITCZ at around 19 ka BP (green dashed line).
236
Discussion
CCSM3 simulations and qualitative P-E and precipitation estimates based on the palaeo-data compilation
are in good agreement for the western and southern
part of the Asian monsoon region. Both show a weak
summer monsoon and dry climatic conditions in the
western IOM subregion, and a strengthened summer
monsoon and wetter climatic conditions off southern
India, in the Bay of Bengal and over the SSS domain
(Fig. 4A, B). Discrepancies between terrestrial data and
model output are visible in India, near the Himalayan
Mountains, and in central China, where palaeo-proxies
suggest drier conditions than simulated, and in NW
Thailand and Taiwan, where proxies indicate wetter
conditions than simulated (Fig. 4A, B).
The observed differences between palaeo-proxies
and CCSM3 simulations may be attributable to a
number of factors: (i) the coarse resolution of CCSM3
may not allow the detection of oceanatmosphere
interactions (Marchant et al. 2007); this may explain
why the model does not capture the climatic conditions
suggested by the palaeo-data; (ii) the selected LGM
boundary conditions (e.g. SSTs, PFTs, dust) can influence atmospheric dynamics (Otto-Bliesner et al. 2009;
Hargreaves et al. 2011; Jiang et al. 2011); LGM dust,
for example, is not parameterized well in CCSM3
(Otto-Bliesner et al. 2006a) and it is believed that dust
would have had a major impact on precipitation patterns given the many available dust sources (Kohfeld &
Harrison 2001); (iii) qualitative P-E and precipitation
were not here proper classification cause of uncertainty
in reconstructed conditions assessments; (iv) the influences of wind speed and/or surface temperature on
evaporation make interpretations of P-E more complicated than of precipitation; (v) the individual sites and
proxies may represent local conditions that were not
representative for a larger region.
The obvious differences between speleothem and
biome proxies and between speleothem proxies and the
model simulation in central China are more difficult to
explain (Fig. 4A, B). The low LGM 18O values of
speleothems from Jintanwan and Hulu caves were
originally interpreted as a signal of East Asian
monsoon intensity (Wang et al. 2001; Cosford et al.
2010). However, recent work has challenged this view
and suggests instead that the signal seen in speleothem
18O values is due to precipitation originating from
different sources, i.e. the South China Sea and the
Pacific Ocean, and thus reflects changes in synoptic
circulation patterns (Clemens et al. 2010; Pausata et al.
2011; Maher & Thompson 2012). This hypothesis
needs to be tested further, but could explain the dis-
BOREAS
BOREAS
237
increased for example on the leeward side of the Himalayan Mountains (#74, Fujii & Sakai 2002; Hayashi
et al. 2009; #73, Kotlia et al. 2010) and along the
eastern side of the Sumatra highland (#11, Maloney
1980; #12, Maloney & McCormac 1996), which is
located in the rain shadow of the mountain range. The
onset or strengthening of the summer monsoon around
2019 ka BP in the northern EAM domain could be
explained by a gradual weakening of the Siberian highpressure system and/or strengthened westerly winds
(An et al. 2012), which dominated during the LGM.
These climatic changes seem to have occurred slightly
earlier than those described for China, where the
change towards wetter conditions took place between
18.5 and 17.5 ka BP (Herzschuh 2006).
Proxy-based precipitation reconstructions of the
northern boundary of the ITCZ suggest a distinct
northward shift at around 2019 ka BP. Prior to 20 ka
BP, the northern boundary of the ITCZ was located at
around 5N in the Indian Ocean, shifted northwards in
the Bay of Bengal, and crossed southern China around
latitude 2025N (Fig. 7). After 2019 ka BP, the ITCZ
shifted northward, reaching above 10N in the Indian
Ocean, 20N in the Bay of Bengal, and 30N over
China. The reconstructed and modelled northern
boundaries of the ITCZ do not correspond well with
each other. For example, CCSM3 simulates the boundary over southern India at around 15N, whereas the
reconstruction suggests a more southerly location. For
the Bay of Bengal and over the Indochina Peninsula the
simulated northern boundary is at around 1015N,
which is more southern than inferred from the reconstructions (Fig. 7). Although the CCSM3 simulated
ITCZ compares well to the ensemble of PMIP2 runs
over southern India, the picture is more complicated
over the Indochina Peninsula and southern China
(Braconnot et al. 2007). Some PMIP2 models indicate
that the northern boundary of the ITCZ reached
2030N, whereas others locate it at around 1015N.
The HadCM2 model, which includes vegetation interactions, supports a more northerly position of the
ITCZ (Braconnot et al. 2007), which is in line with our
reconstructions. The obvious differences between
proxy data and model simulations may be because of
the coarse resolution of the models and the different
parameterization schemes used (i.e. different models
show divergent results). However, the datamodel contrast also illustrates inherent uncertainties of the proxy
reconstructions. The few available palaeo-records only
provide qualitative information regarding precipitation
changes. This makes it difficult to assess the amount of
rainfall, which would help to delineate a more precise
position of the northern boundary of the ITCZ.
Our datamodel comparison shows that the LGM
climate in the Asian monsoon region was more variable
than generally assumed (e.g. van Campo et al. 1982;
Huang et al. 1997; Hodell et al. 1999; von Rad et al.
238
BOREAS
Conclusions
Proxy records from marine and terrestrial palaeo-data
sets for the Asian monsoon region have been compiled,
evaluated, and partly re-assessed in terms of Last
Glacial Maximum (LGM) (23-19 ka BP) precipitation,
effective moisture (P-E) and sea surface temperatures
(SSTs). Qualitative palaeoclimate estimates were then
compared to CCSM3 model output data. The palaeoproxy compilation and the modeldata comparison
allowed us to discuss past changes in Asian monsoon
strength in three different subregions, the Indian Ocean
monsoon (IOM), the Sunda-Sahulland (SSS) and the
East Asian monsoon (EAM), on temporal and spatial
scales. They also provide estimates for the location of
the northern boundary of the ITCZ during the LGM.
References
Adkins, J. F., McIntyre, K. & Schrag, D. P. 2002: The salinity,
temperature, and 18O of the glacial deep ocean. Science 298, 1769
1773.
Ahmad, S. M., Babu, G. A., Padmakumari, V. M. & Raza, W. 2008:
Surface and deep water changes in the northeast Indian Ocean
during the last 60 ka inferred from carbon and oxygen isotopes
of planktonic and benthic foraminifera. Palaeogeography,
Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 262, 182188.
An, Z., Colman, S. M., Zhou, W., Li, X., Brown, E. T., Jull, A. J. T.,
Cai, Y., Huang, Y., Lu, X., Chang, H., Song, Y., Sun, Y., Xu, H.,
Liu, W., Jin, Z., Liu, X., Cheng, P., Liu, Y., Ai, L., Li, X., Liu, X.,
Yan, L., Shi, Z., Wang, X., Wu, F., Qiang, X., Dong, J., Lu, F. &
BOREAS
239
240
Elenga, H., Peyron, O., Bonnefille, R., Jolly, D., Cheddadi, R.,
Guiot, J., Andrieu, V., Bottema, S., Buchet, G., De Beaulieu, J. L.,
Hamilton, A. C., Maley, J., Marchant, R., Perez-Obiol, R., Reille,
M., Riollet, G., Scott, L., Straka, H., Taylor, D., Van Campo, E.,
Vincens, A., Laarif, F. & Jonson, H. 2000: Pollen-based biome
reconstruction for southern Europe and Africa 18,000 yr bp.
Journal of Biogeography 27, 621634.
Erez, J. & Luz, B. 1983: Experimental paleotemperature equation for
planktonic foraminifera. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 47,
10251031.
Fleitmann, D., Burns, S. J., Mangini, A., Mudelsee, M., Kramers, J.,
Villa, I., Neff, U., Al-Subbary, A. A., Buettner, A., Hippler, D. &
Matter, A. 2007: Holocene ITCZ and Indian monsoon dynamics
recorded in stalagmites from Oman and Yemen (Socotra). Quaternary Science Reviews 26, 170188.
Fleitmann, D., Burns, S. J., Pekala, M., Mangini, A., Al-Subbary, A.,
Al-Aowah, M., Kramers, J. & Matter, A. 2011: Holocene and
Pleistocene pluvial periods in Yemen, southern Arabia. Quaternary
Science Reviews 30, 783787.
Flenley, J. R. 1998: Tropical forests under the climates of the last
30,000 years. Climatic Change 39, 177197.
Fujii, R. & Sakai, H. 2002: Paleoclimatic changes during the last
2.5 myr recorded in the Kathmandu Basin, Central Nepal Himalayas. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences 20, 255266.
Godad, S. P., Naidu, P. D. & Malmgren, B. A. 2011: Sea surface
temperature changes during May and August in the western
Arabian Sea over the last 22 kyr: implications as to shifting of the
upwelling season. Marine Micropaleontology 78, 2529.
Govil, P. & Naidu, P. D. 2011: Variations of Indian monsoon precipitation during the last 32 kyr reflected in the surface hydrography of the Western Bay of Bengal. Quaternary Science Reviews 30,
38713879.
Hanebuth, T. J. J., Stattegger, K. & Bojanowski, A. 2009: Termination of the Last Glacial Maximum sea-level lowstand: the SundaShelf data revisited. Global and Planetary Change 66, 7684.
Hanebuth, T. J. J., Voris, H. K., Yokoyama, Y., Saito, Y. & Okuno,
J. I. 2011: Formation and fate of sedimentary depocentres on
Southeast Asias Sunda Shelf over the past sea-level cycle and
biogeographic implications. Earth-Science Reviews 104, 92110.
Hargreaves, J. C., Paul, A., Ohgaito, R., Abe-Ouchi, A. & Annan, J.
D. 2011: Are paleoclimate model ensembles consistent with the
MARGO data synthesis? Climate of the Past 7, 917933.
Hayashi, R., Takahara, H., Hayashida, A. & Takemura, K. 2010:
Millennial-scale vegetation changes during the last 40,000 yr based
on a pollen record from Lake Biwa, Japan. Quaternary Research
74, 9199.
Hayashi, T., Tanimura, Y., Kuwahara, Y., Ohno, M., Mampuku,
M., Fujii, R., Sakai, H., Yamanaka, T., Maki, T., Uchida, M.,
Yahagi, W. & Sakai, H. 2009: Ecological variations in diatom
assemblages in the Paleo-Kathmandu Lake linked with global and
Indian monsoon climate changes for the last 600,000 years. Quaternary Research 72, 377387.
Herzschuh, U. 2006: Palaeo-moisture evolution in monsoonal
Central Asia during the last 50,000 years. Quaternary Science
Reviews 25, 163178.
Hodell, D. A., Brenner, M., Kanfoush, S. L., Curtis, J. H., Stoner, J.
S., Xueliang, S., Yuan, W. & Whitmore, T. J. 1999: Paleoclimate of
southwestern China for the past 50,000 yr inferred from lake sediment records. Quaternary Research 52, 369380.
Holton, J. R. 2004: An Introduction to Dynamic Meteorology. 553 pp.
Elsevier Academic Press, Burlington.
Hope, G. 2001: Environmental change in the Late Pleistocene and
later Holocene at Wanda site, Soroako, South Sulawesi, Indonesia.
Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 171, 129145.
Hope, G. 2009: Environmental change and fire in the Owen Stanley
ranges, Papua New Guinea. Quaternary Science Reviews 28, 2261
2276.
Huang, C.-Y., Liew, P.-M., Zhao, M., Chang, T.-C., Kuo, C.-M.,
Chen, M.-T., Wang, C.-H. & Zheng, L.-F. 1997: Deep sea and
lake records of the Southeast Asian paleomonsoons for the last
25 thousand years. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 146, 59
72.
BOREAS
BOREAS
241
242
BOREAS