Você está na página 1de 63

LTE Basics

&
RNP Comparison UMTS vs. LTE

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD.

LTE Introduction

May. 10th , 2012


By Vikalp Dutt

Contents :

LTE Basic Principle

UMTS & LTE RNP Comparison

HUAWEI
CO., LTD.
HISILICONTECHNOLOGIES
SEMICONDUCTOR

Page 2

Evolution of LTE:
3GPP, LTE is an evolution of UMTS beyond RelRel-8
GSM

WCDMA

Basic CS
Voice
Service

Increased
Voice
Capacity and
Data

IS-95

CDMA2K1X

HSDPA

Broadband
Download

1X-EvDO
Rel 0

HSUPA

HSPA+

Broadband
Upload &
QoS

1X-EvDO
Rev A/B

LTE
1X-EvDO
Advanced

3GPP2, LTE is defined only for interworking


The aim of above systems is towards offering a mobile broadband user experience similar to that of current xed access networks such as (ADSL) & (FTTH)
HUAWEI
CO., LTD.
HISILICONTECHNOLOGIES
SEMICONDUCTOR

Page 3

LTE Introduction
What is LTE

LTE (Long Term Evolution) is known as the evolution of Radio Access


technology conducted by 3GPP

The radio access network would evolve to E-UTRAN (Evolved UTRAN),


accompanied by the core network evolution to EPC (Evolved Packet Core)
combined as EPS

LTE was designed as Packet-oriented service considering that all the


services will be Packet Switched, rather than the earlier CS based Systems
of telecommunication

What can LTE do

Flexible bandwidth configuration: supporting 1.4MHz, 3MHz, 5MHz, 10Mhz,


15Mhz and 20MHz
Peak date rate (within 20MHz bandwidth): 150Mbps for downlink and
50Mbps for uplink
Time delay: <100ms (control plane), <5ms (user plane)
Provide 100kbps data rate for mobile user ( for speed up to 350kmph)
Support eMBMS
Circuit services are implemented in PS domain: VoIP
The SAE specifications are found in the 22 series, 23 series, 24 series, and 33 series of Release 8, with work being
Lower cost due to simple system architecture
done in parallel in Release 9.
HUAWEI
CO., LTD.
HISILICONTECHNOLOGIES
SEMICONDUCTOR

Page 4

Motivation for LTE


WIRELINE
EVOLUTION
PUSHES Data
Rates

WIRELESS data
Usage requires
more capacity

Flat rate pricing


pushes
Efficiency

Other
technologies
push WBB

LTE

HUAWEI
CO., LTD.
HISILICONTECHNOLOGIES
SEMICONDUCTOR

Page 5

LTE Brings Better User Experience

SIMO

16QAM

16QAM

16QAM
HUAWEI
CO., LTD.
HISILICONTECHNOLOGIES
SEMICONDUCTOR

Page 6

There is a growing number of LTE frequency bands that


are being designated as possibilities for use with LTE.
Many of the LTE frequency bands are already in use for
other cellular systems, whereas other LTE bands are
new and being introduced
TDD LTE Freq Band Allocations

HUAWEI
CO., LTD.
HISILICONTECHNOLOGIES
SEMICONDUCTOR

FDD LTE Freq Band Allocations

LTE Spectrum Allocations

Page 7

LTE UE Category

The Chipset Vendors (namely: Hisilicon, Qualcomm ,Altair etc) are contributing to the LTE Industry development by constantly developing
Multi-Technology & Multiband Chipsets. Most of the Commercially available UEs belong to Category 3 as on date
HUAWEI
CO., LTD.
HISILICONTECHNOLOGIES
SEMICONDUCTOR

Page 8

LTE Device Update

China
Mobile

RIL

Hisilicon , Qualcomm and Altair have


Multimode Dongles
Mobile Wifi
Indoor CPEs
Outdoor CPEs
Smart Phones
HUAWEI
CO., LTD.
HISILICONTECHNOLOGIES
SEMICONDUCTOR

Page 9

Key LTE Technologies:

Sy stem Ban dwidth


Sub-carriers

Sub -fram e

Fre qu enc y

Flat
Architecture

Scalable BW

T ime frequency
resource for User 1
T ime frequency
resource for User 2

Time

DL OFDMA

T ime frequency
resource for User 3

Supporting
High Performance

S y s te m B a n d w id t h

MIMO

S in g le C a rr ie r
S u b - f ra m e

F re q u e n c y

T im e fre q u e n c y
re s o u rc e fo r U s e r 1
T im e fre q u e n c y
re s o u rc e fo r U s e r 2

Tim e

UL SC-FDMA

H.O.M

T im e fre q u e n c y
re s o u rc e fo r U s e r 3

HUAWEI
CO., LTD.
HISILICONTECHNOLOGIES
SEMICONDUCTOR

Data

MIMO

Streaming

Channel

Page 10

LTE Network Architecture


Main Network Element of LTE

The E-UTRAN consists of e-NodeBs, providing the user plane


and control plane.

The EPC consists of MME, S-GW, P-GW and HSS.

Network Interface of LTE

The e-NodeBs are interconnected with each other by means of


the X2 interface, which enables direct transmission of data and
signaling.

S1 is the interface between e-NodeBs and the EPC, more


specifically to the MME via the S1-MME and to the S-GW via the
S1-U

Compared with the traditional 3G network, LTE architecture becomes much more
simple and flat, which can lead to lower networking cost, higher networking flexibility
and shorter time delay of user data and control signaling.
P-GW: PDN Gateway, S-GW: serving Gateway, MME: Mobility Management Entity

HUAWEI
CO., LTD.
HISILICONTECHNOLOGIES
SEMICONDUCTOR

Page 11

Key Technology Differences


Items

GSM

UMTS

LTE

Channel Bandwidth

200KHz

5MHz

1.420MHz

Radio Transmission

TDMA

CDMA

OFDMA

Frequency Plan?

Yes

No

SFR

Handover

Hard HO

Soft HO

Hard HO

Support MIMO?

No

No (HSPA+, Yes)

Yes

Pilot Channel

BCCH

CPICHRSCP

RS(RSRP)

Capacity Resource

# of TRX

# of Carriers

# of RBs

Support AMC?

No (EDGE, Yes)

No (HSPA, Yes)

Yes

UE max Tx Power

33dBm

24dBm

23dBm

More differences, such as flat network architecture, reduced time delay, higher user data
rates, improved spectral efficiency ...
HUAWEI
CO., LTD.
HISILICONTECHNOLOGIES
SEMICONDUCTOR

Page 12

Different Layers and Protocol Stack in LTE

HUAWEI
CO., LTD.
HISILICONTECHNOLOGIES
SEMICONDUCTOR

Page 13

Orthogonality and OFDM


Orthogonality: Mathematically 2 vectors are said to be orthogonal to
each other if and only if their Dot Product (Scalar Product) is ZERO.

f1 f2 f3 f4 f5 f6 f7

A.B=0
|A| |B|Cos

= 0

In Telecom, however a pair of frequencies is said to be orthogonal , if the separation between


them is precise enough to interfere with each other even when they are multiplexed and
transmitted. This process of multiplexing such orthogonal frequencies is called OFDM
HUAWEI
CO., LTD.
HISILICONTECHNOLOGIES
SEMICONDUCTOR

Page 14

OFDM & OFDMA


OFDM (Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing) is a modulation multiplexing technique, that
divides the system bandwidth into multiple orthogonal subcarriers. CP is inserted between the
OFDM symbols to avoid the ISI in time domain.
OFDMA is the multi-access scheme deploying OFDM used in the LTE downlink. OFDMA is the
combination of TDMA and FDMA essentially that allows multiple users access the Bandwidth
simultaneously using stipulated orthogonal subcarriers
Advantage: High spectrum utilization efficiency due to orthogonal subcarriers need no guard band.
Support frequency link auto adaptation and scheduling. Easy to combine with MIMO.
Disadvantage: Strict requirement of time-frequency domain synchronization. High PAPR.

HUAWEI
CO., LTD.
HISILICONTECHNOLOGIES
SEMICONDUCTOR

Page 15

DL OFDMA & UL SC-FDMA


DL is based on OFDMA, where entire Channel BW is uniformly divided
into narrowband orthogonal Subcarriers with 15KHz / 7.5 KHz** subcarrier
spacing. Later is it scheduled in Time domain as subframes to allow
multiple user access the System simultaneously

UL however has chosen the SC-FDMA* with Cyclic prefix. It is as


closely efficient as the OFDMA in terms of Orthogonality, also it
offers lower Peak to Average Power Ratio (PAPR) to help in Cost
effective & less complex design of UE Equalizers & PAs (Power
Amplifiers)
** 7.5 KHz was introduced for broadcast services

HUAWEI
CO., LTD.
HISILICONTECHNOLOGIES
SEMICONDUCTOR

* Another name of SC-FDMA is DFT Spread FDMA

Page 16

Introduction to MIMO Technology


The Basics: Signal Fading Physics between Tx & Rx
The Phenomena experienced by a Propagating Waveform due
to various kind of obstruction in the path are as:
Scattering, Reflection, Refraction & Diffraction

Multi-path Dimension
Above factors create Multipath, which causes the original
signal to arrive at Rx as phased, delayed and attenuated.
Advent of MIMO took place in Rel 7 version of HSDPA, however
LTE adopted MIMO as its basic technology from the day one.
MIMO tend to resolve few fundamental principles which aim to
leveraging some key properties of Multi-antenna radio propagation
channels, basically 3 advantages associated with such channels
are:
Diversity Gain
Array Gain
Spatial Multiplexing gain

HUAWEI
CO., LTD.
HISILICONTECHNOLOGIES
SEMICONDUCTOR

Page 17

MIMO Modes
Transmission Mode

Introduction to MIMO Technology


Transmission scheme

Reference

Mode 1

single-antenna port (port 0)

It is compatible with single-antenna transmission

Mode 2

transmit diversity

It weakens the interference caused by channel fading and is applicable


within low SINR environment

Mode 3

open-loop space division


multiplexing

It increases the peak rate and is applicable within high rate and SINR
environment

Mode 4

Closed-loop spatial multiplexing

It is weighted according to the channel characteristics, increases the peak


rate, and is applicable within low rate but high SINR environment

Mode 5

Multi-user MIMO

It improves cell throughput

Mode 6

Closed-loop pre-coding with rank


of 1

It increases cell coverage

Mode 7

Beam forming, single-antenna


port (port 5)

It weakens interference and increases cell coverage

Mode 8

Dual-antenna port: Dual-stream


BF

It increases cell throughput

Courtesy 3GPP

HUAWEI
CO., LTD.
HISILICONTECHNOLOGIES
SEMICONDUCTOR

Page 18

Introduction to MIMO Technology

DL MIMO

Mode 2 (Transmit diversity)

User1
codeword

Mod

Mode 3/4/5 (spatial multiplexing)

Layer 1, CW1, AMC1

S
F
B
C

MIMO
encoder
and layer
mapping

UE2
UE1

Layer 2, CW2, AMC2

UE1

Same stream transmitted simultaneously in certain


form of MIMO coding at the same time-frequency
resource from both antenna ports (Rank = 1)
Depending on the environment & number of
antennas, SFBC can reduce fading margin by 2~8
dB, extend coverage, and enhance system capacity

Multiple data streams transmitted at the same timefrequency resource from different antenna ports
to the same user with open loop SM(DL SU MIMO,
mode 3)
to the same user with closed loop SM(DL SU MIMO,
mode 4)
to different users (DL MU MIMO, mode 5)
The terminal must have at least 2 Rx antennas for spatial
multiplexing (SM)

HUAWEI
CO., LTD.
HISILICONTECHNOLOGIES
SEMICONDUCTOR

Page 19

Introduction to MIMO Technology


UL Virtual MIMO

Benefits
User 2

User 1

Features
Improve the overall uplink cell throughput.
Increase the UL spectrum efficiency.

HUAWEI
CO., LTD.
HISILICONTECHNOLOGIES
SEMICONDUCTOR

The uplink channels of paired users must be


with good orthogonality to each other to
prevent interference.
Multi-users use the same time-frequency
resource.

Page 20

HoM (High Order Modulation)


Depending on the Radio channel conditions the UE is allocated the High Order
Modulation. Use of Higher Order Modulation significantly improves the System
throughput & User experience. Using 64 QAM, 6 information bits (26) can be
modulated per OFDM Symbol, that way large transport blocks can be supported.
64 QAM

AMC (Adaptive Modulation & Coding)


Adaptive Modulation independently optimizes the
modulation scheme to each sub carrier so that spectral
efficiency is maximized , while maintaining a target Bit
Error Rate(BER), then the maximum throughput can be
obtained for different channel states. There are 29 MCS
(Modulation and Coding Schemes), strategically allocated
by the eNodeB based on the Radio condition feedback
messages from UE
HUAWEI
CO., LTD.
HISILICONTECHNOLOGIES
SEMICONDUCTOR

Page 21

Physical Layer Parameters


Values

Parameters
Bandwidth (MHz)

1.4

Subcarrier

10

15

20

15 KHz

FFT Size

128

256

512

1024

1536

2048

Usable Sub-Carriers

72

180

300

600

900

1200

Resource Blocks

15

25

50

75

100

OFDM Symbols /slot


Cyclic Prefix

7,6&3
5.21 us with short CP & 16.67 us with extended CP

Modulation Schemes

HUAWEI
CO., LTD.
HISILICONTECHNOLOGIES
SEMICONDUCTOR

BPSK, QPSK (Signaling)


QPSK, 16QAM, 64QAM (Data)

Page 22

LTE TDD vs. LTE FDD


Differences

Similarities
Item
LTE - TDD
Scalable Bandwidth 1.4 , 3, 5, 10, 15,
Configuration ( MHz)
20
Multiple Access DL OFDMA/ UL SCSchemes
FDMA
Coding Schemes

LTE - FDD
1.4 , 3, 5, 10, 15, 20
DL OFDMA/ UL SCFDMA

Convolution Codes Convolution Codes and


and Turbo Codes
Turbo Codes

Modulation Schemes

QPSK, 16 QAM
and 64 QAM

QPSK, 16 QAM and 64


QAM

AMC

Supported

Supported

Item

LTE - TDD

LTE - FDD

Bands

TDD LTE Band

FDD LTE Band

Duplex Modes

TDD

FDD

Frame Structure

Flexible DL&UL Config in a Radio frame

Individual Radio frames for UL & DL

Beam Forming

Supported ( Based in UL & DL Channel)

Not supported

Random Access Preamble

Formats 0-4

Format 0-3

Reference Signal

Congestion Control

Mobility

Supported

Supported

Support for Max of


Support for Max of 450
450 Km/hr
Km/hr Support for
Support for inter /
inter / Intra-RAT
Intra-RAT
handovers
handovers

HUAWEI
CO., LTD.
HISILICONTECHNOLOGIES
SEMICONDUCTOR

According to the different Sub-frame 8 No. of DL HARQ Processes per serving cell
Configurations
and delay are fixed

HARQ Process

DL - Both UE specific & Cell Specific RS


DL : Only cell Specific RS is applied now
supported.
( RS)
UL: Both DMRS and SRS are supported, SRS
UL: both DMRS and SRS are supported.
is carried on Data Subframe
Usually SRS is transmitted in UpPTS

MIMO Modes

Supports 1-8

Supports 1-6

Network Interference

Strict Synchronization required

Synchronization requirement is not strict.


When using different spectrum then Guard
BW can avoid interference

Page 23

LTE Radio Frame Structure


Radio frame, T frame = 10 msec
Subframe, T subframe =1 msec
UL

fUL

DL
Subframe

fDL
#0

#1

#2

#3

#4

#5

#6

#7

#8

FDD

#9

TDD
Special
Subframe
DwPTS

GP

UpPTS

A Radio frame is 10 mSec length with 10 Subframes of 1 mSec each


for TDD there are 2 Time Slots in each Sub frame
Frame allocation is settable in TDD LTE
The sampling rate in both TDD & FDD LTE is the same Both the
technologies operate under the same 1mSec TTI & 0.5 mSec Time slot
A time slot of 0.5 msec accommodates 7 OFDM Symbols in Time
Domain & 12 subcarriers in Freq domain forming a Resource Block (RB)
For a 20 MHz of Bandwidth we can have 100 such RBs, therefore the
RB allocation depends on the Bandwidth selected for the Service
HUAWEI
CO., LTD.
HISILICONTECHNOLOGIES
SEMICONDUCTOR

Page 24

LTE Frame Structure

HUAWEI
CO., LTD.
HISILICONTECHNOLOGIES
SEMICONDUCTOR

Page 25

LTE Channels & Signals


Broad cast Channel
Paging Channel
Control Channel
Traffic Channel
Reference Signals
L L L
TTT
E E E

Random Access Channel


Control Channel
Traffic Channel
Reference Signal

HUAWEI
CO., LTD.
HISILICONTECHNOLOGIES
SEMICONDUCTOR

Page 26

Contents :
LTE Basic Principle

UMTS & LTE RNP Comparison

HUAWEI
CO., LTD.
HISILICONTECHNOLOGIES
SEMICONDUCTOR

Page 27

Key Differences between UMTS, HSDPA & LTE


Items

UMTS

HSDPA

LTE

Channel Spacing

5MHz

5MHz

1.420MHz

Radio Transmission

CDMA

CDMA

OFDMA

Frequency Plan?

No

No

Yes

Handover

Soft HO

Hard HO

Hard HO

Power Control

Yes (for R99 & HSUPA)

No

No (UL, Yes)

Support MIMO?

No(HSPA+,Yes)

Yes

Yes

Pilot Channel

CPICH (RSCP&Ec/Io)

CPICH (RSCP&Ec/Io)

RS(RSRP/RSRQ)

Capacity Resource

# of Carriers

# of Carriers

# of RBs

Support AMC?

No (HSPA, Yes)

Yes

UE max Power

24dBm

24dBm

Yes
23dBm

LTE is similar to HSDPA in many aspects


HUAWEI
CO., LTD.
HISILICONTECHNOLOGIES
SEMICONDUCTOR

Page 28

Content
UMTS & LTE RNP Comparison Overview
Coverage & Capacity Comparison

HUAWEI
CO., LTD.
HISILICONTECHNOLOGIES
SEMICONDUCTOR

Page 29

Radio Network Planning Procedure of LTE


Agreement
achieved by the
operator and
Huawei

Preparation

Coverage area (Dense urban, Urban, Suburban )


Quality objective (QoS criteria)
Capacity requirement (Subscriber, traffic model)
Link budget parameters (Penetration loss, Propagation model)

Huawei deliver
Background Interference Test (optional)
Propagation model tuning (optional)

Site location/ RF parameters configurations


Search ring specifications
prediction & Simulation
Cluster definition for project management

Detailed Planning

Link budget
Capacity dimensioning
Site configuration
Cell radius in each morphology
Network development solution

The output of dimensioning


is important criteria to assess
RNP solution

The operator provides:


naming conventions

Nominal
Planning

existing sites information


Site survey/candidate site search
Neighbor cell configuration
PCI planning
Cell parameters configuration
Algorithm configuration

Network Deployment

LTE RNP procedure is similar with UMTS


HUAWEI
CO., LTD.
HISILICONTECHNOLOGIES
SEMICONDUCTOR

Page 30

Contents for LTE & UMTS RNP Comparison

Dimensioning

Coverage & Capacity

Output for eNodeB quotation

Signals used for coverage


evaluation
Threshold for coverage prediction

Nominal Planning

Detail Planning

PCI planning
X2 relationship planning

Radio Planning

HUAWEI
CO., LTD.
HISILICONTECHNOLOGIES
SEMICONDUCTOR

Page 31

Methods for Identify Adjacent Cells


OVSF Code2

OVSF Code1

RB1

Scrambling code2

RB2

Physical Cell Identity 2

Cell2

Scrambling code1

Cell2

Physical Cell Identity 1

Cell1

Channel Code (OVSF)

Cell1
S y s t e m B a n d w i d th

Scrambling code

S u b - c a r r ie r s

User1 Data
Signal
combine

User2 Data
User3 Data

x
x
x

S u b -f r a m e

F re q u e n c y

T im e fr e q u e n c y
r e s o u rc e fo r U s e r 1

User n Data

T im e fr e q u e n c y
r e s o u rc e fo r U s e r 2

UMTS DL Data transmission

T im e

T im e fr e q u e n c y
r e s o u rc e fo r U s e r 3

WCDMA

LTE

LTE uses PCI for adjacent cell identification


HUAWEI
CO., LTD.
HISILICONTECHNOLOGIES
SEMICONDUCTOR

Page 32

LTE PCI Planning Principles


168 S-SCH ID

PCI1
PCI7

PCI2
PCI3

PCI8
PCI9

PCI4
PCI6
PCI5

3 P-SCH ID

S-SCH0

SSC0,SSC1,SSC2

S-SCH1

SSC0,SSC1,SSC2

.,.

.,.

S-SCH167

SSC0,SSC1,SSC2

There are total 504 PCI to reuse for


whole network
There must be adequate distance to
isolate two cell with same PCI

PCI4

504 PCIs could be reused for LTE network


HUAWEI
CO., LTD.
HISILICONTECHNOLOGIES
SEMICONDUCTOR

Page 33

LTE PCI Planning Principles (2/2)


PCI: 169

Which cell I belong to?

Cell 2

PCI: 169

PCI: 168

PCI: 168
Cell 1
Collision Free

Cell 2

Adjacent cell should use different PCIs

The only effort is to avoid any overlap and repetition of the


PCIs in the neighbor list. The SINR (or RSRP) threshold of the
other cell bearing the same PCI should be significantly low.

Cell 1

PCI: 167

Which cell should I handover to, cell 1 or cell 2

Confusion Free
Cells in the same neighbor list should use different PCIs

This condition should be verified carefully while deciding


the Neighbor list on both Neighbors and Second
Neighbors i.e. the Neighbor list of each Neighbor

504 PCIs could be reused for LTE network


HUAWEI
CO., LTD.
HISILICONTECHNOLOGIES
SEMICONDUCTOR

Page 34

PSC Planning Principle


PSC: 169
Which cell I belong to?

Cell 2

PSC: 169

PSC: 168

PSC: 168
Cell 1
Collision Free

Cell 2

Cell 1

PSC: 167

Which cell should I handover to, cell 1 or cell 2

Confusion Free

Adjacent cell should use different PSCs

The only effort is to avoid any overlap and repetition of the


PSCs in the neighbor list. The Ec/Io (or RSCP) threshold of the
other cell bearing the same PSC should be significantly low.

Cells in the same neighbor list should use different PSCs

This condition should be verified carefully while deciding


the Neighbor list on both Neighbors and Second
Neighbors i.e. the Neighbor list of each Neighbor

512 PSCs to be reused for UMTS network


HUAWEI
CO., LTD.
HISILICONTECHNOLOGIES
SEMICONDUCTOR

Page 35

LTE X2 Relationship Planning


X2 interface Functions

Intra-LTE mobility management

Data forwarding between eNBs

Load management

Signaling for ICIC

Cell 3

Cell 1

Cell 2

Neighbor Cell List of Cell 1


Cell2 PCI=5 GCI=27

X2 relationship is same as
the neighbor cell

Cell3 PCI=3 GCI=17


GCI: Global cell ID = Calculated by PLMN ID & eNodeB ID & PCI
PCI Physical Cell ID

HUAWEI
CO., LTD.
HISILICONTECHNOLOGIES
SEMICONDUCTOR

A cell sets up X2 connection with cells in its


neighbor cell list

Primarily 2 types of information are exchanged on X2 interface:

(1) Load or interference and (2) Handover related information


Page 36

Content
UMTS & LTE RNP Comparison Overview
Coverage & Capacity Comparison

HUAWEI
CO., LTD.
HISILICONTECHNOLOGIES
SEMICONDUCTOR

Page 37

Contents for Coverage & Capacity Comparison

Voice & data coverage comparison

Signals and threshold used for coverage prediction comparison

Peak & average cell throughput comparison

HUAWEI
CO., LTD.
HISILICONTECHNOLOGIES
SEMICONDUCTOR

Page 38

Link Budget Procedure Comparison


UE Antenna Gain

Slow fading margin


Interference margin

UE TX Power

Body Loss

Penetration Loss

Antenna Gain

Cell Radius
Path Loss

Cable Loss
eNodeB
Sensitivity

Cable Loss
eNodeB Antenna Gain
Penetration
Loss
eNodeB RX sensitivity

Similar link budget procedure, just some parameters different


HUAWEI
CO., LTD.
HISILICONTECHNOLOGIES
SEMICONDUCTOR

Page 39

Uplink Limited Coverage for LTE


LTE Link Budget
Morphology
Duplex Mode
User Environment
Channel Bandwidth (MHz)
Channel Model
MIMO Scheme
Cell Edge Rate (kbps)
MCS
Tx
Max Total Tx Power (dBm)
Allocated RB
Subcarrier Power (dBm)
Tx Antenna Gain (dBi)
Tx Cable Loss (dB)
Tx Body loss (dB)
EIRP per Subcarrier (dBm)
Rx
SINR (dB)
Rx Noise Figure (dB)
Receiver Sensitivity (dBm)
Rx Antenna Gain (dBi)
Rx Cable Loss (dB)
Rx Body loss (dB)
Target Load
Interference Margin (dB)
Min Signal Reception Strength (dBm)

Uplink
Downlink
Dense Urban
FDD
Indoor
20
ETU 3
12
22 SFBC
256
1024
QPSK 0.25
QPSK 0.19
23
4
6.19
0
0
0
6.19

46
24
15.21
18
0.5
0
32.71

-2.52
2.5
-132.26
18
0.5
0
50.00%
0.87
-148.89

-3.39
7
-128.63
0
0
0
70.00%
3.67
-124.96

Path Loss & Cell Radius


Penetration Loss (dB)

20

20

Std.of Shadow Fading (dB)


Area Coverage Probability

11.7
95.00%

11.7
95.00%

Shadow Fading Margin (dB)


Path loss

9.48
125.6

9.48
128.18

Propagation Model
eNodeB/UE Antenna Height (m)

Cost231-Hata
30

1.5

Frequency (MHz)

2600

2600

Cell Radius (km)

0.29

0.34

LTE coverage is typically uplink limited due to UE power limitation


HUAWEI
CO., LTD.
HISILICONTECHNOLOGIES
SEMICONDUCTOR

Page 40

No Fast Fading Margin for LTE


Rx signal level

Long term fading


Distance

WCDMA

Fast Fading

LTE

Tx Power Level

AMC

Rx Power Level

Fast PC

Fast Scheduling
HARQ

UMTS uses fast power control to resist fast fading and


hence FFM is needed to guarantee adequate power
under fast CLPC
HUAWEI
CO., LTD.
HISILICONTECHNOLOGIES
SEMICONDUCTOR

LTE uses fast scheduling, AMC and HARQ to


resist fast fading
Page 41

Fast Power Control is Necessary for UMTS


Uplink

Downlink
NodeB Tx
Power

Avoid Near-Far Effect and resist fast


fading for uplink

Improve downlink capacity and resist


fast fading

Fast fading margin (Power


control headroom ) is needed
to guarantee adequate under
power control

HUAWEI
CO., LTD.
HISILICONTECHNOLOGIES
SEMICONDUCTOR

Page 42

Smaller Interference Margin for LTE


System Bandwidth
Sub-carriers

Sub-frame

Frequency

Time frequency
resource for User 1

WCDMA

Multipath transmission destroy orthogonality


of OVSF code
Users experience interference from own cell
and other cell

LTE

Time

Time frequency
resource for User 2
Time frequency
resource for User 3

Orthogonal subcarrier guarantees the orthogonality of


users
Users only experience interference from other cell

Interference Margin(dB)

12.0

UMTS
LTE

10.0
8.0
6.0

For 50% uplink load, LTE interference


margin is about 2dB lower than UMTS

4.0

2dB

2.0
0.0
10%

30%

50%

Load Factor70%

HUAWEI
CO., LTD.
HISILICONTECHNOLOGIES
SEMICONDUCTOR

90%

Page 43

Larger Slow Fading Margin for LTE

Area coverage probability (%)

HUAWEI
CO., LTD.
HISILICONTECHNOLOGIES
SEMICONDUCTOR

Page 44

Receiver Sensitivity
Rx Sensitivity Per Sub-carrier (LTE)
(1)

= Thermal noise (dBm/Hz)+ 10*log(15000Hz)+ NF + SINR


= -132.24 dBm/15KHz + NF +SINR

Rx Sensitivity over the Bandwidth ( UMTS)


= Thermal noise (dBm/Hz)- 10*log(Spreading Gain)+ NF + Required Eb/No Interference Margin
= -174 dBm 10 *Log* (( 384000/ Service rate))+ NF + Required (Eb/No)service - Interference Margin

eNodeB Sensitivity Specified by 3GPP


channel
bandwidth(MHz)
1.4
3
5
10
15
20

eNodeB receiver
sensitivity (dBm)
-106.8 (6RB)
-103.0 (15RB)
-101.5 (25RB)
-101.5 (25RB)
-101.5 (25RB)
-101.5 (25RB)
---- 3GPP TS 36.104

HUAWEI
CO., LTD.
HISILICONTECHNOLOGIES
SEMICONDUCTOR

Page 45

(2)

RS Power Allocation
Power Boosting for RS

Bandwidth

PB

PRS ( dBm)

10M

15M

20M

18.2
16.4
15.2

BW : 20 MHz , i.e. 100 RBs or 1200 Subcarriers of 15 KHz each


Total Power per Antenna Port is : 20Watts i.e. 43 dBm
RS Power for 20MHz
PRS= 43 10*log(100*12) + 10*log10(PB+1) = 15.2dBm

HUAWEI
CO., LTD.
HISILICONTECHNOLOGIES
SEMICONDUCTOR

Page 46

RS Power Overhead Comparison with CPICH

Type B Symbol: with RS REs

Type A Symbol: without RS REs

RS power per RE is 15.2dBm (0.033W) for 20MHz


Total RS power in 20MHz for Type B Symbol is 0.033*2 (RS REs/ RB) * 100 RBs = 6.6W
Total RS power in 20MHz for Type A Symbol is 0
Only two symbols carry RS within 0.5ms and hence the RS power overhead is about 6.6/20 * 4/14 = 9.4% over 1 timeslot

LTE RS power overhead is about 9.4% which is similar to 10% CPICH power overhead of UMTS

HUAWEI
CO., LTD.
HISILICONTECHNOLOGIES
SEMICONDUCTOR

Page 47

RSRP and RSCP Signal Strength Comparison


Items

UMTS

LTE

(e)NodeB power per Tx (dBm)

43

43

Bandwidth (MHz)

20

Number of RB

100

CPICH power /RS power per RE (dBm)

33

15.2

CL (dB)

120

120

RSCP/RSRP (dBm)

-87

-104.8

Received RS signal strength over whole


bandwidth

-81.8

RSRP is the received signal strength


over 15KHz bandwidth while bandwidth
of RSCP is 5MHz

Only 1/6 REs is used for RS transmission within


one RB and hence the total received RS power is
10*log10(100*12*1/6) = 23dB higher than RSRP

RSRP of LTE is much smaller than RSCP of UMTS under same radio environment
HUAWEI
CO., LTD.
HISILICONTECHNOLOGIES
SEMICONDUCTOR

Page 48

RSRP Drive Test Results


34.50%
35%

29.90%
25.80%

30%
25%
20%
15%

8.60%

10%

1.20%

5%
0%
-70RSRP

-80RSRP-70

-90RSRP-80

-105RSRP-90

RSRP-105

Conditions
2.6GHz, 20MHz bandwidth
2*20W power configuration
About 27% RSRP is
smaller than -90dBm

Drive test results also proves RSRP smaller than RSCP


HUAWEI
CO., LTD.
HISILICONTECHNOLOGIES
SEMICONDUCTOR

Page 49

Same Band Uplink Voice Coverage Comparison


Voice Coverage
Data Rate (Kbps)

UMTS AMR12.2

VoLTE

12.2

12.2

12.2

System Bandwidth (MHz)

20

20

MCS at Cell Edge

QPSK0.43

QPSK0.36

Antenna Configuration
Uplink Load

7.95

1x2

1x2

50%

75%

50%

75%

Channel Model

TU3

ETU3

Resource Block
# RB Allocated for the user

Max Tx Power (dBm)

24.00

24.00

23.00

23.00

Cable Loss (dB)

0.00

0.00

0.0

0.0

Body Loss (dB)

3.00

3.00

3.00

3.00

21.0

21.0

20.0

20.0

7dB

Tx

Antenna Gain (dBi)


EIRP (dBm)
Rx
Antenna Gain (dBi)

18

18

18

18

Cable Loss (dB)

0.5

0.5

0.5

0.5

Body Loss (dB)


Noise Figure (dB)
Interference Margin (dB)
SINR (dB)
FFM(dB)

1.60

1.60

2.50

2.50

0.8

-19.6

-19.6

-4.2

-5.3

0.8

0.8

0.0

0.0

RX Sensitivity per subcarrier (dBm)

-126.1

-126.1

-118.4

-119.5

Minimum Signal Level (dBm)

-139.8

-136.8

-135.1

-136.0

8.5

8.5

10.0

10.0

152.3

149.3

145.1

146.0

LTE voice coverage is


worse than UMTS

MAPL
Shadow Fading Margin
MAPL (dB)

HUAWEI
CO., LTD.
HISILICONTECHNOLOGIES
SEMICONDUCTOR

Page 50

3dB

Same Band Uplink Data Coverage Comparison


Data Coverage
Data Rate (Kbps)

R99

HSUPA

LTE

64

384

64

384

64

System Bandwidth (MHz)

384
5

MCS at Cell Edge

QPSK0.31

QPSK0.25

Antenna Configuration

1*2

1*2

1*2

1*2

1*2

1*2

Uplink Load

75%

75%

75%

75%

75%

75%

Channel Model

TU3

TU3

ETU3

~2dB

Resource Block
# RB Allocated for the user

6
23.00

Tx
Max Tx Power (dBm)

24.00

24.00

24.00

24.00

23.00

Cable Loss (dB)

0.00

0.0

0.00

0.0

0.00

0.0

Body Loss (dB)

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Antenna Gain (dBi)

Power Back Off (dB)

1.5

1.5

24.0

24.0

22.5

22.5

23.0

23.0

EIRP (dBm)

~2.5dB

Rx
Antenna Gain (dBi)

18

18

18

18

18

18

Cable Loss (dB)

0.5

0.5

0.5

0.5

0.5

0.5

Body Loss (dB)


Noise Figure (dB)
Interference Margin (dB)

1.60

1.60

1.60

1.60

2.50

2.50

-15.3

-7.9

-15.6

-8.8

-1.5

-2.6

0.8

1.9

0.2

0.2

0.0

0.0

RX Sensitivity per subcarrier (dBm)

-121.8

-114.5

-122.2

-115.4

-120.4

-113.8

Minimum Signal Level (dBm)

-132.5

-124.1

-133.5

-126.7

-136.9

-130.3

SINR (dB)
FFM(dB)

LTE data coverage is


better than UMTS

MAPL
Shadow Fading Margin
MAPL (dB)

8.5

8.5

8.5

8.5

10.0

10.0

148.0

139.6

147.5

140.7

149.9

143.3

HUAWEI
CO., LTD.
HISILICONTECHNOLOGIES
SEMICONDUCTOR

Page 51

HSPA & LTE Coverage Comparison Field Test Results(1/3)


Uplink LTE & HSPA Throughput Comparison

Test Conditions:
HSPA 5MHz@ PCS, 30W Tx power for SISO
LTE 15MHz@AWS,2*30W power for 2*2MIMO

LTE has better uplink coverage than HSUPA


HUAWEI
CO., LTD.
HISILICONTECHNOLOGIES
SEMICONDUCTOR

Page 52

HSPA & LTE Coverage Comparison Field Test Results(2/3)


Downlink LTE & HSPA Throughput Comparison

Test Conditions:
HSPA 5MHz@ PCS, 30W Tx power for SISO
LTE 15MHz@AWS,2*30W power for 2*2MIMO

LTE has higher downlink throughput at cell edge than HSDPA


HUAWEI
CO., LTD.
HISILICONTECHNOLOGIES
SEMICONDUCTOR

Page 53

HSPA & LTE Coverage Comparison Field Test Results(3/3)


LTE RSRP & UMTS RSCP Comparison

~ 20dB

Test Conditions:
HSPA 5MHz@ PCS, 30W Tx power for SISO
LTE 15MHz@AWS,2*30W power for 2*2MIMO

RSRP of LTE@AWS is ~20dB less than RSCP of UMTS@PCS band for co-site scenario
HUAWEI
CO., LTD.
HISILICONTECHNOLOGIES
SEMICONDUCTOR

Page 54
Page 54

Factors Influencing LTE Coverage


Frequency

LTE Specific

Band

ICIC

Data Rate

TX Power
RB Number

Factors Affecting LTE


Link Budget

LTE
Specific

Cell Load
MCS

Interference
Margin

MIMO

Radio Condition

LTE
Specific

Receiver
Sensitivity

LTE Standard

Some other factors such as site height, BPL, TMA, coverage probability,
ICICInter Cell Interference Coordination

HUAWEI
CO., LTD.
HISILICONTECHNOLOGIES
SEMICONDUCTOR

Page 55

Coverage Comparison Summary


LTE has a better data coverage and a poor voice coverage than UMTS at the same frequency band
LTE uses RSRP and RS SINR for coverage evaluation while UMTS uses RSCP and Ec/Io
RSRP is the signal strength over 15kHz bandwidth and is about 20dB lower than RSCP under same
environment
Averaged RS power overhead is about 9.4% which is similar to CPICH power overhead 10%
LTE uplink coverage is power limited and hence larger bandwidth could not increase uplink
coverage

HUAWEI
CO., LTD.
HISILICONTECHNOLOGIES
SEMICONDUCTOR

Page 56

UE Peak Rate Comparison

Combined uplink and


downlink UE definition

---- 3GPP TS 36.306

HSPA

Features Supported

UE Category

Peak Rate (Mbps)

Downlink

HSDPA
64QAM
MIMO
MIMO+64QAM
Downlink DC
DC+MIMO
HSUPA
Uplink 16QAM
Uplink DC

Category 1~12
Category 13~14
Category 15~16
Category 17~20
Category 21~24
Category 25~28
Category 1~6
Category 7
Category 8~9

13.976
21
28
42
42
84
5.7
11.5
23

Uplink

HUAWEI
CO., LTD.
HISILICONTECHNOLOGIES
SEMICONDUCTOR

Page 57

DC: Dual Cell


---- 3GPP TS 25.306

Cell Average Throughput Comparison


HSPA vs. LTE Average Cell throughput

DC+64QAM

~20% Gain

~100% Gain

MIMO+64QAM

LTE offers higher cell capacity than UMTS HSPA


HUAWEI
CO., LTD.
HISILICONTECHNOLOGIES
SEMICONDUCTOR

Page 58

Spectrum Efficiency Comparison

~25% Gain
~100% Gain

HSPA+: 2*2MIMO+64QAM for DL, 1*2 SIMO +16QAM for UL


LTE: 2*2MIMO+64QAM for DL,1*2 SIMO +16QAM for UL

HUAWEI
CO., LTD.
HISILICONTECHNOLOGIES
SEMICONDUCTOR

Page 59

Why LTE Uplink is Much Better than HSUPA?


Intra-cell interference of
HSUPA leads to smaller
capacity
Multi-code transmission of
HSUPA leads to selfinterference

HSUPA peak rate is


about 11 Mbps using
16QAM
LTE peak rate is about
14Mbps with 16QAM

HUAWEI
CO., LTD.
HISILICONTECHNOLOGIES
SEMICONDUCTOR

HSUPA

Page 60

Factors Influencing Capacity


LTE can be scalable
Spectrum
Bandwidth
eNodeB Power

Users
Distribution

Lower throughput for


EdgeUser

LTE ICIC can improve

LTE standard
MIMO & ICIC

Own Cell Load


Factors Affecting
Capacity

Larger throughput with


higher load

Neighboring
Scheduling

Cell Load

IRC

UE Performance
S1/X2 Bandwidth

LTE Related

ICIC: Inter-Cell Interference Coordination

Capacity is controlled not only by hardware resources, but also radio condition,
HUAWEI
CO., LTD.
HISILICONTECHNOLOGIES
SEMICONDUCTOR

Page 61

Larger interference due to


higher load

ICIC & Higher Order MIMO Improves Throughput


ICIC
Cell 1,4,7

MIMO

Power

Multi-path
Transmitter

Frequency

76

Cell 3,6,9

3
3

5
9

Frequency

48

M
UE

6
5

1
1

Frequency
Power

2
2

eNodeB

Cell 2,5,8

Power

Multi-path
Receiver

4x2 MIMO vs. 2x2 MIMO


1x3x1 ICIC vs. 1x3x1

Reducing the DL inter-cell interference among neighbor


cells

~17% gain in average cell throughput

~23% gain in cell edge user throughput

4x4 MIMO vs. 4x2 MIMO

30~50% throughput increased for cell edge users

(<50% load)

HUAWEI
CO., LTD.
HISILICONTECHNOLOGIES
SEMICONDUCTOR

17%~60% gain in average cell throughput


23%~90% gain in cell edge user throughput

Page 62

Thank you
www.huawei.com

Copyright2010 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

Você também pode gostar