MARKING SCHEME PAPER 1

Section A : Directed Writing (35 marks)

Format

3 marks

Content

12 marks

Language

20 marks

__________________________
TOTAL

35 marks

__________________________

FORMAT (3 marks)
Award 1 mark each :
F1

Adressing the Principal

-

F2

Giving title of the report

-

F3

For example To : The Principal of Sekolah .

For example - School Canteen Poor Service

Stating the writer of the report
-

For example - Reported by :

CONTENT (12 marks)

Award 1 mark each for each content use appropriately.
Do not awards mark for mere mention of key words.
C1

Unhealthy Food

C2

Oily fried keropok lekor

C3

Less vegetable

C4

Lack of Cleanliness

C5

Stained glasses

C6

Messy counter

C7

Poor Facilities

C8

Broken benches

C9

Slow water

C10

(First suggestion)

C11

(Second suggestion)

C12

(Third suggestion)

LANGUAGE (20 marks)

CRITERIA OR MARKING LANGUAGE

Mark Range

Remarks/Description

19 20

16 - 18

The language is entirely accurate apart from occasional

first draft slips.
Sentence structure is varied and sophisticated shows
that the candidate is able to use sentence length and type
to achieve an intended effect.
Vocabulary sophisticated and is used with precision.
Punctuation is accurate and helpful to the reader.
Spelling is accurate across the full range of vocabulary
used.
Paragraphs have unity and are appropriately linked.
The style and tone are appropriate for a formal studentprincipal communication.

The language is almost always accurate but there will be

minor errors of first draft slips.
Sentence show some variation in length and type,
including the confident use of complex sentences.
Vocabulary is wide enough to convey intended shades of
meaning with some precision.
Punctuation is almost always accurate and generally
helpful to the reader.
Spelling is nearly always accurate.

13 - 15

10 - 12

Written in paragraphs which show some unity and are

usually linked appropriately.
The style and tone are almost appropriate for a formal
student-principal communication.

The language is largely accurate..

Simple structure sentences are used without errors;
mistakes may occur when more sophisticated structures
are attempted.
Vocabulary is adequate to convey intended meaning
although it may not be suiciently developed to achieve
precision.
Punctuation is generally accurate although errors may
occur in more complex uses.
Spelling is generally accurate for common vocabulary.
Written in paragraphs which show some unity although
links may be absent or inappropriate at times.
The style and tone maybe generally appropriate for a
formal student-principal communication.

The language is sufficiently accurate for meaning to come

through.
There will be patches of clarity, accurate language,
particularly when simple vocabulary and structures are
used.
Mistakes will occur when more complex sentences are
attempted.
There may be some variety of sentence length and type
but this may not be successful in enhancing meaning or
arousing interest.
Vocabulary is adequate but lacks precision.
Punctuation is generally accurate but does not enhance
or clarify meaning.
Simple words are spelt correctly, but errors may occur
when unfamiliar words are used.
Written in paragraphs which show some unity in topic and
attempt to use links.
The style and tone may not be entirely appropriate for a
report to a principal but some attempt has been made.

Meaning is never in doubt, but single word errors are

sufficiently frequent and serious to hamper precision and
speed of reading.


7-9

U(i)

46

U (ii)

2-3

Some simple structures will be accurate but accuracy is not

sustained.
Vocabulary is limited and either too simple to convey
precise meaning or is imperectly understood.
Simple words may be spelt correc tly but requent mistaes
in spelling and punctuation mae reading the script difficult.
Paragraphs lack unity. Links are incorrectly used. There
may be errors of sentence separation and punctuation.
The style and tone are unlikely to be appropriate or a
report. It may not show understanding o the detailed
requirements o the task.

Meaning is fairly clear but the incidence o errors is high

and definitely impedes the reading.
A script at this level will have ew accurate structures.
Vocabulary may not extend beyond a simple range of
words that are inadequate to express intened shades of
meaning.
There may be frequent spelling errors.
Punctuation will sometimes be used correctly but sentence
separation errors may occur.
Paragraphs may not be used, or if used, show a lack of
planning.
The style and tone are inappropriate for a talk.

Sense will be decipherable but some of the errors will be

multiple in nature requiring the reader to re-read and
reorganize beore meaning becomes clear.
Whole sections may mae little or no sense. They are
unlikely to be more than one or two accurate sentences.
The content is incromprehnsible but its style and tone are
hidden by the density of errors.

U (iii)
0-1

Scripts in this category are most entirely impossible to

recognize as pieces of English.
Whole sections may make no sense at all or are copied
rom the task.
Award 1 mark I some sense can be obtained.
The mark 0should only be awarded if the talk makes no

sense at all from the beginning to the end.