Você está na página 1de 4

MENU

Home / Articles / 2016 / Analysis of the recent self-driving Tesla crash

A debate is in progress concerning where the legal responsibilities of the manufacturers


end and the responsibilities of the 'brain' of the car begin.
By Bla Liptk
Oct 10, 2016

This article discusses the state-of-the-art of controlling self-driving cars, including the control loops
and their limitations as they exist today. Part 2 will suggest improvements to their sensors and
operating algorithms, using the experience and knowledge that weve accumulated in the process
industries.
The evolution of industrial process control had three distinct periods:
Phase 1Manual: In the first decades of the industrial age, the operator (assisted by some
sensors) manually controlled the process. During this period, most of the many avoidable
accidents were caused by operators.
Phase 2Semi-Automatic: Starting around World War II, automatic PID control loops were
introduced, but the operators were still in chargethey were still free to change setpoints or
switch the loop to manual control. Therefore, control quality and safety was improved, but
operator errors still could cause accidents.
Phase 3Full-Automatic: During the past couple of decades, multivariable envelope controls,
self-diagnosing smart sensors, voting systems and the use of Override Safety Control (OSC)
eliminated those accidents that in the past were caused by operator errors.
In the transportation industry, the use of automation evolved more slowly. As of today, trains still run
mostly under manual control (Phase 1), airplanes are usually controlled in the semi-automatic mode
(Phase 2) as autopilots are available but can be overruled by the pilot, and its only in space travel
and the military applications where fully-automatic control is used (Phase 3).

White Paper: The Increasing Value of Modern 2-Wire Loop Power Technology
The use of automatic process control in automobiles and trucks started later than in other industries,
and picked up speed only in the past decade. The goals of this technology are both life saving and
cost reduction. It is also expected that this would bring mobility to millions who today cant afford to
own cars. This development also had three phases:
Phase 1Manual: Until the 21st century, most cars were controlled completely by the driver, who
was assisted by only a few sensors (mirrors, speedometer, GPS). In 2015, about 250 million cars
were on U.S. roads (1 billion worldwide), and in the U.S. alone, 35,200 people died in car
accidentsabout one per 70 million miles of driving.

Phase 2 Semi-Automatic (autopilot): These control systems were developed during the past
decade, and as yet, are on only about 70,000 (Tesla) cars on the road. Their control loops have only
a few sensors (radar, camera, GPS, self-diagnostics), and they basically have only two controlled
variables: speed and direction. They can park and maintain lane position, legal speed and distance to
other cars, but operate in a hands on the wheel mode, so the driver can take over control at any
time. To date, one fatal accident occurred after about 140 million miles of driving in these vehicles.
Phase 3Automatic (driver-less autonomous): These control systems are mostly under
development (Figure 1) although those designed by Google have already logged 1.5 million miles in
California; the Chevrolet Bolt is running around in San Francisco; and Ford, Apple and others are
planning to do the same soon. Testing of these cars is largely by the manufacturers, which should
change. I would prefer if they were government-tested in standardized testing centers, which included
simulated streets, cars, traffic lights, road signs, tunnels and robotic moving and stationary objects,
including people and animals.

Figure 1: No steering wheel, no brake, no gas pedal . Naturally, the laser imaging detection and
ranging (LIDAR) sensor on the roof can be more elegantly packaged.
It seems that the first markets for autonomous robotic cars are expected to be in ride-hailing, ridesharing (Uber, Lyft) and delivery, business-type applications, which are using commercial fleets.
Besides increased safety, their cost of operation would be reduced both by full-time usage and by
eliminating the salary of the drivers. To serve these markets, Fiat Chrysler works with Google;
General Motors is in partnership with Lyft; Volvo teamed with Uber, etc.

The fatal Tesla accident on May 7 in Williston, Fla., shows the roles played by the three loop
components (sensors, control algorithms and final control elements), the contributions they made to
the accident, and how these early design errors can be corrected. I should also mention that an
unresolved debate is in progress concerning where the legal responsibilities of the car manufacturers
end (hardware such as sensors and final control elements, such as the brake) and where the

responsibilities of the brain of the car begin (the control software). I believe the outcome of the legal
process concerning this accident will represent a big step in resolving this debate.

Figure 2: The software probably interpreted the radar signal as reporting a stationary object above
the road, such as an overpass or a road sign.
The crash in Florida occurred on a divided highway when a white tractor-trailer in the westbound lane
made a left turn, crossing in front of the oncoming traffic in the eastbound lane, in which the Tesla
was traveling. It is unresolved if neither the driver nor the autopilot attempted to brake or if the brake
actuators themselves were defective. So all we know is that the Tesla did not brake, and it would not
have with or without the autopilot.
The failure to see a white tractor trailer (Figure 2) was probably because neither the camera of the
autopilot nor the driver could see it against the brightly lit sky. Its probable that the radar would have
seen it, if it was properly focused, but because the object appeared like a stationary object above the
road, the control algorithm could have assumed that it was not a vehicle, but an overpass or a road
sign. As a result, the Tesla passed through, under the center of the trailer, was hit at windshield
height, and came to rest at the side of the road, after hitting a fence and a power pole (Figure 3).

Figure 3: The Tesla passed through, under the center of the trailer, was hit at windshield height,
and came to rest at the side of the road, after hitting a fence and a power pole.

As we went to press, Tesla announced that its switching to metal-sensitive radar as the primary
scanner, and only supplementing it by camera, plus forcing the drivers to keep their hands on the
steering wheel. These software changes are being transmitted wirelessly to the correct the Tesla fleet
because no hardware changes are involved.

Bla Liptk, PE, control consultant, is also editor of the Instrument Engineers
Handbook, and is seeking new co-authors for the for coming new edition of that
multi-volume work. He can be reached at liptakbela@aol.com.

SHOW MORE CONTENT

Latest News Stories Pit Google Against the Conventional Automakers with Google Demonstrating

We've come a long way; still have a way to go.

It lets us take and move more data, do more computing, archive more process lore, make

Fords head of leadership development shares the keys to success in the never-ending

This Special Report explores Liptks critical view of the oil & gas industry and offers

Past 7 Days

Past 30 Days

Past 6 Months

All Time