Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
INTRODUCTION
Mosquito control manages the population of mosquitoes to reduce their
damage to human health, economies, and enjoyment. Mosquito control is a vital
public-health practice throughout the world and especially in the tropics because
mosquitoes spread many diseases, such as malaria and the Zika virus.
Mosquito-control operations are targeted against three different problems:
1.
2.
3.
fever, Wuchereria
bancrofti, Japanese
Encephalitis,
chikungunya, malaria and filariasis in Africa and Asia; and Murray Valley
encephalitis in Australia.
Depending on the situation, source reduction, biocontrol, larviciding (killing
of larvae), or adulticiding (killing of adults) may be used to manage mosquito
populations. These techniques are accomplished using habitat modification,
pesticide, biological-control agents, and trapping.
1
COMPANY PROFILE
NAME
ADDRESS
CONTACT NO
90034 0044
WEBSITE
www.aallwinfilament@gmail.com
MAIL ID
www. aallwinfilament@.com
MANAGING BODY
ESTABLISHED IN
BANKER
1823
THE KARUR VYSYA BANK LTD
KARUR WEST (L.N.S)
CHAPTER - II
HISTORY
"Wove wire for window screens" were referenced in the American Farmer in
1823. Advertisement for wire window screens appeared in Boyd's Blue Book in
1836.
Two wire window screens were exhibited at Quincy Hall in Boston in 1839.
In 1861 Gilberr, Bennett and Company was manufacturing wire mesh sieves for
food processing. An employee realized that the wire cloth could be painted gray
and sold as window screens and the product became an immediate success.
On July 7, 1868, Bayley and McCluskey filed a U.S. Patent, number 79541
for screened roof-top rail-car windows, allowing ventilation, while preventing
"sparks, cinders, dust, etc." from entering the passenger compartment. By 1874,
E.T. Barnum Company of Detroit, Michigan advertised screens that were sold by
the square foot. Apparently,
window screens designed specifically to prevent insect entry were not
patented in the United States, although by 1900 several patents were awarded for
particular innovations related to window screen design. By the 1950s, parasitic
diseases were largely eradicated in the United States in part due to the widespread
use
of
window
screens.
Today
most
houses
in Australia,
the United
For screens installed on aluminium frames, the material is cut slightly larger
than the frame, then laid over it, and a flexible vinyl cord, called a spline, is
pressed over the screen into a groove (spline channel) in the frame. The excess
screen is then trimmed close to the spline with a sharp utility knife.
The spline is often manufactured with parallel ridges running along the
length of the spline to provide a better grip and compliance when it is pressed into
the channel. A spline roller a special tool that consists of a metal (or plastic)
wheel on a handle is used to press the spline into the frame. The wheel edge is
concave, to help it hold the spline and not slip off to the side. Some spline rollers
are double-ended and have both convex and concave rollers; the convex roller can
be used to seat the spline deeper into the channel without risk of cutting the screen.
Driving the spline into the channel tends to tension the screen on the frame,
so the installer must avoid pre-tensioning the screen excessively to prevent the
frame from becoming warped.
The usage of mosquito netting is mainly used for the protection against the
malaria transmitting vector, Anopheles gambiae. The first record of malaria-like
symptoms occurred as early as 2700 BCE from China. The vector for this disease
was not identified until 1880 when Charles Louis Alphonse Laveran identified
mosquitos as a vector for malaria.
5
Mosquito netting has a long history. Though use of the term dates from the
mid-18th century,[1] Indian literature from the late medieval period has references
to the usage of mosquito nets in ritual Hindu worship. Poetry composed
by Annamayya, the earliest known Telugumusician and poet, references domatera,
which means mosquito net in Telugu.
Use of mosquito nets has been dated to prehistoric times. It is said
that Cleopatra, the last active pharaoh of Ancient Egypt, also slept under a
mosquito net.Mosquito nets were used during the malaria-plagued construction of
the Suez Canal.
Construction
Mosquito netting can be made from cotton, polyethylene, polyester,
polypropylene, or nylon. A mesh size of 1.2 mm stops mosquitoes, and smaller,
such as 0.6 mm, stops other biting insects such as biting midges/no-see-ums.
A mosquito bar is an alternate form of a mosquito net. It is constructed of a
fine see-through mesh fabric mounted on and draped over a box-shaped frame. It is
designed to fit over an area or item such as a sleeping bag to supply protection
from insects. A mosquito bar could be used to protect oneself from mosquitos and
other insects while sleeping in jungle areas.
The mesh is woven tightly enough to stop insects from entering but loosely
enough to not interfere with ventilation. The frame is usually self-supporting or
freestanding although it can be designed to be attached from the top to an
alternative support such as tree limbs.
Usage
Mosquito nets are often used where malaria or other insect-borne diseases
are common, especially as a tent-like covering over a bed. For effectiveness, it is
important that the netting does not have holes or gaps large enough to allow insects
to enter.
It is also important to 'seal' the net properly because mosquitos are able to
'squeeze' through improperly secured nets. Because an insect can bite a person
through the net, the net must not rest directly on the skin.
Mosquito netting can be hung over beds from the ceiling or a frame, built
into tents, or installed in windows and doors. When hung over beds, rectangular
nets provide more room for sleeping without the danger of netting contacting skin,
at which point mosquitos may bite through untreated netting.
Where mosquito nets are freely or cheaply distributed, local residents
sometimes opportunistically use them inappropriately, for example as fishing nets.
When used for fishing, mosquito nets have harmful ecological consequences
because the fine mesh of a mosquito net retains almost all fishes,
including bycatch such as immature or small fish and fish species that are not
suitable for consumption.[11][12][13] In addition, insecticides with which the mesh has
been treated, such as permethrin, may be harmful to the fish and other aquatic
fauna.
Insecticide-treated nets
Mosquito nets treated with insecticidesknown as insecticide-treated nets
(ITNs) or bednetswere developed in the 1980s for malaria prevention. ITNs are
estimated to be twice as effective as untreated nets,and offer greater than 70%
protection compared with no net.
These nets are dip-treated using a synthetic pyrethroid insecticide such as
deltamethrin or permethrin which will double the protection over a non-treated net
by killing and repelling mosquitoes. For maximum effectiveness, ITNs should be
re-impregnated with insecticide every six months
malaria
and
are
part
of
WHOs Millennium
Development
CHAPTER III
Distribution
While some experts argue that international organizations should distribute
ITNs and LLINs to people for free to maximize coverage (since such a policy
would reduce price barriers), others insist that cost-sharing between the
international organization and recipients would lead to greater use of the net
(arguing that people will value a good more if they pay for it).
Additionally, proponents of cost-sharing argue that such a policy ensures
that nets are efficiently allocated to the people who most need them (or are most
vulnerable to infection).
Through a "selection effect", they argue, the people who most need the bed
nets will choose to purchase them, while those less in need will opt out.
However, a randomized controlled trial study of ITNs uptake among
pregnant women in Kenya, conducted by economists Pascaline Dupas and Jessica
Cohen, found that cost-sharing does not necessarily increase the usage intensity of
ITNs nor does it induce uptake by those most vulnerable to infection, as compared
to a policy of free distribution.
In some cases, cost-sharing can decrease demand for mosquito nets by
erecting a price barrier. Dupas and Cohens findings support the argument that free
distribution of ITNs can be more effective than cost-sharing in increasing coverage
and saving lives. In a cost-effectiveness analysis,
10
Dupas and Cohen note that "cost-sharing is at best marginally more costeffective than free distribution, but free distribution leads to many more lives
saved."
The researchers base their conclusions about the cost-effectiveness of free
distribution on the proven spillover benefits of increased ITN usage. [21] ITNs
protect the individuals or households that use them, and they protect people in the
surrounding community in one of two ways.
First, ITNs kill adult mosquitos infected with the malaria parasite directly
which increases their mortality rate and can therefore decrease the frequency in
which a person in the community is bit by an infected mosquito.
Second, certain malaria parasites require days to develop in the salivary
glands of the vector mosquito.
This process can be accelerated or decelerated via weather; more specifically
heat. Plasmodium falciparum, for example, the parasite that is responsible for the
majority of deaths in Sub-Saharan Africa, takes 8 days to mature. Therefore,
malaria transmission to humans does not take place until approximately the 10th
day, although it requires blood meals at intervals of 2 to 5 days.
By killing mosquitoes before maturation of the malaria parasite, ITNs can
reduce the number of encounters of infected mosquitos with humans.
When a large number of nets are distributed in one residential area, their
chemical additives help reduce the number of mosquitoes in the environment. With
fewer mosquitoes, the chances of malaria infection for recipients and nonrecipients are significantly reduced. (In other words, the importance of the physical
11
barrier effect of ITNs decreases relative to the positive externality effect of the nets
in creating a mosquito-free environment when ITNs are highly concentrated in one
residential cluster or community.)
Unfortunately, standard ITNs must be replaced or re-treated with insecticide
after six washes and, therefore, are not seen as a convenient, effective long-term
solution to the malaria problem.[26] As a result, the mosquito netting and pesticide
industries developed so-called long-lasting insecticidal mosquito nets, which also
use pyrethroid insecticides.
There are three types of LLINs polyester netting which has insecticide
bound to the external surface of the netting fibre using a resin; polyethylene which
has insecticide incorporated into the fibre and polypropylene which has insecticide
incorporated into the fibre.
All types can be washed at least 20 times, but physical durability will vary.
A survey carried out in Tanzania concluded that effective life of polyester nets was
2 to 3 years;with polyethylene LLINs there is data to support over 5 years of life
with trials in showing nets which were still effective after 7 years.
When calculating the cost of LLINs for large-scale malaria prevention
campaigns, the cost should be divided by the number of years of expected life: A
more expensive net may be cheaper over time.
In addition the logistical costs of replacing nets should be added to the
calculation.
12
Scientific trials
A review of 22 randomized controlled trials of ITNs[29] found (for
Plasmodium falciparum malaria) that ITNs can reduce deaths in children by one
fifth and episodes of malaria by half.
More specifically, in areas of stable malaria "ITNs reduced the incidence of
uncomplicated malarial episodes by 50% compared to no nets, and 39% compared
to untreated nets" and in areas of unstable malaria "by 62% compared to no nets
and 43% compared to untreated nets". As such the review calculated that for every
1000 children protected by ITNs, 5.5 lives would be saved each year.
Through the years 1999 and 2010 the abundance of female anopheles
gambiae densities in houses throughout western Kenya were recorded. This data
set was paired with the spatial data of bed net usage in order to determine
correlation. Results showed that from 2008 to 2010 the relative population density
of the female anopheles gambiae decreased from 90.6% to 60.7%.
The conclusion of this study showed than as the number of houses which
used insecticide treated bed nets increased the population density of female
anopheles gambiae decreased. This result did however vary from region to region
based on the local environment.
Associated problems
Malaria and other arboviruses are known to contribute to economic disparity
within that country and vice versa. This opens the stage for corruption associated to
the distribution of self-protection aides. The least wealthy members of society are
13
both more likely to be in closer proximity to the vectors' prime habitat, but are also
less likely to be protected from the vectors.
This increase in probability of being infected increases the demand for selfprotection which therefore allows for unfair pricing and distribution of selfprotection means. A decrease in per capita income exaggerates a high demand for
resources such as water and food resulting in civil unrest among communities.
Protecting resources as well as attempting to obtain resources are both a cause for
conflict.
Alternatives
Mosquito nets do reduce air flow to an extent and sleeping under a net is
hotter than sleeping without one, which can be uncomfortable in tropical areas
without air-conditioning.
14
The application of an insect repellent to the skin; this also may be less
effective (reducing rather than eliminating bites), more expensive, and may
pose health risks with long-term use.
15
Africa with
current
plans
to
expand
Background
The UN Foundation and its partners use the money raised by
donations to Nothing But Nets to fight malaria. In conjunction with
16
Partnerships
The UN Foundation has partnered with groups as diverse
as National Basketball Associations NBA Cares, Major League
Soccer WORKS, The People of the United Methodist Church, and
Sports Illustrated to bring Nothing But Nets to the American
public. These Founding Partners have been joined by corporate,
multi-media, and financial partners to make a significant impact
by raising awareness and funds to purchase and distribute bed
nets to save lives. Recent significant partners have included
the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the Boy Scouts of
America. Stephen Curry of the Golden State Warriors is also a big
advocate of Nothing but Nets.
17
18
Screened porches can be built in a manner similar to that of pole barns, with
the screens added after the structure of the walls and the roof is completed. While
screen porches are often attached to houses, they are sometimes built separately in
order to simplify the construction process.
Because screens can reduce the amount of light that enters the porch's
interior, some screened porches are built so that the screens can be removed at
times when insects and sunlight are less of a problem to the resident.
Some homeowners fill their porches with furniture and amenities typically
found indoors, such as tables, chairs, and couches, ceiling fans, imitation hardwood
floors,
electrical
outlets,
painted
elements and
and plumbing.
19
even built-in
furniture
20
Founded
Founder
Purpose
Location
Area
served
Key
Rob Mather
people
Sean Good
Website
Andrew Garner
Peter Sherratt
www.againstmalaria.com
21
LLINs are distributed through partnerships with the International Red Cross,
the Malaria Consortium, and others, with partners responsible for all costs of
distribution. Distributions include malaria education for the local population, and
they are documented through reports, photos, and video.[6] Post-distribution checkups are carried out 6, 12, 18, 24, and 30 months after the initial distribution to
assess net usage and conditions.
AMF has eight trustees and an advisory committee drawn from leading
malaria experts around the world.[8] The charity is registered in the United
Kingdom and governed by the laws of England and Wales. It is also registered in
the USA, Germany, Canada, Japan, and other countries.
[12]
The status was reaffirmed in the mid-2016 top charities refresh, with updates to
The Against Malaria Foundation was set up in August 2004 with the purpose
of handling money raised through the World Swim Against Malaria, a global
fundraising event scheduled for December 3, 2005. More than 250,000 people
participated in the swim, which raised $1.3 million to buy mosquito nets. The
money was used to buy 270,000 nets, which were distributed to protect an
estimated 540,000 people from the risk of mosquito-borne malaria infection.
The World Swim Against Malaria was the brainchild of Rob Mather, a
London-based strategy consultant. Mather had earlier organized a swim to raise
money for a 2-year-old girl who was badly burned in a house fire. Held in
December 2003, the "Swim for Terri" started as a three-person fundraiser and grew
to include 10,000 swimmers in 73 countries.
In 2012, AMF did not undertake all planned distributions due to safety
concerns in Mali and concerns about transparency with potential partners
in Malawi and Togo.
23
Approach
One hundred percent of funds raised through AMF's website
are used to purchase bednets, according to the foundation's
founders. Distribution
and
education
costs
are
covered
by
from
lawyers,
accountants,
advertising
agencies,
the
needs
of
the
target
area.
AMF raises the funds for the nets and purchases them
directly from the manufacturer, while the distribution partner
covers all non-net costs. The nets constitute the majority of the
distribution's costs. In some cases, the partner will raise funds
through AMF's website, in which case all funds raised are ringfenced for the partner's proposed distribution. All details of each
distribution are made available to the public on dedicated
"distribution pages".
26
A window
screen (also
known
as insect
screen, bug
screen, fly
Uses
27
CHAPTER IV
DECORATION
Main article: Screen painting
Screen painting is a folk art consisting of paintings on
window screens. It is also possible to print images directly onto
fiberglass screen cloth using specially designed inkjet printers.
Fabric types
Aluminum
is
generally
(which
have
larger
area
than
29
In addition to insect screening, denser screen types that also reduce sunlight
and heat gain are available. These offer significant potential energy savings in hot
climates.
Several manufacturers offer screens that roll into a pocket when not in use.
These are available for casement windows as well as other types of window and
door openings.
30
Screen sizes
Typically, metal screen frames (roll form) are 6.4 mm (14 in),
7.9 mm (516 in), 9.5 mm (38 in) or 11 mm (716 in) in thickness by
19 mm (34 in) and 25 mm (1 in). The most common sizes are
7.9 mm (516 in) and 11 mm (716 in) by 19 mm (34 in). The 6.4 mm
(14 in) and 7.9 mm (516 in) sizes are generally used for single hung
windows, while the two larger sizes are used for double hung
windows. As 9.5 mm (38 in) is not a common size, the 7.9 mm
(516 in) thickness may be used instead and shimmed as needed.
They come in a variety of colors including unpainted, white,
bronze, tan, black, desert sand, etc. The screen may also include
a crossbar for added strength.
for the more commonly used fiberglass. The fineness of a screen mesh is measured
in wires per inch on the warp (length) and the weft or filler (width). An 1814
mesh has become standard; 1616 was formerly common and other common sizes
are 1818 and 2020. For comparison, a typical screen in a clothes dryer has a
nylon 23x23 mesh screen.
Fiberglass solar screens provide over 75% of UV protection, by using
thicker strands and a closer mesh than regular 18x14 fiberglass window screening.
There is some reduction in visibility, but this can be advantageous, since Solar
Screens are difficult to see through from the outside, while easier to see through
from the inside.
Finer meshes have been developed to prevent very small insects, often called
"noseeums" from flying through. The finer mesh screens are also used to prevent
pollens and allergens from entering homes in order to control allergic reactions.
32
CHAPTER V
CONCLUSION
After conducting the survey, we gel lo understand more about the
preferences of the participants from two different age groups towards
Starbucks and the few main attractions that keep the participants for going to
Starbucks.
We conclude that 65% of the survey participants are students in the
age group of 18-20 and they are more likely to visit Starbucks. Most of the
participants, regardless of the age groups visit Starbucks to enjoy coffee and
meals. Besides going for coffee and meals, they would also spend their
leisure time in Starbucks.
Most of the survey participants preferred cold drinks than hot drinks,
which sums up to a total of 75% out of 100 participants. And for the cup
size, 52% of the participants prefer Grande size. 41 out of 100 of the survey
participants prefer adding nothing into their drinks, while the number of
participants who choose to add raw sugar is at its least. For the topping, most
of the participants choose to add cream instead of chocolate chips and
caramel. Regardless of the age groups, most of the participants visit
Starbucks once or twice a week and spend less than 1 hour there.
33
BIBLIOGRAPHY
japonicus (Diptera:
Culicidae)
in
Connecticut,
Belkin, J.N. 1962: The mosquitoes of the South Pacific: Diptera, Culicidae.
Berkeley, University of California Press.
Belkin, J.N. 1968: Mosquito studies (Diptera, Culicidae) VII. The Culicidae
of New Zealand. Contributions of the American Entomological Institute
34
35