Você está na página 1de 6

RTC BRANCH 8

Presiding Judge: Hon. Altone M. Miralles


Date: September 13, 2016
Case
1. Crim. Case No.
2011-06-393 PP
VS. Wilson
Martinez for: Viol.
Of Sec. 11 of R.A.
9165
2. Crim. Case No.
2013-04-310 PP
VS. Allan
Calasterio for:
Estafa
3. Crim Case No.
2009-09-199/200
PP VS. Almar
Ballais Jr. for:
Viol. Of Sec. 5
&11 of R.A. 9165
4. Crim. Case No. PP
VS. Allen Joseph
Cinco for: Viol. Of
Sec. 11 of Art. II
R.A. 9165
5. Crim. Case No.
2009-12-589 PP
VS. Francisco
Pililio for:
Frustrated Murder

Incident

Remarks/Observation

Pros. Witness

The witness was not


around the case will reset
on Nov. 8 2016

Pre-trial

The witness was absent


the case will reset for
preliminary conference
on Oct. 17, 2016

Pros. Witness

The prosecutor requested


to reset the hearing for
reconstitution. The case
will reset on Oct. 27,
2016

Arraignment

The accused pleaded not


guilty, the accused
requested to transfer the
case to Branch 7

For the Submission for


Amended Information

The hearing will reset


because the accused was
given a period of time to
present information

RTC BRANCH 34
Presiding Judge: Hon: Emelinda R. Maquilan
Date: September 22, 2016
Case

Incident

Remarks/Observation

1. Crim. Case No. 1601266 PP. VS.


Alvin Dumdum
Macato for: Viol. of
Sec. 5 R.A. 9165
2. Crim. Case No.
2002-11-632 PP.
VS. Leby Sugali
Corpin for:
Reckless
Imprudence
resulting in
Homicide
3. Crim Case No. 9910-539 PP.
Felicisimo Malinao
for: Infedility/
Removal
concealment or
destruction of
document
4. Crim. Case No. 1500613 PP. VS.
Wilfred Ube
Villanueva for:
Theft (Simple)

Arraignment

The accused pleaded not guilty


Hence, the case will stipulate for
Preliminary Conference on Sept.
28, 2016 and for Pre-trial on Nov,
18, 2016
The case was reset because the
prosecutor failed to issue a
subpoena to the witness

5. Crim. Case No.


202-04-210 PP. VS.

Presentation of
Evidence by

Presentation of
Evidence by
Prosecution

Presentation of
Evidence by
Defense

The court will issue a subpoena


to the accused in order for him to
testify, the failure on his
presence, the court will
automatically cancel the case.

Hearing

The complainant was not around,


but the accused was already
detained. Then the court issued a
subpoena to the said complainant,
the failure to appear and testify
before the court, the case will be
cancelled
The case will reset because the
accused requested to hire a new

Andres Mirasol for:


Viol. of Sec. 5 R.A.
9165

Prosecution

council of his own choice

RTC BRANCH 8
Presiding Judge: Hon. Altone M. Miralles
Date: September 6, 2016
Case
1. Crim. Case No.
2012-10-634 PP.
VS. Ferdinand
Llanto for: Estafa
2. Crim. Case No.
2012-06-294 PP.
VS. Randy
Francisco for:
Homicide
3. Crim. Case No.
2012-02-115 201202-116,2012-02117 PP. VS.
Christopher
Guzman for: Viol.
of Sec. 5,11 & 12
of R.A 9165
4. Crim. Case No.
156-00273 PP. VS.
Roberto Larido
for: Attempted
Murder
5. Crim. Case No.
15-00198 PP. VS.
Aldrin Suplente
for: Viol. of Sec.
11 of R.A. 9165

Incident

Remarks/Observation

Pre-trial

The case will reset


because the accused was
not present during the
hearing.
The case will reset on
Dec. 13, 2016 because
the police officer who
issued the subpoena was
not around
The case will reset on
Oct. 6, 2016 because the
medical examination and
report of the medicolegal officer is not ready.

Pre-trial

Pros Witness

Arraignment

Pre-trial

The accused was already


convicted, and he is
detained already in New
Bilibid Prison of
Muntinlupa City.
The trial was terminated
last August 24, 2016.
There is already a
subpoena but didnt
return.

RTC BRANCH 8
Presiding Judge: Hon. Altone M. Miralles
Date: September 20, 2016
Case

Incident

Remarks/Observation

1. Crim. Case No,


16000009 PP. VS.
Felicidad &
Edward Margallo
for: Viol. of Sec. 5
& 11 Art. II of
R.A. 9165
2. Crim. Case No.
2007-06-330/331
PP. VS. Virginia
Flores for:
Theft/Sedition

Pros. Witness

3. Crim. Case No.


16-00396 PP. VS.
Leandro Adonis
for: Robbery with
Force upon things
4. Crim. Case No.
16-00452 PP. VS.
Marlon Dumduma
for: Robbery
5. Crim. Case No.
2009-09-432 PP.
VS. Benedicto
Perante for:
Frustrated

Arraignment

The case will reset


because the prosecutor
requested a subpoena to
PO2 Lea Dactiya, to
examine the specimen to
crime laboratory for the
chemistry result.
This case is only for
reconstitution, this case is
before Yolanda, there
was already a
Preliminary
Investigation.
The accused pleaded not
guilty, this case will reset
for pre-trial on Feb. 9,
2017

Pre-trial

Arraignment

The case will reset to


Oct. 4, 2016

Reconstitution

The accused was


accepted for temporary
provisional dismissal for
(2) two years to
reconstitute the case. He

Homicide

bailed for the amount of


(12) twelve thousand
pesos.

RTC BRANCH 8
Presiding Judge: Hon. Altone M. Miralles
Date: August 30, 2016
Case
1. Crim. Case No.
2012-03-129/127
PP. VS. Laurel De
la Rosa for: Viol.
of Sec. 11 of R.A.
9165
2. Crim. Case No.
2001-08-576,200210-698 PP. VS.
Joel Badidles for:
Homicide and
Frustrated
Homicide
3. Crim. Case No.
2005-10-539 PP.
VS. Lito Orpin for:
Murder
4. Crim. Case No.
2013-08-554/555
PP. VS. Alejandro
P. Acebo for: Viol.
of Sec. 5 of R.A.
9165

Incident

Remarks/Observation

Pros
Witness

The case will reset on Nov. 14, 2016

Retaking

The Atty. Is asking for reseting because


there is no subpoena that had sent to the
witness Joel Balais

Pre-trial

The case will reset for other schedule


because the prosecutor was asking the
accused to have Plea Bargaining from
Murder to Homicide
The Agent of PDEA gave her testimonial
evidence that the team organized and
conduct a buy-bust operation, between
the subject and the agent, worth of 1,000
pesos of marked money, exchange for
two(2) sachet of shabu, the case will

Pros
Witness

5. Crim. Case No.


Pros
2018-09-321 PP.
Witness
VS. Ken
Christopher Garcia
for: Viol. of Sec. 5
of R.A. 9165

reset for other schedule


P03 Elijah Enriquez from C.I.D.G.
Division gave his testimonial evidence
that the team organized a buy-bust
operation, between the subject and the
undercover police, worth of 1,500 pesos
of marked money, exchange for three (3)
sachet of shabu.

PROJECT IN COURT
TESTIMONY
(COURT OBSERVATION)
Submitted to: Atty. Ramon N. Pedroza Jr.
Submitted by: Christofer Joseph V. Sanchez

Você também pode gostar