Você está na página 1de 15

ORIGINAL / DUPLICATE

CENTRAL PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT


Annual Performance Assessment Report (APAR)
Executive Engineer/ Architects/Asstt. Executive Engineer/
Dy. Architects/Dy.Director(Hort.)/Assistant Engineer/
Asstt. Director (Hort.)/Assistant Architect/Technical Officer
Period of Assessment from 10.09.2014 to 31.03.2015
PART-I
(PERSONAL DATA)
(To be filled by the Administrative section concerned of the
Ministry/Department/Office, in its absence, Reporting officer to get it from
officer reported upon)
1.1

Name of Officer :

Bishamber Dass

Designation
(during the period reported upon)

Executive Engineer

B D A 0 2 0 1 1 9 5 8 J E C I 0 2 1 9 8 2

PIMS ID No.

1.2

Date of Joining of Service :

05-02-1982

1.3

Date of Birth :

02-01-1958

1.4

Date of continuous
appointment to present
grade :

Date 10-04-2008 Grade:


Civil

Executive

Engineer

1.5

Present post and date of


posting thereto :

Date 28-02-2014 Grade:


Civil

Executive

Engineer

1.6

Period of discontinuity from


duty :

On account of Leave
On account of Training/
other official Assignments

Page 1 of 15

Not Applicable

Name & Designation :


Bishamber Dass E.E.
PIMS ID No.
BDA02011958JECI021982
1.7

Academic and Professional Qualifications :


B.Tech (Civil)

1.8

Inland/Foreign Training/Refresher Courses undertaken and Professional


qualification attained and whether report submitted or not:

NIL

1.9

Registration No. of Council Architecture and date upto which it is valid


(applicable in case of Architects Professional only)
---------------Not Applicable--------------

1.1
0

Fellowship/Membershi
p of Professional
Bodies/:

Sl. No.

Yes / No

Certificate awarded

Membership No. if
awarded

---------------Not Applicable--------------

Page 2 of 15

Page 3 of 15

Name & Designation :


Bishamber Dass E.E.
PIMS ID No.
BDA02011958JECI021982
PART-II
Self Appraisal For The Year
2.1

Brief description of duties of post :


During the period I was looking after the maintenance of roads under
the jurisdiction of M-313. The roads of VVIP Areas like Civil Lines,
Vidhan Sabha area etc. are under the jurisdiction of M-313. During
this period working various Strengthening / Upgradation /
Improvement of Road like G.T. Road, Ring Road (Road NO. 45),
Bhamashah Road, Shah Alam Bandh Road were at advance stage of
completion. It was a challenging job to execute the works without
disturbing traffic. Besides these works 18 Nos. of Court Cases were
under process, three arbitration cases and various PGC Cases were
also in process. It is also a herculean task to cop up with all these
activities alongwith the running works when there is acute shortage
at the level of J.E. and subordinate staff. All these were managed
with the timely and proper guidance of Senior Officers from time to
time.

2.2

Please specify the quantitative/physical/financial targets/objectives


(8 to 10 items priority-wise/in order of importance) that were set for
you and your achievements against each targets and unforeseen
assignments and initiatives taken

Sl. No.
1

Target
Financial target
budget allotment

Finalization of bills

Completion
works

Desiliting of drains

The target was achieved as per


programme.

Court Cases

About 18 court cases


handled successfully

Arbitration Cases

Three Arbitration Cases were


processed during the period.

PGC Cases

Numerous
PGC
Cases
were
successfully handled during the
period.

of

as

Achievement
per There was no surrender from the
budget allotment.
All the bill were finalized as per
programme.

running More
than
12
works
were
completed during the period.

Page 4 of 15

were

Name & Designation :


Bishamber Dass E.E.
PIMS ID No.
BDA02011958JECI021982
2.3

Please comment briefly on your achievements with reference to


targets/objectives referred to in column 2.2. Please also indicate
significantly higher achievements in relation to the targets and your
contribution thereto.
Most of the works were at final stage of completion. Thus extra
effort/ time and devotion required to handle all these works for
timely completion besides this the Court Cases, Arbitration Cases
also to be dealt timely. Thus extra time were devoted to copup with
all these activities smoothly.
Every bit of effort were made in this regard.

2.4

Any other additional and unforeseen


out/initiatives undertaken worth mentioning

assignments

carried

Most of the time there is urgency to carryout the road works besides
attending PGMS/ Complaints as these things are directly linked to
day to day functioning of public life. Thus every effort were made for
timely action to resolve the complaints etc.

2.5

Please comments briefly on the limitations / shortfalls with reference


to the targets referred to in column 2.2 Please specify the
constraints, if any, in achieving the targets
---------------NO --------------

2.6
(a)

Have you filed your immovable property return as due. If yes, please
mention date
Yes

(b)

Have you set the annual work plan for all officers of the Current year,
in respect of whom you are the reporting Authority?

Page 5 of 15

Yes
(c)

Have you written the APAR of all Officers in respect of whom you are
the reporting authority?
Yes

(d)

Have you attached summary report of Annual Medical Examination in


the prescribed proforma, if the officer of Group A has attained the
age of 40 years and above.
(See instructions in this regard)
Yes

Date

Signature of Officer reported upon


Name in Block Letters
BISHAMBER DASS
Designation
EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
(during the period report)

Page 6 of 15

Name & Designation :


Bishamber Dass E.E.
PIMS ID No.
BDA02011958JECI021982
PART-III (To be filled by Reporting Officer)
3.0

Do you agree with the self appraisal of the officer with regard to target
and achievements? Indicate reasons and extent of disagreement with
reference to 2.1 to 2.6 above, if any
YES

NO

Comments, in case of difference of opinion with self appraisal :

3.1

Assessment of work output (weightage 40%)


On scale 1-10 ; See instructions
Reporting
Reviewing
Authority
Authority

i) Extent of Accomplishment
of planned work as per para
2.2 above
ii) Accomplishment of other
additional and unforeseen
assignments / initiatives
undertaken as per para 2.4
above
iii) Quality of output

Overall Grading on
Work Output

Page 7 of 15

Initial of
Reviewing
Authority

Page 8 of 15

Name & Designation :


Bishamber Dass E.E.
PIMS ID No.
BDA02011958JECI021982
3.2

Assessment of personal attributes (weightage 30%)


On scale 1-10 ; See instructions
Reporting
Authority

i) Attitude to work
ii) Initiative, drive and
resourcefulness
iii) Discipline

iv) Communication skills

v) Leadership qualities
vi) Capacity to work in team
spirit
vii) Capacity to work to time
lines
viii) Inter-personal relations
and relation with clients
and customers
ix) Dependability and
willingness to take
responsibility
Overall Grading on personal
attributes

Page 9 of 15

Reviewing
Authority

Initial of
Reviewing
Authority

Name & Designation :


Bishamber Dass E.E.
PIMS ID No.
BDA02011958JECI021982
3.3

Assessment of functional competency (weightage 30%)


On scale 1-10 ; See instructions
Reporting
Authority

i) Knowledge of Rules/
Regulations/ Procedures in the
area of function and ability to
apply them effectively
ii) Strategic Planning ability
iii) Decision making ability
iv) Analytical ability
v) Coordination ability
vi) Ability to motivate and develop
subordinates
vii) For Executive Engineer
Knowledge and Proficiency in
Planning & Designing,
Specification and Codes,
Valuation, Vigilance Techniques
For Architects
Practicability of design attention
to maintenance problems etc.,
Creativity and originality for
aesthetic, imaginative and
innovative designs
For Horticulture
Landscaping and Designing flower
shows, Horticulture Methodology
viii) Management organization and
supervision of works
ix) Promptness in initiating extra
substituted items. Finalizing
measurements, test checks,
recording completion certificate,
Responding to CTEs observation
(N.A. for Architects)
Overall Grading on functional
competency

Page 10 of 15

Reviewing
Authority

Initial of
Reviewing
Authority

Name & Designation :


Bishamber Dass E.E.
PIMS ID No.
BDA02011958JECI021982
3.4 Overall grading of Part-III on scale 1-10
Grading

Reporting
Authority

Reviewing
Authority

Initial of
Reviewing
Authority

Part 3.1
Part 3.2
Part 3.3
Overall Grading

PART-IV : General Attributes ( Weightage not applicable)


4.1

Integrity : Please comment on integrity of the officer :

4.2
Reporting
Authority

Reviewing
Authority

i) State of Health

ii) Attitudes towards


weaker section and
SC/ST/OBC

Page 11 of 15

Initial of
Reviewing
Authority

iii) Aptitude and


potential please
mention about the
aptitude of the officer
and areas in which
he has potential to
develop alongwith
training needs.
Name & Designation :
Bishamber Dass E.E.
PIMS ID No.
BDA02011958JECI021982
4.3

Place

Pen Picture in about 70 words :

Signature of Reporting
Officer
Name in block letters

Date

Designation
(during the period of
report)

Page 12 of 15

Name & Designation :


PIMS ID No.

Bishamber Dass E.E.


BDA02011958JECI021982

PART-V :
(Remarks of the Reviewing Officer)
I)

Length of Service under Reviewing Authority :

II)

Do you agree with the assessment made by the Reporting officer with
respect to the work output and various attributes in Part-III & IV. In case
you do not agree with any of the numerical assessment or attitudes,
please record your assessment in column provided for in that Part and
initial your entries
YES

NO

III)
In case of difference of opinion details and reasons for the same may
be given

IV)

Remarks/observation on the Pen Picture by the Reporting Officer :

Page 13 of 15

V)

Place

Overall Grade :
Outstanding (9)

Very Good (7)

Good (5)

Unsatisfactory(0)

Signature of Reporting
Officer
Name in block letters

Date

Designation
(during the period of report)

Page 14 of 15

Name & Designation :


PIMS ID No.

Bishamber Dass E.E.


BDA02011958JECI021982

PART VI : Remarks of the Acceptance Authority


1.
Do you agree with the assessment made by the Reporting Officer /
Reviewing Officer and details of difference of opinion, if any, with reasons for
the same. In such case, Acceptance Authority will also give overall grade on
scale of 1 to 10.
YES

NO

2.
Remarks / observation of Acceptance Authority, in case of difference of
opinion with Reviewing Officer :-

3.

Place

Overall Grading
Outstanding (9)

Very Good (7)

Good (5)

Unsatisfactory(0)

Signature of Reporting
Officer
Name in block letters

Date

Designation
(during the period of report)

Page 15 of 15

Você também pode gostar