Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
com
scaterbone@live.com
717-826-5354 phone
888-533-3606 facsimile
Stan J. Caterbone
Advanced Media Group
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
December 18, 2009
To: Lancaster County and Lancaster City Public Officials
Re: Torture Techniques Used Against Me and My Executive Summary of U.S. Sponsored
Mind Control
To Whom It May Concern:
As you have been previously warned about the pain and suffering that you have and still subject
me to on a daily basis; I am once again reminding you of your obligations to the U.S. Constitution
and the Pennsylvania Crimes Code.
I am once again supplying you with my Executive Summary of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control for
your review and reference. U.S. Sponsored Mind Control does not supersede any Pennsylvania
Criminal Code that falls within our respective jurisdictions. It does not supersede any United
States or Pennsylvania Constitution Statutes and Amendments.
In addition you will find attached a printed page of my FaceBook.Com website. Please note that
you are encouraged to review that site to find all of the webspaces that Stan Caterbone and
Advanced Media Group have posted on the World Wide Web.
These webspaces contain
information, evidence, and documentation of my allegations and complaints; as well as
information and education into the matter of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control.
Respectfully,
www.scribd.com
Page 1 of 946
1 of 4
Home
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?ref=name&id=100000507983468
Profile
Friends
Inbox
Stan Caterbone
Settings
Logout
Search
Stan Caterbone I am tortured every day with both physical and emotional pain. I am aTargeted Individual, or TI, of
U.S. Sponsored Mind Control Experiments, like my Father, Samuel P. Caterbone and Brother Sammy Caterbone. I blew
the whistle on ISC in 1987 which lead to a U.S. Attorney Prosecution of a $1 Billion Fraud and Arms to Iraq. I have been
Telepathic since 2005, and the victim of a large Cover-Up since 1987 on Monday clear
Wall
Edit My Profile
Info
Photos
Links
Causes
Create an Ad
This is your Publisher. Use it to post content, like photos or links to your wall.
Meet singles
Visit my Website at:
www.amgglobalentertainment
group.com
and
visit
www.scribd.com/amgroup01 to
learn more about me.
Stan
Just Friends
Settings
Stan Caterbone Now, Before You Think You Know Anything About
U.S. Sponsored Mind Control I Strongly Suggest You Review These 51
Videos In My Library - That's 8 and a half Hours Worth Of Compelling
Documentaries In My Mind Control Video Library! Then You Must
Remember To Review All of the Documents That I Have Posted As
Evidence to S...
Information
Relationship Status:
Single
Birthday:
July 15, 1958
See More
Current City:
Lancaster, PA
Political Views:
Independant
Religious Views:
Christian - Catholic
Website:
http://www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com
http://www.scribd.com/amgroup01
Friends
87 friends
See All
5 hours ago Comment Like Share
Paul
Adams
www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com
www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com
Advanced Media Group/Global Entertainment Group of Lancaster, Pennsylvania, is an
information technologies company founded by Stan J. Caterbone in 1989
6 hours ago Comment Like Share
Denise
DiPaolo
Chris
DePatto
Derrick
Robinson
Zach
Adams
Dave
Costarella
Heather
Rakas
Tom Zane
Scott
Schulz
Photos
2 of 10 albums
See All
Wall Photos
Created on
Saturday
Working on
December 11,
2009
Created last
Friday
Applications
Chat (6)
Page 2 of 946
18
12/17/2009 11:36 AM
2 of 4
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?ref=name&id=100000507983468
Video
1 video
See All
Links
3 of 59 links
See All
www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com
5:19am Dec 17
RECENT ACTIVITY
Applications
Chat (6)
Page 3 of 946
18
12/17/2009 11:36 AM
3 of 4
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?ref=name&id=100000507983468
Stan Caterbone "I try to avoid hyperbole, but I think Obama is possibly the
most
dangerous and destructive president we have ever had."Nat Hentoff on
December 11, 2009
America under Barack Obama
www.reviewmessenger.com
Review Messenger, The Only Locally Owned Newspaper in Wadena County,
Minnesota.
Applications
Page 4 of 946
18
12/17/2009 11:36 AM
4 of 4
Facebook 2009
English (US)
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?ref=name&id=100000507983468
Stan Caterbone
Working on December 11, 2009
Older Posts
About Advertising Developers Careers Terms Find Friends Privacy Mobile Help
Applications
Chat (6)
Page 5 of 946
18
12/17/2009 11:36 AM
Executive Summary
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
copyright 2009
Date Completed:
Date Initiated:
July 8, 2009
_____________________________
Stan J. Caterbone
Advanced Media Group, Targeted Individual
Member Freedom From Covert Harassment and
Surveillance Organizations
Pro Se Litigant, U.S. District & Commonwealth of PA
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
Scaterbone@Live.com
www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com
717-826-5354
888-533-3606 Facsimile
Advanced
Media LETTERS
Group
FULTON
PROBE
OF INTEREST
Page 61 of
of 18
Page
946
09/13/2009
Wednesday November
9, 2016
Executive Summary
HISTORY
In 1987 Stan J. Caterbone went public with allegations of fraud within International Signal
and Control, or ISC as they were commonly referred.
Chem Con officials (an ISC/James Guerin straw company), and as a shareholder of record since
1983 of ISC, Stan J. Caterbone had a meeting with an ISC executive on June 23, 1987, which
resulted in a 22 year legal odyssey. The discussions involved a joint venture with his company,
Financial Management Group, Ltd., or FMG, Ltd., but ended in disclosure of his recent public
allegations of fraud. Four years later, ISC founder and chairman James Guerin, and other officials
and companies pleaded guilty to a $1 Billion Dollar Fraud and export violations including the
selling of arms through South Africa to Iraq and Sadaam Hussein.
influence and public corruption had been used to cover-up the activities and Federal False Claims
Act violations of Stan J. Caterbone for the next eighteen years. There ensued a total blockade of
all United States Courts for all redress and remedy available in accordance with federal, state,
and local laws. This included recovery of his business interests; intellectual property; real estate;
personal and business real property; his unblemished and impressive reputation; and his most
valuable asset - the ability to produce income. This might be legally referred to as the Right-ToWork under federal statutes.
investment or developed a business that did not make a profit over the next 22 years.
This
includes two real estate properties that were illegally seized through foreclosure proceedings.
Since 1987 Stan J. Caterbone has been a prisoner and enemy of the state.
ISC was a
Department of Defense (DOD) Contractor and a partner with United States Intelligence Agencies
since it's beginings in the early 1970's. One of it's first contracts was Project X with the National
Security Agency or NSA of Ft. Meade, Maryland.
In summary, the following are facts and
INTERNATIONAL SIGNAL & CONTROL OR ISC:
part
of
the
public
record
regarding
Once the third (3rd) largest employer in the County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania, with
over 5,000 employees.
James Guerin, founder and CEO was once the largest philanthropist to charitable
organizations in the County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania.
The ISC/Ferranti Scandal was the third (3) largest white-collar fraud within the United
States as of 1992.
The following are some of the public officials and politicians associated with ISC:
George H.W. Bush, former U.S. President, and Director of the Central Intelligence
Agency (CIA).
Advanced
Media LETTERS
Group
FULTON
PROBE
OF INTEREST
Page 72 of
of 18
Page
946
09/13/2009
Wednesday November
9, 2016
Executive Summary
Robert Gates, former Director of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and current
Secretary of Defense.
Bobby Ray Inman, former Board of Directors if ISC, former Director of the NSA, and
currently associated and directly involved with Mind Control Research organizations.
Alexander Haig, former U.S. Secretary of State, and ISC lobbyist and Board of Directors?
Carlos Cardoen/Cardoen Industries, a joint venture partner with ISC and arms
merchant for the cluster bomb who eventually sold to Iraq and other Middle Eastern
Countries under U.S. sanctions.
ISC was credited with the design of the cluster bomb, and has patents filed in the U.S.
Patent Office.
In 1987 ISC completed the merger with the 3rd largest defense contractor of Great
Britain, Ferranti International; who paid $1 billion dollars for ISC and all of it's subsidiaries.
ABC News/Financial Times aired 3 episodes on ABC Nightline with Ted Koppel regarding
the ISC/CIA defense weapons; technologies; and cluster bombs to Iraq story and lead into
the allegations that then nominee for the Director of CIA Robert Gates was involved with
ISC and the selling of arms to Iraq.
ABC News 20/20 aired a story on the ISC/CIA efforts to sell cluster bombs to Saadam
Hussein and Iraq on February 1, 1991 days after the start of the Persian Gulf War I, with
the initial bombing raid destroying a cluster bomb factory built in Iraq by Carlos Cardoen.
On July 1st and 2nd of 1987 Stan J. Caterbone solicited the legal counsel of Lancaster
Attorney Joseph Roda for counsel regarding, FMG, Ltd., International Signal & Control
(ISC); Commonwealth Bank, etc., and was billed for his services. Joseph Roda did
absolutely nothing but refute Stan J. Caterbone's claims and would not believe him.
Advanced
Media LETTERS
Group
FULTON
PROBE
OF INTEREST
Page 83 of
of 18
Page
946
09/13/2009
Wednesday November
9, 2016
Executive Summary
investigation into ISC was still ongoing. It is not known whether it has closed or not. All of these
activates constitute a RICO crime due to the pattern and organization of the perpetrators. The
pattern and source of the activities can be traced back to 1987, with subgroups changing over
time, but still engaging in the same practices. The following plan of action was followed in order
to perpetrate the cover-up:
Totally discredit Stan(ley) J. Caterbone and any and all allegations in every way
possible.
Extort and maintain his net worth to $ zero or load him with debts.
Keep him out of any profession and or occupation when and where possible.
Totally isolate him and disenfranchise him from his friends, colleagues, and family
into a life of solitaire.
Somehow persuade the community of Lancaster County to buy into this plan of
action through money, favors, etc.,
Always keep attorneys and anyone remotely involved with the legal community
away at times when efforts for justice are pursued.
When attempts to enter the U.S. legal system arise, isolate, harass, and extort any
monies and/or possessions of value.
Advanced
Media LETTERS
Group
FULTON
PROBE
OF INTEREST
Page 94 of
of 18
Page
946
09/13/2009
Wednesday November
9, 2016
Executive Summary
This case is still not settled and has been withdrawn by plaintiff Stan J.
Caterbone in October of 2008 after a successful ruling in the U.S. Third Circuit Court of
Appeals (07-4474) in September of 2008. The case will be continued upon the security
of evidence and the cease and desist of obstruction of justice and due process. On May
16, 2005 at the Federal Courthouse in Philadelphia, Stan J. Caterbone filed the case under seal.
One week later in the United States Bankruptcy Court for Eastern Pennsylvania in Reading,
Pennsylvania, again appearing as pro se, Stan J. Caterbone filed a petition for protection under
the Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Code, in case no. 05-23059.
These acts of entering the United States legal system with these issues triggered yet
another round of attempts to keep these cases from the courts and judges - Organized Stalking
with Directed Energy Devices and Weapons, built on a foundation of mental telepathy or total
Mind Control.
Advanced
Media LETTERS
Group
FULTON
PROBE
OF INTEREST
Page10
5 of
Page
of18
946
09/13/2009
Wednesday November
9, 2016
Executive Summary
suicide. As far back as the late 1980's Stan J. Caterbone knew that his mind was being read, or
"remotely viewed". This was verified and confirmed when information only known to him, and
never written, spoken, or typed, was repeated by others. In 1998, while soliciting the counsel of
Philadelphia attorney Christina Rainville, (Rainville represented Lisa Michelle Lambert in the Laurie
Show murder case), someone introduced the term remote viewing through an email. That was
the last time it was an issue until 2005. The term was researched, but that was the extent of the
topic.
Remote Viewers may have attempted to connect in a more direct and continuous way
without success.
In 2005 the U.S. sponsored mind control turned into an all-out assault of mental
telepathy; synthetic telepathy; and pain and torture through the use of directed energy devices
and weapons that usually fire a low frequency electromagnetic energy at the targeted victim.
This assault was no coincidence in that it began simultaneously with the filing of the federal action
in U.S. District Court, or CATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison, et. al., or 05-cv-2288.
This
assault began after the handlers remotely trained Stan J. Caterbone with mental telepathy. The
main difference opposed to most other victims of this technology is that Stan J. Caterbone is
connected 24/7 with a person who declares that she is Interscope recording artist Sheryl Crow of
Kennett Missouri. Stan J. Caterbone has spent 3 years trying to validate and confirm this person
without success. Most U.S. intelligence agencies refuse to cooperate, and the Federal Bureau of
Investigation and the U.S. Attorney's Office refuse to comment.
more information.
In 2006 or the beginning of 2007 Stan J. Caterbone began his extensive research into
mental telepathy; mind control technologies; remote viewing; and the CIA mind control program
labeled MK ULTRA and it's subprograms.
FAMILY HISTORY
If you listen to the propaganda machine and the community of Lancaster County,
Pennsylvania, including professionals, the family history of Stan J. Caterbone goes something like
the following:
Father, Samuel Caterbone, Jr., Schizophrenic who ran out on his family because
of nervous breakdowns while trying to run a small dry cleaning business.
He
traveled the world looking for the Blessed Mother Mary and Space Aliens. He ended
up living in government subsidized housing broke and with a severe mental illness.
Advanced
Media LETTERS
Group
FULTON
PROBE
OF INTEREST
Page11
6 of
Page
of18
946
09/13/2009
Wednesday November
9, 2016
Executive Summary
Brother, Samuel A. Caterbone, suffered from the very same illness has his
father, Schizophrenia, who finally killed himself trying to live in California.
Brother, Thomas W. Caterbone, suffered from the very same mental illness as
his brother, Stan J., Bipolar Mood Disorder, who ran a lawn business and finally
committed suicide at an early age.
Stan J. Caterbone, suffered from Bipolar Mood Disorder, or Manic Depression and
had a nervous breakdown in 1987 trying to compete in the financial services
industry.
everyone in court and is deeply paranoid in thinking the whole world is against him.
He always spends all of his money during his fits of mania and has delusions about
his success as a businessman.
The Family History was formulated back in the 1960's when Samuel Caterbone, Jr.,
father of Stan J. Caterbone, became engaged in a black budget mind control program that began
during his service in the United States Navy as a radioman and air gunner.
Samuel Caterbone,
Jr., was most likely a direct product of MK ULTRA or one of it's subprograms. His brother, Samuel
A. Caterbone, was most likely part of the LSD experiments of MK ULTRA. Stan J. Caterbone is
most likely part of a program sponsored by the Department of Defense Agencies, such as DARPA
or the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA). The facts of Stan J. Caterbone's intimate discussions
with both his father and brother over the years before they died, the totality of documents that
were preserved in thier estate, including service records; letters; official court papers; high school
documents; and the like - all will prove that they were in fact part of MK ULTRA or one of it's
subprograms.
The following are the facts and the real record of the family history:
Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., (Father) served in the Navy from 1943 to 1946 and
graduated with honors from Air Gunners School in Jacksonville, Florida. He was an exceptional
student/athlete while attending Lancaster Catholic High School, participating in the band as well
as sports. He was also his senior class secretary/treasurer. After the Navy, he went on to build a
successful dry cleaning business, which he is credited with inventing a filtration system for the
solvents.
He also developed a very good investment in real estate along the Manheim Pike,
owning several properties. By his own writings and from his personal accounts to me, he was
definitely a remote viewer for some U.S. Agency with telepathic abilities.
His viewing is
documented to have begun back in the early 1970's. He also suffered from organized stalking,
Advanced
Media LETTERS
Group
FULTON
PROBE
OF INTEREST
Page12
7 of
Page
of18
946
09/13/2009
Wednesday November
9, 2016
Executive Summary
traveler, this is documented by his passports. Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., may have been a covert
carrier for someone in intelligence. Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., had his mental health history laced
with electro shock therapy.
ULTRA. In addition, and especially disturbing is his criminal record with the Lancaster City Police
Department and the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas. In 1973 Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr.
was convicted of forging a 2 checks from the Caterbone Cleaners, Inc., checking account. The
one check to Joe the Motorists Store at the Manor Shopping Center was never entered into
evidence, it was for a total of $70.00.
James Coho for $200.00 with "divorce proceedings" written in the memo.
criminal record.
wrote an ORDER releasing him from probation and ordering him to "leave the vicinity of the
County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania". The President Judge of Lancaster County Court of Common
Pleas literally threw my father out of Lancaster County for forging 2 checks from his own
corporation. In 1987 I was arrested for stealing my own files from my own company, Financial
Management Group, Ltd., You can research the life of Candy Jones and Kate O'Brien to learn
more on this topic. Samuel Caterbone, Jr., has left enough writings and documentation to know
that his life fits the model for targeted individuals, complete with economic ruin, isolation,
disenfranchised from family and friends, and of course a fabricated mental illness history. You
can view most of his record online.
Samuel A. Caterbone, (Brother) served in the United States Air Force in 1968 to 1970.
In 1991, Stan J. Caterbone accused the United States Government of using his brother, Samuel
A. Caterbone for part of the LSD experiments on mind control, or MK ULTRA. A notarized letter of
October 23, 1991 was sent certified mail to the California Attorney General on the subject matter,
with a return letter from the California Attorney General on January 14, 1992.
By his own
admission before his death, Samuel A. Caterbone disclosed to Stan J. Caterbone of the "bad LSD"
trips while in the Air Force. Since his death of December 25, 1984, Stan J. Caterbone and others
questioned the classification of suicide, and made allegations of foul play that was ultimately
responsible for his death. Finally in a meeting in Santa Barbara, California with the Santa Barbara
Public Guardian's Office, an office admitted that the death was more likely due to foul plan than
suicide.
Samuel A. Caterbone was also an exceptional student and athlete while attending
Bellefonte, Pennsylvania, his hunting pants caught fire trying to stay warm.
Lancaster General Hospital for months, going through painful skin grafts and isolation.
Advanced
Media LETTERS
Group
FULTON
PROBE
OF INTEREST
Page13
8 of
Page
of18
946
The
09/13/2009
Wednesday November
9, 2016
Executive Summary
hunting accident interrupted his athletic career and scared his legs for life.
The Schizophrenia
diagnosis was a combination of LSD flashbacks and organized stalking and harassment.
Thomas P. Caterbone, (Brother) had an unfortunate transaction at Fulton Bank that set
a course of action that resulted in a suicide. Although diagnosed with Bipolar Disease and Manic
Depression -- embezzled and extorted monies were most likely the reason for his suicide in 1996.
Fulton Bank was involved in a fraud that took $72,000 from a real estate settlement closing and
lead to his total financial ruin and collapse in June of 1995. The funds were never recovered and
Fulton Bank is a defendant for a wrongful death claim in the United States District Court for the
Eastern District of Pennsylvania in CATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison, et. al., 05-cv-2288.
FULTON BANK triggered a severe and lethal death blow to Thomas P. Caterbone, and as of this
day has refused to acknowledge any wrongdoing or remorse. Thomas P. Caterbone was also an
exceptional athlete. Playing for Lancaster Catholic High School, Franklin and Marshall College, the
Harrisburg Patriots, and even the Philadelphia Eagles.
McCaskey and Franklin and Marshall College. Thomas P. Caterbone had a very successful lawn
and landscaping business before joining forces with John DePatto of United Financial Services and
selling residential mortgages.
James Guerin and ISC. Parent Bank, owned by ISC also foreclosed on 2323 New Danville Pike,
Conestoga, Pennsylvania in 1988, which was owned by Stan J. Caterbone. Thousands of dollars
of equity was extorted in the process, despite still being short sold for a profit to Mr. Keith
Kirchner, an executive of Lancaster Newspapers and former graduate of Lancaster Catholic High
School.
Stan J. Caterbone is a remote viewer, is telepathic, and a federal whistleblower with
an exceptional entrepreneurial record in spite of all of his adversaries and their assaults. In spite
of the U.S. Sponsored mind control and torture, he has endured and will prevail. Legally, Stan J.
Caterbone has been able to preserve his claims, and progress his legal challenges and claims
through both the federal and state court system appearing pro se, without the aid or expense of
additional legal counsel. Some of his claims and briefs will most likely be landmark decisions in
years to come. Stan J. Caterbone was a 2-Sport MVP at Lancaster Catholic High School, in both
football and track. Stan J. Caterbone never received less than a B grade in his four years of high
school and had an 87+ average. Stan J. Caterbone excelled in computer technologies, taking his
first full term course in 1975, while in high school and continuing into college at Millersville
University, graduating with a degree in business administration in 1980.
Stan J. Caterbone
excelled profoundly at building his companies, first beginning with Financial Management Group,
Ltd., then working with Tony Bongiovi of Power Station Studios and the "Digital Movie"; then
building Advanced Media Group, Ltd..
Advanced
Media LETTERS
Group
FULTON
PROBE
OF INTEREST
Page14
9 of
Page
of18
946
09/13/2009
Wednesday November
9, 2016
Executive Summary
foreclosures, Stan J. Caterbone has amassed a portfolio of impressive real estate deals that have
always paid off in profits, no matter how or when they were sold.
businesses.
Financial Management Group, Ltd., was a $20,000 dollar investment in 1986 and
was still sold for approximately $100,000 two years later, despite the false arrests and the
extortion of most of it's real value and equity.
The mental health history and the criminal records were completely fabricated, and a
close review and investigation into the actual court records and hospital records can prove that in
very short fashion.
There are TWO (2) ways to quickly dispute the Mental Health History and
Record:
One - Review the word "Delusional; delusions; etc.,;
used by mental health professionals, and the false reports by friends and family were associated
with facts, and matters of the official record, the complete opposite of the meaning of the word
"delusional". And they still exist to this very day.
Two - Review the 3 Fabricated Suicide Allegations of the following dates: August
10(?), 1987 at Burdette Tomlin Hospital (Cape May County New Jersey); February 18th(?), 2005
by Kerry Egan and the Southern Regional Police Department; and July 19, 2009 for the 302
Commitment by the Lancaster City Police Department at Lancaster General Hospital.
The Criminal Record is very similar, since 1987 Stanley J. Caterbone has had 31 false
arrests; formal charges and convictions dismissed prior to court proceedings or won on summary
appeals in the County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania; most of which Stan J. Caterbone appearing as
pro se (representing himself). These have resulted in civil complaints filed in 2008 in CATERBONE
v. The County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of
Pennsylvania.
In all some
40,000 pages of documents are now filed and electronically scanned or microfilmed in
prothonotary offices. In addition in both the U.S. Federal Courts and the Lancaster County Court
of Common Pleas there are more than 11 hours of audio recordings; some 3,000 scanned
images; and several video broadcasts of the ISC News broadcasts all stored on a CD-ROM and
filed as an exhibit to some of the law suits filed by Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group,
as plaintiffs. Stan J. Caterbone has over 100 court docket sheet numbers in federal, state, and
Advanced
Media LETTERS
Group
FULTON
PROBE
OF INTEREST
Page 15
10 of
of 18
Page
946
09/13/2009
Wednesday November
9, 2016
Executive Summary
local courts.
There are also Pennsylvania Unemployment Compensation records; Department of Welfare
and Lancaster County Assistance Office records; Local Real Estate Tax records; Lancaster County
Tax Assessment records; Social Security Administration Benefits records; Lancaster Catholic High
School transcripts; Millersville University transcripts; all for Stan J. Caterbone, in addition to his
court filings.
For Samuel A. Caterbone, my brother, there are United States Air Force service
records; Lancaster Catholic High School transcripts; Millersville University transcripts; Social
Security Administration records; Santa Barbara County Guardian and Public Defender records;
and papers and documents persevered from his estate.
For Samuel P. Caterbone, my father, there are United States Naval records, Lancaster
Catholic High School transcripts; Social Security Administration records; Lancaster County
Assistance Office records; Local Real Estate Tax records; Lancaster County Tax Assessment
records; Samuel Caterbone Cleaners, Inc., corporate records; Real Estate Deeds and Mortgages;
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas civil and criminal records; and of course papers and
documents persevered from his estate
Advanced
Media LETTERS
Group
FULTON
PROBE
OF INTEREST
Page 16
11 of
of 18
Page
946
09/13/2009
Wednesday November
9, 2016
Executive Summary
often the evolution of most technologies born out of the U.S. Department of Defense.
Top Secret experiments and the resulting technological advancements can stay
secretive for so long.
broadcast on WHAN Coast to Coast with a guest that was one of the leading Physicist
turned Remote Viewer and expert that testified to this same notion.
Advanced
Media LETTERS
Group
FULTON
PROBE
OF INTEREST
________________________________
Stan J. Caterbone
Advanced Media Group, Targeted Individual
Member Freedom From Covert Harassment and
Surveillance Organizations
Pro Se Litigant, U.S. District & Commonwealth of PA
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
Scaterbone@Live.com
www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com
717-826-5354
888-533-3606 Facsimile
Page 17
12 of
of 18
Page
946
09/13/2009
Wednesday November
9, 2016
Executive Summary
September 7, 2009
Stan J. Caterbone
Advance Media Group
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, Pennsylvania 17603
Derrick Robinson
Freedom From Covert Harassment and Surveillance
P.O. Box 9022
Cincinnati, Ohio 45209
Phone 1-800-571-5618
Fax 1-866-433-4170
email: info@freedomfchs.com
Re: Is County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania Ground Zero for Organized
Stalking and Covert Surveillance?
Derrick,
My pleasure. Derrick, I was trying to get group rates at our new Lancaster
Convention Center Marriot Hotel last week, just as a little fact finding mission. I
have a theory that I would like to send your way. I thought it would be very
fruitful to bring some TI's together for a conference, unless you think the
exposure would be harmful.
I believe that they try new models for harassment; organized stalking and
surveillance on me here in Lancaster. Remember, Lancaster is now one of the
most "Watched Communities" in the country. "With those cameras, the Safety
Coalition will operate and monitor 165 cameras across Lancaster City making
Lancaster the most watched city of its size in the nation." See article attached,
Watching you: City to add 105 more cameras.
I believe that Lancaster may be ground zero for some of the models of organized
stalking and harassment that we TI's experience and wanted to get some
reaction from Lancaster. Some history on the Lancaster Convention Center. Dale
High of High Industries is the lead partner in our new convention center/hotel. It
is first class all the way. Now in the late 1980's I was a joint venture partner with
Dale High in American Helix Technology Company/Advanced Media Group.
American Helix was a cd manufacturer and I and my company Advanced Media
Group was the CD-ROM division of American Helix. I was one of a handful of CDROM manufacturers in the domestic United States back then. Also in 2005 I filed
a civil action against the lead hotel, the Eden Resort Inn, for trying to block the
development and building of the Hotel/Convention Center, see attached.
Advanced
Media LETTERS
Group
FULTON
PROBE
OF INTEREST
Page 18
13 of
of 18
Page
946
09/13/2009
Wednesday November
9, 2016
Executive Summary
Now, some history about Lancaster and the intelligence community. Back in the
1980's there were several defense contractors located in Lancaster, the main
being International Signal & Control, which I, of course, blew the whistle on a
billion dollar fraud and arms to Iraq.
Click here for an overview of ISC.
Click here to see the Lancaster Newspapers Archives regarding International
Signal
&
Control,
or
ISC.
Click here to view the live video of the WGAL-TV News Broadcast of October 31,
1991 the evening of the ISC indictments. The U.S. Department of Justice and
other U.S. Agencies held a Press Conference in the Philadelphia Federal
Courthouse to announce the indictments and $ Billion Dollar Fraud.
Click here for Part 2 of the WGAL-TV 8 Broadcast.
Now politically, Lancaster is and has always been predominately Republican.
Lancaster is one of the oldest cities in the country and our courthouse was one of
the first in this country. Lancaster has one of the oldest fraternities of the
Masons. Lancaster and the George W.Bush administration has a close and very
"interesting relationship". George H. Bush had a very close relationship with ISC,
and of course the NSA and CIA all had a very "close" relationship with
International Signal & Control, or ISC. The following are some transcripts for Ted
Koppel and ABC News Nightline regarding ISC and Arms to Iraq and the
intelligence community. The transcripts are contained in my Amicus for Case No.
2006-cv-2160 filed in the Eastern District of Michigan, Southern Division.
Now, Robert Gates, presently the Secretary of the United States Defense
Department, and his relationship to Lancaster. First of all, the attached video is
the authentic transcript of Robert Gates' confirmation hearing in September of
1991 for the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). If you fast forward
to approximately 9:00:00 you will see the back and forth questions from Senator
Murkowski to Robert Gates regarding the allegations by several members of the
U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence regarding his alleged involvement
with ISC and the Arms deals with Carlos Cardoen and the shipping of cluster
bombs through South Africa and on to Iraq. Of course, he denied all of the
allegations.
Robert Gates also has relatives that live in Lancaster County, if fact he attended a
wedding here a few months ago, on May 3, 2009 at St. John Neuman Catholic
Church in Manhiem Township, Lancaster County. His wife has a niece that lives in
Manheim Township.
Now, I'll give you the ABC News Nightline May 23, 1991 excerpt regarding ISC
and the NSA, National Security Agency:
Advanced
Media LETTERS
Group
FULTON
PROBE
OF INTEREST
Page 19
14 of
of 18
Page
946
09/13/2009
Wednesday November
9, 2016
Executive Summary
"It all started legally, if covertly, back in 1974. That's when the National Security
Agency, a super-secret U.S. Intelligence unit asked ISC to help complete project
X, a chain of electronic listening posts based at South Africa's Simonstown Naval
Station. South Africa was using these posts to follow Soviet submarine traffic off
of the Cape of Good Hope. To ensure secrecy, ISC and the NSA made sure
shipments could not be tracked back to them. They created a company called
Gamma Systems Associates. In fact, this company was nothing more than a post
office box at John F. Kennedy Airport. Gamma was a cut-out. ... But this
sanctioned covert operation was stopped in 1977 when President Carter, a strong
opponent of South Africa's apartheid regime, told U.S. firms to stop any militaryrelated business with Pretoria. But ISC continue shipping electronics, some
civilian, some military, to South Africa. The in the early 1980's, South Africa
began to intensify its efforts at ballistic missile development. For ISC, that was a
golden opportunity because on of its top executives was a man named Clyde
Ivey, an American electronics expert who has been the father of South Africa's
missile program. Ivey had extraordinary contacts in the nations defense
structure. Begining in 1984, federal investigators say, senior ISC exeutives,
including Ivey, began regular contacts with CIA officials." You can read the rest.
The entire transcript of the May 23, 1991 ABC News/Nightline broadcast.
Now remember, George H. Bush was director of CIA. "He served in this role for
357 days, from January 30, 1976 to January 20, 1977.[22] The CIA had been
rocked by a series of revelations, including those based on investigations by
Senator Frank Church's Committee regarding illegal and unauthorized activities
by the CIA, and Bush was credited with helping to restore the agency's
morale.[23] In his capacity as DCI, Bush gave national security briefings to
Jimmy Carter both as a Presidential candidate and as President-elect, and
discussed the possibility of remaining in that position in a Carter
administration[24] but it was not to be," according to Wikipedia.
Now, lets get to Bobby Ray Inman, former Navy, Director of the National Security
Agency (NSA), former Director of International Signal & Control (ISC), and
currently part of the Mind Control industry. The following appears on the
Welcome page of my website:
"S.A.I.C. involvement in 1993 American Para psychological Association meeting
arrangements, via their 'Cognitive Sciences Laboratory'. Science Applications
International Corporation is a big time defense contractor, has held the largest
number of research contracts of any defense contractor. Bobby Ray Inman (ISC
Board of Directors) is on its board of directors, among others."
by John Porter, CIA Program on Mind Control copyright 1996. In 1994, after
Bobby Ray Inman requested to be withdrawn from consideration as Bill Clinton's
first Defense Secretary, his critics speculated that the decision was motivated by
a desire to conceal his links to ISC. Inman was a member of the so-called
Advanced
Media LETTERS
Group
FULTON
PROBE
OF INTEREST
Page 20
15 of
of 18
Page
946
09/13/2009
Wednesday November
9, 2016
Executive Summary
"shadow board" of the company which was allegedly either negligent or approved
the exports." by Wikipedia on International Signal and Control, (ISC).
Now, lets list the former Navy personnel:
George H. Bush, former President of the United States, former Director of
CIA.
James Guerin, President and Founder of International Signal & Control.
Bobby Ray Inman, former Director of the National Security Agency (NSA)
and Director of International Signal & Control, (ISC).
My father, Samuel P. Cateronne, Jr.
His father, Samuel J. Caterbone, Sr.
George Noory, of Coast to Coast Radio (just anecdotal, nothing assumed or
alleged).
George W. Bush flew with the Navy.
James Cross
I will Finish later and add more.
Next we get to Jim Guerin's attorney back in 1989 through at least 1992. His
name was Joseph Tate, of Philadelpha. This link will take you to a document
regarding Joseph Tate, James Guerin and Joseph Roda, Esq., of Lancaster, my
former attorney who said I fabricated everything back in 1987. The document
contains a letter of September 12, 2005 from Special Prosecutor Patrick
Fitzgerald regarding Scooter Libby, Former Vice President Dick Cheney's Chief of
Staff. the letter involves Scooter Libby's Grand Jury Indictment for leaking
Covert CIA Operative Valerie Plame and eventually outing her.
Now in Austin Texas in July of 2005 I was detained by 2 Agents from The Defense
Intelligence Agency. I was merely visiting a Military Museum, that had old and
vintage helicopters and airplanes. near where my brother, Dr. Phillip Caterbone
lived. I was visiting on my way to California. While inside the museum 2 Agents
from the Department of Defense Defense Intelligence Agency escorted me
outside to my Honda Oddesey and interrogated me making me confirm that I was
visiting and staying with my brother. They caused a problem for my brother's
Medical Practice by shaking up one of his secretaries. The reviewed my court
documents for CATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison, et. al., Case No. 2005-cv0288 filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. The
demanded that I stay off all military bases before releasing me.
In 2006 I was telepathic with an older NSA executive on many occasions who
wanted to meet me at the Clipper Stadium who told me he wanted to rent a
facility in Lancaster for a training exercise. I told him to to and see Dale High and
the High Group for space at the Greenfield Industrial Park. He said he was
retiring and that our discussions were keeping him a few weeks longer than
expected. We had intimate discussions of my history and the Chesapeake Bay
Area. We also discussed Sheryl Crow, and he told me his wife was a fan. I turned
Advanced
Media LETTERS
Group
FULTON
PROBE
OF INTEREST
Page 21
16 of
of 18
Page
946
09/13/2009
Wednesday November
9, 2016
Executive Summary
him on to her new album, Wildflower, and he said she liked it. We had to
disengage because he was being harassed by other telepathic assailants.
My former secretary (Susan Bare) at Pflumm Contractors, Inc., where I was
controller and was hired to rescue the company from near bankruptcy in 1993,
told me that her husband, Ross Bare, who grew up just some 10 or so doors from
me, worked for the NSA. She disclosed this soon after I hired her in 1994 or
1995.
Advanced
Media LETTERS
Group
FULTON
PROBE
OF INTEREST
Page 22
17 of
of 18
Page
946
09/13/2009
Wednesday November
9, 2016
Executive Summary
Stan J. Caterbone
Advanced Media Group, Targeted Individual
Member Freedom From Covert Harassment and Surveillance Organizations
Pro Se Litigant, U.S. District & Commonwealth of PA
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
Scaterbone@Live.com
www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com
717-826-5354
888-533-3606 Facsimile
Advanced
Media LETTERS
Group
FULTON
PROBE
OF INTEREST
Page 23
18 of
of 18
Page
946
09/13/2009
Wednesday November
9, 2016
Re:
City of Lancaster, Pennsylvania Mayor Rick Gray - Corruption of a Public Official and Violations of the RICO Statutes
Page 24 of 946
Rick Gray, as Mayor of the City of Lancaster, in his official capacity and other Lancaster City officials and
departments ensure that my person, my property; my legal and business files and evidence are in constant harms way by
the acitities and visitors of 1252 Fremont Street, Lancaster, Pennsylvania; as well as the continued organized stalking and
harassment.
Page 25 of 946
CHAPTER
DIVIDER
Page 26 of 946
Stan J. Caterbone
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Freedom From Covert Harassment &
Surveillance,
Registered in Pennsylvania
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. FEDS PROBE FULTON BANK and 3 other SUBSIDIARY BANKS of FULTON FIANCIAL
for possible fair-lending violations LNP Front Page Sunday November 6, 2016
A. Former Fulton Bank manager sentenced for embezzling $99,100 Fernando of
Manor Shopping Center Branch - No Trespass in 2010 May 6, 2016
A. TD Ameritrade STATEMENT re FULTON BANK STOCK and $12,456 CASH as of
Sunday November 6, 2016
2. Valarie Plame speaks on career of being a CIA agent New Mexico October 27,
2016
3. recorded Third Circuit Lambert Appeal SUBMISSION Statement as EXHIBIT re The
Intelligence and Department of Defense Ties to Lancaster and the APPELLANT
Stan J. Caterbone, November 13 , 2015
A. Don Eberly will not challenge Smucker for 16th district November 13, 2015
B. Letter to Kathleen Kane re Old Boys Network of November 12, 2015
C. Guess who came to the wedding Robert Gates in Lancaster for Wedding May 3,
2009
D. Bobby Ray Inman on Wikipedia November 13, 2015
2. FULTON BANK
A. December 3, 2007 - Letter from Stan J. Caterbone/Advanced Media Group to
R. Scott Smith, Jr. Chairman, CEO Fulton Financial Corporation
B. Fulton Bank Letter From Mark Crowe General Counsel March 25 2005
C. Roda and Nast, PC and Stan J. Caterbone Class Action v. Fulton Finanical 2008
D. Letter to Diane Nast of Roda Nast re Class Action Lawsuit v. Fulton Bank
January 25, 2008
E. Anonymous Letter Disparaging Fulton Financial Corporation Dec 16 2007
F. Letter from Stephany Carfly of Barley Snyder re Employment at Roda and Nast
January 11, 2008
G. Letter From Barley Snyder re Letter to Board of Directors and Ethics Point
Report January 8, 2008
H. Letter to Barley Snyder re Letter to Board of Directors and Ethics Point Report
January 1, 2008
I. Letter From Barley Snyder re Letter to Board of Directors and Ethics Point
Report December 27, 2007
Page 1 of 16
Page 2 of 16
Page 3 of 16
Page 4 of 16
HISTORY OF COMPLAINT
In 1987 Stan J. Caterbone went public with allegations of fraud within International Signal
and Control, or ISC as they were commonly referred. After discussions with ISC and United Chem
Con officials (an ISC/James Guerin straw company), and as a shareholder of record since 1983 of
ISC, Stan J. Caterbone had a meeting with an ISC executive on June 23, 1987, which resulted in a
22 year legal odyssey.
Management Group, Ltd., or FMG, Ltd., but ended in disclosure of his recent public allegations of
fraud.
Four years later, ISC founder and chairman James Guerin, and other officials and
companies pleaded guilty to a $1 Billion Dollar Fraud and export violations including the selling of
arms through South Africa to Iraq and Sadaam Hussein. However, money, power, influence and
public corruption had been used to cover-up the activities and Federal False Claims Act violations
of Stan J. Caterbone for the next eighteen years.
States Courts for all redress and remedy available in accordance with federal, state, and local
laws. This included recovery of his business interests; intellectual property; real estate; personal
and business real property; his unblemished and impressive reputation; and his most valuable
asset - the ability to produce income.
under federal statutes. Notwithstanding, Stan J. Caterbone has never made a bad investment or
developed a business that did not make a profit over the next 22 years. This includes two real
estate properties that were illegally seized through foreclosure proceedings.
Since 1987 Stan J. Caterbone has been a prisoner and enemy of the state.
ISC was a
Department of Defense (DOD) Contractor and a partner with United States Intelligence Agencies
since it's beginings in the early 1970's. One of it's first contracts was Project X with the National
Security Agency or NSA of Ft. Meade, Maryland.
In summary, the following are facts and
INTERNATIONAL SIGNAL & CONTROL OR ISC:
part
of
the
public
record
regarding
Once the third (3rd) largest employer in the County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania,
with over 5,000 employees.
James Guerin, founder and CEO was once the largest philanthropist to
charitable organizations in the County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania.
The ISC/Ferranti Scandal was the third (3) largest white-collar fraud within the
United States as of 1992.
The following are some of the public officials and politicians associated with ISC:
George H.W. Bush, former U.S. President, and Director of the Central
Intelligence Agency (CIA).
Robert Gates, former Director of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and
current Secretary of Defense.
Bobby Ray Inman, former Board of Directors if ISC, former Director of the NSA,
and currently associated and directly involved with Mind Control Research
organizations.
Alexander Haig, former U.S. Secretary of State, and ISC lobbyist and Board of
Page 5 of 16
Directors?
Joseph McDade, former Pennsylvania House of Representative and Chair of the
Appropriations Committee who was later investigated for the United Chem Con
scandal.
Carlos Cardoen/Cardoen Industries, a joint venture partner with ISC and arms
merchant for the cluster bomb who eventually sold to Iraq and other Middle Eastern
Countries under U.S. sanctions.
ISC was credited with the design of the cluster bomb, and has patents filed in the
U.S. Patent Office.
In 1987 ISC completed the merger with the 3rd largest defense contractor of Great
Britain, Ferranti International; who paid $1 billion dollars for ISC and all of it's
subsidiaries.
ABC News/Financial Times aired 3 episodes on ABC Nightline with Ted Koppel
regarding the ISC/CIA defense weapons; technologies; and cluster bombs to Iraq
story and lead into the allegations that then nominee for the Director of CIA Robert
Gates was involved with ISC and the selling of arms to Iraq.
ABC News 20/20 aired a story on the ISC/CIA efforts to sell cluster bombs to
Saadam Hussein and Iraq on February 1, 1991 days after the start of the Persian
Gulf War I, with the initial bombing raid destroying a cluster bomb factory built in
Iraq by Carlos Cardoen.
On July 1st and 2nd of 1987 Stan J. Caterbone solicited the legal counsel of
Lancaster Attorney Joseph Roda for counsel regarding, FMG, Ltd., International
Signal & Control (ISC); Commonwealth Bank, etc., and was billed for his services.
Joseph Roda did absolutely nothing but refute Stan J. Caterbone's claims and would
not believe him.
In Clark v. Guerin (CI-1990-0074 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas),
Lancaster Attorney Joseph Roda represented William Clark, ISC's in-house legal
counsel, and never mentioned any conflict to Stan J. Caterbone in 1987.
In Clark v. Guerin (CI-1990-0074 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas),
James Guerin deposited $1.75 million dollars into an escrow account at Fulton Bank,
Lancaster, County.
In Clark v. Guerin (CI-1990-0074 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas),
Christopher Underhill of Harman, Underhill & Brubaker, represented James
Guerin. In 2005 Christopher Underhill represented the Manheim Township Police
Department (05-cv-2288 U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania)
CATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison, et. al.,.
In Clark v. Guerin (CI-1990-0074 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas),
Philadelphia Attorney Joseph Tate represented James Guerin and ISC, and in 2007
Joseph Tate represented Scooter Libby during his federal prosecution by U.S.
Special Prosecutor Fitzpatrick.
In 2015 Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group had to again return to local,
state, and federal courts. Again the obstruction of due process, the local gang stalking, torture,
trespass, thefts, and the like began in earnest.
Psychiatric Commitment of April 2010 by Detective Clark Bearinger, until January of 2015, Stan J.
Caterbone and Advanced Media Group had been in seclusion and in a state of rehabilitation and
rest due to the forced medication by Fairmount Behavioral Hospital and Dr. Silvia Gratz.
psychotropic drugs reduce your motor skills and put you in an extreme state of confusion.
end
of
the
summer
of
2010
every
Page 6 of 16
social
media
site,
including
The
By the
the
Lancaster City Police Department took the lead role. As usual Stan J. Caterbone summoned state
and federal authorities for help and assistance, including direct communications with the White
House, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office and
Kathleen Kane, The Pennsylvania State Police, the Pennsylvania General Assembly, several U.S.
Congressmen, and of course the Lancaster County District Attorney's Office.
Since August 1,
2015 the Geek Squad had performed diagnostics and repairs six (6) times due to computer
hacking. On at least 2 occasions the entire hard drive had to be wiped clean and restored.
On June 23, 2015 Stan J. Caterbone was named MOVANT in the 2014 Habeus
Corpus Petition by Lisa Michelle Lambert, Case No. 14:02559 in the U.S. District Court
for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania after filing an Amicus on the case. Judge Paul
Diamond was presiding since it's filing in 2014. However, the Petition was not able to
be granted and the case was stalled on jurisdictional law based on new and compelling
evidence, or lack there of.
In fact a working theory was filed that suggested that the East Lampeter
So Stan J.
Caterbone continued filing in the courts for assistance and resolution. In August, in a desperate
attempt to stop the local torture campaign, another Emergency Injunction was filed in the
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas. On August 6, 2015 Stan J. Caterbone went so far as to
undertake a Professional Polygraph Test administered by Bonnie Lee of Polygraph Solutions of
West Chester, Pennsylvania. The test ended up being 4 grueling hours of torture and a scam of
Page 7 of 16
$600.00.
On July 9th , 2015 a Private Criminal Complaint was filed against Detective Clark Bearinger,
Officer Williams, Officer Binderup, and 2 unidentified patrolman.
Department were so desperate for retaliation from the Amicus filing in the Lisa Michelle Lambert
case, that they actually broke the door in of 1250 Fremont Street in order to execute the
fabricated 302 petition. The Complaint was denied by the Lancaster County District Attorney on
August 8th . The Complaint is now under a Petition for Review by the Lancaster County Court of
Common Pleas.
On August 17, 2015 another Emergency Injunction for Relief was filed in the Lancaster
County Court of Common Pleas, Case No. 15-06985. The Injunction was heard by Judge Jeffrey
Wright, who dismissed it as frivolous. An appeal, MD 1561, is pending in the Superior Court of
Pennsylvania.
In addition, by September 26, 2015 Stan J. Caterbone had been granted Electronic Filing
Privileges in the local, state, and federal courts. This should alleviate the fraud and abuses of the
U.S. Postal Service and the computer hackers.
In 2015 Stan J. Caterbone identifies a trend that suggests that the Lancaster County
community-at-large was subject to either community targeting or community hypnosis.
The
community targeting theory is supported by experts Jullianne McKinney, Cheryl Welsh, and Dr.
John Hall. The community hypnosis theory is supported by direct personal relationships with the
Amazing Kreskin, Samuel P. Caterbone and Stan J. Caterbone.
In September of 2015 Stan J. Caterbone begins to digitize a library of approximately 45
audio cassette tapes from his father, Samuel P. Caterbone. The tapes range in date from 1971 to
1996. The tapes prove an identical targeting campaign against both Samuel P. Caterbone and
Stan J. Caterbone.
Caterbone, was most likely a target dating back to the early 1960's. In addition, the death of
Samuel P. Caterbone on July 20, 2001 was confirmed to be that of murder, not natural causes.
In the early 1990's Dr. Phillip Caterbone, brother, had been solicited by the National
Institute of Health, or NIH in Washington, D.C., for a fellowship to research and catalog a study to
find a genetic marker for depression in the CATERBONE family.
descendants and relatives of my father, Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., and took blood samples. I am
alleging that this was a deliberate act to continue the cover story of mental illness to distract and
provide plausible deniability for any linkage to U.S. Sponsored Mind Control.
Page 8 of 16
investigation into ISC was still ongoing. It is not known whether it has closed or not. All of these
activates constitute a RICO crime due to the pattern and organization of the perpetrators. The
pattern and source of the activities can be traced back to 1987, with subgroups changing over
time, but still engaging in the same practices. The following plan of action was followed in order
to perpetrate the cover-up:
Totally discredit Stanley J. Caterbone and any and all allegations in every way
possible.
Fabricate a history of mental illness.
Fabricate a criminal record.
Attach his character and honesty with rumors and propaganda.
Extort and maintain his net worth to $ zero or load him with debts.
Keep him out of any profession and or occupation when and where possible.
Totally isolate him and disenfranchise him from his friends, colleagues, and family.
Somehow persuade the community of Lancaster County to buy into this plan
Use bribery with sex, drugs, influence, career promotion, favors, etc.,
Always prohibit attorneys and anyone remotely involved with the legal community.
When attempts to enter the U.S. legal system arise, isolate, harass, and extort
any monies and/or possessions of value.
Change the history of events and the truth.
THE COURTS AND THE UNITED STATES LEGAL SYSTEM
For 18 years, (from 1987 until 2005) it has always been fairly easy to keep these issues
from court dockets and judges. During these years Stan J. Caterbone had solicited at least twenty
attorneys, some from large firms with national recognition in their respective fields of specialties.
Attorneys from New York City to Santa Barbara and San Diego California were visited and
consulted as well as a group of ex FBI agents who specialized in white collar crime that are now
globally recognized. However, the money and influence of persons and entities that wanted these
issues silence always prevailed. The issues were so complex and convoluted, and involved such
high profile politicians and U.S. agencies, it was far easier to state that there was no case, or their
were no claims that would result in remedy or redress. Between the Republican Party and the
Department of Defense, the CIA and the NSA, there was not an attorney that could not be
influenced. The obstruction of justice and due process in this case is most likely unprecedented in
Page 9 of 16
evidence and the cease and desist of obstruction of justice and due process. On May 16,
2005 at the Federal Courthouse in Philadelphia, Stan J. Caterbone filed the case under seal. One
week later in the United States Bankruptcy Court for Eastern Pennsylvania in Reading,
Pennsylvania, again appearing as pro se, Stan J. Caterbone filed a petition for protection under
the Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Code, in case no. 05-23059.
These acts of entering the United States legal system with these issues triggered yet
another round of attempts to keep these cases from the courts and judges - Organized Stalking
with Directed Energy Devices and Weapons, built on a foundation of mental telepathy or total
Mind Control.
Organized stalking and harassment began in 1987 following the public allegations of fraud
within ISC. This organized stalking and harassment was enough to drive an ordinary person to
suicide. As far back as the late 1980's Stan J. Caterbone knew that his mind was being read, or
"remotely viewed".
This was verified and confirmed when information only known to him, and
never written, spoken, or typed, was repeated by others. In 1998, while soliciting the counsel of
Philadelphia attorney Christina Rainville, (Rainville represented Lisa Michelle Lambert in the Laurie
Show murder case), someone introduced the term remote viewing through an email. That was
the last time it was an issue until 2005. The term was researched, but that was the extent of the
topic.
Remote Viewers may have attempted to connect in a more direct and continuous way
without success.
In 2005 the U.S. sponsored mind control turned into an all-out assault of mental telepathy;
synthetic telepathy; and pain and torture through the use of directed energy devices and weapons
that usually fire a low frequency electromagnetic energy at the targeted victim. This assault was
no coincidence in that it began simultaneously with the filing of the federal action in U.S. District
Court, or CATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison, et. al., or 05-cv-2288.
opposed to most other victims of this technology is that Stan J. Caterbone is connected 24/7 with
Page 10 of 16
a person who declares that she is Interscope recording artist Sheryl Crow of Kennett Missouri.
Stan J. Caterbone has spent 3 years trying to validate and confirm this person without success.
Most U.S. intelligence agencies refuse to cooperate, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation and
the U.S. Attorney's Office refuse to comment. See attached documents for more information.
In 2006 or the beginning of 2007 Stan J. Caterbone began his extensive research
into mental telepathy; mind control technologies; remote viewing; and the CIA mind
control program labeled MK ULTRA and it's subprograms.
Page 11 of 16
CAUSES OF ACTIONS
1. Thomas P. Caterbone, (Brother) had an unfortunate transaction at Fulton Bank
that set a course of action that resulted in an alleged suicide in KILL DEVIL
ISLAND, NORTH CAROLINA ON APRIL 29, 1996 JUST ONE WEEK AFTER THE
WEDDING OF OUR BROTHER MIKE AND MARIA CATERBONE.
BROTHER SAMMY DIED ON CHRISTMAS DAY OF 1984.
CONNECTION?
REMEMBER, MY
IS THERE AN ATHEIST
embezzled and extorted monies were most likely the reason for his suicide in 1996.
Fulton Bank was involved in a fraud that took $72,000 from a real estate settlement
closing and lead to his total financial ruin and collapse in June of 1995. The funds were
never recovered and Fulton Bank is a defendant for a wrongful death claim in the United
States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania in CATERBONE v. Lancaster
County Prison, et. al., 05-cv-2288. FULTON BANK triggered a severe and lethal death blow
to Thomas P. Caterbone, and as of this day has refused to acknowledge any wrongdoing or
remorse.
Catholic High School, Franklin and Marshall College, the Harrisburg Patriots, and even the
Philadelphia Eagles. Tom also coached football at J.P. McCaskey and Franklin and Marshall
College. Thomas P. Caterbone had a very successful lawn and landscaping business before
joining forces with John DePatto of United Financial Services and selling residential
mortgages. John DePatto was the former head of Parent Bank, owned by James Guerin
and ISC.
Parent Bank, owned by ISC also foreclosed on 2323 New Danville Pike,
On June 25, 1987, Financial Group Executives burglarized the PLAINTIFFs office and began
to extort the PLAINTIFF business interests in the Institutional Investors joint partnership.
Up to that point in time, the PLAINTIFF had developed a pipeline in excess of $100 million
in projects, a firm commitment for a satellite office in Hollywood, California, and a
commitment for a $5 million second mortgage on the Olde Hickory Properties, of Lancaster,
County. The PLAINTIFF was able to offer more attractive financing arrangements than that
of the local commercial lending institutions, including Fulton Bank and Commonwealth
Bank. Both banks would eventually engage in anti-trust violations.
3. In June of 1987, Jill Carson, a Fulton Bank Branch Manager libeled and slandered the
PLAINTIFF in notifying Mr. Chuck Smith, owner operator of Lancaster Aviation, the Plaintiff
was bankrupt and had no liquid funds, which was totally fabricated.
Page 12 of 16
infringement and at least until August 8, 1987, the PLAINTIFFs credit rating as reported by
the Lancaster Credit Bureau was perfect, with all creditors paid in full within 30 days, as
agreed.
customer, borrower, and a client in good standing with Fulton Bank, this amounts to
defamation of character, slander, wrongful interference with business relations, wrongful
interference with contracts, trespass to person, unfair competition, fraud, conspiracy,
embezzlement, breech of contract.
4. On October 14th, 2006 PLAINTIFF files a RICO complaint in the United States District Court
against Shawn Long, attorney for Fulton Bank, MDJ Leo Eckert, Commins, Simms, Case
No. 4650.
5. On October 26th, 2006
Page 13 of 16
charges by District Justice Leo H. Eckert Jr., a Defendant in U.S. District Civil Action 064650, scheduled for January 18th, 2007., again for not having access to all of his
evidentiary files and without transportation. PLAINTIFF files and sends his Brief to the
Superior Court of Pennsylvania Case No. 1463 MDA 2006 for the challenge to Fulton Banks
220 Stone Hill Road Foreclosure, via U.S. Postal Priority Mail Return Receipt No. 0306 2400
003 1072 4451; the request stated: Other - We need 7 copies of this brief, also all copies
need to be bound on the left like a book and if you use staples they must be covered with
tape. PLAINTIFF borrows $50.00 from Joseph Caterbone for food, paper, and postage for
the Superior Court Brief.
11.January 13th, 2007 PLAINTIFF visits the Red Rose Transit Authority Terminal at Queen
Street again attempting to get his January Monthly Bus Pass, which he thinks is missing in
the mail. PLAINTIFF borrows $20.00 from Richard Hobday, for food, postage, and paper;
and ride home from the Lancaster County Courthouse. PLAINTIFF receives a letter and a
Distribution Schedule from the Lancaster County Sheriffs Office that states:
On
December 20,2007 your property located at 220 Stone Hill Rd. was sold at Sheriff Sale to a
third party buyer, Central Penn Property Services, Inc. for $156,000.00. Attached, you will
find a Schedule of Distribution, which we are required to do. On this schedule you will see
that there is a balance of proceeds to be paid to you, Stanley J. Caterbone. You, the
defendant, will receive this balance of $17,306.80, however, you have served Sheriff
Bergman with a petition to set aside the sale (PARCP 3132). Please note that we, the
Sheriffs Office, do not have a dated and signed copy by the court of your petition. At the
advice of our solicitor, the distribution of any payouts regarding this property will not be
made until the matter is resolved. Fulton Bank and the Lancaster County Sheriffs
Department embezzle over $50,000 in Fees, Costs, and the Distribution of Sale associated
with the Sale Proceeds of 220 Stone Hill Road, Conestoga, PA.
The Praecipe-Writ of
Execution filed on July 31sth, 2006 by Fulton Bank for Foreclosure Case No. CI-06-02271
stated: FILED. WRIT ISSUED. AFFIDAVIT OF NON-MILITARY SERVICE. PRINCIPAL:
$88,568.53; INTEREST TO 03/02/2006 AT A RATE OF $14.56 PER DIEM: $4,442.96;
NEGATIVE ESCROW BALANCE: $1,096.38; LATE CHARGES: $317.20; ATTORNEYS' FEES:
$3,000.00; TOTAL: $97,425.07. FILED BY SHAWN M. LONG, ESQ. PLAINTIFF receives a
letter from the Superior Court of Pennsylvania regarding the Fulton Bank Foreclosure
Challenge, notifying him that AND NOW, this fourth day of January, 2007 the appeal in this
matter is DISMISSED for failure to file a brief.
considering that the Superior Court placed no time conditions on receiving the additional
(7) Copies and it was received several days AFTER PLAINTIFF had already mailed the
required (7) Copies and fulfilled the obligations to the Superior Court, thus furthering the
fact that Fulton Bank and the Sheriffs Office of Lancaster County held an illegal sale on
Page 14 of 16
December 20th, 2006. PLAINTIFF receives DENIED on an ORDER from Change of Venue
and Continuance for the Hearings for January 18th, 2007, signed by Judge Dennis Reinaker
of the Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County, Pennsylvania.
12.January 13th, 2007 PLAINTIFF visits the Red Rose Transit Authority Terminal at Queen
Street again attempting to get his January Monthly Bus Pass, which he thinks is missing in
the mail. PLAINTIFF borrows $20.00 from Richard Hobday, for food, postage, and paper;
and ride home from the Lancaster County Courthouse. PLAINTIFF receives a letter and a
Distribution Schedule from the Lancaster County Sheriffs Office that states:
On
December 20,2007 your property located at 220 Stone Hill Rd. was sold at Sheriff Sale to a
third party buyer, Central Penn Property Services, Inc. for $156,000.00. Attached, you will
find a Schedule of Distribution, which we are required to do. On this schedule you will see
that there is a balance of proceeds to be paid to you, Stanley J. Caterbone. You, the
defendant, will receive this balance of $17,306.80, however, you have served Sheriff
Bergman with a petition to set aside the sale (PARCP 3132). Please note that we, the
Sheriffs Office, do not have a dated and signed copy by the court of your petition. At the
advice of our solicitor, the distribution of any payouts regarding this property will not be
made until the matter is resolved. Fulton Bank and the Lancaster County Sheriffs
Department embezzle over $50,000 in Fees, Costs, and the Distribution of Sale associated
with the Sale Proceeds of 220 Stone Hill Road, Conestoga, PA.
The Praecipe-Writ of
Execution filed on July 31sth, 2006 by Fulton Bank for Foreclosure Case No. CI-06-02271
stated: FILED. WRIT ISSUED. AFFIDAVIT OF NON-MILITARY SERVICE. PRINCIPAL:
$88,568.53; INTEREST TO 03/02/2006 AT A RATE OF $14.56 PER DIEM: $4,442.96;
NEGATIVE ESCROW BALANCE: $1,096.38; LATE CHARGES: $317.20; ATTORNEYS' FEES:
$3,000.00; TOTAL: $97,425.07. FILED BY SHAWN M. LONG, ESQ. PLAINTIFF receives a
letter from the Superior Court of Pennsylvania regarding the Fulton Bank Foreclosure
Challenge, notifying him that AND NOW, this fourth day of January, 2007 the appeal in this
matter is DISMISSED for failure to file a brief.
considering that the Superior Court placed no time conditions on receiving the additional
(7) Copies and it was received several days AFTER PLAINTIFF had already mailed the
required (7) Copies and fulfilled the obligations to the Superior Court, thus furthering the
fact that Fulton Bank and the Sheriffs Office of Lancaster County held an illegal sale on
December 20th, 2006. PLAINTIFF receives DENIED on an ORDER from Change of Venue
and Continuance for the Hearings for January 18th, 2007, signed by Judge Dennis Reinaker
of the Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County, Pennsylvania.
13.The PLAINTIFF, Stanley J. Caterbone (CATERBONE), alleges that the City of Lancaster and
the
Lancaster
City
Bureau
of
Police
and
others
colluded
to
deliberately
ignore
Page 15 of 16
current and ongoing litigation and civil complaints against several major businesses and
government agencies with headquarters in the City of Lancaster and the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania. Those would include the Lancaster General Hospital; High Industries (Penn
Square Partners and the Lancaster County Convention Center); Fulton Bank and Fulton
Financial Corporation; Wachovia Bank branches; Lancaster Newspapers; the County of
Lancaster; the Lancaster County Prison; the Hotel Brunswick; James Street Investment
District; Aurora Films; Haverstick Films; and the Lancaster City Bureau of Police.
Page 16 of 16
CHAPTER
DIVIDER
Feds probe Fulton Bank, 3 others for possible fair-lending violations | Ins...
1 of 3
http://lancasteronline.com/insider/feds-probe-fulton-bank-others-for-poss...
Monday
Sunday November 7,
6, 2016
11/6/2016 11:17 PM
Feds probe Fulton Bank, 3 others for possible fair-lending violations | Ins...
2 of 3
http://lancasteronline.com/insider/feds-probe-fulton-bank-others-for-poss...
Monday
Sunday November 7,
6, 2016
11/6/2016 11:17 PM
1 of 3
http://lancasteronline.com/news/local/former-fulton-bank-manager-sente...
2 of 3
http://lancasteronline.com/news/local/former-fulton-bank-manager-sente...
3 of 3
http://lancasteronline.com/news/local/former-fulton-bank-manager-sente...
TD Ameritrade
1 of 2
https://invest.ameritrade.com/grid/p/site#r=home
Monday
Sunday November 7,
6, 2016
11/6/2016 11:31 PM
TD Ameritrade
https://invest.ameritrade.com/grid/p/site#r=balances
Monday
Sunday November 7,
6, 2016
11/6/2016 11:32 PM
TD Ameritrade
https://invest.ameritrade.com/grid/p/site#r=balances
Monday
Sunday November 7,
6, 2016
11/6/2016 11:32 PM
1 of 2
http://www.scsun-news.com/story/news/local/2016/10/30/plames-speaks...
SILVER CITY Ask anyone to describe a typical CIA agent, and youll get a furtive figure in a slouch hat and
raincoat, with a pale face from long nights in smoke-filled bars. What you wont expect is a blue-eyed blonde
with an engaging smile, multi-lingual with a couple of masters degrees. Valerie Plame will take you by surprise.
Plame appeared at Western New Mexico Universitys Light Hall Auditorium Thursday evening, October 27, to
Buy Photo
tell the story of her career in the Central Intelligence Agency and its abrupt ending following events surrounding
her husband, former Ambassador Joseph Wilson, during the years of President George W. Bushs Iraq War.
She also signed copies of her books: Fair Game and two recent spy novels.
My story is the story of power and of speaking truth to power, she began. Plame was recruited to the CIA in
the mid-1980s during the Reagan years as the agency set out to diversify its image and staff. She underwent rigorous training, some of it paramilitary,
and began a series of assignments overseas. The daughter of a retired Air Force officer, she had grown up loving the adventure of visiting foreign
cultures. Her social skills melded well with her work as an undercover agent, and she got good reviews.
Then, possibly because her cover had been compromised, Plame found herself back in Washington DC, which was where she met Wilson, a veteran of
embassy service in Africa and Iraq. Hed served as Ambassador in Baghdad at the outbreak of the first Gulf War, the last American to meet with Saddam
Hussein. Plame and Wilson fell in love, married, and had twins.
ADVERTISING
Plame rose through CIA administration. Her specialty in nuclear counter-proliferationlooking for evidence of weapons of mass destructioncame
center stage at the time of the 9/11 attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. But her downfall began when Joe Wilson agreed to take a
two-week trip to Niger, to investigate a rumor that Saddam was getting uranium materials from the poor African country. Despite his report that the rumor
was groundless, in January 2003 President Bush announced in his State of the Union address: The British Government has learned that Saddam
Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa. The assertion was echoed in a United Nations address by Secretary of State Colin
Powell two weeks later; and in March, 2003, the United States invaded Iraq.
Valerie and Joe were dismayed. What would you do? she asked rhetorically, when you have information that completely contradicts whats being said?
When Wilson published a New York Times op-ed article, What I Didnt Find in Iraq, on July 6, 2003, Republican leadership went into a tailspin. Attacking
Wilsons motives, on July 14, Washington Post columnist Robert Novak, a Bush cohort, took it upon himself to disclose the fact that Wilsons wife, Valerie
Plame, was a covert operative for the CIA.
Suddenly I knew that everything that was to come in my life would be different from what had come before, Plame recalled. She feared for the safety of
her children and for her undercover contacts in Europe. She regretted all that shed invested in her career. In 2006, following the conviction of Scooter
Libby, an aide to Vice President Dick Cheney, for disclosing her identity, Valerie Plame resigned from the CIA. The following year, she and Wilson left
Washington DC for a new home in Santa Fe.
In a way we were a sort of proxy for the growing unease the American people were feeling toward the war in Iraq, Plame reflected in Silver City. What
V. PLAME-JOE
FEDS
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
- November 6, 2016 Page 9
1 of 201
6
193
198
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
7,
6, 2016
10/31/2016 1:40 AM
2 of 2
http://www.scsun-news.com/story/news/local/2016/10/30/plames-speaks...
HAVE WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
kind of debate was there in the run-up to that war? Id say it was very muted. You must holdDO
yourI government
to account, at whatever
level. That is how
you keep your democracy healthy.
Today Plame continues her work to stop the spread of nuclear weapons through an organization, Global Zero (www.globalzero.org
(http://www.globalzero.org/)), and promotes a favorite documentary film, Countdown to Zero."
Read or Share this story: http://scsun.co/2eJwtJM
V. PLAME-JOE
FEDS
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
- November 6, 2016 Page
Page10
2 of
7
of198
193
201
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
7,
6, 2016
10/31/2016 1:40 AM
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Date
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO I1HAVE
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
Stanley J. Caterbone
Advanced Media Group
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
IN THE UNITED STATES THIRD CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS
_______________________________________________________________________________
Lisa Michelle Lambert
:
PETITIONER
:
:
v.
:
CASE NO. 3400-2015
:
:
Lynn Bissonnette, et al.,
:
RESPONDANT
:
:
Stanley J. Caterbone
APPELLANT
:
:
:
:
I hereby on this 13th day of November, 2015, submit for considerations in the above captioned case the
attached document as an EXHIBIT to be considered by the court in the deliberations of this case. This exhibit, like
the previous EXHIBITS is to help the Court understand the complexity of the APPELLANT'S legal odyssey and
journey through the federal court system and to restore credibility that was maliciously and purposefully eroded by
way of a complex and deceitful conspiracy that was no more than a means of diverting assets, intellectual property,
and future earnings from the APPELLANT beginning in 1987 and continuing to the present.
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016 Page
Page11
1 of
3
8
of198
191
193
201
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
Don Eberly will not challenge Smucker for 16th district | Local News | l...
Case: 15-3400
http://lancasteronline.com/news/local/don-eberly-will-not-challenge-sm...
Document: 003112129707
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016 Page
Page12
2 of
4
9
of198
191
193
201
1 of 3
Page:
Date
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO I2HAVE
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
11/13/2015 10:07 AM
Don Eberly will not challenge Smucker for 16th district | Local News | l...
Case: 15-3400
http://lancasteronline.com/news/local/don-eberly-will-not-challenge-sm...
Document: 003112129707
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016 Page
Page13
10
3 of
5
of193
191
198
201
2 of 3
Page:
Date
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO I3HAVE
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
11/13/2015 10:07 AM
Don Eberly will not challenge Smucker for 16th district | Local News | l...
Case: 15-3400
http://lancasteronline.com/news/local/don-eberly-will-not-challenge-sm...
Document: 003112129707
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016 Page
Page14
11
4 of
6
of193
191
198
201
3 of 3
Page:
Date
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO I4HAVE
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
11/13/2015 10:07 AM
CHAPTER
DIVIDER
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016 Page
Page15
12
5 of
7
of193
191
198
201
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Date
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO I5HAVE
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
Stan J. Caterbone
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
Stan J. Caterbone
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016 Page
Page16
13
6 of
8
of193
191
198
201
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
Case: 15-3400
http://lancasteronline.com/news/guess-who-came-to-the-wedding/article...
Document: 003112129707
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016 Page
Page17
14
7 of
9
of193
191
198
201
1 of 4
Page:
Date
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO I6HAVE
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
11/13/2015 9:59 AM
Case: 15-3400
http://lancasteronline.com/news/guess-who-came-to-the-wedding/article...
Document: 003112129707
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016 Page
Page18
10
15
8 of
of191
193
198
201
2 of 4
Page:
Date
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO I7HAVE
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
11/13/2015 9:59 AM
Case: 15-3400
http://lancasteronline.com/news/guess-who-came-to-the-wedding/article...
Document: 003112129707
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016 Page
Page19
11
16
9 of
of191
193
198
201
3 of 4
Page:
Date
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO I8HAVE
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
11/13/2015 9:59 AM
Case: 15-3400
http://lancasteronline.com/news/guess-who-came-to-the-wedding/article...
Document: 003112129707
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016 Page 20
10 of 201
12
17
191
193
198
4 of 4
Page:
Date
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO I9HAVE
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
11/13/2015 9:59 AM
1 of 2
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bobby_Ray_Inman
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO10
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
Bobby Ray Inman (born April 4, 1931) is a retired United States admiral who held several
influential positions in the U.S. Intelligence Community.
Contents
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Career
Nomination for Secretary of Defense
International Signal and Control (ISC) Scandal
Statements
See also
References
External links
Career
He served as Director of Naval Intelligence from September 1974 to July 1976, then moved to the
Defense Intelligence Agency where he served as Vice Director until 1977. He next became the
Director of the National Security Agency. Inman held this post until 1981. His last major position was
as the Deputy Director of Central Intelligence, a post he held from February 12, 1981 to June 10,
1982.
Inman has been influential in various advisory roles. Notably, he chaired a commission on improving
security at U.S. foreign installations after the Marine barracks bombing and the April 1983 US
Embassy bombing in Beirut, Lebanon. The commission's report has been influential in setting
security design standards for U.S. Embassies.
April 4, 1931
Rhonesboro, Texas
Born
Allegiance
United States
Service/branch
Years of service
19511982
Rank
Admiral
After retirement from the Navy, he was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the
Microelectronics and Computer Technology Corporation (MCC) in Austin, Texas for four years and
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Westmark Systems, Inc., a privately owned electronics industry holding company for three years. Admiral
Inman also served as Chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas from 1987 through 1990.
Admiral Inmans primary activity since 1990 has been investing in start-up technology companies, where he is a Managing Director of Gefinor Ventures and
Limestone Ventures. He is a member of the Board of Directors of Massey Energy Company and of several privately held companies. He serves as a Trustee of
the American Assembly and the California Institute of Technology. He is an elected Fellow of the National Academy of Public Administration.
President Clinton nominated him as Secretary of Defense, but he withdrew his nomination (see below).
Inman also was on the board of SAIC.[1]
Since 2001, Inman has held the LBJ Centennial Chair in National Policy at The University of Texas at Austin Lyndon B. Johnson School of Public Affairs, and
in 2005 and again in 2009 was the school's interim dean.[2] Inman graduated from Texas with a bachelor's in history in 1950.
Inman has also served on the Board of Directors of the Council on Foreign Relations, Dell Computer, SBC Corporation (now AT&T)[3] and Massey Energy.
In 2011 he became head of the board of directors of Xe Services, formerly Erik Prince's Blackwater and now known as Academi.[4] As of 2013, he sits on the
Board of Directors of Academi.[5]
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016 Page 21
11 of 201
13
18
191
193
198
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
11/13/2015 9:56 AM
2 of 2
Case: 15-3400
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bobby_Ray_Inman
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO11
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
desire to conceal his links to ISC. Inman was a member of the board of directors of the company, which was allegedly either negligent or approved illegal
exports.[5]
Originally called ESI (Electronic Systems International), the company manufactured sub-assemblies for the AGM-45 Shrike and RIM-7 Sea Sparrow missiles
in 1974, and just after the Vietnam war which was part of a standard arms contract for the US defense administration (DCAS). The company also had a
commercial repair facility of two meter portable amateur ("ham") radios from a company in New Jersey called Clegg,[2] and manufactured communications
helmet radios for firemen, and electronic outdoor bug zappers.
ISC was involved in two major indiscretions, for which CEO James Guerin received a 15-year prison sentence:
It defrauded and caused the collapse of the British company Ferranti, which acquired it in 1987.[3] It exported classified military technology to South Africa,
which was then forwarded to third countries, notably Iraq.
From 1984 to 1988, ISC sent South Africa more than $30 million in military-related equipment, including telemetry tracking antennae to collect data from
missiles in flight, gyroscopes for guidance systems, and photo-imaging film readers, all of which would form the "backbone" of a medium-range missile
system. Some of this technology was reportedly transferred to Iraq.[7] Another link to Iraq was the supply of the specifications for the Mk 20 Rockeye II cluster
bomb through Chilean defence company Carlos Cardoen, which was able to build an almost identical weapon that was subsequently used against coalition
forces in the Persian Gulf War of JanuaryFebruary 1991.[8]
Statements
In 2006, Inman criticized the Bush administration's use of warrantless domestic wiretaps, making him one of the highest-ranking former intelligence officials to
criticize the program in public.[9][10]
See also
References
1. James Bamford, The Shadow Factory, Doubleday, 2008, p201
2. Lyndon B. Johnson School of Public Affairs. Biography of Bobby R. Inman (https://www.utexas.edu/lbj/directory/faculty/bobby-inman), retrieved 2015-06-14.
3. Pletz, John. "Michael Dell's view from the top", (http://www.statesman.com/business/content/business/stories/archive/0502dell.html) Austin American-Statesman, 2004
May 2.
4. Former Blackwater Security Firm Gets New Leaders in Image Makeover (http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/03/09/blackwater-security-firm-gets-new-leadersimage-makeover/) By Justin Fishel March 09, 2011, foxnews.com
5. Academi Board of Directors (http://academi.com/pages/about-us/board-of-directors)
6. Bobby Inman Withdrawal Press Conference (http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/53874-1)
7. http://www.nytimes.com/1993/12/23/opinion/essay-cold-comfort-level.html William Safire column on December 23, 1993
8. Adm. Inman Asks Clinton To Withdraw Nomination - The Tech (http://tech.mit.edu/V113/N66/inman.66w.html)
9. Shachtman, Noah. "Ex-NSA Chief Assails Bush Taps (http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/news/2006/05/70855)", Wired News, 2006 May 9.
10. "Ex-NSA Head Bobby R. Inman on the National Security Agencys Domestic Surveillance Program: This Activity Was Not Authorized (http://www.democracynow.org
/article.pl?sid=06/05/17/159213)", www.democracynow.org, 2006 May 17.
External links
Biography of Bobby R. Inman (http://www.fas.org/irp/news/1993/931216i.htm)FAS.org
University of Texas Biography (http://www.utexas.edu/lbj/faculty/bobby-inman/)
Government offices
Preceded by
Lew Allen, Jr.
Succeeded by
Lincoln D. Faurer
Preceded by
Frank Charles Carlucci III
Succeeded by
John N. McMahon
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016 Page 22
12 of 201
14
19
191
193
198
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
11/13/2015 9:56 AM
CHAPTER
DIVIDER
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016 Page 23
13 of 201
15
20
191
193
198
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO12
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com
mailto:amgroup01@msn.com
Blog: http://advancedmediagroup.wordpress.com/
Research Blog: www.advancedmediagroupresearch.wordpress.com
Video Biography at: http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=advancedmediagroup
Stanley J. Caterbone
Advanced Media Group
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
December 3, 2007
R. Scott Smith
Chairman, President
And Chief Executive Officer
Fulton Financial Corporation
One Penn Square
P.O. Box 4887
Lancaster, Pennsylvania 17604
Re:
Black Budget Identities of the United States Government regarding Covert Activates & Mind Control
Rufus Fulton, Former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer & Department of Defense
Caterbone v. Fulton Bank litigation
Federal False Claims Act Complaint re International Signal & Control (ISC) of Lancaster, PA
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016 Page 24
14 of 201
16
21
191
193
198
Advanced Media Group
Page 1 of 2
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
December 3, 2007
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO13
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
The problem is the involvement of the Department of Defense, Mr. Rufus Fultons past affiliation and
possible influence, my allegations and civil complaints against Fulton Bank, and my telepathic abilities and
remote viewing1.
For some time I have been trying to identify groups and or agencies that may have remotely trained
me. I have written to and personally visited the office of Senator Arlen Specter2, the Federal Bureau of
Investigation3, the Senate Select Committee for Intelligence4, and corresponded with the Defense Advanced
for Research Projects Agency5, and the Central Intelligence Agency6 with the hopes of finding some answers.
However they have proved fruitless.
See the attached research document dated Thursday, November 29, 2007, titled THE SHADOW
GOVERNMENT: ITS IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS, by Richard J. Boylan, Ph.D7; it is a report that
identifies organizations, agencies, and companies that are directly involved with mental telepathy and
remote viewing, most of which operate under the direction and funding of the Department of Defense. I
have just recently discovered this document on Friday, November 30, 2007 and found it most disturbing
after having to watch the Rufus Fulton interview the prior week. Pay particular attention to the items in
red highlight.
Your Board of Directors and the Securities and Exchange Commission should be and will be alerted to
this discovery. I wish you would reconsider your letter of November 14, 2007 and your position no to meet
with me personally to discuss some of these issues. I believe it will be in your best interest to stay ahead of
this information. A civil and criminal conspiracy allegation that involves this information will have dire
consequences to your major stakeholders and your shareholders.
As a courtesy I will promise to give you until the end of this week, December 7, 2007 to review this
material and perform any due diligence that you seem worthy; and communicate a response. After that
time, I will take it upon myself to disclose this information as it pertains to Fulton Bank and Fulton Financial
Corporation to the Securities and Exchange Commission, and others that will help protect my interests and
the interests of the Advanced Media Group and my litigation v. Fulton Bank.
Respectfully,
See attached research document titled On the Need for New Criteria of Diagnosis of Psychosis in the Light of Mind Invasive Technology
By Carole Smith Global Research, October 18, 2007; Journal of Psycho-Social Studies, 2003.
2
See attached letter dated July 12, 2007 from Stan J. Caterbone/Advanced Media Group to Senator Arlen Specter of the Senate Judiciary
Committee. Senator Arlen Specter was visited on May 17, 2006.
3
See the attached letter dated July 16, 2007 from Stan J. Caterbone/Advanced Media Group to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI).
The meeting at the FBI Philadelphia Field Office took place on October 24, 2007, and the FBI Harrisburg Field Office was visited on May
17, 2006.
4
The Senate Select Intelligence Committee office was visited on May 17, 2006
5
See attached email dated February 26, 2007 regarding mental telepathy and mind control to the Defense Advanced Research Projects
Agency (DARPA).
6
See the attached email confirmation from the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA).
7
See the attached research document dated Thursday, November 29, 2007, titled THE SHADOW GOVERNMENT: ITS IDENTIFICATION
AND ANALYSIS, by Richard J. Boylan, Ph.D..
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016 Page 25
15 of 201
17
22
191
193
198
Advanced Media Group
Page 2 of 2
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
December 3, 2007
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO14
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
CORPORATION
I am Deputy General Counsel for Fulton Financial Corporation ("FFC"), and I am writing
to you at the request of Fulton Bank, a wholly-owned subsidiary of FFC. Mr. E. Philip Wenger,
President and Chief Operating Officer of Fulton Bank referred your letter dated February 21,
2005 to me for review and rcsponsc.
As I understand your inquiry, it concerns a check which your deceased brother, Thomas
P. Caterbone, attempted to deposit to an account he maintained at Fulton Bank. Subsequent to
your original letter, you provided a copy of the front side of the check in question. The check
was drawn on Fulton Bank by Abstract United, Inc., and was payable to Country Funding. The
check was dated May 16,2005 and was payable in the amount of $70,285.00. The face of the
check has been conspicuously stamped "Account Frozen." I understand that Country Funding
was a trade name under which your deceased brother operated as a sole proprietor. You have
indicated that Fulton Bank declined to accept the check for deposit on multiple occasions.
Fulton Bank has conducted research concerning the check, to determine whether any
information exists concerning its original processing. Unfortunately, because of the passage of
nearly ten yexs since this check was issued, Fu!tan Bank no longer maintains aiiy transaction
records for the account on which the check was drawn. Fulton Bank's general account records
do, however, indicate that the account on which the check was drawn was closed on June 2,
1995.
Since there are no transaction records concerning the actual processing of the check, I
will confine my response to general provisions applicable to items presented for deposit to a
Fulton Bank deposit account. Fulton Bank's deposit accounts are subject to Fulton Bank's Rules
and Regulations for Deposit Accounts. I have enclosed with this letter a copy of the Rules,
which would have been in effect during 1995. The last sentence of the first paragraph of Section
1 (Deposit Accounts) provides that Fulton Bank "may at any time refuse any deposit, limit the
amount which may be deposited, return all or any part of any deposit, or may close your account,
with interest, if any, to the date of closing of such account." Again, Fulton Bank has no means to
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016 Page 26
16 of 201
18
23
191
193
198
Advanced Media Group
Page 1 of 3
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO15
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016 Page 27
17 of 201
19
24
191
193
198
Advanced Media Group
Page 2 of 3
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO16
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016 Page 28
18 of 201
20
25
191
193
198
Advanced Media Group
Page 3 of 3
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO17
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
amgroup01@msn.com
http://www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com/
Blog: http://advancedmediagroup.wordpress.com/
Research Blog: www.advancedmediagroupresearch.wordpress.com
Video Biography at: http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=advancedmediagroup
Page 1 of 14
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
January 25, 2008
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO18
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
files on the subject matter. I did not provide any detailed summary of the requested allegations, but
merely sent them raw data in case I was unable to deliver a summary and detail of my allegations.
Before I submit my allegations in writing, as requested, I would like an opinion from a qualified
class action attorney that may be interested in these matters. Of course, with your spectacular record as
a class action litigant, I would like to meet with you to discuss my options. Also attached is a letter from
Ms. Stephanie Carfley, of Barley Snyder, LLC, the Fulton attorney involved in these matters, stating and
answering my question of conflict regarding her past employment with your firm, RodaNast, P.C. and Joe.
Would you please contact me at your earliest convenience regarding these matters? I apologize
for the lateness in contacting you, however my own litigation schedule has been quite extensive.
Stan J. Caterbone
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se
Advanced Media Group
Enclosures
Cc: Stephanie Carfley, Barely Snyder, LLC.
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016 Page 30
20 of 201
22
27
191
193
198
Advanced Media Group
Page 2 of 14
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
January 25, 2008
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO19
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016 Page 31
21 of 201
23
28
191
193
198
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO20
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016 Page 32
22 of 201
24
29
191
193
198
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO21
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016 Page 33
23 of 201
25
30
191
193
198
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016
Case: 15-3400
Page 34
24 of 201
26
31
191
193
198
Document: 003112129707
Page: 22
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 20,
31,
6,
7, 2016
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO23
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016 Page 35
25 of 201
27
32
191
193
198
Advanced Media Group
Page 3 of 14
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
January 25, 2008
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO24
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
January 8, 2008
Stanley J. Caterbone
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
Re:
Page 4 of 14
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
January 25, 2008
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO25
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
January 8, 2008
Page 2
Finally, you indicate in your letter that you will provide the documentation addressed in
the Ethics Point Report, and in the letters to Fulton. In order to most efficiently and effectively
investigate your allegations, at your earliest convenience, kindly advise as to whether or not the
"evidence of negligence, incompetence, and possible criminal conduct" you mention in your
letter is the same evidence supporting the claims of "misconduct or inappropriate behavior"
made in your Ethics Point Report.
Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation with regard to the above. Should
you have any questions, please let me know.
Very truly yours,
Stephanie Garftey
SC/SC:2145342.1
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016 Page 37
27 of 201
29
34
191
193
198
Advanced Media Group
Page 5 of 14
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
January 25, 2008
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO26
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
amgroup01@msn.com
http://www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com/
Blog: http://advancedmediagroup.wordpress.com/
Research Blog: www.advancedmediagroupresearch.wordpress.com
Video Biography at: http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=advancedmediagroup
January 1, 2008
Ms. Stephanie Carfley
Barley Snyder LLC
126 East King Street
Lancaster, PA 17602
Re:
Letter of December 28, 2007 re: Letter to Board of Directors and Ethics Point Report
Page 6 of 14
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
January 25, 2008
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO27
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
I will provide the documentation that I addressed in the Ethics Point Report, and in the letters to Fulton
Financial Corporation. It just will not be within the next 2 weeks.
I would like Fulton Corporation to provide a letter authorizing Barley Snyder, LLC to negotiate the terms
and conditions of addressing your demands in the letter of December 28, 2007, and with whom they
would like to represent them, outside of Barley Snyder, LLC.
Respectfully,
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016 Page 39
29 of 201
31
36
191
193
198
Advanced Media Group
Page 7 of 14
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
January 25, 2008
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO28
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
E-mail: scarfley@barley.com
December 28,2007
Stanley J. Caterbone
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
Re:
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016 Page 40
30 of 201
32
37
191
193
198
Advanced Media Group
Page 8 of 14
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
6, 2016
7,
January 25, 2008
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO29
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016 Page 41
31 of 201
33
38
191
193
198
Advanced Media Group
Page 9 of 14
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
January 25, 2008
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO30
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com
mailto:amgroup01@msn.com
Blog: http://advancedmediagroup.wordpress.com/
Research Blog: www.advancedmediagroupresearch.wordpress.com
Video Biography at: http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=advancedmediagroup
Stanley J. Caterbone
Advanced Media Group
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
Formal request for the resignation of R. Scott Smith, Chairman, and Chief Executive Officer
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016 Page 42
32 of 201
34
39
191
193
198
Advanced Media Group
Page 10 of 14
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
January 25, 2008
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Date
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO31
I HAVE
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
R. Scon SMITH,JR.
CHAIRMAN
CHIEFEx=
November 14,2007
-A
AND ~ S I D M
Thank you for taking a few moments to introduce yourself yesterday, as we passed on
the sidewalk. At the time of our m d g , I did not inmmdately recall in what
connection I recognized your name. Upon returning to my oBce, I realized that we had
previously corresponded on several subjects, and that you have filed a number of
lawsuits against Fulton Bank, some of which are still pending.
Unfortunately, given that you are actively engaged in litigation against Fulton Bank, I
will not be able to acummodate your request to schedule a meeting with me. If you
have any matters that you wish to communicate, please direct them to our counsel:
Stephanie Catfley
Barley Snyder, LLC
126 East King Street
Lmcaster, PA 17602
Thank you for complying with our communicationpreference.
R. S ~ tSmith,
t
Jr.
Cbabnm, President and
Chief Executive Officer
.1
cc:
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016 Page 43
33 of 201
35
40
191
193
198
Advanced Media Group
Page 11 of 14
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
6, 2016
7,
January 25, 2008
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO32
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016 Page 44
34 of 201
36
41
191
193
198
Advanced Media Group
Page 12 of 14
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
January 25, 2008
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO33
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
13-Dec-07 07:10 pm
"We dissatisfied shareholders need to collectively collaborate and formerly propose a management
plan to the Board of Directors.
This process will accomplish several tactics toward getting the Board of Directors to listen to our
concerns. First, it will be recorded. Secondly, when and if they violate our shareholder rights, they
can be held accountable. Thirdly, it will provide all participants with a benchmark for future
litigation against the present management if they are found negligent in their respective duties. This
could include performance issues and a decline in shareholder value.
If you want to study and research how this is done, review articles about Carl Ichan. He is often
viewed as an adversary until a comparison of his proposals with future results proves that he
proposed alternatives that would have succeeded in increasing shareholder value. He will often put
the Board of Directors in a position of being greenmailed.
advancedmed...
47/Male
Lancaster, ...
View Messages
Report Abuse
www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com
Advanced Media Group"
Rating :
(1 Rating)
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016 Page 45
35 of 201
37
42
191
193
198
Advanced Media Group
Page 13 of 14
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
January 25, 2008
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO34
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
14-Dec-07 10:48 am
First of all thank you for sending your letter to the BOD. I personally don't think you will get a
response as I have also sent many letters to R. Scott Smith and did not receive any response. Personally
I would like to bring a law suit against every BOD and R. Scott Smith. I would be more than willing to
contribute a few thousand dollars to make it happen. I also know a few other large shareholders that are
willing to contribute. As you know that untill someone stops this "Little Boys Club" in Lancaster our
stock will continue to decline. They must and will be stopped if I have anything to do with it. Looking
forward to your response.
P.S. Your right on the money with your charge of negligence and incompetence which also includes
the boaard members. Thanks much
Rating :
(No ratings)
Rate it:
1 star + unrated
View
Messages
Ignore User
Report Abuse
5 stars
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016 Page 46
36 of 201
38
43
191
193
198
Advanced Media Group
who36juliet...
Page 14 of 14
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
January 25, 2008
CHAPTER
DIVIDER
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016 Page 47
37 of 201
39
44
191
193
198
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO35
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
The calculated and technological entry into another persons mind is an act of monumental
barbarism which obliterates perhaps with the twiddling of a dial the history and civilisation
of mans mental development. It is more than an abuse of human rights,
it is the destruction of meaning.
For any one who is forced into the hell of living with an unseen mental rapist, the effort to stay
sane is beyond the scope of tolerable endurance. The imaginative capacity of the ordinary
mind cannot encompass the horror of it.
We have attempted to come to terms with the experiments of the Nazis in concentration
camps. We now have the prospect of systematic control authorised by men who issue
instructions through satellite communications for the destruction of societies while they are
driving new Jaguars and Mercedes, and going to the opera.
By Carol Smith
On the Need for New Criteria of Diagnosis of Psychosis in the Light of Mind Invasive Technology
Global Research
October 18, 2007
Page 1 of 13
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO36
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
the progress of the patient in terms of the reduction of the number of carrier bags. It is too often difficult
to believe, however, when hearing the history of a life, that the schizophrenic was not suffering the
effects of having been made, consciously and unconsciously, the carefully concealed carrier of the ills of
the family.
For someone who felt his mind was going to pieces, to be put into the stressful situation of the psychiatric
examination, even when the psychiatrist acquitted himself with kindness, the situation of the assessment
procedure itself, can be an effective way to drive someone crazy, or more crazy. (Laing, 1985, p 17).
But if the accounting of bizarre experiences more or less guaranteed you a new label or a trip to the
psychiatric ward, there is even more reason for a new group of people to be outraged about how their
symptoms are being diagnosed. A doubly cruel sentence is being imposed on people who are the victims
of the most appalling abuse by scientific-military experiments, and a totally uncomprehending society is
indifferent to their evidence. For the development of a new class of weaponry now has the capability of
entering the brain and mind and body of another person by technological means.
Harnessing neuroscience to military capability, this technology is the result of decades of research and
experimentation, most particularly in the Soviet Union and the United States. (Welsh, 1997, 2000) We
have failed to comprehend that the result of the technology that originated in the years of the arms race
between the Soviet Union and the West, has resulted in using satellite technology not only for surveillance
and communication systems but also to lock on to human beings, manipulating brain frequencies by
directing laser beams, neural-particle beams, electro-magnetic radiation, sonar waves, radiofrequency
radiation (RFR), soliton waves, torsion fields and by use of these or other energy fields which form the
areas of study for astro-physics. Since the operations are characterised by secrecy, it seems inevitable
that the methods that we do know about, that is, the exploitation of the ionosphere, our natural shield,
are already outdated as we begin to grasp the implications of their use. The patents deriving from Bernard
J. Eastlunds work provide the ability to put unprecedented amounts of power in the Earths atmosphere at
strategic locations and to maintain the power injection level, particularly if random pulsing is employed, in
a manner far more precise and better controlled than accomplished by the prior art, the detonation of
nuclear devices at various yields and various altitudes. (ref High Frequency Active Auroral Research
Project, HAARP).
Some patents, now owned by Raytheon, describe how to make nuclear sized explosions without
radiation and describe power beam systems, electromagnetic pulses and over-the-horizon detection
systems. A more disturbing use is the system developed for manipulating and disturbing the human
mental process using pulsed radio frequency radiation (RFR), and their use as a device for causing
negative effects on human health and thinking. The victim, the innocent civilian target is locked on to, and
unable to evade the menace by moving around. The beam is administered from space. The Haarp facility
as military technology could be used to broadcast global mind-control, as a system for manipulating and
disturbing the human mental process using pulsed radio frequency (RFR). The super-powerful radio waves
are beamed to the ionosphere, heating those areas, thereby lifting them. The electromagnetic waves
bounce back to the earth and penetrate human tissue.
Dr Igor Smirnov, of the Institute of Psycho-Correction in Moscow, says: It is easily conceivable that some
Russian Satan, or lets say Iranian or any other Satan, as long as he owns the appropriate means and
finances, can inject himself into every conceivable computer network, into every conceivable radio or
television broadcast, with relative technological ease, even without disconnecting cablesand intercept the
radio waves in the ether and modulate every conceivable suggestion into it. This is why such technology is
rightfully feared.(German TV documentary, 1998).
If we were concerned before about diagnostic criteria being imposed according to the classification of
recognizable symptoms, we have reason now to submit them to even harsher scrutiny. The development
over the last decades since the Cold War arms race has included as a major strategic category, psychoelectronic weaponry, the ultimate aim of which is to enter the brain and mind. Unannounced, undebated
and largely unacknowledged by scientists or by the governments who employ them technology to enter
and control minds from a distance has been unleashed upon us. The only witnesses who are speaking
about this terrible technology with its appalling implications for the future, are the victims themselves
and those who are given the task of diagnosing mental illness are attempting to silence them by
classifying their evidence and accounts as the symptoms of schizophrenia, while the dispensers of psychic
mutilation and programmed pain continue with their work, aided and unopposed.
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016 Page 49
39 of 201
41
46
191
193
198
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
By Carole Smith of Global Research
Page 2 of 13
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO37
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
If it was always crucial, under the threat of psychiatric sectioning, to carefully screen out any sign of
confused speech, negativity, coldness, suspicion, bizarre thoughts, sixth sense, telepathy, premonitions,
but above all the sense that others can feel my feelings, and that someone seemed to be keeping up a
running commentary on your thoughts and behaviour, then reporting these to a psychiatrist, or anyone
else for that matter who was not of a mind to believe that such things as mind-control could exist, would
be the end of your claim to sanity and probably your freedom. For one of the salient characteristics of
mind-control is the running commentary, which replicates so exactly, and surely not without design, the
symptoms of schizophrenia. Part of the effort is to remind the victim that they are constantly under
control or surveillance. Programmes vary, but common forms of reminders are electronic prods and
nudges, body noises, twinges and cramps to all parts of the body, increasing heart beats, applying
pressures to internal organs all with a personally codified system of comments on thoughts and events,
designed to create stress, panic and desperation. This is mind control at its most benign. There is reason
to fear the use of beamed energy to deliver lethal assaults on humans, including cardiac arrest, and
bleeding in the brain.
It is the government system of secrecy, which has facilitated this appalling prospect. There have been
warning voices. the government secrecy system as a whole is among the most poisonous legacies of
the Cold War the Cold War secrecy (which) also mandate(s) Active Deceptiona security manual for
special access programs authorizing contractors to employ cover stories to disguise their activities. The
only condition is that cover stories must be believable. (Aftergood & Rosenberg, 1994; Bulletin of Atomic
Scientist). Paranoia has been aided and abetted by government intelligence agencies.
In the United Kingdom the fortifications against any disturbing glimmer of awareness of such actual or
potential outrages against human rights and social and political abuses seem to be cast in concrete.
Complete with crenellations, ramparts and parapets, the stronghold of nescience reigns supreme. To
borrow Her Majesty the Queens recent observation: There are forces at work of which we are not
aware. One cannot say that there is no British Intelligence on the matter, as it is quite unfeasible that
the existence of the technology is not classified information. Indeed it is a widely held belief that the
women protesting against the presence of cruise missiles at Greenham Common were victims of electromagnetic radiation at gigahertz frequency by directed energy weapons, and that their symptoms,
including cancer, were consistent with such radiation effects as reported by Dr Robert Becker who has
been a constantly warning voice against the perils of electro-magnetic radiation. The work of Allen Frey
suggests that we should consider radiation effects as a grave hazard producing increased permeability of
the blood-brain barrier, and weakening crucial defenses of the central nervous system against toxins.
(Becker, 1985, p. 286). Dr Becker has written about nuclear magnetic resonance as a familiar tool in
medecine known as magnetic resonance imaging or MRI. Calcium efflux is the result of cyclotronic
resonance which latter can be explained thus: If a charged particle or ion is exposed to a steady magnetic
field in space, it will begin to go into a circular or orbital, motion at right angles to the applied magnetic
field.The speed with which it orbits will be determined by the ratio between the charge and the mass of
the particle and by the strength of the magnetic field. (Becker, 1990,p.235) The implications of this for
wide scale aggression by using a combination of radar based energy and the use of nuclear resonating are
beyond the scope of the writer, but appear to be worth the very serious consideration of physicists in
assessing how they might be used against human beings.
Amongst medical circles, however, it has so far not been possible for the writer to find a neuroscientist,
neurologist or a psychiatrist, nor for that matter, a general medical practitioner, who acknowledges even
the potential for technological manipulation of the nervous system as a problem requiring their
professional interest. There has been exactly this response from some of Englands most eminent
practitioners of the legal profession, not surprisingly, because the information about such technology is
not made available to them. They would refer anyone attempting to communicate mind- harassment as a
psychiatric problem, ignoring the crime that is being committed.
The aim here is not to attempt a comprehensive history and development of the technology of mind
control. These very considerable tasks - which have to be done under circumstances of the most extreme
difficulty - have been addressed with clarity and courage by others, who live with constant harm and
threats, not least of all contemptuous labelling. Their work can be readily accessed on the internet
references given at the end of this paper. For a well-researched outline of the historical development of
electro-magnetic technology the reader should refer to the timeline of dates and electromagnetic weapon
development by Cheryl Welsh, president of Citizens against Human Rights Abuse. (Welsh 1997; 2001).
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016 Page 50
40 of 201
42
47
191
193
198
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
By Carole Smith of Global Research
Page 3 of 13
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO38
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
There are at least one and a half thousand people worldwide who state they are being targeted. Mojmir
Babacek, now domiciled in his native Czech Republic, after eight years of residence in the United States in
the eighties, has made a painstakingly meticulous review of the technology, and continues his research.
(Babacek 1998, 2002)
We are concerned here with reinforcing in the strongest possible terms:
i) The need for such abuses to human rights and the threats to democracy to be called to consciousness,
and without further delay.
ii) To analyse the reasons why people might defend themselves from becoming conscious of the existence
of such threats.
iii) To address the urgent need for intelligence, imagination, and information
compassion - in dealing with the victims of persecution from this technology, and
- not to mention
iv) To alert a sleeping society, to the imminent threats to their freedom from the threat from fascist and
covert operations who have in all probability gained control of potentially lethal weaponry of the type we
are
describing.
It is necessary to emphasise that at present there is not even the means for victims to gain medical
attention for the effects of radiation from this targeting. Denied the respect of credulity of being used as
human guinea pigs, driven to suicide by the breakdown of their lives, they are treated as insane at best
regarded as sad cases. Since the presence of a permanent other in ones mind and body is by definition
an act of the most intolerable cruelty, people who are forced to bear it but who refuse to be broken by it,
have no other option than to turn themselves into activists, their lives consumed by the battle against
such atrocities, their energies directed to alerting and informing the public of things they dont want to
hear
or
understand
about
evil
forces
at
work
in
their
society.
It is necessary, at this point, to briefly outline a few one might say the precious few attempts by public
servants
to
verify
the
existence
and
dangers
inherent
in
this
field:
In January 1998, an annual public meeting of the French National Bioethics Committee was held in
Paris. Its chairman, Jean-Pierre Changeux, a neuroscientist at the Institut Pasteur in Paris, told the
meeting that advances in cerebral imaging make the scope for invasion of privacy immense.
Although the equipment needed is still highly specialized, it will become commonplace and capable
of being used at a distance. That will open the way for abuses such as invasion of personal liberty,
control of behaviour and brainwashing. These are far from being science-fiction concernsand
constitute a serious risk to society. (Nature. Vol 391, 1998.
In January 1999, the European Parliament passed a resolution where it calls for an international
convention introducing a global ban on all development and deployment of weapons which might
enable any form of manipulation of human beings. It is our conviction that this ban can not be
implemented without the global pressure of the informed general public on the governments. Our
major objective is to get across to the general public the real threat which these weapons
represent for human rights and democracy and to apply pressure on the governments and
parliaments around the world to enact legislature which would prohibit the use of these devices to
both
government
and
private
organisations
as
well
as
individuals.
(Plenary
sessions/Europarliament, 1999)
Page 4 of 13
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO39
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
no mention in the revised bill of any of the aforementioned mind-invasive weaponry, nor of the use
of satellite or radar or other energy based technology for deploying or developing technology
designed for deployment against the minds of human beings. (Space Preservation Act, 2002)
In reviewing the development of the art of mind-invasive technology there are a few outstanding
achievements to note:
In 1969 Dr Jose Delgado, a Yale psychologist, published a book: Physical Control of the Mind: Towards a
Psychocivilized Society. In essence, he displayed in practical demonstrations how, by means of electrical
stimulation of the brain which had been mapped out in its relations between different points and activities,
functions and sensations, - by means of electrical stimulation, how the rhythm of breathing and
heartbeat could be changed, as well as the function of most of the viscera, and gall bladder secretion.
Frowning, opening and closing of eyes and mouth, chewing, yawning, sleep, dizziness, epileptic seizures in
healthy persons were induced. The intensity of feelings could be controlled by turning the knob, which
controlled the intensity of the electric current. He states at the end of his book the hope that the new
power will remain limited to scientists or some charitable elite for the benefit of a psychocivilized society.
In the 1980s the neuromagnetometer was developed which functions as an antenna and could monitor
the patterns emerging from the brain. (In the seventies the scientists had discovered that electromagnetic
pulses enabled the brain to be stimulated through the skull and other tissues, so there was no more need
to implant electrodes in the brain). The antenna, combined with the computer, could localize the points in
the brain where the brain events occur. The whole product is called the magnetoencephalograph.
In January 2000 the Lockheed Martin neuroengineer Dr John D. Norseen, was quoted (US News and World
Report, 2000) as hoping to turn the electrohypnomentalaphone, a mind reading machine, into science
fact. Dr Norseen, a former Navy pilot, claims his interest in the brain stemmed from reading a Soviet book
in the 1980s claiming that research on the mind would revolutionize the military and society at large. By
a process of deciphering the brains electrical activity, electromagnetic pulsations would trigger the release
of the brains own transmitters to fight off disease, enhance learning, or alter the minds visual images,
creating a synthetic reality. By this process of BioFusion, (Lockheed Martin, 2000) information is placed
in a database, and a composite model of the brain is created. By viewing a brain scan recorded by
(functional) magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) machine, scientists can tell what the person was doing at
the time of recording say reading or writing, or recognise emotions from love to hate. If this research
pans out, says Norseen, you can begin to manipulate what someone is thinking even before they know
it. But Norseen says he is agnostic on the moral ramifications, that hes not a mad scientist just a
dedicated one. The ethics dont concern me, he says, but they should concern someone else.
The next big thing looks like being something which we might refer to as a neurocomputer but it need
not resemble a laptop it may be reducible to whatever size is convenient for use, such as a small mobile
phone. Arising from a break-through and exploitation of PSI-phenomena, it may be modelled on the
nervous-psychic activity of the brain that is, as an unbalanced, unstable system of neurotransmitters
and interacting neurones, the work having been derived from the creation of a copy of a living brain
accessed by chance, and ESP and worked on by design.
On receiving a communication from the writer on the feasibility of a machine being on the horizon which,
based on the project of collecting electromagnetic waves emanating from the brain and transmitting them
into another brain that would read a persons thoughts, or using the same procedure in order to impose
somebody elses thoughts on another brain and in this way direct his actions there was an unequivocal
answer from IBM at executive level that there was no existing technology to create such a computer in the
foreseeable future. This is at some variance with the locating of a patent numbered 03951134 on the
Internet pages of IBM Intellectual Property Network for a device, described in the patent, as capable of
picking up at a distance the brain waves of a person, process them by computer and emit correcting
waves which will change the original brain waves. Similar letters addressed to each of the four top
executives of Apple Inc., in four individual letters marked for their personal attention, produced absolutely
no response. This included the ex- Vice President of the United States, Mr Al Gore, newly elected to the
Board of Directors of Apple.
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016 Page 52
42 of 201
44
49
191
193
198
By Carole Smith of Global Research
Page 5 of 13
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
October 18, 2007
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO40
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
Enough people have been sufficiently concerned by the reports of victims of mind control abuse to
organise The Geneva Forum, in 2002, held as a joint initiative of the Quaker United Nations Office,
Geneva; the United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research; the International Committee of the Red
cross, and the Human Rights Watch (USA), and Citizens against Human Rights Abuses (CAHRA); and the
Programme for Strategic and International Security Studies, which was represented by the Professor and
Senior Lecturer from the Department of Peace Studies at the University of Bradford.
In England, on May 25, 1995, the Guardian newspaper in the U.K. carried an article based on a report by
Nic Lewer, the peace researcher from Bradford University, which listed more than 30 different lines of
research into new age weaponssome of the research sounds even less rational. There are, according to
Lewer, plans for pulsed microwave beams to destroy enemy electronics, and separate plans for very-lowfrequency sound beams to induce vomiting, bowel spasm, epileptic seizures and also crumble masonry.
Further, the article states, There are plans for mind control with the use of 'psycho-correction messages
transmitted by subliminal audio and visual stimuli. There is also a plan for psychotronic weapons
apparently the projection of consciousness to other locations and another to use holographic projection
to disseminate propaganda and misinformation. (Welsh, Timeline). Apart from this notable exception it is
difficult to locate any public statement of the problem in the United Kingdom.
Unfortunately, the problem of credulity does not necessarily cease with frequent mention, as in the United
States, in spite of the number of reported cases, there is still not sufficient public will to make strenuous
protest against what is not only already happening, but against what will develop if left unchecked. It
appears that the administration believes that it is necessary and justifiable, in the interests of national
security, to make experimental human sacrifices, to have regrettable casualties, for there to be collateral
damage, to suffer losses in place of strife or war. This is, of course, totally incompatible with any claims
to be a democratic nation which respects the values of human life and democracy, and such an
administration which tutors its servants in the ways of such barbaric tortures must be completely
condemned as uncivilised and hypocritical.
Disbelief as a Defence Mechanism
In the face of widespread disbelief about mind-control, it seems worth analysing the basis of the
mechanisms employed to maintain disbelief:
i) In the sixties, Soviet dissidents received a significant measure of sympathy and indignant protest from
western democracies on account of their treatment, most notedly the abuse of psychiatric methods of
torture to which they were subjected. It is noteworthy that we seem to be able to access credulity,
express feelings of indignant support when we can identify with victims, who share and support our own
value system, and who, in this particular historical case, reinforced our own values, since they were
protesting against a political system which also threatened us at that time. Psychologically, it is equally
important to observe that support from a safe distance, and the benefits to the psyche of attacking a splitoff bad father, the soviet authorities in this case, presents no threat to ones internal system; indeed it
relieves internal pressures. On the other hand, recognizing and denouncing a similar offence makes very
much greater psychic demands of us when it brings us into conflict with our own environment, our own
security, our own reality. The defence against disillusion serves to suppress paranoia that our father
figure, the president, the prime minister, our governments - might not be what they would like to be seen
to be.
ii) The need to deposit destructive envy and bad feelings elsewhere, on account of the inability of the ego
to acknowledge ownership of them - reinforces the usefulness of persons or groups, which will serve to
contain those, disowned, projected feelings which arouse paranoid anxieties. The concepts of mindinvasion strike at the very heart of paranoid anxiety, causing considerable efforts to dislodge them from
the psyche. The unconscious identification of madness with dirt or excrement is an important aspect of
anal aggression, triggering projective identification as a defence.
iii) To lay oneself open to believing that a person is undergoing the experience of being invaded mentally
and physically by an unseen manipulator requires very great efforts in the self to manage dread.
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016 Page 53
43 of 201
45
50
191
193
198
By Carole Smith of Global Research
Page 6 of 13
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
October 18, 2007
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO41
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
iv) The defence against the unknown finds expression in the split between theory and practice; between
the scientist as innovator and the society who can make the moral decisions about his inventions;
between fact and science fiction, the latter of which can present preposterous challenges to the
imagination without undue threat, because it serves to reinforce a separation from the real.
v) Identification with the aggressor. Sadistic fantasies, unconscious and conscious, being transferred on to
the aggressor and identified with, aid the repression of fear of passivity, or a dread of punishment. This
mechanism acts to deny credulity to the victim who represents weakness. This is a common feature of
satanic sects.
vi) The liberal humanist tradition which denies the worst destructive capacities of man in the effort to
sustain the belief in the great continuity of cultural and scientific tradition; the fear, in ones own past
development, of not being ongoing, can produce the psychic effect of reversal into the opposite to shield
against aggressive feelings. This becomes then the exaggerated celebration of the new as the affirmation
of human genius which will ultimately be for the good of mankind, and which opposes warning voices
about scientific advances as being pessimistic, unenlightened, unprogressive and Luddite. Strict
adherence to this liberal position can act as overcompensation for a fear of envious spoiling of good
possessions, i.e. cultural and intellectual goods.
vii) Denial by displacement is also employed to ignore the harmful aspects of technology. What may be
harmful for the freedom and good of society can be masked and concealed by the distribution of new and
entertaining novelties. The technology, which puts a camera down your gut for medical purposes, is also
used to limit your freedom by surveillance. The purveyors of innovative technology come up with all sorts
of new gadgets, which divert, entertain and feed the acquisitive needs of insatiable shoppers, and bolster
the economy. The theme of Everythings up to date in Kansas City only takes on a downside when
individual experience exploding breast implants, say takes the gilt off the gingerbread. Out of every
innovation for evil (i.e. designed for harming and destroying) some good (i.e. public diversion or
entertainment) can be promoted for profit or crowd-pleasing.
viii) Nasa is sending a spacecraft to Mars, or so we are told. They plan to trundle across the Martian
surface searching for signs of water and life. We do not hear dissenting voices about its feasibility.
Why is it that, when a person accounts that their mind is being disrupted and they are being persecuted
by an unseen method of invasive technology, that we cannot bring ourselves to believe them? Could it be
that the horror involved in the empathic identification required brings the shutters down? Conversely, the
shared experience of the blasting of objects into space brings with it the possibilities of shared potency or
the relief that resonates in the unconscious of a massive projection or evacuation a shared experience
which is blessed in the name of mans scientific genius.
ix) The desire not to be taken in, not to be taken for a fool, provides one of the most powerful and
common defence mechanism against credulity.
Power, Paranoia and Unhealthy Governments
The ability to be the bearer and container of great power without succumbing to the pressures of latent
narcissistic psychoses is an important matter too little considered. The effect of holding power and the
expectation and the need to be seen as capable of sustaining it, if not exercising it, encourages
omnipotence of thought. In the wake of this, a narcissistic overevaluation of the subjects own mental
processes may set in. In the effort to hold himself together as the possessor, container and executor of
power, he (or indeed, she) may also, undergo a process of splitting which allows him, along with others,
to bear enthralled witness of himself in this illustrious role. This may mean that the seat of authority is
vacated, at least at times. The splitting process between the experiencing ego and the perceiving ego
allows the powerful leader to alternate his perception of himself inside and outside, sometimes beside,
himself. With the reinforcement of himself from others as his own narcissistic object, reality testing is
constrained. In this last respect, he has much in common with the other powerful figure of the age, the
movie star. or by those, in Freuds words, who are ruined by success.
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016 Page 54
44 of 201
46
51
191
193
198
By Carole Smith of Global Research
Page 7 of 13
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
October 18, 2007
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO42
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
In a world, which is facing increasing disillusion about the gulf between the public platforms on which
governments are elected, and the contingencies and pragmatics of retaining defence strategies and
economic investments, the role of military and intelligence departments, with their respective tools of
domination and covert infiltration, is increasingly alarming. Unaccountable to the public, protected from
exposure and prosecution by their immunity, licensed to lie as well as to kill, it is in the hands of these
agents that very grave threats to human rights and freedom lies. Empowered to carry out aggression
through classified weapon experimentation which is undetectable, these men and women are also open to
corruption from lucrative offers of financial reward from powerful and sinister groups who can utilize their
skills, privileged knowledge and expertise for frankly criminal and fascist purposes.
Our information about the psychological profiles of those who are employed to practice surveillance on
others is limited, but it is not difficult to imagine the effects on the personality that would ensue with the
persistent practice of such an occupation, so constantly exposed to the perversions. One gains little
snatches of insight here and there. In his book on CIA mind control research (Marks, 1988), John Marks
quotes a CIA colleagues joke (always revealing for personality characteristics): If you could find the
natural radio frequency of a persons sphincter, you could make him run out of the room real fast. (One
wonders if the same amusement is derived from the ability to apply, say infra-sound above 130 decibels,
which is said to cause stoppage of the heart, according to one victim/activist from his readings of a report
for the Russian Parliament.)
Left to themselves, these servants of the state may well feel exempt from the process of moral selfscrutiny, but the work must be dehumanising for the predator as well as the prey. It is probably true that
the need to control their agents in the field was an incentive to develop the methods in use today. It is
also an effectively brutalising training for persecuting others. Meanwhile the object, the prey, in a bid for
not only for survival but also in a desperate effort to warn his or her fellows about what is going on,
attempts to turn himself into a quantum physicist, a political researcher, a legal sleuth, an activist, a
neurologist, a psychologist, a physiologist his own doctor, since he cannot know what effects this
freakish treatment might have on his body, let alone his mind. There are always new methods to try out
which might prove useful in the search to find ways of disabling and destroying opponents air injected
into brains and lungs, lasers to strike down or blind, particle beams, sonar waves, or whatever
combination of energies to direct, or destabilise or control.
Science and Scepticism
Scientists can be bought, not just by governments, but also by sinister and secret societies. Universities
can be funded by governments to develop technology for unacceptably inhumane uses. The same people
who deliver the weapons - perhaps respected scientists and academics - may cite the acceptable side of
scientific discoveries, which have been developed by experimenting on unacknowledged, unfortunate
people. In a cleaned up form, they are then possibly celebrated as a break-through in the understanding
of the natural laws of the universe. It is not implausible that having delivered the technical means for
destruction, the innovator and thinker goes on, wearing a different hat, to receive his (or her) Nobel Prize.
There are scientists who have refused to continue to do work when they were approached by CIA and
Soviet representatives. These are the real heroes of science.
In the power struggle, much lies at stake in being the first to gain control of ultimate mind-reading and
mind-controlling technology. Like the nuclear bomb, common ownership would seem by any sane
calculations to cancel out the advantage of possession, but there is always a race to be the first to possess
the latest ultimate means of mass destruction. The most desirable form is one that can be directed at
others without contaminating oneself in the process - one that can be undetected and neatly, economically
and strategically delivered. We should be foolish to rule out secret organisations, seeing threat only from
undemocratic countries and known terrorist groups.
As consumers in a world which is increasingly one in which shopping is the main leisure activity, we should
concern ourselves to becoming alert to the ways in which human welfare may have been sacrificed to
produce an awesome new gadget. It may be the cause for celebration for the innovator, but brought
about as the result of plugging in or dialling up the living neuronal processes of an enforced
experimentee. If we are concerned not to eat boiled eggs laid by battery hens, we might not regard it
morally irrelevant to scrutinise the large corporations producing electronically innovative software. We
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016 Page 55
45 of 201
47
52
191
193
198
By Carole Smith of Global Research
Page 8 of 13
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
October 18, 2007
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO43
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
might also be wary about the origins of the sort of bland enticements of dating agencies who propose
finding your ideal partner by matching up brain frequencies and bio-rhythms.
We do not know enough about the background of such technology, nor how to evaluate it ethically. We do
not know about its effects on the future, because we are not properly informed. If governments persist in
concealing the extent of their weapon capability in the interests of defence, they are also leaving their
citizens disempowered of the right to protest against their deployment. More alarmingly, they are leaving
their citizens exposed to their deployment by ruthless organisations whose concerns are exactly the
opposite of democracy and human rights.
Back in the United Kingdom
Meanwhile, back in England, the Director of the Oxford Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, Professor Colin
Blakemore, also the elective Chief Executive of the Medical Research Council writes to the author that he
... knows of no technology (not even in the wildest speculations of neuroscientists) for scanning and
collecting neuronal data at a distance. (Blakemore, 2003, ) This certitude is at distinct variance with the
fears of other scientists in Russia and the United States, and not least of all with the fears of the French
neuroscientist, Jean-Pierre Changeux of the French National Bioethics Committee already quoted (see
page 5). It is also very much at odds with the writing of Dr Michael Persinger from the Behavioural
Neuroscience Laboratory at Laurentian University in Sudbury, Ontario, Canada. His article On the
Possibility of Directly Accessing Every Human Brain by Electromagnetic Induction of Algorithms (1995),
he describes the ways that individual differences among human brains can be overcome and comes to a
conclusion about the technological possibilities of influencing a major part of the approximately six billion
people on this planet without mediation through classical sensory modalities but by generating
electromagnetic induction of fundamental algorithms in the atmosphere. Dr Persingers work is referred to
by Captain John Tyler whose work for the American Air Force and Aerospace programmes likens the
human nervous system to a radio receiver. (1990)
Very recently the leading weekly cultural BBC radio review had as one of its guests, the eminent astrophysicist and astronomer royal, Sir Martin Rees, who has recently published a book, Our Final Century,
in which he makes a sober and reasoned case for the fifty-fifty chance that millions of people, probably in
a third-world country could be wiped out in the near future through biotechnology and bio-terrorism
by error or malign release. He spoke of this devastation as possibly coming from small groups or cults,
based in the United States. few individuals with the right technology to cause absolute mayhem. He
also said that in this century, human nature is no longer a fixed commodity, that perhaps we should
contemplate the possibility that humans would even have implants in the brain.
The other guests on this programme were both concerned with Shakespeare, one a theatre producer and
the other a writer on Shakespeare, while his remaining guest was a young woman who had a website
called Spiked, the current theme of which was Panic Attack, that is to say, Attack on Panic. This guest
vigorously opposed what she felt was the pessimism of Sir Martin, regarding his ideas as essentially
eroding trust, and inducing panic. This reaction seems to typify one way of dealing with threat and
anxiety, and demonstrates the difficulty that a warning voice, even from a man of the academic
distinction of Martin Rees, has in alerting people to that which they do not want to hear. This flight
reaction was reinforced by the presenter who summed up the mornings discussion at the end of the
programme with the words: We have a moral! Less panic, more Shakespeare!
The New Barbarism
Since access to a mind-reading machine will enable the operator to access the ideas of another person, we
should prepare ourselves for a new world order in which ideas will be, as it were, up for grabs. We need
not doubt that the contents of anothers mind will be scooped up, scooped out, sorted through as if the
event was a jumble sale. The legal profession would therefore be well advised to consider the laws on
Intellectual Property very judiciously in order to acquit themselves with any degree of authenticity. We
should accustom ourselves to the prospect of recognizing our work coming out of the mouth of another.
The prospect of wide-scale fraud, and someone posturing in your stolen clothes will not be a pretty sight.
The term personal mind enhancement is slipping in through the back door, to borrow a term used by
the Co-Director of the Center for Cognitive Liberty and Ethics, and it is being done through
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016 Page 56
46 of 201
48
53
191
193
198
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
By Carole Smith of Global Research
Page 9 of 13
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO44
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
technologically-induced mental co-ercion mind raping and looting. In place of, or in addition to, cocaine,
we may expect to see mind-enhanced performances on live television.
The brave new science of neuropsychiatry and brain mapping hopes to find very soon, with the fMRI
scanner - this brand new toy that scientists have got their hands on - the blob for love and the blob
for guilt, (BBC Radio 4: All in the Mind, 5 March, 2003). Soon we will be able to order a brain scan for
anyone whose behaviour strikes us as odd or bizarre, and the vicissitudes of a life need no longer trouble
us in our diagnostic assessments. In his recent Reith Lectures for the BBC (2003), Professor
Ramachandran, the celebrated neuroscientist from the La Hoya Institute in San Diego, California, has
demonstrated for us many fascinating things that the brain can do. He has talked to us about personality
disorders and shown that some patients, who have suffered brain damage from head injury, do not have
the capacity to recognise their mothers. Others feel that they are dead. And indeed he has found brain
lesions in these people. In what seems to be an enormous but effortless leap, the self-styled kid in a
candy store is now hoping to prove that all schizophrenics, have damage to the right hemisphere of the
brain, which results in the inability to distinguish between fantasy (sic) and reality. Since Professor
Ramachandran speaks of schizophrenia in the same breath as denial of illness, or agnosia, it is not clear,
and it would be interesting to know, whether the person with the head injury has been aware or unaware
of the head injury. Also does the patient derive comfort and a better chance at reality testing when he is
told of the lesion? Does he feel better when he has received the diagnosis? And what should the
psychoanalysts and the psychiatrists, - feel about all those years of treating people of whose head
injuries they were absolutely unaware? Was this gross negligence? Were we absolutely deluded in
perceiving recovery in a sizeable number of them?
It is, however, lamentable that a neuroscientist with a professed interest in understanding schizophrenia
should seek to provide light relief to his audience by making jokes about schizophrenics being people who
are convinced that the CIA has implanted devices in their brain to control their thoughts and actions, or
that aliens are controlling them. (Reith Lecture, No 5, 2003).
There is a new desire for concretisation. The search for meaning has been replaced by the need for hard
proof. If it doesnt light up or add up it doesnt have validity. The physician of the mind has become a
surgeon. He found a lump as big as a grapefruit!
Facing up to the Dread and Fear of the Uncanny
Freud believed that an exploration of the uncanny would be a major direction of exploration of the mind in
this century. The fear of the uncanny has been with us for a very long time. The evil eye, or the terrifying
double, or intruder, is a familiar theme in literature, notably of Joseph Conrad in The Secret Sharer, and
Maupassants short story, Le Horla. Freuds analysis of the uncanny led him back to the old animistic
conception of the universe: it seems as if each one of us has been through a phase of individual
development corresponding to the animistic phase in primitive men, that none of us has passed through it
without preserving certain residues and traces of it which are still capable of manifesting themselves, and
that everything which now strikes us as uncanny fulfils the condition of touching those residues of
animistic mental activity within us and bringing them to expression. (Freud: 1919. p.362)
The separation of birth, and the childhood fear of spooks in the night, also leave their traces in each and
every one of us. The individual experience of being alone in ones mind the solitary fate of man which
has never been questioned before, and upon which the whole history of civilised nurture is based - is now
assaulted head-on. Since growing up is largely synonymous with acceptance of ones aloneness, the
effort to assuage it is the basis for compassion and protection of others; it is the matrix for the greatest
good, that of ordinary human kindness, and is at the heart of the communicating power of great art. Even
if we must all live and die alone, we can at least share this knowledge in acts of tenderness which atone
for our lonely state. In times of loss and mental breakdown, the starkness of this aloneness is all too
clear. The best of social and group constructiveness is an effort to allay the psychotic anxieties that lie at
the base of every one of us, and which may be provoked under extreme enough conditions.
The calculated and technological entry into another persons mind is an act of monumental barbarism
which obliterates perhaps with the twiddling of a dial the history and civilisation of mans mental
development. It is more than an abuse of human rights, it is the destruction of meaning. For any one who
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016 Page 57
47 of 201
49
54
191
193
198
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
By Carole Smith of Global Research
Page 10 of 13
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO45
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
is forced into the hell of living with an unseen mental rapist, the effort to stay sane is beyond the scope of
tolerable endurance. The imaginative capacity of the ordinary mind cannot encompass the horror of it.
We have attempted to come to terms with the experiments of the Nazis in concentration camps. We now
have the prospect of systematic control authorised by men who issue instructions through satellite
communications for the destruction of societies while they are driving new Jaguars and Mercedes, and
going to the opera.
This is essentially about humiliation, and disempowerment. It is a manifestation of rage acted out by
those who fear impotence with such dread, that their whole effort is directed into the emasculation and
destruction of the terrifying rival of their unconscious fantasies. In this apocalypse of the mind the punitive
figure wells up as if out of the bowels of the opera stage, and this phantasmagoria is acted out on a
global scale. These men may be mad enough to believe they are creating a psychocivilised world order.
For anyone who has studied damaged children, it is more resonant of the re-enactment from the
unconscious, reinforced by a life devoid of the capacity for empathic identification, of the obscenities of
the abused and abusing child in the savage nursery. Other people -which were to them like Action Man
toys to be dismembered, or Barbie Dolls to be obscenely defiled - become as meaningless in their
humanity as pixillated dots on a screen.
Although forced entry into a mind is by definition obscene, an abbreviated assessment of the effects that
mind-invaded people describe testifies to the perverted nature of the experiments. Bizarre noises are
emitted from the body, a body known well enough by its owner to recognise the noises as extrinsic; air is
pumped in and out of orifices as if by a bicycle pump. Gradually the repertoire is augmented - twinges and
spasms to the eyes, nose, lips, strange tics, pains in the head, ringing in the ears, obstructions in the
throat, pressure on the bowel and bladder causing incontinence; tingling in the fingers, feet, pressures on
the heart, on breathing, dizziness, eye problems leading to cataracts; running eyes, running nose;
speeding up of heart beats and the raising of pressure in the heart and chest; breathing and chest
complaints leading to bronchitis and deterioration of the lungs; agonizing migraines; being woken up at
night, sometimes with terrifying jolts ; insomnia; intolerable levels of stress from the loss of ones privacy.
This collection of assorted symptoms is a challenge to any medical practitioner to diagnose.
There are, more seriously, if the afore-going is characterised as non-lethal, the potential lethal effects
since the capability of ultrasound and infra-sound to cause cardiac arrest, and brain lesions, paralysis and
blindness, as well as blinding by laser beam, or inducing asphyxia by altering the frequencies which
control breathing in the brain, epileptic seizure all these and others may be at the fingertips of those
who are developing them. And those who do choose to use them may be sitting with the weapon, which
resembles, say, a compact mobile telephone, on the restaurant table next to the bottle of wine, or beside
them at the swimming pool.
Finally if the victims at this point in the new history of this mind-control, cannot yet prove their abuse, it
must be asserted that, faced with the available information about technological development it is
certainly not possible for those seeking to evade such claims to disprove them. To wait until the effects
become widespread will be too late.
For these and other reasons which this paper has attempted to address, we would call for an
acknowledgement of such technology at a national and international level. Politicians, scientists and
neurologists, neuroscientists, physicists and the legal profession should, without further delay,
demand public debate on the existence and deployment of psychotronic technology; and for the
declassification of information about such devices which abuse helpless people, and threaten
democratic freedom.
Victims accounts of abuse should be admitted to public account, and the use of psycho-electronic
weapons should be made illegal and criminal,
The medical profession should be helped to recognise the symptoms of mind-control and
psychotronic abuse, and intelligence about their deployment should be declassified so that this
abuse can be seen to be what it is, and not interpreted automatically as an indication of mental
illness.
If, in the present confusion and insecurity about the search for evidence of weapons of mass destruction,
we
conclude
failure
to
locate
them 6,
- whatever
us
to be generally
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE that
FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November
2016 Page the
48 oftruth
50
55
58
191 of the matter encourages
193
198
201
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
Monday
November
October
20,
31,
7,
6, 2016
By Carole Smith of Global Research
Page 11 of 13
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO46
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
complacent, then we shall be colluding with very dark forces at work if we conclude that a course of
extreme vigilance signifies paranoia. For there may well be other weapons of mass destruction being
developed and not so far from home; weapons which, being even more difficult to locate, are developed
invisibly, unobstructed, unheeded in our midst, using human beings as test-beds. Like ESP, the methods
being used on humans have not been detectable using conventional detection equipment. It is likely that
the signals being used are part of a physics not known to scientists without the highest level of security
clearance. To ignore the evidence of victims is to deny, perhaps with catastrophic results, the only
evidence which might otherwise lead the defenders of freedom to becoming alert to the development of a
fearful new methods of destruction. Manipulating terrorist groups and governments alike, these sinister
and covert forces may well be very thankful for the professional derision of the victims, and for public
ignorance.
References
Laing, R.D. (1985) : Wisdom, Madness and Folly: The Making of a Psychiatrist. Macmillan, 1985
Welsh, Cheryl (1997): Timeline of Important Dates in the History of Electromagnetic Technology and Mind
Control, at: www.dcn.davis.ca.us/~welsh/timeline.htm
Welsh, Cheryl (2001):Electromagnetic Weapons: As powerful as the Atomic Bomb, President Citizens
Against Human Rights Abuse, CAHRA Home Page: U.S. Human Rights Abuse Report:
www.dcn.davis.ca.us/~welsh/emr13.htm
Begich, Dr N. and Manning, J.: 1995 Angels Dont Play this HAARP, Advances in Tesla Technology,
Earthpulse Press.
ZDF TV:
No. 35
Secret Russia: Moscow The Zombies of the Red Czars, Script to be published in Resonance,
Aftergood, Steven and Rosenberg, Barbara: The Soft Kill Fallacy, in The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists,
Sept/Oct 1994.
Becker, Dr Robert: 1985,The Body Electric: Electromagnetism and the Foundation of Life, William Morrow,
N.Y.
Babacek, Mojmir: International Movement for the Ban of Manipulation of The Human Nervous System:
http://mindcontrolforums.com/babacek.htm and go to: Ban of Manipulation of Human Nervous System
Is
it
Feasible
to
Manipulate
www.aisjca-mft.org/braindist.htm
the
Psychoelectronic
Threat
http://mindcontrolforums.com/babacek.htm
Human
Brain
to
at
Distance?
Democracy
Nature: Advances in Neuroscience May Threaten Human Rights, Vol, 391, Jan. 22, 1998, p. 316; (ref
Jean- Pierre Changeux)
Space Preservation Act: Bill H.R.2977 and HR 3616 IH in 107th Congress 2nd Session: see:
www.raven1.net/govptron.htm
Sessions
European
www.europarl.eu.int/home/default_en.htm?redirected=1
Parliament:
Click at Plenary Sessions, scroll down to Reports by A4 number, click, choose 1999 and fill in oo5 to A4
Delgado, Jose M.R: 1969. Physical Control of the Mind: Towards a Psychocivilized Society, Vol. 41,
World Perspectives, Harper Row, N.Y.
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016 Page 59
49 of 201
51
56
191
193
198
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
By Carole Smith of Global Research
Page 12 of 13
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO47
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
US News & World Report: Lockheed Martin Aeronautics/ Dr John Norseen; Report January 3/10 2000,
P.67
Freud,
Sigmund:
1919:
Also Those Wrecked by Success.
Marks, John:
20137-3
Art
and
Literature:
The
Uncanny.
Penguin,
1988 :The CIA and Mind Control the Search for the Manchurian Candidate, ISBN 0-440-
Persinger, M.A. On the Possibility of Directly Accessing Every Human Brain by Electromagnetic Induction
of Fundamental Algorythms; In Perception and Motor Skills, June, 1995, vol. 80, p. 791 799
Tyler, J.Electromagnetic Spectrum in Low Intensity Conflict, in Low Intensity Conflict and Modern
Technology, ed. Lt. Col. J. Dean, USAF, Air University Press, Centre For Aerospace Doctrine, Research
and Education, Maxwell Air Force base, Alabama, June, 1986.
Rees, Martin Our Final Century: 2003, Heinemann.
Conrad, Joseph: The Secret Sharer, 1910. Signet Classic.
Maupassant, Guy de: Le Horla, 1886. Livre de Poche.
Carole Smith is a British psychoanalyst. In recent years she has been openly critical of government use of
intrusive technology on non-consenting citizens for the development of methods of state control. Carole
Smith
E-mail: rockpool@dircon.co.uk
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not
necessarily reflect those of the Centre for Research on Globalization.
To become a Member of Global Research
The CRG grants permission to cross-post original Global Research articles on community internet sites as
long as the text & title are not modified. The source and the author's copyright must be displayed. For
publication of Global Research articles in print or other forms including commercial internet sites, contact:
crgeditor@yahoo.com
www.globalresearch.ca contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically
authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the
provisions of "fair use" in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and social
issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest
in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes
other
than
"fair
use"
you
must
request
permission
from
the
copyright
owner.
For media inquiries: crgeditor@yahoo.com
Copyright Carole Smith, Journal of Psycho-Social Studies, 2003., 2007
The url address of this article is: www.globalresearch.ca/PrintArticle.php?articleId=7123
Copyright 2005-2007 GlobalResearch.ca
Web site engine by Polygraphx Multimedia Copyright 2005-2007
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016 Page 60
50 of 201
52
57
191
193
198
By Carole Smith of Global Research
Page 13 of 13
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
October 18, 2007
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO48
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
amgroup01@msn.com
www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com
Page 1 of 2
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
07/12/2007
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO49
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
Sincerely,
Stan J. Caterbone
cc:
Enclosures
Page 2 of 2
07/12/2007
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO50
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
amgroup01@msn.com
www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com
Important Matters
Page 1 of 2
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
07/16/2007
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO51
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
Sincerely,
Stan J. Caterbone
cc:
Enclosures
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016 Page 64
54 of 201
56
61
191
193
198
THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Page 2 of 2
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
07/16/2007
DARPA - ESP - MENTAL TELEPATHY & THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT'S PROJECTS AND ACTIVITIES copyright 2007
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO52
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
amgroup01@msn.com
From :
Sent :
To :
webmaster-dso@darpa.mil
Subject :
Programs
Attachment :
I am looking for information of some of your programs regarding the Mind and Remote Channelling. See attached.
I did some work on the "TIMIT" project with the National Istitute for Standards and Technologies, NIST back in 1990, as a
contractor (Advanced Media Group). I was the CD-ROM manufacturer. I believe you were part of that project.
Within the past 14 months I have become telepathic, and I want to be assured your staff has nothing to do with that activity.
I also have a Federal False Claims Act complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvnania
06-cv-3955, it will be amended in due time and refiled.
In July of 2005, I was detained by 2 DIA Agents in Austin, Texas, and questioned about another Federal complaint 05-2288.
I would like some transparency and some answers involving your involvement.
Advanced Media Group
Stan Caterbone
mailto: amgroup01@msn.com
www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com
Fax: (717) 427-1621
Advanced Media Group
220 Stone Hill Road
Conestoga, PA 17516
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016 Page 65
55 of 201
57
62
191
193
198
Research by Advanced Media Group
Page 1 of 1
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
Published On 11/13/2007
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO53
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016 Page 66
56 of 201
58
63
191
193
198
THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Page 1 of 1
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
07/12/2007
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO54
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
Page 1 of 9
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016 Page 68
58 of 201
60
65
191
193
198
by Richard J. Boylan, Ph.D.
Page 2 of 9
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
Page 3 of 9
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
Weapons
Development
and
Covert
Special
Forces/Special
Operations
Units
a) CIA's Directorate for Science and Technology, (which gathers information with promise
for scientific and technological developments which present a superiority advantage for, or
a threat against, the National Security, [also contains the "Weird Desk", which centrally
processes intelligence about UFOs and Star Visitors and their interaction with Earth],
current Deputy Director of Central Intelligence for Science and Technology is Ron Pandolfi);
b) Strategic Defense Initiative Office (SDIO)/ Ballistic Missile [sic] Defense Organization (BMDO),
(which coordinates research, development and deployment of Star Wars electromagnetic-pulse, killerlaser, particle-beam, plasmoid, and other advanced-technology aerospace weapons;
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016 Page 70
60 of 201
62
67
191
193
198
by Richard J. Boylan, Ph.D.
Page 4 of 9
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO58
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
c) Department of Energy (DOE) (which, besides its cover-story of researching cleaner-burning coal and
gasoline and more solar power, is principally involved in research and development of: more
specialized nuclear weapons; plus compact, self-sustaining, fusion-powered, particle and wave
weapons, including electromagnetic pulse, gravitational/antigravitational, laser, neutral particle-beam
and plasmoid applied weapons research; high-energy invisibility "cloaking" technology, etc.);
d) Lawrence Livermore National Laboratories (LLNL)/Sandia National Laboratories-West (SNL-W),
(which are involved in nuclear warhead "refinements", development of new trans-uranic elements for
weapons and energy applications, development of anti-matter weapons (the Teller Bomb: 10,000
times the force of a hydrogen bomb), laser/maser technology applications, and, reportedly, successful
teleportation experiments, among other projects, at this Russian-nicknamed "City of
Death"),Livermore, CA;
e) Idaho National Engineering Laboratories (INEL), (which houses numerous underground facilities in
an immense desert installations complex larger than Rhode Island, has security provided by its own
secret Navy Base, is involved in nuclear, high-energy electromagnetic, and other research, and
includes Argonne National Laboratory, West), Arco, ID;
f) Sandia National Laboratories (SNL)/Phillips Air Force Laboratory, (which are sequestered on Kirtland
Air Force Base/Sandia Military Reservation, and conduct the translation of theoretical and experimental
nuclear and Star Wars weapons research done at Los Alamos and Lawrence Livermore National
Laboratories into practical, working weapons), Albuquerque, NM;
g) Tonopah Test Range (SNL's DOE weapons-testing facility for operationally testing Star Wars
weapons in realistic target situations, and is adjacent to classified stealth and cloaked aerospace craft
and U.S.-UFO bases at the Groom Lake [USAF/DOE/CIA] Base [Area 51] and Papoose Lake Base [S4]), Nevada Test Site/Nellis AFB Range, Tonopah, NV;
h) Haystack USAF Laboratory, Haystack Buttes, Edwards AFB, CA, (a 30-levels deep, extreme-security
facility reportedly engaged in Star Visitor technology retro-engineering;
i) Los Alamos National Laboratories (LANL), (which is the premiere research lab for nuclear, subatomic
particle, high magnetic field, exo-metallurgical, exo-biological and other back-engineered
extraterrestrial technologies research), Los Alamos County, NM;
j) Area 51 (Groom Lake [USAF/DOE/CIA] Base), and S[Site]-4 (Papoose Lake Base), ultra-secure
"nonexistent" deployment bases where extremely classified aerospace vehicles are tested and
operationally flown, including the Aurora [Mach-8] spyplane, the Black Manta [TR-3A] stealthy fighter
follow-on to the F-117A, the Pumpkinseed hyperspeed unmanned aerospace reconnaissance vehicle,
and several variants of antigravitational craft (U.S.-UFOs), including the "Christmas Tree Ornament"
(glowing orange orb) and the "Firefly" (strobing, flitting, bluish-white lit airframe);
k) U.S. Special Forces Command, Hurlburt Field, Mary Esther, Fl, along with its Western U.S.
Headquarters, Special Forces Command, Beale AFB, Marysville, CA, coordinating: 1) U.S. Army Delta
Forces (Green Berets); 2) U.S. Navy SEALS (Black Berets), Coronado, CA; and 3) USAF Blue Light
(Red Berets) Strike Force;
l) Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), (which coordinates the application
of latest scientific findings to the development of new generations of weapons); (now called
ARPA);
m) the Jason Group (elite weapons-application scientists, developing cutting-edge-science weapons for
DARPA/ARPA, and operating under the cover of the Mitre Corporation);
o) Aquarius Group (UFO technology-application scientists, reportedly working under the guidance of
the Dolphin Society, an elite group of scientists privy to extremely classified science and technology
findings);
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016 Page 71
61 of 201
63
68
191
193
198
by Richard J. Boylan, Ph.D.
Page 5 of 9
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
Page 6 of 9
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO60
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
d) Edgerton, Germhausen & Greer Corporation (EG&G), (NSA/DOE-contractor involved in Star Wars
weapons development, fusion applications, and security for Area 51 (U.S. UFO-technology aerospace
vehicles base) and nuclear installations, etc.);
e) Wackenhut Corporation (NSA/CIA/DOE cut-out contractor) involved in contract security operations
for Top Secret Ultra and Black Budget surface and underground military reservations, such as Area S-4
(U.S. UFO base), NV and Sandia National Labs, (Star Wars weapons testing facility), NM), and,
reportedly, "dirty jobs" for CIA and Defense Intelligence agencies;
f) Bechtel Corporation (CIA's "ditch-digger" for covert projects and off-the-books underground bases);
g) United Nuclear Corporation (military nuclear applications);
h) Walsh Construction Company (on the CIA projects dole);
i) Aerojet (Genstar Corp.):( makes DSP-1 Star Wars battle satellites for the NRO);
j) Reynolds Electronics Engineering (on CIA/DoD dole);
k) Lear Aircraft Company (Black Budget technology);
l) Northrop Corporation (makes U.S. antigravity craft, back-engineered from Star Visitor technology,
ear Lancaster, CA);
m) Hughes Aircraft (classified projects compartment);
n) Lockheed-Martin Corporation (Black Budget aerospace projects);
o) McDonnell-Douglas Corporation (Black Budget aerospace projects);
p) BDM Corporation (CIA contractor, involved in UFO back-engineering and psychotronic projects,
etc.);
q) General Electric Corporation (electronic warfare and weapons systems); and
r) PSI-TECH Corporation (involved in military/Intelligence-applications of research into
psychotronics,
parapsychology,
remote
viewing,
and
contacting
extraterrestrial
consciousness);
s) Science Applications International Corp. (SAIC); "black projects" contractor, reportedly including
psychic warfare.
FINANCIAL DEPARTMENT
(Extra-Constitutional funding):
a) Federal Reserve System (cartel of private banks overseen by elite superwealthy financiers, such as
the Rockefellers, Mellons, DuPonts, Rothschilds, etc., which dictates to the Government the flow of
money, worth of money, and the interest rates the government and citizens must pay);
b) CIA self-financing (the operation and/or control of much of the international drug trade in heroin,
cocaine and marijuana, as well as "front" business enterprises, as a source of cash for off-the-books
covert operations, and the purchase of exotic munitions and strategic bribe funds);
c) Department of Justice self-financing (the use of confiscated cash and valuables from "targets of
investigation" to finance "special projects");
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016 Page 73
63 of 201
65
70
191
193
198
by Richard J. Boylan, Ph.D.
Page 7 of 9
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO61
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
d) Special Forces self-financing (the self-use of confiscated "booty" from covert military operations to
fund other clandestine operations).
What conclusions can be drawn from this preliminary analysis of the structure, functions and
operations of the Shadow Government?
Foremost, the Shadow Government is a very large, well-organized, skillfully camouflaged, parallel
power structure. History suggests that it has served its masters well, and that its predilection for
operating out of sight and notoriety, if not in an outright clandestine fashion, is exactly how its
masters want it to function -- not drawing attention to itself, manipulating power behind the scenes,
and accomplishing by covert operations what cannot lawfully or politically be accomplished out in the
open.
What should be the attitude of the informed citizen to the Shadow Government?
Since it thrives in the dark, we should shine the light of full disclosure on it. Citizens can
demand: the end of the Congressional practice of allowing "Black Budget" items; the end of
unpublished secret Executive Orders and National Security Directives; the end of the
practice of indefinitely- sustained Presidential Declarations of National Emergency (as is
currently in place); the end of Federal Reserve Notes and the return to the gold standard to
back the dollar; the end to governmental domestic spying on its own citizens; and extremely
severe reduction (on the order of 90%) in the number, staffing and scope of the endlessly
proliferating Intelligence agencies, which are an anachronism since the Cold War ended;
and an end to CIA and DEA collusion in allowing a continuing stream of drugs to pour into
this country.
We founded this Country (USA); it's time to take it back.
- Richard J. Boylan, Ph.D.
Dr. Richard Boylan is a behavioral scientist, university instructor, certified clinical hypnotherapist, and
researcher into extraterrestrial-human encounters.
Richard Boylan, Ph.D., LLC,
Post Office Box 1009, Diamond Springs California 95619, United States of America.
Phone: (530) 621-2674 (PDT)
E-mail: drboylan@sbcglobal.net
WEBSITE: http://www.drboylan.com
You are invited to join his UFOFacts internet reports-and-ET/UFO/Experiencers
chat list; moderated by Dr. Boylan: (subscribe at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ufofacts); or
join DrRichBoylanReports (his reports-only!) list at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/drrichboylanreports
Posted by Stewart at 6:46 AM
Labels: american, amero, bankers, bilderberg, CFR, CIA, euro, FBI, FEMA, money, oligarchy, poverty,
project, royal, slavery, trilateral commission, UFO, wealth, world
Advanced Media Group
Stan J. Caterbone
www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com
Visit Our Blog For Journey of a Whistleblower
Visit Our Blog For Research Into ESP - Mental Telepathy & The U.S. Governments Activities
Visit Our Video Biography
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016 Page 74
64 of 201
66
71
191
193
198
by Richard J. Boylan, Ph.D.
Page 8 of 9
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO62
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
Notice and Disclaimer: Stan J. Caterbone and the Advanced Media Group have been slandered, defamed, and publicly discredited since
1987 due to going public (Whistle Blower) with allegations of misconduct and fraud within International Signal & Control, Plc. of
Lancaster, Pa. (ISC pleaded guilty to selling arms to Iraq via South Africa and a $1 Billion Fraud in 1992). Unfortunately we are forced to
defend our reputation and the truth without the aid of law enforcement and the media, which would normally prosecute and expose
public corruption. We utilize our communications to thwart further libelous and malicious attacks on our person, our property, and our
business. We continue our fight for justice through the Courts, and some communications are a means of protecting our rights to
continue our pursuit of justice. Advanced Media Group is also a member of the media. Reply if you wish to be removed from our Contact
List. Number 7.
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016 Page 75
65 of 201
67
72
191
193
198
by Richard J. Boylan, Ph.D.
Page 9 of 9
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
Lancaster Online
1 of 2
http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_action=doc&p_docid...
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO63
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
He compared his information with that of journalist Alan Friedman, the investigative reporter who first had broken the "Iraqgate" story.
The two were in the last days of a three-month joint investigation by the Intell and the Financial Times that would result in a May 1991 program for ABC's
Nightline.
It clicked.
A big story had just gotten much, much bigger.
The 1991 conversation was one of the major links connecting decades of classified documents, covert operations and bribes to prove American support of
arms shipments to Saddam Hussein.
The end result, "Spider's Web: The Secret History of How the White House Illegally Armed Iraq," written by Friedman after four years of work, will be
published Wednesday by Bantam Books.
Woven in with names familiar to every American - George Bush, James Baker, Ronald Reagan - are other situations less familiar to many of them.
Former Lancastrian James Guerin's ties to illegal arms shipments to South Africa. ISC's sale to British defense industry power Ferranti. Fake contracts for
Pakistani missile deals.
The issues have been covered regularly in the Intelligencer Journal by Flannery for the past several years. In "Spider's Web," his research dovetails with
Friedman's to chronicle White House-directed arms transfers, illegal financial dealings with Iraq and investigative delays orchestrated by high-ranking
officials, including former Attorney General Richard Thornburgh.
A four-time winner of British Press Awards, the British equivalent of the Pulitzer Prize, Friedman credits Flannery with much of the investigative project's
success.
"He's brilliant," Friedman said Sunday from New York. "We've worked hard to bring Tom and his world-beating work on the ISC story together with other
information" gathered from government sources.
As his own research on Bank of Credit and Commerce International and the Banca Nazionale del Lavoro progressed, Friedman said, he "decided the full
story needed to get out."
He pulled together "seven top investigative researchers and associates, of which Tom Flannery was one of the most senior and best on the team."
In his introduction, Friedman writes that Flannery "helped mightily to make sense of this dark chapter in the history of the CIA."
The local reporter has won an Associated Press award for his work in unearthing the local connection to illegal international arms shipments.
Among other claims, "Spider's Web" references on-the-record interviews to say:
Some of the arms deals were channeled to Baghdad and Saddam Hussein through U.S. military bases, including Frankfurt's Rhein-Main, with the
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016 Page 76
66 of 201
68
73
191
193
198
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
11/13/2015 6:08 AM
Lancaster Online
2 of 2
http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_action=doc&p_docid...
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO64
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
knowledge of then-Vice President Bush, CIA Director William Casey and National Security Adviser William Clark;
James Baker's State Department in 1989 approved export of equipment intelligence sources said was likely to go into Saddam's nuclear weapons;
The CIA and Defense Intelligence Agency knew of billions of dollars of loans, sent from an Atlanta bank, that financed work on Iraqi Scud missiles and
nuclear weapons projects.
Both Flannery and Friedman said they were surprised, as they pursued the story, with the willingness of top government officials to come forward.
"Former White House and intelligence officials were confirming White House-directed operations," Friedman said, along with a cover-up by Bush and
former National Security Adviser Brent Scowcroft.
"I like to think of myself as a hard-boiled investigative reporter," he added, but some of the American, British and Italian documents he found "made my
toes curl.
"...The abuse of power, and the duplicity, lying to the American public and Congress, it's broader than anyone's suspected to date."
The subsequent "egregious" cover-up, he added, "was a silent threat to the principles of American democracy, although the politicians perceived it as
`damage control', or the legitimate desire to protect state secrets."
More indictments should be coming relatively soon, Friedman said, adding that he hopes the Clinton administration honors its campaign pledge to take the
investigation wherever it leads.
"I hope it (the investigation) is expanded, to look at the involvement and knowledge of American intelligence services in the money flow" stemming from
illegal, covertly endorsed, arms sales.
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016 Page 77
67 of 201
69
74
191
193
198
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
11/13/2015 6:08 AM
Lancaster Online
1 of 2
http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_action=doc&p_docid...
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO65
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
Terms of the out-of-court settlement accepted by Lancaster County Common Pleas Judge Michael A. Georgelis were not released with the order and are
expected in a March 29 joint statement by Guerin's attorney, Joseph A. Tate of Philadelphia, and Joseph F. Roda, the Lancaster attorney representing
William A. Clark.
The statement will coincide with the scheduled release of nearly $2.1 million in escrowed cash to Roda who will handle its disbursement.
Roda delined comment on the terms of the settlement Monday afternoon and Tate could not be reached for comment, however a source close to the case
who spoke on the condition of anonymity said the bulk of the money _ including some $100,000 in attorney's fees _ will go to Clark.
The remainder will go to Guerin's former personal holding company, Parent Industries Inc., now Urban Industries Inc., of Austin, Texas, not Guerin
according to the source.
The Clark / Guerin dispute centered around a contract signed between the two in March 1989.
The document was to repay Clark for unfulfilled financial promises made by Guerin to lure him from his Washington law firm and into Guerin's former
flagship defense contracting firm, International Signal & Control Corp., now Ferranti International PLC, as its vice president and general counsel.
Also the agreement called for Guerin and Urban Industries to buy Clark's York County estate for $750,000.
Had the pact to end Clark's five-year tenure at ISC been honored, Roda previously said there would have been no reason for Clark to exercise a
provision of the deal that allowed him to seek help from the courts to recover the money.
The private agreement between the two spilled into the Lancaster County courts in July 1989 when Clark exercised this provision by filing a judgment for
the $1.75 million balance owed under the agreement. That filing also froze all of Guerin's assets and those of Urban Industries.
Guerin obligated both himself and Urban to fulfill the terms of the agreement.
Guerin immediately countered saying he paid had Clark $1 million of the pact, but quit paying on the deal because Clark had used coercion and extortion
to secure it, threatening to go public with various aspects of Guerin's business practices that would end any possibility of a $350 million buy-back by
Guerin of several ISC divisions Guerin sold to Ferranti when the companies merged in November 1987.
Guerin also asked for the $1 million back he had given Clark, saying he could could prove his claim of Clark's alleged criminal actions through a number
of recordings secretly made when the two drafted the settlement document.
In January, Clark again sued Guerin, this time for violation of the state's Wiretapping and Electronic Surveillence Act requiring two-party consent to the
taping of any conversation, unless the taping is part of a police investigation.
Monday's settlement also puts an end to this civil action, but still leaves the possibility of criminal action by the district attorney unanswered.
"At this point I still want my office to review the history of this case," said Lancaster County District Attorney Henry S. Kenderdine Jr.
When the existence of the tapes first became known Kenderdine did not rule out the possibility of prosecuting Guerin for initiating the recordings without
Clark's consent.
The Monday order directed Lancaster County Prothonotary Clair L. Wolf to liquidate a more than $2 million escrow account established in August 1989.
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016 Page 78
68 of 201
70
75
191
193
198
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
11/13/2015 6:13 AM
Lancaster Online
2 of 2
http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_action=doc&p_docid...
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO66
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
The escrow account was established on the order of Lancaster County President Judge D. Richard Eckman when it became clear the Clark / Guerin
dispute would not be quickly resolved and both Guerin and Urban Industries needed access to their funds.
According to Wolf, the current status of the escrow account held at the Fulton Bank includes $2,070,000 in principal and interest in treasury bills, and a
regular savings account of $26,077 in principal and interest.
Yield on the treasury bills varied between 7.3 percent and 7.47 percent, based on a 30-day reinvestment schedule, Wolf said.
Guerin was one of several former ISC executives named in a $200 million civil suit filed by Ferranti in hopes of recovering some of $443 million the firm
claims it lost when it purchased overvalued and non-existent contracts carried on the books of ISC Technologies Ltd. at the time of the merger.
ISC Technologies was one of the companies Guerin had hoped to buy back from Ferranti in the failed $350 million attempt last Spring.
To date, Ferranti has filed more than $1 billion in claims against individuals and companies associated with Guerin, including the international accounting
firm of KPMG Peat Marwick, Guerin's personal and business accountants who vouched for the accuracy of ISC's books internationally.
Guerin has also been named in a $93 million suit by James B. Christian, former president of the defunct Lancaster defense contract firm, United
Chem-Con Corp. Christian has charged that Guerin allegedly masterminded a $16 million fraud within Chem-Con that has sent nine of its top executives
to jail.
Christian is presently serving time in federal prison for his role in the fraud.
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016 Page 79
69 of 201
71
76
191
193
198
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
11/13/2015 6:13 AM
CNN.com - Cheney's top aide indicted; CIA leak probe continues - Oct 2...
1 of 3
Case: 15-3400
http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/10/28/leak.probe/
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO67
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
International Edition
Home Page
World
U.S.
Weather
Business
Sports
Analysis
Politics
Law
Technology
Science & Space
Health
Entertainment
Offbeat
Travel
Education
Special Reports
Video
Autos
I-Reports
E-mails
RSS
Podcasts
Mobile
CNN Pipeline
Image:
RELATED
Reaction to CIA leak indictments
Libby helped shape Iraq policy
SPECIAL REPORT
QUICKVOTE
Do you think indictments are
warranted in the CIA leak probe?
Yes
No
or View Results
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016 Page 80
70 of 201
72
77
191
193
198
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
11/13/2015 6:18 AM
CNN.com - Cheney's top aide indicted; CIA leak probe continues - Oct 2...
2 of 3
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/10/28/leak.probe/
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO68
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
NBC News when, in fact, he learned of Plame's identify from other government
officials, the indictment alleged.
"Mr. Libby's story that he was at the tail end of a chain of phone calls, passing on from
one reporter what he heard from another, was not true," Fitzgerald said.
"He was at the beginning of the chain of phone calls -- the first official to disclose this
information outside the government to a reporter -- and then he lied about it afterwards,
under oath and repeatedly," he said.
Libby's attorney Joseph Tate said Fitzgerald concluded Libby did not violate a law that
makes it a crime to intentionally disclose the identity of a covert agent. (Watch as news
of Libby's resignation breaks -- :52)
Tate said in a written statement that Libby is innocent, and he asked that the public not
judge the case until a verdict is returned.
He said he and his client were "dismayed" and "surprised" at the charges, and accused
Fitzgerald of turning "alleged inconsistencies in Mr. Libby's recollection and those of
others" into charges.
'No decision'
Rove, who testified four times before the grand jury, was not indicted Friday, but
sources said he is not out of legal jeopardy. (Full story)
Rove's attorney Robert Luskin issued a statement Friday in which he said Fitzgerald
"advised Mr. Rove that he has made no decision about whether or not to bring
charges."
"We are confident that when the special counsel finishes his work, he will conclude that
Mr. Rove has done nothing wrong," Luskin's statement said.
The event that triggered the legal and political quagmire was a syndicated newspaper
column by Robert Novak, published on July 14, 2003, about Wilson.
Before Novak's column, Plame's role as a CIA officer was classified and "not widely
known" outside the intelligence community, Fitzgerald said.
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016 Page 81
71 of 201
73
78
191
193
198
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
11/13/2015 6:18 AM
CNN.com - Cheney's top aide indicted; CIA leak probe continues - Oct 2...
3 of 3
Case: 15-3400
http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/10/28/leak.probe/
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO69
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
In a written statement, Wilson on Friday called the indictments an "important step in the
criminal justice process."
"It is certainly not a day to celebrate," Wilson said, adding that he and his wife "are
confident that justice will be done."
"Revealing my wife Valerie's secret CIA identity was very wrong and harmful to our
nation," Wilson said. "I feel that my family was attacked for my speaking the truth about
the events that led our country to war."
CNN's Kelli Arena, Dana Bash, John King and Kevin Bohn contributed to this report.
Story Tools
Home Page
International Edition
Home Page
CNN TV
CNN International
Headline News
Transcripts
Advertise with Us
About Us
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016 Page 82
72 of 201
74
79
191
193
198
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
11/13/2015 6:18 AM
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO70
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
Network.
The U.S.
Government knew, and turned a blind eye. Sophisticated Military Technology was illegally
transferred from a major U.S. company in Lancaster, Pennsylvania (International Signal & Control),
to South Africa,
weapons plant in Lybia, set up shop in Florida, producing and shipping to Iraq chemical weapon
components.
The CIA, FBI, and other U.S. agencies were made aware of the operation and did
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016 Page 83
73 of 201
75
80
191
193
198
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO71
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
had merit - but there werent willing or in some instances werent successful in fighting it out in
Capital Hill so they found other ways. They made a mockery of the Export Control System, and
they found ways of encouraging foreign governments to do what our laws prohibited. They even
knew or if not were guilty of the grossest incompetence that U. S. companies were collaborating
with foreign Arms merchants in the illegal transfer of American Technology that helped Sadaam
Hussein build is formidable arsenal.
This week, the CIA again told ABC News Nightline that our allegations over the past few months
regarding covert operations to supply Iraq with U.S. Arms and weapons technologies simply were
not true.
The CIAs Inspector General said a statement from the Agency [On Screen] - Has found to factual
support whatsoever for such an operation or for the involvement of Mr. Gates.
[Ted Koppel] At least one member of the Senate Intelligence Committee, Bill Bradley of New
Jersey, feels that there may be reason to doubt both those claims, and hell raise the issues next
week during the Gates Confirmation Hearings, next week.
The CIA also told us that its Inspector General has found no evidence of any off-thebooks illegal activity.
Tactical
Fighter Wing, last February attacking a bomb factory, on the outskirts of Bagdad U.S. Technology
in the air, destroying U.S. Technology on the Ground. The factory was built by Carlos Cardoen.
For all of us here at ABC News, Good night.
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016 Page 84
74 of 201
76
81
191
193
198
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO72
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
His
connection with Robert Gates has not. By the mid 1980s Cardoen was the largest private supplier
of weapons to Iraq. In all he has believed to ship a half billion dollars worth of arms and advanced
technologies to Bagdad.
thousands of bombs and other equipment, absolutely essentially to Iraq during its eight year war
with Iran.
The material would be loaded aboard regular Iraqi airway flights flown from Santiago to Bagdad.
Cardoen did not simply ship weapons, he set up entire factories capable of producing bombs and
other explosives the components would be shipped from all over the world and then assembled in
Iraq. One of those factories turned out Cluster Bombs.
As we first reported on the 24th of May, much of the sophisticated military technology that Cardoen
was shipping to Iraq came from the United States.
Pennsylvania, is believed to be the source for some of the Cluster Bomb technology. But there was
more.
Nasser Bedouin is also an arms dealer. He acted as a middleman between Carlos Cardoen
and Iraq.
[Nasser Bedouin on Video] I am aware of Carlos Cardoen getting some type of technology
from the air fuel bomb from the United States. I believe Iraq has a viable fuel air explosive.
[Ted Koppel] These explosives are designed to explode just above ground level like miniature
atomic bombs, literally sucking all available oxygen out of the air. It is clear that Carlos Cardoens
special relationship with the United States was not known by all Departments. When the Commerce
Department inquired about that relationship in early 1987, it received a cable from the U.S.
Ambassador to Chile saying although Cardoen is involved with the sale of armaments, and he has
made his fortune from it, he is considered to be a responsible recipient of U.S. products. In fact by
1987, the covert relationship between the CIA and Cardoen was already well established.
In 1983 the Reagan Administration had become alarmed at how poorly the Iraqi military was doing
against Iran. A decision was made at the highest level of Government to begin helping Iraq.
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016 Page 85
75 of 201
77
82
191
193
198
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO73
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
Indeed ABC News has learned only today, that around that time, in 1983 Ronald Reagan issued a
highly classified Presidential Finding stating that it was important to the National Interests that
arms and technical assistance be covertly funneled to Iraq and with the help of the CIA. More on
the significance of that Presidential Finding in a moment.
What it unleashed was a flood of US help to Iraq. A former CIA operative who was involved in the
program has told us of a series of covert operations, in which loads of 727s were flown into Iraq.
On one such mission in 1987 our source tells us he accompanied a planeload of Soviet built one
hundred twenty-two missiles.
with what the Iraqis already had. By 1987, there was at least one such flight a week into Bagdad.
Our former CIA source recalls bringing in $100 dollar bills in a bowling bag, they would also carry
whiskey, cartons of cigarettes and copies of Penthouse magazines to speed up the unloading
process, which usually took place at night.
Assistance Program to Iraq, the CIA took over. In effect the former CIA operative told us the covert
operation amounted to here is what we want you to do, and we really dont want to know too much
about how you do it.
Our source tells us that he has at least one meeting in 1986 in Florida between Robert Gates and
Carlos Cardoen, the Chilean Arms Dealer. Other sources have told us of other such meetings. Here
in the United States and in Europe.
telephoned in to Nightline from the Central Intelligence Agency almost a month ago on June 17th.
Allegations, the statement read that Robert Gates facilitated illegal shipments to Iraq during the
1980s are totally without basis. Since we had never requested a statement of Mr. Gates, we didnt
know quite what to make of it at the time. But then today we learned of that Presidential Finding,
authorizing the Covert shipment of arms to Iraq.
It would be true then that Robert Gates did not facilitate illegal shipments to Iraq, under the
Presidential Finding, the shipments would have been quite legal.
confirmation hearings, back in 1987, Robert Gates assured the Senate Confirmation Committee that
he would always keep the Committee current on ongoing covert operations.
supposed to provide the Intelligence Committee with quarterly reports. According to well-informed
sources on the Committee it has had no briefings on the Covert arms pipeline to Iraq.
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016 Page 86
76 of 201
78
83
191
193
198
That, said
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO74
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
one Senator on the Committee would be a total breach of trust. What would it do to the Gates
Nomination? I asked. It would probably be enough said the Senator, to derail the Nomination.
Again, an excerpt from Mr. Gates Testimony before the Senate Intelligence Committee in 1987:
[Robert Gates 1987 on video] If you cannot have a system in which you can have some
confidence between A the branches of government, and confidence between the senior officials of
the Government, A that they abide by the rules, and B that they will deal with one another
honestly, then I think the system begins to collapse.
[Ted Koppel] Late this evening, the Whitehouse communicated its response to the charges
contained in this report, the Whole story is unfounded.
overt to Iraq or Iran through a third country. And Mr. Gates never met with Carlos Cardoen.
Well be back with more, in a moment.
[Ted Koppel] For the viewers, this is Alan Freidman, New York Correspondent for the Financial
Times of London, and a member of the team investigating Robert Gates. Alan Id like to begin by
repeating a statement, and let me put my specs on for a moment, the White House. This story is
unfounded and there were never any sales covert or overt to Iraq or Iran through a third country.
And Mr. Gates never met with Carlos Cardoen.
Ah, ah a fairly carefully drafted statement one would think.
[Alan Friedman, New York Correspondent for the Financial Times of London] Yes Ted, I
think that is right, I would agree with the statement that there were never any sales Iraq through a
third party.
Indeed what we found was that some of the cluster bomb technology and fuel air
technology was given smuggled down to Chile, for use that were used and made and shipped on
through to Iraq.
In terms of the um statement by the White House that there were never any
meetings between Mr. Gates and Mr. Cardoen, we have a number of sources, some of them
personally involved in these operations, one of them who was personally and physically an eye
witness present at a meeting, in Florida, with Mr. Gates and Mr. Cardoen in 1986. And who was
told my Mr. Gates, about other meetings that he had with Mr. Cardoen.
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016 Page 87
77 of 201
79
84
191
193
198
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO75
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
[Ted Koppel] Now Congressman Gejdenson, I realized that we sort of unleashed an awful lot of
material on you today, but to what degree does this fit in with those thousands of documents that
you subpoenaed with the information that you have?
[House Representative Sam Gejdenson of the House Foreign Affairs Committee] Well we
just got the documents after a several month battle with the Administration to pry them loose and
it took the vote of a subpoena by the subcommittee to start the flow of those documents, but its
certainly consistent with the information that we got with Committee staffs with some of those
people that said they were at those meetings, ah as well.
remember here is that the United States in 1982 under the Reagan Administration took Iraq off the
terrorist list at a time when some of the worst terrorist of the world were being harbored by
Saddam Hussein, and we suddenly changed our policy and continued to keep Iraq off the terrorist
list, enabling the export of dual use, ah items that can be used for dual use from the United States
to Iraq, as well as these sales that went indirectly to Iraq.
So, all through a time when they were harboring terrorists, and they killed 5,000 Kurds in 1988,
and as recent as six days before the invasion of Kuwait, when I and several members of Congress,
tried to stop the subsidy of grain sales to Iraq, the Bush Administration continued to impose any
sanctions against Iraq.
[Ted Koppel] Well of course theres a huge difference between grain sales and the shipment of
entire plants for the building of a cluster bomb factory.
[House Representative Sam Gejdenson of the House Foreign Affairs Committee] Except
for what I think you find is that a pattern by both the Bush and Reagan Administrations to trying to
assist Saddam Hussein.
Department, ah that said that the United States was ready to sell weapons to Iraq as long as they
were for the personal protection of Saddam Hussein. A policy that ignored all the outrages, a policy
that ignored I think the intent of the Congress and the American People. And that the allegations
that weve gotten from a number of sources seem to be consistent with that. The United States did
everything it could under the Reagan and Bush Administrations to assist Saddam Hussein.
[Ted Koppel] Alan, I know that one of the things that we discovered in our investigations was
and Id like you to elaborate on it a little bit was that frequently there was Federal Agencies, Law
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016 Page 88
78 of 201
80
85
191
193
198
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO76
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
Enforcement Agencies that was trying to uncover what was going on we found that they were
stymied at every turn. Can you talk about a that a little bit?.
[Alan Friedman, New York Correspondent for the Financial Times of London] Yes I think
that if we look back at other discoveries that we made, you can say that when we found ISC, the
company in Lancaster, Pennsylvania, that was, that had cluster bomb technology, shipped down to
Chile that was part of this covert operation for Iraq, we found that the CIA had detailed knowledge
over a period of 4 years of all sorts of shipments from ISC to South Africa, some of which were
later trans shipped to Iraq, we found that Federal Law Enforcement Officers and Agencies were
unable to do anything about it because they just werent told. Likewise, we were just told of the
case that the man that built the Rapta Chemical Weapons plant in Libya, who ah, even though the
CIA were tracking him very carefully here in the United States, was allowed to build a chemical
weapons plant here in Florida, and shipped dangerous cyanide with the help of CIA Contract
Shippers to Iraq.
All of these things were going on and the investigators seem unable to do
anything about any of these things. We seem to have part of the Government trying to investigate,
and part of the Government trying to ship.
[Ted Koppel] Congressman Gejdenson Id like to get your reaction to that and see if your
experiences have been similar in some of the findings that ah or some of the conclusions that you
have reached, but well take a break first and be back in just a moment.
[House Representative Sam Gejdenson of the House Foreign Affairs Committee] Well we
saw it ah from across all of the agencies. We had Dennis Kloskey who was then in charge of export
licensing at Commerce testify before our committee in April that he suggested to Mr. Gates and
others that ah meetings at White House to stop the export of dangerous technologies to Iraq. The
following day ah Mr. Kloskey resigned from the Government. We were told by Mr. Kloskey that the
White House, the people in that room representing the President argued for a policy that assisted
Saddam Hussein in getting dual use technologies. We had Congressman Rose who I know has been
on your show testifying about the grain sales being tied up with funding weapons to Iraq as well.
So across the government, this thing went on. Its hard to believe that somebody like Mr. Gates in
his position didnt know about it.
[Ted Koppel] We are suggesting a lot more that he knew about it. Were suggesting that he was
actively involved in it let me just pass on a little information that we have gathered today, having to
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016 Page 89
79 of 201
81
86
191
193
198
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO77
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
do with the Confirmation Hearings and was told earlier this afternoon. Alan Fryers, Senior Officer
with the CIA and Clair George are not likely to be testifying voluntarily, indeed Alan Fryers said he
will not be testifying before the Senate Intelligence Committee. The White House, as we have all
heard throughout the day is putting on some pressure to get those Hearings underway before the
August recess, August 2nd, of course, the Senate goes into recess. Ah, and there are indications
now that a week from Monday, indeed the Hearings will begin, Mr. Gates will be asked to testify at
that time, but Ive been also told that there is no way that the Hearing will no way be completed
before the August recess. And that Mr. Gates will be told that he will be recalled again after other
witnesses have testified, after the August recess. So these Hearing now, are destined to go into
September.
[House Representative Sam Gejdenson of the House Foreign Affairs Committee] I think that is
terribly important, because we have to what we have to remember here, unlike other appointees of
the President, what the head of the CIA does is not transparent. If youre the Secretary of Housing,
like Jack Kemp is, and I disagree with one of his programs, not only do I know about it, but the
average citizen knows about what Jack Kemps doing. Sometimes you agree with it and sometimes
you disagree with him.
experiences, often times even the people in Congress were suppose to know about these activities
are not informed. This has to do with National Security the standard ought not be somebody that
can get by the Hearing process with White House pressure. The White House ought to be with us
on this one, we ought to make sure that we have someone fully discloses what is going on to the
appropriate committees and to Congress. Not someone involved in Iran Contra and not someone
who hasnt told the entire truth. And not someone who is in question about these activities. This
has to be a definitive decision by the Congress, that this individual will come clean with the
Congress and fulfill not just the letter of the law, but the spirit of the law.
[Ted Koppel] Alright, let me just interrupt here for a moment, because were down to our last
minute and a half or so, Alan, it is inevitable in this kind of investigation that you run into a lot of
sleazy characters and I just want to get from you for our audience some sense of how much of the
information that we have compiled here comes from the sleazy characters and how much comes
from the few that we can really rely upon?
[Alan Friedman, New York Correspondent for the Financial Times of London] I think, ah
Ted the important thing to remember here is that we have had all kinds of allegations for the last
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016 Page 90
80 of 201
82
87
191
193
198
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO78
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
three months when our team has interviewed dozens of people, weve been acidulously cross
checking and weve waited to go ahead with this story until weve had very credible witnesses.
Those who were documented CIA operatives and those who were physically with Mr. Gates during
those meetings, and we asked some of them why would Mr. Gates take the risk and go out and
meet with Mr. Cardoen and get directly involved and get his hands dirty in these operations,
especially as he was deputy director of the CIA at the time himself. We were told that he went out
because he wanted to give his improtore in order to make sure the job got done. Weve talked to a
number of top people and cross checked.
[Ted Koppel] Alright, Alan Friedman thank you very much, Congressman Gejdenson, thank you
very much, Ill be back in a moment.
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016 Page 91
81 of 201
83
88
191
193
198
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO79
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016 Page 92
82 of 201
84
89
191
193
198
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO80
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016 Page 93
83 of 201
85
90
191
193
198
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO81
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016 Page 94
84 of 201
86
91
191
193
198
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO82
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016 Page 95
85 of 201
87
92
191
193
198
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO83
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016 Page 96
86 of 201
88
93
191
193
198
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO84
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016 Page 97
87 of 201
89
94
191
193
198
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO85
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016 Page 98
88 of 201
90
95
191
193
198
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO86
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016 Page 99
89 of 201
91
96
191
193
198
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO87
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016Page
2016 Page100
90 of
92
97
of198
191
193
201
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO88
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016Page
2016 Page101
91 of
93
98
of198
191
193
201
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO89
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016Page
2016 Page102
92 of
94
99
of198
191
193
201
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO90
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016Page
Page103
100
93 of
95
of193
191
198
201
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO91
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016Page
Page104
101
94 of
96
of193
191
198
201
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO92
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016Page
Page105
102
95 of
97
of193
191
198
201
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO93
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016Page
Page106
103
96 of
98
of193
191
198
201
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO94
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016Page
Page107
104
97 of
99
of193
191
198
201
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO95
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016Page
Page
Page108
100
105
98 of
of191
193
198
201
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO96
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016Page
Page
Page109
101
106
99 of
of191
193
198
201
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO97
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016Page
Page 110
100 of 201
102
107
191
193
198
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO98
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016Page
Page 111
101 of 201
103
108
191
193
198
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO99
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016Page
Page 112
102 of 201
104
109
191
193
198
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO100
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016Page
Page 113
103 of 201
105
110
191
193
198
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO101
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016Page
Page 114
104 of 201
106
111
191
193
198
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO102
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016Page
Page 115
105 of 201
107
112
191
193
198
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO103
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016Page
Page 116
106 of 201
108
113
191
193
198
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO104
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016Page
Page 117
107 of 201
109
114
191
193
198
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO105
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016Page
Page 118
108 of 201
110
115
191
193
198
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO106
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016Page
Page 119
109 of 201
111
116
191
193
198
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO107
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016Page
Page 120
110 of 201
112
117
191
193
198
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
CHAPTER
DIVIDER
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016Page
Page 121
111 of 201
113
118
191
193
198
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
Case: 15-3400
Document:
Joseph Tate - Wikipedia,
the free encyclopedia
003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Tate
DO108
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
Joseph Tate
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Joseph Tate is an American attorney who has represented Lewis Libby in the CIA leak grand jury
investigation. Tate is a partner with the law firm Dechert, LLP in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. He specializes in
defending clients against charges of complex white collar, in particular, anti-trust and other regulatory issues.
Previously, Tate worked in the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice.
Contents
1 Education
2 Involvement with the CIA leak grand jury investigation
3 Letter related to CIA leak investigation
4 See also
5 External links
Education
Tate graduated from Villanova University in 1963 and Villanova University School of Law in 1966. He was a
member of the Villanova University Law Review.
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016Page
Page 122
112 of 201
114
119
191
193
198
1 of 2
THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Page 1 of 37
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
6/28/2007 8:01 PM
06/29/2007
Case: 15-3400
Document:
Joseph Tate - Wikipedia,
the free encyclopedia
003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Tate
DO109
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
See also
CIA leak grand jury investigation
Plame Affair
Judith Miller
External links
Dechert LLP (http://www.dechert.com/index.jsp)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Tate"
Categories: Year of birth missing | Living people | American federal lawyers | Pennsylvania lawyers
This page was last modified 10:34, 19 February 2007.
All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License. (See Copyrights for
details.)
Wikipedia is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a US-registered 501(c)(3)
tax-deductible nonprofit charity.
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016Page
Page 123
113 of 201
115
120
191
193
198
2 of 2
THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Page 2 of 37
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
6/28/2007 8:01 PM
06/29/2007
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO110
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016Page
Page 124
114 of 201
116
121
191
193
198
THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Page 3 of 37
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
06/29/2007
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO111
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016Page
Page 125
115 of 201
117
122
191
193
198
THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Page 4 of 37
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
06/29/2007
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO112
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016Page
Page 126
116 of 201
118
123
191
193
198
THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Page 5 of 37
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
06/29/2007
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO113
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016Page
Page 127
117 of 201
119
124
191
193
198
THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Page 6 of 37
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
06/29/2007
Sun Filed:
Tues Wed Thur
114
~ ~ % ~ B Page:
/FOR
~I HAVE
T WHISTLBLOWER
[ Date
E M~o n 11/13/2015
DO
PROTECTIONS?
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
~4
[C#rcleOne]
1
II
i
Cl
Ilvm
i
I . :I*
. -"
.
.
.
.
..
lS 4101
AEV 185
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016
Page 128
118 of 201
120
125
191
193
198
THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Page 7 of 37
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
06/29/2007
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Date Filed: 11/13/2015
DO 115
I HAVE WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
Guerin arrives
:o testify on
12.75-million
pay dispute
1y Ernest Schwlber
bnd Tlm Mekeel
James H. Guerin, right, founder of International Signal and Control, walks into a law office il
today. He isaccompanied by his attorney, Joseph A. Tate, of Philadelphia.
-b4
'A
paid Clark $1 million in spring $750,000 for Clark's estate in
Court documents 1
1989, but halted payment Of the York County - because, he indicate that be wa:
remainder, claiming that Clark charges, Clark "extorted'' the tion Guerin about
+ lieves the
secrec.
had
broken
a secrecy. -~ r o v ~ s l o n o faeremrentfmrrrhiftr.
~.~~
. ~ -~~
~ .
- - ~- ~
the agreement.
. 7Today's
session was intended
and wh
In addition, Guerin has agrue@'
to allow Clark's attorney, Joseph
in court, he should not be
quired to pay the.
money - $1 million
See GUEl
-.
-L
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016
Page
P
age 129
119 of 201
121
126
191
193
198
THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Page 8 of 37
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
6, 2016
7,
06/29/2007
Case: 15-3400
A-4
Document: 003112129707
Page:
116 WHISTLBLOWER
Date Filed: 11/13/2015
DO I HAVE
PROTECTIONS?
FROM P I
~-~
~~
~~
....
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016
Page 130
120 of 201
122
127
191
193
198
THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Page 9 of 37
-py&
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
6, 2016
7,
06/29/2007
'
1'
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
117 WHISTLBLOWER
Date Filed: 11/13/2015
DO I HAVE
PROTECTIONS?
Guerin is expected
to testify ~uesday
?ewn mEraMekeel
StaflWrlter
James H.Guerin is scheduled to give preliminary testimony Tuesday in his $2.75 million severance dispute with his former corporate
attorney.
If Guerin appears, it would be the first time his whereabouts have
been established since September.
Guerin. the founder of International Signal & Control, is disputing
the validity of the deal with William A. Clark, formerly its vlce
president and general counsel.
Guerin's deposition is set for 9:30 a.m. in the office of Clark's
S m s i o n is closed to the
attorney, Joseph F. Rod? 36
.- E. King
-.ns.hlie
r
UU....
I'Eideoosition
was scheduled in December at the order of Judge
-~
~..
Michael A. Georgelisof Lancaster County Common I'leasCourt.
Geargelis denled Guerin's bid to ha\.e the session delayed. pending
resolutl'on of ~ossiblecriminal charges aaainst him. and denied his
rique.it lolimit questionsstr~ctlyt o t h c a g k n e n t .
In court papers. Hoda has indicated he \ r i l l ask Guerin about issues
currmll\. under investigation b?' British and American authorltlcs.
becauseihey relate toGierln's stateof mlnd whcn he signed thedcdl
lnternatlonal Signal is being prubcd for posslblecontract fraud and
~llevalexDorts. Nocharges hare been fllcd
But Guerin
is beine sued bv International Signal's merger Dartner.
~Ferranti, torallegcdly participating ina $331)nilllion cont?acifraud.
Guerin's whereabouts have been a mystcry slncr. news 01 thc frautl
broke in Se~tember.Though he has homes in Naples. Fla.. and Lancaster. f r b r k ~~nattemnts
t ~ . . 6v
~the~Dress
- toreach hiin ha've been unsuc~.
cessful He reportedly has been t ; a v e l ~ nabroad.
~
In court DaDers. Guerin has said Roda's questioning \rill force him
to choose between defending himself against Clark and asserting his
constitutional right against self-incrimination. thereby posslbly losing to Clark.
Guerin also has said that answers to Roda's questions could "expose facts" that could hamper his defense against possible criminal
charges.
Tuesday's deposition is the latest development in seven months of
legal jousting between Clark and Guerin.
Clark signed the deal March 28 with Guerin and Parent Industries
Inc., at that time Guerin's holding company.
Guerin paid $1 million of the agreement. then balked at paying the
rest. Clarkstartedcourt proceedingslast July to collect the balance.
Guerin contends that Clark used extortion and coercion to obtain
the deal, and broke a secrecy provision in it. so the deal is void.
Guerin also claims that he has audiotapes of Clark that prove extortion was used.
Clark denies he used extortion to win the deal. He argues that it is a
legitimate agreement to compensate him for unfulfilled financial
promises.
Parcnt Industries Inc. presldenl Michael A. Peck is schcduled for
de~ositlonWednesdas. Peck bought
- Parent Industries Inc from Gutriliin September. In other developments today:
Ferranti is expected this week to report a loss of at least $8
million for the six months ended Sept. 30, in part because of the
restructuring costs from the fraud, said The Guardian newspaper.
The French firm Thomson-CSF is unlikely to complete a rescue
bid for Ferranti before Ferranti's Feb. 5 deadline, The London Times
reported.
~
.~~
----
~~~
~~
~~~~
-~
~~
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016
Page 131
121 of 201
123
128
191
193
198
THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Page 10 of 37
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
6, 2016
7,
06/29/2007
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page: 118
DateDO
Filed:
11/13/2015
I HAVE
WHISTLBLOWER PROTECTIONS?
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016
THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Page 132
122 of 201
124
129
191
193
198
Page 11 of 37
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 20,
31,
6,
7, 2016
06/29/2007
-..-
... .....
r l ' U C l i l l iilJlllOri[l
' -..: .'.
criminal charges have been
biggest
defense
in
Europe,
but
one
of
the
,nost
: ; ;1 $
t;$
;lCase: 15-3400 Document: 003112129707 Page:
119 WHISTLBLOWER
Date Filed: 11/13/2015
filed.
DO I HAVE
PROTECTIONS?
cleverly
orchestrated
99
ucts
wcre
actual\\
Guerin has steadfastlv" denied
"illegal" products
any wrongdoing.
a former Ferranti financial official
looking at whether
Guerin's attorney. Joseph A.
products were ship
Tate, said this week it is impossibiled military purp
ble to provide a detailed rebuttal
Whatev~r
h r.~a
~..
~- .. t.
...
to the fraud allegations because
of the ongoing criminal investi- suit as Lerwick Holdings S.A. ifying the French Mirage fightcr ranti bcgan raisi
gation. He said he cannot allow Marwick, an outside auditipg jet that would carry the missiles, about the Tech Ltc
Guerin to present his explanation firm that regularly checked In- the missiles were not shipped to ments from South i
a sudden halt.
of the alleged fraud. Nor, hesaid, ternational Signal's figures, took the Middle East kingdom.
Ferranti has wri
is there anyone who can steps to verify thecontract.
Turning that delay to its advanFerranti auditors and officials tage, Tech Ltd. signed the UAE $50 million that it
knowledgeably give Gucrin's
even visited Pakistan, where to a contract for a more sophistiside at present.
Shireman, the Marietta man they interviewed a man believed cated version of the Hakim, and
Fcrranli-is cxnec
who was head of finance at Tech to be Major Gen. Talat Masood, sold, or supposedly sold, the old
Ltd.. was out of town this week then in charge of Army ord- missiles to the People's Republic
and could not be reachedfor com- nance, and received satisfactorv of China.
Durine those
ment on the detailed fraud ac- answers to their questions, iimFerranti
officials
say
auditors
Guerin
and the 0th
count. His attorney didnot return pany officials say.
from Peat Manvick ins~ected
.
will have an oppo
phonecalls.
The alleged fraud began to un- portions of the old mi~silc
vr(1c.r.
The other two employees ravel as Guerin left the company orwhat they though1 a a s t h c mis- fend themselves
explanation (
named in the suit, Radcliife of in May to organize a Leveraged sile order, in a warehouse in 19nh. their
Pass
contract.
buyout
that
would
have
returned
Lancaster, and Resch, of San
But afte'r the missiles were
Meanwhile, the c
Clemente, Calif., have declined several divisions - including shipped from the warehouse, tigation
into Intet
comment on their lawyers' ad- TechLtd. -to hisownership.
they vanishcd. Private investigaThat deal collapsed when Gue- tors hired by Ferranti to find nal's business deal
vice. Radcliffe has told the Brituing.
ish court that he intends to o p rin was unable to get financing, them have beenunsuccessful.
Federal author?
after being turned down by Drexpose Ferranti's lawsuit.
are working "in c
During
a
chairman's
commitel
Burnham,
Citibank
and
Ferf the three losses idention" with their cc
tified by Ferranti, the ranti itself. Had the buyout been tee meeting, however, Sir Derek Britain's Serious :
Alun-Jones,
Ferranti
chairman,
completed,
investigators
believe
fictitious "Khyber
congratulated Guerin on the sale Taking part in the
Pass" contract was the alleged contract fraud might of
the missiles, which were then U.S. Attorney's 01
by f a r the most dam- not have come to light.
code-named
Project Alpha, one Department, IRS,
The
first
substantial
sign
that
aging. accounting for about $250
and other agencies.
director
recalls.
something was amiss came when
~ 1 1 l i k othe
f totdloss.
SO,
wherever
those
missiles
Ferranti
officials
noticed
a
lack
The contract, brought to the
company in late 1986 by Guerin of consistency on dates on con- are today, Ferranti says it had to
swallow a loss on them totaling
nersonall\~.called for delivery of tract documents.
about $100 miltion.
Further
financial
discrepanbroductiin systems for at least
The final shortage discovincorrect date
three missile systems - air-to- cies came to tight in summer, ered by Ferranti financial inves- theAnspeech
Retire,
andin
mid-July,
the
front
compaair, air-to-ground and ground-tonies abruptly were dissolved. At tigators is the smallest - under Richard Scott will
air.
$50 million - and the simplest to Lancaster Histori
~
was month's end, payments on the understand.
Tech Ltd.'s S U.D. D O S ~role
about his escape frc
Pakistan
deal
stopped
altogetht u pnll the pieces together. in this
Since the late 1970s. Ferranti prisoner of war ca
rase buyins h;~rd\vareand tech- e..r. ~
Ferranti officials now are con- officials say, Tech Ltd. and its rect day is Tuesdaj
n o l o ~ from
r
South Africa. and asvinced
the Pakistan1 contract predecessor ISC companies had New Era regrets the
sembling the systems for resale
been selling large volumes of
wasenttrely f~ct~ttous.
to Pakistan.
electronics - integrated cirJoseph C. Kauff
They
say
the
front
companies
Its contract called for supply of
cuits, antennas and other hightooling, technological "how-to" were all controlled by Guerinand tech communication equipment been re-appointed
ship roadmaster by
data, test facilities and missile had no ties to the CIA or South
to South Africa, a nation supervisors. A stor
Africa.
prototypes, all supplied by an
The contract managers, a shunned by many U.S. eorpora- day's New Era inco:
arms subsidiarv of BarlowFerranti official says. tions because of its racial segre- that another towr
high-level
Rand, a South ~ j r i c a ncorporahad been named to
wcre
people
simply posing in that gationpolicies.
tion, and a second as-yet unidenThose. sales were based on New Era regrets thc
role.
tified company.
The major general either was
Even by Tech Ltd.'s normal another impostor, paid by the
~
~
*
~
=
5
3
s
s
~
standards for high secrecy, the Perpetrators, or was a genuine rll
"Khyber Pass" contract had ex- official mistakenly responding to
ccptionalsecurity safeguards.
questions about a different misFirst, it was not accompanied sile project, company officials
a bank's now suspect.
by a letter of credit
guarantee that Tech Ltd. would
All the known contract docube paid. Supposedly, Pakistan ments were fabricated for the auobjected to such a letter, fearing ditors' benefit, a former Ferranti
news of the deal might
- leak official says, Other documents
through the bank.
that would have supported a real
Second, Pakistan's payments contract are nowhere to be found.
Clutches Billfolds- French
were routed indirectly to Tech
"If you'rean accountant, evRoute 340 o n The P l a ~ n& Fancy Far
Ltd. through a Swiss bank ac- erything is there for you. But the
O p e n Dally 9-5,Frl 9-8. Closed Sun 7~
count managed by a front compa- only paper is what was generated
s
a
~
~
~
~
~
~
ny. identified in Ferranti's law- for the financial people." another h
~
-..r..>4n
OUlrll,llL1Ci),
VUI
I,"
~~
~~~
fku&
-LLu
g;
/-5-98
$,irkel's o f New Y
BUXTON WALLE
I.'
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016
Page 133
123 of 201
125
130
191
193
198
THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Page 12 of 37
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
6, 2016
7,
06/29/2007
necords seized at
local home aid probe
of Guerin-South Africa
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Mekeel
!?ewTlmErastaff
Writer
Page:
Date Filed: 11/13/2015
DO 120
I HAVE WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016
Page 134
124 of 201
126
131
191
193
198
THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Page 13 of 37
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
6, 2016
7,
06/29/2007
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
121 WHISTLBLOWER
Date Filed: 11/13/2015
DO I HAVE
PROTECTIONS?
INTELLIGENCER JOURNAL
LOCALIBUSINESS
iar*casrEn.Pa.
OBITUARIES/<
SATURDAY. FEaRt
*nagnah-tstsn
ALLENMWN
- A federal judge
day
the rwuest
nlm
t am
l l,
si I
lorrner
a t h e y lo
de%aheatinglodetermineilhe~enti.
tledta,methaat2milliMthathasbeen
theoblwtof
a legal bttlefwnea.ly
a
year.
William A. Clark's Washin--baed
atfaney Barnet D. SLolnik, asked US.
Dlltrict judge Edward N. Cahn lodelay
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016
Page 135
125 of 201
127
132
191
193
198
THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Page 14 of 37
~&d"tb"C~
because the m e y wovl
by t h e p r e v i o ~ e a v r t
who
Shesid
la ri hlfully
that theburd,
enti"
?utinvokingUlisri~ht,aadpossibIy
hurt-
I,,
chargesbebrovghiatalatetedatt.
Assi~tantUS. Attorney Sania C. Jai-
M=.
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
06/29/2007
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
122 WHISTLBLOWER
Date Filed: 11/13/2015
DO I HAVE
PROTECTIONS?
4EuStScMeiber
T ."d,rn
Mekeel
I New 618 S1a" Wl#lers
e
r
:I
r
3
Williarncbr*
Allegedinblachmail
It 1141hYear-No.35,653
z:?:2?A,ler
METROPOLITAN
Page 15 of 37
~~
~~~~
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016
Page 136
126 of 201
128
133
191
193
198
M
s?m.-.
~
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
06/29/2007
Prl
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
123 WHISTLBLOWER
Date Filed: 11/13/2015
DO I HAVE
PROTECTIONS?
PEB /--
7/ / F ? /
'Blackmail'
Continuedfrom A-1
In the acquisition, Ferranti
~-~ used
"The one thing I will look for savs. "Guerin and others
you to do, Bill, after we close this faise' contracts to overstate the
out, is ...(that) you look me in the value of ISC by at least $350 mileye and you say, I've destroyed lion, and Fcrranti officials relied
those packages," Guer~nsays. on those material misrepresentaClark assures his boss that after tions in agreeing to (a) stock
he gets his last payment, he will swap."
"take a trip, and I don't mean a
Ferranti says it is entitled to
vacation trip.
get the money back because it
"And when I get back from that was "illegally obtained propertrip, I will tell you that I have ty" that Guerin had no right to
been to certain places, and I have give toClark.
recovered the packages that are
The court testimony of an IRS j
there, and I have destroyed agent last May shows that $1.3
million of the funds were direct
them," Clarksays.
"I will take a book of matches results of the ISC swindle, Ferand they will be done away ranti says.
Another $700,000, it says, was
with," hesays.
Guerin testified here in Janu- illegally diverted from an ISC :
i
ary 1990 that Clark had attempt- subsidiary.
ed to extort $2.75 million from
Clark is not entitled to the
him, using 11 packages of al- funds, the company says, belegedly damaging information cause he knew the money was
tainted and used that knowledge,
about Guerin and his associates.
(
to force payments from Guerin.
!
The packages
alleged
"What Clark had in mind was
wrongdoing,
illegal
salefinancial
of arms
to South Africa, conflicts of inter- blackmail, not settlement of real i
est and cheating on government or imagined grievances about his
contracts, Guerin said.
employment," Ferranti charges
Clark's demand for money in its filing.
came during delicate financial
negotiations when Guerin was attempting to buy back a portion of
Ferranti.
Guerin believed the packages
particularly those alleging
Guerin had inflated its financial
worth would have scuttled the
buyback.
Clark suggested masking the
payments as a severance agreement in which he left the company due to health problems and
promised not to "bad mouth" the
company. Guerin agreed.
In Anril and Mav of 1989. while
the buiback negoiiations were in
progress, Guerin p a ~ dClark $1
million, according t o court documents.
But after the negotiations collapsed, Guerin stopped further
payment. Clark sued for the r e
mainder. and Guerin set it aside
in- a hankescrow
- ---- - ...- - account
-.
..-- -.
In Wednesday's filing, however, Ferranti, which in 1987 had
acauired Guerin's International
~ i d n a l & control cornoanies.
~~~.
claims that -ieitht.r Guerin nor
t the money.
Clarkhad any r ~ g hto
Since autumn 1989, the compai
nv has claimed that Guerin and
ISC management
vict~mized
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November
6, 2016
Page 137
127
129
134
of 201
191 it in
193
198
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
6, 2016
7,
what its attorneys now call "a
1
THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Page 16 ofconspiracy"
37
06/29/2007
truly stupendous
~
~.
~~
~~
Clark, Guerin
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
124 WHISTLBLOWER
Date Filed: 11/13/2015
DO I HAVE
PROTECTIONS?
-
K-17-9a
~~
!Tee"
r-r
..--*--I-
--A
>.
~~
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
125 WHISTLBLOWER
Date Filed: 11/13/2015
DO I HAVE
PROTECTIONS?
,-
by Tim Mekeel
and Ernest Schreiber
hew Era Slafl Wr ters
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016
Page 139
129 of 201
131
136
191
193
198
THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Page 18 of 37
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
6, 2016
7,
06/29/2007
CHAPTER
DIVIDER
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016Page
Page 140
130 of 201
132
137
191
193
198
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
126 WHISTLBLOWER
Date Filed: 11/13/2015
DO IP.C.
HAVE
PROTECTIONS?
JOSEPH F. RODA.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
301 C4PHER BUILDING
36 E A S T I(INC. STREET
LANCASTER. PENNSYLVANIA 1 7 6 0 2
TELEPHONE 17171 3 9 7 - 3 7 9 1
JOSEPH F R O D *
PAUL 5.R O M A N O
Joseph F. Roda
JFR: dlb
Enc.
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016
Page 141
131 of 201
133
138
191
193
198
THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Page 19 of 37
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
06/29/2007
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
127 WHISTLBLOWER
Date Filed: 11/13/2015
DO I HAVE
PROTECTIONS?
J u l y 22, 1987
CATERBONE
Attorney
JFR
JFR
JFR
Description
C o n f e r e n c e s w i t h S. C a t e r b o n e ;
telephone c a l l f r o m J .
Jamouneau, E s q . ; l e t t e r t o
R. K a u f m a n .
3.1
Telephone c a l l s t o and f r o m S .
C a t e r b o n e and f r o m R . K a u f f m a n .
-4
L e t t e r f r o m R. K a u f f m a n .
.1
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016
Page 142
132 of 201
134
139
191
193
198
THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
H ours
-
Page 20 of 37
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
6, 2016
7,
06/29/2007
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
128 WHISTLBLOWER
Date Filed: 11/13/2015
DO I HAVE
PROTECTIONS?
JOSEPH
F. RODA. P.C.
3 0 1 C I P H E R B U I L O I N G 36 E K l N G STREET
LANCASTER PENNSYLVANIA 1 7 6 0 2
I
CATERBONE
$74.48
1.00
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016
Page 143
133 of 201
135
140
191
193
198
THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Page 21 of 37
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
06/29/2007
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Date Filed: 11/13/2015
DO 129
I HAVE WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
INFORMATION SOURCES
Santa Barbara P s y c h i a t r i a c
(805) 964-6713
Therapist Gerry Eckrosh
Cottage Hospital
Pueblo & Bath S t r e e t s
Santa Barbara, CA
Place of Death
John Carpenter
Santa Barbara, CA
Coroner/ Signed Report
Dept L .R. G i l l e s p i e
Santa Barbara, CA
(805) 967-5561
P o l i c e contact from Santa Barbara
B i l l McCord
never made c o n t a c t t o family
West Lampeter P o l i c e
Contacted Mary Caterbone 12/26/84 @2:00 pm
Charles F. Snyder, Jr.
Charles F. Snyder Funeral Home
414 E. King S t .
17602
Lancaster, PA
Handled a l l arrangements f o r b u r i a l
contacted on 12/26/84 @ 8:00 pm
Mental Health Association
No information
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016
Page
P
age 144
134 of 201
136
141
191
193
198
THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Page 22 of 37
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
6, 2016
7,
06/29/2007
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO130
I HAVE Date
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
JOSEPH F. RODA
MARC J. ZUCKER
February 5, 1 9 8 5
M r . S t a n l e y J. C a t e r b o n e
433 W e s t Marion S t r e e t
L a n c a s t e r , P A 17603
Dear S t a n :
A t J o e ' s r e q u e s t , I am r e t u r n i n g t h e i n f o r m a t i o n t h a t
you s e n t t o u s r e g a r d i n g your b r o t h e r ' s e s t a t e .
With b e s t r e g a r d s ,
Sincerely,
j e a n R . Grace
Legal A s s i s t a n t
J R G :m l h
Enc
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016Page 145
135 of 201
137
142
191
193
198
THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Page 23 of 37
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
6, 2016
7,
06/29/2007
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
131 WHISTLBLOWER
Date Filed: 11/13/2015
DO I HAVE
PROTECTIONS?
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016
Page 146
136 of 201
138
143
191
193
198
THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Page 24 of 37
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
06/29/2007
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
cQ)NII=IIDMRAL
DANIEL E. LUNGREN
Attorney General
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO132
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
State of California
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
PUBLIC INOUIRY UNIT
PFO. BOX 944255
SACRAMENTO,CA 94244-2550
(916) 322-3360
CA TOLLFREE 1800) 952-5225
HEARING IMPAIREDI TDY (916j324-5564
or CA TOLLFREET D Y (800) 952-5548
Stan Caterbone
615 Wyncroft Lane, #2
Lancaster, PA 17603
Dear Mr. Caterbone:
Thank you for your recent letter to Attorney General Dan
Lungren dated October 23, 1991 regarding your brother, Samuel
Catebone .
Unfortunately, this office does not have the authority to
initiate an investigation into your brother's death. Only the
County of Santa Barbara can conduct such an investigation. If
you wish to pursue the matter, we suggest that you contact the
Santa Barbara District Attorney's Office at: 1105 Santa Barbara
Street, Santa Barbara, California, 93101 or the Santa Barbara
Coroner's Office at: P.O. Box 6427, Santa Barbara, California,
93160.
You may also want to request that the local police
department conduct an investigation. You may contact the Santa
Barbara Police Department at: 215 East Figueroa, Santa Barbara,
California, 93102. We hope we have been of assistance to you.
Again, thank you for contacting the office of Attorney
General Dan Lungren.
Sincerely,
GP :cpc
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016Page
Page 147
137 of 201
139
144
191
193
198
THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Page 25 of 37
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
6, 2016
7,
06/29/2007
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
133 WHISTLBLOWER
Date Filed: 11/13/2015
DO I HAVE
PROTECTIONS?
FOLDERS
C L E R G Y
E S C O R T
T E M P O R A R Y MARKER
L'ancadzt, P a .
ARRANGEMENTS OF
&.C!?mb.e.r....25.~~~~~198.4
......................................................................................................
Hour ....................................
M.
Cottage Hospital - Santa Barbara CA
Santa Barbara County
............................................. .... ................................... .............................................. Twp. ..................................................................
.....
Place of Death
Residence No.
...........................................................................................................................................................................................................................
.................... ......
...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
(Town, Village or City)
(State)
(Zip)
(Length of Residence)
_._
Birthplace
.......................1.%9
............... Age ..........3.5............................
(Day)
(Year)
(Year)
12........
6..............................................
(Month)
(Day)
Lancaster Pa.
................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
(City. Town or Township)
(State)
(County)
Color or
Single, Married
caucasian.
single
Race ..............................
.
................ or Widowed ................................................................................................
male
Sex ................................................
If Married or Widowed,
Husband of (or) Wife of (Maiden Name)
Samuel Caterbone
Father's Name ......................................................................................
Deceased Occupation ........................unemp.loyed...........
..............................................................................................................................
183 40 2503
Social Security Account No. .......................................................
Physician ....John...Ga.~pen.&r:.~c~x~~e.~:
...........................
............:.............................................................................
I(
sf anley..J.,...C.aferb.0.n~
..........................................................................................................
Informant
Relationship
........
b~o$r
............
1 17 / Q q
3Q73
Address
f . ~ . r & . g . . ,20
f ~ 7603)
299-5958 W
...............................................................................................................................................................................................................
....................................................
....ca.s.ket.....................................................................................................................................
Place of Viewing CEST;TH.......................cC1.c?se.d
Sat. 12/29/84
.......................................................
Date of Viewing ....................
.
.
Time
1O:OO am
.CFSFH St. Joseph's Church
please omit Mental Health Assn. Inc.
Place of Funeral ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Sat. 12/29/84
11:OO am
Time ..................................................................................................................
5
....................................
Row
No. ................................
Lot
:.......................................
C
NZ.25.................................... Section No. ...................................................
Lawrence C. Gross
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016
Page 148
138 of 201
140
145
191
193
198
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
6, 2016
7,
Services
toPROBE
be Conducted
byBANK
Rev.
..........................................................................................................................................................................................
THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Page 26 of 37
Address
.........................................................................................................................................................................
06/29/2007
Phone .........................................................
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:DO
134
Filed: 11/13/2015
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
11 be sent to Me Mental H
, AsKL~~~OII
Inc. of Lanc
Miami Fla
2. ............................... bro:....S t e ~ k n . . ...................................................................................................................................................................................
P.~
Stanley J.
3. .............................................................................................................................................................
.,.La.J-!~c!?xr
.~ .....................................................................
Phillip W.
Phila.
4.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
5.
.................................................................
.Michae.!....
k ....................................................................................
~
..........................................................
Thomas W.
Lanc
6.
................
7. ..............................paternal ...granhthe.~.:
....Mary....Caterb,o.ne
I
I
8........................................................................................................................................................................................
9 ......................................................................................................................................................................................
10. ......................
.
...................................................................................................................................................................
'
11. ................................................................................................................................................................................................
12. ........................................................................................................................................................................................
13. ..............................................................................................................................................................................................
..
; son of Samuel-Caterbone.ahd.Y
14. ................................................................................................................................................................................................, .landahRhoda. Caterbope,"bo$
: :J+ancaster;i{i,:
:'j;&&?;F
x,;?.;:.t - ?: ;
15. ................................................................................................................................................................................................. ,i+; .. He. was. ,,thl;:U$i Air,Force;
. .
;*'and,.stationed..inc.Santa"
Barbar?'
Lodge or Soaetles.................................................................................................................................................
a
.-...........................................................................................................................................................................................................
St. Joseph's
Church Affiliations .........................................................................................................................................................
..
&,
-uRF//sj.6?Le...? ...
.*...@./ 48..
....................
,..............
...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................................................................
Cf
......................................................
........................
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016Page
Page 149
139 of 201
141
146
191
193
198
THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Page 27 of 37
(8051569-2424.
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
06/29/2007
I
I
Case: 15-3400
Document:
003112129707 Page: 135
CERTIFICATE OF DEATH
Date Filed:
DO I 11/13/2015
HAVE WHISTLBLOWER PROTECTIONS?
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
I 1 B . MIDDLE
I 1 C . LAST
., . ..: . .
. . .
a .
. .. . .
..
..,
DECEDENT
PERSONAL
DATA
rr
OR
.. . .
. .. .< .
.,
OIR1H NAME)
:L,.
.. ,;. .. .
.... ... ... ...
. .. . .. .
..
.. ,.. .. .. ..
.. .... ..... ....
. .. . . .
.. . . .
.'
,
USUAL
RESIDENCE
S t a n l e y Caterbone ( b r o t h e r )
PLACE
OF
DEATH
i S a n t a Barbara
Cottage H o s ~ i t a l
2 l C . S T R E E T A D D R E S S (STRCLT AND NUMOER OR LOCATION)
22. D E A T H W A S C A U S E D BY.
433 Marian S t r e e t
Barbara
I Lancaster,
THE IMMEOIAT~
W E TO. OR AS A CON3EOUCNCE OF
TO
crusa.
1st
WE
THE
MATE
INTERVAL
BETWEEN
ONSET
AND
CONDITIONS-CONTRIWIN(~
WAS AUTOPSY
rrnronurnr
No
22
M1
No
l 2 8 B
I
I
I
I
I A ~ E N D E D DECCDENT
SINCE
NO
2 6
2 B A . I CERTIPY
THAT D E A T H OCCURRED AT THE
HOUR. DATE AND PLACE STATED FROM THE CAUSES
!STATED.
(ENTER YO. DA. YR.)
Yes
25 WAS 010PSY H M O ~ M L O ?
DEATH
'
PHYSICIAN'S
CERTIFICATION
APPROXI-
TO. OR AS A CONSEQUENCE OF
2 3 OTHER SIGNIFICANT
IN 2 2 A
4
4
C O N M T I O N ~ . IC ANY.
RL
,I
PA
( E N T E R O N L Y O N E C A U S E P E R L I N E F O R A. E. A N D C )
IMMEDIATE CAUSE
CAUSE
OF
PHYSICIAN-SIGNATURE
30.PLACE OF INJURY
.
,
3 1 . INJURY AT WORK
INJURY
INFORMATION
McD-tt.
STATE
REGISTRAR
IA'
-C r n
V E l 1 0-831
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE
FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016
.. '... . . .
. .......
.- .. . .. . ..
1 2 1 ~C
. ITY O R T O W N
I Santa
P u e b l o @ Bath S t r e e t s
( '
F ?F!?
C
:
D.
Page 150
140 of 201
142
147
191
193
198
Page 28 of 37
E.
. . .'.:. .. . ,.. .
... -.... ,
.. .. .. . .. .. .
. . .- ..':
-,
. .:*
.
'
;$
,'d
.'.:
'
1 F.
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 20,
31,
6,
7, 2016
06/29/2007
Case: 15-3400
SUICIDE
1927L .OCI.L
-WIV.WTI
-.o
l
..IT"!
(I."
AOO.
..
Cottage H o s p i t a l pers-1,
**.
*
.
*
.
a-a
...,
cw..
COurfT.
..lT..
-I.-.'.lo.
Nurse Pzxton
~ ~ c o r n ~
o roc lm~ s . o i
(rarr. amo-..s.
CWY.
COVITT.
lo.
0.CU.II.
,
.TAIR.
wc.
.US,
9-
o v n m m u.-CT:
l...)
&
-OW.-D=.~.~C.
m~l. . ~
Sal 1y Rodriguez
Marv Caterbone/Grandmothq_
.,.
"
i n person
..t..OIO.W.
. - .
.., Lancaster
0..
Coclnty PA,
--Pol ice..
...,.,....
, Telepype
Refer t o c o n t i n u a t i o n
**
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November
Page
6, 2016
141 of 201
143
148
151
191
193
198
THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
12-26-84
Page 29 of 37
.VTACII.DT*
T" *.ro*.
mDVS.8.
....,,.,
,,,
1228 Hrs.
, 12-26-84/1228
U ~ C O ~
u n~ r I-1
...L
-.
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
6, 2016
7,
06/29/2007
Case: 15-3400
PAGE
(A)
OF
CONTINUATION FORM
- 84 - 543
LISTCONTINUATIONS (01 DESCRIBE: PHYSICAL EVIDENCE, LOCATION FOUND & DlSPOSlTlON (C) NARRATIVE
264:
1.1
Document: 003112129707
Page:
137
Date Filed:
11/13/2015
DO I HAVE
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
B e l t booked as Coroner
property.
2.
268:
None Found.
5.1
6.1.
&I
11.
12.
131
14.1
I b r i e f l y examined the v i c t i m
The mark
16.
17.
l8
19
I/
here
were
t o t h e Coroner's o f f i c e .
23
Ix.l
25
27.
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November
Page6,152
142
144
149
2016
191Yett (supervisor)
193
198
201
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
Monday
November
October
20,
7,
6, 2016
County FULTON
oTATE-JOE
f Santa
Barbara.
According
t oofTim
the
v i c t l m 31,
was
THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Page 30 of 37
06/29/2007
Case: 15-3400
PAGE
ITEM
NO.
Document: 003112129707
Page:
138
Date
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO I HAVE
WHISTLBLOWER
SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT.
cA= PROTECTIONS?
OF
- 84 -
534
CONl'INUATIOJ FORM
(A) LIST CONTINUATIONS 'BI DESCRIRE: PHYSICAL EVIDENCE. LOCATION FOUND & DISPOSITION (C) NARRAT lVE
Mr. Y e t t
The v i c t i m was found hanging i n Room 204 b y James Kidman, who occupies t h e
room.
Mr. Y e t t be1 ieves t h a t the v i c t i m used Room 204 because i t was unoccupied a t
the time.
Yett
according t o Yett.
There
Paramedics s a i d t h a t t h e v i c t i m
No b o t t l e s of a l c o h o l were located.
There was no e v i -
dence o f a s t r u g g l e .
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November
Page6,153
143
145
150
2016
of 201
191
193
198
Page 31 of 37
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
6, 2016
7,
SH 316 Rn. 1.84
06/29/2007
Case: 15-3400
PAGE
Document: 003112129707
Page:
139
Date Filed:
11/13/2015
DO I HAVE
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
OF
S A N T A B A R B A R A COIJNTY
C - 84 - 534
CONTINUATION FORM
(0) DESCRIBE: PHYSICAL EVIDENCE. LOCATION FOUND & DISPOSITION (C) NARRATIVE
I was unable t o access the v i c t i m ' s f i l e , which may be a t County Psych and
a v a i l a b l e d u r i n g business hours.
victim.
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November
Page 154
144
146
151
6, 2016
of 201
191
193
198
THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Page 32 of 37
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
6, 2016
7,
06/29/2007
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO140
I HAVE Date
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
Stan Caterbone
220 Stone H i l l Ruad
Conestoga, PA
17516
me1 A. Caterbone
Thh~k~rsdIk.IImProlsllPswo#l#sdinhLa~~8upariweaurt
I. %ktthemnectdimid@St~1) Under Cdurnn t belaw,ehedtthe one type d a d o n whkh best describesthe nature of this case.
2) In Caiumn 2 below, drde the m s m for your choiceofdistrict that appliesto the type of action y
w have heelred
1.
6.
7.
Othm Statutory A u t h w g
May be filed inthe appropriate dimkt (Local Rule 2 . q ~ states
)
A6210
A6211
(JI A6212
A6213
C 5-7.
c5-7.
~ 6 2 1 5 S P O U ~~operty
~I
Petition
A6216
A621 7
I/j A6218
Comlmt#rhipIGuurdhrhip
)/) A6230 FWtIonfor Conseruaorshipof Perxrnand Estate
r] A6231
PetItion~CO~~~~rvatorshipdPcrSQn
only
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016Page 155
145 of 201
147
152
191
193
198
THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Page 33 of 37
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
6, 2016
7,
06/29/2007
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707 DO
Page:
141
Date Filed:PROTECTIONS?
11/13/2015
I HAVE
WHISTLBLOWER
C m s m a m s h i p I Guardianship
A624EI
A6241
0h6242
r]AfKW
Tmst Rvreedlngr
A6200
A6243
A6233
Capwltydetemidon
11. Select the appropriated m Enter the address of the party. decedent'sresidence,property, or crther d ~ m s t a n c you
e have clrded In mlumn 2 as the
proper mason for filing inthe dlmict you selected
1*ysat~wMBLRmaRPeO~+mllMHPRDm~EllSE
-(XRI1116CTm/FmmMW
l
am
!irm
Santa
111,
iw E
Barbara, Califarnia
Rnother case IIndudingJuverdb Famlly law,AdOparons, e t 4 has k n filedwith LosAndes Superlor Court imIving the same mino*).
51s
I declare under perraky ofperjury under tf~el a w ofthe State of Callfornla that the foregoi
I/
/
NmProbdoCaFlllngRubuctla
This fwm is required so that the court m asign your we to the c o w m courthow In the propw district for filing. It m*sfiesthe requirementfor a
cerHRcate as to r e a m for authwlzlng flling R the courthwse IaEaffon, w set forth h Los Angeles Superior Court Local Rule 2 8 It must be completed
and submttwd a the cwrt along with the odginal Petiefon In ALL Probate cases filed In any d i m e flndudng the Cenaal Disbictl of the Lw Ahgeles
County Superior Couh
3. Other documentsas requiredby statute, Callfamil Rules of Court or Rules of thls CouR
4. Pdymcm In full dthe filing f e s or
Order ofthe Court wMnq payment of the flllng fees flee w a l w applkatlonforms wallable atthe FormsWindow).
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November Page
6, 2016
146 of 201
148
153
156
191
193
198
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
6, 2016
7,
PROBATE
CASE
COVER
SHEET
CERTIFICATE
OF
BROUNDS
FOR
ASSlGNYENT
l
U
DISTRICT
THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Page 34 of 37
06/29/2007
PIW nrn n u 3
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
142 WHISTLBLOWER
Date Filed: 11/13/2015
DO I HAVE
PROTECTIONS?
S W cadmlle
220 Stum Hill Road
Cmatoga,PA 17516
DarightFdMDep*
Public ~~r~
Post Office Box 2517
105 E.Anapuma Street
born 301
Santa Barbara, CA 93120-2517
Dear Mr.FaUlW:
B ~ l is d
the fie that yaw ofke bad lost.
J~Wsdyou&inUpthtethismatter.
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016
Page 157
147 of 201
149
154
191
193
198
THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Page 35 of 37
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
6, 2016
7,
06/29/2007
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
143
Date PROTECTIONS?
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO I HAVE
WHISTLBLOWER
Instructions
1. Each ClM-M-Shl@ label h unique. Lnbob am lo bs
m d r r s p r i n s s d a n d ~ o n i y DONOTPHOTO
~.
COPY OR ALTER LABEL
Slgttalu1-8ConflnnatIonm Number:
(Label I of i )
wht:
m
1
W
L
9
9
1W081M05
5
11 lbOoz
lJfiwy-Poatspe:
$k&
QignatureCanfirmatian: $1.30
(EbdmkRpB)
f ~ :
S-16
I T o m p l l y o u ~ ~ i t h P C ~ ~ y w
mry-.Csrrlwpl~LUpOnlb#handm
mEz.
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November
Page 158
148
150
155
6, 2016
of 201
191
193
198
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
6, 2016
7,
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
144WHISTLBLOWER
Date Filed: 11/13/2015
DO
I HAVE
PROTECTIONS?
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6,Page
2016159
149 of 201
151
156
191
193
198
THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Page 37 of 37
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
6, 2016
7,
06/29/2007
CHAPTER
DIVIDER
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016Page
Page 160
150 of 201
152
157
191
193
198
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October 31,
20,
7,
6, 2016
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO145
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
Stan J. Caterbone
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
Federal Whistleblower
and
Targeted Individual (Victim)
of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
Executive Summary
Updated on October 10, 2015
I remain,
Stan J. Caterbone
PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL: Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant, and the Advanced Media
Group are victims of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control and has been engaged in litigation in both
Federal and State courts seeking financial remedies and a resolution of his Civil Liberties and
his Constitutional Rights. In 1987 Stan J. Caterbone, while managing the financial firm the he
founded, Financial Management Group, Ltd., Stan J. Caterbone became a Federal Whistleblower
when, as a shareholder, he claimed fraud and misconduct within the international arms dealer
and local start-up International Signal & Control, Plc., Some 4 years later ISC was indicted and
plead guilty to the 3rd largest fraud in U.S. history, some $1 Billion and selling arms to Irag via
South Africa. In June of 2015 Stan J. Caterbone became the Movant in the U.S. District Court
for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania case No. 5:14-cv-02559-PD for the Habeus Corpus
Petition of Lisa Michelle Lambert. The case is now before the U.S. Third Circuit Court of
Appeals, Case No. 15-3400.
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016Page
Page
151
153
158
of 41
191
193
198
201
Page161
1 of
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October10,
20,
31,
7,
6, 2015
2016
Saturday,
October
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO146
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
copyright 2009
Ya know what, I am beginning to analyze this War on Terror and am having difficulty understanding
it all. To me the most effective fundamental fight against Extreme Terrorism is to reduce the motive; or the
Hatred Against America. No one seems to talk about that subject. How do we reduce that Hatred Towards
America and the West?
See, from my perspective, my situation is very disturbing. I mean we have the United States Torturing Me, a
U.S. Citizen for no good or valid reason. I have warned EVERYONE about using my situation to feed this
HATRED towards America.
Low and behold a week or so ago I have had several Muslims sign up as Followers to my
www.scribd.com/amgroup01 online webspace, which I use to post documents. The following being the most
prominent IKWAN Scope, "The Largest Muslim Brotherhood's Scope on the Web":
http://ikhwanscope.net/main/
There have also been several Muslim individuals who signed up as followers around the same time, a week
or so ago. They have also signed up as followers on my www.twitter.com/StanCaterbone webspace.
You must understand, I am a VERY Patriotic Person and live a very patriotic life - I believe in the
U.S. Constitution and Our Founding Father's vision for America; I support Our Military and our
Troops; I believe in the Rule of Law; I am a Practicing Catholic, and have been my whole life; I
Believe in the TRUTH; I believe in Right v. Wrong; Good v. Evil; and finally I believe in God. What
do you believe in?
Posted on the Yahoo Fulton Bank Stock Message Board, January 7, 2010
Date Updated:
Date Completed:
Date Initiated:
Stan J. Caterbone
Advanced Media Group
scaterbone@live.com
www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016Page
Page
152
154
159
of 41
191
193
198
201
Page162
2 of
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October10,
20,
31,
7,
6, 2015
2016
Saturday,
October
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO147
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
Psychiatric Commitment of April 2010 by Detective Clark Bearinger, until January of 2015, Stan J.
Caterbone and Advanced Media Group had been in seclusion and in a state of rehabilitation and
rest due to the forced medication by Fairmount Behavioral Hospital and Dr. Silvia Gratz.
The
psychotropic drugs reduce your motor skills and put you in an extreme state of confusion.
By
the
end
of
the
summer
of
2010
every
social
media
site,
including
the
Lancaster City Police Department took the lead role. As usual Stan J. Caterbone summoned state
and federal authorities for help and assistance, including direct communications with the White
House, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office and
Kathleen Kane, The Pennsylvania State Police, the Pennsylvania General Assembly, several U.S.
Congressmen, and of course the Lancaster County District Attorney's Office.
Since August 1,
2015 the Geek Squad had performed diagnostics and repairs six (6) times due to computer
hacking. On at least 2 occasions the entire hard drive had to be wiped clean and restored.
On June 23, 2015 Stan J. Caterbone was named MOVANT in the 2014 Habeus
Corpus Petition by Lisa Michelle Lambert, Case No. 14:02559 in the U.S. District Court
for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania after filing an Amicus on the case. Judge Paul
Diamond was presiding since it's filing in 2014. However, the Petition was not able to
be granted and the case was stalled on jurisdictional law based on new and compelling
evidence, or lack there of.
In fact a working theory was filed that suggested that the East Lampeter
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016Page
Page
153
155
160
of 41
191
193
198
201
Page163
3 of
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October10,
20,
31,
7,
6, 2015
2016
Saturday,
October
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO148
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
Lisa Michelle Lambert, or grant her her Habeus Corpus, and whether to grant Summary
Judgment to Stan J. Caterbone in all civil actions in both state and federal courts.
Two weeks later, on July 9, 2015, Detective Clark Bearinger filed another fabricated
Petition for Involuntary Psychiatric Commitment. And again Stan J. Caterbone endured 7 days in
the Fairmount Behavioral Hospital in Philadelphia.
no
MANDATORY Treatment Program Ordered by the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas.
So Stan J. Caterbone continued filing in the courts for assistance and resolution. In August, in a
desperate attempt to stop the local torture campaign, another Emergency Injunction was filed in
the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas. On August 6, 2015 Stan J. Caterbone went so far
as to undertake a Professional Polygraph Test administered by Bonnie Lee of Polygraph Solutions
of West Chester, Pennsylvania. The test ended up being 4 grueling hours of torture and a scam of
$600.00.
On July 9th , 2015 a Private Criminal Complaint was filed against Detective Clark Bearinger,
Officer Williams, Officer Binderup, and 2 unidentified patrolman.
Department were so desperate for retaliation from the Amicus filing in the Lisa Michelle Lambert
case, that they actually broke the door in of 1250 Fremont Street in order to execute the
fabricated 302 petition. The Complaint was denied by the Lancaster County District Attorney on
August 8th . The Complaint is now under a Petition for Review by the Lancaster County Court of
Common Pleas.
On August 17, 2015 another Emergency Injunction for Relief was filed in the Lancaster
County Court of Common Pleas, Case No. 15-06985. The Injunction was heard by Judge Jeffrey
Wright, who dismissed it as frivolous. An appeal, MD 1561, is pending in the Superior Court of
Pennsylvania.
In addition, by September 26, 2015 Stan J. Caterbone had been granted Electronic Filing
Privileges in the local, state, and federal courts. This should alleviate the fraud and abuses of the
U.S. Postal Service and the computer hackers.
In 2015 Stan J. Caterbone identifies a trend that suggests that the Lancaster County
community-at-large was subject to either community targeting or community hypnosis.
The
community targeting theory is supported by experts Jullianne McKinney, Cheryl Welsh, and Dr.
John Hall. The community hypnosis theory is supported by direct personal relationships with the
Amazing Kreskin, Samuel P. Caterbone and Stan J. Caterbone.
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016Page
Page
154
156
161
of 41
191
193
198
201
Page164
4 of
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October10,
20,
31,
7,
6, 2015
2016
Saturday,
October
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO149
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
Caterbone, was most likely a target dating back to the early 1960's. In addition, the death of
Samuel P. Caterbone on July 20, 2001 was confirmed to be that of murder, not natural causes.
In the early 1990's Dr. Phillip Caterbone, brother, had been solicited by the National
Institute of Health, or NIH in Washington, D.C., for a fellowship to research and catalog a study to
find a genetic marker for depression in the CATERBONE family.
descendants and relatives of my father, Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., and took blood samples. I am
alleging that this was a deliberate act to continue the cover story of mental illness to distract and
provide plausible deniability for any linkage to U.S. Sponsored Mind Control.
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016Page
Page
155
157
162
of 41
191
193
198
201
Page165
5 of
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October10,
20,
31,
7,
6, 2015
2016
Saturday,
October
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO150
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
HISTORY
In 1987 Stan J. Caterbone went public with allegations of fraud within International Signal
and Control, or ISC as they were commonly referred.
Chem Con officials (an ISC/James Guerin straw company), and as a shareholder of record since
1983 of ISC, Stan J. Caterbone had a meeting with an ISC executive on June 23, 1987, which
resulted in a 22 year legal odyssey. The discussions involved a joint venture with his company,
Financial Management Group, Ltd., or FMG, Ltd., but ended in disclosure of his recent public
allegations of fraud. Four years later, ISC founder and chairman James Guerin, and other officials
and companies pleaded guilty to a $1 Billion Dollar Fraud and export violations including the
selling of arms through South Africa to Iraq and Sadaam Hussein.
influence and public corruption had been used to cover-up the activities and Federal False Claims
Act violations of Stan J. Caterbone for the next eighteen years. There ensued a total blockade of
all United States Courts for all redress and remedy available in accordance with federal, state, and
local laws.
This included recovery of his business interests; intellectual property; real estate;
personal and business real property; his unblemished and impressive reputation; and his most
valuable asset - the ability to produce income. This might be legally referred to as the Right-ToWork under federal statutes.
investment or developed a business that did not make a profit over the next 22 years.
This
includes two real estate properties that were illegally seized through foreclosure proceedings.
Since 1987 Stan J. Caterbone has been a prisoner and enemy of the state.
ISC was a
Department of Defense (DOD) Contractor and a partner with United States Intelligence Agencies
since it's beginings in the early 1970's. One of it's first contracts was Project X with the National
Security Agency or NSA of Ft. Meade, Maryland.
In summary, the following are facts and part of the public record regarding
SIGNAL & CONTROL OR ISC:
INTERNATIONAL
Once the third (3rd) largest employer in the County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania, with
over 5,000 employees.
James Guerin, founder and CEO was once the largest philanthropist to charitable
organizations in the County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania.
The ISC/Ferranti Scandal was the third (3) largest white-collar fraud within the United
States as of 1992.
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016Page
Page
156
158
163
of 41
191
193
198
201
Page166
6 of
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October10,
20,
31,
7,
6, 2015
2016
Saturday,
October
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO151
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
The following are some of the public officials and politicians associated with ISC:
George H.W. Bush, former U.S. President, and Director of the Central Intelligence
Agency (CIA).
Robert Gates, former Director of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and current
Secretary of Defense.
Bobby Ray Inman, former Board of Directors if ISC, former Director of the NSA, and
currently associated and directly involved with Mind Control Research organizations.
Alexander Haig, former U.S. Secretary of State, and ISC lobbyist and Board of
Directors?
Carlos Cardoen/Cardoen Industries, a joint venture partner with ISC and arms
merchant for the cluster bomb who eventually sold to Iraq and other Middle Eastern
Countries under U.S. sanctions.
ISC was credited with the design of the cluster bomb, and has patents filed in the U.S.
Patent Office.
In 1987 ISC completed the merger with the 3rd largest defense contractor of Great
Britain, Ferranti International; who paid $1 billion dollars for ISC and all of it's
subsidiaries.
ABC News/Financial Times aired 3 episodes on ABC Nightline with Ted Koppel
regarding the ISC/CIA defense weapons; technologies; and cluster bombs to Iraq
story and lead into the allegations that then nominee for the Director of CIA Robert
Gates was involved with ISC and the selling of arms to Iraq.
ABC News 20/20 aired a story on the ISC/CIA efforts to sell cluster bombs to Saadam
Hussein and Iraq on February 1, 1991 days after the start of the Persian Gulf War I,
with the initial bombing raid destroying a cluster bomb factory built in Iraq by
Carlos Cardoen.
On July 1st and 2nd of 1987 Stan J. Caterbone solicited the legal counsel of Lancaster
Attorney Joseph Roda for counsel regarding, FMG, Ltd., International Signal &
Control (ISC); Commonwealth Bank, etc., and was billed for his services. Joseph
Roda did absolutely nothing but refute Stan J. Caterbone's claims and would not
believe him.
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016Page
Page
157
159
164
of 41
191
193
198
201
Page167
7 of
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October10,
20,
31,
7,
6, 2015
2016
Saturday,
October
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO152
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
investigation into ISC was still ongoing. It is not known whether it has closed or not. All of these
activates constitute a RICO crime due to the pattern and organization of the perpetrators. The
pattern and source of the activities can be traced back to 1987, with subgroups changing over
time, but still engaging in the same practices. The following plan of action was followed in order
to perpetrate the cover-up:
Totally discredit Stan(ley) J. Caterbone and any and all allegations in every way
possible.
Somehow persuade the community of Lancaster County to buy into this plan of
action through money, favors, etc.,
Always keep attorneys and anyone remotely involved with the legal community
away at times when efforts for justice are pursued.
When attempts to enter the U.S. legal system arise, isolate, harass, and extort
any monies and/or possessions of value.
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016Page
Page
158
160
165
of 41
191
193
198
201
Page168
8 of
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October10,
20,
31,
7,
6, 2015
2016
Saturday,
October
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO153
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
twenty attorneys, some from large firms with national recognition in their respective fields of
specialties. Attorneys from New York City to Santa Barbara and San Diego California were visited
and consulted as well as a group of ex FBI agents who specialized in white collar crime that are
now globally recognized. However, the money and influence of persons and entities that wanted
these issues silence always prevailed. The issues were so complex and convoluted, and involved
such high profile politicians and U.S. agencies, it was far easier to state that there was no case, or
their were no claims that would result in remedy or redress. Between the Republican Party and
the Department of Defense, the CIA and the NSA, there was not an attorney that could not be
influenced. The obstruction of justice and due process in this case is most likely unprecedented in
nature and in malice.
However in 2005 that all changed when Stan J. Caterbone appeared as a pro se litigant
representing himself, without any counsel, in the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Pennsylvania in CATERBONE v. The Lancaster County Prison, et. al., or case no. 05-cv2288.
This case is still not settled and has been withdrawn by plaintiff Stan J.
Caterbone in October of 2008 after a successful ruling in the U.S. Third Circuit Court of
Appeals (07-4474) in September of 2008. The case will be continued upon the security
of evidence and the cease and desist of obstruction of justice and due process. On May
16, 2005 at the Federal Courthouse in Philadelphia, Stan J. Caterbone filed the case under seal.
One week later in the United States Bankruptcy Court for Eastern Pennsylvania in Reading,
Pennsylvania, again appearing as pro se, Stan J. Caterbone filed a petition for protection under
the Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Code, in case no. 05-23059.
These acts of entering the United States legal system with these issues triggered yet
another round of attempts to keep these cases from the courts and judges - Organized Stalking
with Directed Energy Devices and Weapons, built on a foundation of mental telepathy or total
Mind Control.
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016Page
Page
159
161
166
of 41
191
193
198
201
Page169
9 of
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October10,
20,
31,
7,
6, 2015
2016
Saturday,
October
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO154
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
Remote Viewers may have attempted to connect in a more direct and continuous way
without success.
In 2005 the U.S. sponsored mind control turned into an all-out assault of mental
telepathy; synthetic telepathy; and pain and torture through the use of directed energy devices
and weapons that usually fire a low frequency electromagnetic energy at the targeted victim.
This assault was no coincidence in that it began simultaneously with the filing of the federal action
in U.S. District Court, or CATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison, et. al., or 05-cv-2288.
This
assault began after the handlers remotely trained Stan J. Caterbone with mental telepathy. The
main difference opposed to most other victims of this technology is that Stan J. Caterbone is
connected 24/7 with a person who declares that she is Interscope recording artist Sheryl Crow of
Kennett Missouri. Stan J. Caterbone has spent 3 years trying to validate and confirm this person
without success. Most U.S. intelligence agencies refuse to cooperate, and the Federal Bureau of
Investigation and the U.S. Attorney's Office refuse to comment.
more information.
In 2006 or the beginning of 2007 Stan J. Caterbone began his extensive research into
mental telepathy; mind control technologies; remote viewing; and the CIA mind control program
labeled MK ULTRA and it's subprograms.
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016Page
Page
160
162
167
191
193
198
Page170
10 of
of 201
41
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October10,
20,
31,
7,
6, 2015
2016
Saturday,
October
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO155
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
FAMILY HISTORY
If you listen to the propaganda machine and the community of Lancaster County,
Pennsylvania, including professionals, the family history of Stan J. Caterbone goes something like
the following:
Father, Samuel Caterbone, Jr., Schizophrenic who ran out on his family
because of nervous breakdowns while trying to run a small dry cleaning
business.
He traveled the world looking for the Blessed Mother Mary and
Brother, Samuel A. Caterbone, suffered from the very same illness has his
father, Schizophrenia, who finally killed himself trying to live in California.
Brother, Thomas W. Caterbone, suffered from the very same mental illness as
his brother, Stan J., Bipolar Mood Disorder, who ran a lawn business and
finally committed suicide at an early age.
Stan J. Caterbone, suffered from Bipolar Mood Disorder, or Manic Depression and
had a nervous breakdown in 1987 trying to compete in the financial services
industry. When he has his nervous breakdowns, he always threatens to sue
everyone in court and is deeply paranoid in thinking the whole world is
against him. He always spends all of his money during his fits of mania and
has delusions about his success as a businessman.
The Family History was formulated back in the 1960's when Samuel Caterbone, Jr.,
father of Stan J. Caterbone, became engaged in a black budget mind control program that began
during his service in the United States Navy as a radioman and air gunner.
Samuel Caterbone,
Jr., was most likely a direct product of MK ULTRA or one of it's subprograms. His brother, Samuel
A. Caterbone, was most likely part of the LSD experiments of MK ULTRA. Stan J. Caterbone is
most likely part of a program sponsored by the Department of Defense Agencies, such as DARPA
or the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA). The facts of Stan J. Caterbone's intimate discussions
with both his father and brother over the years before they died, the totality of documents that
were preserved in their estate, including service records; letters; official court papers; high school
documents; and the like - all will prove that they were in fact part of MK ULTRA or one of it's
subprograms.
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016Page
Page
161
163
168
191
193
198
Page171
11 of
of 201
41
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October10,
20,
31,
7,
6, 2015
2016
Saturday,
October
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO156
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
The following are the facts and the real record of the family history:
Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., (Father) served in the Navy from 1943 to 1946 and
graduated with honors from Air Gunners School in Jacksonville, Florida. He was an exceptional
student/athlete while attending Lancaster Catholic High School, participating in the band as well
as sports. He was also his senior class secretary/treasurer. After the Navy, he went on to build a
successful dry cleaning business, which he is credited with inventing a filtration system for the
solvents.
He also developed a very good investment in real estate along the Manheim Pike,
owning several properties. By his own writings and from his personal accounts to me, he was
definitely a remote viewer or data miner for some U.S. Agency with telepathic abilities.
His
viewing is documented to have begun back in the early 1970's. He also suffered from organized
stalking, and was considered an enemy and prisoner of the state. Back in the 1960's, he was a
world traveler, this is documented by his passports. Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., may have been a
covert carrier for someone in intelligence. Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., had his mental health history
laced with electro shock therapy. Electro Shock Therapy Experiments is another subprogram of
MK ULTRA. In addition, and especially disturbing is his criminal record with the Lancaster City
Police Department and the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas.
In 1973 Samuel P.
Caterbone, Jr. was convicted of forging a 2 checks from the Caterbone Cleaners, Inc., checking
account.
The one check to Joe the Motorists Store at the Manor Shopping Center was never
entered into evidence, it was for a total of $70.00. The other check was made out to Lancaster
Attorney James Coho for $200.00 with "divorce proceedings" written in the memo. This was his
only criminal record. Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., was sentenced to one year probation by President
Judge William Johnstone.
wrote an ORDER releasing him from probation and ordering him to "leave the vicinity of the
County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania". The President Judge of Lancaster County Court of Common
Pleas literally threw my father out of Lancaster County for forging 2 checks from his own
corporation. In 1987 I was arrested for stealing my own files from my own company, Financial
Management Group, Ltd., You can research the life of Candy Jones and Kate O'Brien to learn more
on this topic. Samuel Caterbone, Jr., has left enough writings and documentation to know that his
life fits the model for targeted individuals, complete with economic ruin, isolation, disenfranchised
from family and friends, and of course a fabricated mental illness history. You can view most of
his record online.
The estate was probated in November of 2000. Some two weeks later, on Memorial Day Weekend
of 2001, he had called me to come to New York City to help care for him.
He was in perfect
health until this time. In a matter of six (6) weeks he had succumbed to lung cancer. As per
Julianne McKinney,
former intelligence officer for the U.S. Army and victim activist of U.S.
Sponsored Mind Control, the weapons are lethal enough to kill and the one thing that I worry
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016Page
Page
162
164
169
191
193
198
Page172
12 of
of 201
41
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October10,
20,
31,
7,
6, 2015
2016
Saturday,
October
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO157
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
about is that of dying of cancer (paraphrase). There is no doubt now that my father's death was
a murder, not natural.
Samuel A. Caterbone, (Brother) served in the United States Air Force in 1968 to 1970.
In 1991, Stan J. Caterbone accused the United States Government of using his brother, Samuel
A. Caterbone for part of the LSD experiments on mind control, or MK ULTRA. A notarized letter of
October 23, 1991 was sent certified mail to the California Attorney General on the subject matter,
with a return letter from the California Attorney General on January 14, 1992.
By his own
admission before his death, Samuel A. Caterbone disclosed to Stan J. Caterbone of the "bad LSD"
trips while in the Air Force. Since his death of December 25, 1984, Stan J. Caterbone and others
questioned the classification of suicide, and made allegations of foul play that was ultimately
responsible for his death. Finally in a meeting in Santa Barbara, California with the Santa Barbara
Public Guardian's Office, an office admitted that the death was more likely due to foul plan than
suicide.
Samuel A. Caterbone was also an exceptional student and athlete while attending
Bellefonte, Pennsylvania, his hunting pants caught fire trying to stay warm.
Lancaster General Hospital for months, going through painful skin grafts and isolation.
hunting accident interrupted his athletic career and scared his legs for life.
The
The Schizophrenia
diagnosis was a combination of LSD flashbacks and organized stalking and harassment.
Thomas P. Caterbone, (Brother) had an unfortunate transaction at Fulton Bank that set
a course of action that resulted in a suicide. Although diagnosed with Bipolar Disease and Manic
Depression -- embezzled and extorted monies were most likely the reason for his suicide in 1996.
Fulton Bank was involved in a fraud that took $72,000 from a real estate settlement closing and
lead to his total financial ruin and collapse in June of 1995. The funds were never recovered and
Fulton Bank is a defendant for a wrongful death claim in the United States District Court for the
Eastern District of Pennsylvania in CATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison, et. al., 05-cv-2288.
FULTON BANK triggered a severe and lethal death blow to Thomas P. Caterbone, and as of this
day has refused to acknowledge any wrongdoing or remorse. Thomas P. Caterbone was also an
exceptional athlete. Playing for Lancaster Catholic High School, Franklin and Marshall College, the
Harrisburg Patriots, and even the Philadelphia Eagles. Tom also coached football at J.P. McCaskey
and Franklin and Marshall College.
landscaping business before joining forces with John DePatto of United Financial Services and
selling residential mortgages.
James Guerin and ISC. Parent Bank, owned by ISC also foreclosed on 2323 New Danville Pike,
Conestoga, Pennsylvania in 1988, which was owned by Stan J. Caterbone. Thousands of dollars
of equity was extorted in the process, despite still being short sold for a profit to Mr. Keith
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016Page
Page
163
165
170
191
193
198
Page173
13 of
of 201
41
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October10,
20,
31,
7,
6, 2015
2016
Saturday,
October
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO158
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
Kirchner, an executive of Lancaster Newspapers and former graduate of Lancaster Catholic High
School.
Stan J. Caterbone is a remote viewer (at least one way in), is telepathic, and a
federal whistleblower with an exceptional entrepreneurial record in spite of all of his adversaries
and their assaults. In spite of the U.S. Sponsored mind control and torture, he has endured and
will prevail. Legally, Stan J. Caterbone has been able to preserve his claims, and progress his
legal challenges and claims through both the federal and state court system appearing pro se,
without the aid or expense of additional legal counsel. Some of his claims and briefs will most
likely be landmark decisions in years to come. Stan J. Caterbone was a 2-Sport MVP at Lancaster
Catholic High School, in both football and track. Stan J. Caterbone never received less than a B
grade in his four years of high school and had an 87+ average. Stan J. Caterbone excelled in
computer technologies, taking his first full term course in 1975, while in high school and
continuing into college at Millersville University, graduating with a degree in business
administration in 1980.
beginning with Financial Management Group, Ltd., then working with Tony Bongiovi of Power
Station Studios and the "Digital Movie"; then building Advanced Media Group, Ltd..
Over the
years, despite the illegal seizures and foreclosures, Stan J. Caterbone has amassed a portfolio of
impressive real estate deals that have always paid off in profits, no matter how or when they
were sold.
$20,000 dollar investment in 1986 and was still sold for approximately $100,000 two years later,
despite the false arrests and the extortion of most of it's real value and equity.
The mental health history and the criminal records were completely fabricated, and a
close review and investigation into the actual court records and hospital records can prove that in
very short fashion.
There are TWO (2) ways to quickly dispute the Mental Health History and
Record:
One - Review the word "Delusional; delusions; etc.,;
used by mental health professionals, and the false reports by friends and family were associated
with facts, and matters of the official record, the complete opposite of the meaning of the word
"delusional". And they still exist to this very day.
Two - Review the 3 Fabricated Suicide Allegations of the following dates: August
10(?), 1987 at Burdette Tomlin Hospital (Cape May County New Jersey); February 18th(?), 2005
by Kerry Egan and the Southern Regional Police Department; and July 19, 2009 for the 302
Commitment by the Lancaster City Police Department at Lancaster General Hospital.
The Criminal Record is very similar, since 1987 Stanley J. Caterbone has had 31 false
arrests; formal charges and convictions dismissed prior to court proceedings or won on summary
appeals in the County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania; most of which Stan J. Caterbone appearing as
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016Page
Page
164
166
171
191
193
198
Page174
14 of
of 201
41
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October10,
20,
31,
7,
6, 2015
2016
Saturday,
October
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO159
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
pro se (representing himself). These have resulted in civil complaints filed in 2008 in CATERBONE
v. The County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of
Pennsylvania.
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016Page
Page
165
167
172
191
193
198
Page175
15 of
of 201
41
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October10,
20,
31,
7,
6, 2015
2016
Saturday,
October
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO160
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
broadcast on WHAN Coast to Coast with a guest that was one of the leading Physicist
turned Remote Viewer and expert that testified to this same notion.
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016Page
Page
166
168
173
191
193
198
Page176
16 of
of 201
41
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October10,
20,
31,
7,
6, 2015
2016
Saturday,
October
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO161
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
September 7, 2009
Stan J. Caterbone
Advance Media Group
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, Pennsylvania 17603
Derrick Robinson
Freedom From Covert Harassment and Surveillance
P.O. Box 9022
Cincinnati, Ohio 45209
Phone 1-800-571-5618
Fax 1-866-433-4170
email: info@freedomfchs.com
Re: Is County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania Ground Zero for Organized Stalking and
Covert Surveillance?
Derrick,
My pleasure. Derrick, I was trying to get group rates at our new Lancaster Convention Center
Marriot Hotel last week, just as a little fact finding mission. I have a theory that I would like to
send your way. I thought it would be very fruitful to bring some TI's together for a conference,
unless you think the exposure would be harmful.
I believe that they try new models for harassment; organized stalking and surveillance on me
here in Lancaster. Remember, Lancaster is now one of the most "Watched Communities" in the
country. "With those cameras, the Safety Coalition will operate and monitor 165 cameras across
Lancaster City making Lancaster the most watched city of its size in the nation." See article
attached, Watching you: City to add 105 more cameras.
I believe that Lancaster may be ground zero for some of the models of organized stalking and
harassment that we TI's experience and wanted to get some reaction from Lancaster. Some
history on the Lancaster Convention Center. Dale High of High Industries is the lead partner in our
new convention center/hotel. It is first class all the way. Now in the late 1980's I was a joint
venture partner with Dale High in American Helix Technology Company/Advanced Media Group.
American Helix was a cd manufacturer and I and my company Advanced Media Group was the
CD-ROM division of American Helix. I was one of a handful of CD-ROM manufacturers in the
domestic United States back then. Also in 2005 I filed a civil action against the lead hotel, the
Eden Resort Inn, for trying to block the development and building of the Hotel/Convention Center,
see
attached.
Now, some history about Lancaster and the intelligence community. Back in the 1980's there were
several defense contractors located in Lancaster, the main being International Signal & Control,
which I, of course, blew the whistle on a billion dollar fraud and arms to Iraq.
Click here for an overview of ISC.
Click here to see the Lancaster Newspapers Archives regarding International Signal & Control, or
ISC.
Click here to view the live video of the WGAL-TV News Broadcast of October 31, 1991 the evening
of the ISC indictments. The U.S. Department of Justice and other U.S. Agencies held a Press
Conference in the Philadelphia Federal Courthouse to announce the indictments and $ Billion
Dollar Fraud.
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016Page
Page
167
169
174
191
193
198
Page177
17 of
of 201
41
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October10,
20,
31,
7,
6, 2015
2016
Saturday,
October
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO162
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016Page
Page
168
170
175
191
193
198
Page178
18 of
of 201
41
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October10,
20,
31,
7,
6, 2015
2016
Saturday,
October
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO163
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
"S.A.I.C. involvement in 1993 American Para psychological Association meeting arrangements, via
their 'Cognitive Sciences Laboratory'. Science Applications International Corporation is a big time
defense contractor, has held the largest number of research contracts of any defense contractor.
Bobby Ray Inman (ISC Board of Directors) is on its board of directors, among others."
by John Porter, CIA Program on Mind Control copyright 1996. In 1994, after Bobby Ray Inman
requested to be withdrawn from consideration as Bill Clinton's first Defense Secretary, his critics
speculated that the decision was motivated by a desire to conceal his links to ISC. Inman was a
member of the so-called "shadow board" of the company which was allegedly either negligent or
approved the exports." by Wikipedia on International Signal and Control, (ISC).
Now, lets list the former Navy personnel:
George H. Bush, former President of the United States, former Director of CIA.
James Guerin, President and Founder of International Signal & Control.
Bobby Ray Inman, former Director of the National Security Agency (NSA) and Director of
International Signal & Control, (ISC).
My father, Samuel P. Cateronne, Jr.
His father, Samuel J. Caterbone, Sr.
George Noory, of Coast to Coast Radio (just anecdotal, nothing assumed or alleged).
George W. Bush flew with the Navy.
James Cross
I will Finish later and add more.
Next we get to Jim Guerin's attorney back in 1989 through at least 1992. His name was Joseph
Tate, of Philadelpha. This link will take you to a document regarding Joseph Tate, James Guerin
and Joseph Roda, Esq., of Lancaster, my former attorney who said I fabricated everything back in
1987. The document contains a letter of September 12, 2005 from Special Prosecutor Patrick
Fitzgerald regarding Scooter Libby, Former Vice President Dick Cheney's Chief of Staff. the letter
involves Scooter Libby's Grand Jury Indictment for leaking Covert CIA Operative Valerie Plame
and eventually outing her.
Now in Austin Texas in July of 2005 I was detained by 2 Agents from The Defense Intelligence
Agency. I was merely visiting a Military Museum, that had old and vintage helicopters and
airplanes. near where my brother, Dr. Phillip Caterbone lived. I was visiting on my way to
California. While inside the museum 2 Agents from the Department of Defense Defense
Intelligence Agency escorted me outside to my Honda Oddesey and interrogated me making me
confirm that I was visiting and staying with my brother. They caused a problem for my brother's
Medical Practice by shaking up one of his secretaries. The reviewed my court documents for
CATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison, et. al., Case No. 2005-cv-0288 filed in the U.S. District
Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. The demanded that I stay off all military bases
before releasing me.
In 2006 I was telepathic with an older NSA executive on many occasions who wanted to meet me
at the Clipper Stadium who told me he wanted to rent a facility in Lancaster for a training
exercise. I told him to to and see Dale High and the High Group for space at the Greenfield
Industrial Park. He said he was retiring and that our discussions were keeping him a few weeks
longer than expected. We had intimate discussions of my history and the Chesapeake Bay Area.
We also discussed Sheryl Crow, and he told me his wife was a fan. I turned him on to her new
album, Wildflower, and he said she liked it. We had to disengage because he was being harassed
by other telepathic assailants.
My former secretary (Susan Bare) at Pflumm Contractors, Inc., where I was controller and was
hired to rescue the company from near bankruptcy in 1993, told me that her husband, Ross Bare,
who grew up just some 10 or so doors from me, worked for the NSA. She disclosed this soon
after I hired her in 1994 or 1995.
I will finish later and add to this allegation. This is a work-in-progress.
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016Page
Page
169
171
176
191
193
198
Page179
19 of
of 201
41
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October10,
20,
31,
7,
6, 2015
2016
Saturday,
October
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO164
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
Stan J. Caterbone
Advanced Media Group
scaterbone@live.com
www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com
www.advancedmediagroup.wordpress.com
www.scribd.com/amgroup01
www.facebook.com/scaterbone
www.twitter.com/StanCaterbone
www.mcvictimsworld.ning.com/profile/StanJCaterbone
http://www.youtube.com/advancedmediagroup
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016Page
Page
170
172
177
191
193
198
Page180
20 of
of 201
41
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October10,
20,
31,
7,
6, 2015
2016
Saturday,
October
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO165
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
AFFIDAVIT
BE IT ACKNOWLEDGED, that Stanley J. Caterbone, Financial Management Group, Ltd.,
FMG Advisory, and and all affiliates, Pro Financial Group, Ltd., Advanced Media Group, Advanced
Media Group, Ltd., Global Entertainment Group, Ltd., Power Productions I, Radio Science
Laboratories, Ltd., of Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, the undersigned deponent, being of legal
age, does hereby depose and say under oath as follows:
I am now convinced that the situation surrounding my litigation and all factors attributed
to my financial and professional demise bore out of the fact that my Father, Samuel P. Caterbone
was a victim of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control, in the truest sense of the words.
The
whistleblowing activities of 1987 either were a coincidence or I was set up in the very beginning
by Pennsylvania State Senator Gibson Armstrong (former stock broker) in 1983 when he solicited
me to purchase the ISC stock. The preceding would have been the perfect cover story for my
demise; that I was involved in a fraud. Following this analysis would lead one to conclude that
the collateral damage from the activities of my financial ruin always left my fellow businesses in
financial ruin, for example Robert Kauffman and Michael Hartlett, partners, and the shareholders
and affiliated professionals of Financial Management Group, Ltd., Tony Bongiovi and Power Station
Studios, Jim and Lynn Cross as Cross Microwave Consultants, Dave Dering, Scott Robertson, and
James Boyer as American Helix/High Industries, Ralph Mazzochi and Gallo Rosa Restaurant;
Pflumm Contractors, Inc., Mike Caterbone's AIM Wholesaler's Business, Dr. Phillip Caterbone, D.O.
And associated Primary Care Practices of Austin, Texas, Sam Lombardo and Ralph Mazzochi as
S.N. Lombardo Associates for Lancaster Avenue Project, Sheryl Crow Singer Songwriter, my
immediate family, friends, and relatives.
Following this analysis would lead one to concur that the legal and financial remedies
would only be reconciled by the above named parties enjoining my civil litigation. This AFFIDAVIT
is to be considered a legal and binding document to accomplish that remedy.
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016Page
Page
Page181
171
173
178
21 of 41
191
193
198
201
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
Saturday,
MondayNovember
October
October 10,
20,
31,
7,
6, 2015
2016
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO166
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
And I affirm that the foregoing is true except to statements made upon information and belief,
and as to those I believe them to be true. Witness my hand under the penalties of perjury this
10th day of October, 2015.
Signature,
____________________________
Stanley J. Caterbone
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
Signature
STATE OF
COUNTY OF
On
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016Page
Page
172
174
179
191
193
198
Page182
22 of
of 201
41
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October10,
20,
31,
7,
6, 2015
2016
Saturday,
October
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO167
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
!" #
,/
,/
,/
,/
,/
,/
,/
,/
/
/
#
9
"
"
!
3
,
9
"
!
3
,
#
9
"
!
3
,
/
#/
#/
#/
#/
#/
#/
#/
/
/
,3!
,3!
,3!
,3!
,3!
,3!
,3!
,3!
"
"
/ /
"
/ #/
!
/ #/
!
/ #/
!
/ #/
!
/ #/
!
/ 3/
!
/ 3/
!
9/# /
!
9/# /
!
9/# /
!
9/# /
!
/ /
!
/ /
!
/ ,/
!
/ /
!
/ /
!
!/ #/
3
!/ #/
3
$ % &'
$&()*%& (* & +$+
$*(
(+ +%
- ( & .+
+ /0+$-.( 0%/%*$1 2+ $'
,3! $*
3
! "$
$4
1
5
4
/.
/.
, 1 2 6 78 6 (
1
5
4
/.
/.
## 9
6
4 8 1 # % 66
/0 4
7
#
)
6 :1
5
4
/.
/.
#!
6(
:1
5
4
/.
/.
#,
$4 8 ): 2 678 $ ;
* .
< # % 66
/0 4
7
#,##
2 6 78 6 2
*8
1 # % 66
/0 4
7
#,##
2 6 78 6 2
*8
1 #5
4
/.
/.
3=
# ==
.
6:
12
6 %
10 4
7 > 7
3 = #, " == 9 $4 8 *8
1 @
*8
0 4
7 > 7
3 = ! , == ! 1
(
+
4
0 4
7 >
3 1
%
;
*
0 4
7 > 7
?
3 1#
A 6
0 4
7 > 7
?
3="
==
(
42
/
& .
> 7
3 1
%
;
*
0 4
7 > 7
?
3 1#
A 6
0 4
7 > 7
?
! =
9# == .
04 6 *
* (
;
%
6 :
! = !3" == *
A 4 0/* ( @B
(
%
6 :
3=
# == 9/ .
- C
/ 4: *88 %
6 :
3=
! == / *
- 47 : %
6 :
#/ 3 = ! , == # 1
*8
0/%
% 66
! =#
== / .
$ 88
6.
%
6 : % 66
3=
9(
/* 4
7& 8
3/ 9/
" D9!!
#
3 = , 3 ==
; ( / 66/& *88 0
3/ 9/
" D9!!
% 66
! =
9# == .
04 6 *
* (
;
%
6 :
! = #! 9 ==
6
.
3/ 9/
" % 66
! = #3
== E .2+F
+
/+
8.
8 6: % 66
$(
3# 1 3 .
2
:
:6
6
$(
3# 1 3 .2+ 4
:
.*$
6
8 6
:
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016Page
Page
173
175
180
191
193
198
Page183
23 of
of 201
41
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October10,
20,
31,
7,
6, 2015
2016
Saturday,
October
?
?
?
?
Case: 15-3400
)6
G!
(&. G
++ /
,3! - ( & .+
+
*2$-&(% (& +*%
6+ 8
&$-+
&
Document: 003112129707
6& 4
8
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO168
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
&. *( *A&($2(%&. *%
&
6(
6 : > ,3#?
*% +.&( $+*%
>& 4
? !1
!"
#
# (
%
= 3#
(
*(
+
!(
&'
9
@
'
8 62
9
#
= 3#
8
'
(
*(
!( ,
-(
.(
"(
-
66 : >
,,9?
88B
> ,,"? /
1
( 2
!( 3
*B
*( 3
'
#
,
,
4
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016Page
Page
174
176
181
191
193
198
Page184
24 of
of 201
41
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October10,
20,
31,
7,
6, 2015
2016
Saturday,
October
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO169
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
scaterbone@live.com
www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com
www.advancedmediagroup.wordpress.com
www.scribd.com/amgroup01
www.facebook.com/scaterbone
www.twitter.com/StanCaterbone
www.mcvictimsworld.ning.com/profile/StanJCaterbone
http://www.youtube.com/advancedmediagroup
Stan J. Caterbone
Advanced Media Group
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
Community Stalking and Organized Libel/Slander Campaign Strategy Issue a few every
year to support false arrests; false imprisonment; fabricated mental illness history. In addition to
isolate by prohibiting entrance to major entertainment venues with good live music. Prohibit from
defending against the lies and slander in public to a minimum. Also, destroy history of strong
Christian values and church attendance on a weekly basis by keeping away from church. The
Millersville University Graduate Studies No Trespass Notice was accommodated by the denial of
entitled benefits of LETA Job Training Education Course of the Paralegal program at HACC during
the same time period.
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016Page
Page
175
177
182
191
193
198
Page185
25 of
of 201
41
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October10,
20,
31,
7,
6, 2015
2016
Saturday,
October
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO170
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016Page
Page
176
178
183
191
193
198
Page186
26 of
of 201
41
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October10,
20,
31,
7,
6, 2015
2016
Saturday,
October
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO171
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016Page
Page
177
179
184
191
193
198
Page187
27 of
of 201
41
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October10,
20,
31,
7,
6, 2015
2016
Saturday,
October
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO172
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016Page
Page
178
180
185
191
193
198
Page188
28 of
of 201
41
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October10,
20,
31,
7,
6, 2015
2016
Saturday,
October
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO173
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016Page
Page
179
181
186
191
193
198
Page189
29 of
of 201
41
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October10,
20,
31,
7,
6, 2015
2016
Saturday,
October
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO174
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
AFFIDAVIT
I, Stanley J. Caterbone, Targeted Individual or TI, residing at: 1250 Fremont Street,
Lancaster, Pennsylvania, 17603, do hereby state that I am at least 18 years of age, that I am
a citizen or a legal resident of the United States of America, that I am of sound mind, and that I
am the person whose signature follows on this Affidavit. The purpose of this document is (1) to
advise Congress as well as state and local officials of organized stalking and electronic and mind
manipulation torture being committed against me and (2) to request a state, local, or
Congressional investigation and hearing on the use of remotely-operated directed energy attacks
and mind control technologies on Americans in this country.
Our Government is responsible for protecting its citizens from elements that
covertly harass, torment, murder, and cause victims to commit suicide through
organized stalking and remote electronic torture. Yet, unbiased research indicates that
certain elements of Government either engage in these activities or protect those who perform
them. I seek the complete dismantling of any officially-sanctioned covert Government torture
programs, the passage of legislation specifically outlawing that high-tech torture, and the full
prosecution of any person, regardless of his rank or position, who has violated my civil rights and
my most basic human rights. The assaults on my mind and body have been occurring for 24
year(s) and include, but are not limited to the following victimization's:
1.
2.
Invading my thoughts via remote sensing technologies. Was sent an autonomous
email in 1998 introducing the term remote viewing. Various technologies and tactics are being
used to create emotional signatures that induce various emotional states; a systematic complete
hacking of my mind.
3.
Making me mentally hear others' voices through the microwave hearing effect.
Synthetic and/or Mental Telepathy. First started to experience telepathy/synthetic telepathy
in 2005 with full-time 24/7 connection during the same time to present. When full-time telepathy
started a male conducted interrogations lasting several hours at a time concerning a wealth of
subjects including ISC/CIA Knowledge. Cannot disconnect from continuous conversations at all
times with one female person. The handlers know everything I know and experience in real time.
During 2006 and 2007 have been telepathic with some 10 or more persons, both male and female
for short durations. Can recall most conversations and subject matter with identities of who they
said they were. Interrogation type harassment is still being used telepathically to harass and for
some sleep deprivation. Made first complaints to DARPA, the FBI, and U.S. Senator Arlen Specter
in 2007. Some conversations by the persons that are telepathic with me elude to some program
similar to the DARPA datalog program where they record your entire life. Everything that you try
to do on a daily basis is subject matter for conversation and harassment. Interference with
thought, harassment, and interrogation is used often times with electromagnetic weapon attacks
to the brain or body.
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016Page
Page
180
182
187
191
193
198
Page190
30 of
of 201
41
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October10,
20,
31,
7,
6, 2015
2016
Saturday,
October
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO175
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
4.
Depriving me of sleep due to neurological intervention. Mostly Experienced Sleep
Deprivation Techniques during periods of time in 2008 to 2010. Mostly with attacks of pain from
Directed Energy Weapons to back, neck, head (brain); and heart on a few occasions; and with
harassment from telepathy.
5.
Introducing poisonous gas and radiation toxins into my home. First experienced
toxic gases (Chloroform?) in heavy doses in 2006-2007. Made complaints to the Lancaster City
Police Department and the Southern Regional Police. Experienced attacks that would cause
dizziness at home, in automobile and in public. Was informed it was being released through a
distribution system the size of fishing line. To counter attacks used cotton in nostrils and gas
mask. In 2009 experienced attacks of what is said to be sleeping gas, when attacked could not
open eyes. Took Pictures during some attacks.
6.
Having me stalked en masse on foot and in vehicles. vandalizing my home and/or
car. Gang Stalking or Organized Stalking began in 1987 and continues today. It includes
strangers using gestures such as finger under eye; various forms of harassment; and public
mobbing. Complaints have been filed in 1987; 1992;1998 and 2005 to 2010. Complaints were
made to various public officials and local, state, and federal agencies as mental duress. The terms
organized stalking, gang stalking, targeted individual, etc., was not learned until a few years ago.
The organized stalking and harassment followed in several states, some while traveling from
Lancaster, Pennsylvania to California. Tracking technologies may have been used and most likely
are still being used. Police were involved in most places.
7.
8.
Blacklisting me in the labor market. Filed complains of employment discrimination with
the Pennsylvania Attorney General in 2006 and the Lancaster County Human Relations
Commission in 2008.
9.
10. Public Mobbing. Public type mobbing and organized stalking and harassment was
perpetrated heavily in the years 2005 to 2010 in the following places: The Lancaster County
Courthouse, The Lancaster County Public Library, the Pennsylvania Career Link, and the Millersville
University Library and University Offices. I was given suspicious and illegal No Trespass Notices
in some 18 public places in Lancaster County in the years 2005 to 2009 without just cause. I was
complaining of stalking and harassing in most all of those public places. The Lancaster County
Public Library and the Millersville University took away my access to a computer after my personal
computers were vandalized and/or hacked inoperable. Fulton Bank took away my safe deposit
box. Others included my church of worship, various bars and restaurants and one attorneys office.
Complaints have been filed regarding the same in courts and with various authorities.
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016Page
Page
181
183
188
191
193
198
Page191
31 of
of 201
41
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October10,
20,
31,
7,
6, 2015
2016
Saturday,
October
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO176
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
11.
12.
Pet Killing. Cat was killed in 2005 with complaints to the Lancaster County Humane
Shelter and the Southern Regional Police Department.
13.
Illegal Entries of Home/Properties. First in 1987 in Stone Harbor, New Jersey, then
again in 1991; 1997-1998; and most serious in 2005 to 2010. Filed Police Reports and insurance
claims, most with the Southern Regional Police Department of Conestoga, Pennsylvania , State
Farm and Harleysville Insurance Companies.
Physical Assaults. One attack and filed complaint with police report in Los Osos California
in 2005 and one in the City of Lancaster. Police reports were filed and obtained for both.
16. False Arrests. Experienced 7 in 1987 and more than 20 in 2005 and 2006 in the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas. The false arrests were
charges that were all dismissed prior to court hearings.
17. False Imprisonments. Spent 7 to 10 days in Lancaster County Prison in 1987 with all
charges dismissed and again for some 60 days in 2006 with all charges dismissed. The 60 Days of
imprisonment of 2006 was triggered with a false report of missing a bail supervision meeting,
which was confirmed to be false in court; however bail was maliciously and purposefully reinstated
as secured instead of unsecured. The appropriate appeal was filed which secured my release after
some 60 days of false imprisonment. There were no charges that resulted in any convictions.
18.
19. Vandalism to Property. First in 1987 in Stone Harbor, New Jersey, then again in 1991;
1997-1998; and most serious in 2005 to 2010. Filed Police Reports and insurance claims, most
with the Southern Regional Police Department of Conestoga, Pennsylvania and Harleysville
Insurance Company. 3 computers have been rendered inoperable since 2005 along with various
electronics equipment; dvd recorders; printers; household items; appliances; etc., Most insurance
claims have been paid. In the past years a wave of purchased items, online and in stores, were
received broken or the wrong item and all had to be returned. Some included items to secure my
property, and others included computer related items, others were household and clothing items.
20. Gas Lighting. The illegal entering of home and causing psychological duress by moving
items and or hiding items. First reported in 1998 to the Conestoga Police and continued to
present. Clothing was also manipulated and altered. The term gas lighting was only learned in
2010, although it was reported to police as harassment by neighbors of friends. The daily draining
of my hot tub was also used as a psychological warfare tactic and used to run up utility bills.
Numerous complaints were made to police in 2008 to 2010.
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016Page
Page
182
184
189
191
193
198
Page192
32 of
of 201
41
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October10,
20,
31,
7,
6, 2015
2016
Saturday,
October
Case: 15-3400
21.
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO177
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
22. Vandalism to Car/Truck. Since 2005 have experienced years of gas siphoning, battery
outages, letting air out of tires, and wetting of inside of floor mats as psychological warfare tactics
by perps and stalkers. Made numerous complaints the Lancaster City Police Department.
23.
Toxic Chemical Causing Running Nose. Experienced on regular basis in 2009 when in
public places. Was not in conjunction with cold/flu symptoms. Research states it is a tactic used
in organized stalking.
24.
Computer Hacking. Computer Hacking complaints were filed to local authorities in the
County of Lancaster and the Cyber Crime unit of the Federal Bureau of Investigation in 2005 to
2010. Numerous complaint numbers have been secured. Complaints of cell phone hacking was
also reported in 2010. Websites and blogs were regularly hacked and sometimes taken off-line.
Electronic calenders, court documents, and financial records were often hacked causing many
problems of the years, including having to withdraw civil complaints.
26.
27.
28.
29. Forced Hospitalizations. Forced Hospitalizations in 1987 (2) one for 6 hours and one for
5 days; 2006 one for 3 days; 2009 one for several hours while in intensive care for emergency
surgery; and 2010 one for 8 days. Filed complaints to Citizens Commission for Human Rights in
1991 and 2008.
30.
Manipulation and Theft of Documents. Numerous thefts and manipulation of all legal
and business documents both in paper and in electronic format have occurred since 1987.
Microfiche/Microfilming began in 1987 and other measures to secure documents have been
ongoing to present. Numerous complaints have been filed with law enforcement since 1987.
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016Page
Page
183
185
190
191
193
198
Page193
33 of
of 201
41
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October10,
20,
31,
7,
6, 2015
2016
Saturday,
October
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO178
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
Statement: I have been a Targeted Individual, TI, and Victim since 1987. In 1987 I blew the
whistle (public Allegations and Complaints to State and Federal Authorities of Fraud during merger
negotiations with British Defense Contractor Ferranti International) on an international defense
contractor named International Signal & Control, or ISC, who was selling arms (Everything from
Telemetry Systems to Cluster Bombs) to Iraq via South Africa and was convicted of a $1 Billion
dollar Fraud in 1992 by the United States Attorney and several other federal agencies. See
ABC/News 20/20 and Nightline in 1991. They were founded and headquartered in my hometown
of Lancaster, Pennsylvania. I was a shareholder and was solicited by a top ISC Executives
(Convicted as a Mastermind of the Billion Dollar Fraud) to help finance some of their operations
through an affiliate called United Chem Con. ISC was a Department of Defense (DOD) Contractor
and a partner with United States Intelligence Agencies since it's beginnings in the early 1970's.
One of it's first contracts was Project X with the National Security Agency or NSA of Ft. Meade,
Maryland. Former Secretary of the Navy, Bobby Ray Inman was on the Board of Directors of ISC
and was also on the Board of Directors of Science Applications International Corporation, or SAIC.
SAIC was a huge defense contractor that was the recipient of the Defense Intelligence Agency, or
DIA, program on Remote Viewing, which SAIC named Project Stargate. It was reported that
Bobby Ray Inman declined the nomination for Secretary of Defense under the first Clinton
Administration because of the ISC and Trecor scandals. In the early 1990's I was a subcontractor
on a project for the Defense Advanced Research Project Agency, or DARPA, with the National
Institute of Standards and Technology, or NIST called TIMIT.
The project developed speech
corpora for the development of computer based speech recognition systems. I was also involved
in the bidding of other Department of Defense contracts dealing with information technologies. In
1998 I was stalked and approached by an employee of the National Security Agency, or NSA in
York, Pennsylvania who said my problems were not with the NSA, but the good ole boys. In
2005 I was detained by 2 Defense Intelligence Agency, or DIA officers in a museum on a military
base in Austin, Texas and was questioned and interviewed regarding my civil actions filed in
federal court for several hours. I was released and told to stay off of all military bases. My
brother, a Family Physician in Austin Texas had to verify my travel plans and the fact that I was
staying with him prior to my release.
My father alleged he was part of U.S. Navy experiments in the 1940's and experienced
synthetic telepathy in the 1970's, 1980's and 1990's as outlined in memos and documents he had
authored; and from my personal conversations with him prior to his death. Ms. Amy Fuchs of the
Disclosure Project confirmed that he was most likely given an ET experience via synthetic
telepathy. He died in 2001 in New York City of cancer. My brother was in the U.S. Air Force in the
late 1960's and I allege was a victim of the LSD experiments relating to MKULTRA in the late
1960's and a victim of murder (Suspicious Suicide with tainted medical reports) in Santa Barbara
California in 1984; Notarized Complaints were filed to the California Attorney General in 1991. He
made a declaration type statement prior to his death that he got bad LSD while in the U.S. Air
Force.
Organized stalking and harassment began in 1987 following the public allegations of fraud
within ISC. As far back as the late 1980's I thought that my mind was being read, or "remotely
viewed". During the times that legal Counsel and attorneys were solicited in 1987, 1991, and
1997 Organized Stalking and Harassment and other forms of attacks experienced by Targeted
Individuals were severely increased. In 2005 the U.S. sponsored mind control turned into an allout assault of mental telepathy; synthetic telepathy; and pain and torture through the use of
directed energy devices and/or electromagnetic weapons. This assault was no coincidence in that
it began simultaneously with the filing of the federal action in U.S. District Court, of CATERBONE v.
Lancaster County Prison, et. al., or 05-cv-2288.
This targeting has ruined every aspect of my life.
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016Page
Page
184
186
191
191
193
198
Page194
34 of
of 201
41
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October10,
20,
31,
7,
6, 2015
2016
Saturday,
October
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO179
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
Some Perspectives
The calculated and technological entry into another persons mind is an act of monumental barbarism which obliterates perhaps with the twiddling of a dial the history and civilization of
mans mental development. It is more than an abuse of human rights, it is the destruction of
meaning. For anyone who is forced into the hell of living with an unseen mental rapist, the effort
to stay sane is beyond the scope of tolerable endurance. The imaginative capacity of the ordinary
mind cannot encompass the horror of it. We have attempted to come to terms with the experiments of the Nazis in concentration camps. We now have the prospect of systematic control authorized by men who issue instructions through satellite communications for the destruction of
societies while they are driving new Jaguars and Mercedes, and going to the opera.
"On the Need for New Criteria of Diagnosis of Psychosis in the Light of Mind Invasive
Technology"by Carole Smith
Global Research, October 18, 2007; Journal of Psycho-Social Studies, 2003.
People have no comprehension of how lethal only one aspect (aside from the obvious of driving
the victim completely insane) of telepathy technology can be in disrupting and ruining an individual's life through the sabotaging of his/her daily activities. Everything an individual does begins
with a momentary thought. From the split second that thought is learned by the person on the
other end (telepathically) - the individual's right to privacy is not the real threat or loss. The real
lethal weapon is the advantage in disrupting or preventing the individual from accomplishing
whatever he/she is going to do before they actually do it. With a simple cell phone call or instant
message, the Advanced Team is in place to subvert; sabotage; manipulate; propagandize;
smear; disrupt; or even prevent the task or activity from being accomplished in any successful
manner. The perps are skilled at creating scenarios that are covertly arranged to simulate everyday occurrences to make the victim at fault for the loss or failure. Imagine the consequences
when these activities have legal and financial implications. With telepathy technology the need for
tracking and surveillance technology is greatly diminished and may even become obsolete. This is
not merely Mind Invasive Technology, as Carole Smith so eloquently wrote this is LIFE Invasive Technology. Say Goodbye to any true sense of capitalism and free enterprise in the not to
distant future unless of course someone stops these illegal and disastrous technology transfers
and leaks.
Stan J. Caterbone
Organized or Gang Stalking
A system of organized psychological terror tactics used against a person who has become an enemy of an individual or a government. Subtle but effective techniques of stalking by multiple individuals and psychological intimidation and manipulation are used to slowly but surely drive the
target to make complaints to authorities who will see the complaints as bogus because of the
methods used against the target. As a result, the target gets labeled as mentally ill.
There are as many stalking tactics as there are targets as the multistalkers will tailor the stalking
to the individuals habits and individual personality. Some common examples or organized stalking
are: following the target on foot, by car and public transportation, crowding the target's space in a
public place, murmuring insults under the breath so only the target can hear, sitting in the car
outside the target's residence, starting "fights" in public with the target, doing "skits" on the
street which involves information only the target should know but has been found out via surveillance of the target, stealing and vandalism of the target's possessions.
Organized Stalking Website
Organized Stalking is a form of terrorism used against an individual in a malicious attempt to
reduce the quality of a persons life so they will: have a nervous break-down, become incarcerated, institutionalized, experience constant mental, emotional, or physical pain, become homeless, and/or commit suicide. This is done using well-orchestrated accusations, lies, rumors, bogus
investigations, setups, framings, intimidation, overt or covert threats, vandalism, thefts, sabotage, torture, humiliation, emotional terror and general harassment. It is a ganging up by members of the community who follow an organizer and participate in a systematic terrorizing of an
individual. Mark M. Rich
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016Page
Page
185
187
192
191
193
198
Page195
35 of
of 201
41
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October10,
20,
31,
7,
6, 2015
2016
Saturday,
October
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO180
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
The acts described above violate many laws aimed at protecting Americans. Some of these laws
include but are not limited to the following:
10 USC 921, Article 121 -- Larceny and wrongful appropriation
10 USC 920A, Article 120a -- Stalking
18 2340 USC -- Torture
18 USC 241 -- Conspiracy against rights of sovereign, free, God created, spirit and soul
beings
18 USC 213 -- Illegal Surreptitious entry
18 USC 242 -- Deprivation of rights under color of law
18 USC 35 -- Imparting or conveying false information
18 USC 1117 -- Conspiracy to Murder
18 USC 1111 -- Murder
18 USC 1905 -- Disclosure of information generally
42 USC 1983 -- Civil action for deprivation of rights
42 USC 1985 -- Conspiracy to interfere with civil rights
31 USC 5328 -- Whistleblower protections
18 USC 1512 -- Engaging in misleading conduct
18 USC 1503 -- Intimidating a witness/victim
18 USC 1512 -- Tampering with a witness/victim
18 USC 1513 -- Retaliation against a witness/victim
18 USC 1510 -- Obstructing a criminal investigation, conflict of interest roles in
government
18 USC 1509 -- Impeding due exercise of rights by attempting to prevent, obstruct,
impede and Interfere with same
18 USC 1622 -- Subordination of perjury by procuring another to commit perjury
(Optional) I have attached a personal message _______ (check).
AFFIRMATION
I affirm that the statements in this Affidavit concerning my torture and the results of
that torture are true and correct. I further affirm that those statements are based on
my own direct knowledge, personal experience, research, and known and published
historical fact.
Stan J. Caterbone
Affiant (signature) ______________________________________
Stan J. Caterbone
Name (print): __________________________________________
June 19, 2015
Date: _________________________________________________
Pennsylvania
State of __________________________
County of
Lancaster
_____________________________
19
15
June
Sworn before me this _______
day of _______________________,
20__
Stan J. Caterbone - I was a notary from '94-'98
________________________________,
Notary Public Exp.:
______________________
SJC
Stamp
& Seal:
Freedom From Covert Harassment & Surveillance. All rights reserved. Copyright 2010 (This is an amended
form of the original Affidavit of September 2010 from Freedom From Covert Harassment & Surveillance.)
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016Page
Page
186
188
193
191
193
198
Page196
36 of
of 201
41
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October10,
20,
31,
7,
6, 2015
2016
Saturday,
October
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO181
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016Page
Page
187
189
194
191
193
198
Page197
37 of
of 201
41
THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Page 35 of 41
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October10,
20,
31,
7,
6, 2015
2016
Saturday,
October
06/10/2007
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO182
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016Page
Page
188
190
195
191
193
198
Page198
38 of
of 201
41
THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Page 36 of 41
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October10,
20,
31,
7,
6, 2015
2016
Saturday,
October
06/10/2007
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO183
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016Page
Page
189
191
196
191
193
198
Page199
39 of
of 201
41
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October10,
20,
31,
7,
6, 2015
2016
Saturday,
October
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO184
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016Page
Page
190
192
197
191
193
198
Page200
40 of
of 201
41
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October10,
20,
31,
7,
6, 2015
2016
Saturday,
October
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112129707
Page:
Filed: 11/13/2015
DO185
I HAVEDate
WHISTLBLOWER
PROTECTIONS?
ISC-CIA-FULTON
V.
FEDS
PLAME-JOE
PROBE FULTON
TATE-JOE
BANK-JOE
BANK
RODA-ISC-CIA
RODA
- November 6, 2016Page
Page
191
193
198
191
193
198
Page201
41 of
of 201
41
Wednesday
Monday
Sunday
MondayNovember
October10,
20,
31,
7,
6, 2015
2016
Saturday,
October
CHAPTER
DIVIDER
Page 1 of 153
\LED
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 05-2288
T h , c A ~ ? . 5 ~ ! ~9Je.,
. ~',2iI<
I>ii '
cy/-
I.
the ground that the plaintiff has failed to state a timely claim.'
The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit peh&K
ER
Page 2 of 153
dismiss under Rule 12(b) (6) if the time-bar is apparent on the face
of the complaint. Robinson v. Johnson, 313 F.3d 128, 135 (3d Cir.
2002).
The plaintiff
(7)
&
No. 252 Annuity Fund v. Newbridqe SeC., 93 F.3d 1171, 1186 (3d Cir.
1996) (a breach of fiduciary duty is tortious conduct, subject to a
two year statute of limitations); 42 Pa.C.S.
5525(a) (imposing
him, and unnamed officers used excessive force against him; and (4)
in January 1991, a Lt. Madenspacher called the plaintiff regarding
his letter to the Department of Defense about alleged blackmail
occurring in 1987, but failed to attend a scheduled meeting.
(Compl. at 5-6, 33, 39-40, 59.)
Again construing the allegations in the complaint in the
light most favorable to the plaintiff, he has arguably asserted:
(1) assault, battery, false imprisonment, false arrest, malicious
42 Pa. C.S.
5524(1).
Plaintiffs must also bring any 5 1983 civil rights claims within
EXHIBIT - FEDS PROBE FULTON BANK
Page 5 of 153
two years.
(2)
embezzled
$5,000 from his checking account in 1990, did not credit the
account for more than 60 days, and never credited the lost interest
income; and ( 3 ) refused to allow the plaintiff's brother, Thomas
Caterbone, to deposit a check in 1996, on the grounds that no funds
were available, and was therefore responsible for his
suicide/wrongful death later that year.
Fulton Bank for: (1) breach of fiduciary duty, fraud, and/or unjust
enrichment, for its actions toward the plaintiff in 1990; and (2)
fraud or wrongful death, for its actions toward the plaintiff's
brother in 1996. These claims are time barred as well. As
explained above, there is a two-year statute of limitations on
actions for breach of fiduciary duty or fraud. 42 Pa. C.S. $3
5524(3) and (7). There is a four-year statute of limitations on
5525(4).
(Compl. at 81.)
11.
serve the complaint and summons, and has therefore failed to compl)
with the Court's January
5,
2006 Order.
Grand Entertainment
Grouw, Ltd. v. Star Media Sales, Inc., 988 F.2d 476, 488 (3d Cir.
1993).
The plaintiff has not submitted any evidence that he
attempted to serve the Southern Regional Police Department.
For each of the other defendants, the plaintiff filed a
The plaintiff's
Each of these
&
Grimm, LLP in
The
days.
Mr. Basse are the appropriate persons to receive service for these
public bodies.
Page 10 of 153
Page 11 of 153
Page 12 of 153
Page 13 of 153
Page 14 of 153
Page 15 of 153
Page 16 of 153
Page 17 of 153
Page 18 of 153
Page 19 of 153
Page 20 of 153
Page 21 of 153
Page 22 of 153
Page 23 of 153
Page 24 of 153
amgroup01@msn.com
http://www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com/
Blog: http://advancedmediagroup.wordpress.com/
Video Biography at: http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=advancedmediagroup
Stanley J. Caterbone
Advanced Media Group
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
v.
Lancaster County Prison, et al.
AND NOW on this 15th, day of October, 2007, I, Stanley J. Caterbone, PLAINTIFF, Pro Se
Litigant, do hereby file before the Courts an AMENDMENT to the above case.
The PLAINTIFF
requests the Court to grant an additional 60 days to further amend this complaint and to amend
and/or dismiss case no. 06-4650 on or before December 15, 2007, at the time of the next
amendment to this complaint. The PLAINTIFF also seeks clarification from the Court per the rules
of original service; otherwise the PLAINTIFF will service all defendants, both original and the
additional defendants per the 120-day rule after the filing of the next amendment to this
complaint. The PLAINTIFF will also meet with the Federal Bureau of Investigation on October 15,
2007 at the time of this filing to report activities, which have prevented the PLAINTIFF from
completing this amended complaint per the order of July 25, 2007.
Page 25 of 153
Page 1 of 63
10/12/2007
Page 26 of 153
Page 2 of 63
10/12/2007
DEFENDANTS LIST
Page 27 of 153
Page 3 of 63
10/12/2007
II)
Page 28 of 153
Page 4 of 63
10/12/2007
1.
III)
IV)
All tolling doctrines are based upon whether it is fair, under the
circumstances, to bar the victim's claims on the basis of the running of the
statute of limitations.
Page 29 of 153
Page 5 of 63
10/12/2007
Lancaster Aviation arrange for the selected aircraft to be flown in from the Midwest to be
inspected by PLAINTIFF. Pete Wolfson of Lancaster Aviation conducts the meeting, as an
official agent of Lancaster Aviation. Commonwealth Bank has approved the financing of
$97,000 for the purchase.
Pete
Wolfson insists that the plane must be purchased before being flown back to the Midwest.
Pete Wolfson requests a post-dated check from PLAINTIFF for the remaining balance.
PLAINTIFF refuses, citing that the remaining funds must be liquidated from the Keystone
Mutual Fund, and the exact receipt of the moneys is not guaranteed, and could take up to
10 days. Pete Wolfson agrees not to deposit the check until PLAINTIFF confirms that the
funds have been received and deposited in order to cover the check for the remaining
$25,000. PLAINTIFF makes sure that Pete Wolfson has the authority to make the
arrangement, and Pete Wolfson agrees. The purchase of the airplane was also subject to a
pre-purchase inspection by Lancaster Aviation. Lancaster Aviation also advises PLAINTIFF
to have his airplane included in their Fleet Insurance plan. PLAINTIFF also advises
Lancaster Aviation that he would like to offer the airplane to his business associates for
use in order to subsidize the costs and maintenance.
4.
Chuck Smith, president of Lancaster Aviation, later discloses to PLAINTIFF that he had
deposited PLAINTIFFs pre dated check for $25.000, without the confirmation by PLAINTIFF
that the funds had been transferred from accounts.
Wolfson, the salesman for Lancaster Aviation, that he did not want to give them a post
dated check, however Chuck Wolfson insisted. Now, Chuck Smith had told PLAINTIFF that
Page 30 of 153
Page 6 of 63
10/12/2007
agreement for $300.00 per hour and an estimated 6-hour charter planned.
6.
On June 23, 1987 Larry Resch, an executive of both International Signal & Control,
Plc,.(ISC) And United Chem Con visits PLAINTIFF at Financial Management Group, Ltd.,
headquarters in Lancaster, as scheduled to discuss business opportunities.
Larry Resch
explains "we had to fly Carl Jacobson out of the country early this morning" as the reason
for his not being able to attend the meeting as planned. Larry Resch discusses possible
strategies to rescue Chem Cons Minority 8A Set-aside contracts, and solicits financing for
new facility. PLAINTIFF becomes annoyed the context of the conversation, especially the
lack Of disclosure, and discusses allegations of wrongdoing by Guerin and International
Signal & Control, Plc, and the relationship to United Chem Con. After evaluating the
financial statements, PLAINTIFF also suggests there is approximately $15 to $18 million in
missing funds.
7.
Mr. Larry Resch failed to inform the PLAINTIFF of his association and position with
International Signal & Control, Plc., while the PLAINTIFF formally began his whistle blowing
activities on International Signal & Control, Plc..
8.
On June 23, 1987, at 2:00 pm immediately following the meeting with International Signal
& Control Executive, Mr. Larry Resch, the PLAINTIFF has his locks changed to his office by
Russell Locksmith of Lititz, in order to secure confidential personal and business files in
light of the current internal power struggle between himself, Michael Hartlett and Robert
Kauffman, and given the conversation with Mr. Larry Resch of International Signal &
Control, Plc., a few hours earlier.
9.
The Plaintiff was a personal guarantor of a 5 year lease agreement with the Developer,
Fishcer Spounagle, Ltd., for the offices of Financial Management Group, Ltd., at 1755
Oregon Pike, Lancaster, Pennsylvania, that began in 1986 and did renew until 1991.
10.
Page 31 of 153
Page 7 of 63
10/12/2007
business files have yet to be found. Kauffman and Robert Long illegally issue FINANCIAL
MANAGEMENT GROUP, Ltd., stock certificates to Peter Peneros and Scott Robertson.
Robert Long signs the stock certificates as Secretary of FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT GROUP,
Ltd., when PLAINTIFF was acting Secretary, and was the only person duly authorized to
issue FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT GROUP, Ltd., stock certificates. PLAINTIFF learned of the
burglary by Robert Kauffman, President, in a telephone conversation while at Stone
Harbor, NJ; Kauffman inadvertently mentioned that the stock certificates were issued,
however, with all documents at risk of being stolen, PLAINTIFF did not mention the
incident, in hopes to first recover any potentially stolen business and personal files.
11.
12.
On May 20, 1987, the PLAINTIFF and Attorney Ric Fox, of Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, draft
the legal Letter of Intent for investors of Power Productions I, which the PLAINTIFF was
general partner.
The PLAINTIFF had several interested parties some which have made
verbal commitments, including Norris Boyd and Dave Cook, an executive of Turkey Hill
Minit Markets.
13.
On June 29, 1987, the PLAINTIFF received patent research materials from patent attorney
Joel S. Goldhammer, of the prominent Philadelphia law firm Siedel, Gonda, Goldhammer &
Abbot regarding the "Digital" Movie, and the national franchising of Financial Management
Group, Ltd.,.
Abbot
in
order
to
investigate
all
relevant
matters
concerning
the
technology,
merchandising, and marketing of the "Mutant Mania" project, and the use of the "Power
Station" label.
professional audio/visual digital mixing consoles, and the "Power Station Digital Movie
System (PSDMS), as created by PLAINTIFF in the proposal for SONY Corporation of
Japan.
14.
On May 11, 1987, the PLAINTIFF invested and paid Scott Robertson, executive vice
president of Financial Management Group, Ltd., $2,000 dollars from a personal account for
an advance for work on mortgage banking projects and the Digital Movie. On the same
day the PLAINTIFF paid film producer Marcia Silen, of Flatbush Films, Hollywood,
California, an advance of $750.00 for a cash advanced for work with the Digital Movie
project.
Page 32 of 153
Page 8 of 63
10/12/2007
The PLAINTIFF was executor producer of the project, general partner of Power Productions
I, the investment group, and named in the Mutant Mania budget to receive a salary of
$100,000. In addition the PLAINTIFF had agreements to receive royalties on all revenues
associated with both the distribution of the film and video release and all branding of the
merchandise from the project.
16.
Financial Management Group, Ltd., its officers and employees, along with other
Defendants including but not limited to Commonwealth National Bank (Mellon Bank)
(Mellon), Fulton Bank, the Manheim Township Police Department engaged in unfair
competition, wrongful interference with contracts, trespass to person, criminal trespass,
forgery, undo influence, conspiracy, embezzlement, Count IV - extortion, mental duress,
slander, defamation of character, obstruction of justice, wrongful interference with
business relations, and other anti trust violations pertaining to the Digital Movie project.
17.
The PLAINTIFF, on behalf of Financial Management Group, Ltd., began research and
discussions with corporate attorney, Jeff Jamanou of the law firm McNesse, Wallace and
Nurick regarding franchising the concept of Financial Management Group, Ltd, on a
national scale and considerations for a stock split.
Beginning in April of 1987, Financial Management Group, Ltd, officers and executives
engaged in a pattern of unfair competition, wrongful interference with contracts, trespass
to person, obstruction of justice, criminal trespass, forgery, undo influence, conspiracy,
embezzlement, Count IV - extortion, mental duress, slander, defamation of character,
wrongful interference with business relations, and other anti trust violations.
19.
On June 18, 1987, the PLAINTIFF and Randy Grespin, corporate attorney for The Life
Underwriters Group, fly to Atlanta, Georgia, to visit with executives of Planners Securities
Group, a nationally known Broker Dealer, and joint venture partner that was in the midst
of a deal in which Financial Management Group, Ltd., had negotiated an equity interest.
The PLAINTIFF had initially consulted with both Kauffman and Hartlett concerning the trip,
however when both disagreed, The PLAINTIFF questioned why the PLAINTIFF was the only
principal to personally visit the operations of Hibbard Brown & Company, which lead the
PLAINTIFF his decision to terminate the ill fated merger.
20.
Planners Securities Group, was regarded as the most successful Broker Dealers in the
financial planning community, and included several former presidents of the national board
of the International Association of Financial Planners. The company had previously been
recruiting Financial Management Group, Ltd.,., and offering an attractive equity interest.
Randy Grespin agreed to reimburse $600 to The PLAINTIFF for the expense and use of his
aircraft.
21.
The PLAINTIFF had the following agenda for the trip and meeting:
Page 33 of 153
Page 9 of 63
10/12/2007
Discuss and evaluate the opportunities of utilizing insurance products from Randy
Grespin's firm, and all matters related to the structuring of business.
c.
Familiarize Greg Burie, a personal friend and recruitment of The PLAINTIFFs who
was also visiting from Florida to consider opening a Florida office for Financial
Management Group, Ltd..
d.
22.
On June 18, 2007, after arriving at the corporate offices of Upon entering the offices of
Financial Management Group, Ltd., Robert Kauffman pulls The PLAINTIFF into his office
and abruptly shouts "Who is running this corporation, me or you?". The PLAINTIFF quickly
answers "I don't give a damn who runs this company. as long as it's run right, and for the
right reasons!" The PLAINTIFF immediately left the office.
23.
On June 18, 1987, later in the evening, Robert Kauffman, President visits the home of the
PLAINTIFF and engaged in a contractual dispute when the PLAINTIFF refused to agree to
approve the new contract and salary increase of Robert Kauffman, President,.
Robert
Kauffman, President, engaged in retaliatory and activities, including fraud, Count IV extortion, libel, defamation of character, obstruction of justice, and conspiracy.
24.
June 22, 1987, The PLAINTIFF hires Todd Dellinqer, a planner in Financial Management
Group, Ltd.,., to help administrate the daily activities of his personal clientele and to
perform administrative duties necessary due to the amount of time The PLAINTIFF is
conducting business out at the office, allowing The PLAINTIFF to focus attention on the
Strategic Planning, and allowing him to better manage his time. The PLAINTIFF sends a
memo to client and shareholder Dr. William Umiker that introduces his new assistant, in
addition to information regarding his pension accounts.
25.
Page 34 of 153
Page 10 of 63
10/12/2007
On January 20, 1987, the PLAINTIFF and Al Dannatt, a principal and managing partner
with the commercial mortgage banking company Institutional Investors of Houston, Texas,
consummate a joint venture agreement where the PLAINTIFF will market and solicit clients
on the eastern part of the regional for commercial mortgages with a lending authority of
$3 to $100 million dollars. The agreement also calls for the PLAINTIFF to develop other
joint venture proposals and business transactions with a bank the Institutional Investors
was in the process of purchasing. The PLAINTIFF in turn would began to offer the joint
venture to members of Financial Management Group, Ltd., to offer finder fees to both
Financial Management Group, Ltd., and any members of Financial Management Group,
Ltd., which referred clients and projects.
27.
j.
Page 35 of 153
Page 11 of 63
10/12/2007
On June 25, 1987, Financial Group Executives burglarized the PLAINTIFFs office and
began to extort the PLAINTIFF business interests in the Institutional Investors joint
partnership. Up to that point in time, the PLAINTIFF had developed a pipeline in excess of
$100 million in projects, a firm commitment for a satellite office in Hollywood, California,
and a commitment for a $5 million second mortgage on the Olde Hickory Properties, of
Lancaster, County.
arrangements than that of the local commercial lending institutions, including Fulton Bank
and Commonwealth Bank. Both banks would eventually engage in anti-trust violations.
29.
On June 29, 1987, The PLAINTIFF visits with Dave Schaad, President of the York based
real estate firm of Bennett Williams, Inc., The PLAINTIFF was finalizing plans to secure
financing of a $2.5 million office complex for the new headquarters of Bennett Williams, as
well as 3 or 4 additional anchor tenants.
Schaad for the past 3 months, along with Scott Robertson. The PLAINTIFF had previously
discussed the deal with Dave Cook, and executive and former owner of the Turkey Hill
Convenience Stores. Dave Cook indicated a serious interest in providing the entire $2.5
million investment.
The above deal would have provided over $150,000 of fees upon
settlement to The PLAINTIFF upon settlement. Prior to the meeting, Dave Schaad had
indicated by telephone, that Robert Kauffman had invited himself to the meeting, without
prior consent or notice to The PLAINTIFF, During the meeting, The PLAINTIFF disclosed the
current criminal activities within the principals of Financial Management Group, Ltd., being
facilitated by Robert Kauffman himself.
30.
In June of 1987, Jill Carson, a Fulton Bank Branch Manager libeled and slandered the
PLAINTIFF in notifying Mr. Chuck Smith, owner operator of Lancaster Aviation, the Plaintiff
was bankrupt and had no liquid funds, which was totally fabricated. At the time of this
infringement and at least until August 8, 1987, the PLAINTIFFs credit rating as reported
by the Lancaster Credit Bureau was perfect, with all creditors paid in full within 30 days,
as agreed.
customer, borrower, and a client in good standing with Fulton Bank, this amounts to
defamation of character, slander, wrongful interference with business relations, wrongful
interference with contracts, trespass to person, unfair competition, fraud, conspiracy,
embezzlement, breech of contract.
31.
On July 1, 1987, the PLAINTIFF retained the counsel of Mr. Joseph F. Roda, Esq., of
Lancaster, to arrange for a meeting to discuss the recent events and Coup attempt by
Kauffman and Hartlett that included several criminal and security violations. The
PLAINTIFF visits with Mr. Joseph F. Roda, Esq. and describes the incidents in detail,
including the "Digital Movie", ISC, and all related activities.
instructs The PLAINTIFF to have all of the files copied and arranges for the return of all
Page 36 of 153
Page 12 of 63
10/12/2007
Mr.
Joseph F. Roda, Esq. advised that The PLAINTIFF had no right to any funds. All checks
were returned to Financial Management Group, Ltd., along with all other documents.
32.
The PLAINTIFF advises Mr. Joseph F. Roda, Esq. that he is in fear that someone is
deliberately orchestrating all of the recent incidents, which were quite extraordinary and
extremely criminal and have been coming from all directions. The PLAINTIFF advised Mr.
Joseph F. Roda, Esq. that he would like to take all of his files to Stone Harbor, New Jersey
for safekeeping while he pursued his legal recourse. The PLAINTIFF also explained that he
would feel safer leaving Lancaster until these circumstances were brought under control.
33.
Mr. Joseph F. Roda, Esq., failed to provide any advocacy representation; colluded with
Financial Management Group, Ltd.,; failed to inform the PLAINTIFF of any conflicts of
interests with current clients (Mr. William Clark, in house legal counsel for International
Signal & Control, Plc.,); was negligent in not reviewing the hundreds of documents the
PLAINTIFF delivered and for not identifying causes of actions, which United States District
Judge Mary McLaughlin identified from similar documents in June of 2006; was negligent
in not believing the PLAINTIFF detailed account of the Commonwealth National Bank
(Mellon Bank) wrongful repossession, may have conspired to cover-up the PLAINTIFFs
Federal False Claims Act against International Signal & Control, Plc,.
34.
Mr. Joseph F. Roda committed fraud in invoicing the PLAINTIFF for services rendered,
without any actual benefit afforded to the PLAINTIFF.
35.
The Defendants conspired to discredit the PLAINTIFF with a massive campaign of libel,
slander and deceit when immediately following the meeting with International Signal &
Control, Plc., meeting of June 23, 1987 the following contracts were terminated without
cause:
a. Planners Securities Group, Ltd., NASD Series 22 Securities License
b. Planners Securities Registered Representative Agreements
c. William O. Umiker Executor of Estate
d. Michael T. Caterbone Power of Attorney
36.
On July 3, 1987, at approximately 12:00 am, Victor Miasnikowcs, owner operator of Romar
Aviation (Currently Venture Jets, Inc.) calls The PLAINTIFF to notify him that his aircraft
was reposed some hour earlier, and locked in the hanger of Lancaster Aviation, with all of
his personal and business files on board. Victor only would say that Commonwealth Bank
had taken part in the repossession, with no reasons given. The first payment of the loan
agreement with Commonwealth National Bank (Mellon Bank) was not due until July 25,
1987 and the $25,000 cash deposit for the airplane was now officially extorted from the
Page 37 of 153
Page 13 of 63
10/12/2007
38.
On July 4, 1987 at approximately 9:00 am in the morning, The PLAINTIFF calls his
attorney Mr. Joseph F. Roda, Esq., under emotional duress from the previous conversation
with Victor and the repossession of his aircraft with all documents on board; Mr. Joseph F.
Roda, Esq. responds "Stan, you have to quit fabricating these allegations, it is July 4th,
what do you want me to do.
Lancaster to ruin him, and supports his efforts to leave Lancaster with his files to solicit aid
and support from legal and law enforcement authorities to suppress the conspiracy. The
PLAINTIFF realizes that the documents were authentic proof and evidence of all of his
allegations, and most importantly all of his business activities for the past 5 or more years.
The loss of the files would have devastating consequences for his life.
39.
Mr. Joseph F. Roda committed fraud in invoicing the PLAINTIFF for services rendered,
without any actual benefit afforded to the PLAINTIFF.
40.
On July 4, 1987, at approximately 9:30 am, after the disturbing phone, The PLAINTIFF
drives to the Cape May County Airport to solicit the services of a pilot to fly to Lancaster to
retrieve his files.
Brad Donahue accepts the job, and agrees to a $200 tee, and an
additional $200 it there are any difficulties in obtaining the files. The PLAINTIFF provides
Brad Donahue with all documentation showing legal title to the aircraft in the event
authorities are notified. The PLAINTIFF gives explicit instructions to notify the police in the
event personnel will not return all of the files. Brad Donahue arrives a few hours later, with
boxes of files.
payment and the activity, and $400 in cash is paid to Brad Donahue. Pilot Dave Austin, of
the Cape May County Airport witnesses the transactions and the event.
41.
In the following weeks, Dave Austin, would later disclose to The PLAINTIFF that Brad
Page 38 of 153
Page 14 of 63
10/12/2007
The PLAINTIFF solicits the legal services of Ric Fox, a Harrisburg attorney that has
prepared legal documents for the "Digital" Movie. Rio Fox flies his aircraft to the Cape May
County Airport, and arrives at The PLAINTIFF's house accompanied with another attorney
Robert Chercicoff.
Financial Management Group, Ltd.,; the "Digital Movie"; and the illegal repossession of the
aircraft.
The PLAINTIFF questioned Mr. Fox and his associate of any relationship with
Commonwealth Bank, which headquarters were also in Harrisburg, and both gave a very
ambiguous answer. The meeting ended with both attorneys failing to recognize or admit to
any wrongdoing by any and all related parties, and further demanding a $2,000 retainer
fee to look further into the matters. The PLAINTIFF suspects the conspiracy theory again,
especially in light of the acknowledged relationship with Commonwealth Bank, and an
indirect relationship with Robert Kauffman, through Life Underwriters of Harrisburg, a joint
venture arranged by The PLAINTIFF some months earlier. By July 5, The PLAINTIFF had
already made two legitimate attempts to solicit legal aid for the unexplained events and
circumstances, both of which were maliciously sabotaged.
43.
Ric Fox and Robert Chercicoff engaged in conspiracy, collusion, interference with business
contracts, interference with business relations, and had attempted to thwart and cover-up
the PLAINTIFFS Federal False Claims Act complaint.
44.
On July 6, 1987, In an effort to document the conspiracy theory, PLAINTIFF requests Tom
Caterbone to call Robert Kauffman, President, to inquire about the status of his affairs, and
to tape the conversation.
PLAINTIFF's and Robert Kauffman, President, states the following: "PLAINTIFF has moved
his office to Stone Harbor, NJ.. he is not taking care of business, and I need to see to it
that his clients are taken care of for the time being.. he has been spending a lot of money,
an airplane, a place at the shore, and he seems to think that he is too important for his
traditional clientele.. There is some history of mental disorders in his family history.. I
can't come right out and say that that is what's going on,.... I wish Stan would get some
professional help.. However for the time being, Stan is not taking care of business, and I
need to be concerned for his clients.
45.
On July 6, 1987, PLAINTIFF telephones Dr. Al Schulz, psychiatrist at St. Joseph Hospital,
and client of PLAINTIFF's in order to thwart the allegations of insanity. Dr. Al Shulz had
disclosed that several persons, including Mary Lynn Dipaolo and Jere Sullivan had called
him concerning PLAINTIFF's behavior and activities.
46.
From the allegations, Dr. Shulz advised that PLAINTIFF was suffering from illusions of
grandeur, and prescribed Lithium treatment, and to return to Lancaster for consultation.
Page 39 of 153
Page 15 of 63
10/12/2007
On July 6, 1987, PLAINTIFF contacts David Drubner, of Boston, Ma, a friend of PLAINTIFF's
brothers Mike, and an attorney.
PLAINTIFF about "taking some medication", and supports the allegations of insanity.
48.
On July 17, 1987 PLAINTIFF travels to Hollywood, California to meet and visit with Ted
Gamillion and Gamillion Studios (Film Studio), and Marcia Silen of Flatbush Films. Ted
Gamillion had previously solicited the consulting of PLAINTIFF in order to help reorganize
the financing of the film studio, after earlier arrangements in North Carolina had gone
sour.
PLAINTIFF had spent several days visiting and touring the studio. Ted Gamillion
agreed to allow PLAINTIFF to represent the studio in order to secure the required
financing.
During the visit, Marcia Silen had disclosed to PLAINTIFF that Scott Robertson had made
allegations of insanity about him (PLAINTIFF) to persons at Power Station Studios and and
Flatbush Films.
50.
In the following days, PLAINTIFF had made numerous telephone calls to local, state, and
federal authorities, for intervention and help regarding all of the preceding events and
circumstances.
Department, responded "what bank branch repossessed your aircraft"; Pennsylvania State
Senator Gib Armstrong, responded, "I will call the Pa Attorney General's Office and have
them call you; the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the Philadelphia-based field
office; U.S. Representative Robert Walker (R-Pa), a detailed and explicit conversation with
Mrs. Robert Walker, who would only advise PLAINTIFF to put his situation in writing and
submit it to the Congressman in his Washington, D. C. office. In addition: David Wouls
(Executive Vice President of the Lancaster chamber of Commerce & Industry), PLAINTIFF
talked at length, and in detail, making allegations of misconduct with members of the
same; National Association of securities Dealers (NASD), in Washington, D.C., PLAINTIFF
discussed the securities related violations. And also: the Securities & Exchange
Commission (SEC), also in Washington, D.C., and discussed securities laws violations; the
Pennsylvania Securities Commission, of Harrisburg, Pa, discussed the implications of
PLAINTIFF's illegal lock-out, and his legal and formal positions, including incorporating
officer of Financial Management Group, Ltd., PLAINTIFF received no support or follow-up
communications concerning all of the above requests, despite his apparent emotional
duress, and extreme situation.
51.
On July 2, 1987, The PLAINTIFF negotiates with Romar Aviation to provide pilot; storage;
Page 40 of 153
Page 16 of 63
10/12/2007
$1,000 to Romar Aviation for the flight to Stone Harbor and insurance, which was
conducted by Victor M. of Romar Aviation.
PLAINTIFF calls Sam Goode, of Sam Goode Assoc., to bind insurance for the aircraft. Sam
Goode Binds the insurance and instruct The PLAINTIFF to mail a payment of $750. The
conversation took place in Romar Aviation, at the time the $1,000 was paid to Victor. The
PLAINTIFF loads his aircraft with all of his personal and business files to be transported to
the Cape May County Airport, just a few miles outside of Stone Harbor, in the morning of
July 4.
52.
In July and August of 1987 Mr. Robert Kauffman, President, had several meetings with
Millard Johnson, client of PLAINTIFF since 1982, in efforts to coerce Millard Johnson to
provide false statements to a bonding company that a legitimate loan from Millard Johnson
to the PLAINTIFF was instead an act of embezzlement of $25,000 of funds that were
transferred to the PLAINTIFF for an investment. Mr. Millard Johnson testified in person on
September 29, 1987 before Mr. Howard Eisler of the Pennsylvania Securities Commission
in a recorded interview and attested to the preceding. Mr. Millard Johnson refused and
notified Mr. Robert Kauffman that his attempt was a serious crime.
53.
Mr. Kauffman and Mr. Michael Hartlett, a principal and partner of Financial Management
Group, Ltd., contracted with an insurance company on June 29, 1987 an errors and
omissions insurance policy for corporate officers of Financial Management Group, Ltd., in
an effort to collude, conspire, and defraud that insurance company of a claim, while at the
same time committing slander, libel, and conspiracy to extort the PLAINTIFFs stock
holdings, and all other business interests.
54.
On July 24, 1987, Michael M. Hartlett sends a letter to all creditors of Financial
Management Group, Ltd., informing them that stated the following: The PLAINTIFF is no
longer an officer of the corporation; he was removed from office on July 1, 1987; he had
been purchasing items under Financial Management Group, Ltd., and obtaining corporate
discount and rates; and formally notifying them that The PLAINTIFF had never had the
right to purchase items through Financial Management Group, Ltd., or make corporate
commitments on behalf of Financial Management Group, Ltd., or contract or in any way
obligate Financial Management Group, Ltd.,.
55.
56.
On July 7th, 1987, the PLAINTIFF contacts the law firm of Capello & Foley, of Santa
Barbara, California.
Page 41 of 153
Page 17 of 63
10/12/2007
The
PLAINTIFF intended to file suit against Commonwealth National Bank (Mellon Bank) for the
illegal and unjustified repossession of his aircraft. The PLAINTIFF discussed the case briefly
with Diane Campell that day, and The PLAINTIFF made arrangements to deliver supporting
documents to the office in Santa Barbara the following week, while visiting with Gamillion
Studios, in Hollywood.
57.
58.
59.
No explanation was provided, or any reasons for the termination. The PLAINTIFFs reprisal
for disclosing criminal activities to the proper authorities is that he will illegally loose his
privilege to sell securities without any merit.
60.
On July 8, 1987, The PLAINTIFF's brothers, Steve, Phil, Mike, and Tom, arrive
unexpectedly and uninvited at the residence of The PLAINTIFF's in Stone Harbor, NJ, and
refuse to leave until The PLAINTIFF agrees to take Lithium and return
to Lancaster to
Steve Caterbone, Phil Caterbone, Mike Caterbone, and Tom Caterbone had engaged in
conspiracy, libel, slander, defamation of character, conspiracy to commit Count IV extortion, interference with business relations, interference with business contracts,
invasion of privacy, and civil trespass.
62.
Commonwealth National Bank (Mellon Bank) regarding the repossession of 9 days prior.
The following reasons are given for the repossession: Failure to provide adequate
insurance; Removal of aircraft from Lancaster Aviation; Intended plan to fly aircraft to
Florida without prior written notice.
63.
Commonwealth National Bank (Mellon Bank) engaged in violations of lender liability by not
providing advanced notice of the repossession with any opportunity for the PLAINTIFF to
cure any legitimate deficiencies in the lending agreements.
64.
On July 10, 1987, the PLAINTIFF receives a formal notarized notification from Dr. and Mrs.
William Umiker of Financial Management Group, Ltd., removing The PLAINTIFF as the
former Trustee for their Estates.
65.
On July 10, 1987, Mr. Robert Kauffman also sends a personal letter to all of The
Page 42 of 153
Page 18 of 63
10/12/2007
67.
On July 15, 1987 the PLAINTIFF travels to Boston, Massachusetts to research lender
liability and other legal matters in a law library of Suffolk Community College.
68.
On July 16, 1987, the PLAINTIFF travels to New York, from Boston, MA, to visit with Bob
Walters of Power Station Studios, to discuss the allegations of Blackmail, and to find out
who is involved, including Scott Robertson and Power Station Studios.
69.
On July 17, 1987, the PLAINTIFF travels to Hollywood, California to meet and visit with
Ted Gamillion and Gamillion Studios (Film Studio), and Marcia Silen of Flatbush Films. Ted
Gamillion had previously solicited the consulting of The PLAINTIFF in order to help
reorganize the financing of the film studio, after earlier arrangements in North Carolina
had gone sour. The PLAINTIFF had spent several days visiting and touring the studio. Ted
Gamillion agreed to allow The PLAINTIFF to represent the studio in order to secure the
required financing.
confidential financial, legal, and tax documents for the project. During the visit, Marcia
Silen had disclosed to The PLAINTIFF that Scott Robertson had made allegations of
insanity about him (The PLAINTIFF) to persons at Power Station Studios and at Flatbush
Films.
70.
The PLAINTIFF discusses the illegal repossession and other related matters, however
during the conversation, becomes suspicious when Bob Walters and Tony Bongiovi disclose
that the "Digital" Movie project is suddenly suspended until a later time.
71.
On July 21, 1987, At 2:30 pm The PLAINTIFF visits the law firm of Capello & Foley, in
Santa Barbara, California, and delivers 3 large blue binders for Diane Cambell and attorney
Barry Capello to review, concerning his allegations of dire violations of lender liability with
specific regards to the illegal repossession of his aircraft by Commonwealth National Bank
(Mellon Bank). The PLAINTIFF research the law firm of Capello & Foley at the Suffolk law
library and learned that it was the leading law firm in the nation leading the way in
violations of lender liability litigation.
72.
The law firm of Capello & Foley and the PLAINTIFF had numerous communications,
although there was never any commitment for representation by Capello & Foley, it is
alleged that the law firm engaged in conspiracy, collusion, interference with business
contracts, interference with business relations, and had attempted to thwart and cover-up
Page 43 of 153
Page 19 of 63
10/12/2007
On July 24, 1987 The PLAINTIFF conducts a three (3) hour meeting at his residence in
Stone Harbor, NJ, with attorney Lew Schweller regarding legal action concerning all events
and activities of the prior days and months. The PLAINTIFF also gives Lew Schweller a
$500.00 retainers fee, for his representation.
74.
75.
On July 24, 1987, Attorney Joseph Roda invoices The PLAINTIFF $527.00 for the time and
services of July 1 & 2, 1987.
76.
On July 30, 1987, The PLAINTIFF had paid $600 to Dr. Levine, a Psychiatrist from North
field, New Jersey, for an objective evaluation of his mental state of mind, in order to prove
the fabricated allegations of 'insanity". Dr. Levine had conducted a 2-hour meeting in his
residence in Stone Harbor, NJ, and required The PLAINTIFF to complete the Minneapolis
Multiphase Personality Inventory (MMPI).
immediately returned it to Dr. Levine. After several weeks without any communications
from Dr. Levine, The PLAINTIFF had called for the results. Dr. Levine had explained that
he had conducted telephone interviews with members of The PLAINTIFF's family, without
notice or consent, in addition to the original request of The PLAINTIFF to conduct an
objective and confidential examination. In addition, Dr. Levine prescribed Lithium drug
therapy, and disclosed a diagnosis of Bi-Polar Mood Disorder.
77.
78.
On August 6, 1987, the law firm of Appel, Yost & Sorentino, of Lancaster, Pa., sends a
formal notice to The PLAINTIFF, demanding the return of a facsimile machine leased from
the ACM Company of Lancaster, Pa. Attorney Appel advises The PLAINTIFF that it is the
property of Financial Management Group, Ltd., and should be returned at once or legal
action will follow.
79.
Appel Yost & Sorentino and Attorney Appel engaged in fraud, collusion, libel, slander,
defamation of character, conspiracy to commit Count IV - extortion, interference with
business relations, interference with business contracts.
80.
On August 7, 2007 the PLAINTIFF receives a Credit Report from the Credit Bureau of
Lancaster County as requested. The credit report up to the date of August 1, 1987 verifies
and confirms that his credit report was excellent, without any blemishes. The history of all
accounts was "paid within 30 days, or as agreed".
81.
Page 44 of 153
Page 20 of 63
10/12/2007
On August 10, 1987, the PLAINTIFF receives a facsimile from the Board of Directors of
Financial Management Group, Ltd., signed by Robert Long as The FMG Board of Directors
threatening to file criminal charges for "embezzlement (we have checks to prove it),
burglary, employee theft, corporate opportunity and slander against our firm".
83.
84.
On August 12, 1987, Yolanda Caterbone, mother of The PLAINTIFF, Steve, Phil, Mike, and
Tom Caterbone, all brothers, arrive unexpectedly and uninvited to the residence of The
PLAINTIFF in Stone Harbor. After several requests for the visitors to leave the premises
are denied, several brothers refuse to let The PLAINTIFF leave the premises.
The
PLAINTIFF flees, and the brothers chase after him. The PLAINTIFF runs into a neighbors
house to ask to use the telephone to phone the police. However, after realizing that he is
scaring the occupants, he flees to the Stone Harbor Police Department, a few blocks away,
in an effort to obtain a restraining order and to lawfully have the unwanted persons vacate
his residence and personal property. Officer Steve Conners and Officer Henry Stanford
refuse the request, and hold The PLAINTIFF in custody.
officers, accompanied by Steve and Tom Caterbone, place The PLAINTIFF into a Police
Cruiser and proceed to the Burdette Tomlin Hospital, in Stone Harbor. Upon arriving, The
PLAINTIFF is interrogated and questioned extensively about a "gun".
A hospital staffer
then accuses The PLAINTIFF of an attempted suicide and keep him in custody for 4 or
more hours.
Yolanda Caterbone, Steve Caterbone, Phil Caterbone, Mike Caterbone, Tom Caterbone
engaged in invasion of privacy, civil trespass, obstruction of justice, wrongful interference
with contracts, trespass to person, criminal trespass, forgery, undo influence, conspiracy,
embezzlement, Count IV - extortion, mental duress, slander, defamation of character,
wrongful interference with business relations; and engaged in psychiatric abuse.
86.
The Stone Harbor Police, James Warner (Current Executive Director of the Lancaster
County Solid Waste Management Authority) and Burdette Tomlin Hospital engaged in
Page 45 of 153
Page 21 of 63
10/12/2007
On August 13, 1987, the PLAINTIFF At approximately 9:30 am, The PLAINTIFF returns to
the Burdette Tomlin Hospital to obtain a formal copy of the incident the preceding night.
After some arguments1 hospital officials provide explicit records of the event, including the
following summary: "Stan was brought to the ER (emergency room) by two brothers and
police.
Police received a phone call from Jim Warner, (872-9081, friend staying at the
Conestoga residence of the PLAINTIFF), who told them he believed Stan planned to take a
gun, go to the beach & kill himself. Client denied any such statement, thoughts or plans.
He has legal and difficult times, financial deals which have fallen through; license to do
financial planning (his business) revoked; repossessed material goods (airplane); being
blackmailed; and several major financial deals (in which he had invested personal funds)
fall through-but NO PROBLEMS! Denied any Depression.
88.
On August 14, 1987, the same family members again arrive unwanted at the residence of
The PLAINTIFF in Stone Harbor, NJ. After another confrontation, similar to the incident of
two evenings before, The PLAINTIFF fleas to the Avalon Police Department for another
attempt to get a restraining order. However, en route, just a few blocks from the Avalon
Police Station, an Avalon Police cruiser pulls The PLAINTIFF over and arrests him for the
following violations:
a. Driving Beyond the speed limit.
b. Driving an unregistered vehicle (all required registration materials were in
Lancaster, PA)
c. Containing an empty beer can in his vehicle (which was at .1 east three days old)
89.
In addition, the Avalon Police Department repossessed his car and locked it in the Avalon
Police Department compound, which was his only
Again, Yolanda Caterbone, Steve Caterbone, Phil Caterbone, Mike Caterbone, Tom
Caterbone engaged in invasion of privacy, civil trespass, obstruction of justice, wrongful
interference with contracts, trespass to person, criminal trespass, forgery, undo influence,
conspiracy, embezzlement, Count IV - extortion, mental duress, slander, defamation of
character, wrongful interference with business relations; and engaged in psychiatric abuse.
91.
The Avalon Police Department engaged in false arrest, false imprisonment, false
statements, civil conspiracy, malicious prosecution and/or malicious abuse of process
claims arising out of the charges and arrest; and (2) civil rights claims under 42 U.S.C.
1983, arising out of the Department's actions or inactions during court scheduled hearings
Page 46 of 153
Page 22 of 63
10/12/2007
On August 24, 1987, Robert Kauffman sends a letter to Millard Johnson, The PLAINTIFF's
client, regarding his previous intentions of paying the $25,000 demand note of The
PLAINTIFF to Millard Johnson. Robert Kauffman had previously promised to pay the debt
to Millard Johnson during a meeting. Robert Kauffman, told Millard Johnson to contact the
Financial Management Group, Ltd., attorney, Craig Russell in order to file legal claim, and
formally disclosed that he would: no longer handle any discussions concerning Stanley J.
Caterbone. In the last paragraph, Robert Kauffman discloses "attorney Mr. Patterson, no
longer
represents
the
Caterbone
family
regarding
his
pending
bankruptcy
or
guardianship". The PLAINTIFF never gave any legal jurisdiction or rights to any family
member, has never filed for bankruptcy, was not bankrupt, or even knew of an attorney
named Mr. Patterson.
93.
Robert Kauffman and Craig Russell engage in conspiracy to commit fraud, libel, slander,
defamation of character, conspiracy to commit Count IV - extortion, and false statements.
94.
meeting is set for September 4, 1987 at 10:00 am in the aide Hickory Inn, a mile away
from Financial Management Group, Ltd., The PLAINTIFF requests that the meeting be in
the strictest of confidence.
95.
On September 3, 1987, Attorney Joseph Roda sends The PLAINTIFF a letter requesting
payment of $525.48 in outstanding legal tees for the meetings of July 1 & 2 and copying
charges.
96.
The PLAINTIFF calls Victor of Romar Aviation (no charge) to schedule a charter flight from
Cape May County Airport to the Lancaster Airport for September 3rd at approximately
2:00 pm, the day before the meeting with Financial Management Group, Ltd., executives.
97.
On September 3, 1987, Robert Kauffman calls detective Larry Sigler of the Manheim
Township Police Department to report an alleged Terroristic threat made two days prior,
on September 1, 1987, by The PLAINTIFF between the hours of 9:00 and 1 pm noontime.
Detective Larry Sigler issues a warrant for the arrest of The PLAINTIFF with District Justice
Murray Horton that was issued at about the same time as the arrival of The PLAINTIFF at
Romar Aviation.
98.
On September 3, 1987, Larry Sigler and the Manheim Township Police Department engage
in false imprisonment, false arrest, malicious prosecution and/or malicious abuse of
process claims arising out of the charges and arrest in September 1987; and (2) civil
rights claims under 42 U.S.C. 1983, arising out of the Department's actions or inactions
Page 47 of 153
Page 23 of 63
10/12/2007
On September 3, 1987, At approximately 3:00 pm Mary Lynn Dipaolo picks The PLAINTIFF
up at Romar Aviation for a scheduled visit and dinner.
annoyed at Mary Lynn Dipaolo's unjustified allegations, The PLAINTIFF borrows her car to
go home to his residence in Conestoga and to go play basketball.
100.
101.
102.
Upon leaving,
The PLAINTIFF temporarily disconnect the systems which he had integrated and developed
for Financial Management Group, Ltd., which fall under intellectual property rights. Stacy
Walters assists The PLAINTIFF in loading the tiles in his automobile, and The PLAINTIFF
kisses Stacy Walters goodbye, and awaits for her safe return to the building until leaving.
103.
104.
On September 4, 1987, after midnight, upon entering his residence, the PLAINTIFF is
taken into custody by the Conestoga Police, and requests that the files that he had taken
out of the offices of Financial Management Group, Ltd., be taken along to prove his rights
to the property, and his position within the company. The PLAINTIFF was then taken to
the jurisdiction of Manheim Township Police, at Where the New Danville Pike meets South
Prince Street, where he is arrested and taken into custody.
105.
106.
Bail is set at $20,000 and The PLAINTIFF is placed in the Lancaster County Prison. He was
not permitted to post real estate for bail.
107.
The Manheim Township Police Department, Detective Larry Mathias and the Lancaster
Page 48 of 153
Page 24 of 63
10/12/2007
September 5, 1987 - The Lancaster New Era and the Lancaster Intelligencer Journal report
the alleged crimes, reporting that The PLAINTIFF is an ax-employee; that Financial
Management Group, Ltd., sustained $60,000 because of his actions; and that he
threatened 2 female employees.
109.
110.
The entire arrests and reports fail to acknowledge that The PLAINTIFF is an individual
lessee of the property, and in accordance with law, still holds all of his offices of PING,
Ltd., and is the founder of the company. The above incident further facilitates the ongoing
conspiracy, and publicly discredits The PLAINTIFF in every way, financially, professionally,
and most importantly conveniently supports the continued allegations of insanity.
111.
visitation at the Lancaster county prison, completely unexpectedly and unsolicited. Robert
Beyer offers his services and representation with regards to only defending the criminal
charges.
112.
113.
The PLAINTIFF is released from Lancaster County prison, and immediately escorted to St.
Joseph Hospital and admitted into the Psychiatric Unit.
114.
On September 9, 1987, Yolanda Caterbone, Robert Beyer, and Mary Lynn Dipaolo engage
in conspiracy to commit fraud, false statements, and conspiracy to commit Count IV extortion, obstruction of justice, and false imprisonment.
115.
On September 15, 1987, The PLAINTIFF questions the legality of the ultimatum for posting
bail, and upon learning that it is unlawful, arranges for his discharge - Upon his discharge,
the St. Joseph Hospital administrators learn that Financial Management Group, Ltd., had
terminated his health insurance, and demand payment of $3, 064.60 for the six days of
hospitalization. The PLAINTIFF is not able to pay, and leaves the hospital and returns to
his residence of Conestoga, PA.
116.
St. Joseph Hospital engaged in collusion to commit fraud, Count IV - extortion, libel,
slander, and defamation of character, false imprisonment, obstruction of justice, and false
Page 49 of 153
Page 25 of 63
10/12/2007
On September 15, 1987, The PLAINTIFF receives an invoice from St. Joseph Hospital for
$3,064.00.
118.
On September 16, 1987, The PLAINTIFF receives a call from Howard Eisler, an Investigator
for the Pennsylvania Securities Commission who requests a meeting with The PLAINTIFF.
A meeting is scheduled for September 29, and The PLAINTIFF arranges for Robert Beyer
and Millard Johnson to attend.
119.
On September 21, 1987, ISC and the British Ferranti firm agree in principal to merge,
creating what appeared to be a $1.5 billion defense/electronics conglomerate, after six
months of negotiations.
120.
On September 22, 1987,The PLAINTIFF and James Warner settle on the real estate deal,
of 433 w. Marion Street, which The PLAINTIFF had sold to James Warner, at a distressed
price, which still yielded a profit. The profits of the transaction were paid directly to Millard
Johnson, with The PLAINTIFF getting none of the proceeds. Millard Johnsons funds were
extorted by Commonwealth National Bank and Lancaster Aviation.
121.
The parties engaged in Count IV - extortion of funds, collusion to commit fraud, and civil
conspiracy.
122.
On September 25, 1987, Art Kerst visits The PLAINTIFF at his residence and accuses him
and his cousin of being connected with the Mafia, and conspiring together, in order to
provide the financing of the $50 million shopping center in Florida, that was originally
owned by the Fisher/Sponougle Group, and diverting the profits of the deal away from him
(Art Kerst) and the Fisher Sponougle Group.
123.
The PLAINTIFF becomes infuriated, not only at the absurd allegation, but the timing, when
in fact The PLAINTIFF had bean fighting for his life for the past 4 months, and to even
consider such activities would be insane.
124.
On September 29, 1987, Howard Eisler conducts a meeting at the Residence of The
PLAINTIFF, with all parties consenting to have the meeting recorded by The PLAINTIFF.
125.
Howard Eisler was not able to provide a believable explanation of what he was
investigating or why he had contacted The PLAINTIFF. The PLAINTIFF explains all of the
circumstances regarding his prior meeting with ISC/Chem Con executive Larry Resch, and
details his allegations of wrongdoing of James Guerin/ISC/Chem Con6 and the discussions
of that meeting on June 23, 1987, with ISC executive Larry Resch. The PLAINTIFF also
discloses his ISC stock holdings, and his relationships with ISC and Chem Con associates.
126.
127.
Millard Johnson testifies to Howard Eisler during the meeting regarding a previous meeting
Page 50 of 153
Page 26 of 63
10/12/2007
Robert
The PLAINTIFF
spent more than 4 hours explaining and detailing all of his allegations and business
activities including how he founded and built Financial Management Group, Ltd.,; his
mortgage banking activities; the illegal repossession of his aircraft; all of the fabricated
arrests; and the chronology of events after the June 23 meeting with ISC executive Larry
Resch.
Howard Eisler ended the meeting and requested copies of documents from The
PLAINTIFF.
128.
On September 1987, Scott Robertson, begins work with American Helix founder, David
Dering, to secure financing for the venture and manufacturing facility to manufacture CD
Audio & CD-ROM Compact Discs, an extension of the "Digital" technologies activities of The
PLAINTIFF.
129.
David Dering solicited Financial Management Group, Ltd., to provide help in securing the
necessary $5 million of capital required .for the venture. David Dering was referred to
Financial Management Group, Ltd., by Norris Boyd (Financial Management Group, Ltd.,
shareholder) and Bob Fogarty, who had previously been working with The PLAINTIFF on
various financing arrangements.
Robertson and Rob Long to participate in the venture capital markets. Scott Robertson
would later conduct negotiations with High Industries, Inc., to provide the entire $5 million
financial package. Scott Robertson also was named executive Vice President of American
Helix Technology Corporation, and would resign from Financial Management Group, Ltd., in
order pursue the venture on a full time basis.
130.
David Deering, Scott Robertson, and Financial Management Group, Ltd., engaged in
collusion and conspiracy to commit Count IV - extortion, and violated several anti-trust
violations.
131.
James Boyer, formerly the lead recording engineer for Billy Joel, was also recruited to form
the principals of American Helix, consisting of Dave Dering, Scott Robertson, and James
Boyer In mid December of 1990, David Dering will confirm the above formation of
American Helix to The PLAINTIFF, after The PLAINTIFF alleges violations at the 1934
Sherman Antitrust Act, concerning his activities in the digital technologies industries, and
the undo influence by Scott Robertson, Robert Long, and High Industries, as well as
criminal conspiracy, of all parties concerned in the destruction of his business affairs that
began in June at 1987.
132.
On October 2, 1987, District Justice Murray Horton conducts a preliminary hearing for all
criminal charges against The PLAINTIFF.
Page 51 of 153
Page 27 of 63
10/12/2007
District Justice Murray Horton engaged in obstruction of justice, collusion and conspiracy
to commit Count IV - extortion, public corruption, and violated several anti-trust violations
134.
On October 4, 1987, The PLAINTIFF meets with high school classmate and attorney Mike
McDonald at The PLAINTIFF's residence, to discuss legal action and recourse against all
involved. Mike McDonald accepts the case, and The PLAINTIFF provides all of the relevant
information and documentation.
135.
Mike McDonald will engage in negligence, and collusion to commit Count IV - extortion.
136.
On October 12, 1987, The PLAINTIFF travels to New York city to the offices of Intercon
Special Services (white collar crime detective agency) in order to attempt to obtain
assistance in all of the circumstances. Intercon Special Services, which is staffed with ax
FBI agents, estimates that the services would cost at least $25,000.
137.
On October 16, 1987, The PLAINTIFF survives a near death collision on the New Danville
Pike, when a driver ran through a stop sign at the intersection of Long Lane, while
traveling at a speed of 45 mph. The driver hit The PLAINTIFF's Jeep Cherokee directly in
the passengers door, sending The PLAINTIFF in a free tall, spinning a full 180 degrees and
landing upside down in a field, facing the opposite direction. The PLAINTIFF was trapped in
the car, while a passerby attempted to brake the windshield to get him out.
The
PLAINTIFF's car was completely demolished, and he sustained a whiplash. The PLAINTIFF
was now without any means of transportation, in addition to all of his other mitigating
circumstances.
138.
On October 18, 1987, The Unemployment Compensation Review Board formally and
officially decides against a claim for benefits by The PLAINTIFF and cites misconduct and
wrongdoing as the reasons; states that the PLAINTIFF managed the day to day operations,
and used the false arrests as the reason to deny benefits.
139.
140.
On October 27, 1987, Lancaster Aviation files a civil suit with District Justice Murray
Horton for alleged unpaid bills of some $5,000.
141.
In late October or early November, The PLAINTIFF was driving in the Southern end of the
County, in Conestoga, when he noticed a vehicle following closely. It was about 9:00 pm
in the evening, and the roads were deserted in this rural area. The PLAINTIFF began
turning, not going in any particular direction. The ensuing vehicle kept following, and The
Page 52 of 153
Page 28 of 63
10/12/2007
On November 9, 1987, The PLAINTIFF visits with Parent Federal Savings and Loan's
president, John Depatto, to discuss him problems in meeting his current mortgage
payments. John Depatto immediately disclosed to The PLAINTIFF that foreclosure
proceedings have officially begun, and that the full loan of approximately $110,000 is
immediately due. The PLAINTIFF stands up from the conference table and declares, "You
tell Mr. James Guerin he is in trouble", and abruptly walks out of the offices.
143.
144.
On November 11, 1987, The PLAINTIFF meets with representatives of Tabor Community
Services, of Lancaster, Pa, in order to formally apply for assistance to the Pennsylvania
Homeowners Emergency Mortgage Fund, in order to subsidize his monthly mortgage
payments, in an effort to avoid becoming homeless. The PLAINTIFF supplies Tabor
community services with financial data and supportive documents relating to his
circumstances, which must be found to be out of the applicants control in order for
financial assistance.
145.
On November 18, 1987, ISC-Ferranti settlement takes place with Guerin becoming the
deputy chairman of Ferranti and exchanges his is million shares of ISC stock for over 32.2
million shares of Ferranti stock.
146.
On November 19, 1987, The PLAINTIFF contacts attorney Jeff Jamounou of McNeese,
Wallice, and Nurick, who The PLAINTIFF retained as legal counsel for the security law, and
demanded a legal opinion as to the offices that The PLAINTIFF formerly held, including his
Financial Management Group, Ltd., Board of Directors seat. Jeff Jamounou disclosed that
he no longer represented Financial Management Group, Ltd., in that capacity, and that
Craig Russell was the attorney now handling issues such as that.
147.
148.
On November 25, 1987, The PLAINTIFF receives a letter from the Pennsylvania Securities
Commission, Howard Eisler, citing a misunderstanding and lack of communication, and
now requests that The PLAINTIFF submit a written complaint of all allegations discussed in
the meeting of September 29, 1987.
149.
On November 30, 1987, The PLAINTIFF fears that the conspiracy now involves local and
state authorities, and delivers 9,079 documents to the Good Sheppard Industrial Services,
Page 53 of 153
Page 29 of 63
10/12/2007
The PLAINTIFF feared that an attempt would be made to destroy all incriminating
evidence, and given the number of documents, and the lack of money, their safekeeping
was becoming at great risk.
151.
For security reasons, and to remain anonymous, The PLAINTIFF uses the Global
Entertainment Group, Ltd., company for the transaction with the Good Sheppard Industrial
Services company.
152.
On November 26, 1987 , The PLAINTIFF visits the Pennsylvania State Police barracks in
Lancaster, to file a formal complaint to the White Collar Crime Division. The PLAINTIFF was
treated as if he was making the entire story up, and received no help.
153.
On December
PLAINTIFF visits the PA State Capitol building and personally delivers documents to the
offices of: Pennsylvania Governor Casey; the Pennsylvania Securities Commission; and
Financial Management Group, Ltd., attorney Jeffrey Jamounou of McNeese, Wallice, &
Nurick, all of Harrisburg, PA. During the same day, at a press conference being held by
Mark Singleton, The PLAINTIFF approaches State Senator Sib Armstrong and Sen.
Armstrong refused to talk and literally ran away in the middle of the State Capitol.
154.
On December 4, 1987, Financial Management Group, Ltd., holds its first annual
shareholders meeting, for the year ended June 30, 1987, at the Treadway Resort Inn
(Eden Resort Inn owned by Drew Anthon). In an effort to promote propaganda against
The
PLAINTIFF,
and
to
support
the
fabricated
allegations
of
insanity,
Financial
Management Group, Ltd., president hired armed security personnel to guard the doorways
of the meeting, insinuating that the meeting was under a threat of violence, and to
collaborate his recent allegations of Terroristic threats, which The PLAINTIFF was
previously arrested and awaiting trial.
155.
Financial Management Group, Ltd., engaged in libel, slander, and defamation of character.
156.
On December 17, 1987, The United States Postal Inspector acknowledges receipt of formal
complaint from The PLAINTIFF regarding executives from Financial Management Group,
Ltd., illegally changing or address; opening of confidential personal and business mail; and
withholding and possibly destroying confidential personal and business mail at The
PLAINTIFF's leased property of 1755 Oregon Pike, Lancaster, PA, also the headquarters of
Financial Management Group, Ltd.,.
157.
On January 15, 1988, the PLAINTIFF drives to San Diego, California, and meets with
attorney Sandra Gray, and International Signal & Control, Plc., uses his dire illegalities and
to find access to due process of the law.
of obtaining legal counsel, The PLAINTIFF thought that it would be easier to find adequate
Page 54 of 153
Page 30 of 63
10/12/2007
159.
On March 14, 1988, The PLAINTIFF is served notice by Lancaster Constables regarding
Parent Federal .Guerin' Bank) v. The PLAINTIFF Mortgage Foreclosure of his residence at
2323 New Danville Pike, Conestoga, PA.
160.
On May 1988, The PLAINTIFF is forced to sell his residence, and subdues to the undo
influence that he was responsible for all circumstances,
brother.
161.
On October 23, 1988 the PLAINTIFF, destitute, without a personal residence, automobile,
or any income, and with accumulated debts of more than $65,000 from all related
incidents in the 1987 "Blackmail", sells his Financial Management Group, Ltd., holdings to
Robert Kauffman and is given $72,000 in proceeds at settlement. This by and of itself will
be proven to be Count IV - extortion. Robert Kauffman was in fear of
The PLAINTIFF
exercising his large voting rights in the upcoming Financial Management Group, Ltd.,
annual shareholders meeting, which included the election off Financial Management Group,
Ltd., Board of Directors. The PLAINTIFF had approximately 19% of the outstanding shares
of Financial Management Group, Ltd., and had the potential to vote someone of his
selection to a Board seat. Scott Robertson had solicited the deal for both parties, and
acted as negotiator for both.
162.
Scott Robertson had solicited the PLAINTIFF to New York to review the current
management and to author a proposal to help Tony Bongiovi manage the recording studio
and all special projects. The PLAINTIFF spent time in New York and interviewed the Power
Station management team and personnel. The Digital Movie, Mutant Mania project had
already been terminated in 1987.
163.
On March 13, 1989, Scott Robertson, cofounder and executive vice president of American
Helix Technology Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of High Industries, Inc., of
Lancaster, Pa, recruits The PLAINTIFF for marketing help. The PLAINTIFF accepts a weekly
consulting contract, with no long-term commitment, in light of his efforts with Radio
Science Laboratories, Inc., Scott Robertson wanted The PLAINTIFF to help develop the new
and emerging CD-ROM business, which was essentially "Digital" technologies. American
Helix was one of 10 domestic manufacturing facilities located in the continental U.S., for
Page 55 of 153
Page 31 of 63
10/12/2007
On April 17, 1989, the PLAINTIFF incorporates Radio Science Laboratories, Inc., to further
his interest in microwave technologies, and the telecommunications industry.
The
company is a venture with James & Lynn Cross, both capable design engineers with over
30 years experience. The company was trying to secure financing for the development of a
manufacturing enterprise for Low Noise Amplifiers, or LNA's as they are commonly
referred.
165.
On July 8, 1989, William A. Clark, Guerin's former top INTERNATIONAL SIGNAL &
CONTROL, PLC., attorney, sues Guerin for $2 million, the balance Clark claims is owed him
in a $2.75 million settlement (over an employment dispute) accepted by Guerin in March.
Joe Roda is legal counsel for William Clark. Joe Roda was the first attorney that The
PLAINTIFF had gone to for help, who told The PLAINTIFF to quit fabricating things.
166.
On July 19, 1989, The PLAINTIFF, Scott Robertson, and American Helix agree on a one
year employment contract, which American Helix will never fulfill in its entirety, and will be
terminated in the following April.
167.
On October 10, 1989, British Labor unions urge Ferranti to drop all INTERNATIONAL
SIGNAL & CONTROL, PLC., related companies, claiming job loss in Scotland alone could
exceed 8,000 workers.
168.
On October
showing that the company bearing his family's name was cautioned not to merge with
INTERNATIONAL SIGNAL & CONTROL, PLC., by Lazard Brothers. Ferranti chairman, Sir
Derek,Alun Jones comes under tire by stockholders who demand his resignation during the
company's annual meeting in London.
169.
On October 24, 1989 , Scotland Yard joins the U.S. in the Guerin probe. Federal agents
will travel to London in January to coordinate the investigation.
170.
On November 1989, Ferranti begins firing INTERNATIONAL SIGNAL & CONTROL, PLC.,
executives still within the company.
171.
On December 1, 1989, Ferranti sues Guerin and three former INTERNATIONAL SIGNAL &
CONTROL, PLC., executives, including Larry Resch, for $198 million each, claiming all of
INTERNATIONAL SIGNAL & CONTROL, PLC., worth was a sham built on bogus contracts.
172.
On April 1990, The American Helix Board of Directors, lead by S. Dale High/High
Industries, vote to terminate Scott Robertson of American Helix, continue the financing of
the CD-ROM business which The PLAINTIFF was directly managing.
Page 56 of 153
Page 32 of 63
10/12/2007
On May 5, 1990, the PLAINTIFF is awarded his first government contract for CD-ROM
technologies with the National Institute of Standards and Technologies (NIST), of
Gaithersburg, Maryland. NIST is the technology arm of the federal government, similar to
the National Institute of Health (NIH), of Bethesda, Maryland. Because of the technological
complexities of the project surrounding the UNIX system environment, Phillips DuPont
(PSO) was the only other competitor in the U.S.. Computer Scientist, John Garofolo, will
coordinate the project, which is responsible for the research and development of speech
recognition systems for the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency Information
Science and Technology Office (DARPA-ISTO) The Automated Speech Recognition Group,
will supervise the project for MIST. The group will develop CD-ROM'S containing speech
corpora for the scientific I community, including: Massachusetts institute of Technology
(MIT); Texas instruments (TI); SRI International; and other academic institutions.
174.
On May 21, 1990 the PLAINTIFF and American Helix Technology Corporation, represented
by David D. Dering, sign an agreement authorizing the PLAINTIFF and Advanced Media
Group to continue all CD-ROM activities and to market the services to the markets-atlarge.
175.
premastering, and mastering charges to the clients. All other services were billed directly
by the PLAINTIFF.
another agreement is reached and agreed upon. Both David D. Dering and the PLAINTIFF
have signed and executed the agreement.
November 2, 1990. All previous invoices and work by the PLAINTIFF was grandfathered
Page 57 of 153
Page 33 of 63
10/12/2007
On October 11, 1990, Department of Justice claims proceeds from the sale of his Naples
home after paying the $600,000 outlined in his guilty plea agreement to the Justice
Department. Ferranti has asked the court to assist in collecting over $189 million from
Guerin, an amount awarded the firm by a British court when it said Guerin failed to
convince the court he had nothing to do with the 31 billion fraud. The PLAINTIFF begins to
organize. all relevant documents, stored in some 30 boxes, regarding all circumstances
involving the "1987" blackmail and criminal conspiracy, in hopes of finally resolving all
outstanding issues, by taking action tar legal recourse. In response from the effects of
Post Traumatic Stress Syndrome, The PLAINTIFF had rescinded efforts for due process
immediately after loosing his home and businesses. In similar matter of being
brainwashed, The PLAINTIFF was fearful of pursuing due process of the law in fear of
continuing reprisals, intimidation, and retaliation. However, upon the public disclosure of
the Federal courts indictments into illegal ISC activities, the PLAINTIFF began to review his
case, and find distinct and substantiated activities associated directly to his disclosure of
fraud within ISC.
177.
On January
The PLAINTIFF at his lab/office in him home at approximately 2:00 pm. Lt. Madenspacher
explains that he had received a copy of the letter to the Department of Defense, that
Detective Larry Mathias had forwarded to him. Lt. Madenspacher questioned his motives of
the letter and stated: "What are you going to do.. We (Manhiem Township Police
Department) just don't want to see a multi-million do00000000023llar law suit come down
our way.." The PLAINTIFF responded, "You know that I was an individual leassee of that
property, and in addition I had never resigned any offices or my Board of Director's seat
of Financial Management Group, Ltd., .. You also know that I had met with Larry Resch of
ISC on June 2S, 1987, and that I made allegations of misconduct.." Lt. Madenspacher
responded, "We were forced into that (the arrests of The PLAINTIFF on Sept. , 1987), we
were caught between a rock and a hard place, we were forced into that". Lt.
Madenspacher then changed the subject to "Digital" technologies, and described the
activities of the police department of using the same in the telephone surveillance of
criminal suspects. Lt. Madenspacher then requested to meet with The PLAINTIFF.
The
PLAINTIFF agreed, however due to his current busy schedule, confirmed he would contact
him later to schedule a meeting.
178.
On January 10, 1991 The PLAINTIFF sends a letter to Lt. Madenspacher of the Manheim
Township Police Department, to schedule a meeting for Thursday, Jan. 17th at 3:00 pm, at
his office at American Helix Technology Corporation, at the Green field Corporate Park.
The PLAINTIFF requested a response only if the time was in conflict of his schedule.
Page 58 of 153
Page 34 of 63
10/12/2007
ON January 17, 1991 Lt. Madenspacher fails to show up for the scheduled meeting with
The PLAINTIFF at Amen can Helix, and never contacted him before that date to change the
meeting, or called to apologize for not being able to keep the prior commitment.
180.
On January 18, 1991 The PLAINTIFF sends documents concerning the Blackmail" of 1987
to several reporters of the Lancaster Newspapers,: Tim MeKeele; Earnest Schriber; and
Thomas Planner. Tim MeKeele also received a tape with some excerpts of the September
29, 1987 meeting with the PA Securities Commission, where The PLAINTIFF discusses
allegations of misconduct against J. Guerin and ISC.
181.
On January 19, 1991 the PLAINTIFF, Al Thornburg, with Dave Dering. On Saturday
morning, THE PLAINTIFF went to the American Helix facility to pick up some computer
hardware.
Upon attempting to unlock the side door entrance with his 24-hour access
security card, the door would not unlock. Assuming something may have been wrong with
the security system, THE PLAINTIFF drove to the residence of Al Thornburg (former SONY
DADC engineer from Terre Huette, Indiana), the engineer for American Helix.
THE
PLAINTIFF asked Al to drive over to see if his access card was operable. The PLAINTIFF
and Al Thornburg entered the building with Al Thornburg's access card and found that his
access card was inoperable throughout the building. Al then said, "Stan, your locked out".
THE PLAINTIFF said, "I was in here until 5: 00pm last evening and my access card worked
fine. THE PLAINTIFF proceeded to pick up the tape back-up and said "Let's go. I don't
want to be arrested for burglary, like I was 3 years ago. I don't know what the Hell is
going on".
182.
As the PLAINTIFF and Al Thornburg left the computer room, Dave Dering appeared. This
was quite unusual, since Al Thornburg and the PLAINTIFF often work on Saturdays, and
Dave Dering had not been in the plant on a Saturday for the past few months.
THE
PLAINTIFF said to Dave "Dave, why am I locked out?" He said "talk to Jim Boyer". The
PLAINTIFF, quite emphatically said, "why am I locked out?". "Stan, you'll have to talk to
Jim". THE PLAINTIFF said, "Dave, you are the president, my contract is with you, not Jim
Boyer".
PLAINTIFF." THE PLAINTIFF told Al I'm getting out of here. The PLAINTIFF and Al
Thornburg left the building, and Al was especially suspicious of the events and especially
why suddenly Dave Dering showed up at the building on that particular Saturday, only
moments after we arrived at the building.
183.
On January 21, 1991 The PLAINTIFF Faxed a letter to David D. Dering, afraid of the
"LOCKOUT" and the lack of any events or activities that would explain such a drastic and
damaging action of American Helix citing Dave Dering in breach of the PLAINTIFFS
business agreement and in conspiracy to eliminate or sabotage the PLAINTIFFS business
and reputation. The fax also contained a cc: to High executives, that was never sent.
Page 59 of 153
Page 35 of 63
10/12/2007
On January 22, 1991 the PLAINTIFF and Dave Dering Dave Dering had a telephone
conversation; "Stan, how did you get in here last night?". Stan "Dave, what are you
talking about?, I won't go near that building, the last time I went back into my own
building after being illegally locked out, I ended up in jail". Dave Dering " How did you get
in here and steal your fax?". The PLAINTIFF replied, Dave, why would I want to steal the
fax that I wrote?" Dave Dering "You have caused a big problem. You put me in a difficult
position I don't know if I can rectify things with the 'High's' and especially Allon Lefevre.
I always went to bat for you how do I trust you?" A meeting was set up for 6:00 pm
later that day.
185.
January 22, 1991 the PLAINTIFF met with Dave Dering and he gave three (3) reasons for
the "LOCKOUT", although never willing to engage in any real conversations relating to
those issues:
a. The computer system went down, causing a problem in the security system.
b. Jim Boyer did not reinstall the PLAINTIFFS access identification number for the
security system.
c. Jim Boyer was to talk to the PLAINTIFF on Friday, the day before the Lockout,
concerning eliminating your access to the facility.
186.
Dave Dering said "Jim Boyer said that he can take over the CD-ROM business no
problem". Dave Dering talked about trust and who to trust.
agreed to continue the business relationship and adhere to the agreements, however' only
on an arms length basis.
during normal business hours. THE PLAINTIFF was no longer to have a private office.
187.
Dave Dering never addressed the issues or the circumstances that preceded the
"LOCKOUT", and never addressed the reasons as to why there was any reason to modify
the agreement concerning my business American Helix that was established back in June
of 1990.
that American Helix, Dave Dering, or Jim Boyer intended to change or modify our
relationship.
188.
On January 24, 1991: The PLAINTIFF met with Allon Lefevre (Executive Vice President of
High Industries responsible for overseeing all subsidiaries). The PLAINTIFF called a
meeting Allon Lefevre to discuss the following:
a. The R.R. Donnelly merger and acquisition of American Helix.
b. The "LOCKOUT".
189.
Allon Lefevre asked questions regarding the PLAINTIFFS contact with R.R. Donnelly and
Barry Click (President of R.R. Donnelly GeoSystems, former MAPQUEST). THE PLAINTIFF
quickly made it clear that Barry Click contacted the PLAINTIFF in December after seeing
the PLAINTIFFS advertisement in the CD-ROM Enduser magazine, published by Linda
Page 60 of 153
Page 36 of 63
10/12/2007
Regarding the "LOCKOUT" THE PLAINTIFF gave the three reasons that Dave Dering had
provided during our meeting a few days before to Allon Lefevre. THE PLAINTIFF told Allon
that after "THE PLAINTIFF had built a strong foundation for the CD-ROM business
everybody suddenly wants it back, six months ago, nobody wanted anything to do with it,
not to mention the capital that THE PLAINTIFF had invested in it".
191.
Allon Lefevre was only concerned with why THE PLAINTIFF had sent the Fax. "Why did
you send the Fax?
concerned with or wanted to discuss the issue of why THE PLAINTIFF was "LOCKED OUT".
Allon asked the PLAINTIFF the problems surrounding American Helix and what solutions
THE PLAINTIFF thought could help restore the company to stability. THE PLAINTIFF
discussed the lack of systems, the lack of a strong business foundation, and most
Importantly the lack of management.
THE PLAINTIFF responded, "Dave Dering is an engineer, not a manager, he has no real
management skills". Allon then asked me how to approach the meeting with Donnelly.
THE PLAINTIFF suggested that they just sit and listen to their ideas. THE PLAINTIFF asked
Allon to assure me that this meeting would be kept confidential between the two of us. He
said "THE PLAINTIFF will have to tell Dave sooner or later, and that he was not gong to get
in the middle of the two of us".
192.
February 15, 1991 the PLAINTIFF met with Jim Tritch & Allon Lefevre. Allon Lefevre had
requested a meeting to be certain that THE PLAINTIFF was not representing the High's or
American Helix. THE PLAINTIFF had told Allon that THE PLAINTIFF was not concerned with
the merger issue, that the Advanced Media Group was continuing discussions with Barry
Click on various information technologies, which were strictly my business. THE PLAINTIFF
also informed him that Barry Click had told me "Stan, we are quite honestly more
interested in you rather than the facility or American Helix". THE PLAINTIFF also informed
Allon that Barry asked if THE PLAINTIFF would make a trip the Chicago, the corporate
headquarters to discuss the technologies and specifically the manufacturing technologies
Page 61 of 153
Page 37 of 63
10/12/2007
THE PLAINTIFF made it perfectly clear that the two (2) contacts for a merger or acquisition
that THE PLAINTIFF had provided to the High's were contacts that approached the
PLAINTIFF.
THE PLAINTIFF also notified Lefevre and Tritch that Dave Dering had
requested the PLAINTIFF to look for a joint venture partner as far back as November. THE
PLAINTIFF also made it perfectly clear that THE PLAINTIFF would not solicit any leads:
unless THE PLAINTIFF was to be compensated. Alien Lefevre suggested that it may help
the PLAINTIFF to look for contacts, and THE PLAINTIFF quite emphatically restated my
contentions that THE PLAINTIFF would not do any work without compensation.
194.
Jim Tritch acknowledged that THE PLAINTIFF was the only person responsible for the
development of the CD-ROM business, and the only person with any real technical
expertise in information technologies and CD-ROM, and that neither American Helix nor
High Industries had the capabilities to manufacture CD-ROMs without the PLAINTIFF. Jim
Tritch also admitted that the Advanced Media Group, Ltd., would have to be a purchased
separately in the case of any merger or acquisition of American Helix. Jim Tritch also
stated that in his initial meeting with Donnelly that they like me and wanted to continue to
work toward a business relationship. Both Allon and Jim stated that they would like to
continue to work with me in the CD-ROM business.
195.
On February 15, 1991 American Helix conducted a Staff Meeting. Through an employee
that was present during the meeting, THE PLAINTIFF had learned that Dave Dering "spent
20 minutes "slimming", or slandering and defaming the character of the PLAINTIFF, and
called the PLAINTIFF a RUNAWAY EX-CONVICT THAT WOULD END UP IN JAIL SOON".
Dave Dering also told the group that THE PLAINTIFF had almost ruined the company, and
THE PLAINTIFF should not be trusted. THE PLAINTIFF was also informed the previous day
that David Dering was telling persons that the reason that THE PLAINTIFF was out of town
in December was because "THE PLAINTIFF was on the run from authorities".
196.
The PLAINTIFF was in Captiva, Florida, scanning documents and indexing the CD-ROM
AMG Legal Prototype Disc concerning the ISC Cover-UP.
197.
On January 19, 1991 High Industries American Helix illegally and without notice locks The
PLAINTIFF out of his office and the facility of American Helix, who was currently
under
joint venture agreement with The PLAINTIFF and his Advanced Media Group, Ltd., for his
digital technologies business. This "Lock-Out" was similar to that of Financial Management
Group, Ltd., on July 1, 1987. Again conveniently when The PLAINTIFF had raised issues
and allegations involving Guerin and ISC.
198.
On January 21, 1991 In fear and confused about his involvement, and in respect to the
massive fraud of the ISC/Ferranti merger, The PLAINTIFF sends a package to Ferrantis
legal counsel in England by way of United Postal Service' Overnight International Delivery
Page 62 of 153
Page 38 of 63
10/12/2007
On Jan 22, 1991In an effort to support his allegations of misconduct and the allegedly
threatening activities of The PLAINTIFF, American Helix president Dave Dering has all of
the locks in the building changed by a professional locksmith, which is nothing more than
an act of propaganda. Later that day, The PLAINTIFF and David Dering meet.
David
Dering resolves to only allow The PLAINTIFF in the building during normal business hours,
and does not allow him to occupy his own office. The PLAINTIFF has never been given any
reason why he was locked out in the first place.
200.
On February 1, 1991 ABC News 20/20 features the story "Weapons Sales to Iraq" about
the ISC/Cardoen cluster bomb technology and how it got to Saddam Husain.
201.
On Feb 17, 1991 The PLAINTIFF receives a letter from Sandra K. Paul, of the Citizens
Ambassador Program, a division of People to People International, notifying him that he
has been selected to participate in the upcoming Printing and Publishing Delegation to the
Soviet Union and Eastern Europe in the coming August. People to People International is a
nonprofit organization started by the late Dwight D. Eisenhower to facilitate the
communications of experts from various professions throughout the world. The objective
of the delegation was to exchange ideas, information, and technologies of the printing and
publishing industries with American counterparts in the Soviet Union, and various Eastern
European countries.
202.
On February 22, 1991 Federal prosecutors seize $800,000 from Clark, claiming he was
privy to information about ongoing criminal acts within ISC that generated the tainted
cash.
203.
On February 1991 In an American Helix staff meeting, with all employees present, but The
PLAINTIFF, president David Dering had spent approximately 20 minutes alleging that The
PLAINTIFF almost ruined his company, and that he "is a runaway ex-convict, that will end
up in jail very soon". Engineer Al Thornburg, immediately following the meeting, disclosed
the above discussion.
204.
On May 23, 1991 At approximately 2:00 pm, Jay Curtis, (appearing as a Department of
Defense contractor, who had recently solicited the services of The PLAINTIFF and his
Advanced Media Group, Ltd., to provide engineering in the development of "Digital"
simulation and training applications for various U.S. Military Logistics bases) had called
Page 63 of 153
Page 39 of 63
10/12/2007
The PLAINTIFF had to eventually tell Mr. Curtis that he could not discuss this
anymore.
He abruptly changed the subject and hung up on Mr. Curtis. The PLAINTIFF
immediately went to a friends house, and disclosed that fact that he was in fear for his
life. He quietly sat on the steps with his friend, Abby (2 years old). Later that night, his
friend Dave Pflumm would take him to the corner bar for a few drinks, while unknowing to
The PLAINTIFF, Ted Koppel was disclosing the story of the CIAs involvement with ISC.
Several hours later, Ted Koppel broke the story about the CIA and ISC's covert operations
to sell arms to Iraq.
205.
Immediately following the conversation with Mr. Jay Curtis regarding the CIA and ISC, The
PLAINTIFF packed a suitcase and confidential information assets, in preparation to leave
Lancaster, in total and legitimate fear for his life.
206.
On May 23, 1991 ABC News/Nightline and Ted Koppel feature the first in a series of
stories, relating to CIA knowledge of a covert operation to supply munitions to south Africa
implemented by ISC and Carlos Cardoen. The story featured Lancaster and ISC.
The
report ties Guerin to the National Security Agency project in the 1970s. ABC News, the
Financial Times of London, and the Lancaster Intelligencer News investigated the report.
Tom Flannery of the Lancaster Intelligencer Journal appeared on the program and was
given credits on the show.
207.
On May 24, 1991 The Lancaster Intelligencer Journal reports on the above story. At
approximately 1:30 pm, The PLAINTIFF drives out of Lancaster, en route to a safe haven,
and stops at a convenience store and reads the early edition of the Lancaster New Era,
learning for the first time of ABC News/Nightline story about ISC and the CIA the evening
before, just hours after his conversation regarding the same to Jay Curtis.
208.
On June 7, 1991 The PLAINTIFF is again arrested by the Stone Harbor Police.
After
passing several sobriety tests, and two Breathalyzer tests, The PLAINTIFF is placed in a jail
Page 64 of 153
Page 40 of 63
10/12/2007
retrieved from his car, located just a few blocks away. The Avalon police officer responded
by saying, "we can't let you go to your car, you may have a gun in there". The PLAINTIFF
was immediately escorted to the cape May county Prison, fingerprinted and processed.
209.
On June 8, 1987 The PLAINTIFF calls Mike Orstein, Lt. of the Stone Harbor police patrol,
and requests that he retrieve the required cash from his car, and post the required bail. At
approximately 2:30 pm, The PLAINTIFF is released on bail. On June 11, 1991 The
PLAINTIFF left the Stone Harbor Marina at approximately 12:30 am en route to Lancaster,
Pa, to retrieve some files concerning the ISC cover-up. Upon driving north on Route 47
(the normal route to Lancaster), approximately 10 miles outside the Cape May county
Courthouse, The PLAINTIFF noticed a car following him closely. Suspicious, The PLAINTIFF
decreased his speed from 55 mph to 35 mph, in order for the car to pass him. However,
the car remained directly behind, adjusting the speed accordingly. In an effort to elude the
car, without raising suspicion, The PLAINTIFF gradually increased his speed, while also
increasing the distance between the cars, resulting in the loss of his taillights to the
ensuing vehicle - Because of the winding road, The PLAINTIFF looked for an abrupt turnoff, in hopes of dashing the eluding vehicle, by loosing sight of his taillights. There was
little or no traffic on the route during the early morning hours, and The PLAINTIFF stopped
at an intersection, and noticed that the headlights of the ensuing vehicle were not visible
in his rear view mirror, meaning that his taillights were also not visible to the ensuing
vehicle. Immediately upon pulling from the intersection, The PLAINTIFF noticed a narrow
dirt road that lead into a field of small trees, the perfect place to sit for the ensuing auto to
pass him, unnoticed. The ensuing vehicle pulled to the intersection, and continued north
on route 47, in the direction of Lancaster. The PLAINTIFF sat in his vehicle a few minutes,
until continuing on his travel, north on Route 47. Approximately five (5) minutes later, a
car traveling in excess of SS mph, approached The PLAINTIFF, traveling south on the same
road (2 lanes).As the two cars approached each other, and approximately 30 yards from
reaching each other, the approaching vehicle drove directly into the lane of The PLAINTIFF,
with its high beams on, and continued straight for his vehicle, or what appeared to be a
head-on-collision. The PLAINTIFF drove off of the berm of the road, missing a line of trees
by less than 12 inches (eluding a life threatening disaster), and passed the vehicle that
was still in the north bound lane, heading south. The PLAINTIFF, shaking and sweating
furiously, noticed the cars brake lights go on, and the car apparently turned around, and
began pursuing The PLAINTIFF again. The PLAINTIFF drove as fast as he could to Route
Page 65 of 153
Page 41 of 63
10/12/2007
On June 10, 1991 two independent U.S. courts uphold a $189 million award by Britian's
High Court against ISC executives Shireman and Larry Reach for their role in the fraud.
Ferranti makes its first open statement against Guerin saying a similar decision is expected
to uphold the High Court's decision against him.
211.
The PLAINTIFF leaves Stone Harbor, in constant fear for his life, and
remains in seclusion, in various parts of the Eastern Seacoast, spanning from Captiva
Island, Florida, to Boston, MA, in order to prepare an official request for a Congressional
Investigation of all related matters.
212.
On Jul 11, 1991 The PLAINTIFF files an official request C300 pages) for a Congressional
Investigation into all of the ISC and preceding issues with U. S. Representative Robert
Walker CR-Pennsylvania), and Speaker of the House, U. S. Representative Thomas Foley.
Overnight Mail Service of the United States Post Office, outside of Baltimore, Maryland,
sent both requests.
213.
On July 12, 1991 The PLAINTIFF returns to his home, in Lancaster, PA, at approximately
1200 pm, after remaining in seclusion immediately following the phone conversation of
May 23, 1991 with Jay Curtis, regarding the CIA and ISC. ABC News/NightLine features it's
second story about Lancaster's ISC and Arms to South Africa and Iraq.
214.
On July 18, 1991 U.S. Representative Robert Walker sends a letter to The PLAINTIFF
relating to his request for a Congressional Investigation into all of his allegations of
misconduct and criminal wrongdoing regarding his alleged ISC/Fraud "cover-up". The
letter said : "Thank you for your recent letter and information on International Signal &
Control corporation. I appreciate your thinking of me; however, since this case is before
the courts, it is unethical for me to interfere with the judicial process. If you think I may
be of assistance with other matters, please feel free to contact me".
215.
On July 25, 1991 Christian is released from prison after serving two years and a day for
Page 66 of 153
Page 42 of 63
10/12/2007
On August 1, 1991 The PLAINTIFF receives a notice of a warrant for his arrest by the
Stone Harbor (NJ) Municipal Court, regarding summons #081370. The PLAINTIFF called
the Court Clerk, Pam Davidson, to explain the circumstances. The Court Clerk refused to
identify herself, and did not have time to listen to his explanation. She then questioned
why he (The PLAINTIFF) wanted to write to the Judge to explain. The PLAINTIFF writes a
formal letter to Judge Peter M. Tourison, of the Stone Harbor Municipal Court explaining
his allegations of misconduct, and the issues surrounding his recent arrest of June 7th, and
all of the arrests dating back to August of 1987. The PLAINTIFF had described in detail his
assertions and evidence that the arrests were conveniently orchestrated while he was
seeking legal recourse for the alleged ISC "Cover-Up'. The PLAINTIFF also explained his
fear for not returning to the Stone Harbor Municipality, in light of the fabricated arrests,
and other questionable incidents. The PLAINTIFF requested another means of settling all
outstanding frivolous traffic violations, other than appearing in Stone Harbor Municipal
Court.
217.
On August 8, 1991 Stone Harbor Municipal Court Judge, Peter M. Tourison, sends The
PLAINTIFF an official letter acknowledging receipt of his previous letter and explanations.
Judge Tourison concluded his notice by demanding that The PLAINTIFF appear in Court, as
scheduled, "to have this matter taken care of in the proper manner
218.
On August 13, 1991 Ferranti announces it has recovered $650,000 hidden by Guerin in a
number of Swiss Hank accounts. Ferranti also announces a fiscal 1991 loss of $282 million.
The PLAINTIFF responds to Judge Tourison letter of August 8, and discloses the recent
attempt on his life, the past June, just outside or Stone Harbor, and states that because of
the apparent criminal conspiracy within the same municipality, The PLAINTIFF formally
notifies the Judge that he refuses to return to Court, as requested.
219.
On August 15, 1991 Guerin and Cardoen are shown to have been deeply involved in a
failed $100 million arms procurement plot linked to the infamous Iran-Contra scandal.
220.
On August 16, 1991 The PLAINTIFF receives a formal notice and demand from American
Helix President David D. Dering, for the return or equipment, currently in the possession of
The PLAINTIFF, and notice of the termination of the business agreement, dated October 1,
1990 between Stan J. Caterbone and American Helix Technology Corporation. The
PLAINTIFF receives a facsimile from Mike Hess (former ISC engineer who frequented S.
Africa and who solicited The PLAINTIFF in late 1989 for work), and refuses to sign a nondisclosure agreement with The PLAINTIFF and the Advanced Media Group, Ltd., as
requested to continue a further relationship considering the recent activities from the May
23rd phone call and the national media publicity regarding the ISC Scandal.
221.
On August 19, 1991 The PLAINTIFF sends a letter to attorney Timothy Lanza via the
Page 67 of 153
Page 43 of 63
10/12/2007
On August 29, 1991 A federal judge dismisses Christian's $93 million suit against Guerin,
but Christian vows to re file the suit.
223.
On September 13, 1991 ABC News/Nightline features another story about ISC, the CIA,
and Arms Deals, in preparation for the beginning of the-Confirmation Hearings of George
Bush's nomination or the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency, Robert Gates, which
begins just three days away, by the Senate Intelligence Committee.
224.
On September 16, 1991 The first day of the Robert Gates' Confirmation Hearings brings
questioning by Senator Murkowski, of the Senate Intelligence Committee, about
knowledge of the ISC operations by Robert Gates. Gates, whose candor about Iran-Contra
resulted in his 1987 withdraw when nominated for the same slot by then President
Reagan. In a less-than sincere line of questioning, Robert Gates denies any knowledge of
ISC, Guerin, or Carlos Cardoen, including any operations to sell munitions to Iraq or south
Africa. In addition, he denies any knowledge of any CIA involvement in the same.
225.
On September 19, 1991 The PLAINTIFF visits the office of Senator Bill Bradley (D-New
Jersey), in the Hart Office Building, Washington, D.C., and delivers documents, tapes, and
a video, all relating to his allegations of an alleged "Cover-Up" regarding the ISC Scandal.
The materials were taken by assistant Jackie Widrow, who signed a receipt.
226.
On September 21, 1991 The PLAINTIFF delivers a contract for the consulting services he
has agreed to provide to J. Oman Landis, in order to insure against any wrongdoing, and
especially in light of Mr. Landis' assertion the previous Friday that "you (The PLAINTIFF)
are taking a break (from business) to rest your mind". This assertion conveniently
supports the alibi of mental insanity, that has been made by numerous persons, including
Mr. Landis' friends, the High's, who wholly own American Helix Technology corporation.
Several hours after delivering the contract to Mr. Landis, and after beginning to work, as
outlined in the contract, Mr. Landis called The PLAINTIFF into his office and said "there
Page 68 of 153
Page 44 of 63
10/12/2007
On September 25, 1991 The PLAINTIFF mails a cover letter and accompanying materials
to attorney Howard Corny, of New York city, as previously discussed, via UPS regular way
service.
228.
On October 1, 1991 The PLAINTIFF receives a facsimile from David Dering, President of
American Helix, formally charging The PLAINTIFF with charges of 16,730.00. David Dering
also demands that the equipment be returned, and upon receipt, American Helix would
forgive $11,816.00 ($16,730 - $4914)(Caterbone's invoice) of unpaid charges to The
PLAINTIFF and or the Advanced Media Group, Ltd.,
229.
On October 1, 1991 The PLAINTIFF sends by certified mail, a copy of a recent complaint
(filed Sep. 6, 1991) to the New Jersey Department of Motor Vehicles, and a demand for
the title to his boat, and again allegations of criminal wrongdoing by the Stone Harbor
Marina, for not delivering title, given the bill of sale was satisfied on June 10, 1991, and a
fee for the title was paid as well.
230.
On October 1, 1990 The PLAINTIFF personally meets with Ted Koppel, of ABC
News/Nightline, at the Washington National Airport, at approximately 5:30 pm. The
PLAINTIFF questioned Ted Koppel if he knew a Mr. Jay Curtis, and why he was questioned
about the CIA's involvement with the ISC affairs, just hours before the broadcast. Ted
Koppel denied any knowledge of Mr. Jay Curtis, and stated that Thomas Flannery was
involved in the broadcast by the Financial Times of London. The letter of August 28, 1987
to Diane sawyer was also mentioned. Ted Koppel requested the phone number of The
PLAINTIFF, and said that he would contact him later, due to his present time constraints,
and asked, "what do you want, and what is the story line?" The PLAINTIFF responded,
"Justice and protection, someone is trying to cover me up, and someone already made
attempts on my life... someone keeps getting information from me, while I'm left sitting in
Lancaster like a sitting duck".
231.
232.
On October
Page 69 of 153
Page 45 of 63
10/12/2007
On October 27, 1991 The PLAINTIFF writes a letter to Sandra Woods, Associate Managing
Editor, of the Philadelphia Inquirer, regarding the recent feature story, "What went wrong
in America" The PLAINTIFF describes his experience and present situation regarding the
ISC scandal, and cites corruption as the cause of the present dire and destitute
circumstances controlling his life.
234.
On October 31, 1991 Guerin and 19 others, including Larry Reach, are indicted on 75
criminal counts by the Philadelphia based grand jury.
235.
On October 31, 1991 Laura McQueen, administrator for the New Jersey Department of
Motor Vehicles, called The PLAINTIFF at approximately 3:30 pm, to notify him that she
was trying to sort out the problem with his complaint regarding title to his boat. Ms.
McQueen acknowledged that the Stone Harbor Marina had submitted an application for a
title, apparently dated on or about June 10, however the identity of the boat did not match
that of The PLAINTIFFs. Ms. McQueen also admitted that there seemed to be evidence of
wrongdoing, but denied to state whether the matter was presently being investigated. Ms.
McQueen also stated that the title in question was being microfiche, and that within a few
days, they should be able to trace the title, and resolve the problem.
236.
On October 31, 1991 Robert Clyde Ivy, Terrance Faulds, Wayne Radcliffe, Gerald Schuler,
and Thomas Jaslin enter a not guilty pleas to all charges handed down by the Philadelphia
grand jury.
237.
On November 24, 1987 Robert Shireman, ISC financial executive pleads his guilt in the
ISC $billion fraud and scandal. Anthony Stagq, ISC executive in charge of Singapore
operations, pleads guilty in the Arms Export violations.
238.
On November 27, 1987 ISC Executive Larry Resch pleads guilty to his role in the massive
contract fraud in the Ferranti/ISC merger of November, 1987.
239.
indictment of William Clark, and possibly his attorney Joseph Roda. The largest of the fake
contracts was the Pakistan Missile deal, in which Larry Resch was charged and indicted by
the grand jury for managing.
240.
On December 3, 1991 Mike Hess, a former ISC engineer that also has done work for The
PLAINTIFF, visits The PLAINTIFF to deliver all materials in his possession which is the
property of the Advanced Media Group, Ltd., The PLAINTIFF and Mike Hess engage in an
argument when Mike Hess becomes annoyed at The PLAINTIFFs continued caution and
suspicion of Mike Hess's real motives and agenda for the relationship. The PLAINTIFF had
Page 70 of 153
Page 46 of 63
10/12/2007
On December 4, 1991 The PLAINTIFF calls the Citizens Commission of Human Rights, after
seeing the organization featured on the Murray Povich Show, and talks to Roy Griffen. The
organization's mission is to investigate abuses within the mental illness profession. Roy
Griffen requests information, and agrees to investigate his allegations. The PLAINTIFF
states that he will Federal Express a copy of this chronology.
242.
243.
On December 5, 1991 At approximately 4:52 pm, James Guerin pleads guilty to eight (B)
grand jury indictments of October 31.
245.
On December 11, 1991 The PLAINTIFF finally requests that Michelle and Jason Miller
vacate his residence.
246.
On December 20, 1991 The PLAINTIFF receivers a notice from the Internal Revenue
Service regarding a discrepancy in income reported on his 1989 Federal Income Tax
Return.
The items in question were his "disability income" from Monarch life insurance
On December 23, 1991 The PLAINTIFF responds to the IRS letter and submits a copy of
the chronology of this conspiracy, along with the entire audio transcript (2 - 90 minute
cassettes) of his meeting of September 29, 198? with the Pennsylvania Securities
Commission and requests assistance in his ordeal.
'Return Receipt Requested" in order to insure proof of delivery. The PLAINTIFF sends an
updated chronology to Roy Griffen of the Citizen's Commission for Human Rights.
248.
On December 28, 1991 The PLAINTIFF sends a formal notice to attorney Howard Cerny,
Page 71 of 153
Page 47 of 63
10/12/2007
On December 30, 1991 The PLAINTIFF travels to the U.S. 9:50 am courthouse in
Philadelphia, PA, and personally delivers the chronology and a copy of the "1987"
Pennsylvania Securities Commission meeting to Chief Judge Bechtle, who is presiding over
the ISC court preceding. At 10:00 am The PLAINTIFF visits the U.S. Attorney Generals
office in the same building and files a formal complaint, "Criminal Conspiracy to "cover-up"
the International Signal a Control scandal.
Assistant U. S. Attorney General Gray asks The PLAINTIFF to briefly describe his
complaint. The PLAINTIFF gives Gray the chronology along with the tapes. The PLAINTIFF
briefly describes the meeting of June 23, 1987 with Larry Resch, the nay 23, 1991 phone
call from Jay Curtis, the arrests by Manheim Township, and the attempts on his life. Agent
Gray took notes, and said he is not familiar with the case, but would personally see that
the information is passed to the proper authorities involved in the case. During the
conversation, Mr. Gray asked the exact same question that was asked by both Joe Roda
and Investigator Eisler of the Pennsylvania Securities Commission) "But you did not work
for them (ISC), you were not involved with them?" The PLAINTIFF gave this response to
all questions by Mr. Gray: It's all in there (the chronology), all of the information and
events".
250.
On January 6, 1992 The PLAINTIFF sends a copy of the criminal conspiracy chronology and
a complete audio transcript of the PA SEC meeting of 1987 to the legal counsel of the
Pennsylvania Securities Commission via Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested:
P825
695 935.
251.
252.
On January 9, 1992 The PLAINTIFF receives the Return Receipt from the Pennsylvania
SEC, signed by Sharon F. Heinspach on January 8, 1992.
253.
On November 8, 1997 the PLAINTIFF solicits Attorney Matt Samley, of the law firm of
Xelkallis, Reese and Pugh (Pflumm Contractors Corporate Attorney and David Pflumms
Attorney), to provide a legal opinion as to the circumstances involved in the cover up. Mr.
Samley quickly asks if anyone had called Stan Caterbone about the issues. Mr. Samley
agrees to review the documents and will provide a legal opinion of any criminal and
prosecutorial misconduct.
254.
On November 23, 1997 - the PLAINTIFF delivers materials to Mr. Samley and also sends
Page 72 of 153
Page 48 of 63
10/12/2007
On December, 8, 1997 - Ms. Pam Pflumm call Dr. Albert Shultz regarding the behavior of
the PLAINTIFF.
256.
On December 15, 1997 - the PLAINTIFF telephones Jim Christian to again confirm that he
did not have knowledge of his meeting with Mr. Larry Resch.
you have to
forget about it. Your life will be worse off than it is now, you better just forget it
257.
In December of 1997 The PLAINTIFF had made a journal of all of the mental and
psychological duress that the employees of the firm of Pflumm Contractors, Inc., had
engaged. The PLAINTIFF started to log incidents of mental duress in December of 1997
after the incidents became consistent and demonstrated not be random acts of mere
occurrences. This behavior and malicious treatment was an extreme divergence from the
previous 45 months of my tenure and a polarization of the PLAINTIFFS relationships with
all employees involved, including Mr. David Pflumm.
PLAINTIFF was credited with saving the company from near bankruptcy (1993) and
leading the company to the highest level of profitability, marketability, financial stability,
and respect in the 20 year history of the company.
On January 14, 1998 The PLAINTIFF visits with Fr. Edward Lavelle for advice and guidance
concerning his situation. the PLAINTIFF only asked that Fr. Lavelle call Mr. David Pflumm,
and ask he and is key employees refrain from inflicting any additional mental duress upon
his person Fr. Lavelle refuses unless he is told to do so by Dr. Al Shulz.
He offers no
further assistance. 1:00 pmA few hour later, the PLAINTIFF visits Dr. Al Shulz for his
quarterly appointment.
plaintiff will speak any words, Dr. Al Shulz will contemporaneously accuse the plaintiff and
declare: Stan, you are very sick.
medications. The recorded transcript will prove the horrid implications of these
conversations.
Page 73 of 153
Page 49 of 63
10/12/2007
On February 20, 1998 the PLAINTIFF is forced to vacate his position of Controller of
Pflumm Contractors, Inc., due to the purposeful and intentional infliction of mental duress,
perpetrated as a direct reprisal against the PLAINTIFFS rightful pursuit of due process of
the law concerning all issues contained herein.
260.
On April 21, 1998 The Pennsylvania Department of Labor and Industry will again illegally
deny the Plaintiff of his legitimate claim for Unemployment Compensation Benefits, which
again is an act of reprisal against his rightful pursuit of fair access to the law, and his
disclosures of the incidents contained herein. The Pennsylvania Department of Labor and
Industrys 1987 rulings against the Plaintiff have been also proven to be in err, which
conveniently and intentionally subjects the Plaintiff to financial hardship and mental
duress, all purposefully hindering the Plaintiffs right to access the law. The record of the
plaintiffs claim for Unemployment Compensation Benefits is corrupted.
261.
On November 25, 2004, Thanksgiving day, the PLAINTIFF was inside his residence with
the doors locked. At approximately 11:30 am Dave Pflumm, Lizzy Pflumm, and Keagan
Pflumm began knocking on the back patio door. The PLAINTIFF did not want to accept the
visitors and would not answer the door. The visitors had not been at the residence for at
least 4 or 5 months and the PLAINTIFF had not been to the residence of the Pflumms
since July of 2002.
After the unwanted visitors would not leave, the PLAINTIFF went
Pflumm then began banging on the lower daylight door and the front door. The PLAINTIFF
then began lifting weights.
appeared inside the back bedroom. The PLAINTIFF quickly questioned them how they got
into the residence of the PLAINTIFF. Keagan Pflumm said he used a credit card to open
the back patio door. They both said that their father, Dave Pflumm was upstairs sitting at
the PLAINTIFFS kitchen bar.
questioned Dave Pflumm as to how they broke into the PLAINTIFFs residence.
Pflumm responded that I have keys, everyone has keys to your house.
Dave
The visitors
stayed for about an hour before leaving. This incident has been reported to the Southern
Regional Police Department and the PLAINTIFF had questioned the Southern Regional
Police Department if the incident was ever investigated. The PLAINTIFF never received a
response.
262.
On December 15, 2004 Plaintiff sends a complaint to Agent Sarsfield of the Pennsylvania
Attorney Generals Office in Pittsburg regarding illicit telephone activities. The PLAINTIFF
made complaints and amended the formal Verizon Customer Relations Complaint number
C-006142-2004, which was made pursuant to the Pennsylvania Do Not Call statute. The
complaint alleged that his telephone calls were often being intercepted, misdirected, or
impersonated. The PLAINTIFF also made complaints of harassing calls from Out of the
Page 74 of 153
Page 50 of 63
10/12/2007
On February 12th, 2005, Pamela Pflumm invited the Plaintiff for dinner after the Plaintiffs
return from a trip to Florida on the same day.
Plaintiffs cats and mail during his trip to Florida at his residence at 220 Stone Hill Road,
Conestoga, Pennsylvania.
264.
On February 12th, after dinner, Pamela Pflumms asked the Plaintiff to drive her and a
boyfriend of Abby Pflumm to Kegels Restaurant to pick up Abby Pflumm from work. The
boyfriend of Abby Pflumm and Keagan Pflumm entered the rear seats of the Plaintiffs car
and the boyfriend held a green tennis ball in his hand and aggressively put in the Plaintiffs
face and said I found a tennis ball in your back seat.
driveway and Keagan Pflumm and Abby Pflumms boyfriend made a comment about the
Plaintiffs car audio system that was previously vandalized.
turned around and told Pamela Pflumm to drive herself to pickup up Abby Pflumm from
work. When the Plaintiff arrived back home at his residence, the green tennis ball that
hangs from the Plaintiffs garage to align his parking, was suspiciously missing and was
reported stolen that night to the Southern Regional Police Department.
265.
On February 17th, 2006, as the Plaintiff drove down Main Street, in Conestoga, while the
Plaintiff noticed a four-wheeler driving in the horse pasture of the Plfumm Property. The
Plaintiff stopped and questioned the unknown persons because it was a school night and
Pamela Pflumm was residing at the residence alone without her husband. No member of
Pflumm family was on the scene at that time.
property as soon as a member of the Pflumm household walked out of the house indicated
that the persons on their property did have permission.
incidents, Mr. David Pflumm separated from his wife and was not living at the residence.
The Plaintiff was called upon by Pamela Pflumm on several occasions to help her around
the house and property.
266.
On February 17, 2005, at approximately 2:20am Officer Fedor of the Southern Regional
Police Department abruptly entered the Plaintiffs home, awakening the Plaintiff, and
falsely accused the Plaintiff of harassment for driving on the residence of David and
Pamela Pflumm. Pamela Pflumm calls the Plaintiff during the altercation with Officer Fedor
on the Plaintiffs cell phone.
267.
Immateriality after the altercation with Officer Fedor, the Plaintiff wrote a letter and sent it
the Chief Fiorill (formerly of the Lancaster City Police Bureau) of the Southern Regional
Police Department.
268.
At 1:00 pm on February 17, 2005 the Plaintiff did visit the Lancaster County District
Attorneys Office and requested to meet with District Attorney Donald Totaro. The Chief of
Page 75 of 153
Page 51 of 63
10/12/2007
On February 18,2005 the Plaintiff did meet with the Chief of the Southern Regional Police
Department, Chief Fiorill, at the precinct located at 3284 Main Street, in Conestoga. The
meeting was initiated by request of Chief Fiorill.
Pennsylvania State Police) was outside Chief Fiorills office listening to the meeting.
270.
At the meeting of February 18th, 2005, Chief Fiorill did libel and slander the Plaintiff by
stating that I dont believe anything that you say, regarding the incidents of the week of
February 17th and the allegations contained in Federal Civil Action 05-2288.
271.
At the meeting of February 18th, both Chief Fiorill and Officer Robert Busser did libel and
slander the Plaintiff by stating that the Plaintiff was nuts and questioned the Plaintiffs
mental health.
This assault on the Plaintiffs mental health was done to discredit the
At the meeting of February 18th, Officer Fiorill disclosed that he had called the Plaintiffs
brother, Mike in Plantation Florida (who has been residing in Florida for the past 18 years),
to discuss the incidents without permission, thus violating the Plaintiffs civil rights and
privacy rights.
273.
At the meeting of February 19th Officer Robert Busser threatened and assaulted the
Plaintiff by taking his nightstick and raising it up in a position to strike the Plaintiff on the
head. Chief Fiorill grabbed Officer Robert Bussers forearm just in time to stop him from
hitting the Plaintiff.
274.
Both Officer Busser and Chief Fiorill demanded the Plaintiff out of the office, thus violating
his civil rights, and placing the Plaintiff in harms way of future threats, harassment, and
numerous criminal activities.
275.
On February 18th, 2005, the Plaintiff visited the establishment of the Alley Kat Bar and
Restaurant, located on Lemon Street, Lancaster, Pennsylvania from approximately
10:00pm until 11:30pm.
On February 19th, 2005, at approximately 5:00am, Officer Fedor pounded on the Plaintiffs
front door to awaken him. The Plaintiff refused to open the door and let the Officer in due
to the preceding incidents and went into his bathroom and called the Pennsylvania State
Police. The Pennsylvania State Police refused to answer the plea for help to intervene in
Page 76 of 153
Page 52 of 63
10/12/2007
Approximately 20 minutes later, Officer Fedor and Pamela Pflumm illegally entered into the
residence of the Plaintiff by breaking and entering.
278.
Officer Fedor stated he was responding to a 911 call about an attempted suicide.
The
Plaintiff tried to tell Officer Fedor that he did not know what he was talking about. Officer
Fedor handcuffed the Plaintiff and was physically abusive by pushing and shoving the
Plaintiff directly in front of the Plaintiffs loveseat and handcuffing the Plaintiff.
Officer
Fedor asked him why he sent an email to Kerry Egan threatening to commit suicide.
Pamela Pflumm was standing in front of the Plaintiffs back door. The Plaintiff kept trying
to tell Officer Fedor that he came home and was sleeping all night.
Officer Fedor kept arguing about an incident that never occurred. Officer Fedor violated
several civil rights of the Plaintiff.
279.
Officer Fedor stated the Kerry Egan made a call to 911 at approximately 4:00 am and
stated that she received an email from the Plaintiff early that morning with a threat to
commit suicide. The Plaintiff called Comcast cable during the altercation to try to get an
activity list of the Plaintiffs online activities to prove that the Plaintiff did not send any
email to Kerry Egan. Officer Fedor slandered and libeled the Plaintiff by not believing his
account.
The Plaintiff kept asking why Pamela Pflumm was summoned to the Plaintiffs
home and received no explanation. The Plaintiff did not see Pamela Pflumm before that
she entered the residence with Officer Fedor.
280.
It was later determined that there never was an email, and the Southern Regional Police
Department never withdrew their allegations of mental health issues.
281.
On April 5, 2006 Officer Buzzer did knowingly and willing falsely imprison Plaintiff and
maliciously attack plaintiff and accompanied several police officers in theft of a white
envelope containing approximately $743.00 in cash in a police chase from the Conestoga
Wagon Wheel Restaurant in Conestoga to Duke Street in Millersville, Pennsylvania, via
Kendig Road.
282.
On April 5th, 2006, Officer Fedor did make false statements to authorities in the 302
petitions to Lancaster General Hospital
and
to
Crisis
Intervention
of
Lancaster,
Pennsylvania with regards to the incarceration of the Plaintiff in the Psychiatric ward from
the period of April 5th to April 10th, 2006.
283.
On April 5th, 2006, Officer Busser did harass, threaten, and physically abuse the Plaintiff
in the apprehension that took place on South Duke Street, Millersville, Pennsylvania and
did knowingly draw his weapon upon the Plaintiff without any threat, merely to incite
public attention to the Plaintiff that defamed his character, and slandered his name.
284.
All of the preceding acts of retaliation by the Southern Regional Police Department were a
direct result of undo influence upon the Plaintiff and his attempts to remedy causes of
Page 77 of 153
Page 53 of 63
10/12/2007
On April 5th, 2006, Defendants did falsely imprison Defendant at Approximately 3:15 EST
at the emergency intake unit of the Lancaster General Hospital, Duke Street, Lancaster
County, Pennsylvania.
286.
On April 5th, 2006, upon request, staff of the Lancaster General Hospital failed to produce
any official documentation to support the apprehension of the Plaintiff or the holding of the
Plaintiff in said facility.
287.
The Defendants did open locking cell and plaintiff again asked for documentation, plaintiff
walked out of the holding cell, and not documentation was produced, agent for defendant
picked plaintiff up and literally threw plaintiff back into holding cell.
288.
Between 3:30pm and 7:15pm Dr. Riley examined plaintiff by asking the following
questions:
a. Do you drink alcohol?
b. Do you take drugs?
c. May I listen to your heart and drugs?
The preceding examination took under 2 minutes and was not near sufficient for the
requirements as outlined in the 302 petition, whether legal or not.
289.
Mental Duress: Agents, employees, and staff of the Lancaster General Hospital did engage
in planned and occasional events to inflict, cause, and provoke extreme mental duress.
290.
Agents, employees, and staff did obstruct justice and cause plaintiff to suspend, neglect,
and or cease all activities relating to CA 05-0288 and TMT 05-23059 in an overt attempt to
interfere with Plaintiffs constitutional right to due process.
291.
Agents, employees, and or staff did subject Plaintiff to a life threatening environment when
patient William X was intentionally given a ball point pen immediately after Angela X
administered a drug, and William X stood 1 foot away from Plaintiff and held ball point pen
as a knife. Plaintiff had to immediately remove himself from the immediate area.
292.
Agents, employees, and or staff subjected Plaintiff to further harm by condoning and
further provoking situation. As of April l0th, 2006, Plaintiff is still falsely imprisoned.
293.
Agents, employees, and or staff did take from Plaintiffs possession a white bank envelope
containing Seven Hundred and Forty-Three dollars ($730.00), which was not included in
Plaintiffs Possession Form.
294.
On July 23rd, 2006 PLAINTIFF speaks with Governor Ed Rendell at a Campaign Speech at
Binns Park, in Downtown Lancaster, and requests his assistance in his Civil Rights
Obstruction of Justice Complaint filed a few weeks earlier in the Office of Attorney General.
Page 78 of 153
Page 54 of 63
10/12/2007
On October 14th, 2006 PLAINTIFF files a RICO complaint in the United States District Court
against Shawn Long, attorney for Fulton Bank, MDJ Leo Eckert, Commins, Simms, Case
No. 4650.
296.
On October 17th, 2006 PLAINTIFF attends a Bail Supervision (of the Lancaster County
Sheriffs Department) Intake meeting at the Bail Administrators Office in the Lancaster
County Courthouse. PLAINTIFF serves the Lancaster County Sheriffs Department, the
Lancaster County District Attorneys Office, and the Lancaster County Public Defenders
Office Civil Actions. The Lancaster County Public Defenders Office literally took the
Certificate of Service signing sheet from PLAINTIFF and PLAINTIFF immediately told Judge
Joseph Madenspacher about the incident while he walked to the Bus Terminal to go the
Office of MDJ Commins. The document was never returned even after several emails to
the contrary by the Public Defender, Mr. Karl.
297.
On October 20th, 2006 PLAINTIFF files a Federal False Claims Act for Whistle-Blowing
against ISC in the United States District Court For The Eastern District of Pennsylvania,
Case No. 06-4734.
298.
On October 26th, 2006 The Pennsylvania Superior Court received a Brief for the Appeal
Challenging the Fulton Bank Judgment of June 29, 2006.
299.
October 30th, 2006 The Pennsylvania Superior Court sends a letter to PLAINTIFF
requesting (7) more copies of the brief, which PLAINTIFF will not receive until January 4th,
2007. An amended complaint to PLAINTIFFs Southern Regional Police Department Civil
Action, Case No. 06-3401, is due in the Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County on
exactly this date. An Unsecured Bail Bond was revoked by Officer Adam Cramer of the
Southern Regional Police Department and (2) Bench Warrants were issued for the Arrest
of PLAINTIFF by Adam Cramer of the Southern Regional Police Department and MDJ Leo
Eckert, Jr.. PLAINTIFF filed the Amended Complaint and mailed it from the Bausman Post
Office Substation, and did not go to the Lancaster County Courthouse in fear it would not
get filed. At 2:20pm (2) PA Constable arrest and apprehend the PLAINTIFF at 1250
Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA, and take him to Magisterial District Justice Eckerts Office
on the (5) Bench warrants for summary citations and then COMMITT The PLAINTIFF to the
Lancaster County Prison, stating that an Indigent Hearing will be held within 10 days, and
challenges the PLAINTIFFS Indigent status and his Superior Court Cases.
Magisterial
District Justice Eckert complains to the PLAINTIFF about being named a Defendant in
Federal Case No. 06-4650, and remarks that the PLAINTIFF may have to be taken to
Dauphin County Prison for suing all of the District Justices in Lancaster County. He also
said You are not even close to getting to the Superior Court.
300.
On November 1st, 2006 PLAINTIFF appears before Judge Paul K. Allison who reinstates his
Bail Bond as Secured, which required PLAINTIFF to post $5,000 to get out of the Lancaster
Page 79 of 153
Page 55 of 63
10/12/2007
On November 6th, 2006 PLAINTIFF files his first Appeal for Reconsideration to the ORDER
of Judge Paul K. Allison to Reinstate the Bail Bond as Unsecured, and Release him from
Lancaster County Prison.
November 20th, 2006 The United States District Court for the Eastern District of
Pennsylvania records 28 U. S. C. 2241 Habeas Corpus Petition Case No. 06-5138
(Challenging the Detainer and Imprisonment) filed from the Lancaster County Prison on
November 14th, 2006. This case is still
302.
On November 30th, 2006 Judge Paul K. Allison Denies PLAINTIFFs Appeal to Reinstate Bail
as Unsecured.
303.
304.
On December 2nd, 2006 PLAINTIFF files an Appeal to Judge Paul K. Allison ORDER of
November 30th, 2006.
305.
On December 5th, 2006 The Lancaster Intelligencer Journal publishes the Story The Next
Sound You Hear regarding former business partner Tony Bongiovi, which is central to all
of the litigation in the United States District Courts. The worlds of pro audio and consumer
electronics were bridged at New York City's Avatar Studios in December, where Bongiovi
Acoustics unveiled the Digital Power Station car radio. Demonstrated by audio icon Tony
Bongiovi (pictured) in Avatars Studio A (former Power Station Studios), the patentpending technology being manufactured by JVC made a very impressive debut.
307.
On December 6th, 2006 Honda Financial repossess a Honda Odyssey stored at the St.
Dennis Towing Companys facility from August 31, 2006; the Honda was take because of
the illegal repossession of the drivers license and there were no funds available for the tow
that was just a few blocks away. The Honda was protected under the pending Chapter 11
Bankruptcy Petition and was conveniently taken while incarcerated. The PLAINTIFF had
talked to Honda Financial in August and there was no problem with the lease, even though
the PLAINTIFF had not made a payment since May of 2005.
Company was charging $25.00 per day, and has never filed or sent the PLAINTIFF an
invoice for the storage, which is very suspect.
Page 80 of 153
Page 56 of 63
10/12/2007
On December 8th, 2006 PLAINTIFF files a Writ of Mandamus against Magisterial District
Justice Leo H. Eckert, Jr, and Mary Commins for the fraudulent activities leading to the
false imprisonment of October 30th, 2006, and Bench Warrants.
309.
On December 12th, 2006 PLAINTIFF files for Continuances in all of the following Civil
Complaints in the Commonwealth Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County,
Pennsylvania: CI-06-07330; CI-06-08742; CI-06-08490; CI-06-07376; CI-06-07188; CI06-06658; CI-06-04939; CI-06-03403; CI-06-03401; CI-06-03349.
310.
On December 13th, 2006 The Lancaster County Sheriffs Department (Maluskus) and Chief
John Fiorill tried to get PLAINTIFF to change his address to the Lancaster County Prison
and Judge Perezous refused to get ORDER PLAINTIFF to comply with the demand and
Judge Perezous CONTINUED the Appeal Hearing because PLAINTIFF did not have any files
to conduct a Trial.
311.
On December 20th, 2006 The Lancaster County Sheriffs Department (Hiem & N/A-names
given by Sheriff Simone) refused PLAINTIFF to wear his suit into the courtroom, or take
his files into the Pre-Trial Conference before Judge Farina, which caused PLAINTIFF to
forget to discuss material motions for the Trial, and caused the PLAINTIFF to be defamed
by appearing in a Lancaster County Prison uniform before the Court and in front of 20 or
so other people in the Courtroom.
312.
On December 20th, 2006, while in the Lancaster County Prison, the Lancaster County
Sheriffs Department and Fulton Bank conduct a Sheriff Sale for 220 Stone Hill Road,
Foreclosure CI-06-02271, with NO notification before or after the SALE to PLAINTIFF; and
sold the property to Central Penn Settlement Company of Akron, Pennsylvania.
313.
On December 28th, 2006 Judge Paul K. Allison overturned his previous ORDER and Granted
PLAINTIFF his Appeal ORDER and signed the Unsecured Bail ORDER and the RELEASE from
Lancaster County Prison.
314.
On December 29th, 2006 PLAINTIFF is RELEASED from Lancaster County Prison, and walks
to the Lancaster County Courthouse to report to Court Administration and the
Prothonotary Office to get a print out of all of the Civil Dockets for all cases in Civil Court,
including the Fulton Bank Foreclosure and finds out for the first time that the Sheriff Sale
on December 20th took place. PLAINTIFF retrieves a check for $19.34 from Attillio Grossi,
which is all the funds has available for food, and all other necessities.
315.
On January 2, 2007 PLAINTIFF files and records (4:09pm) a Petition To Set Aside Sale for
220 Stone Hill Road, Conestoga in the Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster
County and personally serves Fulton Bank and the Lancaster County Sheriffs Department.
316.
January 4th, 2007 At 1:15pm PLAINTIFF visits 220 Stone Hill Road and finds 2 unidentified
individuals on his property loading the entire contents of 220 Stone Hill Road onto 2
Penske moving trucks, to an unidentified location, and is ordered off the Property for
Page 81 of 153
Page 57 of 63
10/12/2007
The 2 individuals said they were from Noble Real Estate Company.
Mr.
Joseph Caterbone accompanied him as a witness and driver. PLAINTIFF takes several
pictures of the individuals and the Penske Trucks. At 1:35pm PLAINTIFF retrieves his mail
from the Conestoga Post Office from dating back to October 25th, 2006 up to the present
and temporarily forwards mail to 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA. PLAINTIFF visits the
Lancaster County Sheriffs Office and speaks to Lt. Lancaster and Mr. Bergman about the
incident at 220 Stone Hill Road and is told that Southern Regional Police have already
responded, and would not give any information about the incident. At 3:00pm PLAINTIFF
attends the Trial for Criminal Case No. CP-36-CR-0003179-2006 (Fleeing & Eluding filed by
Sgt. Busser of Southern Regional Police Department on April 5th, 2006) in Courtroom 1 of
the Lancaster County Courthouse and moves for a Motion for a Continuance due to the
incident at the property at 220 Stone Hill Road an hour before.
On January 5th, 2007 At 8:30am PLAINTIFF files and records an Addendum to the Petition
To Set Aside Sale for 220 Stone Hill Road, Conestoga in the Pennsylvania Court of
Common Pleas of Lancaster County and personally serves Fulton Bank and the Lancaster
County Sheriffs Department regarding the theft of all of his personal possessions,
including business files of Advanced Media Group, and all Legal files and evidentiary assets
for all pending litigation. At 9:00 am the Lancaster County District Attorney Deborah
Muzereus moves for A Continuance in the Trial for Criminal Case No. CP-36-CR-00031792006 and the Honorable James P. Cullen Grants a Continuance until the February Trial
Schedule.
318.
On January 7th , 2007 PLAINTIFF files a claim with Harleysville Insurance Homeowners
Policy HOAI 93468 for the theft of his personal possessions and the property at Stone Hill
Road. PLAINTIFF files for a Change of Venue for the Hearing scheduled for January 18th,
2007 in Intercourse before Magisterial District Justice Leo H. Eckert, Jr.. PLAINTIFF does
not have all of his evidentiary files and no transportation because of the illegal revocation
of his Red Rose Transit Authority Monthly Bus Pass.
319.
On January 8th, 2007 PLAINTIFF files an Emergency Petition for Food Stamps and other in
the Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster after his Food Stamps and Red Rose
Transit Authority Monthly Pass was illegally terminated, thus leaving him without food and
transportation for all court preceding. PLAINTIFF files for a Continuance for Summary
charges by District Justice Leo H. Eckert Jr., a Defendant in U.S. District Civil Action 064650, scheduled for January 18th, 2007., again for not having access to all of his
evidentiary files and without transportation. PLAINTIFF files and sends his Brief to the
Superior Court of Pennsylvania Case No. 1463 MDA 2006 for the challenge to Fulton
Banks 220 Stone Hill Road Foreclosure, via U.S. Postal Priority Mail Return Receipt No.
Page 82 of 153
Page 58 of 63
10/12/2007
On January 9th, 2007 PLAINTIFF files for Continuance in all of his pending Civil Actions
before the United States District Courts for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania; 05-2288;
06-4650; 06-5138; 06-4734; 06-CV-4154; 06-5117; 06-2236; 05-23059BKY. PLAINTIFF
files for a Change of Venue and Continuance for Summary Citations (TR-0008735-2006;
TR-0008578-2006; TR-0008721-2006; TR-0008503-2006; TR-0007528-2006) Scheduled
for a Hearing on January 23, 2007 before District Magistrate Richard H. Simms, a
Defendant in U.S. District Civil Action 06-4650. PLAINTIFF receives a Notice to Change the
Hearing Scheduled for January 18th, 2007 from Magisterial District Justice Leo H. Eckert,
Jr. to Isaac Stoltzfus of Intercourse. PLAINTIFF Petitions the Pennsylvania Court of
Common Pleas of Lancaster County to vacate the Bail Supervision Ordered by Magisterial
District Justice Mary Commins on October 10th, 2006. The Bail Supervision was without
merit or cause.
321.
January 10th, 2007 PLAINTIFF reports a theft of the Digital Recorder used containing an
authentic and original audio recording of the incident for the Case No. CP-36-CR-00031792006 (Fleeing & Eluding filed by Sgt. Busser of Southern Regional Police Department on
April 5th, 2006) to Officer Cole of the Lancaster City Police Department who responded at
approximately 10:25pm to 1250 Fremont Street and filed the incident as Case No. 0701014878.
322.
January 11th, 2007 The Honorable Judge James P. Cullen Orders PLAINTIFFs Petition to
vacate the Bail Supervision as Denied Case No. 4771-2006.
following in an email to the Red Rose Transit Authority: I am having a problem with my
monthly passes. I have not received my January Monthly Pass, and my forwarded mail
has not been received from 220 Stone Hill Road, Conestoga. Today, your driver Dave on
the 3 8th Ward/Park City 8:35 bus made me pay him for the fare. Some drivers let me on
with my December Pass and my Letter of Acceptance from September of 2006. I never
received a termination letter, and on January 5th, filed an Emergency Petition against the
Lancaster County Assistance Office to have all benefits that have been terminated,
reinstated. What is the status of my Monthly Pass? Below is an excerpt from the Civil
Action, Case No. CI-07-00150 in the Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County,
Pennsylvania. The Petitioner has not received his January Red Rose Transit Authority
January Monthly Bus Pass, sponsored by the RRTA and the Lancaster County Assistance
Office. The Petitioner did receive his December Monthly Bus Pass, and complained to the
Red Rose Transit Authority Terminal Station on Queen Street, Lancaster, Pennsylvania, on
Page 83 of 153
Page 59 of 63
10/12/2007
January 12th, 2007 PLAINTIFF receives the following email from Ms. Gail Parenteau, of
Bongiovi Acoustics: What is Advanced Media Group? It is our policy not to open
unsolicited attachments. What's your tel. no. I've been with Tony since 1986 and neither
of us remembers what this is. I've highlighted your type-os in red below. PLAINTIFF
responds with the following email to Ms. Gail Parenteau: I (Financial Management Group,
Ltd.,) was at Power Station from February until July in 1987 working extensively with
Tony, Ellen, and all of the Producers from Flatbush Films in Hollywood. Tony named me
Executive Producer of the project, and that is in the budgets. Now, are you really
associated with Tony, or are you covering for someone? I have still photos, audio recorded
meetings with Bob Walters (Co-Owner of Power Station Studios), business plans for
"Mutant
Mania",
Tony's
Digital
Movie,
with
budgets,
screenplays,
joint
venture
agreements, Patent and Copyright materials for Power Station Studios and Tony. I also
have documents for the Pier in Wildwood, which Tony owned. I personally authored many
of these materials with Tony, at his request. I spent many days and nights working at
Power Station on this project. I had a Navajo Chieftain twin turbo prop that I flew to Power
Station for some of my meetings, the other times me and Scott Robertson drove. I even
have another management consulting proposal that I developed for Tony in 1989, when he
wanted me to restructure Power Station from top to bottom. If, you were not privy to
these projects, then maybe you should at least talk to Tony.
January 13th, 2007 PLAINTIFF visits the Red Rose Transit Authority Terminal at Queen
Street again attempting to get his January Monthly Bus Pass, which he thinks is missing in
the mail. PLAINTIFF borrows $20.00 from Richard Hobday, for food, postage, and paper;
and ride home from the Lancaster County Courthouse. PLAINTIFF receives a letter and a
Distribution Schedule from the Lancaster County Sheriffs Office that states:
Page 84 of 153
Page 60 of 63
On
10/12/2007
The Praecipe-Writ of
Execution filed on July 31sth, 2006 by Fulton Bank for Foreclosure Case No. CI-06-02271
stated: FILED. WRIT ISSUED. AFFIDAVIT OF NON-MILITARY SERVICE. PRINCIPAL:
$88,568.53; INTEREST TO 03/02/2006 AT A RATE OF $14.56 PER DIEM: $4,442.96;
NEGATIVE ESCROW BALANCE: $1,096.38; LATE CHARGES: $317.20; ATTORNEYS' FEES:
$3,000.00; TOTAL: $97,425.07. FILED BY SHAWN M. LONG, ESQ. PLAINTIFF receives a
letter from the Superior Court of Pennsylvania regarding the Fulton Bank Foreclosure
Challenge, notifying him that AND NOW, this fourth day of January, 2007 the appeal in
this matter is DISMISSED for failure to file a brief.
considering that the Superior Court placed no time conditions on receiving the additional
(7) Copies and it was received several days AFTER PLAINTIFF had already mailed the
required (7) Copies and fulfilled the obligations to the Superior Court, thus furthering the
fact that Fulton Bank and the Sheriffs Office of Lancaster County held an illegal sale on
December 20th, 2006. PLAINTIFF receives DENIED on an ORDER from Change of Venue
and Continuance for the Hearings for January 18th, 2007, signed by Judge Dennis
Reinaker of the Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County, Pennsylvania.
Page 85 of 153
Page 61 of 63
10/12/2007
2005 Fulton Bank Project Hope Freeze Account, Gift Certificate, false arrests, Scouts Trail Count
IV - extortion, Slander, Libel
2006 False Arrests, Comcast Cable, 4650, False Imprisonment, Civil Rights Complaint,
2007 Computer Hacking, Lancaster City Police, Human Relations Complaint, Judge Cullen
http://www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com/
Page 86 of 153
Page 62 of 63
10/12/2007
I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the Amended Complaint has been served
this 14th day of October 2007, by first class mail, Postage prepaid, or by electronic mail upon, or
by hand deliver to:
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Clerk of Court
600 Market Street, Room
Philadelphia, PA 19106
Stuart A. Weiss, Esquire
817 East Landis Avenue
Vineland, NJ 08360
George M. Gowen, 111, Esquire
Cozen O'Connor
1900 Market Street
Philadelphia, PA 1 9103
Howard L. Kelin, Esquire
Kegel, Kelin, Almy & Grimm
24 North Lime Street
Lancaster, PA 17602
Hartman, Underhill & Brubaker, LLC
221 East Chestnut Street
Lancaster, PA 17602
Stephanie Carfley, Esquire
Attorneys For Defendant Fulton Bank
126 East King Street
Lancaster, Pa 17602-2893
Robert W. Hallinger
Appel & Yost LLP
33 North Duke St
Lancaster, Pa 17602
______________________________
Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
amgroup01@msn.com
http://www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com/
Page 87 of 153
Page 63 of 63
10/12/2007
Page 88 of 153
Page 89 of 153
Page 90 of 153
Page 91 of 153
Page 92 of 153
Page 93 of 153
Page 94 of 153
Page 95 of 153
Page 96 of 153
Page 97 of 153
Page 98 of 153
Page 99 of 153
CHAPTER
DIVIDER
CHAPTER
DIVIDER
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Stan J. Caterbone
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUPFreedom
www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com
stancaterbone@gmail.com
______________________________________
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. Background of Stan J. Caterbone as a Targeted Individual
2. In Contravention of Conventional Wisdom CIA No-Touch Torture Makes
Sense, by Cheryl Welsh 2008
4. Transcript of the Richmond City Council Public Hearing of May 19, 2015
Passing a City Resolution 5-2 to Ban Spaced-Based Weapons in Support of the
Many Targeted Individuals Suffering Symptoms of the City.
10. Proposed U.S. Government Settlement for TI via Change.org Petition by Stan
J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group March 17, 2016 with Affidavit and
Kane Op Ed Letter Sent to President Obama
Page 1 of 548
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Stan J. Caterbone
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
__________________________________
EXCLUSIVE Transcripts of Whistleblower Testimonies as
Targeted Individuals of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control and
Related Hearings and Lectures
________________________________
June 2, 2016
BACKGROUND
Stan J. Caterbone's International Signal & Control or ISC Whistleblowing History and Mind
Control Relationships are outlined in the following statements and declarations, which have already
been proven and verified and have never been specifically contested in any court of law:
Stan J. Caterbone was a Federal Whistleblower in 1987 regarding ISC
The 29 False Arrests and Prosecutorial Misconduct that Stan J. Caterbone was subject to in 1987
through 2015 was an effort to cover-up the allegations made by Stan J. Caterbone in the Spring and
Summer of 1987 after the Meeting of June 23, 1987 with ISC and United Chem Con Executive Larry
Resch.
The ISC Fraud and Sales of Arms to Iraq Story by the ABC News Nightline with Ted Koppel and the
Financial Times of London in May, July, and September of 1991 was most likely initiated or was
corroborated by Lancaster Newspapers reporter Thomas Flannary.
Thomas Flannary's mysterious death in February of 2004 was either murder or was a cover story to
hide the fact that he was a CIA operative used to control the flow of information, disinformation, and
propaganda. It is highly subject that he began his career with Lancaster Newspapers in 1987 and is not
a native Lancastrian.
The ISC merger was not completed until December of 1987, 3 months after the False Arrests of Stan
J. Caterbone.
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page 2 of 548
173
183
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
The official meeting with the Pennsylvania Securities Commission Agent Howard Eisler in September of
1987, which was solicited by Agent Eisler was an effort to illegally interrogate Stan J. Caterbone without
a legal subpoena.
In the months after the June 23, 1987 meeting with ISC Executive Larry Resch Stan J. Caterbone had
personally solicited a vast array of local, state, and federal officials, including the FBI and Congressman
Robert Walker, PA State Representative Gibson Armstrong for assistance in the retaliation and slander
campaign that was in progress. There is credible linkage between the ISC Scandal, U.S. Sponsored
Mind Control, Stan J. Caterbone's family VICTIMIZATION of the same, and the participation of
LANCASTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA.
The Zook Murder Appeal proves that Lancaster County Detective Michael Landis, Judge James Cullen,
and Judge Farina of the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas were all involved in U.S. Sponsored
Mind Control before 2004 and before Stan J. Caterbone went public with his VICTIMIZATION of U.S.
Sponsored Mind Control.
Bobby Ray Inman, former director of the National Security Agency (NSA) was on the Board of
Directors of ISC and was involved in U.S. Sponsored Mind Control Technologies through his company
S.A.I.C. Corporation. Bobby Ray Inman would later be selected by Former President Bill Clinton for his
Director of Defense, but would later remove himself due to allegations and public scrutiny for his role in
the ISC scandal.
In the Fall of 1991 Robert Gates was nominated for Director of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)
and during his televised confirmation hearings the was subject to brutal array of questions concerning
his participation in the ISC scandal. He went on to be nominated and later would serve both the Bush
Administrations and the Obama Administrations as Secretary of Defense until resigning in 2011.
There have been at least 3 documented attempts on the life of Stan J. Caterbone; 1987, 1991, and
2004, all attempts at vehicular homicide. Thomas P. Caterbone's passing in 1996 was the result of a
wrongful death claim by Fulton Bank. Samuel A. Caterbone was most likely an KULTRA murder tactic in
Santa Barbara, California on December 25, 1984. Samuel P. Caterbone was most likely the result of an
MKULTRA murder tactic on July 20,2001 in New York city.
The above finding of facts and evidence corroborates a vast conspiracy and criminal enterprise that
violates both civil and criminal RICO statutes and antitrust statutes.
The above would constitute treble damages for Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group in U.S.
District Courts, specifically in the Eastern District for Pennsylvania Case No. 05-2288, 06-4650, 1402559, and other related cases; and Case No. 08-13373 in the Lancaster County Court of Common
Pleas.
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page 3 of 548
173
183
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Page 4 of 548
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Table of contents
Introduction
I. A university professor uncovers CIA no touch torture
II. The beginnings of CIA no touch torture and how it spread
III. What is no touch torture?
IV. An example of no touch torture
V. The long history of U.S. torture
VI. CIA Cold War neuroscience-based mind control research
VII. CIA Cold War nonlethal weapons research
VIII. Why CIA no touch torture has been so successful
IX. All three programs are state tools for neutralizing the enemy
without killing; for intelligence operations and counterinsurgency
warfare
X. Mind control allegations by a Korean War POW, (prisoner of war),
a Soviet political prisoner and Abu Ghraib detainees
XI. The banal and bizarre techniques of no touch torture
XII. The three key behavioral components of no touch torture
XIII. Torture as a kind of total theater
XIV. A comparison of no touch torture to mind control allegations
XV. The phenomenology of the torture situation
XVI. Comparing no touch torture techniques of sensory disorientation
and self inflicted pain to mind control allegations
XVII. Conclusions: what everyone can agree on
Page 5 of 548
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Introduction
After the horrific pictures of prisoners being tortured at Abu Ghraib were displayed in front pages of
newspapers around the world, the United States maintained that the U.S. government does not
torture; Abu Ghraib was about a few bad officers. Evidence now proves that CIA no touch torture
and worse were ordered by the executive branch and approved by top military officers. Surprisingly
this scandal has much in common with another national security issue, neuroweapons, commonly
referred to as mind control.
The field of neuroethics should begin now, according to bioethicist Dr. Jonathan Moreno in his 2006
book Mind Wars, Brain Research and National Defense. The influential book was reviewed in
Nature and JAMA (Journal of American Medical Association). Most neuroscientists agree that
advanced neuroweapons are over a half century away but the ethics of the new weapons need more
planning than occurred for the atomic bomb. Moreno began the first chapter of his book describing
the growing numbers of allegations of illegal government mind control targeting. He immediately
dismissed them as conspiracy theory nut cases. A 2007 Washington Post Magazine article,
Thought Wars followed suit. So why should anyone read further given these credible and highly
respected expert opinions?
Much of what the public should know about the issue has gone unreported or uninvestigated. For
example, after over a half century of classified research, not one publicly known neurological weapon
has been deployed. This raises more questions than it answers. Putting aside the major and
undebated points of the consensus position, the mind control allegations do sound crazy and on this
singular point, most people, including experts and news reporters refuse any closer examination.
Clearly, understanding why the mind control allegations sound so crazy would have significant
consequences.
Two analogies help clarify the major problems for the mind control issue, secrecy and the lack of a
thorough, impartial investigation;
Excerpt of a 1970s congressional hearing uncovering illegal CIA activities; [Senator Frank]
Church, ... persisted in blaming the plots [assassinations] on the CIA. The agency, he said, was
a rogue elephant on a rampage. For proof, he pointed to the lack of documentary evidence
that any president had ever approved an assassination. Former CIA director Richard Helms
countered that it was absurd to expect to find such evidence. I cant imagine anybody wanting
something in writing saying I have just charged Mr. Jones to go out and shoot Mr. Smith, he
testified. The Agency, he insisted, had simply carried out the wishes of the executive.
Even today, experts dont understand how the U.S. secrecy system works. Similar to the torture
scandal, until there is a national security scandal about neuroscience weapons, the public will
remain uninformed about a serious public issue.
During a dairymans strike in 19th century New England, when there was suspicion of milk
being watered down, Henry David Thoreau wrote; Sometimes circumstantial evidence can be
quite convincing; like when you find a trout in the milk. Mind Wars and the Washington Post
Magazine article examined the growing numbers of crazy sounding mind control allegations.
U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
Page 6 of 548
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
But unlike Thoreaus account, the publications only reported the convincing circumstantial
evidence of finding a trout in the milk and dismissed the suspicions without a fair or
impartial investigation. As a result, the mind control allegations made no sense.
Update: In the 2008 book The Commission, the Uncensored History of the 9-11 Investigation,
Philip Shenon explained that explicit, very classified kill orders are now put in writing. On page
254 Shenon wrote: MONs [memorandum of notification] were top-secret orders prepared by the
White House to authorize covert operations abroad by the CIA. ... there was an explicit, if highly
secret, order given by Clinton to the CIA in late 1998 to kill bin Laden.
Page 7 of 548
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
The UCDavis Center for the Study of Human Rights in the Americas (CSHRA) and the UCDavis
Center for Mind and Brain (CMB) further explain what psychological torture is and its effects on
torture victims.
[CSHRA and CMB] have initiated a collaboration to investigate theneurobiology of
psychological torture. ...Psychological torture (henceforthPT) is a set of practices that are
used worldwide to inflict pain or suffering without resorting to direct physical violence.
PT includes the use of sleep deprivation, sensory disorientation, forced self-induced pain,
solitary confinement, mock execution, severe humiliation, mind-altering drugs and
threats of violenceas well as the exploitation of personal or cultural phobias.
The psychiatric sequelae of PT are severe. They include delirium, psychosis, regression,
self-mutilation, cognitive impairment, and anxiety disorders, including post-traumatic
stress disorder. Neuroscience research on these and related mental disorders continues
to establish their neurobiological underpinnings, thus challenging the popular view that
PT is not physical, not serious, and perhaps not even torture at all.
The CSHRA and the CMB launched their collaborative efforts by holding The First
UCDavis Workshop on the Neurobiology of Psychological Torture. The goal of this
workshop was to bring together researchers and practitioners from different specialties
and research groups in order to set off a unified, long-term, research program on the
ways in which PT affects the human central nervous system in an effort to understand it
in relation to the more traditional forms of physical torture, and to establish clearly
articulated ethical, legal, and medical descriptions of this set of practices. It is expected
that these descriptions will help treat, document, and deter PT.
Supplemented by studies on the social, historical, and ethical ramifications of PT, the
presentations made at The First UCDavis Workshop on the Neurobiology of
Psychological Torture have been bound into The Trauma of Psychological Torture, a
volume to be published by Praeger on June 30, 2008.
Please note that numerous torture experts, including CSHRA and CMB have completely shunned
suggestions to investigate mind control allegations or to consider the issue. But this information may
be helpful to the therapists of TIs (targeted individuals of mind control) who are coping with mind
control targeting.
Page 8 of 548
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Page 9 of 548
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Page 10 of 548
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Page 11 of 548
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Page 12 of 548
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Page 13 of 548
10
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Page 14 of 548
11
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
The book Torture, also included a description of counterinsurgency warfare, in which torture was a
principal weapon and was developed during the French experience in Indochina and Algeria.
[The] genesis of this new kind of warfare is the idea that the enemy takes the form of an
invisible political organization hidden among the civilian population. One can know its
leaders and its structure only by waging a war of information: by arresting masses of
civilian suspects, interrogating them, and, if necessary, torturing them. ... In the modern
era, ... the science of torture and similar abusive treatment has developed to break the
physical and mental resistance of subjects before they expire or go mad and thus become
useless as sources of information. ... Torture is still about domination.
Page 15 of 548
12
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Page 16 of 548
13
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
town. A December 13, 1976, Federal Times article, Microwave Weapons Study by Soviets
Cited described the alleged Russian capability of microwave hearing;
The Defense Intelligence Agency has released a report on heavy Communist
research on microwaves, including their use as weapons. Microwaves are used in
radar, television and microwave ovens. They can cause disorientation and possibly
heart attacks in humans. Another biological effect with possible anti-personnel uses
is microwave hearing. Sounds and possibly even words which appear to be
originating intracranially (within the head) can be induced by signal modulation at
very low average power densities, the report said. According to the study,
Communist work in this area has great potential for development into a system for
disorienting or disrupting the behavior patterns of military or diplomatic
personnel.
3. Jon Ronson, author of the New York Times reviewed book, The Men Who Stare at Goats
wrote about alleged mind control experiments on Iraqi detainees. In an interview on April 14,
2005 at the Politics and Prose book store in Washington DC., Ronson discussed his book.
(Tape available from Cspan, Book TV at www.booktv.org. Videotape # 186334)
And from the former detainees from Guantanamo Bay that Ive interviewed it
seems exactly the same things are going on there. I said to a man called Jamal alHarith how do you feel, you know how did you feel at Guantanamo Bay and he said
felt like a laboratory rat. And he said, I felt they were trying stuff out on me. ...
And one example is with Barney the purple dinosaur. When it was announced a
year ago that they were rounding up prisoners of war in Iraq and blasting them
with Barney the purple dinosaur, it was treated as a funny story, because, by all the
major news networks in America, you know... the torture wasnt that bad. ... It was
disseminated as funny because who wants to replace a funny story with, as Eric
[Olson] once said to me, with one thats not fun. ...
I was given seven photographs of a detainee who had just been given the Barney
treatment as they called it. It was 48 hours of Barney with flashing strobe lights
inside a shipping container in the desert heat. ...
... The current chief of staff of the Army is a man called General Pete Shoemaker. ...
Hes well known to have an interest in these paranormal esoteric military pursuits.
... So now is the time when I know that these ideas go to the very top [levels of the
military].
One of the things you spoke of, the one that I have knowledge of is the frequencies.
You can follow a trail of patents like footprints in the snow and the patents
sometimes vanish into the world of military classification. And theres many
patents bought up by a man called Dr. Oliver Lowry. ...
Page 17 of 548
14
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
So we know that these patents have been bought up by the military. ... And the
detainees of Guantanamo Ive spoken to speak of being blasted withfrequencies, put
inside music, high and low frequencies, masked with music.
...I think theres no doubt theyre experimenting with this stuff. To add to that
controversial suggestion. I think theres a good chance that even though theyre
trying this stuff out, its not necessarily true that it works. A lot of this stuff doesnt
work. This may or may not work. I dont know.
Page 18 of 548
15
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Page 19 of 548
16
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Page 20 of 548
17
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Page 21 of 548
18
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
phenomenon they call street theater. For example, people around the victim have
repeated verbatim, the victims immediate thoughts, or harassive and personalized
statements are repeated by strangers wherever the victim may go.
Emotions can be manipulated. Microwave hearing, known to be an unclassified military
capability of creating voices in the head, is regularly reported. Implanted thoughts and
visions are common, with repetitive themes that can include pedophilia, homophobia
and degradation. Victims say it is like having a radio or TV in your head. Less frequently,
remote and abusive sexual manipulation is reported. Almost all victims say repetitive
behavior control techniques are used and include negative, stimulus-response or
feedback loops.
The counterintuitive and bizarre torture techniques are discernible within the mind control
allegations. The mind control techniques seem to be psychological techniques to disorient the victim
and cause him to feel completely controlled, dependent and at the mercy of his torturers. Similar to
the kind of total theater for torture, street theater is almost certainly a part of the process of
breaking ones personality to gain behavior control over that person.
an asymmetry of power;
the anonymity of the torturer to the victim;
the double bind of either enduring or betraying others;
the systematic falsehood of trumped-up charges, artificial lighting, cunning
deceptions, and mock executions;
5. confinement in distinctive spaces signifying displacement, trapping, narrowness
and destruction; and
6. a temporality characterized by some unpredictability and much circularity, having
no end. ...
Thus, much of the pain from all forms of torture is psychological, not physical, based
upon denying victims any power over their lives. In sum, the torturer strives through
insult and disqualification, by means of threats ... to break all the victims possible
existential platforms. Through this asymmetry, the torturer eventually achieves
complete power and reduces the victims to a condition of total or near total
defenselessness. (Question of Torture, 10-11)
In torture, a torture situation is created according to Doerr-Zegers. In mind control allegations,
there is a similar phenomenology of a mind control situation. TIs describe this as an electronic
prison. Doerr-Zegers described the torture technique, 1) an asymmetry of power. In torture, the
torturer has complete power and the victim is completely powerless. Similarly, TIs are targeted
U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
Page 22 of 548
19
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
remotely and are completely powerless to stop the targeting. Doerr-Zegers described the torture
technique, 2) the anonymity of the torturer to the victim. Torture victims do not know their torturer
and similarly, there is the anonymity of the remote targeting in the mind control situation.
Most TIs described street theater or seemingly staged events which matches 3), 4) and 6). DoerrZegers described torture technique, 5) confinement in distinctive spaces signifying displacement,
trapping, narrowness and destruction. Although TIs are not physically imprisoned, most victims
describe the experience as very debilitating and compare it to mental rape, an electronic prison, or
total destruction of the quality of their lives. Mind control poses a severe restriction on their former
lives. Doerr-Zegers technique 6) a temporality characterized by some unpredictability and much
circularity, having no end is also similar to sensory deprivation in mind control allegations. TIs
routinely report the simple but extremely repetitive and negative, stimulus-response and feedback
loops of their environment.
Page 23 of 548
20
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
McCoy described the photos of the hooded detainee with the arms extended for self-inflicted pain.
The torturer forces the prisoner to stand with arms extended and the prisoner has no control over
his situation. The prisoner still has a sense of guilt at causing his own pain by his extended arms.
This intended effect of self inflicted pain for torture seems to be similar to mind control. TIs who are
remotely targeted with physical pain cannot escape. Although TIs go to extremes in trying to escape
the physical targeting, they are unsuccessful. The psychological trauma is inflicted by the sense of
causing ones own pain. Many TIs report that the targeting causes TIs to become isolated from
friends, families and in many cases TIs are unable to work. This common reaction to targeting seems
to be a type of self-inflicted psychological pain.
Carole Sterlings description of targeting is also found in the addendum of Naylors book and seems
to illustrate the techniques of sensory disorientation and self-inflicted pain. It is a typical TI
description;
In 1997, Carole Sterling wrote a letter to the editor of the Star Beacon. She described her
alleged targeting with EMR weapons technologies that within months, led to her suicide.
Dear Star Beacon, I am writing about something that happened to me which goes back to
December 1995. I went to a conference in Nevada. The day following the last night at the
conference, I noticed that I had an injection mark on the base of my spine which was
sore. Then the nightmare started three days after my return to Washington, D.C. ... It
totally scrambled my brain, leaving me unable to think properly, simply functioning on
sheer shock and horror, with total incomprehension of what was going on. It actually was
debilitating. The room felt like a torture chamber. This forced me out of my home. I
believe that the technology used, be it some type of a frequency assault, some sort of
directed energy, in addition to whatever was injected in me, has caused damage to my
brain. [I have] been living with this debilitating and excruciating pain for the last eight
months so far.
TIs describe both psychological and physical targeting similar to torture. It seems logical to surmise
that the successful psychological theories of no touch torture would cross over to more technically
based remote, advanced mind control programs. This becomes a significant step forward in
understanding the mind control issue. The mind control allegations are the secret in plain sight.
Page 24 of 548
21
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Page 25 of 548
22
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony
2
3
4
5
6
7
TAKEN BY:
BEFORE:
DATE:
PLACE:
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
APPEARANCES:
MARSHALL, DENNEHEY, WARNER, COLEMAN & GOGGIN
BY: CHRISTOPHER M. REESER, ESQUIRE
16
FOR - ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Allstate
U.S.
Sponsored
Sworn Testimony
Mind Control
Page
Page26
1 of 548
34
Saturday September
June 17,
28, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony
1
2
3
4
WITNESSES
NAME
EXAMINATION
STANLEY J. CATERBONE
BY:
MR. REESER
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Allstate
U.S.
Sponsored
Sworn Testimony
Mind Control
Page
Page27
2 of 548
34
Saturday September
June 17,
28, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony
1
2
EXAMINATION
4
5
THE WITNESS:
MR. REESER:
THE WITNESS:
Okay.
Here's one of the first things.
BY MR. REESER:
10
11
Lancaster, yes.
12
13
14
And the
15
16
17
18
19
20
Now if you're
21
22
23
24
25
Allstate
U.S.
Sponsored
Sworn Testimony
Mind Control
In 1997, a
Page
Page28
3 of 548
34
Saturday September
June 17,
28, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony
Stengel.
10
11
Christina Rainville.
12
Her name is
13
14
suffered.
15
16
17
CIA and the NSA -- I blew the whistle in '87 -- they were
18
19
20
21
break my things.
Now you couple that with the fact that I'm the
22
23
24
25
Allstate
U.S.
Sponsored
Sworn Testimony
Mind Control
Page
Page29
4 of 548
34
Saturday September
June 17,
28, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony
5
6
They all
In addition, Social
Determination?
11
Sure.
12
10
it.
13
14
15
16
17
se.
I was pro
18
19
Yes.
It was
20
21
and illnesses.
22
'09.
23
24
one year.
25
Allstate
U.S.
Sponsored
Sworn Testimony
Mind Control
Page
Page30
5 of 548
34
Saturday September
June 17,
28, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony
weapons.
3
4
Right.
10
11
12
reports submitted.
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
physical.
22
23
24
is disabled --
25
Allstate
U.S.
Sponsored
Sworn Testimony
Mind Control
Page
Page31
6 of 548
34
Saturday September
June 17,
28, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony
He was a
victim of MKUltra.
What is that?
program.
Okay.
10
11
He was a
12
13
14
special option.
15
school.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Before I get
claim?
24
No.
25
No.
Allstate
U.S.
Sponsored
Sworn Testimony
Mind Control
Page
Page32
7 of 548
34
Saturday September
June 17,
28, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony
1
2
Okay.
that guarantee.
All right.
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
All right.
Every day.
So we'll see.
but --
13
14
All right.
15
16
emergency relief.
17
18
19
Oh, okay.
20
21
So
22
23
24
Okay.
25
Allstate
U.S.
Sponsored
Sworn Testimony
Mind Control
Page
Page33
8 of 548
34
The
Saturday September
June 17,
28, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony
receivables.
Complainant seeks
10
11
12
13
14
15
billings invoice.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
The Complainant
All right.
Changing gears.
Allstate
U.S.
Sponsored
Sworn Testimony
Mind Control
Page
Page34
9 of 548
34
Date,
I think we left
Saturday September
June 17,
28, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony
10
going to move onto the next item, which is a wet dry vac.
Okay.
And we're
Oh, they
Okay.
10
11
March.
12
13
14
15
power motor.
16
17
18
It was 21-years-old?
19
Yeah, yeah.
20
Okay.
21
Oh, yeah.
22
23
it didn't work?
24
25
work.
Allstate
U.S.
Sponsored
Sworn Testimony
Mind Control
Page
Page35
10of
of548
34
Saturday September
June 17,
28, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony
11
Okay.
Are
No.
Yeah.
10
11
All right.
12
13
14
15
16
17
Comcast server.
18
19
So I switched over.
20
21
No.
22
Why not?
23
24
25
Allstate
U.S.
Sponsored
Sworn Testimony
Mind Control
Page
Page36
11of
of548
34
Saturday September
June 17,
28, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony
12
1
2
3
priorities.
replace it.
Let's see.
boxes.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
I disconnected it.
17
18
19
20
21
So I
They send
23
They couldn't
24
even -- I'd get billed for HBO for three months, and I
25
Page
Page37
12of
of548
34
So
I don't know if
22
Allstate
U.S.
Sponsored
Sworn Testimony
Mind Control
So
And I kept
Saturday September
June 17,
28, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony
13
hours -- one time two and a half hours, and it still didn't
work.
Okay.
quarter.
I stopped trying.
10
Okay.
11
12
just the value of the cable boxes and the modems or modem?
A
13
14
I mean,
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
I couldn't return it
I guess, yeah.
23
24
No.
25
Allstate
U.S.
Sponsored
Sworn Testimony
Mind Control
Page
Page38
13of
of548
34
Saturday September
June 17,
28, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony
14
that.
I even
He got
this.
10
door were doing was they were going and wetting the bags,
11
12
Do you
13
14
15
16
17
Oh, yeah.
18
19
Yeah.
20
All right.
21
Yeah.
22
Is that $4 a bag or --
23
Yeah.
They filled in
24
the holes before I could -- I had to dig the holes out two
25
or three times.
Allstate
U.S.
Sponsored
Sworn Testimony
Mind Control
Page
Page39
14of
of548
34
Saturday September
June 17,
28, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony
15
Oh, gees.
Oh, yeah.
days.
10
11
Okay.
clothes, $100?
12
13
14
Both.
15
16
that?
17
18
19
20
kinds of tricks.
My
I mean all
21
I'm sorry?
22
Slippers big.
23
24
25
Allstate
U.S.
Sponsored
Sworn Testimony
Mind Control
Page
Page40
15of
of548
34
Saturday September
June 17,
28, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony
16
were here.
Forced entry?
No ---
-- a broken door.
-- in '87, I did.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
Signs
17
18
19
20
and, you know, hard to get in, you know, to see your key
21
22
23
24
25
It's harassment.
cigarettes?
A
cigarettes.
Allstate
U.S.
Sponsored
Sworn Testimony
Mind Control
Page
Page41
16of
of548
34
Saturday September
June 17,
28, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony
17
are expensive.
or dry herbs.
nicotine.
They
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
Oh, no, no, no, no, no, I don't leave this behind.
Same thing, you don't know when they got in, how
they got in, but they are just not there anymore?
A
18
example.
19
20
describing.
21
every day.
22
That's it.
23
those.
Okay.
I used to
24
Yeah.
25
Allstate
U.S.
Sponsored
Sworn Testimony
Mind Control
Page
Page42
17of
of548
34
Saturday September
June 17,
28, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony
18
you.
the Court?
All right.
online.
Yes.
10
-- in Civil Court?
11
I just
12
13
14
you page to the left, you'll see the three pages that were
15
stamped.
16
17
18
down.
19
20
21
It
22
23
24
All right.
25
Allstate
U.S.
Sponsored
Sworn Testimony
Mind Control
Page
Page43
18of
of548
34
Saturday September
June 17,
28, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony
19
1
2
3
sheet.
Q
either.
Okay.
what she said was that I didn't provide her enough evidence
10
11
she said.
12
13
Okay.
15
technologies.
17
18
Alaska.
19
14
16
And essentially
Administration.
20
21
Begich, B-e-g-i-c-h.
I'm sorry.
22
23
24
25
Allstate
U.S.
Sponsored
Sworn Testimony
Mind Control
Page
Page44
19of
of548
34
And they
Saturday September
June 17,
28, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony
20
weapons.
10
Now I have a
11
Okay.
12
13
14
15
16
Yeah, yeah.
Now
17
18
information, and she emailed me back and said thank you for
19
it.
20
21
22
23
24
25
I emailed some
Allstate
U.S.
Sponsored
Sworn Testimony
Mind Control
And she
Page
Page45
20of
of548
34
Saturday September
June 17,
28, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony
21
I blew
Iraq.
In 1994,
Plus on March
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Maryland.
19
20
21
22
23
was a lie.
24
of them.
25
Allstate
U.S.
Sponsored
Sworn Testimony
Mind Control
Page
Page46
21of
of548
34
Saturday September
June 17,
28, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony
22
she since -- after she blew the whistle and started having
Okay.
Let me
8
9
A
sprayer.
Are
10
11
Industrial Park.
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
Okay.
Tips.
So I put
It cost me $119.
The
22
tip in.
23
24
25
Allstate
U.S.
Sponsored
Sworn Testimony
Mind Control
So I had
It had an
Page
Page47
22of
of548
34
I
So I had
Saturday September
June 17,
28, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony
23
1
2
Okay.
So I'm just
receipt.
8
9
Correct?
Only if you give me a guarantee that you're going
10
11
Okay.
12
13
Correct?
14
To the police?
15
Yes.
16
17
18
All right.
19
20
21
22
23
24
No.
25
All right.
Allstate
U.S.
Sponsored
Sworn Testimony
Mind Control
Page
Page48
23of
of548
34
Saturday September
June 17,
28, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony
24
question.
that house.
Is it a rental house?
Yes.
10
11
I mean I
12
13
14
harass me.
15
16
17
and 10 Vicodin.
18
19
That
20
21
Right.
22
23
They
That was
theft?
24
Yeah, theft.
25
Allstate
U.S.
Sponsored
Sworn Testimony
Mind Control
Page
Page49
24of
of548
34
Saturday September
June 17,
28, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony
25
my back.
Yeah.
tips.
Of this year?
10
Yeah.
11
12
13
Okay.
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
I'd
Okay.
I think the
Are we
23
talking about, you know, a belt to hold your pants up, that
24
kind of belt?
25
Allstate
U.S.
Sponsored
Sworn Testimony
Mind Control
Yeah, yeah.
Page
Page50
25of
of548
34
Saturday September
June 17,
28, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony
26
Stolen, damaged?
Stolen.
When?
Oh, yeah.
-- black screen?
replace it.
10
Stolen?
11
Stolen.
12
13
14
I'm sorry?
screened-in porch?
15
16
Right.
17
roll.
18
19
20
21
It's 100 by --
So it was on the
Okay.
gloves?
22
Yeah.
23
24
Yeah.
25
I had to
A lot of times
Allstate
U.S.
Sponsored
Sworn Testimony
Mind Control
Page
Page51
26of
of548
34
Saturday September
June 17,
28, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony
27
It's psychological
Some.
list.
possession.
Some were.
Okay.
Let's see.
10
11
12
them.
13
14
15
16
17
18
I
Now
today?
A
there.
Q
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Allstate
U.S.
Sponsored
Sworn Testimony
Mind Control
Page
Page52
27of
of548
34
Saturday September
June 17,
28, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony
28
discussed?
keeping lists.
think.
Okay.
myself.
Let me see.
Let me
I went to -- this
10
11
12
and on.
13
14
cartridge.
15
toner gets low, it will give you a warning that you need to
16
17
document.
18
19
20
a wireless copier.
21
22
Q
off.
23
No.
24
All right.
25
Allstate
U.S.
Sponsored
Sworn Testimony
Mind Control
Page
Page53
28of
of548
34
Saturday September
June 17,
28, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony
29
Yeah, yeah.
I -- okay.
Conestoga, PA.
Now what they did was the one they paid the claim, but they
It's when
So I filed a complaint
10
11
12
13
14
15
Now in 2006 --
16
17
Are you
18
No.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
then.
Now
Allstate
U.S.
Sponsored
Sworn Testimony
Mind Control
Page
Page54
29of
of548
34
Saturday September
June 17,
28, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony
30
on the claims.
know.
Theft or damaged or --
three laptop drives and two external hard drives from 2005
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Q
you.
Okay.
I ordered
No.
the receipts.
Q
24
morning.
25
that.
Allstate
U.S.
Sponsored
Sworn Testimony
Mind Control
Page
Page55
30of
of548
34
They stole
Saturday September
June 17,
28, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony
31
6
7
Yes.
10
11
12
I have that.
13
14
15
that.
16
17
Right.
18
19
20
21
mandatory.
22
That's right.
Yeah, I have
You
23
Okay.
24
25
Allstate
U.S.
Sponsored
Sworn Testimony
Mind Control
Page
Page56
31of
of548
34
Saturday September
June 17,
28, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony
32
1
2
3
4
Okay.
MR. REESER:
Okay.
Thank you
very much.
THE WITNESS:
Yeah.
a.m.)
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Allstate
U.S.
Sponsored
Sworn Testimony
Mind Control
Page
Page57
32of
of548
34
Saturday September
June 17,
28, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony
33
COUNTY OF DAUPHIN
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
SS
3
10
11
12
13
14
hereof.
15
16
17
18
19
action.
20
21
22
said witness.
23
24
25
Allstate
U.S.
Sponsored
Sworn Testimony
Mind Control
Page
Page58
33of
of548
34
Saturday September
June 17,
28, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony
34
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Allstate
U.S.
Sponsored
Sworn Testimony
Mind Control
Page
Page59
34of
of548
34
Saturday September
June 17,
28, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
TAKEN BY:
BEFORE:
DATE:
PLACE:
APPEARANCES:
MARSHALL, DENNEHEY, WARNER, COLEMAN & GOGGIN
BY: CHRISTOPHER M. REESER, ESQUIRE
FOR - ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
J. CaterboneMind
Under
Control
Oath
Page
Page60
1 of 51
548
Saturday September
June17,
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
2
1
WITNESSES
NAME
STANLEY J. CATERBONE
EXAMINATION
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
EXHIBITS
13
14
CATERBONE EXHIBIT
15
1.
LIST OF ITEMS
13
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
J. CaterboneMind
Under
Control
Oath
Page
Page61
2 of 51
548
Saturday September
June17,
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
3
1
2
3
4
EXAMINATION
BY MR. REESER:
Stan.
Stan, okay.
10
You can
call me Chris.
11
All right.
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
No.
spreadsheet --
20
Okay.
21
22
All right.
23
24
25
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
J. CaterboneMind
Under
Control
Oath
Page
Page62
3 of 51
548
Saturday September
June17,
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
4
1
Okay.
I've had --
Go ahead.
Go ahead.
policies with the same types of claims, and I've never been
10
Okay.
11
-- on the record.
12
So noted.
13
Okay.
14
15
16
All right.
17
18
All right.
19
20
Okay.
22
Sure.
23
21
24
25
Well --
This
is --
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
J. CaterboneMind
Under
Control
Oath
Page
Page63
4 of 51
548
Saturday September
June17,
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
5
1
2
Okay.
Great.
Okay.
the claim.
claim.
Okay.
So --
10
11
Go.
12
-- to put it in perspective?
13
Yeah.
14
I am a federal whistleblower.
Go.
I blew the whistle
15
They were
16
17
18
1987 they --
19
I'm sorry.
20
Yes.
21
operations.
22
Okay.
23
24
courts, hired various attorneys from '87 all the way up.
25
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
J. CaterboneMind
Under
Control
Oath
Page
Page64
5 of 51
548
Saturday September
June17,
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
6
1
litigant.
Okay.
Okay.
I became a
control technologies.
around.
10
11
period of time.
Now, these
12
Okay.
13
14
15
16
ordinary claim.
17
18
19
say.
20
be agents.
21
It could be neighbors.
It's impossible to
It could be police.
It could be anybody.
But you believe that they are all in conspiracy
22
23
whistleblower?
24
25
A
that.
It could
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
J. CaterboneMind
Under
Control
Oath
Page
Page65
6 of 51
548
Saturday September
June17,
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
7
1
Okay.
Okay.
10
11
All right.
12
Harleysville
13
But
14
15
These are all the reports from the past year on Geek Squad
16
17
18
Okay.
19
20
21
22
23
24
Okay.
25
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
J. CaterboneMind
Under
Control
Oath
Page
Page66
7 of 51
548
Saturday September
June17,
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
8
1
Locally?
No.
No.
No.
Okay.
10
11
12
Complaints --
13
Okay.
14
15
16
harassment.
17
Okay.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
J. CaterboneMind
Under
Control
Oath
Page
Page67
8 of 51
548
Now,
Saturday September
June17,
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
9
1
describing.
Okay.
10
11
12
13
14
15
They were
16
17
I don't know.
18
door.
19
20
I'm trying
to understand this.
21
Okay.
22
23
24
25
pain.
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
J. CaterboneMind
Under
Control
Oath
Page
Page68
9 of 51
548
Saturday September
June17,
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
10
1
Okay.
officer.
The second is
10
11
Administration.
12
read them.
You can
13
Okay.
14
15
16
No.
17
Okay.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Okay.
25
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
J. CaterboneMind
Under
Control
Oath
Page
Page69
10of
of 548
51
Saturday September
June17,
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
11
1
How --
Okay.
7
8
9
10
awaiting decisions.
Q
Superior Court?
11
12
Okay.
13
They dismissed it --
14
Okay.
15
16
Oral
17
Okay.
18
Both cases
19
20
21
before them.
22
23
Okay.
24
No.
25
Okay.
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
J. CaterboneMind
Under
Control
Oath
Page
Page70
11of
of 548
51
Saturday September
June17,
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
12
1
Yes.
Okay.
he is?
Are you
documented, verified.
10
Huh.
11
12
Okay.
13
for that?
Is it --
14
15
I have.
16
Yeah.
17
Okay.
18
19
applied in '09.
20
21
22
23
24
25
Okay.
bit.
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
J. CaterboneMind
Under
Control
Oath
Page
Page71
12of
of 548
51
Saturday September
June17,
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
13
1
Okay.
Okay.
Yeah.
No.
Okay.
Here.
That's updated.
MR. REESER:
13
1.)
14
BY MR. REESER:
16
Okay.
on there?
12
15
missing.
10
11
All right.
17
Yeah.
18
19
You're
20
Right.
21
22
23
24
25
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
J. CaterboneMind
Under
Control
Oath
Page
Page72
13of
of 548
51
Saturday September
June17,
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
14
1
Yes.
All right.
Freemont Street.
Yes.
Okay.
No.
All right.
10
11
claim.
12
13
number of grantees.
14
My brothers.
15
Okay.
16
No.
17
18
policy?
19
20
Okay.
21
Yeah.
22
Okay.
23
24
No.
25
Okay.
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
J. CaterboneMind
Under
Control
Oath
Page
Page73
14of
of 548
51
Saturday September
June17,
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
15
1
Right.
Okay.
a 302 petition, but what they did was they broke into my
to pay for all the locks and the door, but they didn't.
8
9
10
11
Okay.
12
13
All right.
14
15
do.
302 petition?
16
What do they --
17
18
19
20
Okay.
21
22
23
to pin on you?
24
Oh, yeah.
25
What?
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
J. CaterboneMind
Under
Control
Oath
Page
Page74
15of
of 548
51
Saturday September
June17,
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
16
1
4
5
6
What year?
name it.
Q
Okay.
institutionalized --
Oh, yeah.
one in July?
10
11
12
13
14
15
Then they
16
Okay.
17
It started
18
in '87.
19
20
21
22
studios.
23
24
25
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
J. CaterboneMind
Under
Control
Oath
Page
Page75
16of
of 548
51
But in 1987 I
I rented a home
Saturday September
June17,
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
17
1
Okay.
Okay.
I stood
10
11
Part of?
12
This one.
No.
Where
13
are they?
These
14
15
pages.
16
17
18
19
20
Okay.
21
22
in '08.
23
24
25
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
J. CaterboneMind
Under
Control
Oath
Page
Page76
17of
of 548
51
Saturday September
June17,
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
18
1
I want.
Okay.
5
6
Yeah.
10
11
Yeah.
12
Okay.
13
Yeah, I do.
14
it store.
15
16
17
18
19
No.
20
21
For Humanity.
22
Habitat?
23
24
25
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
J. CaterboneMind
Under
Control
Oath
Page
Page77
18of
of 548
51
Saturday September
June17,
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
19
1
Reuse it.
Greenfield.
Yeah.
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
I see.
17
18
Okay.
19
20
21
22
23
$20.
24
$20?
25
Yes.
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
J. CaterboneMind
Under
Control
Oath
Each
I apologize if I
Page
Page78
19of
of 548
51
Saturday September
June17,
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
20
1
Yeah.
Wizard.
Wizard.
Locks.
Yeah.
Yeah.
10
11
circumstances --
12
13
14
15
complaints.
16
to sue them.
17
Okay.
18
19
20
21
investigate or...
22
23
24
25
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
J. CaterboneMind
Under
Control
Oath
Page
Page79
20of
of 548
51
Saturday September
June17,
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
21
1
No.
Okay.
5
6
Right.
'05 or '06.
Okay.
10
11
All right.
12
13
Yeah.
14
15
16
Okay.
17
18
Okay.
19
20
were expensive.
21
Yeah.
22
No.
23
-- just an iPod?
24
25
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
J. CaterboneMind
Under
Control
Oath
Page
Page80
21of
of 548
51
This was --
Saturday September
June17,
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
22
1
2
button.
Okay.
Oh, boy.
fall of '15.
Okay.
No.
10
Why not?
11
Why?
12
14
15
Okay.
16
I bought a replacement.
17
Okay.
13
18
19
20
21
22
23
No.
No.
I --
I mean --
24
25
questions.
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
J. CaterboneMind
Under
Control
Oath
Page
Page81
22of
of 548
51
Saturday September
June17,
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
23
1
2
Okay.
All right.
It's funny.
10
11
Okay.
12
Right.
13
How old --
14
15
16
Oh, yeah.
17
Okay.
18
I don't remember.
19
20
21
I'm just
or four stolen.
Q
Okay.
When?
In the past year.
I had three
22
Oh, no.
23
Oh, okay.
24
25
No, it doesn't.
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
J. CaterboneMind
Under
Control
Oath
No.
Well, no.
Page
Page82
23of
of 548
51
Saturday September
June17,
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
24
1
not a quantity.
that.
be three.
No.
Let me see
That should
All right.
Shack.
10
11
really not.
12
is harassment.
13
14
I'm
15
16
Okay.
17
18
19
Okay.
20
I document everything.
21
I'm an expert in
information technologies.
22
23
24
25
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
J. CaterboneMind
Under
Control
Oath
Page
Page83
24of
of 548
51
I was one
Saturday September
June17,
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
25
1
business.
were stolen?
Yeah.
10
Okay.
I know my
basement.
Yeah.
11
12
13
about that.
14
15
about these --
16
17
Okay.
18
19
20
21
official report.
22
All right.
23
24
25
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
J. CaterboneMind
Under
Control
Oath
Page
Page84
25of
of 548
51
Saturday September
June17,
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
26
1
Okay.
All right.
After what?
Let me think.
Okay.
10
11
12
Yeah.
Yeah.
took them?
A
everybody.
13
Okay.
14
Yes.
15
16
17
it worked.
18
buy a replacement.
One day
19
20
21
22
23
24
No.
25
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
J. CaterboneMind
Under
Control
Oath
Page
Page85
26of
of 548
51
Maybe '08.
Saturday September
June17,
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
27
1
Yeah.
All right.
if it could be fixed?
No.
How much?
How much.
Oh, boy.
9
10
I probably paid -- I
11
Okay.
12
-- on eBay.
13
14
Yeah.
15
16
17
18
of it?
19
Harbor Freight?
20
Harbor Freight.
21
drill.
22
Okay.
24
What is it?
25
Maybe 100?
23
Harbor Tools.
so --
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
J. CaterboneMind
Under
Control
Oath
Page
Page86
27of
of 548
51
Saturday September
June17,
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
28
1
Maybe.
Okay.
Reciprocating saw.
Yeah.
It just --
sawing.
Okay.
10
11
12
13
It used to
replacement one?
14
The replacement.
15
16
Harbor Tools.
17
Harbor Freight?
18
Harbor Freight.
19
Okay.
20
23
24
25
When did
21
22
A
'06.
'05.
Q
Oh, boy.
Let's see.
'05, '06.
Okay.
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
J. CaterboneMind
Under
Control
Oath
Page
Page87
28of
of 548
51
Saturday September
June17,
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
29
1
No.
Okay.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
8
9
10
11
12
two-week span.
Q
Yeah.
college.
13
All right.
14
15
16
assuming --
17
Right.
18
19
20
21
22
I mean, I'm
a do-it-yourselfer.
Q
Well, no.
23
Oh, I do.
24
-- don't.
25
I do.
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
J. CaterboneMind
Under
Control
Oath
Page
Page88
29of
of 548
51
Saturday September
June17,
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
30
1
2
Okay.
I'm
trying to understand.
I do.
I don't.
Okay.
No.
I understand.
10
I use my tools.
11
12
I use my stuff.
13
Fair enough.
14
15
16
Uh-huh.
17
18
Yeah.
19
Okay.
20
that up?
21
No.
22
Okay.
23
24
25
No.
I'm not
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
J. CaterboneMind
Under
Control
Oath
Okay.
Page
Page89
30of
of 548
51
Saturday September
June17,
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
31
1
Broken.
When?
of last year.
Okay.
So I put it on eBay.
Right.
10
11
12
electronic funds.
13
the money.
Right.
14
15
What's that?
16
Or a PayPal account.
17
PayPal account.
18
Okay.
19
20
21
22
account.
23
Uh-huh.
24
25
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
J. CaterboneMind
Under
Control
Oath
Page
Page90
31of
of 548
51
Right.
Now, in my
Saturday September
June17,
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
32
1
judgment.
So eBay
Uh-huh.
Okay.
10
11
12
Right.
My PACER account
13
14
15
So
16
Okay.
17
18
19
20
my cases.
Q
Let me go back.
at some point.
21
Okay.
22
23
phone?
24
25
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
J. CaterboneMind
Under
Control
Oath
Page
Page91
32of
of 548
51
Saturday September
June17,
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
33
1
you?
Okay.
So I replaced it.
of Apple.
I got out
How old --
service about it, and they had harassed me, and I had to
10
11
Radio Shack, and under Sprint's program they would pay your
12
13
have a Samsung.
14
15
So I went to
How old was the phone at the time that you tried
16
17
Okay.
18
19
20
21
22
or --
23
24
25
Okay.
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
J. CaterboneMind
Under
Control
Oath
Page
Page92
33of
of 548
51
Saturday September
June17,
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
34
1
Yeah.
I can't buy
Okay.
Okay.
10
11
12
13
What happen?
14
15
I think January.
16
Of this year?
17
Yes, '16.
18
19
I think January.
General's Office or --
20
Oh.
21
22
23
Okay.
24
25
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
J. CaterboneMind
Under
Control
Oath
Page
Page93
34of
of 548
51
Saturday September
June17,
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
35
1
everything to me.
Okay.
Service me everything.
8
9
A
the NSA.
Okay.
I mean, if
10
11
He said
12
13
she's been saying that the good old boys are behind her
14
problems.
15
stated for the record what the NSA agent told me about the
16
good old boys and how it relates to what she was saying.
17
Uh-huh.
Okay.
18
19
information on file.
20
21
22
Office.
23
Okay.
24
25
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
J. CaterboneMind
Under
Control
Oath
Page
Page94
35of
of 548
51
Saturday September
June17,
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
36
1
Uh-huh.
They'd work.
Oh, yeah.
Yes.
Well, supposedly.
10
didn't work.
11
Okay.
12
Lowe's.
13
14
Yeah.
15
Yes.
16
17
Okay.
18
19
I'm sorry.
Foam
memory mattress.
A
On the record,
20
21
say '98 I've been going to the doctors on and off for it.
22
23
24
25
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
J. CaterboneMind
Under
Control
Oath
Page
Page95
36of
of 548
51
Since I'd
So I got a
Saturday September
June17,
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
37
1
Okay.
excruciating pain.
6
7
Yes.
10
Thank you.
11
12
13
Okay.
14
15
magnets.
16
17
All right.
18
19
21
No.
22
All right.
24
25
You ask
the questions.
20
23
So
the mattress?
A
No.
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
J. CaterboneMind
Under
Control
Oath
Page
Page96
37of
of 548
51
Saturday September
June17,
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
38
1
Other nights...
3
4
Okay.
No.
10
11
12
chiropractor.
A
being effective.
13
Okay.
14
15
to Medicare.
16
house.
17
medicines.
18
19
Okay.
And pain
20
21
22
there.
23
24
25
If not,
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
J. CaterboneMind
Under
Control
Oath
Page
Page97
38of
of 548
51
Saturday September
June17,
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
39
1
MR. REESER:
THE WITNESS:
with me.
BY MR. REESER:
Okay.
If I know what?
10
11
12
13
That's fine.
14
15
I can't.
I went to -- okay.
16
17
18
19
March 23rd
May 10th
20
21
22
It gets severe.
I have to use
23
24
25
Family Health
Clinic.
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
J. CaterboneMind
Under
Control
Oath
Page
Page98
39of
of 548
51
Saturday September
June17,
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
40
1
2
3
4
That's a medical
doctor?
A
Okay.
treatments.
the NFL.
10
11
12
13
14
15
Okay.
16
17
I put it on there?
18
19
20
Okay.
21
Oh, yeah.
22
a -- it vibrates.
23
24
25
Full.
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
J. CaterboneMind
Under
Control
Oath
Page
Page99
40of
of 548
51
Saturday September
June17,
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
41
1
Perfectly normal.
Yeah.
All right.
Yeah.
10
Okay.
11
12
13
14
it?
Laptop computers.
15
16
Let me see.
17
How
aren't in there.
18
Yeah.
19
Let me see.
20
21
be right.
Two.
22
Okay.
23
24
right.
25
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
J. CaterboneMind
Under
Control
Oath
That's about
Page
Page100
41 of 51
548
Saturday September
June17,
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
42
1
Oh, boy.
HP.
usually.
6
7
Compaq.
Viruses
Oh, yeah.
Yeah.
10
It's not --
11
12
13
an old processor.
14
15
sometimes --
16
No, I -- I understand.
The economics of it
17
18
Squad.
19
The laptops --
20
21
Okay.
22
23
Oh, no.
24
Okay.
25
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
J. CaterboneMind
Under
Control
Oath
No.
Page
Page101
42 of 51
548
Saturday September
June17,
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
43
1
Maybe 2012.
2013.
8
9
Compaq, '15.
No.
11
-- last month?
12
No.
13
it in bulk.
14
litigation.
15
16
document.
18
Okay.
I do
19
Right.
20
21
Maybe
10
17
The
computers?
22
Yeah.
23
The --
24
25
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
J. CaterboneMind
Under
Control
Oath
Page
Page102
43 of 51
548
Saturday September
June17,
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
44
1
We talked
about the HP and the Compaq, and then you said you bought a
by --
A Lenovo.
Right.
Denovo?
Lenovo.
10
Lenovo?
11
L-e-n-o-v-o.
12
13
14
have repaired?
A
Yeah.
Yeah, I had it
15
16
17
18
19
He had a computer
20
21
22
23
No.
24
Yeah.
25
Let me see.
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
J. CaterboneMind
Under
Control
Oath
He just
I think he moved
Page
Page103
44 of 51
548
Saturday September
June17,
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
45
1
hacking.
years.
Okay.
A Plus on Columbia
Avenue.
the detective.
Okay.
I met with
10
11
He
You're
12
Okay.
13
He never -- I guess
14
15
16
17
18
19
Yes.
20
21
Three or four.
22
23
24
Okay.
25
repairs?
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
J. CaterboneMind
Under
Control
Oath
Page
Page104
45 of 51
548
Saturday September
June17,
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
46
1
I'm sorry?
Okay.
No.
Why not?
Oh, sure.
10
11
12
items.
13
14
15
Okay.
16
17
And I take it
18
19
Great.
20
21
No, I can't.
22
23
24
25
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
J. CaterboneMind
Under
Control
Oath
Let me see.
Page
Page105
46 of 51
548
Saturday September
June17,
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
47
1
Okay.
That's $160.
5
6
Here's one.
technical people.
Okay.
A Plus.
Okay.
Here's A Plus.
10
receipt.
11
Avenue.
12
13
computer.
14
Let's see.
Here's
Okay.
That's on Columbia
I want to put
15
16
17
19
Sure.
20
21
items?
22
23
18
24
25
that?
Sure.
Do you have
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
J. CaterboneMind
Under
Control
Oath
I don't know.
Page
Page106
47 of 51
548
Saturday September
June17,
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
48
1
piece of paper.
Let's see.
Let me go
Here's a receipt.
This is a Verizon.
10
11
12
Okay.
13
I believe.
14
Geek Squad.
No,
concerned.
15
16
17
18
I don't know.
19
Okay.
20
I don't know.
21
22
23
24
25
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
J. CaterboneMind
Under
Control
Oath
Page
Page107
48 of 51
548
Saturday September
June17,
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
49
1
Okay.
I got people
BY MR. REESER:
Okay.
them back?
Sure.
10
11
12
13
continue it or not.
14
15
A
fine.
Okay.
16
Okay.
17
18
19
20
Yeah, that'd be
21
Why?
22
23
24
25
office?
Q
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
J. CaterboneMind
Under
Control
Oath
Okay.
Page
Page108
49 of 51
548
Saturday September
June17,
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
50
1
Or we can do it at my house.
It's nice.
All right.
Okay.
Roughly an hour.
started.
10
11
12
Yeah.
13
MR. REESER:
14
15
Okay.
Very good.
10:19 a.m.)
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
J. CaterboneMind
Under
Control
Oath
Page
Page109
50 of 51
548
Saturday September
June17,
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
51
1
COUNTY OF DAUPHIN
2
3
4
: SS
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
said witness.
22
23
24
25
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
J. CaterboneMind
Under
Control
Oath
_______________________
Diane F. Foltz, RMR
Notary Public
Page
Page110
51 of 51
548
Saturday September
June17,
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Stan J. Caterbone
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Richmond, California City Council hears from victims and advocates and votes in support of the Space
Preservation Act and the Space Preservation Treaty to permanently ban spaced-based weapons.
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page
Page111
4 ofof183
173
548
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
One is to adopt a resolution in support of the Space Preservation Act and the Spaced-Based
Treaty to permanently ban Space-based weapons. And we have 15 speakers for this item.
Council Member Beckles, would you like to introduce this?
Beckles : I would. You know I think what I would like to do is just kind of rehash the statement of this
issue for those that dont have the agenda in front of them. The city of Richmond is a welcoming and safe
area for all of our residents. We have led the way in so many initiatives that protect and provide the rights
for all of our residents to feel safe. And so its imperative that Richmond adopt this resolution in order to
stand in solidarity with residents who claim to be under assault with spaced-based weapons that should be
outlawed by the Space Preservation Act.
Now, the thing about this is that were not trying something new here. This is in support of what is already
there at the federal level. So we say as a council we support this treaty thats already in affect and we also
support our residents who are feeling attacked by certain kinds of weapons. And so the purpose of this
resolution is to show support for our residents that identify themselves as targeted individuals by
supporting the Space Preservation Act thats been passed by Congress and the Space Preservation Treaty
to permanently ban spaced-based weapons.
Now, many targeted individuals believe they have been personally attacked by weaponry that should be
outlawed by the Space Preservation Act. Some years ago one of the residents who is going to talk now, I
met with her. I met with many of them, to talk about this issue. Ive also spoken with our police
department. The representative from the department was Captain Gagan to figure out how law
enforcement can support these individuals, first of all, by at least listening and not assuming, and actually
just taking reports of incidences that are reported. And the police department was open to that, and is
open to that, and are willing to work with our residents in helping them to feel safe. Because its important
that we all feel safe living in our city. And in our city we have put forth our best effort to listen and respect
the voices and wisdom and experiences of our residents.
And so I dont intend to ignore it and Im hoping that my colleagues on this (unclear word) wont ignore,
but support those who suspect they have been exposed to these types of inhumane attacks with the intent
to cause them great emotional and bodily harm. And Im encouraged by these residents, these citizens of
Richmond, who stood up to protect these other residents here. Id like to encourage other officials at the
local, state and national level to explore methods to expand support to all residents. And as many as
you can see those of us with an agenda in front of us, and those who dont have an agenda in front of
you, who may be watching, or the livecast on the web, is that there is no financial impact to this. This is
not going to cost anything and its not going to hurt anyone to pass it. But it certainly would continue to
cause emotional distress to those who are being targeted if we dont pass this. And I urge you to support
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page
Page112
5 ofof183
173
548
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
all of our residents in the city.
Mayor: Do we have questions from council members? Okay, Vice Mayor.
V Mayor: Just real quickly. You mentioned that this was passed by Congress. Can you tell me when that
happened because Im trying to look it up now and I thought that was just introduced in 2001 and never
was
Beckles: Actually, Ms Anderson can probably answer that question. When was it passed at the federal
level, Ms Anderson?
Anderson:
9/10/2002. Space Preservation Act, former Congressman Dennis Cosenich had introduced
this bill.
Vice Mayor: But was that
Mayor:
Were sort of getting out of our process here. I think that (word unclear) do you have other
questions?
Vice Mayor: Well, Im looking at the sheet that youre looking at. It looks like thats when the Burkley
City Council passed a resolution, not when Congress passed the law. Im looking on line at the House
website. And I know that theres, I understand that theres been multiple versions of this so I dont know if
its been passed or not. But from what it looks like here, it doesnt look like that version was passed by
Congress, so I dont know if it was. But I understand the Burkley City Council passed it on 9/10 of 2002.
Mayor: Other questions from the council?
Mayor:
So I had a couple of questions. Im looking at the resolution and it talks about the Space
Preservation Act. Can you tell me what act that was? Theres never been a Space Preservation Act passed,
right?
Beckles: It wasnt passed. It was brought forward by the Representative, the Congressman at the time.
Because there were some, you know how it goes in Washington, theres just a lot of power play. So it
never gotbut it did get passed in 2002 in Burkley. So were making ours similar to the one that was
passed in Burkley.
Mayor: Well it doesnt say anything about Burkley here. All it says is the Space Preservation Act. Are you
talking about the resolution Burkley passed or are you talking about one of the two resolutions that
Representative Cosenich introduced in 2001 and 2002?
Beckles: Well because that one didnt pass were just making reference that it was brought forward by
Dennis Cosenich, and of course politics being the way they are, it did not pass. So this is, Im making
reference to and using the Burkley model as an example of ours.
Mayor: Which one of the Cosenich resolutions did the Burkley model refer to?
Anderson: HR3616. House Resolution 3616.
Mayor: I didnt hear you, what?
Anderson: House Resolution 3616.
Mayor: 3615.
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page
Page113
6 ofof183
173
548
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Anderson: 3616. 1. 6.
Mayor: The research I did on this, that resolution was substantially different than HR2977.
Anderson: Yes sir.
Mayor:
And significantly it omitted any references to chem trails, particle beams, electromagnetic
radiation, plasmas, extremely low frequency or ultra-high frequency energy radiation and mind control
technology. So, the question I have is, it seemed to me, it was your intent to include all these in it, right?
So if you go with HR3616 and we approve this, it will not include any of these things I named. Was that
your intent?
Beckles: That was not my intent. My intent, and working with staff, of course, it helped put this together,
because we know that we get help with our staff. The intention was to include all of the things that people
are feeling, yeah, that people are feeling the pressures of and feeling the attacks of, and so I think thatI
dont know how much of this issue that Burkley had in theirs. But I think that to include these, and this is
the resolution saying we support this treaty, this act. Then Id like to have it in there. Because again, to
me its important that we defend, that we support and that we protect our residents. And so if these are
the things that residents are saying theyre feeling, then it should be in there.
Mayor: Well, all Burkley did, and Im looking at the Burkley resolution, and it just says, It is the will of
the council and the city of Burkley that the US Senate and House of Representatives enact, and the US
President sign and enforce the Space Preservation Act. But Im confused because there were actually two
Space Preservation Acts introduced and I think if were going to do this right, we need to define which one
were going to support. Because theyre different.
Beckles: Youre absolutely right. And I want the best one to move forward as well, and Im sure that the
residents want the best one and so.
Mayor: Which one is the best one?
Anderson: HR2977.
Mayor: So that would be HR2977.
Anderson: Yes.
Beckles: Which is the one that includes
Anderson: Everything.
Mayor: Ok, so, with that in mind, I dont have any more council people... oh I do too. Council Member
yeah, Ive got a bunch; Council Member Martinez and Council Member McLaughlin.
Martinez: Yes, I wanted to change the language to say that we endorse the intent of the act since the
act is not actually in place.
Mayor: The intent of which act?
Martinez: The intent of the second act.
Mayor: The second one is HR3616.
Beckles: Are you talking about HR2977 which includes all that, right? Which includes the chem trails. Is
that right?
Mayor: Thats my understanding of it.
Beckles: Is that right, Council Member Martinez?
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page
Page114
7 ofof183
173
548
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Martinez: Is that the revision? Right.
Mayor: Council Member McLaughlin.
McLaughlin: Actually I did some research on this too. Apparently Representative Cosenich didnt read
fully the first resolution that was brought forward in his name. He brought it forward based on some
recommendations. And when he realized it was drawn out to the level that it was, he pulled it. And he
brought forward the second one, which is 3616, which I think is more general.
Many of us remember, just to share some input going back, many of us remember in the 80s, Ronal
Reagan brought forth the Strategic Defense Initiative, which was later dubbed Star Wars, you know, thats
where this all came from. Basically, it was to put weapons technology into space as a global shield, as a
supposed defense against China and the Soviet Union. It was later seen as infeasible. And many others..
many people saw this as the idea to put weapons in spacewas insane. And I happen to think it was a
crazy idea, as did the population at large.
Then the Clinton administration in 1993 morphed it into the Ballistic Missile Defense. Later in 2002, which
is currently now the Missile Defense Agency. But also, along the way, in 2002 Dennis Cosenich introduced
this bill, and its the second one that he fully introduced, 3616, which basically called for a ban on spacedbased weapons. And then it was, I think it was just introduced, a co-sponsor was Representative Barbara
Lee, and at a certain point, this Space Preservation Act that was just introduced was brought to the UN
and the Space Preservation Treaty was linked with it. And actually the UN had previously addressedset
upestablished, I guess the basis for this treaty by saying they wanted a permanent ban on spaced-based
weapons that passed in the United Nations that passed 156 to 0. Then Burkley supported the 2002 the
Space Preservation Act and I believe also, the Space Preservation Treaty.
So thats what Council Member Beckles is referring to in terms of the resolution that shes brought
forward. I dont know how anyone can not support not having weapons in space when it has been
supported by the UN and also been supported, clearly stated by many experts that its infeasible this
original Ronald Reagan plan to dub this Star Wars.
I think the resolution is fine as it is. It basically says that the residentsthe well-being of our residents is
of importance to us and it also, it doesnt state pro or con in terms of what individuals are saying. But it
just refers to the fact that our residents deserve to be protected. And in general it states that spacedbased weapons are something that the city of Richmond does not support. (applause)
Mayor: Okay, so would you call the public speakers?
Anderson:
Speakers are Amy Anderson, Jesse Beltrand, Dr. John Hall, Dr. Edward Spencer, Ben
Yes
Mayor: Could you come over here to the podium to speak, please?
Anderson: Good evening Council Members, Council Beckles. I really want to thank you for not deviating
your plan because I went on your Facebook and I saw why you came in office and you never deviated your
plan. You said that you wanted to first put the community first and from you doing that, I want to thank
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page
Page115
8 ofof183
173
548
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
you first. And secondly, as a psychologist, a child psychologist, I want to thank you for putting up with
some of those pains I have suffered along this way. But I am here in happiness, in a moment of greatness.
I have a perfect city. Nowhere in the United States, no targeted individual can get this kind of support
that I have gotten. We just needed just one person, one city. And because of that, you all are our heroes,
and we want to thank you. And I can go on and say much much.
But we are dying within because the technology is so sophisticated. Its hard for someone who has no
experience to fathom it. It is so sophisticated. So what we are saying to you all is please let us help you
understand enough, as someone outside looking in to our lives. Because were in pain, we are tortured
and we are humiliated every day in our lives because our lives have taken on a path. We dont even know
how or why we have this type of people on this planet who would harm in this type of way. And I just want
to thank you all. And you, Mayor, for you being in the cityworking in the service. Being in the service. For
others to do this, I know that should sadden you. (applause)
Jesse Beltrand: Good evening, Mayor, Vice Mayor and City Council Members. My name is Jesse Beltrand.
Im the president of the International Center Against the Use of Covert Technologies. Our organization was
formed in 2010 in Sacramento California for the purpose to bring awareness to the general public and
legal systems around the world about serious human rights abuses with regards to the utilization of
remote influencing technologies. My colleagues and co-speakers today, hopefully well get John Hall, who
was the author of Guinea Pigs, Technologies of Control, which have been sent to each of you and signed. I
also have Dr. Edward Spencer, whos a Neurologist from the Yale School of Medicine and Ben Colonson who
is a PHD in psychology, and therapist, and co-author of a book about PTSD. I myself am a retired
Sacramento City Fire Paramedic and a recent graduate of HMI and do provide therapy to victims.
In 2010 I met Dr. Hall and when meeting him I discovered this phenomenon and asked, Why isnt
anything being done about this? He said its because of the symptomology. If everyone went to traditional
medicine and complained about what they were experiencing, they would be railroaded into the mental
health institutions. The fact of the matter is, this is affecting all demographics of society: the poor, the
rich, the elite. I see victims on a monthly basis and hear from hundreds of people every week. I currently
have over 23,000 correspondences from victims not only within, here in the United States, but around the
world.
What we have discovered is that there are hot pockets within the United States where there are victims
that are being exposed to these types of technologies. And as our speakers continue to speak they will
explain to you how that has developed. Currently the hot spots are New York, Florida, Chicago, Texas, and
California. Unfortunately, in California, the East Bay has the highest amount of victims that we have
collected in our database, within our study within our organization. This is why we are currently here
today.
Beckles: Your time has expired Sir.
Beltrand: Okay, thank you.
Beckles: Dr. John Hall. Dr. John Hall.
Beltrand: Dr. Hall is unable to be reached so were going to have Dr. Spencer here.
Spencer:
Mr. Mayor, City Council, thank you. Thank you for attacking this very difficult problem. And
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page
Page116
9 ofof183
173
548
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
there are a lot of people around the world, especially in Europe, where I attended a counsel just recently,
in November, who thank you. Im a retired neurologist. I attended Stanford University, Yale University and
a residency at the University of California in San Francisco.
Ive studied this sort of problem for a period of time. And its been a mystery to me why medicine in
general does not approach this and study the multitude of documents that are out there. But this is the
case. And I wont answer this for you, because this is an ongoing study, ongoing problem. This is really
intense technology. Essentially what might be described as EEG heterodyning. The entire electrical activity
of the human brain can be captured in this super computer and certainly processed and then put back into
someone else. Imits science fiction. But unfortunately, its not science fiction. So naturally this is
difficult. So the technology is incredible. But basically this is a moral problem. Ethical problem. This is a
violation of the golden rule, any ethics, anything thats decent. And this is a major thing to consider. Its
also a violation of our constitutional rights. So thats an important thing to keep in mind.
To bring it back down to Richmond, I know there are a lot of targeted individuals here, and the police
encounter them. And cant understand this and help them. The medical community is hobbled by not
having a differential diagnosis. And many of the psychiatric disorders, they should say rule out
psychotronic disorders, but they dont. So they cant face it at all. Thank you.
Beckles: Ben Colonson
Colonson: I thank you all. Two minutes. Okay, lets go. Thank you all for your endurance. I see you listen
to a lot of humans. Im gonna talk really fast with two minutes to go. I am a psychologist. I have
evaluated many targeted individuals who have previously been diagnosed as delusional and psychotic and
my job is to deconstruct those diagnoses. Because of the methods of my colleagues that can actually
detect advanced nano-technology present in their bodies both through frequency emissions and
lymphaticbasicallylike when you fire a bullet theres a trajectory and the police can determine the
trajectory. There are chemical tests to do that. I was just gonna, very quickly, since its two minutes, this
is this months issue of Smithsonian Magazine that says, The Future is Here: Brain to Brain
Communication is Real. Targeted Individuals report synthetic telepathy, voices in their skull, people
putting thoughts in their head, things that up until now weve been told are complete delusion and lock
em up. But you know, the capabilities exist.
This is the National Nanotech Initiative. The last 15 years budgets of a billion and a half dollars just by the
federal governments non-black budgets. We dont know what they spend on the black budgets. Doing
experimental programs showing how nano sensors in people can give us much more data about humanity.
These technologies can be used for great good but they have apparently also been used for tremendous
evil in non-consensual human experimentation. There is great documentation on this.
I do think its a little unfortunate, that confusion about the Space Preservation Act. There arethe systems
SCADAS, theyre called. The acronym stands for Supervisory Control And Data Systems Systems. They
include a component of satellite communication from a central command post as well as components
inside the human beings, or targeted individuals. So although there is a component of these weapons
systems, and they are clearly weapons systems by the major nations on earth, theres an arms race on for
the mind at this time. Control of the human mind. The Human Brain Initiative is part of it. If I only have
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page
Page117
10 of
of183
173
548
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
two minutes I have to stop there. I hope you will listen to these people. They are suffering greatly as nonconsensual experimentees.
Beckles: A question, really quick, to the speaker. Could you repeat the names of those two references
that you gave, the magazines? Can you give me the names of those again, please?
Colonson: The first one, the current issue of the Smithsonian Magazine. A main stream magazine, which
in this months issue, says communicating brain to brain. And this is merely what they are releasing
publicly. The majority of the most advanced weapons systems are classified and we dont know the full
capabilities. This is just the supplemental to the presidents budget, this years Nanotechnology Initiative.
And what I didnt get to say in my two minutes is the National Registry of Environmental Professionals,
which certifies people to do all kinds of environmental quality testing, has just certified SCADAS,
Supervisory Control And Data Administration Systems, as something that needs to be studied for its
environmental impact on the environment in general. And I am part of the HSCADAS task force, how
these SCADAS systems are impacting human beings. And there are thousands of reports from targeted
individuals that crimes are being committed against them. And my intention in coming here tonight was to
support their claims so that law enforcement, with as much
Mayor: I think she asked you the names of the magazinesso
Beckles: Thank you very much. Lisa Becker.
Becker: Hi. Good evening. My name is Lisa Becker and I came here from Racine, Wisconsin. I have been
a victim of this technology for 14 years. I have been tortured for 14 years. My justice department has
failed me. My executive branch has failed me. My senators have failed me. My congressmen have failed
me. You are the only people in this country who have had the courage to even put this on the agenda.
Thats why I flew all this way to thank you, and to address you. This is torture. And it is enslavement. And
any one of these people can tell you the same thing. We have suffered desperately. And Im sorry if Im
emotional. But Im very tired. But if you wont save us, save yourselves. Because I promise you, this will
come back to every one of you. Every one of us in this country are going to be tapped into these computer
systems and you are gonna see what this feels like. Do something now while you still can. Thank you.
Council Member: I have a question. Could you be more specific in terms of how you feel that youve
beenthe injustice.
Becker: You mean in terms of the justice department failing me?
Council Member: Well in terms of your being a victim.
Becker: You mean in what Im feeling?
Council Member: Yeah, explain a little bit to me how you perceive yourself as being.
Becker:
Sure, well I have actual photographs of burns on my body. When I went to my doctor, the
response was, Well how do I know you didnt do that to yourself? How do you address that? Ive passed
two psychological evaluations. Not one but two. The one physician said, Youre sound as a bell. I have no
idea whats going on with you. When I go to sleep, when I go to try to sleep, I feel like Im being lit up
like a Christmas tree. I feel like every cell in my body just bouncing out of my body. I cant even describe
it. I get electric shock up my rectum. I get electric shock up my nose. Ive woken up with burns on the
end of my tongue. Ive had burns on the palms of both my hands. I vibrate. I vibrate. I can barely hold a
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page
Page118
11 of
of183
173
548
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
piece of paper without quivering. Does that answer your question?
Council Member: Im trying to find out whats the source.
Becker:
The source are these exotic weapons. They talk about, in 2977, they talk about the space
weapons, spaced-based weapons. Basically in that document they talk about exotic weapons. Thats what
were talking about. And the fact of the matter is they did complete that global surveillance network. My
cousin worked for the defense department. She worked on the global mapping of that system. And when I
told her what I was going through, all she could say was, Youre on your own. Well, I figured that out. I
figured that out. If you would please, I urge you to pass this. I realize you cant enforce it, but if you
would pass it, it might give other communities the courage to do the same thing and show our defense
department we are not the enemy. We are not to be attacked. We are not terrorists. Most of us are
defenseless women.
Mayor: Okay, thank you.
Becker: Thank you.
Beckles:
Our next speaker is Derrick Robinson, followed by Laquisha Baker, Dolores Hall, Kim, Alex,
Hello to all the legislators, and city hall, Javanka, my girl Amy over there. I have been a
Richmond resident 40 plus years. Ive seen two of my friends try and fight this fight. But their minds are
gone and theres no coming back. My mother was a Black Panther. They killed her. She was only 58 years
old. And Im just happy at this moment that somebody in our town, our city, has opened the doors for
many people who couldnt make it, didnt make it, and were survivors of it. And I just want to say thank
you.
Beckles: Dolores Hall.
Hall: I did not know you were going to call me to speak. But I will share. I head up the Los Angeles
Freedom from Covert Harassment Group. Its a support group. And I have about 300 people that is in that
group. And I get over 400 emails on a weekly basis of people asking me to help them, begging me, please
help. No one will listen to me. I am 65 years old and as I walk here, up to this podium, Im in so much
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page
Page119
12 of
of183
173
548
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
pain. I have burns all over my body. Theymy doctor I had treated with for 16 years, my legs swelled up
from the electric magnetic frequencies hitting me on my legshe told me to go to the hospital. And when I
went to the hospital they were supposed to put an IV in me. They sent me to the mental ward because
they said I did this to myself. I would never hurt me. I have been a victim since 2007. You cant see this
horrific electric hitting you. Electric is invisible. You take a remote control to turn your tv, turn on your
television. It hurts so bad. I want to thank you for opening your minds and your time today. I am a retired
legal investigator. I have asked all my friends, I have very prominent friends, to help me. They cant do
anything about this. It is way, way over our heads. They say its the shadow government. It is people that
cannot be touched. Please help us.
Beckles: Kim, next speaker.
Buckner: Hello, my name is Kimberly Buckner and I have been a targeted individual for a very long time.
The things that Ive experienced due to being targeted, they have been unreal. However, I can attest that
they are very real indeed. My life has been destroyed in every possible way and every day has been a
struggle for me. I am very grateful to be before you today due to Amy Andersons due diligence and to
everyone else involved. I thank you council members for giving us targeted individuals a chance to speak
and to be heard. And I pray that these atrocities will soon be brought to an end. But we need your help.
Thank you.
Beckles: Alex
Rafter: Good evening, my name is Alec Rafter. I am an NYU graduate and have spent much of my time
working in a financial holding company in San Francisco. I have been a targeted individual for eight years
six months. Im from Lafayette, California, which is in this county. I am here to support and corroborate
what these other speakers are trying to convey. This technology exists and is being used on a mass scale.
It is torturous, brutal and inhumane. It happens everywhere I go. People dont understand the capabilities
of this technology. The person I came with here tonight was being shocked and stabbed in this very room
with a directed energy weapon while waiting to speak with the council. My ears are getting frequency
tinnitus while I was sitting here waiting for you as well as technology called voice to skull Dr. Alan Frey.
Like I said, this happens everywhere I go in Northern and Southern California. Ive been tortured all day,
all night, minute after minute, year after year after year. We need your help and support to stop this, to
save us, and to prevent this from happening to others. Please support banning these so called spacedbased weapons. Thank you very much.
Beckles: Robert Swegan
Swegan: Good evening. My name is Robert Swegan. I live in Modesto California. Im here tonight after
being targeted for 12 years with direct energy weapons, voice to skull. I wake up in the middle of the
night in excruciating pain. Theres nobody I can call. Theres nobody to help me. You know, sometimes I
have suicidal idealization because theres no one to help. You know, Ive been diagnosed schizophrenic,
delusional, at 53 and 57 years old. Im a graduate of junior college with a degree in counseling and human
service. I commend you people for what youre doing here. I want toIm here to support my friends. And
I know this has been very difficult for me and my family. My familyI have 4 children. One is in prison
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page
Page120
13 of
of183
173
548
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
right now. I suspect he was here for about 45 minutes. And others will not even talk to me. My familys
been fragmented. I dont tell anybody whats happening to me anymore. Its a dark secret with me. I
cannot explain to people whats happening. The police in Modesto are at least talking to me now. Theyre
not taking me down to the mental health facility. I thank you very much for listening to me.
Beckles: Marilyn Languist
Languist:
Good evening Mayor and Council Members. Marilyn Languist, Richmond resident. I want to
thank Ms Anderson for bringing this topic forward and for bringing so many speakers. I urge you to adopt
this resolution. As has been said, the original Space Preservation Act was originally introduced by
Congressman Cosenich, co-sponsored by Congresswoman Barbara Lee and Congressman Pete Stark of the
Bay Area. And this concept was also voted on and supported unanimously by the United Nations to
prohibit weaponization of space and spaced-based weapons. These are clearly not good for anyone on
earth and not good for anyone in Richmond. You have to be aware that there are a lot of exotic weapons
research programs going on. Some of them covert, some of them not covert. A former Richmond resident
sent me a lot of emails last year about a public comment period for allowing US military testing of directed
energy weapons in the Olympic peninsula in the state of Washington, which is of great concern. In terms
of the types of weapons that are affecting these individuals, before you judge the targeted individuals, I
would suggest that you listen to them, take the time to really listen deeply to their experience. Try to put
yourself in their shoes for a moment. If you can believe them, then please do what you can to support
them. If youre not sure, then I urge you to take the precautionary principle, when in doubt error on the
side of extra protection for those who are vulnerable. So please do adopt this resolution. Thank you.
Beckles: Sylvia Gray White
White: Good evening. My name is Sylvia Gray White, a very long time Richmond resident. Tonight Im so
thankful and happy that our city is looking up, waking up and standing up. Approval of this agenda item
will make an impact on the whole world and will help us to restore our mother earth and our health. The
heavy metal toxins falling down on us daily from the chem trails are done by our military without our
approval and knowledge. Lead is one of the many chemicals in the chem trails even though our
government banned it decades ago. Banned it from paint, toys, even bullets, and other manufacturing
processes. This toxin has really negatively impacted my life. Lead is very toxic and there are no safe
levels. It displaces the calcium in your bones among many other illnesses, particularly with children. The
level of lead in my body has drastically increased in the past 3 years. Ive gotta get the lead out. We need
to stop this constant daily abuse of our universal rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. If you
cant feel good, you cant live good. I am not the only one breathing this pollution. If you breathe, youre
breathing it too. We have rights. Stand up for them! Now in order to stand Ive got to use a cane. But I
still can stand and will stand up for whats right.
Beckles: Our last speaker is Elizabeth Adams.
Adams: First and foremost Id like to pass this cell phone around. This is what electronic burns look like.
This is my 6 year old grand-daughter who has been targeted since birth. So can I just walk around and
show this to you?
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page
Page121
14 of
of183
173
548
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Mayor: Give it to the clerk.
Adams: This was taken less than 30 days ago at Eden hospital. Thats when you hear of the victim speak
of being electronically burned. That is my 6 year old grand-daughter. I am 59 years old. I have 6
grandchildren and 2 great grand- children. I first and foremost want to say that I thank God for every one
of you. And I mean literally from the bottom of my heart. I thank him for each one of you and I thank him
for the blessings that hes gonna bring your way just for addressing these issues. These issues are beyond
the average eye. The average eye cant even see it. So its not even worth even talking about in that
sense. I have sent each and every one of you information. Everything that I sent you is just what you
need to know. But theres one more thing left:
research into your local fusion center. Just look it up on line. That is where you will find information, ill
activities of some sort, that is going on withinIm not going to say city government because I cant
pinpoint it. But you need to look into your local fusion center. Secondly, mental health of children(timer
beeping).May I finish just two minutes please?
Mayor: No, I think we need to give everybody the same amount of time. Thank you.
Adams: Okay, no problem.
Beckles: That was the last speaker.
Mayor: (lady asked to speak) Maam, you know, if you didnt sign up you cant speak. Okay, I have Vice
Mayor Meyers.
Vice Mayor:
I was just gonna briefly say that the weaponization of space as the history that was so
eloquently described by Council Member McLaughlin is something that I think is extremely immoral and we
should not be, as a nation, engaging in and so Im gonna support this resolution based on that.
Mayor: Do we have any other speakers? Okay, hearing none, do we have a motion?
Beckles: I can make a motion. I share that we adopt the resolution thats put before us.
Mayor: Motion of second?
Beckles: Pinplay has something
Mayor: Oh, Councilman Pinplay
Pinplay:
I just want to address for a second this whole idea about weaponization of space and there
seems to be this assumption that just because Ronald Reagan supported Star Wars, its automatically
become some unmitigated evil. The context in which it was considered a problem was simply because
there was this perception that Star Wars or any kind of strategic defense initiative could not be made
foolproof. And it could not be made foolproof because the opponent, particularly a very well-armed
opponent like the Soviet Union could launch like tens of thousands of dummy missiles at any one point
and so it would be almost impossible to intercept all of them and to distinguish the nuclear missiles from
the dummy missiles. And the understanding was that it would be that there could be a problem created
because based on the overestimation of the effectiveness of Star Wars, namely that America might think
that it was too effective and therefore, go for a first strike and knock out all the Soviet weapons. Or, on
the other hand, the Soviets might feel it was too effective and go for a preemptive strike beforehand. And
it was only in that specific cold war context that Star Wars was considered a horrible idea. Actually, Star
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page
Page122
15 of
of183
173
548
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Wars is not a particularly bad idea, the whole idea is that you can knock out someones weapons before
they enter your air space, in fact, long before they enter your air space. And this, for example, was
practiced more than 20 years ago, in the Gulf War, when the Patriot system modification of this was used
when the Patriot system knocked out some of the Iraqi missiles that were launched at Israel. And it is not
just a perfectly valid system, it is actually a particularly useful system, in the time that we have now
where there are nations that are not quite as well armed as the Soviet Union used to be in the 1980s.
Which may not have the capability to launch tremendous numbers of missiles at any one time. And, in
fact, this is a fairly useful system to have. And so this automatic knee jerk reaction that because Reagan
supported Star Wars and at the time it was considered a bad idea and so for that purpose it is considered
a bad idea forever, I just think this is a wrong understanding of the system. And I just wanted to mention
that.
Mayor: So we have Council Member McLaughlin next.
McLaughlin: So, I justthe reason I was interrupting because I dont think we should get into it. Thats
kind of way off base. I was just giving the history of this in general. I will say that there were some of us
in the 80s that were talking about a nuclear freeze like to stop the arms war rather than weapons in
space. You know, I think space should be for exploration and good things to learn, scientifically. Not for a
weapons trace.
Mayor: Wait, no, were not having anything from the audience. Council Member Martinez.
Martinez: Yes, just last week on 60 Minutes there was a special on the reintroduction to the arms war,
with people trying to develop missiles to take out communication satellites. But any kind of war effort is
wrong. And we need to do whatever we can to stop all war efforts. Now when I was in university in the
1980s for humanities class, I did a paper on a science fiction novel. What I actually did was, I took all of
the predictions in this science fiction novel, and then I went to magazines and newspapers, and I was
surprised to find that every single prediction in this science fiction novel, that was written 20 years earlier,
had already come true. And they were happening there, then, in 1980. So its easy for me to see that
things which are wrong can happen because we have the wrong mindset. We have the mindset which is a
war mindset and this proposition that was put forth by Cosenich was to change our attitudes towards one
of seeking peace, and thats why Im endorsing it.
Mayor: Okay, Vice Mayor.
Vice Mayor: Well, I want to say that I do think this debate is, it is on topic, because the debate on Star
Wars is sort of, was part of what initiated this. And what I would say, and its been said, that any sort of
in my viewthe idea that we dont have enough tools to kill each other here on earth and so that we need
to start doing it in space, that just is simply immoral. And you know, it may be that some wars are
unavoidable. That may be true. But whatever we can do to get our country to move away from that mind
set and move away from utilizing new methods of war, we should support. And so thats why I support this
resolution.
Mayor: Okay, if theres nobody else, lets vote. Wait. Council Member Pinplay.
Pinplay: So the motion before us, does that include things like chem trails and stuff, or no?
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page
Page123
16 of
of183
173
548
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Mayor: Well, let me, I think hes bringing up a good point, because, Im really confused. I think that the
resolution itself is very simple. It simply says, the city of Richmond thereby supports the Space
Preservation Act and companion Space Preservation Treaty to ensure that individuals will not be targets of
spaced-based weapons. So I see that. All the testimony Ive heard tonight is about targeted individuals.
And so, I mean, Im confused. Is this about spaced-based weapons or is it about targeted individuals? And
if individuals are targeted, whos targeting them and why? I just dont understand it.
Beckles: Its simple enough. Its saying that, on the thereforeas you read, we are supporting this Space
Preservation Act and companion Space Preservation Treaty and the reason were doing this is that
individuals will not be targets of spaced-based weapons, which is what theyre saying. All this stuff is high
technology, itsand sothats what were adopting here. And you know, whether you believe it or not, one
thing that was very clear, and Ive met with folks a lot around this issue, and some of them Im just
hearing tonight. And even the ones I heard tonight, just out of compassion for folks that are saying help
us, and us supporting this, by adopting this resolution, I think it sends out a message that, you know, we
sympathize with you, we support you, and the very least we can do is just pass this resolution to make
sure that you feel the support and love and sympathy that you deserve. Its simple, it reads right there
Mayor. Thats all were trying to pass. Whats there before you. Thats all were trying to pass. Dont
complicate it. Its simple, so vote it yes or no.
Mayor: I sympathize with everyone who is suffering some kind of affliction. But on the other hand, you
know, in 1967, the US adopted, or the President signed the treaty on the principles guarding the activities
of states in the exploration and use of outer space including the moon and other celestial bodies. So the
US government has acted on this, and they have, within that particular treaty, is a ban on using outer
space for military purposes. So, I just dont understand what were talking about. Are we talking about the
weaponization of space? Are we talking about chem trails? Are we talking about individuals who are being
targeted? If so, by whom and why? I mean, you know, Im just a dumb city council person and this is way,
way over my head. And I frankly think that its sort of way out of the purview of what this city council
could be taking up.
Weve got real problems here. Weve got potholed roads, weve got a budget thats out of balance, weve
got crime, weve got greenhouse gases. Weve got all these things to worry about and here Im being
asked to support a resolution that deals with things like chem trails and particle beams and plasmas and
mind control technologies. I just dont know enough about it. If I were an expert Id probably take a side,
but Im not. And so for that reason Im just not gonna support it. Maybe some time Ill learn more and be
more oriented
Beckles: Id like to call the questions.
Mayor: Council Member Bates
Bates: Well, it is confusing. Im gonna support the resolution for the simple reason that weve voted on
lot of dumber ideas than this resolution represents. And again, we know that we dont control the
universe, we dont control Congress. So this is the least of my worries. So, Im gonna support it. Now call
for the questions.
Mayor: Does anybody else want to talk about it? Okay, lets just vote.
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page
Page124
17 of
of183
173
548
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Beckles: Council Member Pinplay? No. The motion passes 5-2 with Council Member Pinplay voting no,
and Mayor Butt voting no.
Bates: One reason I voted for it was there wasnt one speaker in opposition of it.
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page
Page125
18 of
of183
173
548
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
1 of 1
http://richmondstandard.com/2015/05/richmond-council-passes-resolutio...
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
More
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page
Page126
19 of
of183
173
548
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
6/5/2016 6:44 AM
1 of 1
http://www.eastbaytimes.com/portlet/article/html/fragments/print_article....
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
RICHMOND -- A city resolution banning space weapons within city limits has prompted dozens of calls to the Richmond Police
Department in recent days to ask the agency to investigate the alleged use of chips, bugs and other devices for mind and body
control.
On May 19, the City Council approved a resolution supporting the Space Preservation Act and Space Preservation Treaty
permanently banning "space-based weapons," such as microchips planted in people's bodies and micro waves that supporters
believe are used by nefarious sources to harm them.
The resolution was written by Councilwoman Jovanka Beckles, who works as a mental health specialist for Contra Costa County,
and aimed at "making all Richmond residents feel safe," she said.
"I don't intend to ignore the concerns from residents who say they have been exposed to these attacks that have caused them great
emotional and bodily harm," Beckles said.
The fallout has prompted worries that Richmond, which is working hard to remold its image in recent years, will be dismissed as
slightly off by the news media and other municipalities.
" I am trying to figure out how we can use this newfound fame to help market Richmond, much as desolate eastern Nevada has
used the Extraterrestrial Highway to lure tourists to an otherwise deserted stretch of desert highway," joked Richmond Mayor Tom
Butt in a recent online posting.
But the issue actually started last June, when Richmond police Capt. Mark Gagan was asked by Beckles to meet with residents who
said they were being targeted by space technology. Eager to show the department was sensitive to residents' concerns, Gagan
agreed.
"My desire was how to better serve this population from a public safety standpoint," said Gagan, a 20-year veteran with the
department. "There are people who have a huge amount of stress, anxiety and fear. These issues have public safety implications
no matter how far-fetched they seem."
The meeting had the best of intentions. But it appears to have also motivated conspiracy theorists who began to see the city as an
ally. Gagan began receiving invitations to speak at conferences organized by the "targeted individuals" community, and a rumor
started that the city had a task force devoted to uncovering government conspiracies. One organization even gave Gagan a
"humanitarian award" for his work on the issue.
"People were thrilled that someone was finally listening to them," Gagan said.
Since that meeting, he estimates that he's received more than 100 calls from people from as far away as Ireland who say they want
Richmond police to investigate their particular situations. Gagan always takes the time to explain that the department looks at facts
and has so far found no evidence to support concerns raised by callers.
"We try to refocus the conversation, and if they are local, get them into a managed program of medication and supervision," Gagan
said.
Contact Karina Ioffee at 510-262-2726 or kioffee@bayareanewsgroup.com. Follow her at Twitter.com/kioffee
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page
Page127
20 of
of183
173
548
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
6/5/2016 6:47 AM
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Stan J. Caterbone
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUPFreedom From
THE DISCLOSURE
Karen Stewart graduated from Florida State University in 1979 with a BS degree in German Language
and a minor or co-major equivalent in Fine Art. She worked for NSA (National Security Agency) from
1982 to 2010. Her resume will follow.
interrogated for over an hour, while my car was dog sniffed and searched. I was ordered to return to
Lancaster rather than continue on to Washington, D.C., and was ordered not to enter any federally
owned property again. The following is a video of my statement:
Statement and Video of False Imprisonment re Handcuffed and Interrogation for an hour at NSA
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page
Page128
21 of
of183
173
548
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Headquarters (National Security Agency at Ft. Meade, Maryland) by 8 NSA Police officers on March 9,
2015 Recorded on March 11, 2016
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FeXlaQn5Nhs
Karen Stewart's resume at the NSA is as follows: I Worked various projects over the years, not
just USSR/Russia, but various countries researching/reporting on foreign military status and alliances,
weapons development and proliferation, the Chernobyl disaster and aftermath, the fall of the Iron
Curtain
and
changing
relations
among
newly
liberated
countries,
economic
and
diplomatic
developments of certain target countries. I researched and wrote a series of intelligence reports in
support of Operation Iraqi Freedom that kept secret Russian countermeasures sold to Iraq from
wreaking havoc on the American invasion. This ultimately is what got me fired because I questioned
why my work was used to promote another employee who had no experience with but, was credited
with my work .
The following transcript of an interview by Karen Stewart in which she describes the lethal
electromagnetic weapons and her experience on being on the receiving end was taken from the article
titled NSA Whistleblower Comes Out of the Shadows Into the Light and can be found at:
http://canadafreepress.com/article/nsa-whistleblower-comes-out-of-the-shadows-intothe-light
The article was written by Sher Zieve -- Bio and Archives and published March 28, 2016. The byline is
as follows: In February, 2014 I published an interview of an NSA Whistleblower. This is a follow-up to
that column. Due to recent threats to her person and other exigent circumstances, the Whistleblower
has decided to come out of the shadows and into the light. I am honored that she again chose me to
write her story.
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page
Page129
22 of
of183
173
548
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
infraction by attacking me. Threats were made to paint my complaint as paranoid and to fire me for a
non-existent mental illness if I did not drop my effort to get credit for and the promotion for my own
work, given to the wrong woman. These threats quickly took shape as false accusations against me by
the guilty personnel obviously coached by Security, manifested with stalking harassment masquerading
as an investigation by NSA Security goons from 2006-2009. In late 2010, despite all evidence
showing my innocence from ridiculous and impossible charges, I was fired by an NSA Kangaroo court
with a predetermined agenda. My EEOC appeal (lawsuit) had been accepted for adjudication and the
judge had ordered no adverse action until its adjudication but NSA ignored his orders.
I moved from Columbia, Maryland back to my familys hometown of Tallahassee, Florida in 2011.
All was quiet until February 2015 when I instructed the law firm I had hired to subpoena evidence from
the Maryland Department of Motor Vehicles identifying a burglar (a now retired NSA Executive) who had
broken into my home very shortly after I had tried to make my 2006 Inspector General request for an
investigation, and stolen extra house, car, and mail keys as well as illegally bugging (burst bug) our
home and phone/internet to facilitate further harassment and likely search for blackmail material (no
luck for them there).
After the subpoena, I began noticing Security types in Tallahassee following me and photostalking me by March/April. Their license plates suggested Naval Security Group from Pensacola and
NSA Security personnel from Georgia (Augusta) and Texas (San Antonio). A quick check with the Leon
County Sheriffs Department, specifically Duty Officer deputy Canon, confirmed that NSA also had
personnel land at a private airport and deputies had escorted them the the Phipps property north of
Lake Jackson (near where I now live) for a secret exercise, just before the second round of stalking
harassment began. The sequence of events seems to have been for NSA Security to contact the Naval
Security Group in Pensacola, Florida (Headquartered at Ft. Meade, Maryland along with NSA) to initially
stalk and photograph me under ridiculous false pretenses until NSA could send its own Security
personnel to Tallahassee. Once there, under guise of authority, it appears that NSA enlisted the help of
the Florida Department of Law Enforcement (FDLE) and its civilian group, InfraGard, made up of
civilians recruited from their Ride-Along programs. As usual, NSA personnel fabricated some big lie as
to why the civilians should actively and passively stalk and harass me, and despite quite obvious
questions about why laws and due process were to be completely suspended in my case, the group
eagerly jumped at the opportunity for hundreds to gang up on one person (for Federal money, I may
add).
Thus, under NSA tutelage and FDLE auspices, suddenly I was a cast-iron target, meaning
multiple people covered me wherever I was, whatever I did. Cars were even stationed near my home
overnight on rotating shifts, beeping to each other when changing shifts but also for my benefit. NSA
also sought out willing neighbors to augment their snooping and harassment efforts, which could be
anything from hosting an NSA Security goon for accessibility to my property, both home (to bug and
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page
Page130
23 of
of183
173
548
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
monitor short-distance transmissions) and car (to install and switch out vehicle GPS trackers to
facilitate car stalking and impeding as harassment. ) Those were the active participants, others not
assigned to me on a certain shift were ordered to quickly text in to a special site the big bad threat to
report my location and time I was there. People even snooped in my shopping carts to be able to tattle
to someone about what I was doing, what I was buying. (God help us, she bought bananas!!! Save the
children!).
This was annoying enough but I tried to ignore it because I thought NSA once again was going
for the usual See, shes paranoid, reporting harassment every day now just dismiss her lawsuit!
But I did report acts of harassment that caused physical damage such as hit and run,
purposely sideswiping my car, (This is exatly what happened to the PETTITIONER on May 9,
2016 enroute to MEDEXPRESS for pain medications) and botching the placement/removal of
a GPS tracker under my rear spoiler that destroy my spoiler. (They feared my mechanic
would find their tracker so they botched its removal the night before my appointment). I
even made fun of my stalkers when I could, using my hobby art shop on a popular internet
site to create bumper magnets making fun of them. After all, they were mostly nave,
unsophisticated boobs who desperately imagined that they were little James Bonds and that
the greatest existential threat to their country was a woman waiting for her lawsuit to be
decided, living in Tallahassee, walking her dogs, visiting friends.
In late November 2015, however, NSA apparently decided that I was not sufficiently
being intimidated by their civilian confederacy of dunces to back off my lawsuit to recover
my stolen salary and stolen retirement at the appropriate pay level. In 2009 I had
researched gang-stalking and discovered it was a real and growing phenomenon, but when
electrical harassment was mentioned, I could not really grasp the concept and wondered
about its existence. But I was to find out first hand in November 2015 that it does exist and
is a horrific crime against humanity.
NSA and its operatives started using small, mobile devices called Directed Energy
Weapons (DEWs) against me and my family in the night. These mobile weapons emit
multiple types of electrical emanations from ultrasonic, to microwaves modulated to radio
frequencies, to other kinds of wave variations I cant say I understand yet. Now, with the
help of certain mercenary and morally depraved neighbors, the effort is almost 24/7 now
with the intention being torture and slow-kill. These types of weapons over a lengthy time,
cause cancer, autoimmune disease, heart attacks, seizures, strokes, etc. It is the perfect
stealth murder weapon for a corrupt government.
At this point, when we leave the house, a criminal base of stalkers has been enlisted
by NSA to follow us and aim the DEWs at us wherever feasible to increase exposure in order
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page
Page131
24 of
of183
173
548
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
to speed up death, with the help of the InfraGard dimwits still texting in my location like
good little sheeple.
The Leon County Sheriffs Department as well as the Tallahassee Police Department
are dragging their feet, making excuses, denying any such thing exists, or insulting me when
I try to enlist their help to come up with a strategy to combat this new crime before I or
one of my family is dead. They cant quite grasp the fact that this is domestic terrorism and
nothing protects the police or any official from this new weapon held and wielded by
criminals. Yet, plenty of recruits in their ranks have experience using the mobile DEWs in
Iraq. It is very interesting to me that the Naval Security Group headquartered at Ft. Meade
with NSA, is also called the Silent Warriors because they specialize in the use of Directed
Energy Weapons. Im sure the Naval Security Group base in Pensacola has many on hand
and may have even gotten a request from NSA to borrow a few for their secret exercise in
Tallahassee.
Clearly, NSA is of the opinion that you do not have Constitutional Rights unless they
say you do. If they use this to get rid of an inconvenient lawsuit such as mine instead of
simply settling for a tenth of the cost of harassment, then they must feel confident they
can murder anyone, anywhere, for any reason and get away with itincluding any leader or
politician.
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page
Page132
25 of
of183
173
548
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
At the very least, for the past few months to a year it has become increasingly evident thatalthough
not allmany agencies of the US Federal government have become increasingly dirty, perverse and
corrupt and require a deep and thorough cleaning.
The US Secret Service has previously been exposed as including claims of involvement with
prostitutes, leaking sensitive information, publishing pornography, sexual assault, illegal wiretaps,
improper use of weapons and drunken behavior and the IRS was caught and admitted to denying
Obamas political enemies (aka TEA Party, Christians, religious Jews, conservatives) their Constitutional
rights while allowing progressive groups (aka Liberals, Leftists, Marxists, Maoists, Socialists,
Communists) theirs. Andlove him, hate him or fall somewhere in-betweenEdward Snowden shone a
very bright light on the unconstitutional domestic mega-spying of one of these clandestine agencies
the National Security Agency. Thus far, under Obamas increasingly iron rule, few-to-no members of
these agencies have even been indicted by Congress for their blatant crimes against the American
people.
The NSA appears to have begun as a patriotic organization that was geared toward protecting the USA
and its citizens. Whether or not that was its original intended purpose is a subject for discussion and
speculation. However, portions of the NSA seem to have devolved into something very sinister. Todays
interview will concentrate on this agency.
NSA Analyst. Due to a number of substantive reasons, this former Analysts identity cannot be divulged
at this time and will be referred to as W. I have, however, confirmed this individuals prior employment
and credentials via a well-known NSA Whistleblower. The information disseminated to me, amongst
other things tells a sordid story of corruption and how employees are silenced into submissionvia fear
within the agency,
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page
Page133
26 of
of183
173
548
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
The Interview
Sher:Thanks so much for being with me, today, in order to provide essential additional information to
the public on how many of their tax dollars are really being spent. You were employed by the NSA for
over two decades. Would you tell the readers what initially attracted you to the agency as well as how it
has deteriorated over time?
Karen Stewart: Like many people from families with a strong history of serving our country, coming
out of college, I looked to find a way to best utilize my particular interests and talents in service to my
fellow Americans. The mission of the NSA it seemed to me, was to stop threats coming to our shores.
Its charter clearly targeted foreign nationals on foreign soil who did or could intend us harm. That
appealed to me as a righteous endeavor and honorable tack for my life to take.
Sher: Youve shared with me how the NSA deals with its employees who bring legitimate complaints to
their superiors. How thoroughly intimidating and threatening are their behaviors toward those who balk
at their adverse treatment? Would you give a few examples?
Karen Stewart: Apparently the nature of NSA Security degenerated under General Michael Hayden,
the previous Director of NSA (DIRNSA), who promoted a very questionable mid-level Security manager
to a power position within Security. Hayden had originally been tasked to eviscerate NSA since a very
shallow and short-sighted Congress believed that the fall of the Iron Curtain meant no danger existed
anywhere anymore that required the existence of a robust NSA presence. There evolved, under him, a
gratuitously vicious bully mindset that employees were to be intimidated at any opportunity not only to
drive them out of NSA but to cut back on people reporting problems that made NSA look bad, especially
problems involving upper management.
Under Hayden and his successor, General Keith Alexander, the filing of complaints to or requests for
investigations by the NSA EEO or the OIG (Office of the Inspector General) were often inexplicably
blown off despite adequate evidence or the presence of willing witnesses. Then the person who had
filed the complaint would be subjected to an out of cycle reinvestigation interview with Security as
well as polygraph exam, wherein the tone of the Security person was not neutralas it should bebut,
hostile with far-fetched or even ridiculous non-issues presented as potentially problematic. This was a
Security shot across the bow to warn the person that he had crossed the line by filing the complaint. If
he pursued the complaint, Security would lean on his managers to heavily discourage him from doing
what he thought was proper and was indeed a protected action under the law. If he persisted, did his
own amateur investigation, or told coworkers about the situation, he might be called down to Security
multiple times and accused of being paranoid and delusional based on his complaint, and his job
threatened.
The worse the infraction reported, especially if a high level manager looked to be involved, the more
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page
Page134
27 of
of183
173
548
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
severe the reaction by Security. In cases of egregious wrong-doing by a manager, Security would
review the personnel files, medical files, and financial statements to find anything they could use to
threaten or blackmail him with, or pretend to misinterpret some tidbit of information as something it
was not.
Some people were forced to sign admissions of guilt of preposterous misinterpretations of facts in order
to keep their jobs, thereby killing their credibility and complaint. When nothing was found in such files
that could be used, a false accusation of espionage or leaking classified materials ginned up by Security,
was used to justify a Security intrusion into the persons home to search for blackmail material, further
assess the interests and personality of the targeted individual (TI), and plant bugs and abscond with an
extra set of keys for further intrusions. The more the person objected to being bullied, the more heavyhanded Security became, insisting that hostility toward them indicated wrong-doing on the TIs part.
Thus the TI would become harried and harassed for a crime he never committed, if it ever
even was committed, and to repeated accusations by Security Psych services of a nonexistent mental illness, more than adequately supported by years of internal, psychological
evaluations stating he was mentally sound (Paranoia with delusions is rare and certainly
never occurs overnight, but that does not deter a Security psychologist attack dog, whose
favorite mode of attack employs reference to this malady).
The more a person stood his ground, the more personal it became to Security, which then
became dedicated to the personal destruction of the TI. Under the pretext of the fake
accusation of espionage or leaking classified information, Security would slander the
individual with his coworkers, work friends and managers to isolate him and apply yet more
pressure. Many backed away from supporting the TI in fear for their careers and maybe even
freedom. Certainly this sent a message to the workforce in the TIs area that NSA Security
was at its essence, a rogue, unaccountable and psychotic entity that was to be greatly
feared.
Once NSA Security had decided upon the removal of the TI for failing to be sufficiently
cowed, then false evidence was given to the FBI liaisons assigned to NSA. This would
engender a fraudulent FISA warrant, which loosed FBI surveillance and investigators upon
the person for a few weeks or months, further slandering him to his work and social circles
and thereby putting pressure on him by their constant presence. When the FBI would find no
basis for the accusation, they would drop the case and move on. However, at that point,
Security would send in their own personnel sans warrant, to overtly stalk and harass the TI ,
24/7.
Page
Page135
28 of
of183
173
548
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Karen Stewart: In my career, promotions were always hard to come by, meted out perhaps every
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page
Page136
29 of
of183
173
548
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
five years if you were a good or exceptional worker, but male managers discovered that they held the
keys to paradise in regard to attractive or even acceptable women willing to take shortcuts. These
were the women who would make promotions in stunningly rapid succession with little to no
accomplishments - of their own, that is. While others killed themselves with years of grueling shift work
or even multiple dangerous foreign assignments only to find themselves evaluated as a 3.6 on a scale
of 5, when an attractive, morally loose recent college graduate would receive a 4.8 for essentially
alphabetizing a shelf of reference books her first 6 months on the job. This made many, many people
bitter and certainly sent the wrong signal to the hardest workers and the most talented. Though many
stopped being as dedicated to their jobs, others did indeed press ahead and worked tirelessly knowing
their reward was the mission accomplished and not likely appropriate recognition. Capable men
despaired of receiving deserved promotions and women almost feared being promoted for exceptional
work, fearing they would be assumed to be one of the typically incapable promotion bimbos among the
bloated management. Expertise and knowledge became commodities to guard and not share with new
workers, fearing you would not reap the benefits of your own work. This of course created a situation
where expertise and insight must be gained and regained from scratch, losing precious time training up
area or target experts to the detriment of the mission.
It was very discouraging to see immature or degenerate bosses spending their time flirting and chasing
skirts, the very same people who were charged with competently reviewing your work, (keeping
apprised of the big picture so people felt free to specialize their research), and whose responsibility it
was to accurately and honestly represent their people before promotion boards. But the atmosphere of
secrecy, the strict laws about divulging names of NSA employees or anything that occurred there,
emboldened certain men to believe that their wives and families would never know of their
indiscretions, and turned work time into play time for them. And now apparently young males are also
being pursued as sexual toys. One has to wonder what is being missed in the realm of highly perishable
intelligence leads by distracted managerial incompetents.
Sher: As an additional example of NSA intimidation, one of the things youd said may be shared is your
experience with the 3 Amigos. Would you tell us about them?
Karen Stewart:There were three eccentric looking older males who were often seen in the NSA OPS1
cafeteria together, whom we also got to know by word of mouth, as master electricians well-versed in
computer science. They were nicknamed by some in the analyst field as Rasputin, Santa, and Choo
Choo or the engineer, due to their highly unusual appearances and dress. One eye witness being
harassed on yet another NSA Security retaliatory witch hunt, reported seeing one of these men at her
home, on her property, when she discovered indications that her home had been broken into, her cable
box broken into, and her phone hacked, leaving tell-tale clicking sounds at regular intervals whenever
she used her phone. Any phone tap done by warrant is done at the carriers hub under their auspices
and will not click, only illegal hack jobs click.
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page
Page137
30 of
of183
173
548
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
somewhere he should not have been, but recognized him by his highly unusual appearance from work.
When she attempted to look him up in the NSA data base by career specialty, she found that what
should have been his photo, which should have been a source of pride since he was of the rank to be a
Flag Badger (Manager whose rank is senior enough to garner a photo with the American flag in the
background), was instead a photo of a desert animal called a Meercat indicating that he wanted his
identity hidden from the general NSA population.
Sher: With regards to many who have said that the NSAs collection of meta-data on all forms of
communication between legal citizens of the USA is unconstitutional, also indicated is the fact that not
one terrorist act has been stopped by said collection. It appears good old-fashioned police work is what
still gets the perp. In your opinion, is this accurate?
Karen Stewart: I think it is indeed true that the meta data collection ruse within the USA distracts
from tried and true research and investigation, which the latter method apparently DID INDEED
uncover the 9/11 plot months before it happened, well in time to have prevented it, according to two
separate analysts with whom I have spoken, one just two days after 9/11 as he broke down and
sobbed his heart out, repeating We could have saved them! We could have saved them! But they
wouldnt let us report it!, and the other several years later, who maintained the same story of being
threatened and forbidden to report any warning about 9/11, then being harassed and fired for a nonexistent mentally illness. However, it is a good means to track your political enemies and detractors and
their affiliates within the US - for future reference? It would appear much more for the self-preservation
and expansion of NSA as the ubiquitous Orwellian Big Brother than for the protection of the USA. With
the power the NSA wields, it could easily influence border control issues and immigration issues to
make us not as susceptible to terrorist intrusions and infiltrations, but that would undermine their
power grab and expansion within the US, something never intended at NSAs creation - and for good
reason.
Sher:As a former long time employee of the NSA, what do you believeif anythingcan be done to
correct the problems within the agency?
Karen Stewart:There is no doubt that NSA is now run by those sycophants and sociopaths who are
the least desirable to have in any position of such sensitivity and trust and are purging NSA ranks of
people with integrity. Compromising activity that would rightfully cost you your clearance, is now
viewed as intrinsic perks of the job once you reach a certain pay grade. These lesser leaders have
turned NSA into an American Gestapo Wanna-Be agency. NSA lost its way with non-serious super grade
playboys not mature enough for the responsibility of the job of managing and directing NSA,
compounding the problem by promoting sycophants to protect their backs as well as lightweights with
whom to have sexcapades behind office doors, but in that group also has risen opportunistic
sociopaths and psychopaths attracted to more and more power, any way they can get it, and by
conniving and ruthlessness have blown past incompetent, distracted management to change the very
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page
Page138
31 of
of183
173
548
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
nature of the NSA from watchman to the American people to jack booted prison guard.
If the Legislative Branch is possessed of anyone with the least bit of courage and common sense, they
would demand super clearances for those on the Intelligence Oversight Committees so that years or
decades of abusive behaviors, kingdom building, or even crimes can not continually be swept under the
rug by telling these particular politicians, You dont have the need to know, just trust us. Obviously,
they cannot be trusted. An appointment to that Committee would of course have to become much more
exclusive, requiring a thorough vetting as any job with a Top Secret clearance should. But to deal with
the toxic management at NSA now, I would require every Flag Badger and Security manager to account
for himself and what he adds to the mission. If he is pork, retire him or require him to laterally transfer
to another agency. Before that however, I would require that every single Flag Badger and every
Security group manager take a polygraph by non-NSA affiliated or non-NSA sympathetic sources to
account for the millions of dollars wasted on their vicious and illegal war on NSA employees who
dutifully report fraud, waste, abuse as well as sexual predation and treason. Those who are found to be
guilty of such things as falsifying accusations against innocent employees; fabricating false witnesses
and evidence; engaging in illegal acts of breaking and entering; falsifying FISA warrant justifications;
lying to the FBI about a targeted victims criminality; falsifying psychological assessments; subverting
lie detector exams by screaming at the targeted subject during or just before the exam to create false
impressions of guilt; hiding or destroying exonerating evidence supporting their victims claims;
intimidating or roughing up witnesses; coordinating or participating in criminal stalking and harassment
activities, illegal break-ins, illegal wire taps, organizing and paying civilian groups under the table to
augment harassment of targeted employees, and lastly, conspiring to effect or cover up any or all of
these actions. And any NSA employee in that group who pleads the 5th, should be fired and stripped of
his retirement since this type of betrayal rots a country from within. NSA must be recreated, and
returned to the stated task in their founding charter of focusing on foreign enemies overseas.
Sher: W, so much of the information youve provided is truly astounding! Thanks so much for being
with us today and I hope youll be available for another should ongoing events require one.
Click to view 3 Comments
Sher Zieve is an author and political commentator. Zieves op-ed columns are widely carried by multiple
internet journals and sites, and she also writes hard news. Her columns have also appeared in The
Oregon Herald, Dallas Times, Sacramento Sun, in international news publications, and on multiple
university websites. Sher is also a guest on multiple national radio shows.
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page
Page139
32 of
of183
173
548
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1NSA Whistleblower Comes Out of the Shadows Into the Light Karen Stewarty
various
projects
over
the
years,
not
just
USSR/Russia,
but
various
countries
researching/reporting on foreign military status and alliances, weapons development and proliferation,
the Chernobyl disaster and aftermath, the fall of the Iron Curtain and changing relations among newly
liberated countries, economic and diplomatic developments of certain target countries. I researched and
wrote a series of intelligence reports in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom that kept secret Russian
countermeasures sold to Iraq from wreaking havoc on the American invasion. This ultimately is what
got me fired because I questioned why my work was used to promote another employee who had no
experience with but, was credited with my work.
Note...Due to the Top Secret nature of the work, the above summary is slightly vague, by design.
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page
Page140
33 of
of183
173
548
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
The Interview
Sher: Karen, thanks for taking the time to speak with me and its so good to have you back and this
time under your name! As a Whistleblower, what finally made you decide to come out from the
shadows?
Karen: I always intended to link my name with my story because it is a story that needs to be told, but
since I have a lawsuit against NSA (technically an appeal of an unlawful, employer action, i.e. my
termination at the 28 point year of my career for trying to request an investigation by the NSA
Inspector General), sitting under a gag order demanded by NSA, on the docket at the Equal
Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) in Baltimore, I could not do so without risking the
adjudication going against me for that reason alone. However, in 2015 NSA Security made the decision
to yet again engage in a massive slander campaign against me in my new location, thus breaking its
own gag order so I feel no compunction to be held to a standard required by the EEOC judge at NSAs
request that NSA itself clearly holds in utter contempt.
Sher: Since we last talked, a lot has happened with you. You have refused to drop your discrimination
lawsuit against the NSA and have shared with me that the agency has stepped up its efforts against
youpersonally.
Youre now being stalked by what appear to be NSA operatives. Is that correct? As you reported to me
they, also, seem to be using electronic emanation technology to both stop and damage you. I believe
former NSA employee and Whistleblower Russel Tice reported on this, also. This is really deep dark
side information. Would you tell the readers what theyre doing to you, [possibly] others and why?
Karen: First of all, the case STEWART V. NSA is a righteous lawsuit, (brought in 2010) meaning it is a
clear case of employer abuse of power and position to an egregious and even premeditated criminal
level meant to circumvent whistleblower protection laws like the No Fear Act. Simply put, I asked the
NSA Inspector General (IG) to investigate why my award-winning intelligence report series supporting
Operation Iraqi Freedom (2003) was used to promote an entirely different woman twice (2004 & 2005)
one who had nothing to do with my reports whatsoever, and was a known incompetent, but had
methodically sexually compromised many of the male managers within the Weapons & Space (W&S)
Directorate. Instead of following correct procedure, the IG and NSA Security decided to cover up the
infraction by attacking me. Threats were made to paint my complaint as paranoid and to fire me for a
non-existent mental illness if I did not drop my effort to get credit for and the promotion for my own
work, given to the wrong woman. These threats quickly took shape as false accusations against me by
the guilty personnel obviously coached by Security, manifested with stalking harassment masquerading
as an investigation by NSA Security goons from 2006-2009. In late 2010, despite all evidence
showing my innocence from ridiculous and impossible charges, I was fired by an NSA Kangaroo court
with a predetermined agenda. My EEOC appeal (lawsuit) had been accepted for adjudication and the
judge had ordered no adverse action until its adjudication but NSA ignored his orders.
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page
Page141
34 of
of183
173
548
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
I moved from Columbia, Maryland back to my familys hometown of Tallahassee, Florida in 2011. All
was quiet until February 2015 when I instructed the law firm I had hired to subpoena evidence from the
Maryland Department of Motor Vehicles identifying a burglar (a now retired NSA Executive) who had
broken into my home very shortly after I had tried to make my 2006 Inspector General request for an
investigation, and stolen extra house, car, and mail keys as well as illegally bugging (burst bug) our
home and phone/internet to facilitate further harassment and likely search for blackmail material (no
luck for them there).
After the subpoena, I began noticing Security types in Tallahassee following me and photo-stalking me
by March/April. Their license plates suggested Naval Security Group from Pensacola and NSA Security
personnel from Georgia (Augusta) and Texas (San Antonio). A quick check with the Leon County
Sheriffs Department, specifically Duty Officer deputy Canon, confirmed that NSA also had personnel
land at a private airport and deputies had escorted them the the Phipps property north of Lake Jackson
(near where I now live) for a secret exercise, just before the second round of stalking harassment
began. The sequence of events seems to have been for NSA Security to contact the Naval Security
Group in Pensacola, Florida (Headquartered at Ft. Meade, Maryland along with NSA) to initially stalk
and photograph me under ridiculous false pretenses until NSA could send its own Security personnel to
Tallahassee. Once there, under guise of authority, it appears that NSA enlisted the help of the Florida
Department of Law Enforcement (FDLE) and its civilian group, InfraGard, made up of civilians
recruited from their Ride-Along programs. As usual, NSA personnel fabricated some big lie as to why
the civilians should actively and passively stalk and harass me, and despite quite obvious questions
about why laws and due process were to be completely suspended in my case, the group eagerly
jumped at the opportunity for hundreds to gang up on one person (for Federal money, I may add).
Thus, under NSA tutelage and FDLE auspices, suddenly I was a cast-iron target, meaning multiple
people covered me wherever I was, whatever I did. Cars were even stationed near my home overnight
on rotating shifts, beeping to each other when changing shifts but also for my benefit. NSA also sought
out willing neighbors to augment their snooping and harassment efforts, which could be anything from
hosting an NSA Security goon for accessibility to my property, both home (to bug and monitor shortdistance transmissions) and car (to install and switch out vehicle GPS trackers to facilitate car stalking
and impeding as harassment. ) Those were the active participants, others not assigned to me on a
certain shift were ordered to quickly text in to a special site the big bad threat to report my location
and time I was there. People even snooped in my shopping carts to be able to tattle to someone about
what I was doing, what I was buying. (God help us, she bought bananas!!! Save the children!).
This was annoying enough but I tried to ignore it because I thought NSA once again was going for the
usual See, shes paranoid, reporting harassment every day now just dismiss her lawsuit! But I did
report acts of harassment that caused physical damage such as hit and run, purposely sideswiping my
car, and botching the placement/removal of a GPS tracker under my rear spoiler that destroy my
spoiler. (They feared my mechanic would find their tracker so they botched its removal the night before
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page
Page142
35 of
of183
173
548
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
my appointment). I even made fun of my stalkers when I could, using my hobby art shop on a popular
internet site to create bumper magnets making fun of them. After all, they were mostly nave,
unsophisticated boobs who desperately imagined that they were little James Bonds and that the
greatest existential threat to their country was a woman waiting for her lawsuit to be decided, living in
Tallahassee, walking her dogs, visiting friends.
In late November 2015, however, NSA apparently decided that I was not sufficiently
being intimidated by their civilian confederacy of dunces to back off my lawsuit to
recover my stolen salary and stolen retirement at the appropriate pay level. In 2009
I had researched gang-stalking and discovered it was a real and growing
phenomenon, but when electrical harassment was mentioned, I could not really
grasp the concept and wondered about its existence. But I was to find out first hand
in November 2015 that it does exist and is a horrific crime against humanity.
NSA and its operatives started using small, mobile devices called Directed Energy
Weapons (DEWs) against me and my family in the night. These mobile weapons
emit multiple types of electrical emanations from ultrasonic, to microwaves
modulated to radio frequencies, to other kinds of wave variations I cant say I
understand yet. Now, with the help of certain mercenary and morally depraved
neighbors, the effort is almost 24/7 now with the intention being torture and slowkill. These types of weapons over a lengthy time, cause cancer, autoimmune
disease, heart attacks, seizures, strokes, etc. It is the perfect stealth murder
weapon for a corrupt government. At this point, when we leave the house, a
criminal base of stalkers has been enlisted by NSA to follow us and aim the DEWs at
us wherever feasible to increase exposure in order to speed up death, with the help
of the InfraGard dimwits still texting in my location like good little sheeple.
The Leon County Sheriffs Department as well as the Tallahassee Police Department are dragging their
feet, making excuses, denying any such thing exists, or insulting me when I try to enlist their help to
come up with a strategy to combat this new crime before I or one of my family is dead. They cant
quite grasp the fact that this is domestic terrorism and nothing protects the police or any official from
this new weapon held and wielded by criminals. Yet, plenty of recruits in their ranks have experience
using the mobile DEWs in Iraq. It is very interesting to me that the Naval Security Group headquartered
at Ft. Meade with NSA, is also called the Silent Warriors because they specialize in the use of Directed
Energy Weapons. Im sure the Naval Security Group base in Pensacola has many on hand and may
have even gotten a request from NSA to borrow a few for their secret exercise in Tallahassee.
Clearly, NSA is of the opinion that you do not have Constitutional Rights unless they say you do. If they
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page
Page143
36 of
of183
173
548
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
use this to get rid of an inconvenient lawsuit such as mine instead of simply settling for a tenth of the
cost of harassment, then they must feel confident they can murder anyone, anywhere, for any reason
and get away with itincluding any leader or politician.
Sher: Why in the world do you think the NSA simply didnt settle the suit? With all of the
documentation you have, it seems that they are guilty of the discrimination and could have spent far
less of the taxpayers money to simply pay you off and make it go away. They would, also, have
avoided this coming out into the open. Are they that arrogant and Narcissistic?
Karen: This has truly NEVER made any sense to me or any of my friends, even those who worked at
NSA. NSA could have investigated, claimed a mistake had been made and retroactively promoted me
without even addressing the unethical behavior of W&S personnel. Instead, the IG refused to
investigate, illegally of course, but I could not have made him do his job. Plus, the guilty were
instructed to blame me for what turned out to be the first leak by ex-NSA executive Thomas Drake,
despite the fact that I had no access to, knowledge of or training in the type of material he leaked
(computer technology) and he was identified as the source of that leak six months before I was fired.
The polygraph section of Security actively tried to sabotage my polygraph exams in response to the
false counter-accusation by inappropriately screaming and threatening me, making it impossible to pass
a polygraph, which ruined my first polygraph in this regard though I passed the next two of the three
given in reaction to the false accusation.
The EEOC is capped at $300,000 actual damages, no punitive allowed. My intention was to get the lost
difference in my wages as a GS-12 when I should have been a GS-14, and to get the appropriate level
of retirement. Yet, clearly, NSA has spent millions organizing and paying civilians (and greasing the
palms of crooked law enforcement) to harass, bully, intimidate,and quite obviously viciously slander
me.
Do they engage in such psychopathic behavior because they can? Because they simply have no real
oversight? The operational head of NSA Security is indeed rumored far and wide to be an actual
psychopath who is obsessed with paintings of Dantes Inferno.
A coworker who worked in NSA Human Resources says she remembered when the resumes of
inappropriate people (criminals, perverts, mentally unstable) were automatically thrown away but
suddenly when General Hayden, a former NSA Director, promoted this particular man, the resumes of
thieves, moral degenerates, etc., were then coveted by Security. She said that she was so upset that
she had to find a different job. I did read an opinion on the Anti-polygraph site that NSA Security
leadership, and hence all of Security in essence, could be said to suffer from Dark Triad personality
disorder, which is a dangerous combination of such things as (malignant) narcissism, sociopathy, etc.
Their egos are such that they are obsessed with winning at all costseven fighting to keep a known
false accusation from being proven false by their victim, because they exist in their own projected
narrative. They exist in their own lies and cannot stand being exposed. This means they follow their
own agendas. What is good for NSA Security leadership, even at the cost of NSA or the USA. Their
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page
Page144
37 of
of183
173
548
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
allegiances are to themselves. This has made me wonder, of late, if the woman who Security protected
instead of reprimanding or firing for sexually compromising W&S management was not a Security plant,
meant to do just that. And, in so doing, was NSA Security procuring a means to blackmail these
managers for themselves or another entity, perhaps foreign?
Sher: You have multiple photos and even drawings youve made of you stalkers. Youve also indicated
to me that the NSA has been in touch with your local law enforcement. Said law enforcement is siding
with the NSA against youa private citizen. What do your attorneys have to say about these?
Karen: At the beginning of my search for a law firm to take my case, Melville Johnson PC informed me
that I had potentially two cases, in 2009, an employment law case and a criminal case. I could only
afford to pursue the employment case since I was facing illegal termination on false pretenses within a
few months. While my lawyers have recorded the information about the new assault campaign by NSA
in Florida, thus far their pleas with the EEOC for some kind of response because their client is now in
physical danger have been completely ignored.
What has been going on in Florida is entirely criminal and could be a separate lawsuit, to even include
law enforcement in regard to their depraved negligenceif not complicity. But, at the moment, I am
concerned with surviving the relentless Directed Energy Weapons assaults. If I do not, then my family
will have to consider a wrongful death lawsuit against NSA, FBI (that refuse to get involved because
NSA is involved), and the FDLE, the TPD and Leon County Sheriffs Department as well as certain
complicit neighbors accepting a new riding mower or new carpeting in exchange for helping NSA
murder an inconvenient person who actually thought she had any Constitutional, human, or Civil
Rights.
Sher: With regards to your lawsuit, what are your current plans?
Karen: Good question. Reporting and recording the new barrage of assaults has whittled deeply into
my retainer. This was hard enough to maintain after spending about $110,000, thus far, and often
countering ridiculous and frivolous legal shenanigans by NSA to waste my money. With an outrageously
unresponsive EEOC, which may indeed be a complete and obscene sham for show, one wonders why
continue with the pretense that we exist as a nation of laws? Clearly, we do not.
The government has no desire for a level playing field to impede its quest for complete tyranny. We are
now a nation of wolves and sheeple. Im sure that after getting wind of this article, NSA will come to
the EEOC with big crocodile tears claiming they need to win by default because I broke the gag order
after they themselves spent millions, bald-faced lying to thousands of civilians, law enforcement and
(apparently) the FBI about me, invoking National Security Letters to swear them to secrecy and to hide
the true nature of their faux secret exercise in Tallahasseei.e., enticing a foolish community to stalk,
harass and commit murder for Big Brother.
But, God forbid the victim would speak out!
It truly sickens me that I spent my career trying to protect and serve my fellow Americans when not
only my government but these unworthy mercenary, sociopaths have stabbed me in the back. Some of
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page
Page145
38 of
of183
173
548
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
the stalkers have even been Iraqi War veteranssome of whom might not have returned alive without
my reports.
I cant think a lot about the lawsuit with each nocturnal assault leaving me wondering if I or one of my
family will not wake up tomorrow. Im sentenced to death for being a patriot. What a country. I read
Psalm 91 & 94 nightly, praying God will want to erase this growing evil from our country. But, I also
remember that Ruth Graham said a while ago, if God doesnt judge America, Hell have to apologize to
Sodom and Gomorrah.
Americans are just not the people they and we used to be and, therefore, our leaders are either
apathetic cowards who tolerate evil or potentially monsters like NSA Securitywho show that they can
be and are not responsible to anyone but themselves.
Is NSA Security even able to be reined in anymore? Or would any potential leader be found dead of a
microwave induced heart attack if he tried to? Someone ought to care but I may not be around long
enough to see it.
Sher: Thanks you so much for all youve done and I sincerely hope and pray youre wrong, Karen. Its
individuals like you who founded the United States of America on Godly principles and an unwavering
sense of ethics.
*Karen may be contacted for interviews at kams56@ME.com
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page
Page146
39 of
of183
173
548
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
StanJ. Caterbone
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Freedom From Covert Harassment &
Surveillance,
Registered in Pennsylvania
1250Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com
stancaterbone@gmail.com
717-669-2163
This interview contains information from Julianne McKinneys book Microwave Harassment and
Mind Control Experimentation, 1992, as well as current conditions world-wide. Years of
interviews turned Gregg Szymanski from skeptic to believer in the secret world of electronic
harassment, as harassment against Julianne McKinney has turned potentially lethal. They are
taking a stand to help TIs, Targeted Individuals, many civilians, escape this cruel harassment.
Julianne: Okay. I have seen evidence of a closed circuit TV and it seems to be some form of major
source of entertainment and perhaps instruction for the individuals participating in this harassment. I
dont know who runs it. I have seen aspects of that on a large screen TV across the street on which I
saw surveillance films of a TI being harassed, obviously, in an office environment. Gang stalked. Shows
brain scans and is otherwise a very sophisticated, sleek, communications operation. Why would it be
used? As I said either for entertainment, for creating a sense of unity, or for identifying persons, TIs,
who are to be harassed on the street. I mean, obviously you cant harass someone if you dont know
what that person looks like. So its a means of communicating to the perpetrators, perps, what the TI
looks like.
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page
Page147
40 of
of183
173
548
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
(Also) I have a guest whos never given a radio interview before. Her name is
Julianne McKinney. For those of you who dont know who she is, she is an expert in electronic
harassment and surveillanceformer military background. And those of you who have followed this
story on my show, many may know who she is and the importance she has in this field.
Were just going to lay some very solid credibility to what weve been talking about. So this interviews
quite important and I want you to remember that, as we go along, shes a very, very well-read person.
Were gonna get to that in a minute. The problem on the use of electronic weaponry on a person was
when I was working in a law office. The law office I was working for severaloh a number of years ago,
the law office I worked for prided in taking cases that were difficult. And I listened to a person tell me
about the facts regarding the use of electronic weaponry. And I had a discussion with somebody else at
the law firm and we came to this conclusion causation causation causation Greg, remember that
element. Its going to be awfully difficult to link whats happening to the person. The injuries they were
alleging, to actually the person, or the defendants, that were doing it.
So it was a case, Ill be very honest with you, that I was very skeptical over. But, as a journalist, I
started to interview a number of people, and I would like to say that this issue, after a number of years,
has come up to one of the top of my list as a problem in this country.
I talked to hundreds of people all around the country that are experiencing things that are just
unbelievable. And from a standpoint of the law, you want to get justice for these people. You hate to
see their lives destroyed, and you hate to see what happens, to a person thats been harassed. But the
biggest problem is its very difficult to pinpoint whats going on.
I have a guest today who is an expert in this field. You, the public, may not know who she is. But those
of you who have been targeted and listen to my show know very well. Shes never been interviewed
before and I feel honored that shes here. Her name is Julianne McKinney. Shes had an extensive
career in the US Army as an Area Intelligence Case Officer till 1990.
Upon her return to civilian life Julianne became a member of the Association of National Security
Alumni. That is an organization of former intelligence officers dedicated to exposing excesses by the US
Intelligence Services. Julianne became the director of the Electronic Surveillance Project under their
auspices
as
such
she
authored
the
publication
Microwave
Harassment
and
Mind
Control
Experimentation in 1991. She kept that electronic surveillance project going for four years, funding it
with her own personal funds, obtained by her military benefits and pay.
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page
Page148
41 of
of183
173
548
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Julianne did not copy write her work and it is out in the public domain for the public good. Microwave
Harassment and Mind Control Experimentation, the public has taken her hard copy publication and
uploaded it to several thousand domain sites over the past 15 years. It is respected as one of the most
important publications on this subject. And with that, Id like to say hello, Ms. McKinney, how are you
today?
Julianne McKinney: Please dont call me Ms. McKinney (laugh).
Greg: Okay, can I say Julianne?
Julianne: Yes, Julianne.
Greg: Now, youre an expert in surveillance and electronic harassment. The first question I have is
that, in your observation, is there a wider scale of surveillance of average people, people with no threat
to national security, in your estimation?
Julianne: I would say that most of us targeted are not, and never have been, a threat. I think that
what happened initially, when these operations began probably 30 years, ago people were singled out,
perhaps, because of some affiliation, either direct or indirect, with the United States government, and
invited attention. But they were not singled out as being a threat; they were singled out as being
lucrative targets of experimentation.
In the past 15 years, since shutting down the Electronic Surveillance Project, primarily to seek
employment, which I did seek, and did obtain, I had occasion to observe many, many, many instances
of individuals in the corporate environment being singled out and targeted simply because they were
convenient targets of opportunity. And, I have to comment on something I heard you say
Greg: Okay
Julianne:
Early on you referred to the difficulty of establishing causation in order to pursue these
claims.
Greg: That, I might add, that was made is a legal sense, based on the fact that we were nave people,
not really understand I have to be honest with youI had not understood the problem back then,
and felt it would be a difficult problem, based on the fact of how the crime was committed and knowing
how to pin that crime on someone. Go ahead.
Julianne: I understand the legal implications, certainly. There is enough literature, on the internet and
elsewhere, that establishes the existence of these weapon systems. To pinpoint, for purposes of
prosecution, to pinpoint their existence would be difficult and the position I take is that rather than
pinpoint for prosecution purposes, easy enough to single them out by electronic means to destroy
them. But I guess thats taking the matter a little far left field.
I think, frankly, we still face, until congress establishes laws that forbid the use of these technologies
for involuntary experimental purposes, that were going to get absolutely nowhere in attempting to
prosecute.
Greg:
Okay, listen, I need to take a break Julianne. And well be back in three minutes on the
Investigative Journal.
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page
Page149
42 of
of183
173
548
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Julianne: Okay.
Greg:
Okay, back for the second half hour. My guest is Julianne McKinney. Shes an expert on
surveillance and electronic harassment. And Julianne, I gave you an introduction at the beginning of the
show.
Julianne: Yes
Greg:
A brief introduction. But I think our listeners would like to know your background and why
I certainly have had experience with them, having, for approximately the past 40 years,
been on the receiving end of this type of harassment. Expertise in surveillance comes with my
employment in the intelligence field. I understand what constitutes surveillance and am capable of
immediately spotting the surveillance and I can see, as in the case of gang stalking, a subject that you
have addressed on prior occasions. I can see those who I label as covert want-to-bes fumbling through
what they think are covert activities and Id find it really rather amusing if it werent so perverted in the
ultimate objective.
Im not certain what more I can add. I do have experience with these weapon systems. Ive had
sufficient opportunity over these past many years to observe the progressive threat of these
harassment operations. And Im talking specifically about electronic weapon systems.
Greg: Well, youve been a voice - I mean a strong voice - for warning people of these systems for at
least the past 10 years regarding the installation of specialized electronic equipment and utilities. What
are these electronics and what are their capabilities?
Julianne:
Their capabilities, generally, are to inflict pain in a highly focused fashion, and to alter
mental states. Certainly, when you have a frequency aimed at your brain, your mental functions tend to
alter. In amplified form, theyre sufficient, the frequencies are. They have the capacity to kill. Though
thats one reason the department of defense refers to them as less than lethal rather than nonlethal weapons. As a matter of fact, the Department of Defense has gone so far to eliminate them, to
remove them from the category of even less than lethal weapons to bury them in the category of
electronic weapons trying to make them a little bit blacker.
Greg:
Now is this protocol of surveillance and harassment seemingly patterned after a government
Its difficult to pinpoint everything on the US government exclusively because these are
global operations.
Greg: Okay.
Julianne:
The pattern the protocols, are virtually identical on a global scale so someone is
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page
Page150
43 of
of183
173
548
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
overseeing the entire activity. The government obviously is complicent because otherwise these
operations would not be allowed to exist. Why? Its hard to say. Whether its for testing electronic
weapon systems for future use under combat conditions or whether ultimately there's a holocaust. (nointelligible) Its hard to say.
Greg:
Well, you know what I find interesting.how people who arent aware of this problem cant
believe its happening to begin with. And I try to mentionI have run stories about the Duplessis
Orphans. Its a program thats been verified, that the government actually used money in Canada and
the United States to do medical testing on children, on adults. Ive talked to people on the POW issue,
one Dr. Joe Douglas, who has documented how, that our government has done allowed foreign
governments to do illegal experimentation on POWs. So why would people think that they wouldnt
allow it on just average citizens? Just in your mind. Do you have an answer for people?
Julianne: Why wouldnt they allow it?
Greg: Yeah, my thing is that they do it, theyre doing it. But some people that deny it cant believe
that our government would do something like this.
Julianne: I find, even among the community of, I hate using slang terms, but the term TI is common,
referring to targeted individuals. Those are people who know they are on the receiving end of electronic
weapon systems. And even amongst TIs, there is a perception in certain areas that our government
wouldnt do this; a case of not recognizing reality. First of all if this were not being done by our
government, congress would step in because of the hundreds of complaints they have received,
thousands of complaints, no doubt, over the past 10-15 years, from citizens who recognize whats going
on. Congress, back in the early 90s, late 80s, took the position that anyone complaining about these
systems were imagining things because they simply didnt exist. In two years, by 1992, they were off
the drawing boards, and in fact, being fielded and conveyed to law enforcement agencies.
Congress recognizes that these weapon systems exist and funds them, and knows, as a result of
appropriate briefings, what the bio-effects can be. Yet they have passed no legislation prohibiting their
use under unconstrained experimental circumstances.
Thats number 1. Number 2, given the nature, given the nature, given that the systems draw on
existing power grids, it would be necessary for the FCC at a minimum, and the Department of Energy,
as a minimum, give some oversight and control over what is going on. Though obviously, those with
Congress, the FDA and the Department of Energy, the FCC and the Department of Energy are
knowledgeable and yet unwilling to do anything about it. So, there is complicity, but the question is,
whos knitting, and submitting, the US government, allowing these operations to take place?
Greg: Now from your experience, how intense is this surveillance of targeted individuals? And tell us
about the ways that the targeted that this is accomplished.
Julianne: From what I have observed, first of all I should explain that the standard that I address this
in Microwave Harassment and Mind Control Experimentation, it was a pattern that was unfolding as I
was dealing with other targeted individuals whothat contacted me. It was a pattern of harassment
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page
Page151
44 of
of183
173
548
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
which indicated that there had been some surveillance going on, some monitoring of their private lives.
There had been entry into their houses. There was systematic harassment. And then, ultimately, as part
of a softening up process, and then ultimately, electronic harassment, which followed; which would
include the inducement of auditory input, which is now being referred to as Z2K.
In answer to your question (laugh) Im not certain if I I think Im probably missing the point there,
but in order to target someone, it requires that that person be put under surveillance, so that their
personality traits, their capacity to inter- relate with people, their capacity for corruption or noncorruption, that seems to be a critical point. And even their religion factors into it.
Following a period of harassments, they are singled out for preliminary stages of harassment which
includes gang stalking, entry of their private homes or apartments, followed by gradually intensified
and ultimately extremely intensified electronic harassment. This is the pattern that has unfolder over
and over and over.
Greg:
And so, when you, I guess what Im getting atthats a very good answer. Youre seeing a
pattern amongst these individuals. I guessyeahis there any pattern about how they choose them?
Julianne: I cant speak for men. But it appears that quite a few of the women who have been singled
out appear to be somewhat, too independent; perhaps too intelligent. Tend to live alone or tend to
pursue professional careers. Theres a heavy predominance of those types of women in the TI
community, the community of targeted individuals. Men are in a smaller proportion and seem to be
those who have a propensity to fly off the handle. Have a sense of self-esteem and pride that seems to
invite targeting. And I did mention a curious predominance of a certain lack of religion amongst TIs, as
opposed to a certain predominance of a particular religion amongst those who are participating in these
operations.
Greg: Now you mentioned this was a global problem. Have you communicated with people from across
the Atlantic regarding whats going on in other countries? Is it similar to here?
Julianne:
Its virtually identical, virtually identical. When I was running the electronic surveillance
project I was in extensive correspondence with people overseas and patterns were the same. The
nature of the gang stalking and harassment were the same.
Greg: Now, when youre talking about specific numbers I know youreyouve been following this for
years and years and years. Is there any way that you can give our listeners a kind of an idea of how
wide spread this problem is in terms numbers in our country and compared to maybe overseas?
Julianne: I would say that the person who has realized what is going on is just a drop in a bucket. The
persons whom I have seen being targeted are completely unaware of whats happening. So those who
are complaining of this are, as I said, the tip of the iceberg. I would say this is very, very, widespread.
But I cannot under the circumstances come up with any figures. Many, many, many thousands, no
doubt, are involved. But I would say that the bulk of them are running to their doctors and taking
totally unnecessary prescription drugs to cure ailments that dont exist.
Gregg: I guess that you have to ask this question even though its very difficult to answer. And you
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page
Page152
45 of
of183
173
548
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
mentioned, you said it earlier. But I really have to ask it because its on my mind and I know its always
in the back of everyones mind when they think of this problem. Why?? What is the major reason, I
mean, outside of just pure experimentation Im interested; for example, lets say that they have
targeted 100 people in Oklahoma. What do they, first of all, why are they doing it? Is it for, basically, a
blanket statement controlling the population? Orand, what do they do with this information once they
get it?
Julianne: I dont think they do anything with the information once they get it, other than to establish
a harassment protocol which will follow that targeted individual for the rest of his or her life. Why are
they doing it? I see a number of reasons. First, I dont know if youve done any research on the
phenomenon of capturing a percentage of the population in order to install a dictatorship. There is
always a percentage of the population, roughly 20% or so, that will buckle and throw whatever
constitutions might exist into the toilet and eagerly join the efforts at destroying the remainder of the
population.
Part of the problem or part of the objective they are seeking obviously is testing the latest and greatest
in electronic weaponry and other forms of technologies. A part of it is to control and choreograph those
who are involved in these harassment operations on the dispensing end. And it would appear that those
being targeted are simply objects who I see as ultimately being disposable. In other words, I think that
once full control is established over a major percentage of the population, and enough of the population
is silenced and unwilling to stick their necks out, that we inevitably would be heading toward a
holocaust.
Greg: The question, if I was, for example, lets say we have a person, who suspects, and lets just for
hypothetical purposes, say this person is being targeted, okay? Now, tell our listeners, because Ive
always wondered this myself, okay. Im sitting in my house and I see around me theres telephone
poles, there may be a tower in the distance that I dont see that handles the cell phones. Theres of
course a grid of electric going on around me. Ive talked to people and I try to say, how does this get
into your house? And I wanted to get your opinion, if a person is targeted, how basically are they
beginning to intrude their premises, and violate their constitutional rights, not only their rights ofnot
only trespassing on their property? Go ahead. How would that happen?
Julianne: Now, are you talking about, how would the frequencies impact upon them and how would
they first become aware of it? Or how would they first become aware of the fact that their privacy has
been violated?
Greg: Well no, I guess I didnt explain the question right. I wanted to know how they physically, are
doing it? I mean are they using a cell tower? Are they using a truck thats in the distance? How is this
being transmitted into the home to target the person and to use this weaponry on them, from your
experience?
Julianne: Well, first of all, in order to target a person you have to be able to see that person. And
while they may not be able to, they may, on entering the house, plant miniature cameras, miniature
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page
Page153
46 of
of183
173
548
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
microphones, as a means of, for their monitoring a person. But that is not necessarily the means by
which they hone in on a person. There are plenty of technologies that allow for the imaging of a person
that might be sitting in a chair, as you mentioned you might be.
Using infrared imagery techniques, for example, they can capture your image by monitoring the
concentration of heat emanating from your body using certain acoustical frequencies, they can detect
mass. And using sophisticated computer software, they can convert those images to likenesses on
computers, which conceivably could be used in a software program that could be connected to an
electronic weapon system. And in that context I should point out that, while devices draw on the
existing power grid, and while theyyes indeed, they do involve microwave towers
Sounds like youve got a commercial coming on
Greg:
Yes we do, and thank you for making my job easier. Well be back in 3 minutes on the
Investigative Journal.
First, Ive put this in the top 3 of my stories that I believe are important, that the American people need
to deal with, because as Ms. McKinney, who is a, I consider her an expert. She would only say shes an
authority. But let me tell you, Julianne, you are an expert in this. The reasons could be, like she said at
thebefore we went into the break, and a total testing of our population to see, basically, perhaps
maybe there is a holocaust in the future or a dictatorship in the future. And they want to see how
people react to it. That may be a simplistic way to look at it. Not a simplistic way that Julianne looked at
it but my way of explaining it.
But lets get back to some of the things here, the last few minutes that are important. What can you tell
us, Julianne, about the microwave energy on citizens in terms of the existence of such a program and
the nuts and bolts of what they do?
Julianne:
Microwave energy is only one aspect of the entire electromagnetic frequency spectrum.
Microwaves can be lethal depending upon how theyre used. Obviously in order to achieve appropriate
effects on people, they have to be pulsed, because otherwise the individual would be cooked from the
inside out. The objective of using microwaves as opposed to other electromagnetic frequencies would
be to inflict extremes of pain to cause thermal heating. Thats a common complaint which leaves a hot
spot on the scull. Again, primarily, just to inflict extremes of pain. I was just wondering, we kind of
skipped over or didnt quite complete a preceding topic.
Greg: Oh, go ahead, go ahead. Youve got free reign.
Julianne:
You were talking about the use of the electrical grid throughout the country, the use of
microwave towers, the use of devices affixed to poles that are connected to power lines. But what
wasnt addressed, what you havent mentioned, is also that these weapon systems are used by
neighbors surrounding persons who have been singled out as targets of opportunity.
Greg: Are they solicited to do this or what?
Julianne: Thats something that Ive been pondering for some time. Again, what Ive noticed is, there
seems to be a predominant, particular religion that makes it particularly easy for them to cooperate.
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page
Page154
47 of
of183
173
548
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Greg: Well listen, lets talk about that after the break, a short break, and then Ive got something to,
some business I have to take care of for 3 4 minutes. Then well get back for our 2 nd hour with
Julianne McKinney. Well take some calls. Back in 2 minutes on the Investigative Journal.
(In this section there seemed to be jumping around, like maybe the video was edited or there was
some problem with the recording.)
by some of the Tis and thats Targeted Individuals.
That song rose to number one without any publicity on the internet. And that song called TI, well play
that again Dr. McKinney. I think it hits the nail on the head. I mean theres a lot of people out there
suffering. And I know youre one person, an authority in this field. And for my guests who are just
picking us up this hour, Dror excuse me, Julianne McKinney is a very highly regarded person in the
field of electronic weaponry, and surveillance in studying this issue. Shes a former area Intelligence
Case Officer until 1990 in the Army. And her credentials can be found, will be found, you can go to
RBNLive.com and go to my archives in the Investigative Journal and read about that. Shes well
qualified. Shes still with us this hour. And Dror excuse me, I keep calling you Dr. and you should be.
Julianne: (Laugh) Im not a Dr., thank you. Dr. Americus.
Greg: Dr. Americus. You know, thats funny. I have a doctorate in law. And nobody ever calls me that
and I hate being called that, a doctor. But Im interviewed on a Tehran TV station once every blue
moon, couple months, and they refer to me as Dr. Szymanski. And its nice to hear once in a while. Ill
be honest with you. Every two months is good enough. Otherwise they just call me the jerk on the
radio, which is better.
But, lets go from here. Youre adding such credibility to this story, adding credibility in my mind as I
speak. Because, Ive talked to hundreds of these people and was a doubting Thomas in the beginning. I
must mention that. I did not think it existed, and that was years ago. I thought people were either
insane, or crazy, or trying to get attention. But you know something? I will admit I was totally wrong
with that initialI guessthe look at the situation and have come around to fully believe in most of the
people I talk to and really sympathize with their suffering as I see their lives being ripped apart.
Are there any things you can dowere going to get into a few more things here as far as the technical
aspects of this but what can targeted individuals do to get some peace in their life? I mean thats one
thing theyre looking for. Is there anything they can do?
Julianne: (prolonged silence)
Greg: Difficult question there.
Julianne: Its very difficult to advise targeted individuals how to acquire peace. These frequencies can
be blocked or deflected. All of these frequencies I have found, some may contest this, but I have found
can beare vulnerable, and are subject to deflection. And the pain can be immediately (word unclear),
if not halted all together. Finding peace by writing to members of congress or to state legislators might
not be a better alternative because you will be treated as something worthy of the circular basket. They
just wont intervene. Writing to the various agencies and calling a meeting with them serves no useful
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page
Page155
48 of
of183
173
548
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
purpose either because they will say there are no laws prohibiting these types of activities. They cant,
say for example, the FBIand I was given this statement on a number of occasions.there are no laws
prohibiting experimentation with these weapon systems. Youre talking to the wrong people.
So my advice would be to do what you can to secure your premises, because so long as your house is
or apartment is being entered, you are susceptible to, in addition to being targeted by electronic
weapons, there is a potential for having drugs put in your food. And Im not exaggerating there.
Greg: I had a few targeted individuals I talked to send me some questions that Id like to ask you.
Julianne: Certainly.
Greg: And the one was Are targeted individuals also broadcast around the country via closed circuit
TV? And, What purpose does this serve? Im fully in the dark on this question, but, go ahead.
Julianne: Okay. I have seen evidence of a closed circuit TV and it seems to be some form of
major source of entertainment and perhaps instruction for the individuals participating in
this harassment. I dont know who runs it. I have seen aspects of that on a large screen TV
across the street on which I saw surveillance films of a TI being harassed, obviously, in an
office environment. Gang stalked. Shows brain scans and is otherwise a very sophisticated,
sleek,
communications
operation.
Why
would
it
be
used?
As
said
either
for
entertainment, for creating a sense of unity, or for identifying persons, TIs, who are to be
harassed on the street. I mean, obviously you cant harass someone if you dont know what
that person looks like. So its a means of communicating to the perpetrators, perps, what the
TI looks like.
Greg: Okay, now, before I get to some more, I want to put out that call for people to call. I got a
couple emails. A lot of times Tis dont want to go public. And theyve sent me some emails. I want to
get to one in a minute. But one question I have for you is, how can people gather evidence to support
their beliefs that this is happening to them? Many people will say, well its only a lack of sleep. I mean,
you have a sleep disorder. Maybe theres a problem with your joints, I dont know. It could be anything
that the answers are when you suspect youre being targeted. What kind of evidence do you tell people
to gather to support their beliefs that this is actually happening to them.
Julianne:
Well, when youre gathering evidence, obviously you have an objective in mind and that
generally is legal. What you want to do with that evidence. Theres really nothing you can do with it. So
in the absence of that, the main thing is to try to protect yourself and to alleviate the pain that youre
experiencing. Collecting the evidence, if you were to go to, frankly, Id strongly recommend that you
keep your faculties together and avoid going to see psychiatrists and psychologists, because the pattern
that is evolving is that they are highly complicit of these operations.
And if you go to a medical doctor, you do not talk about it because medical doctors, many, are also
involved. What you do when you see a doctor is that you define your symptoms and get a very clear
statement that, well, we cant figure this out. Well, thats a clear indication that it is not indigenous,
its not part of your system. Its not coming from within you, so obviously something is happening from
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page
Page156
49 of
of183
173
548
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
outside. If they prescribe drugs and yet cant find the ecology, the basis for your disease, dont take
those drugs.
Greg:
Now earlier we were talking about the fact that they may, whoevers doing this, youve
delineated, youve led a good course into whatyoure tracking these people. But what I was getting at,
we never got to the point where ifyou mentioned something about a religious group that may be
targeted. What did you mean by that?
Julianne: The way I dont.well let me put it this way. Im not out to start a religious war. I have
found over the years that the persons involved, both in gang stalking.Ive made it a point to get to
know these people. Ive had to necessarily. Im not the type to
Greg: Youre talking about the perpetrators or the targets?
Julianne: The perpetrators.
Greg: Okay
Julianne: As well as theIve been drawing distinctions. And what Ive found is that the perpetrators
appear to belong predominantly to one particular religion; whereas the targeted individuals do not
belong predominantly to that particular religion.
Greg: And what is the particular religion of the perpetrators?
Julianne:
Right. So, at this stage, again, Im not particularly enthused about the idea of starting a
religious war. And I have challenged other TIs to get out there and become acquainted with, and get to
know, the people who are harassing them, to draw those distinctions themselves, because Im not
going to be making brash claims. This is something Ive observed over the past 10 years.
Greg: Thats fair enough. And maybe, perhaps, I could talk to you about it just for my own knowledge
off the air.
Julianne: That would be fine.
Greg: And I will keep your name out of it at that point and let people know what the targeted group
may be and what the other group may be.
Julianne: There is a religious influence but thats not to say these people arent just being used as
puppets by some broader interest.
Greg: Very good point. Can you stick with us one more segment of 5 minutes?
Julianne: Okay.
Greg: Were interviewing Julianne McKinney, our last segment. Juliannes an authority in the use of
surveillance and electronic weaponry. And this is an email question, kind of a technical one from a TI.
Let me read this to you. Perhaps you can answer it. Are the protocols for each individual modified based
to custom tailor it for the specific targeted individual? And if so, how does this process work?
Julianne: Yes indeed they are modified. There is a basic protocol that the perpetrators begin with. But
the TI contributes to the modification. A good example of that would be, if someone. Im trying to
think of a good example. If the TI feels the need to cooperate, even in the most subtle fashion, with the
persons who are harassing him or her, he or she will modify his behavior, in pathlobean condition, which
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page
Page157
50 of
of183
173
548
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
alters the protocol. Theyre constantly, targets are constantly monitored, and if they respond
emotionally to a particular trigger, that will be built into the protocol. If the target displays a certain
sense of guilt or embarrassment about a subject, that will be built into the protocol. Its an ongoing
process. And one thing I want to emphasize is no TI should look for a reason as to why this is going on.
Its a serious, serious mistake. I know I did that myself when they started on me and over the years I
came up with probably 6 different excuses.
Greg: Is it still going on with you?
Julianne: Oh yes. Not to the degree that it was before but certainly in very lethal form.
Greg: Now, how has this hampered your life?
Julianne: Its come close to being lethal on a number of occasions. I deal, I dealt with gang stalking
head on and I essentially put that to rest. I deal with.Ive developed a means for communicating with
perps directly and made them feel like the trailer trash that they are. So gang stalking is not one of
their favorite activities in my case. So the primary activity now is to see what I can survive in the way
of an induced brain aneurism or stroke or a heart attack.
Greg: I just had a caller who doesnt want to get on the air but wants to know, does moving help;
moving your location?
Julianne: Running, if youre talking about moving to a completely new location, no. This country is
wired to the hilt for immediate transfer. Your protocol follows you wherever you go so its a waste of
time. Moving about physically in place will not change anything. Other than, if you make a 180 degree
turn you will notice the targeting will suddenly stop because the weapon systems are programmed to
focus on a particular area of your anatomy. So if you turn, the targeting will suddenly end. If you turn
back itll hit you again.
Greg: Interesting. Now, going full circle in the last 2 minutes here, in 1991 you published Microwave
Harassment and Mind Control Experimentation. This has been passed around the internet and over
thousands of domain sites over the past 15 years. Can you tell us how someone can get ahold of this
publication to be informed?
Julianne: Its not copy-writed. All they need to do is plug in my last name, McKinney, and type in the
title Microwave Harassment and Mind Control Experimentation and innumerable sites will appear and
just read it from there. It will give you a good insight into what the pattern is when harassment begins.
Greg:
Now, let me just spell your name for people that are going to do that. Thats MCKINNEY
McKinney. And then its Microwave Harassment and Mind Control Experimentation for an authority in
the field.
I guess since 1981, have you seen.I guess a question I wanted to ask, from 2001, have you seen any,
from the time of 911, has there been an increase in the last 4or 5 years, with this type of, that youve
seen, in the number of people contacting you. Has it been more wide spread since 911?
Julianne: Not since 911. WhenI would say back in the early 90s Ive seen a tremendous expansion
of these activities since the early 1990s. And it has moved forward in consistent fashion. Its become
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page
Page158
51 of
of183
173
548
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
ever more sophisticated and ever more wide spread. There was no sudden burst or flurry of activity
since 911.
Greg: And you have no help whatsoever with the political arena in this. Correct? Politicians will not
touch this with a 10 foot pole?
Julianne: Thats right. And even those who purport to be liberally inclined, and Im speaking about
members of the democratic party, will not touch it, because quote unquote, and they know, they know
whats going on. They dont they simply dont have the funds to be able to pursue it. All sorts of
humma humma excuses will be furnished for not pursuing something like this. Before you close.I hear
the music in the background.
Greg: We can stay another minute if you want.
Julianne: Okay.
Greg: Why dont you come back for 2 minutes on the other side of the break and then well finish up.
Okay?
Julianne: Okay.
Greg: Okay, back with Julianne McKinney and 3 minutes on the Investigative Journal. You wanted to
say something at the break.
Julianne: I did. I want to thank you very, very much for taking on this subject. There are so few in the
media, as a matter of fact, youre the only one I know of, who has the guts to address it.
Greg: And you know, it really doesnt just in defense of every other media person. I dont think its
guts, in a sense, maybe it is. I dont consider myself having guts in this issue. I consider it to be an
issue that you need to take time to understand it. And thats what I would recommend to the people in
the media that havent touched this issue. If it isnt being down right censored by someone above you,
at least take the time to talk, Ill spend time talking to you about it. Because it took me a little time to
figure it out. And, Ill tell you what, its people like you that need to be applauded because its your
efforts that are bringing this to the forefront. Youre laying the credibility on the line. But I thank you
anyway for your kind words.
And with that, I wanted to say goodbye to you. And were going to have to move on. And well have you
on again to talk about this. And thank you so much.
Julianne: And thank you so much.
Greg: And that was Julianne McKinney. And she is an authority in the use of electronic weaponry and
microwave weaponry and she was with us for the last hour and a half.
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page
Page159
52 of
of183
173
548
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page
Page160
53 of
of183
173
548
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
1
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1
2
3
Mind Control:
4
5
DR. BEGICH:
here and thank you to Peter and the rest of the team for
8
9
In the back?
Good.
10
All right.
11
12
13
14
For
15
16
17
18
19
20
Congress.
21
22
23
24
25
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page
Page161
54 of
of183
173
548
He was
He had a
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
2
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1
At
DC.
10
11
planes disappeared.
12
13
second term.
14
15
office.
16
moved up again.
17
18
And then one of the old Manson women from the Charles
19
20
21
Ford
22
23
24
25
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Nixon
Page
Page162
55 of
of183
173
548
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
3
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1
happened there.
in Washington, DC.
10
it seems like.
11
12
13
14
15
at a crash site.
16
17
18
19
20
there were.
21
Conspiracies are
22
23
24
25
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page
Page163
56 of
of183
173
548
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
4
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1
happen.
revealed.
do it with fear.
years.
10
I don't
In fact, that
11
12
HAARP?
13
Okay.
14
to be.
15
16
17
All right.
18
19
20
21
22
presentation.
23
24
subject.
25
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
I don't
Page
Page164
57 of
of183
173
548
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
5
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1
They're
antennas.
small space.
shine that against the wall, the beam starts out small,
10
11
source.
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
They have
19
20
21
energy.
22
23
24
25
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page
Page165
58 of
of183
173
548
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
6
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1
application.
9
10
And so
11
12
13
efficient.
14
15
16
17
18
19
into space.
20
If you
21
22
they would come from the earth, they'd bounce off of us,
23
24
large distances.
25
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page
Page166
59 of
of183
173
548
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
7
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1
8
9
10
11
12
13
politically engaged.
14
15
16
17
18
19
And when you think about big projects, you know, you
20
21
22
23
24
25
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
And I did.
Page
Page167
60 of
of183
173
548
I picked up maybe
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
8
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1
back in 1994.
10
These are
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
energy.
19
20
21
22
23
effect.
24
25
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page
Page168
61 of
of183
173
548
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
9
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1
around it.
10
11
12
13
14
shield.
15
And as a
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
these that are not so relevant -- was the idea that you
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page
Page169
62 of
of183
173
548
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
10
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1
a better example.
ringing a bell.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
underground structures.
21
They're
22
23
24
following response.
25
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Because ELF
Page
Page170
63 of
of183
173
548
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
11
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1
You can use flickering light, you can use binaural beat,
signal that the human body will join with, will couple
10
11
12
effect.
13
14
15
16
We heard that
It's
17
18
Brzezinski.
19
20
Columbia University.
21
22
23
24
25
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page
Page171
64 of
of183
173
548
This is around
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
12
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1
blueprint, in fact.
It's the
convoluted style.
English to understand.
10
accuracy.
11
prediction.
12
13
14
15
control technology.
16
17
geophysicist at UCL.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page
Page172
65 of
of183
173
548
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
13
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1
But we
But
10
11
12
13
You
And I'll
14
15
16
17
Society".
18
19
20
21
Toward a Psychocivilized
Those
They had
22
23
24
25
graduated in 1950.
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
He
Electrophysiology, as a degree
Page
Page173
66 of
of183
173
548
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
14
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
And then he
20
21
22
23
24
25
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Was it a quintillion?
Page
Page174
67 of
of183
173
548
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
15
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1
earlier.
discover?
10
kind of activity.
11
12
13
on a radio.
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
Whether
23
24
25
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page
Page175
68 of
of183
173
548
25,000 sources, I
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
16
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1
25,000 sources
body.
A lot of
10
11
science.
12
13
14
body.
15
16
our medicine.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
But
24
25
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page
Page176
69 of
of183
173
548
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
17
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1
incurable.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
them so they would be like this super spy that you could
20
send into another country and they'd hang out for a year
21
22
23
24
25
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page
Page177
70 of
of183
173
548
You could
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
18
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1
By
lot about, sort of, the conclusions and there are things
10
11
12
13
And
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
That's
24
25
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page
Page178
71 of
of183
173
548
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
19
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1
tertiary sources.
surplus book room, and I'm telling this guy that I know,
10
11
12
13
This is
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
changed.
22
The LSD
23
24
25
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page
Page179
72 of
of183
173
548
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
20
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1
All
10
11
12
13
14
15
torture them.
16
17
18
19
criminals.
20
21
It's a government of
22
23
24
iceberg.
25
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page
Page180
73 of
of183
173
548
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
21
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1
8
9
It was prepared by
And it was talking
10
11
12
modification in animals.
13
14
category.
15
happening in 1984.
16
17
fields.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
A lot of money
It was a
Page
Page181
74 of
of183
173
548
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
22
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1
it remotely.
Mind control.
Yeah, 2002.
"The Economist".
Cover story.
Some of
10
11
12
13
credible publication.
14
story.
15
16
17
18
document.
19
human experiments.
20
21
22
23
approve them.
24
25
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
I'll
You know,
Page
Page182
75 of
of183
173
548
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
23
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1
Naval Intelligence
beings.
"Technology Horizons".
issue.
10
controlled effects.
11
The first
12
13
14
15
operate.
16
17
18
19
20
that you can disrupt the software, then you disrupt the
21
22
23
human operator.
24
25
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page
Page183
76 of
of183
173
548
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
24
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1
What does
the norm?
from warfare.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Some people
Wars need to be
20
21
22
23
gone.
24
publication.
25
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page
Page184
77 of
of183
173
548
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
25
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1
military affairs.
And this
10
11
12
13
14
15
Or conversely,
16
17
18
considered dangerous.
19
example.
20
21
22
get sick.
23
You'll
24
25
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page
Page185
78 of
of183
173
548
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
26
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1
poisoning.
not there.
Mystery illness.
10
simple way.
11
12
13
14
publication.
15
the -- I believe it was the Fall 1998, but you can look
16
17
18
19
20
technology today.
21
22
23
"Parameters".
There was an
It's
24
25
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page
Page186
79 of
of183
173
548
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
27
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1
of the population.
of different ways.
It was called
"Undercurrents".
participate in.
10
mind control.
11
12
13
14
15
16
they did in the White House, but they could talk about
17
18
19
was the idea that you could -- you could create, sort
20
21
signal.
22
cake.
23
24
of Europe as well.
25
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page
Page187
80 of
of183
173
548
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
28
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1
broadcast this.
15-year-old technology.
10
And DARPA
11
Tony Tether
12
13
14
15
16
telepathy.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Okay.
Electronic
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page
Page188
81 of
of183
173
548
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
29
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1
area.
10
11
12
the other.
13
They
14
15
16
work for DARPA at the time and we had talked about him
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
And
Page
Page189
82 of
of183
173
548
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
30
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1
family.
So a very wealthy
10
11
kinds of technologies.
12
13
14
All of us
15
have it.
16
do today.
17
18
been wrong.
19
about it.
20
21
22
23
24
25
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page
Page190
83 of
of183
173
548
And
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
31
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1
provided it.
bought my books.
I mean, the
10
11
12
out my work.
13
book.
14
15
two and a half million dollars and I spent that two and
16
17
I published my
18
A VOICE:
19
(Applause.)
20
DR. BEGICH:
Thank you.
21
educate.
22
23
24
25
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Okay.
And the
Page
Page191
84 of
of183
173
548
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
32
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1
an hour.
on your board.
10
I said, okay.
11
12
13
14
(Applause.)
15
DR. BEGICH:
16
17
18
19
20
diligence again.
21
23
me a number of ways.
24
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Do your due
22
25
Go research
It's
Page
Page192
85 of
of183
173
548
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
33
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1
situation economically.
children at home.
foundation.
10
11
12
13
14
15
I want
And I want
We decided that I
16
could do this.
17
18
19
public.
20
21
22
And it was to
23
24
25
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page
Page193
86 of
of183
173
548
He was well
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
34
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1
10
11
12
13
14
A&M.
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Okay.
Garth
He taught over a
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page
Page194
87 of
of183
173
548
He formed a
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
35
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1
difficult circumstances.
conference.
And he was
Makayla.
applications of lasers.
Quite brilliant.
10
She's an electrophysiologist.
She serves on
She's an electrophysiologist.
We invited her.
11
12
passed.
13
physicist, biologist.
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Okay.
Does anyone
A few.
Rosalie's
But she
Page
Page195
88 of
of183
173
548
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
36
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1
platform.
Kaivarainen.
He was
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page
Page196
89 of
of183
173
548
And what
So he was invited to
We
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
37
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1
not even use these things, but I think people feel more
And I jump
I used to
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
the cranium they will cancel each other out and leave a
20
21
15,000, 15,007.
22
23
24
drives to.
25
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Within
Page
Page197
90 of
of183
173
548
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
38
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1
8
9
This is
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
of your dreams.
22
23
24
25
that.
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page
Page198
91 of
of183
173
548
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
39
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1
supposed to work.
of ours.
You know, I
10
11
12
13
radio engineer.
14
15
16
17
18
19
He
So he
20
21
series.
22
binaural beat.
23
24
25
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
He developed a whole
Page
Page199
92 of
of183
173
548
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
40
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1
the comparison.
8
9
He developed a
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
over the course of many, many, many, many years, and now
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
A whole array of
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page
Page200
93 of
of183
173
548
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
41
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1
little energy.
So very
10
11
12
states.
13
14
15
somebody else.
16
This is
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page
Page201
94 of
of183
173
548
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
42
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1
match.
10
11
channels.
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
years.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page
Page202
95 of
of183
173
548
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
43
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1
other people over here and ten other groups over there
10
Now, the US
You know,
Okay.
very expensive.
11
12
13
14
method.
15
16
connect.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
dangerous.
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page
Page203
96 of
of183
173
548
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
44
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1
manipulate it.
They did
10
11
scalars.
12
13
It's always
14
15
they have a very quick rise time and a very fast drop.
16
17
18
19
20
21
carrier.
22
Those
23
first Bush War, and you remember how the Iraqi Army just
24
25
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page
Page204
97 of
of183
173
548
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
45
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1
United States.
10
and prayers.
11
12
Unbeknownst
13
14
15
16
And
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page
Page205
98 of
of183
173
548
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
46
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1
10
11
12
13
Yet, men
14
15
consciousness?
16
17
18
states of consciousness.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page
Page206
99 of
of183
173
548
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
47
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1
scattered in patterns.
rhythmic patterns.
love and they -- you know the saying, and I looked into
10
11
way.
12
long enough.
13
synchronize.
14
15
16
17
18
television.
19
20
uncomfortable.
21
Now, we heard
22
someone talk about the 6:00 news and how that kind of
23
works.
24
25
already fatigued.
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Most
They're
Page 207
100 of 548
173
183
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
48
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1
right?
Nobody's listening.
No one's hearing.
Because
If you
10
11
12
the advertising.
13
14
15
16
advertising?
17
18
19
That's why
20
21
22
23
24
that agitation.
25
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page 208
101 of 548
173
183
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
49
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1
not right.
Unease.
that way.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
inform.
20
Very
21
22
23
public.
24
25
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page 209
102 of 548
173
183
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
50
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1
neutral news.
come on.
what doesn't.
the news?
up.
10
Occasionally.
11
12
13
14
15
alluded to.
16
17
It had 144
18
19
20
21
22
23
has advanced.
24
25
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page 210
103 of 548
173
183
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
51
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1
Wow.
increased.
10
11
computer.
12
13
14
15
16
could do in a second.
17
18
19
20
21
22
there.
23
What will
24
25
as a concept.
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page 211
104 of 548
173
183
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
52
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1
right?
10
11
12
13
14
15
But everyone
16
17
18
19
It has nothing
20
21
22
that resolution.
23
24
25
hours.
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
We
Page 212
105 of 548
173
183
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
53
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1
point.
And over time that flaw will amplify to where it's big
flaws.
The Internet.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
PBS, our
It doesn't
18
19
20
21
22
23
I
Our
You
24
25
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page 213
106 of 548
173
183
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
54
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1
on was the idea -- and this was Rosalie Bertell, the nun
and physicist, and she said that the next leap is going
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
not possible.
Do
It's physiologically
16
17
18
19
you know, the king keeps you poor and the church keeps
20
you dumb, kind of was the early idea when you think
21
22
ago.
23
24
25
changed.
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page 214
107 of 548
173
183
Nothing's
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
55
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1
10
11
other people.
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
sense.
19
And I heard it
20
21
22
of research.
23
24
25
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Some of you
Page 215
108 of 548
173
183
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
56
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1
source.
less.
10
privacy issues.
11
12
13
2000, and you'll see the same things, because the old
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
Parliament.
22
23
in this.
24
25
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
A gentleman by the
So we had a conversation.
Page 216
109 of 548
173
183
Somebody had
And at my expense,
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
57
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1
look at.
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
in the US.
15
16
17
invitation to come.
18
In the European
You
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page 217
110 of 548
173
183
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
58
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1
to follow along.
10
11
12
session.
13
We
14
day.
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
there.
24
25
And then I
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page 218
111 of 548
173
183
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
59
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1
of these things.
seizures.
a problem, right?
Some say
10
11
12
13
fresh.
14
It was
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page 219
112 of 548
173
183
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
60
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1
hear this voice in their head and nobody else would hear
it.
them up.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
right?
17
18
demonstration.
19
Now,
20
21
22
23
24
25
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page 220
113 of 548
173
183
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
61
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1
machine, L-i-d-a.
kinds of areas.
War.
10
11
12
13
14
1960s.
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page 221
114 of 548
173
183
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
62
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1
that risk.
Nobody does.
Because insurance
that.
It's as simple as
10
11
harmful.
12
13
all of a sudden.
14
15
16
a powerful adversary.
17
18
19
controversy.
20
21
22
study.
23
Brain cancer.
Big
Congress
24
25
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page 222
115 of 548
173
183
All right.
He issues his
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
63
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1
report.
himself.
5
6
You know,
He got to spend
A VOICE:
DR. BEGICH:
A VOICE:
10
George Carlo.
Which one is it?
George Carlo.
DR. BEGICH:
And
11
12
book.
13
14
15
damage to skulls.
16
17
18
19
Ten-year-old,
20
21
22
efficient with the battery and the energy with even more
23
leakage.
24
25
it.
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page 223
116 of 548
173
183
They're almost
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
64
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1
impossible to find.
one day.
radiation has been the cause and the root to most of the
10
11
12
13
14
15
and then you add this on top of it, and now you have a
16
17
18
downloading of that.
19
achieve?
20
Blap.
21
22
23
kind of education.
24
programming.
25
thinking involved.
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
There's your 12
Page 224
117 of 548
173
183
Just
No critical
Curriculum
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
65
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1
risk.
This is the
What does
10
There
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
that?
Because
18
19
20
21
federal employees.
22
23
24
25
For what?
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page 225
118 of 548
173
183
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
66
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1
right?
want people that are smart enough to look good, but not
10
11
12
political outcomes.
Some people
13
14
voting.
15
16
17
18
19
they're informed.
20
So
21
22
social programs you've got running and you say, you will
23
24
25
them.
Whoever can
The moment they walk into the booth, they go, ah,
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page 226
119 of 548
173
183
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
67
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1
claim internally.
Because you
Everybody
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
wouldn't it?
17
I mean, if
18
19
20
21
22
23
confidence.
24
25
It
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page 227
120 of 548
173
183
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
68
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1
right and true and you step into it on the idea that you
are doing good work otherwise step back, do what you can
10
here.
11
12
13
They
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
the time.
23
24
25
Yeah, it was at
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page 228
121 of 548
173
183
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
69
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1
forward.
standing up as an adult.
10
11
change.
12
13
(Applause.)
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control Transcripts
Mind Control
Page 229
122 of 548
173
183
SaturdaySunday,
September
June17,
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Mind
U.S.
Sponsored
Control
Transcripts
Mind
Control
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
10
18
7
11of
1of
of
1of
of
51
172
173
174
of
51
176
51
51
51
Page
123
230
173
183
548
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
12,
15,
2016
Saturday
Sunday,
September
June
5, 2015
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
"# $
%" "&##'(
#$
" "
*
#)
/ * .
.
/-
.
*
! #!" ! !
+
- / * )
0
) . ) 0
3
-
. /
-
9::;
0
)
)
*
% &!
'
,
)
0 )
*
- 0
0 . - 0
.
0
0 ) .
' -
* .
0
/
/+
1 ,
-
/
*
. /
5678
9::;
/ .1 0
0 )
/
)
/-
) -
* +
#-
!"
)
'
'
! # (
)
<
,,
!
344///
2
4
,!
6666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666
7, , *
,
- ,
/ *
* 3
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Mind
U.S.
Sponsored
Control
Transcripts
Mind
Control
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
11
29
8
22
1of
2of
of
2of
1
of
51
172
173
174
of
51
176
50
51
51
51
Page
124
231
173
183
548
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
2016
Saturday
Sunday,
September
June
5, 2015
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Mind
U.S.
Sponsored
Control
Transcripts
Mind
Control
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
10
12
39
33
2of
3of
of
3of
of
51
172
of
51
173
174
176
50
51
51
51
Page
125
232
173
183
548
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
2016
Saturday
Sunday,
September
June
5, 2015
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
"
%
"
/
4 4 2 1
12! 1 3
!
"
'
"
& %
) '
$
!
)
($
!&
#
%
.
&"
&
+,
#
$
'
"
$ %"
+,
'
"%
$
$%
$%
)
)
"
"%
"
%&
)
#
"
&
'
$ ($ "
%
"
"& %
) "
""
"
%%
) "
$
$
$ % )
$
#'
% )
&
% '"
&
"
$
"%
%%
'$
"
" !
+ % /
0$
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Mind
U.S.
Sponsored
Control
Transcripts
Mind
Control
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
10
11
13
444
3of
4of
of
4of
of
51
of
51
172
173
174
176
50
51
51
51
Page
126
233
173
183
548
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
2016
Saturday
Sunday,
September
June
5, 2015
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
8 *
- =8 *
<
*+ ;
<
)=
@, #-
) .-
) . #
<
0
A,#-
) - - 0
0
.& !
#
5697 > - )
0
0
4
0
-
)
0
0
/ .C
0)
0
.
?)
0 .
? 0
-
.>
- 0
0
.
#-
- ) -
.
- 0
)
-
.
.
.
) -
3
.
<
/
0
)
/
00
/ )
0
-
) 0
)
- - )
2
.
-
0
0
)
0
+ ,
-
. .
0
.?
)
?- 0
$ 8 *
9
: *
0
/ )
0
/- 0 *
/ )
) )
)
)0
) .
4
* .
0
0
0
+D 5 :::,
0
0
)
) /
0
+ , /2
))
. .
0
0
0
)
)
#- "
-
) -
) - <
- B 0
/* .
-
/ -
. .
#
- <
.-
0
) -
.
.
/
- .- .
.
.- 0
" .
) )-
(
)
.-
0
0
-
*+ ;
9,
?
-
)
-
5, #)
-
#0
. >>>
&
*
-
/ .
0
/ )
4
. 0
)
E
EE
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Mind
U.S.
Sponsored
Control
Transcripts
Mind
Control
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
11
12
14
555
4of
5of
of
5of
2
of
51
of
51
172
173
174
176
50
51
51
51
Page
127
234
173
183
548
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
2016
Saturday
Sunday,
September
June
5, 2015
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
B
) ?
- /
/ - 0
) .- 0
/ - )
)
0
)
0
/ - ) - -
)
.
. )?
#-
. )?
) -
00
) - -
)
0 * . -
0
)
/) 0
. -
/ -
) -
) 0
- )
/
) -
)
)
/
)
? 0
00
)
)
? 0
0?
0
00
?
-
) F 0
0
-
#-
.
/ - 0
) .
)
00
) 0
)
-
- ? !
. -
/ -
00
00
? 00
?
) F0 *
/00
. .
0 0
) - .
-
0
)
- -
00
/- 00
.
-
0
8
+ , !
0
F0
00
) 0
.
-
0
)
/- -
/- ))
/-
/ / -
0
-
F0
0
.
-
.
)
F
.
.
*
/ -
0 *
) 0
-
.
-
0 /- - /
0
0
*
)
0
)
) F
) - ) /
)
)
0
)
? 0
/ -
.
-
)
)
)
) -
? 0
) /- -
?!
.
.
) 0
00
)
)
.
0
5:
) )
.
)
,
/- / )
0
-
? 00
) 0
))
/ /- / -
2
/
.
/- -
2
.
0
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Mind
U.S.
Sponsored
Control
Transcripts
Mind
Control
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
12
13
15
666
5of
6of
of
6of
3
of
51
of
51
172
173
174
176
50
51
51
51
Page
128
235
173
183
548
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
2016
Saturday
Sunday,
September
June
5, 2015
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
+ , !
0
/00
)
/-
)
0
0
.
- .
)
) / *
.
+D 5 :::,
)
0
0
0
.
0
F C
+5, #0
0 *
00
/ *
. 0
5: 0
0 * . 0
- / *
) 0
.
. . 0
-
+ ,
+), )
+., B
0
-
) -
0
B
)
0
/-
)
+D5: :::,
) )
0
))
0
/
0 -
0
-
/ .
0
-
)
)
0
/-
)
-
0
-
00
0
00
)
-
/00
. / -
0 *
+ , + ,
0 ?
/-
00
?
) F 0
+/ ) .
4
/ - 4
)
/
-
* .
*+ /
0
00
-
0
. /
. 0
0
.
0 .
0
F 0
/ ) 3
+! B,
.
, .
* /
.
)
.
2
1
0 . .
.
+
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
13
14
16
777
6of
7of
of
7of
4
of
51
of
51
172
173
174
176
50
51
51
51
Mind
U.S.
Sponsored
Control
Transcripts
Mind
Control
Page
129
236
173
183
548
+
. 00
0 *
/- )
0
0
/ - /- 0 .
. . 0
2
. -
+ ,
)
0
/ - 9A=-
0
0
0 *
0
-
+ , + ,
3
.
. -
+ ,
+9, #-
00
.
))
/
0
00
/ - -
0
0
- .
- #-
) -
+ ,
))
00
/-
0 0 * . -
0 *
00
)
0
0
)
0 *
-
/)
/ )
!
0
0 *
0
/ ) 3
+< B,
0
)
.
)
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
2016
Saturday
Sunday,
September
June
5, 2015
0
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
0
=
0
.
. 0
0
-
.
-
/ =
0 .
)
)
=
1
=
-
)
F
0
. - 0
.
0
.
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Mind
U.S.
Sponsored
Control
Transcripts
Mind
Control
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
14
15
17
888
7of
8of
of
8of
5
of
51
of
51
172
173
174
176
50
51
51
51
Page
130
237
173
183
548
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
2016
Saturday
Sunday,
September
June
5, 2015
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
!
"
#
$
& #
'
"
"
# )
* ()+
"
,
/
."
1
!
#
%
3
"
)
. #
#
"
#
5%1%
%4
"
%/
"
-
%
#
,
0
%2
""
%4
"
"'
#
"
!"
"
0
!
()
6
&
%9
#
-4,
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Mind
U.S.
Sponsored
Control
Transcripts
Mind
Control
0
:
'
"
"
%
#
'
" #
"
"
%
# #
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
15
16
18
999
8of
9of
of
9of
8
of
51
of
51
172
173
174
176
50
51
51
51
Page
131
238
173
183
548
()
# %
"
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
2016
Saturday
Sunday,
September
June
5, 2015
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
.'
'
%
#
#
"
"
"
()
%'
;
"
%
<=
#
"
"
5%1%
9
"
"
!
@
()
"
"
%
(
(
!;
.
!
# %
,
-1
.
511
"
""
"
1
()
#
"
,
(
A 1
"
%
"
"
%
"
#
.
%
,
"
4
%-
.
%'
$
#
4
)
;
#
#
-4 ,
>?
#
5%1%
"
%B
"
#
5%1%
%
4
#
#
@
#
"
"
C%%
%.
)
"
'
-:
% -@ ;
%'
.)
"
%@
%4,
"
"
%.
D $
2
!
) $&
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Mind
U.S.
Sponsored
Control
Transcripts
Mind
Control
C%
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
10
16
17
19
10
10
910
10
of
of
9of
51
172
173
174
176
50
of
51
51
51
51
Page
132
239
of
173
183
548
E
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
2016
Saturday
Sunday,
September
June
5, 2015
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
!
)
"
& '(
*
+ &$ #
*
$'' ,&
./0 1/.2
" #
3
$*
) $
0
0
&
"$
)
**
! 34
0
3 "
0
# &
*
" "
"
& $
5 " )
&
'
$
)
# 3
$
"
.678
0
'
" "
)
&
) '
&
" '
$*0 3
0
& '
0
& '
) $
' &
$&
'
9$*
"
:
0 &0
' ;,
&
,
<
"
) $
,0
' =. >
"
'
"#
&
$
) 1/.2
& '
#
&
$
&
)
,#
&
24.;9	/12269
)
?
$
*$
) 3
&
3 '
!
&
)
!
&$
$
)
.29<;//
#& '
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Mind
U.S.
Sponsored
Control
Transcripts
Mind
Control
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
11
17
18
20
11
10
11
11
of
of
51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
Page
133
240
ofof
173
183
548
Page
111
of
41
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
2015
2016
Saturday
Sunday,
September
June
5, 2015
Saturday,
October
10,
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
!
'
" #$ $ %
)'
%)
&
%
*++
!
"
#
"
"
&
'
)' +
"# - /
*
2
5 #$ '
(922
(34
( 6
2
(
0
(
8 ' (
69
(
(
!
%
'
',%
/0
2'
" !
( )%
"
'
#%
'
'
,
%
2
*
'
+
0
(
'
, - .$
%
*
"
-
"% .
"## $"
%&
&
)
.
%
-
%' ( )*+*
+. *+ /
0! ) * . *++
0! ) . *++
0$
&
2
$
1
$
!%
!%$
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Mind
U.S.
Sponsored
Control
Transcripts
Mind
Control
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
12
18
19
21
12
11
12
12
of
of
51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
Page
134
241
ofof
173
183
548
Page
212
of
41
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
2015
2016
Saturday
Sunday,
September
June
5, 2015
Saturday,
October
10,
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
)( )*+,
)*+,
.
"%-
"
"
% )
)4
"
.
.
*+ /
3
"
3
$ -
/ 1
-" $%
1-"%
/#
"
5"%"
#' .
"&
5"
" $ $"& /
5"%"
5!
3
!
!%$
.
!
-""
).
)?
-""
#$ $
! !
5/# 4
5" ! #" /#
#"
)*+6
%!
# %
9!
"$'
%#"
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Mind
U.S.
Sponsored
Control
Transcripts
Mind
Control
# 5
4%
5/%&
" / /
$9
/%! /
!" !"
5/%&
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
13
19
20
22
13
12
13
13
of
of
51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
Page
135
242
ofof
173
183
548
Page
313
of
41
= 5
-"
& ! 10" / $
&
&"
&$"
4 #
"4
# $$"# "&
% 01"
5"
& !
9 <
5"
! %"
/# %/!
5" ! #"
4 - #"&
/#!
&
2 4"."%
5"
1/! #
1/! # 4 # 9/ "&
%/
+67*),,8 /
9 "% 9/ / $
1"&
; %/#&/! /
% #"!
) 1
) '
" 4 #
1-"%
5"
"0 % 1"
5 4 9 1/ '
; "
) 1
0$
/!5" "
9
5)
!
)
"%-
4 % / $
+88+
! !
"
9 !
1 %&"% /
"!
10 /$
<
7$
/# %/!
"## ! %% - %
/!"
-'
# "%
"./&" !"
3 ;
" / /
9 % 5"
" )3 )*+,
%0 #
0$
&
"
A!
"
""9
"% 2 ! / $
%
!
.
)
) " *+ /.
'$
<
5!
0$
"
.
!
10
' %
" <
<(> (
<
)
3
""
"
<
"
"
%! ) !
0$
"
*+ +
.!
!%$
& )
.
"
!
3
35
) !
36**
!%
)'
35
*+ + ) '
"
"
4/
"
"&/
&
6 !
!"&
"
&.
4 )
% )
&
" .
"
5"
" &
5 !
/1
00"
/%! / 1 ' %
"
/#
/!5" "
#
5"
10" "%
9 %
"
#"
B 45" 5"%
+,>
9%""
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
2015
2016
Saturday
Sunday,
September
June
5, 2015
Saturday,
October
10,
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
/#
/!5" "
1-"%
% $%
&$1"
"%-
)4 )
"
!
"/
0! )
!
%
<
!
!
"
5#
"
4 )
)
& 9"&"%
$ -
"
! !
B. *+ /
"
! ! .
C!
"
0$
) 5
!%
% #
"
11 %'
"
<
"
$%
0$
%
"
"
.4
3 5
%
)
#/
. *+ /. '
% $% 1 -
1"
0$
%
! /
5
%"
!/./
%0 #
"
<
" 4 )
"
"
EB++$++$
0! )
. *+ /
-""
. -""
"
!%.
!
%
"
! !
. *+ /
"
<
<
) 4
&
<
*/+
)
4
"
<
) '
<
"
(
.
> $
C!
/9+B
/$
%%
. &'
! $
"
"
"
0 ""
"
<
C!
/B .
) 0!
%
!%
*B. *+ /
.
"
#$ $ 4
%!
*+ /
"
"
0$
)9 9
! C
$
@
3 .
0$
!
3
"
4$
!
!
!%%
)%
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Mind
U.S.
Sponsored
Control
Transcripts
Mind
Control
"
"
! "
! !
35
"
'
"
.
4
"
"
)
$
F+* %
* !
' %
"
)
)
8%
<
0!
!%%
0$
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
14
20
21
23
14
13
14
14
of
of
51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
Page
136
243
ofof
173
183
548
Page
414
of
41
& @
)
).
!
)%
'$
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
2015
2016
Saturday
Sunday,
September
June
5, 2015
Saturday,
October
10,
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
%
" *+ /
%
B$
0$
"
/&"
4$
"
'$ 4
. '$ $. "
"
4$
% !
)"
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Mind
U.S.
Sponsored
Control
Transcripts
Mind
Control
#$ $
0$
"
>
! )
)$
. 0 $.
!
%
"
(=5->( "
) "
) D/
.
"
%
"
"
4$
B+? $
"
> 6
3
4$
%%
"
0! ) *+. *++
"
"
3 )
+?
%
%
4$
"6
/!
)
!
"
.
!
0$
4
3
) "
%
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
15
21
22
24
15
14
15
15
of
of
51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
Page
137
244
ofof
173
183
548
Page
515
of
41
&
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
2015
2016
Saturday
Sunday,
September
June
5, 2015
Saturday,
October
10,
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
2
0$
%!
""
F
"
1!
)
1
""
! $
"
$.
&1. <
.
! )
!
$
9
"
"
5"
1!
""
"
"
.
3
.&
"
7
/
"
)
%
&"%
&
"
"
)H
"
"
8 ** )
"
%
+? $ -
%
%!
$&
). %
0$
"
C "%%
'-'
"%/
7
%!
"
>
).
).
0$
8%
)H
9!%
!
%
>
*F.
)
%
0!
6!
"
$.
'
"
"
0$
) .
!%
"
"
"
" !
%!
! )
)$
!%. <
' %
&
3 !
"
0$
** )
"!
G0
""
"
? "
>
$
"
%!
'"%
" <
. 4
&
! ) "<
.4
F
$
9
"
*$
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Mind
U.S.
Sponsored
Control
Transcripts
Mind
Control
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
16
22
23
25
16
15
16
16
of
of
51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
Page
138
245
ofof
173
183
548
Page
616
of
41
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
2015
2016
Saturday
Sunday,
September
June
5, 2015
Saturday,
October
10,
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
"
" %$" 2 D
)
"#. "
) "' "
-"%
--'
'
%!
""
#$ $ 4
'
,
'
"
"
" '
)
"
. "
'
&
#$ $
&". "
#"05
!
%% %
%
.
. "
!
"E
"
#5. "
$
"
"
.
7
6 !
>
=
)
"
" = %
"
"
$
%
%& " C
"
!
!
-""
5
!
%& "
!
#$ $
& # %/"#.
!
!
&
$
"
"
#$ $
$
%
F
E
"
" 1
"
"
"4#C /
!/
/1"#
G
"
%
%
>
@ %%
"
"
"4# )*C)*
6!
)
! ) .
G
)
"
A$
""
"
'
!
"
"
4
)
1! "
!
.
)
$
-
0! )
*
) 0
"
% =
H
! )
"
0$
!
5
!
" <
3.
"!
&1. < $.
"
0$
?
$.
$ 0
!
K
%
$
%
"%/
<
) 0
!
% .
1!
<
9
+9++ D <
E $ /
"%/
%
.
>+88*>**(6 <
% =
%
)
"
"
3.
4
?
9
$
0$
!
"
4
!
. 0
5
3.
)$
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Mind
U.S.
Sponsored
Control
Transcripts
Mind
Control
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
17
23
24
26
17
16
17
17
of
of
51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
Page
139
246
ofof
173
183
548
Page
717
of
41
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
2015
2016
Saturday
Sunday,
September
June
5, 2015
Saturday,
October
10,
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
%
.
"%/
9
+9++ D <
! )
!
"
5%/# 05"%
&"%5/
" 6
. #
K 5 ! 3 .
%
1!
$
*++/
%
#
%
&
' %
+/9 9**
#$ $ '
!
"
(
4
)
(=5->( $ <
! )4
. $ $.$
%
4
0
9
) 0
"%/
%
+9++ D <
%
%
<
3$
7%
0
)
'
"
"
1!
"
4
.
!
*++
) #$ $
>
>
""
!
.
H
)
H
H "
H "
!%
!
.
% $
)$
! H
%
H %!
!%
"
"
". !% !
C! )
$
8
%
% %!
"
"
"
9 !
4
0
% 4
"
"
!%
"
"
"
9!%,
)
%
) 0$
"
"
$
) "
$
$
)
(8
@
E7
%
"
)%
"
!%
"
"
%
"
). "
)
""
%
)
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Mind
U.S.
Sponsored
Control
Transcripts
Mind
Control
)
.
$
.
!)
)
"
C!
#$ $
G
"
" <
$.
"
)
"
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
18
24
25
27
18
17
18
18
of
of
51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
Page
140
247
ofof
173
183
548
Page
818
of
41
!
%! !
$
.
! $
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
2015
2016
Saturday
Sunday,
September
June
5, 2015
Saturday,
October
10,
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
) "
!
)
%
. "
C!
) .
"
*++/
) "
'!
>
"
$ 6
!
"
"!
"!
"
"
" %
% 8
"
"
)
>
" C!
$ 5
= %!
! %
3 )! %
0$
".
'
"4
$
"%00"
#"
" /
9 "%
-"%
9 )**F
"0 "1-"%
B. *++/
3
#
.
%%
5
3 !% )
"
'
'
!
& 5 # -""
# !!"##9
9 )**F
9
3 !% )
5"
-" !
9 ; # /!"
.
!
"
$.
$ +/9
-' 0
5/%&
/%! /
"&
0$
"
4
%
"
"
& )
"
/99
0$
#
%
4/ 5&% 4
/ $ /
-# % ! /
) 4
5" ! #" 4/
.
!
$ +/9*F+/ $
"
!
"&
%%
<
& &"#/#
(=5->( $
# ?*(>66(6@ /
5/# ! #" /# # /
9 "./&" !"
&
*++/
**
'
#$ $
0$
' %
) %
%
"
L 3
!%
"
2
)
"
) '
"
%
!
!
" !
C!
"
9 -
7
%
3
)
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Mind
U.S.
Sponsored
Control
Transcripts
Mind
Control
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
19
25
26
28
19
18
19
19
of
of
51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
Page
141
248
ofof
173
183
548
Page
919
of
41
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
2015
2016
Saturday
Sunday,
September
June
5, 2015
Saturday,
October
10,
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
D
-
"
$
!
7
"
+?
)%
#$ $
)H )
<
*++/$
!
&
<
"
< !
. !
"
! !
! !
)H
) "
9 !
!
"
A!
! .
(=5->( $ <
"
&
!
$ &
$.
"
"
+/9
9**
F)
#$ $
-""
"
"
"!
)?
)$
0$
0$
"
#$ $
"
"
) 4
! $
0$
%%
*DG
"
"
! )
!
""
)
!
#$ $ '
*++/
%
) 3
)
!
!
! !
% $
. =
) %
"
3
"
0$
"
.
""
M$
. % 3
%!
"!
5!
"
"
*++B
%
" *++
)H
&@ #< =
0$
H
! %
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Mind
U.S.
Sponsored
Control
Transcripts
Mind
Control
8
H
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
20
26
27
29
20
19
20
20
20
of
of
of
51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
Page
142
249
of
173
183
548
Page
10
of
41
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
2015
2016
Saturday
Sunday,
September
June
5, 2015
Saturday,
October
10,
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
2
" ) !
4
"
"
"
"%-
"
) "
" <
0$
).
3
,
5"%
1 "
!
"
7 %
%$.
3
$ 6
"
"
!%
&
!
&
$
%
5"%
1 "
"
%
5"%
7 %
5 1 # D
.
"
' "
! %
"
. 0 $.
8%
! %
' %
0$
)
H
)
"
. !
' =4
?
.
H ""
%
0$
$ 6
"
"
B+?
"
"
!
%
)
!
)
.
"
' %
< '
&
"
"
) '
'
"
%) %
>
&
5%
3 ) %
"
"
)
'
)
"
"
&
%'
3 )
". !""
)
"
3 )%
"%-
)3
)$
0 $.
"
"
$ 6
0$
"
"
". !""
!
"
!""
"%-
1/ ' 2/#
".
0$. 5 %
5"
"%-
!
)
"
% %
!
H
"
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Mind
U.S.
Sponsored
Control
Transcripts
Mind
Control
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
21
27
28
30
21
20
21
21
21
of
of
of
51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
Page
143
250
of
173
183
548
Page
11
of
41
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
2015
2016
Saturday
Sunday,
September
June
5, 2015
Saturday,
October
10,
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
"
"
1 "
"
"%-
"
"
<
"!
$
6
%
%)$ (
' %
" <
. 4
)
!%. <
" "
.
$
"
"
?
%
& @
&
).
"
%
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Mind
U.S.
Sponsored
Control
Transcripts
Mind
Control
0
)
) "
"
"
"
"
)0
"
"
%
"
).
-?5
! .
"
)$ L !
. *++
4$
0 $. "
3
3
L 3
8 B
""
)4
. 0!
>
0!
<
"
"
$.
4$
" *+++$
" <
" *++ .
%%
"
>
0!
& )
&
* .
"
"
. 0 $.
"
" <
"
$. L !
"
)
"
! %
3 "
"
% $
"
M$
) "
&
"
%) (8%
! !
"
B+? .
<
. 0 $.
. 0 $.
-='(=
)
&
4$
"
. 0 $.
" E +$++$
!""
4$
&
E*++$++
43 .
.
"
4$
" "
3
"
$ 5
. 0$
0!
%
!
<
"
+? $ 6
"
) 0
).
#$ $
"
>
&
"
"
"
&@ #< = $
"
$ 5)
DB
$ 6
. %
!
DF
) "
%
%
"
)G
)
),
>
0
$ 6
5"%@
1!
G
%
"
"
#$ $
!
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
22
28
29
31
22
21
22
22
22
of
of
of
51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
Page
144
251
of
173
183
548
Page
12
of
41
"
.
"
!
E +.+++$++$
&
' )
$
6
!
"
%
$
"
%
" #$ $
:
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
2015
2016
Saturday
Sunday,
September
June
5, 2015
Saturday,
October
10,
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
!
" )
"
"%-
"
" ? %
0$
"
1
.
"
.
"
$
? -""
<
"
% )
"
"
"
' %
99
77
"!
%
"
" 4
8
6
0!
5%
"
"
/$
&
"
) 4
)
8
$ 4
. 4
"
$. +/9
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Mind
U.S.
Sponsored
Control
Transcripts
Mind
Control
3.
' 4
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
23
29
30
32
23
22
23
23
23
of
of
of
51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
Page
145
252
of
173
183
548
Page
13
of
41
3 )
"!
" #
" 4
"
)
.
0$4$ &
"
&
"
"
.
%
' 4
9**
4$
"
4$
"
B$
'
!
&
"!
$ <
<
1!
A! )
'
(=5->(
"
7 %
$ 4 )
" $
"!
4$
"!
"
"
3 E *.+++ "
!
"
'
" ! %
3 )
"
! "
$
"
!
)
5
5"%@
< 'M
%
>
"< '"
"
) "
" ? %
5)
0$
"
"%-
"
!%
5 1 #
! C
"
"
*$
3 )
8
" " ! % )
!
. 4
D.
D.
!
"
""
! "
*/.
!
0$
<
"'
"
"
)1
A!
&@ #< = $
) 1
+$
" !
"
"
1!
< ' 8%
"
4!
)"
"
5"%@
*F.
1 "
.
; %
*F*F >
0$
$
"
'
!
3.
43 .
"
"
&$ @
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
2015
2016
Saturday
Sunday,
September
June
5, 2015
Saturday,
October
10,
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
@
" <
>
% %
"
" <
"%-
" /#
%"1
"
8
!
%
$ <
"
).
" ./"4"% ?
%
#$ $
8%
3 )
"
+$
M'
&
7!
!%. <
)
!
E*+.+++
"
"
5"
5 5/#
"
"
"
"
M$
+ J .
) @
"
" 4
!%. <
$$
"
!%. <
) E ++.+++
!
$.
A! )$
%"! %&#
)"
%
A! 3 )
"
)
&
%%
"
>
"./"4
5" 3
5!
5"
%!
<
%
&
"&
) "
/!/&"
%
)4
' %
)
& )
"$
!
" <
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Mind
U.S.
Sponsored
Control
Transcripts
Mind
Control
. 4
"
"
0
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
24
30
31
33
24
23
24
24
24
of
of
of
51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
Page
146
253
of
173
183
548
Page
14
of
41
!
"
,
!
0! )
<
"
) H
"
) >
%
)
"
"
%%
' %
H"
!
#B " ! B
)$
"! %&
#/
%
-%/!
6
%/1/
"
!
)
B &"
""
) (
#/
"
%%
""
. "
) 5
- *
,
" >
0$
!
)
)
3
"
%'
" !
5" 1"
0$
&
<
/.
$.
%
$
"
& 4
!
%
MH
).
8
&
%
"
0$
%%
0$
"!
&
"
*9 %
3$
0$
"
"
"
"
%!
"
!
"
" ! )
3
6
0$
" 4 ' / @.
!
!
" #
J . *++/
. *++
6
"
F+*
) 0$
!
0$
! !
"
)
%%
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
2015
2016
Saturday
Sunday,
September
June
5, 2015
Saturday,
October
10,
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
%
" $
" <
. 4
#$ $ '
"
"
*++
"
(=5->(
'
"
2
4!
4
"
""
"
<
#$ $
"
"
<
)
++
)
"
F.+++
0$
!
D+.+++
'9=-&
"
0$
"
>
"
"" $
"
#$ $
"
"
&
"
!%.
4
<
-""
"
H' %
(
% H
"
"
H <
H <
"
"
)
0$
1 "
"%-
H <
!
%
H <
% H &
!
% )
1 "
"%-
<
(
.
"
4!
5"%.
!
% H
' "
" 1' 9
H <
! ) 1!
"
% H
-""
5"%.
% H &
% %
$.
>
. <
H <
H <
H =
!
(
'
"
8
&
!
% %
"
D
$
$"
% ,GG
1' -%
"
7
!%$
""
$
$
$
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Mind
U.S.
Sponsored
Control
Transcripts
Mind
Control
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
25
31
32
34
25
24
25
25
25
of
of
of
51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
Page
147
254
of
173
183
548
Page
15
of
41
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
2015
2016
Saturday
Sunday,
September
June
5, 2015
Saturday,
October
10,
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
2
PP
-""
/# /10 %
! 11"%!/
#/ $
"1
9 "
"
"!%"
/K"& -' ! %0 %
-%
&! #
% "&
J "&/ 1J
"1
5/#
D2
"
# !
9 1 #
"E0"%/1"
#"!%" /." 9 % #
&% 1
" 5
/"4"%#
5" ".
/"4"%
"
9 5/# 4%/ / $
1"%/!
& !"%
# 9 % %" &
'#/#
"!5
$/"# - %
9 5"
&
5" %"#
5/# 5 # %"!"
/ $
' -""
# #" #
#
& "E0"%
"!5
$ "#
"# /9/"&
"
/"4/ $ 5 # %"!"
" ,** ! 10
"0 % 1"
$/!
&.
#
!"1"
%'
5/# # 1"
"
%"
5/# /#
"9" #"
# !
5"
'
/"#
#"& /
' 8 )**F
# 4/ 5
"1
'
" "./#/
% &/
/."
5'#/!/#
'
, 0! ) * . *++
0$
&
1 !%
2
$
$
!%$
5" 9
4/ $ %"
$"% / #"%./!"7
$
!%$
%
$
$
$
G
!%+
$"
3$
G
$
$
G
$
$
$
G% " G
0
%,GG
$) ! ! $
G
!%
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Mind
U.S.
Sponsored
Control
Transcripts
Mind
Control
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
26
32
33
35
26
25
26
26
26
of
of
of
51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
Page
148
255
of
173
183
548
Page
16
of
41
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
2015
2016
Saturday
Sunday,
September
June
5, 2015
Saturday,
October
10,
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
"0 "1-"% ( )**8
0$
&
!%
*/+
<
.4
'
B+F
3=
6
4$-$ 5 8 +**
.D/*+
4
9 ++9/ 9/B
8 9 BB9DFF9D +
, " 2"
"
"7 #
."%
'
3.
&) %
&
! $ '
6
) !
)$
) !
3
9
!"L
%."/
'
! # "%
3.
) Q
'9=-&
."
$
3
*++/
%
$
4
$M
7
<
3
$
%
+?
%
)G
&
1 !%
!"
!
&
'9=-&
!%$
.
!
"
)$ 5
.
$
+?
K
!
A$
$
>
3
"
"
)
% )
"! "
"
"
"
<
"
"
3
"
B/
"6
)$ >
)
3
$
'
!
8$
<
!
"
! <
"
"
"
)
"
. "
"
&
"
"
"
!"
6
>
%
)
/ $
" )
)
8%
/K"&
+/
%$
<
"
9 %
!
$
$'
G
'
<
%
& G"%
<
"
<
)
!%
"
) " ! "!
"! $
. <
.
3
) !,
#' .
"
) )
$ =
<
"
3. C!
!
8% !
<
)$ M
% %
"
1 <9
#$ $ ' %
%
!
>
5
" 0!
!
"-
F .
#$ $
4
E 5
! $
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Mind
U.S.
Sponsored
Control
Transcripts
Mind
Control
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
27
33
34
36
27
26
27
27
27
of
of
of
51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
Page
149
256
of
173
183
548
Page
17
of
41
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
2015
2016
Saturday
Sunday,
September
June
5, 2015
Saturday,
October
10,
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
3
>
"
4
* "
). <
1 <9
!
"
.
"
)M
"
$
)
!
"
&
>
"
%
!
$<
%M$ 1
)M
%
6$ 5!
M
"
!
'
A
)
>
! "
> $ *++B9
. =
?
)
A!
"
. %
%
"
9* B+ "
<
"
"
" ) ! "
"
#$ $
"
&! 3
'
,++,++ ) !
=
"
<
>
>
. ?
) !
)
5
),
>
). "
#$ $
%
"
!
!
%
!
)
@
$
)
%
4
%
.
""
%
$ 1
)9
).
!
"
"
!
! ! $5
!
5 >
>
0 !
!
"
. 1
B
) F+.
3%
?
""
"" "
6$ 5!
! ) *+.
.
" =
"
"
). " "
!
%$
8
D$
?
%
%
>
%
"1
3
% C
$
!
6 % $
$
)
"
'
' %
& ) *F.
$R**S
)
.
)
'
)
$R*FS
4
%
>
"
> !
&
%.
!
I.
"
).
"
!
!
!
!
+? .
%%
"
%%
!
8%
!%
>
1
8
0
%%
#$ $ "
.
")
!
"
%
"
>
).
% )
""
"
8 !
!
%
$ M6
"
3
5!
. 5!
4
&
>
3
.
% )
! 9 ! $ $$$ 5!
.
%%
"
!
!
4
$ 5!
!
"
$
)
%
$
.
)
).
%
$
)
8
D. "
).
""
$M L !
$
3
?
).
& ) *F.
"
F/
"
) . "
.
%
!
9
R*DS
"
0
%
)
"
.M
.
!
G>
! !
)?
>
"
!
"
>
).
3
!
"
K
5 >
%
.
!
<
$ 0
.
& ) F. *++
)$ 6
"
"
"
)
%%
A$ -"
)$ <
$5!
' "
!
"
)
"
!
%
@ %%
)$
"&
"
8
1
%%
$ <
.
%
) = %!
"
1
"
'
)$
5
"
"
) = )
. "
>
). '
"
K
%%
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Mind
U.S.
Sponsored
Control
Transcripts
Mind
Control
.
%
"
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
28
34
35
37
28
27
28
28
28
of
of
of
51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
Page
150
257
of
173
183
548
Page
18
of
41
>
!
) %
! )
"
) >
&
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
2015
2016
Saturday
Sunday,
September
June
5, 2015
Saturday,
October
10,
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
M $ $ $ $
?
"
5
) = )
) 0
4
A!
% !
"
%%
<
% )
%%
)?$
!
5
.
"
"
" '
&
%)
5
B$
? "
D.
' "
)
M
$M )
8%
> .
"
1
6$ 5! . "
0
1!
.4
5
) = )
. "
K
&) "
.
! 4$
6 "
.
! 0$
1
>
). "
1
$ 5!
"
0
>
4
"
.
5
"
"
9
%
)
"
3
"
) = )
).
$
3%
)%
$
$M
,
"
!
'
.
."
"
"
'
"
K
>
$
)
>
'
"
.0$
. $
=
> )$
C!
> 8
0
1!
?
3
% $
=
. ( A$. " <
!
<
<
)? 1
! ) !
$
)
3
3 ) !
. )"
"
. " 4
0
%
$
7
>
)
"
4
)
(=5->( $ <
! "
(
"
$
*++B
%
%%
>
'
3$ 6
8%
!
"
.
%
)
"
1
6
!
)
!
$
!
)
$
!
5
% )"
+
D
/$
"
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Mind
U.S.
Sponsored
Control
Transcripts
Mind
Control
"
4
"
"
!
""$
-%
' "
"
)
)
!
#$ $ '
)
"
)
""
<
?
"
"
%
3 %
)
' "
3
1
"
3 5 )
"
3
$
!
!
4" !
3 !% )
"
.
%
)
)
!% "
)
"
"
3
)
!
!% C!
"
! .
)
&) "
%
)?
0
%
1!
3
4
3
. 0
)
"
" *++/
) *
"
&
) &! ! .
)
. '$ 4
%
$
! !
*
"
' %
!
) 6
)
)
)
$
)
!
3
!%
"
$
! ) 4
. $ $.
> $ *++/9 9+*
'
" 4
)
$
$
$
4
"
*$ 6
%
%
"
)
*. *++/ "
' 3
3
).
0! )
0! )
)$
&
!
!
.
F.
3
$.
!
"
39 9%
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
29
35
36
38
29
28
29
29
29
of
of
of
51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
Page
151
258
of
173
183
548
Page
19
of
41
>
.=
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
2015
2016
Saturday
Sunday,
September
June
5, 2015
Saturday,
October
10,
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
0$
&
2
$
$
$
$"
$
$
%,GG
1
$
!%$
!%+
G
3$
!%
!%$
%
$
G
G
$) ! !
$
$
$
G
G%
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Mind
U.S.
Sponsored
Control
Transcripts
Mind
Control
"
0
!%
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
30
36
37
39
30
29
30
30
30
of
of
of
51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
Page
152
259
of
173
183
548
Page
20
of
41
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
2015
2016
Saturday
Sunday,
September
June
5, 2015
Saturday,
October
10,
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
! "
%& '
%
%
#$
"
" (
* '
"
&
$#
( -
&
'
* '
#
% ((
"
( ''
'
)( #""
"
'
''
"
''
( "
* !
'
&
%
'
+ %
%&
% % $
#$
'#
'
7 '
&
( "
'
#'
%) *
+
+ '
'
'
+ ' #
::
'
$
% + $
"
'' '
'
! &
<
#%
'
''
"
%'
./05 *
#'
"
*
&
'
::
# %
&
;'
'
#$
%
'
'
'
+ $
#'
'
(
"#
! "
%#
'' * #%
&
#$
!*
"
& '
'' * #%
&
'
'
* &
'
'
%#'
* ' '
"
;'
%
'%
( "
798 !
' (
'
* #%
'
''
%'
"
* !
% ) "
% ! * #%
#(("
! 2(
#%
'
'!
&
''
# %
# '
"'
"
# % ! "
) *
' (
" '
"" %
%&
*',
'#
#
( ./01
& & %
7 "$
%$
#% '
'(
% "'
'
' &
' #
'
% " !
'
'
'
% "' 6
%
( ''
#$
# %
' &
"
#$
%'
% $
* !
'
% $ '
&
' )
"
'
* '
((
'
!
#$
% !%
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Mind
U.S.
Sponsored
Control
Transcripts
Mind
Control
" %$
#"
'
<
!
!"
"$ '
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
31
37
38
40
31
21
30
31
31
31
of
of
51
172
173
174
176
of
51
41
50
51
51
51
Page
153
260
ofof
173
183
548
&
% (
!
" % '
'
" %
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Saturday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
October
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
10,
12,
15,
11,
2016
Saturday
Sunday,
September
June
5, 2015
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Mind
U.S.
Sponsored
Control
Transcripts
Mind
Control
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
32
38
39
41
32
31
32
32
32
of
of
51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
Page
154
261
ofof
173
183
548
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
2016
Saturday
Sunday,
September
June
5, 2015
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Mind
U.S.
Sponsored
Control
Transcripts
Mind
Control
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
33
39
40
42
33
32
33
33
33
of
of
51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
Page
155
262
ofof
173
183
548
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
2016
Saturday
Sunday,
September
June
5, 2015
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Mind
U.S.
Sponsored
Control
Transcripts
Mind
Control
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
34
40
41
43
34
33
34
34
34
of
of
51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
Page
156
263
ofof
173
183
548
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
2016
Saturday
Sunday,
September
June
5, 2015
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
!
$%
'
"
&
( )!
*+ ,
-''.#!' /0 12. )!
/01- . !#!-/ 1
1!/
!1.230/. !/4 !45!/ .4 ".4-! #206)
5
!
)
5
71
'
!
#
&
!
+( $
'
"
$
,
.
2
7
0
6
9
:
;
,/
,,
,.
,2
%
()" *
&
"
'
)
"
'
!
4
)
)
4
)
.//0
1
.
2
- (
4
!
(0
3
( '' '
0
4
5
.//6 - &
, !
#
'
/
( (
&
!
*
5
!
&
((! ' 4
'
2
1
( "
.//6 ' 4
'
!
:
2
3 ( '
(
!
'
'
5
/
('
%
"
2
( '
(
%
.//: ' 4
'
5
( '
(
*
<
8
' 4
'
3
;
('
(
&
)
'
'
4
#
.//;
, !
#
!
3
< 2
3 ('
"
6
#
(
*
!
#
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Mind
U.S.
Sponsored
Control
Transcripts
Mind
Control
+ !!
- &
&
-&
&
, !
(
#
) 3
#
!)8
%
./,0
( '
(
#
./,0
5
# &
.//6
.//: ' 4
'
&
./,0
5
.//:
.//: ' 4
(
3
(
"
*
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
35
41
42
44
35
35
35
35
of
of
51
172
173
174
176
of
51
51
51
51
Page
157
264
ofof
173
183
548
#
6
*
.//0
.//6
'
'
5
&
#
*
'
)=
.//; ' 4
( "
1
'
(
.//;
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
12,
15,
2016
Saturday
Sunday,
September
June
5, 2015
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
,7 1#-& &
,0 '
4
4
'
,6
"
1
,9 0<;
,: &
3
8
='
&
< ('
2
"
3 ('
<
('
4
./,/ ' 4
< 3 ('
(#
(&
&
#
./,/ ' 4
1
>
(
1
&
$
'
.0 ./,/
#
&
)
( #
.6 ./,/
(%
+
& %
#1 #
$& &
'
*
./,/ '
&
!
' 4
4
.0 ./,/
#
!
'
&
1 5
5
$
&
"
!
1
$$ 5
=( $
: ./,0
%(
+
/
$, '
( *
.//,0
$> 3
./,0
( ''
'
%
4
$& 1
)
$% ?
$+ )
+
1
!
$*
'@
1
&
./,,
/0 ..::
!
"
*
,.0. 4
(/
'"
5
3
!8# (
+
&
0
>
./,0
3
( '
(
.2 ./,0
(
1
"
&
0
!
1
$A 6
&
'
&
'&
./,6
&
#
!
#
; ./,6
+
1!
$& 4
@ #
,0 ./,6
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Media
Caterbone
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Executive
Summary
Summary
Summary
Mind
U.S.
Sponsored
Control
Transcripts
Mind
Control
Page
Page
Page
Page
36
42
43
45
36
3636
of
of
172
173
174
176
of
51
51
51
Page
158
265
of51
173
183
548
Tuesday,
Tuesday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
12,
15,
Saturday
Sunday,
September
June
17,
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Mind
U.S.
Sponsored
Control
Transcripts
Mind
Control
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
37
43
44
46
37
36
37
37
37
of
of
of
51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
Page
159
266
of
173
183
548
Page
27
of
41
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
2015
2016
Saturday
Sunday,
September
June
5, 2015
Saturday,
October
10,
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Mind
U.S.
Sponsored
Control
Transcripts
Mind
Control
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
38
44
45
47
38
37
38
38
38
of
of
of
51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
Page
160
267
of
173
183
548
Page
28
of
41
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
2015
2016
Saturday
Sunday,
September
June
5, 2015
Saturday,
October
10,
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Mind
U.S.
Sponsored
Control
Transcripts
Mind
Control
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
39
45
46
48
39
38
39
39
39
of
of
of
51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
Page
161
268
of
173
183
548
Page
29
of
41
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
2015
2016
Saturday
Sunday,
September
June
5, 2015
Saturday,
October
10,
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
! "
"
$% &
!
" #
%
"&#
(
'
!
(
,
"
"
")
"
""
-
)
!
! "
!
'
%
" !
"
!
)
+
!
" *
"
"
,
,
,
*
%
*
(
%
!
/"0
1
1 ,
"
"
4
!
"
"
!
!
#
.
.
&,,0
%
1 ,
2"3
!
)
** ! "
&,,..$/
&,,
%
&,,
%
&
, "
"
00
"
!,
"
6
7
7 , !
&,,-
8,
:
(
$;$
"2
! " ,
, ,
** !
;
5
$
!
&,,@
,
.
&<;=
>
1
9
,
&,,=
$
,
>
A
1 B3
.+
&,,=
1 B3
2
>
%
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Mind
U.S.
Sponsored
Control
Transcripts
Mind
Control
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
40
46
47
49
40
39
40
40
40
of
of
of
51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
Page
162
269
of
173
183
548
Page
30
of
41
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
2015
2016
Saturday
Sunday,
September
June
5, 2015
Saturday,
October
10,
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
<
1
1
* "
!
"
C#
"$
"
<
*
&, ,
24
#9
; "
&,,@(&,,= A
3
24
5
!
%
&,,0 4
! %3
"
"
!
&,,
%
!
4
'
5
4
D
%
%
"
""
,! "
0 =
0 =9
9
00&9 00
:
9
&,,-
&, , $
!
%
!
D
%
%
=
F
!
))
+
/4
),
"
0 =
/
$
G
3
%
00
3
3
"
%#
$
$
&, ,
&,,4
!- "
.
&,,@
,
*
&,,<
E
&,,
-) !
/ 4
24
/
$
D
&, ,
D
$
&,,-
&,,0
%
D
!
D
D %
7F !
>
!
D
$
A
8F
$
%
;
D
.
%
&,,3
E
$
*
00=; 00
$
5
! 7
0 =
00
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Mind
U.S.
Sponsored
Control
Transcripts
Mind
Control
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
41
47
48
50
41
40
41
41
41
of
of
of
51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
Page
163
270
of
173
183
548
Page
31
of
41
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
2015
2016
Saturday
Sunday,
September
June
5, 2015
Saturday,
October
10,
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
)
A
24
$;$
00
(F
&
%
B
5
00 9
" * <
00=( 00 9
:#
;3
#, " !
&,,-
"
"
"
0 =
&, ,
/
.
$
B
3
3
=
0 =
) "
.
&,,1
0 =
24
" "
3
"
&,,@
" E
""
B
$
<
&,,1
.
&,,-
,-(&&
2
=
@,
"
&,
3
&,,!
&,,@
&,,@
0 =
@, 1
&,,@
9
!
@,
#" !,
0 =
" "1 ,
"
"*
":
" E
F
&,,-
!
B
/
!
"
00=( 00 9
B
:
9
$
'
.
&,,1
9
0 =
&, ,
/
.
00 9
/
&,,9
&,
( "
!
.
00
$
!
&, ,
F
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Mind
U.S.
Sponsored
Control
Transcripts
Mind
Control
3
7
8
!
&,,
&, ,
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
42
48
49
51
42
41
42
42
42
of
of
of
51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
Page
164
271
of
173
183
548
Page
32
of
41
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
2015
2016
Saturday
Sunday,
September
June
5, 2015
Saturday,
October
10,
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
&
, * "
&&
*#
"
&:
;!
&<
:
%
$
&, ,
$
&,,-
!-
,
5
%
"
>
$
$
< !-
24
? "
;
>
&,,0
B
&,,%
(
$
&, ,
&-
A
.+ $
&@
! :
&,,$
: , *
&, ,
* @
&,,@
"
E
3
&,,
"
&,,0
7 "!
7 "
0 =
*
&=
) "
":
)"
&,,@
"
&
&0
!
< ")
9 &,,@
9
&, ,
&,,
00
:,
!6
+
:
"
"
" .
9 &,,0
0 = "&#
, *
&,,@
/
" F
0 =
;A
0 =
F
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Mind
U.S.
Sponsored
Control
Transcripts
Mind
Control
0 =
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
43
49
50
52
43
42
43
43
43
of
of
of
51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
Page
165
272
of
173
183
548
Page
33
of
41
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
2015
2016
Saturday
Sunday,
September
June
5, 2015
Saturday,
October
10,
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
!
3
"
$
+
$
.
0 =
I $
!
0 =
.
$
"2
'
+$;F
D
"$
&,;&,
3
A
00
'
$ 24
"1E1# $
K
E
A
00&
>
L
F
F
B
F
+
0=,K
A
$
$
1
+
>
1
$
>
B
!
3
F
1
00
) % 3
&,,-
!
>
! A !
00,K
1 B3
>
F
F
& 1
F
8
! 4
'
A
! 4
A
0=,K
F
00,K
0 ,K
0<,K
3
/
>
%
&,,
) %$
D 1
"
$
0 <9 F
0@,K
0@,K
$
2!
A? D!B
#
*
$
7
+
00
D 18
.
E
$
M 1
00= E
0 =
%
0 ,K
$
0 =
M
00
!
&,,9
(
9
!
1
,-(
$ !2B+EF2
(&&
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Mind
U.S.
Sponsored
Control
Transcripts
Mind
Control
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
44
50
51
53
44
43
44
44
44
of
of
of
51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
Page
166
273
of
173
183
548
Page
34
of
41
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
2015
2016
Saturday
Sunday,
September
June
5, 2015
Saturday,
October
10,
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
") !
"
7!
N
.
!
5
F
(
(
5
G
*
A'
, ?
*
? 1
!,
A
(
> "
!, '!
,
B
A
" " * #" !, " "
$C
* #" !, D
73
8
* 7
,
"
"
&
"
#
.
"
#(
5
7
9
'
5
%
7A
8 !
8 !
'
!
7D .2
O
% 8
'
7
'
(
(
%
%
4
K
K
M %
%
K
'
7E
(
8
"
%
'
%(
(
(
4
;
(
7
7
87
(
(
8
8
- 7 > !,
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Mind
U.S.
Sponsored
Control
Transcripts
Mind
Control
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
45
51
52
54
45
44
45
45
45
of
of
of
51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
Page
167
274
of
173
183
548
Page
35
of
41
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
2015
2016
Saturday
Sunday,
September
June
5, 2015
Saturday,
October
10,
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
!
* , "
!
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
.
.
&
B
B
B
B
B
@
E
@
E
&. @
DD
@
. DD
"
@
& DD
@
. DD
@
& DD
@
$ DD
@
DD
@
E
DD
@
EB& DD
@
EB DD
@
& B DD
@
DD
@
& DD
@
DD
@
& DD
@
DD
B@
)
B@
DD
!
"
)
*
!
")
1
3
1
))
1"
)
)
, "
*"
"
, "
!
*
"
")
"
7
"!
"
*
!
*
")
!
6, "
1
5
)
>
' "
*
, "
1 ,!
, "
)
!
"
"
!
!
1
"": !
1 , 1
"": !
"
1
"": !
!
"
! * !
)
*
"E
DD
")
E DD
%
,
!
!"
, "
"
"
"
1 ,"
DD
*)
PPPPPPP "
>7
%#
'?
Stan J. Caterbone
# PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
"
Stan J. Caterbone
# PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
"
Pennsylvania
PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
$
Lancaster
PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
19
PPPPPPP
15
June
PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
&,PP
I
&, ,
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Mind
U.S.
Sponsored
Control
Transcripts
Mind
Control
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
46
52
53
55
46
45
46
46
46
of
of
of
51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
Page
168
275
of
173
183
548
Page
36
of
41
24
$
$
Q &, , "!
I
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
2015
2016
Saturday
Sunday,
September
June
5, 2015
Saturday,
October
10,
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Mind
U.S.
Sponsored
Control
Transcripts
Mind
Control
THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
47
53
54
56
47
46
47
47
47
of
of
of
51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
Page
169
276
of
173
183
548
Page
37
of
41
Page 35 of 41
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
2015
2016
Saturday
Sunday,
September
June
5, 2015
Saturday,
October
10,
06/10/2007
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Mind
U.S.
Sponsored
Control
Transcripts
Mind
Control
THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
48
54
55
57
48
47
48
48
48
of
of
of
51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
Page
170
277
of
173
183
548
Page
38
of
41
Page 36 of 41
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
2015
2016
Saturday
Sunday,
September
June
5, 2015
Saturday,
October
10,
06/10/2007
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Mind
U.S.
Sponsored
Control
Transcripts
Mind
Control
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
49
55
56
58
49
48
49
49
49
of
of
of
51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
Page
171
278
of
173
183
548
Page
39
of
41
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
2015
2016
Saturday
Sunday,
September
June
5, 2015
Saturday,
October
10,
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Mind
U.S.
Sponsored
Control
Transcripts
Mind
Control
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
50
56
57
59
50
49
50
50
50
of
of
of
51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
Page
172
279
of
173
183
548
Page
40
of
41
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
2015
2016
Saturday
Sunday,
September
June
5, 2015
Saturday,
October
10,
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Mind
U.S.
Sponsored
Control
Transcripts
Mind
Control
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
51
57
58
60
51
50
51
51
51
of
of
of
51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
Page
173
280
of
173
183
548
Page
41
of
41
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
2015
2016
Saturday
Sunday,
September
June
5, 2015
Saturday,
October
10,
Page 1 of 2
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Historical References
General Histories | Ancient History | 1800-1850 | 1860 | 1870 | 1880 | 1890
1900 | 1910 | 1920 | 1930 | 1940 | 1950 | 1960 | 1970 | 1980 | 1990
Table of Contents
JOINT HEARING
BEFORE THE
SELECT COMMITTEE ON
INTELLIGENCE
AND THE
SUBCOMMITTEE ON
HEALTH AND SCIENTIFIC
RESEARCH
OF THE
COMMITTEE ON HUMAN
RESOURCES
UNITED STATES SENATE
NINETY-FIFTH CONGRESS
FIRST SESSION
____________
AUGUST 3, 1977
1/22/2009
Page 2 of 2
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1/22/2009
Page 1 of 2
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Historical References
General Histories | Ancient History | 1800-1850 | 1860 | 1870 | 1880 | 1890
1900 | 1910 | 1920 | 1930 | 1940 | 1950 | 1960 | 1970 | 1980 | 1990
Table of Contents
1/22/2009
Page 2 of 2
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Prepared Statement of CIA Director Stansfield Tur... Page 1 of 6
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Historical References
General Histories | Ancient History | 1800-1850 | 1860 | 1870 | 1880 | 1890
1900 | 1910 | 1920 | 1930 | 1940 | 1950 | 1960 | 1970 | 1980 | 1990
Table of Contents
-5destruction of MKULTRA files in 1973; the 1963 report on MKULTRA by the Inspector General
notes on page 14: "Present practice is to maintain no records of the planning and approval of test
U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Prepared Statement of CIA Director Stansfield Tur... Page 2 of 6
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
programs."
When I reported to you last on this matter, my staff had not yet had an opportunity to review the
newly located material in depth. This has now been accomplished, and I am in a position to give
you a description of the contents of the recovered material. I believe you will be most interested in
the following aspects of the recent discovery:
How the material was discovered and why it was not previously found;
The nature of this recently located material;
How much new information there is in the material which may not have been previously
known and reported to Senate investigators; and
What we believe the most significant aspects of this find to be.
To begin, as to how we discovered these materials. The material had been sent to our Retired
Records Center outside of Washington and was discovered sent to our Retired Records Center
outside of Washington and was discovered there as a result of the extensive search efforts of an
employee charged with responsibility for maintaining our holdings on behavioral drugs and for
responding to Freedom of Information Act requests on this subject. During the Church Committee
investigation in 1975, searches for MKULTRA-related material were made by examining both the
active and retired records of all branches of CIA considered at all likely to have had association
with MKULTRA documents. The retired records of the Budget and Fiscal Section of the Branch
responsible for such work were not searched, however. This was because financial papers
associated with sensitive projects such s MKULTRA were normally maintained by the Branch
itself under the project file, not by the Budget and Fiscal Section. In the case at hand, however,
the newly located material was sent to the Retired Records Center in 1970 by the Budget and
Fiscal Section as part of its own retired holdings. The reason for this departure from normal
procedure is not known. As a result of it, however, the material escaped retrieval and destruction
in 1973 by the then-retiring Director of the Office as well as discovery in 1975 by CIA officials
responding to Senate investigators.
The employee who located this material did so by leaving no stone unturned in his efforts to
respond to FOIA requests. He reviewed all listings of material of this Branch stored at the Retired
Records Center, including those of the Budget and Fiscal Section and, thus, discovered the
MKULTRA-related documents which had been missed in the previous searches. In sum, the
Agency failed to uncover these particular documents in 1973 in the process of attempting to
destroy them; it similarly failed to locate them in 1975 in response to the Church Committee
hearings. I am convinced that there was no attempt to conceal this material during the earlier
searches.
Next, as to the nature of the recently located material, it is important to realize that the recovered
folders are finance folders. The bulk of the material in them consists of approvals for advance of
funds, vouchers, accountings, and the like -- most of which are not very informative as to the
nature of the activities that were undertaken. Occasional project proposals or memoranda
commenting on some aspect of a subproject are scattered throughout this material. In general,
however, the recovered material does not include status reports or other documents relating to
operational considerations or progress in the various subprojects, though some elaboration of the
activities contemplated does appear. The recovered documents fall roughly into three categories:
First, there are 149 MKULTRA subprojects, many of which appear to have some connection
with research into behavioral modification, drug acquisition and testing or administering drugs
surreptitiously.
U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Prepared Statement of CIA Director Stansfield Tur... Page 3 of 6
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Second, there are two boxes of miscellaneous MKULTRA papers, including audit reports and
financial statements from "cut-out" (i.e., intermediary) funding mechanisms used to conceal CIA's
sponsorship of various research projects.
Finally, there are 33 additional subprojects concerning certain intelligence activities previously
funded under MKULTRA which have nothing to do either with behavioral modification, drugs,
and toxins or with any other related matters.
We have attempted to group the activities covered by the 149 subprojects into categories under
descriptive headings. In broad outline, at least, this presents the contents of these files. The
activities are placed in the following 15 categories:
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Prepared Statement of CIA Director Stansfield Tur... Page 4 of 6
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
subprojects.
12. Subprojects involving funding support for unspecified activities connected with the Army's
Special Operations Division at Fr. Detrick, Md. This activity is outline in Book I of the Church
Committee Report, pp. 388-389. (See Appendix A, pp. 68-69.) Under CIA's Project MKNAOMI,
the Army Assisted CIA in developing, testing, and maintaining biological agents and delivery
systems for use against humans as well as against animals and crops. The objectives of these
subprojects cannot be identified from the recovered material beyond the fact that the money was
to be used where normal funding channels would require more written or oral justification than
appeared desirable for security reasons or where operational considerations dictated short lead
times for purchases. About $11,000 was involved during this period 1953-1960: 3 subprojects.
13. Single subprojects in such areas as effects of electro-shock, harassment techniques for
offensive use, analysis of extrasensory perception, gas propelled sprays and aerosols, and four
subprojects involving crop and material sabotage.
14. One or two subprojects on each of the following:
"Blood Grouping" research, controlling the activity of animals, energy storage and transfer in
organic systems; and
stimulus and response in biological systems.
15. Three subprojects canceled before any work was done on them having to do with laboratory
drug screening, research on brain concussion, and research on biologically active materials to be
tested through the skin on human volunteers.
Now, as to how much new the recovered material adds to what has previously been reported to
the Church Committee and to Senator Kennedy's Subcommittee on Health on these topics, the
answer is additional detail, for the most part: e.g., the names of previously unidentified
researchers and institutions associated on either a witting or unwitting basis with MKULTRA
activities, and the names of CIA officials who approved or monitored the various subprojects.
Some new substantive material is also present: e.g., details concerning proposals for
experimentation and clinical testing associated with various research projects, and a possibly
improper contribution by CIA to a private institution. However, the principal types of activities
included have, for the most part, either been outlined to some extent or generally described in
what was previously available to CIA in the way of documentation and was supplied by CIA to
Senate investigators. For example:
Financial disbursement records for the period 1960-1964 for 76 of the 149 numbered MKULTRA
subprojects had been recovered from the Office of Finance by CIA and were made available to the
Church Committee investigators in August or September 1975.
The 1963 Inspector General report on MKULTRA made available to both the Church Committee
and Senator Kennedy's Subcommittee mentions electro-shock
-7and harassment substances (pp. 4, 16); covert testing on unwitting U.S. citizens (pp. 7, 10-12); the
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Prepared Statement of CIA Director Stansfield Tur... Page 5 of 6
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
search for new materials through arrangements with specialists in universities, pharmaceutical
houses, hospitals, state and federal institutions, and private research organizations (pp. 7, 9); and
the fact that the Technical Service Division of CIA had initiated 144 subprojects related to the
control of human behavior between 1953-1963 (p. 21).
The relevant section of a 1957 Inspector General report on the Technical Service Division was
also made available to the Church Committee staff. That report discusses techniques for human
assessment and unorthodox methods of communication (p. 201); discrediting and disabling
materials which can be covertly administered (pp. 201-202); studies on magicians' arts as applied
to covert operations (p. 202); specific funding mechanisms for research performed outside of CIA
(pp. 202-203, 205); research being done on "K" (knockout) material, alcohol tolerance, and
hypnotism (p. 203); research on LSD (p. 204); anti-personnel harassment and assassination
delivery systems including aerosol generators and other spray devices (pp. 206-208); the role of
Fort Detrick in support of CIA's Biological/Chemical Warfare capability (p. 208); and material
sabotage research (p. 209). Much of this material is reflected in the Church Committee Report,
Book I, pp. 385-422. (See Appendix A, pp. 65-102).
The most significant new data discovered are, first, the names of researchers and institutions who
participated in the MKULTRA project and, secondly, a possibly improper contribution by CIA to
a private institution. We are now in possession of the names of 185 non-government researchers
and assistants who are identified in the recovered material dealing with the 149 subprojects. The
names of 80 institutions where work was done or with which these people were affiliated are also
mentioned.
The institutions include 44 colleges or universities, 15 research foundations or chemical or
pharmaceutical companies and the like, 12 hospitals or clinics (in addition to those associated
with universities), and 3 penal institutions. While the identities of some of these people and
institutions were known previously, the discovery of the new identities adds to our knowledge of
MKULTRA.
The facts as they pertain to the possibly improper contribution are as follows: One project
involves a contribution of $375,000 to a building fund of a private medical institution. The fact
that a contribution was made was previously known; indeed it was mentioned in a 1957 Inspector
General report on the Technical Service Division of CIA, pertinent portions of which had been
reviewed by the Church Committee staff. The newly discovered material, however, makes it clear
that this contribution was made through an intermediary, which made it appear to be a private
donation. As a private donation, the contribution was then matched by federal funds. The
institution was not made aware of the true source of the gift. This project was approved by the
then DCI, and concurred in by CIA's top management at the time, including the then General
Counsel who wrote an opinion supporting the legality of the contribution.
The recently discovered documents give a greater insight into the scope of the unwitting drug
testing but contribute little more than that. We now have collaborating information that some of
the unwitting drug testing was carried on in safehouses in San Francisco and New York City, and
we have identified that three individuals were involved in this undertaking as opposed to the
previously reported one person. We also know now that some unwitting testing took place on
criminal sexual psychopaths confined at a State hospital and that, additionally, research was done
on knock-out or "K" drug in parallel with research to develop pain killers for cancer patients.
These, then are the principal findings identified to date in our review of the recovered material. As
noted earlier, we believe the detail on the identities of researchers and institutions involved in
CIA's sponsorship of drugs and behavioral modification is a new element and one which poses a
considerable problem. Most of the people and institutions involved are not aware of Agency
sponsorship. We should certainly assume that the researchers and institutions which cooperate
U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Prepared Statement of CIA Director Stansfield Tur... Page 6 of 6
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
with CIA on a witting basis acted in good faith and in the belief that they were aiding their
government in a legitimate and proper purpose. I believe we all have a moral obligation to these
researchers and institutions to protect them from any unjustified embarrassment or damage to
their reputations which revelation of their identities might bring. In addition, I have a legal
obligation under the Privacy Act not to publicly disclose the names of the individual researchers
without their consent. This is especially true, of course, for
-8those researchers and institutions which were unwitting participants in CIA-sponsored activities.
Nevertheless, recognizing the right and the need of both the Senate Select Committee on
Intelligence and the Senate Subcommittee on Health to investigate the circumstances of these
activities in whatever detail they consider necessary. I am providing your Committee with all of
the names on a classified basis. I hope that this will facilitate your investigation while protecting
the individuals and institutions involved. Let me emphasize that the MKULTRA events are 12 to
25 years in the past. I assure you that the CIA is in no way engaged in either witting or unwitting
testing of drugs today.
Finally, I am working closely with the Attorney General and with the Secretary of Health,
Education and Welfare on this matter. We are making available to the Attorney General whatever
materials he may deem necessary to any investigation he may elect to undertake. We are working
with both the Attorney General and the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare to determine
whether it is practicable from this new evidence to attempt to identify any of the persons to whom
drugs may have been administered unwittingly. No such names are part of these records, but we
are working to determine if there are adequate clues to lead to their identification; and if so, how
to go about fulfilling the Government's responsibilities in the matter.
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Testiomony of Philip Goldman and John Gittinger, ... Page 1 of 18
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Historical References
General Histories | Ancient History | 1800-1850 | 1860 | 1870 | 1880 | 1890
1900 | 1910 | 1920 | 1930 | 1940 | 1950 | 1960 | 1970 | 1980 | 1990
Table of Contents
-51Senator INOUYE. And Mr. John Gittinger, are you a former employee of the Central
Intelligence Agency?
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Testiomony of Philip Goldman and John Gittinger, ... Page 2 of 18
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Senator INOUYE. Were you a member of the Agency at the time MKULTRA was in
operation?
Mr. GITTINGER. Yes.
Senator INOUYE. Thank you. Senator Kennedy.
Senator KENNEDY. I want to welcome both of you to the committee. If we could start with
Mr. Goldman. Were you the project engineer for the safe houses in either San Francisco or
New York?
Mr. GOLDMAN. I know of no safe house in San Francisco.
Senator KENNEDY. How about in New York?
Mr. GOLDMAN. I knew of one facility that was established there, but I didn't know anything
of its operation.
Senator KENNEDY. Were you a monitor on any testing of drugs on unwitting persons in San
Francisco?
Mr. GOLDMAN. No.
Senator KENNEDY. Well, we have a classified document here that was provided by the
Agency that lists your name as a monitor of the program and I would appreciate it if you
would look-Mr. GOLDMAN. I think the misunderstanding arises because I was project officer.
Senator KENNEDY. Well, would you take a look at that?
[Mr. Goldman inspected the document.]
Mr. GOLDMAN. This document as it states is correct. However, my-Senator KENNEDY. That document is correct?
Mr. GOLDMAN. As far as I see on the first page, the project. But my-Senator KENNEDY. Well, could I get it back, please.
That would indicate that you were a monitor of the program.
Mr. GOLDMAN. I was in charge of disbursing the moneys to Morgan Hall.
Senator KENNEDY. To whom was that?
Mr. GOLDMAN. To the individual whose name was listed at the top of that document.
Senator KENNEDY. And you knew that he was running the project in San Francisco?
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Testiomony of Philip Goldman and John Gittinger, ... Page 3 of 18
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Mr. GOLDMAN. I knew he was the person who was in charge out there.
Senator KENNEDY. All right.
Mr. GOLDMAN. But I had no knowledge nor did I seek knowledge of actually what he was
doing, because there would be other things involved.
I did receive-Senator KENNEDY. What were you doing?
-52Mr. GOLDMAN. I was collecting -- I had to be sure that all the receipts that ever were turned
in balanced with the moneys that were paid out to see that everything was run all right. There
was no illegal use of funds as far as we could determine by the receipts and cash.
Senator KENNEDY. So even though the Agency document indicates that you were a monitor
for the program, one of the few monitors of that particular program which you mentioned for
San Francisco and Mill Valley, Calif., you described your responsibility only as a carrier of
money, is that correct?
Mr. GOLDMAN. I would say as a disburser or carrying out -- seeing that the moneys were
handled properly. There was within that -- I don't know what's done or what he did do in
conjunction with other people.
Senator KENNEDY. Were you responsible for the disbursement of all the funds?
Mr. GOLDMAN. I was responsible for turning over the check to him.
Senator KENNEDY. And what did you know of the program itself?
Mr. GOLDMAN. The only thing I knew of the program was what he furnished us in terms of
receipts and that sort of thing. I didn't indulge or concern myself in that.
Senator KENNEDY. You still wrote, and I'll let you examine it -- it's a classified document -but you wrote a rather substantive review of the program in May of 1963, talking about the
experiments, the factual data that had been collected, covert and realistic field trials, about the
necessity of those particular -- and talked about the effectiveness of the various programs, the
efficiency of various delivery systems. That doesn't sound to me like someone who is only-Mr. GOLDMAN. Well, if you would refresh my memory, if I could read this I would
certainly agree with whatever is said there, if it was written.
Senator KENNEDY. I am trying to gather what your role was. You've indicated first of all
that you didn't know about -- you knew about a safe house in New York; now we find out that
U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Testiomony of Philip Goldman and John Gittinger, ... Page 4 of 18
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
you're the carrier for the resources as well and the agent in San Francisco. We find out now
that the CIA put you as a monitor. You're testifying that you only were the courier, and here
we have just one document, and there are many others that talk about the substance of that
program with your name on it and I am just trying to find out exactly what role you were
playing.
Mr. GOLDMAN. The only thing I can tell you about this and I am drawing completely on
my memory is that this individual who was in charge out there conducted these things and
reported them back to the Agency. I didn't participate in any of them. All I know was that he
furnished me with receipts for things that were done and told of the work that they had done.
Senator KENNEDY. Well, that document covers more than receipts.
Mr. GOLDMAN. Yes, it tells of what -- they had conducted work out there.
Senator KENNEDY. It describes, does it not? Read the paragraph 2.
Mr. GOLDMAN. "A number of covert"-Senator KENNEDY. Well, you can't read it, it's a classified document, and I don't know why,
quite frankly, but it relates to the substance
-53of those programs and your name is signed to the memorandums on it. I am not interested in
you trying to review for us now what is in the document, but I think it would be unfortunate if
we were left with the opinion that all you were was a courier of resources when we see a
document with your name on it, signed, that talks about the substance of the program. And
what we're interested in is the substance of the program. We have the recent documents that
were provided by the Agency, which do indicate that you were at least involved in the
substance, and I'm just trying to find out whether you're willing to tell us about that.
Mr. GOLDMAN. I am perfectly willing to tell you everything that I can remember.
Senator KENNEDY. But you can't remember anything.
Mr. GOLDMAN. I can't remember the substantive parts of these, things, I really can't.
Senator KENNEDY. Of the program that was taking place.
Do you have any greater familiarity with what was happening in New York?
Mr. GOLDMAN. No, no.
Senator KENNEDY. And you have the same function with regards to New York?
Mr. GOLDMAN. The same function with regard to New York.
U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Testiomony of Philip Goldman and John Gittinger, ... Page 5 of 18
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Testiomony of Philip Goldman and John Gittinger, ... Page 6 of 18
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Senator KENNEDY. Did you talk to him about these programs? Did you have anything to do
with him during this period of time?
Mr. GOLDMAN. I didn't have anything to do with him until I would say probably in the
sixties.
Senator KENNEDY. And can you tell us what you had to do with him then?
Mr. GOLDMAN. Just what you see there, on the papers.
Senator KENNEDY. Well, that is the request for the money and he approves it.
Mr. GOLDMAN. That is the request for money and he approves it, and I am quite sure that I
probably discussed with him whether the work was going along all right, whether his reports
were being turned in, and whether he was satisfied with the way things were going and did he
have any complaints about the way other people were requesting him, but I did not engage
myself in anything he was doing.
Senator KENNEDY. Well, did you get the impression that Gottlieb knew what was going
on?
Mr. GOLDMAN. I didn't ask.
Senator KENNEDY. But you told him that your impression that what was going on even
though you didn't know what was going on, was going on well, I guess? [Laughter.]
Mr. GOLDMAN. I told Gottlieb what you saw in there was that the things appeared to be
going along all right. I was repeating and parroting back the words that were given to me
while I was there.
Senator KENNEDY. What was the money being spent for, do you know?
Mr. GOLDMAN. No; I can't recall that, sir.
Senator KENNEDY. Would you remember if we told you it was red curtains and can-can
pictures-Mr. GOLDMAN. No, sir.
Senator KENNEDY. Floral pictures and the rest.
Mr. GOLDMAN. No, sir.
Senator KENNEDY. Recorders.
Mr. GOLDMAN. No, sir.
Senator KENNEDY. Recorders and two-way mirrors.
Mr. GOLDMAN. Wait, hold on. You're slipping a word in there now.
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Testiomony of Philip Goldman and John Gittinger, ... Page 7 of 18
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Senator KENNEDY. But you would have authorized those funds, would you not, since you
were the-Mr. GOLDMAN. Did you say two-way mirrors?
Senator KENNEDY. Yes.
Mr. GOLDMAN. Where?
Senator KENNEDY. In the safe houses.
Mr. GOLDMAN. Where?
Senator KENNEDY. San Francisco.
Mr. GOLDMAN. No.
Senator KENNEDY. How about New York?
Mr. GOLDMAN. Yes.
Senator KENNEDY. You remember now that you approved expenditures for New York?
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Testiomony of Philip Goldman and John Gittinger, ... Page 8 of 18
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Testiomony of Philip Goldman and John Gittinger, ... Page 9 of 18
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Testiomony of Philip Goldman and John Gitting... Page 10 of 18
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Mr. GITTINGER. My responsibilities which would involve any of the period of time that
you were talking about really was not directly related to drugs at all. I was a psychologist
charged with the responsibility of trying to develop as much information as I could on various
cultures, overseas cultures, anthropological type data, if you follow what I mean. I was also
engaged in trying to work out ways and means of assessing people and understanding people.
I originally became involved in this through working on Chinese culture, and over a series of
time I was introduced to the problem of brainwashing, which is the thing that really was the
most compelling thing in relationship to this, and became charged with the responsibility of
trying to find out a little bit about interrogation techniques.
-57And among other things, we decided or I decided that one of the best sources of interrogation
techniques would be trying to locate and interview and become involved with experienced
police interrogators in the country and experienced people who had real practical knowledge
of interrogation. The reason for this is that we had become pretty well convinced after the
experience of the brainwashing problems coming out of China, that it was the techniques of
the interrogators that were causing the individuals to make confessions and so forth in
relationship to this, rather than any kind of drugging and so forth. So we were very much
interested in interrogation techniques, and this led to me being introduced to the agent in the
west coast, and I began to talk to him in connection with these interrogation techniques.
Senator KENNEDY. OK. Now, that is the agent that ran the tests on the west coast on the
unwitting people. That's where you come in, correct?
Mr. GITTINGER. If I understand -- would you say that again?
Senator KENNEDY. The name Morgan Hall has been -- that is the name that has been used.
Mr. GITTINGER. Yes.
Senator KENNEDY. And that is the agent that you met with.
Mr. GITTINGER. That is right.
Senator KENNEDY. And you met at the safe house.
Mr. GITTINGER. Yes, sir.
Senator KENNEDY. Whom did you meet with in the safe house?
Mr. GITTINGER. This is the part that is hard for me to say, and I am sorry that I have to. In
connection with some work that we were doing, we needed to have some information on
sexual habits. Morgan Hall provided informants for me, to talk to in connection with the sex
habits that I was interested in trying to find information. During one period of time the safe
house, as far as I was concerned, was used for just these particular type of interviews. And I
U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Testiomony of Philip Goldman and John Gitting... Page 11 of 18
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
-58drug age or the drug culture comes later on. Consequently, those of us who had any
responsibility in this area were interested in trying to get as much information as we could on
the subculture, the subculture drug groups, and obviously the Bureau of Narcotics represented
a means of doing this. Consequently, other types of things that were involved in discussions at
that time would have to do with the underground use of drugs. When I am talking about this I
am talking about the folkways in terms of unwitting use of drugs. Did these people that I was
talking to have any information about this and on rare instances they were able to tell me
about their use, and in most cases this would largely turn out to be a Mickey Finn or
something of that sort rather than anything esoteric.
I also was very much interested because we had relatively little information, believe it or not,
at that time, in terms of the various reactions that people were having to drugs. Therefore,
these people were very informative in terms of they knew a great deal of information about
reactions.
Senator KENNEDY. At least you gathered -- or am I correct in assuming that you gathered
the impression that the prostitutes that you had talked to were able to slip the drugs to people
U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Testiomony of Philip Goldman and John Gitting... Page 12 of 18
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
-59Senator KENNEDY. Well, we're not interested in names or institutions, so we prefer that you
do not. That has to be worked out in arrangements between Admiral Turner and the
individuals and the institutions.
But we're interested in what the Foundation really was and how it functioned and what its
purpose was.
U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Testiomony of Philip Goldman and John Gitting... Page 13 of 18
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Mr. GITTINGER. Well, it was established to undertake research in the general area of the
behavioral sciences. It definitely had almost no focus or interest in, say, drug-related type of
activities except in a very minor way, because it was largely set up to attempt to gain a certain
amount of information and to fund projects which were psychological, sociological,
anthropological in character. It was established in the sense of a period of time that a lot of us
who are in it wish we could do it over again, but we were interested in trying to get together a
panel of the most representative high-level behavioral scientists we could to oversee and help
in terms of developing the Society for the Investigation of Human Ecology type of program.
The Agency in effect provided the money. They did not direct the projects. Now, the fact of
the matter is, there are a lot of innocent people who received the Society for the Investigation
of Human Ecology money which I know for a fact they were never asked to do anything for
the CIA but they did get through this indirectly. They had no knowledge that they were getting
CIA money.
Senator KENNEDY. Over what period of time did this take place?
Mr. GITTINGER. As far as I was concerned , it was the period of time ending in 1961. 1
believe the Human Ecology fund finally phased out in 1965, but I was not involved in this
phasing out.
Senator KENNEDY. Can you give the range of the different sort of individual projects of the
universities in which it was active?
Mr. GITTINGER. Well, it would have as many as -- I am very fuzzy on my memory on the
number of projects. It is over 10, 20, 30.
Senator KENNEDY. After it made the grants, what was the relationship of the Agency with
the results of the studies? The Foundation acquired the money to make the grants from the
Agency, and then it made the grants to these various research programs.
Mr. GITTINGER. Yes, sir.
Senator KENNEDY. And that included eight universities as well as individual researchers?
Mr. GITTINGER. Yes, sir.
Senator KENNEDY. Then what follow-up was there to that, sir?
Mr. GITTINGER. Well, in every sense of the word, the organization was run exactly like
any other foundation, and it carried with it the same thing in terms of making certain that the
people that they had given money to used it for the purpose for which it had been granted, that
they had access to any of the reports that they had put out, but there were no strings attached to
anybody. There wasn't any reason they couldn't publish anything that they put out.
Senator KENNEDY. What, sort of budget are we talking about here?
Mr. GITTINGER. I honestly do not remember. I would guess we are talking in the realm of
about $150,000 a year, but don't hold me to that, because I don't know.
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Testiomony of Philip Goldman and John Gitting... Page 14 of 18
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
-60Senator KENNEDY. What is your view about such funding as a professional person, in terms
of compromising the integrity of a university, sir?
Mr. GITTINGER. Well, obviously, sir, insofar as today there is no question about it. I will
have to say at the time that we were doing this there was quite an entirely different kind of an
attitude, and I do know for a fact that we moved to start towards phasing out the Society for
the Investigation of Human Ecology and the Human Ecology Fund for the very reason that we
were beginning to recognize that it was moving into an area but this would be compromised.
Senator KENNEDY. Well, that is commendable, both your attitude and the reasons for it, but
during that period of time it still was involved in behavior research programs, as I understand
it.
Mr. GITTINGER. Yes, sir. On its own, in connection with this, it participated again, and
these again were not CIA-directed projects, but these were all things which would
theoretically contribute to the general knowledge at the time where the things like the study of
the Hungarian refugees -- obviously, the study of the Hungarian refugees who came to this
country after the Hungarian revolt was a very useful exercise to try to get information about
the personality characteristics of the Communists and so forth.
Senator KENNEDY. Were there other foundations that were doing similar kinds of work?
Mr. GITTINGER. Not to my knowledge, sir.
Senator KENNEDY. You believe-Mr. GITTINGER. You mean, CIA, other CIA?
Senator KENNEDY. Right.
Mr. GITTINGER. Well, my answer is in the sense that I know of no other CIA foundations,
no. There were, of course, other foundations doing similar kinds of work in the United States.
Senator KENNEDY. Have you heard of the Psychological Assessments Foundation?
Mr. GITTINGER. I certainly have.
Senator KENNEDY. What was that? What function did that have?
Mr. GITTINGER. Now, this was bringing us up to a different era. I believe the functions of
that organization have nothing whatsoever to do with the things that are being talked about
here while I was associated with it.
Senator KENNEDY. Rather than getting into the work, it was another foundation, was it not?
U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Testiomony of Philip Goldman and John Gitting... Page 15 of 18
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
-61Senator KENNEDY. All right. I want to thank you for your helpful testimony, Mr. Gittinger.
It is not easy to go back into the past. I think you have been very fair in your characterizations,
and I think it is quite appropriately indicated that there are different standards now from what
they were 25 years ago, and I think you have responded very fairly and completely to the
inquiries, and I think with a good deal of feeling about it.
You are a person who is obviously attempting to serve the country's interest, so I want to
thank you very much for your statement and for your helpful timeliness.
Mr. GITTINGER. Thank you, sir.
Senator INOUYE. Senator Case?
Senator CASE. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I am sorry that I had another committee that I had
to complete the hearing with this morning before I got here.
I shall read the testimony with very great interest, and I appreciate your testimony as I have
heard it. I would like to comment just on one point, and that is, it relates to a story in the press
yesterday about part of this program involving the funding of a grant at a foreign university. I
would like to elicit from you a comment as to the additional sensitivity and difficulty that that
practice involves from your standpoint as a scientist, as well as a citizen, if you will.
Mr. GITTINGER. I will say it was after the fact thinking. It was utter stupidity the way
things worked out to have used some of this money outside the United States when it was CIA
money. I can categorically state to my knowledge, and I don't claim a complete knowledge all
the way across of the human ecology functions, but to my knowledge, and this is unfortunate,
those people did not know that they were getting money from CIA, and they were not asked to
contribute anything to CIA as such.
U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Testiomony of Philip Goldman and John Gitting... Page 16 of 18
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Senator CASE. It would be interesting to try to examine this by turning the thing around and
thinking what we would think if this happened from a foreign official agency to our own
university. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Senator INOUYE. Senator Schweiker.
Senator SCHWEIKER. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Dr. Goldman, I wonder if you would tell us what your training and educational background is?
Dr. GOLDMAN. I have already given a biography for the record.
Senator SCHWEIKER. I have not seen it. Who has it? Is it classified? We may have it for
the record, but may I ask you to briefly describe your training and background for us now? I
hope it is no secret.
Dr. GOLDMAN. Well, I was told if I was asked this to say that. I was told that by your staff
people, but I have no objection to telling you. I am a resident from Pennsylvania, southwest
Pennsylvania, Lancaster County. I went to Penn State, and I am in nutrition.
Senator SCHWEIKER. In what?
Dr. GOLDMAN. Nutrition.
Senator SCHWEIKER. Were you in charge of a section or segment of the CIA in your past
capacity?
Dr. GOLDMAN. During the time I was with that organization, I was in charge of one small
section of it, one small segment of it; yes.
-62Senator SCHWEIKER. What was the function or purpose of that section that you headed?
Dr. GOLDMAN. To provide support for the other parts of the division.
Senator SCHWEIKER. Where in the chain of command would that put you in relation to Dr.
Gottlieb?
Dr. GOLDMAN. Pretty far down the line.
Senator SCHWEIKER. Mr. Gittinger, I would just like to ask you a few questions. We
appreciate your frankness and candor with the committee, and we realize this is a very difficult
area to go into. I am not quite clear on two matters that were raised earlier. First, were the safe
houses we were talking about here used on occasion by the prostitutes you referred to?
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Testiomony of Philip Goldman and John Gitting... Page 17 of 18
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Testiomony of Philip Goldman and John Gitting... Page 18 of 18
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Before adjourning the hearings, I would like to have the record show that Dr. Goldman and
Mr. Gittinger have voluntarily cooperated with the committee in staff interviews, that they
appear this morning voluntarily, and they are not under subpoena.
Gentlemen, I realize that this experience may have been an unhappy one and possibly a
painful one. Therefore, we thank you very much for participating this morning. We also
realize that the circumstances of that time differed very much from this day, and possibly the
national attitude, the national political attitude condoned this type of activity. So, we have not
asked you to come here as persons who have committed crimes, but rather in hope that you
can assist us in studying this problem so that it will not occur once again. In that spirit we
thank you for your participation, and we look forward to working with you further in this case.
Thank you very much.
Senator KENNEDY. Mr. Chairman, I would like also to thank the witnesses. These are
difficult matters, and I think all of us are very grateful.
Senator SCHWEIKER. I think the witnesses should know that though it may not always
seem that way, what we are trying to do is to probe the past and look at the policies of the past
to affect the future. I think our emphasis really is on the future, not the past, but it is important
that we learn from the past as we formulate policies and legislation for the future, I hope that
all of the witnesses who did come before us voluntarily this morning, including Admiral
Turner respect the fact that we are questioning the past to learn about the future. I think it
should be looked at in that light.
Senator KENNEDY. I think that is the spirit in which we have had these hearings. It seems to
me that from both these witnesses and others, Gottlieb knows the information and can best
respond, and we are going to make every effort in the Senate Health Committee to get Mr.
Gottlieb to appear, and we obviously look forward to cooperating with Senator Inouye and the
other members of the committee in getting the final chapter written on this, but we want to
thank you very much for your appearance here.
Senator INOUYE. The hearing will stand in recess, subject to the call of the Chair.
[Whereupon, at 12:12 p.m., the hearing was recessed, subject to the call of the Chair.]
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Testiomony of Philip Goldman and John Gittinger, ... Page 1 of 18
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Historical References
General Histories | Ancient History | 1800-1850 | 1860 | 1870 | 1880 | 1890
1900 | 1910 | 1920 | 1930 | 1940 | 1950 | 1960 | 1970 | 1980 | 1990
Table of Contents
-51Senator INOUYE. And Mr. John Gittinger, are you a former employee of the Central
Intelligence Agency?
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Testiomony of Philip Goldman and John Gittinger, ... Page 2 of 18
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Senator INOUYE. Were you a member of the Agency at the time MKULTRA was in
operation?
Mr. GITTINGER. Yes.
Senator INOUYE. Thank you. Senator Kennedy.
Senator KENNEDY. I want to welcome both of you to the committee. If we could start with
Mr. Goldman. Were you the project engineer for the safe houses in either San Francisco or
New York?
Mr. GOLDMAN. I know of no safe house in San Francisco.
Senator KENNEDY. How about in New York?
Mr. GOLDMAN. I knew of one facility that was established there, but I didn't know anything
of its operation.
Senator KENNEDY. Were you a monitor on any testing of drugs on unwitting persons in San
Francisco?
Mr. GOLDMAN. No.
Senator KENNEDY. Well, we have a classified document here that was provided by the
Agency that lists your name as a monitor of the program and I would appreciate it if you
would look-Mr. GOLDMAN. I think the misunderstanding arises because I was project officer.
Senator KENNEDY. Well, would you take a look at that?
[Mr. Goldman inspected the document.]
Mr. GOLDMAN. This document as it states is correct. However, my-Senator KENNEDY. That document is correct?
Mr. GOLDMAN. As far as I see on the first page, the project. But my-Senator KENNEDY. Well, could I get it back, please.
That would indicate that you were a monitor of the program.
Mr. GOLDMAN. I was in charge of disbursing the moneys to Morgan Hall.
Senator KENNEDY. To whom was that?
Mr. GOLDMAN. To the individual whose name was listed at the top of that document.
Senator KENNEDY. And you knew that he was running the project in San Francisco?
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Testiomony of Philip Goldman and John Gittinger, ... Page 3 of 18
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Mr. GOLDMAN. I knew he was the person who was in charge out there.
Senator KENNEDY. All right.
Mr. GOLDMAN. But I had no knowledge nor did I seek knowledge of actually what he was
doing, because there would be other things involved.
I did receive-Senator KENNEDY. What were you doing?
-52Mr. GOLDMAN. I was collecting -- I had to be sure that all the receipts that ever were turned
in balanced with the moneys that were paid out to see that everything was run all right. There
was no illegal use of funds as far as we could determine by the receipts and cash.
Senator KENNEDY. So even though the Agency document indicates that you were a monitor
for the program, one of the few monitors of that particular program which you mentioned for
San Francisco and Mill Valley, Calif., you described your responsibility only as a carrier of
money, is that correct?
Mr. GOLDMAN. I would say as a disburser or carrying out -- seeing that the moneys were
handled properly. There was within that -- I don't know what's done or what he did do in
conjunction with other people.
Senator KENNEDY. Were you responsible for the disbursement of all the funds?
Mr. GOLDMAN. I was responsible for turning over the check to him.
Senator KENNEDY. And what did you know of the program itself?
Mr. GOLDMAN. The only thing I knew of the program was what he furnished us in terms of
receipts and that sort of thing. I didn't indulge or concern myself in that.
Senator KENNEDY. You still wrote, and I'll let you examine it -- it's a classified document -but you wrote a rather substantive review of the program in May of 1963, talking about the
experiments, the factual data that had been collected, covert and realistic field trials, about the
necessity of those particular -- and talked about the effectiveness of the various programs, the
efficiency of various delivery systems. That doesn't sound to me like someone who is only-Mr. GOLDMAN. Well, if you would refresh my memory, if I could read this I would
certainly agree with whatever is said there, if it was written.
Senator KENNEDY. I am trying to gather what your role was. You've indicated first of all
that you didn't know about -- you knew about a safe house in New York; now we find out that
U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Testiomony of Philip Goldman and John Gittinger, ... Page 4 of 18
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
you're the carrier for the resources as well and the agent in San Francisco. We find out now
that the CIA put you as a monitor. You're testifying that you only were the courier, and here
we have just one document, and there are many others that talk about the substance of that
program with your name on it and I am just trying to find out exactly what role you were
playing.
Mr. GOLDMAN. The only thing I can tell you about this and I am drawing completely on
my memory is that this individual who was in charge out there conducted these things and
reported them back to the Agency. I didn't participate in any of them. All I know was that he
furnished me with receipts for things that were done and told of the work that they had done.
Senator KENNEDY. Well, that document covers more than receipts.
Mr. GOLDMAN. Yes, it tells of what -- they had conducted work out there.
Senator KENNEDY. It describes, does it not? Read the paragraph 2.
Mr. GOLDMAN. "A number of covert"-Senator KENNEDY. Well, you can't read it, it's a classified document, and I don't know why,
quite frankly, but it relates to the substance
-53of those programs and your name is signed to the memorandums on it. I am not interested in
you trying to review for us now what is in the document, but I think it would be unfortunate if
we were left with the opinion that all you were was a courier of resources when we see a
document with your name on it, signed, that talks about the substance of the program. And
what we're interested in is the substance of the program. We have the recent documents that
were provided by the Agency, which do indicate that you were at least involved in the
substance, and I'm just trying to find out whether you're willing to tell us about that.
Mr. GOLDMAN. I am perfectly willing to tell you everything that I can remember.
Senator KENNEDY. But you can't remember anything.
Mr. GOLDMAN. I can't remember the substantive parts of these, things, I really can't.
Senator KENNEDY. Of the program that was taking place.
Do you have any greater familiarity with what was happening in New York?
Mr. GOLDMAN. No, no.
Senator KENNEDY. And you have the same function with regards to New York?
Mr. GOLDMAN. The same function with regard to New York.
U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Testiomony of Philip Goldman and John Gittinger, ... Page 5 of 18
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Testiomony of Philip Goldman and John Gittinger, ... Page 6 of 18
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Senator KENNEDY. Did you talk to him about these programs? Did you have anything to do
with him during this period of time?
Mr. GOLDMAN. I didn't have anything to do with him until I would say probably in the
sixties.
Senator KENNEDY. And can you tell us what you had to do with him then?
Mr. GOLDMAN. Just what you see there, on the papers.
Senator KENNEDY. Well, that is the request for the money and he approves it.
Mr. GOLDMAN. That is the request for money and he approves it, and I am quite sure that I
probably discussed with him whether the work was going along all right, whether his reports
were being turned in, and whether he was satisfied with the way things were going and did he
have any complaints about the way other people were requesting him, but I did not engage
myself in anything he was doing.
Senator KENNEDY. Well, did you get the impression that Gottlieb knew what was going
on?
Mr. GOLDMAN. I didn't ask.
Senator KENNEDY. But you told him that your impression that what was going on even
though you didn't know what was going on, was going on well, I guess? [Laughter.]
Mr. GOLDMAN. I told Gottlieb what you saw in there was that the things appeared to be
going along all right. I was repeating and parroting back the words that were given to me
while I was there.
Senator KENNEDY. What was the money being spent for, do you know?
Mr. GOLDMAN. No; I can't recall that, sir.
Senator KENNEDY. Would you remember if we told you it was red curtains and can-can
pictures-Mr. GOLDMAN. No, sir.
Senator KENNEDY. Floral pictures and the rest.
Mr. GOLDMAN. No, sir.
Senator KENNEDY. Recorders.
Mr. GOLDMAN. No, sir.
Senator KENNEDY. Recorders and two-way mirrors.
Mr. GOLDMAN. Wait, hold on. You're slipping a word in there now.
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Testiomony of Philip Goldman and John Gittinger, ... Page 7 of 18
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Senator KENNEDY. But you would have authorized those funds, would you not, since you
were the-Mr. GOLDMAN. Did you say two-way mirrors?
Senator KENNEDY. Yes.
Mr. GOLDMAN. Where?
Senator KENNEDY. In the safe houses.
Mr. GOLDMAN. Where?
Senator KENNEDY. San Francisco.
Mr. GOLDMAN. No.
Senator KENNEDY. How about New York?
Mr. GOLDMAN. Yes.
Senator KENNEDY. You remember now that you approved expenditures for New York?
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Testiomony of Philip Goldman and John Gittinger, ... Page 8 of 18
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Testiomony of Philip Goldman and John Gittinger, ... Page 9 of 18
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Testiomony of Philip Goldman and John Gitting... Page 10 of 18
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Mr. GITTINGER. My responsibilities which would involve any of the period of time that
you were talking about really was not directly related to drugs at all. I was a psychologist
charged with the responsibility of trying to develop as much information as I could on various
cultures, overseas cultures, anthropological type data, if you follow what I mean. I was also
engaged in trying to work out ways and means of assessing people and understanding people.
I originally became involved in this through working on Chinese culture, and over a series of
time I was introduced to the problem of brainwashing, which is the thing that really was the
most compelling thing in relationship to this, and became charged with the responsibility of
trying to find out a little bit about interrogation techniques.
-57And among other things, we decided or I decided that one of the best sources of interrogation
techniques would be trying to locate and interview and become involved with experienced
police interrogators in the country and experienced people who had real practical knowledge
of interrogation. The reason for this is that we had become pretty well convinced after the
experience of the brainwashing problems coming out of China, that it was the techniques of
the interrogators that were causing the individuals to make confessions and so forth in
relationship to this, rather than any kind of drugging and so forth. So we were very much
interested in interrogation techniques, and this led to me being introduced to the agent in the
west coast, and I began to talk to him in connection with these interrogation techniques.
Senator KENNEDY. OK. Now, that is the agent that ran the tests on the west coast on the
unwitting people. That's where you come in, correct?
Mr. GITTINGER. If I understand -- would you say that again?
Senator KENNEDY. The name Morgan Hall has been -- that is the name that has been used.
Mr. GITTINGER. Yes.
Senator KENNEDY. And that is the agent that you met with.
Mr. GITTINGER. That is right.
Senator KENNEDY. And you met at the safe house.
Mr. GITTINGER. Yes, sir.
Senator KENNEDY. Whom did you meet with in the safe house?
Mr. GITTINGER. This is the part that is hard for me to say, and I am sorry that I have to. In
connection with some work that we were doing, we needed to have some information on
sexual habits. Morgan Hall provided informants for me, to talk to in connection with the sex
habits that I was interested in trying to find information. During one period of time the safe
house, as far as I was concerned, was used for just these particular type of interviews. And I
U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Testiomony of Philip Goldman and John Gitting... Page 11 of 18
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
-58drug age or the drug culture comes later on. Consequently, those of us who had any
responsibility in this area were interested in trying to get as much information as we could on
the subculture, the subculture drug groups, and obviously the Bureau of Narcotics represented
a means of doing this. Consequently, other types of things that were involved in discussions at
that time would have to do with the underground use of drugs. When I am talking about this I
am talking about the folkways in terms of unwitting use of drugs. Did these people that I was
talking to have any information about this and on rare instances they were able to tell me
about their use, and in most cases this would largely turn out to be a Mickey Finn or
something of that sort rather than anything esoteric.
I also was very much interested because we had relatively little information, believe it or not,
at that time, in terms of the various reactions that people were having to drugs. Therefore,
these people were very informative in terms of they knew a great deal of information about
reactions.
Senator KENNEDY. At least you gathered -- or am I correct in assuming that you gathered
the impression that the prostitutes that you had talked to were able to slip the drugs to people
U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Testiomony of Philip Goldman and John Gitting... Page 12 of 18
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
-59Senator KENNEDY. Well, we're not interested in names or institutions, so we prefer that you
do not. That has to be worked out in arrangements between Admiral Turner and the
individuals and the institutions.
But we're interested in what the Foundation really was and how it functioned and what its
purpose was.
U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Testiomony of Philip Goldman and John Gitting... Page 13 of 18
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Mr. GITTINGER. Well, it was established to undertake research in the general area of the
behavioral sciences. It definitely had almost no focus or interest in, say, drug-related type of
activities except in a very minor way, because it was largely set up to attempt to gain a certain
amount of information and to fund projects which were psychological, sociological,
anthropological in character. It was established in the sense of a period of time that a lot of us
who are in it wish we could do it over again, but we were interested in trying to get together a
panel of the most representative high-level behavioral scientists we could to oversee and help
in terms of developing the Society for the Investigation of Human Ecology type of program.
The Agency in effect provided the money. They did not direct the projects. Now, the fact of
the matter is, there are a lot of innocent people who received the Society for the Investigation
of Human Ecology money which I know for a fact they were never asked to do anything for
the CIA but they did get through this indirectly. They had no knowledge that they were getting
CIA money.
Senator KENNEDY. Over what period of time did this take place?
Mr. GITTINGER. As far as I was concerned , it was the period of time ending in 1961. 1
believe the Human Ecology fund finally phased out in 1965, but I was not involved in this
phasing out.
Senator KENNEDY. Can you give the range of the different sort of individual projects of the
universities in which it was active?
Mr. GITTINGER. Well, it would have as many as -- I am very fuzzy on my memory on the
number of projects. It is over 10, 20, 30.
Senator KENNEDY. After it made the grants, what was the relationship of the Agency with
the results of the studies? The Foundation acquired the money to make the grants from the
Agency, and then it made the grants to these various research programs.
Mr. GITTINGER. Yes, sir.
Senator KENNEDY. And that included eight universities as well as individual researchers?
Mr. GITTINGER. Yes, sir.
Senator KENNEDY. Then what follow-up was there to that, sir?
Mr. GITTINGER. Well, in every sense of the word, the organization was run exactly like
any other foundation, and it carried with it the same thing in terms of making certain that the
people that they had given money to used it for the purpose for which it had been granted, that
they had access to any of the reports that they had put out, but there were no strings attached to
anybody. There wasn't any reason they couldn't publish anything that they put out.
Senator KENNEDY. What, sort of budget are we talking about here?
Mr. GITTINGER. I honestly do not remember. I would guess we are talking in the realm of
about $150,000 a year, but don't hold me to that, because I don't know.
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Testiomony of Philip Goldman and John Gitting... Page 14 of 18
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
-60Senator KENNEDY. What is your view about such funding as a professional person, in terms
of compromising the integrity of a university, sir?
Mr. GITTINGER. Well, obviously, sir, insofar as today there is no question about it. I will
have to say at the time that we were doing this there was quite an entirely different kind of an
attitude, and I do know for a fact that we moved to start towards phasing out the Society for
the Investigation of Human Ecology and the Human Ecology Fund for the very reason that we
were beginning to recognize that it was moving into an area but this would be compromised.
Senator KENNEDY. Well, that is commendable, both your attitude and the reasons for it, but
during that period of time it still was involved in behavior research programs, as I understand
it.
Mr. GITTINGER. Yes, sir. On its own, in connection with this, it participated again, and
these again were not CIA-directed projects, but these were all things which would
theoretically contribute to the general knowledge at the time where the things like the study of
the Hungarian refugees -- obviously, the study of the Hungarian refugees who came to this
country after the Hungarian revolt was a very useful exercise to try to get information about
the personality characteristics of the Communists and so forth.
Senator KENNEDY. Were there other foundations that were doing similar kinds of work?
Mr. GITTINGER. Not to my knowledge, sir.
Senator KENNEDY. You believe-Mr. GITTINGER. You mean, CIA, other CIA?
Senator KENNEDY. Right.
Mr. GITTINGER. Well, my answer is in the sense that I know of no other CIA foundations,
no. There were, of course, other foundations doing similar kinds of work in the United States.
Senator KENNEDY. Have you heard of the Psychological Assessments Foundation?
Mr. GITTINGER. I certainly have.
Senator KENNEDY. What was that? What function did that have?
Mr. GITTINGER. Now, this was bringing us up to a different era. I believe the functions of
that organization have nothing whatsoever to do with the things that are being talked about
here while I was associated with it.
Senator KENNEDY. Rather than getting into the work, it was another foundation, was it not?
U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Testiomony of Philip Goldman and John Gitting... Page 15 of 18
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
-61Senator KENNEDY. All right. I want to thank you for your helpful testimony, Mr. Gittinger.
It is not easy to go back into the past. I think you have been very fair in your characterizations,
and I think it is quite appropriately indicated that there are different standards now from what
they were 25 years ago, and I think you have responded very fairly and completely to the
inquiries, and I think with a good deal of feeling about it.
You are a person who is obviously attempting to serve the country's interest, so I want to
thank you very much for your statement and for your helpful timeliness.
Mr. GITTINGER. Thank you, sir.
Senator INOUYE. Senator Case?
Senator CASE. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I am sorry that I had another committee that I had
to complete the hearing with this morning before I got here.
I shall read the testimony with very great interest, and I appreciate your testimony as I have
heard it. I would like to comment just on one point, and that is, it relates to a story in the press
yesterday about part of this program involving the funding of a grant at a foreign university. I
would like to elicit from you a comment as to the additional sensitivity and difficulty that that
practice involves from your standpoint as a scientist, as well as a citizen, if you will.
Mr. GITTINGER. I will say it was after the fact thinking. It was utter stupidity the way
things worked out to have used some of this money outside the United States when it was CIA
money. I can categorically state to my knowledge, and I don't claim a complete knowledge all
the way across of the human ecology functions, but to my knowledge, and this is unfortunate,
those people did not know that they were getting money from CIA, and they were not asked to
contribute anything to CIA as such.
U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Testiomony of Philip Goldman and John Gitting... Page 16 of 18
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Senator CASE. It would be interesting to try to examine this by turning the thing around and
thinking what we would think if this happened from a foreign official agency to our own
university. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Senator INOUYE. Senator Schweiker.
Senator SCHWEIKER. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Dr. Goldman, I wonder if you would tell us what your training and educational background is?
Dr. GOLDMAN. I have already given a biography for the record.
Senator SCHWEIKER. I have not seen it. Who has it? Is it classified? We may have it for
the record, but may I ask you to briefly describe your training and background for us now? I
hope it is no secret.
Dr. GOLDMAN. Well, I was told if I was asked this to say that. I was told that by your staff
people, but I have no objection to telling you. I am a resident from Pennsylvania, southwest
Pennsylvania, Lancaster County. I went to Penn State, and I am in nutrition.
Senator SCHWEIKER. In what?
Dr. GOLDMAN. Nutrition.
Senator SCHWEIKER. Were you in charge of a section or segment of the CIA in your past
capacity?
Dr. GOLDMAN. During the time I was with that organization, I was in charge of one small
section of it, one small segment of it; yes.
-62Senator SCHWEIKER. What was the function or purpose of that section that you headed?
Dr. GOLDMAN. To provide support for the other parts of the division.
Senator SCHWEIKER. Where in the chain of command would that put you in relation to Dr.
Gottlieb?
Dr. GOLDMAN. Pretty far down the line.
Senator SCHWEIKER. Mr. Gittinger, I would just like to ask you a few questions. We
appreciate your frankness and candor with the committee, and we realize this is a very difficult
area to go into. I am not quite clear on two matters that were raised earlier. First, were the safe
houses we were talking about here used on occasion by the prostitutes you referred to?
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Testiomony of Philip Goldman and John Gitting... Page 17 of 18
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Testiomony of Philip Goldman and John Gitting... Page 18 of 18
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Before adjourning the hearings, I would like to have the record show that Dr. Goldman and
Mr. Gittinger have voluntarily cooperated with the committee in staff interviews, that they
appear this morning voluntarily, and they are not under subpoena.
Gentlemen, I realize that this experience may have been an unhappy one and possibly a
painful one. Therefore, we thank you very much for participating this morning. We also
realize that the circumstances of that time differed very much from this day, and possibly the
national attitude, the national political attitude condoned this type of activity. So, we have not
asked you to come here as persons who have committed crimes, but rather in hope that you
can assist us in studying this problem so that it will not occur once again. In that spirit we
thank you for your participation, and we look forward to working with you further in this case.
Thank you very much.
Senator KENNEDY. Mr. Chairman, I would like also to thank the witnesses. These are
difficult matters, and I think all of us are very grateful.
Senator SCHWEIKER. I think the witnesses should know that though it may not always
seem that way, what we are trying to do is to probe the past and look at the policies of the past
to affect the future. I think our emphasis really is on the future, not the past, but it is important
that we learn from the past as we formulate policies and legislation for the future, I hope that
all of the witnesses who did come before us voluntarily this morning, including Admiral
Turner respect the fact that we are questioning the past to learn about the future. I think it
should be looked at in that light.
Senator KENNEDY. I think that is the spirit in which we have had these hearings. It seems to
me that from both these witnesses and others, Gottlieb knows the information and can best
respond, and we are going to make every effort in the Senate Health Committee to get Mr.
Gottlieb to appear, and we obviously look forward to cooperating with Senator Inouye and the
other members of the committee in getting the final chapter written on this, but we want to
thank you very much for your appearance here.
Senator INOUYE. The hearing will stand in recess, subject to the call of the Chair.
[Whereupon, at 12:12 p.m., the hearing was recessed, subject to the call of the Chair.]
1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix A--Testing and Use of Chemical and Biolog... Page 1 of 43
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Historical References
General Histories | Ancient History | 1800-1850 | 1860 | 1870 | 1880 | 1890
1900 | 1910 | 1920 | 1930 | 1940 | 1950 | 1960 | 1970 | 1980 | 1990
APPENDIX A
XVII. Testing And Use Of Chemical And Biological Agents By The
Intelligence Community
Under its mandate [1] the Select Committee has studied the testing and use of chemical and
biological agents by intelligence agencies. Detailed descriptions of the programs conducted
by intelligence agencies involving chemical and biological agents will be included in a
separately published appendix to the Senate Select Committee's report. This section of the
report will discuss the rationale for the programs, their monitoring and control, and what the
Committee's investigation has revealed about the relationships among the intelligence
agencies and about their relations with other government agencies and private institutions
and individuals. [2]
Fears that countries hostile to the United States would use chemical and biological agents
against Americans or America's allies led to the development of a defensive program
designed to discover techniques for American intelligence agencies to detect and counteract
chemical and biological agents. The defensive orientation soon became secondary as the
possible use of these agents to obtain information from, or gain control over, enemy agents
became apparent.
Research and development programs to find materials which could be used to alter human
behavior were initiated in the late 1940s and early 1950s. These experimental programs
originally included testing of drugs involving witting human subjects, and culminated in tests
using unwitting, nonvolunteer human subjects. These tests were designed to determine the
potential effects of chemical or biological agents when used operationally against individuals
unaware that they had received a drug.
The testing programs were considered highly sensitive by the intelligence agencies
administering them. Few people, even within the agencies, knew of the programs and there is
no evidence that either the executive branch or Congress were ever informed of them. The
highly compartmented nature of these programs may be explained in part by an observation
made by the CIA Inspector General that, "the knowledge that the Agency is engaging in
unethical and illicit activi-
1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix A--Testing and Use of Chemical and Biolog... Page 2 of 43
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
[1] Senate Resolution 21 directs the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence Activities to investigate a number
of issues:
"(a) Whether agencies within the intelligence community conducted illegal domestic activities (Section 2 (1)
and (2));
"(b) The extent to which agencies within the intelligence community cooperate (Section 2 (4) and (8));
"(c) The adequacy of executive branch and congressional oversight of intelligence activities (Section 2 (7) and
(11));
"(d) The adequacy of existing laws to safeguard the rights of American citizens (Section 2 (13))."
[2] The details of these programs may never be known. The programs were highly compartmented. Few records
were kept. What little documentation existed for the CIA's principal program was destroyed early in 1973.
(65)
-66ties would have serious repercussions in political and diplomatic circles and would be
detrimental to the accomplishment of its missions." [3]
The research and development program, and particularly the covert testing programs,
resulted in massive abridgments of the rights of American citizens, sometimes with tragic
consequences The deaths of two Americans [3a] can be attributed to these programs; other
participants in the testing programs may still suffer from the residual effects. While some
controlled testing of these substances might be defended, the nature of the tests, their scale,
and the fact that they were continued for years after the danger of surreptitious
administration of LSD to unwitting individuals was known, demonstrate a fundamental
disregard for the value of human life.
The Select Committee's investigation of the testing and use of chemical and biological agents
also raise serious questions about the adequacy of command and control procedures within
the Central Intelligence Agency and military intelligence, and about the relationships among
the intelligence agencies, other governmental agencies, and private institutions and
individuals. The CIA's normal administrative controls were waived for programs involving
chemical and biological agents to protect their security. According to the head of the Audit
Branchof the CIA, these waivers produced "gross administrative failures." They prevented
the CIA's internal review mechanisms (the Office of General Counsel, the Inspector General,
and the Audit Staff) from adequately supervising the programs. In general, the waivers had
the paradoxical effect of providing less restrictive administrative controls and less effective
internal review for controversial and highly sensitive projects than those governing normal
Agency activities.
The security of the programs was protected not only by waivers of normal administrative
controls, but also by a high degree of compartmentation within the CIA. This
compartmentation excluded the CIA's Medical Staff from the principal research and testing
1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix A--Testing and Use of Chemical and Biolog... Page 3 of 43
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
-67their overseas testing program, which included surreptitious administration of LSD, from the
CIA. Learning of the Army's program, the Agency surreptitiously attempted to gain details
of it.
The decision to institute one of the Army's LSD field testing projects had been based, at least
in part, on the finding that no long-term residual effects had ever resulted from the drug's
administration. The CIA's failure to inform the Army of a death which resulted from the
surreptitious administration of LSD to unwitting Americans may well have resulted in the
institution of an unnecessary and potentially lethal program.
The development, testing, and use of chemical and biological agents by intelligence agencies
raises serious questions about the relationship between the intelligence community and
foreign governments, other agencies of the Federal Government, and other institutions and
individuals. The questions raised range from the legitimacy of American complicity in
actions abroad which violate American and foreign laws to the possible compromise of the
integrity of public and private institutions used as cover by intelligence agencies.
1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix A--Testing and Use of Chemical and Biolog... Page 4 of 43
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Project CHATTER was a Navy program that began in the fall of 1947. Responding to
reports of "amazing results" achieved by the Soviets in using "truth drugs," the program
focused on the identification and testing of such drugs for use in interrogations and in the
recruitment of agents. The research included laboratory experiments on animals and human
subjects involving Anabasis aphylla, scopolamine, and mescaline in order to determine their
speech-inducing qualities. Overseas experiments were conducted as part of the project.
The project expanded substantially during the Korean War, and ended shortly after the war,
in 1953.
2. Project BLUEBIRD/ARTICHOKE
The earliest of the CIA's major programs involving the use of chemical and biological
agents, Project BLUEBIRD, was approved by the Director in 1950. Its objectives were:
(a) discovering means of conditioning personnel to prevent unauthorized extraction of
information from them by known means, (b) investigating the possibility of control of an
individual by application of special interrogation techniques, (c) memory enhancement, and (d)
establishing defensive means for preventing hostile control of Agency personnel. [4]
As a result of interrogations conducted overseas during the project, another goal was added - the evaluation of offensive uses of unconventional interrogation techniques, including
hypnosis and drugs. In August 1951, the project was renamed ARTICHOKE. Project
ARTICHOKE included in-house experiments on interrogation techniques, conducted "under
medical and security controls which would ensure
[4] CIA memorandum to the Select Committee, "Behavioral Drugs and Testing," 2/11/75.
-68that no damage was done to individuals who volunteer for the experiments. [5] Overseas
interrogations utilizing a combination of sodium pentothal and hypnosis after physical and
psychiatric examinations of the subjects were also part of ARTICHOKE.
The Office of Scientific Intelligence (OSI), which studied scientific advances by hostile
powers, initially led BLUEBIRD/ARTICHOKE efforts. In 1952, overall responsibility for
ARTICHOKE was transferred from OSI to the Inspection and Security Office (I&SO),
predecessor to the present Office of Security. The CIA's Technical Services and Medical
Staffs were to be called upon as needed; OSI would retain liaison function with other
government agencies. [6] The change in leadership from an intelligence unit to an operating
unit apparently reflected a change in emphasis; from the study of actions by hostile powers
to the use, both for offensive and defensive purposes, of special interrogation techniques -primarily hypnosis and truth serums.
1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix A--Testing and Use of Chemical and Biolog... Page 5 of 43
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Representatives from each Agency unit involved in ARTICHOKE met almost monthly to
discuss their progress. These discussions included the planning of overseas interrogations [8]
as well as further experimentation in the U.S.
Information about project ARTICHOKE after the fall of 1953 is scarce. The CIA maintains
that the project ended in 1956, but evidence suggests that Office of Security and Office of
Medical Services use of "special interrogation" techniques continued for several years
thereafter.
3. MKNAOMI
MKNAOMI was another major CIA program in this area. In 1967, the CIA summarized the
purposes of MKNAOMI:
(a) To provide for a covert support base to meet clandestine operational requirements.
(b) To stockpile severely incapacitating and lethal materials for the specific use of TSD
[Technical Services Division].
(c) To maintain in operational readiness special and unique items for the dissemination of
biological and chemical materials.
(d) To provide for the required surveillance, testing, upgrading, and evaluation of
materials and items in order to assure absence of defects and complete predictability of
results to be expected under operational conditions. [9]
Under an agreement reached with the Army in 1952, the Special Operations Division (SOD)
at Fort Detrick was to assist CIA in developing, testing, and maintaining biological agents
and delivery
[5] Memorandum from Robert Taylor, O/DD/P to the Assistant Deputy (Inspection and Security) and Chief of
the Medical Staff, 3/22/52.
[6] Memorandum from H. Marshall Chadwell, Assistant Director, Scientific Intelligence, to the Deputy
Director/Plans (DDP) "Project ARTICHOKE," 8/29/52.
[8] "Progress Report, Project ARTICHOKE." 1/12/53.
[9] Memorandum from Chief, TSD/Biological Branch to Chief, TSD "MKNAOMI: Funding. Objectives, and
Accomplishments." 10/18/67, p. 1. For a fuller description of MKNAOMI and the relationship between CIA
and SOD, see p. 360.
-69-
1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix A--Testing and Use of Chemical and Biolog... Page 6 of 43
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
systems. By this agreement, CIA acquired the knowledge, skill, and facilities of the Army to
develop biological weapons suited for CIA use.
SOD developed darts coated with biological agents and pills containing several different
biological agents which could remain potent for weeks or months. SOD developed a special
gun for firing darts coated with a chemical which could allow CIA agents to incapacitate a
guard dog, enter an installation secretly, and return the dog to consciousness when leaving.
SOD scientists were unable to develop a similar incapacitant for humans. SOD also
physically transferred to CIA personnel biological agents in "bulk" form, and delivery
devices, including some containing biological agents.
In addition to the CIA's interest in biological weapons for use against humans, it also asked
SOD to study use of biological agents against crops and animals. In its 1967 memorandum,
the CIA stated:
Three methods and systems for carrying out a covert attack against crops and causing severe
crop loss have been developed and evaluated under field conditions. This was accomplished
in anticipation of a requirement which was later developed but was subsequently scrubbed
just prior to putting into action. [9a]
MKNAOMI was terminated in 1970. On November 25,1969, President Nixon renounced the
use of any form of biological weapons that kill or incapacitate and ordered the disposal of
existing stocks of bacteriological weapons. On February 14, 1970, the President clarified the
extent of his earlier order and indicated that toxins -- chemicals that are not living organisms
but are produced by living organisms -- were considered biological weapons subject to his
previous directive and were to be destroyed. Although instructed to relinquish control of
material held for the CIA by SOD, a CIA scientist acquired approximately 11 grams of
shellfish toxin from SOD personnel at Fort Detrick which were stored in a little-used CIA
laboratory where it went undetected for five years. [10]
4. MKULTRA
MKULTRA was the principal CIA program involving the research and development of
chemical and biological agents. It was "concerned with the research and development of
chemical, biological, and radiological materials capable of employment in clandestine
operations to control human behavior." [11]
In January 1973, MKULTRA records were destroyed by Technical Services Division
personnel acting on the verbal orders of Dr. Sidney Gottlieb, Chief of TSD. Dr. Gottlieb has
testified, and former Director Helms has confirmed, that in ordering the records destroyed,
Dr. Gottlieb was carrying out the verbal order of then DCI Helms.
MKULTRA began with a proposal from the Assistant Deputy Director for Plans, Richard
Helms, to the DCI, outlining a special
[9a] Ibid. p. 2.
[10] Senate Select Committee, 9/16/75, Hearings, Vol. 1.
1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix A--Testing and Use of Chemical and Biolog... Page 7 of 43
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
[11] Memorandum from the CIA Inspector General to the Director, 7/26/63.
-70funding mechanism for highly sensitive CIA research and development projects that studied
the use of biological and chemical materials in altering human behavior. The projects
involved:
Research to develop a capability in the covert use of biological and chemical materials. This
area involves the production of various physiological conditions which could support present
or future clandestine operations. Aside from the offensive potential, the development of a
comprehensive capability in this field of covert chemical and biological warfare gives us a
thorough knowledge of the enemy's theoretical potential, thus enabling us to defend
ourselves against a foe who might not be as restrained in the use of these techniques as we
are. [12]
MKULTRA was approved by the DCI on April 13, 1953 along the lines proposed by ADDP
Helms.
Part of the rationale for the establishment of this special funding mechanism was its extreme
sensitivity. The Inspector General's survey of MKULTRA in 1963 noted the following
reasons for this sensitivity:
a. Research in the manipulation of human behavior is considered by many authorities in
medicine and related fields to be professionally unethical, therefore the reputation of
professional participants in the MKULTRA program are on occasion in jeopardy.
b. Some MKULTRA activities raise questions of legality implicit in the, original charter.
c. A final phase of the testing of MKULTRA products places the rights and interests of U.S.
citizens in jeopardy.
d. Public disclosure of some aspects of MKULTRA activity could induce serious adverse
reaction in U.S. public opinion. as well as stimulate offensive and defensive action in this
field on the part of foreign intelligence services. [13]
Over the ten-year life of the program, many "additional avenues to the control of human
behavior" were designated as appropriate for investigation under the MKULTRA charter.
These include "radiation, electroshock, various fields of psychology, psychiatry, sociology,
and anthropology, graphology, harassment substances, and paramilitary devices and
materials." [14]
The research and development of materials to be used for altering human behavior consisted
of three phases: first, the search for materials suitable for study; second, laboratory testing on
voluntary human subjects in various types of institutions; third, the application of
MKULTRA materials in normal life settings.
1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix A--Testing and Use of Chemical and Biolog... Page 8 of 43
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
The search for suitable materials was conducted through standing arrangements with
specialists in universities, pharmaceutical houses, hospitals, state and federal institutions, and
private research organi-
[12] Memorandum from ADDP Helms to DCI Dulles, 4/3/53, Tab A, pp. 1-2. [13] I.G. Report on MKULTRA,
1963, pp. 1-2. [14] Ibid, p. 4.
-71zations. The annual grants of funds to these specialists were made under ostensible research
foundation auspices, thereby concealing the CIA's interest from the specialist's institution.
The next phase of the MKULTRA program involved physicians, toxicologists, and other
specialists in mental, narcotics, and general hospitals, and in prisons. Utilizing the products
and findings of the basic research phase, they conducted intensive tests on human subjects.
One of the first studies was conducted by the National Institute of Mental Health. This study
was intended to test various drugs, including hallucinogenics, at the NIMH Addiction
Research Center in Lexington, Kentucky. The "Lexington Rehabilitation Center," as it was
then called, was a prison for drug addicts serving sentences for drug violations.
The test subjects were volunteer prisoners who, after taking a brief physical examination and
signing a general consent form, were administered hallucinogenic drugs. As a reward for
participation in the program, the addicts were provided with the drug of their addiction.
LSD was one of the materials tested in the MKULTRA program. The final phase of LSD
testing involved surreptitious administration to unwitting nonvolunteer subjects in normal
life settings by undercover officers of the Bureau of Narcotics acting for the CIA.
The rationale for such testing was "that testing of materials under accepted scientific
procedures fails to disclose the full pattern of reactions and attributions that may occur in
operational situations." [15]
According to the CIA, the advantage of the relationship with the Bureau was that
test subjects could be sought and cultivated within the setting of narcotics control. Some subjects
have been informers or members of suspect criminal elements from whom the [Bureau of
Narcotics] has obtained results of operational value through the tests. On the other hand, the
effectiveness of the substances on individuals at all social levels, high and low, native American
and foreign, is of great significance and testing has been performed on a variety of individuals
within these categories. [Emphasis added.] [16]
1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix A--Testing and Use of Chemical and Biolog... Page 9 of 43
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
-72subjects -- the CIA had developed six drugs for operational use and they had been used in six
different operations on a total of thirty-three subjects. [17] By 1963 the number of operations
and subjects had increased substantially.
In the spring of 1963, during a wide-ranging Inspector General survey of the Technical
Services Division, a member of the Inspector General's staff, John Vance, learned about
MKULTRA and about the project involving the surreptitious administration of LSD to
unwitting, nonvoluntary human subjects. As a result of the discovery and the Inspector
General's subsequent report, this testing was halted and much tighter administrative controls
were imposed on the program. According to the CIA, the project was decreased significantly
each budget year until its complete termination in the late 1960s.
5. The Testing of LSD by the Army
There were three major phases in the Army's testing of LSD. In the first, LSD was
administered to more than 1,000 American soldiers who volunteered to be subjects in
chemical warfare experiments. In the second phase, Material Testing Program EA 1729, 95
volunteers received LSD in clinical experiments designed to evaluate potential intelligence
uses of the drug. In the third phase, Projects THIRD CHANCE and DERBY HAT, 16
unwitting nonvolunteer subjects were interrogated after receiving LSD as part of operational
field tests.
1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix A--Testing and Use of Chemical and Biol... Page 10 of 43
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
The late 1910s and early 1950s were marked by concern over the threat posed by the
activities of the Soviet Union, the People's Republic of China, and other Communist bloc
countries. United States concern over the use of chemical and biological agents by these
powers was acute. The belief that hostile powers had used chemical and biological agents in
interrogations, brainwashing, and in attacks designed to harass, disable, or kill Allied
personnel created considerable pressure for a "defensive" program to investigate chemical
and biological agents so that the intelligence community could understand the mechanisms
by which these substances worked and how their effects could be defeated. [18]
Of particular concern was the drug LSD. The CIA had received reports that the Soviet Union
was engaged in intensive efforts to produce LSD; and that the Soviet Union had attempted to
purchase the world's supply of the chemical. As one CIA officer who was deeply involved in
work with this drug described the climate of the times: "[It] is awfully hard in this day and
age to reproduce how frightening all of this was to us at the time, particularly after the drug
scene has become as widespread and as knowledgeable in this country as it did. But we were
literally terrified, because this was the one material that we
-73had ever been able to locate that really had potential fantastic possibilities if used
wrongly." [19]
But the defensive orientation soon became secondary. Chemical and biological agents were
to be studied in order "to perfect techniques... for the abstraction of information from
individuals whether willing or not" and in order to "develop means for the control of the
activities and mental capacities of individuals whether willing or not." [20] One Agency
official noted that drugs would be useful in order to "gain control of bodies whether they
were willing or not" in the process of removing personnel from Europe in the event of a
Soviet attack. [21] In other programs, the CIA began to develop, produce, stockpile, and
maintain in operational readiness materials which could be used to harass, disable, or kill
specific targets. [22]
Reports of research and development in the Soviet Union, the People's Republic of China,
and the Communist Bloc countries provided the basis for the transmutation of American
programs from a defensive to an offensive orientation. As the Chief of the Medical Staff of
the Central Intelligence Agency wrote in 1952:
There is ample evidence in the reports of innumerable interrogations that the Communists were
utilizing drugs, physical duress, electric shock, and possibly hypnosis against their enemies.
With such evidence it is difficult not to keep from becoming rabid about our apparent laxity. We
1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix A--Testing and Use of Chemical and Biol... Page 11 of 43
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
are forced by this mounting evidence to assume a more aggressive role in the development of
these techniques, but must be cautious to maintain strict inviolable control because of the havoc
that could be wrought by such techniques in unscrupulous hands. [23]
In order to meet the perceived threat to the national security, substantial programs for the
testing and use of chemical and biological agents -- including projects involving the
surreptitious administration of LSD to unwitting nonvolunteer subjects "at all social levels,
high and low, native American and foreign" -- were conceived, and implemented. These
programs resulted in substantial violations of the rights of individuals within the United
States.
-74Although the CIA recognized these effects of LSD to unwitting individuals within the United
States, the project continued. As the Deputy Director for Plans, Richard Helms, wrote the
Deputy Director of Central Intelligence during discussions which led to tile cessation of
unwitting testing:
While I share your uneasiness and distaste for any program which tends to intrude upon an
individual's private and legal prerogatives, I believe it is necessary that the Agency maintain
a central role in this activity, keep current on enemy capabilities the manipulation of human
behavior, and maintain an offensive capability. [25]
There were no attempts to secure approval for the most controversial aspects of these
programs from the executive branch or Congress. The nature and extent of the programs
were closely held secrets; even DCI McCone was not briefed on all the details of the
program involving the surreptitious administration of LSD until 1963. It was deemed
imperative that these programs be concealed from the American people. As the CIA's
Inspector General wrote in 1957:
U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix A--Testing and Use of Chemical and Biol... Page 12 of 43
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Precautions must be taken not only to protect operations from exposure to enemy forces but
also to conceal these activities from the American public in general. The knowledge that the
Agency is engaging in unethical and illicit activities would have serious repercussions in
political and diplomatic circles and would be detrimental to the accomplishment of its
mission. [26]
2. The Death of Dr. Frank Olson
The most tragic result of the testing of LSD by the CIA was the death of Dr. Frank Olson, a
civilian employee of the Army, who died on November 27, 1953. His death followed his
participation in a CIA experiment with LSD. As part of this experiment, Olson unwittingly
received approximately 70 micrograms of LSD in a glass of Cointreau he drank on
November 19, 1953. The drug had been placed in the bottle by a CIA officer, Dr. Robert
Lashbrook, as part of an experiment he and Dr. Sidney Gottlieb performed at a meeting of
Army and CIA scientists.
Shortly after this experiment, Olson exhibited symptoms of paranoia and schizophrenia.
Accompanied by Dr. Lashbrook, Olson sought psychiatric assistance in New York City from
a physician, Dr. Harold Abramson, whose research on LSD had been funded indirectly by
the CIA. While in New York for treatment, Olson fell to his death from a tenth story window
in the Statler Hotel.
[24] Even during the discussions which led to the termination of the unwitting testing, the DDP turned down
the option of halting such tests within the. U.S. and continuing them abroad despite the fact that the Technical
Services Division had conducted numerous operations abroad making use of LSD. The DDP made this decision
on the basis of security noting that the past efforts, overseas had resulted in "making an inordinate number of
foreign nationals witting of our role in the very sensitive activity." (Memorandum for the Deputy Director of
Central Intelligence from the Deputy Director for Plans, 12/17/63, p. 2.)
[25] Ibid., pp. 2-3.
[26] I.G. survey of TSD, 1957, p. 217.
-75a. Background. -- Olson, an expert in aerobiology who was assigned to the Special
Operations Division (SOD) of the U.S. Army Biological Center at Camp Detrick, Maryland.
This Division had three primary functions:
(1) assessing the vulnerability of American installations to biological attack;
(2) developing techniques for offensive use of biological weapons; and
(3) biological research for the CIA. [27]
1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix A--Testing and Use of Chemical and Biol... Page 13 of 43
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Professionally, Olson was well respected by his colleagues in both the Army and the CIA.
Colonel Vincent Ruwet, Olson's immediate superior at the time of his death, was in almost
daily contact with Olson. According to Colonel Ruwet: "As a professional man... his
ability... was outstanding." [28] Colonel Ruwet stated that "during the period prior to the
experiment... I noticed nothing which would lead me to believe that he was of unsound
mind." [29] Dr. Lashbrook, who had monthly contacts with Olson from early 1952 until the
time of his death, stated publicly that before Olson received LSD, "as far as I know, he was
perfectly normal." [30] This assessment is in direct contradiction to certain statements
evaluating Olson's emotional stability made in CIA internal memorandum written after
Olson's death.
b. The Experiment. -- On November 18, 1953, a group of ten scientists from the CIA and
Camp Detrick attended a semi-annual review and analysis conference at a cabin located at
Deep Creek Lake, Maryland. Three of the participants were from the CIA's Technical
Services Staff. The Detrick representatives were all from the Special Operations Division.
According to one CIA official, the Special Operations Division participants "agreed that an
unwitting experiment would be desirable." [31] This account directly contradicts Vincent
Ruwet's recollection. Ruwet recalls no such discussion, and has asserted that he would
remember any such discussion because the SOD participants would have strenuously
objected to testing on unwitting subjects. [32]
In May, 1953, Richard Helms, Assistant DDP, held a staff meeting which the Chief of
Technical Services Staff attended. At this meeting Helms "indicated that the drug [LSD] was
dynamite and that he should be advised at all times when it was intended to use it." [33] In
addition, the then DDP, Frank Wisner, sent a memorandum to TSS stating the requirement
that the DDP personally approve the use of LSD. Gottlieb went ahead with the experiment,
[34] securing the ap-
-76-
1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix A--Testing and Use of Chemical and Biol... Page 14 of 43
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
proval of his immediate supervisor. Neither the Chief of TSS nor the DDP specifically
authorized the experiment in which Dr. Olson participated. [35]
According to Gottlieb, [36] " a "very small dose" of LSD was placed in a bottle of Cointreau
which was served after dinner on Thursday, November 19. The drug was placed in the
liqueur by Robert Lashbrook. All but two of tie SOD participants received LSD. One did not
drink; the other had a heart condition. [37] About twenty minutes after they finished their
Cointreau, Gottlieb informed the other participants that they had received LSD.
Dr. Gottlieb stated that "up to the time of the experiment," he observed nothing unusual in
Olson's behavior. [37a] Once the experiment was underway, Gottlieb recalled that "the drug
had a definite effect on the group to the point that they were boisterous and laughing and
they could not continue the meeting or engage in sensible conversation." The meeting
continued until about 1: 00 a.m., when the participants retired for the evening. Gottlieb
recalled that Olson, among others, complained of "wakefulness" during the night. [38]
According to Gottlieb on Friday morning "aside from some evidence of fatigue, I observed
nothing unusual in [Olson's] actions, conversation, or general behavior." [39] Ruwet recalls
that Olson "appeared to be agitated" at breakfast, but that he "did not consider this to be
abnormal under the circumstances." [40]
c. The Treatment. -- The following Monday, November 23, Olson was waiting for Ruwet
when he came in to work at 7:30 a.m. For the next two days Olson's friends and family
attempted to reassure him and help him "snap out" of what appeared to be a serious
depression. On Tuesday, Olson again came to Ruwet and, after an hour long con-
[35] Dr. Gottlieb testified that "given the information we knew up to this time, and based on a lot of our own
self-administration, we thought it was a fairly benign substance in terms of potential harm." This is in conflict
not only with Mr. Helms' statement but also with material which had been supplied to the Technical Services
Staff. In one long memorandum on current research with LSD which was supplied to TSD, Henry Beecher
described the dangers involved with such research in a prophetic manner. "The second reason to doubt
Professor Rothland came when I raised the question as to any accidents which had arisen from the use of LSD25. He said in a very positive way, 'none.' As it turned out this answer could be called overly positive, for later
on in the evening I was discussing the matter with Dr. W. A. Stohl, Jr., a psychiatrist in Bleulera's Clinic in
Zurich where I had gone at Rothland's insistence. Stohl, when asked the same question, replied, 'yes,' and added
spontaneously, 'there is a case Professor Rothland knows about. In Geneva a woman physician who had been
subject to depression to some extent took LSD-25 in an experiment and became severely and suddenly
depressed and committed suicide three weeks later. While the connection is not definite, common knowledge of
this could hardly have allowed the positive statement Rothland permitted himself. This case is a warning to us
to avoid engaging subjects who are depressed, or who have been subject to depression.'" Dr. Gottlieb testified
that he had no recollection of either the report or that particular section of it. (Sidney Gottlieb testimony,
10/19/75, p. 78.)
[36] Memorandum of Sheffield Edwards for the record, 11/28/53, p. 2.
[37] Lashbrook (staff summary), 7/19/75, p. 3.
[37a] Gottlieb Memorandum, 12/7/53. p. 2.
[38] Edwards memorandum, 11/28/53, p. 3.
[39] Gottlieb memorandum. 12/7/53, p. 3.
1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix A--Testing and Use of Chemical and Biol... Page 15 of 43
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
-77versation, it was decided that medical assistance for Dr. Olson was desirable. [41]
Ruwet then called Lashbrook and informed him that "Dr. Olson was in serious trouble and
needed immediate professional attention." [42] Lashbrook agreed to make appropriate
arrangements and told Ruwet to bring Olson to Washington, D.C. Ruwet and Olson
proceeded to Washington to meet with Lashbrook, and the three left for New York at about
2:30 p.m. to meet with Dr. Harold Abramson.
At that time Dr. Abramson was an allergist and immunologist practicing medicine in New
York City. He held no degree in psychiatry, but was associated with research projects
supported indirectly by the CIA. Gottlieb and Dr. Lashbrook both followed his work closely
in the early 1950s. [43] Since Olson needed medical help, they turned to Dr. Abramson as
the doctor closest to Washington who was experienced with LSD and cleared by the CIA.
Ruwet, Lashbrook, and Olson remained in New York for two days of consultations with
Abramson. On Thursday, November 26, 1953, the three flew back to Washington so that
Olson could spend Thanksgiving with his family. En route from the airport Olson told Ruwet
that he was afraid to face his family. After a lengthy discussion, it was decided that Olson
and Lashbrook would return to New York, and that Ruwet would go to Frederick to explain
these events to Mrs. Olson. [44]
Lashbrook and Olson flew back to New York the same day, again for consultations with
Abramson. They spent Thursday night in a Long Island hotel and the next morning returned
to the city with Abramson. In further discussions with Abramson, it was agreed that Olson
should be placed under regular psychiatric care at an institution closer to his home. [45]
d. The Death. -- Because they could not obtain air transportation for a return trip on Friday
night, Lashbrook and Olson made reservations for Saturday morning and checked into the
Statler Hotel. Between the time they checked in and 10:00 p.m.; they watched television,
visited the cocktail lounge, where each had two martinis, and dinner. According to
Lashbrook, Olson "was cheerful and appeared to enjoy the entertainment." He "appeared no
longer particularly depressed, and almost the Dr. Olson I knew prior to the experiment." [46]
After dinner Lashbrook and Olson watched television for about an hour, and at 11:00, Olson
suggested that they go to bed, saying that "he felt more relaxed and contented than he had
since [they] came to New York." [47] Olson then left a call with the hotel operator to wake
them in the morning. At approximately 2:30 a.m. Saturday, November 28. Lashbrook was
awakened by a loud "crash of glass." In his report on the incident, he stated only that Olson
"had crashed through the closed window blind and the closed window and he fell to his death
from the window of our room on the 10th floor." [48]
1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix A--Testing and Use of Chemical and Biol... Page 16 of 43
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
[41] Ibid., p. 4.
[42] Lashbrook memorandum, 12/7/53, p. 1.
[43] Staff summary of Dr. Harold Abramson interview, 7/29/75, p. 2.
[44] Lashbrook memorandum, 12/7/53, P. 3.
[45] Abramson memorandum, 12/4/53.
[46] Lashbrook memorandum, 12/7/53, p. 3.
[47] Ibid., p. 4.
[48] Ibid.
-78Immediately after finding that Olson had leapt to his death, Lashbrook telephoned Gottlieb at
his home and informed him of the incident. [49] Gottlieb called Ruwet and informed him of
Olson's death at approximately 2:45 a.m. [50] Lashbrook then called the hotel desk and
reported the incident to the operator there. Lashbrook called Abramson and informed him of
the occurrence. Abramson told Lashbrook he "wanted to be kept out of the thing
completely," but later changed his mind and agreed to assist Lashbrook. [51]
Shortly thereafter, uniformed police officers and some hotel employees came to Lashbrook's
room. Lashbrook told the police he didn't know why Olson had committed suicide, but he
did know that Olson "suffered from ulcers." [52]
e. The Aftermath. -- Following Dr. Olson's death, the CIA made a substantial effort to ensure
that his family received death benefits, but did not notify the Olsons of the circumstances
surrounding his demise. The Agency also made considerable efforts to prevent the death
being connected with the CIA, and supplied complete cover for Lashbrook so that his
association with the CIA would remain a secret.
After Dr. Olson's death the CIA conducted an internal investigation of the incident. As part
of his responsibilities in this investigation, the General Counsel wrote the Inspector General,
stating:
I'm not happy with what seems to be a very casual attitude on the part of TSS representatives
to the way this experiment was conducted and the remarks that this is just one of the risks
running with scientific experimentation. I do not eliminate the need for taking risks, but I do
believe, especially when human health or life is at stake, that at least the prudent, reasonable
measures which can be taken to minimize the risk must be taken and failure to do so was
culpable negligence. The actions of the various individuals concerned after effects of the
experiment on Dr. Olson became manifest also revealed the failure to observe normal and
reasonable precautions. [53]
As a result of the investigation DCI Allen Dulles sent a personal letter to the Chief of
Technical Operations of the Technical Services Staff who had approved the experiment
criticizing him for "poor judgment... in authorizing the use of this drug on such an unwitting
basis and without proximate medical safeguards." [54] Dulles also sent a letter to Dr.
Gottlieb, Chief of the Chemical Division of the Technical Services Staff, criticizing him for
recommending the "unwitting application of the drug" in that the proposal "did not give
sufficient emphasis for medical collaboration and for the proper consideration of the rights of
U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix A--Testing and Use of Chemical and Biol... Page 17 of 43
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
-79The letters were hand carried to the individuals to be read and returned. Although the letters
were critical, a note from the Deputy Director of Central Intelligence to Mr. Helms
instructed him to inform the individuals that: "These are not reprimands and no personnel
file notation are being made." [56]
Thus, although the Rockefeller Commission has characterized them as such, these notes
were explicitly not reprimands. Nor did participation in the events which led to Dr. Olson's
death have any apparent effect on the advancement within the CIA of the individuals
involved.
3. The Surreptitious Administration of LSD to Unwitting NonVolunteer Human Subjects by
the CIA After the Death of Dr. Olson
The death of Dr. Olson could be viewed, as some argued at the time, as a tragic accident, one
of the risks inherent in the testing of new substances. It might be argued that LSD was
thought to be benign. After the death of Dr. Olson the dangers of the surreptitious
administration of LSD were clear, yet the CIA continued or initiated [57] a project involving
the surreptitious administration of LSD to nonvolunteer human subjects. This program
exposed numerous individuals in the United States to the risk of death or serious injury
without their informed consent, without medical supervision, and without necessary followup to determine any long-term effects.
Prior to the Olson experiment, the Director of Central Intelligence had approved
MKULTRA, a research program designed to develop a "capability in the covert use of
biological and chemical agent materials." In the proposal describing MKULTRA Mr. Helms,
then ADDP, wrote the Director that:
we intend to investigate the development of a chemical material which causes a reversible nontoxic aberrant mental state, the specific nature of which can be reasonably well predicted for
each individual. This material 'could potentially aid in discrediting individuals, eliciting
information, and implanting suggestions and other forms of mental control. [58]
On February 12, 1954, the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency wrote TSS officials
1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix A--Testing and Use of Chemical and Biol... Page 18 of 43
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
criticizing them for "poor judgment" in administering LSD on "an unwitting basis and
without proximate medical safeguards" to Dr. Olson and for the lack of "proper
consideration of the rights of the individual to whom it was being administered." [59] On the
same day, the Inspector General reviewed a report on Subproject Number 3 of MKULTRA,
in which the same TSS officers who had just received letters from the Director were quoted
as stating that one of the purposes of Subproject Number 3 was to
-80"observe the behavior of unwitting persons being questioned after having been given a
drug." [60] There is no evidence that Subproject Number 3 was terminated even though the
officers were unequivocally aware of the dangers of the surreptitious administration of LSD
and the necessity of obtaining informed consent and providing medical safeguards.
Subproject Number 3, in fact, used methods which showed even less concern than did the
OLSON experiment for the safety and security of the participants. Yet the evidence indicates
the project continued until 1963. [61]
In the project, the individual conducting the test might make initial contact with a
prospective subject selected at random in a bar. He would then invite the person to a
"safehouse" where the test drug was administered to the subject through drink or in food.
CIA personnel might debrief the individual conducting the test, or observe the test by using a
one-way mirror and tape recorder in an adjoining room.
Prior consent was obviously not obtained from any of the subjects. There was also,
obviously, no medical prescreening. In addition, the tests were conducted by individuals who
were not qualified scientific observers. There were no medical personnel on hand either to
administer the drugs or to observe their effects, and no follow-up was conducted on the test
subjects.
As the Inspector General noted in 1963:
A significant limitation on the effectiveness of such testing is the infeasibility of performing
scientific observation of results. The [individuals conducting the test] are not qualified scientific
observers. Their subjects are seldom accessible beyond the first hours of the test. The testing
may be useful in perfecting delivery techniques, and in identifying surface characteristics of
onset, reaction, attribution, and side-effect. [62]
1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix A--Testing and Use of Chemical and Biol... Page 19 of 43
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
number of instances,... the test subject has become ill for hours or days, including hospitalization
in at least one case, and the agent could only follow up by guarded inquiry after the test subject's
return to normal life. Possible sickness and attendant economic loss are inherent contingent
effects of the testing. [61]
Paradoxically, greater care seems to have been taken for the safety of foreign nationals
against whom LSD was used abroad. In several cases medical examinations were performed
prior to the use of LSD. [64]
[60] Memorandum to Inspector General from Chief, Inspection and Review, on Subproject #3 of MKULTRA,
2/10/54.
[61] IG Report on MKULTRA, 1903.
[62] Ibid., p. 12.
[63] Ibid. According to the IG's survey in 1963, physicians associated with MKULTRA could be made
available in an emergency.
[64] The Technical Services Division which was responsible for the operational use of LSD abroad took the
position that "no physical examination of the subject is required prior to administration of [LSD] by TSS
trained personnel. A physician need not be present. There is no danger medically in the use of this material as
handled by TSS trained personnel." The Office of Medical Services had taken the position that LSD was
"medically dangerous." Both the Office of Security and the Office of Medical Services argued that LSD
"should not be administered unless preceded by a medical examination... and should be administered only by or
in the presence of a physician who had studied it and its effect." (Memorandum from James Angleton, Chief,
Counterintelligence Staff to Chief of Operations, 12/12/57, pp. 1-2.
-81Moreover, the administration abroad was marked by constant observation made possible
because the material was being used against prisoners of foreign intelligence or security
organizations. Finally, during certain of the LSD interrogations abroad, local physicians
were on call, though these physicians had had no experience with LSD and would not be told
that hallucinogens had been administered. [65]
The CIA's project involving the surreptitious administration of LSD to unwitting human
subjects in the United States was finally halted in 1963, as a result of its discovery during the
course of an Inspector General survey of the Technical Services Division. When the
Inspector General learned of the project, he spoke to the Deputy Director for Plans, who
agreed that the Director should be briefed. The DDP made it clear that the DCI and his
Deputy were generally familiar with MKULTRA. He indicated, however, that he was not
sure it was necessary to brief the DDCI at that point.
On May 24,1963, the DDP advised the Inspector General that he had briefed the Director on
the MKULTRA program and in particular had covered the question of the surreptitious
administration of LSD to unwitting human subjects. According to the Inspector General, the
DDP said that "the Director indicated no disagreement and therefore the testing will
continue." [66]
1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix A--Testing and Use of Chemical and Biol... Page 20 of 43
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
One copy of an "Eyes Only" draft report on MKULTRA was prepared by the Inspector
General who recommended the termination of the surreptitious administration project. The
project was suspended following the Inspector General's report.
On December 17, 1963, Deputy Director for Plans Helms wrote a memo to the DDCI, who
with the Inspector General and the Executive Director-Comptroller had opposed the covert
testing. He noted two aspects of the problem: (1) "for over a decade the Clandestine Services
has had the mission of maintaining a capability for influencing human behavior;" and (2)
"testing arrangements in furtherance of this mission should be as operationally realistic and
yet as controllable as possible." Helms argued that the individuals must be "unwitting" as
this was "the only realistic method of maintaining the capability, considering the intended
operational use of materials to influence human behavior as the operational targets will
certainly be unwitting. Should the subjects of the testing not be unwitting, the program
would only be "pro forma" resulting in a "false sense of accomplishment and readiness." [67]
Helms continued:
[65] Physicians might be called with the hope that they would make a diagnosis of mental breakdown which
would be useful in discrediting the individual who was the subject of the CIA interest.
[66] Memorandum for the Record prepared by the Inspector General, 5/15/63, p. 1.
[67] Ibid., p. 2.
-82If one grants the validity of the mission of maintaining this unusual capability and the
necessity for unwitting testing, there is only then the question of how best to do it.
Obviously, the testing should be conducted in such a manner as to permit the opportunity to
observe the results of the administration on the target. It also goes without saying that
whatever testing arrangement we adopt must afford maximum safeguards for the protection
of the Agency's role in this activity, as well as minimizing the possibility of physical or
emotional damage to the individual tested. [68]
In another memo to the Director of Central Intelligence in June, 1964, Helms again raised
the issue of unwitting testing. At that time General Carter, then acting DCI, approved several
changes in the MKULTRA program proposed by Mr. Helms as a result of negotiations
between the Inspector General and the DDP. In a handwritten note, however, Director Carter
added that "unwitting testing will be subject to a separate decision." [69]
No specific decision was made then or soon after. The testing had been halted and, according
to Walter Elder, Executive Assistant to DCI McCone, the DCI was not inclined to take the
positive step of authorizing a resumption of the testing. At least through the summer, the
DDP did not press the issue. On November 9, 1964, the DDP raised the issue again in a
memo to the DCI, calling the Director's attention to what he described as "several other
indications during the past year of an apparent Soviet aggressiveness in the field of covertly
administered chemicals which are, to say the least, inexplicable and disturbing." [70]
U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix A--Testing and Use of Chemical and Biol... Page 21 of 43
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Helms noted that because of the suspension of covert testing, the Agency's "positive
operational capability to use drugs is diminishing, owing to a lack of realistic testing. With
increasing knowledge of the state of the art, we are less capable of staying up with Soviet
advances in this field. This in turn results in a waning capability on our part to restrain others
in the intelligence community (such as the Department of Defense) from pursuing operations
in this area." [71]
Helms attributed the cessation of the unwitting testing to the high risk of embarrassment to
the Agency as well as the "moral problem." He noted that no better covert situation had been
devised than that which had been used, and that "we have no answer to the moral issue." [72]
Helms asked for either resumption of the testing project or its definitive cancellation. He
argued that the status quo of a research and development program without a realistic testing
program was causing the Agency to live "with the illusion of a capability which is becoming
minimal and furthermore is expensive." [73] Once again no formal action was taken in
response to the Helms' request.
-83From its beginning in the early 1950's until its termination in 1963, the program of
surreptitious administration of LSD to unwitting nonvolunteer human subjects demonstrates
a failure of the CIA's leadership to pay adequate attention to the rights of individuals and to
provide effective guidance to CIA employees. Though it was known that the testing was
dangerous, the lives of subjects were placed in jeopardy and their rights were ignored during
the ten years of testing which followed Dr. Olson's death. Although it was clear that the laws
of the United States were being violated, the testing continued. While the individuals
involved in the Olson experiment were admonished by the Director, at the same time they
were also told that they were not being reprimanded and that their "bad judgment" would not
be made part of their personnel records. When the covert testing project was terminated in
1963, none of the individuals involved were subject to any disciplinary action.
4. Monitoring and Control of the Testing and Use of Chemical and Biological Agents by the
CIA
The Select Committee found numerous failures in the monitoring and control of the testing
and use of chemical and biological agents within the CIA. [74] An analysis of the failures
can be divided into four sections: (a) the waiver of normal regulations or requirements; (b)
U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix A--Testing and Use of Chemical and Biol... Page 22 of 43
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
the problems in authorization procedures; (c) the failure of internal review mechanisms such
as the Office of General Counsel, the Inspector General, and the Audit Staff; and (d) the
effect of compartmentation and competition within the CIA.
a. The Waiver of Administrative Controls. -- The internal controls within any agency rest on:
(1) clear and coherent regulations; (2) clear lines of authority; and (3) clear rewards for those
who conduct themselves in accord with agency regulations and understandable and
immediate sanctions against those who do not. In the case of the testing and use of chemical
and biological agents, normal CIA administrative controls were waived. The destruction of
the documents on the largest CIA program in this area constituted a prominent example of
the waiver of normal Agency procedures by the Director.
These documents were destroyed in early 1973 at the order of then DCI Richard Helms.
According to Helms, Dr. Sidney Gottlieb, then Director of TSD:
... came to me and said that he was retiring and that I was retiring and he thought it would be a
good idea if these files were destroyed. And I also believe part of the reason for our thinking this
was advisable was there had been relationships with outsiders in government agencies and other
organizations and that these would be sensitive in this kind of a thing but that since the program
was over and finished and done with, we thought we would just get rid of the files as
[74] Section 2(9) of S. Res. 21 instructs the Committee to examine: the "extent to which United States
intelligence agencies are governed by Executive Orders, rules, or regulations either published or secret."
-84well, so that anybody who assisted us in the past would not be subject to follow-up or questions,
embarrassment, if you will. [75]
The destruction was based on a waiver of an internal CIA regulation, CSI 70-10, which
regulated the "retirement of inactive records." As Thomas Karamessines, then Deputy
Director of Plans, wrote in regulation CSI-70-10: "Retirement is not a matter of convenience
or of storage but of conscious judgment in the application of the rules modified by
knowledge of individual component needs. The heart of this judgment is to ensure that the
complete story can be reconstructed in later years and by people who may be unfamiliar with
the events." [76]
The destruction of the MKULTRA documents made it impossible for the Select Committee
to determine the full range and extent of the largest CIA research program involving
chemical and biological agents. The destruction also prevented the CIA from locating and
providing medical assistance to the individuals who were subjects in the program. Finally, it
prevented the Committee from determining the full extent of the operations which made use
of materials developed in the MKULTRA program. [77]
From the inception of MKULTRA normal Agency procedures were waived. In 1953, Mr.
Helms, then Assistant Deputy Director for Plans, proposed the establishment of MKULTRA.
U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix A--Testing and Use of Chemical and Biol... Page 23 of 43
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Under the proposal six percent of the research and development budget of TSD would be
expended "without the establishment of formal contractual relations" because contracts
would reveal government interest. Helms also voted that qualified individuals in the field
"are most reluctant to enter into signed agreements of any sort which connect them with this
activity since such a connection would jeopardize their professional reputa-
-85tions". [78] Other Agency procedures, i.e., the forwarding of document, in support of
invoices and the provision for regular audit procedures, were also to be waived. On April 13,
1953, then DCI Allen Dulles approved MKULTRA, noting that security considerations
precluded handling the project through usual contractual agreements.
Ten years later investigations of MKULTRA by both the Inspector General and the Audit
Staff noted substantial deficiencies which resulted from the waivers. Because TSD had not
reserved the right to audit the books of contractors in MKULTRA, the CIA had been unable
to verify the use of Agency grants by a contractor. Another firm had failed to establish
controls and safeguards which would assure "proper accountability" in use of government
funds with the result that "funds have been used for purposes not contemplated by grants or
allowable under usual contract relationship." [79] The entire MKULTRA arrangement was
condemned for having administrative lines which were unclear, overly permissive controls,
and irresponsible supervision.
U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix A--Testing and Use of Chemical and Biol... Page 24 of 43
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
The head of the Audit Branch noted that inspections and audits: led us to see MKULTRA as
frequently having provided a device to escape normal administrative controls for research
that is not especially sensitive, as having allowed practices that produce gross administrative
failures, as having permitted the establishment of special relationships with unreliable
organizations on an unacceptable basis, and as having produced, on at least one occasion, a.
cavalier treatment of a bona fide contracting organization.
While admitting that there may be a need for special mechanisms for handling sensitive
projects, the Chief of the Audit Branch wrote that "both the terms of reference and the
ground rules for handling such special projects should be spelled out in advance so that
diversion from normal channels does not mean abandonment of controls.
Special procedures may be necessary to ensure the security of highly sensitive operations. To
prevent the erosion of normal internal control mechanisms, such waivers should not be
extended to less sensitive operations. Moreover, only those regulations which would
endanger security should be waived; to waive regulations generally would result in highly
sensitive and controversial projects having looser rather than stricter administrative controls.
MKNAOMI, the Fort Detrick CIA project for research and development of chemical and
biological agents, provides another example where efforts to protect the security of agency
activities overwhelmed administrative controls. No written records of the transfer of agents
such as anthrax or shellfish toxin were kept, "because of the sensitivity of the area and the
desire to keep any possible use of materials like this recordless." [81] The
-86result was that the Agency had no way of determining what materials were on hand, and
could not be certain whether delivery systems such as dart guns, or deadly substances such
as cobra venom had been issued to the field.
b. Authorization. -- The destruction of the documents regarding MKULTRA made it difficult
to determine at what level specific projects in the program were authorized. This problem is
not solely a result of the document destruction, however. Even at the height of MKULTRA
the IG noted that, at least with respect to the surreptitious administration of LSD, the
"present practice is to maintain no records of the planning and approval of test
programs." [82]
U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix A--Testing and Use of Chemical and Biol... Page 25 of 43
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
While it is clear that Allen Dulles authorized MKULTRA, the record is unclear as to who
authorized specific projects such as that involving the surreptitious administration of LSD to
unwitting nonvolunteer human subjects. Even given the sensitive and controversial nature of
the project, there is no evidence that when John McCone replaced Allen Dulles as the
Director of the Central Intelligence Agency he was briefed on the details of this project and
asked whether it should be continued . [83] Even during the 1963 discussions on the
propriety of unwitting testing, the DDP questioned whether it was "necessary to brief
General Carter", the Deputy Director of Central Intelligence and the Director's "alter ago,"
because CIA officers felt it necessary to keep details of the project restricted to an absolute
minimum number of people. [84]
In May of 1963, DDP Helms told the Inspector General that the covert testing program was
authorized because he had gone to the Director, briefed him on it and "the Director indicated
no disagreement and therefore the testing will continue." [85] Such authorization even for
noncontroversial matters is clearly less desirable than explicit authorization; in areas such as
the surreptitious administration of drugs, it is particularly undesirable. Yet according to
testimony
-87before the Committee, authorization through lack of agreement is even more prevalent in
sensitive situations. [86]
1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix A--Testing and Use of Chemical and Biol... Page 26 of 43
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
The unauthorized retention of shellfish toxin by Dr. Nathan Gordon and his subordinates, in
violation of a Presidential Directive, may have resulted from the failure of the Director to
issue written instructions to Agency officials. The retention was not authorized by senior
officials in the Agency. The Director, Mr. Helms, had instructed Mr. Karamessines, the
Deputy Director of Plans, and Dr. Gottlieb, the Chief of Technical Services Division, to
relinquish control to the Army of any chemical or biological agents being retained for the
CIA at Fort Detrick. Dr. Gottlieb passed this instruction on to Dr. Gordon. While orders may
be disregarded in any organization, one of the reasons that Dr. Gordon used to defend the
retention was the fact that he had not received written instructions forbidding it. [87]
In some situations the existence of written instructions did not prevent unauthorized actions.
According to an investigation by the CIA's Inspector General TSD officers had been
informed orally that Mr. Helms was to be "advised at all times" when LSD was to be used. In
addition TSD had received a memo advising the staff that LSD was not to be used without
the permission of the DDP, Frank Wisner. The experiment involving Dr. Olson went ahead
without notification of either Mr. Wisner or Mr. Helms. The absence of clear and immediate
punishment for that act must undercut the force of other internal instructions and regulations.
One last issue must be raised about authorization procedures within the Agency. Chemical
agents were used abroad until 1959 for discrediting or disabling operations, or for the
purpose of interrogations with the approval of the Chief of Operations of the DDP. Later the
approval of the Deputy Director for Plans was required for such operations. Although the
medical staff sought to be part of the approval process for these operations, they were
excluded because, as the Inspector General wrote in 1957:
Operational determinations are the responsibility of the DDP and it is he who should advise
the DCI in these respects just as it is he who is responsible for the results. It is completely
unrealistic to consider assigning to the Chief Medical Staff, (what, in effect, would be
authority over clandestine operations.) [88]
Given the expertise and training of physicians, participation of the Medical Staff might well
have been useful.
Questions about authorization also exist in regard to those, agencies which assisted the CIA.
For instance, the project involving the surreptitious administration of LSD to unwitting nonvolunteer human subjects was conducted in coordination with the Bureau of Narcotics and
Dangerous Drugs. There is some question as to the Commissioner of Narcotics' knowledge
about the project.
[86] Mr. Elder was asked whether the process of bringing forward a description of actions by the Agency in
getting approval through the absence of disagreement was a common one. He responded, "It was not
uncommon.... The more sensitive the project the more likely it would lean toward being a common practice,
based on the need to keep the written record to a minimum."
[87] Nathan Gordan testimony, 9/16/75, Hearings, Vol. 1.
[88] 1957 IG Report.
1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix A--Testing and Use of Chemical and Biol... Page 27 of 43
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
-88In 1963, the Inspector General noted that the head of the BNDD had been briefed about the
project, but the IG's report did not indicate the level of detail provided to him. Dr. Gottlieb
testified that "I remember meeting Mr. Anslinger and had the general feeling that he was
aware." [89] Another CIA officer did not recall any discussion of testing on unwitting
subjects when he and Dr. Gottlieb met with Commissioner Anslinger.
In a memorandum for the record in 1967 Dr. Gottlieb stated that Harry Giordano, who
replaced Mr. Anslinger, told Dr. Gottlieb that when he became Commissioner he was "only
generally briefed on the arrangements, gave it his general blessing, and said he didn't want to
know the details." The same memorandum states, however, that there were several
comments which indicated to Dr. Gottlieb that Mr. Giordano was aware of the substance of
the project. It is possible that the Commissioner provided a general authorization for the
arrangement without understanding what it entailed or considering its propriety. A reluctance
to seek detailed information from the CIA, and the CIA's hesitancy to volunteer it, has been
found in a number of instances during the Select Committee's investigations. This problem is
not confined to the executive branch but has also marked congressional relationships with
the Agency.
c. Internal Review. -- The waiver of regulations and the absence of documentation make it
difficult to determine now who authorized which activities. More importantly, they made
internal Agency review mechanisms much less effective. [90] Controversial and highly
sensitive projects which should have been subject to the most rigorous inspection lacked
effective internal review.
Given the role of the General Counsel and his reaction to the surreptitious administration of
LSD to Dr. Olson, it would have seemed likely that he would be asked about the legality or
propriety of any subsequent projects involving such administration. This was not done. He
did not learn about this testing until the 1970's. Nor was the General Counsel's opinion
sought on other MKULTRA projects, though these had been characterized by the Inspector
General in the 1957 Report on TSD as "unethical and illicit." [91]
There is no mention in the report of the 1957 Inspector General's survey of TSD of the
project involving the surreptitious administration of LSD. That project was apparently not
brought to the attention of the survey team. The Inspector who discovered it during the IG's
1963 survey of TSD recalls coming upon evidence of it inadvertently,
1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix A--Testing and Use of Chemical and Biol... Page 28 of 43
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
-89rather than its having been called to his attention as an especially sensitive project. [92]
Thus both the General Counsel and the Inspector General, the principal internal mechanisms
for the control of possibly improper actions, were excluded from regular reviews of the
project. When the project was discovered the Executive Director Comptroller voiced strong
opposition to it; it is possible that the project would have been terminated in 1957 if it had
been called to his attention when he then served as Inspector General.
The Audit Staff, which also serves an internal review function through the examination of
Agency expenditures, also encountered substantial difficulty with MKULTRA. When
MKULTRA was first proposed the Audit Staff was to be excluded from any function. This
was soon changed. However, the waiver of normal "contractual procedures" in MKULTRA
increased the likelihood of "irregularities" as well as the difficulty in detecting them. The
head of the Audit Branch characterized the MKULTRA procedures as "having allowed
practices that produced gross administrative failures," including a lack of controls within
outside contractors which would "assure proper accountability in use of government funds."
It also diminished the CIA's capacity to verify the accountings provided by outside firms.
d. Compartmentation and Jurisdictional Conflict Within the Agency. -- As has been noted,
the testing and use of chemical and biological agents was treated as a highly sensitive
activity within the CIA. This resulted in a high degree of compartmentation. At the same
time substantial jurisdictional conflict existed within the Agency between the Technical
Services Division, and the Office of Medical Services and the Office of Security.
This compartmentation and jurisdictional conflict may well have led to duplication of effort
within the CIA and to Agency policymakers being deprived of useful information.
During the early 1950's first the BLUEBIRD Committee and then the ARTICHOKE
Committee were instituted to bring together representatives of the Agency components
which had a legitimate interest in the area of the alteration of human behavior. By 1957 both
these committees had fallen into disuse. No information went to the Technical Services
Division (a component supposedly represented on the ARTICHOKE Committee) about
ARTICHOKE operations being conducted by the Office of Security and the Office of
Medical Services. The Technical Services Division which was providing support to the
Clandestine Services in the use of chemical and biological agents, but provided little or no
information to either the Office of Security or the Office of Medical Services. As one TSD
officer involved in these programs testified: "Although we were acquainted, we certainly
didn't share experiences." [93]
[92] Even after the Inspector came upon it the IG did not perform a complete investigation of it. It was
discovered at the end of an extensive survey of TSD and the Inspector was in the process of being transferred to
1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix A--Testing and Use of Chemical and Biol... Page 29 of 43
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
-90QKHILLTOP, another group designed to coordinate research in this area also had little
success. The group met infrequently -- only twice a year -- and little specific information
was exchanged. [94]
Concern over security obviously played some role in the failure to share information, [95]
but this appears not to be the only reason. A TSD officer stated that the Office, of Medical
Services simply wasn't "particularly interested in what we were doing" and never sought
such information. [96] On the other hand, a representative of the Office of Medical Services
consistently sought to have medical personnel participate in the use of chemical and
biological agents suggested that TSD did not inform the Office of Medical Services in order
to prevent their involvement.
Jurisdictional conflict was constant in this area. The Office of Security, which had been
assigned responsibility for direction of ARTICHOKE, consistently sought to bring TSD
operations involving psychochemicals under the ARTICHOKE umbrella. The Office of
Medical Services sought to have OMS physicians advise and participate in the operational
use of drugs. As the Inspector General described it in 1957, "the basic issue is concerned
with the extent of authority that should be exercised by the Chief, Medical Staff, over the
activities of TSD which encroach upon or enter into the medical field," and which are
conducted by TSD "without seeking the prior approval of the Chief, Medical Staff, and often
without informing him of their nature and extent." [91]
As was noted previously, because the projects and programs of TSD stemmed directly from
operational needs controlled by the DDP, the IG recommended no further supervision of
these activities by the Medical Staff:
It is completely unrealistic to consider assigning to the Chief, Medical Staff, what, in effect,
would be authority over clandestine operations. Furthermore, some of the activities of
Chemical Division are not only unorthodox but unethical and sometimes illegal. The DDP is
in a better position to evaluate the justification for such operations than the Chief, Medical
Staff. [98] [Emphasis added.]
Because the advice of the Director of Security was needed for "evaluating the risks involved"
in the programs and because the knowledge that the CIA was "engaging in unethical and
illicit activities would have serious repercussions in political and diplomatic circles," the IG
recommended that the Director of Security be fully advised of TSD's activities in these areas.
Even after the Inspector General's Report of 1957, the compartmentation and jurisdictional
conflict continued. They may have had a sub-
1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix A--Testing and Use of Chemical and Biol... Page 30 of 43
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
[94] The one set of minutes from a QKHILLTOP meeting indicated that individuals in the Office of Medical
Services stressed the need for more contact.
[95] When asked why information on the surreptitious administration of LSD was not presented to the
ARTICHOKE committee, Dr. Gottlieb responded: "I imagine the only reason would have been a concern for
broadening the awareness of its existence."
[96] CIA Officer, 11/21/75, p. 14
[97] IG Survey of TSD, 1957, p. 217.
[98] Ibid.
-91stantial negative impact on policymaking in the Agency. As the Deputy Chief of the
Counterintelligence Staff noted in 1958, due to the different positions taken by TSS, the
Office of Security, and the Office of Medical Services, on the use of chemical or biological
agents, it was possible that the individual who authorized the use of a chemical or biological
agent could be presented with "incomplete facts upon which to make a decision relevant to
its use." Even a committee set up by the DDP in 1958 to attempt to rationalize Agency
policy did not have access to records of testing and use. This was due, in part, to excessive
compartmentation, and jurisdictional conflict.
1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix A--Testing and Use of Chemical and Biol... Page 31 of 43
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
examinations of subjects were neglected in efforts to maintain the secrecy of the tests.
Finally, the command and control problems which were apparent in the CIA's programs are
paralleled by a lack of clear authorization and supervision in the Army's programs.
1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix A--Testing and Use of Chemical and Biol... Page 32 of 43
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
At the conclusion of the laboratory test phase of Material Testing Program EA 1729 in 1960,
the Army Assistant Chief of Staff for Intelligence (ACSI) authorized operational field testing
of LSD. The first field tests were conducted in Europe by an Army Special Purpose Team
(SPT) during the period from May to August of 1961. These tests were known as Project
THIRD CHANCE and involved eleven separate interrogations of ten subjects. None of the
subjects were volunteers and none were aware that they were to receive LSD. All but one
subject, a U.S. soldier implicated in the theft of classified documents, were alleged to be
foreign intelligence sources or agents. While interrogations of these individuals were only
moderately successful, at least one subject (the U.S. soldier) exhibited symptoms of severe
paranoia while under the influence of the drug.
The second series of field tests, Project DERBY HAT, were conducted by an Army SPT in
the Far East during the period from August to November of 1962. Seven subjects were
interrogated under DERBY HAT, all of whom were foreign nationals either suspected of
dealing in narcotics or implicated in foreign intelligence operations. The purpose of this
second set of experiments was to collect additional data on the utility of LSD in field
interrogations, and to evaluate any different effects the drug might have on "Orientals."
[101] Inspector General of the Army Report. "Use of Volunteers in Chemical Agent Research," 3/10/76, p. 138.
1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix A--Testing and Use of Chemical and Biol... Page 33 of 43
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
-94general lack of interagency communication on drug related research. As the October 1959
study noted, "there has been no coordination with other intelligence agencies up to the
present." [106]
On December 7, 1959, the Army Assistant Chief of Staff for Intelligence (ACSI, apparently
a General Willems) was briefed on the proposed operational use of LSD by USAINTC
Project Officer Jacobson, in preparation for Project THIRD CHANCE. General Willems
expressed concern that the project had not been coordinated with the FBI and the CIA. He is
quoted as saying "that if this project is going to be worth anything, it [LSD] should be used
on higher types of non-U.S. subjects" in other words "staffers." He indicated this could be
accomplished if the CIA were brought in. The summary of the briefing prepared by Major
Mehovsky continues: "Of particular note is that ACSI did not direct coordination with CIA
and the FBI but only mentioned it for consideration by the planners." [107]
After the briefing, four colonels, two lieutenant colonels and Major Mehovsky met to discuss
interagency cooperation with CIA and FBI. The group consensus was to postpone efforts
U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix A--Testing and Use of Chemical and Biol... Page 34 of 43
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
toward coordination:
Lt. Col. Jacobson commented that before we coordinate with CIA we should have more
factual findings from field experimentation with counterintelligence cases that will
strengthen our position and proposal for cooperation. This approach red to by the conferees.
[108]
Had such coordination been achieved, the safety of these experiments might have been
viewed differently and the tests themselves might have been seen as unnecessary.
3. Subordination of Individual Rights to National Security Considerations
Just as many of these experiments may have been unnecessary, the nature of the operational
tests (polygraph-assisted interrogations of drugged suspects) reflects a basic disregard for the
fundamental human rights of the subjects. The interrogation of an American soldier as part
of the THIRD CHANCE 1961 tests is an example of this disregard.
The "trip report" for Project THIRD CHANCE, dated September 6, 1961, recounts the
circumstances surrounding and the results of the tests as follows:
[The subject] was a U.S. soldier who had confessed to theft of classified documents.
Conventional methods had failed to ascertain whether espionage intent was involved. A
significant, new admission by subject that he told a fellow soldier of the theft while he still
had the documents in his possession was obtained during the EA 1729 interrogation along
with other variations of Subject's previous account. The interrogation results were deemed by
the local operational authority satisfactory evidence of Subject's claim of innocence in regard
to espionage intent. [109]
[106] Ibid, p. 6
[107] Mehovsky Fact Sheet, 12/9/60, p. 1.
[108] Ibid, p. 2.
[109] SPT Trip Report, Operation THIRD CHANCE, 9/6/61, p. 5.
-95The subject apparently reacted very strongly to the drug, and the interrogation, while
productive, was difficult. The trip report concluded:
(1) This case demonstrated the ability to interrogate a subject profitably throughout a highly
sustained and almost incapacitating reaction to EA 1729.
(2) The apparent value of bringing a subject into the EA 1729 situation in a highly stressed
state was indicated.
1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix A--Testing and Use of Chemical and Biol... Page 35 of 43
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
(3) The usefulness of employing as a duress factor the device of inviting the subject's
attention to his EA 1729 influenced state and threatening to extend this state indefinitely
even to a permanent condition of insanity, or to bring it to an end at the discretion of the
interrogators was shown to be effective.
(4) The need for preplanned precautions against extreme paranoiac reaction to EA 1729 was
indicated.
(5) It was brought to attention by this case that where subject has undergone extended
intensive interrogation prior to the EA 1729 episode and has persisted in a version repeatedly
during conventional interrogation, adherence to the same version while under EA 1729
influence, however extreme the reaction, may not necessarily be evidence of truth but merely
the ability to adhere to a well rehearsed story. [110]
This strong reaction to the drug and the accompanying discomfort this individual suffered
were exploited by the use of traditional interrogation techniques. While there is no evidence
that physical violence or torture were employed in connection with this interrogation,
physical and psychological techniques were used in the THIRD CHANCE experiments to
exploit the subjects' altered mental state, and to maximize the stress situation. Jacobson
described these methods in his trip report:
Stressing techniques employed included silent treatment before or after EA 1729
administration, sustained conventional interrogation prior to EA 1729 interrogation,
deprivation of food, drink, sleep or bodily evacuation, sustained isolation prior to EA 1729
administration, hot-cold switches in approach, duress "pitches", verbal degradation and
bodily discomfort, or dramatized threats to subject's life or mental health. [111]
Another gross violation of an individual's fundamental rights occurred in September 1962 as
part of the Army's DERBY HAT tests in the Far East. A suspected Asian espionage agent
was given 6 micrograms of LSD per kilogram of bodyweight. The administration of the drug
was completed at 1035 that morning:
At 1120, sweating became evident, his pulse became thready. He was placed in a supine
position. He began groaning with expiration and became semicomatose. [112]
1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix A--Testing and Use of Chemical and Biol... Page 36 of 43
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix A--Testing and Use of Chemical and Biol... Page 37 of 43
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
-97against the US Government for alleged injury due to EA 1729 must be legally shown to have
been due to the material. Proper security and appropriate operational techniques can protect
the fact of employment of EA 1729. [116]
On the basis of this evaluation, the study concluded that in view of "the stakes involved and
the interests of national security," the proposed plan for field testing should be approved.
The surreptitious administration of drugs to unwitting subjects by the Army raises serious
constitutional and legal issues. The consideration given these issues by the Army was wholly
insufficient. The character of the Army's volunteer testing program and the possibility that
drugs were simply substituted for other forms of violence or duress in field interrogations
raises serious doubts as to whether national security imperatives were properly interpreted.
The "consent" forms which each American volunteer signed prior to the administration of
LSD are a case in point. These forms contained no mention of the medical and psychological
risks inherent in such testing, nor do they mention the nature of the psychotropic drug to be
administered:
The general nature of the experiments in which I have volunteered have been explained to
me from the standpoint of possible hazards to my health. It is my understanding that the
experiments are so designed, based on the results of animals and previous human
experimentation, that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment. I
understand further that experiments will be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical
and medical suffering and injury, and that I will be at liberty to request that the experiments
be terminated at any time if in my opinion I have reached the physical or mental state where
continuation of the experiments becomes undesirable.
I recognize that in the pursuit of certain experiments transitory discomfort may occur. I
recognize, also, that under these circumstances, I must rely upon the skill and wisdom of the
physician supervising the experiment to institute whatever medical or surgical measures are
indicated. [Emphasis added.] [118]
The exclusion of any specific discussion of the nature of LSD in these forms raises serious
doubts as to their validity. An "understanding... that the anticipated results will justify the
performance of the experiment" without full knowledge of the nature of the experiment is an
incomplete "understanding." Similarly, the nature of the experiment limited the ability of
both the subject to request its request its termination and the experimenter to implement such
a request. Finally, the euphemistic characterization of "transitory discomfort" and the
agreement to "rely on the skill and wisdom of the physician" combine to conceal inherent
risks in the experimentation and may be viewed as dissolving the experimenter of personal
responsibility for damaging aftereffects. In summary, a "volunteer" program in which
subjects are not fully informed of potential hazards to their persons is "volunteer" in name
only.
1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix A--Testing and Use of Chemical and Biol... Page 38 of 43
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
[116] USAINTC staff study, Material Testing Program EA 1729," 10/15/59, p. 26.
[118] Sample volunteer consent form.
-98This problem was compounded by the security statements signed by each volunteer before
he participated in the testing. As part of this statement, potential subjects agreed that they
would:
... not divulge or make available any information related to U.S. Army Intelligence Center
interest or participation in the Department of the Army Medical Research Volunteer Program
to any individual, nation, organization, business, association, or other group or entity, not
officially authorized to receive such information.
I understand that any action contrary to the provisions of this statement will render me liable
to punishment under the provisions of the Uniform Code of Military Justice. [119]
Under these provisions, a volunteer experiencing aftereffects of the test might have been
unable to seek immediate medical assistance.
This disregard for the well-being of subjects drug testing is inexcusable. Further, the absence
of any comprehensive long-term medical assistance for the subjects of these experiments is
not only unscientific; it is also unprofessional.
4. Lack of Normal Authorization and Supervision
It is apparent from documents supplied to the Committee that the Army's testing programs
often operated under informal and nonroutine authorization. Potentially dangerous
operations such as these testing programs are the very projects which ought to be subject to
the closest internal scrutiny at the highest levels of the military command structure. There are
numerous examples of inadequate review, partial consideration, and incomplete approval in
the administration of these programs.
When the first Army program to use LSD on American soldiers in "field stations" was
authorized in May 1955, the Arm violated its own procedures in obtaining approval. Under
Army Chief of Staff Memorandum 385, such proposals were to be personally approved by
the Secretary of the Army. Although the plan was submitted to him on April 26, 1956, the
Secretary issued no written authorization for the project, and there is no evidence that he
either reviewed or approved the plan. Less than a month later, the Army Chief of Staff issued
a memorandum authorizing the tests. [120]
Subsequent testing of LSD under Material Testing Program EA 1729 operated generally
under this authorization. When the plans for this testing were originally discussed in early
1958 by officials of the Army Intelligence Center at Fort Holabird and representatives of the
U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix A--Testing and Use of Chemical and Biol... Page 39 of 43
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Chemical Warfare Center at Edgewood Arsenal, an informal proposal was formulated. This
proposal was submitted to the Medical Research Directorate at Edgewood by the President
of the Army Intelligence Board on June 3, 1958. There is no evidence that the plan was
approved at any level higher than the President of the Intelligence Board or the Commanding
General of Edgewood. The approval at Edgewood appears to have been issued by the
Commander's Adjutant. The Medical Research Laboratories did not submit the plan to the
Surgeon General for approval (a standard procedure) because
-99the new program was ostensibly covered by the authorizations granted in May 1956. [121]
The two projects involving the operational use of LSD (THIRD CHANCE and DERBY
HAT) were apparently approved by the Army Assistant Chief of Staff for Intelligence
(General Willems) on December 7, 1960. [122] This verbal approval came in the course of a
briefing on previous drug programs and on the planned field experimentation. There is no
record of written approval being issued by the ACSI to authorize these specific projects until
January 1961, and there is no record of any specific knowledge or approval by the Secretary
of the Army.
On February 4, 1963, Major General C. F. Leonard, Army ACSI, forwarded a copy of the
THIRD CHANCE Trip Report to Army Chief of Staff, General Earl Wheeler. [123] Wheeler
had apparently requested a copy on February 2. The report was routed through a General
Hamlett. While this report included background on the origins of the LSD tests, it appears
that General Wheeler may only have read the conclusion and recommendations. [124] The
office memorandum accompanying the Trip Report bears Wheeler's initials. [125]
5. Termination of Testing
On April 10, 1963, a briefing was held in the ACSIs office on the results of Projects THIRD
CHANCE and DERBY HAT. Both SPT's concluded that more field testing was required
before LSD could be utilized as an integral aid to counterintelligence interrogations. During
the presentation of the DERBY HAT results, General Leonard (Deputy ACSI) directed that
no further field testing be undertaken. [126] After this meeting the ACSI sent a letter to the
Commanding General of the Army Combat Developments Command (CDC) requesting that
he review THIRD CHANCE and DERBY HAT and "make a net evaluation concerning the
adoption of EA 1729 for future use as an effective and profitable aid in counterintelligence
interrogations." [127] On the same day the ACSI requested that the CDC Commander revise
regulation FM 30-17 to read in part:
1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix A--Testing and Use of Chemical and Biol... Page 40 of 43
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
-100The subsequent adoption of this regulation marked the effective termination of field testing
of LSD by the Army.
The official termination date of these testing Programs is rather unclear, but a later ACSI
memo indicates that it may have occurred in September of 1963. On the 19th of that month a
meeting was held between Dr. Van Sims (Edgewood Arsenal), Major Clovis (Chemical
Research Laboratory), and ACSI representatives (General Deholm and Colonel Schmidt).
"As a result of this conference a determination was made to suspend the program and any
further activity pending a more profitable and suitable use." [129]
1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix A--Testing and Use of Chemical and Biol... Page 41 of 43
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
cooperation did not continue. The failure by the military to share information apparently
breached the spirit, if not the letter, of commands from above.
As noted above, the Army Assistant Chief of Staff for Intelligence was briefed on the
proposed operational testing of LSD under Project THIRD CHANCE, and expressed
concern that the project had not been coordinated with FBI and CIA. Despite this request, no
coordination was achieved between the Army and either of these agencies. Had such
cooperation been forthcoming, this project may have been evaluated in a different light.
The competition between the agencies in this area reached bizarre levels. A military officer
told a CIA representative in confidence about the military's field testing of LSD in Europe
under Project THIRD CHANCE, and the CIA promptly attempted to learn surreptitiously the
nature and extent of the program. At roughly the same time Mr. Helms argued to the DDCI
that the unwitting testing program should be continued, as it contributed to the CIA's
capability in the area and thus allowed the CIA "to restrain others in the intelligence
community (such as the Department of Defense) from pursuing operations. [130]
The MKNAOMI program was also marked by a failure to share information. The Army
Special Forces (the principal customer of the Special Operations Division at Fort Dietrick)
and the CIA rather than attempting to coordinate their efforts promulgated different
requirements which varied only slightly. This apparently resulted in some duplication of
effort. In order to insure the security of CIA operations, the Agency would request materials
from SOD for operational use without fully or accurately describing the operational
requirements. This resulted in limitations on SOD's ability to assist the CIA.
-1012. Relationship Between the Intelligence Community Agencies and Foreign Liaison Services
The subjects of the CIA's operational testing of chemical and biological agents abroad were
generally being held for interrogation by foreign intelligence or security organizations.
Although information about the use of drugs was generally withheld from these
organizations, cooperation with them necessarily jeopardized the security of CIA interest in
these materials. Cooperation also placed the American Government in a position of
complicity in actions which violated the rights of the subjects, and which may have violated
the laws of the country in which the experiments took place.
Cooperation between the intelligence agencies and organizations in foreign countries was not
limited to relationships with the intelligence or internal security organizations. Some
MKULTRA research was conducted abroad. While this is, in itself, not a questionable
practice, it is important that such research abroad not be undertaken to evade American laws.
U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix A--Testing and Use of Chemical and Biol... Page 42 of 43
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
-102apparent unwillingness on the part of the Bureau's leadership to ask for details, and the CIA's
hesitation in volunteering information. These problems raise serious questions of command
and control within the Bureau.
4. Relationships Between the Intelligence Community Agencies and Other Institutions and
Individuals, Public and Private
1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix A--Testing and Use of Chemical and Biol... Page 43 of 43
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
The Inspector General's 1963 Survey of MKULTRA noted that "the research and
development" phase was conducted through standing arrangements with "specialists in
universities, pharmaceutical houses, hospitals, state and federal institutions, and private
research organizations" in a manner which concealed "from the institution the interests of the
CIA." Only a few "key individuals" in each institution were "made witting of Agency
sponsorship." The research and development phase was succeeded by a phase involving
physicians, toxicologists, and other specialists in mental, narcotics, and general hospitals and
prisons, who are provided the products and findings of the basic research projects and
proceed with intensive testing on human subjects." [134]
According to the Inspector General, the MKULTRA testing programs were "conducted
under accepted scientific procedures... where health permits, test subjects are voluntary
participants in the programs." [135] This was clearly not true in the project involving the
surreptitious administration of LSD, which was marked by a complete lack of screening,
medical supervision, opportunity to observe, or medical or psychological follow-up.
The intelligence agencies allowed individual researchers to design their project. Experiments
sponsored by these researchers (which included one where narcotics addicts were sent to
Lexington, Kentucky, who were rewarded with the drug of their addiction in return for
participation in experiments with LSD) call into question the decision by the agencies not to
fix guidelines for the experiments.
The MKULTRA research and development program raises other questions, as well. It is not
clear whether individuals in prisons, mental, narcotics and general hospitals can provide
"informed consent" to participation in experiments such as these. There is doubt as to
whether institutions should be unwitting of the ultimate sponsor of research being done in
their facilities. The nature of the arrangements also made it impossible for the individuals
who were not aware of the sponsor of the research to exercise any choice about their
participation based on the sponsoring organization.
Although greater precautions are now being taken in research conducted on behalf of the
intelligence community agencies, the dilemma of classification remains. The agencies
obviously wished to conceal their interest in certain forms of in order to avoid stimulating
interest in the same areas by hostile governments. In some cases today contractors or
researchers wish to conceal their connection with these agencies. Yet the fact of
classification prevents open discussion and debate upon which scholarly work depends.
[134] Ibid p. 9.
[135] Ibid p. 10.
1/22/2009
Page 1 of 5
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Historical References
General Histories | Ancient History | 1800-1850 | 1860 | 1870 | 1880 | 1890
1900 | 1910 | 1920 | 1930 | 1940 | 1950 | 1960 | 1970 | 1980 | 1990
APPENDIX B
Documents Referring To Discovery
Of Additional MKULTRA Material
[document begins]
22 June 1977
MEMORANDUM FOR: Deputy Director of Central Intelligence
THROUGH: Deputy Director for Science and Technology
SUBJECT: Request for Guidance on Handling Recently Located MKULTRA Material
1. (U/AIUO) This memorandum is to advise you that additional MKULTRA documents
have been discovered and to obtain your approval for follow-on actions required. Paragraph
7 contains a recommended course of action.
2. (U/AIUO) As a result of John Marks FOIA request (F-76-374), all of the MKULTRA
material in OTS possession was reviewed for possible release to him. Following that
review, the OTS material in the Retired Records Center was searched. It was during that
latter search that the subproject files were located among the retired records of the OTS
Budget and Fiscal Section. These files were not discovered earlier as the earlier searches
were limited to the examination of the active and retired records of those branches
considered most likely to have generated or have had access to MKULTRA documents.
Those branches included: Chemistry, Biological, Behavioral Activities, and Contracts
Management. Because Dr. Gottlieb retrieved and destroyed all the MKULTRA documents
he was able to locate, it is not surprising that the earlier search for MKULTRA documents,
directed at areas where they were most likely to be found, was unsuccessful. The purpose of
1/22/2009
Page 2 of 5
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
establishing the MKULTRA mechanism was to limit knowledge of the sensitive work being
performed to those with an absolute need to know. If those precepts had been followed, the
recently found B&F files should have contained only financial and administrative
documents. (In retrospect, I realize that
1/22/2009
Page 3 of 5
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
The contribution could be controversial in that it was made through a mechanism making it
appear to be a private donation. Private donations qualified for, and [deletion] received, an
equal amount of Federal matching funds. A letter from the Office of General Counsel dated
21 February 1954 attesting to the legality of this funding is in the file.
6. (U/AIUO) The Legislative Counsel has been made aware of the existence of these
additional MKULTRA documents which are still under review and sanitation. The MARKS
case is in litigation and we are committed to advise Mr. Marks of the existence of these files
shortly, and to deliver the releasable material to his attorneys by 31 July. A letter from the
Information and Privacy Staff to Mr. Marks' attorneys informing them of the existence of
this material is in the coordination process and is scheduled to be mailed on 24 June.
7. (U/AIUO) There are now two actions that should be taken:
a. Release appropriately sanitized material to Mr. Marks' attorneys as required by
FOIA litigation.
b. Inform the Senate Select Committee of the existence of the recently located records
prior to informing Mr. Marks' attorneys.
It is recommended that you approve of both of these actions.
8. (U/AIUO) If additional details on the contents of this material are desired, the OIS
officers most familiar with it are prepared to brief you at your convenience.
[signature]
David S. Brandwein
Director
Office of Technical Service
[document ends]
1/22/2009
Page 4 of 5
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1/22/2009
Page 5 of 5
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Committee on the full details of this unfortunate series of events. I am in the process of
reading the fairly voluminous material involved and do want to be certain that I have a
complete picture when I talk with the Committee. I will be in touch with you next week to
discuss when hearings might be scheduled at the earliest opportunity.
I regret having to bring this issue to your attention, but I know that it is essential to your
oversight procedures that you be kept fully informed in a timely manner.
Yours sincerely,
[signature]
STANSFIELD TURNER
[document ends]
1/22/2009
Page 1 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Historical References
General Histories | Ancient History | 1800-1850 | 1860 | 1870 | 1880 | 1890
1900 | 1910 | 1920 | 1930 | 1940 | 1950 | 1960 | 1970 | 1980 | 1990
Table of Contents
APPENDIX C
Documents Referring To Subprojects
[document begins]
DRAFT
1 May 1953
MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD
SUBJECT: Project MKULTRA, Subproject 2
1. Subproject 2 is being set up to provide a secure and
efficient means to exploit [deletion] in regard to the MKULTRA
program.
2. [deletion] is a practicing psychiatrist in [deletion] and a
faculty member of the [deletion] His past positions have included
Chief Neuropsychiatrist at [deletion] Chief of the Psychiatric
Section at [deletion] and OSS experience during World War II.
He has been of value in the general MKULTRA field as an
overall advisor and consultant, he has been of value in containing
individuals in the [deletion] area and in setting up projects there,
and he has done work himself which has contributed to the
MKULTRA field. His professional activities and known
connections with the [deletion]
1/22/2009
Page 2 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1/22/2009
Page 3 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
[document begins]
-111- [View JPEG Document Scan of This Page]
[deletion at top of page]
PROPOSAL
Objective: To study the possible synergistic action of drugs
which may be appropriate for use in abolishing consciousness.
Proposal: Allocation of $1000 for animal experiments, to be
drawn on as needed. That experiments be conducted informally
at [deletion] without a specific grant, and with appropriate cover.
[multiple deletions]
[document ends]
1/22/2009
Page 4 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1/22/2009
Page 5 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1/22/2009
Page 6 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1/22/2009
Page 7 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1/22/2009
Page 8 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1/22/2009
Page 9 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
APPROVED:
[signature deleted]
Chief, Chemical Division, TSS
PROGRAM APPROVED AND RECOMMENDED:
[signature deleted]
Exec. [illegible] Res. Ed.
Date: Jan 28 1954
APPROVED FOR OBLIGATION OF FUNDS:
[signature deleted]
Research Director
Date: 28 Jan 1954
Attachment: Proposal
[document ends]
1/22/2009
Page 10 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
TOTAL.....................................$42,700.00
[document ends]
1/22/2009
Page 11 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1/22/2009
Page 12 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1/22/2009
Page 13 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
[document ends]
1/22/2009
Page 14 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1/22/2009
Page 15 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1/22/2009
Page 16 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1/22/2009
Page 17 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1/22/2009
Page 18 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
[document ends]
1/22/2009
Page 19 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1/22/2009
Page 20 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1/22/2009
Page 21 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1/22/2009
Page 22 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1/22/2009
Page 23 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
-3-
1/22/2009
Page 24 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1/22/2009
Page 25 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1/22/2009
Page 26 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1/22/2009
Page 27 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1/22/2009
Page 28 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
-2-
1/22/2009
Page 29 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1/22/2009
Page 30 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1/22/2009
Page 31 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1/22/2009
Page 32 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1/22/2009
Page 33 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
X. Security.
All security matters and details are being co-ordinated with the
TSS/Liaison and Security Office.
-7-
1/22/2009
Page 34 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1/22/2009
Page 35 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1/22/2009
Page 36 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Page Two
delay this matter for a few days. Several checks have been
written during recent days, and I would like to be sure they
cleared the bank in [deletion] before closing out the account. You
will receive a check in the amount of $1356.26 early next week.
If there is any additional information required, I will be happy
to cooperate.
[signature deleted]
Executive Director
1/22/2009
Page 37 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
[deletion]
Enc.
[document ends]
1/22/2009
Page 38 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1/22/2009
Page 39 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1/22/2009
Page 40 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1/22/2009
Page 41 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1/22/2009
Page 42 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1/22/2009
Page 43 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
[signature deleted]
[deletion] Research Director
Date: June 27 1956
Original Only.
[document ends]
1/22/2009
Page 44 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1/22/2009
Page 45 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1/22/2009
Page 46 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1/22/2009
Page 47 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
accompanying report.
The chemical synthesis of new compounds will be continued
at the [deletion] under the supervision of [deletion] and at the
[deletion] under the supervision of [deletion] These chemical
agents will be screened for their capacity to provoke stress or to
suppress the stress reaction in its acute or chronic phases. Animal
testing will include pharmacologic screening and proper toxicity
studies of these compounds as heretofore.
Chemical agents that have been found active and within a
suitable toxicity range will be subjected to clinical screening on
appropriate patients, the initial screening being carried out on
advanced cancer patients. The amount of money devoted to
chemical synthesis, however, has been further reduced. Chemical
compounds available from biologic sources as well as those
synthesized in the project will be screened, particularly those that
are active in either raising or lowering body temperature.
As heretofore any agents which prove to be of interest
[deletion] both on transplant
1/22/2009
Page 48 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1/22/2009
Page 49 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1/22/2009
Page 50 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1/22/2009
Page 51 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
[document begins]
DRAFT
24 January 1964
MEMORANDUM FOR: THE RECORD
SUBJECT: MKULTRA, Subproject 149
1. This subproject is being established for the purpose of
supporting realistic tests of certain development items and
delivery systems of interest to TSD/BB.
[handwritten note: 31 Jan '64 Testing in stand-down until policy
issues (illegible) at DCI level. OK to (illegible)]
2. During the course of development it is sometimes found
that certain very necessary experiments or tests are not suited to
ordinary laboratory facilities. At the same time, it would be
difficult if not impossible to conduct such tests as operational
field tests. This project is designed to provide a capability and
facilities to fill this intermediate requirement.
3. The activities under this subproject will be conducted by
Mr. [deletion], an individual in the import and export business, in
[deletion] Mr. [deletion] holds a TOP SECRET Treasury
Department clearance and a SECRET Agency approval. He is
completely witting of the aims and goals of his activities.
4. Mr. [deletion] possesses unique facilities and personal
abilities which makes him invaluable in this kind of testing
operation. Mr. [deletion] because of his peculiar talents and
1/22/2009
Page 52 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1/22/2009
Page 53 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1/22/2009
Page 54 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1/22/2009
Page 55 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1/22/2009
Page 56 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1/22/2009
Page 57 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1/22/2009
Page 58 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Counsel
Office of Legislative
23 December 1977
1/22/2009
Page 59 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
QKHILLTOP DEFINITION
QKHILLTOP was a cryptonym assigned in 1954 to a project
to study Chines Communist brainwashing techniques and to
develop interrogation techniques. Most of the early studies are
believed to have been conducted by the Cornell University
Medical School Human Ecology Study Programs. The effort was
absorbed into the MKULTRA program and the QKHILLTOP
cryptonym became obsolete. The Society for the investigation of
Human Ecology, later the Human Ecology Fund, was an
outgrowth of the QKHILLTOP.
[document ends]
1/22/2009
Page 1 of 20
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Historical References
General Histories | Ancient History | 1800-1850 | 1860 | 1870 | 1880 | 1890
1900 | 1910 | 1920 | 1930 | 1940 | 1950 | 1960 | 1970 | 1980 | 1990
Table of Contents
1/22/2009
Page 2 of 20
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
-9The material in 1975 was also sparse because most of the CIA people who had been involved in
1953 to 1964 in this activity had retired from the Agency. I would further add that I think the
material was sparse in part because it was the practice at that time not to keep detailed records in
this category.
For instance, the 1963 report of the Inspector General notes:
Present practice is to maintain no records of the planning and approval of test programs.
In brief, there were few records to begin with and less after the destruction of 1973.
What I would like to do now, though, is to proceed and let you know what the new material adds
to our knowledge of this topic, and I will start by describing how the material was discovered and
why it was not previously discovered. The material in question, some seven boxes, had been sent
to our Retired Records Center outside of the Washington area. It was discovered that as the result
of an extensive search by an employee charged with the responsibility for maintaining our
holdings on behavioral drugs and for responding to Freedom of Information Act requests on this
subject.
During the Church committee investigation of 1975, searches for MKULTRA-related material
were made by examining both the active and the retired records of all of the branches of CIA
considered likely to have had an association with MKULTRA documents. The retired records of
the Budget and Fiscal Section of the branch that was responsible for such work were not
searched, however. This was because the financial paper associated with sensitive projects such
as MKULTRA were normally maintained by the branch itself under the project title, MKULTRA,
not by the Budget and Fiscal Section under the project title, MKULTRA, not by the Budget and
Fiscal Section under a special budget file.
In the case at hand, however, this newly located material had been sent to the Retired Records
Center in 1970 by the Budget and Fiscal Section of this branch as part of its own retired holdings.
In short, what should have been filed by the branch itself was filed by the Budget and Fiscal
Section, and what should have been filed under the project title, MKULTRA, was filed under
budget and fiscal matters. The reason for this departure from the normal procedure of that time is
simply not known, and as a result of it, however, the material escaped retrieval and destruction in
1973, as well as discovery in 1975.
The employee who located this material did so by leaving no stone unturned in his efforts to
respond to a Freedom of Information Act request, or several of them, in fact. He reviewed all of
the listings of material of this branch, stored at the Retired Records Center, including those of the
Budget and Fiscal Section, and thus discovered the MKULTRA-related documents, which had
been missed in the previous searches.
In sum, the agency failed to uncover these particular documents in 1973, in the process of
attempting to destroy them. It similarly failed to locate them in 1975, in response to the Church
committee hearings. I am personally persuaded that there is no evidence of any attempt to conceal
this material during the earlier searches. Moreover, as we will discuss as we proceed, I do not
U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
1/22/2009
Page 3 of 20
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
-10there would be a motive on the part of the CIA to withhold this, having disclosed what it did in
1975.
Next, let me move to the nature of this recently located material. It is important to remember what
I have just noted, that these folders that were discovered are finance folders. The bulk of the
material in them consists of approvals for the advance of funds, vouchers, and accountings and
such, most of which are not very informative as to the nature of the activities that they were
supporting. Occasional project proposals or memoranda commenting on some aspect of a
subproject are scattered throughout this material. In general, however, the recovered material does
not include overall status reports or other documents relating to operational considerations, or to
the progress on various subprojects, though some elaboration of the activities contemplated does
appear from time to time.
There are roughly three categories of projects. First, there are 149 MKULTRA subprojects, many
of which appear to have some connection with research into behavioral modification, drug
acquisition and testing, or administering drugs surreptitiously. Second, there are two boxes of
miscellaneous MKULTRA papers, including audit reports and financial statements from
intermediary funding mechanisms used to conceal CIA sponsorship of various research projects.
Finally, there are 33 additional subprojects concerning certain intelligence activities previously
funded under MKULTRA but which have nothing to do either with behavioral modifications,
drugs or toxins, or any closely related matter.
We have attempted to group the activities covered by the 149 subprojects into categories under
descriptive headings. In broad outline, at least, this presents the contents of these files. The
following 15 categories are the ones we have divided these into.
First, research into the effects of behavioral drugs and/or alcohol. Within this, there are 17
projects probably not involving human testing. There are 14 subprojects definitely involving
testing on human volunteers. There are 19 subprojects probably including tests on human
volunteers and 6 subprojects involving tests on unwitting human beings.
Second, there is research on hypnosis, eight subprojects, including two involving hypnosis and
drugs in combination.
Third, there are seven projects on the acquisition of chemicals or drugs.
Fourth, four subprojects on the aspects of the magician's art, useful in covert operations, for
instance, the surreptitious delivery of drug-related materials.
Fifth, there are nine projects on studies of human behavior, sleep research, and behavioral change
during psychotherapy.
Sixth, there are projects on library searches and attendants at seminars and international
conferences on behavioral modifications.
U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
1/22/2009
Page 4 of 20
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
-11Tenth, there are six subprojects on research on drugs, toxins, and biologicals in human tissue,
provision of exotic pathogens, and the capability to incorporate them in effective delivery
systems.
Eleventh, there are three subprojects involving funding support for unspecified activities
conducted with the Army Special Operations Division at Fort Detrich, Md. This activity is
outlined in Book I of the Church committee report, pages 388 to 389. (See Appendix A, pp. 6869).
Under CIA's Project MKNAOMI, the Army assisted the CIA in developing, testing, and
maintaining biological agents and delivery systems for use against humans as well as against
animals and crops.
Thirteenth, there are single subprojects in such areas as the effects of electroshock, harassment
techniques for offensive use, analysis of extrasensory perception, gas propelled sprays and
aerosols, and four subprojects involving crop and material sabotage.
Fourteenth, one or two subprojects on each of the following: blood grouping research; controlling
the activities of animals; energy storage and transfer in organic systems; and stimulus and
response in biological systems.
Finally, 15th, there are three subprojects canceled before any work was done on them having to
do with laboratory drug screening, research on brain concussion, and research on biologically
active materials.
Now, let me address how much this newly discovered material adds to what has previously been
reported to the Church committee and to Senator Kennedy's Subcommittee on Health. The answer
is basically additional detail. The principal types of activities included in these documents have
for the most part been outlined or to some extent generally described in what was previously
available in the way of documentation and which was supplied by the CIA to the Senate
investigators.
For example, financial disbursement records for the period of 1960 to 1964 for 76 of these 149
subprojects had been recovered by the Office of Finance at CIA and were made available to the
Church committee investigators. For example, the 1963 Inspector General report on MKULTRA
made available to both the Church Committee and the Subcommittee on Health mentions
electroshock and harassment substances, covert testing on unwitting U.S. citizens, the search for
new materials through arrangements with specialists in hospitals and universities, and the fact that
U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
1/22/2009
Page 5 of 20
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
the Technical Service Division of CIA had initiated 144 subprojects related to the control of
human behavior.
For instance also, the relevant section of a 1957 Inspector General report was also made available
to the Church committee staff, and that report discusses the techniques for human assessment and
unorthodox methods of communication, discrediting and disabling materials which can be
covertly administered, studies on magicians' arts as applied to covert operations, and other similar
topics.
The most significant new data that has been discovered are, first, the names of researchers and
institutions who participated in
-12MKULTRA projects, and second, a possibly improper contribution by the CIA to a private
institution. We are now in the possession of the names of 185 nongovernment researchers and
assistants who are identified in the recovered material dealing with these 149 subprojects.
There are also names of 80 institutions where work was done or with which these people were
affiliated. The institutions include 44 colleges or universities, 15 research foundation or chemical
or pharmaceutical companies or the like, 12 hospitals or clinics, in addition to those associated
with the universities, and 3 penal institutions.
While the identities of some of these people and institutions were known previously, the
discovery of the new identities adds to our knowledge of MKULTRA.
The facts as they pertain to the possibly improper contribution are as follows. One project
involves a contribution of $375,000 to a building fund of a private medical institution. The fact
that that contribution was made was previously known. Indeed, it was mentioned in the 1957
report of the Inspector General on the Technical Service Division of CIA that supervised
MKULTRA, and pertinent portions of this had been reviewed by the Church committee staff.
The newly discovered material, however, makes it clear that this contribution was made through
an intermediary, which made it appear to be a private donation. As a private donation, the
contribution was then matched by Federal funds. The institution was not made aware of the true
source of the gift. This project was approved by the then Director of Central Intelligence and
concurred in by CIA's top management including the then General Counsel, who wrote an
opinion supporting the legality of the contribution.
The recently discovered documents also give greater insight into the scope of an unwitting nature
of the drug testing, but contribute little more than that. We now do have corroborating
information that some of the unwitting drug testing was carried out in what is known in the
intelligence trade as safe houses in San Francisco and in New York City, and we have identified
that three individuals were involved in this undertaking, whereas we previously reported there
was only one person.
We also know that some unwitting testing took place on criminal sexual psychopaths confined at
a State hospital, and that additionally research was done on a knockout or K drug in parallel with
research to develop painkillers for cancer patients.
U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
1/22/2009
Page 6 of 20
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
These, then, are the principal findings identified to date in our review of this recovered material.
As noted earlier, we believe the detail on the identities of researchers and institutions involved in
CIA sponsorship of drug and behavioral modification research is a new element and one which
poses a considerable problem. Most of the people and institutions involved were not aware of
CIA sponsorship. We should certainly assume that the researchers and institutions which
cooperated with CIA on a witting basis acted in good faith and in the belief that they were aiding
their Government in a legitimate and proper purpose.
I believe that we all have a moral obligation to these researchers and institutions to protect them
from any unjustified embarrassment
-13or damage to their reputations which revelation of their identities might bring. In addition, I have
a legal obligation under the Privacy Act not to publicly disclose the names of the individual
researchers without their consent.
This is especially true, of course, for those researchers and institutions which were unwitting
participants in CIA sponsored activities.
Nonetheless, Mr. Chairman, I certainly recognize the right and the need of both the Senate Select
Committee on Intelligence and the Senate Subcommittee on Health and Scientific Research to
investigate the circumstances of these activities in whatever detail you consider necessary. I am
providing your committee with all of the documentation, including all of the names, on a
classified basis. I hope that this will facilitate your investigation while still protecting the
individuals and the institutions involved.
Let me emphasize again that the MKULTRA events are 12 to 24 years in the past, and I assure
you that CIA is in no way engaged in either witting or unwitting testing of drugs today.
Finally, I am working closely with the Attorney General on this matter. We are making available
to the Attorney General whatever materials he may deem necessary to any investigations that he
may elect to undertake. Beyond that, we are also working with the Attorney General to determine
whether it is practicable from this new evidence to identify any of the persons to whom drugs
were administered, but we are now trying to determine if there are adequate clues to lead to their
identification, and if so how best to go about fulfilling the Government's responsibilities in this
matter.
Mr. Chairman, as we proceed with that process of attempting to identify the individuals and then
determining what is our proper responsibility to them, I will keep both of these committees fully
advised. I thank you, sir.
Senator INOUYE. Thank you very much, Admiral Turner. Your spirit of cooperation is much
appreciated. I would like to announce to the committee that in order to give every member an
opportunity to participate in this hearing, that we would set a time limit of 10 minutes per
Senator.
Admiral Turner, please give this committee the genesis of MKULTRA. Who or what committee
U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
1/22/2009
Page 7 of 20
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
or commission or agency was responsible for dreaming up this grandiose and sinister project, and
why was it necessary? What is the rationale or justification for such a project and was the
President of the United States aware of this?
Admiral TURNER. Mr. Chairman, I am going to ask Mr. Brody on my right, who is a long-time
member of the CIA to address that in more detail. I believe everything that we know about the
genesis was turned over to the Church committee and is contained in that material. Basically, it
was a CIA-initiated project. It started out of a concern of our being taken advantage of by other
powers who would use drugs against our personnel, and it was approved in the Agency. I have
asked the question you just asked me, and have been assured that there is no evidence within the
Agency of any involvement at higher echelons, the White House, for instance, or specific
approval. That does not say there was not, but we have no such evidence.
1/22/2009
Page 8 of 20
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Very late in March, he discovered these seven boxes. He arranged to have them shipped from the
Retired Records Center to Washington, to our headquarters. They arrived in early April. He
advised his appropriate superiors, who asked him how long he thought it would take him to go
through these and screen them appropriately, clear them for Freedom of Information Act release.
There are, we originally estimated, 5,000 pages here. We now think that was an underestimation,
and it may be closer to 8,000 pages. He estimated it would take about 45 days or into the middle
of May to do that. He was told to proceed, and as he did so there was nothing uncovered in the
beginning of these 149 cases that appeared particularly startling or particularly additive to the
knowledge that had already been given to the Church committee, some details, but no major
revelations.
He and his associates proceeded with deliberateness, but not a great sense of urgency. There were
other interfering activities that came and demanded his time also. He was not able to put 100
percent of his time on it, and there did not appear to be cause for a great rush here. We were
trying to be responsive to the Freedom of Information Act request within the limits of our
manpower and our priorities.
-15In early June, however, he discovered two projects, the one related to K drugs and the one related
to the funding at the institution, and realized immediately that he had substantial new information,
and he immediately reported this to his superiors.
Two actions were taken. One was to notify the lawyers of the principal Freedom of Information
Act requestor that we would have substantial new material and that it would be forthcoming as
rapidly as possible, and the second was to start a memorandum up the chain that indicated his
belief that we should notify the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence of this discovery
because of the character at least of these two documents.
As that proceeded up from the 13th of June, at each echelon we had to go through the legal office,
the legislative liaison office and at each echelon about the same question was asked of him: Have
you gone through all of this, so that when we notify the Senate Select Committee we do not notify
half of the important revelations and not the other half? The last thing I want, Mr. Chairman, is in
any way to be on any topic, give the appearance on any topic of being recalcitrant, reluctant, or
having to have you drag things out of me, and my subordinates, much to my pleasure, had each
asked, have you really gone through these 8,000 pages enough to know that we are not going to
uncover a bombshell down at the bottom?
By late June, about the 28th, this process reached my deputy. He notified me after his review of it
on the 7th of July, which is the first I knew of it. I began reading into it. I asked the same probing
question directly. I then notified my superiors, and on the 15th delivered to you my letter letting
you know that we had this, and we have been working, many people, many hours since then, to
be sure that what we are telling you today does include all the relevant material.
Senator INOUYE. I would like to commend Mr. Laubinger for his diligence and expertise, but
was this diligence the result of the Freedom of Information Act or could this diligence have been
exercised during the Church hearings? Why was it not exercised? Admiral TURNER. There is
no question that theoretically this diligence could have been exercised at any time, and it may
U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
1/22/2009
Page 9 of 20
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
well be that the Freedom of Information Act has made us more aware of this. Would you speak
for yourself, please.
Mr. LAUBINGER. I really don't attribute it, Senator, to diligence so much as thoroughness. If
you can imagine the pressures under an organization trying to respond, which I think the CIA did
at the time of the Church committee hearings, the hallways of the floor I am on were full of boxes
from our records center. Every box that anyone thought could possibly contain anything was
called up for search. It was one of a frantic effort to comply.
When the pressure of that situation cools down, and you can start looking at things systematically,
you are apt to find things that you wouldn't under the heat of a crash program, and that is what
happened here.
Senator INOUYE. Thank you very much. Senator Kennedy?
Senator KENNEDY. Admiral Turner, this is an enormously distressing report that you give to
the American Congress and to the American people today. Granted, it happened many years ago,
but what we are
-16basically talking about is an activity which took place in the country that involved the perversion
and the corruption of many of our outstanding research centers in this country, with CIA funds,
where some of our top researchers were unwittingly involved in research sponsored by the
Agency in which they had no knowledge of the background or the support for.
Much of it was done with American citizens who were completely unknowing in terms of taking
various drugs, and there are perhaps any number of Americans who are walking around today on
the east coast or west coast who were given drugs, with all the kinds of physical and
psychological damage that can be caused. We have gone over that in very careful detail, and it is
significant and severe indeed.
I do not know what could be done in a less democratic country that would be more alien to our
own traditions than was really done in this narrow area, and as you give this report to the
committee, I would like to get some sense of your own concern about this type of activity, and
how you react, having assumed this important responsibility with the confidence of President
Crater and the overwhelming support, obviously, of the Congress, under this set of circumstances.
I did not get much of a feeling in reviewing your statement here this morning of the kind of
abhorrence to this type of past activity which I think the American people would certainly deplore
and which I believe that you do, but could you comment upon that question, and also perhaps
give us what ideas you have to insure that it cannot happen again?
Admiral TURNER. Senator Kennedy, it is totally abhorrent to me to think of using a human
being as a guinea pig and in any way jeopardizing his life and his health, no matter how great the
cause. I am not here to pass judgment on my predecessors, but I can assure you that this is totally
beyond the pale of my contemplation of activities that the CIA or any other of our intelligence
agencies should undertake.
1/22/2009
Page 10 of 20
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
I am taking and have taken what I believe are adequate steps to insure that such things are not
continuing today.
Senator KENNEDY. Could you tell us a little bit about that?
Admiral TURNER. I have asked for a special report assuring me that there are no drug activities
extant, that is, drug activities that involve experimentation. Obviously, we collect intelligence
about drugs and drug use in other countries, but there are no experimentations being conducted by
the Central Intelligence Agency, and I have had a special check made because of another incident
that was uncovered some years ago about the unauthorized retention of some toxic materials at
the CIA. I have had an actual inspection made of the storage places and the certification from the
people in charge of those that there are no such chemical biological materials present in our
keeping, and I have issued express orders that that shall not be the case.
Beyond that, I have to rely in large measure on my sense of command and direction of the people
and their knowledge of the attitude I have just expressed to you in this regard.
Senator KENNEDY. I think that is very commendable.
Admiral TURNER. Thank you, sir.
Senator KENNEDY. I think it is important that the American people understand that.
-17You know, much of the research which is our area of interest that was being done by the Agency
and the whole involved sequence of activities done by the Agency, I am convinced could have
been done in a legitimate way through the research programs of the National Institutes of Mental
Health, other sponsored activities, I mean, that is some other question, but I think you went to an
awful lot of trouble, where these things could have been.
Let me ask you specifically, on the followup of MKULTRA, are there now -- I think you have
answered, but I want to get a complete answer about any experimentations that are being done on
human beings, whether it is drugs or behavioral alterations or patterns or any support, either
directly or indirectly, being provided by the Agency in terms of any experimentation on human
beings.
Admiral TURNER. There is no experimentation with drugs on human beings, witting or
unwitting, being conducted in any way.
Senator KENNEDY. All right. How bout the nondrug experimentation our Committee has seen - psychosurgery, for example, or psychological research?
Admiral TURNER. We are continually involved in what we call assessment of behavior. For
instance, we are trying to continually improve our polygraph procedures to, you know, assess
whether a person is lying or not. This does not involve any tampering with the individual body.
This involves studying records of people's behavior under different circumstances, and so n, but it
is not an experimental thing. Have I described that accurately, Al?
1/22/2009
Page 11 of 20
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
-18The other psychological assessments involve handwriting analysis or graphological assessment. The work is done by
a pair of trained graphologists, assisted by a small number of measurement technicians. They generally require at
least a page of handwritten script by the subject. Measurements are made of about 30 different writing characteristics,
and these are charted and furnished to the graphologist for assessments.
The psychologists also give courses in psychological assessment to group of operations officers, to sharpen their own
capabilities to size up people. As part of the training course, the instructor does a psychological assessment of each
student. The students are writing participants, and results are discussed with them.
It is important to reiterate that psychological assessments are only a service to the operations officers. In the final
analysis, it is the responsibility of the operations officer to decide how a potential agent should be approached, or to
make a judgment as to whether any agent is telling the truth.
Admiral TURNER. The kind of thing we are interested in is, what will motivate a man to
become an agent of the United States in a difficult situation. We have to be familiar with that kind
of attitudinal response that we can expect from people we approach to for one reason or another
become our spies, but I will be happy to submit a very specific listing of these.
Senator KENNEDY. Would you do that for the committee?
In the followups, in the MKSEARCH, in the OFTEN, and the CHICKWIT, could you give us
U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
1/22/2009
Page 12 of 20
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
-19before, and I am hopeful we can get that on the calendar early in September, and that is our strong
interest.
Admiral TURNER. The CIA certainly has no objection to that proposed legislation, sir. It is not
my role in the administration to be the supporter of it or the endorser of it.
Senator KENNEDY. As a personal matter, since you have reviewed these subjects, would you
comment? I know it is maybe unusual, but you can understand what we are attempting to do.
1/22/2009
Page 13 of 20
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
-20ation where it is not even clear whether we actually saw that material or not, simply because we
could not keep a copy of the report under the procedures we had to follow. We were limited by
notetaking, and so it is rather ambiguous as to just what was seen and what was not seen. I
certainly hope that the new Intelligence Committee will not be bound by procedures that restrict
its ability to exercise effective oversight.
I have a second question. Does it concern you, Admiral, that we used a subterfuge which resulted
in the use of Federal construction grant funds to finance facilities for these sorts of experiments
on our own people? Because as I understand what you are saying, while the CIA maybe only put
up $375,000, this triggered a response on the part of the Federal Government to provide on a
U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
1/22/2009
Page 14 of 20
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
good faith basis matching hospital funds at the same level. We put up more than $1 million of
matching funds, some based on an allegedly private donation which was really CIA money.
Isn't there something basically wrong with that?
Admiral TURNER. I certainly believe there is. As I stated, the General Counsel of the CIA at
that time rendered a legal opinion that this was a legal undertaking, and again I am hesitant to go
back and revisit the atmosphere, the laws, the attitudes at that time, so whether the counsel was on
good legal ground or not, I am not enough of a lawyer to be sure, but it certainly would occur to
me if it happened today as a very questionable activity.
Senator SCHWEIKER. Well, I think those of us who have worked on and amended the HillBurton Act and other hospital construction assistance laws over the years, would have a rather
different opinion on the legal intent or object of Congress in passing laws to provide hospital
construction project money. These funds weren't intended for this.
It reminds me a little bit of the shellfish toxin situation which turned up when I was on the Church
committee. The Public Health Service was used to produce a deadly poison with Public Health
money. Here we are using general hospital construction money to carry on a series of drug
experimentation.
Admiral TURNER. Excuse me, sir. If I could just be, I think, accurate, I don't think any of this
$375,000 or the matching funds were used to conduct drug experiments. They were used to build
the hospital. Now, the CIA the put more money into a foundation that was conducting research on
the CIA's behalf supposedly in that hospital, so the intent was certainly there, but the money was
not used for experimentation.
Senator SCHWEIKER. Well, I understand it was used for bricks and mortar, but the bricks
were used to build the facility where the experiments were carried on; were they not?
Admiral TURNER. We do not have positive evidence that they were. It certainly would seem
that that was the intent, but I do not want to draw inferences here -Senator SCHWEIKER. Well, why else would they give this money for the building fund if the
building was not used for a purpose that benefited the CIA program?
Admiral TURNER. I certainly draw the inference that the CIA expected to benefit from it, and
some of the wording says the General
-21Counsel's opinion was that this was legal only if the CIA was going to derive adequate benefit
from it, but, sir, there is no evidence of what benefit was derived.
Senator SCHWEIKER. There must have been some pretty good benefits at stake. The Atomic
Energy Commission was to bear a share of the cost, and when they backed out for some reason or
another, the CIA picked up part of their tab. So, at two different points there were indications that
CIA decisionmakers thought there was great benefit to be derived from whatever happened within
the brick and mortar walls of that facility.
U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
1/22/2009
Page 15 of 20
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Admiral TURNER. You are absolutely right. I am only taking the position that I cannot
substantiate that there was benefit derived.
Senator SCHWEIKER. The agreement documents say that the CIA would have access to onesixth of the space involved in the construction of the wing, so how would you enter into an
agreement that specifically says that you will have access to and use of one-sixth of the space and
not perform something in that space? I cannot believe it was empty.
Admiral TURNER. Sir, I am not disputing you at all, but both of us are saying that the inference
is that one-sixth of the space was used, that experimentation was done, and so on, but there is no
factual evidence of what went on as a result of that payment or what went on in that hospital. It is
just missing. It is not that it didn't happen.
Senator SCHWEIKER. Admiral Turner, one other-Senator KENNEDY. Would the Senator yield on that point?
Senator SCHWEIKER. I understand that in the agency's documents on the agreement it was
explicitly stated that one-sixth of the facility would be designated for CIA use and made available
for CIA research are you familiar-Mr. BRODY. Senator, as I recall, you are right in that there is a mention of one-sixth, but any
mention at all has to do with planning. There are no subsequent reports as to what happened after
the construction took place.
Senator SCHWEIKER. Admiral Turner, I read in the New York Times that part of this series of
MKULTRA experiments involved an arrangement with the Federal Bureau of Narcotics to test
LSD surreptitiously on unwitting patrons in bars in New York and San Francisco. Some of the
subjects became violently ill and were hospitalized. I wonder if you would just briefly describe
what we were doing there and how it was carried out? I assume it was through a safe house
operation. I don't believe your statement went into much detail.
Admiral TURNER. I did mention the safe house operation in my statement, sir, and that is how
these were carried out. What we have learned from the new documentation is the location and the
dates at which the safe houses were run by the CIA and the identification of three individuals who
were associated with running those safe houses. We know something about the construction work
that was done in them because there were contracts for this. Beyond that, we are pretty much
drawing inferences as to the things that went on as to what you are saying here.
Senator SCHWEIKER. Well, the subjects were unwitting. You can infer that much, right?
Admiral TURNER. Right.
-22Senator SCHWEIKER. If you happened to be at the wrong bar at the wrong place and time, you
got it.
1/22/2009
Page 16 of 20
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Mr. BRODY. Senator, that would be -- contacts were made, as we understand it, in bars, et
cetera, and then the people may have been invited to these safe houses. There really isn't any
indication as to the fact that this took place in bars.
Admiral TURNER. We are trying to be very precise with you, sir, and not draw an inference
here. There are 6 cases of these 149 where we have enough evidence in this new documentation
to substantiate that there was unwitting testing and some of that involves these safe houses. There
are other cases where it is ambiguous as to whether the testing was witting or voluntary. There are
others where it was clearly voluntary.
Senator SCHWEIKER. Of course, after a few drinks, it is questionable whether informed
consent means anything to a person in a bar anyway.
Admiral TURNER. Well, we don't have any indication that all these cases where it is ambiguous
involved drinking of any kind. There are cases in penal institutions where it is not clear whether
the prisoner was given a choice or not. I don't know that he wasn't given a choice, but I don't
positively know that he was, and I classify that as an ambiguous incident.
Senator INOUYE. Your time is up, Senator.
Senator Huddleston?
Senator HUDDLESTON. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Admiral Turner, you stated in your testimony that you are convinced there was no attempt to
conceal this recently discovered documentation during the earlier searches. Did you question the
individuals connected with the earlier search before you made that judgment?
Admiral TURNER. Yes; I haven't, I don't think, questioned everybody who looked in the files or
is still on our payroll who looked in the files back in 1975, but Mr. Laubinger on my left is the
best authority on this, and I have gone over it with him in some detail.
Senator HUDDLESTON. But you have inquired, you think, sufficiently to assure yourself that
there was no intent on the part of any person to conceal these records from the previous
committee?
Admiral TURNER. I am persuaded of that both by my questioning of people and by the
circumstances and the way in which these documents were filed, by the fact which I did not and
should have mentioned in my testimony, that these were not the official files. The ones that we
have received or retrieved were copies of files that were working files that somebody had used,
and therefore were slipped into a different location, and again I say to you , sir, I can't imagine
their deliberately concealing these particular files and revealing the other things that they did
reveal in 1975. I don't see the motive for that, because these are not that damning compared with
the overall material that was provided.
Senator HUDDLESTON. Is this the kind of operation that if it were continuing now or if there
were anything similar to it, that you would feel compelled to report to the Select Committee on
Intelligence?
Admiral TURNER. Yes, sir. You mean, if I discovered that something like this were going on
without my knowledge? Yes, I would feel absolutely the requirement to --
1/22/2009
Page 17 of 20
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
-23Senator HUDDLESTON. But if it were going on with your knowledge, would you report it to
the committee? I assume you would.
Admiral TURNER. Yes. Well, it would not be going on with my knowledge, but theoretically
the answer is yes, sir.
Senator HUDDLESTON. Well, then, what suggestions would you have as we devise charters
for the various intelligence agencies? What provision would you suggest to prohibit this kind of
activity from taking place? Would you suggest that it ought to be specifically outlined in a
statutory charter setting out the parameters of the permissible operation of the various agencies?
Admiral TURNER. I think that certainly is something we must consider as we look at the
legislation for charters. I am not on the face of it opposed to it. I think we would have to look at
the particular wording as we are going to have to deal with the whole charter issue as to exactly
how precise you want to be in delineating restraints and curbs on the intelligence activities.
Senator HUDDLESTON. In the case of sensitive type operations, which this certainly was,
which might be going on today, is the oversight activity of the agency more intensive now than it
was at that time?
Admiral TURNER. Much more so. I mean, I have briefed you, sir, and the committee on our
sensitive operations. We have the Intelligence Oversight Board. We have a procedure in the
National Security Council for approval of very sensitive operations. I think the amount of
spotlight focused on these activities is many, manyfold what it was in these 12 to 24 years ago.
Senator HUDDLESTON. How about the record keeping?
Admiral TURNER. Yes; I can't imagine anyone having the gall to think that he can just blithely
destroy records today with all of the attention that has come to this, and certainly we are
emphasizing that that is not the case.
Senator HUDDLESTON. Admiral, I was particularly interested in the activity that took place at
the U.S. Public Health Service Hospital at Lexington, Ky., in which a Dr. Harris Isbell conducted
experiments on people who were presumably patients there. There was a narcotics institution, I
take it, and Dr. Isbell was, according to the New York Times story, carrying on a secret series of
correspondence with an individual at the agency by the name of Ray. Have you identified who
that person is?
Admiral TURNER. Sir, I find myself in a difficult position here at a public hearing to confirm or
deny these names in view of my legal responsibilities under the Privacy Act not to disclose the
names of individuals here.
Senator HUDDLESTON. I am just asking you if you have identified the person referred to in
that article as Ray. I am not asking you who he was. I just want to know if you know who he is.
Admiral TURNER. No. I am sorry, was this W-r-a-y or R-a-y?
U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
1/22/2009
Page 18 of 20
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
-24[Pause.]
Admiral TURNER. Senator, we have a former employee whose first name is Ray who may have
had some connection with these activities.
Senator HUDDLESTON. You suspect that but you have not verified that at this time, or at least
you are not in a position to indicate that you have verified it?
Admiral TURNER. That is correct.
Senator HUDDLESTON. Thank you.
Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Senator INOUYE. Senator Wallop?
Senator WALLOP. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Admiral Turner, not all of the -- and in no way trying to excuse you of the hideous nature of some
of these projects, but not all of the projects under MKULTRA are of a sinister or even a moral
nature. Is that a fair statement?
Admiral TURNER. That is correct.
Senator WALLOP. Looking down through some of these 17 projects not involving human
testing, aspects of the magician's art, it doesn't seem as though there is anything very sinister
about that. Studies of human behavior and sleep research, library searches. Now, those things in
their way are still of interest, are they not, to the process of intelligence gathering?
Admiral TURNER. Yes, sir. I have not tried to indicate that we either are not doing or would not
do any of the things that were involved in MKULTRA, but when it comes to the witting or
unwitting testing of people with drugs, that is certainly verboten, but there are other things.
Senator WALLOP. Even with volunteer patients? I mean, I am not trying to put you on the spot
to say whether it is going on, but I mean, it is not an uncommon thing, is it, in the prisons of the
United States for the Public Health Service to conduct various kinds of experiments with vaccines
and, say, sunburn creams? I know in Arizona they have done so.
Admiral TURNER. My understanding is, lots of that is authorized, but I am not of the opinion
U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
1/22/2009
Page 19 of 20
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
that this is not the CIA's business, and that if we need some information in that category, I would
prefer to go to the other appropriate authorities of the Government and ask them to get it for us
rather than to in any way-Senator WALLOP. Well, you know, you have library searches and attendants at the national
seminars. This is why I wanted to ask you if the bulk of these projects were in any way the kinds
of things that the Agency might not do now. A President would not have been horrified by the list
of the legitimate types of things. Isn't that probably the case?
Admiral TURNER. Yes, sir.
Senator WALLOP. And if it did in fact appear in the IG report, is there any reason to suppose
that the President did not know of this project? You said there was no reason to suppose that he
did, but let me reverse that. Is there any reason to suppose that they did not?
Admiral TURNER. No.
Senator WALLOP. Well, you know, I just cannot imagine you or literally anybody undertaking
projects of the magnitude of dollars here and just not knowing about it, not informing your
superior that
-25these were going on, especially when certain items of it appear in the Inspector General's report
on budget matters.
Admiral TURNER. Well, I find it difficult when it is that far back to hypothesize what the
procedures that the Director was using in terms of informing his superiors were. It is quite a
different climate from today, and I think we do a lot more informing to day than they did back
then, but I find it very difficult to guess what the level of knowledge was.
Senator WALLOP. I am really not asking you to second-guess it, but it just seems to me that,
while the past is past, and thank goodness we are operating under different sets of circumstances,
I think it is naive for us to suppose that these things were conducted entirely without the
knowledge of the Presidents of the United States during those times. It is just the kinds of
research information that was being sought was vital to the United States, not the means, but the
information that they were trying to find.
Admiral TURNER. I am sorry. Your question is, was this vital? Did we view it as vital?
Senator WALLOP. Well, your implication at the beginning was that it was a response to the
kinds of behavior that were seen in Cardinal Mindszenty's trial and other things. I mean,
somebody must have thought that this was an important defensive reaction, if nothing else, on the
part of the United States.
Admiral TURNER. Yes, sir, I am sure they did, but again I just don't know how high that
permeated the executive branch.
Senator WALLOP. But the kinds of information are still important to you. I mean, I am not
U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
1/22/2009
Page 20 of 20
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
suggesting that anyone go back and do that kind of thing again, but I'm certain it would be of use
to you to know what was going to happen to one of your agents assuming someone had put one of
these things into his bloodstream, or tried to modify his behavior.
Admiral TURNER. Absolutely, and you know, we would be very concerned if we thought there
were things like truth serums or other things that our agents or others could be subjected to by use
or improper use of drugs by other powers against our people or agents.
Senator WALLOP. Are there? I don't ask you to name them, but are there such serums?
Admiral TURNER. I don't know of them if there are. I would have to answer that for the record,
sir.
Senator WALLOP. I would appreciate that.
[The material referred to follows.]
1/22/2009
Page 1 of 11
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Historical References
General Histories | Ancient History | 1800-1850 | 1860 | 1870 | 1880 | 1890
1900 | 1910 | 1920 | 1930 | 1940 | 1950 | 1960 | 1970 | 1980 | 1990
Table of Contents
-26to relax the individual's defenses to the point that he unknowingly reveals truths he has been trying to
conceal. This investigative technique, however humanitarian as an alternative to physical torture, still
raises serious questions of individual rights and liberties. In this country, where drugs have gained only
marginal acceptance in police work, their use has provoked cries of "psychological third degree" and has
precipitated medico-legal controversies that after a quarter of a century still occasionally flare into the
open.
The use of so-called "truth" drugs in police work is similar to the accepted psychiatric practice of narcoanalysis; the difference in the two procedures lies in their different objectives. The police investigator is
concerned with empirical truth that may be used against the suspect, and therefore almost solely with
probative truth: the usefulness of the suspect's revelations depends ultimately on their acceptance in
evidence by a court of law. The psychiatrist, on the other hand, using the same "truth" drugs in diagnosis
and treatment of the mentally ill, is primarily concerned with psychological truth or psychological reality
rather than empirical fact. A patient's aberrations are reality for him at the time they occur, and an accurate
account of these fantasies and delusions, rather than reliable recollection of past events, can be the key to
recovery.
The notion of drugs capable of illuminating hidden recesses of the mind, helping to heal the mentally ill
and preventing or reversing the miscarriage of justice, has provided an exceedingly durable theme for the
press and popular literature. While acknowledging that "truth serum" is a misnomer twice over -- the
drugs are not sera and they do not necessarily bring forth probative truth -- journalistic accounts continue
U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
1/22/2009
Page 2 of 11
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
to exploit the appeal of the term. The formula is to play up a few spectacular "truth" drug successes and to
imply that the drugs are more maligned than need be and more widely employed in criminal investigation
than can officially be admitted.
Any technique that promises an increment of success in extracting information from an uncompliant
source is ipso facto of interest in intelligence operations. If the ethical considerations which in Western
countries inhibit the use of narco-interrogation in police work are felt also in intelligence, the Western
services must at least be prepared against its possible employment by the adversary. An understanding of
"truth" drugs, their characteristic actions, and their potentialities, positive and negative, for eliciting useful
information is fundamental to an adequate defense against them.
This discussion, meant to help toward such an understanding, draws primarily upon openly published
materials. It has the limitations of projecting from criminal investigative practices and from the permissive
atmosphere of drug psychotherapy.
SCOPOLAMINE AS "TRUTH SERUM"
Early in this century physicians began to employ scopolamine, along with morphine and chloroform, to
induce a state of "twilight sleep" during childbirth. A constituent of henbane, scopolamine was known to
produce sedation and drowsiness, confusion and disorientation, incoordination, and amnesia for events
experienced during intoxication. Yet physicians noted that women in twilight sleep answered questions
accurately and often volunteered exceedingly candid remarks.
In 1922 it occurred to Robert House, a Dallas, Texas obstetrician, that a similar technique might be
employed in the interrogation of suspected criminals, and he arranged to interview under scopolamine two
prisoners in the Dallas county jail whose guilt seemed clearly confirmed. Under the drug, both men denied
the charges on which they were held; and both, upon trial, were found not guilty. Enthusiastic at this
success, House concluded that a patient under the influence of scopolamine "cannot create a lie... and
there is no power to think or reason." [14] His experiment and this conclusion attracted wide attention,
and the idea of a "truth" drug was thus launched upon the public consciousness.
The phrase "truth serum" is believed to have appeared first in a news report of House's experiment in the
Los Angeles Record, sometime in 1922. House resisted the term for a while but eventually came to
employ it regularly himself. He published some eleven articles on scopolamine in the years 1921-1929,
with a noticeable increase in polemical zeal as time when on. What had begun as something of a scientific
statement turned finally into a dedicated crusade by the "father of truth serum" on behalf of his offspring,
wherein he was "grossly indulgent of its wayward behavior and stubbornly proud of its minor
achievements." [11]
-27Only a handful of cases in which scopolamine was used for police interrogation came to public notice,
though there is evidence suggesting that some police forces may have used it extensively. [2,16] One
police writer claims that the threat of scopolamine interrogation has been effective in extracting
confessions from criminal suspects, who are told they will first be rendered unconscious by chloral
hydrate placed covertly in their coffee or drinking water. [16]
Because of a number of undesirable side effects, scopolamine was shortly disqualified as a "truth" drug.
Among the most disabling of the side effects are hallucinations, disturbed perception, somnolence, and
physiological phenomena such as headache, rapid heart, and blurred vision, which distract the subject
from the central purpose of the interview. Furthermore, the physical action is long, far outlasting the
psychological effects. Scopolamine continues, in some cases, to make anesthesia and surgery safer by
U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
1/22/2009
Page 3 of 11
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
drying the mouth and throat and reducing secretions that might obstruct the air passages. But the
fantastically, almost painfully, dry "desert" mouth brought on by the drug is hardly conducive to free
talking, even in a tractable subject.
THE BARBITURATES
The first suggestion that drugs might facilitate communication with emotionally disturbed patients came
quite by accident in 1916. Arthur S. Lovenhart and his associates at the University of Wisconsin,
experimenting with respiratory stimulants, were surprised when, after an injection of sodium cyanide, a
catatonic patient who had long been mute and rigid suddenly relaxed, opened his eyes, and even answered
a few questions. By the early 1930's a number of psychiatrists were experimenting with drugs as an
adjunct to established methods of therapy.
At about this time police officials, still attracted by the possibility that drugs might help in the
interrogation of suspects and witnesses, turned to a class of depressant drugs known as the barbiturates.
By 1935 Clarence W. Muehlberger, head of the Michigan Crime Detection Laboratory at East Lansing,
was using barbiturates on reluctant suspects, though police work continued to be hampered by the courts'
rejection of drug-induced confessions except in a few carefully circumscribed instances.
The barbiturates, first synthesized in 1903, are among the oldest of modern drugs and the most versatile of
all depressants. In this half-century some 2,500 have been prepared, and about two dozen of these have
won an important place in medicine. An estimated three to four billion doses of barbiturates are prescribed
by physicians in the United States each year, and they have come to be known by a variety of commercial
names and colorful slang expressions: "goofballs," Luminal, Nembutal, "red devils," "yellow jackets,"
"pink ladies," etc. Three of them which are used in narcoanalysis and have seen service as "truth" drugs
are sodium amytal (anobarbital), pentothal sodium (thiopental), and to a lesser extent seconal
(seconbarbital).
As one pharmacologist explains it, a subject coming under the influence of a barbiturate injected
intravenously goes through all the stages of progressive drunkenness, but the time scale is on the order of
minutes instead of hours. Outwardly the sedation effect is dramatic, especially if the subject is a
psychiatric patient in tension. His features slacken, his body relaxes. Some people are momentarily
excited; a few become silly and giggly. This usually passes, and most subjects fall asleep, emerging later
in disoriented semi-wakefulness.
The descent into narcosis and beyond with progressively larger doses can be divided as follows:
I. Sedative stage.
II. Unconsciousness, with exaggerated reflexes (hyperactive stage).
III. Unconsciousness, without reflex even to painful stimuli.
IV. Death.
Whether all these stages can be distinguished in any given subject depends largely on the dose and the
rapidity with which the drug is induced. In anesthesia, stages I and II may last only two or three seconds.
The first or sedative stage can be further divided:
Plane 1. No evident effect, or slightly sedative effect.
Plane 2. Cloudiness, calmness, amnesia. (Upon recovery, the subject will not remember what
happened at this or "lower" planes or stages.)
Plane 3. Slurred speech, old thought patterns disrupted, inability to integrate or learn new patterns.
1/22/2009
Page 4 of 11
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
-28Plane 3 is the psychiatric "work" stage. It may last only a few minutes, but it can be extended by further
slow injection of drug. The usual practice is to back into the sedative stage on the way to full
consciousness.
CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES
The general abhorrence in Western countries for the use of chemical agents "to make people do things
against their will" has precluded serious systematic study (at least as published openly) of the
potentialities of drugs for interrogation. Louis A. Gottschalk, surveying their use in information-seeking
interviews, [13] cites 136 references; but only two touch upon the extraction of intelligence information,
and one of these concludes merely that Russian techniques in interrogation and indoctrination are derived
from age-old police methods and do not depend on the use of drugs. On the validity of confessions
obtained with drugs, Gottschalk found only three published experimental studies that he deemed worth
reporting.
One of these reported experiments by D.P. Morris in which intravenous sodium amytal was helpful in
detecting malingerers. [12] The subjects, soldiers, were at first sullen, negativistic, and non-productive
under amytal, but as the interview proceeded they revealed the fact of and causes for their malingering.
Usually the interviews turned up a neurotic or psychotic basis for the deception.
The other two confession studies, being more relevant to the highly specialized, untouched area of drugs
in intelligence interrogation, deserve more detailed review.
Gerson and Victoroff [12] conducted amytal interviews with 17 neuropsychiatric patients, soldiers who
had charges against them, at Tilton General Hospital, Fort Dix. First they were interviewed without
amytal by a psychiatrist, who, neither ignoring nor stressing their situation as prisoners or suspects under
scrutiny, urged each of them to discuss his social and family background, his army career, and his version
of the charges pending against him.
The patients were told only a few minutes in advance that narcoanalysis would be performed. The doctor
was considerate, but positive and forthright. He indicated that they had no choice but to submit to the
procedure. Their attitudes varied from unquestioning to downright refusal.
Each patient was brought to complete narcosis and permitted to sleep. As he became semiconscious and
could be stimulated to speak, he was held in this stage with additional amytal while the questioning
proceeded. He was questioned first about innocuous matters from his background that he had discussed
before receiving the drug. Whenever possible, he was manipulated into bringing up himself the charges
pending against him before being questioned about them. If he did this in a too fully conscious state, it
proved more effective to ask him to "talk about that later" and to interpose a topic that would diminish
suspicion, delaying the interrogation on his criminal activity until he was back in the proper stage of
narcosis.
The procedure differed from therapeutic narcoanalysis in several ways: the setting, the type of patients,
and the kind of "truth" sought. Also, the subjects were kept in twilight consciousness longer than usual.
This state proved richest in yield of admissions prejudicial to the subject. In it his speech was thick,
mumbling, and disconnected, but his discretion was markedly reduced. This valuable interrogation period,
lasting only five to ten minutes at a time, could be reinduced by injecting more amytal and putting the
patient back to sleep.
U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
1/22/2009
Page 5 of 11
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
The interrogation technique varied from case to case according to the background information about the
patient, the seriousness of the charges, the patient's attitude under narcosis, and his rapport with the
doctor. Sometimes it was useful to pretend, as the patient grew more fully conscious, that he had already
confessed during the amnestic period of the interrogation, and to urge him, while his memory and sense of
self-protection were still limited, to continue to elaborate the details of what he had "already described."
When it was obvious that a subject was withholding the truth, his denials were quickly passed over and
ignored, and the key questions would be rewarded in a new approach.
Several patients revealed fantasies, fears, and delusions approaching delirium, much of which could
readily be distinguished from reality. But sometimes there was no way for the examiner to distinguish
truth from fantasy except by reference to other sources. One subject claimed to have a child that did not
exist,
-29another threatened to kill on sight a stepfather who had been dead a year, and yet another confessed to
participating in a robbery when in fact he had only purchased goods from the participants. Testimony
concerning dates and specific places was untrustworthy and often contradictory because of the patient's
loss of time-sense. His veracity in citing names and events proved questionable. Because of his confusion
about actual events and what he thought or feared had happened, the patient at times managed to conceal
the truth unintentionally.
As the subject revived, he would become aware that he was being questioned about his secrets and,
depending upon his personality, his fear of discovery, or the degree of his disillusionment with the doctor,
grow negativistic, hostile, or physically aggressive. Occasionally patients had to be forcibly restrained
during this period to prevent injury to themselves or others as the doctor continued to interrogate. Some
patients, moved by fierce and diffuse anger, the assumption that they had already been tricked into
confessing, and a still limited sense of discretion, defiantly acknowledged their guilt and challenged the
observer to "do something about it." As the excitement passed, some fell back on their original stories and
others verified the confessed material. During the follow-up interview nine of the 17 admitted the validity
of their confessions; eight repudiated their confessions and reaffirmed their earlier accounts.
With respect to the reliability of the results of such interrogation, Gerson and Victoroff conclude that
persistent, careful questioning can reduce ambiguities in drug interrogation, but cannot eliminate them
altogether.
At least one experiment has shown that subjects are capable of maintaining a lie while under the influence
of a barbiturate. Redlich and his associates at Yale [25] administered sodium amytal to nine volunteers,
students and professionals, who had previously, for purposes of the experiment, revealed shameful and
guilt-producing episodes of their past and then invented false self-protective stories to cover them. In
nearly every case the cover story retained some elements of the guilt inherent in the true story.
Under the influence of the drug, the subjects were crossexamined on their cover stories by a second
investigator. The results, though not definitive, showed that normal individuals who had good defenses
and no overt pathological traits could stick to their invented stories and refuse confession. Neurotic
individuals with strong unconscious self-punitive tendencies, on the other hand, both confessed more
easily and were inclined to substitute fantasy for the truth, confessing to offenses never actually
committed.
In recent years drug therapy has made some use of stimulants, most notably amphetamine (Benzedrine)
and its relative methamphetamine (Methadrine). These drugs, used either alone or following intravenous
barbiturates, produce an outpouring of ideas, emotions, and memories which has been of help in
U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
1/22/2009
Page 6 of 11
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
diagnosing mental disorders. The potential of stimulants in interrogation has received little attention,
unless in unpublished work. In one study of their psychiatric use Brussel et al. [7] maintain that
methedrine gives the liar no time to think or to organize his deceptions. Once the drug takes hold, they
say, an insurmountable urge to pour out speech traps the malingerer. Gottschalk, on the other hand, says
that this claim is extravagant, asserting without elaboration that the study lacked proper controls. [13] It is
evident that the combined use of barbiturates and stimulants, perhaps along with ataraxics (tranquilizers),
should be further explored.
OBSERVATIONS FROM PRACTICE
J.M. MacDonald, who as a psychiatrist for the District Courts of Denver has had extensive experience
with narcoanalysis, says that drug interrogation is of doubtful value in obtaining confessions to crimes.
Criminal suspects under the influence of barbiturates may deliberately withhold information, persist in
giving untruthful answers, or falsely confess to crimes they did not commit. The psychopathic personality,
in particular, appears to resist successfully the influence of drugs.
MacDonald tells of a criminal psychopath who, having agreed to narco-interrogation, received 1.5 grams
of sodium amytal over a period of five hours. This man feigned amnesia and gave a false account of a
murder. "He displayed little or no remorse as he (falsely) described the crime, including burial of the
body. Indeed he was very self-possessed and he appeared almost to enjoy the examination. From time to
time he would request that more amytal be injected." [21]
MacDonald concludes that a person who gives false information prior to re-
-30ceiving drugs is likely to give false information also under narcosis, that the drugs are of little value for
revealing deceptions, and that they are more effective in releasing unconsciously repressed material than
in evoking consciously suppressed information.
Another psychiatrist known for his work with criminals, L.Z. Freedman, gave sodium amytal to men
accused of various civil and military antisocial acts. The subjects were mentally unstable, their conditions
ranging from character disorders to neuroses and psychoses. The drug interviews proved psychiatrically
beneficial to the patients, but Freedman found that his view of objective reality was seldom improved by
their revelations. He was unable to say on the basis of the narco-interrogation whether a given act had or
had not occurred. Like MacDonald, he found that psychopathic individuals can deny to the point of
unconsciousness crimes that every objective sign indicates they have committed. [10]
F.G. Inbau, Professor of Law at Northwestern University, who has had considerable experience observing
and participating in "truth" drug tests, claims that they are occasionally effective on persons who would
have disclosed the truth anyway had they been properly interrogated, but that a person determined to lie
will usually be able to continue the deception under drugs.
The two military psychiatrists who made the most extensive use of narcoanalysis during the war years.
Roy R. Grinker and John C. Spiegel, concluded that in almost all cases they could obtain from their
patients essentially the same material and give them the same emotional release by therapy without the
use of drugs, provided they had sufficient time.
The essence of these comments from professionals of long experience is that drugs provide rapid access to
information that is psychiatrically useful but of doubtful validity as empirical truth. The same
psychological information and a less adulterated empirical truth can be obtained from fully conscious
subjects through non-drug psychotherapy and skillful police interrogation.
U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
1/22/2009
Page 7 of 11
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
APPLICATION TO CI INTERROGATION
The almost total absence of controlled experimental studies of "truth" drugs and the spotty and anecdotal
nature of psychiatric and police evidence require that extrapolations to intelligence operations be made
with care. Still, enough is known about the drugs' actions to suggest certain considerations affecting the
possibilities for their use in interrogation.
It should be clear from the foregoing that at best a drug can only serve as an aid to an interrogator who has
a sure understanding of the psychology and techniques of normal interrogation. In some respects, indeed,
the demands on his skill will be increased by the baffling mixture of truth and fantasy in drug-induced
output. And the tendency against which he must guard in the interrogate to give the responses that seem to
be wanted without regard for facts will be heightened by drugs: the literature abounds with warnings that
a subject in narcosis is extremely suggestible.
It seems possible that this suggestibility and the lowered guard of the narcotic state might be put to
advantage in the case of a subject feigning ignorance of a language or some other skill that had become
automatic with him. Lipton [20] found sodium amytal helpful in determining whether a foreign subject
was merely pretending not to understand English. By extension, one can guess that a drugged interrogatee
might have difficulty maintaining the pretense that he did not comprehend the idiom of a profession he
was trying to hide.
There is the further problem of hostility in the interrogator's relationship to a resistance source. The
accumulated knowledge about "truth" drug reaction has come largely from patient-physician relationships
of trust and confidence. The subject in narcoanalysis is usually motivated a priori to cooperate with the
psychiatrist, either to obtain relief from mental suffering or to contribute to a scientific study. Even in
police work, where an atmosphere of anxiety and threat may be dominant, a relationship of trust
frequently asserts itself: the drug is administered by a medical man bound by a strict code of ethics; the
suspect agreeing to undergo narcoanalysis in a desperate bid for corroboration of his testimony trusts both
drug and psychiatrist, however apprehensively; and finally, as Freedman and MacDonald have indicated,
the police psychiatrist frequently deals with a "sick" criminal, and some order of patient-physician
relationship necessarily evolves.
-31Rarely has a drug interrogation involved "normal" individuals in a hostile or genuinely threatening milieu.
It was from a non-threatening experimental setting that Eric Lindemann could say that his "normal"
subjects "reported a general sense of euphoria, ease and confidence, and they exhibited a marked increase
in talkativeness and communicability." [18] Gerson and Victoroff list poor doctor-patient rapport as one
factor interfering with the completeness and authenticity of confessions by the Fort Dix soldiers, caught as
they were in a command performance and told they had no choice but to submit to narco-interrogation.
From all indications, subject-interrogation rapport is usually crucial to obtaining the psychological release
which may lead to unguarded disclosures. Role-playing on the part of the interrogator might be a possible
solution to the problem of establishing rapport with a drugged subject. In therapy, the British narcoanalyst William Sargent recommends that the therapist deliberately distort the facts of the patient's lifeexperience to achieve heightened emotional response and abreaction. [27] In the drunken state of
narcoanalysis patients are prone to accept the therapist's false constructions. There is reason to expect that
a drugged subject would communicate freely with an interrogator playing the role of relative, colleague,
physician, immediate superior, or any other person to whom his background indicated he would be
responsive.
1/22/2009
Page 8 of 11
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Even when rapport is poor, however, there remains one facet of drug action eminently exploitable in
interrogation -- the fact that subjects emerge from narcosis feeling they have revealed a great deal, even
when they have not. As Gerson and Victoroff demonstrated at Fort Dix, this psychological set provides a
major opening for obtaining genuine confessions.
POSSIBLE VARIATIONS
In studies by Beecher and his associates, [3-6] one-third to one-half the individuals tested proved to be
placebo reactors, subjects who respond with symptomatic relief to the administration of any syringe, pill,
or capsule, regardless of what it contains. Although no studies are known to have been made of the
placebo phenomenon as applied to narco-interrogation, it seems reasonable that when a subject's sense of
guilt interferes with productive interrogation, a placebo for pseudo-narcosis could have the effect of
absolving him of the responsibility for his acts and thus clear the way for free communication. It is
notable that placebos are most likely to be effective in situations of stress. The individuals most likely to
react to placebos are the more anxious, more self-centered, more dependent on outside stimulation, those
who express their needs more freely socially, talkers who drain off anxiety by conversing with others. The
non-reactors are those clinically more rigid and with better than average emotional control. No sex or I.Q.
differences between reactors and non-reactors have been found.
Another possibility might be the combined use of drugs with hypnotic trance and post-hypnotic
suggestion: hypnosis could presumably prevent any recollection of the drug experience. Whether a subject
can be brought to trance against his will or unaware, however, is a matter of some disagreement. Orne, in
a survey of the potential uses of hypnosis in interrogation, [23] asserts that it is doubtful, despite many
apparent indications to the contrary, that trance can be induced in resistant subjects. It may be possible, he
adds, to hypnotize a subject unaware, but this would require a positive relationship with the hypnotist not
likely to be found in the interrogation setting.
In medical hypnosis, pentothal sodium is sometimes employed when only light trance has been induced
and deeper narcosis is desired. This procedure is a possibility for interrogation, but if a satisfactory level
of narcosis could be achieved through hypnotic trance there would appear to be no need for drugs.
DEFENSIVE MEASURES
There is no known way of building tolerance for a "truth" drug without creating a disabling addiction, or
of arresting the action of a barbiturate once induced. The only full safeguard against narco-interrogation is
to prevent the administration of the drug. Short of this, the best defense is to make use of the same
knowledge that suggests drugs for offensive operations: if a subject knows that on emerging from narcosis
he will have an exaggerated notion of how much he has revealed he can better resolve to deny he has said
anything.
-32The disadvantages and shortcomings of drugs in offensive operations become positive features of the
defensive posture. A subject in narco-interrogation is garbled and irrational, the amount of output
drastically diminished. Drugs disrupt established thought patterns, including the will to resist, but they do
so indiscriminately and thus also interfere with the patterns of substantive information the interrogator
seeks. Even under the conditions most favorable for the interrogator, output will be contaminated by
fantasy, distortion, and untruth.
Possibly the most effective way to arm oneself against narco-interrogation would be to undergo a "dry
run." A trial drug interrogation with output taped for playback would familiarize an individual with his
own reactions to "truth" drugs, and this familiarity would help to reduce the effects of harassment by the
U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
1/22/2009
Page 9 of 11
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
interrogator before and after the drug has been administered. From the viewpoint of the intelligence
service, the trial exposure of a particular operative to drugs might provide a rough benchmark for
assessing the kind and amount of information he would divulge in narcosis.
There may be concern over the possibility of drug addiction intentionally or accidentally induced by an
adversary service. Most drugs will cause addiction with prolonged use, and the barbiturates are no
exception. In recent studies at the U.S. Public Health Service Hospital for addicts in Lexington, Ky.,
subjects received large doses of barbiturates over a period of months. Upon removal of the drug, they
experienced acute withdrawal symptoms and behaved in every respect like chronic alcoholics.
Because their action is extremely short, however, and because there is little likelihood that they would be
administered regularly over a prolonged period, barbiturate "truth" drugs present slight risk of operational
addiction. If the adversary service were intent on creating addiction in order to exploit withdrawal, it
would have other, more rapid means of producing states as unpleasant as withdrawal symptoms.
The hallucinatory and psychotomimetic drugs such as mescaline, marihuana, LSD-25, and microtine are
sometimes mistakenly associated with narcoanalytic interrogation. These drugs distort the perception and
interpretation of the sensory input to the central nervous system and affect vision, audition, smell, the
sensation of the size of body parts and their position in space, etc. Mescaline and LSD-25 have been used
to create experimental "psychotic states," and in a minor way as aids in psychotherapy.
Since information obtained from a person in a psychotic drug state would be unrealistic, bizarre, and
extremely difficult to assess, the self-administration of LSD-25, which is effective in minute dosages,
might in special circumstances offer an operative temporary protection against interrogation. Conceivably,
on the other hand, an adversary service could use such drugs to produce anxiety or terror in medically
unsophisticated subjects unable to distinguish drug-induced psychosis from actual insanity. An
enlightened operative could not be thus frightened, however, knowing that the effect of these
hallucinogenic agents is transient in normal individuals.
Most broadly, there is evidence that drugs have least effect on well-adjusted individuals with good
defenses and good emotional control, and that anyone who can withstand the stress of competent
interrogation in the waking state can do so in narcosis. The essential resources for resistance thus appear
to lie within the individual.
CONCLUSIONS
The salient points that emerge from this discussion are the following. No such magic brew as the popular
notion of truth serum exists. The barbiturates, by disrupting defensive patterns, may sometimes be helpful
in interrogation, but even under the best conditions they will elicit an output contaminated by deception,
fantasy, garbled speech, etc. A major vulnerability they produce in the subject is a tendency to believe he
has revealed more than he has. It is possible, however, for both normal individuals and psychopaths to
resist drug interrogation; it seems likely that any individual who can withstand ordinary intensive
interrogation can hold out in narcosis. The best aid to a defense against narco-interrogation is
foreknowledge of the process and its limitations. There is an acute need for controlled experimental
studies of drug reaction, not only to depressants but also to stimulants and to combinations of depressants,
stimulants, and ataraxics.
-33-
REFERENCES
1/22/2009
Page 10 of 11
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1/22/2009
Page 11 of 11
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
24. Pelikan, E. W., & Kensler, C. J. Sedatives: Their pharmacalogy and uses. Reprint from The Medical
Clinics of North America. W. B. Saunders Company, Sept. 1958.
25. Redlich, F. C., Ravitz, L. J., & Dression, G. H. Narcoanalysis and truth. Amer. J. Psychiat., 1951, 107,
586-593.
26. Rolin, J. Police Drugs. Translated by L. J. Bendit. New York: Philosophical Library, 1956.
27. Sargant, W., & Slater, E. Physical methods of treatment in psychiatry. (3rd. ed.) Baltimore: Williams
and Wilkins, 1954.
28. Snider, R. S. Cerebellum. Sci. Am., Aug. 1958, 84.
29. Uhr, L., & Miller, L. G. (eds.). Drugs and Behavior. New York-London: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.,
1960.
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. 33... Page 1 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Historical References
General Histories | Ancient History | 1800-1850 | 1860 | 1870 | 1880 | 1890
1900 | 1910 | 1920 | 1930 | 1940 | 1950 | 1960 | 1970 | 1980 | 1990
Table of Contents
-34Admiral Turner, I appreciate that these tawdry activities were taking place long before your
watch, and I think you have correctly labeled them as abhorrent, but not only were they
abhorrent, it seems to me that they wee rather bungled, amateurish experiments that don't
seem to have been handled in a very scientific way, at least from the scanty evidence we
have.
It seems to me that there were a minimum of reports and the Agency didn't have the ability
to call it quits. It went on for some 12 years, as you mentioned. What I would like to get to
is, are you convinced now in your Agency that those scientific experiments, legitimate
ones that you were conducting with polygraph and so forth, were being conducted in a
scientific manner and that you are handling it in a correct manner to get the best
information that you are seeking in the end?
U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. 33... Page 2 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Admiral TURNER. Yes, I am, and I also have a sense of confidence that we are limiting
ourselves to the areas where we need to be involved as opposed to areas where we can rely
on others.
Senator CHAFEE. I am convinced of that from your report. I just do hope that you have
people who are trained in not only handling this type of experiment, but in preparing the
proper reports and drawing the proper data from the reports. You are convinced that you
have this type of people?
Admiral TURNER. Yes, sir.
Senator CHAFEE. The second point I am interested in was the final lines in your
testimony here, which I believe are very important, and that is that the Agency is doing all
it can in cooperation with other branches of the Government to go about tracking down the
identity of those who were in some way adversely affected, and see what can be done to
fulfill the government's responsibilities in that respect. I might add that I commend you in
that, and I hope you will pursue it vigorously.
A hospital in my State was involved in these proceedings, and it is unclear exactly what did
take place, so I have both a parochial interest in this and a national interest as well, and I do
hope you will press on with it. It involves not only you, I appreciate, but also HEW and
perhaps the Attorney General.
Admiral TURNER. Thank you, sir. We will.
Senator CHAFEE. Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Senator INOUYE. Thank you very much.
Admiral Turner, MKULTRA subproject 3 was a project involving the surreptitious
administration of LSD on unwitting persons, was it not?
Admiral TURNER. Yes, sir.
Senator INOUYE. In February 1954, and this was in the very early stages of MKULTRA,
the Director of Central Intelligence wrote to the technical services staff officials criticizing
their judgment because they had participated in an experiment involving the administration
of LSD on an unwitting basis to Dr. Frank Olson, who later committed suicide. Now, the
individuals criticized were the same individuals who were responsible for subproject 3,
involving exactly the same practices. Even though these individuals were clearly aware of
the dangers of surreptitious administration and had been criticized by the Director
-35of Central Intelligence, subproject 3 was not terminated immediately after Dr. Olson's
death.
U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. 33... Page 3 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
In fact, according to documents, it continued for a number of years. Can you provide this
committee with any explanation of how such testing could have continued under these
circumstances?
Admiral TURNER. No, sir, I really can't.
Senator INOUYE. Are the individuals in technical services who carried on subproject 3
still on the CIA payroll?
Admiral TURNER. I am sorry. Are you asking, are they today?
Senator INOUYE. Yes.
Admiral TURNER. No, sir.
Senator INOUYE. What would you do if you criticized officials of the technical services
staff and they continued to carry on experimentation for a number of years?
Admiral TURNER. I would do two things, sir. One is, I would be sure at the beginning
that I was explicit enough that they knew that I didn't want that to be continued anywhere
else, and two, if I found it being continued, I would roll some heads.
Senator INOUYE. Could you provide this committee with information as to whether the
individuals involved had their heads rolled?
Admiral TURNER. I don't believe there is any evidence they did, but I will double check
that.
[See p. 170 for material referred to.]
Senator INOUYE. As you know, Senator Huddleston and his subcommittee are deeply
involved in the drafting of charters and guidelines for the intelligence community. We will
be meeting with the President tomorrow. Our concern is, I think, a basic one. Can anything
like this occur again?
Admiral TURNER. I think it would be very, very unlikely, first, because we are all much
more conscious of these issues than we were back in the fifties, second, because we have
such thorough oversight procedures. I cannot imagine that this kind of activity could take
place today without some member of the CIA itself bypassing me, if I were authorizing
this, and writing to the Intelligence Oversight Board, and blowing the whistle on this kind
of activity.
I am also doing my very best, sir, to encourage an openness with myself and a free
communication in the Agency, so that I am the one who finds these things if they should
happen. The fact is that we must keep you and your committee and now the new committee
in the House informed of our sensitive activities. I think all of these add up to a degree of
scrutiny such that this kind of extensive and flagrant activity could not happen today
without it coming to the attention of the proper authorities to stop it.
Senator INOUYE. A sad aspect of the MKULTRA project was that it naturally involved
U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. 33... Page 4 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. 33... Page 5 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
get smeared all over the newspapers in spite of all the security steps that have been taken.
It seems to me that those universities should be entitled to that information, so that the ones
with other administrations can adapt procedures to protect those universities. The
importance of preserving the independence of our research areas and the communities
seems to me to be a very fundamental kind of question about the protection of the integrity
of our universities and our research centers.
Admiral TURNER. You are saying that you feel that if we identify them privately to
themselves, we can benefit them in an adequate way to cover the risk that this will lead to a
more public disclosure? There are lots of the 80 who have not been identified publicly at
this point.
Senator KENNEDY. I think the universities themselves should be notified. I think then
the universities can take whatever steps in terms of their setting up the procedures to
protect. their own kinds of integrity in terms of the future. I would certainly hope that, they
would feel that they could make a public comment or a public statement on it. I think it is
of general public interest, particularly for the people that are involved in those universities,
to have some kind of awareness of whether they were. used or were not used and how they
were used.
I think they are entitled to it, and quite frankly, if there is a public official or an official of
the university that you notify and be wants
-37for his own particular reasons not to have it public, I don't see why those in a lesser echelon
or lower echelon who have been effectively used by it should not have the information as
well.
So, I would hope that you would notify the universities and then also indicate to the public.
I can't conceive that this information will not be put out in the newspapers, and it puts the
university people at an extraordinary disadvantage, and of course some of it is wrong,
which is the fact of the matter, and I think some university official saying, well, it isn't so,
is a lot different than if they know it is confirmed or it is not confirmed in terms of the
Agency itself. I think that there is a responsibility there.
Admiral TURNER. I have great sympathy with what you are saying. I have already
notified one institution because the involvement was so extensive that I thought they really
needed to protect themselves, and I am. most anxious to do this in whatever way will help
all of the people who were perhaps unwitting participants in this, and the difficulty I will
have is, I can't quite do, I think, what you suggested, in that I may not be able to tell an
institution of the extent and nature of its participation.
Senator KENNEDY. Well, you can tell them to the best of your information, and it seems
to me that just because the university or an individual is going to be embarrassed is not a
reason for classifying the information. So, I would hope -- I mean, I obviously speak as an
U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. 33... Page 6 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
individual Senator, but I feel that that is an incredible disservice to the innocent individuals
and I think, a disservice to the integrity of the, universities unless they are notified, to be
able to develop procedures you are developing with regards to your own institution and we
are trying to in terms of the Congress. Certainly the universities are entitled to the same.
Admiral TURNER. Yes. Not all of these, of course, were unwitting.
Senator KENNEDY. That's right.
Admiral TURNER. Many of them were witting, and therefore they can take all those
precautionary steps on their own, but I am perfectly open to doing this. I am only interested
in doing it in a way that when identifying a university it will not lead to the public
disclosure of the individuals, whom I am not allowed to disclose, and so on.
Senator KENNEDY. That could be done, it seems to me.
Admiral TURNER. So, we will see if we can devise a way of notifying these institutions
on a private basis so that they can then make their own decision whether their equities are
best served by their announcing it publicly or their attempting to maintain it-Senator KENNEDY. Or you. I wonder. What if they were to ask you to announce, or
indicate?
Admiral TURNER. My personal conscience, sir, at this time, is that I would be doing a
disservice to these universities if I notified the public.
Senator KENNEDY. Would you meet with some university officials and ask what their
views are or whether they feel that the preservation of the integrity of the universities
would be better served or not? I think that would be useful to find out from small, large,
private, and public universities' officials how they view the integrity-Admiral TURNER. Fine. I Will phone several university presidents today who are my
friends and who are not involved in this, and ask them what they think the equities would
be.
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. 33... Page 7 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
going to be credible. I would value it if you would get some input from universities as to
what they believe is the fairest way in terms of the preservation of the integrity of the
universities.
Let me, if I could, ask on the question of the uses of these safe houses, as I understand from
information that was provided to us in the course of our last committee, the testing of
various drugs on individuals happened at all social levels, high and low, it happened on
native Americans and also on foreign nationals. That is what I understand was the nature of
the project itself.
Now, I am just wondering whether those tests were conducted at the two locations on the
east coast and the west coast which were known as safe houses. To your knowledge, is that
correct?
Admiral TURNER. Yes.
Senator KENNEDY. In terms of the research in this particular program, it did not go
beyond the safe houses located on the east coast and the west coast? I believe I am correct
on that.
Admiral TURNER. That type of unwitting testing of sort of randomly selected
individuals, yes.
Senator KENNEDY. It was just located in those two places?
Admiral TURNER. To the best of our knowledge, there were only two locations.
Senator KENNEDY. Well, how do we interpret randomly selected?
Admiral TURNER. Well, as opposed to prisoners in a prison who were somehow
selected.
Senator KENNEDY. All right. Do you know from this information how many people
were recruited during this period?
Admiral TURNER. No idea.
Senator KENNEDY. Do you know approximately?
Admiral TURNER. I asked that question the other day, and we just don't have -apparently we are very -- well, either there were no records kept of the actual numbers and
types of people tested or they were destroyed.
Senator INOUYE. Senator Schweiker.
Senator SCHWEIKER. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Admiral Turner, I would like to come back to the experiments which may have been
conducted at the hospital research facilities which the CIA helped to finance. It wasn't clear
to me from your previous answers what kind of work was done there. I gather you are
unclear on that, too, from your remarks, yet I find in the CIA documentation which you
U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. 33... Page 8 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
have supplied us, a list describing some of the advantages the Agency hoped to gain. It
says:
(a) One-sixth of the total space in the new hospital wing will be available to the Chemical
Division of TSS * * *; (b) Agency sponsorship of sensitive research
-39projects will be completely deniable; (c) Full professional cover will be provided for up to
three biochemical employees of the Chemical Division; (d) Human patients and volunteers for
experimental use will be available under controlled clinical conditions with the full
supervision of
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. 33... Page 9 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Senator SCHWEIKER. Why did you delete that reference? Why is that still classified,
that particular project of whatever it is?
Admiral TURNER. I don't know this particular case. We will get you the exact answer to
that one and inform you about it, but it is quite probable that that other case is unrelated to
this in the -- well, not unrelated, but that that was a project that still deserves to be
classified.
[The material referred to follows:]
Construction of the Gorman Annex was begun in 1957 and the Annex was dedicated in March
1959. Of the several MKULTRA projects conducted at Georgetown only one involving human
testing covered a time span subsequent to March 1959. Subproject 45 ran from 1955 to 1963,
thus it is possible that the final four years 1959-1963) of the subproject could have been spent
in the Gorman Annex. However, there is no reference to the Gorman Annex or a "new Annex"
in Subproject 45 papers, neither is there any mention of the subproject moving to a new
location in 1959 or later years.
Authorization to contribute CIA funds toward construction of the Gorman Annex is contained
in Subproject 35 of MKULTRA. Recently discovered material indicated that Dr. Geschickter
continued his research for sleep- and amnesia-producing drugs under Project MKSEARCH
through July 1967 at Georgetown University Hospital. But it is impossible to determine if the
facilities of the Gorman Annex were involved.
-40Senator SCHWEIKER. I think that would give us a pretty good clue as to what was
going to be done in the wing the CIA helped to finance.
Was there any indication at all in the records you found that the project ultimately used
cancer patients or terminally ill patients in connection with this facility?
Admiral TURNER. I'm sorry. I missed your question because I was trying to get the data
on the last one. I will read you the blank.
Senator SCHWEIKER. Go ahead.
Admiral TURNER. QKHILLTOP. It doesn't help you, but-Senator SCHWEIKER. Can you tell us what that is, or is it still classified?
Admiral TURNER. I don't know, and I assume from the fact that we deleted it, it is still
classified, but I will get you that answer, sir.
Senator SCHWEIKER. Thank you. I'd like to see that information.
[See p. 171 for material referred to.]
U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. ... Page 10 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Now my next question was: Is there any indication, Admiral, that projects in that particular
center involved experimentation on terminally ill cancer patients?
Admiral TURNER. I missed the first part of your question, sir. I am very sorry.
Senator SCHWEIKER. Do you have any indication that some experiment in the facility
used terminally ill cancer patients as subjects? You do acknowledge in your statement and
it is clear from other documents that these kinds of experiments were at some point being
done somewhere. My question is, is there any indication that cancer patients or terminally
ill patients were experimented with in this wing?
Admiral TURNER. Yes, it does appear there is a connection here, sir.
Senator SCHWEIKER. The other question I had relates to the development of something
which has been called the perfect concussion. A series of experiments toward that end were
described in the CIA documents. I wonder if you would just tell us what your
understanding of perfect concussion is.
Admiral TURNER. Is that in my testimony, sir, or in some other document?
Senator SCHWEIKER. Subproject 54, MKULTRA, which involved examination of
techniques to cause brain concussions and amnesia by using weapons or sound waves to
strike individuals without giving and without leaving any clear physical marks. Someone
dubbed it "perfect concussion" -- maybe that was poetic license on the part of our staff
rather than your poets over there. I wonder if you could just tell us what brain concussion
experiments were about?
Admiral TURNER. This project, No. 54, was canceled, and never carried out.
Senator SCHWEIKER. Well, I do believe the first year of the project in 1955 was carried
out by the Office of Naval Research, according to the information that you supplied us.
The CIA seems to have been participating in some way at that point, because the records
go on to say that the experimenter at ONR found out about CIA's role, discovered that it
was a cover, and then the project was transferred to MKULTRA in 1956. Again, this is all
from the backup material you have given us. So, it was canceled at some time. I am not
disagreeing
-41with that, but apparently for at least a year or two, somebody was investigating the
production of brain concussions with special blackjacks, sound waves, and other methods
as detailed in the backup material.
Admiral TURNER. The data available to me is that this project was never funded by the
CIA, but I will double-check that and furnish the information for the record for you as to
whether there was ever any connection here and if so, what the nature of the work was.
U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. ... Page 11 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Senator SCHWEIKER. Yes; I would appreciate that. I would like to know how it went
from ONR to CIA after a year. Somebody made a decision to make that transfer, and to
make this an MKULTRA subject. There had to be some sort of review that led to a
decision to continue that kind of concussion -- total blackout, maximum amnesia, and
whatever else it was you were interested in -- study and testing.
Mr. LAUBINGER. Senator, if I may try to say a few words on that, the files that were
available to us for inspection, which are limited, indicated that there was a project being
carried on by the Navy having to do with the, effects of brain concussion. The CIA
developed an interest in that, and considered funding it, but actually never did, and as the
admiral testified, the MKULTRA is merely a funding mechanism, a place they go for
money to do such things, but there is no evidence that I know of that that project was ever
funded.
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. ... Page 12 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
-42Senator SCHWEIKER. Well, I am confused, because here again is another quote from a
document that we have seen, which you have released and supplied to us:
Following is the technical progress made under the current [deleted] contract: (a) Specializing
instrumentation and numerous testing techniques have been developed to obtain the desired
dynamic data; (b) considerable data has now been obtained supporting the resonancecavilation theory of brain concussion; and (c) preliminary acceleration threshold data has been
obtained for a fluid-filled glass simulated skull.
It goes on to talk about a blast range and a 2,500-square-foot laboratory. The document
notes that "Three blast test series have been run to date." It describes a special blackjack
device, "a pancake-type blackjack giving a high peak impact force with a low unit surface
pressure."
I agree the records are inconclusive as to the results of this work, but it certainly seems that
some testing was done.
Mr. LAUBINGER. Senator, you are putting us in the same position I think you were
stating that you were in earlier referring to documents not before us, but I believe you are
quoting from a proposal that someone sent to the Agency to fund this work, and he is
referring to past work. The past work would have encompassed a lot of things like that, but
CIA was not involved with that.
Senator SCHWEIKER. What do you mean, Admiral, on page 6 of your testimony when
you mention projects using magician's art? How do magicians get into the spook business?
Admiral TURNER. I have interpreted this as to how to slip the mickey into the finn, but I
would like to ask my advisers here to comment.
Mr. BRODY. I think that is essentially it, Senator. It is surreptitious administration of
material to someone, deceptive practices, how to distract someone's attention while you are
doing something else, as I understand it. It was also some type of a covert communication
project involved with the study of how magicians and their assistants perhaps communicate
information to one another without having other people know it. This is the type of thing
that was involved, sir.
Senator SCHWEIKER. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Senator INOUYE. Senator Huddleston?
Senator HUDDLESTON. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Admiral, in your checking these newly discovered documents and interviewing members
of the CIA staff, did you find information that would confirm the contention described by
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. ... Page 13 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
the reporters for the New York Times that this type of experimentation was begun out of a
fear that the Agency that foreign powers might have drugs which would allow them to alter
the behavior of American citizens or agents or members of the Armed Forces who were
taken into custody, and which would have resulted in false confessions and the like? Is my
question clear?
Admiral TURNER. Yes, sir. I haven't personally read the documentation on that. In my
discussions with the people who are well informed in this area at the Agency, I am told that
that is the case.
Senator HUDDLESTON. Was there any evidence or any indication that there were other
motives that the Agency might also be looking for drugs that could be applied for other
purposes, such as debilitating an individual or even killing another person? Was this part of
this kind of experimentation?
-43Admiral TURNER. Yes; I think there is. I have not seen in this series of documentation
evidence of desire to kill, but I think the project turned its character from a defensive to an
offensive one as it went along, and there certainly was an intention here to develop drugs
that could be of use.
Senator HUDDLESTON. The project continued for some time after it was learned that, in
fact, foreign powers did not have such a drug as was at first feared, didn't it?
Admiral TURNER. That is my understanding. Yes, sir.
Senator HUDDLESTON. Is there any indication that knowledge gained as a result of
these experiments has been useful or is being applied in any way to present operations?
Mr. BRODY. Senator, I am not sure if there is any body of knowledge. A great deal of
what there was, I gather, was destroyed in 1973. I would like to defer to Frank here. Do
you know of any?
Mr. LAUBINGER. I know of no drugs or anything like that developed under this program
that ever reached operational use or are in use today.
Senator HUDDLESTON. So apparently any information that was gathered was
apparently useless and not worth continuing, not worth further development on the part of
the Agency.
Mr. LAUBINGER. I am having difficulty hearing your questions.
Senator HUDDLESTON. I can hardly hear myself.
Admiral TURNER. I think the answer to your question is that we have no evidence of
great usefulness on this, and yet I think we should remember-U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. ... Page 14 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
-44Senator HUDDLESTON. You don't know whether any of your agents anywhere in the
world have been subjected to any kind of procedure like this?
Admiral TURNER. We certainly know of other powers conducting research in these
areas, yes.
Senator HUDDLESTON. Do you know how they go about that research?
Admiral TURNER. It is pretty sketchy, the information we have.
Senator HUDDLESTON. Do you know of any other organization in this country or any
institution that has conducted extensive research on unwitting individuals and through
unwitting institutions?
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. ... Page 15 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Admiral TURNER. Well, I have read something in the newspapers about this, but I have
not familiarized myself with it in specifies.
Senator HUDDLESTON. It is not a normal mode of operation for hitman research, is it?
Admiral TURNER. No, sir.
Senator HUDDLESTON. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Senator INOUYE. Senator Wallop?
Senator WALLOP. Mr. Chairman, I only have one to follow up on Senator Huddleston's
questions and my earlier ones. You are not really saying, are you Admiral Turner, that
there are no mind-altering drugs or behavior modification procedures which have been
used by foreign powers?
Admiral TURNER. No, sir, I am not.
Senator WALLOP. I drew that inference partly in answer to my question that you knew
of no truth serum. Maybe that is a misnomer, but surely there are relaxants that make
tongues looser than they would otherwise be. Isn't that true?
Admiral TURNER. Yes.
Senator WALLOP. So I think it is fair to say, too, that the experience of many American
prisoners of war in the Korean conflict would indicate that there are behavior modification
procedures in use by foreign powers of a fairly advanced degree of sophistication.
Admiral TURNER. Yes, sir.
Senator WALLOP. Again, I will just go back and say I think this must have been part of
the motivation. I don't think you would have mentioned Cardinal Mindszenty had you
thought his behavior was normal at the time or had anybody else. So, I would just again
say I think it is a little bit scapegoating. I don't think the object of this hearing is in any way
to lay blame on those passed or those dead or otherwise, but I think it is a little bit
scapegoating to say that it stopped with the directors of the CIA or the DCT's of the time.
Also I think it is a little bit scapegoating, to say they didn't even know it, but that it was
some lower echelon acting alone.
I think this was a behavior pattern that was prevalent in those years, and I think the object
lesson is that we have discovered, we think and we hope, through your assurances and
other activities of the Congress, means of avoiding future incidents of that kind. I thank
you, Mr. Chairman.
Senator INOUYE. Senator Chafee?
Senator CHAFEE. No questions.
Senator INOUYE. Senator Kennedy, I think you have another question.
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. ... Page 16 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
-45Senator KENNEDY. Just talking about the two safe houses on the east and west, coast as
being the sources for the unwitting trials, now, the importance of this and the magnitude of
it, I think, is of significance, because we have seen from your records that these we're used
over a period of 8 or 9 years, and the numbers could have been considerable. You are
unable to determine, at least, in your own research, what the numbers would be, and what
the drugs were, how many people were involved, but it could have been considerable
during this period of time.
It would certainly appear to me in examining the documents and the flow charts of cash
slips that were expended in these areas that it was considerable, but that is a judgmental
factor on it, but I think it is important to try and find out what the Agency is attempting to
do to get to the bottom of it.
Now, the principal agent that was involved as I understand it is deceased and has been
deceased for 2 years. The overall agent, Mr. Gottlieb, has indicated a fuzzy memory about
this whole area. He has testified before the Intelligence Committee. Yet he was responsible
for the whole program. Then, the Director had indicated the destruction of the various
materials and unfamiliarity with the project.
Now, you have indicated in your testimony today that there are two additional agents on
page 9 of your testimony, you indicated there were two additional agents which you have
uncovered at the bottom of it, and you say the names of CIA officials who approved or
monitored the various projects. You talk about the two additional agents in your testimony.
Now, I am just wondering if you intend to interview those agents to find out exactly what
is being done. I suppose, first of all, shouldn't the project manager know what was being
done?
Admiral TURNER. Our first problem, Senator, is that we have been unable to associate
an individual with those names at this point. We are still burrowing to find out who these
people are. We haven't identified them as having been CIA employees, and we don't know
whether these were false names.
Senator KENNEDY. You are tracking that down, as I understand it?
Admiral TURNER. Yes, sir.
Senator KENNEDY. You are tracking that. down, and you have every intention of
interviewing those people to find out whatever you can about the program and project?
Admiral TURNER. My only hesitation here is whether I will do this or the Justice
Department.
Senator KENNEDY. It will be pursued, though, I understand?
U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. ... Page 17 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. ... Page 18 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
-47who, if either of us, should get into discussions with Dr. Gottlieb so as not to prejudice any
legal rights that may be involved here, or to appear in any way to be improper.
Senator KENNEDY. Well, do I understand you have not contacted the Justice Department
about this particular case since the development of this new material about Gottlieb?
Admiral TURNER. Not about Gottlieb specifically. We have contacted him.
Senator KENNEDY. Well, it is amazing to me. I mean, can you understand the difficulty
that any of us might have in terms of comprehending that when you develop a whole new
series of materials that are on the front page of every newspaper in the country and are on
every television, I mean, that means something, but it does not mean nearly as much as the
interest that we have in the fact about the testing of unwitting Americans, and every single
document that the staff reviews has Mr. Gottlieb's name on it and you come to tell us that
we don't have to worry any more, we have these other final facts, and Mr. Gottlieb has not
been talked to?
Admiral TURNER. Sir, I am not saying that these are in any way the final facts. I am
saying these are all the facts we have available.
U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. ... Page 19 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Senator KENNEDY. And you have not talked to the person who was in charge of the
program, so what kind of value or what kind of weight can we give it?
Admiral TURNER. We are happy to talk to him. I think the issue here again is one of
propriety and how to go about this. We have not, I believe, enough new information about
Gottlieb's participation here to signal that his interview would be that much more revealing
than what was revealed in 1975.
Senator KENNEDY. The importance of it, I think, from our point of view, is, he would
know the drugs that were administered, the volume of drugs, how it was administered, and
in terms of your ability to follow lip to protect these people and their health, to the extent
that it can be done, that opportunity is being lost.
I want to get on to some others, but will you give us the assurance that you will get ahold
of Gottlieb or that you will talk to Attorney General Bell and talk with Gottlieb?
Admiral TURNER. Yes, sir.
Senator KENNEDY. And let us know as to the extent of it. I don't see how we can fulfill
our responsibility in this area on the drug testing without our hearing from Gottlieb as well,
but I think it is important that you do so, particularly since all of the materials have been
destroyed.
These other two agents, have they talked to them?
Admiral TURNER. We don't, know who they are, sir. We are trying to track down and
see whether these names can be related to anybody.
Senator KENNEDY. That is under active investigation by the Agency?
Admiral TURNER. Yes, sir.
Senator KENNEDY. And you have the intention of talking to those people when you
locate them. Is that correct?
Admiral TURNER. Yes, sir, under the same circumstances as Gottlieb.
Senator KENNEDY. And you have people working on it? Admiral TURNER. Yes, sir.
-48Senator KENNEDY. With regards to the activities that took place in these safe houses, as
I understand from the records, two-way mirrors were used. Is that your understanding?
Admiral TURNER. Yes, sir. We have records that construction was done to put in twoway mirrors.
U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. ... Page 20 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. ... Page 21 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
-49and the new documentation and the new memoranda -- and he did not have the checks at
that time -- and with the wide variety of different memoranda with his name on it, his
memory could be stimulated on that.
Thank you.
Senator INOUYE. I would like to thank the admiral and his staff for participating in this
hearing. I believe the record should show that this hearing was held at the request of the
Agency and the admiral. It was not held because we insisted upon it. It was a volunteer
effort on the part of the Agency. I think the record should also indicate that Admiral Turner
has forwarded to this committee a classified file, including all of the names of the
institutions and the persons involved as the experimentors.
I should also indicate that this hearing is just one step involved in the committee's
investigation of drug abuse. Just as you have had much work in going over the 8,000
pages, the staff of this committee has had equal problems, but I would like the record to
show that you have made these papers and documents available to the committee. I thank
you for that.
As part of the ongoing investigation, we had intended to call upon many dozens of others,
experimentors, or those officials in charge, and one of those will be Dr. Gottlieb.
In thanking you, I would like to say this to the American people, that what we have
experienced this morning in this committee room is not being duplicated in any other
committee room in any other part of the world. I doubt that very much. Our Agency and
our intelligence community has been under much criticism and has been subjected to much
abuse, in many cases justified, but this is the most open society that I can think of. For
example, in Great Britain there are about six people who are aware of the identity of the
man in charge of intelligence. In other countries, similar conditions exist. Here in the
United States we not only know Admiral Turner, we have had open hearings with him,
such as this. The confirmation hearings were all open.
In a few weeks, the Senate of the United States will debate a resolution to decide upon
whether we should disclose the amounts and funds being used for counterintelligence and
national intelligence. I would hope that, in presenting this issue to the public, the media
will take note that the Agency has cooperated and will continue to. The abuse that we have
learned about this morning is one I hope will never happen again, but without constant
oversight on the part of the Executive Office, on the part of the Congress, it could happen
again. It is important, therefore that we continue in this oversight activity.
So, once, again, Admiral, I thank yon very much for helping us. We will continue to call
upon you for your assistance. We would like to submit to you several questions that the
members and staff have prepared. I hope you will look them over carefully and prepare
responses for the record, sir.
Senator KENNEDY. Mr. Chairman?
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. ... Page 22 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
-50I have found him personally to be extremely responsive, and it is a very difficult challenge
which lie has accepted in heading this Agency. I want you to know, personally, I, too,
would like to see this put behind us. I don't think we are quite there yet in terms of this
particular area that we are interested in. I think the Intelligence Committee has special
responsibilities in this area of the testing, so we look forward to working with you in
expediting the time that we can put it behind, but it does seem to me that we have to dig in
and finish the chapter. So, I want to personally express my appreciation to you, Admiral
Turner, and thank you for your cooperation and your help, and I look forward to working
with you.
Admiral TURNER. Thank you.
Senator HUDDLESTON. Mr. Chairman, I am not sure you emphasized this enough, but I
think the record ought to show that Admiral Turner informed the Select Committee on his
own initiative when the new documentation was found. The documentation has been made
available to us voluntarily, in a spirit of cooperation.
I think this shows a vast difference from the mode of operation that existed prior to the
formation at least of the Church committee, and a difference that is very helpful.
Senator INOUYE. Thank you very much. Thank you very much, Admiral.
We would now like to call upon Mr. Philip Goldman and Mr. John Gittinger.
Mr. Goldman and Mr. Gittinger, will you please rise and take the oath.
Do you solemnly swear that the testimony you are about to give is the truth, the whole truth
and nothing but the truth, so help you, God?
Mr. GOLDMAN. I do.
Mr. GITTINGER. I do.
Senator INOUYE. Thank you, sir.
Mr. Goldman, will you identify yourself, and after that, Mr. Gittinger.
Senator KENNEDY. Before we start in, we had a third witness, Mr. Chairman, Mr.
Pasternac, who planned to testify, traveled to Washington -- he, lives in Washington, and
U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. ... Page 23 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
was contacted recently --with the intention of testifying this morning. And something -- he
called us late this morning and indicated that he wanted to get a counsel before he would
wish to testify.
Senator INOUYE. Mr. Goldman.
Mr. Goldman, will you identify yourself, sir.
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. 33... Page 1 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Historical References
General Histories | Ancient History | 1800-1850 | 1860 | 1870 | 1880 | 1890
1900 | 1910 | 1920 | 1930 | 1940 | 1950 | 1960 | 1970 | 1980 | 1990
Table of Contents
-34Admiral Turner, I appreciate that these tawdry activities were taking place long before your
watch, and I think you have correctly labeled them as abhorrent, but not only were they
abhorrent, it seems to me that they wee rather bungled, amateurish experiments that don't
seem to have been handled in a very scientific way, at least from the scanty evidence we
have.
It seems to me that there were a minimum of reports and the Agency didn't have the ability
to call it quits. It went on for some 12 years, as you mentioned. What I would like to get to
is, are you convinced now in your Agency that those scientific experiments, legitimate
ones that you were conducting with polygraph and so forth, were being conducted in a
scientific manner and that you are handling it in a correct manner to get the best
information that you are seeking in the end?
U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. 33... Page 2 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Admiral TURNER. Yes, I am, and I also have a sense of confidence that we are limiting
ourselves to the areas where we need to be involved as opposed to areas where we can rely
on others.
Senator CHAFEE. I am convinced of that from your report. I just do hope that you have
people who are trained in not only handling this type of experiment, but in preparing the
proper reports and drawing the proper data from the reports. You are convinced that you
have this type of people?
Admiral TURNER. Yes, sir.
Senator CHAFEE. The second point I am interested in was the final lines in your
testimony here, which I believe are very important, and that is that the Agency is doing all
it can in cooperation with other branches of the Government to go about tracking down the
identity of those who were in some way adversely affected, and see what can be done to
fulfill the government's responsibilities in that respect. I might add that I commend you in
that, and I hope you will pursue it vigorously.
A hospital in my State was involved in these proceedings, and it is unclear exactly what did
take place, so I have both a parochial interest in this and a national interest as well, and I do
hope you will press on with it. It involves not only you, I appreciate, but also HEW and
perhaps the Attorney General.
Admiral TURNER. Thank you, sir. We will.
Senator CHAFEE. Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Senator INOUYE. Thank you very much.
Admiral Turner, MKULTRA subproject 3 was a project involving the surreptitious
administration of LSD on unwitting persons, was it not?
Admiral TURNER. Yes, sir.
Senator INOUYE. In February 1954, and this was in the very early stages of MKULTRA,
the Director of Central Intelligence wrote to the technical services staff officials criticizing
their judgment because they had participated in an experiment involving the administration
of LSD on an unwitting basis to Dr. Frank Olson, who later committed suicide. Now, the
individuals criticized were the same individuals who were responsible for subproject 3,
involving exactly the same practices. Even though these individuals were clearly aware of
the dangers of surreptitious administration and had been criticized by the Director
-35of Central Intelligence, subproject 3 was not terminated immediately after Dr. Olson's
death.
U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. 33... Page 3 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
In fact, according to documents, it continued for a number of years. Can you provide this
committee with any explanation of how such testing could have continued under these
circumstances?
Admiral TURNER. No, sir, I really can't.
Senator INOUYE. Are the individuals in technical services who carried on subproject 3
still on the CIA payroll?
Admiral TURNER. I am sorry. Are you asking, are they today?
Senator INOUYE. Yes.
Admiral TURNER. No, sir.
Senator INOUYE. What would you do if you criticized officials of the technical services
staff and they continued to carry on experimentation for a number of years?
Admiral TURNER. I would do two things, sir. One is, I would be sure at the beginning
that I was explicit enough that they knew that I didn't want that to be continued anywhere
else, and two, if I found it being continued, I would roll some heads.
Senator INOUYE. Could you provide this committee with information as to whether the
individuals involved had their heads rolled?
Admiral TURNER. I don't believe there is any evidence they did, but I will double check
that.
[See p. 170 for material referred to.]
Senator INOUYE. As you know, Senator Huddleston and his subcommittee are deeply
involved in the drafting of charters and guidelines for the intelligence community. We will
be meeting with the President tomorrow. Our concern is, I think, a basic one. Can anything
like this occur again?
Admiral TURNER. I think it would be very, very unlikely, first, because we are all much
more conscious of these issues than we were back in the fifties, second, because we have
such thorough oversight procedures. I cannot imagine that this kind of activity could take
place today without some member of the CIA itself bypassing me, if I were authorizing
this, and writing to the Intelligence Oversight Board, and blowing the whistle on this kind
of activity.
I am also doing my very best, sir, to encourage an openness with myself and a free
communication in the Agency, so that I am the one who finds these things if they should
happen. The fact is that we must keep you and your committee and now the new committee
in the House informed of our sensitive activities. I think all of these add up to a degree of
scrutiny such that this kind of extensive and flagrant activity could not happen today
without it coming to the attention of the proper authorities to stop it.
Senator INOUYE. A sad aspect of the MKULTRA project was that it naturally involved
U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. 33... Page 4 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. 33... Page 5 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
get smeared all over the newspapers in spite of all the security steps that have been taken.
It seems to me that those universities should be entitled to that information, so that the ones
with other administrations can adapt procedures to protect those universities. The
importance of preserving the independence of our research areas and the communities
seems to me to be a very fundamental kind of question about the protection of the integrity
of our universities and our research centers.
Admiral TURNER. You are saying that you feel that if we identify them privately to
themselves, we can benefit them in an adequate way to cover the risk that this will lead to a
more public disclosure? There are lots of the 80 who have not been identified publicly at
this point.
Senator KENNEDY. I think the universities themselves should be notified. I think then
the universities can take whatever steps in terms of their setting up the procedures to
protect. their own kinds of integrity in terms of the future. I would certainly hope that, they
would feel that they could make a public comment or a public statement on it. I think it is
of general public interest, particularly for the people that are involved in those universities,
to have some kind of awareness of whether they were. used or were not used and how they
were used.
I think they are entitled to it, and quite frankly, if there is a public official or an official of
the university that you notify and be wants
-37for his own particular reasons not to have it public, I don't see why those in a lesser echelon
or lower echelon who have been effectively used by it should not have the information as
well.
So, I would hope that you would notify the universities and then also indicate to the public.
I can't conceive that this information will not be put out in the newspapers, and it puts the
university people at an extraordinary disadvantage, and of course some of it is wrong,
which is the fact of the matter, and I think some university official saying, well, it isn't so,
is a lot different than if they know it is confirmed or it is not confirmed in terms of the
Agency itself. I think that there is a responsibility there.
Admiral TURNER. I have great sympathy with what you are saying. I have already
notified one institution because the involvement was so extensive that I thought they really
needed to protect themselves, and I am. most anxious to do this in whatever way will help
all of the people who were perhaps unwitting participants in this, and the difficulty I will
have is, I can't quite do, I think, what you suggested, in that I may not be able to tell an
institution of the extent and nature of its participation.
Senator KENNEDY. Well, you can tell them to the best of your information, and it seems
to me that just because the university or an individual is going to be embarrassed is not a
reason for classifying the information. So, I would hope -- I mean, I obviously speak as an
U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. 33... Page 6 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
individual Senator, but I feel that that is an incredible disservice to the innocent individuals
and I think, a disservice to the integrity of the, universities unless they are notified, to be
able to develop procedures you are developing with regards to your own institution and we
are trying to in terms of the Congress. Certainly the universities are entitled to the same.
Admiral TURNER. Yes. Not all of these, of course, were unwitting.
Senator KENNEDY. That's right.
Admiral TURNER. Many of them were witting, and therefore they can take all those
precautionary steps on their own, but I am perfectly open to doing this. I am only interested
in doing it in a way that when identifying a university it will not lead to the public
disclosure of the individuals, whom I am not allowed to disclose, and so on.
Senator KENNEDY. That could be done, it seems to me.
Admiral TURNER. So, we will see if we can devise a way of notifying these institutions
on a private basis so that they can then make their own decision whether their equities are
best served by their announcing it publicly or their attempting to maintain it-Senator KENNEDY. Or you. I wonder. What if they were to ask you to announce, or
indicate?
Admiral TURNER. My personal conscience, sir, at this time, is that I would be doing a
disservice to these universities if I notified the public.
Senator KENNEDY. Would you meet with some university officials and ask what their
views are or whether they feel that the preservation of the integrity of the universities
would be better served or not? I think that would be useful to find out from small, large,
private, and public universities' officials how they view the integrity-Admiral TURNER. Fine. I Will phone several university presidents today who are my
friends and who are not involved in this, and ask them what they think the equities would
be.
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. 33... Page 7 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
going to be credible. I would value it if you would get some input from universities as to
what they believe is the fairest way in terms of the preservation of the integrity of the
universities.
Let me, if I could, ask on the question of the uses of these safe houses, as I understand from
information that was provided to us in the course of our last committee, the testing of
various drugs on individuals happened at all social levels, high and low, it happened on
native Americans and also on foreign nationals. That is what I understand was the nature of
the project itself.
Now, I am just wondering whether those tests were conducted at the two locations on the
east coast and the west coast which were known as safe houses. To your knowledge, is that
correct?
Admiral TURNER. Yes.
Senator KENNEDY. In terms of the research in this particular program, it did not go
beyond the safe houses located on the east coast and the west coast? I believe I am correct
on that.
Admiral TURNER. That type of unwitting testing of sort of randomly selected
individuals, yes.
Senator KENNEDY. It was just located in those two places?
Admiral TURNER. To the best of our knowledge, there were only two locations.
Senator KENNEDY. Well, how do we interpret randomly selected?
Admiral TURNER. Well, as opposed to prisoners in a prison who were somehow
selected.
Senator KENNEDY. All right. Do you know from this information how many people
were recruited during this period?
Admiral TURNER. No idea.
Senator KENNEDY. Do you know approximately?
Admiral TURNER. I asked that question the other day, and we just don't have -apparently we are very -- well, either there were no records kept of the actual numbers and
types of people tested or they were destroyed.
Senator INOUYE. Senator Schweiker.
Senator SCHWEIKER. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Admiral Turner, I would like to come back to the experiments which may have been
conducted at the hospital research facilities which the CIA helped to finance. It wasn't clear
to me from your previous answers what kind of work was done there. I gather you are
unclear on that, too, from your remarks, yet I find in the CIA documentation which you
U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. 33... Page 8 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
have supplied us, a list describing some of the advantages the Agency hoped to gain. It
says:
(a) One-sixth of the total space in the new hospital wing will be available to the Chemical
Division of TSS * * *; (b) Agency sponsorship of sensitive research
-39projects will be completely deniable; (c) Full professional cover will be provided for up to
three biochemical employees of the Chemical Division; (d) Human patients and volunteers for
experimental use will be available under controlled clinical conditions with the full
supervision of
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. 33... Page 9 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Senator SCHWEIKER. Why did you delete that reference? Why is that still classified,
that particular project of whatever it is?
Admiral TURNER. I don't know this particular case. We will get you the exact answer to
that one and inform you about it, but it is quite probable that that other case is unrelated to
this in the -- well, not unrelated, but that that was a project that still deserves to be
classified.
[The material referred to follows:]
Construction of the Gorman Annex was begun in 1957 and the Annex was dedicated in March
1959. Of the several MKULTRA projects conducted at Georgetown only one involving human
testing covered a time span subsequent to March 1959. Subproject 45 ran from 1955 to 1963,
thus it is possible that the final four years 1959-1963) of the subproject could have been spent
in the Gorman Annex. However, there is no reference to the Gorman Annex or a "new Annex"
in Subproject 45 papers, neither is there any mention of the subproject moving to a new
location in 1959 or later years.
Authorization to contribute CIA funds toward construction of the Gorman Annex is contained
in Subproject 35 of MKULTRA. Recently discovered material indicated that Dr. Geschickter
continued his research for sleep- and amnesia-producing drugs under Project MKSEARCH
through July 1967 at Georgetown University Hospital. But it is impossible to determine if the
facilities of the Gorman Annex were involved.
-40Senator SCHWEIKER. I think that would give us a pretty good clue as to what was
going to be done in the wing the CIA helped to finance.
Was there any indication at all in the records you found that the project ultimately used
cancer patients or terminally ill patients in connection with this facility?
Admiral TURNER. I'm sorry. I missed your question because I was trying to get the data
on the last one. I will read you the blank.
Senator SCHWEIKER. Go ahead.
Admiral TURNER. QKHILLTOP. It doesn't help you, but-Senator SCHWEIKER. Can you tell us what that is, or is it still classified?
Admiral TURNER. I don't know, and I assume from the fact that we deleted it, it is still
classified, but I will get you that answer, sir.
Senator SCHWEIKER. Thank you. I'd like to see that information.
[See p. 171 for material referred to.]
U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. ... Page 10 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Now my next question was: Is there any indication, Admiral, that projects in that particular
center involved experimentation on terminally ill cancer patients?
Admiral TURNER. I missed the first part of your question, sir. I am very sorry.
Senator SCHWEIKER. Do you have any indication that some experiment in the facility
used terminally ill cancer patients as subjects? You do acknowledge in your statement and
it is clear from other documents that these kinds of experiments were at some point being
done somewhere. My question is, is there any indication that cancer patients or terminally
ill patients were experimented with in this wing?
Admiral TURNER. Yes, it does appear there is a connection here, sir.
Senator SCHWEIKER. The other question I had relates to the development of something
which has been called the perfect concussion. A series of experiments toward that end were
described in the CIA documents. I wonder if you would just tell us what your
understanding of perfect concussion is.
Admiral TURNER. Is that in my testimony, sir, or in some other document?
Senator SCHWEIKER. Subproject 54, MKULTRA, which involved examination of
techniques to cause brain concussions and amnesia by using weapons or sound waves to
strike individuals without giving and without leaving any clear physical marks. Someone
dubbed it "perfect concussion" -- maybe that was poetic license on the part of our staff
rather than your poets over there. I wonder if you could just tell us what brain concussion
experiments were about?
Admiral TURNER. This project, No. 54, was canceled, and never carried out.
Senator SCHWEIKER. Well, I do believe the first year of the project in 1955 was carried
out by the Office of Naval Research, according to the information that you supplied us.
The CIA seems to have been participating in some way at that point, because the records
go on to say that the experimenter at ONR found out about CIA's role, discovered that it
was a cover, and then the project was transferred to MKULTRA in 1956. Again, this is all
from the backup material you have given us. So, it was canceled at some time. I am not
disagreeing
-41with that, but apparently for at least a year or two, somebody was investigating the
production of brain concussions with special blackjacks, sound waves, and other methods
as detailed in the backup material.
Admiral TURNER. The data available to me is that this project was never funded by the
CIA, but I will double-check that and furnish the information for the record for you as to
whether there was ever any connection here and if so, what the nature of the work was.
U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. ... Page 11 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Senator SCHWEIKER. Yes; I would appreciate that. I would like to know how it went
from ONR to CIA after a year. Somebody made a decision to make that transfer, and to
make this an MKULTRA subject. There had to be some sort of review that led to a
decision to continue that kind of concussion -- total blackout, maximum amnesia, and
whatever else it was you were interested in -- study and testing.
Mr. LAUBINGER. Senator, if I may try to say a few words on that, the files that were
available to us for inspection, which are limited, indicated that there was a project being
carried on by the Navy having to do with the, effects of brain concussion. The CIA
developed an interest in that, and considered funding it, but actually never did, and as the
admiral testified, the MKULTRA is merely a funding mechanism, a place they go for
money to do such things, but there is no evidence that I know of that that project was ever
funded.
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. ... Page 12 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
-42Senator SCHWEIKER. Well, I am confused, because here again is another quote from a
document that we have seen, which you have released and supplied to us:
Following is the technical progress made under the current [deleted] contract: (a) Specializing
instrumentation and numerous testing techniques have been developed to obtain the desired
dynamic data; (b) considerable data has now been obtained supporting the resonancecavilation theory of brain concussion; and (c) preliminary acceleration threshold data has been
obtained for a fluid-filled glass simulated skull.
It goes on to talk about a blast range and a 2,500-square-foot laboratory. The document
notes that "Three blast test series have been run to date." It describes a special blackjack
device, "a pancake-type blackjack giving a high peak impact force with a low unit surface
pressure."
I agree the records are inconclusive as to the results of this work, but it certainly seems that
some testing was done.
Mr. LAUBINGER. Senator, you are putting us in the same position I think you were
stating that you were in earlier referring to documents not before us, but I believe you are
quoting from a proposal that someone sent to the Agency to fund this work, and he is
referring to past work. The past work would have encompassed a lot of things like that, but
CIA was not involved with that.
Senator SCHWEIKER. What do you mean, Admiral, on page 6 of your testimony when
you mention projects using magician's art? How do magicians get into the spook business?
Admiral TURNER. I have interpreted this as to how to slip the mickey into the finn, but I
would like to ask my advisers here to comment.
Mr. BRODY. I think that is essentially it, Senator. It is surreptitious administration of
material to someone, deceptive practices, how to distract someone's attention while you are
doing something else, as I understand it. It was also some type of a covert communication
project involved with the study of how magicians and their assistants perhaps communicate
information to one another without having other people know it. This is the type of thing
that was involved, sir.
Senator SCHWEIKER. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Senator INOUYE. Senator Huddleston?
Senator HUDDLESTON. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Admiral, in your checking these newly discovered documents and interviewing members
of the CIA staff, did you find information that would confirm the contention described by
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. ... Page 13 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
the reporters for the New York Times that this type of experimentation was begun out of a
fear that the Agency that foreign powers might have drugs which would allow them to alter
the behavior of American citizens or agents or members of the Armed Forces who were
taken into custody, and which would have resulted in false confessions and the like? Is my
question clear?
Admiral TURNER. Yes, sir. I haven't personally read the documentation on that. In my
discussions with the people who are well informed in this area at the Agency, I am told that
that is the case.
Senator HUDDLESTON. Was there any evidence or any indication that there were other
motives that the Agency might also be looking for drugs that could be applied for other
purposes, such as debilitating an individual or even killing another person? Was this part of
this kind of experimentation?
-43Admiral TURNER. Yes; I think there is. I have not seen in this series of documentation
evidence of desire to kill, but I think the project turned its character from a defensive to an
offensive one as it went along, and there certainly was an intention here to develop drugs
that could be of use.
Senator HUDDLESTON. The project continued for some time after it was learned that, in
fact, foreign powers did not have such a drug as was at first feared, didn't it?
Admiral TURNER. That is my understanding. Yes, sir.
Senator HUDDLESTON. Is there any indication that knowledge gained as a result of
these experiments has been useful or is being applied in any way to present operations?
Mr. BRODY. Senator, I am not sure if there is any body of knowledge. A great deal of
what there was, I gather, was destroyed in 1973. I would like to defer to Frank here. Do
you know of any?
Mr. LAUBINGER. I know of no drugs or anything like that developed under this program
that ever reached operational use or are in use today.
Senator HUDDLESTON. So apparently any information that was gathered was
apparently useless and not worth continuing, not worth further development on the part of
the Agency.
Mr. LAUBINGER. I am having difficulty hearing your questions.
Senator HUDDLESTON. I can hardly hear myself.
Admiral TURNER. I think the answer to your question is that we have no evidence of
great usefulness on this, and yet I think we should remember-U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. ... Page 14 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
-44Senator HUDDLESTON. You don't know whether any of your agents anywhere in the
world have been subjected to any kind of procedure like this?
Admiral TURNER. We certainly know of other powers conducting research in these
areas, yes.
Senator HUDDLESTON. Do you know how they go about that research?
Admiral TURNER. It is pretty sketchy, the information we have.
Senator HUDDLESTON. Do you know of any other organization in this country or any
institution that has conducted extensive research on unwitting individuals and through
unwitting institutions?
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. ... Page 15 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Admiral TURNER. Well, I have read something in the newspapers about this, but I have
not familiarized myself with it in specifies.
Senator HUDDLESTON. It is not a normal mode of operation for hitman research, is it?
Admiral TURNER. No, sir.
Senator HUDDLESTON. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Senator INOUYE. Senator Wallop?
Senator WALLOP. Mr. Chairman, I only have one to follow up on Senator Huddleston's
questions and my earlier ones. You are not really saying, are you Admiral Turner, that
there are no mind-altering drugs or behavior modification procedures which have been
used by foreign powers?
Admiral TURNER. No, sir, I am not.
Senator WALLOP. I drew that inference partly in answer to my question that you knew
of no truth serum. Maybe that is a misnomer, but surely there are relaxants that make
tongues looser than they would otherwise be. Isn't that true?
Admiral TURNER. Yes.
Senator WALLOP. So I think it is fair to say, too, that the experience of many American
prisoners of war in the Korean conflict would indicate that there are behavior modification
procedures in use by foreign powers of a fairly advanced degree of sophistication.
Admiral TURNER. Yes, sir.
Senator WALLOP. Again, I will just go back and say I think this must have been part of
the motivation. I don't think you would have mentioned Cardinal Mindszenty had you
thought his behavior was normal at the time or had anybody else. So, I would just again
say I think it is a little bit scapegoating. I don't think the object of this hearing is in any way
to lay blame on those passed or those dead or otherwise, but I think it is a little bit
scapegoating to say that it stopped with the directors of the CIA or the DCT's of the time.
Also I think it is a little bit scapegoating, to say they didn't even know it, but that it was
some lower echelon acting alone.
I think this was a behavior pattern that was prevalent in those years, and I think the object
lesson is that we have discovered, we think and we hope, through your assurances and
other activities of the Congress, means of avoiding future incidents of that kind. I thank
you, Mr. Chairman.
Senator INOUYE. Senator Chafee?
Senator CHAFEE. No questions.
Senator INOUYE. Senator Kennedy, I think you have another question.
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. ... Page 16 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
-45Senator KENNEDY. Just talking about the two safe houses on the east and west, coast as
being the sources for the unwitting trials, now, the importance of this and the magnitude of
it, I think, is of significance, because we have seen from your records that these we're used
over a period of 8 or 9 years, and the numbers could have been considerable. You are
unable to determine, at least, in your own research, what the numbers would be, and what
the drugs were, how many people were involved, but it could have been considerable
during this period of time.
It would certainly appear to me in examining the documents and the flow charts of cash
slips that were expended in these areas that it was considerable, but that is a judgmental
factor on it, but I think it is important to try and find out what the Agency is attempting to
do to get to the bottom of it.
Now, the principal agent that was involved as I understand it is deceased and has been
deceased for 2 years. The overall agent, Mr. Gottlieb, has indicated a fuzzy memory about
this whole area. He has testified before the Intelligence Committee. Yet he was responsible
for the whole program. Then, the Director had indicated the destruction of the various
materials and unfamiliarity with the project.
Now, you have indicated in your testimony today that there are two additional agents on
page 9 of your testimony, you indicated there were two additional agents which you have
uncovered at the bottom of it, and you say the names of CIA officials who approved or
monitored the various projects. You talk about the two additional agents in your testimony.
Now, I am just wondering if you intend to interview those agents to find out exactly what
is being done. I suppose, first of all, shouldn't the project manager know what was being
done?
Admiral TURNER. Our first problem, Senator, is that we have been unable to associate
an individual with those names at this point. We are still burrowing to find out who these
people are. We haven't identified them as having been CIA employees, and we don't know
whether these were false names.
Senator KENNEDY. You are tracking that down, as I understand it?
Admiral TURNER. Yes, sir.
Senator KENNEDY. You are tracking that. down, and you have every intention of
interviewing those people to find out whatever you can about the program and project?
Admiral TURNER. My only hesitation here is whether I will do this or the Justice
Department.
Senator KENNEDY. It will be pursued, though, I understand?
U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. ... Page 17 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. ... Page 18 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
-47who, if either of us, should get into discussions with Dr. Gottlieb so as not to prejudice any
legal rights that may be involved here, or to appear in any way to be improper.
Senator KENNEDY. Well, do I understand you have not contacted the Justice Department
about this particular case since the development of this new material about Gottlieb?
Admiral TURNER. Not about Gottlieb specifically. We have contacted him.
Senator KENNEDY. Well, it is amazing to me. I mean, can you understand the difficulty
that any of us might have in terms of comprehending that when you develop a whole new
series of materials that are on the front page of every newspaper in the country and are on
every television, I mean, that means something, but it does not mean nearly as much as the
interest that we have in the fact about the testing of unwitting Americans, and every single
document that the staff reviews has Mr. Gottlieb's name on it and you come to tell us that
we don't have to worry any more, we have these other final facts, and Mr. Gottlieb has not
been talked to?
Admiral TURNER. Sir, I am not saying that these are in any way the final facts. I am
saying these are all the facts we have available.
U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. ... Page 19 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Senator KENNEDY. And you have not talked to the person who was in charge of the
program, so what kind of value or what kind of weight can we give it?
Admiral TURNER. We are happy to talk to him. I think the issue here again is one of
propriety and how to go about this. We have not, I believe, enough new information about
Gottlieb's participation here to signal that his interview would be that much more revealing
than what was revealed in 1975.
Senator KENNEDY. The importance of it, I think, from our point of view, is, he would
know the drugs that were administered, the volume of drugs, how it was administered, and
in terms of your ability to follow lip to protect these people and their health, to the extent
that it can be done, that opportunity is being lost.
I want to get on to some others, but will you give us the assurance that you will get ahold
of Gottlieb or that you will talk to Attorney General Bell and talk with Gottlieb?
Admiral TURNER. Yes, sir.
Senator KENNEDY. And let us know as to the extent of it. I don't see how we can fulfill
our responsibility in this area on the drug testing without our hearing from Gottlieb as well,
but I think it is important that you do so, particularly since all of the materials have been
destroyed.
These other two agents, have they talked to them?
Admiral TURNER. We don't, know who they are, sir. We are trying to track down and
see whether these names can be related to anybody.
Senator KENNEDY. That is under active investigation by the Agency?
Admiral TURNER. Yes, sir.
Senator KENNEDY. And you have the intention of talking to those people when you
locate them. Is that correct?
Admiral TURNER. Yes, sir, under the same circumstances as Gottlieb.
Senator KENNEDY. And you have people working on it? Admiral TURNER. Yes, sir.
-48Senator KENNEDY. With regards to the activities that took place in these safe houses, as
I understand from the records, two-way mirrors were used. Is that your understanding?
Admiral TURNER. Yes, sir. We have records that construction was done to put in twoway mirrors.
U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. ... Page 20 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. ... Page 21 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
-49and the new documentation and the new memoranda -- and he did not have the checks at
that time -- and with the wide variety of different memoranda with his name on it, his
memory could be stimulated on that.
Thank you.
Senator INOUYE. I would like to thank the admiral and his staff for participating in this
hearing. I believe the record should show that this hearing was held at the request of the
Agency and the admiral. It was not held because we insisted upon it. It was a volunteer
effort on the part of the Agency. I think the record should also indicate that Admiral Turner
has forwarded to this committee a classified file, including all of the names of the
institutions and the persons involved as the experimentors.
I should also indicate that this hearing is just one step involved in the committee's
investigation of drug abuse. Just as you have had much work in going over the 8,000
pages, the staff of this committee has had equal problems, but I would like the record to
show that you have made these papers and documents available to the committee. I thank
you for that.
As part of the ongoing investigation, we had intended to call upon many dozens of others,
experimentors, or those officials in charge, and one of those will be Dr. Gottlieb.
In thanking you, I would like to say this to the American people, that what we have
experienced this morning in this committee room is not being duplicated in any other
committee room in any other part of the world. I doubt that very much. Our Agency and
our intelligence community has been under much criticism and has been subjected to much
abuse, in many cases justified, but this is the most open society that I can think of. For
example, in Great Britain there are about six people who are aware of the identity of the
man in charge of intelligence. In other countries, similar conditions exist. Here in the
United States we not only know Admiral Turner, we have had open hearings with him,
such as this. The confirmation hearings were all open.
In a few weeks, the Senate of the United States will debate a resolution to decide upon
whether we should disclose the amounts and funds being used for counterintelligence and
national intelligence. I would hope that, in presenting this issue to the public, the media
will take note that the Agency has cooperated and will continue to. The abuse that we have
learned about this morning is one I hope will never happen again, but without constant
oversight on the part of the Executive Office, on the part of the Congress, it could happen
again. It is important, therefore that we continue in this oversight activity.
So, once, again, Admiral, I thank yon very much for helping us. We will continue to call
upon you for your assistance. We would like to submit to you several questions that the
members and staff have prepared. I hope you will look them over carefully and prepare
responses for the record, sir.
Senator KENNEDY. Mr. Chairman?
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. ... Page 22 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
-50I have found him personally to be extremely responsive, and it is a very difficult challenge
which lie has accepted in heading this Agency. I want you to know, personally, I, too,
would like to see this put behind us. I don't think we are quite there yet in terms of this
particular area that we are interested in. I think the Intelligence Committee has special
responsibilities in this area of the testing, so we look forward to working with you in
expediting the time that we can put it behind, but it does seem to me that we have to dig in
and finish the chapter. So, I want to personally express my appreciation to you, Admiral
Turner, and thank you for your cooperation and your help, and I look forward to working
with you.
Admiral TURNER. Thank you.
Senator HUDDLESTON. Mr. Chairman, I am not sure you emphasized this enough, but I
think the record ought to show that Admiral Turner informed the Select Committee on his
own initiative when the new documentation was found. The documentation has been made
available to us voluntarily, in a spirit of cooperation.
I think this shows a vast difference from the mode of operation that existed prior to the
formation at least of the Church committee, and a difference that is very helpful.
Senator INOUYE. Thank you very much. Thank you very much, Admiral.
We would now like to call upon Mr. Philip Goldman and Mr. John Gittinger.
Mr. Goldman and Mr. Gittinger, will you please rise and take the oath.
Do you solemnly swear that the testimony you are about to give is the truth, the whole truth
and nothing but the truth, so help you, God?
Mr. GOLDMAN. I do.
Mr. GITTINGER. I do.
Senator INOUYE. Thank you, sir.
Mr. Goldman, will you identify yourself, and after that, Mr. Gittinger.
Senator KENNEDY. Before we start in, we had a third witness, Mr. Chairman, Mr.
Pasternac, who planned to testify, traveled to Washington -- he, lives in Washington, and
U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. ... Page 23 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
was contacted recently --with the intention of testifying this morning. And something -- he
called us late this morning and indicated that he wanted to get a counsel before he would
wish to testify.
Senator INOUYE. Mr. Goldman.
Mr. Goldman, will you identify yourself, sir.
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. 33... Page 1 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Historical References
General Histories | Ancient History | 1800-1850 | 1860 | 1870 | 1880 | 1890
1900 | 1910 | 1920 | 1930 | 1940 | 1950 | 1960 | 1970 | 1980 | 1990
Table of Contents
-34Admiral Turner, I appreciate that these tawdry activities were taking place long before your
watch, and I think you have correctly labeled them as abhorrent, but not only were they
abhorrent, it seems to me that they wee rather bungled, amateurish experiments that don't
seem to have been handled in a very scientific way, at least from the scanty evidence we
have.
It seems to me that there were a minimum of reports and the Agency didn't have the ability
to call it quits. It went on for some 12 years, as you mentioned. What I would like to get to
is, are you convinced now in your Agency that those scientific experiments, legitimate
ones that you were conducting with polygraph and so forth, were being conducted in a
scientific manner and that you are handling it in a correct manner to get the best
information that you are seeking in the end?
U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. 33... Page 2 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Admiral TURNER. Yes, I am, and I also have a sense of confidence that we are limiting
ourselves to the areas where we need to be involved as opposed to areas where we can rely
on others.
Senator CHAFEE. I am convinced of that from your report. I just do hope that you have
people who are trained in not only handling this type of experiment, but in preparing the
proper reports and drawing the proper data from the reports. You are convinced that you
have this type of people?
Admiral TURNER. Yes, sir.
Senator CHAFEE. The second point I am interested in was the final lines in your
testimony here, which I believe are very important, and that is that the Agency is doing all
it can in cooperation with other branches of the Government to go about tracking down the
identity of those who were in some way adversely affected, and see what can be done to
fulfill the government's responsibilities in that respect. I might add that I commend you in
that, and I hope you will pursue it vigorously.
A hospital in my State was involved in these proceedings, and it is unclear exactly what did
take place, so I have both a parochial interest in this and a national interest as well, and I do
hope you will press on with it. It involves not only you, I appreciate, but also HEW and
perhaps the Attorney General.
Admiral TURNER. Thank you, sir. We will.
Senator CHAFEE. Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Senator INOUYE. Thank you very much.
Admiral Turner, MKULTRA subproject 3 was a project involving the surreptitious
administration of LSD on unwitting persons, was it not?
Admiral TURNER. Yes, sir.
Senator INOUYE. In February 1954, and this was in the very early stages of MKULTRA,
the Director of Central Intelligence wrote to the technical services staff officials criticizing
their judgment because they had participated in an experiment involving the administration
of LSD on an unwitting basis to Dr. Frank Olson, who later committed suicide. Now, the
individuals criticized were the same individuals who were responsible for subproject 3,
involving exactly the same practices. Even though these individuals were clearly aware of
the dangers of surreptitious administration and had been criticized by the Director
-35of Central Intelligence, subproject 3 was not terminated immediately after Dr. Olson's
death.
U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. 33... Page 3 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
In fact, according to documents, it continued for a number of years. Can you provide this
committee with any explanation of how such testing could have continued under these
circumstances?
Admiral TURNER. No, sir, I really can't.
Senator INOUYE. Are the individuals in technical services who carried on subproject 3
still on the CIA payroll?
Admiral TURNER. I am sorry. Are you asking, are they today?
Senator INOUYE. Yes.
Admiral TURNER. No, sir.
Senator INOUYE. What would you do if you criticized officials of the technical services
staff and they continued to carry on experimentation for a number of years?
Admiral TURNER. I would do two things, sir. One is, I would be sure at the beginning
that I was explicit enough that they knew that I didn't want that to be continued anywhere
else, and two, if I found it being continued, I would roll some heads.
Senator INOUYE. Could you provide this committee with information as to whether the
individuals involved had their heads rolled?
Admiral TURNER. I don't believe there is any evidence they did, but I will double check
that.
[See p. 170 for material referred to.]
Senator INOUYE. As you know, Senator Huddleston and his subcommittee are deeply
involved in the drafting of charters and guidelines for the intelligence community. We will
be meeting with the President tomorrow. Our concern is, I think, a basic one. Can anything
like this occur again?
Admiral TURNER. I think it would be very, very unlikely, first, because we are all much
more conscious of these issues than we were back in the fifties, second, because we have
such thorough oversight procedures. I cannot imagine that this kind of activity could take
place today without some member of the CIA itself bypassing me, if I were authorizing
this, and writing to the Intelligence Oversight Board, and blowing the whistle on this kind
of activity.
I am also doing my very best, sir, to encourage an openness with myself and a free
communication in the Agency, so that I am the one who finds these things if they should
happen. The fact is that we must keep you and your committee and now the new committee
in the House informed of our sensitive activities. I think all of these add up to a degree of
scrutiny such that this kind of extensive and flagrant activity could not happen today
without it coming to the attention of the proper authorities to stop it.
Senator INOUYE. A sad aspect of the MKULTRA project was that it naturally involved
U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. 33... Page 4 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. 33... Page 5 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
get smeared all over the newspapers in spite of all the security steps that have been taken.
It seems to me that those universities should be entitled to that information, so that the ones
with other administrations can adapt procedures to protect those universities. The
importance of preserving the independence of our research areas and the communities
seems to me to be a very fundamental kind of question about the protection of the integrity
of our universities and our research centers.
Admiral TURNER. You are saying that you feel that if we identify them privately to
themselves, we can benefit them in an adequate way to cover the risk that this will lead to a
more public disclosure? There are lots of the 80 who have not been identified publicly at
this point.
Senator KENNEDY. I think the universities themselves should be notified. I think then
the universities can take whatever steps in terms of their setting up the procedures to
protect. their own kinds of integrity in terms of the future. I would certainly hope that, they
would feel that they could make a public comment or a public statement on it. I think it is
of general public interest, particularly for the people that are involved in those universities,
to have some kind of awareness of whether they were. used or were not used and how they
were used.
I think they are entitled to it, and quite frankly, if there is a public official or an official of
the university that you notify and be wants
-37for his own particular reasons not to have it public, I don't see why those in a lesser echelon
or lower echelon who have been effectively used by it should not have the information as
well.
So, I would hope that you would notify the universities and then also indicate to the public.
I can't conceive that this information will not be put out in the newspapers, and it puts the
university people at an extraordinary disadvantage, and of course some of it is wrong,
which is the fact of the matter, and I think some university official saying, well, it isn't so,
is a lot different than if they know it is confirmed or it is not confirmed in terms of the
Agency itself. I think that there is a responsibility there.
Admiral TURNER. I have great sympathy with what you are saying. I have already
notified one institution because the involvement was so extensive that I thought they really
needed to protect themselves, and I am. most anxious to do this in whatever way will help
all of the people who were perhaps unwitting participants in this, and the difficulty I will
have is, I can't quite do, I think, what you suggested, in that I may not be able to tell an
institution of the extent and nature of its participation.
Senator KENNEDY. Well, you can tell them to the best of your information, and it seems
to me that just because the university or an individual is going to be embarrassed is not a
reason for classifying the information. So, I would hope -- I mean, I obviously speak as an
U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. 33... Page 6 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
individual Senator, but I feel that that is an incredible disservice to the innocent individuals
and I think, a disservice to the integrity of the, universities unless they are notified, to be
able to develop procedures you are developing with regards to your own institution and we
are trying to in terms of the Congress. Certainly the universities are entitled to the same.
Admiral TURNER. Yes. Not all of these, of course, were unwitting.
Senator KENNEDY. That's right.
Admiral TURNER. Many of them were witting, and therefore they can take all those
precautionary steps on their own, but I am perfectly open to doing this. I am only interested
in doing it in a way that when identifying a university it will not lead to the public
disclosure of the individuals, whom I am not allowed to disclose, and so on.
Senator KENNEDY. That could be done, it seems to me.
Admiral TURNER. So, we will see if we can devise a way of notifying these institutions
on a private basis so that they can then make their own decision whether their equities are
best served by their announcing it publicly or their attempting to maintain it-Senator KENNEDY. Or you. I wonder. What if they were to ask you to announce, or
indicate?
Admiral TURNER. My personal conscience, sir, at this time, is that I would be doing a
disservice to these universities if I notified the public.
Senator KENNEDY. Would you meet with some university officials and ask what their
views are or whether they feel that the preservation of the integrity of the universities
would be better served or not? I think that would be useful to find out from small, large,
private, and public universities' officials how they view the integrity-Admiral TURNER. Fine. I Will phone several university presidents today who are my
friends and who are not involved in this, and ask them what they think the equities would
be.
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. 33... Page 7 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
going to be credible. I would value it if you would get some input from universities as to
what they believe is the fairest way in terms of the preservation of the integrity of the
universities.
Let me, if I could, ask on the question of the uses of these safe houses, as I understand from
information that was provided to us in the course of our last committee, the testing of
various drugs on individuals happened at all social levels, high and low, it happened on
native Americans and also on foreign nationals. That is what I understand was the nature of
the project itself.
Now, I am just wondering whether those tests were conducted at the two locations on the
east coast and the west coast which were known as safe houses. To your knowledge, is that
correct?
Admiral TURNER. Yes.
Senator KENNEDY. In terms of the research in this particular program, it did not go
beyond the safe houses located on the east coast and the west coast? I believe I am correct
on that.
Admiral TURNER. That type of unwitting testing of sort of randomly selected
individuals, yes.
Senator KENNEDY. It was just located in those two places?
Admiral TURNER. To the best of our knowledge, there were only two locations.
Senator KENNEDY. Well, how do we interpret randomly selected?
Admiral TURNER. Well, as opposed to prisoners in a prison who were somehow
selected.
Senator KENNEDY. All right. Do you know from this information how many people
were recruited during this period?
Admiral TURNER. No idea.
Senator KENNEDY. Do you know approximately?
Admiral TURNER. I asked that question the other day, and we just don't have -apparently we are very -- well, either there were no records kept of the actual numbers and
types of people tested or they were destroyed.
Senator INOUYE. Senator Schweiker.
Senator SCHWEIKER. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Admiral Turner, I would like to come back to the experiments which may have been
conducted at the hospital research facilities which the CIA helped to finance. It wasn't clear
to me from your previous answers what kind of work was done there. I gather you are
unclear on that, too, from your remarks, yet I find in the CIA documentation which you
U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. 33... Page 8 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
have supplied us, a list describing some of the advantages the Agency hoped to gain. It
says:
(a) One-sixth of the total space in the new hospital wing will be available to the Chemical
Division of TSS * * *; (b) Agency sponsorship of sensitive research
-39projects will be completely deniable; (c) Full professional cover will be provided for up to
three biochemical employees of the Chemical Division; (d) Human patients and volunteers for
experimental use will be available under controlled clinical conditions with the full
supervision of
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. 33... Page 9 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Senator SCHWEIKER. Why did you delete that reference? Why is that still classified,
that particular project of whatever it is?
Admiral TURNER. I don't know this particular case. We will get you the exact answer to
that one and inform you about it, but it is quite probable that that other case is unrelated to
this in the -- well, not unrelated, but that that was a project that still deserves to be
classified.
[The material referred to follows:]
Construction of the Gorman Annex was begun in 1957 and the Annex was dedicated in March
1959. Of the several MKULTRA projects conducted at Georgetown only one involving human
testing covered a time span subsequent to March 1959. Subproject 45 ran from 1955 to 1963,
thus it is possible that the final four years 1959-1963) of the subproject could have been spent
in the Gorman Annex. However, there is no reference to the Gorman Annex or a "new Annex"
in Subproject 45 papers, neither is there any mention of the subproject moving to a new
location in 1959 or later years.
Authorization to contribute CIA funds toward construction of the Gorman Annex is contained
in Subproject 35 of MKULTRA. Recently discovered material indicated that Dr. Geschickter
continued his research for sleep- and amnesia-producing drugs under Project MKSEARCH
through July 1967 at Georgetown University Hospital. But it is impossible to determine if the
facilities of the Gorman Annex were involved.
-40Senator SCHWEIKER. I think that would give us a pretty good clue as to what was
going to be done in the wing the CIA helped to finance.
Was there any indication at all in the records you found that the project ultimately used
cancer patients or terminally ill patients in connection with this facility?
Admiral TURNER. I'm sorry. I missed your question because I was trying to get the data
on the last one. I will read you the blank.
Senator SCHWEIKER. Go ahead.
Admiral TURNER. QKHILLTOP. It doesn't help you, but-Senator SCHWEIKER. Can you tell us what that is, or is it still classified?
Admiral TURNER. I don't know, and I assume from the fact that we deleted it, it is still
classified, but I will get you that answer, sir.
Senator SCHWEIKER. Thank you. I'd like to see that information.
[See p. 171 for material referred to.]
U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. ... Page 10 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Now my next question was: Is there any indication, Admiral, that projects in that particular
center involved experimentation on terminally ill cancer patients?
Admiral TURNER. I missed the first part of your question, sir. I am very sorry.
Senator SCHWEIKER. Do you have any indication that some experiment in the facility
used terminally ill cancer patients as subjects? You do acknowledge in your statement and
it is clear from other documents that these kinds of experiments were at some point being
done somewhere. My question is, is there any indication that cancer patients or terminally
ill patients were experimented with in this wing?
Admiral TURNER. Yes, it does appear there is a connection here, sir.
Senator SCHWEIKER. The other question I had relates to the development of something
which has been called the perfect concussion. A series of experiments toward that end were
described in the CIA documents. I wonder if you would just tell us what your
understanding of perfect concussion is.
Admiral TURNER. Is that in my testimony, sir, or in some other document?
Senator SCHWEIKER. Subproject 54, MKULTRA, which involved examination of
techniques to cause brain concussions and amnesia by using weapons or sound waves to
strike individuals without giving and without leaving any clear physical marks. Someone
dubbed it "perfect concussion" -- maybe that was poetic license on the part of our staff
rather than your poets over there. I wonder if you could just tell us what brain concussion
experiments were about?
Admiral TURNER. This project, No. 54, was canceled, and never carried out.
Senator SCHWEIKER. Well, I do believe the first year of the project in 1955 was carried
out by the Office of Naval Research, according to the information that you supplied us.
The CIA seems to have been participating in some way at that point, because the records
go on to say that the experimenter at ONR found out about CIA's role, discovered that it
was a cover, and then the project was transferred to MKULTRA in 1956. Again, this is all
from the backup material you have given us. So, it was canceled at some time. I am not
disagreeing
-41with that, but apparently for at least a year or two, somebody was investigating the
production of brain concussions with special blackjacks, sound waves, and other methods
as detailed in the backup material.
Admiral TURNER. The data available to me is that this project was never funded by the
CIA, but I will double-check that and furnish the information for the record for you as to
whether there was ever any connection here and if so, what the nature of the work was.
U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. ... Page 11 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Senator SCHWEIKER. Yes; I would appreciate that. I would like to know how it went
from ONR to CIA after a year. Somebody made a decision to make that transfer, and to
make this an MKULTRA subject. There had to be some sort of review that led to a
decision to continue that kind of concussion -- total blackout, maximum amnesia, and
whatever else it was you were interested in -- study and testing.
Mr. LAUBINGER. Senator, if I may try to say a few words on that, the files that were
available to us for inspection, which are limited, indicated that there was a project being
carried on by the Navy having to do with the, effects of brain concussion. The CIA
developed an interest in that, and considered funding it, but actually never did, and as the
admiral testified, the MKULTRA is merely a funding mechanism, a place they go for
money to do such things, but there is no evidence that I know of that that project was ever
funded.
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. ... Page 12 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
-42Senator SCHWEIKER. Well, I am confused, because here again is another quote from a
document that we have seen, which you have released and supplied to us:
Following is the technical progress made under the current [deleted] contract: (a) Specializing
instrumentation and numerous testing techniques have been developed to obtain the desired
dynamic data; (b) considerable data has now been obtained supporting the resonancecavilation theory of brain concussion; and (c) preliminary acceleration threshold data has been
obtained for a fluid-filled glass simulated skull.
It goes on to talk about a blast range and a 2,500-square-foot laboratory. The document
notes that "Three blast test series have been run to date." It describes a special blackjack
device, "a pancake-type blackjack giving a high peak impact force with a low unit surface
pressure."
I agree the records are inconclusive as to the results of this work, but it certainly seems that
some testing was done.
Mr. LAUBINGER. Senator, you are putting us in the same position I think you were
stating that you were in earlier referring to documents not before us, but I believe you are
quoting from a proposal that someone sent to the Agency to fund this work, and he is
referring to past work. The past work would have encompassed a lot of things like that, but
CIA was not involved with that.
Senator SCHWEIKER. What do you mean, Admiral, on page 6 of your testimony when
you mention projects using magician's art? How do magicians get into the spook business?
Admiral TURNER. I have interpreted this as to how to slip the mickey into the finn, but I
would like to ask my advisers here to comment.
Mr. BRODY. I think that is essentially it, Senator. It is surreptitious administration of
material to someone, deceptive practices, how to distract someone's attention while you are
doing something else, as I understand it. It was also some type of a covert communication
project involved with the study of how magicians and their assistants perhaps communicate
information to one another without having other people know it. This is the type of thing
that was involved, sir.
Senator SCHWEIKER. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Senator INOUYE. Senator Huddleston?
Senator HUDDLESTON. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Admiral, in your checking these newly discovered documents and interviewing members
of the CIA staff, did you find information that would confirm the contention described by
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. ... Page 13 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
the reporters for the New York Times that this type of experimentation was begun out of a
fear that the Agency that foreign powers might have drugs which would allow them to alter
the behavior of American citizens or agents or members of the Armed Forces who were
taken into custody, and which would have resulted in false confessions and the like? Is my
question clear?
Admiral TURNER. Yes, sir. I haven't personally read the documentation on that. In my
discussions with the people who are well informed in this area at the Agency, I am told that
that is the case.
Senator HUDDLESTON. Was there any evidence or any indication that there were other
motives that the Agency might also be looking for drugs that could be applied for other
purposes, such as debilitating an individual or even killing another person? Was this part of
this kind of experimentation?
-43Admiral TURNER. Yes; I think there is. I have not seen in this series of documentation
evidence of desire to kill, but I think the project turned its character from a defensive to an
offensive one as it went along, and there certainly was an intention here to develop drugs
that could be of use.
Senator HUDDLESTON. The project continued for some time after it was learned that, in
fact, foreign powers did not have such a drug as was at first feared, didn't it?
Admiral TURNER. That is my understanding. Yes, sir.
Senator HUDDLESTON. Is there any indication that knowledge gained as a result of
these experiments has been useful or is being applied in any way to present operations?
Mr. BRODY. Senator, I am not sure if there is any body of knowledge. A great deal of
what there was, I gather, was destroyed in 1973. I would like to defer to Frank here. Do
you know of any?
Mr. LAUBINGER. I know of no drugs or anything like that developed under this program
that ever reached operational use or are in use today.
Senator HUDDLESTON. So apparently any information that was gathered was
apparently useless and not worth continuing, not worth further development on the part of
the Agency.
Mr. LAUBINGER. I am having difficulty hearing your questions.
Senator HUDDLESTON. I can hardly hear myself.
Admiral TURNER. I think the answer to your question is that we have no evidence of
great usefulness on this, and yet I think we should remember-U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. ... Page 14 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
-44Senator HUDDLESTON. You don't know whether any of your agents anywhere in the
world have been subjected to any kind of procedure like this?
Admiral TURNER. We certainly know of other powers conducting research in these
areas, yes.
Senator HUDDLESTON. Do you know how they go about that research?
Admiral TURNER. It is pretty sketchy, the information we have.
Senator HUDDLESTON. Do you know of any other organization in this country or any
institution that has conducted extensive research on unwitting individuals and through
unwitting institutions?
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. ... Page 15 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Admiral TURNER. Well, I have read something in the newspapers about this, but I have
not familiarized myself with it in specifies.
Senator HUDDLESTON. It is not a normal mode of operation for hitman research, is it?
Admiral TURNER. No, sir.
Senator HUDDLESTON. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Senator INOUYE. Senator Wallop?
Senator WALLOP. Mr. Chairman, I only have one to follow up on Senator Huddleston's
questions and my earlier ones. You are not really saying, are you Admiral Turner, that
there are no mind-altering drugs or behavior modification procedures which have been
used by foreign powers?
Admiral TURNER. No, sir, I am not.
Senator WALLOP. I drew that inference partly in answer to my question that you knew
of no truth serum. Maybe that is a misnomer, but surely there are relaxants that make
tongues looser than they would otherwise be. Isn't that true?
Admiral TURNER. Yes.
Senator WALLOP. So I think it is fair to say, too, that the experience of many American
prisoners of war in the Korean conflict would indicate that there are behavior modification
procedures in use by foreign powers of a fairly advanced degree of sophistication.
Admiral TURNER. Yes, sir.
Senator WALLOP. Again, I will just go back and say I think this must have been part of
the motivation. I don't think you would have mentioned Cardinal Mindszenty had you
thought his behavior was normal at the time or had anybody else. So, I would just again
say I think it is a little bit scapegoating. I don't think the object of this hearing is in any way
to lay blame on those passed or those dead or otherwise, but I think it is a little bit
scapegoating to say that it stopped with the directors of the CIA or the DCT's of the time.
Also I think it is a little bit scapegoating, to say they didn't even know it, but that it was
some lower echelon acting alone.
I think this was a behavior pattern that was prevalent in those years, and I think the object
lesson is that we have discovered, we think and we hope, through your assurances and
other activities of the Congress, means of avoiding future incidents of that kind. I thank
you, Mr. Chairman.
Senator INOUYE. Senator Chafee?
Senator CHAFEE. No questions.
Senator INOUYE. Senator Kennedy, I think you have another question.
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. ... Page 16 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
-45Senator KENNEDY. Just talking about the two safe houses on the east and west, coast as
being the sources for the unwitting trials, now, the importance of this and the magnitude of
it, I think, is of significance, because we have seen from your records that these we're used
over a period of 8 or 9 years, and the numbers could have been considerable. You are
unable to determine, at least, in your own research, what the numbers would be, and what
the drugs were, how many people were involved, but it could have been considerable
during this period of time.
It would certainly appear to me in examining the documents and the flow charts of cash
slips that were expended in these areas that it was considerable, but that is a judgmental
factor on it, but I think it is important to try and find out what the Agency is attempting to
do to get to the bottom of it.
Now, the principal agent that was involved as I understand it is deceased and has been
deceased for 2 years. The overall agent, Mr. Gottlieb, has indicated a fuzzy memory about
this whole area. He has testified before the Intelligence Committee. Yet he was responsible
for the whole program. Then, the Director had indicated the destruction of the various
materials and unfamiliarity with the project.
Now, you have indicated in your testimony today that there are two additional agents on
page 9 of your testimony, you indicated there were two additional agents which you have
uncovered at the bottom of it, and you say the names of CIA officials who approved or
monitored the various projects. You talk about the two additional agents in your testimony.
Now, I am just wondering if you intend to interview those agents to find out exactly what
is being done. I suppose, first of all, shouldn't the project manager know what was being
done?
Admiral TURNER. Our first problem, Senator, is that we have been unable to associate
an individual with those names at this point. We are still burrowing to find out who these
people are. We haven't identified them as having been CIA employees, and we don't know
whether these were false names.
Senator KENNEDY. You are tracking that down, as I understand it?
Admiral TURNER. Yes, sir.
Senator KENNEDY. You are tracking that. down, and you have every intention of
interviewing those people to find out whatever you can about the program and project?
Admiral TURNER. My only hesitation here is whether I will do this or the Justice
Department.
Senator KENNEDY. It will be pursued, though, I understand?
U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. ... Page 17 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. ... Page 18 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
-47who, if either of us, should get into discussions with Dr. Gottlieb so as not to prejudice any
legal rights that may be involved here, or to appear in any way to be improper.
Senator KENNEDY. Well, do I understand you have not contacted the Justice Department
about this particular case since the development of this new material about Gottlieb?
Admiral TURNER. Not about Gottlieb specifically. We have contacted him.
Senator KENNEDY. Well, it is amazing to me. I mean, can you understand the difficulty
that any of us might have in terms of comprehending that when you develop a whole new
series of materials that are on the front page of every newspaper in the country and are on
every television, I mean, that means something, but it does not mean nearly as much as the
interest that we have in the fact about the testing of unwitting Americans, and every single
document that the staff reviews has Mr. Gottlieb's name on it and you come to tell us that
we don't have to worry any more, we have these other final facts, and Mr. Gottlieb has not
been talked to?
Admiral TURNER. Sir, I am not saying that these are in any way the final facts. I am
saying these are all the facts we have available.
U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. ... Page 19 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Senator KENNEDY. And you have not talked to the person who was in charge of the
program, so what kind of value or what kind of weight can we give it?
Admiral TURNER. We are happy to talk to him. I think the issue here again is one of
propriety and how to go about this. We have not, I believe, enough new information about
Gottlieb's participation here to signal that his interview would be that much more revealing
than what was revealed in 1975.
Senator KENNEDY. The importance of it, I think, from our point of view, is, he would
know the drugs that were administered, the volume of drugs, how it was administered, and
in terms of your ability to follow lip to protect these people and their health, to the extent
that it can be done, that opportunity is being lost.
I want to get on to some others, but will you give us the assurance that you will get ahold
of Gottlieb or that you will talk to Attorney General Bell and talk with Gottlieb?
Admiral TURNER. Yes, sir.
Senator KENNEDY. And let us know as to the extent of it. I don't see how we can fulfill
our responsibility in this area on the drug testing without our hearing from Gottlieb as well,
but I think it is important that you do so, particularly since all of the materials have been
destroyed.
These other two agents, have they talked to them?
Admiral TURNER. We don't, know who they are, sir. We are trying to track down and
see whether these names can be related to anybody.
Senator KENNEDY. That is under active investigation by the Agency?
Admiral TURNER. Yes, sir.
Senator KENNEDY. And you have the intention of talking to those people when you
locate them. Is that correct?
Admiral TURNER. Yes, sir, under the same circumstances as Gottlieb.
Senator KENNEDY. And you have people working on it? Admiral TURNER. Yes, sir.
-48Senator KENNEDY. With regards to the activities that took place in these safe houses, as
I understand from the records, two-way mirrors were used. Is that your understanding?
Admiral TURNER. Yes, sir. We have records that construction was done to put in twoway mirrors.
U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. ... Page 20 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. ... Page 21 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
-49and the new documentation and the new memoranda -- and he did not have the checks at
that time -- and with the wide variety of different memoranda with his name on it, his
memory could be stimulated on that.
Thank you.
Senator INOUYE. I would like to thank the admiral and his staff for participating in this
hearing. I believe the record should show that this hearing was held at the request of the
Agency and the admiral. It was not held because we insisted upon it. It was a volunteer
effort on the part of the Agency. I think the record should also indicate that Admiral Turner
has forwarded to this committee a classified file, including all of the names of the
institutions and the persons involved as the experimentors.
I should also indicate that this hearing is just one step involved in the committee's
investigation of drug abuse. Just as you have had much work in going over the 8,000
pages, the staff of this committee has had equal problems, but I would like the record to
show that you have made these papers and documents available to the committee. I thank
you for that.
As part of the ongoing investigation, we had intended to call upon many dozens of others,
experimentors, or those officials in charge, and one of those will be Dr. Gottlieb.
In thanking you, I would like to say this to the American people, that what we have
experienced this morning in this committee room is not being duplicated in any other
committee room in any other part of the world. I doubt that very much. Our Agency and
our intelligence community has been under much criticism and has been subjected to much
abuse, in many cases justified, but this is the most open society that I can think of. For
example, in Great Britain there are about six people who are aware of the identity of the
man in charge of intelligence. In other countries, similar conditions exist. Here in the
United States we not only know Admiral Turner, we have had open hearings with him,
such as this. The confirmation hearings were all open.
In a few weeks, the Senate of the United States will debate a resolution to decide upon
whether we should disclose the amounts and funds being used for counterintelligence and
national intelligence. I would hope that, in presenting this issue to the public, the media
will take note that the Agency has cooperated and will continue to. The abuse that we have
learned about this morning is one I hope will never happen again, but without constant
oversight on the part of the Executive Office, on the part of the Congress, it could happen
again. It is important, therefore that we continue in this oversight activity.
So, once, again, Admiral, I thank yon very much for helping us. We will continue to call
upon you for your assistance. We would like to submit to you several questions that the
members and staff have prepared. I hope you will look them over carefully and prepare
responses for the record, sir.
Senator KENNEDY. Mr. Chairman?
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. ... Page 22 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
-50I have found him personally to be extremely responsive, and it is a very difficult challenge
which lie has accepted in heading this Agency. I want you to know, personally, I, too,
would like to see this put behind us. I don't think we are quite there yet in terms of this
particular area that we are interested in. I think the Intelligence Committee has special
responsibilities in this area of the testing, so we look forward to working with you in
expediting the time that we can put it behind, but it does seem to me that we have to dig in
and finish the chapter. So, I want to personally express my appreciation to you, Admiral
Turner, and thank you for your cooperation and your help, and I look forward to working
with you.
Admiral TURNER. Thank you.
Senator HUDDLESTON. Mr. Chairman, I am not sure you emphasized this enough, but I
think the record ought to show that Admiral Turner informed the Select Committee on his
own initiative when the new documentation was found. The documentation has been made
available to us voluntarily, in a spirit of cooperation.
I think this shows a vast difference from the mode of operation that existed prior to the
formation at least of the Church committee, and a difference that is very helpful.
Senator INOUYE. Thank you very much. Thank you very much, Admiral.
We would now like to call upon Mr. Philip Goldman and Mr. John Gittinger.
Mr. Goldman and Mr. Gittinger, will you please rise and take the oath.
Do you solemnly swear that the testimony you are about to give is the truth, the whole truth
and nothing but the truth, so help you, God?
Mr. GOLDMAN. I do.
Mr. GITTINGER. I do.
Senator INOUYE. Thank you, sir.
Mr. Goldman, will you identify yourself, and after that, Mr. Gittinger.
Senator KENNEDY. Before we start in, we had a third witness, Mr. Chairman, Mr.
Pasternac, who planned to testify, traveled to Washington -- he, lives in Washington, and
U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. ... Page 23 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
was contacted recently --with the intention of testifying this morning. And something -- he
called us late this morning and indicated that he wanted to get a counsel before he would
wish to testify.
Senator INOUYE. Mr. Goldman.
Mr. Goldman, will you identify yourself, sir.
1/22/2009
Page 1 of 5
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Historical References
General Histories | Ancient History | 1800-1850 | 1860 | 1870 | 1880 | 1890
1900 | 1910 | 1920 | 1930 | 1940 | 1950 | 1960 | 1970 | 1980 | 1990
APPENDIX B
Documents Referring To Discovery
Of Additional MKULTRA Material
[document begins]
22 June 1977
MEMORANDUM FOR: Deputy Director of Central Intelligence
THROUGH: Deputy Director for Science and Technology
SUBJECT: Request for Guidance on Handling Recently Located MKULTRA Material
1. (U/AIUO) This memorandum is to advise you that additional MKULTRA documents
have been discovered and to obtain your approval for follow-on actions required. Paragraph
7 contains a recommended course of action.
2. (U/AIUO) As a result of John Marks FOIA request (F-76-374), all of the MKULTRA
material in OTS possession was reviewed for possible release to him. Following that
review, the OTS material in the Retired Records Center was searched. It was during that
latter search that the subproject files were located among the retired records of the OTS
Budget and Fiscal Section. These files were not discovered earlier as the earlier searches
were limited to the examination of the active and retired records of those branches
considered most likely to have generated or have had access to MKULTRA documents.
Those branches included: Chemistry, Biological, Behavioral Activities, and Contracts
Management. Because Dr. Gottlieb retrieved and destroyed all the MKULTRA documents
he was able to locate, it is not surprising that the earlier search for MKULTRA documents,
directed at areas where they were most likely to be found, was unsuccessful. The purpose of
1/22/2009
Page 2 of 5
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
establishing the MKULTRA mechanism was to limit knowledge of the sensitive work being
performed to those with an absolute need to know. If those precepts had been followed, the
recently found B&F files should have contained only financial and administrative
documents. (In retrospect, I realize that
1/22/2009
Page 3 of 5
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
The contribution could be controversial in that it was made through a mechanism making it
appear to be a private donation. Private donations qualified for, and [deletion] received, an
equal amount of Federal matching funds. A letter from the Office of General Counsel dated
21 February 1954 attesting to the legality of this funding is in the file.
6. (U/AIUO) The Legislative Counsel has been made aware of the existence of these
additional MKULTRA documents which are still under review and sanitation. The MARKS
case is in litigation and we are committed to advise Mr. Marks of the existence of these files
shortly, and to deliver the releasable material to his attorneys by 31 July. A letter from the
Information and Privacy Staff to Mr. Marks' attorneys informing them of the existence of
this material is in the coordination process and is scheduled to be mailed on 24 June.
7. (U/AIUO) There are now two actions that should be taken:
a. Release appropriately sanitized material to Mr. Marks' attorneys as required by
FOIA litigation.
b. Inform the Senate Select Committee of the existence of the recently located records
prior to informing Mr. Marks' attorneys.
It is recommended that you approve of both of these actions.
8. (U/AIUO) If additional details on the contents of this material are desired, the OIS
officers most familiar with it are prepared to brief you at your convenience.
[signature]
David S. Brandwein
Director
Office of Technical Service
[document ends]
1/22/2009
Page 4 of 5
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1/22/2009
Page 5 of 5
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Committee on the full details of this unfortunate series of events. I am in the process of
reading the fairly voluminous material involved and do want to be certain that I have a
complete picture when I talk with the Committee. I will be in touch with you next week to
discuss when hearings might be scheduled at the earliest opportunity.
I regret having to bring this issue to your attention, but I know that it is essential to your
oversight procedures that you be kept fully informed in a timely manner.
Yours sincerely,
[signature]
STANSFIELD TURNER
[document ends]
1/22/2009
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
"
!
#"
!
)
* ++
,*
+
+,$ !
$% &
+
%
$% &
$% &
1"&&$&&& !
. -
'
'
'
'
. '
$% &
'
'
+
'
!'
/
- ,
'
% *
%
*
%
.
'
'
2
'
3
5'
* % 6
7 %
%
%!
)
5 '
'
'
') %
%
6 %!
'
% :
'
'!'
*%
*
%
.
%
( 7
'*
= '
% !
.
%
(
%
.
; .*
/ '%
' ' 9!
'
<
=
4 '>
'
@#<
*
."
!
! ,
A41 ) $086B 9
'
!
*
%
C 1
C 1
)
!
& !
)D& $A
' %
'
'
2!
'!
* '
/
.,
B
B
: 0$0? $086B
*
=>8 4
.
B
C 1
.
+,0
'
!' ) '
,
*
*
*
'
!'
.
*
. .
*
.
' .
. *
' '!'
.*
'&
$ /
* $
' 0 '!'
*
$
' 0 '!'
1
0
'
** ' !
$% .
' %
' !
*
!'
'
*
'
'
' '(
)
'
% (
& !
. %
%
+ !' ,
%
/
1
8%
'
/ ' ,
%
%
6 %!
)
1
?
% %
$%
"#$ %&"'(
+ *
/
'
' A4 4 A1>
'!
' ) '
.
'
*
# %
' ' 8%
%.
'
' ) '
E
?
*
'
'
'
.,
=
% !
.B
* '
'
**
'
%
'
'
.B
'
'
' A
%
%
'
%
'
*
'
B
B *
E
F
Affidavit
AFFIDAVIT
of Stan
of Transcripts
Stan
J.Mind
J
Caterbone
Caterbone
J. Caterbone
re
reState-of-Affairs
Current
re State-of-Affairs
State-of-Affairs
Page
Page
Page
111of
of
of113
23
27
23
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control
Control
Page
174
539
of
183
548
'
E
'F
'
Tuesday,
March
Saturday
Sunday,
September
June22,
17,
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
C 1
' %
'!
' ) ' ?
% !
'
' ' *
'
'
' '
#7 '
9=%
,
:
%
*
'
'
% 0
G 1
*
90 1
' '
.
0 2 !
% *
'
( ,
'
## : & *
.
*
'
' * '
' %
%
%
%
' *
*
' %
'
%
'
.
' =
H
%
* %
'
/
.
'
=
* % * ;
%
% % 1
'
*
%
* ;
'!
' ) ' ?
* %
'
A . * .
%
! ' *
1
>
1
.
1 . %'
'1
1 ! "&
. =%
,
* % 0 1
' I
'
*
Affidavit
AFFIDAVIT
of Stan
of Transcripts
Stan
J.Mind
J
Caterbone
Caterbone
J. Caterbone
re
reState-of-Affairs
Current
re State-of-Affairs
State-of-Affairs
Page
Page
Page
222of
of
of113
23
27
23
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control
Control
Page
175
540
of
183
548
.
'
'
Tuesday,
March
Saturday
Sunday,
September
June22,
17,
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
"
!
#"
%%$ %&"'
3 4
67
0 % !
% !
#7
'
* % ! .
#7 0
%
%
'
'*
'
' % 6
0
%
'
% !
*
'
' ' #*
% ' .
D %
8
'
%
0
' !
D %
. 0
2!
! "
!
'
%
'
%
*
. %
% J
D
G 1
% %
'
!
'
*
%
%
' *
'
'
/
' '
. J 0
0 1 %
'
* % 10
( ,
+
0
'
%
' %
' ' * %
' % '
*
/
'
'*
% &
1
' %
*
%
% .
%
.
% ' $% .
!
'
'
%
**
%
% .
! %
'
%
.!
- .
% %
$%
' *
%
%
% ; '
.
'
*
'
. %
' '
%
%
'
1
.
' . 0
%
4
6$
*
% &
$% ' 1
1
*
%
! !
% >
1
*
!
'
'
'
) %
'
%
. ## E
%
' *
%
## &
+
C '
+ H
*
' %
.
'
J
* %
*
'
% 4
%
/
J
'
' %
*
$%
'
'
%
%
.!
. ?
%
)/
%
' % %
* #
%
.
%
% * % * '
%
>
1
$
/
7
'
!
% >
+ H *
% * '
%
%
%
C '
*
, 1
)/
%
'
%
%
'
.
/
% '
$%
' ' @7 >
$% .
) %
' '!
0
.
* %
*
!
. %
*
%
C '
.
%
*
'
%
%%
' . %
' *
) %
1
.1
%
%
$
) !
/
*1
*
"
'
'
' .
%
.
$% >
'
G4
!
#
'
'
J? ' 8 ' , . J
'
' **
*
. **
*
% 0 % '
'
.
' **
! .
%'
% )85 6$
.
' %
%
.
'
%
* %
'
.
* % ! .
%
) %
). **
'
*
%
% %
'
'
%
*
%
%
0
%
.
%
% >
1
% * '
) . *
@ 0
% &
+
!
! '
' '
.
* '
%
/
*
*
.
'*
Affidavit
AFFIDAVIT
of Stan
of Transcripts
Stan
J.Mind
J
Caterbone
Caterbone
J. Caterbone
re
reState-of-Affairs
Current
re State-of-Affairs
State-of-Affairs
Page
Page
Page
333of
of
of113
23
27
23
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control
Control
Page
176
541
of
183
548
Tuesday,
March
Saturday
Sunday,
September
June22,
17,
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
' 0 *
'
% '
#7
. *
'
! J $%
* '
'
J'
% '
'
'
'
. ## E 0
*
% % ' %
*
1+A8)E %
' '
%
'
' '
'*
'
'
' $ . ,
!
' % *
'
* 6
K /
' !
'
'
% *
.
%
' % A018
%
.
.
%*
% J? ' 8 ' , . J
% '
LLLLLLLLLLLLLF FLLLLLLLLLLL
$
9
!
*** . +
+
.
/
%
0 %
*
!
#7 E %
#7 E
/
/
,
!
9
*
%
*#
'
'
' '
,
-
, +
-
- !!
,
1
..
+, 1
6
" @#B "
1
6
" #7@B
6
)+
B
+ ,1
6
7"
Affidavit
AFFIDAVIT
of Stan
of Transcripts
Stan
J.Mind
J
Caterbone
Caterbone
J. Caterbone
re
reState-of-Affairs
Current
re State-of-Affairs
State-of-Affairs
Page
Page
Page
444of
of
of113
23
27
23
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control
Control
Page
177
542
of
183
548
@ B
@"
# )+
B
"
"
#B
B
"@@ @
" 77B
"@
B
"
@#
Tuesday,
March
Saturday
Sunday,
September
June22,
17,
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
::
$
-"%;& :
9
,
/ + !
.
$
"#'&<
3 #"#=>%'=;<;?
*
. *
.!
).
C 1
'
0
*
'
% * *
% !
'.
' %
!
0 % !
*
B
%
% !
$ :
'
0 %
**
**
+
-
'
'
'
0% !
--
--
, +
+ @
8
.!
. %
'
--
,
* %
.
/ '
,
,
**
'
'
0 % !
$
$ 9
B
;
. / * ,
+$
5
:0 %
0
--
A 5
' %
'
' %
% !
' *
**
.
.
0 %
, +
!
*
'
' ) ' 1
'
''
*
' % %
+ 5
' %
+
. &
'
3 9
$ 9
'
%
'
--
'
. 9 '!'
''
C 1
**
*
**
-
'
.
!
/
'
0 %
%.
**
'
%
.
.%
. *
'
'
'
'
'
. *
0
.
'
Affidavit
AFFIDAVIT
of Stan
of Transcripts
Stan
J.Mind
J
Caterbone
Caterbone
J. Caterbone
re
reState-of-Affairs
Current
re State-of-Affairs
State-of-Affairs
Page
Page
Page
555of
of
of113
23
27
23
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control
Control
Page
178
543
of
183
548
Tuesday,
March
Saturday
Sunday,
September
June22,
17,
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
% !
!
*
' '
* 9
' '
. %
&
'
'
'
M >
'
'.
.*
'
*
'
%
F*
' ?
* !
'
!
'
'
% %
'.
'
'*B
+8+
1% *
* 1
.
" M
**
NC
'
'
! !
' !
'
'
$
'O
*
' %
&
'
.*
'
' !
'
'
'
%
.
!
*
'.
%
;
'
. 0 '
%
' *
'
'
* %
'
L' 'L;
&
* % &
+ *
'
" M
'
' $ *
' >
** ' !
! !
'
!
'
F' 'F'
* %
%
: *
!
'
**
''
0 %
9>> : >
'
'!'
% !
F'
3FF
0 '!'
'
%
.
*+ *
0 % !
&
A %
* %
'
'
' !
% >
4-
'
'
'
0
.
.%
%
% '
$%
* + *
+
*
% .
'
'
'
3
"<
"<
"<
5 9 /D $%
/ /
/ 99
"< "
-
'
'
.
"< %
'
'
% *
C 9
%
.
' '
. -
+ +
$%
%
'
;
:
:
! .
"< % "
! !
%
'
*
'
'
;
:
;
. 9
.
'
' %
4.
%.
/
. %
;
% %
;
'
. !
Affidavit
AFFIDAVIT
of Stan
of Transcripts
Stan
J.Mind
J
Caterbone
Caterbone
J. Caterbone
re
reState-of-Affairs
Current
re State-of-Affairs
State-of-Affairs
Page
Page
Page
666of
of
of113
23
27
23
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control
Control
Page
179
544
of
183
548
Tuesday,
March
Saturday
Sunday,
September
June22,
17,
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
"< % %
'
2!
'
'
'
'
% *
+ +
+ +1
'
* %
* %
%
"< % < B .
&
'
'
'
*
' >
'
A814+&A4
% *
'
>
% %
4-
+ +
'
'
'
'
'
/
.
' %
;
.
% %
+
*
*
%
0%
,
!!
!
,
% 0
HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH$
-
, +
- 9
,
-
. $ 6
,-
- 9
-,
6
*
*+
,,
,
-$
$
+ $
,
++
-- 2
2
,
. G HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH$ !
,
! , ,
G HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
,
'
- HHHHHHHHHHHHHH$ %&HHHH$
F!
./
'
%
--
,$ HHHHHHHHH
'
'!'
' 9 :
F+
.
, .
--
,
+
+ HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
Affidavit
AFFIDAVIT
of Stan
of Transcripts
Stan
J.Mind
J
Caterbone
Caterbone
J. Caterbone
re
reState-of-Affairs
Current
re State-of-Affairs
State-of-Affairs
Page
Page
Page
777of
of
of113
23
27
23
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control
Control
Page
180
545
of
183
548
.. ,,
2!
Tuesday,
March
Saturday
Sunday,
September
June22,
17,
5, 2016
KEISLING: Palace coup: what the Kathleen Kane prosecution is really ...
1 of 4
http://newslanc.com/2015/12/09/keisling-palace-coup-what-the-kathleen...
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
December 9, 2015
!
!
"
"#
$
%
'
&
)*$
"#
"#
&
,
-
"
.
$/
$
$
&
,
"#
"
45)4&
$
"
'
&
$
&
Affidavit
AFFIDAVIT
of Stan
of Transcripts
Stan
J.Mind
J
Caterbone
Caterbone
J. Caterbone
re
reState-of-Affairs
Current
re State-of-Affairs
State-of-Affairs
Page
Page
Page
888of
of
of113
23
27
23
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control
Control
Page
181
546
of
183
548
Tuesday,
March
Saturday
Sunday,
September
June22,
17,
5, 2016
3/22/2016 2:11 AM
KEISLING: Palace coup: what the Kathleen Kane prosecution is really ...
2 of 4
http://newslanc.com/2015/12/09/keisling-palace-coup-what-the-kathleen...
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
"#
$
$
&
"#
8
&
)9*5$
"#
& :1
)9*5$
" &;
,
8
,
"#7
&
<
"
&
$
$
&
$
&3
"#
&
3
"#
&
3
$
&=
%
&
$
&
"#
1
&
#
&
3
"#
.
&
Affidavit
AFFIDAVIT
of Stan
of Transcripts
Stan
J.Mind
J
Caterbone
Caterbone
J. Caterbone
re
reState-of-Affairs
Current
re State-of-Affairs
State-of-Affairs
Page
Page
Page
999of
of
of113
23
27
23
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control
Control
Page
182
547
of
183
548
Tuesday,
March
Saturday
Sunday,
September
June22,
17,
5, 2016
3/22/2016 2:11 AM
KEISLING: Palace coup: what the Kathleen Kane prosecution is really ...
3 of 4
http://newslanc.com/2015/12/09/keisling-palace-coup-what-the-kathleen...
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
&.
"# .
&
$1
"
$ >:
"#; .
&?
$"
&
&
>3
$? "
&>
&?
$
"#
&
$
&
&
$
$
$
&
&
'
&
&@
$
8
"
&
$
1
>
& #<
&
(
"#
,
&
8
+
3
&# &3
$# &6
&
+
'
&
#<
# &6
&
Affidavit
AFFIDAVIT
of Stan
of Transcripts
Stan
J.Mind
J
Caterbone
Caterbone
J. Caterbone
re
reState-of-Affairs
Current
re State-of-Affairs
State-of-Affairs
Page
Page
Page
10
10
10of
of
of
of548
113
23
27
23
MindSponsored
U.S.
Control
Control
Page
183
548
183
&
Tuesday,
March
Saturday
Sunday,
September
June22,
17,
5, 2016
3/22/2016 2:11 AM