Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Background
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) will soon report on a review of oral emergency
contraception (EC) and the effect of heavier body weight on contraceptive efficacy.
This statement from the Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Healthcares (FSRH) Clinical
Effectiveness Unit (CEU) outlines existing recommendations and arrangements for EC provision in
the UK.
The information is provided to clarify the current situation and to facilitate planning and rapid
implementation of any changes to EC availability that may result from the 2014 EMA review. A
web link to NHS templates for Patient Group Directions (PGDs) is provided to facilitate
development of local PGDs. A decision-making guide for community pharmacists is included as
an appendix for quick reference. The guide may be easily amended to include weight criteria if
this is indicated by the outcome of the EMA review.
The FSRH will issue further guidance after the EMA report is published.
Types of EC
There are currently three forms of emergency contraceptives available in the UK.
Table 1 Methods of Emergency Contraception available in UK
Method
Products
Class
Recommended
dose / use
Indications
Mode of action
Copper
intrauterine
device (CuIUD)
Various types
licensed for
contraception
(only Gynefix
licensed for EC)
Intrauterine
contraceptive
method
Levonorgestrel
Levonelle One
Step (P)
Progestogen
hormone
Prevention of
fertilisation via
effects on sperm
and ovum. Can
have an antiimplantation
effect
Delay of
ovulation.
Levonelle 1500
(POM)
Ulipristal
acetate
ellaOne (POM)
Progesterone
receptor
modulator
Delay of
ovulation.
Endometrial
effect has not
been proven or
excluded
Efficacy of EC
The absolute effectiveness of EC is unknown. The copper IUD is considered to be the most
effective method as it has a low documented failure rate of <1%. For this reason the IUD should be
offered to all eligible women requesting EC between 0 and 120 hours of UPSI. The copper IUD can
also be used as EC if a woman needs EC more than 120 hours after UPSI and her menstrual cycle
date is within 5 days of the earliest expected date of ovulation, for example, up to day 19 of a 28
day cycle.
A published meta-analysis suggested that ulipristal acetate (UPA) is more effective than
levonorgestrel (LNG) EC(1). The meta-analysis did not include women using EC after hormonal
contraceptive failure, thus the findings may not be generalisable to clinical practice. Although
subgroup analysis indicated that efficacy may have been reduced in heavier women published
studies have been insufficiently powered to confirm an effect of body weight or to compare the
efficacy of ulipristal and levonorgestrel in women of normal weight(2).
Further information on the efficacy EC can be found in FSRH Clinical Guidance on Emergency
Contraception(3). FSRH Guidance on EC may be amended after the EMA report is issued. Current
recommendations for oral EC are:
The efficacy of UPA has been demonstrated up to 120 hours and can be offered to all
eligible women requesting EC during this time period. It is the only oral EC licensed for use
between 72 and 120 hours.
The efficacy of LNG has been demonstrated up to 96 hours; between 96-120 hours efficacy
is unknown. Use of LNG beyond 72 hours is outside the product licence.
In addition to efficacy, the decision as to which method to provide to a woman will be dictated
by a number of factors such as; patient choice, medical eligibility, number of episodes of
unprotected sex, and time since UPSI (see table 2).
Templates for contraception PGDs can be accessed online via NHS resources (Weblink:
http://www.medicinesresources.nhs.uk/en/Communities/NHS/PGDs/Local-PGD-examples/).
Multiple episodes
of UPSI within 120
hours
Multiple episodes
of UPSI
Sex occurred <5
days ago plus > 5
days
Using enzyme
inducing drugs
Breastfeeding
Women under 25
years of age
Nulliparous women
Cu-IUD
LNG
UPA
(outside product
licence)
FSRH supports use
up to 96 hours and
up to 120 hours if
no other method
appropriate
(3mg
recommendedoutside
product
licence)
/X
(Yes if presents
within 5 days of
ovulation. If
presents more than
5 days following
earliest estimated
time of ovulation
an IUD is not
suitable)
X
(unless all episodes
within 5 days of
earliest expected
ovulation)
(Can be given if
the woman is
willing to express for
7 days after taking)
X
Key to abbreviations: Cu-IUD copper intrauterine device; EC Emergency contraception; FSRH Faculty of
Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare; LNG levonorgestrel; UPA Ulipristal acetate; UPSI unprotected sexual
intercourse
References
(1) Glasier AF, Cameron ST, Logan SJS, Casale W, Van Horn J, Sogar L, et al. Ulipristal acetate
versus levonorgestrel for emergency contraception: a randomised non-inferiority trial and
meta-analysis. The Lancet 2010;375:555-62.
(2) Glasier A, Cameron ST, Blithe D, Scherrer B, Mathe H, Levy D, et al. Can we identify women at
risk of pregnancy despite using emergency contraception? Data from randomized trials of
ulipristal acetate and levonorgestrel. Contraception 2011;84:363-7.
(3) Faculty of Sexual & Reproductive Health Care Clinical Effectiveness Unit. Emergency
Contraception. 2011. Available at:
http://www.fsrh.org/pdfs/CEUguidanceEmergencyContraception11.pdf (Accessed:
26/06/14)
(4) Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare CEU. Quick Starting Contraception. Available
at: http://www.fsrh.org/admin/uploads/678_CEUGuidanceQuickStartingContraception.pdf
(Accessed: 26/06/14)
Appendix