Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Local stakeholders
own a majority
share
Majority of
social and
economic
benefits are
distributed
locally
Carlo Schick
Voting control
rests with a
communitybased
organisation
Community Wind
(WWEA
definition)
20,4%
Institutional
investors 39,4%
Community Wind
(broad defintion)
50,4%
Minority share
participation
and supra-regional
participation
25,8%
Data basis
Carlo Schick
Project development and operation by local citizens, motivated through local citizens, financed
by local citizens
Very high
influence
High
influence
Medium
influence
Carlo Schick
Job creation
Establishment of a new economic sector
Networking structures
Barriers
Competition with larger project
developers (e.g. land leases)
Higher complexity of planning
processes
Conflicts with wind energy
opponents
Prospectus requirements for
closed-end funds
Decreasing social
awareness/backing of the
Energiewende
Carlo Schick
How will the upcoming onshore wind auctions affect the activities of
Community Wind stakeholders?
16
14
12
10
very negative
Carlo Schick
negative
neutral
positive
very positive
Carlo Schick
level of usefulness
level of usefulness
Carlo Schick
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Energy efficiency
Storage
E-mobility
not planned
Carlo Schick
of interest
already active
1st WCPC Fukushima, 3 November 2016
Future prospects
Exemptions for Community Wind project necessary
Conducive framework conditions for Community Wind in general