Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
US $ 2.2
Trillion
UN report tells us
According to the UN Report conducted by Trucost, Worlds top firms
cause $2.2tn of environmental damage in 2008
The figure accounts for one-third of profit firms made in 2008
What if firms were forced to pay for use, loss and damage of
environment ?
One-third of their profit would be lost
464
Environmental
Activity Profiles
464 Environmental
Activity Profiles
Modeling env.impacts
Developed unique methodology based on an input-output
model to calculate companys env. impact
Extensive studies of industries to identify the quantities of
over 700 env. Indicators
Trucost calculates env. Impact of 464 industries, based on
the North American Industrial Classification System(NAICS)
464 Environmental
Activity Profiles
Power transmission
464 Environmental
Activity Profiles
Disclosure
Financial and Initial Company
and Public
Segmental Analysis Profile Profile
Registers
464 Environmental
Activity Profiles
Disclosure
Financial and Initial Company
and Public
Segmental Analysis Profile Profile
Registers
Companies are given the opportunity to review and verify their data
Companies can easily verify their data through Trucosts on-line system
464 Environmental
Activity Profiles
Disclosure
Financial and Initial Company
and Public
Segmental Analysis Profile Profile
Registers
Objectives
Selection of companies with lower greenhouse gas emissions in each sector,
reducing the intensity of the greenhouse gas emissions
Apply Ebitda/Total Asset selection process within the lower CO2 emitting stocks
to generate performance
Selection Process
200 stocks selected from KOSPI200
KOSPI200
Stocks filtered according to carbon
100 stocks with below sector emission(CO2 Equivalents/Revenue),
Median emissions with only those with below sector
median emissions
2007/12/11
2008/01/11
2008/02/12
2008/03/10
2008/04/04
2008/05/06
2008/06/03
2008/07/01
2008/07/28
2008/08/25
2008/09/22
2008/10/20
2008/11/14
2008/12/11
2009/01/12
2009/02/10
2009/03/09
2009/04/03
2009/04/30
2009/10/12
2009/11/06
2009/12/03
2010/01/04
2010/01/29
2010/02/26
2010/03/26
Time period: 30-April-07 ~ 30-April-10
2010/04/22
14.3%
56.8%
17
GIN 2010 Conference
0.000
0.200
0.400
0.600
0.800
1.000
1.200
1.400
1.600
1.800
2007/04/30
2007/05/31
2007/07/02
2007/08/01
2007/08/31
2007/10/05
2007/11/05
2007/12/04
2008/01/08
2008/02/11
2008/03/11
2008/04/10
2008/05/14
2008/06/13
2008/07/14
2008/08/12
2008/09/11
2008/10/14
2008/11/12
2008/12/11
2009/01/14
2009/02/16
2009/03/17
2009/04/15
2009/05/18
2009/06/16
2009/07/15
2010/01/13
2010/02/11
2010/03/16
Time period: 30-April-07 ~ 30-April-10
2010/04/14
Ebitda 55
Carbon50
KOSPI200
18
GIN 2010 Conference
GIN 2010 Conference
1.0000
0.1999
0.9770
0.9600
0.1567 0.0155
0.1600 0.0160
0.8800
0.8567 0.0106
0.0886
0.8000
0.00050
0.00043
KOSPI200
0.00040
0.00034
0.00030
Ebitda55
0.00020
0.00010 Carbon50
0.00010
0.00000
Carbon intensity
Implications
On the other hand, the carbon intensity of carbon50 portfolio lowered that of
KOSPI200 by 76%
In terms of risk profile, carbon50 portfolio is less volatile as well as less risky
Carbon Ebitda Strategy represents excellence in terms of performance, risk profile and
greenhouse gas emissions
END OF PRESENTATION