Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Bioresource Technology
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/biortech
Ethanol production from sweet sorghum juice using very high gravity
technology: Effects of carbon and nitrogen supplementations
Lakkana Laopaiboon a,b,*, Sunan Nuanpeng c, Penjit Srinophakun d, Preekamol Klanrit a, Pattana Laopaiboon a
a
Department of Biotechnology, Faculty of Technology, Khon Kaen University, 123 Mittraparp Road, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
Fermentation Research Center for Value Added Agricultural Products, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
c
Graduate School, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
d
Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Kasertsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand
b
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 13 November 2008
Received in revised form 12 March 2009
Accepted 13 March 2009
Available online 17 April 2009
Keywords:
S. cerevisiae
Ethanol production
VHG fermentation
Sweet sorghum juice
Sugarcane molasses
a b s t r a c t
Ethanol production from sweet sorghum juice by Saccharomyces cerevisiae NP01 was investigated under
very high gravity (VHG) fermentation and various carbon adjuncts and nitrogen sources. When sucrose
was used as an adjunct, the sweet sorghum juice containing total sugar of 280 g l1, 3 g yeast extract l1
and 5 g peptone l1 gave the maximum ethanol production efciency with concentration, productivity
and yield of 120.68 0.54 g l1, 2.01 0.01 g l1 h1 and 0.51 0.00 g g1, respectively. When sugarcane
molasses was used as an adjunct, the juice under the same conditions gave the maximum ethanol concentration, productivity and yield with the values of 109.34 0.78 g l1, 1.52 0.01 g l1 h1 and
0.45 0.01 g g1, respectively. In addition, ammonium sulphate was not suitable for use as a nitrogen
supplement in the sweet sorghum juice for ethanol production since it caused the reduction in ethanol
concentration and yield for approximately 14% when compared to those of the unsupplemented juices.
2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Ethanol production as an alternative to petroleum-based fuels
can be produced from biomass, a plentiful renewable resource.
To increase the productivity and cost effectiveness of ethanol production, many process improvements including very high gravity
(VHG) technology have been studied. VHG fermentation technology is dened as the preparation and fermentation to completion
of mashes containing 270 or more grams of dissolved solids per litre (Bayrock and Ingledew, 2001). It has several advantages for
industrial applications such as the increase in both the ethanol
concentration and the rate of fermentation, which reduce capital
costs, energy costs per litre of alcohol and the risk of bacterial contamination (Thomas et al., 1996; Bvochora et al., 2000; Bayrock
and Ingledew, 2001; Bai et al., 2004).
Apart from sugarcane (in Brazil), corn grain (in USA), tapioca
starch and sugarcane molasses (in Thailand), other agricultural
raw materials rich in fermentable carbohydrates, including sweet
sorghum, have been of particular interest for biological transformation into ethanol for use as fuel or fuel additive (Schaffert,
1995; Gksungur and Zorlu, 2001). Sweet sorghum has been
promised as a large scale energy crop because its stalks contain
high fermentable sugar and it can be cultivated in nearly all temperatures and tropical climate areas (Sree et al., 1999). It is also
one of the most drought resistant agricultural crops because of
its capacity to remain dormant during the driest periods (Woods,
2000).
It was reported that under appropriate environmental and
nutritional conditions, Saccharomyces cerevisiae can produce
and tolerate high ethanol concentrations (Thomas et al., 1996;
Bafrncova et al., 1999). VHG fermentation process exploits the
observation that the growth of S. cerevisiae is promoted and prolonged when very low but adequate levels of oxygen are present
and assimilable nitrogen levels are not limiting (Casey and
Ingledew, 1986). Several investigators have observed that yeast extract (Casey et al., 1984; Thomas and Ingledew, 1990; Jones et al.,
1994; Bafrncova et al., 1999), ammonium (Jones et al., 1994), urea
(Jones and Ingledew, 1994a), calcium and magnesium (Dombek
and Ingram, 1986) have protective effects either on growth and fermentation or viability, which stimulate the fermentation rate and
ethanol production. Our previous study showed that S. cerevisiae
NP01 isolated from Long-pang (Chinese yeast cake) for Sato (Thai
rice wine) making was a high-ethanol-producing strain under
VHG condition (Laopaiboon et al., 2008). As total soluble solids in
the sweet sorghum juice cv. KKU 40 has only 18Bx (grams per
100 ml), ethanol fermentation under VHG supplemented with
other carbon sources in order to raise the sugar content in the juice
needs to be investigated. Characteristics of raw sweet sorghum
juice cv. KKU 40 are shown in Table 1. The aim of this study was
pH
Total soluble solid (Bx)
Total sugar (g l-1)
Glucosea (g l1)
Fructosea (g l1)
Sucrosea (g l1)
b
NH
4 N (ppm)
b
NO
3 N (ppm)
Total Pc (ppm)
Total Kd (ppm)
Total Nad (ppm)
Total Se (ppm)
Total Caf (ppm)
Total Mgf (ppm)
Total Fef (ppm)
Total Mnf (ppm)
Total Cuf (ppm)
Total Znf (ppm)
a
b
c
d
e
f
Contents
Sweet sorghum juice
Molasses
4.9
18
173.02
20.85
16.80
124.05
21.4
4.4
20
1790
170
120
166
194
2
3
0.3
1.4
4.9
85
696.04
95.42
169.79
387.53
1602
2985
150
56
2.8
7.4
By HPLC.
MgO-Devarda alloy distillation method.
Vanado-molybdate method.
Flame photometry method.
Turbidimetry method.
Atomic absorption.
to compare the efciency of ethanol production from sweet sorghum juice supplemented with sucrose or sugarcane molasses under VHG fermentation using S. cerevisiae NP01. The inuences of
yeast extract and peptone (YEP) or ammonium sulphate
[(NH4)2SO4] as nitrogen sources for ethanol production were also
studied.
2. Methods
2.1. Microorganism and inoculum preparation
S. cerevisiae NP01 isolated from Long-pang (Chinese yeast cake)
from Nakorn Pranom province, Thailand, was inoculated into a
250-ml Erlenmeyer ask containing 150 ml of yeast and malt extract (YM) medium. The medium contained (in g l1) yeast extract
3, peptone 5, malt extract 3 and glucose 10. The ask was incubated on a rotating shaker at 100 rpm, 30 C for 15 h. To increase
cell concentration, the yeast (approximately 3%) was transferred
into a 500-ml Erlenmeyer ask with 360 ml of the YM medium
containing 150 g l1 of glucose to give the initial cell concentration
of 1 106 cells ml1. The asks were further incubated under the
conditions previous mentioned. After 15 h, the cells were harvested and used as an inoculum for ethanol production.
2.2. Raw materials
Sweet sorghum juice cv. KKU40 modied from cv. Keller was
obtained from Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture,
Khon Kaen University, Thailand. After extraction, the juice was
kept at 18 C until use. Sugarcane molasses obtained from Mitr
Phu Viang Sugar Mill, Nongrua, Khon Kaen, Thailand was kept at
4 C until use.
2.3. Ethanol production medium
Sweet sorghum juice (pH 4.9) containing total soluble solids of
18Bx was adjusted with sucrose or molasses. The total soluble
solids in the juice were adjusted to 24, 28 and 32Bx by sucrose
4177
addition and to 28, 32 and 34Bx by molasses addition, which corresponded to total sugar concentrations of approximately 240, 280
and 320 g l1, respectively. Then the juices were supplemented
with 8 g l1 of YEP (3 g yeast extract and 5 g peptone) or 1.3 g l1
of (NH4)2SO4, and used as ethanol production (EP) medium without pH adjustment. The EP medium was transferred into a 500ml air-locked Erlenmeyer ask with a nal working volume of
400 ml and autoclaved at 110 C for 15 min.
2.4. Fermentation conditions
The sterile EP medium containing various sugar and nitrogen
supplements was inoculated to give the initial yeast cell concentration of 1 108 cells ml1. The fermentation was carried out in
batch mode at 30 C under static condition. The samples were
withdrawn at time intervals for analysis.
2.5. Analytical methods
The viable yeast cell numbers and total soluble solids of the fermentation broth were determined by direct counting method
using haemacytometer and hand-held refractometer, respectively.
The fermentation broth was centrifuged at 13,000 rpm for 10 min.
The supernatant was then determined for residual total sugar in
terms of total carbohydrate by phenol sulfuric acid method (Mecozzi, 2005). Ethanol concentration (P, g l1) was analyzed by gas
chromatography (Shimadzu GC-14B, Japan, Solid phase: polyethylene glycol (PEG-20 M), carrier gas: nitrogen, 150 C isothermal
packed column, injection temperature 180 C, ame ionization
detector temperature 250 C; C-R7 Ae plus Chromatopac Data Processor) and 2-propanol was used as an internal standard (modied
from Laopaiboon et al., 2007). The ethanol yield (Y ps ;) was calculated as the actual ethanol produced and expressed as g ethanol
per g total sugar utilized (g g1). The volumetric ethanol productivity (Q p ; g l1 h1) was calculated by ethanol concentration produced (P; g l1) divided by fermentation time giving the highest
ethanol concentration. Fermentable nitrogen or formol nitrogen
in the fermentation broth was analyzed by formol titration method
(Zoecklein et al., 1995).
300
120
100
250
80
200
60
150
100
40
50
20
350
120
300
100
250
80
200
60
150
100
40
50
20
350
120
300
100
250
80
200
60
150
100
40
50
20
350
4178
0
0
20
40
60
80
Time (h)
Fig. 1. Sugar consumption and ethanol production during batch ethanol fermentation by S. cerevisiae NP01 from sweet sorghum juice supplemented with sucrose
at various initial soluble solids and nitrogen sources: 24Bx (s, d), 28Bx (5, .) and
32Bx (h, j), total sugar (open symbol) and ethanol (close symbol). (A) No extra
nitrogen source, (B) supplemented with YEP and (C) supplemented with (NH4)2 SO4.
Table 2
Kinetic parameters of ethanol production from sweet sorghum juice supplemented with sucrose at various initial total soluble solids and nitrogen sources by S. cerevisiae NP01.
Extra nitrogen sources
None
YEP
(NH4)2SO4
a
b
c
Bxa
24
28
32
24
28
32
24
28
32
248.16 1.39
285.10 5.11
336.01 2.38
236.06 3.14
286.06 4.71
336.89 0.39
246.72 1.21
287.17 3.93
333.28 4.71
12.80 3.05
63.76 2.14
134.63 2.34
5.96 1.23
47.71 2.67
120.30 3.12
8.48 0.59
59.98 1.57
145.50 3.18
Q p (g l1 h1)
Y ps (g g1)
t (h)
113.20 0.81
117.28 0.14
107.39 1.07
116.71 0.85
120.68 0.54
108.23 0.16
96.58 0.73
101.48 0.06
83.31 0.06
2.83 0.02
2.44 0.00
2.24 0.02
2.43 0.02
2.01 0.01
1.50 0.00
2.01 0.02
2.11 0.00
1.74 0.00
0.48 0.03
0.53 0.01
0.53 0.00
0.51 0.01
0.51 0.00
0.50 0.01
0.41 0.00
0.45 0.02
0.44 0.02
40
48
48
48
60
72
48
48
48
4179
Table 3
Fermentable nitrogen utilized during ethanol production from sweet sorghum juice supplemented with sucrose at various initial total soluble solids and nitrogen sources by S.
cerevisiae NP01.
Extra nitrogen sources
Bxa
None
24
28
32
24
28
32
24
28
32
248.16 1.39
285.10 5.11
336.01 2.38
236.06 3.14
286.06 4.71
336.89 0.39
246.72 1.21
287.17 3.93
333.28 4.71
12.80 3.05
63.76 2.14
134.63 2.34
5.96 1.23
47.71 2.67
120.30 3.12
8.48 0.59
59.98 1.57
145.50 3.18
YEP
(NH4)2SO4
Initial
Utilized
657.28 7.21
626.91 0.00
594.96 1.80
1138.96 10.81
1149.15 18.02
1098.19 18.02
1114.40 7.92
1094.80 3.96
1061.20 11.88
391.12 1.80
294.29 16.22
215.31 19.82
420.40 21.62
402.60 50.45
287.90 10.81
439.60 3.96
380.80 7.92
313.60 7.92
See Table 1.
See Table 1.
The experiments were performed in duplicate and the results were expressed as mean SD.
9.0
8.5
8.0
7.5
7.0
6.5
6.0
-1
Total sugar (g l )
8.5
8.0
7.5
7.0
120
300
100
250
80
200
60
150
100
40
6.0
50
20
5.5
6.5
5.0
9.0
350
8.5
-1
8.0
7.5
7.0
6.5
6.0
5.5
120
300
100
250
80
200
60
150
100
40
50
20
5.0
0
0
20
40
60
80
20
40
60
-1
350
5.0
9.0
5.5
Total sugar (g l )
Ethanol concentration (g l )
80
Time (h)
Time (h)
Fig. 2. Yeast viability of S. cerevisiae NP01 during batch ethanol fermentation from
sweet sorghum juice supplemented with sucrose at various initial total soluble
solids and nitrogen sources: 24Bx (d), 28Bx (.) and 32Bx (j). (A) No extra
nitrogen source, (B) supplemented with YEP and (C) supplemented with (NH4)2 SO4.
Fig. 3. Sugar consumption and ethanol production during batch ethanol fermentation by S. cerevisiae NP01 from sweet sorghum juice supplemented with molasses
at various initial total soluble solids: 28Bx (s, d), 32Bx (5, .) and 34Bx (h, j),
total sugar (open symbol) and ethanol (close symbol). (A) No extra nutrient, (B)
supplemented with YEP.
4180
Table 4
Kinetic parameters of ethanol production from sweet sorghum juice supplemented with molasses at various initial total soluble solids and nitrogen sources by S. cerevisiae NP01.
Extra nitrogen sources
None
YEP
Bxa
28
32
34
28
32
34
242.56 4.29
279.78 2.36
315.89 0.00
247.53 4.08
277.02 2.38
315.18 5.56
18.26 2.12
63.29 0.19
85.29 1.60
23.94 2.36
34.88 1.98
63.57 3.28
Q p (g l1 h1)
Y ps (g g1)
t (h)
100.54 0.70
102.08 2.63
98.29 2.16
104.99 1.51
109.34 0.78
104.95 2.18
2.51 0.02
2.13 0.05
2.05 0.13
1.46 0.02
1.52 0.01
1.46 0.03
0.45 0.01
0.43 0.00
0.43 0.04
0.47 0.04
0.45 0.01
0.44 0.02
40
48
48
72
72
72
Sugar consumption and ethanol production during batch fermentation from the sweet sorghum juice supplemented with
molasses under the presence and absence of YEP are shown in
Fig. 3. The proles of sugar and ethanol concentrations during fermentation were similar to those when using sucrose as the carbon
adjunct (Fig. 1). Table 4 shows the initial and nal total sugar concentrations at various conditions and summarizes the important
kinetic parameters of the ethanol fermentation. P and Y ps of the
broth containing YEP were higher than those of the control broth
at all gravities. The amount of utilized sugar in the control medium
and the medium supplemented with YEP at 28Bx were similar,
while the utilized sugar in the control media at 32 and 34Bx were
lower than those of the supplemented media at the same gravities
(Table 4). However, the cell numbers at specic fermentation time
throughout the experiments under various conditions were similar
(Fig. 4). These results indicated that the supplemented YEP did not
promote cell growth but it stimulated sugar utilization and ethanol
production under very high gravities. In contrast, the rate of ethanol fermentation (ethanol productivity) in the presence of YEP was
signicantly lower than that of the unsupplemented medium due
to longer fermentation time (Table 4). These ndings were consistent with those when using the juice supplemented with sucrose
and YEP. The reasons of these results were previously described
in Section 3.1. The juice supplemented with molasses and YEP at
the initial total soluble solids of 32Bx, corresponding to total sugar
of approximately 280 g l1, gave the maximum ethanol concentration with the value of 109.34 0.78 g l1. Under these conditions,
the productivity and yield of ethanol were 1.52 0.01 g l1 h1
and 0.45 0.01 g g1, respectively. Y ps slightly decreased when sugar concentrations were increased (Table 4). Possible reasons were
that some consumed sugar might be used for maintenance and/or
converted to more byproducts. Ozmichi and Kargi (2007) reported
that the ethanol yield decreased when the feed sugar content increased more than 200 g l1 due to high osmotic pressure and
maintenance requirements at high sugar concentrations. Similar
results were also observed by Jones et al. (1994) and Limtong
et al. (2007).
9.0
9.0
8.5
8.0
7.5
7.0
6.5
6.0
5.5
5.0
8.5
8.0
7.5
7.0
6.5
6.0
5.5
5.0
0
20
40
60
80
Time (h)
Fig. 4. Yeast viability of S. cerevisiae NP01 during batch ethanol fermentation from
sweet sorghum juice supplemented with molasses at various initial total soluble
solids and nitrogen sources: 28Bx (d), 32Bx (.) and 34Bx (j). (A) No extra
nutrient, (B) supplemented with YEP.
4181
4182
Taillandier, P., Portugal, F.R., Fuster, A., Strehaiano, P., 2007. Effect of ammonium
concentration on alcoholic fermentation kinetics by wine yeasts for high sugar
content. Food Microbiol. 24, 95100.
Thomas, K.C., Ingledew, W.M., 1990. Fuel alcohol production: effects of free amino
nitrogen on fermentation of very-high-gravity wheat mash. Appl. Environ.
Microbiol. 56, 20462050.
Thomas, K.C., Hynes, S.H., Ingledew, W.M., 1996. Practical and theoretical
considerations in the production of high concentration of alcohol by
fermentation. Process Biochem. 31, 321331.
Valero, J., Millan, C., Ortega, J.M., Mauricio, J.C., 2003. Concentration of amino acids
in wine after the end of fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. J. Sci.
Food Agric. 88, 830835.
Wang, X.D., Bohlscheid, J.C., Edwards, C.G., 2003. Fermentative activity and
production of volatile compounds by Saccharomyces grown in synthetic
grape juice media decient in assimilable nitrogen and/or pantothenic acid. J.
Appl. Microbiol. 94, 349359.
Woods, J., 2000. Integrating Sweet sorghum and sugarcane for bioenergy: modelling
the potential for electricity and ethanol production in SE Zimbabwe, Ph.D.
Thesis, Kings College, London.
Zoecklein, B.U., Fugelsang, K.C., Gump, B.H., Nury, F.S., 1995. Wine Analysis and
Production. Chapman & Hall, New York.