Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Daqing Hou
Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories, Inc.
I. INTRODUCTION
In medium-voltage distribution systems less than 34.5 kV,
a majority of faults are single-phase-to-ground. Quickly and
reliably detecting and isolating these single-phase-to-ground
faults increases service continuity and power quality, which
are important for industrial and sensitive electronic loads,
especially during adverse weather conditions.
Compared with faults that involve more than one phase,
single-phase-to-ground faults are more challenging to detect.
Other than the system short-circuit capacity and fault
resistance, the available ground fault current closely relates to
the system grounding methods. The fault resistance also
depends upon the ground surface materials and earth
resistance.
Throughout the history of electric power supply, many
grounding methods have been developed for distribution
systems to achieve or balance several objectives, some of
which conflict with each other. The main objectives of
distribution system grounding include the following [1]:
Minimize system equipment overvoltage and thermal
stress
Provide personnel safety
Reduce interference to communications systems
Assist quick detection and isolation of single-phase-toground faults
Maximize system economic returns
In the early years of power systems, when distribution
systems were simple and small, the system usually began with
its neutral isolated from the ground. Isolated neutral systems
did bring the benefit of self-extinction of arcing ground faults
Fig. 1.
CS0
CL0
F
Fig. 2.
IF =
L ( mile ) VLL ( kV )
160
(1)
Fig. 3.
3RF
jXS0
R
Fig. 4.
I0
V0
jXL0
Fig. 5.
Amperes
Fig. 7.
Fig. 6, however, does not tell the whole story. The fault
current is three times I0F, as shown in Fig. 4. A relay actually
measures a fraction of I0F that depends on the ratio of XS0 to
XL0. When the protected feeder is short compared with the
equivalent of all other system feeders, XL0 is much higher than
XS0. The relay measures larger current for forward faults than
for reverse faults. Protection is therefore more sensitive for
forward faults in general. This is especially true when station
transformers have large stray capacitance that reduces XS0.
E. System Simulation
In this paper, we use system simulation to verify the
characteristics of ungrounded systems and explore their
ground fault resistance coverage. The simulated system also
becomes a common reference for comparing ground fault
detection on systems with different grounding methods.
Fig. 7 shows a simulated 12.5 kV distribution system. The
138 kV system source has a short-circuit rating of 500 MVA.
The substation transformer is a 10 MVA, 138/12.5 kV
Z1 = 0.4470.1 /km
(2)
Z0 = 1.9679.5 /km
(3)
0.9 m
A
C
0.5 m
0.5 m
8.32 m
Fig. 8.
Line-tower configuration
0.2
0
0.2
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
0.7
0.8
0.9
0.2
0
0.2
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
Seconds
X ()
Amperes
Fig. 11. 3I0 of Feeder 3 (faulted) and Feeder 2 (unfaulted) for a 20 k fault
Zero-Sequence Impedance
Fig. 12. Z0 trajectories for Feeder 3 (forward fault) and Feeder 2 (reverse
fault)
1.5
X ()
0.5
Z0 Feeder 3
0.5
Z0 Feeder 2
1
1.5
4000 3000 2000 1000
0
R ()
1000
2000
3000
4000
jXS0
RN
a. High-Resistance Grounding
3RN
R
jXL0
F
b. Zero-Sequence Network
Fig. 13b shows the zero-sequence network of a highresistance-grounded system. The figure does not include the
transformer and system zero-sequence impedances that are in
series with the NGR because their values are much smaller
than the NGR. The line zero-sequence impedance is also not
included because of its much smaller value compared with the
distributed line capacitive reactance.
Because of their small fault currents, high-resistancegrounded systems are quite similar to ungrounded systems, in
terms of ground fault detection. Detecting the faulted feeder
requires a directional element. Fig. 13b shows that the source
impedance measured by a relay for forward faults is equal to
3RN and jXS0 in parallel. When 3RN = (XS0 + XL0) and
XL0<<XS0, this source impedance angle is close to
135 degrees. We can adjust the maximum torque angle of the
Fig. 5 directional element to increase the fault detection
sensitivity for high-resistance-grounded systems [9]. Fig. 14
shows this maximum torque angle adjustment.
X0
j3RNXS0
3RN jXS0
Forward
Faults
Reverse Faults
R0
Z0MTA
jXL0
Fig. 16. Directional element using the in-phase component of the zerosequence current
System loads can be either phase-to-phase or phase-toground on multigrounded systems. Because of this flexibility,
there are many single-phase laterals on a multigrounded
system, especially in rural areas.
Because of small system zero-sequence impedance, ground
fault current can be large on multigrounded systems. Ground
faults require immediate isolation to reduce equipment
thermal damage and ensure system integrity.
Fig. 18 shows the zero-sequence network of multigrounded
systems with balanced loads, where ZS0, ZT0, ZL0, and ZLD0 are
the zero-sequence impedances of the system, substation
transformer, line, and load, respectively. Again, the CT in the
figure marks the place where the zero-sequence current is
measured for ground fault protection. The R marker is the
point of connection to the system positive- and negativesequence networks for reverse ground faults, and the F marker
is the connection point for forward faults on the feeder.
The main benefit of multigrounded systems is low steadystate and transient overvoltage. The voltage rise of unfaulted
phases during a single-phase-to-ground fault is less than
25 percent for multigrounded systems [12]. The system
equipment insulation can be rated at the system phase-toneutral voltage level, and therefore, the overall system cost
can be less than that for ungrounded or high-resistancegrounded systems.
Fig. 19. Zero-sequence network interconnection for a forward single-phaseto-ground fault on a multigrounded system
Positive
ZLD2
ZT1 + ZS1
ZLD3
ZL21
Feeder 2
ZL31
Feeder 3
Negative
ZT1 + ZS1
ZL21
ZLD2
ZLD3
Feeder 2
ZL31
Feeder 3
Zero
ZT0 + ZS0
ZL20
ZLD3
ZLD2
Feeder 2
ZL30
Feeder 3
ZD/3
X0
ZL0
Z0R
Z0F
Forward Faults
(ZS0 + ZT0)
R0
Fig. 22. 3I0 of Feeder 2 and Feeder 3 with an unbalanced load on Feeder 3
Amperes
Fault
Current (A)
Fault
Resistance ()
Reinforced Concrete
35 to 80
90 to 200
Wet Grass
20 to 50
150 to 360
Dry Grass
10 to 25
290 to 720
Wet Sand
5 to 15
480 to 1,500
Dry Sand/Asphalt
Amperes
TABLE I
HIGH-IMPEDANCE FAULT CURRENT AND RESISTANCE
Fig. 23. Residual currents of Feeder 2 and Feeder 3 for 0 A-phase-toground fault on Feeder 3
10
Zero-Sequence Impedance
180
160
140
120
a. Three-Wire System
80
60
40
20
0
0
20
40
60
80
R ()
100
120
140
160
Fig. 24. Z0 trajectories for Feeder 3 (forward fault) and Feeder 2 (reverse
fault)
Amperes
0.4
0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
Amperes
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
0.7
0.8
0.9
40
20
0
20
40
0
b. Four-Wire System
100
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
Seconds
Fig. 25. Residual currents of Feeder 2 and Feeder 3 for 200 A-phase-toground fault on Feeder 3
11
When utilities use the ground as a return to supply singlephase loads, the load unbalance contaminates the ground
current measurement and decreases the sensitivity of ground
fault detection. One utility reported up to 40 A load unbalance
on a three-wire unigrounded system.
VII. CONCLUSION
Utilities choose distribution grounding methods to achieve
certain objectives. No single grounding method satisfies all of
the requirements to ground a system. System grounding is
often a tradition set by engineers who make decisions based
on the technology of their time.
There are basically two types of grounding methods, largeand small-current grounding, defined by the ground fault
current magnitude.
Large-current grounding methods include multigrounding,
unigrounding, and low-impedance grounding. Ground faults
typically cause larger fault currents on these systems and call
for immediate fault isolation. Equipment on these systems can
be phase-to-neutral voltage rated, which reduces the overall
system cost. Single-phase loads can be economically and
flexibly supplied on multigrounded and unigrounded systems.
The perceived benefit of the large-current grounding
method is the ease of detecting ground faults because of large
available fault currents. Nevertheless, because the ground fault
protection setting has to be above the maximum load
unbalance, the large possible load unbalance significantly
limits the ground fault resistance coverage. The ground fault
resistance coverage is typically less than several hundred
ohms on multigrounded systems. On unigrounded or lowimpedance-grounded systems where there is no single-phase
load unbalance, the fault resistance coverage can be
comparable to that for small-current-grounded systems.
Small-current grounding methods include ungrounded,
high-resistance grounded, and resonant grounded. Common
characteristics of these systems are that fault currents are
small enough (less than 25 A) that a ground fault can selfextinguish. They can normally operate under a single-ground
fault condition, and the service reliability is high. People have
to pay attention to overvoltage problems on these systems.
The overall system cost is high because equipment has to be
phase-to-phase voltage rated.
A perceived drawback of the small-current grounding
method is the difficulty of selective ground fault detection.
With the much improved sensitivity and detection algorithms
of modern digital relays, fast and selective ground fault
detection is no longer an issue. In fact, detecting highimpedance ground faults is easy on these systems. The main
limiting factor of fault resistance coverage is system
unbalance from nonsymmetrical three-phase constructions of
power equipment. This unbalance normally generates standing
residual currents that are under 1 A. The fault resistance
coverage on these systems is in the range of tens of kilohms.
VIII. REFERENCES
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]
IX. BIOGRAPHY
Daqing Hou received his BSEE and MSEE degrees at the Northeast
University, China, in 1981 and 1984, respectively. He received his Ph.D. in
Electrical and Computer Engineering at Washington State University in 1991.
Since 1990, he has been with Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories, Inc.,
where he has held numerous positions, including development engineer,
application engineer, research and development manager, and principal
research engineer. Daqing is currently the research and development technical
director for East Asia. His work includes power system modeling, simulation,
signal processing, and advanced protection algorithm design. Daqing holds
multiple patents and has authored or coauthored many technical papers. He is
a senior member of IEEE.